Do Indian gods like the number 3?

13 406 52
Do Indian gods like the number 3?

"Avoid matters that depend on others; strive only for what depends on yourself."
An old Indian proverb


Oddly enough, this Indian proverb is directly relevant to what's happening in the Russian-Indian arena. And a lot is happening there.



Indian company Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) signed a memorandum of understanding with UAC for the production of the SJ-100 regional jet, designed for nearly 100 passengers, in India. aviation The UAC giant also signed an agreement to supply six Il-114-300 aircraft to the Indian company Flamingo Aerospace.

That's not bad, but a memorandum isn't a firm contract. It's like a dialogue: "Will you sell it to us if we want to buy it?" "Yes, we will," but nothing more. Especially since, as always, we're not talking about buying 100 aircraft, but about licensed production, something everyone in India is passionate about.

But all this is civilian, while our review is military, so we're more interested in the Indian dances around Russian weapons. And here, too, it's interesting, since the Indians are starting to show interest in the Su-57, which is understandable: after snatching the Rafale from the Chinese and Pakistani MiG-21s in a new package, something really needs to be done!

India's aircraft situation, to put it mildly, smells like rancid curry, and nothing can replace it. The Rafale deal was a complete failure, especially since the French have completely ruined all of India's plans for domestic assembly. The Americans won't even sell the Texan II on India's terms, let alone more advanced aircraft. But they'll sell Pakistan everything China has, from the MiG-21/JF-17 to the J-35 and beyond. And all India has is the Su-30MKI. The JF-17 is more than enough to counter the J-35, but I'm not so sure about the J-35. It could end up like the Rafale.

A truly new frontier is needed, and the Su-57, a fifth-generation aircraft with the world's most extensive combat experience despite a relatively small production run, could very well provide that. Russia and India currently cooperate closely on air defense systems such as the S-400 and missiles BrahMos, which is a world-class military product. But both BrahMos and the S-400 are a thing of the past, no matter how you look at it.

India is a developing economic powerhouse that, let's not rule it out, could soon become the world's third-largest economy, the country with the largest population, and one of the largest markets. It's not without its challenges, including two nuclear-armed neighbors. weapons.

It should be noted that, although historically all conflicts on the Indo-Pakistani border have been unleashed by Pakistan, this does India some credit, but does not relieve the Indian armed forces of the obligation to be prepared to repel any attacks.

As India continues to reduce its dependence on Russian weapons, while simultaneously reducing its military effectiveness, it makes sense to think about new horizons, as India and Russia still have the potential for close cooperation in the field of arms, especially in missiles and aviation.

Yes, Russia can provide the technology, and India can create a manufacturing hub using its relatively skilled local workforce, software, private sector resources, financing, and best business practices.


It is true that one cannot be sure about business practices, because, despite their presence in India, the Indian-made T-72 is considerably more expensive than the Russian one. tank, and we won’t even mention the Su-30MKI in comparison with the Su-30SM, because we simply don’t understand where such a cost comes from.

More precisely, there is understanding, there is no evidence, but we don’t really need it; after all, these are Indian problems.

Many experts in India say production could be carried out for Russia and India, as well as other countries around the world. Incidentally, this poses a rather unpleasant issue for us, which we'll discuss below.

Let's look back history.

Relations between India and the Soviet Union, and now Russia, have been time-tested since India's independence in 1947.


In 1951, the USSR exercised its veto over the Kashmir dispute in support of India. The Soviet Union declared its neutrality during the 1959 border conflict and the Sino-Indian War of October 1962, despite China's strong objections.

The Soviet Union provided India with significant economic and military aid, and by 1960, India received more aid from the USSR than China. This, of course, led to a shift in relations, and China began to distance itself from the USSR.


In 1962, the Soviet Union agreed to transfer MiG-21 jet fighter production technology to India, a request previously denied to China. The Soviet Union helped India build factories to produce aircraft, engines, and avionics, ultimately resulting in the production of 800 aircraft for the Indian Air Force.


In 1965, the Soviet Union mediated peace talks between India and Pakistan after the war. India's relations with the Soviet Union developed strategically, and in 1971, the Indo-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation was signed.

During the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 for the liberation of Bangladesh, the Soviet Union supported India despite pressure from the United States and China.

During the Cold War, India and the USSR maintained a "special and privileged strategic partnership" built on five pillars: politics, defense, civil nuclear energy, counter-terrorism cooperation, and space.

Even after the collapse of the Soviet Union, India maintained warm relations with Russia's successor state. India is one of the largest markets for the Russian defense industry. Today, approximately 60% of India's military equipment is manufactured in Russia. Military equipment supplies and, more recently, the establishment of joint ventures have become key areas of cooperation.

But in the 1960s, the "Make in India" program began. The Soviet Union was the first to support the "Make in India" program in defense production. MiG-21 production plants, opened in the early 60s, later produced the MiG-27 (170 units) and Su-30MKI (230 units). The Su-30MKI was a joint research and development project.

Since 2004, 222 Su-30 MKIs have been produced under license at the HAL Nashik plant. Approximately 920 AL-31FP turbofan engines have been manufactured at the HAL Koraput plant.


In 1965, with Soviet assistance, the Heavy Vehicles Plant (HVPP) was established in Avadi, Chennai. HVPP produced the Russian-designed T-72 Ajun and T-90 Bhishma tanks.

In September 1965, the Soviet Union and India signed their first contract for the supply of naval equipment, including four Project 641 diesel-electric submarines, five Project 159E corvettes, and five Project 368P motorboats. The agreement also provided for Soviet technical assistance in the construction of a submarine naval base in Visakhapatnam.

Russia recently built two frigates, INS Tushil and INS Tamala, at the Yantar shipyard, and two more frigates are being built at the Goa Shipyard Ltd (GSL) in India using technology transferred from Russia.

By 2027, GSL will also build 24 river-sea cargo vessels for Russian customers in the Caspian Sea. Collaboration with India in shipbuilding is beneficial for Russia, as the cost per vessel is projected to be half that of Russian shipbuilders.

And joint projects shouldn't be forgotten. BrahMos Aerospace is a joint venture between India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and Russia's NPO Mashinostroyeniye.


Then there is the joint venture Indo-Russian Rifles Private Limited (IRRPL), which has secured a Rs 5,000 crore (approximately US$550 million) contract to supply over 610,000 AK-203 assault rifles to the Indian Army.


Indian companies hold a controlling stake of 50,5%, while Russian companies hold 49,5%. The level of local content has already reached 50% and continues to grow rapidly, with plans to reach 100% in the near future. How this will impact quality remains to be seen, but nonetheless, Kalashnikovs are inherently capable of forgiving even greater things.

But when it comes to aviation, it's worth remembering that some joint ventures never got off the ground. India withdrew from the joint fifth-generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) program, while Russia continued the project and today has the successful Su-57 fifth-generation fighter.


There was also the story of the Ka-226T, of which 197 units were to be produced, and in December 2015, an agreement was signed to create a joint venture between Rostec, Russian Helicopters and HAL to produce helicopters at a new plant in Tumakuru, India.

But India backed out of the agreement, deciding to develop its own light utility helicopter (LUH) based on the indigenous Dhruva. ​​Naturally, the Indian LUH performed as well as the Tejas, but India still has a chance to buy the Ka-226T.

Similarly, the Indo-Russian programme to develop a new Multi-role Transport Aircraft (MTA) for both countries through a joint venture between Russia's UAC and India's HAL has been cancelled by India.

It is no secret that India has long been behaving like a capricious princess.


A Russian Su-57 fifth-generation fighter jet at Yelahanka Air Force Base in Bangalore on February 10, 2025.

China recently unveiled two sixth-generation fighters, plus more than 300 of the fifth-generation J-20 fighter have been produced, and more than 50 of the J-35. Pakistan has announced plans to purchase 40 J-35 stealth fighters from China. This could mean their entry into service around 2029. This scenario would change the entire dynamic of Asian air dominance.

What about India?

The Indian Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), a fifth-generation multirole combat aircraft that has been so prominently featured in Indian media and which received Cabinet Committee on Security approval for prototype development in March 2024, is much the same as the Tejas. That is, it's dull and dreary. The stated timeframe is for entry into service in 2035, but given that there isn't even a fully developed prototype, it's safe to add another 10 years, which would be entirely feasible given the time it took to develop the Tejas and Arjun.

So, as expected, all this sparked a heated debate in India about its immediate plans and capabilities. The idea of ​​a defense relying on Rafale and Su-30MKI aircraft against fifth-generation aircraft, even Chinese ones, was not well received by many.

The Su-57 is a highly maneuverable fighter, like most others in its family. It's a modern aircraft, equipped to meet all requirements, and most importantly, its equipment has been combat-tested with positive results.

The Su-57 can carry four R-37M missiles in two main internal weapons bays and two short-range R-74M missiles in side bays. For missions that do not require stealth, the Su-57 can carry munitions on six external hardpoints, including the Kh-47M2 Kinzhal hypersonic air-launched ballistic missile.

According to various sources, the Su-57 costs approximately $45 million per aircraft, which is significantly less than the Chinese J-20 and even less than the single-engine American F-35. The Su-57's lifecycle cost is believed to be comparable to the Su-27, Su-30, and Su-35, which it was designed to replace.

Under the agreement, Russia is prepared to disclose its entire fifth-generation ecosystem, including engines, sensors, stealth materials, avionics, advanced aircraft weapons that the West refused to provide to India, and other classified systems. But there are nuances.

Of course, India envisions full technology transfer and joint production in India. Considering that during the recent exhibition in Bangalore, Indian specialists were able to closely examine new Russian and American products and assess the strengths and weaknesses of both.

It was noted that Russian aircraft were simpler in design, with larger cockpits, more electromechanical rather than electronic systems, and a high degree of standardization and unification. Transferring from one Russian aircraft to another was much easier.

The Russian autopilot's leveling mode allowed the aircraft to level off with a single press of a button on the control column. This was convenient if the pilot became disoriented. Russian ejection seats were just as simple and reliable as Western ones.

Over the past two decades, India has sought alternative sources of military equipment in the United States, France, and Israel. This ended with the Rafale, a scandalous story, of course. But India inevitably returned to its time-tested strategic partner: Russia.


Most of the platforms purchased from Western countries were also acquired under terms that did not include the provision of technology.

Let's be honest: India has managed to improve the combat readiness of its armed forces solely thanks to the "Make in India" program and Russian deals/joint ventures. However, many foreign arms manufacturers, such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and General Electric, have launched numerous "Make in India" projects in recent years.

India plans to begin modernizing its Su-30 MKIs. Initially, this will affect 84 aircraft, but the entire fleet will be upgraded eventually. Sukhoi will also participate in the project to modernize the engine fly-by-wire control system and, eventually, replace the engines themselves. The West will be unable to assist in this regard.

The aircraft will also be modified to launch BrahMos-ER missiles. All of this will require significant support from Russia.

There have been reports that HAL and Russia are in talks to export Indian-made Su-30MKIs, with Russian support, to customers worldwide. As Russia seeks to circumvent US economic sanctions, more and more Russian companies are seeking to establish production facilities in India.

If India chooses the Su-57 for licensed production and close cooperation with Russia, it could transform the aerospace industries of both countries. India will receive fifth-generation stealth aircraft more quickly, strengthening the Indian Air Force's position and enabling the integration of indigenous avionics, weapons, and systems as part of the "Make in India" initiative.

And there is some indirect evidence to support this. One of these, in fact, has recently caused a lot of confusion.

We're talking about the "Product 177" engine, which has raised many questions. Indeed, with the much-anticipated "Product 30"/AL-51F1, a second engine suddenly, one might say unexpectedly, appears.


Yes, many people both here and in India were surprised to learn that, in addition to the long-awaited "Product 30," also known as the AL-51F1 for the Su-57, another product has appeared that belongs to the new generation of aircraft engines.

We once devoted considerable attention to "Product 30," openly criticizing the delays in its development, which took approximately eight years, with the engine only entering mass production in 2024. Meanwhile, just over a year passed from the first news of "Product 177" to its final release.

Many didn't even realize they were talking about different engines, confusing the "30" and "177" engines, mistaking them for the same thing. In fact, they are indeed different engines. The "177" was rushed into production precisely because the Indians, in the event of a Su-57 agreement, demanded a full technology transfer. And so the "177" appeared, compatible with both the Su-30MKI and the two-seat export version of the Su-57. It's logical that no one was going to transfer the AL-51F-1, a new engine with predicted excellent performance, to them.

But it's not like the "177" is junk; it's a compromise. Generally, it's common practice to install simplified equipment on export vehicles.

The Indians are desperately haggling. It's the usual thing. It's the peculiarities of national business. But on the sidelines of the Wings India air show, Mr. Shishir Patra (executive director of HAL's Sukhoi Engine division, which collaborates with Sukhoi specifically on aircraft engines) stated:

In the very near future, we will begin deploying a new production line for fifth-generation fighter engines. This is a joint project with Russia based on the "Product 177" engine, which we plan to use for the potential assembly of the Su-57, our own fifth-generation fighter project, the AMSA, and the global modernization of the Su-30MKI. Thanks to this superior engine, the upgraded Su-30MKI will gain some stealth features and non-afterburning supersonic performance.

Now this is interesting: the Su-30MKI is also being upgraded within the same program.

Interestingly, "Item 177" is an export product. This means it has lower thrust and other parameters slightly inferior to the AL-51F-1. This is as expected given the difference between the main engine and the export version. The fact that they exist in metal and are already being used on the Su-57 was demonstrated not long ago.

This will prevent domestic capacity from being diverted from production of the "177" for India, which will have to handle this themselves, while the AL-51F-1 will be used in the Su-57.

But the question remains regarding the Su-30SM2 and Su-35S. What engines will these aircraft be upgraded with?

However, this is a separate issue.

In our case, it remains to be noted that India was very successful with the MiG-21. The Su-30MKI was a breakthrough, establishing a stronghold for the country's Air Force. There's every chance of tripling that number with the Su-57. India understands this, too, and perhaps will be able to make the right decisions.
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 13+
    4 February 2026 05: 53
    The author deserves credit—with a tenacity worthy of a better cause, he churns out articles about unparalleled products we're willing to offer for the smallest price with the greatest technology transfer, and about incompetent Indians who don't understand their own happiness. The point of such auto-training is unclear—such articles have no impact on reality, but the author's persistence is worthy of respect. However, alas, reality is quite different.
    According to the MRFA, the Rafale won (which, in the author's opinion, is pure stupidity) - in addition to the two existing contracts, they are preparing a new one for 114 aircraft and for an astronomical sum of 38 billion dollars.
    In addition, there is a solid contact with almost a hundred Tejas (with whom, in the author’s opinion, everything is dull and dreary).
    We have real plans to modernize our entire Su-30 fleet (with an initial option of 84 aircraft). However, all major system components (except possibly the engine) are expected to be Indian-made.
    1. +3
      4 February 2026 07: 25
      The author defends many ideas with heroic tenacity... even the downed Rafales—many analyses have already been done. In short, until that fateful day, the Indians were calmly bombing militant camps in Pakistan without any resistance; there was something like an unwritten agreement (though it could easily have been reached). Therefore, during each approach, the Indian Air Force followed the same route, at the same speed, without much cover or airspace reconnaissance. In short, it was like an exercise. Except Pakistan, once again, didn't bother to observe the courtesies—it brought in fighter jets, a flying radar, etc. It was essentially an ambush and a provocation.
      The author is also exaggerating with the "Chinese copy of the MiG-21." It's like saying the T-72 is a modernized T-34. No, so what? The engine is a further development of the B-2, there's a turret, a cannon, a machine gun (even chambered for 7.62x54R)...
      1. +3
        4 February 2026 16: 09
        Quote: parma
        The author defends many ideas with heroic tenacity... even take the situation with the downed Rafales - many analyses have already been done.

        The target of these articles is simply unclear. It would be logical to persuade Indians to buy at least some of our aircraft; that would be normal commercial practice—praising and promoting our own. But if the author tried to publish an article in the Indian press describing how the Indians "grabbed" everything and how incompetent they were, such an article would a) be completely useless, and b) even if it were published, it would cause a scandal and have the opposite effect.
        That is, this self-praise is only for one's own people; it has nothing to do with India at all.
        As for the reasons why Russia lost the Indian military aviation market (and Soviet aircraft formed its basis, from transport aircraft and helicopters to AWACS).
        1) For most positions there is simply nothing to offer and no way to produce it.
        2) What's being offered, even at the lowest prices, is simply poorly executed. The last contract for the MiG-29K was a complete failure.
        3) Sanctions
        However, if they manage to leave the SVO and at least some of the sanctions are lifted, they might buy the Su-57. The terms they're being offered are simply incredible. No one else would even remotely offer anything like that.
    2. -1
      4 February 2026 13: 48
      Quote: Belisarius
      With a tenacity worthy of a better cause, he churns out articles about unique products we're willing to offer for the smallest price with the largest technology transfer, and about incompetent Indians who don't understand their own happiness.

      What can you do if the author is a generalist – he writes on everything, and with equal superficiality. That's what the forum is for – to correct. First of all, the price... he's got it all mixed up again – horses, people, the domestic price for the Aerospace Forces and the export price with all the markups, export duties, associated equipment, ASP, and the training of flight crews and technical personnel. For the Aerospace Forces, the cost of the Su-57 is indeed around $40-50 million, but the export price... Although no one mentions it, if you look at the export contract price of the Su-35SE (100+ billion dollars), it's obvious that the export contract price of the Su-57E will be around $150 million. These things, figures, and facts need to be understood and distinguished.
      Next comes the "surprise of the new, unknown engine" "Product 177". The author claims that they first heard about it... "a year ago". But in fact, this is the same Single Engine for the entire T-10 line and optionally for the T-50, which has been in the works for a long time, and the problem has been covered and discussed for at least 10 years now. From the very moment when the Ministry of Defense and the Aerospace Forces were amazed at the zoo of "closely related" machines being purchased, in which... well, simply EVERYTHING is different. Even the engines are not interchangeable, the avionics, radars, avionics, the placement of blocks, units and components... That's when they came to the decision (and this was covered and discussed, including on the Military Forum, but about 10 years ago) that the maximum possible unification is needed - in the engine, avionics, avionics. What's needed is a single engine that will fit on the Su-34, Su-30SM, and Su-35S. Simply installing the AL-41F-1S on the Su-34 and Su-30SM isn't possible. The single engine must have the same dimensions, mounts, and fuel system connections as the AL-31F, but with the same performance. That's the contractor's brief. The fact that the resulting engine exceeded all expectations in terms of maximum afterburning thrust (16,000 kgf is no joke) is a great success and a boon for domestic aviation. Now it can fit on export Su-57s (and all previously produced VKS fighters, too), and all Su-4++ generation fighters. So this is not a "snowfall", but a completely expected engine, which, thanks to the use of technologies and materials from the "Product-30", was able to jump above its head and surpass the AL-41F-1S in thrust by almost 2000 kgf.
      Regarding the contract with India for the Su-57E, this issue has been resolved, but it is large, complex, and very lengthy, so it is being prepared by lawyers and other specialists from both sides. It is being written out. But it is already known for certain that India intends to purchase 40 Russian-assembled Su-57Es ready-made, and assemble the rest locally, "gradually increasing localization." We (the Russian side) will be paid approximately the same amount for each aircraft produced from our kits as for a finished Russian-assembled Su-57E at the export price. This was the case with our licensed assembly of the Su-30MKI, and this (the figures and price range for the license and kit) is from the domestic Indian press. So for the Russian Federation and the Sukhoi company, this is a VERY profitable and VERY long contract. In total, the Indians plan to assemble up to 300 of these aircraft locally, but this will be realized through several contracts. The first contract for licensed assembly of approximately 140 Su-57Es will be signed upon completion and final approval of the contract text. They haven't needed any "persuasion" for a long time (for several years now), as it's become reliably known why the Indians abandoned the ideal MiG-35S medium transport aircraft 10 years ago, withdrew from the joint T-50 project, and generally wagged their tails... why they seized on the horribly overpriced (both in money and promises) Rafale and generally behaved strangely. They were simply told by "very authoritative men from the City of London" that Russia's days were numbered, that it would end up just like the USSR, "and you'll end up with nothing and no air force." So they rushed headlong into these Rafales.
      They've already realized it and are biting their elbows.
      All those involved from the Indian side in the Rafale scam have already been convicted and are in prison.
      That's why they're now going full steam ahead, concluding massive deals and agreements one after another, despite Russia having been at war in the northern Black Sea region for five years now. Because Russia is winning, and the "united West" is cracking and falling apart, already at loggerheads with itself. So India has simply returned to common sense and is making up for lost time. And there's no need to rush them... they're rushing themselves now. But with the understanding that we're at war.
      Quote: Belisarius
      According to the MRFA, the Rafale won (which, in the author's opinion, is pure stupidity) - in addition to the two existing contracts, they are preparing a new one for 114 aircraft and for an astronomical sum of 38 billion dollars.

      Don't trust the French and British press, especially now. They're simply broadcasting their own desires and trying to pressure India... just like they're doing with Trump. They'll probably buy carrier-based Rafales, and only because that's what the Vikrant was built for. They're actually also waiting for the Su-75.
      Quote: Belisarius
      In addition, there is a solid contact with almost a hundred Tejas (with whom, in the author’s opinion, everything is dull and dreary).

      Well, this is their homemade product, so they will drag it out, because it is “made in India”.
      Quote: Belisarius
      We have real plans to modernize our entire Su-30 fleet (with an initial option of 84 aircraft). However, all major system components (except possibly the engine) are expected to be Indian-made.

      The Israelis prepared the Su-30MKI modernization project for them; they even developed an AESA radar for it. So, the avionics and radar will be modernized according to their own design. But we also have plenty of orders for this modernization, including for engines and their control systems. The Su-30MKI modernization project itself is currently being reviewed with the participation of our specialists. But the Indians won't abandon their legacy so easily.
      By the way, they also involved Israel in the modernization of their MiG-29 fleet.
      So, India is currently buzzing with events and new anticipations. But certainty will come when all these contracts are signed and implementation begins.
      Incidentally, they doubled their order for the S-400E, ordering five more regimental kits. However, not all deliveries under the first contract have been completed due to the Air Defense Forces.
      Well, the author is a multi-tasker, don't judge him too harshly. He doesn't always succeed in embracing the immensity.
      1. +1
        4 February 2026 14: 30
        Quote: bayard
        By the way, they doubled their order for the S-400E - they ordered 5 more regimental sets.

        I'm curious where they're planning to deploy them—on the Pakistani border or in the mountains near China, since there's no one else to build an air defense system against. Judging by the numbers and Pakistan's flat terrain, it's most likely there.
        1. +2
          4 February 2026 15: 24
          That's their concern. But judging by the fact that they intended to deploy the first five regimental units on the western and eastern coasts (two units on each) and the fifth on the southern tip, and now they need to strengthen the Pakistani and Chinese borders, the answer is obvious – they will be strengthening them.
      2. 0
        4 February 2026 15: 29
        Quote: bayard
        Don't trust the French and English press, especially now. They're simply broadcasting their own agendas and trying to put pressure on India.

        I usually don't comment on your epic statements—you're a saint. Blessed are those who believe—they have an easy life. But at least in pure factual terms, one shouldn't fantasize like that.
        https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/centre-clears-procurement-of-114-additional-rafale-jets-in-major-boost-to-air-defence-2853244-2026-01-16
        This is India Today 2026 (not the "French and English press"). "On January 16, 2026, the Defence Acquisition Council, chaired by Defence Minister Rajesh Kumar Singh, approved the procurement proposal. This proposal will now be reviewed at the next meeting of the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), chaired by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The final decision is expected from the Cabinet Security Committee, chaired by the Prime Minister." Macron is coming to India this month – they are signing the contract.
        Quote: bayard
        They will probably buy carrier-based Rafales, and only then

        We bought it a long time ago.
        1. +1
          4 February 2026 17: 23
          Quote: Belisarius
          On January 16, 2026, the Defence Acquisition Council, chaired by Defence Minister Rajesh Kumar Singh, approved the procurement proposal. The proposal will now be considered at the next meeting of the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), chaired by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The final decision is awaited from the Cabinet Committee on Security, chaired by the Prime Minister.

          So the issue is still under consideration, or rather, it's only just been approved for consideration, and you're jumping to conclusions about the inevitability of a purchase? That's pretty cool. It's no secret that Macron is actively lobbying for Rafale sales, and it's expected that some persuasion and cajoling will follow. But no decision has been made. So, it's you who are passing off your own whims or fantasies as reality.
          The Indian press is "the most democratic in the world"—that's common knowledge. Opinions there are often polarizing. It's also a fact that corrupt officials are already in prison for a previous contract. And the outcry against the Rafales after the clash with the Pakistanis in India was incredibly vocal—it's the absolute truth.
          So what's wrong?
          I'm not suggesting you, as a citizen of another country, be a sympathizer of Russia and its arms business, but twisting the facts and pulling owls onto a globe like this... isn't worth it. The Rafale is certainly a good aircraft and one of the best in its class (light/medium fighters), but it shouldn't be turned into a wunderwaffe. Moreover, India received the Rafale with a penetrating electronically scanned array (PESA), not an active phased array (AESA), and without the Meteors in its air defense system, even though the Indians were counting on them. It's no match for modern heavy fighters in a duel situation and won't give India parity against the Chinese and Pakistani J-20 and J-35. It even lost to the rather mediocre J-10, although they can claim it was an ambush – the Rafale's vaunted electronic warfare didn't save it and they weren't able to respond with maneuvers, that's a fact. So, purchasing such aircraft, and in such quantities, seems rather pointless. This is precisely what the Indian press wrote about. Especially an aircraft with such an exorbitant price tag.
          Although, of course, an element of political pressure or economic intimidation cannot be ruled out, since the main shareholder of the Rafale concern is the French Rothschild banking house, whose head now leads the entire clan of this family, and Macron, as is known, is their protégé and former employee, so he is working and will indeed persuade Modi to accept the contract. And this will be actively announced in the European and Indian press. Which is what is happening. Which is what you are claiming.
          But this isn't a final decision on the purchase. It's merely an APPROVAL FOR CONSIDERATION of this issue. And it will only be DISCUSSED. And I don't rule out the possibility that the Rothschilds (through their representative Macron) will be able to push their interests through with Modi. But this is only a PROBABILITY, nothing more. Like the blonde about meeting a dinosaur. If the plane's price were at least somewhat reasonable, and knowing Indians and their love of collecting, I would allow such a purchase with a much higher probability. Now, even taking into account the forces that will push the contract through... I wouldn't give it more than 50/50. The discrepancy between price and quality is too great. In Russia, the Tu-160M ​​procurement costs that much.
          However, the Rothschilds already dissuaded India from breaking contracts and negotiations with Russia on the MiG-35S and Su-57 (and several others), while deceiving them. Now India is returning to a number of long-term contracts with Russia, continues cooperation with Israel, and can obtain everything it needs at a much lower price and on better terms. Unless they buy Indian fighters under most-favored-nation status and "duty-free trade with the EU"... if these issues are linked to the Rafale... anything is possible. But this will be a political decision, not a choice of the best option. And you insisted on the advantages of the Rafale.
          Disagree again?
          Your right .
          Quote: Belisarius
          We bought it a long time ago.

          As far as I remember, deliveries had just begun. And the Indians had no intention of canceling them, since the aircraft carrier was being built specifically for the Rafale.
          1. +1
            4 February 2026 20: 03
            Quote: bayard
            Moreover, India received Rafales with PFAR, not AFAR, and without Meteors in the ASP, although the Indians were counting on them.

            According to the Thales specification RBE2-AA (this is an AESA-AESA) with 838 Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) T/R modules and ECCM Spectra.
            1. 0
              5 February 2026 08: 37
              I've read otherwise. But even if it's true what you wrote, gallium arsenide modules are weak in radiation and require intensive cooling to maintain their parameters. The Rafale's antenna cross-section is small (a light fighter is still a light fighter), so the detection range of typical targets is limited. The Chinese J-10, for example, has a much more powerful radar and a longer-range air-to-air missile system. So the Rafale is a good plane, but if it had the price of a light fighter, it would sell like hotcakes, like the Mirages did back in the day. As it is, it's priced like our Tu-160M2. And only the Rothschilds' patronage helps sales.
              1. 0
                5 February 2026 12: 44
                Quote: bayard
                Gallium arsenide is weak to radiation and requires intensive cooling to keep it within the parameters

                So far the whole world is on GaAs (except us, due to the practical absence of APAA), and nothing.
                F-18, F-35 are now changing their air defense systems
                GaN-on-SiC HEMT. Thales is also almost ready.
                The KLJ-10A radar is certainly good (according to the manufacturer’s advertising data) 5 square meters at 200 km.
                However, the “backward” RBE2 is not inferior to it at all: 3 square meters for the same 200 km.
                We'll see.
                The Dassault Rafale is hardly "light" at 9500 kg.

                The cost of the la and the contract, as always, is a misconception.
                The price of a Tu-160 as a complete product in Russia is one thing, while the price of a Rafale in India, complete with training, simulators, weapons, and a full set of spare parts (with an option to purchase additional ammunition) is quite another.
                1. 0
                  7 February 2026 20: 34
                  Quote: don_Reba
                  So far the whole world is on GaAs (except us, due to the practical absence of APAA), and nothing.

                  It seems that the Belka for the Su-57 is built on gallium arsenide.
                  1. 0
                    7 February 2026 21: 29
                    Yes, of course. The N036 PPM GaAs (gallium arsenide nanoheterostructure) radars are manufactured at NPP Istok, and the radar is assembled at the Ryazan State Instrument-Making Plant. 1526 units.
                    Just how many of them are there (H036)?
                    And according to plans, they should go into production in 2027.
                    It's strange to me:
                    In 2018, it was reported that "Rostec launched production of gallium nitride (GaN) transistors for the creation of 5G communication networks, quadcopters, and new radars."
                    (Heteroepitaxial structures of GaN and solid solutions based on it)
                    Since 2019, JSC Pulsar has been producing GaN PPM….
                    According to reports
                    1. 0
                      7 February 2026 21: 46
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      In 2018, it was reported that "Rostec launched production of gallium nitride (GaN) transistors for the creation of 5G communication networks, quadcopters, and new radars."

                      I suspect that despite using the same material, there are significant differences in operating modes. And related design differences. It's entirely possible that the PPMs for base stations have worked well, but radar use requires a radically different design. Or perhaps gallium nitride carbide plates were purchased overseas, and now access to materials of the required quality is blocked.
                      That's why we decided to use what we have and what has been used up - gallium arsenide.
                      1. 0
                        7 February 2026 22: 13
                        28V versus 5-12V, nonlinearity and parasitic effects, no benchtop testing equipment in Russia, GaN is much worse at withstanding overloads.
                        And so->
                        (However, the Chinese did succeed; in my opinion, they actually jumped the GaAs step)
                      2. 0
                        7 February 2026 23: 06
                        Quote: don_Reba
                        28V versus 5-12V, nonlinearity and parasitic effects, no benchtop testing equipment in Russia, GaN is much worse at withstanding overloads.

                        I think it's more likely a production issue. There's a significant variability there depending on the heterostructure synthesis technology. And the technology also needs to be refined to ensure good repeatability of characteristics.
                        So they're making do with what they have. And thank God, I suppose.

                        Quote: don_Reba
                        However, the Chinese managed to do it; in my opinion, they actually jumped over the GaAs step.

                        Here we have to wait because, on the one hand, their microelectronics are well developed, on the other hand, there is a fear of wishful thinking.
                      3. 0
                        7 February 2026 23: 37
                        So I wrote about it
                        (There weren't even any stands; everything was "not ours")
                        And they "saw"...
                        So the talkative Borisov promised to put it into service in 2012, 2015, 2018.
                        The Su-57 itself is also taking a long time to be developed.
                        2010: On January 29, the first flight of the first flying prototype of the T-50-1 took place in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.
                2. 0
                  7 February 2026 21: 58
                  Quote: don_Reba
                  While the whole world is on GaAs (except us, due to the practical absence of APAA)

                  Well, we already have over 70 Su-57s, and they have phased array antennas. We've also developed an active phased array antenna for the MiG-35S and Su-75 with very good parameters for an antenna cloth of this cross-section. And the new modification of the Belka-M1 is no longer based on arsenide, but on gallium nitride. We've been a bit slow with this, but the Irbis turned out to be beyond praise (a phased array antenna, but with a rotating cloth and a 240-degree field of view), and now we have an active phased array antenna using gallium nitride, with the Belka detecting a target with an RCS of 10-20 square meters at 520 km+. That's a lot. And that's encouraging.
                  Quote: don_Reba
                  The price of a Tu-160 as a complete product in Russia is one thing, while the price of a Rafale in India, with training, simulators, weapons, and a set of spare parts, is quite another.

                  This was just for the sake of imagery, as a grotesque comment. For a fair comparison, the cost of an Su-35SE with two sets of spare engines, simulators, training, spare parts, consumables, and an emergency response system is around $110 million. And that's for a heavy fighter with obviously superior performance to the Rafale. But even here, the Rafale is 2,5 times more expensive. That's why I'm writing that this aircraft is overpriced, even though it's good in its class, and that's undeniable.
                  The choice is up to the Indians, and I'm certainly no doctor. If they're required to buy a Rafale for duty-free trade with the EU, they'll likely buy it, but it won't be because it's "the best," but because "it's the right thing to do." Meanwhile, India is expecting the Su-57E and, in the future, the Su-75. These are the aircraft they'll/want to buy in large quantities.
                  1. 0
                    7 February 2026 23: 32
                    I heard/read that there are 36-42 Su-57xs in 2026, including all the test ones. How many N-036s are there?
                    It's best not to bring up the MiG-35 and Zhuk-AE. Has anyone seen a "live" AFARK on a live aircraft?
                    Moreover, there are murky rumors about Altera's Taiwanese components.
                    ACEX.
                    It's too early to even talk about the Su-75 as a flying aircraft, let alone its AESAs.
                    The Belka already has an active phased array (APA) on gallium nitride with a detection range of 520 km+ for targets with an RCS of 10-20 sq.m. This is a lot.

                    This nonsense from the idiot box:
                    1. The instrumented (!) range of the AN/APY-1/2(V) is 536 km, and this horse can't compare to the radar either in terms of antenna aperture or power. The radar is a pygmy.
                    2. Look at the specifications of any airborne radar: detection range on head-on and tail-on courses. Therefore, the idiotic idea of ​​"putting an Irbis on a dirigible and seeing UAVs at 400 km" doesn't hold water.
                    The Irbis is good. And the mean time between failures? That's it.
                    2018: At the economic forum in St. Petersburg, details of the contract for the supply of Su-35 fighter jets to China were officially announced. For $2,5 billion, China will receive 24 aircraft. The cost of each fighter exceeds $104 million—$10 million more than the American F-35.

                    Vs
                    There are varying reports about the price of the Dassault Rafale, ranging between $100 and $120 million per piece in the most basic configuration. According to Shephard Media, an average Rafale costs about $124.95 million in contemporary terms, based on the French budget documents reporting the average cost of Rafale B (the twin-seat variant) at €74 million ($98.2 million) in 2013

                    ~110-120 million$
                    Further +inclusion of Meteor missiles, Scalp cruise missiles, training systems, spare parts and support infrastructure.
                    +20% on technical service.
                    + Simulators can cost millions, not even considering operational readiness exercises that include live flights.
                    ™️It's not as clear-cut as our newspapers say.
                    1. 0
                      8 February 2026 11: 34
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      I heard/read that there are 36-42 Su-57x in 2026,

                      The other day, two peppers were trying to prove to me that there are no more than twenty of them, and even then, only experienced ones. lol . Don't be like.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      And how many N-036 are there on them?

                      On the line - everyone.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      It's best not to bring up the MiG-35 and Zhuk-AE. Has anyone seen a "live" AFARK on a live aircraft?

                      The fact is that the AESA program for the MiG-35S, which was closed at the request of its "partners," has been reinstated, as this radar will now be used not only for the MiG-35S, but also for the Su-75. The "partners'" wishes have been a rusty bolt for four years now.
                      And the funding there is already fine.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      It's too early to even talk about the Su-75 as a flying aircraft, let alone its AESAs.

                      Yes, it will take off, don't worry. They made some changes to the airframe, otherwise it would have taken off back in November or December, as announced. The airframe is new, they're improving it. And then there are the new engines. And don't worry about the active phased array (AESA) on it.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      This nonsense from the idiot box:

                      Well, of course, and the Irbis can’t see at 400 km.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      1. The instrumented (!) range of the AN/APY-1/2(V) is 536 km, and this horse can't compare to the radar either in terms of antenna aperture or power. The radar is a pygmy.

                      The parameters and operating modes are different. You didn't believe in the characteristics of the Irbis or Zaslon-M, after all. And the US has a radar with similar parameters on the way. And the characteristics of the first iteration of the Belka arsenide radar (the main canvas) are roughly in line with those of the Lightning radar. Only our radar is all-aspect. So everything is fine and nothing out of the ordinary. The new radar will be on the Su-57M-1, which has already been demonstrated, and it has not only a new radar, but also engines, avionics, rotating flat nozzles, radar-absorbing coatings, and software. Everything is normal there, and without any boasting – normal system operation.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      Irbis is good. What about the mean time between failures?

                      Do you have any complaints about it? Could you share them? Preferably in comparison with similar characteristics of NATO aircraft radars.

                      Quote: don_Reba
                      2018: At the economic forum in St. Petersburg, details of the contract for the supply of Su-35 fighter jets to China were officially announced.

                      This was the very first contract, and it was eight years ago. Nowadays, such a contract would cost a bit more due to inflation. Currently, even with one set of spare engines, the Su-35SE costs around 110 million.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      Dassault Rafale, ranging between $100 and $120 million

                      Well, there you have it. You've pulled Schrödinger's cat by the genitals again. You're comparing the full contract price of the Su-35SE (including spare parts, equipment, training, ASP, spare engines, and warranty service) with the bare price of the Rafale. But in reality, Algeria paid $110 million for the Su-35SE, and India $236 million+ for the Rafale. So, compare these figures.
                      And for the Aerospace Forces, the Su-35S costs no more than $35 million.
                      Quote: don_Reba
                      not so simple

                      Yeah, right. Everything is not at all like it really is, as one character said.
              2. 0
                7 February 2026 20: 33
                Quote: bayard
                But even if it is what you wrote, gallium arsenide modules are weak to radiation and require intensive cooling so that they do not go beyond the parameters.

                The Irbis's radiation source will last a long time without intensive cooling. Gallium arsenide is quite good, and good radars based on it are available; gallium nitride-based elements are simply better.
                As an example, the Belka, for the Su-57, was also made using gallium arsenide and, apparently, turned out to be an excellent radar system.
                1. 0
                  7 February 2026 20: 57
                  Quote: NordOst16
                  It seems that the Irbis' radiation source will last a long time without intensive cooling.

                  The Irbis has a phased array antenna (PAA), apparently using klystrons. Its advantage is that the antenna can be rotated left and right, providing a 240-degree field of view. An active phased array antenna (APA) can't do that.
                  Gallium arsenide has been around for a long time, and its performance is also prone to problems with temperature dependence. This problem can be solved by cooling. Gallium nitride is certainly better—it provides higher output power and is less dependent on thermal heating.
                  Quote: NordOst16
                  As an example, Belka, for the Su-57, is also made using gallium arsenide.

                  Yes, the basic "Belka" is arsenide-based. But the next iteration (also called "Belka," but I'm afraid the index is mistaken, perhaps "Belka-M1") is nitride-based, with increased power, detection range (over 500 km for targets with an RCS of 20 square meters), and continuous operation time.
                  The Rafale has a small active electronically scanned array (AESA) field, so its detection range will be significantly shorter than that of our heavy fighters. Similar to our MiG-35S, whose AESA radar detects a 10-square-meter target at 280 km, while the Irbis's PEAS detects such a target at 400 km. And the Su-57M-1 airborne missile system detects such a target at 520-540 km. Clearly, this data is only for a large target of 10-20 square meters, but that's based on available data; estimates can be extrapolated for targets with a smaller ESA.
                  1. 0
                    7 February 2026 21: 40
                    Quote: bayard
                    The Irbis has PFAR, it seems to have klystrons.

                    Yeah, the emitter uses vacuum tube technology. Considering the radar's power, it dissipates quite a bit of heat.

                    Quote: bayard
                    Its advantage is that the antenna can be rotated left and right, providing a 240-degree field of view. An AESA cannot do this.

                    Unlike PFARs, APAAs aren't particularly necessary because they can steer the beam without mechanical components. True, there's a certain loss in efficiency, but the elimination of mechanical components saves weight and space.
                    If necessary, mechanical turning can also be implemented on AESA radars, such as on the Raven or Captor radars.

                    Quote: bayard
                    Yes, the basic "Belka" is arsenide-based. But the next iteration (also called "Belka," but I'm afraid the index is mistaken, perhaps "Belka-M1") is nitride-based, with increased power, detection range (over 500 km for targets with an RCS of 20 square meters), and continuous operation time.

                    In the near and probably medium term, the 57s will be based on the basic version of the Belka. Judging by articles in specialized journals, gallium nitride production is still a problem.
                    I suspect that the problems with the A100 AWACS are related, among other things, to the production of the gallium nitride transmitter/receiver modules. Or rather, to problems with their production.
                    1. 0
                      7 February 2026 22: 18
                      Quote: NordOst16
                      Yeah, there's tube technology in the emitter.

                      Vacuum tube technology maintains its parameters much better than solid-state technology. But that's PFAR.
                      Quote: NordOst16
                      AFAR, unlike PFAR, is not particularly necessary because they can control the beam without the use of mechanics.

                      The PFAR also scans with a beam, and turning it increases the field of view. On a stationary surface, the field of view typically doesn't exceed 90-100 degrees. The Irbis has at least 240 degrees. This is why the single-seat Su-35S could perform the AWACS role, tracing eight marks behind the front lines. They still do, but they are increasingly being replaced by the Su-30SM2.
                      Quote: NordOst16
                      If necessary, mechanical rotation can also be done on the AFAR

                      It's very difficult to implement due to its specific nature. But yes, we managed to do it. Not as effectively as the Irbis, and by the way, they took on this project with an eye on it, because we've been showing off the Irbis prototype at exhibitions since at least the 00s. But I remember a prototype of this canvas from the second half of the 90s.
                      Quote: NordOst16
                      In the near and probably medium term, the 57s will be on the basic version of the Belka.

                      We'll see how it goes. Funding and government support have now been pouring into the industry, and many processes have accelerated significantly, if not by an order of magnitude. I think the issue with gallium nitride antitank missiles will be resolved and mass production will be established. But the Belka arsenide system is still quite good, too, as it offers all-aspect coverage and has two decimeter-wavelength panels for "covert observation" in the wing's leading edges. This is a significant advantage and offers very high situational awareness. The Su-57M-1 will be equipped with gallium nitride antitank missiles, and their deployment was announced (in the middle of last year) for this year. This means the first of them will be deployed no later than next year. We'll see how it goes.
                      1. 0
                        7 February 2026 23: 01
                        Quote: bayard
                        Vacuum tube technology maintains its parameters much better than solid-state technology. But that's PFAR.

                        But it needs time to reach operating parameters.

                        Quote: bayard
                        It's very difficult to implement due to its specific nature. But yes, we managed to implement it. Not as effectively as the Irbis, and by the way, they took on this project with an eye on it, because we've been taking the Irbis prototype to exhibitions since at least the 00s.

                        I don't think there were any major complications, other than running the cooling lines, as the PPM modules get very hot. On the other hand, waveguides also need to be installed on the PFAR.
                        Plus, mechanical scanning is nothing new for radar manufacturers, so I don’t think foreign manufacturers could lag behind in any way.
                        Most likely, some customers decided that a wide viewing angle was not necessary if the AWACS would handle detection and it was better to save weight.

                        Quote: bayard
                        We'll see how it goes. Now money and government support have flowed into the industry and many processes have accelerated several times, if not by an order of magnitude.

                        That's true, but fundamental and applied research in high-tech industries has a very long lead time. The French have been hammering away at gallium nitride for a decade and a half, and the Americans have needed about the same amount of time. Based on this, I think we'll be stuck with gallium arsenide for a long time.

                        Quote: bayard
                        But even on arsenide, the "Belka" is still quite good, because it has all-aspect coverage and two decimeter-range panels for "covert observation" in the leading edges of the wing.

                        There are 5 or 6 panels (if you also put them in the tail), one centimeter-long main one that looks forward, two side ones also centimeter-long.
                        Decimeter, rather for detecting low-observable targets, since this is a fairly popular range of ground and shipborne radars, and onboard warning systems recognize it.

                        Quote: bayard
                        This means the first of them will be sent to the troops no later than next year. We'll see how it goes.

                        Time will tell, but there are quite a lot of doubts about this.

                        But again, there is no need for it to be better, the main thing is that it is enough.
                      2. 0
                        8 February 2026 10: 50
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        But it needs time to reach operating parameters.

                        If you "warm up the cathodes" before takeoff and keep the radar warm and ready to transmit, there won't be any delay. Especially since I don't think Su-35S pilots have this capability.
                        Quote: NordOst16

                        I don't think there were any big difficulties there.

                        Indeed, they did. That's why radars with the ability to rotate their webbing toward the target only recently appeared on some NATO fighters. Our developers, however, had been demonstrating radars with webbing rotation since the second half of the 90s. In our country, everything was held back only by a lack of funding and the bourgeoisie's desire to develop combat aviation.

                        Quote: NordOst16
                        Most likely, some customers decided that a wide viewing angle was not necessary if the AWACS would take over detection and it would be better to save money.

                        No, they simply didn't have such technical capability.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        The French have been tinkering with gallium nitride for a decade and a half now, and the Americans have been working on it for about the same amount of time. Based on this, I think we'll be stuck with gallium arsenide for a long time.

                        We also had work on gallium nitride, not only for aviation, but also for ground-based air defense and missile defense. Back in 2014-2015. I read in the translated Chinese press about "Russia's great progress in the field of creating solid-state antitank missiles based on gallium nitride, and their advantages in comparison with antitank missiles based on gallium arsenide. And in order for the developers to make progress, they need to work on this topic for at least five years. But since the then-promised radars did not appear soon... either they were unable to do something, or (and this is most likely) "esteemed partners" asked us not to work on this topic. Just as they asked us not to work on the development of the air-based "Zircon". But it was precisely this (airborne) version of the "Zircon" that was the basic one and they were created for the Tu-22M3/M3M, and drop tests were already underway. But the will of the partner is the law for the loser of the Cold War. And we still don't have an airborne version of the "Zircon". But they could have carried it Su-34M2.
                        Or perhaps there are technical problems with implementing mass production. In any case, with urgent need and sufficient funding, such projects tend to be resolved.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        Decimeter, rather for detecting low-observable targets, since this is a fairly popular range of ground and shipborne radars, and onboard warning systems recognize it.

                        Exactly .
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        Again, there's no need for it to be better, the main thing is that it's enough.

                        Quantity always matters. Just like Lenin's imperative to transform quantity into quality. Our combat aircraft production has already expanded to a fairly high-end market, so aircraft are also being exported. So, we currently have a major problem with the number of young pilots graduating from flight schools, as well as at the base and dispersal airfields for new and existing air regiments. The infrastructure and training of pilots and technical personnel must not lag behind aircraft production. However, the Su-57M-1 is a very significant breakthrough. It's already a sixth-generation system. It's already at least 5++. And with a detection range of targets over 10-20 square meters (RCS) at 500+ km, it will be able to confidently engage AWACS, military transport aircraft, anti-submarine warfare aircraft, refueling tanks, ELINT systems, etc. from a distance of 400 km. from its own stealth zone. And also to have a guaranteed superiority over any enemy fighters in terms of enemy detection range from its own stealth zone. And we've already seen the Su-57M-1.
                      3. 0
                        8 February 2026 14: 14
                        Quote: bayard
                        No, they simply didn't have the technical capability to do so.

                        The US APG-63/65 from the 70s could already do this. They abandoned the mechanical rotation when switching to AESA. This suggests that they clearly didn't abandon it due to a lack of technical capabilities.

                        Quote: bayard
                        or (and this is most likely) "respected partners" asked not to deal with this topic

                        If the request was for a ban on the supply of materials and equipment (purchasing finished wafers from abroad was a common practice here), then it's entirely possible. Synthesizing heterostructures on a substrate is a separate, extremely complex process.

                        Quote: bayard
                        Or perhaps there are technical problems with implementing mass production. In any case, with urgent need and sufficient funding, such projects tend to be resolved.

                        But not right away, so it's much better to have a little less money, but evenly and steadily, than a lot, but over a short period.

                        Quote: bayard
                        So we now have a big problem with the number of young pilots graduating from flight schools.

                        Not here, the US Air Force faced the same problem. Because civilian pay is higher and life is much more peaceful.

                        Quote: bayard
                        Although the Su-57M-1 is a very serious breakthrough. Moreover, it is already in the 6th generation. Because it is already at least 5++.

                        There we would have to figure out with the fifth generation what kind of beast this is.

                        Quote: bayard
                        And the Su-57M-1 has already been shown to us.

                        For now, I would only count on +/- the basic version, because, most likely, the new version will be tested for another 5-10 years.
                        Our Air Force could also use a two-seat attack version of the 57 and a jammer.
                      4. 0
                        8 February 2026 18: 56
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        The US APG-63/65 from the 70s could already do this. They abandoned the mechanical rotation when switching to AESA.

                        They can explain it any way they want now, but when the first phased array antennas (PAAs) appeared, no one even tried to make the antenna canvas move. Because electronic beam scanning control replaced the mechanical scanning of a reflector antenna. Another issue is that back then, a scanning sector of 60-90 degrees was considered quite sufficient, and the entire aircraft could be rotated if necessary. Supplementing electronic scanning with antenna canvas rotation is our know-how from the second half of the 90s. Back then, people were amazed and admired it, but realizing that the USSR was gone, and for Russia, these were the last gasps of engineering thought struggling without orders, they didn't even think of repeating it. They simply drastically cut funding for defense programs and proclaimed the "end of history." They only revived with the advent of the Su-35S and the demonstration of its radar. That's when the whole commotion began, with export bans, arms sanctions, secondary sanctions, and attempts to dissuade India from cooperating with us because "they'll all die soon and Russia will be no more than the USSR." And they themselves began frantically devising their own antenna array adjustments. And that's not a simple engineering solution.
                        Before that, they simply rested on their laurels as winners of the Cold War.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        If the request was in the form of a ban on the supply of materials and equipment (we had a fairly common practice of purchasing ready-made plates from abroad), then it is entirely possible.

                        I think it was a combination of pressure. Often, it was simply outright: "You're developing a new missile/radar/military technology, and we're against it. Stop it, or we'll impose sanctions, starve you, paralyze your financial system, or just bomb you." Putin has spoken about this more than once at briefings and press conferences; haven't you heard? And we either agreed to their ban, or sanctions/personal sanctions/other ostracism were imposed against us, our companies, enterprises, and executives/scientists. Just remember how they essentially banned us from selling their Su-35SEs—we had so many customers and contracts lined up, and no one but China managed to buy. And only now have orders and purchases of our military aircraft resumed, but as a rule, both the negotiations and the deliveries themselves are not public, without revealing details, particulars, and calculation schemes.
                        This regime of "containment" and isolation was necessary in the context of a non-sovereign financial system and the destruction of scientific schools and industrial cooperation since the 90s. Often, this work itself and its sources and methods of funding were kept secret. So the conditions for such work were far from ideal.
                        As for gallium nitride antitank missiles, our first work on this was in the missile defense field, for the S-500 air defense missile system's multi-role radar. Since domestic demand was limited, exports were hampered, and establishing full production cooperation was difficult and expensive, we did try to resolve some issues through cooperation with... Israel. We recall the A-100, Tu-214R, and other projects. But there was no luck there either. So the reasons were complex, but now it's a completely different matter—War. And now everything needs to be done ourselves, arms trading can be done without the dollar and publicity, requests and prohibitions from "partners" can be ignored, and money for defense programs has started flowing. And no one is saying that something worked out overnight. But we have been at war for four years now, that's quite a long time. And if the radar specifications for the Su-57M-1 are announced and that the aircraft will go into production next year (an announcement last year at international exhibitions in China and India), this should be taken more seriously. Especially since the aircraft itself was shown and nothing similar is definitely observed from competitors today. If everything is true, then we will see the first operational Su-57M-1 no later than the first half of next year (the assembly cycle of such aircraft is at least 1 - 1,5 years from laying on the slipway to delivery). Then we will be able to talk more specifically.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        Not here, the American Air Force encountered the same thing.

                        Not just us. But our Aerospace Forces are several times smaller than the US's and were at the bare minimum. And it was under Taburetkin that they stopped recruiting cadets to military universities for five years, while simultaneously cutting the remaining military schools and institutes to a utter disgrace. Fighter pilots were left in just one school. The result was a shortage of junior officers, which they tried to compensate for with junior officers, but that's definitely not the solution for aviation. We still train too few pilots for combat aviation. Too few. And they pay poorly. But it's not so easy to transition from combat aviation to civilian aviation; it's not transport aviation, after all.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        There we would have to figure out with the fifth generation what kind of beast this is.

                        It all depends on basic concepts, not on "magic." Generations in aviation were invented to more clearly categorize aircraft. This happened at the turn of the 70s and 80s, and this division was also accepted in the USSR. Back then, it was simply believed that a new generation of aircraft appeared every 10 years. A more powerful and fuel-efficient engine, a more sophisticated radar, a more advanced airframe and avionics - and you have a new generation. That's how it should be understood. It's just that the USSR disappeared and the Armaments Defense Industry Committee ended just on the eve of the emergence of the 5th generation. Back then, it was understood somewhat differently. Including here. Look at the MiG-1.44, the Su-47 "Berkut" - this is exactly how we saw the 5th generation. Faster, more maneuverable, with more powerful radars and AESA, and with stealth elements. The US embraced the idea of ​​"absolute stealth," but only implemented its F-22 in the late 90s, already without a competitor. And everything came to a standstill—"end of history." As a result, they overlooked the emergence of worthy aerial adversaries in the form of China and Russia by the 20s. And they have nothing but the "Pregnant Penguin." Hence the fuss over the super-duper F-47, which no one has ever seen.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        For now, I would only count on +/- the basic version, because, most likely, the new version will be tested for another 5-10 years.

                        It's been in production for years now, and new engines, nozzles, coatings, radar, anti-aircraft fire, and software have arrived. The base model is already being exported, precisely because the Su-57M-1 is already being prepared for production.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        Our Air Force could also use a two-seat attack version of the 57th.

                        They're working on it, and they promise to show it soon. But to do that, the airframe really needs to be significantly redesigned—this cockpit wasn't originally planned. But the addition of new engines will compensate for the increased weight and airframe changes.
                        Quote: NordOst16
                        and a jammer.

                        This function is best entrusted to loyal wingmen based on the unmanned version of the Su-75.
    3. 0
      5 February 2026 07: 45
      On the contrary, Skomorokhov dragged our civil aviation industry through the mud last year, when, for my indignation, Skomorokhov himself apparently slapped me with two warnings, using administrative resources.
      Interestingly, our civil aviation's "drag in the mud" didn't stop him from inserting information about UAC's possible civil aviation export contracts into this article. A remarkably talented journalist, with acrobatic insight.
  2. +4
    4 February 2026 06: 03
    As I understand it, in the case of the dancers, the issue isn't which production to localize. The key is for the localization to work—and that's not the case. The Su-30 MKIs were twice as expensive as those supplied from Russia, and they're still that way? Localization doesn't work that way.
    Let me explain. There was a funny thing in our market: we couldn't produce twisted-pair cable for networks... And fiber optics, for good measure. The market is huge, bigger than Europe, but the problem is that it's already divided, and it's impossible to just squeeze in without government support. A factory built from scratch would simply produce products at a higher cost until the investment was recouped. Well, we finally got the government involved, sponsored something, and eventually broke even—and now they're churning out hundreds of thousands of kilometers of these cables, outperforming any competitor in price and quality in the domestic market alone. Meanwhile, the Indians—no matter how much you invest in Su-30MKI assembly, the end result is both expensive and crappy. That's not localization, that's sabotage.
    So now they need to think about why this is so, but until they learn to do it instead of stealing, they either have to buy it or sit without a weapon.
    1. +3
      4 February 2026 11: 17
      Quote: Foggy Dew
      As I understand it, in the case of dancers, the issue isn't which production to localize. The point is to ensure that the localization works—and that's not the case.

      Worse still, the Indians regularly blame all their production and operational flaws on us, claiming the Russians have poor designs and low-quality parts. Only later does it become clear that in India itself, they couldn't find enough skilled assemblers to properly service the aircraft at just one plant.
      India operates a modification of the Su-30MKI, not very different from the Algerian version. At the same time, according to the Minister of Defense, the Indian Air Force already had five accidents and 69 incidents with AL-31FP engines manufactured by HAL since 2012. According to Parrikar, of these 69 incidents, 33 were caused by chips in the oil, 11 caused vibration in the engine, and eight were due to very low pressure in the oil supply. Accusations were made regarding the poor quality of the assembly, which quickly resulted in a fatigue effect that caused cracks, which led to the appearance of metal fragments and the oil circuit. The investigation also drew attention to the quality of the oil. By order of the Indian Ministry of Defense, measures have been taken: the use of better quality oil, the alteration and replacement of welding and mounting components between mechanical parts.
      © bmpd
      But the aftertaste from the first statements of the Indians "Russia has given us a marriage!"still remained...
    2. +1
      4 February 2026 14: 33
      Quote: Foggy Dew
      This is not localization, but sabotage.

      and yet this is progress towards independent provision, the path is also crooked.
      For example, in our civil aviation, things are not going well at all – neither cheap nor expensive. Not at all.
  3. Eug
    +5
    4 February 2026 06: 21
    It's interesting—regarding the price of the Su-30MKI, the author rightly asks, "How does this happen?" But he doesn't address the similar question of why shipbuilding in Russia costs almost twice as much as in India (as discussed in the article)... and yet, the question is, why?
    1. +2
      4 February 2026 06: 48
      Quote: Eug
      But he doesn't ask a similar question - why does shipbuilding cost almost twice as much in Russia as in India (as discussed in the article)... but it's interesting - why?
      The question is, of course, interesting.
      Alternatively, you can steal a lot more from building an airplane than from these little vessels.
      Or, more likely, low-skilled labor, primarily used in civilian shipbuilding, is dirt cheap in India. Aviation, however, requires expertise, and such specialists are few in India, and those who do exist charge roughly the same price as they would earn if they went to work in the West.
      And, of course, the traditional "elephant dances", which are a must in India.
      1. -1
        4 February 2026 14: 35
        Quote: Nagan
        They charge about the same price as they would have received if they had gone to work in the West.

        Even more so, because they're unique in their own country, while in the West they're second-rate, plentiful and easily replaced. It's roughly the same, and even worse, with IT specialists in Kazakhstan. Someone invited from Russia can earn significantly less than their import-substituting counterpart.
    2. +2
      4 February 2026 13: 48
      Quote: Eug
      and why does this happen?

      Why do people in India wear two pairs of underwear?
      1. Localization has reached 62%, but they don’t write anything
      2. Open a map of the Russian Federation and look at the locations where components for the Su-30*** and AL-31FP are produced.
      Now we calculate all these km to the HAL workshops.
      "It's a penny overseas, but a rouble for transportation"
      And they are assembled by cheap Indians, yes.
      Ships and other vessels: everything there is Indian (from the rental to the anchor), according to weather conditions: 13 months are summer, the rest is winter, they do not need to spend money on heating (in the Russian Federation it’s the opposite: 13 months are winter, the rest is summer).
      And yes, I am tormented by vague doubts that the troughs will arrive in the Russian Federation loaded and recoup 20% immediately upon delivery.
  4. +8
    4 February 2026 08: 01
    The author describes it as an achievement that instead of taking advantage of the situation and bringing the Indians to their knees, the effective ones themselves became crabs in front of them! laughing
  5. +4
    4 February 2026 08: 34
    Cooperation with India in shipbuilding is beneficial for Russia, as the cost of one vessel is expected to be half that of Russian shipbuilders.
    It's more beneficial for the Russian budget, and for Russia, for the money to stay in the country and provide jobs for the local population.
  6. +1
    4 February 2026 09: 14
    There's no chance of tripling the results. The Indians are pulling the blanket over themselves and doing the right thing, while ours don't know what they want.
    1. +2
      4 February 2026 14: 39
      Quote: APASUS
      Ours don't know what they want

      They want to sit on 5 chairs:
      Create conditions for a raw materials economy, but produce
      Don't invest in science and education, but get advanced developments
      sell fighters that we need ourselves
      and it is profitable to trade on your own terms, but entering into negotiations on unfavorable terms during negotiations.
      don't fight for markets, but sell a lot
  7. -1
    4 February 2026 09: 46
    Watch the 2024 film "Operation Valentine." The Mirage 2000 is the star, not the Su-30MKI.
    Even the Bisons (MiG-21) were spotted in combat.
    Tejas are on the move. And the Su-57E, apparently, will also be assembled in India.
    1. -1
      4 February 2026 12: 58
      Did Jimmy Disco beat everyone there?
      1. 0
        5 February 2026 09: 52
        There was no dancing, but there were songs.
    2. -1
      4 February 2026 14: 53
      The Indians have a pretty good film about the events in Kashmir, where a regiment of Su-30 MKIs holds the line against some very nasty F-16s.
  8. -1
    4 February 2026 10: 13
    "For the past two decades, India has sought alternative sources of military equipment in the US, France, and Israel. This ended with the Rafale, a scandalous story, of course. But India inevitably returned to its time-tested strategic partner, Russia." This India, like a woman of easy virtue...
  9. -1
    4 February 2026 10: 58
    The author's phrase about China having two 6th(!!!) generation aircraft made me smile. laughing Well, it is implied that they have a 5th generation in abundance lol It should be noted, however, that the US only succeeded in the 5th generation with the F-22, and even then it barely flies, and the F-35 is doubtful that it's even 5th generation. Russia's situation is no better; the Su-57 still exists inexplicably, with some prototypes, prototypes 1 and 2, and so on. The radar isn't up to par, the engine is still essentially undeveloped, and so on. But that's beside the point. The important thing is that the US and Russia are head and shoulders above China in aviation, yet the author insists China is already on the 6th generation. Yes
  10. +3
    4 February 2026 11: 10
    In 1962, the Soviet Union agreed to transfer technology to India for the production of MiG-21 jet fighters, something it had previously denied to China.

    China received a license and documentation package for the MiG-21 in 1960.
    In 1960, China received from the USSR a package of documentation for the MiG-21F-13 fighter, as well as several finished aircraft and assembly kits.
    © Sergey Linnik. Military-technical cooperation between the West and China in the field of combat aviation.
    Moreover, documentation for the R-11F-300 engine was transferred along with the MiG-21 documentation, and specialists were dispatched to establish serial production of the "twenty-first" in China. They worked there until 1964, after which the PRC finally parted ways with the "northern revisionists."
  11. +1
    4 February 2026 15: 30
    This proverb is incorrect. All changes in history have occurred through the efforts of masses of people, led by individuals whose actions were the result of a desire for change—both for themselves and for others. It was a shared struggle. No one lives in a vacuum, and the only thing an individual can do is change their life, but only to the extent that the system allows. Significant change always occurs with the support of broad groups of people.
  12. DO
    0
    4 February 2026 20: 59
    The author has devoted many words to the history of India's relations with the USSR/Russia. However, let's ask, whose side would India take in the event of a direct military conflict between Russia and European NATO? And what about the United States?
    It seems highly probable that India will side with the economically strongest, and it is quite clear that this is not Russia.
    In terms of military power, Russia is objectively stronger, of course, given its political will, adequate for today's turbulent times. However, given the integrity of the Dnieper bridges, the Beskydy Tunnel, and other elements of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' logistics in the fourth year of the Second Military Operation, as well as past deals with the Ukrainian Armed Forces that undermined the goals of the Second Military Operation and Russia as a whole, the world, including the Indians, conclude that this political will is weak compared to the other side's "uninhibited" actions. Therefore, here too, the Indians may side with the alliance they consider the strongest.
    Therefore, it would be wise for the Russian military-industrial complex to focus its efforts not on dubious allies, but rather on its own military. And in the current period of unstable international relations, largely directed against Russia, it would be wise not to transfer any technologies to anyone. Especially not the Su-57, which even exported in finished form should be done very, very carefully and sparingly.
  13. 0
    4 February 2026 22: 12
    Skomorokhov, it's on fire again.

    "After the Rafale was snatched from the Chinese-Pakistani MiG-21s in new packaging, something really needs to be done!"

    Nobody snatched anything from anyone, buffoons. Especially not from a MIG-21.

    Stop spreading this nonsense. I'm really fed up with it.
  14. 0
    4 February 2026 22: 14
    Skomorokhov, why is it so weak and sour!

    "China recently unveiled two sixth-generation fighter jets, plus more than 100,000 of its fifth-generation fighter jets, the J-20, have been produced."

    Why not the 66th generation?

    This is a real piece of nonsense. So many letters, and the article is crap.
  15. 0
    4 February 2026 23: 35
    The story of the Ka-226T, which was supposed to be produced in a quantity of 197 units

    The author certainly wrote everything correctly about this agreement, but it's worth remembering that according to the plans (the ones calling for 1000 aircraft), Russia was supposed to assemble the Ka-226 by 2030. Just one. And now, 200. It seems like a very odd ratio. Could it be that without this contract, not only India, but we, too, ended up missing out on the helicopters? The Indians can buy helicopters from others or try to build something themselves. But our options are limited. So, I wouldn't laugh so much at their "dance," considering we're the partner.