And who is that guy behind the back of the big guy with the club?

55 429 85
And who is that guy behind the back of the big guy with the club?

A detachment of Chinese warships has arrived in the Middle East, or more specifically, the shores of Iran. It's not just a random visit; Chinese media are describing the mission as "long-term." That is, definitely not for a couple of weeks.

The group of ships is led by what the Chinese believe to be a destroyer, and what their US opponents believe to be a rocket cruiser. That is, we are talking about a Project 055 ship.




Seaworthy ships with a simply excellent armament composition, which is located in vertical launch systems of a modular-cell type for 8 anti-aircraft, anti-submarine or tactical cruise missiles each.


Eight modules, each with 64 missiles, are located in the bow of the ship, forward of the superstructure, and six others (each with 48 missiles) are located in the aft section of the superstructure, forward of the helicopter hangar. The dimensions of the UVP cells (9 m × 0,85 m) are suitable for housing anti-ship hypersonic and long-range anti-aircraft missiles. A total of 112 missiles of various types are carried, representing a considerable salvo.


But the Project 055 destroyer (Dalian, if I'm not mistaken) isn't the most dangerous ship in this group. Experience shows there are other options.


In the last days of January, a message literally flashed through the Chinese online media that one of the operational units of the Southern fleet A Chinese vessel was spotted near Hainan Island. The message itself was nothing out of the ordinary; Hainan is within the Southern Fleet's operational zone, so everything was perfectly normal.

Some doubters, however, expressed concern that the Chinese were planning a jump into the Arabian Sea, where a US Navy squadron was already en route to "reassure" Iran. But the distance of 7 kilometers cooled many, and the vast majority decided that "China wouldn't make it in time for war."

In general, of course, the assumption is strange. On the one hand, Iran is an important partner for China, and watching it be reduced to rubble again... Well, we've already seen it once. It's hard to say what was going through the minds of Chinese commanders and leaders, but it's incredible but true: a detachment of Chinese ships was in the right place at the right time.

Clearly, no one intended to fight like this, and an armed confrontation between the US and Chinese navies would require more than compelling, catastrophic reasons. So, let's say the Chinese warships arrived more for show purposes.

Or security, if there's someone to guard. And there is, indeed, someone to guard.


Liaowang-1, commissioned last year, is the "brain" of this group. Its presence lends the Chinese detachment's mission a different meaning than observation.

Anyone from the Soviet generation seeing this ship for the first time immediately recalled the snow-white Soviet beauties with their enormous antennas that belonged to the "space fleet" of the USSR Academy of Sciences. The "Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin," "Akademik Sergei Korolev," "Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov," and other ships of the "space fleet" that served in every corner of the world's oceans.


The Liaowang-1 is similar. True, in terms of displacement, it's twice the size of any of the "space fleet" vessels, and as for its capabilities... There's a huge amount of room for speculation.

According to unconfirmed reports (the Chinese are obviously never in a hurry to confirm), the Liaowang-1 is literally packed to the brim with phased array antennas, multi-domain radars, and specialized electronic reconnaissance equipment.

Yes, it seems the ship was openly described as a space program control and data collection ship for rocket launches, but... But we understand perfectly well how "open" our neighbors are in terms of information about their new developments!

Well, that is to say, there is zero information about Liaowang-1.

Based on satellite imagery, estimates suggest this ship will be approximately 225 meters long and 32 meters wide. It could be slightly more or less. Its estimated displacement is approximately 30,000 tons.


In short, it's on par with any aircraft carrier. The Italian Cavour is 244 meters long, 39 meters wide, and displaces 28,000 tons. So, that's the bottom line. And compared to other similar surveillance and tracking ships, the Liaowang 1 is a monster.

Clearly, China won't use this ship solely to monitor its own missile tests and space program. The Liaowang-1's size and characteristics suggest it is designed for long-duration missions and acts as a gigantic maritime surveillance system, thereby plugging potential gaps in China's radar network or significantly expanding it.

Besides all this, the fleeting information that the Liaowan-1 has implemented the concept of multi-domain radars has many on the other side scratching their heads.

Multi-domain/multi-static radar is a radar system that uses multiple transmitting and receiving antennas working in tandem. This allows for simultaneous observation of an object from different angles and at different frequencies, significantly improving visibility and quality and providing greater resistance to interference.

Most likely, the Liaowan is equipped with so-called monostatic multistatic radars, meaning their antennas are not spaced apart from each other. The ship's size doesn't allow for this, but spacing the antennas apart while simultaneously operating in a multi-domain system allows for target observation from different angles.

Translation: Stealth aircraft have problems with low observability. Big ones. Very big ones. Like the Liaowang-1.

Although it is possible that to create a small effect (looking at the photo, we understand that there are definitely 80-90 meters between the different antenna blocks at the stern and closer to the bow), the separation of antennas on board the ship may be sufficient.

It is clear that these are all guesses based on hints, but what is truly true is that such a huge ship can be equipped with any amount of equipment of various types and thereby not only create competition for AWACS aircraft, but create a full-fledged program.

Call it whatever you like: an AWACS ship, a spy ship, or a radio intelligence ship, the essence is the same: thanks to radar surveillance capabilities and other technical equipment, valuable information can be collected, processed, and transmitted to its intended destination.

And it must be said that a ship has many advantages over an airplane:

- the ship is practically unlimited in terms of energy, its turbines will produce much more power, which can be sent to the antennas, than the aircraft generators;

- the ship is more autonomous when it comes to area control. Yes, aircraft can replace each other, but this is more risky and expensive;

- An aircraft is much easier to neutralize if necessary, and there's no point in even mentioning the air defense system; it's all pure fiction to calm the crew's nerves: our A-50 couldn't "cover" itself from the ancient S-200, let alone more modern designs? A ship has much greater survivability, and if there are escort ships nearby, things take a rather unpleasant turn for the aircraft.

Thus, the presence in the Arabian Sea of ​​a ship capable of monitoring the surface and air situation over a radius of several hundred kilometers is interesting.


In addition to ships, missiles, and aircraft, the Liaowang-1 can also track satellites. At least, that's what's been implied. Some analysts even believe this is one of the main reasons China built the ship.

With a little imagination, the equipment on such a ship could be used to intercept and decrypt information coming from satellites. China currently lacks a comprehensive satellite network capable of monitoring maritime and air traffic worldwide, but the country is working diligently on this. The Liaowang-1 could assist in surface surveillance in a specific region. In other words, it's a tactical tool.

In fact, a floating AWACS with the necessary capabilities and equipment, once positioned in the Arabian Sea, can not only intercept information from other countries' satellites but also monitor the air situation in an entire region.

Iran, a strategic ally of China, clearly lacks early warning capabilities in its Air Force. Unlike its missile forces, the Iranian Air Force is not a role model in terms of technological innovation, so the lack of AWACS aircraft is normal.

There were some attempts to create one. The HESA IrAn-140, based on the An-140, was a promising candidate, but producing a sufficient number of these aircraft proved a major challenge. Indeed, producing the IrAn-140 in general became a problem for Iran.


The Liaowan-1, in combat mode, can track up to a thousand targets, which is beyond the capabilities of AWACS aircraft. If the ship can provide the Iranian army and navy with information about the situation in the region, Iran will likely be able to neutralize the advantage of the United States and its allies in obtaining data and monitoring the situation.

In general, such assistance could help eliminate the surprise effect of a potential US attack on Iran. And, it must be said, there's not much science fiction here, really.

The Americans already accused the PLA Navy in the summer of 2025 of using their Yan Wan-class reconnaissance ships to provide targeting information for Houthi missiles in the spring. The accusation, so to speak, was dropped due to lack of evidence, and it's unlikely the Americans will be able to prove the transfer of information from China to Iran. At the very least, there's no need to teach the Chinese how to get out of situations; they're quite adept at it.


If the Chinese decide to share such strategic information, it could have far-reaching geopolitical consequences. Iran will have a real chance to preemptively prevent another US attempt to destroy something on its territory.

It is clear that the Iranian Air Force is not yet capable of providing any counteraction to the same aviation US Navy, but here is the missile component Defense With sufficient information support, it is quite capable of tearing off the wings of any group of aircraft that takes off from the deck of an aircraft carrier.

However, Chinese ships could have visited the Arabian Sea for completely different purposes, right?
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 19
    15 February 2026 03: 35
    tear off the wings of any group of aircraft that takes off from the deck of an aircraft carrier
    I really liked the expression, I hope it will remain so. good
    1. + 21
      15 February 2026 06: 34
      Alas... The novel, for the umpteenth time, is wishful thinking.
      1. + 25
        15 February 2026 08: 48
        "Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin," "Akademik Sergei Korolev," "Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov," and other ships of the "space fleet" that served in every corner of the world's oceans. "Liaowang-1" is similar. However, in terms of displacement, it is twice the size of any of the "space fleet" vessels. Based on an analysis of satellite images, it is estimated that this ship will be approximately 225 meters long and 32 meters wide. It may be slightly more or less. The estimated displacement is approximately 30,000 tons.

        The Gagarin has a displacement of 45000 tons and is over 231 meters long. Komarov and Korolev are smaller, at 18,000 tons and 21,500 tons, respectively, and are half as large.
        1. + 12
          15 February 2026 09: 53
          And this entire fleet “removed” telemetry from our spacecraft.
        2. kig
          +3
          15 February 2026 13: 58
          Quote: Borik
          no two times.

          Who cares what happened once. What matters is what is now.
      2. +5
        15 February 2026 09: 23
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Alas... The novel, for the umpteenth time, is wishful thinking.

        I'd even say "wildly fantasizing." If I understood the article correctly, the Liaowang-1 is "rubbing" near Hainan? It's perfectly placed there. Let me remind you that this island is home to one of China's main spaceports. And whether it is part of a formation of ships or simply located nearby, it may or may not be a reconnaissance aircraft or an AWACS, and even more so, where it will go or not is purely the author’s imagination.
        1. +5
          15 February 2026 10: 05
          Quote: Adrey
          It may or may not be a reconnaissance aircraft and an AWACS

          Unfortunately, the ship is not capable of AWACS. While its powerful radars could certainly complicate some US Navy air operations, they are limited and limited to a relatively small area.
          It's just that Roman really doesn't like aircraft carriers, so he's grasping at any straw to make things unpleasant for them:)))
  2. + 16
    15 February 2026 03: 45
    We had our own, at one time, it was never worse, but as far as I understand it was never really put into operation
    1. + 12
      15 February 2026 08: 47
      Quote: d ^ Amir
      but as far as I understand, it was never really put into operation

      It was practically commissioned and entered combat service, but the total degradation and lack of funds in the 90s took their toll. There were not enough specialists, and it was impossible to maintain such a complex ship with a nuclear power plant "anyhow," so breakdowns began one after another...

      To Article:
      The Liaowan-1 is similar. However, in terms of displacement, it is twice as large as any of the "space fleet" vessels, and

      That's unlikely. Yuri Gagarin, the cosmonaut, had a displacement of 45 tons, while the nuclear-powered Ural had a displacement of 36 tons. Chinese achievements are certainly admirable, but... they haven't yet reached the level of the Soviet Union.
    2. -1
      15 February 2026 09: 47
      His crew was "raw." One sailor, a fellow sailor of mine, had previously served on the Ural. He told a story about how the demobilized sailors salted the reactor so that a combat mission would be cancelled and they would be sent home instead of to sea. Don't laugh, it's a very real story and not the first; similar things have happened in the navy before, but this was probably the first time something like this happened to the editor. The ship was too big, the crew was unruly, and there were a lot of random ground troops, as one former naval brigade commander said on TV.
      1. +9
        15 February 2026 15: 32
        Quote: Sokolov_Vladimir
        The demobilized sailors salted the reactor so that the combat mission would be cancelled and they would go home instead of to sea. Don't laugh,

        The legend is fresh. But hard to believe! (c)
        Sir! Your "demobilization" of the sailors has told the sailors everything at once! lol
        And how did your "demobilized" guy plan to "salt" the closed loop of the PPU?
        Speaking of birds! The feed water is double-distilled! If anything goes wrong, a howler and a red flasher will bring the head of the chemical department back from the grave!
        But it is entirely possible to pickle the auxiliary equipment... But they are not nuclear energy, not a nuclear power plant!
        But there were leaks. And the Ural emitted radiation like a backyard boiler room, burning off the burnt-out fuel... That's why it... well... So, not all the naval tales were true. Yep.
        1. 0
          15 February 2026 15: 38
          I'm from the last conscription, who served for three years, and I know about "demobilized" soldiers, but I don't understand why the chief of chemicals is responsible for the salt composition of the coolant?
          1. +7
            15 February 2026 15: 50
            Volodya. There are GODKI in the navy. There are water treatment chemists. They have a BP = laboratory with chemical reagents. The Head of Chemical is responsible for overseeing the safety of nuclear power plants. On a submarine, he's a highly respected and serious person. On 1143, there was a safety zone where no one was allowed except the special watch of BC-5, and so on.
            It was a long time ago, so I don't feel like remembering it. Better to talk about "birds!" than about Belarus.
            1. 0
              15 February 2026 16: 13
              You're confused somewhere. 1143 is an aircraft carrier cruiser. You're apparently a submarine expert. But when I tell submariners that the BIP on a surface ship is entirely manned by sailors, the submariner's hair stands on end. After all, navigation tasks on the maneuvering tablet are handled exclusively by the radiotechnical service commander, not a conscript sailor. Therefore, on a surface ship, even sailors could have access to the corresponding console.
              Regarding access to the BC-5 posts, the BC-7 political officer personally told me that when he served as the BC-5 political officer on the Minsk, he was afraid to go down into the holds, but he had served in the navy and was a prize-winning boxer. And what can I say about the sailor? In short, it's better for a BC-7 sailor not to go down into the holds.
              And not YEARS, but CIVILIANS,
              1. +4
                15 February 2026 16: 31
                Quote: Sokolov_Vladimir
                And not YEARS, but CIVILIANS,

                Volodya! Civilians - this is after the Order is issued.
                Yes, I mixed up 1144 type Kirov/Peter the Great.
                The stories about the "godki" (little guys) in Minsk are like Grandma Arina's tales! No one from BC-7 ever went into the holds. They simply had no business there, just like the oil-belly boys in the Voskhod VChB, for example... And even in 1977, the situation on the Northern Fleet was completely different...
  3. + 10
    15 February 2026 04: 00
    Were there supposedly "scheduled" Iranian-Russian-Chinese exercises scheduled for February? Will ours be there, who knows? Otherwise, everyone will completely forget that Russia has a navy.
    1. + 10
      15 February 2026 06: 33
      Does it even exist?
      ............,........
      1. -1
        15 February 2026 08: 09
        Quote: novel xnumx
        Does it even exist?
        "That's exactly it," Fyodor Sukhov would say with a chuckle.
        ...
        although on the other hand... it's like a network... but more often "shadow" and tanker-like... smile
        and they increasingly look at him with a contemptuous squint as they descend on board from helicopters along ropes. wink
  4. +6
    15 February 2026 04: 30
    Yes, very good news. This is pretty much how you should greet uninvited guests who decide to put their feet up on the table.
    1. + 14
      15 February 2026 05: 06
      We should greet you like we did in the Black Sea in 1988. Instead of the lingering smell of Alaskan sewage.
      1. +4
        15 February 2026 05: 53
        Quote: Gavrilo Princip
        We should greet them like they did in the Black Sea in 1988.

        Bulk on board?
        This case.
  5. +7
    15 February 2026 04: 51
    A fleet is a fleet, but a fleet isn't just about metal hulls and engines; it's all about the equipment. It's a shame we're so poorly equipped with electronics these days; they're the foundation of everything. And the future isn't being highlighted anywhere, except in nameplate manufacturing.
    1. +7
      15 February 2026 15: 43
      Quote: Igor K_2
      And the prospects are not highlighted anywhere except in nameplate production.

      There are glimmers of hope... Chip production has opened in the Kaliningrad region. True, the process technology is 350 nm. But they're already moving to 130 nm... A nanotechnology production complex is being built in the Moscow region. There are wholesale installations (laser lithographs, not tin vapor ones) with dimensions of 5-7 nm. So, there are glimmers of hope. But there is no TIME! It was lost and stolen by Yeltsin's tricks... and the troubled times of the seven bankers.
      Who's to blame? -- It's our own fault. We naively trusted the traitors and degenerates... And now capitalism with all its charms... So -- NO BANANAS! (c)
      1. +4
        15 February 2026 16: 37
        Quote: BoA KAA
        There are wholesale installations (lithographs on a laser, not tin vapor) with a dimension of 5-7 nm
        Did you happen to miss one zero in nanometers?
        1. 0
          15 February 2026 17: 33
          Worse: I naively believed the reports in our media:
          Recently, news broke that Russia is developing an equivalent of EUV technology—a domestic lithograph with a wavelength of less than 13,5 nm. EUV stands for "extreme ultraviolet," referring to the wavelength of light. Deep ultraviolet (DUV) light, used in chip manufacturing, has wavelengths of 248 and 193 nm, while the light used in EUV lithography has a wavelength of 13,5 nm (the violet line in the UV range).
          It is stated that A working demonstrator sample has already been created, capable of forming nanostructures up to 7 nm.
          A lithographic installation is being developed at the Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IAP RAS) in Nizhny Novgorod.
          In 2011, a lithograph demonstrator with an operating wavelength of 13,5 nm was built. This served as a test bed for ongoing fundamental scientific research.
          (Indeed, a working prototype was created in 2011.)
          By improving projection optics systems, we are achieving increasingly sophisticated topologies: the resolution has been increased from 7 nm to 3 nm. New projection optics are being developed for the EUV system, capable of producing 2 nm topologies. However, all of these issues needed to be addressed during the demonstrator's development.
          But can a Russian institute solve the problems that required a Dutch company to invest a significant amount of time, money, and collaboration with the most advanced US companies and institutes in the field of microelectronics?
          The answer is NO. And no one else in the world is yet attempting to achieve similar results, even understanding the effort required to develop their own equivalents of this system.
          In 2018, scientists from the IPM RAS published a paper presenting experimental data on a xenon-based laser-plasma X-ray source. The paper, by scientists and specialists from the IPM RAS, was peer-reviewed and published on an American scientific resource.
          The work clearly demonstrated the results obtained by our scientists in achieving an innovative method of nanolithography – maskless X-ray lithography at a wavelength of 6,7 nm.
          Instead of the molten tin source used in projection lithography by ASML, the Russian development uses a xenon-based target. With comparable efficiency, this significantly simplifies the design of the source and the laser system, minimizes contamination of optical elements, reduces the operating wavelength by 20% when operating at a wavelength of 10,8 nm, and by 2 times at a wavelength of 6,7 nm.
          Of course, reducing the wavelength proportionally increases the resolution of the lithograph.
          In general, scientists from the USA agreed that a lithograph based on a Russian design would be 1,5-2 times more efficient than that of ASML.
          The institute's arsenal includes X-ray mirrors, which are successfully manufactured there, a laser-plasma X-ray source, and the prototype of the installation itself, which has already produced the first 7-nm structures.
          In other words, X-ray lithography is becoming a reality. If everything is completed on time, it will create the world's first X-ray photolithography system operating in the 10,8 and 6,7 nm wavelength ranges with a resolution of up to 1 nm.
          The demonstration stand already has a wavelength of 11,3 nm, which exceeds the performance of the ASML company.
          In March 2022, Russia, commissioned by the Ministry of Industry and Trade, began developing a concept for a maskless X-ray photolithograph with a wavelength of less than 13,5 nm based on a synchrotron source. 670 million rubles were allocated for this work.
          The work involves MIET, the Zelenograd company ESTO, and the Zelenograd synchrotron—now the Zelenograd Technological Storage Complex (TSC) of the Kurchatov Institute National Research Center.
          Something like that, though. I understand that this is all SCIENCE. But who's going to stop me from believing in the best??? smile
      2. +4
        15 February 2026 16: 50
        Unfortunately, we don't have our own lithographs in production yet. There's no word yet on the 5-7. And the one that's being prepared for mass production is a joint development with the Belarusians; it's only thanks to them that it's seen the light of day.
      3. +1
        16 February 2026 14: 40
        The key isn't so much having the technology as being able to scale it. After all, a single production line typically produces a very small number of items, while hundreds and thousands of varieties and types of products are needed. Historically, we've been able to shoe a single flea, but putting mechanical fleas on a conveyor belt to bite enemies has always been a monstrous pain, a decades-long struggle, and a struggle.
        1. 0
          16 February 2026 20: 04
          Totally agree with you!
          But, in order to do everything as you said, we need to MOBILIZE the economy! The electronics industry, at the very least! Do you see that???
          Personally, I don't! It's all blah-blah-blah! And from the box: "Everything is fine, beautiful marquise! And things are going well for us!!!"
          Stalin would not have won the war this way, and the people understood this perfectly well, sacrificing everything for the sake of Victory, even millions of the lives of their best sons and daughters!
          1. 0
            16 February 2026 21: 11
            We need MOBILIZATION of the economy!
            It's impossible to mobilize the economy without mobilizing the brains of the leadership. You have to figure out where to mobilize—a hundred thousand for building buildings here, fifty thousand for chemical reactors there, appoint this smart guy for the ideas, and that talented administrator to lead. And what's it like in our army now? Are you getting paid? So, use that to buy all the little things you need. And then give Soviet factories orders: give us BTR-82As, and a bigger one, here's the money. So, all they can do is redirect the money, and then you'll manage on your own, while we go to Altai for vacation.
            I've met managers like that more than once, who don't know how to solve organizational problems; they can only give money, which is insufficient...
  6. +1
    15 February 2026 04: 59
    So how many ships did Russia send, since it has a strategic partnership agreement with Iran?
    1. +8
      15 February 2026 06: 14
      Quote: Gavrilo Princip
      So, how many ships did Russia send? After all, it has a strategic partnership agreement with Iran.
      But not about joint defense!
    2. +1
      15 February 2026 15: 56
      Quote: Gavrilo Princip
      strategic partnership agreement with Iran.

      Iran asked us for air defense systems, not ships! They're asking for what they have: China has ships, we have air defense systems and Su-24s!
      1. +1
        16 February 2026 01: 35
        Why didn't the air defense system prove itself last time? Didn't they shoot down a single American-Israeli aircraft?
        1. 0
          16 February 2026 19: 56
          Quote: Gavrilo Princip
          Not a single American-Israeli plane was shot down?

          NOT an air defense specialist, but it seems to me that:
          1. The Yankees and Jews destroyed the Far Eastern Military District radar, making “holes” in the radar field, which was already not continuous and not echeloned;
          2. The air defense systems were obsolete and were not capable of selecting the target against the background of interference and decoys;
          3. The SAMs are old, without multi-channel, interference-resistant seekers (and there was no OEL seeker, IR/UV heads).
          4. The algorithms for defeating air defense systems covered by decoys are hopelessly outdated! And there was no talk of AI in SAMs, AT ALL!
          5. The air defense forces did not enter the battle at all, since they did not have an advantage in the range of detection and destruction of the air defense systems.
          Well, and so on. Question: what does this threaten us with?
          First of all, we need a surface-to-air radar to detect a massive surge of enemy aircraft in a timely manner. It would be good to have AWACS stations on standby (there are only 10-12 of them for the entire Air Force). We need more air defense missile systems, like the R-77M. We need to use space technology—both for detection/targeting and for jamming aircraft avionics.
          We should work on aircraft deployment locations in advance, especially those of refueling ships (tankers), AWACS, airborne command posts, etc. Don't hesitate to use electronic countermeasure systems like the Yelabuga, Krasukha-4, and others. But at the same time, we must destroy the enemy's space forces, as 90% of precision-guided weapons are space-based.
          Well, and so on down the list! But this is only possible with full-scale databases, without equivocation, goodwill, or hand-holding by the military!!! Yes
          1. 0
            17 February 2026 01: 42
            But for now, these “esteemed partners” are held back by nuclear weapons and delivery systems.
  7. +3
    15 February 2026 05: 01
    the ship was described out loud as a space program control ship and data collection ship for rocket launches,
    Again, whose space "program" could this ship control? Missile launches come in all shapes and sizes, and if these data help Iranian "scientists" with their anti-missile "program" against American missile launches into Iranian territory... We're not opposed to that. laughing laughing good
  8. -1
    15 February 2026 05: 11
    It seems like someone with stripes got a slap on the wrist with a wet rag before they started clucking about victories. Such a ship could significantly enhance air defenses, though not very far due to the Earth's topography... Although, again, who knows how it's connected and with what. For example, with those same satellites?
    1. +2
      15 February 2026 07: 44
      It can be assumed that it is connected with radar satellites.
  9. ayk
    + 12
    15 February 2026 05: 13
    China cannot allow the Iranian regime to fall. Otherwise, if pro-American forces come to power, China could lose not only Iranian oil itself, but all oil and gas from the Persian Gulf countries. Iran can currently shut off oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz. If the Americans win, there will be no one to do so. Conversely, all Persian Gulf countries, under US orders, could cut off oil and gas supplies to China at any time. Given that oil supplies through the Turkish and Danish straits could be cut off to Russia, China could find itself in a very difficult situation. Therefore, China will now try to support Iran with arms supplies and intelligence.
    1. 0
      15 February 2026 23: 37
      Then the global economy will simply collapse. China is the world's factory. The American bourgeoisie will simply go bankrupt, since almost all of their production is in China.
      1. ayk
        -1
        16 February 2026 03: 42
        There will be a global economic crisis soon.
      2. 0
        16 February 2026 14: 46
        Well, they can teeter on the brink of bankruptcy for China. They can give China a 1973 reprise, telling them oil is 10 times more expensive because you're bullying the Uyghurs. And the US will continue buying junk from China, just like they buy uranium from us. Trade will simply become unprofitable for China, and they'll have no money to support their army and so on. That's what I'd do if I were them.
  10. + 11
    15 February 2026 05: 26
    This information was truly heartwarming. The Americans can't just fly their AWACS off our coasts... Let them feel that two can play this game... It's a shame, of course, that Russia has disappointingly limited capabilities in this component (AEW&C).
  11. + 12
    15 February 2026 06: 07
    Here you have, comrades, a shining example of the Communist Party's leadership line... Well done.
    1. +9
      15 February 2026 07: 22
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      a shining example of the Communist Party's guiding line

      Yeah...our communists Gorbachev and Yeltsin showed a completely different line.
      It all depends on the personality of the party leader. hi
      1. + 10
        15 February 2026 16: 06
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        The communists Gorbachev and Yeltsin showed a completely different line.

        Being a communist and being considered a "member of the CPSU" are two very different things, as they used to say at Privoz in Odessa! Both figures betrayed communist ideals, as they were essentially social traitors! They were degenerates, not communists, leading the charge under German machine guns.
        Dwarfs standing on the shoulders of GIANTS, that's who they are! am
        1. +3
          15 February 2026 16: 31
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          Dwarfs standing on the shoulders of GIANTS, that's who they are!

          Verily
          1. +2
            15 February 2026 16: 35
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            Dwarfs standing on the shoulders of GIANTS, that's who they are!

            Verily

            Andrew, hello! drinks Nice to meet you!
            Where are your articles? My brain feels a bit depressing when I read fiction like "topical notes." laughing
            1. +4
              15 February 2026 18: 12
              Good day! drinks
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Where are your articles?

              Where? :)))) I'm posting a little at a time - on historical topics. This weekend is the final one about the reasons for choosing "Tsarevich" for the Far Eastern program.
              As for the modern fleet... I'm already losing my nerve writing about it.
              1. +4
                15 February 2026 18: 22
                Andrey, I'm sorry! I somehow missed the part about "Tsarevich"!
                But I'm already over that, and the situation with the modern fleet keeps me up at night. We've already stepped off the decks of our ships and abandoned the PK... But how can I protect our sons on this iron? It's fine if you're on a nuclear-powered missile submarine or a 22350... But what if you're on an old ship decommissioned? I remember well how, after another dry-docking, they limited our depth to 220 meters! That's halving what the nurse was born with!!! And how many more are still listed as part of the 2nd stage PG forces...
                So, "Mina" (Klimov) is missing from the site, and this greatly impacts the quality of discussions and materials on the navy. It's truly a shame...
                Sorry, something just came over me. Good luck, health, and long life! drinks
  12. +6
    15 February 2026 07: 24
    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    However, Chinese ships could have visited the Arabian Sea for completely different purposes, right?
    Catch some horse mackerel... wink
  13. +5
    15 February 2026 07: 40
    Quote: Foggy Dew
    Strengthen the air defense of such a ship

    It would be good to add such a ship to our Zircons... for targeting the US AUG.
    One massive Zircon raid would solve a multitude of problems in the theatre of naval combat.
    1. +2
      15 February 2026 16: 17
      Quote: The same Lech
      Quote: Foggy Dew
      Strengthen the air defense of such a ship

      It would be good to add such a ship to our Zircons... for targeting the US AUG.
      One massive Zircon raid would solve a multitude of problems in the theatre of naval combat.

      1. This ship (in this case) will be an unnecessary link in the chain of command: KA-FR Project 22350M. But collecting information from all the spacecraft in the theater of operations is what will be needed to organize interaction and combat.
      2. I think that the tactics for using the anti-ship missile defense system are still being developed: order, equipment, massing or selective use, etc.
      Therefore, it is difficult to say: "What is there, beyond the horizon!?" (c)
  14. +2
    15 February 2026 07: 57
    Quote: d ^ Amir
    We had our own, at one time.....

    and even with a nuclear power plant...
  15. -2
    15 February 2026 09: 26
    To a big ship - a big torpedo!
  16. +2
    15 February 2026 10: 18
    The Americans already accused the PLA Navy in the summer of 2025 of using their Yan Wan reconnaissance ships to provide targeting information for Houthi missiles in the spring.

    What a surprise.
    Have the Pindos forgotten how they gave the Skakuas missile guidance to the Moskva?
    I am generally surprised by the calm reaction of our leadership to this, as well as to the "web".
    It would be possible to demolish a dozen or so military bases in third countries as punishment.
  17. -1
    15 February 2026 10: 26
    You can install as much equipment of different types as you want and thereby not only create competition for AWACS aircraft, but create a full program.


    What? The ship is sitting on its butt, visibility to the horizon is a couple of dozen kilometers.
    1. +6
      15 February 2026 11: 04
      Quote: MrFox
      visibility to the horizon is a couple of dozen kilometers

      For surface surveillance. Therefore, targeting US aircraft carriers will require retransmission of data from reconnaissance satellites or unmanned reconnaissance aircraft (or, the old-fashioned way, helicopters). But aircraft will have to fly at extremely low altitudes to avoid radar detection. And while carrier-based aircraft are capable of this, "stealth" bombers are unlikely to be. I'm sure the minimum task of the Chinese naval detachment is to characterize the vaunted American "stealth" aircraft in full combat mode. Plus, the American squadron's electronic reconnaissance.
      1. +1
        16 February 2026 10: 40
        Quote: Chief Officer Lom
        For observation of the surface.

        A regular frigate can handle this; there is no need to build a ship with a displacement of tens of kilotons.
        Quote: Chief Officer Lom
        But aircraft will have to fly at extremely low altitudes to avoid being detected by radar.

        They've been flying this way since the 70s. The typical flight profile of carrier-based strike aircraft, even during the Cold War, included a diversion to low altitude and low altitude when approaching an enemy's radar to stay below the radio horizon.
        To "expand" the radio horizon, the antenna needs to be raised. And here the Navy has no alternative to aircraft. A helicopter is too slow and power-hungry, and a balloon is dependent on the weather.
  18. +2
    15 February 2026 10: 57
    In terms of dimensions and number of antennas, it most closely resembles the Ural reconnaissance ship, only without the nuclear power plant.
  19. +7
    15 February 2026 11: 06
    All we have left are memories of the former might of the USSR. China has carefully studied the tragic collapse of the USSR and I believe it will not allow something similar. A series of purges of the CPC leadership confirms this.
    1. +6
      15 February 2026 12: 28
      Quote: tank64rus
      A series of purges of the CPC leadership confirms this.

      Purges can go in different directions. I recall Gorbachev purged the USSR Ministry of Defense of generals and marshals who were hindering him and unwilling to restructure, using the rather murky (in terms of "accident") Rust case as a pretext.
      1. 0
        16 February 2026 13: 19
        Well, yes, if you remember that Rust was being followed from Poland continuously, but “there was no order to intercept.”
    2. 0
      16 February 2026 13: 18
      So I carefully collected and bought all the technical documentation.
  20. +2
    15 February 2026 11: 15
    I would love to read an article like this about the Russian Navy...
  21. +4
    15 February 2026 11: 29
    multistatic radars of monostatic nature

    I wonder if the author himself understands what nonsense he wrote?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  22. +2
    15 February 2026 12: 07
    Anyone from the Soviet generation seeing this ship for the first time immediately recalled the snow-white Soviet beauties with enormous antennas that belonged to the "space fleet" of the USSR Academy of Sciences. "Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin," "Akademik Sergei Korolev," "Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov." "Liaowang-1" is similar. True, in terms of displacement, it's twice the size of any of the "space fleet" vessels, and as for capabilities...

    Those who remember the SSV-33 "Ural" from the Soviet era will remember it well. The "Liaowang-1" is its modern development, minus the nuclear power plant.
  23. +2
    15 February 2026 12: 20
    And it must be said that a ship has many advantages over an airplane:

    And one fatal flaw - the radio horizon.
  24. +2
    15 February 2026 13: 58
    I still don't understand where this ship is now. If it's near the American group, then it will definitely be a deterrent for them.
    If not yet, then there might not be time if the Americans hurry.
    Although they don't seem to be in a hurry... yet.
    1. kig
      +3
      15 February 2026 15: 46
      Quote from cpls22
      I still don't understand where this ship is now.

      At 15:30 Moscow time on 15 February 2026, it was at the pier in Shanghai.
      1. 0
        15 February 2026 15: 52
        Quote: kig
        Quote from cpls22
        I still don't understand where this ship is now.

        At 15:30 Moscow time on 15 February 2026, it was at the pier in Shanghai.

        Thank you Yes
  25. 0
    15 February 2026 14: 19
    How similar are the modules on 3C14... They just look the same.
  26. 0
    15 February 2026 15: 46
    And it must be said that a ship has many advantages over an airplane.
    - very subtle understanding! laughing
    1. 0
      15 February 2026 18: 06
      Quote: "Multistatic radars of a monostatic nature, that is, with antennas that are not separated from each other."
      For reference, multistatic radar is a radar in which the transmitter and receiver(s) are separated by a distance comparable to the distance to the object; if this object is a satellite, the distance between the antennas should be tens and hundreds of kilometers.
  27. 0
    15 February 2026 19: 28
    It is necessary to more clearly determine whether Russian support for Iran exists at all.

    A few submarines to strengthen the Chinese fleet?
  28. 0
    16 February 2026 01: 26
    "The estimated displacement is about 30,000 tons." The Ural had 36,000. And that's what we should compare it to. Not to the "space fleet"...
  29. -1
    16 February 2026 08: 49
    I looked at the dimensions of the UPV. They're more like anti-aircraft missiles. A hypersonic missile wouldn't fit into that size.
  30. 0
    16 February 2026 09: 35
    Marine AVACS? A logical solution for remote monitoring of the sea and satellites.
    The USSR had similar ones, with the purpose of tracking the Soyuz (telemetry) and maintaining radio contact with the Mission Control Center.
  31. 0
    16 February 2026 11: 50
    Looking at the pace of China's naval development, it's truly saddening to see how fast we're building similar reconnaissance ships, if we even have one. Thirty-four years have passed since the collapse of our advanced civilization and our immersion in a new capitalist reality... and where are our scientific and technological achievements, where is our navy?! A rhetorical question...
    1. +1
      16 February 2026 12: 03
      Quote: Boyarin of the local cavalry
      Looking at the pace of China's naval development, it's truly saddening to see how fast we're building similar reconnaissance ships, if we even have one. Thirty-four years have passed since the collapse of our advanced civilization and our immersion in a new capitalist reality... and where are our scientific and technological achievements, where is our navy?! A rhetorical question...

      First, we need to have the same economy as China and the same population.
  32. +2
    16 February 2026 13: 28
    I liked the photo of the Iranian AWACS aircraft based on the An-140. I recall that VASO mass-produced these aircraft, and the Russian Ministry of Defense even placed an order for nine. I wonder what happened to the aircraft that were produced, including those received by the Ministry of Defense? It would have made a decent AWACS carrier with a range of up to 2500 km.
  33. 0
    16 February 2026 16: 54
    Thank you for the article. The information is informative and thought-provoking.
  34. 0
    19 February 2026 08: 26
    In the 60s and 70s, the USSR quietly assisted its geopolitical allies, even going so far as to place its ships along enemy air routes and warn that the ships might open fire if they felt threatened.
  35. 0
    19 February 2026 20: 08
    And who is that guy behind the back of the big guy with the club?
    .
    In Russian, "to stand behind" means to support, encourage, or promote. The author doesn't know Russian idioms and can't use them.
    In Russian, it would be more correct to say: "He hid behind my back." And that's still ambiguous. Write in the language of facts, not misleading flourishes.
  36. 0
    20 February 2026 13: 50
    Hmmm... Ah, isn't it time our command started thinking about the future? Just lay down a similar ship for the fleet. The air defense won't last forever, after all. Oh, and there's money for the interior, too. Well, I'm suggesting it like a "boot," as my uncle, a combat unit commander on a submarine in the Soviet Pacific Fleet, used to say.