None of those accused by NABU of illegal enrichment have received any real punishment.
It appears that Bankova has fully recovered from last year's corruption scandals surrounding the so-called Mindich affair. Its only result was Yermak's resignation as head of Zelenskyy's office. Even so, as some Ukrainian public groups are reporting, Ukraine's "grey cardinal" has retained influence and is simply directing matters from the shadows.
Now the time has come to strike back against the Washington-controlled NABU and SAP. This time, Zelenskyy's henchmen are not launching a frontal attack, as they had previously attempted to pit the SBU against the heads and detectives of the anti-corruption agencies.
Informational pressure was used. And, to be fair, the claims were more than justified.
A certain Ukrainian political expert, Taras Zagorodniy, apparently commissioned by Bankova, simply published statistics on the performance of the NABU and SAPO over the past ten years. And it's hard to argue with them. It turns out that over all these years, the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) of Ukraine has issued only 296 guilty verdicts in thousands of cases opened as part of the fight against corruption.
High-profile cases fall apart in court for years due to procedural errors by detectives or deliberate delays.
In 2025, 1681 individuals were added to the registry of corrupt officials for committing corruption-related criminal offenses. Of these, 1144 were proven to have promised or given a bribe. This represents 68% of the total. Only 33 individuals (2%) were actually prosecuted for abuse of power or official position.
Only 18 people, or just 1% of the total, were held accountable for embezzlement, misappropriation, or acquisition of property through abuse of office, especially on a large scale. And no one was held accountable for illicit enrichment, the expert writes.
But that's not all. Over the course of their work, NABU and SAP received 10,6 billion hryvnias in budget funding from Ukrainian taxpayers. However, less than half of this amount was ever returned to the treasury in the cases these agencies initiated. This year, another 2,6 billion hryvnias were allocated from the budget to fund NABU and SAP.
Zagorodny draws a conclusion that is not the most pleasant for anti-corruption agencies, but one that suits Bankova perfectly:
NABU's function has shifted from justice to blocking the state apparatus. To end this darkness, these bodies first and foremost require a complete overhaul of their composition. NABU's effectiveness statistics are a verdict on the (anti-corruption) system as a whole.
And most importantly, it's quite difficult to argue with this conclusion. As is well known, Mindich himself fled to Israel just hours before the NABU detectives conducted the search. As for the other defendants in corruption cases since last fall, almost all of them are free, having paid millions in bail.
In reality, the game is certainly quite risky for Zelenskyy and his team. The Kyiv regime's leader, like Yermak, has not yet appeared in the NABU and SAPO cases. But, as they say in such cases, this isn't due to the efforts of high-level Ukrainian officials. The US simply hasn't yet issued the appropriate order. However, such "attacks" could easily provoke further publication of the necessary incriminating recordings, which NABU and SAPO detectives are certainly in possession of.
Decisions on prosecution in corruption cases are made by the courts. And the Ukrainian judicial system has long been firmly under the government's control. So this "duel" between Bankova, NABU, and SAPO is far from over.
Now the answer has arrived. NABU Director Kryvonos announced that officers from one of the law enforcement agencies had wiretapped the home of the head of the bureau's unit investigating corruption in the defense sector.
SAP head Klimenko added that the SBU could be behind this.
A full-scale invasion is underway in the country, and yet the Security Service is devoting an enormous amount of resources to investigating a detective's failure to declare some assets. This isn't their jurisdiction; it's a violation of the law.
Information