Operation Starvation: US Military Strategy Against Japan in 1945

5 058 22
Operation Starvation: US Military Strategy Against Japan in 1945

In July 1944, Admiral fleet Chester Nimitz, Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, submitted a plan to mine Japan's internal waters to the U.S. Army, which met with strong resistance. On November 7, Nimitz wrote to Major General Henry Harley Arnold, Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Army Air Forces, proposing that B-29s begin mining Japan's internal waters beginning January 1, 1945. Arnold believed that bombing and blockade could force Japan to surrender without a direct invasion.

On December 22, 1944, Arnold ordered Brigadier General Haywood Hansell, commander of the 21st Bomber Command, to prepare troops for minelaying. However, Arnold was dissatisfied with Hansell and replaced him with General Curtis Lee Mei on January 20, 1945. Lee Mei supported the minelaying idea and, six days after taking office, wrote a letter to Washington outlining a plan to use the 313th Bombardment Wing on Tinian to deliver 1500 mines per month. Training of aerial minelaying crews began in February 1945.



Most historians believe that the complete blockade of Japan was made possible in large part by the exemplary cooperation between Lee Mey and Nimitz.

Joint Chiefs of Staff meeting and its results


In July 1944, President Franklin Roosevelt traveled to Hawaii to meet with General Douglas MacArthur and Admiral Chester Nimitz, his commanders-in-chief in the Pacific theater. MacArthur and Nimitz shared many views. They believed Japan could be defeated through a blockade and bombing campaign, without a costly invasion of the Japanese home islands.

Indeed, Japan was heavily dependent on maritime transport of vital goods (oil, food) – approximately 75% of domestic shipping was carried out via coastal and inland waterways. A successful blockade would have brought industry to a virtual standstill, and a significant portion of the population would have been pushed to the brink of starvation.

However, Army Chief of Staff General George Marshall disagreed with MacArthur and Nimitz and was the main proponent of the invasion of Japan, believing it inevitable. As a result, the Joint Chiefs of Staff were unable to reach a unified position on the war aims against Japan.

The final declaration stated that the first objective was to force Japan into unconditional surrender by weakening its ability and will to resist through the establishment of a naval and air blockade, intensive aerial bombardment, and the destruction of the Japanese Air Force. The second objective was to invade and seize important industrial facilities in Japan.

All the commanders, with the exception of the Marshal, believed that the Navy and Air Force could achieve Japan's unconditional surrender without invading the Japanese home islands. A naval blockade was seen as part of this strategy.

The main objectives of Operation Hunger



The primary goal of Operation Starvation was to prevent the import of raw materials and food into Japan and disrupt shipping in the Seto Inland Sea (specifically, blockading the Shimonoseki Strait, through which 80% of Japan's merchant fleet passed). The Americans also planned to blockade the industrial and commercial ports of Tokyo and Nagoya, as well as disrupt shipping between Korea and Japan by mining Korean ports.

Operation Starvation was a strategic campaign, but it also served a tactical purpose: to support the invasion of Okinawa, which was scheduled to begin on April 1, 1945.

As an island nation dependent on external sources of oil, raw materials, and food, Japan was particularly vulnerable to mine warfare. General Li Mei was far more enthusiastic about using B-29 mine-laying aircraft than his predecessor. General Li Mei devoted all his efforts to Operation Starvation, increasing the number of mines dropped per month and devoting an entire air wing to this task.

A total of 105 B-29 aircraft were planned for the mission. Three of these aircraft failed to take off, and five returned without laying mines in the primary or secondary zones. Ninety-two aircraft laid mines in the primary zones. A total of 549 MK 26 and MK 36 mines and 276 MK 25 mines were dropped.

During the second sortie on the night of March 30, 85 aircraft of the 313th Air Wing laid a minefield and blocked the approaches to Sasebo, as well as the southern approaches to Kure and Hiroshima.

The Japanese were forced to devote significant resources to countering the mine campaign. A visual mine-detection system was established along the coast and on fishing vessels. Radar, searchlights, and underwater sound equipment were used to search for mines. The Japanese deployed 349 vessels and 20,000 personnel for mine clearance.

How appropriate was it to use nuclear weapons?


General Arnold put intense pressure on General Li Mei to find a way to make strategic bombing effective in the Pacific. Li Mei accepted Arnold's challenge and radically changed bombing tactics, targeting entire Japanese population centers rather than specific factories. Political leaders and high command delegated authority to the field commander, placing responsibility for this fundamental shift in US bombing policy on his shoulders.

Low-altitude incendiary bombings and a devastating campaign of mine-laying along Japan's inland waterways so severely undermined Japan's military production that it virtually ceased to exist by mid-1945. Furthermore, it was Li Mei who commanded the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

As a rule, statements about the bombings are tied to the question of whether or not it was necessary to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. What motives prompted the US President to order the use of the atomic bomb? weapons Against a country whose capitulation was only a matter of time? According to the official position of the US military leadership in August 1945, the primary motive was that a land landing on the Japanese islands of Kyushu and Honshu would have resulted in extremely high American losses.

However, if the US military leadership truly wanted to avoid losses by employing the latest weapons, the most logical, simple, and strategically justified course of action would have been to use them on Bougainville Island (part of the Australian Mandate of New Guinea), where trench warfare had continued since November 1943. Despite a 15-to-1 superiority of Allied forces, the island had not been completely cleared of Japanese forces by August 1945. If the Americans had been concerned about the island's status as an Australian ally, they could have used atomic weapons against any of the small Pacific islands that were part of the empire but had no civilian population.

The most eloquent evidence against the need to use atomic weapons in 1945 comes from statements by high-ranking US military officials who were directly involved in the events.

The Japanese had already effectively sued for peace. The atomic bomb did not play a decisive role, from a purely military standpoint, in Japan's defeat.
– said Admiral of the US Navy Ch. Nimitz.

The use of atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki had no significant impact on the course of the war against Japan. The Japanese had already been defeated and were ready to surrender thanks to an effective naval blockade and successful conventional bombing. The future lethal potential of atomic weapons appears terrifying. By being the first to use them, we adopted the ethical standards of medieval barbarians. I was not trained to wage war in this manner, and wars cannot be won by exterminating women and children.
- this is the opinion of Admiral William Leahy.

Nevertheless, political factors must be taken into account: by using atomic weapons against Hiroshima, the United States was demonstrating their destructive power, primarily to the Soviet Union. And the target was not chosen at random; a small island in the Pacific Ocean was unsuitable, as the scale of destruction is most clearly demonstrated in a city that was virtually unbombed during the war.

Conclusion


During the war, mines sank or damaged more than 2 million tons of enemy shipping, representing nearly a quarter of Japan's pre-war merchant fleet. A total of approximately 12,000 mines were laid. In the five months before the end of hostilities, mines sank or damaged more ships than any other means, including submarines and direct air strikes. The Strait of Shimonoseki and its most important industrial ports were almost completely blockaded.

On June 22, 1945, at a meeting of the Supreme War Council, Emperor Hirohito of Japan said what other officials were reluctant or afraid to say out loud: Japan must find a way to end the war. It was a difficult time. Swarms of American bombers were reducing major Japanese cities to ashes. The stifling blockade was leading to a complete halt in military production. The country was threatened by famine.

In May, Germany's surrender dashed Japan's last hopes of receiving a life-saving weapon from Germany and freed the combined Allied forces to conduct operations against Japan. Okinawa, Japan's last outpost, was already in American hands.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    7 February 2026 06: 10
    By using atomic weapons against Hiroshima, the United States demonstrated their destructive power, first and foremost, to the Soviet Union.

    Time has passed, and the Japanese leadership is trying to make the Japanese think that it was not America, but the Soviet Union, that dropped the atomic bombs.
    More and more Japanese youth already think this way, and in another fifty years this will become “true” for all age groups in Japan.
  2. -3
    7 February 2026 07: 16
    My God, how much longer can we chew on the cactus about the bombing of Hirosaki?! The bombing of Japan was discussed at the General Staff Council exactly once—after the carpet bombing of Tokyo. The Japanese simply never discussed Hiroshima and Nagasaki; those bombings had virtually no effect—absolutely no different from the destruction of Tokyo itself.
    It is an ironclad FACT that nuclear bombs did NOT influence the development of the situation in any way.
    1. 0
      8 February 2026 20: 19
      However, Japan surrendered almost immediately after the atomic bombing. This means the use of nuclear weapons had a positive effect on ending the war.
      1. -1
        8 February 2026 20: 46
        The only reason was the defeat of the Kwantung Army, since the General Staff's plans, at the start of the fighting in the Metropolis, called for the evacuation of the Mikado to the mainland and continued resistance. And given the complete unsuitability of the mattresses for land combat, this made perfect sense.
    2. +1
      10 February 2026 11: 35
      Quote: Foggy Dew
      The Japanese simply never discussed Hiroshima and Nagasaki; these bombings had a near-zero effect - absolutely no different from the destruction of Tokyo.

      But the Japanese themselves write something completely different: for them, the entry of the USSR into the war and the two atomic bombings were events of the same order - reasons for capitulation.
      The first cabinet meeting with a peace agenda. 14:30 PM. On August 9, the first emergency cabinet meeting opened to decide whether to immediately sue for peace or continue the war. Following Prime Minister Suzuki's opening remarks, Foreign Minister Togo spoke first. He reported on efforts to end the war through Soviet mediation, described the situation created by the USSR's entry into the war, and reported on information regarding the atomic bomb. The prime minister then invited cabinet members to speak on the issues raised.
      In his speech, War Minister Anami declared that "the terms of unconditional surrender are intolerable. Of course, given factors such as the enemy's possession of the atomic bomb and the USSR's entry into the war, we can hardly hope for victory. But as long as the great Japanese nation continues to fight for its dignity, it has some chance. The disarmament of the Japanese army must not be allowed. In fact, we have no choice but to continue the war..."

      Meeting on August 10.
      (…)
      Foreign Minister Togo then spoke, explaining the rationale behind his proposal. It is difficult and shameful for Japan to accept the declaration's terms, but in the current situation, it is inevitable. This is the cabinet's conclusion. The development of the atomic bomb and the Soviet Union's entry into the war have strengthened our adversaries' positions. Consequently, we have no hope of softening the terms through negotiations. Given the Soviet Union's entry into the war, we cannot put forward too many conditions, as this will lead to their complete rejection. We must put forward only one condition: ensuring the tranquility of the imperial family.
      © Hattori Takushiro

      And yes, the first bomb and the USSR's entry into the war weren't enough for the Japanese leadership to accept the terms of the Potsdam Declaration. Only the second bomb resulted in the final decision being handed over to the Emperor, who approved the surrender.
  3. +12
    7 February 2026 07: 24
    It is strange that the war against Japanese shipping has, for some unknown reason, been a seriously underrated part of the history of the war, because The Americans, in essence, managed to do with Japan what Germany, on the other side of our globe, failed to do with Britain! By the end of the war, virtually all Japanese merchant ships had been sunk or disabled, and food shortages had brought the country to the brink of outright starvation, undermining the war effort and destroying the social fabric of Japanese society.

    Even fish, historically an important part of the Japanese diet, became difficult to obtain, as fishing vessels were either sunk, moored due to oil shortages, or the risk of being struck by mines. This led to the black market becoming the primary source of food for a significant portion of the Japanese population.

    But that's not all!

    Due to the deteriorating food situation, absenteeism in factories began to rise, something unprecedented in Japan, largely because workers went to the countryside to barter for food. By the end of the war, absenteeism in major Japanese cities had reached approximately 50 percent. Continuing with the theme of something unprecedented in Japan, one can also recall the emergence of a new class, the so-called "industrial class." vegetable thieves, after the appearance of which a new article was even introduced into the Japanese criminal code - robbery of fields!
  4. +3
    7 February 2026 07: 57
    "Most of us are still convinced that Japan capitulated because the Americans dropped two atomic bombs of enormous destructive power.

    However, military events in the Japanese-American War before the dropping of the atomic bombs were no less inhumane and bloody. In the summer of 1945, the US Air Force carried out one of the most intensive urban destruction campaigns in world history. Sixty-eight cities in Japan were bombed, and all were partially or completely destroyed. Approximately 1,7 million people were left homeless, 300000 people were killed, and 750000 were injured. Three weeks before Hiroshima, the US Air Force raided 26 cities. Of these, eight (almost a third) were either completely destroyed or more severely damaged than Hiroshima (if you count the proportion of cities destroyed). The fact that 68 cities were destroyed in Japan in the summer of 1945 creates a serious obstacle for those who want to show that the bombing of Hiroshima was the cause of Japan's surrender. The question arises: if they capitulated because of the destruction of one city, then why did they not capitulate when 66 other cities were destroyed?

    The bombing of Tokyo killed approximately 120000 people.
    1. +4
      7 February 2026 08: 10
      The destruction of Hiroshima had no effect on the troops' readiness for stubborn defense on the shores of their home islands.
      Japan was expecting an American invasion.
      However, the effect of the Soviet Union's declaration of war and its invasion of Manchuria and Sakhalin Island was quite different. It was impossible to repel an attack by two great powers advancing from two different directions. The Soviet offensive nullified the military strategy of a decisive battle, just as it had previously devalued diplomatic strategy. The Soviet offensive was strategically decisive because it deprived Japan of both options. The bombing of Hiroshima, however, was not decisive (because it did not eliminate any Japanese options).
      At a meeting of the Supreme Council in June 1945, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Japanese Army Kawabe declared: “Maintaining peace in our relations with the Soviet Union is an indispensable condition for continuing the war.”
      1. +9
        7 February 2026 08: 16
        A convenient option for the emperor's capitulation.
        The people will be shocked to learn of surrender. So what do you do? Admit that you have failed completely? To make a statement that you have seriously miscalculated, made mistakes and caused enormous damage to your nation? Or explain the defeat by amazing scientific achievements that no one could predict? If you lay the blame for the defeat on the atomic bomb, then all the mistakes and military miscalculations can be replaced under the carpet. A bomb is the perfect excuse for losing a war. There is no need to look for the guilty, no need to conduct investigations and courts. Japanese leaders will be able to say that they did everything possible.
        Thus, by and large, the atomic bomb helped remove the blame from Japanese leaders.
        1. +4
          7 February 2026 08: 59
          The Emperor stated that Japan relied too heavily on the samurai spirit and overlooked science. A perfectly valid reason for defeat. We did everything we could, but we missed one small detail.
          1. 0
            8 February 2026 21: 05
            You have overlooked an important detail: before the war, Japan was not a democracy and the government did not take into account the opinions of ordinary Japanese people.
            1. -1
              10 February 2026 07: 41
              Quote: Alexey Lantukh
              You have overlooked an important detail: before the war, Japan was not a democracy and the government did not take into account the opinions of ordinary Japanese people.

              In which country was the people's opinion taken into account? Was a referendum required?
    2. +5
      7 February 2026 09: 22
      Quote: bubalik
      The question arises: if they capitulated because of the destruction of one city, then why did they not capitulate when 66 other cities were destroyed?

      They capitulated after the destruction of 68 cities, two of which were destroyed by one plane with one bomb - there is reason to think... Plus what is stated in the article
  5. +4
    7 February 2026 09: 29
    З
    And in the five months leading up to the end of hostilities, mines sank or damaged more ships than any other means, including submarines and direct air strikes. The Shimonoseki Strait and key industrial ports were almost completely blockaded.

    Hunger is a very good sobering factor.

    The blockade also led to Japan's defeat. A wise decision that saved soldiers' lives.

    Likewise, the naval blockade of Germany in WWI led to mass starvation and mass deaths and the defeat of Germany.
    1. 0
      7 February 2026 15: 14
      Quote: Olgovich
      Likewise, the naval blockade of Germany in WWI led to mass starvation and mass deaths and the defeat of Germany.

      In 1917, Germany occupied the Baltics, Poland, and Ukraine, providing itself with grain, meat, and butter for 1918-1919. Germany's defeat in World War I was caused by clumsy attempts to draw Mexico into the war against the United States, which provoked the United States to enter the war on the side of the Entente. Germany was unable to withdraw troops from the Western Front and provide German divisions and artillery to Turkey, Bulgaria, and Austria-Hungary. Austria-Hungary's defeat reduced German forces by half and made possible an invasion of Germany from the Czech Republic, where there was no fortified line. The Germans simply had no means of covering the new front line from the Black Sea to Switzerland, and the density of their defenses was reduced by more than half. Japan's food and fuel shortages in World War II were largely due to its poor science and technology. Japan was unable to find oil in occupied Manchuria or build refineries in Burma and Indonesia to refuel its ships and aircraft with shorter supply routes. In general, trying to win a conflict by skimping on science and technological development at the expense of greater bloodshed and the deprivation of the people is a disastrous idea. Stalin starved the population, but he invested not in landscaping central Moscow with tropical plants in barrels and theaters, but in science and technology.
      1. -3
        7 February 2026 18: 50
        Quote: gsev
        In 1917, Germany occupied the Baltics, Poland and Ukraine, providing itself with grain, meat and butter for 1918-1919.

        This is a trifle compared to the need - they died in 16, 17, 18, 19 - even after November 1918, until the blockade was lifted.
        Quote: gsev
        Stalin starved the population, but invested money not in greening the center of Moscow with tropical plants in barrels and theaters, but in science and technology.

        wild economic losses from collective farming, millions of deaths, millions of camps and exiles - where did he invest?
        1. -3
          7 February 2026 20: 20
          Oh, the prophetic rooster has crowed about collectivization, camps and famine, the scoundrel.
        2. -1
          8 February 2026 11: 56
          Quote: Olgovich
          where did he invest?

          Machine tool manufacturing, aircraft engine manufacturing, bearing production, and tractor manufacturing. After the capitalists came to power, they lost all of this within 10 years. In Russia, the human losses among the indigenous population since 1991 are greater than those from collectivization, World War II, and the famine. Muslims now make up a third of Russia's population under 25.
          1. 0
            9 February 2026 13: 44
            Quote: gsev
            Machine tool manufacturing, aircraft engine manufacturing, bearing production, tractor manufacturing

            How can losses be...invested?
            Quote: gsev
            Once the capitalists came to power, they lost all of this within 10 years.

            such is the "value"
            Quote: gsev
            In Russia, the human losses of the indigenous population after 1991 are higher than from collectivization,

            A THIRD of Russia's regions were dying out in 1990 - all originally Russian - these are the "achievements" of the Bolsheviks
            Quote: gsev
            A third of Russia's population under 25 is now Muslim.

            The population of Tajikistan, under the caring Bolsheviks, grew sixfold. Have you already forgotten who died on the construction sites of the communist power plants, in logging camps, who endured the most brutal collective farming, oppression, and extortion?
            So remember.
  6. +2
    7 February 2026 10: 44
    In the five months before the end of hostilities, mines sank or damaged more ships than any other means, including submarines and direct air strikes.

    American submarines, surface ships, and aircraft sank 2398 Japanese ships with a total tonnage of 8,839,745 tons. About 300 of these were warships.

    515 ships with a total tonnage of 689,136 tons were sunk by mines laid by submarines and dropped from aircraft.
    The Most Dangerous Sea: Mine Warfare During World War II
    Arnold Lott
  7. +4
    7 February 2026 12: 01
    So, in response to the seizure of our ships, we also need to mine the ports of the country that carried out the seizure. And we can do this without air power: the USSR had self-propelled mines, and maybe they still have them.
    1. ANB
      +1
      7 February 2026 15: 20
      Maybe they still exist

      Well, practically all the naval arsenals remained in Russia. So where would they go? Perhaps they were decommissioned due to age. It wouldn't be hard to make new ones.