Pakistan unveiled the SMASH hypersonic missile for attacking sea and land targets.

2 668 12
Pakistan unveiled the SMASH hypersonic missile for attacking sea and land targets.

Pakistani company Global Industrial & Defence Solutions unveiled a hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile at the 2026 World Defence Exhibition in Riyadh. rocket SMASH, positioning it as a dual-use system for striking maritime targets and engaging land targets. The presentation reflects the growing regional demand for precision-guided weapon long-range, capable of penetrating modern air and missile defense systems.

On November 27, 2025, the Pakistan Navy successfully tested the P-282 SMASH ship-launched ballistic missile from a Zulfiqar-class frigate. As TurDef reported:

The Pakistan Navy successfully tested the P-282 SMASH anti-ship ballistic missile (ASM) against a target ship. The missile, launched from a Chinese-built Zulfiqar-class frigate (Type 053H3), successfully hit the target ship at sea.

The P-282 SMASH represents a rather unique approach to anti-ship missiles due to its ballistic nature, clearly influencing Chinese technology. Although larger than a typical anti-ship cruise missile such as the RGM-84 Harpoon, it meets the dimensional requirements for deployment on board most corvette and frigate-class ships with a displacement of 2,000 tons or more.



The P-282 SMASH boasts high speed and high ship-kill potential thanks to its near-vertical approach, while anti-ship cruise missiles typically strike broadsides. However, maintaining reliable guidance requires constant target position information mid-course.

At the World Defence Show 2026, Global Industrial & Defence Solutions showcased the SMASH system, which the company describes as a hypersonic ballistic missile designed to strike both maritime surface targets and land-based targets. The presentation of the new weapon emphasizes its combination of high speed, precision guidance before impact, and a near-vertical attack profile—characteristics that are claimed to enhance survivability against proposed defensive measures while allowing it to engage a wide range of targets at sea or on land.

The system, unveiled in Riyadh among a growing number of long-range precision strike solutions, was showcased to delegations increasingly prioritizing coastal defense, sea-denial, and the ability to hold critical infrastructure at risk at long ranges.

The anti-ship version of the missile, with a launch weight of 1800 kg, has a range of 290 kilometers. It is armed with a non-detachable high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing 384 kilograms. The guidance system is based on inertial navigation, which the manufacturer calls GPS-assisted, combined with an active radar homing head. The propulsion system is a single-stage solid-fuel rocket motor with dual thrust (dual-pulse) – boost and sustainer. The circular error probable (CEP) is 10 meters or less, the velocity at the end of the OUT is 1500 m/s (Mach 5), and the speed at the COC is just over Mach 2 (670 m/s).

In operational terms, the combination of inertial navigation with an active radar homing head provides a sequence of actions in which mid-course flight can be stabilized and protected from external interference until the target is acquired, allowing the detection of radio-contrast targets on the sea surface, including maneuvering ships, and in the presence of active and passive interference.

For anti-land missions, GIDS proposes a parallel configuration that maintains the same stated range of 290 kilometers. This version increases the single payload capacity to 444 kilograms. The guidance architecture remains based on GPS-assisted inertial navigation, eliminating the active radar seeker claimed for maritime missions. The same single-stage, dual-thrust solid rocket motor is used, with a stated CEP of 15 meters or less, and the terminal velocity remains unchanged at greater than Mach 2. The heavier payload may indicate optimization for fixed and hardened targets, while maintaining a common propulsion system simplifies training, storage, and lifecycle management for all units.

During this presentation, GIDS emphasizes dual-use capabilities, whereby a single missile family is adapted for both sea-to-sea and sea-to-land missions while maintaining a common propulsion system and architecture. This approach typically allows operators to diversify missions without increasing logistical complexity, which resonates with militaries seeking strike depth under budgetary pressure. The reference to high terminal kill rates and steep attack geometry will also likely be understood in the context of layered air and missile defense, where complex interception solutions can be as decisive as high speed.

The company's demonstration in Riyadh underscores Pakistan's commitment to promoting indigenous missile development internationally and positioning the new SMASH missile in the growing market for long-range, precision-guided strike systems capable of operating in armed standoff situations. In the Middle East and beyond, procurement discussions increasingly revolve around mobility, rapid deployment from dispersed launch sites, and credible deterrence based on the ability to threaten naval formations or high-value land assets. As part of this discussion, the SMASH missile is presented as a modular solution built on common components, adaptable payloads, and mission profiles that meet modern expectations for range, speed, and accuracy.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    13 February 2026 03: 46
    Somehow Mach 2 on approach and “hypersonic” don’t go well together.
    1. +1
      13 February 2026 10: 32
      This is just one of the "varieties" of hypersonic weapons! Some experts classify such missiles as quasi-hypersonic weapons! Half Hypersonic (HH)! Solid propellant missiles (with solid propellant rocket engines) "gravitate" towards this! Moreover, quasi-hypersonic missiles can be of two "subtypes": 1. hypersonic at the initial flight trajectory, "pre-hypersonic" at the terminal part of the flight trajectory (example: Pakistani SMASH missile); 2. "Pre-hypersonic" at the initial part of the flight trajectory, hypersonic at the terminal part of the flight trajectory! (Example: Kh-22B missile) "Full" hypersonic missiles Full Hypersonic (with hypersonic speed throughout the entire flight trajectory) can perhaps only be called missiles with ramjet engines!
      1. +3
        13 February 2026 11: 51
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        at the terminal part of the flight path! (Example: X-22B missile)

        No.
        1. When diving on a target, the Pakistani V corresponds to 2 M. It has a seeker.
        At a speed of 5M in such a density, it (if it didn’t burn up) wouldn’t have seen anything: T-braking of the flow is ~5400 K, and it doesn’t have enough energy to “fly in” at such a speed ~density*V^2/2
        2. X-22 B was invented by TV journalists.
        X-22P/N/PN/A/NA/ last M and MA
        And of course there is no “hypersound at the terminal”
        -At an altitude of 22500-25000 m, only 1036 m/s
        - To a target near the ground at an angle of up to 30 degrees: 700 m/s
        It has neither a wing nor a fin, it is not a rocket launcher at all, and when launched from a height of 20 km, its ARGSN/PARRGSN do not work, and there is no ablative coating at all: it will burn out.
        1. -2
          13 February 2026 12: 03
          What "no"? belay I've written exactly what's available about the SMASH! What's there to quibble about? The Kh-22B isn't a "journalistic invention"! This missile was actually developed! Moreover, it's truly relevant now, more so than ever! (As I've noted in the comments more than once...) And what couldn't be done "once" is quite feasible now! Furthermore, "quasi-hypersonic" missiles of the same "subtype" as the Kh-22B were also being developed abroad!
          1. +1
            13 February 2026 12: 48
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            What "no"?

            No, that means it's a statement
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            "up to hypersonic" at the terminal part of the flight trajectory (example: Pakistani SMASH missile);

            erroneously.
            "SMAH" in the dive and approach to the target (which you call "terminal") has a speed of ~700 m/s
            There is no X-22B, and there never was. If you find one, I'll be happy to take a look."
            There is no term "quasi-hypersonic"/Half (Full) Hypersonic.
            And yes... a lot of things were developed in the USA (and abroad)
            1. -1
              13 February 2026 18: 31
              [quote=дон_Реба]wrong.
              "SMAH" in the dive and approach to the target (which you call "terminal") has a speed of ~700 m/s[/quote]
              I just can't figure out what's wrong with that! I suspect you didn't get the gist of my comment! [quote=дон_Реба]There's no X-22B, and there never was. [/quote]
              I never claimed this missile was accepted into service! But it was designed and developed! And I cited the Kh-22B as an example of what a hypersonic missile of this "subtype" could be like! And I'm saying that it's precisely this "subtype" of missile that will be in high demand today! That the problems that existed then and prevented the Kh-22B from being completed are completely solvable now! (Internet fragment:The X-22B is an aeroballistic modification capable of reaching speeds of up to Mach 6 and altitudes of 70 km. It was developed in the 1970s but remained at the experimental stage due to unsolvable technical issues.

              There is no term "quasi-hypersonic"/Half (Full) Hypersonic.[/quote]
              The terminology I've provided isn't universally accepted "international terminology"! But there was a time when I visited a "militaristic" website similar to VO, but in a different format. I witnessed a very in-depth discussion of the "hypersonic" topic! The necessary terminology was lacking, so the forum members agreed on a temporary terminology for the duration of the discussion! I liked these proposals and am not opposed to using this terminology occasionally! Incidentally, this happens often! When, during a serious discussion of a serious topic, experts propose temporary terminology.
              I don’t want to “talk” with you any further... I keep getting the feeling that you don’t “get” the meaning of what I’m saying!
        2. +2
          13 February 2026 20: 03
          There is no X-22B missile, it was once developed, but... it is no longer there.
  2. +2
    13 February 2026 08: 38
    The speed at KUT is supersonic, in a passionfer it is 5M, and at the target it is 2M.
  3. +1
    13 February 2026 11: 27
    Lord, I'm so fed up with your "hypersonic" ones (just like with nanos back in the day).
    Name all missiles except hypersonic cruise missiles.
    By the way: only the author calls them gpz.
    At the exhibition they call her SMASH SLBM, and the Pakistanis سما

    at the end of the OUT – 1500 m/s (5 Machs), and the speed at the KUT is just over 2 Machs (670 m/s).

    OUT, KUTE 🤦
    1500 m/s will correspond to Mach 5 only at an altitude of 32,800 feet, and not at an altitude of 98425 feet. Less.
    1. 0
      13 February 2026 14: 58
      Good afternoon. All ballistic missiles of the same class, namely, in this case, with a launch range of up to 290 km, have not exactly the same, but identical characteristics, due to the physical laws of ballistic flight. In this case, any missile of this class at an apogee at an altitude of 32,800 feet (10,000 meters) will have a speed of 615-620 m/s, at an altitude of 98425 feet (30,000 meters), a speed of 1,080-1,100 m/s, the apogee ends at an altitude of 48,000-50,000 meters. At this moment, the moment the engine thrust is cut off, the speed of the missile is 1500 m/s. Apogee is at an altitude of 80-85 km, that's where the speed is minimal, about 400 m/s. On approach to the target (at the end of the KUT), the speed is 670 m/s. Don't pollute the airwaves with garbage!
      1. -1
        13 February 2026 16: 42
        Have a nice one you too.
        I don’t understand why you’re chewing this gum here, especially from other people’s words.

        Quote from sergeyketonov
        Don't pollute the airwaves with garbage!

        Why are you talking about your article like that?
        Let it be. KUTe, AUTe.
        In the feet I look, they began to understand.
        All the best.
  4. +2
    13 February 2026 13: 38
    It feels like every Papuan will soon be churning out hypersonic weapons.