From Soviet Roots to Modern Conflicts: North Korea's Type-75 MLRS in Russia's Arsenal

8 851 21
From Soviet Roots to Modern Conflicts: North Korea's Type-75 MLRS in Russia's Arsenal

In the context of military-technical cooperation between Russia and the DPRK, which began in 2023, deliveries of North Korean weapons include the Type-75 107mm multiple launch rocket system (MLRS). This towed system, identical in design to the Chinese Type-63, was observed in use by Russian forces during a special military operation (SMO) in 2025. The Type-75 is a compact and mobile solution for close-range fire support, capable of delivering massive strikes against area targets. Its addition to the Russian arsenal highlights the trend toward diversifying supply sources amid shortages of ammunition and equipment.

Historical Roots: From Soviet RPU-14 to Global Distribution


The development of the Type-75 has its roots in the Soviet era, confirming the continuity of jet technology artilleryThe system's predecessor is the Soviet RPU-14 (index 8U38), a towed 140mm MLRS system adopted by the Soviet Army in 1958. Developed in the late 1950s at NII-24 (now NPO Splav), the RPU-14 was designed to provide fire support to infantry and airborne troops. The system consisted of 16 guide tubes for the towed version and 17 guide tubes on a wheeled vehicle towed by a GAZ-63 or similar truck, providing a firing range of up to 9,7 km. Its design—compact, lightweight (weighing approximately 600 kg), and easy to manufacture—formed the basis for subsequent developments.




The Soviet RPU-14 on display at a museum: its distinctive 16 guide tubes, which served as a prototype for Asian systems

In the 1950s, RPU-14 technology was transferred to China as part of Sino-Soviet cooperation. Chinese designers, drawing on this experience, created the Type-63, a 107mm MLRS, which was introduced into service by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in 1963. Although the caliber was reduced (from 140mm to 107mm) to improve mobility and reduce weight, the design retained the key features of the RPU-14: 12 guide tubes (instead of 17), a wheeled carriage, and manual loading.

The Type-63 is not a direct copy of the RPU-14, but is clearly inspired by it, including the general layout of the towed artillery and the principles of multiple rocket launchers. The system was developed at the 169th Plant in Shenyang and was intended to support light infantry, with a range of up to 8,5 km. By the 1980s, the Type-63 had been exported to more than 30 countries, including Vietnam, Iraq, and parts of Africa.


Type 63 in People's Liberation Army training

In 1974, North Korea, having received a license from China, produced its own version, the Type-75, which was identical to the Type-63 in design and specifications. This was part of Pyongyang's efforts to develop its own military-industrial complex in conditions of technological isolation. The Type-75 was integrated into the arsenal of the Korean People's Army (KPA), where it was used for guerrilla and infantry tactics. Thus, the evolutionary chain—from the Soviet RPU-14 through the Chinese Type-63 to the North Korean Type-75—is confirmed. historical data and emphasizes the influence of Soviet developments on Asian armies.


Type 75 during Korean People's Army exercises

Type-75 Specifications


The Type-75 retains the simplicity and reliability of its predecessors. The system is towed by a light truck (such as a ZIL-131 or similar) and consists of 12 107mm guide tubes on a trailer weighing approximately 600 kg. Ammunition capacity: 12 missiles (840 mm long, weighing 18-19 kg each), with a high-explosive fragmentation or cluster warhead (1,3-1,5 kg of explosives). Firing range is 1,5 to 8,5 km, salvo rate is 7-10 seconds per full load, and the destructive area is up to 5000 m². Manual loading, crew of 5-6. Options include mobile installations on 4x4 jeeps or tracked platforms for increased cross-country capability.

The advantages of the Type-75 include its compact size (2,6 meters in length) and low production costs, making it ideal for irregular formations. The missiles are compatible with the Chinese Type-63, simplifying logistics.


Supplies to Russia and Tactical Use


Deliveries of the Type-75 to Russia began in 2025 as part of an aid package from North Korea, including artillery ammunition and systems. Russia is estimated to have received dozens of launchers and thousands of missiles, often with Chinese warheads for compatibility. In the SVO, the Type-75 is used for close-in support: Ukrainian forces destroyed one such system in November 2025 in the Pokrovsk sector. Russian units are adapting it to improvised platforms, including the tracked Varan, for increased mobility. The system compensates for the shortage of light artillery, providing rapid salvoes against trenches and vehicle concentrations, but is limited by its outdated range compared to the Grad.

In a global context, the Type-75 exemplifies the longevity of the Soviet-Chinese-Korean line of rocket systems adapted for modern conflicts. Its simplicity ensures continued service despite its age.


North Korean missile defense system in the Pokrovsky direction

The North Korean Type-75 MLRS, descended from the Soviet RPU-14 via the Chinese Type-63, remains an example of the durability of simple and effective multiple launch rocket systems. Its delivery to Russia in 2025 made it possible to quickly fill the shortage of short-range light rocket artillery, providing tactical flexibility and massive firepower against enemy positions.

This cooperation underscores not only technical continuity but also the fraternal support of the Korean people, who provided Russia with reliable support during this difficult time, reaffirming the historical bonds of solidarity and mutual assistance between our countries. The Type-75 symbolizes how proven solutions from the past continue to work on the modern battlefield, strengthening our shared defense capability.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    26 February 2026 04: 30
    Russia is estimated to have received dozens of systems and thousands of missiles, often with Chinese warheads for compatibility.

    It is not clear why Chinese warheads are needed, or for what compatibility.
    but is limited by its outdated range compared to the Grad

    Probably short-range, not outdated. North Korea also has an improved version of the 122mm MLRS compared to the Grad. Each weapon has its own niche and advantages/disadvantages.
    1. +6
      26 February 2026 09: 05
      Looks like a Nebelwerfer though
      1. +4
        9 March 2026 20: 32
        That's right. It became the prototype for the RPU 14.
  2. +8
    26 February 2026 04: 37
    The article's title and subtitles clearly violate Russian language rules. If the author doesn't know them, then should the VO editorial staff?
  3. +8
    26 February 2026 06: 18
    Some kind of "empty" article with constant repetitions of paragraphs.
  4. +7
    26 February 2026 07: 26
    The development of the Type-75 has its roots in the Soviet era, confirming the continuity of rocket artillery technology. The predecessor of the system is the Soviet RPU-14 (index 8U38), towed 140-mm MLRS,

    The predecessor of the RPU-14 was the Nebelwerfer 41/42, or "Vanyusha" as it was called at the front.
    1. -4
      26 February 2026 12: 41
      Quote: Dedok
      The predecessor of the RPU-14 was the Nebelwerfer 41/42, or "Vanyusha" as it was called at the front

      Maybe we should stop repeating the nonsense that some "expert" once blurted out?! The Germans didn't invent anything new! They used what was already known! The Russian engineer Volovsky's 1912 designs are proof of this! He proposed installations that could be mounted both permanently and in the back of a vehicle! I suggest you look at the sketches and "compare" them with the "German" ones! Russia at that time missed out on many progressive projects due to technological backwardness, a lack of production capacity, and the rigid thinking of officials! The Germans can claim the laurels of being the "first user" of the MLRS! They were the first to use MLRS!
      1. +4
        26 February 2026 14: 10
        Maybe it's enough to repeat this nonsense.

        What does "nonsense" have to do with it?
        I "felt" the remains of this apparatus with my hands...
        but I haven't checked it for patent purity...
        1. +1
          26 February 2026 15: 21
          Quote: Dedok
          What does "nonsense" have to do with it?

          And I'm not saying that Nebelwerfer is fiction and that it can't be "touched"! Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word "nonsense"...sorry! The Germans, perhaps, were the first applied A launcher of this type! That's probably why many compare what came after the "German" version of this type to the Nebelwerfer! But, I repeat, the Germans used something that was already known! Specifically, rocket launchers in the form of a set ("package") of tubular guides were known long before the creation of the German launcher! As an example, I cited sketches for Volovsky's 1912 project! And here are the rocket launchers of the Russian army of the 19th century!
  5. 0
    26 February 2026 08: 08
    With a range of 8,5 km, FPV drones will detect and destroy. How effective is such a MLRS in the SVO?
    1. +3
      26 February 2026 08: 52
      It has few advantages: it's the cheapest MLRS in the world and relatively lightweight (mobile). Its effectiveness is likely modest...
      1. +3
        26 February 2026 09: 39
        It's actually quite effective. It does a fantastic job at dagger range. Plus, the ammunition is inexpensive.
  6. +5
    26 February 2026 08: 50
    "12 guide tubes (instead of 17)" – instead of 16; "The system is towed by a light truck (for example, a ZIL-131 or similar)..." – the 131 isn't exactly a light truck. It's sized for a jeep/pickup truck. Or 5-6 people can handle it manually, not far away (I watched a video about exercises in the DPRK).
  7. +2
    26 February 2026 12: 47
    107mm MLRS are quite common in the DPRK...in addition to 12-round installations, there are 18-round and 24-round 107mm installations on armored personnel carriers and vehicles!
  8. 0
    26 February 2026 13: 53
    I'm missing a mention of Nebelwerfen here. Looks like to be copied
  9. +1
    26 February 2026 16: 22
    Quote: garri-lin
    Plus the ammunition is inexpensive.

    ???Judging by the length of the guides, this thing should fire turbojet projectiles, the design of which includes a precision-made nozzle block, the production of which can hardly be called cheap.
    The main thing is the stabilization method—aerdynamic or gyroscopic. The appearance of the launcher is irrelevant.
    By the way, the article doesn't say a word about this.
  10. 0
    26 February 2026 16: 25
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Quote: Dedok
    What does "nonsense" have to do with it?

    And I'm not saying that Nebelwerfer is fiction and that it can't be "touched"! Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word "nonsense"...sorry! The Germans, perhaps, were the first applied A launcher of this type! That's probably why many compare what came after the "German" version of this type to the Nebelwerfer! But, I repeat, the Germans used something that was already known! Specifically, rocket launchers in the form of a set ("package") of tubular guides were known long before the creation of the German launcher! As an example, I cited sketches for Volovsky's 1912 project! And here are the rocket launchers of the Russian army of the 19th century!

    The main thing isn't the system's appearance. What matters is the rocket's stabilization method. If the device in question stabilizes its projectiles by rotation (not to be confused with twisting), then yes. The system's ancestor is the Nebel.
  11. 0
    27 February 2026 16: 42
    The appropriateness of the application is probably justified
  12. +1
    9 March 2026 20: 34
    Of course, it's funny when it comes full circle. In our country, the RPU 14 was completely forgotten; it quickly disappeared. Meanwhile, export versions became extremely popular. Mounts of all types were and are actively used in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. The RPU-14 was a particular hit, with copies made by the Poles (the 8-round WP-8) and the Chinese (the 107mm 12-round Type 63). The Chinese copy was copied by North Koreans, Iranians, Egyptians, Azerbaijanis, Sudanese, and Turks, the latter of which managed to increase the firing range of their T-107 to 13 km.
    And so the RPU-14 returns and successfully crushes the enemy, finding its place in trench warfare. Such is history's smile.
  13. 0
    28 March 2026 05: 26
    It would have been excellent against Napoleon's columns, but now precision and selectivity are needed. The same applies to any MLRS.
  14. 0
    4 May 2026 14: 23
    In my opinion, it's an excellent weapon, a counterpart to our RPU-14. It's perfect for today's conditions. It's small, very easy to conceal (look at the photo, they rolled it into a tree stand; not every drone can fly over trees), inexpensive, and production is also fast. It's much easier to transport to the front lines than, say, a Grad; its M-14-0F ammunition can be carried on ATVs. Now, when the enemy has launched counterattacks and emerged from cover, it's perfect for hitting infantry after knocking out armored vehicles. It's a shame it only comes with an OCR and no cluster munitions.