A HIMARS multiple launch rocket system shelling Belgorod was destroyed by a combined strike.

23 305 55
A HIMARS multiple launch rocket system shelling Belgorod was destroyed by a combined strike.

The Ukrainian army has lost another HIMARS multiple launch rocket system; the launcher was destroyed in the Kharkiv region. According to Russian sources, this system was used to strike Belgorod.

The Russian Armed Forces launched a combined strike on Ukrainian Armed Forces positions near the village of Yurchenkovo ​​in the Kharkiv region, where a HIMARS multiple launch rocket system was located, shelling Belgorod. A crew and the command post of the 48th separate regiment were destroyed along with the system. artillery Ukrainian Armed Forces brigades and a large amount of equipment. There are no details of the strike yet, but judging by the enemy's losses, it was Rocket or FAB with UMPK, or maybe both.



A combined strike near the village of Yurchenkovo ​​destroyed a HIMARS MLRS position that had been shelling civilian targets in Belgorod. In addition to the launcher, the command post of the 48th separate artillery brigade, 14 pieces of equipment, and more than a platoon of Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel were destroyed.



A missile strike on Belgorod occurred yesterday evening. There were no casualties, but there was damage to infrastructure. Regional authorities reported that power was cut off at water intakes. Belgorod Region Governor Gladkov said the damage was severe.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces launched a missile strike on Belgorod and the Belgorod District. There are no preliminary reports of casualties. There is significant damage to infrastructure.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    4 February 2026 09: 02
    This is why high-altitude UAVs are needed, so that they can hover for days and the area 200 km from the LBS can be viewed in real time.
    1. +8
      4 February 2026 09: 05
      Altair got lost somewhere, it seems like they even built workshops for it
      1. -20
        4 February 2026 09: 07
        It's definitely on Altair)) For now, we'll get by with trampolines, the Mohajers will help us.
    2. +3
      4 February 2026 09: 20
      If you take a circle with a radius of 200 km, you get an area of ​​125,660 km. or 125,660,000,000 m2.
      Even if we take one square meter per pixel and a camera with 100,000,000 pixels, we'd still need to process more than 1000 images to cover the entire area. But then we'd also need to perform a ton of mathematical transformations on each image, since the Earth is a sphere, and the image wouldn't be perpendicular to the surface. In short, this is practically impossible today.
      1. +4
        4 February 2026 09: 37
        But what if we use not just one UAV, but, say, 10? Then the pixels will shrink and the software will harden.
        1. +1
          4 February 2026 09: 44
          One pixel per square meter is very weak. You need at least 30 cm² per pixel. That means increasing the accuracy tenfold, and reducing the 200 km to at least 20 km. Then you'll actually be able to detect something. The Orlan 10 works roughly like that now. The camera isn't 100 megapixels, but rather 12, and the IR camera is generally around 200 kilopixels.
      2. +3
        4 February 2026 10: 00
        What if we don't vacuum the space, but use the OLS system to search for launches and deploy strike weapons to them?
        1. 0
          4 February 2026 10: 46
          Quote: PROXOR
          search for launches through the OLS system

          Once launched, the missiles and shells will only be intercepted by air defense systems. And these are probabilities, with no guarantees.
          We must prevent the launches themselves! This requires not only optical reconnaissance but also synthetic aperture radar, which can detect moving objects within a radius of hundreds of kilometers. All this information can then be automatically transmitted to microwave radars or optical radars for identification, etc.
          However, mounting such reconnaissance systems on small UAVs is impossible. A heavy-duty high-altitude aircraft is needed, preferably a stratospheric aircraft like the CR-71. Preferably with a Burevestnik engine, which would provide enough power for the radar, satellite communications, possibly droppable FPV drones, and active defense systems. That would be an expensive proposition.
      3. +3
        4 February 2026 13: 24
        No one has done this for 5 years!
        The Israelis trained AI to commit genocide against Palestinians.
        The system filtered calls, text messages, social media messages, and so on. The information was transmitted to the IDF, including drone operators, and the individual was eliminated. When everyone who matched this sample was killed, the IDF howled: "No targets!" The IT guys lowered the threat recognition threshold several times. As the "kulleys" called it, the final level was: if it's a man, it's a Hamas member, and a target for a drone strike.
        This is how genocide should be carried out! Learn from the Zionofascists. Read about the Lavender system.
        What is it for?
        There's no need to look through hectares of fields and roads; the AI ​​will identify anything that even slightly resembles HiMARS, 777, or Zeoensky.
        It's a question of desire and Fabergé eggs. However, "we're not like that."
        1. -2
          4 February 2026 14: 33
          Quote: Comrade Kim
          There's no need to look through hectares of fields and roads; the AI ​​will identify anything that even slightly resembles HiMARS, 777, or Zeoensky.
          AI will certainly detect it, but only if there's anything resembling a target in the image. But if your 777 has 4 pixels, and an MLRS or radar has 12, what can you find there?
    3. +1
      4 February 2026 09: 20
      Quote: APASUS
      That's why we need high-altitude UAVs, so they can hang for days

      And how long can a heavy, sizable UAV hang at high altitude, unhindered by the enemy, in a border zone?
      1. -3
        4 February 2026 12: 11
        Quote: Montezuma
        And how long can a heavy, sizable UAV hang at high altitude, unhindered by the enemy, in a border zone?

        If we take the altitude range over 10,000 m and the distance, there are generally not very many such air defense systems. The RQ-4 Global Hawk hangs and does not enter the air defense zone.
        1. +1
          4 February 2026 12: 44
          Quote: APASUS
          If we take the altitude range over 10,000 m and the remoteness, In general, there are not many such air defense systems

          Not many, but they exist. The enemy, understanding the danger posed by an aerial observer, will certainly use every means possible to eliminate him.
          1. -1
            4 February 2026 12: 58
            Quote: Montezuma
            The enemy, understanding the danger posed by an aerial observer, will certainly use every opportunity to eliminate him.

            What should we use if we have nothing?
            1. 0
              4 February 2026 13: 05
              Quote: APASUS
              What should we use if we have nothing?

              We have something to use, but these Global Hawks fly in neutral airspace, if you mean flights over the Black Sea.
              1. 0
                4 February 2026 16: 14
                Quote: Montezuma
                We have something to use, but these Global Hawks are flying in neutral airspace.

                The synthetic payload radar of the American RQ-4 Global Hawk UAV in normal mode provides a radar image of the terrain with a resolution of 1 meter at a range of 200 kilometers. The famous Patriot (military designation MIM-104) is an American medium-range air defense and missile defense system. It is designed to defend against air attack weapons, primarily ballistic missiles.
                kommersant.ru
                Some characteristics of the complex:
                the range of the radar station (RLS) is 150 km or more, the radar can simultaneously track up to 125 targets and guide at least 5 missiles;
                range of destruction of ballistic targets is 15–22 km, maximum altitude of target destruction is 20 km;
                So, a normal reconnaissance aircraft can hang freely, or it will be necessary to bring the air defense system directly to the LBS
    4. +1
      4 February 2026 09: 47
      High-altitude UAVs won't be able to hover for days at 200 km from the LBS; they'll be shot down like Bayraktars.
    5. 0
      4 February 2026 09: 55
      It is also necessary to establish and expand satellite tracking on the ground in real time.
      1. +1
        4 February 2026 10: 12
        Quote: Kamalov
        It is also necessary to establish and expand satellite tracking on the ground in real time.

        Valuable advice, few people know about it. smile
    6. 0
      5 February 2026 17: 38
      They'll shoot it down and it won't have time to hang around for long. No one has cancelled the nomadic air defense systems.
      1. -1
        9 February 2026 08: 05
        Quote: Dost
        No one has cancelled the nomadic air defense systems

        Nomadic S-300 or Patriot, well well
        1. 0
          9 February 2026 10: 39
          Are you hearing this for the first time? That's bad. It was the Patriot who shot down the IL-76 carrying the prisoners. And there are IRIS missiles that could easily get it.
          1. 0
            9 February 2026 15: 54
            Quote: Dost
            Are you hearing this for the first time? That's bad. It was the patriots who shot down the IL-76 carrying the prisoners.

            Are you unaware of this story, or are you just pretending? The IL-76 was shot down only because our people told them the takeoff and landing times. No one was monitoring their movements and couldn't have imagined that the Ukrainian Armed Forces would strike their own prisoners.
            Quote: Dost
            There are also IRISs that can easily get it.

            Who will get it?
            It's possible they were referring to the IRIS-T SL (IRIS-T) system. It is designed to engage various airborne targets: aircraft, helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles, cruise missiles, and short-range ballistic missiles.
            RBC.ru
            Some tactical and technical characteristics of the IRIS-T SLM complex:
            The launcher weight is 14–16 tons.
            Engine power: 440 hp.
            Maximum speed on the highway - 90 km / h.
            Ammunition: 8 IRIS-T missiles.
            The maximum range of destruction - 40 km.
            The maximum height of destruction is 20 km.
            The radar range is up to 250 km.

            If the radar picks up at 200 km from Global Hawk
            1. 0
              9 February 2026 20: 05
              You probably saw our UAVs hitting Patriot replicas in the Kharkiv region. And no one's sure there weren't actual Patriots there before. And IRIS drones can operate from foreign control centers.
              1. 0
                10 February 2026 08: 20
                Quote: Dost
                And IRISES can work from someone else's control center.

                You're like from another planet. During the Civil War, there were trench lines and soldiers tossing grenades to each other. Now, thanks to UAVs, the kill zone extends up to 40 km. Where would we get air defenses? Anything moving in that zone is instantly fired upon.
  2. +2
    4 February 2026 09: 03
    A plus for ours, maybe not the biggest, but still... They shouldn't forget a medal for the Heroes.
    1. -3
      4 February 2026 10: 20
      Don't forget to give the Heroes a medal.

      Well, don't worry about that, someone at headquarters will definitely be awarded for skillful management.
      1. -3
        4 February 2026 10: 39
        Phew... I feel so relieved... I was so worried that they might forget one of the bosses...
  3. +2
    4 February 2026 09: 05
    Did they decide to intimidate Russia before the negotiations? It won't work!! Our bill will be much higher. tongue
    1. +1
      4 February 2026 10: 03
      Belgorod got it yesterday, they hit us again with drones and chemical weapons, then, when there is a massive strike on the remnants of the energy sector on the outskirts, they will start screaming.
  4. -14
    4 February 2026 09: 07
    Where's the video evidence? I remember in the fall of '22, the Ministry of Defense claimed they destroyed more Khimarsovs in a couple of weeks than were delivered to Ukraine.
    1. -11
      4 February 2026 09: 38
      According to the Ministry of Defense, more Khimari were destroyed in a couple of weeks than were supplied to Ukraine.

      But one general received a second star on his shoulder straps... crying
      1. +4
        4 February 2026 09: 54
        Do you have any proof that some general received a star for this destroyed Hymars (there is a video of the destruction) or was it a lie?
        1. -8
          4 February 2026 09: 57
          Do you have any evidence that this destroyed Haimars

          What does this have to do with Hymars, if we're talking about '22? And don't be rude; read what's written, not what you're imagining.
          1. +2
            4 February 2026 10: 00
            You've made things up and you have to make up excuses. No need for words, just provide evidence to support your words about the general.
    2. +1
      4 February 2026 09: 51
      Quote: belost79
      Where is the video evidence?

      Don't worry, there will be video too. Reliable Telegram channels "Two Majors" and "Belarusian Security Force" confirm:
      In the Kharkiv direction, a strike near the village of Yurchenkovo ​​hit a position of an American Hymars MLRS, which had been shelling civilian targets in Belgorod.
    3. +3
      4 February 2026 09: 52
      There's a video on LostAmore and Telegram.
      And why did you assume that the number of delivered Heimars is true and could not have been greater?
      1. 0
        4 February 2026 12: 12
        There's a video on LostAmore and Telegram.
        I couldn't find a video of this destruction anywhere; could you please send me a link? As for the number of Khim-Mars systems officially delivered to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the possible concealment of the actual number, that's unlikely. Around forty were sent at the time, and that seems to be true; there weren't that many systems.
        1. +1
          4 February 2026 12: 18
          I don't know how to find links, you need to look at the SVO discussion from yesterday

          The West always lies, they send new ones to replace the destroyed ones and don't indicate anything, this seems to be the truth
    4. +1
      4 February 2026 13: 20
      Quote: belost79
      I remember in the fall of 22, according to the Ministry of Defense, more Khimars were destroyed in a couple of weeks than were supplied to Ukraine.

      You don't remember because it didn't happen.
      At worst, you might remember the article on VO, where the author painstakingly tried to prove your point. It turned out so-so, but alas, the turbo-patriots liked it.
  5. +3
    4 February 2026 09: 10
    ❝ The HIMARS MLRS shelling Belgorod was destroyed by a combined strike ❞ —

    — It would be better, of course, before that, but this is also good...
    (Work, brothers!)
  6. -3
    4 February 2026 09: 21
    Why can't we track it in advance?
    1. +2
      4 February 2026 09: 26
      Because there are no technical capabilities. It's good that at least we were able to identify those who had already fired. I hope this is true.
      1. +5
        4 February 2026 09: 56
        No country in the world, including the United States, can track everything over such a large territory; this kind of thing only happens in American films.
        It's true, there's a video on Telegram and on LostAmore, and recently there's been a video of several Hymars being destroyed.
      2. -3
        4 February 2026 10: 08
        They identified some of the people who fired, then after that destruction, they fired on Belgorod again, again with Khimari rockets. I have a feeling the Ukrainian Armed Forces aren't running out of them. Two days ago, three Khimari rockets were destroyed, then another one, and now this one from the 48th Separate Artillery Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    2. +2
      4 February 2026 09: 54
      Quote: nikvp
      Why can't we track it in advance?

      Please suggest a reliable way to monitor all objects over a vast area 24/7. I'm sure you'll give our military some valuable advice.
      1. +1
        4 February 2026 11: 08
        I've noticed that recently many people don't understand the difference in scale between real-life territories and those depicted on maps. Just let them go out into the field and look from horizon to horizon to get at least some idea of ​​reality.
      2. +1
        4 February 2026 11: 50
        It's impossible to monitor everything 24/7, but some things were used.
        In Vietnam, the Americans deployed seismic sensors along the Ho Chi Minh Trail. They were effective against vehicles, but the conditions were practically a test site. This approach won't work in the Northeast Military District. The territory is vast, there are too many roads, and the radar is always on the alert...
  7. +1
    4 February 2026 09: 29
    It is no news that a lot depends on the quality and effectiveness of intelligence work.
    We have a wide variety of striking weapons available, you just need to pinpoint the target, and then it's a matter of technique, as they say! soldier
    1. +1
      4 February 2026 10: 13
      We have to monitor and analyze 24/7; we have to keep up with everything. This is especially true in the Sumy, Kharkiv, and Chernihiv regions, of course. We've pretty much eliminated these chemists, but new ones still pop up and wreak havoc, like what happened yesterday in Belgorod's energy sector.
  8. +3
    4 February 2026 09: 48
    Objective control. Don't turn on the sound; this isn't music, but a collection of sounds.



    🥷According to information from the source:
    Reconnaissance personnel discovered a large concentration of Ukrainian Armed Forces in a forest belt near a village. Analysis of the position revealed a HIMARS multiple launch rocket system, which was immediately attacked. The first missile engulfed the MLRS with submunitions, while the second missile precisely destroyed the command post and nearby vehicles. UAVs then used their power to finish off the remaining vehicles nearby.
  9. +2
    4 February 2026 10: 00
    Very, very good! Belgorod residents: hang in there!
  10. +2
    4 February 2026 10: 19
    An excellent performance by our military! One can only wish for one thing: that they strike the enemy beforehand, not after their crimes. It's good that none of our men were hurt this time.
  11. -2
    4 February 2026 11: 04
    Without proof it's impossible, Kanashenkov won't let you lie
  12. -2
    4 February 2026 13: 41
    Do gentlemen take the word? winked