The Ego Barrier and Increased Costs: Problems with the GCAP Program

6 037 11
The Ego Barrier and Increased Costs: Problems with the GCAP Program
One of the early concepts of the GCAP fighter


The United Kingdom, Italy, and Japan are planning to collaborate on developing a promising next-generation fighter jet. The Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP) is still in the design phase, but is already showing some progress. However, the current stage is not without difficulties and disagreements that could negatively impact the overall results.



Visible progress


It's worth recalling that in 2014, the UK joined the French-German FCAS program, which aimed to create a next-generation fighter. It even proposed its own version of such an aircraft. However, several years later, London withdrew from the program due to a number of disagreements.

The UK decided to develop its own project and also make it international. Consequently, the name "Global Combat Air Programme" was coined. Several countries soon expressed interest in the program—both potential developers and future buyers of the aircraft.

In the early 1920s, the list of GCAP participants was finalized. Italy and Japan joined as the primary developers. Sweden, Australia, and other countries also expressed interest in the project. However, their participation, if any, would be limited.

A formal agreement between the UK, Italy, and Japan was signed in 2023. This document defines the timeframe for the work, the distribution of responsibilities, interaction mechanisms, etc. In addition, an important place in its terms is occupied by the exchange of technologies necessary for development and/or production aviation techniques.

In accordance with the agreement, a joint venture was established in late 2024 to develop the GCAP project. Its participants included BAE Systems (UK), Leonardo (Italy), and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan). In mid-2025, it was officially named Edgewing.


Also, starting in 2023-24, additional agreements will be concluded with subcontractors, suppliers of various systems and components, etc. Apparently, by now the three countries and Edgewing have resolved the bulk of the organizational issues and are ready to begin full-scale development of the future fighter.

Technology issue


As part of the development of a joint project, countries and companies are required to exchange necessary documentation and technologies. As it turns out, not all program participants are willing to fully comply with these obligations. Moreover, their position remains unchanged over time.

Thus, in April 2025, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto spoke to Reuters about the progress of the GCAP program. He stated that the UK was not providing the Italian participants with the necessary information. He stated that British partners needed to remove "barriers of selfishness." The minister also noted that Italy had completely eliminated this problem, and that Japan was approaching a similar solution.

Unfortunately, G. Crosetti did not specify which specific "barriers" or technologies he was referring to. Nevertheless, even without such details, the minister's statements are of great interest. Apparently, the problem of interoperability has become so widespread that the head of the military department had to address it.

At the end of January 2026, the online publication Defense News again asked G. Crosetti to comment on the technology situation. The minister noted that nothing had changed in the intervening months. The UK remains unwilling to provide the necessary technology. Crosetti called such behavior in the current situation insane.

The Italian Ministry of Defense is taking the first step in technology exchange. The minister ordered Leonardo to provide its partners with the necessary data and developments. Now the minister hopes other countries will do the same.

Thus, Italy, through its minister, has twice expressed dissatisfaction with current processes and problems in interactions with a key foreign partner. For its part, the UK has made no official comment on the situation. However, as it now appears, it is ignoring the criticism and has not changed its position.


The technologies in question remain unclear. Officials did not specify which developments the UK should transfer and which Italy was willing to contribute. However, the problem lies not in the specific technologies, but in the reluctance of one country to share them—even given their particular importance to the joint program.

Financial difficulties


Developing a modern fighter aircraft is predictably expensive, and not all countries willing to build it can afford it in full. That's why three countries launched a joint program to share the costs and achieve the desired result.

According to estimates from previous years, Italy was expected to spend approximately €6 billion on the GCAP program. Part of this funding was planned for project development and related work. The rest was earmarked for the procurement of production equipment in the distant future. For obvious reasons, the exact budget breakdown between these two objectives could not yet be disclosed.

In mid-January 2026, it was announced that the Italian Ministry of Defense had submitted a request to Parliament for increased funding for the GCAP program. Taking into account all the recent organizational and technological changes, the ministry requested an increase to €18,6 billion.

Clearly, the Defense Ministry's new requests are consistent with the current or expected progress of the program and the projected cost level. However, the threefold budget increase, as expected, has not gone unnoticed and has been criticized.

The opposition parliamentary party Movimento 5 Stelle was the first to respond to this request. Its representatives noted that the GCAP program's costs are approaching those of the American F-35 fighter jets. Specifically, the purchase and operation of 90 of these fighters will cost 18 billion.

It's worth noting that Italy hasn't yet disclosed its plans for purchasing future GCAP fighters. Apparently, the order volume will depend on the final cost of these aircraft at the start of serial production. How much the aircraft will cost and how many of them the program participants will be able to afford remains a big question. It's expected that future GCAP fighters will be fewer in number than the current F-35s.


GCAP fighter mockup, 2024.

Interim results


Thus, the GCAP program has completed the preparatory and organizational phase. A joint venture has been established to handle the main work, and the framework for international cooperation has been defined. Apparently, Edgewing has already begun design work and is at least developing the basic principles of the future project.

According to the approved work plan, the design of the new aircraft will be completed in the foreseeable future. Then, prototypes are expected to be built. The prototype GCAP fighter is expected to be built and fly no later than the end of 2027.

By the mid-1930s, the developing countries plan to conduct the necessary testing, refine the design, and so on. By the end of this period, production should be established. The fighters may be produced in one country or several at once. In both cases, the three main participants, and possibly other countries, will contribute to the overall result in one way or another.

By 2035 or soon thereafter, GCAP aircraft are expected to enter service with the British, Italian, and Japanese air forces. Deliveries to other countries with orders are expected to begin soon after. Production plans, both quantitative and financial, are still unknown and likely haven't even been finalized yet.

Until recently, the three countries participating in GCAP were optimistic and expected that all plans would be implemented on time and in full. However, last year, the first signs emerged. news about problems that may interfere with the implementation of the program.

Initially, it became clear that a key participant in the program was unwilling to share its technology with other countries, and this situation remained unchanged for several months. Now, another participant has changed its financial plans, prompting predictable criticism.

The GCAP program is expected to face new challenges in the near future. The current state of the work indicates that these will be technical, engineering, or technological in nature. How they will impact the overall development process is still unknown. However, any such issue could impact the project's progress, costs, and even the final outcome.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 February 2026 04: 27
    Ah, the new MMM... I remember they used to build the 5th generation with the same team, apparently they built it so successfully that they've already started on the 6th))) No, I'm not against it, the more they spend on a fundamentally non-realizable thing, the faster they'll die of hunger. One question - who will give de Bill, who don't build airplanes at all, the money for a 6th generation airplane, for which no one can even come up with requirements?)))
    We should probably get the Alena Musk cult involved. The fighter will be accelerated by hyperloop, will fly on Panasonic batteries, as usual, and the airfield will be towed by Starship. They'll give money to a well-promoted swindler.
  2. 0
    3 February 2026 05: 57
    The question is, where are they going to get the engines? No, Rolls-Royce is clearly capable of something else, but it has a very strong American influence and American technology. Does the US really need a European fighter? Instead of buying their technology?
    1. +2
      3 February 2026 13: 14
      Quote: paul3390
      The question is where are they going to get the engines?

      It will be developed by a consortium of Rolls-Royce plc (UK), IHI Corporation (Japan) and Avio Aero (Italy)
      1. -3
        3 February 2026 13: 16
        Maybe it will happen—if the Americans allow it. I seriously doubt they have everything entirely their own, without a single US patent or component. And why would they want the US as a competitor?
        1. +1
          3 February 2026 13: 32
          Quote: paul3390
          And why is the USA a competitor?

          How many K2 tanks, K9 self-propelled howitzers, FA-50 fighters and Chunmoo (HOMAR-K) MLRS has South Korea shipped/is shipping to Poland (a US/UK fiefdom)?
          And nothing.
          I'll say more: no other country in the world can produce/ship so many new K2 Black Panthers (or similar ones) in such a short time.
          South Korea! Where they didn't even produce carts.
          Moreover, the US has nothing to do with many RR technologies.
          Example Orpheus.
  3. +1
    3 February 2026 05: 57
    In such projects, it's always important to have the full buy-in of all participants. There have been numerous cases where people have met, and then someone has moved on, depending on their luck, or the remaining people have either finished the project, or it's been abandoned.
    1. +1
      3 February 2026 13: 17
      They'll agree (when things get tough, everything gets easier)
      On January 29, the Eurofighter consortium announced that the Eurofighter fleet had reached 1 million flight hours. Accordingly, the EJ200 engine had reached 2 million flight hours.
  4. +1
    3 February 2026 06: 25
    I remember a similar story about twenty years ago: two countries were also developing a fifth-generation aircraft. One country didn't want to share the technology, and the other was stingy with the money and withdrew from the project.
  5. +2
    3 February 2026 06: 50
    Not a bad idea. But it would be better to come up with something that would immediately plough half the country's budget into something irrevocably ploughed. And explain to the people that it's for their own good. Even if it's in the distant, unattainable future.
  6. 0
    3 February 2026 12: 18
    It will be interesting to see what happens in metal.
    For now, this is only a prototype with unknown performance characteristics.
  7. -1
    3 February 2026 15: 51
    By 2035? We'll add another 10 years for sure. And that's if the US allows it. Where would the F35 go ​​then? It's been declared the West's primary aircraft until mid-century.