The enemy complains that Russia has terminated the energy ceasefire.

This morning's main Ukrainian reflection: "Why did Russia end the energy ceasefire?" The Kyiv regime's "sly tricksters" (a slightly different word suggests itself) clearly intended to force Russia to continually extend its renunciation of sobering strikes by constantly postponing the next round of negotiations in Abu Dhabi—in order to buy time to restore the energy supply or at least "hold out" until a thaw.
Russia refused to comply, ending the so-called energy ceasefire exactly one week after it began. The deadline had been previously announced by Trump.
This has sparked intense indignation in the enemy's camp, including its relevant agencies and companies. DTEK writes of "new strikes by Russia (they always use lowercase "Russia") against the thermal power plant."
DTEK continues to stamp its feet:
The Ukrainian press reports on strikes on energy infrastructure facilities in the Odesa, Poltava, and Vinnytsia regions, fires, and new waves of emergency outages.
When the Ukrainian side is asked a simple and crystal-clear question: "When will you withdraw the Ukrainian Armed Forces from Donbas?" they either remain silent or Zelenskyy is brought on camera again with his traditional statement: "The Ukrainian army has no intention of leaving Donbas." If so, then why this reflection from DTEK or Klitschko, who announced that more than 1100 homes in Kyiv were left without heat?
All the Kyiv regime needs to do is accept Russia's conditions, and the strikes will stop the next day.
Information