Tank to infantry, a new level of DIY

26 619 67
Tank to infantry, a new level of DIY
General view of the PKZ-T machine gun


Against the backdrop of the current conflict in the east of our neighboring state, there's often a return to old weapons concepts and their reimagining. Sometimes this results in interesting weapon designs.



We are talking about the latest creation of the Perm private weapons design bureau – PKZ-T.

Perm gunsmiths have already made a name for themselves in the media. Their design, the PKZ, was widely discussed in the arms and related communities. Despite all the controversial aspects of the bullpup assault machine gun's design, the project's main drawback was that it required significant modifications to the Kalashnikov PK/PKM machine guns.


The Perm gunsmiths' previous creation was the PKZ. Its design is far more complex. What all Laby OOO designs have in common is their high quality of execution.

And as has been discussed many times, rifle-caliber machine guns (of any caliber, but we're specifically talking about the 7,62mm x 54mm caliber) aren't exactly in abundance... Quite the contrary—they're in dire need. Soldiers in the SVO zone have long been issued Degtyaryov light machine guns. These have essentially been decommissioned for a long time. weapon Besides all this, the machine gun chambered for a cartridge that's not the most common in the army doesn't have any standard or even commercial upgrade kits. So, installing optics, a night sight, or a "can" on this machine gun is either impossible or difficult, and soldiers have to make do as best they can. We also got North Korean PKs. But at least they use a standard rifle cartridge, and that's something to be thankful for, even though the design is very unique and strange.


The footage was published by the press service of the Federal Service for the National Security and Defense of the Russian Federation. Fortunately, this is all happening deep in the rear, but still...

And perhaps the most glaring sign of the machine gun shortage is the acquisition of DPM machine guns by Rosgvardia units guarding strategic facilities. In other words, to put it simply, Rosgvardia units deep in the rear have been assigned a new mission: shooting down drones, but there are no resources for this (machine guns), and all that was found were antiques from the end of the Great Patriotic War. Moreover, some believe that these machine guns weren't even from our warehouses, but trophies from the former 65th Order of the Red Star arsenal of the USSR Ministry of Defense, that is, the Ukrainian arsenal in Balakliya. In general, this makes sense, since in the 2000s and 2010s, we underwent a massive purge of our warehouses. Some were dumped on the civilian market as models or hunting weapons, and some were scrapped. In other words, the Soviet mobilization reserve was destroyed... And no new ones were created.


General view of the PKT machine gun with the electric trigger unit attached.

Against this backdrop, the new development by Laby LLC appears incredibly relevant. We're talking about the PKZ-T project – a redesign tank Kalashnikov machine gun in hand.


And here's the rear of the PKT receiver with the electric trigger assembly removed, and therefore without the trigger. Incidentally, the photo of this machine gun was taken from a website selling mock-up guns, and this particular PKT is available for purchase.

The first such conversions seem to date back to the period when Soviet troops were fulfilling their international duty in Afghanistan. Units desperate for additional machine guns turned their attention to damaged armored vehicles, from which they removed the PKTs. Then came the late 1980s and early 1990s, when the patchwork quilt of the post-Soviet space was drowned in a series of local conflicts. Many warring parties were short of weapons, and various makeshift conversions of PKTs into "handguns" flourished. Perhaps the most famous example of this use of the PKT is its use by armed groups during the First Chechen War.


A close-up of the mechanical trigger on the electric trigger unit

A true renaissance in the use of PKTs for other purposes began in 2014 in eastern Ukraine. The scenario was essentially the same: there was often a frank shortage of weapons, while there was an abundance of damaged vehicles from which machine guns could be removed. This trend continued after 2022. The enemy quickly began to experience a clear shortage of small arms, plus entirely new tasks emerged, such as countering drones in the near and far rear, which also required weapons. Unfortunately, over time, we too began to feel a shortage, fortunately not in small arms in general, but certainly in machine guns.


This is probably one of the earliest and most famous photographs of a PKT converted into an infantry machine gun. Some say it's from Afghanistan, others say it's from Kazakhstan. In reality, the photo shows a soldier in the Self-Defense Forces of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. It was taken in August 1992.

The Kalashnikov tank machine gun is more than just a "PKM for a tank." It has numerous differences from, so to speak, the base model. These include a longer and heavier barrel, a modified gas system, and the addition of an electric trigger. The heavier barrel is self-evident. Firing takes a long time, and changing the barrel on a tank-mounted machine gun is difficult, and a few kilograms extra weight compared to the infantry version is insignificant when mounted on a multi-ton armored vehicle. The barrel is longer because the PKT's ballistics were adjusted to match those of the SGMT, which it was intended to replace. It was simply not worth changing the sights on all armored vehicles just to accommodate a new machine gun. The decision was entirely logical and more than economically feasible. And the modified gas bleed mechanism was necessary to reduce gas contamination in the fighting compartment, which is extremely important in armored vehicles.


PKTs have long been widely used in special operations zones by all sides, not for their intended purpose. However, they are used not as infantry weapons, but as anti-aircraft weapons.

But from the standpoint of "picking up a PKT and running with it like an infantryman," the electric trigger is much more important. The machine gun also has a mechanical trigger. This is essentially a classic "trigger" that's needed in case the electric trigger's power supply fails. However, the trigger is part of the electric trigger assembly, so when it's disconnected from the machine gun, the trigger is also disconnected. Furthermore, the trigger is only useful if the PKT is used as a mounted, turret, or anti-aircraft weapon. If we're talking about the PKT as a PK/PKM ersatz, then a special system with an adapter would be needed to use the machine gun with a buttstock and obtain a trigger with a pistol grip.


The PKT has been converted into an "infantry" machine gun for a long time and often. Most of these conversions are pure amateurism. In this photo, a Ukrainian "homebrew" is trying to attach a Picatinny rail to the machine gun. It's clear that attempting to attach a standard PKM stock to the PKT results in the machine gun being too large for any acceptable dimensions.

Most of the designs found online are attempts to attach a standard PKM stock to the PKT via an adapter that also accommodates the trigger system. Since the PKT is longer than the PKM, attaching a standard stock results in a monstrous beast of truly unsightly dimensions. The designers at Laby LLC took their own, and much more appropriate, approach here – they created the stock entirely from scratch, a completely original design. It's shorter than the standard one, allowing the PKZ-T to fit within the dimensions of a standard PKM. This is a significant factor in terms of ease of handling, especially for soldiers accustomed to its dimensions.

The second thing that distinguishes the Perm product is the overall high quality of its execution. Even the PKTs that our opponents in the SVO zone converted into handbrake rifles after 2022, in completely factory conditions, look like blatant home-made work. The PKZ-T is clearly not only of high quality but even features recognizable signature design elements.


The PKZ-T stock features a stylized Latin letter "Z." And why not? We can afford it, as they say.

At least one machine gun prototype is already in use in a special operation zone, and there's a video of a soldier using the weapon system reviewed. And the review is more than positive. The solid design of the upgrade kit from Laby engineers only highlights all the advantages of the original PKT. The heavier barrel eliminates the need to carry a spare barrel (although it seems the army has forgotten the concept of a "spare barrel" anyway) and eliminates the need to worry about the number of rounds fired from the machine gun in a continuous burst, as the receiver volume limits the length of a continuous burst anyway.

The main and fundamental drawback our soldier mentions is, of course, weight. The machine gun is approximately two kilograms heavier than the standard infantry PKM. But this is an inevitable price to pay for a heavier and more durable barrel, as the operator himself notes. Furthermore, Kalashnikov machine guns have long been used with various tuning kits, additional grips, and aftermarket sights, which already increase the weapon's weight. So, to some "PK operators," the weight difference may seem completely insignificant.


At least one model is already definitely in the SVO zone and is fighting, albeit in an anti-aircraft role.

It's also worth noting that the original machine gun has no iron sights, and the PKT's ballistics are different from those of the PKM. This can create difficulties when choosing optical sights, and soldiers already trained in the PKM will have to get used to the new machine gun.

Be that as it may, Perm gunsmiths have created a very interesting and truly original design that can and should find its way onto the battlefields of the Soviet Air Defense Forces. Admittedly, the idea isn't new. There have been attempts to create a standardized kit for converting the PKT into an infantry machine gun, intended to equip all armored vehicles, but that's a completely different matter. story.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    10 February 2026 05: 23
    Quality is rare and expensive...unsuitable for a long war...requiring a lot of simple and reliable weapons.
    What's the big deal? what The military people here come up with all sorts of things.
    Maxima with Piccatini rails will soon be in use.
    1. +1
      10 February 2026 10: 22
      Quote: The same Lech
      Quality is rare and expensive...unsuitable for a long war...requiring a lot of simple and reliable weapons.
      What's the big deal? what The military people here come up with all sorts of things.
      Maxima with Piccatini rails will soon be in use.

      We should be happy if it's not berdysh...
  2. + 11
    10 February 2026 06: 10
    We had a captured PKT (Planet Carrier) in our reconnaissance company in Chechnya, a converted machine gun. We called it a DPK. There's a Kalashnikov light machine gun, but this was a monstrous machine gun.
    1. +3
      10 February 2026 08: 57
      Quote: Bacha
      it was a wild machine gun

      What... were you "growling" at your own people?
  3. +6
    10 February 2026 06: 16
    So, are we out of Pechenegs like the PKMs? I thought we had at least PKMs in our warehouses, or at least wagons. And the RPDs are a complete crapshoot, though I think we could still look for the Shosha and Lewis systems in warehouses or ask our Belarusian brothers to share.
    1. +4
      10 February 2026 09: 05
      Quote from Mazunga
      the Shosh and Lewis systems can also be searched by syllables or

      Where is there a "hurry"? what It seems like the RP-46 hasn't been "overhauled" yet! stop

      Quote from Mazunga
      ask Belarusian brothers to share

      Well, yeah...try asking your dad for free! He'll sell you snow for next to nothing in the winter! No.
    2. +4
      10 February 2026 09: 17
      Quote from Mazunga
      So, the Pechenegs are gone just like the PKM?

      The Degtyarev Plant proved incapable of scaling up PKM/PKP production. It's the only plant producing machine guns. For some time now, the ZiD's production failure has become unacceptable (North Korean machine guns weren't popular). Redesigning the PKT is one solution.
      1. +5
        10 February 2026 10: 44
        Degtyarev Plant proved unable to organize Scaling up PKM/PKP production. This is the only factory producing machine guns.

        Any ability, in modern bureaucratic procedures, comes from the customer...
        And the customer sees only Kalashnikov JSC in "this clearing"!...
        and when there is no funding, then the staff will leave, the technological equipment will not be repaired, etc.
        The problems described in the article stem from a lack of competition, meaning all questions should be directed to the Russian Ministry of Defense...
        1. +4
          14 February 2026 23: 23
          Why is the only enterprise of this kind private? This is something not only the Ministry of Defense should be concerned about, but also more competent authorities.
          1. 0
            April 6 2026 13: 31
            Capitalism is therefore private wink
      2. +5
        10 February 2026 20: 17
        The owner and his children are in Spain too often, which is why they can’t get production going.
    3. -1
      10 February 2026 09: 41
      Nothing ended there, especially since no one stopped production of the Pechenegs. Rosgvardia were issued DPMs as a supplemental weapon, for a new, previously uncharacterized role, in addition to their primary weapon, and even then, they were used to guard targets deep in the rear. This author, for the sake of hype and views/reads, raised a fuss. And there's only one converted PKT in the SVO zone, and that's for anti-aircraft use. Incidentally, I'd only mount PKTs on turrets.
    4. +2
      10 February 2026 10: 24
      Quote from Mazunga
      So, are we out of Pechenegs like the PKMs? I thought we had at least PKMs in our warehouses, or at least wagons. And the RPDs are a complete crapshoot, though I think we could still look for the Shosha and Lewis systems in warehouses or ask our Belarusian brothers to share.

      RPDs were actively scrapped en masse in the 80s; I even participated in it during my service...
    5. 0
      10 March 2026 19: 30
      I was also somewhat perplexed by the "campaign" about the supposed machine gun shortage. I happened to visit the armory—there's as much stuff there as a fool can eat tobacco. I can't speak for the Shosh and Lewis. I haven't seen any. But there are countless DPM, RPD, Goryunov, and Maxim machine guns there. Not to mention the PPSh, PPS, Mosin, TT, and Nagant. I almost forgot—some areas have captured German weapons like the MG, MP, Sturmgewehr, and even the Thompson submachine guns.
      And the guys at "Lenta" don't seem to be complaining either. Other issues. This looks more like a manufacturer's ad. Well, at least one option.
  4. + 13
    10 February 2026 06: 20
    Somehow, articles like these really make you think...
    Hypersonic, no analogues, and the inability to provide a small army with decent machine guns... and the immeasurable Soviet reserves were also wasted...
    To raise your spirits, just tell yourself:
    "Hey, comrade, stop being hysterical.
    Forward to new rakes.
    We will definitely overtake America
    If we catch up with Zimbabwe"...

    But everything is fine, according to plan, this is due to a misunderstanding of plans.
    1. +2
      10 February 2026 07: 04
      As one Ukrainian officer said about Maxim machine guns, they're honest-to-goodness 7,62mm calibers—and I don't care if they're over a century old, the main thing is they get the job done. And here, you can use weapons from damaged vehicles. As the saying goes, you can't just throw everything away. There are auto salvage yards where they salvage used parts from wrecked or rusty cars—they have plenty of things with remaining service life, but there's a war going on—and no one throws away everything that can be used.
    2. +8
      10 February 2026 07: 48
      A typical article about old weapons in the SVO, like: look at how skilled we are – how successfully they remake and use obsolete models, and if the enemy does the same, then: look at what they’ve come to, what a wretched state they’ve reached... Well, that sort of thing...
      P.S.: I remember a video from the huge underground Ukrainian warehouses captured by Prigozhin, where he himself opened crates of Maxims, DP-27s, Thompson submachine guns, and other things... Are we waiting at the front? In the Russian National Guard? In the "militia"?
      1. +9
        10 February 2026 15: 13
        "He himself opened the boxes with Maxims, DP-27s, Thompson submachine guns, etc.... Are we waiting at the front? In the Russian National Guard? In the militia?"
        At American auctions of rare weapons.
      2. +1
        11 February 2026 00: 16
        I remember how Shoigu was planning to melt down captured Fritz weapons for the construction of a new cathedral on Poklonnaya Hill. An interesting idea, melting down expensive rarities instead of using ordinary scrap. Or is this just a way to warm your pockets and line your pockets?
        1. 0
          9 May 2026 14: 50
          Alexander Vanichev
          (Alexander Or is this an opportunity to warm your hands and line your pockets?
          It's clear to everyone, but it's not clear to you
          This is a symbol.
          If we follow the article, then using the converted anti-tank missile systems in the rear to repel air attacks is only a plus: This weapon has a longer direct fire range and a higher rate of fire - everything needed to repel air attacks..
  5. -2
    10 February 2026 06: 31
    There used to be a DT (dead-end weapon) that could be easily removed from a tank and used as a manual trigger. It even came with a quick-release bipod for this purpose. Why couldn't the PKT have been made using the same principle? Why bother with an electric trigger that can't be used outside of a tank, and then redesign it for the sake of convenience? If they really had to use electrics, who stopped them from installing a simple solenoid with a lever that acted like the index finger on a standard trigger? Well, a heavier barrel for different ballistics is understandable, but all this other stuff? Since the USSR didn't directly siphon off money, it makes you wonder if someone wanted a bonus for an invention, a rationalization proposal, or simply harm Ugh, the introduction of new technology, and the military representatives involved get some more stars on their shoulder straps. And they probably got what they wanted.
    1. +6
      10 February 2026 07: 09
      Because the tank machine gun was coaxial with the main gun, they had two electric triggers for the gunner's convenience. That's when the machine gun is in a separate niche in a tank or infantry fighting vehicle, where a person can sit next to it—yes, an electric trigger isn't needed.
      1. -3
        10 February 2026 07: 19
        In Soviet T-26, BT, T-34, KV, and early IS tanks, the twin DT machine gun was mounted to the right of the gun, without any electric trigger, and the gunner, sitting to the left of the gun, did not need to stretch across the gun to pull the trigger or ask the loader.
        1. +4
          10 February 2026 09: 37
          Quote: Nagan
          It was installed to the right of the gun, without any electric trigger, and the gunner, sitting to the left of the gun, did not need to stretch across the gun to pull the trigger, or ask the loader.

          But the gunner did not use the infantry trigger at all, because although there was no electric trigger, there was a mechanical cable trigger from the pedal.
          1. 0
            10 February 2026 10: 29
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            there was a mechanical cable release from the pedal

            Well, yeah. And who stopped you from doing the same with PCT?
            1. 0
              10 February 2026 10: 41
              Quote: Nagan
              Well, yeah. And who stopped you from doing the same with PCT?

              Is there a complaint about the type of remote trigger, or the lack of a standard kit for converting to infantry mode?

              The electric trigger doesn't require any cable adjustments, and it works smoother. Well, they installed an electric trigger on the T-34-85 and the DT, if I remember correctly... Definitely on the gun, unlike the T-34-76.
        2. -3
          10 February 2026 17: 30
          By the way, about tanks))) The BT-7, now on wheels and with its speed, would be very, very relevant
      2. 0
        4 March 2026 02: 03
        The issue isn't the electric trigger itself, but its implementation. In general, the DT machine guns could be removed and used by the crew outside the vehicle, just like the DA.
    2. +3
      10 February 2026 07: 46
      Let's ride in a cart instead of a car? Just give him some oats and drive off.
    3. +2
      10 February 2026 09: 47
      Tank and infantry weapons operate under slightly different conditions. For the latter, greater weight isn't a problem (a tank doesn't care about a few extra kilograms), and a heavier and longer barrel can be made, allowing for more intense firing. For infantry weapons, however, weight is a critical and important factor.
  6. +4
    10 February 2026 07: 20
    What do the effective managers of the Kalashnikov concern do? Run around to exhibitions?
    1. 0
      10 February 2026 23: 16
      A Kalashnikov owner named Krivoruchko sits in the deputy defense minister's chair, and there's no confirmed evidence that he ever sold it to anyone. So they're just getting paid, and they work as best they can.
  7. +6
    10 February 2026 07: 32
    So, for eight years, from '14 to '22, there was absolutely no preparation? Or were the rearguard forces just pouring sugar on the guarantor? In the end, it turned out as usual. Now I understand and accept the older generation's phrase: "Stalin is not for you."
    1. +7
      10 February 2026 10: 03
      So it turns out that for 8 years, from '14 to '22, we didn't prepare for anything?

      Of course we were prepared. Remember how gleefully the artillery depots exploded? One after another... So we were prepared.
      1. +1
        10 February 2026 17: 39
        Everything was sold back in the late 80s and early 90s)) so the guarantor has nothing to do with it. I was hanging out in a tank battalion in Echmiadzin at the time, but I was also in Artsakh. There was an interesting regiment there. The anti-aircraft gunners robbed them during the day by the Azerbaijanis and at night by the Armenians. Everything was divided up. The commanders then received an order not to fire a single bullet at the common people. So the common people had fun: they carried the warehouses along with ammunition in tanks, they took them out by the trainload. Everything was fun and sparkling in those years.))Azerbaijanis They beat down our motorized riflemen and they went to storm Shusha. Oh, what a time it was.
        1. +1
          10 February 2026 23: 14
          Quote from Mazunga
          Everything was sold back in the late 80s and early 90s, so the guarantor has nothing to do with it.

          Back then, they were selling the old ones. And under the guarantor, they were planning to start buying new ones, with trillions of dollars going toward the state defense order. But unfortunately, it all ended up in the pockets of important people.
          1. 0
            11 February 2026 07: 23
            Well, if there is no difference, why pay more? laughing
  8. +6
    10 February 2026 07: 35
    Articles like these must be banned; they undermine the overall well-being of our citizens. After all, there are still those who believe we are the strongest, and only a lack of political will prevents us from demonstrating it. Here's an example:
    And the Baltic Fleet is not a separate flotilla of the principality, but only part of a huge, nuclear state, and if you take the Baltic, the Baltic Fleet is the most powerful there because of its tactical nuclear weapons, not to mention that our strategic nuclear forces are behind it.

    This is taken from the neighboring thread.
    And if anyone doesn't understand, about banning such articles - this is bitter sarcasm.
    1. +2
      10 February 2026 09: 59
      So this article is written by stretching an owl to the point of being far-fetched - there is some kind of initiative development, by a certain "Labi" LLC (who are they, I don't know) to adapt the PKT machine gun for use as an infantry machine gun, one copy was sent to the front and is used as an anti-aircraft gun, from a tripod, for some reason.
      But the author and some of the commentators here have drawn conclusions about an acute shortage of machine guns and that everything is lost... and in general...
      1. 0
        10 February 2026 20: 12
        Yes, everyone knows there are no problems with machine guns, light or heavy, in the army. Some idiotic commentators think otherwise. And the AK3 or AK4 mount, where Kalashnikov assault rifles are connected to a tripod, was also invented by commentators.
        1. +2
          12 February 2026 08: 33
          They use whatever's at hand; it's quite sufficient to hit a drone from 300-400 meters away—you won't see the drone any further anyway. It doesn't matter to the drone whether it's hit by a 5,45mm or a 7,62mm. A twin assault rifle is much easier to control (it's literally half as light as machine guns) and track the drone's movements in the air. So what should have been installed there? Laser blasters?
  9. +9
    10 February 2026 07: 43
    This whole thing is rather depressing, especially about the warehouses...it immediately brings to mind the deeds of bygone days and the giraffe-level complacency:
    "The government has approved the Federal Target Program 'Industrial Disposal of Weapons and Military Equipment for 2011-2015 and for the Period up to 2020.'"
    The third federal target program is intended to rid the Armed Forces of all surplus weapons, equipment, and ammunition, with which their arsenals are literally overflowing.
    A total of 399 land- and sea-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and 260 strategic launchers will be disposed of. There will be 1973 aircraft and helicopters, 9931 armored vehicles, and 4548 military vehicles. The figures for the disposal of missile and artillery weapons are impressive. Various artillery mounts, anti-aircraft missile systems, multiple launch rocket systems, and anti-tank missile systems will be destroyed – 15440. Anti-aircraft, air-to-air, anti-tank, and anti-submarine missiles – approximately 140 units. Ammunition – over 156 million units. Rounds of ammunition – three and a half billion. Six million four hundred fifty thousand units of various small arms will be melted down.
    "
    1. 0
      10 February 2026 07: 48
      Hmm... they lost everything themselves, what kind of mobilization is there... Ehhhh
    2. +1
      10 February 2026 16: 19
      Is it specified what kind of missiles are there (including anti-aircraft ones)? What if there are missiles for the S-75 and S-125? Where do they go?
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +1
    10 February 2026 08: 48
    What kind of non-standard cartridge is the RPD? If it's an RPD-27, as in the photo, then it's a standard rifle cartridge, while the RPD uses 7,62×39.
  12. +1
    10 February 2026 09: 06
    Will the company be able to produce more than 10-20 units per month?
    Will it even be able to produce those 10-20?
    Has the weapon passed quality control, or is "high quality" just a company statement.
    Have they passed military tests, or will they jam from sand and frost?
    Are there any machine guns available for conversion, or were they cannibalized from a tank?
    Behind the praise it is somehow not noticeable.
  13. +3
    10 February 2026 09: 29
    If you are adapting it to the 6U6 anti-aircraft mount, then the sight on the machine gun barrel is not needed, as it has its own sight.
    1. 0
      10 February 2026 10: 52
      Maybe we should leave anti-aircraft machine guns for defense against drones, and tank guns for tanks,
      And shouldn't "gunsmiths" just rip apart working weapons or blanks based on the AR-15 and instead PRODUCE weapons?
      Remaking is the same as "remaking a traumatic weapon for the thugs into a combat weapon", the bottom, amateurish work and hopeless.
    2. AMG
      0
      10 February 2026 14: 22
      The article talks about the need for light machine guns, not heavy machine guns.
  14. +1
    10 February 2026 10: 28
    Quote: Nagan
    If it's absolutely necessary to use electricity, who stopped you from installing a basic solenoid with a lever that acts like an index finger on a standard trigger?

    Don't you think you're delusional? What solenoid? The electric trigger allows for remote control of the weapon and its integration into a single control panel.
  15. +1
    10 February 2026 13: 13
    Hmm, they stopped making PKMs in Izhevsk? What's this "knee-jerk creativity" for?
    1. +1
      10 February 2026 14: 47
      PKM was produced in Kovrov at the Dzerzhinsky plant.
  16. 0
    10 February 2026 13: 47
    Quite the opposite, in fact – there is a catastrophic shortage of them.
    Damn, it's the 21st century, and we still don't have enough machine guns! How can that be? They could just be churning them out on an assembly line!
  17. 0
    10 February 2026 14: 39
    I take it they don't have the money to convert a machine gun into a combat robot. It's so simple...
  18. +2
    10 February 2026 14: 46
    Surprisingly, more PKTs were produced during the Soviet era. Each motorized rifle company had three PKMs and 11 to 14 PKTs. Consequently, production was planned to accommodate this ratio.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. 0
    10 February 2026 18: 43
    And as has been discussed many times, rifle-caliber machine guns (of any caliber, but we're specifically talking about the 7,62mm x 54mm caliber) aren't exactly in abundance... Quite the contrary—they're in dire need. Soldiers in the SVO zone have long been issued Degtyaryov light machine guns.

    So they came with machine guns. They kept praising the 5,45 system. It turns out it doesn't fit everywhere. And what do you mean "fits"? Even the PM fits in some places.
  21. +4
    10 February 2026 19: 17
    I served in the Soviet army from 1977 to 1979. My vehicle (BMD-1) had three PKT machine guns. One day, we were shown some NTK developments from our troops. This was 1978. They showed us a kit for the PKT, so it could be used as a PKM. And remember, the vehicle had three of them: a bipod, a buttstock, and something else. I don't even remember anymore. We were surprised! They said the vehicles would come with a kit. So, the question is, "So what?" The answer is, "Nothing!" Now it turns out they're developing kits, i.e. reinventing the wheel. Dig into the archives, refine them, and there you have it.
    1. -1
      11 February 2026 00: 21
      Didn't you serve in sunny Skobaristan?
      1. +1
        11 February 2026 18: 08
        And what is Scobristan?
        1. -1
          12 February 2026 15: 50
          Pskov. Residents of the Pskov province were formerly called skobari (skobars), as they were known for their ironmongery. This is where the soldier's nickname, "Sunny Skobaristan," comes from, as winters are cold and damp due to the proximity to the damp Baltic climate.
          1. +1
            12 February 2026 18: 50
            Served in the 103rd Airborne Division. BSSR. Borovukha - 1.350th Guards Airborne Regiment.
  22. -1
    10 February 2026 19: 51
    This is such a disgrace for the world's second-largest army. And shame, first and foremost, on the commander-in-chief.
  23. 0
    11 February 2026 11: 00
    Ideally, the author should have briefly mentioned the versions of the new general-purpose machine guns. If he didn't, then everything is fine with the machine guns. After all, only the Degtyarev plant was mentioned, right?
  24. 0
    11 February 2026 15: 52
    Quote from tsvetahaki
    Moreover, the immeasurable Soviet reserves were also wasted...

    Not wasted! They were simply swallowed up by the "Boundless Dark Continent" and a little bit by Afghanistan in the 1990s. That's all!
  25. 0
    13 February 2026 02: 28
    Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
    Quote from Mazunga
    So, the Pechenegs are gone just like the PKM?

    Redesigning the PKT is one of the options.

    PCT supplies are also limited
  26. 0
    16 February 2026 14: 23
    Bence yeni bir silaha ihtiyaç duyulduğunda aynı Mikhail Kalasnikof'un yaptığı gibi AK-47 silahının üstünde oynamalar yaparak yeni silahlar üretilmelidir (Örneğin AK-47'nin bir türevi olan AK-75)
  27. 0
    27 February 2026 16: 49
    Russian glorious arms corps,
    A reactor of endless ideas,
    He united people of ideas into a fist,
    People in love with their homeland.