Building a Russian aircraft manufacturing ecosystem using domestic engines as an example

7 859 52
Building a Russian aircraft manufacturing ecosystem using domestic engines as an example

According to not only Russian officials, but also experts, the coming year will be one of the most successful, so to speak, for modern aviation Russian industry. Testing, certification, and subsequent serial production of several military, combat training, and civilian aircraft are nearing completion.

The key is that they are import-substituted as much as possible, including in terms of Russian power plants. Domestic-produced aircraft engines will be discussed in the video below, following the text announcement.



There's no need to explain why domestic production of aircraft power plants is so important. Currently, only a handful of countries are capable of producing airliner engines. Currently, France, Britain, the United States, and Russia are capable of producing engines for commercial aircraft and fighter jets, while China is capable of producing engines for fighter jets. Canada is also capable, but production there is actually carried out by a subsidiary of an American company, Pratt & Whitney Canada. Currently, all of these countries, except China, are unfriendly to Russia.



After 2022, Russian engine manufacturing will undergo a major transformation, launching serial production of the domestically produced PD-14 powerplants for the MS-21-310, the PD-8 for the SJ-100 and Be-200, and the promising PD-35 for wide-body aircraft. Let's look at examples of how the PD-14 replaced the Pratt & Whitney, the PD-8 replaced the SaM146, and why the PD-35 will become a key heavy-duty aircraft engine project.



And yes, all of this is under Western sanctions pressure. Incidentally, our "partners" began imposing restrictions on the supply of engines, components, and even aircraft materials to Russia several years before 2022. It's fair to say that the starting point for these restrictions was 2014, after Crimea became part of the Russian Federation.

Faced with severe sanctions, Russia faced a choice: either lose its own civil aviation production or essentially revive the industry from scratch, achieving maximum sovereignty.

As an example, let's take the Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SJ-100), which became the first Russian aircraft designed entirely using digital technologies (fly-by-wire). Instead of the Franco-Russian PowerJet SaM146 engine, it now uses the all-Russian PD-8.

Replacing an aircraft engine is a massive undertaking, one our aeronautical engineers had to undertake. It included redesign, the actual replacement, testing before and after installation, certification, and more.

A similar, but even more ambitious, task is being tackled with the MS-21 medium-haul airliner. Its American Pratt & Whitney PW1400G engine is being replaced with our PD-14.



Creating a single modern aircraft engine is already a complex and colossal undertaking. And here, an entire line of engines is being launched simultaneously. There's a risk that, in the rush to develop and produce two engine types at once, their production deadlines will be missed. This is, to some extent, what happened.

At the same time, a multi-tiered conglomerate of domestic suppliers and contractors, including research and development organizations, is emerging around the aviation industry. Aircraft manufacturers are becoming a kind of driving force for their development.

However, this solution does have its advantages. The PD-8 can be considered a "scaled-down" version of the PD-14. Both power plants use the same core, creating synergy and scalability. By solving a problem for one aircraft, our engineers help solve it more quickly and efficiently for another aircraft in a completely different class. This allows for the standardization of production technologies, and engine manufacturing itself, so to speak, becomes not just simpler, but more profitable in every way.

A kind of domestic ecosystem is being created, scalable to other aircraft. This applies not only to light aircraft but also to helicopters. The combination of these projects creates a completely new matrix, one that simply didn't exist in our aviation industry before. True, this comes at a cost: delays in serial production and some increased costs for finished products. But once this stage is completed, the benefits will be repaid a hundredfold.

When it comes to wide-body aircraft, UEC, together with UEC-Saturn, is developing the advanced PD-35 ultra-high-thrust bypass turbofan engine (with a takeoff thrust of 33 to 40 tons). The lead developer is UEC-Aviadvigatel JSC, and the lead manufacturer is UEC-Perm Motors JSC. It is intended for installation on advanced wide-body long-range and transport aircraft.



No country in the world manufactures aircraft 100% independently. Russia could potentially be the first to achieve this level of autonomy. The key is to ensure access to promising foreign inventions and developments while creating a de facto closed system in the aircraft industry.

52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    4 February 2026 21: 00
    According to not only Russian officials, but also experts, the coming year will be one of the most successful

    So far it seems like the saying: "Don't say hop until you've jumped over it."
    Until we see the MC-21-310, SJ-100, and Be-200 aircraft with new engines go into production, there's no point in talking about a successful year.
    Just my opinion - I don't know anything about aviation, but I shouldn't put the cart before the horse.
    1. 0
      4 February 2026 23: 32
      It's hard for 140 million people to maintain the product line... Let alone millions of "qualified consumers" and millions of "new Russians." We have no friends for civilian aircraft who can't buy something more advanced in the West—even slightly more advanced, even with better support, a better warranty.
      If there's no breakeven, there will be subsidies. Where will the money come from? Gas or oil?
      The issue is greatly exacerbated by economics... Especially since the engine is the pinnacle of the supplier pyramid. From metals and alloys to high-temperature electronics and various scientific fields...
      Build the entire pyramid... Especially not in laboratory quantities to produce everything that is needed...
      It's very, very difficult...
      1. +2
        4 February 2026 23: 50
        Quote from tsvetahaki

        If there's no breakeven, there will be subsidies. Where will the money come from? Gas or oil?

        Yes, gas and oil. Almost our entire economy operates like that – they take money from the raw materials industries and pour it into non-raw materials ones. Almost all non-raw materials industries are unprofitable (except for the chemical industry).
        1. -2
          5 February 2026 00: 00
          That's the point. Oil and gas sales aren't great; there's not enough for everyone—as they used to joke back in the old days: "What don't we have? We don't have this, we don't have that..."
        2. +1
          5 February 2026 07: 25
          Well, again, it's just galoshes. Why understate the truth, that is, lie? Sales of military equipment, the most high-tech with the highest added value, and... around $15 billion per year. Agricultural sales are also around $15,000,000,000. Yes, we're like the industrialization of the late 20th century. You could call it Industrialization II, restoring the lost technologies of the late USSR and again catching up with the fled West, which successfully threw a spanner in our works.
          1. +1
            5 February 2026 10: 34
            Quote: Carib
            Sales of military equipment, the most high-tech with the highest added value, and... around $15 billion per year. Sales of agricultural products are also around $15,000,000,000.

            Now, compare these oil and gas sales figures! And everything will fall into place.
            1. 0
              9 February 2026 12: 14
              It's good that we have oil, gas, and coal, which provide foreign currency for foreign trade, including for purchasing equipment and machinery for industrialization. But developing a segment like civil aviation could provide certain leverage for balancing foreign trade in favor of high-tech exports with the highest possible added value. This process is already being restored in military aviation—Russia has resumed exporting combat aircraft, and the rate of export will increase as the rate of combat aircraft production increases. The same is possible and desirable in the civilian airliner sector. We have the necessary foundation for this, our own developments, and renewable production capacity. Then we will be able to export less oil and refine more domestically, developing oil refining, petrochemicals, gas chemistry, and their derivatives. Then we will be able to trade in a product with a much higher value added and keep all the profits for ourselves.
              And yes, I don't know about last year, but on the eve of the Second World War, our food and agricultural exports reached around 40 billion. And that's not the limit. We have very good potential for growth in food exports. And arms exports, if the war ends, could easily triple, and there are more than enough customers for our weapons today.
              1. 0
                9 February 2026 15: 49
                Quote: bayard
                And it’s good that we have oil, gas, coal, thanks to which we have currency for foreign trade.

                If the remaining currency were used for domestic investment and production, that would be perfect. But with 300 billion in foreign exchange reserves, things are just a bit awkward!

                Quote: bayard
                I don't know about last year, but on the eve of the North-Eastern Front, our exports of food and agricultural products reached around 40 billion. And this is not the limit at all.

                Not the limit. In 2024, exports will amount to $43 billion. In 2025, $41,5 billion. The forecast for 2026 is $45 billion. Growth will continue. But there is an unpleasant aspect. We sell a lot of fish and crab. We feed foreigners with fish, but nothing to our own people. In the sense that fish consumption is reduced due to exorbitant prices. I would ban the sale of fish caught in our waters to other countries. It is the same resource as minerals, which, in theory, should belong to the people. The correct scheme is this: catch the fish - give it to the people (sell it all on the domestic market). Raise the fish yourself - sell it wherever you want. Anywhere abroad! In the future, humanity will farm all its fish, not catch them. It's simply more profitable. And here in Russia, we have ideal conditions for this (better than anywhere else). However, the leaders in fish farming are China, Norway, and Türkiye. The Turks are now actively supplying their farmed fish to Russia (river trout, dorado). Previously, the Norwegians supplied farmed salmon. It should be the other way around! And we need to farm not just any carp, but valuable fish species. Sturgeon. Like salmon and trout. A gold mine. We just need a government program for this. And for big business to get involved.
                1. +1
                  9 February 2026 16: 08
                  Quote: Stas157
                  We just need a government program for this. And for big businesses to get involved.

                  You've written everything correctly, except that "big business" has seized a monopoly here and is shipping everything abroad. With this kind of trade, there's no control over how much you caught, how much you sold, and the proceeds don't even have to be transferred to Russia; they can just keep their nest egg in offshore accounts. In the late USSR, the fishing mafia of the Ministry of Fisheries swiped astronomical sums of money, unchecked and unaccounted for. But at least the country was fed cheap fish. Remember what the prices were like? A pittance. But this requires organized logistics - freezing plants/warehouses, a huge fleet of refrigerated cars, low Russian Railways prices (which is simply impossible for capitalists). If our population lived on the coast, we'd certainly have it. But here, all this needs to be transported from the ports over hundreds/thousands of kilometers, distributed among retail chains... We probably need a network of branded stores with freezers for storage, to cut out the chain of middlemen. But this is the responsibility of the state. A state WELL-disposed toward its people. But the current bureaucrats don't consider our people their own. That's why the price of fish rises by an order of magnitude before it reaches the buyer.
                  The very ideology of the state and its vertical power structure needs to be changed. Only the approach of the USSR, or even that of some normal states, where profit margins and trade margins are legally limited, can be tolerated. A proper scientific approach to managing the country's economic life is needed. The Slavophiles (Sharapov's heirs), who created Gosplan, were capable of this. Today's leaders are simply unsuited to this. They are the wrong "human material." They are rotten and foreign.
  2. +4
    4 February 2026 21: 05
    There is a high potential demand for the PD-14 and PD-8, and will production provide for domestic and foreign orders?
  3. +11
    4 February 2026 21: 05
    No country in the world produces aircraft 100% reliant on itself.

    It may seem trite, but our country, until recently, produced a vast array of diverse aircraft and other high-tech equipment entirely on its own. I hope we can replicate this achievement.
    1. +10
      4 February 2026 21: 18
      Let me correct you, the USSR did this.......
      1. +10
        4 February 2026 21: 32
        An important correction. After the collapse, a significant part of the aviation industry found itself outside of Russia – Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Uzbekistan. But all these countries, except for Belarus with its distinguished 558th plant and several other enterprises, lost their aviation expertise. Ukraine was particularly notable – Antonov, Aviant, Motor Sich, Kharkiv, and so on – all these gems collapsed under the watchful eye of Ukrobander's thick-headed creatures. Oh well, we're the winners. We still managed to preserve our industry! I agree with the author; in 2026, I expect:
        Il-76 - 7-8 units, Tu-214 - 4 units, MS-21 - up to 10 units, similar to Superjet, Il-114 -3, resumption of Be-200 production, first flight of Ladoga.
        Such volume and variety has not been seen since the Soviet era.
        1. +4
          4 February 2026 21: 43
          Such volume and variety has not been seen since the Soviet era.
          - That's true, but I don't believe your prediction, but damn, I really hope I'm wrong.... maybe a miracle will happen....
          1. 0
            4 February 2026 22: 26
            ...Such a volume and variety hasn't been seen since the Soviet era...
            The USSR, however, produced engines for both the navy and merchant fleet, across the entire power range. And now... well, I don't know the situation with the nuclear fleet, so maybe it's just pure luxury.
        2. +1
          5 February 2026 10: 55
          Quote: Glagol1
          Such volume and variety has not been seen since the Soviet era.

          This has never happened before, and here it is again! In 2014, 36 Superjet aircraft were produced. In addition, they produced three An-148s, two An-140s, two first-production Il-76MD-90As, and one Tu-214. Both the range and quantity were greater.
    2. +4
      4 February 2026 22: 56
      Quote: South Ukrainian
      Our Motherland, quite recently, produced a huge number of the most diverse aircraft and other high-tech equipment absolutely on its own
      But Pan Am's Boeing 747, powered by PW or GE engines, flew the LED-JFK route nonstop. Aeroflot's comparably sized IL-86 on the same route made two stopovers in Shannon and Gander, exclusively for refueling, because the NK-86s guzzled kerosene like crazy. Ilyushin isn't to blame here; he installed the engines he was given, and if he could have installed PW, he would have flown the same route without making stopovers.
      1. 0
        5 February 2026 08: 18
        Quote: Nagan
        It's not Ilyushin's fault, he installed the engines that were given to him,

        I agree, but your new homeland profited from that war. It gained technological leadership by luring "smart minds" from all over the world. Meanwhile, the USSR (the European part) lay in ruins, and Russia only recently paid off the Lend-Lease. No complaints against you, just the facts. hi
    3. 0
      5 February 2026 10: 39
      Quote: South Ukrainian
      I hope we can repeat this achievement.

      To replicate the achievements in these knowledge-intensive areas, we need большие Investments in science and education. And here they are small. So there is no hope.
  4. +1
    4 February 2026 21: 21
    I won't even watch the video, I'm 99% sure that "everything is fine" there - we'll overcome it and get back on our feet...
  5. +9
    4 February 2026 21: 24
    "Ecosystem." This zoomer newspeak...
    1. +2
      5 February 2026 05: 08
      Quote: Vulpes
      "Ecosystem." This zoomer newspeak...

      More 'synergy'...
  6. 0
    4 February 2026 22: 33
    Making a display model is much easier than producing a series. Where will we find the people to do that in desolate Russia? Irreplaceable specialists are only capable of sweeping a broom. And the military budget is making drastic adjustments to our peaceful desires.
    We'll achieve this by tearfully begging on our knees for a deal... and then all these locally tortured developments won't be needed.
  7. +4
    4 February 2026 22: 40
    So what does "ecosystem" have to do with it? Lately, this trendy word has been thrown around without even looking at the Russian Dictionary... And it turns out stupid, but fashionable stupid, nonetheless!
    1. 0
      5 February 2026 01: 31
      the main thing is to be in trend... bully
  8. +3
    4 February 2026 22: 46
    I really want to bring back production of the IL-96.
    Otherwise, it’s unclear what flight you’ll be flying on to Vladik, or whether you’ll have to change planes...
  9. +3
    4 February 2026 23: 17
    We need to avoid import dependence not only by simply replacing it with domestic hardware, but also by changing the names. And the commercial principle here should indeed be there, but exclusively on domestic principles. Let those abroad get used to the Russian language, as they once did, and to the popular and world-famous Russianisms. Let them return to aviation the original names of aircraft design schools: not "Superjet," but "Su-100," not "MC-21," but "Yak-210," and so on.
    1. +5
      5 February 2026 07: 42
      Quote: Umptek
      Not a Superjet, but a Su-100, not an MS-21, but a Yak-210
      There is also Checkmate - a fighter with a truly Russian name...
      1. +1
        5 February 2026 08: 29
        There is also Checkmate - a fighter with a primordial Russian name...

        as well as the state messenger: MAX...
        Is this "MAX" in Russian?
        or translated into Russian MAX??
  10. -1
    4 February 2026 23: 41
    It's just a laugh. Thanks to the United Russia party and
    To Putin for the development of aircraft manufacturing
  11. +2
    4 February 2026 23: 43
    According to not only Russian officials, but also experts, the coming year will be one of the most successful, so to speak, for the modern aviation industry of the Russian Federation.

    How many times have we heard this already?
  12. +1
    4 February 2026 23: 54
    Quote: Glagol1
    in 2026 we expect:
    ... MS -21 - up to 10 pcs...
  13. +3
    5 February 2026 00: 44
    No matter how hard I try, when federal channels broadcast that here's a domestically produced civil aviation aircraft, entirely assembled from domestic components, I immediately have a question: after all, these components, especially those involving electronics, are made up of components. Right? Yes, I can agree with that. But are the components of these electronic systems also domestically produced? Given the state of our semiconductor industry, which is still struggling to revive, there are serious doubts about the purely Russian origin of these same chips and other components. So are top managers and other media outlets lying again?
    I say this as someone who has worked extensively in semiconductor manufacturing and understands the true state of their production today. In the 99s, when they were killing off the industry, a lot of effort was expended on reducing our electronics industry to nothing. To this day, I don't see any clear progress on this front.
  14. kig
    +1
    5 February 2026 03: 18
    Our rulers had plenty of time to anticipate this possibility and take action in advance, especially when planning a "return home." In 2014, the first warning bells rang, but they brushed it aside.
    1. +1
      5 February 2026 08: 08
      Quote: kig
      The first warning bell sounded in 2014, but they brushed it off.
      In 2014, Putin ordered the Il-114 to be put into production. The plan was for four years, but in the end, it's only now, by mid-2026, that production is finally underway. The MS-21 is similar—it was rolled out in 2016, with its first flight in 2017. So no one was dismissive—it was simply, "We're doing our best."
  15. +4
    5 February 2026 07: 50
    Quote: kig
    The first warning bell rang in 2014.
    In 2014, we were openly told what sanctions would be imposed against us if we didn't stop with Crimea. After that, eight whole years passed (until the start of the Second World War), and nothing was done. Let me just remind you that In just two Five-Year Plans, during the reign of Comrade Stalin, our country entered the club of industrial powers....
  16. 0
    5 February 2026 08: 26
    Building a Russian aircraft manufacturing ecosystem using domestic engines as an example

    Again, bureaucratic games instead of real work...
  17. +2
    5 February 2026 09: 02
    Quote: Carib
    Sales of military equipment, the most high-tech with the highest added value, and... around $15 billion per year. Sales of agricultural products are also around $15,000,000,000.

    Selling military equipment isn't about economics, it's about politics. It's unclear what profit, if any, there is. A significant portion of sales is financed by government loans. The government regularly writes off these loans. Agricultural products are raw materials.
  18. 0
    5 February 2026 10: 32
    Russian engineers deserve congratulations on accomplishing this titanic task. BUT! Scientists should temper their enthusiasm somewhat. The fact is, there are compelling arguments that the current architecture of aircraft engines and the physical processes involved in their sequences for converting the energy of continuous flows are highly inefficient and uniform across all manufacturers of these machines and devices. If there are people in Russia with healthy ambitions and a desire to transform the country into a civilization with advanced and far-reaching prospects in this field of knowledge, and this underpins the country's energy security, then this article is worth paying attention to. Thus, all modern aircraft engines are built using a completely uniform process algorithm, which is highly inefficient for a variety of reasons. These reasons are mitigated by a new device architecture that ensures the process of converting the energy of continuous and moving media. Moreover, the new technical solutions are based on fundamentally new methods of mathematical analysis of hydrogasdynamic processes in their algorithmically linked sequences as systems of interaction involving big data, rather than coefficients and numbers. The new devices are simpler, with fewer components, especially working ones, and are also less material-intensive. They have smaller dimensions and weight, which directly impacts flight safety. They can support a higher payload. But most importantly, they will ensure a breakthrough in industrial-scale energy generation and a transition from hydrocarbon-based raw materials for budget financing. We believe these solutions are consistent with the programmatic objectives of the Russian leadership. This technology will lead to a huge number of new directions not only in science and engineering, but also in chemical production and environmental safety across all areas.
    1. 0
      7 February 2026 22: 03
      Instead of writing all this, it would be better to solve the Navier-Stokes and Bernoulli equations. No solutions to the equations, no new engines! That's all there is to it!
      1. 0
        Yesterday, 11: 45
        Solving equations is a method of partial sets of these arbitrary solutions. Hydrogasdynamic processes, on the other hand, are dynamic and continuous, primarily energy transformations. Mathematically, these are processes that are algorithmically interconnected in their underlying principles. In other words, solving highly dynamic problems with static partial solutions without understanding what dynamics is is simply ridiculous.
  19. +1
    5 February 2026 10: 53
    You have not been active as a commentator for a long time (write comments). Voting is prohibited.
    1. 0
      5 February 2026 11: 04
      The semantic meaning of the word "Long ago" ensures that I still "Can." There are justified reasons for such delays.
  20. 0
    6 February 2026 19: 29
    As an example, let's take the Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SJ-100), which became the first Russian aircraft designed entirely using digital technologies (fly-by-wire).

    But this is not true.
    Fly-by-wire translates as flight by wire. In Russian, it's called EDSU.
    1. 0
      7 February 2026 18: 30
      It's important to understand that, yes, an aircraft is being designed, but it's designed for the engines that provide its flight characteristics. And if these performance characteristics, and not just thrust, are altered, the aircraft's architecture can undergo radical changes. And we're talking about these fundamental decisions.
  21. 0
    7 February 2026 22: 01
    Replacing an aircraft engine is a massive undertaking, one our aeronautical engineers had to undertake. It included redesign, the actual replacement, testing before and after installation, certification, and more.
    A small clarification is needed here. Replacing an aircraft engine for the state, with its once-unique, comprehensive aviation school, presented certain challenges in the 1970s and 1980s, when computing capabilities and communication tools between developers and contractors were much more limited.

    Creating a single modern aircraft engine is already a complex and colossal undertaking. And here, an entire line of engines is being launched simultaneously. There's a risk that, in the rush to develop and produce two engine types at once, their production deadlines will be missed.
    In today's era of advanced CAD systems and precise numerical modeling, this isn't particularly difficult compared to what it was like when supersonic passenger jets were being developed. But establishing mass production, maintenance, and development is truly challenging. Especially considering that some subcontractors deserve a special place in hell, as do contractors who muddy the waters with their subcontractors, and who's ultimately responsible? A separate legion of people are those stuck in stagnant times with their development, but these people are crucial.
    1. 0
      8 February 2026 10: 58
      Thank you for your reply. The multitasking nature of combining all aspects of engine creation should drive consideration of optimizing the entire array of tasks and all scalable levels of the process. BUT. It all begins with optimizing the physical process that powers the engine and optimizing the architecture of the engine that powers it. Moreover, the engine must ensure process scalability without compromising the quality of the physical process, and this is the main challenge of a modern engine. We understand the complexity and scale of the modern production process. But this complexity also poses a danger, as it prevents the country from considering a fundamentally new solution. Again, without the country's advanced technologies, there will be threats from all sides. Therefore, in addition to possessing non-renewable resources, it is necessary to possess technologies that do not rely on these resources. We are talking about the foundation of energy generation based on the conversion of kinetic flow into the potential energy of the substance in that flow. This is essentially a nuclear technology of new process algorithms – optimized and scalable, rather than a modern one that is limited by the limits of a real physical process. The question is not about good or bad engines and achievements, but about a new ideological breakthrough and real devices that create new political aspects of advantages, as well as open up new directions and solutions in science and technology.
      1. 0
        8 February 2026 11: 14
        I'll continue a bit. All nuclear technologies, including the algorithms for the physical process in an aircraft engine, are built on heat exchange—passive nuclear processes, while in an engine with fuel exhaust as the source of heat exchange activation. We're talking about transforming a dynamic kinetic flow into nuclear processes. Any physicist should immediately grasp the basic idea. But for some reason, it remains difficult to understand. And I see that the difficulty lies in the methodology of justification. All this must be considered both as a mathematical system for transforming big data and as electromagnetic, algorithmically linked mathematical and physical transformations. YOU calculate, and we distribute the data. YOU calculate specific solutions, and it links all levels of process scaling. YOU take a step forward and often back. We adhere to algorithms that use only positive process extremes. We do not violate the consistency of problem solving. I apologize for the so-called AI editing. I think the meaning of what was said is clear.
        1. 0
          8 February 2026 22: 32
          We can't talk about, we can only hint at, the transformation of the dynamic flow. Because there's still no complete clarity, much less understanding, of what's going on in the region of the Planck values. Care to explain? And according to Admahl's theorem, you can't distribute data while we're calculating it. And here, the existential nature of the process function extremes is irrelevant.
          Moreover, as we discussed this personally, all this is vanity, a crush of symbols and chatter while we are considering the processes for the state of the False vacuum.
          1. 0
            8 February 2026 23: 33
            It's easy to see that you're reasoning associatively, relying on established knowledge. What kind of calculations can we even talk about if any calculation is a particular solution, and dynamic flows are an array of multi-dynamic, multi-directional, and multi-potential processes and flows in terms of energy? Therefore, I can say without judgment that humanity lacks basic knowledge about the function of a constant value of Number. And until these properties of Number are mastered, it's pointless to talk about understanding the multiplicity of processual aspects and the understanding that energy as a process cannot be realized through particular solutions, since these are always dynamic changes. Hence, it's obvious that it's possible to invent or create a single or even several extremes, but beyond that, in the inability to build algorithmically seamless processuality, they are always and universally nullified. Even such a basic, elementary device, which simply functionally replaces propellers and turbines, won't be understood by designers until they're shown it. Because initially, it's not the device that's being invented, but rather the algorithms for a process that corresponds to already known physical laws. And the device is the executor of this process.
  22. 0
    Yesterday, 09: 08
    Was 26 a successful year? Just the Indians' refusal of our oil could put an end to those dreams.
    1. 0
      Yesterday, 11: 54
      It's important to understand that the decision to refuse is based on the relative level of current circumstances and, in addition, objectively imposed requirements. But in the near future, this array of influencing circumstances will change, and so will India's decision.