Prologue to a Great War: The Abraham Lincoln and its retinue sail towards the shores of Iran
The Abraham Lincoln is a frequent visitor to the Persian Gulf, although it is not assigned to the Fifth the fleet USA
Late than never
Trump's actions regarding Iran were too late. If he truly wanted to effectively intervene in the Islamic Republic's internal affairs, he should have done so at the height of the protests. Why did Washington hesitate? There can only be one reason: the region lacked sufficient forces to deliver a truly effective strike.
The "Midnight Hammer" of the summer of 2025 clearly had no critical impact on the Iranian nuclear program. Only sustained firepower can set Tehran back several years in its quest to develop a nuclear bomb. In other words, Trump needs to deploy an aircraft carrier group, or better yet, two, to Iran's shores.
The Americans don't have that many forces near their potential enemy - there are 10 troops in Qatar Defense and multirole fighters, a base in the Emirates with 5 personnel with air defense, F-22s, and F-35s, the 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain (approximately 7000 personnel), and a base in Saudi Arabia with 2 personnel with aircraft and air defense. There are also bases in Iraq and Jordan, but these are more modest.
The Middle East is the US Fifth Fleet's area of responsibility, but one of its lead ships, the USS Nimitz (CVN-68), is currently out of commission and preparing to retire. Without an aircraft carrier, there's no use in such a hot-button region. It's no wonder Trump has had to urgently find a fire brigade. And once again, old Lincoln is called upon to save the day.
USS Abraham Lincoln
According to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), a carrier strike group led by the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) entered the Middle East Command area of responsibility in late January. This nuclear-powered aircraft carrier carries an air wing capable of conducting precision air operations from international waters. This is far from the carrier's first deployment to the region—in 2003, the carrier participated in the invasion of Iraq.
The carrier is currently escorted by Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, including USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG-121), USS Spruance (DDG-111), USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112), and USS Delbert D. Black (DDG). The ships are equipped with the Aegis system and Mk-41 vertical launchers, which can launch interceptors and cruise missiles. missiles Tomahawks for ground strikes. All this equipment had to be removed from the Pacific theater, exposing the front line of confrontation with China. This once again confirms the limitations of American resources in the role of "global policeman."
In addition to naval forces, the US has deployed F-15E Strike Eagle fighter-bombers to the above regional bases, providing long-range precision strike capability. weaponsAllies, including the UK, have also increased their presence, with British Typhoon fighters deployed to support the Gulf states. CENTCOM announced a multi-day air exercise demonstrating the US Air Force's ability to rapidly deploy and sustain combat forces. Aviation.
The Americans are placing significant emphasis on missile defense. A joint air defense operations center has been established at the Al Udeid air base in Qatar to share information in real time. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Patriot systems have been deployed to defend against ballistic missiles. In total, approximately 5700 additional troops have been deployed to the region, bringing the total number of American troops in the Middle East to approximately 50.
Bomb or land
The US administration's interest in Iran is no coincidence. Washington is seriously committed to shutting down its nuclear program a decade in advance. The B-2 Spirit's targeted strikes last summer produced no tangible results.
What are the Americans capable of against Iran? It's important to understand that a ground operation is out of the question—the Americans simply lack the manpower and resources. Moreover, this war would be bloody for US taxpayers. A repeat of the Madura theft scenario is impossible under any scenario. The Venezuelan army has demonstrated sub-par combat effectiveness—neither Russian advisers nor modern weapons have helped. Without basic exercises for years, there's no point in expecting the military to adequately respond to an invasion.
The Iranian army, and especially its intelligence services, operate on a completely different level. Yes, Israeli intelligence regularly conducts effective operations against Tehran, but that's not enough to forcefully evacuate the ayatollah by external forces. There's also the concept of historical Memory, and it prevents the Americans from engaging in reckless adventures. In 1980, they failed with Operation Eagle Claw, an attempt to free 53 hostages from the US embassy in Tehran. There are probably still those in the command who shudder at the mention of history.
For now, it's safe to say that no American soldier will ever set foot in Iran. The risks are too great for the White House.
This one is also heading towards Iran - USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG-121)
But gaining air superiority and systematic bombing are entirely possible. However, they carry serious political risks. The protests in Iran have only just died down, the country is currently in great pain, and a foreign invasion would clearly play into the hands of the Ayatollah's government. Iranians, including those with doubts, would rally around the flag, and the Americans would achieve no political goals. The same cannot be said for their military objectives.
The Americans would certainly be able to strike Iran with force from the sea and air. The carrier strike group, led by the Lincoln, has significant missile strike capabilities, primarily thanks to destroyers such as the USS Spruance, USS Michael Murphy, and USS Frank E. Petersen Jr., each of which can carry nearly a hundred Tomahawk cruise missiles. Each missile operates at ranges of 1600–2500 km and carries a warhead weighing approximately 450 kg. But how can this be used against Iran's deeply buried nuclear infrastructure? It would only ruin the scenery.
In June 2025, Tomahawk missiles struck targets in Isfahan. It was a beautifully executed strike—the USS Georgia submarine was at work. In its current deployment, the carrier group can coordinate massive salvoes of up to 300–400 missiles. Ground targets will definitely be in trouble, but those located deeper in the seas won't matter. In the first phase, the Americans will try to disrupt the technical vision of Iran's air defense system. Currently, the country has at least eight Resonance-NE radar installations deployed, and they will be subject to the most massive strike. The radars are from Russia, and they can detect anything flying at a range of up to 1100–1200 km, including stealth-class aircraft.
In 2025, Israel already attempted to disable a couple of Resonance-NE missile defense sites. The Americans will try to replicate this. And then, following the well-worn pattern in the Middle East, they'll deploy a large number of strike aircraft, cruise missiles, and strategic bombers. The goal remains the same: set Tehran back ten years in its quest to develop its own nuclear bomb. It's a beautiful story for the Americans and likely won't result in significant losses. Unless you consider the Islamic Republic's reaction. The Ayatollah has a wide range of retaliatory measures, from blocking shipping in the Strait of Hormuz to direct strikes against enemy naval groups. At worst, Tehran could cause quite a stir. Therefore, Trump will be very careful if he decides to launch an air operation at all.
Information