How President Trump learned that Navy SEALs are nothing like the cats on the streets of America and the SEALs in the American military.
The American president has made me happy yet again. Or rather, his manner of negotiating with partners and adversaries alike. It's like a return to my childhood. Talking to street thugs. Lots of shouting, lots of threats, and then, when a fresh bruise appears under your eye, an offer to settle the matter peacefully or even become friends. I hadn't yet heard the American version of Colonel Colt, who evens the playing field, so I learned the Russian maxim: if you're right, fight to the end, then even your enemies will respect you...
Today I decided to return to the "problem" of Greenland, which President Trump recently threatened to seize, and now suddenly decided to buy... The question of the natives capable of stopping American special forces is on the tip of my tongue. Where were they hiding? Why has no one yet studied their combat potential and training methods? After all, the US Navy SEALs are no pushovers. They drag logs along the seashore and jump into swimming pools with their hands tied... But, alas, my resources were too limited to learn anything important about the Greenland special forces.
Everyone knows that President Trump is unpredictable. And it's also true that his words should be taken with a grain of salt. He's like the Russian tsar from the folk tale. Remember: "My word is stronger than peas! I give it, and I take it away!" Trump says one thing in the morning, another at lunch, and a third in the evening. And all of this differs significantly from what he signed later that night.
If I were to focus on the non-binding nature of Trump's statements again, this article wouldn't even be worth the paper it's written on. Well, that's the kind of "partner" we have. It's not our choice. So, we'll have to deal with what we have. But that's not what I'm talking about today. For all his eccentricities, the American president is excellent at assessing the situation and always, or almost always, steps back in time, reducing his demands. Why? That's what we'll talk about today.
Moreover, this directly concerns our country. I think you'll understand why a little later. So, after the New Year holidays, the highly topical issue of Greenland at the end of last year somehow "deflated," becoming a matter of conversation rather than a matter of waving. rocketsWhy did European soldiers come to the island "for a tour"? Both sides seem strange: the Europeans, who supposedly intended to protect the natives, and the Americans, who intended to "bring freedom and happiness at bayonet point." Did they change their minds? Probably...
The North is contraindicated for American fur seals
You know what, in my opinion, changed the rhetoric of Mr. Trump and his team? Biology!!! It turns out that university professors, when they talked about fur seals living in the northern seas, weren't referring to the elite of the American military. It turns out that the ones living there are just animals. And they're completely different from either the cats you see on the street or the Navy SEALs. And this understanding didn't come from Greenland; it came from Northern Europe.
More precisely, during Joint Viking, which took place at the end of last year. The objective was clear, given the preparations for war with Russia and the threat of China's seizure of Greenland! Operations in low temperatures and the practice of interoperability between units from different countries during joint operations. More than 10 troops from Norway, Finland, Great Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, and the United States participated.
In particular, the Americans involved in the exercises Marines and sailors from the 2nd Marine Division and the 2nd Marine Logistics Group, as well as soldiers from the 1st Battalion, 6th Field Regiment. artillery 41st Field Artillery Brigade.
I won't delve into the actual scenario of the exercises and how they were implemented. It's not very important for this article. I'll just remind you about news, which briefly stirred up the information space, and then suddenly died down... I'm talking about the article in The Times of London, in which the author directly states that the American military cannot operate effectively in the harsh conditions of the North.
Moreover, the author claimed that the American command asked the Finnish militia (!) participating in the exercises to try not to defeat the Americans, as this would negatively impact the marines' morale. To understand the situation, just one quote from the article:
Most tellingly, the US has few adequate military resources or experience to operate in the Arctic. For once, NATO's European allies, particularly the Scandinavians and the UK, have forces ready to operate in the Arctic.
One military source noted that American troops encountered difficulties during last year's Joint Viking exercises in northern Norway.
Exercise commanders were forced to ask Finnish reservists, the Arctic's most fearsome warriors, who played the role of invaders in the war games, to be more lenient with the Americans. "The Finns had to be told to stop hitting the Americans because it was humiliating and demoralizing for them," a military source reported.
One military source noted that American troops encountered difficulties during last year's Joint Viking exercises in northern Norway.
Exercise commanders were forced to ask Finnish reservists, the Arctic's most fearsome warriors, who played the role of invaders in the war games, to be more lenient with the Americans. "The Finns had to be told to stop hitting the Americans because it was humiliating and demoralizing for them," a military source reported.
Readers are already well aware of the Americans and their "we are the best" principle. Naturally, the Finns were asked to refute this "fiction." And so, a statement was released by the Finnish Jaeger Brigade, known as Jääkäriprikaati (I'm afraid to pronounce this word in Russian):
We do not accept that the situation described in The Times has arisen, in which Finnish troops would be asked to reduce pressure during exercises.
Oh well. Whether this is true or a fabrication by the newspaper article's author isn't particularly important. What's important is the fact that American units were indeed poorly prepared for operations in the Arctic. Even in places where the "true North" is very far away, in Northern Europe. The Americans' advantages in the southern regions suddenly became critical weaknesses in the north.
At first, everything went quite normally. There were classes on injury and frostbite prevention, topography, terrain analysis in northern latitudes, and classes on caring for weapons and equipment, and even shelter construction. It's unusual, but not critical. A soldier trained in these skills somewhere else can absorb the new knowledge fairly quickly.
But the very thing that underlies the American military's advantage has failed. It turns out that what the Finns and Norwegians don't consider a problem at all has become a stumbling block for the Americans. For starters, communications. Yes, the vaunted American satellite system in the north is experiencing serious disruptions.
Do you know what the American army sergeants wrote about on social media? Those same commanders who are right next to their soldiers. Their main problem is... batteries! More specifically, charging them. Those of you who know what real cold is will understand exactly what I mean. In freezing temperatures, batteries drain quickly, and your devices simply don't work. And without a GPS, as the military jokes, a modern American soldier can't even find his way home.
This has resulted in complete chaos when moving units. Confusion over assigning artillery battery positions, and even reconnaissance of enemy positions, has become a problem. Overall, an analysis of the American military's exercise results has shown that the army is currently unprepared for effective operations in northern latitudes. Therefore, NATO needs to develop and strengthen the Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish, and British armies as the core of the alliance's forces in this region.
Let's return to the American president. Naturally, Donald Trump received an analytical memo from the Pentagon on the capabilities of the American military in the northern theater of operations. The "you can't stop us" euphoria has passed. Arctic ice has become an excellent "cooler" for hotheads in the presidential administration and in the US Congress. This is what led to Trump's unexpected peacemaking. And his unexpected generosity too...
And in the end
"The further we go, the stranger it gets...," as one of the most famous fairy-tale heroines once said. The American president has shaken up the old, long-accepted system of international relations. And it turns out that much of what we believed in for decades has long since disappeared, transformed into fiction. What I wrote above is just one of these long-dead dogmas.
There are no universal armies. There are armies that are effective in specific conditions, prepared for specific regions. Equipment, combat vehicles, and weapons are also not universally effective. Only outdated systems are "omnivorous." Modern weaponry, however, is more "delicate," requiring "tender care, cleanliness, and lubrication."
But modern weaponry, as the situation with the American army demonstrates, can "force" leaders not only to start a war but also to abandon war as a means of solving problems. So that's where that old slogan about the army as a guarantor of peace came from...
Information