Professional revolutionary Rozaliya Zemlyachka

15 729 329
Professional revolutionary Rozaliya Zemlyachka

In this article, we'll discuss the famous Rozalia Zemlyachka (Zalkind, Berlin, Samoylova), the daughter of a Jewish merchant of the first guild. She studied medicine in Lyon but became deputy chair of the USSR Council of People's Commissars and the first woman to be awarded the Order of the Red Banner. Modern Wikipedia literally suggests frightening children with her name, but how well-founded is such a sinister reputation? The heroine of today's article is a pure passionary from the cohort of "ardent revolutionaries" fanatically devoted to the ideas of communism. This fanaticism contains both her strengths and weaknesses. The Bolshevik Kostitsyn, who knew Rozalia Zemlyachka well from her time in exile, wrote:

Her virtues are well known. Her impossible character is also well known.

She was demanding and cruel—to herself and to others. Yet she never went beyond the brutality of the civil war—the merciless, even irrational, cruelty that characterized both the Whites and the Reds. However, unexpectedly, due to her brief stay in Crimea, liberated from Wrangel's troops, she became almost the main symbol of revolutionary terror. Fair enough? Hardly. After all, in reality, the repressions in Crimea were carried out not by the Zemlyachka Regional Committee of the RCPb, but by the Crimean Revolutionary Committee and the Special Departments of the Army. fleet.



And, perhaps, one can agree with A. I. Kolpakidi (author of many works on stories special services), who called Rozaliya Zemlyachka the most slandered person in history, on whom more slander has been poured than on Lenin and Stalin combined.

Let's try to understand the fate of this extraordinary woman.

The origin and early life of the heroine of the article



20-year-old Rosalia Zalkind, photo of 1896.

Rozalia's father, Samuil Markovich Zalkind, was a first-guild merchant. Among other assets, he owned a large apartment building in Kyiv and a haberdashery store, considered the city's finest. The question inevitably arises: how corrupt did the regime of the last emperor have to be for the children of this wealthy man to become revolutionaries? His son, Leonid, was a member of the Narodnaya Volya (Narodnaya Volya), his daughter, Maria, a member of the RSDLP (since 1901), and his daughter, Rozalia, born in 1876, initially joined the Socialist Revolutionaries. To be on the safe side, her father sent her to Switzerland for "recovery."

Let's digress a bit to note: the daughter of a wealthy merchant, who was denied everything, grew up a very modest girl, unfashionable, and favored classic-cut dresses in dark shades. One day in Moscow, the Okhrana, through an agent provocateur, "presented" her with a fashionable hat and a beautiful scarf. Rozaliya never wore them, and the police tried in vain to stop young women in similar outfits on the street. By 1905, the Okhrana was already aware of the young revolutionary's preferences—and, after being arrested in Moscow, she calmly left the pretrial detention center wearing a bright and fashionable dress brought by her comrades—and no one recognized her. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.

In 1897, Rozalia Zalkind enrolled in the medical faculty of the University of Lyon. But just a year later, Rozalia dropped out and returned to Kyiv, where she became a member of the local Socialist Revolutionary organization. Her sister, Maria, however, earned a medical degree.


Rosalia and Maria Zalkind, photo 1899

The article's subject led revolutionary agitation among workers and personally embroidered a red banner for the May Day demonstration in the apartment of midwife Sishinskaya. However, almost the entire group, including Rozaliya, was arrested, and she spent several months in prison while the investigation was ongoing. She was eventually released under police supervision. During this time, she met Shmul Berlin, who became her first husband. He was not a Socialist Revolutionary, but a member of the RSDLP, and under his influence, she changed her party affiliation. Thus, Rozaliya Zemlyachka's pre-revolutionary party "service" was extensive, and she joined the cohort of "old party members" (there were no more than 5 of them).

The article's heroine and her fiancé's freedom was short-lived—just a few months: they were arrested and sent into exile in Verkholensk, Siberia, where they married in February 1901. There, the article's heroine met another exile, Leiba Bronstein, who would become world-famous as Leon Trotsky. He gave her a referral to Lenin's close associate, Gleb Krzhizhanovsky, who was in charge of printing and distributing the newspaper Iskra. Rozaliya's husband refused to flee with her, as he did not want to go underground. He became completely disheartened and, deeply depressed, soon committed suicide. Rozaliya, meanwhile, became an underground agent for Iskra, working in Odessa and then in Yekaterinoslav. Here's one of the police "descriptions" from that time:

The teacher, Zinaida Ilyinichna Trelina, who is subject to arrest, has disappeared. Description: slightly above average height, brunette, thin face, pale, wears pince-nez, white lenses in a steel frame, hair tied in a bun, gray eyes.

This young woman soon became a trusted liaison between party leaders abroad and the Russian RSDLP cells. She first met Lenin in 1903—as she herself wrote, either in Zurich or Bern. However, it appears to have occurred in Munich. She later wrote memoirs of her meetings with the leader.

How to become a Demon of the Revolution?


Wikipedia literally says the following about Rozalia Zemlyachka:

She became known under the nickname "Demon" as one of the organizers of the Red Terror in Crimea.

This is too much even for the mentally retarded authors of this publication. In fact, the article's heroine received the nickname "Demon" in Odessa in 1901, but not for any excessive fanaticism, cruelty, or "bloodthirstiness." In fact, she simply used a volume of Lermontov's poem of the same name ("an oriental tale") as a code book.


But if a girl came across a book with Turgenev’s story “Mumu,” she would become, scary to say, Gerasim.
By the way, take a look at what Rosalia Berlin, nicknamed "The Demon," looked like in photographs from the 1900s:



"It's scary, downright creepy," isn't it?

The article's subject changed her party pseudonym several times. From 1905 to 1908, she was "Osipov," from 1911 to 1915, "Valeria," and from 1915 to 1917, "Aunt Anya." It was this last pseudonym that was the most famous; she appeared under it in all Soviet textbooks. Then she was slandered in a pseudo-historical "investigation" published during the perestroika period in Ogonyok. Its author relied on émigré White Guard sources, rife with factual errors and deliberate "fakes," and on the outright lies of a literary Vlasovite with the telling surname Solzhenitsyn, who called Zemlyachka "the fury of the Red Terror." They recalled the article's subject's very first, now almost forgotten, party pseudonym and deliberately linked it to events in Crimea in late 1920 and early 1921. A falsification of the purest kind.

But let us return to the pre-revolutionary activities of Rozaliya Zemlyachka.

Professional revolutionary


The article's heroine's active activities attracted the attention of the authorities, but literally on the eve of her new arrest, she managed to leave for Geneva.

Her party career also advanced: in 1903, Rozaliya became a delegate to the Second Congress of the RSDLP (in Brussels), was co-opted to the party's Central Committee, and in 1904, joined the so-called "Bureau of Majority Committees." She also participated in the Third Congress of the RSDLP, held in London in 1905. Returning to Moscow, she became one of the leaders of the Moscow Committee of the RSDLP, working specifically in the "military cell." She took part in the December military uprising of 1905, after the suppression of which she was arrested again and spent a year and a half in solitary confinement in the Lithuanian Castle. There, she developed scurvy and developed signs of rheumatism. She wrote to her family:

My legs hurt, they ache, I can jump up and down at night from the pain. I can't stand on my feet; they swell up and become like logs. I wake up with a disgusting sensation in my mouth – my mouth is full of blood.

But at the end of the letter:

The way out is to start a merciless fight for what is most precious to me in life.

What can you say here – the highest level of passionarity.

After her release, she carried out party work in various cities, becoming secretary of the Baku organization of the RSDLP in 1909. In 1910, she was forced to leave the country again, and virtually nothing is known about this period of her life. Reliable information about her emerges after her return to Russia: in 1915-1916, we find her as a member of the underground Moscow Bureau of the Central Committee of the RSDLP.

Incidentally, it should be noted that the article's heroine spoke out against Lenin twice. In 1918, she was a fierce opponent of the Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty. In 1919, she joined the so-called "military opposition" and opposed the recruitment of tsarist officers—"military specialists"—into the Red Army. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.

1917 year


In February 1917, the article's heroine became secretary of the now legal—and now underground—Moscow Committee of the RSDLP(b). She was elected a delegate to the 7th (April) All-Russian Conference and the 6th Congress of the RSDLP(b).

On October 25 (November 7), 1917, at a session of the Moscow Soviet, the Bolsheviks proposed the creation of a coalition Military Revolutionary Committee (MRC), which would "provide every possible support to the Revolutionary Committee of the Petrograd Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies." 394 people voted for this proposal, 106 voted against, and 23 abstained. The MRC included Bolsheviks A. Lomov, V. Smirnov, G. Usievich, and N. Muralov, Mensheviks M. Nikolaev and M. Teitelbaum, and Social Democrat and amalgamator I. Konstantinov (on October 31, only the Bolsheviks remained).
In turn, the City Duma created a Committee for Public Safety (CPS), headed by the Socialist Revolutionary V. Rudnev and the commander of the Moscow Military District, Colonel K. Ryabtsev (also a member of the Socialist Revolutionary Party).

Note: there are no supporters of the old regime among the actors. Moreover, no one objects to the dissolution of the Provisional Government—the "provisionalists" are terribly unpopular, they have already demonstrated their worthlessness to everyone, and no one wants to speak out in their defense. Two groups of revolutionaries are arguing—the Socialist Revolutionaries and the Social Democrats. What is the essence of their disagreement? The Bolsheviks demand that power be transferred to the soviets. The Socialist Revolutionaries object, saying that the Constituent Assembly will convene very soon, and it will decide everything. Since the Socialist Revolutionaries won the elections, they should be understood as follows: we will solve everything (and the rest will just sit on the sidelines).

What were the forces of the parties?

The Moscow garrison consisted of approximately 20 soldiers, approximately 5 of whom supported the Military Revolutionary Committee (MRC), while the rest remained neutral. The KOB included cadets from the Aleksandrovsky and Alekseevsky military schools, a number of students, as well as some officers and Cossacks. The total number of opponents of the MRC reached 15. Incidentally, it was then that the first "White Guard" emerged: that was the name of Colonel L. Treskin's detachment, which took control of Nikitsky Gate Square.

The situation escalated sharply on October 27, when a detachment of soldiers, supporters of the Military Revolutionary Committee, who were unfamiliar with Moscow, advanced from the southern outskirts toward the Soviet building and reached the City Duma directly—and encountered patrols of military cadets near Red Square. Attacking them unexpectedly, the cadets killed 70 people. The next day, the cadets blockaded the Kremlin and managed to convince the commandant (Lieutenant O. Berzin) that the Committee for Public Security had won and was now in control of all of Moscow. The gates were opened, and then a monstrous incident occurred, which we know about, in particular, from the account of the commander. artillery Kremlin warehouse of Major General Kaigorodov:

The cadets occupied the Kremlin, placed two machine guns and a vehicle at the Trinity Gate, and began driving soldiers out of the 56th Infantry Reserve Regiment's barracks depot, using rifle butts and threats to force them to do so. The 500 soldiers in the depot were lined up without a fight. weapons In front of the arsenal gates. Several cadets were making their calculations. At that moment, several shots rang out from somewhere, then the cadets opened fire with machine guns and weapons from the Trinity Gate. The unarmed soldiers of the depot, lined up, fell as if mown down, screams and shouts rang out, everyone rushed back to the arsenal gates, but only a narrow gate was open, in front of which a pile of dead bodies had formed: the wounded, the trampled, and the healthy, trying to climb over the gate. After about five minutes, the fire ceased. The remaining wounded groaned, and mutilated corpses lay scattered about.

Thus, the military actions were started by the opponents of the Bolsheviks; it was they who attempted to seize power in Moscow and shed the first blood.


Juncker in the Kremlin

Armed workers were ready to defend the Military Revolutionary Committee (train cars containing 40 rifles were discovered on the railroad tracks). However, local party leaders hesitated, and proposals to negotiate were made. The decisive moment came with the appearance of the article's heroine at a meeting of the Military Revolutionary Committee: she threatened to shoot P. Smidovich, who advocated compromise, and called for an assault on the Kremlin, declaring that all members of the Military Revolutionary Committee would be arrested if they refused. She herself took command of the militias of the Rogozhsko-Simonovsky district of Moscow. Naturally, she did not personally fire the weapons, but rather provided general leadership.


R. Zemlyachka among former underground fighters in the Rogozhsko-Simonovsky district. Photograph from 1923.

The offensive against the rebels began on October 29, but a truce was announced on October 30, and the rebels surrendered on November 2.


Revolutionary troops on Nikolskaya Street. November 2, 1917.

The terms of the capitulation were extremely lenient: the Committee of Public Safety and the White Guard detachment were disbanded, their officers retaining their weapons, and the cadets who had executed the soldiers simply returned to their schools. Everyone received guarantees of freedom and security on the condition that they cease fighting against Soviet power. What do you think happened next? That's right, many of the officers and cadets who had given their "word of honor" immediately left for the Don and soon began the civil war, embarking on the First Kuban ("Ice") March on Yekaterinodar under the command of L. Kornilov.

Rozaliya Zemlyachka on the Southern Front


In late 1918, the article's heroine was assigned to the active army. Initially, she served as a commissar in one of the brigades, and later became head of the political departments of the 8th and 13th Armies on the Southern Front. Here's how Soviet writer Lev Ovalov (future editor-in-chief of the magazines Vokrug Sveta and Molodaya Gvardiya, author of novels about the much-maligned Major Pronin) recalls his first meeting with this woman:

It was a time of fierce fighting for Orel, the Red Army was going on the offensive against Denikin. I had just joined the Komsomol, and the volost party organization sent me on an assignment to the political department of the Thirteenth Army. I waited for the head of the army's political department to appear, and then he did. It was an unforgettable experience! The head of the political department turned out to be a woman in a leather jacket and chrome-plated boots... Before the revolution, I had seen stern, learned women—teachers, doctors, art historians—and here before me was one of them. The head of the political department was informed about me. She turned around, although I still had the feeling that some invisible force had placed me in front of her. She turned and... raised a lorgnette to her nearsighted eyes. Yes, a lorgnette! The first word I heard from her lips was "shoot." The topic was this: an elderly father was hiding his deserter son, and both had just been brought before a tribunal. Zemlyachka was consulted on what to do with them. Deserters were the scourge of the army in those days; they couldn't be given any leniency, and Zemlyachka couldn't, had no right to, show any leniency... Much water had flowed under the bridge since that meeting until I realized that this trait of her character was not called cruelty, but firmness.

In 1920, the article's heroine married for a second time. This marriage lasted only a few months, but she bore this husband's surname for the rest of her life. So, according to documents, she is not Zemlyachka, but Rozaliya Samoylova.

In the next article we will continue and finish the story about Rozalia Zemlyachka.
329 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    8 February 2026 05: 29
    What can you say here – the highest level of passionarity.

    The tsarist regime itself produced gravediggers for the tsar and his retinue.
    Our authorities are making the same mistake by imprisoning freethinkers in penal colonies. what
    The first word I heard from her lips was "shoot"

    This is something she should have done in vain... I personally find this repulsive to such bloodthirsty people... there was no cruel necessity to kill them... following the logic of this Zemlyachka, then the Tsar's bullies should have shot her too. request
    However, power is based on violence... the commissars and the bread-and-cookie sellers have launched this Moloch of death at full blast.
    They killed each other with great relish... civil war... it will write off everything.
    1. +14
      8 February 2026 06: 31
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      There was no cruel necessity to kill them.

      But for some reason, upon hearing about yet another arson attack on a Russian railway, almost everyone advocates for the abolition of the death penalty—to teach others a lesson. Or is this something else entirely?
      1. +6
        8 February 2026 06: 34
        Quote: Fitter65
        Following the arson of a relay cabinet on a Russian railway, almost everyone is advocating for the abolition of the death penalty—to teach others a lesson. Or is this something else entirely?

        No... that's right... imagine the switch cabinet burned down... a passenger train with hundreds of passengers is traveling... the switch didn't change the track at the right moment... the train derailed... people died... what do you think should be done with the arsonist?
        1. +16
          8 February 2026 08: 28
          Zemlyachka, despite all the contradictions in her personality, has one wonderful quality, in my opinion - silverlessnessSuch were Peter the Great, Stalin, Svyatoslav, Arakcheyev... If only she, with her intelligence and energy, could head an anti-corruption committee with the special powers that come with it in today's Russia! There would be a sea of ​​bloodshed. fellow And not in vain! good
          1. +6
            8 February 2026 15: 16
            Quote: Proxima
            Zemlyachka, despite all the contradictions in her personality, has one wonderful quality, in my opinion - selflessness.

            Why does she need diamonds and silver? She could shoot any lover of silver and diamonds. Maybe that was her greatest pleasure. Such people exist. They exist. They are called sadists.
            1. +2
              8 February 2026 21: 38
              Quote: 30 vis
              Such people exist. They exist.

              Yes, Ilf and Petrov also wrote about them:

              Galkin, Palkin, Malkin, Chalkin and Zalkind They looked at me proudly, as if to say: "You see! And you claimed that the masses wouldn't get it..." lol
        2. +8
          8 February 2026 08: 52
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          No... that's right... imagine the switch cabinet burned down... a passenger train with hundreds of passengers is traveling... the switch didn't change the track at the right moment... the train derailed... people died... what do you think should be done with the arsonist?

          If you didn't switch the switch... the train derails... If the control cabinet fails, all traffic is blocked, and no one goes anywhere. And the deserter abandoned his unit at a crucial moment, and the enemy broke through the sector he was supposed to guard/defend. He moved behind the lines, destroyed the unit, and then, building on his success, broke through the front in that sector... What do you think should be done with the deserter?
          1. +4
            8 February 2026 11: 49
            Quote: Fitter65
            And the deserter abandoned his unit at a crucial moment

            Well, yes... but firstly, we don't know what exactly that guy abandoned. And secondly, there was also the father, who, as is clear from the quoted passage, was also put up against the wall, simply because he hid his son...
            1. +2
              8 February 2026 11: 56
              Quote: Senior Sailor
              But firstly, we don't know what exactly that guy threw away. And secondly, there was also the father, who, as is clear from the above passage, was also put up against the wall, simply because he hid his son.

              Therefore, if we don’t know what these people did and what the consequences of their misdeeds were, perhaps we shouldn’t blame the person who knew all the circumstances at the time and better understood the punishment they deserved for the harsh decision they made.
            2. 0
              8 February 2026 18: 14
              1. It doesn’t matter what post the guy abandoned. He deserted.
              2. Can you imagine what kind of enemy of Soviet power the father of his executed son would have become in the context of the Civil War? He, too, committed a crime during wartime. So...
              1. +2
                9 February 2026 11: 11
                Quote: boriz
                Can you imagine what kind of enemy of Soviet power my father would have become?

                Do you think the rest of the family should have been put to death as well?
          2. +7
            8 February 2026 13: 05
            There is too little information about the deserter to make a decision about her decision.
            1. +3
              8 February 2026 13: 40
              There is too little information about the deserter to make a decision about her decision.


              But Ovalov has how Zemlyachka, with the same deserters, repelled the attack of Denikin's forces.
              1. +5
                8 February 2026 13: 49
                I fully admit it. Those Times were still Those Times, and many things may be incomprehensible to us in the 21st century.

                P.S. By the way, I lived through the 70s, 80s, and 90s and remember them well. And now, when I tell my daughter about life in the USSR, I see that there's a lot she simply doesn't understand.
            2. +1
              8 February 2026 15: 22
              Quote: Technician_Harlan
              There is too little information about the deserter to make a decision about her decision.

              We don't have much. But she had enough. To make the right decision at the time.
          3. 0
            8 February 2026 19: 17
            Quote: Fitter65
            And the deserter at a crucial moment abandoned his unit, in the area that he was supposed to guard/defend
            they is not obliged to serve illegal to the bandit authorities, no one elected them... Why the hell?

            It's obvious. Let the Zalkinds go to the front.
            Ah, we need Zalkinds in the rear to shoot Russian men...
            1. -2
              9 February 2026 11: 30
              Are you an anti-Semite?
              Russia is a federal state.
              Write about today's Zalkinds shooting at Russian men.
              It will be funny to read.
              1. +1
                9 February 2026 12: 12
                Quote: reframing
                Russia is a federal state.

                The United States is a federal state Yes
      2. -3
        8 February 2026 10: 40
        Quote: Fitter65
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        There was no cruel necessity to kill them.

        But for some reason, upon hearing about yet another arson attack on a Russian railway, almost everyone advocates for the abolition of the death penalty—to teach others a lesson. Or is this something else entirely?

        It's a naive, kindergarten belief that someone's death will stop others.
        For 1,300 (one thousand, three hundred!) years, Islam has been stoning wives caught in adultery. The most public way possible—in public squares, the most publicly known—every faithful is obligated to throw a stone, and the most painful way—stoning to death.
        Still in some countries.
        Did this stop women from cheating - someone else's death for 1,300 years, if they are still being slaughtered???
        Nonsense, a person never applies someone else's death to oneself.
        1. VLR
          +10
          8 February 2026 10: 47
          It doesn't stop it, but it reduces it by an order of magnitude. Zlatan Ibrahimovic, for example, noted with disappointment and surprise after the World Cup in Qatar: street crime and drug trafficking exist in Sweden, but for some reason, not in Qatar.
          1. +9
            8 February 2026 13: 16
            Quote: VlR
            It doesn't stop it, but it reduces it by an order of magnitude. Zlatan Ibrahimovic, for example, noted with disappointment and surprise after the World Cup in Qatar: street crime and drug trafficking exist in Sweden, but for some reason, not in Qatar.

            Hmm, did he live in Qatar for 10 years or at least walk around the slums for a year?!!
            In 8 years of living in Moscow and the Moscow region in the 1980s and 1990s (in parts), I was never stopped on the street, never robbed, and never offered drugs.
            Does this mean that in Moscow and the Moscow region there was no crime or drugs at all????!!!!
            Someone's extremely subjective opinion (he lived in a decent area in a decent house and drove a car - which practically excludes contact with the local population!!!) - is of no importance.
            Even the statistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of a given country do not always show this - and the opinion of a football player can be safely ignored
            1. VLR
              +1
              8 February 2026 16: 56
              Qatar is an Islamic country with very strict laws. Similarly, you won't find much to do in the Emirates: there, migrants, who significantly outnumber locals, work from dawn to dusk, walk the walk, and know they'll be sent home without question at the appointed time. Meanwhile, in Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, and so on, they live on welfare, deal drugs, steal on the streets, and establish their own rules. Some, like the Albanians in Italy, take over local criminal gangs with centuries-old traditions.
              1. +1
                8 February 2026 21: 06
                Quote: VlR
                Qatar is an Islamic country with very strict laws. Similarly, you can't really have much fun in the Emirates: migrants, who significantly outnumber locals, work from dawn to dusk, walk the walk, and know they'll be sent home without question at the appointed time.

                Our workers from the tobacco fields came to work there. They work for a day, two, and it's dreary, No alcohol - death penalty belay .
                On the 3rd day they asked the receptionist - he gave it to them for 10 bucks password belay lol from the utility room. There sits local and sells booze - purely for his own people and Russians.
                This is enough to understand that if you want to, you can find everything, and a picture in the brain of a Swedish footballer differs from reality as heaven and earth
                I repeat -
                Quote: your1970
                For 8 years of living in Moscow and the Moscow region, 1980-1990(in pieces) - I was never stopped on the street, never robbed, and never offered drugs.
                Does this mean that in Moscow and the Moscow region there was no crime or drugs at all????!!!!

                Considering that in Moscow at that time, shooters were shooting right on the streets and there were plenty of random deaths?
              2. +5
                9 February 2026 11: 09
                Quote: VlR
                Qatar is an Islamic country with very strict laws. Similarly, you can't really have much fun in the Emirates.

                Iran, too. But the underground booze market there is just as good as our legal one.
                1. -2
                  9 February 2026 11: 17
                  What does booze have to do with it? After all, the initial discussion was about street crime and drug trafficking.
                  1. +2
                    9 February 2026 11: 22
                    Quote: vet
                    What does booze have to do with it? After all, the initial discussion was about street crime and drug trafficking.

                    Well, probably because the strictness of the laws does not mean the absence of crime.
                  2. +2
                    9 February 2026 12: 05
                    Quote: vet
                    What does booze have to do with it? After all, the initial discussion was about street crime and drug trafficking.

                    The death penalty for selling alcohol, and a prison sentence for street crime. If there's alcohol trafficking, why wouldn't there be street crime?
                    1. -2
                      9 February 2026 17: 26
                      So, you want to say that the level of street crime in Abu Dhabi, Riyadh, Dhaka, Tehran is the same as in Paris, Marseille, Amsterdam, New York, Detroit and so on?
                      1. +4
                        9 February 2026 18: 24
                        It depends on what you consider street crime. For example, in Barcelona, ​​you won't get mugged at all (at least that was the case 12 years ago), but they'll pick your pockets pretty good if you don't watch your back.
                      2. +2
                        9 February 2026 18: 57
                        Quote: 3x3zsave
                        In Barcelona, ​​you won't be picked on at all if you try to stop someone (at least that's how it was 12 years ago),

                        It's already outdated... robberies in Barcelona right on the central streets, the police "don't see" and don't react... In December 25th, our guys got a good beating there, good thing they saved their faces... )
                      3. +1
                        9 February 2026 19: 47
                        Hmmm... It would be interesting to compare. It's a shame I won't be going to Barcelona again.
                      4. +5
                        9 February 2026 18: 51
                        Quote: vet
                        So, you want to say that the level of street crime in Abu Dhabi, Riyadh, Dhaka, Tehran is the same as in Paris, Marseille, Amsterdam, New York, Detroit and so on?

                        Everything I wanted to say, I wrote above.
                        Quote: your1970
                        Quote: VlR
                        It doesn't stop it, but it reduces it by an order of magnitude. Zlatan Ibrahimovic, for example, noted with disappointment and surprise after the World Cup in Qatar: street crime and drug trafficking exist in Sweden, but for some reason, not in Qatar.

                        Hmm, did he live in Qatar for 10 years or at least walk around the slums for a year?!!
                        In 8 years of living in Moscow and the Moscow region in the 1980s and 1990s (in parts), I was never stopped on the street, never robbed, and never offered drugs.
                        Does this mean that in Moscow and the Moscow region there was no crime or drugs at all????!!!!

                        Someone's extremely subjective opinion (he lived in a decent area in a decent house and drove a car - which practically excludes contact with the local population!!!) - is of no importance.
                        Even the statistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of a given country do not always show this - and the opinion of a football player can be safely ignored


                        And a little more about comparisons:
                        World Population Review Crime Rates lol lol lol :
                        "Qatar has the lowest crime rate. The country's crime index is just over 12. lol The country's favorable performance is thanks to the tireless work of relevant agencies, particularly the Ministry of Interior and other institutions that ensure security both within the country and at the borders. In terms of traveler safety, Qatar is considered safe even for women traveling alone.
                        "Among the CIS countries, Uzbekistan turned out to be the safest with an index of 33,42 belay Moldova follows with an index of 46,35. Kazakhstan is in third place with 53,77. The most criminal belay belay belay belay Belarus became one of the CIS countries belay belay belay with an index of 59,58, belay belay Kyrgyzstan follows with a crime rate of 59,58. Tajikistan and Turkmenistan are not represented in the World Population Review ranking.
                        After Belarus was named the most criminal country in the CIS, taking seriously someone's claim about low crime in Qatar is, at the very least, foolish.
                        It's like "Finland is the happiest country according to indexes—its citizens are extremely happy," yet Finland consistently ranks first in suicide rates. Apparently, happiness makes people hang themselves...
                      5. -1
                        10 February 2026 09: 18
                        Regarding the happiness of Scandinavians who are all addicted to antidepressants, I completely agree. But regarding your strange doubts about safety in Doha or Abu Dhabi, I disagree. In Paris or Amsterdam, it's practically the "law of the jungle"—you'll get robbed, and the police won't even take a report.
                      6. +2
                        10 February 2026 10: 00
                        Quote: vet
                        Regarding the happiness of Scandinavians who are all addicted to antidepressants, I completely agree. But regarding your strange doubts about safety in Doha or Abu Dhabi, I disagree. In Paris or Amsterdam, it's practically the "law of the jungle"—you'll get robbed, and the police won't even take a report.

                        I gave you the example of Moscow in the 1990s—when the Lyubers were beating up the Saransk guys on Red Square, and the cops were huddled against the walls. I was never stopped, robbed, or offered drugs. Does that mean there was no crime in Moscow?
                        I gave you the example of alcohol and the death penalty for it.
                        I gave you an example with Belarus - I think LAG's eyes were like potatoes when he read about Belarus, the most criminal country in the CIS.
                        The statistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs can still be relatively (!!!) trusted, but even then not always
                      7. -2
                        10 February 2026 10: 13
                        Yes, our tourists who have been to the Emirates, for example, will all confirm that you feel absolutely safe there. Moreover, in Hurghada or Sharm, Egypt, you can walk around the city at night without fear of being robbed, and you can easily hand over an expensive camera or phone to the first person you meet (to take a photo) without fear of being scammed. The only thing they might do is sell you something for three times the price. But in Barcelona or Paris, you have to watch your pockets and bag.
                      8. +3
                        10 February 2026 11: 22
                        Quote: vet
                        Yes, our tourists who have been to the Emirates, for example, will all confirm that you feel absolutely safe there. Moreover, in Hurghada or Sharm, Egypt, you can walk around the city at night without fear of being robbed, and you can easily hand over an expensive camera or phone to the first person you meet (to take a photo) without fear of being scammed. The only thing they might do is sell you something for three times the price. But in Barcelona or Paris, you have to watch your pockets and bag.

                        Two of my colleagues, 23 and 25, went to Dagestan together this summer. Separately, they were cute and big—wow. feel !! - peach...
                        When I saw their photos there, I said I wouldn't go back, they'd steal them... Don't play around with shorts, tank tops, flip-flops...
                        If I were young and unmarried, I would get married right away, by God lol
                        Returned.
                        The only incident was that they got a kick in the ass when they went to the mosque. belay during prayer belay in this form belay locked themselves in.

                        Dagestan, not Chechnya - where Kadyrov hissed with his "Sit, be patient and keep quiet - tourists are bringing money to the republic."
                        A place where people were actually kidnapped 20 years ago.
        2. +5
          8 February 2026 11: 08
          Quote: your1970
          It's a naive, kindergarten belief that someone's death will stop others.
          For 1,300 (one thousand three hundred!) years in Islam, wives caught in adultery have been stoned to death.

          This was about civilized countries, not the Middle Ages.
          The death penalty serves not as a punishment, but as a warning to others. One might even say it's a preventative measure.
          1. +1
            8 February 2026 13: 07
            Quote: Konnick
            This was about civilized countries, not the Middle Ages.
            The death penalty serves not as a punishment, but as a warning to others. One might even say it's a preventative measure.

            And as in this case howl of the hammered served as a "preventative measure" - if they have been slaughtering for 1300 years?

            Quote: Konnick
            This was about civilized countries, not the Middle Ages.

            Civilized?
            okay
            The USSR was a civilized country, absolutely within the framework of the current legislation LEGALLY During the state of siege in Moscow, 1080 people were shot on the spot for panicking and agitation, without trial or investigation.
            This was vitally necessary, the authorities had the right to do this and acted under conditions of extreme necessity.
            The information was posted on all the posts and fences, it was read on the radio, and the population told each other about it.
            Knew ALL 100% of Moscow's population will be slapped without a doubt.
            Nevertheless, tomorrow, and the day after, and a month later, there were people shouting, "The authorities have betrayed us!" Moscow will be surrendered!! We have been abandoned!! Stalin!!" stopped Did the cops and soldiers passing by yesterday and the day before stop them, pull them out of the crowd and shoot them right there?
            1. +4
              8 February 2026 13: 22
              Quote: your1970
              Quote: Konnick
              This was about civilized countries, not the Middle Ages.
              The death penalty serves not as a punishment, but as a warning to others. One might even say it's a preventative measure.

              And as in this case howl of the hammered served as a "preventative measure" - if they have been slaughtering for 1300 years?

              Quote: Konnick
              This was about civilized countries, not the Middle Ages.

              Civilized?
              okay
              The USSR was a civilized country, absolutely within the framework of the current legislation LEGALLY During the state of siege in Moscow, 1080 people were shot on the spot for panicking and agitation, without trial or investigation.
              This was vitally necessary, the authorities had the right to do this and acted under conditions of extreme necessity.
              The information was posted on all the posts and fences, it was read on the radio, and the population told each other about it.
              Knew ALL 100% of Moscow's population will be slapped without a doubt.
              Nevertheless, tomorrow, and the day after, and a month later, there were people shouting, "The authorities have betrayed us!" Moscow will be surrendered!! We have been abandoned!! Stalin!!" stopped Did the cops and soldiers passing by yesterday and the day before stop them, pull them out of the crowd and shoot them right there?

              And I'll add a little - in China, last year, 1 млн cases of corruption - when 7 млн civil servants. Previous years from 200 to 500,000 cases.
              They - the whole 1 million- Did you live in space and not know that in China they shoot for corruption???!!!
              1. mz
                +2
                8 February 2026 15: 15
                Quote: your1970

                I'll add a bit: last year, 1 million corruption-related cases were filed in China, involving 7 million government officials. Previous years saw between 200,000 and 500,000 cases.
                They - all 1 million of them - lived in space and didn’t know that in China they shoot for corruption???!!!

                Most likely, the majority of these cases were brought not only against civil servants, but against people who do not have the status of civil servants: doctors, teachers, minor municipal or rural officials.
                1. +2
                  8 February 2026 17: 44
                  Quote: mz
                  Quote: your1970

                  I'll add a bit: last year, 1 million corruption-related cases were filed in China, involving 7 million government officials. Previous years saw between 200,000 and 500,000 cases.
                  They - all 1 million of them - lived in space and didn’t know that in China they shoot for corruption???!!!

                  Most likely, the majority of these cases were brought not only against civil servants, but against people who do not have the status of civil servants: doctors, teachers, minor municipal or rural officials.

                  Supporters of the "type of communism in China" love to point to Russia in this figure of 7 million civil servants - "look at how effective the managers in China are, that out of 1.5 billion people there are only 7 million of them. Not like ours...".
                  And yes, the news mentioned precisely “1 million corruption cases against civil servants.”
                  1. mz
                    +1
                    8 February 2026 18: 42
                    Quote: your1970

                    Supporters of the "type of communism in China" love to point to Russia in this figure of 7 million civil servants - "look at how effective the managers in China are, that out of 1.5 billion people there are only 7 million of them. Not like ours...".
                    And yes, the news mentioned precisely “1 million corruption cases against civil servants.”

                    Found in a Chinese building in English
                    https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202601/1353478.shtml
                    There is no mention that 1 million (more precisely 983 thousand) are civil servants.
                    1. +3
                      8 February 2026 21: 14
                      Quote: mz
                      Quote: your1970

                      Supporters of the "type of communism in China" love to point to Russia in this figure of 7 million civil servants - "look at how effective the managers in China are, that out of 1.5 billion people there are only 7 million of them. Not like ours...".
                      And yes, the news mentioned precisely “1 million corruption cases against civil servants.”

                      Found in a Chinese building in English
                      https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202601/1353478.shtml
                      There is no mention that 1 million (more precisely 983 thousand) are civil servants.

                      Even if it is so, even if it is so - what does it change?
                      983,000 people haven't heard - what kind of corruption is being regularly shot at in China?
        3. 0
          9 February 2026 19: 56
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          .
          It's a naive, kindergarten belief that someone's death will stop others.
          For 1,300 (one thousand, three hundred!) years, Islam has been stoning wives caught in adultery. The most public way possible—in public squares, the most publicly known—every faithful is obligated to throw a stone, and the most painful way—stoning to death.
          Still in some countries.
          Did this stop women from cheating - someone else's death for 1,300 years, if they are still being slaughtered???

          Are you sure that their guilt has been fully proven, or is the husband’s testimony/suspicions sufficient?
          1. +5
            9 February 2026 21: 20
            Quote: Panin (Michman)
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            .
            It's a naive, kindergarten belief that someone's death will stop others.
            For 1,300 (one thousand, three hundred!) years, Islam has been stoning wives caught in adultery. The most public way possible—in public squares, the most publicly known—every faithful is obligated to throw a stone, and the most painful way—stoning to death.
            Still in some countries.
            Did this stop women from cheating - someone else's death for 1,300 years, if they are still being slaughtered???

            Are you sure that their guilt has been fully proven, or is the husband’s testimony/suspicions sufficient?

            Didn't you know that all you have to do is grab a woman's heel? And that's it - her guilt is proven!!

            Seriously speaking, the conversation was about the ineffectiveness of the death threat as a means of preventing crime.
            1300 years of stonings don't stop the next ones....
            1. +2
              9 February 2026 21: 45
              Quote: your1970
              Seriously speaking, the conversation was about the ineffectiveness of the death threat as a means of preventing crime.

              The threat of death does not prevent crime, but it effectively reduces its scale.
              There are no means to prevent crime.
              Everything else is fornication and demagoguery.
              1. +5
                9 February 2026 22: 11
                Quote: Silhouette
                The threat of death does not prevent crime, but effectively lol reduces its scale.

                It reduces it so effectively - why hasn't women figured it out in 1300 years????
                For 400 years in the Middle Ages, counterfeiters were roasted alive—everyone knew, "Oh, it smells like barbecue, let's go take a look." Didn't it last 400 years?
                In China, last year, there were cases 980 000 Corruption-related cases per 7 million civil servants. Previously, there were between 200,000 and 500,000 cases annually. Don't they realize in China that people are shot for corruption, among other things?
                In Moscow, 1080 people were executed for the state of siege—they didn't know that barking at the Soviet government would get them slapped on the spot and that they should keep their tongues shut? But they continued to bark throughout the entire siege.

                And at what point did the threat of death diminish in scale?
                1. +1
                  10 February 2026 18: 05
                  Quote: your1970
                  And at what point did the threat of death diminish in scale?

                  Everywhere and always. In all the cases you mentioned.
                  1. +3
                    10 February 2026 19: 33
                    Quote: Silhouette
                    Quote: your1970
                    And at what point did the threat of death diminish in scale?

                    Everywhere and always. In all the cases you mentioned.

                    If it had really reduced the level and been a preventative measure, then the women would have gone quiet in 100 years, the counterfeiters in a year, there wouldn't have been 1 million cases in China, and in Moscow in November 1941 everyone would have been chanting in unison "Long live Soviet power!!"
                    It doesn't work like that - it's a sanitary cleaning of the area, nothing more...
      3. +1
        8 February 2026 16: 44
        Quote: Fitter65
        But for some reason, upon hearing about yet another arson attack on a Russian railway, almost everyone advocates for the abolition of the death penalty.

        ...There is no death penalty in the Russian Federation.
        1. -3
          8 February 2026 16: 47
          Quote: Chack Wessel
          ...There is no death penalty in the Russian Federation.

          It's so good you told me, because we, the uneducated ones here, didn't know... In the Russian Federation, there is a moratorium on the death penalty, or capital punishment... So many are advocating for the abolition of this moratorium...
          1. +3
            8 February 2026 17: 07
            So, lifting the moratorium on the death penalty and abolishing the death penalty are, like, opposite things. Yes.
            1. +3
              8 February 2026 17: 46
              Quote: Chack Wessel
              So, lifting the moratorium on the death penalty and abolishing the death penalty are, like, opposite things. Yes.

              Don't pay attention—a lot of people here are just blaming the "enemy" label without reading. Sometimes they look utterly stupid...
              1. 0
                9 February 2026 05: 17
                ...That's true...As for lifting the moratorium on the criminal investigation, we first need to determine who this criminal investigation will be used against and what actions will be punished under it. I have some suspicions that, under our judicial system, those who advocate for its use are more likely to be subject to the criminal investigation.
        2. 0
          9 February 2026 19: 58
          Quote: Chack Wessel
          Quote: Fitter65
          But for some reason, upon hearing about yet another arson attack on a Russian railway, almost everyone advocates for the abolition of the death penalty.

          ...There is no death penalty in the Russian Federation.

          I think 5 years in prison gives you time to think and grow up.
    2. +2
      8 February 2026 11: 40
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The tsar's bullies should have shot her fellow countrywomen too.
      Of course. The whole family, including dad.
    3. +4
      8 February 2026 13: 36
      The first word I heard from her lips was "shoot"

      - this is the norm for GV, in the confession of a Cossack, the Whites shot such people with a machine gun and were not embarrassed.
    4. +1
      9 February 2026 13: 00
      -who called Rozalia Zemlyachka the most slandered person in history,
      The controversial issue is that Mkhlis got no less.
  2. 0
    8 February 2026 06: 25
    The article is not good at all.
    The author tries to mold a passionate woman out of a maniac (!?), and even quotes Zemlyachka herself as saying that she constantly feels like there is blood in her throat, and that her legs and arms itch, and from this the author concludes that...the highest level of passionarity.
    She was a witch of the highest level.
    1. -5
      8 February 2026 06: 54
      Why would the Ashkenazi Jewish sect feel sorry for the Russians? Even now, you look at the negotiations...
      1. +3
        8 February 2026 18: 15
        "Why would the Ashkenazi Jewish sect feel sorry for the Russians? Even now, you look at the negotiations... and there..." Words of gold! Those who are trying to bend Russia during the negotiations are Witkoff, Kushner, and Grünbaum. Three out of three (lovers of little black hats), as if the US doesn't have enough descendants of the British, Germans, or Italians!
        1. -1
          8 February 2026 19: 46
          You forgot about the Kyiv Jew Dmitriev from us and a bunch of cocaine Jews from Zelibobra.
        2. +2
          9 February 2026 13: 38
          -RAYMOND PAULS.- THE MAIN KILLERS IN 1917-1918 WERE LATVIANS AND JEWS, NOT RUSSIANS.
          It has long been known that Jews suffered no less at the hands of the Jew Yakir than at the hands of Petliura's forces.
          In 1918 alone, 245 major counter-revolutionary uprisings were recorded, in the suppression of which Latvian riflemen were used.
    2. -3
      8 February 2026 07: 01
      Quote: bober1982
      She was a witch of the highest level.

      good
      In this article we will talk about the famous Rosalia Zemlyachka (Zalkind, Berlin, Samoylova) – the daughter of a Jewish merchant of the 1st guild

      The author decided that most of the audience doesn't know the story and decided to whitewash this monstrous witch?!
      But the audience turned out to be knowledgeable...
      Author minus!
      1. +1
        8 February 2026 07: 04
        Quote: your vsr 66-67
        The author decided

        The author of the article, as they say, has hit rock bottom, because his stories and conclusions are simply incredible.
      2. VLR
        +17
        8 February 2026 07: 17
        That's exactly it—unfortunately, they don't know history. All the stories about the article's heroine's incredible cruelty come from people who weren't even close to Crimea at the time. Particularly noteworthy are Melgunov, the émigré forger who collected gossip in Berlin and whose book is replete with monstrous inaccuracies, and Sultan-Galiev, the Tatar nationalist Zemlyachka's enemy, who demanded the creation of a Muslim army in Crimea, categorically opposed the establishment of sanatoriums there, and dreamed of an independent Crimea, Bashkiria, and Tatarstan. On the other hand, the true organizers of the terror—the leaders of the Crimean Revolutionary Committee and the Special Departments of the Army and Navy—attempted to shift their sins onto her. Khrushchev also attributed the crimes of his friend Yezhov to Beria (who had stopped Yezhov's repressions). Zemlyachka was the secretary of the Regional Party Committee, which was not involved in repression but in economic matters—establishing peaceful life in Crimea. This "black legend" about a "bloody maniac" was supported by Soviet bribe-takers and embezzlers, whom Zemlyachka fought her entire life, preventing them from acting arbitrarily and stealing. Zemlyachka is highly unpopular with the current authorities, because such people are extremely dangerous to any overly self-important bureaucrats. If she or her reincarnation had found herself in a similar position today, we would not have heard about the staggering cases of theft, falsification of records, and corruption that only came to light after the start of the SVO. And this entire operation would have unfolded according to a completely different scenario.
        1. +6
          8 February 2026 11: 23
          Since when did Yezhov become Khrushchev's friend?
        2. +2
          8 February 2026 15: 01
          Quote: VlR
          bribe-takers and embezzlers, whom Zemlyachka fought against all her life, not allowing them to act arbitrarily and steal.

          Let me remind the author that this “hard worker” worked at the KSK under the leadership Gemran spies, enemies of the people and saboteurs chairmen Antipov, Belenyi, Kosior.

          That's how much it was rotten through and through the state, even if control was under the power of enemies of the people, as were the government, people's commissariats, the army, the NKVD, trade unions, etc.

          Does anyone know which country has had such a number of convicted traitors in its leadership?

          A- there are no more like this...
        3. -2
          8 February 2026 15: 35
          And what do you want?
          There are two publications in AiF on the Internet:

          https://aif.ru/society/history/tovarisch_demon_pochemu_bolshevichku_zemlyachku_boyalis_dazhe_ee_soratniki

          https://aif.by/timefree/history/pravda_o_zemlyachke_uzhas_terrora_ili_obuzdanie_bespredela_v_krymu

          One - from 2012 signed by Pozdnyakova - Zemlyachka - a fanatical killer,
          The second one in 2021 was signed by Kudryashov - Zemlyachka is simply a wonder woman and a great girl....
          The third one is on Zen, a Yandex publication without the author's signature - again, Zemlyachka the butcher...

          Everything is clear about Wikipedia, there is this and that, referring to Melgunov and Solzhenitsyn, which can already be considered a mark of lies...
          In reality, no one presents any documents (not just talk, but documents), although this is not a big secret.
          In the Crimean archives there is a file called fond 6 opis 6 file 1b - "Book of minutes of meetings of the Minor Board of the Crimean Regional Extraordinary Commission for 1921", with a whopping 493 pages... There are several such files in the archive, for different periods of time - why not read it?
          Or there is also case 66 for the years 1922-1941...
          By the way, it would be a good idea to familiarize yourself with the "Wrangel Archive" - ​​although it covers the period December 1918 - December 1919...
          Therefore, everything expressed here, with all due respect, is a personal opinion, unsupported by documents. For a military unit, it's rather weak...

          The article doesn't reveal who this woman really was; rather, it paints a picture of a mentally unstable, deeply hurt, vindictive, and cruel woman, a misanthrope...
          It's possible that researchers are deliberately avoiding this figure—it's of no interest to understand the motives of a potential psychiatric patient against the backdrop of truly significant figures...

          A sick man, tormented by severe pain—and he's also the arbiter of fates... You don't really expect correct and well-thought-out decisions here, hence—without understanding the deserters' case—they just "shoot" them... Meanwhile, the investigative bodies were already working differently, conducting investigations and releasing people (again, referring to the cases I wrote about above)... There were excesses, how did Zemlyachka feel about it? Who was she? The article itself is very contradictory, in my opinion.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. +4
          9 February 2026 12: 15
          Quote: VlR
          If she or her reincarnation had found herself in a similar position in our time, we would not have heard about the mind-boggling facts of theft, falsification of records, and corruption that were revealed only after the start of the SVO.

          Hmm, of the 56 generals executed during WWII, 6 were executed, in part, for "embezzlement." belay . Without capitalists/oligarchs....
          And below they were stealing like crazy...
          One commandant - a colonel who distributed 2 echelon belay gifts to the front - "unidentified persons" - what was it worth...
          And the story with the awards for the fake military unit - which wasn't on any lists, but they still showered them with medals - also clearly wasn't without money.
        6. +5
          10 February 2026 10: 39
          Quote: VlR
          If she or her reincarnation had found herself in a similar position today, we wouldn't have heard about the mind-boggling cases of theft, falsification, and corruption that only came to light after the start of the SVO. And the entire operation would have unfolded according to a completely different scenario.

          The Soviet-Finnish War sends you its warmest greetings. wink
          Fifteen years of bravura reports and boastful speeches have turned into a triumph of mismanagement, falsifications, and outright lies. The result: incompetence. invincible and legendaryMoreover, the facts of the systemic collapse of the Red Army were reflected even in high-level documents, such as the Act on the Adoption of the People's Commissariat of Defense of the USSR.
          1. -3
            10 February 2026 10: 50
            Now imagine what would have happened under a weaker government!
      3. 0
        8 February 2026 13: 43
        Quite the opposite, you and your ilk don't know Russian history. The author correctly identified who carried out the repressions in Crimea; lists of who executed whom, where, and when have long been available online. But you and your ilk don't give a damn about Russian history.
    3. +5
      8 February 2026 12: 00
      Quote: bober1982
      The article is not good at all.
      The author is trying to mold a passionate woman from a maniac.

      Well, in our country, they made a lamb out of Kolchak, the executioner of Siberia. Although on January 26, 1999, the Military Court of the Transbaikal District, having reviewed Kolchak's case, issued a ruling declaring him ineligible for rehabilitation. The ruling was appealed to a higher court, the Military Collegium of the Court of the Russian Federation, and was upheld in 2001.
      1. -2
        8 February 2026 19: 33
        Quote: Fitter65
        and the Military Court of the Transbaikal District, having examined the materials of the Kolchak case,

        You, these Bolshev burps, are considering a case without a representative for the accused, forget it already. The Russian Constitutional Court has banned such nonsense.
        1. VLR
          +4
          8 February 2026 20: 54
          It's been explained a hundred times: the Smolninsky District Court of St. Petersburg found that Kolchak was sentenced to death in violation of legal procedures. And that's simply a statement of fact, which doesn't overturn the decisions of two higher courts recognizing Kolchak as a war criminal. These are different legal issues. The first concerns the legal subtleties surrounding the sentencing. The second concerns the decisions of the higher courts not to sentence Kolchak to death, but to recognize him as a war criminal. And therefore, this same Smolninsky District Court simultaneously declared the installation of a memorial plaque to Kolchak illegal—based solely on the decision of the Transbaikal Military Court regarding Kolchak's war crimes. And the plaque was removed. And the district court couldn't and can't even consider overturning the Supreme Court's decision, which also exists.
          1. +2
            9 February 2026 12: 35
            Quote: VlR
            It has been explained a hundred times already: the Smolninsky District Court of St. Petersburg found that Kolchak was sentenced to death in violation of legal procedures.

            I'll explain for the hundredth time: there was no trial against Kolchak - that's a FACT.

            Smolninsky District Court of St. Petersburg in January 2017, r his execution in 1920 extrajudicial execution, i.e. unlawfully.

            consideration of the case.... without a representative/defender of the accused- Illegal - see the Constitutional Court of Russia, forget about the so-called "courts"

            The military court issued a ruling denying Kolchak's rehabilitation based on the military prosecutor's conclusion, without examining the case on the merits.
            1. 0
              9 February 2026 17: 29
              Kolchak is a war criminal, not subject to rehabilitation precisely for his crimes against humanity. And the fact that he was executed without due process—how many people were executed and tortured under his watch in Siberia, without any trial or investigation?
              1. +2
                10 February 2026 09: 35
                Quote: vet
                Kolchak is a war criminal

                Did not have Kolchak's trial and he does not need rehabilitation.

                He was killed unlawfully - respect the court's decision.

                Consideration of the case... without a representative/defender of the accused is illegal - see the Constitutional Court of Russia, forget about the so-called "courts"
    4. +3
      8 February 2026 13: 01
      Read or watch Kolpakidi's lectures, and your opinion will change. These aren't Ogonyok or White émigré fabrications, but rather work with documents from the FSB archive and elsewhere.
    5. 0
      8 February 2026 13: 08
      Did you know her personally? But it's quite easy to mold anyone into either an angel or a devil.
      1. +6
        8 February 2026 13: 45
        What are the documents for? Read the documents, otherwise you're used to reading the whistleblowers Melgunov and Shmelev. One testified from Paris, the other is not familiar with the structure of Bolshevik government institutions.
        1. +4
          8 February 2026 13: 50
          Historical documents, unfortunately, are written by people. And they can be biased, or they can be biased.
          1. +4
            8 February 2026 14: 17
            Of course, the reports about the executions were written by people. It's unclear what bias you're talking about. Here's an example of a report; it's clear who did the shooting, as the author did, and whom:
  3. -5
    8 February 2026 07: 04
    But what if a girl came across a book with Turgenev’s story “Gerasimov", she would have become, it’s scary to say, Gerasim.

    Or even "Moo-moo", that would be a cool feature.
  4. +1
    8 February 2026 07: 07
    I can't say for sure, but I suppose that the girl never experienced true first love, and there was more than enough humiliation and contempt - hence such hatred for the world.
    "It's scary, downright creepy," isn't it?

    A rather dubious statement. And so:
    1. -6
      8 February 2026 07: 43
      She has some kind of satanic eyes, and a heavy look, and not only in this photo - like from the underworld.
      Ah, well, of course she's quite pretty.
    2. +3
      8 February 2026 14: 27
      Quote: ROSS 42
      and there was an abundance of humiliation and contempt, hence such hatred for the world

      What humiliations - she bathed in wealth and luxury since childhood
      Quote: ROSS 42
      hence such hatred of the world

      an obsessive, dangerous psychopath who imagines herself entitled to rule, judge, and kill, even though she has never worked a day in her life.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. -1
    8 February 2026 07: 29
    It's these "Shmuls" who destroy countries, preventing millions of people from living and working in peace. And Lenin himself had a truly aristocratic attitude toward the proletariat: the people are the instruments of the revolution, and do with them as you please!
    1. VLR
      +12
      8 February 2026 08: 07
      You're partly right: the Bolsheviks were a small, marginal party, and their reputation simply crumbled after they announced their desire to defeat their government. But tell me, what did the incompetent Nicholas II and his incompetent entourage have to do to suddenly boost their popularity and become truly mass? Any opposition is, in fact, very useful to both the state and society. A competent opposition prevents the ruling circles from going completely wild, forcing them to "share with the people" at least the crumbs from the tables of officials and oligarchs, and to steal with caution. An incompetent opposition forces people to rally around the current government on the principle of "others are even worse." But if the opposition suddenly wins, it's a testament to the absolute incompetence of the losers, who saw nothing, heard nothing, and wanted nothing to change.
      1. +11
        8 February 2026 08: 24
        Quote: VlR
        But tell me, what did the incompetent Nicholas II and his incompetent entourage have to do to suddenly make this party incredibly popular and truly become a mass party?
        Well, under Nicholas II, it wasn't anything special, and Lenin himself wrote that he wouldn't live to see the revolution. It was when the "Kerenskys" came to power that things really started.
        1. +2
          8 February 2026 09: 39
          Quote: Dart2027
          That's when the "Kerenskys" came to power, that's when it all started.

          You can check this out when Putin leaves power. A successor is out of the question, unless it's Belousov with military support, but he's getting old—he'll be approaching 80 by 2036... I don't see any worthy young people—name them if you know one.
          United Russia's vote-rigging won't last long either... It'll be quite a whirlwind...
          1. +4
            8 February 2026 09: 53
            Quote: ROSS 42
            You can check this when Putin leaves power.

            Well, what does Putin have to do with this? The fact is that
            Quote: Dart2027
            Under Nicholas II it was nothing special, and Lenin himself wrote that he would not live to see the revolution.
            have something to say?
            1. -4
              8 February 2026 09: 56
              Quote: Dart2027
              Regarding the fact that...do you have anything to say?

              You constantly butt in where you are not asked to butt in.
              I gave an example of a situation that will certainly happen when “our everything” ends...
              1. +4
                8 February 2026 11: 19
                Quote: ROSS 42
                You constantly butt in where you are not asked to butt in.

                Is this when you write a response to something I wrote? What does that mean?
                Quote: ROSS 42
                I gave an example of a situation that will certainly happen.

                Firstly, neither you nor I know what's being decided at the top. Secondly, any objections to the Bolsheviks' role before the February Revolution?
          2. VLR
            +11
            8 February 2026 09: 55
            When will Putin leave power?

            Then he'll likely learn a lot of "interesting" things about himself and the results of his reign. Especially since there are plenty of "interesting" things, including both mistakes (like the loss of gold and foreign exchange reserves or the appointment of thieves or completely incompetent people to high positions) and strange episodes of ignoring the public's sentiments (the Yeltsin Centers, the incomprehensible "love" for Chubais). Like in some old parody song:
            "He's "that one" - then we learned the whole truth about him."
            1. +10
              8 February 2026 11: 23
              Quote: VlR
              Then he will probably be able to find out

              The deceased usually don't respond to criticism... request
            2. +7
              8 February 2026 12: 04
              Quote: VlR
              absolutely incompetent people

              Which keep inflation in the country within acceptable limits with extremely limited opportunities to do so
          3. -2
            8 February 2026 09: 59
            According to tradition, it will be hairy. Look at the hairy ones.
            1. -4
              8 February 2026 10: 13
              Quote: Totor5
              According to tradition, it will be hairy. Look at the hairy ones.


              We look:
              1. 0
                8 February 2026 10: 22
                Where's Medvedev? It's not for nothing that he's now pretending to be powerful and unshakable.
                1. +1
                  8 February 2026 10: 25
                  Quote: Totor5
                  Where is Medvedev?

                  Medvedev will follow Putin. His relevance to the state and his usefulness have become a source of unease for everyone... And there are plenty of others like him in the ranks...
              2. -6
                8 February 2026 16: 40
                Tsarevich Gosha is missing.
                And he is the most suitable figure for a bloodless transition of power, providing guarantees to the outgoing group and satisfying the desires of numerous partners.
                1. +2
                  8 February 2026 18: 50
                  Quote: Victor Leningradets
                  Tsarevich Gosha is missing.

                  belay Chur me!
          4. +2
            8 February 2026 14: 43
            Quote: ROSS 42
            I don't see any worthy young people

            Just because you don't see them doesn't mean they don't exist. Don't look at your entourage. There really aren't any. Look at all of Russia and you'll see many who are better than Putin and his cronies.
            1. -3
              8 February 2026 17: 04
              Quote: VasAndr
              If you don't see, this does not mean that they are not.

              I had no doubt about it. I just meant public space.
              I know that among the SVO members there are many decent and honest people, patriots of the cause... However, you've already seen how they deal with real presidential election competitors, like Grudinin, Platoshkin, and Bondarenko... We'd like to see more Sobchaks or known "outsiders" like Khodorkovsky or Kharitonov on the list. I won't hide the fact that for me, it's not the candidate who's important, but the person themselves. Platoshkin or Bondarenko are preferable to me...
              I hope it won't be offensive to say that not a single Duma party currently has a clear and understandable program for the country's development. Can anyone here comment (or write an article) on the future plans of United Russia, the Communist Party, A Just Russia, and the Liberal Democratic Party?
              To be completely honest, there's no team in the country today that can take on a new Russia, and no one can predict what will happen after Zelenskyy's capitulation. It won't be easy to break the Nazi-raised youth over their knees, especially with such "tolerant" laws. What will remain of the current Russian team will be not only a hoard of Ukrainian problems, but also the fearless greed of the oligarchs that has been nurtured over many years...
              * * *
              These are my thoughts and I don’t ask anyone to share them or reject them... hi
      2. +1
        8 February 2026 08: 25
        Quote: VlR
        This is evidence of the absolute mediocrity of the losers, who saw nothing, heard nothing and did not want to change anything.

        The deputy from Yakutia, Fedot Tumusov, expressed this very well... I completely agree with him... a rare occurrence.
      3. +2
        8 February 2026 13: 03
        Quote: VlR
        You are partly right: the Bolsheviks were a small, marginal party, and their reputation simply collapsed after they announced their desire to defeat their government.

        I agree that it was a small party, but all parties of that time were marginal... Let's look:
        Bolsheviks (RSDLP(b))
        While the Bolshevik (RSDLP(b)) membership in February 1917 was only 24,000, by the end of April 1917, during the 7th (April) Conference of the RSDLP, it had grown to 80,000. By the time of the 6th Congress of the RSDLP (July 1917), membership had reached 240,000.
        ru.wikipedia.org*
        By October 1917, the Bolshevik Party had grown to 350 thousand.

        * * *
        In 2004, the United Russia party had only 400 members, and Putin ignored membership in this party, although before each election, "the cuckoo praises the rooster for praising the cuckoo."
        I want to ask, are there any cases today when people going on a combat mission say: “If I am destined to die, consider me a United Russia member”?
        Here's another strange feature:
        In December 2023, party chairman Dmitry Medvedev announced that United Russia had 30 million supporters or more. 2,5 million members.

        In 2023, First Deputy Minister of Finance Tatyana Nesterenko reported that the total number of employees in government bodies at various levels in Russia was about 2,4 million people.

        Let's get back to...
        But if the opposition suddenly wins, it is evidence of the absolute incompetence of the losers, who saw nothing, heard nothing, and wanted to change nothing.

        And if the opposition in the country cannot win 30-40 (or more)% of mandates, with the rating of the ruling party less than 35%,
        According to data from the VTsIOM analytical center, published in January 2026, by the end of December 2025, United Russia's rating was 34,1%. This is 0,6 percentage points lower than at the beginning.

        This means something is wrong with the election system, and it's necessary to include Heroes of Russia among the candidates, promising them seven miles to the sky... belay
        According to data as of January 1, 1973, 40,7% of CPSU members were factory workers.

        What percentage of United Russia members are in Russian enterprises today?
        * * *
        This is simple information for analysis and comparison...
        1. -5
          8 February 2026 16: 44
          Are there cases today when people going on a combat mission say: “If I am destined to die, consider me a member of United Russia”?

          As the anthem of our self-proclaimed elite sings:
          For money, yes, for money, yes
          For money, yes (Yes— Yes— Yes— Yes—)
          Money— Money— Money— Money— Yes
          Yes— Yes— Yes— Yes—
          For money, yes (Yes— Yes— Yes— Yes—)
          Money— Money— Money— Money— Yes, yes
          For money, yes (Yes— Yes— Yes— Yes—)
          Money— Money— Money— Money— Yes, yes
          For money, yes (Yes— Yes— Yes— Yes—)
          Money— Money— Money— Money— Yes, yes (Yes)
        2. +6
          10 February 2026 10: 51
          Quote: ROSS 42
          I agree that it was a small party, but all parties of that time were marginal... Let's look:
          Bolsheviks (RSDLP(b))
          While the Bolshevik (RSDLP(b)) membership in February 1917 was only 24,000, by the end of April 1917, during the 7th (April) Conference of the RSDLP, it had grown to 80,000. By the time of the 6th Congress of the RSDLP (July 1917), membership had reached 240,000.
          ru.wikipedia.org*
          By October 1917, the Bolshevik Party had 350 members.

          Not bad statistics. It's immediately clear that the Bolshevik Party's growth during the reign of Nicholas II has nothing to do with it—its numbers began to grow rapidly under the Provisionalists.

          And yes, regarding the marginality of all the parties of that time, it's not so clear-cut. For there were the Socialist Revolutionaries, of whom there were about a million by the summer of 1917.
  7. +11
    8 February 2026 07: 44
    Valery, thank you for the essay. Writing about the heroine of an article on VO is comparable to a civic feat.
    Much is ambiguous...
    My personal opinion is that the cadet revolt in Moscow would have fizzled out on its own. However, events have proven this. However, by "cadets" one shouldn't understand modern-day cadets and Suvorov cadets. There was no unified position among them, so the revolt quickly fizzled out.
    Regarding their word of honor... how many promises do our deputies, governors, and municipal heads keep? And what about the average employer and their employee? feel
    1. +6
      8 February 2026 09: 43
      There was no unified position among them, so the rebellion quickly fizzled out.
      "I beg to differ." hi
      It is possible that at the end of October the number of the VRK was greater than the KOB, and the presence of artillery in the VRK played a key role.
      1. +2
        8 February 2026 13: 56
        Zemlyachka played a key role. While the Military Revolutionary Committee and the Committee of Public Safety (KOB) were trying to reach an agreement, no artillery or overwhelming odds could resolve the situation. In the same Kremlin, serfs and officers supporting the Committee of Public Safety (KOB) and Ryabtsev coexisted. After the cadets occupied the Kremlin, the 1st Moscow Infantry Warrant Officer Training School was completely arrested as disloyal. The episode of cadets firing on cadets on orders is telling.
  8. +6
    8 February 2026 07: 51
    Judging by some comments, the anti-Sovietists are really getting worked up now that they are being deprived of yet another anti-Soviet myth.
  9. +10
    8 February 2026 07: 55
    The emergence of such people, especially from wealthy families, is a sign of a profound crisis in the state. Because, as unpleasant as it may be for fans of songs about balls, cadets, and wasted buns, Tsarist Russia was a deeply unhappy country with a poor population (against the ostentatious luxury of the ruling classes) and shocking social inequality.
    1. +5
      9 February 2026 11: 20
      Quote: vet
      The emergence of such people, especially from wealthy families, is a sign of a deep crisis in the state.

      I completely agree. The history of the CPSU also confirms this.
      Because, no matter how unpleasant it may be for fans of songs about balls, cadets and wasted buns to hear, Tsarist Russia was a deeply unhappy country with a poor population (against the backdrop of the defiant luxury of the ruling classes) and shocking social inequality.

      The same can be said about the USSR – no matter how unpleasant it may be for fans of the USSR and its universal equality and free apartments to hear, the Union was a deeply unhappy country with a poor population, a permissive ruling elite, and de facto social inequality, where the party nomenklatura received everything, and everyone else – on a residual basis.
      So both the Empire and the Union were destroyed by similar reasons.
  10. +9
    8 February 2026 07: 58
    It's a shame it's only half the story. What I'd like to highlight is Zemlyachka's high standards for herself, her modesty, and her commitment to the struggle to liberate the working people and peasantry from the slavery of labor. Why did the Bolsheviks win? Once they made a decision, they carried it out on time, despite any obstacles. If someone couldn't cope with the work, they were removed from their position according to the party's plans. Looking back at this, it's clear how much we're losing to those leaders, even without regard to political affiliation. If we look at the country's industrial backbone—where we've had real success, for example, in aviation, mining, and construction—the Bolsheviks at least first distributed housing to those in need, crowding in the formerly wealthy. We've now jacked up housing prices so much that most people can't afford decent housing or pay for utilities.
    Another question is why aren't people who steal on an especially large scale executed? This applies to both the military and civilian life. Zemlyachka, for example, stood at her posts, demonstrating the highest standards of self-discipline and responsibility for her party comrades. Where countries have high standards and accountability, regardless of the political system, success is always achieved. hi
    1. +1
      8 February 2026 09: 48
      Quote: V.
      If a person failed to cope with the work, he was removed from his position according to the party’s plans. Looking back today, it's clear how we're losing to those leaders.

      good
      But mistakes were still made. History has shown that not all people's commissars were prepared for the trials of WWII... But if I could evaluate the ministers in Mishustin's government today... I could (but won't) name names of those who, let alone were "removed" from their positions, would never have been appointed to them.
      1. +7
        8 February 2026 12: 21
        Quote: ROSS 42
        I could (but I won’t) name names of people who were not only “removed” from their positions, but would never have been appointed to them.

        Voroshilov, huh? Kulik? Tukhachevsky? Yezhov, Yagoda? Zhukov as Chief of the General Staff, despite his "dislike of staff and teaching work"? Suslov, who escalated the ideology in the country to the point where anyone serving would yawn reflexively at the mention of "Lenkomnata"?
        Yakovlev?
        Gorbachev?
        Yeltsin?
        Yakovlev was accepted into the party in 1943, Gorbachev in 1952. ALIVE Stalin's system.

        The system was wrong regularly and systematically - That's why she died.
        1. -1
          8 February 2026 12: 44
          You can only look for mistakes and people in the wrong place, or you can only boast about successes, but you should correct mistakes and be proud of successes, like in space or housing construction, as under Brezhnev. You'd think all the geniuses in the country's leadership now are geniuses; who knows what they'll end up with? We want the best, but it turns out as usual. hi
        2. +4
          10 February 2026 11: 03
          Quote: your1970
          Sandpiper?

          And what about Kulik? He performed quite well as the "technical commander"—chief of the Main Artillery Directorate. First and foremost, he brought the weapons design bureaus, which had previously been unashamed to push crude, semi-finished products into service under the pretext of "sign the paperwork, and we'll finish it later," into line. Much of what is attributed to him in memoirs is not supported by documents. But Kulik proved a convenient figure to blame for his own miscalculations, since he could no longer justify himself.
          Even the textbook story of the "police weapon" AKA Degtyarev submachine guns effectively resulted in an admission of non-compliance between the PPD and the technical specifications issued by the army and a demand by the Main Artillery Directorate to continue work on the PP until the result required by the specifications—a cheap and mass-produced weapon—was achieved.
          Quote: your1970
          Suslov - who brought the ideology in the country to such a level that any serving person would yawn reflexively at the word "Lenkomnata"?

          Epishev has been forgotten. It was Epishev's GlavPUR, with its policy of ossifying official military history instead of gradually adjusting it toward greater conformity with the documents, that ultimately gave birth to Rezun and other revisionists.
          1. +4
            10 February 2026 11: 35
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Epishev has been forgotten

            I took the first ones that came to mind BIG bosses.
            And so, yes - the technology of total hushing up and classifying everything that comes to hand has led to complete disbelief to what the authorities say. In public, one thing with your wife is different, with a friend under a liter, a third, and to yourself, a fourth.
            Given the CPSU's fear of taking responsibility for the past, Rezun fired.
            It's okay to kill fascists, hang them by court order, but Soviet citizens are forbidden from reading the transcripts of the Nuremberg Tribunal. belay
            1. +5
              10 February 2026 16: 21
              Quote: your1970
              And so, yes - the technology of total silence and secrecy about everything that comes to mind has led to a complete lack of trust in what the authorities say.

              It wasn't just silence and secrecy that were to blame. The people lost faith in the government's words, as they were completely at odds with its actions. From the podium, a party spokesman proclaims the unity of the party and the people—and then heads off to the special distribution center to stock up. Meanwhile, the average person goes to a regular store, where, after sweet speeches about the unprecedented successes of agriculture, they see an empty counter and meat and dairy products sold by ration coupons.
              The people and the party are united - only the shops are separate. ©
              Today I went to the market and saw speculators selling laundry soap for 1 ruble a bar, and I couldn't buy any. This is happening now, when there hasn't been a war for 30 years, where has all this gone? There's no fish at all; hake, flounder, and cod are in short supply. You can sometimes get pollock, but even that's rare. And chocolates are completely out of the question; they don't even exist. Flour shortages. Please explain, is this only happening in our city, or is there a similar situation elsewhere? I stood in line for sausage, was 60 rubles, and bought 1 kg for my family; they didn't give me more.
              The city party committee isn't particularly concerned about the situation in the city, which we call the "White House." And how could it be bothered when the communists shop there separately in their own buffet, in the evenings, so the people won't notice? Even the guard lives well there, bringing home four sticks of smoked sausage and condensed milk. They don't see any need; they'll have it delivered to the buffet by car, and they'll buy it, but what about the common people?

              An anonymous letter from a Chusovoy resident to the editor of Pravda newspaper about the city's dismal supply of food and essential goods. March 1980.

              Overall, the refrigerator won a convincing victory over the television.
              1. +2
                10 February 2026 16: 40
                Quote: Alexey RA
                Overall, the refrigerator won a convincing victory over the television.

                This is what authority means - I, a "malicious critic of the USSR" (c), would be kicked with cries of "Beat the anti-Soviet people!!" for these same facts and words, and they would be afraid of you, apparently. belay lol

                I was in Moscow with my grandmother in 1983. We went to the store, and there they had Hungarian geese in cellophane for 3.70 rubles, weighing 7 kg each. My grandmother bought one and asked the saleswoman, "How often do you get these?" She said they were there every day, and it was really expensive—26 rubles. And my grandmother started crying, "They're selling meat in the store!!"—we were really short on meat back then—even the collective farmers were starting to steal it.
                1. +2
                  11 February 2026 07: 45
                  Quote: your1970
                  Even collective farmers began to steal carefully.

                  What happened that prevented collective farmers from stealing?
                  Wonderful are thy deeds ...
                  1. +3
                    11 February 2026 10: 33
                    Quote: Senior Sailor
                    Quote: your1970
                    Even collective farmers began to steal carefully.

                    What happened that prevented collective farmers from stealing?
                    Wonderful are thy deeds ...

                    1981-83, apparently Andropov's influence, we had a disabled person jailed for sweeping grain from the side of the road - "According to the documents, it is no longer collective farm grain, but state grain."
                    They gave 2 years to a one-armed...
        3. +1
          10 February 2026 18: 13
          Quote: your1970
          The system made mistakes regularly and systematically - that's why it died.

          A system that makes regular and systematic mistakes is flawed and unviable from the start.
          Her demise was predicted by wise people even at her birth. Read Berdyaev, Ilyin, P. Struve, and many others who turned out to be right.
    2. man
      +6
      8 February 2026 10: 29
      Quote: V.
      Where there is high demand in states and responsibility Regardless of the political system, there is always success there.

      Bravo! hi Unfortunately, with the arrival of Yeltsin in the Russian Federation, complete irresponsibility reigned, despite the colossal harm inflicted on the country and its people...
    3. +1
      8 February 2026 12: 11
      Quote: V.
      Where in states have high demands and responsibility Regardless of the political system, there is always success there.

      Hmm, the US with its lobby? Germany – with its Berlin airport, for example?
      Responsibility lol lol
  11. -14
    8 February 2026 08: 03
    There's no need to continue the article about her. It's long been known who and what she did in Crimea. Here in Perm, they already tried to rename the street named after her to something decent. It didn't work out :(
    1. +5
      8 February 2026 13: 05
      How do you personally know this?
  12. +7
    8 February 2026 08: 32
    Quote: Proxima
    If only I could head an anti-corruption committee in today's Russia, with the special powers that come with it! There would be a sea of ​​bloodshed, and not in vain!

    Well, there would hardly be any bloodshed, but judges and high-ranking officials who took bribes would definitely be in jail, regardless of their connections and status.
    I'm reading the court news with interest right now...there are cases...a southern migrant raped a 15-year-old girl...the judge suddenly gives him a suspended sentence... belay How is that possible? It's a serious article and such a sentence... what It's obvious that they bribed the judge.
    Or the story with the Tajik translator...the judge there hung a large sum of money on the Ministry of Internal Affairs...that's completely outrageous.
    1. +5
      8 February 2026 12: 33
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Or the story with the Tajik translator...the judge there hung a large sum of money on the Ministry of Internal Affairs...that's completely outrageous.

      According to current legislation, the state owes provide an interpreter to any FOREIGNER within the framework of a criminal case - not speaking Russian sufficiently.
      The same practice existed in the USSR – then, due to the significantly smaller number of foreigners, MGIMO translators translated.
      In this case, the drug distributor was not a Russian citizen, so he was required to provide an interpreter.
      The question of payment amounts incomprehensible - perhaps the investigation took a very long time and the translator added on the lost profits from his work.
      1. 0
        8 February 2026 16: 49
        No offense, but reading you, you begin to understand that the people are one thing, and officials are a caste serving the comprador elite.
        1. +4
          8 February 2026 20: 58
          Quote: Victor Leningradets
          No offense, but reading you, you begin to understand that people - this one, Officials are a caste that serves the comprador elite.

          Hah, didn't you know?
          Well, for example, the Great Patriotic War and the fascists - the Soviet people killed the fascists in every conceivable way.
          And it was absolutely right!!!!!
          Several years pass and suddenly almost 90% of the generals and 3/4 of the senior officers of the GDR NPA turn out to be generals and senior officers of the Wehrmacht belay .
          That same Wehrmacht, where these generals issued orders to exterminate the Untermenschen.
          And in 1948, Stalin, at a meeting with Grotewohl, said that “We need to create a former the Nazis bourgeois party"
          Grotewohl picked up my jaw from the floor and began to mumble that "The military administration will be against it!!!", to which Stalin said "I will resolve the issue with the military administration".
          Was Stalin a representative of the comprador bourgeoisie and a representative of the NSDAP???!
          Of course not!!!
          Was it necessary to condemn the Nazis for their crimes in the USSR?
          It is necessary !!!
          How do the above facts fit into this?
          But they don't go together at all.
          1. +4
            10 February 2026 11: 18
            Quote: your1970
            Several years pass and suddenly almost 90% of the generals and 3/4 of the senior officers of the GDR NPA turn out to be generals and senior officers of the Wehrmacht

            There's an even more telling example: when an accomplice to the murder of more than six hundred thousand civilians (according to official estimates) remains president of a neighboring state after the war.
            1. +2
              10 February 2026 11: 53
              Quote: Alexey RA
              Quote: your1970
              Several years pass and suddenly almost 90% of the generals and 3/4 of the senior officers of the GDR NPA turn out to be generals and senior officers of the Wehrmacht

              There's an even more telling example: when an accomplice to the murder of more than six hundred thousand civilians (according to official estimates) remains president of a neighboring state after the war.

              Two months before Doska's hanging, NATO members came there to persuade them to join. Two months later—after Doska's hanging and all the excesses—they refused to join NATO.
              Ours have clearly demonstrated that "Stalin spared us, knowing how well the KGM is treated and despite the massive and violent excesses, we have confirmed with this plaque the peacefulness and Stalinist position."
              The Finns got it right back then.
              As soon as they refused, the board was moved further away after 3 days so that it wouldn’t be visible.

              It's unthinkable that the Red Army of 1945 would have reduced them to a few scraps within a week. They managed to do so quite quickly in 1940, too, after rethinking the initial phase of combat.
              So, naked politics is about the future trade and political link between the USSR and capitalism.
              1. +1
                10 February 2026 16: 53
                Quote: your1970
                2 months before hanging the Board

                I apologize for interrupting, but I just can’t understand what you’re talking about.
                1. +2
                  10 February 2026 17: 28
                  Quote: Senior Sailor
                  Quote: your1970
                  2 months before hanging the Board

                  I apologize for interrupting, but I just can’t understand what you’re talking about.

                  About the memorial plaque to Mannerheim
                  1. +2
                    11 February 2026 07: 44
                    Thank. Got it.
                    I'm probably getting old. request
  13. +4
    8 February 2026 08: 51
    The revolutions that took place on this land were not natural, as we are always told.
    They were organized and carried out by people we speak of - passionaries.
    Moreover, these people are not from the plough, they were educated, their families are well-off...
    These people, while occupying positions in the Soviet Government, were not engaged in greed, although by blood they were...
    Why is it the other way around today?
    Today, the Passionaries are ordinary people who give their last to the front and the country.
    1. +7
      8 February 2026 12: 40
      Quote: Dedok
      Passionaries

      You are misinterpreting the term.
      "Passionaries" is a term from the passionary theory of ethnogenesis, coined by L. N. Gumilev. This term was used by the scientist to describe people who possess an innate ability to absorb more energy from the external environment than is required for personal and species self-preservation alone, and to release this energy through purposeful work to modify the environment.

      Classic examples of passionaries are Prigogine (who gave neither his people nor his front), Stalin, Lenin, etc.
      What is briefly called "an awl in the ass" - people who are incapable of sitting and watching from "my hut on the edge"
  14. +3
    8 February 2026 09: 03
    So why, when cataclysms occur in Russia, are so many Jews among the destroyers? And here's what's so striking: many led the punitive apparatus and were, so to speak, more bloodthirsty, demanding executions and the like. Even as recently as 1993, Svanidze, Akhedzhakova, Novodvorskaya, and other figures of this very nationality demanded on television that Yeltsin mercilessly crush and shoot all the, as they called, red-brown people in the House of Soviets. No one asked why this was so? In general, despite the shrieks of some about the rise of anti-Semitism in the Russian Federation, touching Jews in Russia is not worth it. Two Jews were on trial... The prosecutor was given three years. The author modestly lifted the curtain.
    Rosalia's father, Samuil Markovich Zalkind, met Shmul Berlin. Here, the heroine of the article met another exile, Leiba Bronstein.
    And so on. No one will write about the Bund's influence on the RSDLP, many of whose members later joined it, just as no one will talk about the influence of the Jewish diaspora on the Russian leadership, only to discover later that many prominent figures from the government and the Presidential Administration ended up in Israel and easily obtained citizenship. But... he touched on a taboo subject, and... well, it didn't work out. what
    1. -1
      8 February 2026 14: 09
      Quote: Unknown
      So why, when cataclysms occur in Russia, are so many Jews among the destroyers? And here's what's striking: many led the punitive apparatus and were, so to speak, more bloodthirsty, demanding executions and the like. No one writes about the Bund's influence on members of the RSDLP, many of whose members later joined it.

      No, my dear man, this is purely yours, Bolshevik signHere's who the Ulyanovs brought to Russia in their ice cream wagon:

      Ravvich, Sarra Naumovna, b. August 1, 1879 in Vitebsk
      Tskhakaya, Mikhail Grigorievich [Mikha], b. January 2, 1865
      Skovno, Abram Anchilovich, b. September 15, 1888
      Radomyslsky Apfelbaum [G. Zinoviev], Ovsey Gershen Aronovich, September 20, 1882 in Elisavetgrad
      Radomyslskaya, Zlata Evnovna, b. January 15, 1882
      Radomyslsky, Stefan Ovseevich, b. September 17, 1913
      Ryvkin, Zalman Ber Osherovich, b. September 15, 1883 in Velizh
      Slyusareva, Nadezhda Mikhailovna, b. September 25, 1886
      Goberman, Mikhail Vulfovich, b. September 6, 1892 in Moscow
      Abramovich, Shaya Zelikov, b. March 27, 1881
      Linde, Iogan Arnold Ioganovich, b. 6 September 1888 in Goldingen
      Diamond [Sokolnikov], Grigory Yakovlevich, b. August 2, 1888 in Romny,
      Miringof, Ilya Davidovich, b. October 25, 1877 in Vitebsk
      Miringof, Maria Efimovna, b. March 1, 1886 in Vitebsk
      Rosenblum, David Mordukhovich, b. August 9, 1877 in Borisov
      Payneson, Semyon Gershovich, b. December 18, 1887 in Riga
      Grebelskaya, Fanya Zosimovna, b. April 19, 1891 in Berdichev
      Pogovskaya, Bunya Khemovna, b. July 19, 1889 in Rikiny (with her son Reuben, born May 22, 1913)
      Aizenbund, Meer Kivov, born May 21, 1881 in Slutsk
      Alter, Estera Izrailevna, with a child
      Barak
      Boltin, Leizer Khaimovich
      Weinberg, Markus Arapovich
      Halperin
      Drankin, Wulf Meerovich, with his wife and child
      Diment, Leizer Nakhumovich
      Dreizenshtok, Anna Meerovna
      Zanin, Mayrom Menasheevich
      Ioffe, Pinkus Ioselevich
      Idelson, Mark Lipmanovich
      Klavier, Lev Solomonovich
      Kontorsky, Samuil Srul Davydovich
      Lubinsky, Mechislav Abram Osipovich, with his wife and child
      Levit (Gellert-Levit), Eidel Meerovna, with a child
      Luxemburg, Moses Solomonovich
      Lipnin, Judas Leibovich
      Meerovich, Movsha Gilelevich
      Lerner, David
      Makhlin, Taiva-Zeilik Zelmanovich
      Tusenev, Isaac Markovich
      Rakov, Moses Ilyich
      Nakhimzon, Meer Itskovich
      Rain (Abramovich), Rafail Abramovich, with his wife and two children
      Rosen, Chaim Judovich, with his wife
      Skeptor, Yakov Leibinovich
      Slobodskoy, Valentin Osipovich
      Svetitsky, A. A.
      Höfel, Abram Yakovlevich
      Piklis, Meer Bentsionovich
      Zuckerstein, Solomon Srulevich with two children
      Sheinis, Iser Khaimovich

      and so on and so forth

      The surname Abramovich is famous, yes...
      ..1938 NKVD
      In December, in the group of those executed, my defendant, a teacher who had gold teeth in his upper or lower jaw, was shot. After the execution of the sentence, Abramovich went into the room where the executed men were lying, found the executed man with gold teeth, lifted his head and began knocking out his teeth with a revolver, and then, bending the head of the executed man, poured the teeth into his hand, where he held a handkerchief..."

      And there were countless numbers of them - Yagodas, Bermans, Neumans, Frinovskies, and so on and so forth.
      1. -6
        8 February 2026 15: 44
        Quote: Olgovich
        No, my dear man, this is purely your Bolshevik superstition. This is who the Ulyanovs brought to Russia in their ice cream train:

        You've popped up again... you're not my sweetheart, oh well. You say a Bolshevik superstition... it's partly true. But how many Bundists joined the Bolsheviks? I'm not an expert on party history, but my fellow anti-Soviet, your buddy Shpakovsky, is; he studied the history of the CPSU; look it up at your leisure. From the list provided, how many in power structures were still alive by the early 40s? Let's get back to our... so to speak, recent times and today. Gorbachev and his team can hardly be called Bolshevik, and here's an example: Wikipedia writes, I won't say whose;
        Jews actively participated in the country's democratization process. For example, 15 Jews were elected to the Supreme Soviet of Russia. A certain number of Jews were among the democratic leaders and their supporters.
        How do I understand this...a certain number...? Let's see.
        Major posts were occupied by Nikolai Isaakovich Kotlyar, Vladimir Abramovich Raevsky, Evgeny Fedorovich Saburov, Yegor Timurovich Gaidar, Vyacheslav Alekseevich Nikonov, Viktor Mikhailovich Sukhodrev, Grigory Alekseevich Yavlinsky.
        Next
        Thus, in March 1990, Anatoly Chubais and a group of associates from the Leningrad Association of Social and Economic Sciences, which he founded, prepared an analytical report on the concept of the transition to a market economy in the USSR. Many Jews began to create cooperatives, thereby putting the policies of Perestroika into practice.

        During the attempted coup d'état of August 19–21, 1991, the Jewish community, represented by the Va'ad, supported Russian President B.N. Yeltsin.
        This is all from this wiki. The Union has been gone for almost 35 years, and the Bolsheviks, with their omens, have sunk into oblivion. lol New times have come for Russia, and...all the familiar faces. Twenty years ago, Russia's best people—the Jews Abramovich, Berezovsky, Voloshin, Dyachenko, Yumashev, and Chubais—led VVP into the Kremlin by the hand. They also held power in the oligarchy. Don't let the pseudo-Russian names put you off: Shuvalov, Sechin,
        "It hardly occurs to anyone that Galkin, Dolin, Lavrov, Putin, Sechin, Shokhin, Shuvalov are Jewish... Then there are 106 billionaires in Russia - all JEWS! The heads of Russia's largest state corporations are all JEWS. That's the whole story, and there's superstitions and other nonsense about the Soviet past. But in principle, a visiting Cossack wouldn't care about this arrangement; he doesn't live in Russia, he's in the near abroad. The main thing here is to bite the Soviet regime, and not the current one, even though it's not his own... but close in spirit.
        1. -2
          8 February 2026 16: 13
          Quote: Unknown
          The Bolshevik superstition, you say...is partly true. But how many Bundists joined the Bolsheviks?

          It is completely consistent with reality, for example, the NKVD's top leadership is HALF Jews.
          Quote: Unknown
          Let's return to our...so to speak, recent times and today. Gorbachev and his team can hardly be called Bolshevik

          and your party... has not given birth to other Bolsheviks, only to the likes of EBN x Marked, Shevanradze, and Pryakovalev
          Quote: Unknown
          What do you mean by a certain number? Let's see.
          Major positions were occupied by Nikolai Isaakovich Kotlyar and Vladimir Abramovich Raevsky

          Buddy, that's all. YOUR Bolshevik heritage-from commissars Abramovich's have been remade billionaires Abarmovichi.

          Let me remind you that before you, this did not happen in Russia.

          Thank you for securities staff
          Boltin, Leizer Khaimovich
          Weinberg, Marcus Arapovich
          Halperin

          Drankin, Wulf Meerovich
          Diment, Leizer Nakhumovich
          Dreisenstock, Anna Meerovna
          Zanin, Mayrom Menasheevich
          Ioffe, Pinkus Ioselevich
          Idelson, Mark Lipmanovich
          Klavier, Lev Solomonovich
          Kontorsky, Samuel Srul Davydovich
          Quote: Unknown
          Bite the Soviet power

          Why?! She bit herself and poisoned herself in the end...
          1. -2
            8 February 2026 17: 44
            Quote: Olgovich
            It is completely consistent with reality, for example, the NKVD's top leadership is HALF Jews.

            So, I didn’t consult with my buddy about the BUND, but started up my old barrel organ.
            Quote: Olgovich
            and your party... has not given birth to other Bolsheviks, only to the likes of EBN x Marked, Shevanradze, and Pryakovalev

            And the list goes on: who was born out of perestroika? And by the way, tell us about the Moldovan and Kyiv Jewish politicians born in the USSR?
            Quote: Olgovich
            My friend, this is all YOUR Bolshevik legacy - the Abramovich commissars have been transformed into the Abramovich billionaires.

            Let me remind you that before you, this did not happen in Russia.

            There's no need to try to become friends. stop You didn't say it, but how else?
            Samuil Markovich Zalkind was a first-guild merchant; among other property, he owned a large apartment building and a haberdashery store in Kyiv, considered the best in the city.
            So where does your daughter come from and who does she take after? No need to ask about Russia. to a stranger be sad about her, you won't be able to live in the Russian Federation.
            Quote: Olgovich
            Why?! She bit herself and poisoned herself in the end...

            Because the installation is such - to bite, without this in the neighboring countries, such people cannot survive without being spat upon, for the fact that they peck from the palm of their hand, you have to try
            1. -1
              8 February 2026 19: 57
              Quote: Unknown

              So, I didn't consult with my buddy about the BUND, but started my old hurdy-gurdy.

              I didn't write about the Bolshevik Jews, but half of the top brass of the 30s NKVD were Jews - do you remember?
              Quote: Unknown
              And the list needs to be continued: who did perestroika give birth to?

              The party gave birth to perestroika and Yeltsin and the privatizer-comics
              Quote: Unknown
              You didn't say it, but how else?
              Samuil Markovich Zalkind

              Buddy, come on, show me the Zalkinds among the elite and the richest people of Russia BEFORE you
              As of 1914:
              Nikolai Vtorov (more than 60 million rubles) - the "Russian Morgan", controlled textile, chemical, metalworking enterprises and banks.
              The Nobel brothers (Ludwig, Alfred, Emmanuel) (~60 million rubles) - an oil empire in Baku, mechanical engineering.
              The Polyakov brothers (S.S., D.S., L.S., Ya.S.) (~50 million rubles) are railroad magnates and bankers.
              Prince S.S. Abamelek-Lazarev (45 million rubles) – mining and metallurgy.
              The Morozovs (more than 40 million rubles) are textile kings and manufacturers.
              Alexander Mantashev is an oil magnate.
              etc.

              And the Zalkinds are everywhere - this is YOUR Bolshevik legacy, there was nothing like this before you.
              Quote: Unknown
              As for Russia, a stranger should not be sad about it,

              not unknown stranger and judge
              Quote: Unknown
              Because the installation is such - to bite

              Who gave the order to your power to bite yourself? You poisoned yourself, poor thing. lol
              1. -2
                9 February 2026 08: 22
                The Cossack is on a roll, apparently.
                about the Bolshevik Jews....this has never happened to you...it's not unknown.
                The baton was picked up by a visiting Cossack, and by Russians just like him. Judging by their impudence and stubbornness, they were the ones we were talking about. lol
                1. -1
                  9 February 2026 12: 48
                  Quote: Unknown
                  The baton was picked up by a visiting Cossack, and by the way, by Russians just like himself. Judging by their impudence and stubbornness, they were the ones he was talking about.

                  So WHERE are the Zalkindvas in the Russian elite before the VORs, have you found it yet, hard worker? lol

                  Didn't suit you русские Petrovs, Tretyakovs, Vtorovs-?
                  So eat now, don't get dirty. Yes
                  1. -1
                    9 February 2026 13: 22
                    Quote: Olgovich
                    So WHERE are the Zalkindvas in the Russian elite before the VORs, have you found it yet, hard worker?

                    Were you not satisfied with the Russian Petrovs, Tretyakovs, Vtoroys?
                    So eat now, don't get dirty.

                    Look who's Talking . good Ivanov was found. lol
                    1. -1
                      9 February 2026 13: 28
                      Quote: Unknown
                      Look who's Talking

                      You are ashamed to admit what you did - you are ashamed.
                      Quote: Unknown
                      Ivanov was found.

                      Yes, all of Russia rests on my last name. Yes
                      1. -1
                        9 February 2026 13: 35
                        Here is a cheeky fluttery one request The last name is definitely Sakharov, or more precisely Sakharovich, or even more precisely Zuckerman. laughing It's an exaggeration about Russia, but Israel, Moldova and Ukraine are definitely affected. lol
                      2. +1
                        10 February 2026 09: 47
                        Quote: Unknown
                        What an impudent one! fluttery

                        Well, how pro-Soviet are you after this?

                        Here are your VOR producers:
                        Bronstein
                        Apfelbakm
                        Boltin, Leizer Khaimovich
                        Weinberg, Markus Arapovich
                        Halperin
                        Drankin, Wulf Meerovich, with his wife and child
                        Diment, Leizer Nakhumovich
                        Dreizenshtok, Anna Meerovna
                        Zanin, Mayrom Menasheevich
                        Ioffe, Pinkus Ioselevich
                        Idelson, Mark Lipmanovich
                        Klavier, Lev Solomonovich
                        Kontorsky, Samuil Srul Davydovich
                        Lubinsky, Mechislav Abram Osipovich, with his wife and child
                        Levit (Gellert-Levit), Eidel Meerovna, with a child
                        Luxemburg, Moses Solomonovich
                        Lipnin, Judas Leibovich
                        Meerovich, Movsha Gilelevich
                        Lerner, David
                        Makhlin, Taiva-Zeilik Zelmanovich
                        Tusenev, Isaac Markovich
                        Rakov, Moses Ilyich
                        Nakhimzon, Meer Itskovich
                        Rain (Abramovich), Rafail Abramovich, with his wife and two children
                        Rosen, Chaim Judovich, with his wife
                        Skeptor, Yakov Leibinovich
                        Slobodskoy, Valentin Osipovich
                        Svetitsky, A. A.
                        Höfel, Abram Yakovlevich
                        Piklis, Meer Bentsionovich
                        Zuckerstein, Solomon Srulevich with two children
                        Sheinis, Iser Khaimovich


                        and so on, and you call them fluttery... belay lol
                        Quote: Unknown
                        Last name

                        All of Russia stands on it, envy it silently Yes
                      3. -1
                        10 February 2026 20: 25
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        and so on, and you call them fluttery.

                        Mainly you. lol
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        All of Russia stands on it, envy it silently

                        With such a last name? fool
                      4. -1
                        11 February 2026 16: 11
                        Quote: Unknown
                        Mainly you.

                        And the thieves

                        Bronstein
                        Apfelbakm
                        Boltin, Leizer Khaimovich
                        Weinberg, Markus Arapovich
                        Halperin
                        Drankin, Wulf Meerovich, with his wife and child
                        Diment, Leizer Nakhumovich
                        Dreizenshtok, Anna Meerovna
                        Zanin, Mayrom Menasheevich
                        Ioffe, Pinkus Ioselevich
                        Idelson, Mark Lipmanovich
                        Klavier, Lev Solomonovich
                        Kontorsky, Samuil Srul Davydovich
                        Lubinsky, Mechislav Abram Osipovich, with his wife and child
                        Leviticus (Gellert-Leviticus- etc.--


                        no longer fluttery for you? lol
                        Quote: Unknown

                        With such a last name?

                        Yes Yes

                        these are not yours

                        Bronstein
                        Apfelbakm
                        Boltin, Leizer Khaimovich
                        Weinberg, Markus Arapovich
                        Halperin
                        Drankin, Wulf Meerovich, with his wife and child
                        Diment, Leizer Nakhumovich
                        Dreizenshtok, Anna Meerovna
                        Zanin, Mayrom Menasheevich
                        Ioffe, Pinkus Ioselevich
                        Idelson, Mark Lipmanovich
                        Klavier, Lev Solomonovich
                        Kontorsky, Samuil Srul Davydovich
                        Lubinsky, Mechislav Abram Osipovich, lol
                        Levite (Gellert-Levitt
                      5. -3
                        11 February 2026 20: 16
                        Here the fluttery one has gone lol It's nothing but verbal diarrhea, as if... laughing
                      6. +1
                        12 February 2026 11: 26
                        пАragged That's right, "Russian" :lol - learn Russian.

                        Otherwise you will remain like your "Russian" leaders, the THIEVES
                        Form
                        Bronstein
                        Apfelbakm
                        Boltin, Leizer Khaimovich
                        Weinberg, Markus Arapovich
                        Halperin
                        Drankin, Wulf Meerovich,
                        Diment, Leizer Nakhumovich
                        Dreizenshtok, Anna Meerovna
                        Zanin, Mayrom Menasheevich
                        Ioffe, Pinkus Ioselevich
                        Idelson, Mark Lipmanovich
                        Klavier, Lev Solomonovich
                        Kontorsky, Samuil Srul Davydovich
                        Lubinsky, Mieczyslaw Abram Osipovich, lol
                        Levite (Gellert-Levitt

                        a disgrace .... lol
      2. +4
        9 February 2026 00: 15
        Frinovsky is, in fact, Russian, from the family of an Orthodox priest from Penza (or more precisely, Narovchatov). Frinovsky is a typical, harmonious "seminarian," "priestly," or "artificial" surname. Examples include Voznesensky, Vvedensky, Ametistov, Pyatnitsky, Landyshev, Kiparisov, Lebedinsky, Kedrov, and so on. Interestingly, for some reason, these kinds of surnames were given to Great Russian seminarians, while Little Russians and Belarusians retained their "native" surnames.
        1. -1
          9 February 2026 12: 52
          ...Historical materialism

          Yezhov announced to us that he was going to Kyiv, and we who were present should also go with him.

          After we asked him some questions, Yezhov asked us the question: “Which of you knows the Ukrainian language?”

          It turned out that almost no one present knew the Ukrainian language, so Yezhov asked another question: “How will we speak there in Ukraine?”

          Frinovsky laughed loudly and said: "There's not a single Ukrainian there, it's all Jews." : lol
          :
          1. +1
            9 February 2026 19: 26
            And what does this prove? Frinovsky is Russian; this question has been discussed many times. I was surprised that there are still people who consider him Jewish.
            1. 0
              10 February 2026 09: 55
              Quote: Sergej1972
              And what does that prove?

              And what are you trying to prove that Yagoda, Berman, Neuman and others are Russian?

              Frinovsky is one of them, a breed of executioners
              1. +2
                11 February 2026 00: 49
                I'm writing exclusively about Frinovsky. I've been interested in this character for a long time. He's a unique individual.
                1. -1
                  11 February 2026 16: 17
                  Quote: Sergej1972
                  I am writing exclusively about Frinovsky

                  I didn't write about him at all, even formally I have a Freenovsky

                  Ushakov lol much more interesting: he interrogated and knocked out Tukhachevsky, Alksnis, etc.
  15. The comment was deleted.
    1. +12
      8 February 2026 12: 51
      Quote from Songwolf
      It's amazing how the gendarmerie corps worked back then.

      For the entire Saratov Trans-Volga region - before the revolution, Nikolaevsky and Novouzensky districts of the Samara province - there were 3 gendarmes (KGB officers, conditionally) and 12 police officers (MVD officers, conditionally).
      What could they do in a 300 by 300 km region without communications or roads?
      1. +4
        9 February 2026 14: 14
        This is true if we speak only about the Corps of Gendarmes.
        However, in the Russian Empire there were still gendarmes on the railway, who were not part of the Corps structure.
        For example, in the Far East, at almost every major railway station there was a gendarme assigned with the rank of sergeant or senior sergeant.
        They provided counterterrorism security for the railway, along with other personnel primarily posing a threat to the railway. There are interesting documents on the tasks and powers of the railway gendarmerie department at that time.
        The selection was made from among discharged, distinguished soldiers and non-commissioned officers from the army, with subsequent training in a special gendarmerie school.
        1. +4
          9 February 2026 15: 17
          Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
          However, in the Russian Empire there were still gendarmes on the railway, who were not part of the Corps structure.

          Let it be a plus to have two more gendarmes at relatively important stations of the Ryazan-Ural railway within the Saratov Trans-Volga region.
          Not 3, but 5 - does this greatly increase the level of struggle against revolutionaries?
          1. +2
            9 February 2026 16: 01
            I think we should be talking about 10-20 gendarmes in this area along the railway line alone, but this does not change the overall picture.
            Of course, such forces are not sufficient to counter revolutionaries of all sorts and flavors.
            But this is a common systemic error on the part of the authorities (any government): law enforcement is tasked with whatever task is assigned to it. But whether the authorities actually wanted to provide the necessary resources and manpower to accomplish this task is always a big question...
            Our Ministry of Internal Affairs is currently over 40% understaffed, yet the tasks remain the same. Can the Minister of Internal Affairs achieve these assigned tasks with the current force and resources? No, he can't. And for some reason, the questions are directed at him... good or bad—it doesn't matter. The important thing is: do you have the strength? Do you have the will? If you don't have it, you're in trouble.
            In general, you are right, of course...
            1. +6
              9 February 2026 16: 16
              Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
              I think we should be talking about 10-20 gendarmes in this area along the railway line alone.

              The number of territorial employees is according to the annual statements.
              The number of railway employees - in the absence of major stations as such and their separate mention in the Vedomosti - well, God knows, I don’t have such data.
              Therefore, with a steady hand I will add 2 (Nikolaev and Novouzensk), and the line to Novouzensk is a dead end.
              1. +2
                9 February 2026 18: 24
                Sergey, that was a perfect picture... Please excuse me, I won't give you the archive codes - it was a long time ago... but if you need me, I'll write it down.

                Painting of the gendarmes of the Nikolaev and Novokuznetsk district administrations (Gendarme Corps)
                It was the Nikolaevsky and Novouzensky districts (the so-called "Trans-Volga region") that historically were part of the Saratov province, but in 1851 they were transferred to the newly formed Samara province and were served by the Samara provincial gendarmerie department.

                The staffing structure for the Nikolaevsky and Novouzensky districts (at the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century):
                District gendarmerie officer: 1 person (usually in the rank of captain or lieutenant colonel).
                Sergeant/Non-commissioned officer: from 2 to 5 people for the entire district.
                Secret agents (spies): their number was not constant

                Railway Gendarme Directorate there:
                The staffing structure of the gendarmerie department at the site
                At large stations (such as Nikolaevsk or junction stations of Novouzensky district):
                Section Chief: An officer (usually a captain or lieutenant colonel). His office was located at a major railway junction.
                Non-commissioned officers (senior and junior): These were the backbone of the service. They were assigned to stations.
                At a large station (passenger/junction) - 2-4 people.
                At small stations (passing areas) - 1 non-commissioned officer for several stations (passing service).
                Lower ranks (gendarmes): Performed patrol functions on platforms and on trains.

                Since important lines (for example, the Pokrovskaya Sloboda-Uralsk line) passed through these districts, the staff was strengthened due to the strategic importance of grain transportation.

                Calculation of personnel for a section of road within the county:
                Job Title
                Head of Department 1 The entire area within 100–150 miles.
                Sergeant Major 1-2 Assistant Chief for Administrative Affairs.
                Senior non-commissioned officers 5–8 Senior at key stations (Nikolaevsk, Yershov, Uzen).
                Junior non-commissioned officers 15–25 Station posts, escorting mail trains.
                1. +3
                  9 February 2026 19: 33
                  Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                  The staffing structure for the Nikolaevsky and Novouzensky districts (at the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century):
                  District gendarmerie officer: 1 person (usually of the rank of captain or lieutenant colonel).
                  Sergeant/Non-commissioned officer: from 2 to 5 people for the entire district.
                  Secret agents (spies): their number was not constant

                  И
                  Quote: your1970
                  Before the revolution, Nikolaevsky and Novouzensky districts of the Samara province had to 3 gendarme

                  ?

                  Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                  At large stations (such as Nikolaevsk or junction stations of Novouzensky district):
                  Section Chief: An officer (usually a captain or lieutenant colonel). His office was located at a major railway junction.
                  Non-commissioned officers (senior and junior): These were the backbone of the service. They were assigned to stations.

                  The two major stations are Novouzensk (a dead-end line), Nikolaev, Yershov, and Urbakh, and the rest are small stations and sidings. It wasn't until 1914 that the line began to be developed.
                  Let there not be 2 - let there be 4 railway gendarmes and 10 lower ranks.
                  This again was not enough.
                  I took my figures from the annual Vedomosti, they correspond quite well with yours
  16. +4
    8 February 2026 11: 00
    The author deserves sincere respect for her series of articles about the heroes and antiheroes of the Revolution. Even in Soviet times, Zemlyachka was, for some reason, little spoken or written about. Her image briefly appeared in the film "Two Comrades Were Serving," played by the wonderful Alla Demidova, and that's about it. But she was a remarkable individual, and if we're going to educate young people, it should be on people like her, not on those who traded and are still trading the country.
    1. VLR
      -2
      8 February 2026 11: 47
      Incidentally, if you look at it objectively and impartially, the female commissar in this film acts quite adequately. Put yourself in her shoes: the Red Army is preparing for a decisive offensive, and then they bring in two suspicious-looking men, one of them clearly an intellectual, of which Wrangel's army is full. And they're spouting some nonsense about flying an airplane and escaping in broad daylight from some "green" Batka (he and his entourage are apparently such "suckers" that it's amazing they're still alive). And in their cart are the uniforms of White Guard officers. They're spies, for sure. Do they have time to bother with them, to conduct some kind of investigation? If tomorrow or the day after they attack Perekop, which, despite enormous losses, they still fail to take (this woman will also die), other troops will bypass it, wading chest-deep through icy water across the Sivash.
      1. +2
        8 February 2026 17: 03
        I apologize, of course, but one shouldn't confuse a feature film with the horrific realities of the Civil War. No woman-commissar in a Red Army combat unit (not among bandits) made any decisions other than enforcing the directives of the Central Committee of the RCP(b). Counterintelligence, however, was quite adept at handling such matters. They would have always had time to execute them, and they were simply obliged to contact army headquarters. Otherwise, had intelligence been competent, the Whites, with the help of these hysterical women and proletarian avengers, would have wiped out all the Red military experts, replacing them with trained cadres, and would certainly have taken Moscow in 1919.
        By the way, their business with St. Petersburg almost failed under this sauce.
        1. VLR
          -2
          8 February 2026 17: 25
          Zemlyachka, in her position as head of the political departments of the 8th and 13th Armies on the Southern Front, was quite the "fixer." Wherever she went, she immediately "brought everyone to attention."
          And the film - well, it just happened to come up, he commented.
          1. -5
            8 February 2026 17: 33
            I'm not against it, I'm just fed up with these gold-shouldered commentators and their "Perestroika Ogonyok." I've already written: I know quite a bit about that time from those who were directly involved, and attempts to recreate those events through film (even if brilliantly made) don't give me the feeling of that time. One of the last witnesses of those events (Grandfather Semyon's younger brother) really loved the film "Red Square" and said it was like how the officers were executed, and the commissars shut it down. He later managed to distinguish himself on Nevsky Pyatachok.
      2. +7
        9 February 2026 16: 27
        Quote: VlR
        Incidentally, if you look at it objectively and impartially, the female commissar in this film acts quite adequately. Put yourself in her shoes: the Red Army is preparing for a decisive offensive, and then they bring in two suspicious-looking men, one of them clearly an intellectual, of which Wrangel's army is full. And they're spouting some nonsense about flying an airplane and escaping in broad daylight from some "green" Batka (he and his entourage are apparently such "suckers" that it's amazing they're still alive). And in their cart are the uniforms of White Guard officers. They're spies, for sure. Do they have time to bother with them, to conduct some kind of investigation? If tomorrow or the day after they attack Perekop, which, despite enormous losses, they still fail to take (this woman will also die), other troops will bypass it, wading chest-deep through icy water across the Sivash.

        Have you ever wondered why?
        Quote: oleg Pesotsky
        For some reason, even in Soviet times, little was said or written about Zemlyachka.

        ?
        She was even by GV standards overly fanatical and possibly hysterical- that's why the Soviet government quietly pushed it behind the closet.
        And the time to mess around with spies is understanding what is happening - there is always.
        You don't need a brain to make a hole, but to find out: are they spies or not, who they were going to, why they were going, the enemy's situation - thousandfold more important. Because a spy in his headquarters could lead to the senseless death of everyone - and such fool in glasses - she screamed "Shoot!" and that's it, you won't find out anything...
  17. +10
    8 February 2026 11: 17
    The question inevitably arises: how rotten did the regime of the last emperor have to be for the children of this rich man to become revolutionaries?

    Do you really think this man became a "fighter against the regime" because of hunger?
    In fact, it's not usually the incompetent who become "subversives." They simply don't have the time. They need to earn a living.
    But there are always people who will be against any authority.
    1. VLR
      +7
      8 February 2026 11: 23
      Well, the children of today's rich people aren't joining the revolution, but, on the contrary, they're all, as if hand-picked, supporters of the current government and even ardent "patriots", just like in Dubai and Courchevel, rocking out to "Mother Earth" in kokoshniks.
      1. +9
        8 February 2026 11: 26
        The children of the Soviet elite were more passionate, there's no arguing that. request
        1. VLR
          +7
          8 February 2026 11: 32
          The children of the Soviet elite, like their fathers, were practically destitute compared to today's. It's touching to think of Ryzhkov's surprise when Chernomyrdin wanted to leave his official post and become the head of Gazprom. His argument (according to Chernomyrdin): "You'll lose your official dacha and your official car."
          And six months later, Chernomyrdin could have bought an ocean-going yacht if he'd wanted. But he was more practical than Abramovich and understood that it would be useless, and the maintenance costs would be staggering.
          That's why Soviet party and government leaders so readily betrayed both the CPSU and the Soviet Union: they wanted real wealth and real power. And their children had no objections.
          1. +8
            8 February 2026 11: 45
            Quote: VlR
            The children of the Soviet elite, like their fathers, were virtually destitute.

            And what profound conclusion follows from this? Can a regime be considered stable if children don't follow in their fathers' footsteps? Ah, yes, that's another matter...
            Or take the heroine of your article. A good Jewish girl decided to bring happiness to humanity (unfortunately, not everyone at once, but our homeland). But in the process of doing good, she discovered that some people didn't live up to her lofty ideals. But all she could offer, having gained power, was...
            The first word I heard from her lips was "shoot».

            And the result was that all these sweet and kind people, who supposedly even opposed terrorism (somewhere deep down) staged a bloody orgy...
          2. +2
            8 February 2026 12: 55
            Quote: VlR
            The children of the Soviet elite, like their fathers, were effectively destitute compared to today's.

            An inaccurate comparison. The children of the Soviet elite were just as wealthy compared to the children of ordinary workers and peasants as today's children of "new Russians" from the Old Jewish dynasty are compared to the same children of ordinary Russians.
            The children of the Soviet elite did not die of hunger in the 30s and 40s, and did not eat wild plants, roots, and gophers, like my relatives did in 46-48.
            The children of the Soviet elite became the owners of mineral resources, houses, real estate, factories and steamships, taken by their ancestors from the rightful owners of Russia.
            That's why they "betrayed" the USSR. But that's your way of thinking. Their way of thinking is that they reformed it or privatized it.
          3. -1
            8 February 2026 15: 54
            Quote: VlR
            The children of the Soviet elite, like their fathers, were virtually destitute.

            Tell me, how many 18-year-old girls in the USSR received an apartment in the House on the Embankment, like Stalin's Setanka in the wartime year of 1944?

            And what a gap there was between her and the homeless 18-year-old Smolensk girl in bast shoes with a vomit in her hand?
            1. -4
              9 February 2026 17: 32
              Well, yes, today's children of officials and oligarchs disdain such squalid apartments. And, in general, they try to "love Russia" from abroad.
              1. +1
                10 February 2026 10: 00
                Quote: vet
                Well, yes, today's children of officials

                I'll repeat the question how 18 year old girls in the USSR received an apartment in the House on the Embankment, like Stalin's Setanka in military 1944 on the occasion of marriage?
                Quote: vet
                And in general, they try to "love Russia"


                Yes, the descendants of ALL the leaders - Dzhugashvili, Khrushchev, Suslov, Brezhnev, Andropov, Gorby - live THERE - no country knows such a disgrace...
                1. -3
                  10 February 2026 10: 20
                  Are Prokhorov, Abramovich, Deripaska, Rybolovlev, Potanin, Lisin, Usmanov, Fedun, Yevtushenko, Tinkov, Galitsky, Baturina, Berezkin, and others the descendants of Khrushchev and Suslov? And today's officials, from district heads down? A bold claim.
                  1. +2
                    11 February 2026 10: 01
                    Quote: vet
                    Are Prokhorov, Abramovich, Deripaska, Rybolovlev, Potanin, Lisin, Usmanov, Fedun, Yevtushenko, Tinkov, Galitsky, Baturina, Berezkin, and others the descendants of Khrushchev and Suslov? And today's officials, from district heads down? A bold claim.

                    Dmitry Ionovich Prokhorov, father of Mikhail Dmitrievich Prokhorov, head of the Department of International Relations of the USSR State Sports Committee, a simple machine operator, agrees.
                    Father - Aaron (Arkady) Nakhmanovich Abramovich (1937-1969), worked in the Komi Economic Council. Also an ordinary hard worker.
                    Even Chubais's father was a prominent party member, and was truly devoted to the party's cause.
                    1. -2
                      11 February 2026 10: 08
                      Well, that is, mid-level officials. Not the descendants of Dzhugashvili, Khrushchev, Suslov, and the rest, as stated in the commentary.
                      1. +4
                        11 February 2026 10: 19
                        Quote: vet
                        Well, that is, mid-level officials. Not the descendants of Dzhugashvili, Khrushchev, Suslov, and the rest, as stated in the commentary.

                        I found it interesting. I looked – the descendants of all the Soviet leaders and many descendants of Politburo members (Suslov, for example) live in the US, England, Austria, and Germany. They didn't become Russian oligarchs, of course. But it's still revealing and sad.
  18. +5
    8 February 2026 11: 29
    Quote: V.
    If we look at the state's core industries, where do we have real successes, for example in aviation, in the extractive industry, in construction?

    Citizen, could you tell us more about the successes in aviation, the mining industry, and construction?
    The fact that:
    - 98% of the civilian fleet is imported,
    - the mining industry is based on the Soviet legacy;
    - construction of multi-story kennels at the expense of the destruction of industrial enterprises;
    Are these all the achievements?
    1. 0
      8 February 2026 11: 49
      This is a question with an exclamation mark, which you answered correctly. hi
  19. +7
    8 February 2026 11: 41
    became the head of the political departments of the 8th and 13th

    According to the documents, she is not Zemlyachka, but Rozaliya Samoilova.

    “She was one of the first women to be awarded the Order of the Red Banner of the RSFSR in 1921.
    In 1919, there was only 1 award, in 1920 - 9 awards, in 1921 - 4.
    1. +8
      8 February 2026 11: 57
      but it was this husband's surname that she bore for the rest of her life.
      ,,not quite so.
      When she was awarded the Order of Lenin in 1931, she was known as Zemlyachka.
    2. +1
      8 February 2026 12: 58
      Quote: bubalik
      In 1919, there was only 1 award, in 1920 - 9 awards, in 1921 - 4.

      For what feats?
      Have you ever thought about it?...
      But it’s time.
  20. -4
    8 February 2026 11: 51
    Where I spent my childhood on the outskirts of Moscow, there used to be a street called Zemlyachka, and a mental hospital was located there. I read somewhere that Zemlyachka went mad in her old age and died in a mental hospital.
    It may be a myth, or perhaps it is in this very mental hospital.
    History is full of mysteries
    1. VLR
      +9
      8 February 2026 11: 55
      A myth, of course. She died in her apartment in that very same House on the Embankment. And she wasn't retired—she worked until her death.
      1. -6
        8 February 2026 11: 56
        Did you attend this?
        1. VLR
          +7
          8 February 2026 11: 58
          There's a death scene inspection report and an inventory of the documents—given her condition, they could have included some classified as "Top Secret." So it was all serious.
          1. -4
            8 February 2026 12: 01
            There is a death scene inspection report.
            This is the first time I've heard of a document with this name.
            Have you personally seen the original of this document? Have you familiarized yourself with its contents?
            Or is this "based on reliable information from the Internet"?

            Can you provide a link to the original document?
            1. VLR
              +4
              8 February 2026 12: 04
              The name isn't important. The documents were inventoried, and some very unexpected and surprising discoveries were made. For example, a photograph of a roof—the director of a large plant reported that it had been repaired and no longer leaked. Can you imagine the level of control and discipline she exerted?
              1. -4
                8 February 2026 12: 16
                An inventory of the documents was made, and some very unexpected and surprising discoveries were made. For example, a photograph of the roof.
                Let me ask again: were you personally present at this, or are you retelling someone else’s story?

                Can you provide a link to the official document stating that Zemlyachka died in her own apartment?
                Or "trust me - I know"?
                1. VLR
                  +4
                  8 February 2026 12: 23
                  So, do you seriously believe that after the death of Stalin's former deputy and current deputy chair of the Party Control Commission, no one was interested in what documents were stored in her personal archive?
                  "Let anyone who wants to dig around, but we are above it."
                  Is that really it? Of course not. A major commission was dispatched, everything was sealed and inventoried.
                  1. -3
                    8 February 2026 12: 29
                    Valery, argumentation through asking counter questions is demagoguery.
                    You claim that Zemlyachka:
                    She died in her apartment in that very House on the Embankment.
                    There is a protocol of inspection of the place of death and an inventory of the available documents
                    There was an inventory of the documents, and some very unexpected and surprising discoveries were made.
                    Let me repeat my questions: Have you personally read the original documents? (their scanned copies) that you are talking about, or are you betraying the content of someone else’s story?

                    Just answer precisely: a) yes, I read it, the documents are... b) no, I haven't read the originals, I learned about their contents from... here's the link
                  2. +8
                    8 February 2026 12: 36
                    Valery, are you trying to convince someone who claims the article's subject died in a mental hospital and is simply engaging in demagoguery? He demands proof from you, but offers no evidence to back up his claims?
                    I don’t think that the person who was awarded the second Order of Lenin in 1946, and whose ashes were buried in the Kremlin wall in 1947, was kept in a mental hospital.
                    1. 0
                      8 February 2026 14: 15
                      Valery, are you trying to convince your opponent who claims the article's heroine died in a mental hospital and is engaged in demagoguery?
                      You are engaged in demagogy, because I never claimedthat Zemlyachka died in a mental hospital.
                      Please read what I wrote more carefully since you decided to put in your 5 cents.

                      And I didn’t demand anything from the author, I just asked if he could confirm with any documents what he wrote in his posts, and asked for a link to the source documents.
                      In response I received silence.
            2. +5
              8 February 2026 13: 13
              A crime scene inspection report is compiled, the most universal and primary document in a criminal investigation or investigation of the circumstances of a death or anything else that falls under the criteria of a crime. A properly compiled report is one of the foundations of solving a crime. When drafting it, every detail is recorded, not to mention any documents or items seized, and all of this is included in the report. Considering who died then, besides the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Prosecutor's Office employees, there were likely also some comrades in formal suits. Such documents and files are kept in archives. If you want to read them, by all means, if the classification is declassified, you can read them.
              1. +2
                8 February 2026 14: 31
                A crime scene inspection report is drawn up, the most universal and first document in a criminal investigation.
                Absolutely right, but only in cases where there are signs of violent death, i.e. there are signs of a crime committed.
                If not, law enforcement officials are not invited.
                If a prominent Bolshevik died, NKVD-KGB officers could theoretically arrive to seize the deceased's archive.
                Then an act and an inventory are drawn up in 2 copies.
                If you want to read it, for God's sake, if the classification has been removed, you can take a look.
                To get acquainted with a document, you first need to know exactly which archive it is in, and even earlier, find out whether it has been preserved.
                It's not an easy matter
                1. +4
                  8 February 2026 14: 57
                  Previously, a report was drawn up for every corpse. A forensic expert would determine whether it was criminal or not, after which you would either be prosecuted or refused.
                  1. -2
                    9 February 2026 01: 40
                    Previously, it was in what years, by employees of what specific government organization the protocol was drawn up, and In what legislation is this requirement established?, can you name it specifically and give it links to documents supporting your statement?

                    Or offer to take your word for it?
                    In my opinion, you wrote nonsense without even realizing it yourself.
                    1. +3
                      9 February 2026 07: 23
                      Dear Sir, are you from another planet? When a body is discovered, officers from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor's Office, now the Investigative Committee, arrive at the scene. Crime scene inspection reports are compiled based on the Criminal Procedure Code. Mandatory inspections of corpses were mandatory even for elderly grandmothers, right up until the early 2000s. Later, if there were no signs of criminal death, paramedics would draw up their own documents, but in an emergency, they would call the local police officer. I used to be an investigator and know the ins and outs of things.
                      1. +2
                        9 February 2026 11: 27
                        The inspection report of the scene of the incident is drawn up on the basis of the Criminal Procedure Code
                        You are telling some fairy tales.
                        The Criminal Procedure Code does not require that a report be drawn up for every death of a citizen – you dreamed it.
                        A crime scene inspection report is drawn up when there are indications of a crime. For example, passersby discover a bloody body on the street. A local police task force arrives, the investigator draws up a report, the detective canvasses witnesses, and then opens an investigation.
                        No one went to the apartments of the deceased grandmothers, at most the local police officer would come
                        A forensic expert conducts an examination at the initiative of the investigator and the court, i.e. only during the investigation of a criminal case.
                        If a forensic examination were conducted on every deceased person in Moscow, several hundred forensic experts would be needed, as performing an autopsy to examine a body and determine the cause of death is a time-consuming process. And then the report would still need to be printed.

                        At least that's how it was during the Soviet era, I don't know how it is now.
    2. 0
      9 February 2026 13: 00
      Quote: Marrr
      Where I spent my childhood on the outskirts of Moscow
      History is full of mysteries

      Could you be more specific – where, on what outskirts? Or is it a secret? wink
      1. +2
        9 February 2026 13: 02
        There is no secret - the former Leningradsky district of Moscow is now Khovrino
        1. +2
          9 February 2026 14: 02
          Quote: Marrr
          There is no secret - the former Leningradsky district of Moscow is now Khovrino

          Yes, there was a mental hospital there. Yes In Khimki, the expression "you'll end up on the left bank" was idiomatic, meaning you'll end up in a mental hospital. I don't remember such a legend about Zemlyachki Street, even though I worked on the street named after it for 30 years—but that was in Zamoskvorechye.
          1. +3
            9 February 2026 19: 54
            That's right, before part of Khimki was annexed to Moscow, it was Zemlyachki Street, and later it became Levoberezhnaya Street.
            Now there is a military hospital there for those wounded in the North Military District.
            1. +1
              9 February 2026 20: 24
              Quote: Marrr
              it was Zemlyachki Street

              Indeed, it turns into Dzerzhinsky Street)
  21. +3
    8 February 2026 12: 38
    [quoteModern Wikipedia literally suggests scaring children with her name, ][/quote]
    This is your personal interpretation. A distortion of reality.
    The heroine of today's article is a pure passionary from the cohort of "fiery revolutionaries" fanatically devoted to the ideas of communism.

    The definition of a passionate personality belongs to L. Gumilyov. This character doesn't fit that definition. A psychiatrist is needed here.
    Then came the distortion and substitution of facts:
    [quoteShe was demanding and cruel—to herself and to others. But she still didn't go beyond the cruelty of the civil war—that merciless and even irrational cruelty that was characteristic of both the Whites and the Reds.][/quote]
    The reds and whites are placed on the same board and are equalized in cruelty.
    However, this was not the case.
    The Red Terror was organized from above, by the Bolshevik government at the state level, at the level of state policy, and had an ideological justification based on governing documents, public events, and state propaganda. The White Terror was spontaneous, a consequence of the brutality of the civil war, and was persecuted by the command. The Whites did not march with placards reading "Death to the workers and peasants!" It was condemned by the leaders of the White movement.
    Therefore, it is stupid to equate them.
    Further, the author simply lies.
    However, unexpectedly, due to its short stay in Crimea, liberated from Wrangel's troops, it became almost the main symbol of revolutionary terror. Fair enough? Hardly. After all, in reality, the repressions in Crimea were carried out not by the Zemlyachki Regional Committee of the RCP (Bolshevik) but by the Crimean Revolutionary Committee and the Special Departments of the Army and Navy.

    Wow! Unexpected.
    It's quite unexpected, if you're not aware of the close ties between the regional revolutionary committees and the Special Troops. If you're not aware of who was the "punishing sword of the revolution" at the time.
    There's cognitive dissonance when the beginning of a paragraph doesn't align with the ending. It contradicts it.
    The Crimean Regional Committee executed no one. It directed the terror. Decisions were made by special departments and troikas. The Chekists executed. The Regional Committee organized and supervised, provided assistance, and reported. It was at the forefront of the process of genocide based on class and estate.
    Rozaliya played a leading role in the Revolutionary Committee. She was expelled from Crimea for excessive cruelty.
    She created her own fame, even when she was head of the political department, where she also supervised executions.
    And the author writes about the same thing, citing relevant evidence.
    1. VLR
      +1
      8 February 2026 13: 04
      The White Terror was spontaneous

      The bloody atamans Semyonov and Annenkov were not "greens," but fully official members of Kolchak's administration. With his final decree, Kolchak even transferred power in Eastern Russia to Semyonov. We can also add Denikin's corps commanders Shkuro and Mamantov, whom even Wrangel considered bandits. And many others.
      if you don’t know about the close connection between the regional revolutionary committees

      Zemlyachka was never a member of any Revolutionary Committee in Crimea! Neither the Crimean Béla Kun Revolutionary Committee nor the army Revolutionary Committees. She also had no connection to the Special Departments of the armies and navies stationed in Crimea. Zemlyachka's Regional Committee had other goals—to establish peaceful life in Crimea.
      The definition of a passionate personality belongs to L. Gumilyov. This character does not fit this definition.

      You don't know Gumilyov's theory very well. Zemlyachka is a 100% passionate person.
      1. +1
        8 February 2026 13: 25
        Quote: VlR
        You don't know Gumilyov's theory very well. Zemlyachka is a 100% passionate person.

        Passionate about your ethnic group?
        1. -2
          8 February 2026 20: 27
          So, what's this about ethnicity, passionarity theory expert? Why are we keeping quiet?
          Two sealed train cars of such passionaries arrived in Russia.
          1. 0
            9 February 2026 07: 24
            What is the principle and what is a sealed wagon?
      2. +5
        8 February 2026 14: 20
        Quote: VlR
        The Zemlyachka Regional Committee had other goals - to establish peaceful life in Crimea.

        The Crimean Regional Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) supervised the activities of all government bodies. It appointed members of the Revolutionary Committees of cities and villages, formed revolutionary tribunals, and coordinated the activities of the Cheka and Special Departments.
        1. VLR
          0
          8 February 2026 14: 26
          Bela Kun, head of the Crimean Revolutionary Committee, whom Dzerzhinsky, in a conversation with Veresayev, acknowledged as the main organizer of the terror, was appointed by Moscow. Zemlyachka had no role in appointing members of the Special Departments of the Armies—they were appointed by commanders with whom the Regional Committee had a complex relationship. Zemlyachka complained to Moscow about poor discipline and drunkenness in the 4th Army, which led to various incidents. But she couldn't directly influence them—she lacked the authority; the army had its own superiors.
          1. 0
            8 February 2026 14: 47
            Quote: VlR
            And Zemlyachka had nothing to do with the appointment of members of the Special Departments of the armies - they were appointed by the commanders

            Where did I write that Zemlyachka had something to do with the appointment of members of the Special Departments of the armies?
            You refute your own fabrications.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -3
      8 February 2026 18: 20
      Quote: Silhouette
      The Whites did not walk around with posters saying "Death to the workers and peasants!"

      The Whites were the first to execute their opponents in the Kremlin. The Reds pardoned their opponents both in Moscow and at Krasnoye Selo. Kolchak, Semyonov, and Ungern were responsible for many crimes; there was no higher leadership over them. From the first days of the White uprising on the Don, they executed prisoners without exception. If the Reds hadn't executed them, the Whites would have.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. 0
    8 February 2026 13: 17
    But let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    let's not get ahead of ourselves

    But let's return to the pre-revolutionary activities of Rozaliya Zemlyachka
    So it's not us who are running ahead, but the author, trying to emphasize his sympathy for her

    ,
    In the City Duma, a Committee for Public Safety (CPS) was created, headed by the Socialist Revolutionary V. Rudnev and the commander of the Moscow Military District, Colonel K. Ryabtsev (also a member of the Socialist Revolutionary Party).

    Please note: there are no supporters of the old regime among the current participants. Moreover, no one objects to the dispersal of the Provisional Assembly.
    It's impossible to read this ignorant lie :

    in the evening October 25 A special meeting of the Moscow City Duma was held, at which members considered the question of how "Moscow City Self-Government should respond to the aggressive policies of the Soviets of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies." The Bolshevik faction was also present at the meeting. After a speech by the faction leader, I. I. Skvortsov-Stepanov, the Bolsheviks left the Duma meeting. By decision of the other factions of the City Duma to protect the Provisional Government Under the city government, a Committee of Public Safety (CPS) was created from representatives of the Mensheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries, Cadets and other parties, headed by the mayor of Moscow, Socialist Revolutionary Vadim Rudnev, and the commander of the troops of the Moscow Military District, Colonel Konstantin Ryabtsev. The Committee spoke from the position of defending the Provisional Government
    .

    Unlike the so-called councils, which were not elected by anyone, the Moscow Duma was elected in democratic general secret equal elections, where the Bolsheviks suffered a crushing defeat.

    October 27Thus, the military actions were started by the opponents of the Bolsheviks, it was they who tried to seize power in Moscow
    again a blatant lie:
    The Bolshevik Party's combat center began military operations. on the afternoon of October 25 With their patrols occupying the city post office. That morning, A. S. Vedernikov and A. Ya. Arosev went to the barracks of the 56th Infantry Reserve Regiment to form a detachment to occupy the post office and telegraph office. The regiment was tasked with guarding the Kremlin, its arsenal of small arms and heavy weapons, the State Bank, the Treasury, savings and loan banks, and other institutions.

    I emphasize: the congress's decision to seize power has not even been announced yet, the Provisional Government is still in place, and here we have armed occupiers of institutions, that is, a pure armed illegal rebellion is evident. S. N. Prokopovich, the only minister of the Provisional Government who was at liberty, arrived in Moscow on October 27 to organize resistance to the Bolsheviks.

    The author is not on friendly terms with logic: how legal Moscow Duma could...seize power? At home? lol
    This was done by the VRK bandits. traitors and deserters convicted of cowardice , released from prisons by the Bolsheviks, zalkinds and stupid lumpen.

    The youth and cream of Russia stood up to defend the Motherland and freedom: cadets, military officers, students, schoolchildren with their teachers, women, officers, etc.

    It was the student volunteer detachment that first called itself the White Guard.

    Regarding the sobs over the executed unarmed soldiers in the Kremlin:
    From the memoirs of cadet V.S. Arsenyev of the Alexandrovsky School about the October days of 1917 in Moscow

    The plan of the 56th regiment was as follows: having let a small number of cadets into the Kremlin and, apparently, obeying them, on a signal to rush in and destroy them.

    When everything had more or less calmed down, we went out to the square; wounded and dead soldiers were lying there and cadets, iron chains torn from the bollards by shells hung. When we joined the company, it turned out that when the 56th regiment was lined up and the cadets were busy counting the soldiers, then shots were fired at the cadets from the barracks or the Arsenal - this was the signal for those remaining in the barracks to begin firing from the rifles they had held back from the upper rooms at the cadets in the square; it was for these weapons that the soldiers we met on the stairs ran.
    In response to this the cadets opened fire,


    If it weren't for Ryabtsev's betrayal (he was executed for it), there would have been a chance to nip the bandits in the bud in Moscow.

    The youths and officers, the students were killed en masse for a long time, no one was forgiven for anything, the author is lying...

    .
    Deserters in those days were the scourge of the army; they could not be given any indulgence, and Zemlyachka could not, had no right to show leniency.
    Yes, indeed, 1,9 million deserters in the Red Army in 1919 - the people loved the government and clearly did not want to fight against themselves.

    General leadership
    Yes, this sadist and Russophobe, dripping with Russian blood, had no education whatsoever, never worked a DAY in her worthless life, and that's why she became... Deputy Council of People's Commissars. fool
    1. +2
      8 February 2026 14: 14
      in contrast to the so-called unelected councils


      This is unhistorical, since the Petrograd Soviet handed over power to the disbanded State Duma, from which the Supreme Command and its structures were formed. The Soviets gave power, but took it away in the fall. The Bolsheviks were legitimized first by the Workers' and Soldiers' Soviets, then by the Peasants' Soviets.
      V.S. Arsenyev writes that he's unaware of what was happening, having rummaged through the soldiers' belongings in the barracks. It's known, however, that one of the reasons for the surrender was a lack of ammunition; three trucks from the Simonovsky warehouses fell into the hands of the cadets. Therefore, running to a weapon without ammunition under fire is a rather dubious endeavor, but running from gunfire did occur (there was a traffic jam at the gate and at the entrance to the barracks). And the details: there were two executions—of the 56th Regiment and of the arsenal workers. Arsenal mechanic N. Karzykin points out that if it weren't for General Kaigorodov, everyone would have been shot, as the cadets themselves told him. V.S. Arsenyev writes about the murder of cadets on orders from cadets.
      1. 0
        8 February 2026 15: 36
        Quote: naidas
        This is unhistorical, since the Petrograd Soviet handed over power to the dispersed State Duma.

        The Petrograd Soviet is nothing and no one, there were democratic elections. to the Petrograd City Duma
        Quote: naidas
        they took it away in the fall

        The Bolshevik meeting (the so-called 2nd Congress of Soviets) had nothing to do with the Soviets, if you don't know - it was not recognized by the Peasant Soviets and the Armed Forces Soviets - and this is the overwhelming majority of Soviets - such things can be known.
        Quote: naidas
        It is known that one of the reasons for surrender is the lack of ammunition.

        Red Fairy Tales - The Kremlin is an arsenal of weapons.
        Arsenyev clearly wrote that the weapons in the barracks were not handed over, there were soldiers there, fire was opened on the cadets from the barracks, the cadets responded.

        On November 3, during disarmament, a mass shooting of Russian youth by red bandits took place.
        1. +3
          8 February 2026 17: 57
          democratic elections were held in the Petrograd City Duma

          -you need to know the results:
          1. A minority of voters voted—on August 20, 1917, elections to the Petrograd City Duma were held. 549,378 voters participated, representing approximately 40% of all city residents eligible to vote.
          2. election results:
          1st place was taken by the Socialist Revolutionary Party, which received 37,5% of the votes (75 seats out of 200);
          2nd place – 33,3% (67 seats) – Bolshevik Party;
          3rd place – 20,7% (42 seats) – Cadet Party;
          The Menshevik Party received one of the last places - 4% (8 seats).
          Moreover, the Mensheviks and Left Socialist Revolutionaries support the Bolsheviks. In fact, all the Socialist Revolutionaries in the State Duma fell under the Bolshevik steamroller because they made agreements with the Bolsheviks for the sake of constructive work, which the Bolsheviks took advantage of.
          On October 25, a meeting of the bureau of all factions of the Moscow Soviet of Workers' Deputies was held, with the Bolsheviks participating. Also present were Mayor V.V. Rudnev and Colonel K.I. Ryabtsev. At the meeting, the Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks proposed creating a "temporary democratic-revolutionary body" to combat the "counterrevolution."

          These tales are reflected in the testimony of both a soldier of the 56th Regiment and an arsenal worker. Information about the cadets holding up trucks is also found in books. And about the shooting of workers and soldiers, there is evidence from General Kaigorodov, and then not yet a Bolshevik cadet Popov. The same Arsenyev testifies to how cadets killed cadets: the battalion commander of the Aleksandrovsky School, Colonel Drenyakin, ordered the cannon to open fire across
          The Trinity Gate was locked; a sergeant major was killed by a shell
          6th company Alexandrov (nephew of the rich man Tretyakov) and others
          about five cadets"
          1. -2
            8 February 2026 20: 24
            Quote: naidas
            -you need to know the results:
            1. A minority of voters voted

            No one voted for the Soviets at all - it was a farce of "elections"
            2. The State Duma of Petrograd spoke out against the Bolshevik bandits in the VOR
            Quote: naidas
            On October 25, a meeting of the bureau of all factions of the Moscow Soviet of Workers' Deputies was held, with the Bolsheviks participating. Also present were Mayor V.V. Rudnev and Colonel K.I. Ryabtsev. At the meeting, the Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks proposed creating a "temporary democratic-revolutionary body" to combat the "counterrevolution."

            The Bolsheviks were counter-revolutionaries, which Gordua confirmed by creating the KOB
            Quote: naidas
            The data on the delay of trucks by cadets is as follows

            FROM the Kremlin, what's not clear?
            Quote: naidas
            The same Arsenyev testifies how cadets killed cadets

            He testifies about the execution of cadets from the barracks and a big lie about the surrender of weapons.
            1. 0
              9 February 2026 20: 58
              1. Then why are you writing if this is a farce for you?
              2. The place where the St. Petersburg City Duma spoke out against the Bolsheviks was not indicated; I only know about the appeal to the population.
              3. This is in St. Petersburg, but in Moscow it’s different, it was written to you, don’t get confused.
              4. These are your speculations, here is Arsenyev’s:
              The battalion commander of the Aleksandrovsky School, Colonel Drenyakin, ordered the cannon to open fire through the locked Trinity Gate; a shell killed Sergeant Major Aleksandrov of the 6th Company (the nephew of the wealthy Tretyakov) and five other cadets.
              5. And the rest of the killed cadets are from the 1st School of Ensigns - arrested by the cadets as unreliable
              6. And Arsenyev’s opinion about the execution of the cadets raises questions:
              1. Who was supposed to give the order when the commandant had been beaten and arrested, and only Kaigorodov remained as an officer? It would have been far more effective to shoot the cadets from an armored car upon entry than to hand over their weapons, leaving the orderlies' weapons in the barracks, and shoot the cadets from the remainder.
              1. -1
                10 February 2026 11: 13
                Quote: naidas
                Then why are you writing if this is a farce for you?

                belay I’m not writing to myself, but to you.
                Quote: naidas
                The location where the St. Petersburg City Duma spoke out against the Bolsheviks was not indicated.

                Should I? This much is known: October 25 (November 7) Duma voted for a march to the Winter Palace to support the Provisional Government and did it, but was
                Quote: naidas
                This is in St. Petersburg, but in Moscow it's different, it's written to you, don't get confused.

                What are you talking about? In both St. Petersburg and Moscow, LEGAL elected authorities have come out against the thieves.
                Quote: naidas
                These are your speculations, here's Arsenyev's

                Arsenyev, verbatim:
                Shots were fired from the barracks or the Arsenal at the cadets - this was the signal for those remaining in the barracks to begin firing from the rifles they had held back from the upper rooms at the cadets in the square.
                In response to this, the cadets opened fire.,
                I am writing for the third time - how much more do you need?
                1. 0
                  12 February 2026 11: 36
                  I am writing for the third time - how much more do you need?

                  Read Arsenyev's full report. He wrote who gave the order to shoot the cadets, but you don't see it. Why? And the legitimate authorities in Moscow created the Military Revolutionary Committee, as you were told, but you ignore historical facts here too. Why? Yes, they made me laugh by writing about the St. Petersburg State Duma's protest against the Bolsheviks through an appeal, and the people responded and came to the Winter Palace, and the Military Revolutionary Committee was no more. And handing over their weapons and then taking them back under machine guns is, in your opinion, a clear conspiracy, and without any command at all. And according to the State Duma, the Bolsheviks, Left SRs, and Mensheviks actually hold a majority in St. Petersburg, but you have the opposite. Why?
                  1. -1
                    12 February 2026 12: 16
                    Quote: naidas
                    order to shoot at the cadets

                    at the GATE, - don't you see why?

                    The bandits shot at the cadets - they responded - don't you see why?
                    Quote: naidas
                    And the legitimate authorities in Moscow created the Military Revolutionary Committee, you were told the same thing, but here too you ignore historical facts, why?

                    The legitimate authorities, the City Duma, created the Committee of Public Safety, the bandits created the Military Revolutionary Committee - why can't you read?
                    Quote: naidas
                    the place of the State Duma of St. Petersburg's action against the Bolsheviks through an appeal

                    by demonstration, the bandits did not let
                    Quote: naidas
                    And then hand over the weapons and then take them back under machine guns

                    They were hoping for fire from the barracks, but they miscalculated.
                    Quote: naidas
                    And in the State Duma in St. Petersburg, the Bolsheviks, Left Socialist Revolutionaries, and Mensheviks actually have the majority, but in your country it’s the other way around. Why?

                    City Duma condemned the coupand she came out to protest - it’s not clear why?
                    1. +1
                      12 February 2026 13: 34
                      1. What bandits? Your bandits, unarmed, ran under machine gun fire through the gate behind the barracks and into the barracks, where your witness Arsenyev shot at them. Do you think this is how any war should be fought: surrender your weapons, then flee under fire, instead of being shot at immediately from an armored car. And even surrender to command to ensure victory over the enemy. That's some level of intelligence.
                      2. You were given the breakdown of the State Duma for St. Petersburg, while in Moscow the Socialist Revolutionaries themselves created the VRK. You were given a link to the data, but you ignore the data. It is unclear what your conclusions are based on.
                      3. It is clear that they gave a statement and the war with the Bolsheviks ended. You are fighting normally, but for success in the war you need to hand over your weapons and commanders, then write an appeal.
                      1. -1
                        13 February 2026 15: 36
                        Quote: naidas
                        What bandits?

                        red
                        Quote: naidas
                        Do you think this is how any war should be fought?

                        Read the witness Arsenyev - WHAT is not clear?
                        Quote: naidas
                        You have been provided with a layout for the State Duma in St. Petersburg.

                        belay fool I to you I give the Bolsheviks67 Of the 200, 75 Socialist-Secularists, 48 ​​KD and 8 smaller State Duma members opposed the bandits.

                        Quote: naidas
                        In Moscow, the Socialist Revolutionaries themselves created the Military Revolutionary Committee. You were given a link to the data, but you ignore the data. It's unclear what your conclusions are based on.

                        You were given a link to the Moscow State Duma meeting where the KOB-WHAT is not clear?

                        advice - in the trash.
                        Quote: naidas
                        It's clear they issued a statement and the war with the Bolsheviks ended. You're fighting normally.

                        fight with theirNo one wanted it except the kr bandits - that's the point.
                      2. +1
                        24 February 2026 15: 55
                        red bandits

                        These are your Red bandits under the command of the Tsarist General Kaigorodov? And the rest were arrested, beaten, and isolated by your noble cadets.
    2. -2
      9 February 2026 07: 27
      The baker howled, "I see your hands shaking, I see thugs all around, and only pale-faced youths guarding the democratic regime. Aren't you disgusted? Although who would know?"
      1. +1
        9 February 2026 12: 59
        Korolev and Zhzhenov, lovers of bone crunching, howled, how could they not be disgusted?
  24. 0
    8 February 2026 14: 24
    Quote: The same Lech
    Quote: Fitter65
    Following the arson of a relay cabinet on a Russian railway, almost everyone is advocating for the abolition of the death penalty—to teach others a lesson. Or is this something else entirely?

    No... that's right... imagine the switch cabinet burned down... a passenger train with hundreds of passengers is traveling... the switch didn't change the track at the right moment... the train derailed... people died... what do you think should be done with the arsonist?

    The minibus driver on Fontanka who killed seven people was given six years. So our law is very imperfect.
  25. +4
    8 February 2026 14: 57
    How rotten did the regime of the last emperor have to be for the children of this rich man to become revolutionaries?
    And that's always been the case with them, since Babylonian times. No matter how well they live, they'll still overthrow the existing order at the first opportunity.
  26. +2
    8 February 2026 15: 17
    She was demanding and cruel—to herself and to others. But she never went beyond the brutality of the civil war.

    And then Ostap suffered (s) laughing
    Valery, at least occasionally restrain your imagination if you claim that your publications even look historical.
    During the Civil War there were no established (or "generally accepted") "boundaries of cruelty" that one could cross or not cross.
    In fact, the repressions in Crimea were carried out not the Regional Committee of the RCPb Zemlyachki, and the Crimean Revolutionary Committee and the Special Departments of the Army and Navy.
    Another opus.
    You might as well write that in fact the repressions in Crimea were carried out not by the Regional Committee of the RCPb Zemlyachki, and not even by the Crimean Revolutionary Committee and the Special Departments of the Army and Navy, but by the Red Army soldiers who shot the White Guards.

    The repressions carried out against people declared enemies of Soviet power (and their family members) were the product of collective creativity. And the regional committees of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) played a leading (directing and controlling) role in this creativity. They could either intensify or mitigate the scale of the repressions.
    And the role of Zemlyachka in these repressions could not be secondary a priori
    However, every author on VO has the right to let their imagination run wild. Yes
    1. VLR
      0
      8 February 2026 15: 22
      The party secretary at that time wasn't the top official. Who became general secretary in 1922? Stalin. And what was he really? Everyone perceived his position as purely technical—something like head of personnel. But the real ruler of the state—Lenin—was the chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR. The executive secretary of the Crimean Regional Committee in 1920 wasn't a high-ranking position.
      1. +2
        8 February 2026 16: 28
        You're gravely mistaken in claiming that the party secretary isn't... a boss. Not the main one, but sometimes the most important one. Think about it: why did the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) introduce the institution of commissars? And why was party leadership exercised in the Soviets, industry, and the army?
        Or are you deliberately absolving the party leadership of all responsibility for failures or crimes both during the Civil War and in peacetime?
        There was no supreme ruler in Soviet Russia—that's a lie. Stalin exercised a virtually autocratic rule, and even then, not for his entire period in power—not for everyone, and not in everything...
        The executive secretary of the regional committee in 1920 was a very high position. Look at the documents of that time, and there, this thesis isn't even questioned. In those documents, not in today's journalism.
        1. VLR
          0
          8 February 2026 16: 31
          Stalin became the real Stalin—he assumed complete power in the country—on May 6, 1941, after becoming Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars. Until then, he had been merely General Secretary, a position that gained significance much later, when Khrushchev usurped power after Stalin's death. All decisions before May 6, 1941, were made by a simple vote in the Politburo, and General Secretary Stalin often found himself in the minority.
          1. -1
            8 February 2026 16: 34
            Quote: VlR
            and General Secretary Stalin often found himself in the minority.

            Which didn't stop him from making the necessary decisions...
            And even here you contradict yourself – who was the arbiter of fate? The party leadership in all its forms, or some ruler? You say here – the party leadership, and just above – the ruler... inconsistent.
            1. VLR
              +3
              8 February 2026 16: 43
              Khrushchev ascribed Stalin's "possession of the ring of omnipotence" when he declared a "cult of personality" and labeled the 30s repressions as Stalinist. In reality, Nikita Sergeyevich was "playing ahead": he was the executioner of Moscow and Ukraine, his hands bloody to the shoulders, so he rushed to declare that his savagery was on the personal orders of the demonic Stalin, whom there was no way to resist. In fact, Stalin once responded to requests to increase arrest quotas by sending Khrushchev in Kyiv a telegram with the short message, "Calm down, motherfucker." But Nikita modestly kept silent about this. The equally tainted elite eagerly supported Khrushchev, agreeing to believe that "Stalin is to blame for everything." Even though everyone knew perfectly well that Stalin had not yet wielded real power in the 30s.
              1. 0
                8 February 2026 17: 26
                It's even somehow awkward to discuss with you whether I.V. Stalin had real power before May 6, 1941, or not...
                How and who pinned all the blame on Stalin after his death is irrelevant here. Opportunists and scoundrels have always existed and will always exist, and the authorities are by definition not immune from them.
                Again, one must not make rash statements in order to refute the obvious...
                After Kirov's assassination, Stalin's power became unquestionable; no attempts to restrain him from reaching the pinnacle of absolute power were successful. Looking at newspapers of the time, and again at archives, party documents, and Soviet documents, Stalin's name was the absolute and sole synonym for power. No one even thought of suggesting that Stalin had conceded anything to the Politburo, the Central Committee, or anyone else. That's just the way it was; not seeing it would be simply irrelevant.
                At the same time, Stalin pushed even harder to place all state institutions under the control of the Party. He learned the lesson from the Civil War: if the Party doesn't pursue its own line, its enemies will. This is true always and everywhere, and we see it now in the near-total monopoly of power held by United Russia (ridiculous, a party without an ideology...), despite the few meaningless party symbols on the State Duma's map: the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the National Liberal Party, and the Just Russia...
                1. VLR
                  -2
                  8 February 2026 17: 29
                  Stalin enjoyed enormous authority, a universally recognized talent as a statesman, and incredible work ethic—and at some point, everyone began to understand his indispensability. However, decisions continued to be made by simple votes in the Politburo, where Stalin had the sole vote, just like everyone else. Only on the eve of the war did he finally gain the opportunity to make decisions unilaterally.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. 0
                    9 February 2026 00: 36
                    And after that, many decisions were made at Politburo meetings or by polling of Politburo members. This was especially true since most Politburo members and candidate members simultaneously held positions in the Council of People's Commissars. Incidentally, decisions of the USSR Council of People's Commissars were also formally made collegially.
                  3. +1
                    9 February 2026 11: 32
                    Quote: VlR
                    Stalin enjoyed enormous authority, a universally recognized talent as a statesman, and incredible work ethic—and at some point, everyone began to understand his indispensability. However, decisions continued to be made by simple votes in the Politburo, where Stalin had the sole vote, just like everyone else. Only on the eve of the war did he finally gain the opportunity to make decisions unilaterally.

                    Valery, forgive me, but you can’t write such nonsense.
              2. -2
                8 February 2026 20: 15
                Quote: VlR
                In fact, Stalin once responded to requests to increase arrest quotas by sending Khrushev in Kyiv a telegram with the short text "calm down, f...k."

                It's foolish to think Stalin could have sent such a telegram. It means you understand nothing about that time.
                Khrushchev's memos, sent to Stalin while he was First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine, have survived. One of them reads:

                "Ukraine sends [lists – Ya.B.] of 17-18 thousand repressed people every month, but Moscow approves no more than 2-3 thousand. I ask you to take urgent measures."

                There is a legend that at one of these reports, in which Khrushchev showed his zeal, Stalin wrote the following resolution: “Calm down!”

                However, not a single serious researcher cites evidence of such a resolution by Stalin. Tellingly, Yuri Yemelyanov, despite his reverence for Stalin and his hostility toward Khrushchev, doesn't mention it either, citing a phrase from Khrushchev's report to Stalin.

                It remains to be concluded that this resolution of Stalin is a legend of modern Stalinism.
                In less than a year in office, Khrushchev managed to sanction the arrests of all members of the Central Committee of the Ukrainian Communist Party without exception, all members of the republic's government, all eighteen first secretaries of regional committees in Ukraine and their deputies, as well as the commanders of all three military districts (Kyiv, Kharkov and Odessa) stationed on its territory.
                1. +2
                  9 February 2026 00: 42
                  Well, probably not all first secretaries. Shcherbakov, the first secretary of the Stalin regional committee in 1938, subsequently rose through the party ranks.
              3. +3
                9 February 2026 09: 17
                Regarding the so-called "Stalin's omnipotence" - Historian Yu. Zhukov has a theory that at the February-March plenum of the Central Committee, the first secretary of the Western Siberian regional party committee, Eikhe, submitted a note to the Politburo of the Central Committee with a request (and essentially a demand) to increase the scale of repressions in connection with the exposure of a major conspiracy in the region. Let us recall that in December 37, general secret elections were to be held for all government bodies, and this was a clear threat to the power of the regional barons. And repression is a good way to get rid of opponents. And now once again - the note was submitted during the plenum of the Central Committee, and the plenum of the Central Committee is precisely the congress of the regional barons who elect the members of the Politburo. That is, what would have happened if the Politburo had not obeyed the plenum of the Central Committee? Anything, up to and including the removal of Stalin and others... If there was a conspiracy of the regionalists and Stalin's Politburo understood it, then they had only one way - To lead and, if possible, soften the flywheel of repression. I think this theory has a right to exist...
                1. +1
                  9 February 2026 10: 37
                  Yes, I also read that Stalin and his inner circle wanted to renew the party and state apparatus at the local level, removing the old, uneducated cadres who were holding back the country's development. They did this through competitive elections—they even kept the printed ballots. And they faced a virtual revolt at this plenum. I was forced to agree, but then almost all of its participants were arrested. Unfortunately, before that, they managed to eliminate many good people whom they saw as potential rivals.
          2. 0
            8 February 2026 21: 12
            Quote: VlR
            All decisions up to May 6, 1941 were made in the Politburo by simple vote and General Secretary Stalin often found himself in the minority.


            This is a blatant lie - bring me these PB meetings - they don't exist.

            PB - an obedient instrument of Dzhugashvili since the early 30s
      2. +3
        8 February 2026 16: 42
        The party secretary at that time was - not the main boss.
        Valery, I don't see the point in discussing this with you, since you're using vague, everyday expressions.
        I don't know what you mean by "chief." From some publications, I got the impression that Zemlyachka was first secretary Crimean Regional Committee of the RCP(b), i.e. the "main Bolshevik" in Crimea
        She was also a member of the Crimean Revolutionary Committee.
        The positions are quite significant on the scale of Crimea.
        The real mechanism of power in the Land of Soviets was obscured. For example, we can cite Stalin, who, from April 1922 to June 30.06, 1941, was completely did not hold any position in government agencies, however, he was the actual "shadow" head of state - he ruled a huge country
        The responsible secretary of the Crimean Regional Committee in 1920 was not a high post.
        Not high compared to what?
        With the post of secretary of the party organization of some local "Crimean bagels" artel? laughing
        It seems you don't understand how the Bolsheviks organized their management structure and what role party organizations played in it.
        But I don't see any point in explaining this to you.
        1. +1
          9 February 2026 00: 45
          Isn't the Chairman of the Constitutional Commission of the USSR a government position?
      3. +4
        8 February 2026 17: 01
        something like a head of the HR department.
        A certain Martin Bormann was also the head of the personnel department.
  27. -1
    8 February 2026 17: 22
    The offensive against the rebels began on October 29, but a ceasefire was announced on October 30, and November 2 The rebels surrendered.
    The terms of the capitulation were extremely lenient: the Committee of Public Safety and the White Guard detachment were disbanded, their officers retained their weapons, and the cadets who had executed the soldiers simply returned to their schools. Everyone received guarantees of freedom and safety on the condition that they cease their struggle against Soviet power. What do you think happened next?
    Then, from November 14, 1917, all military schools were closed.
    I guessed?
    That's right, many officers and cadets who gave their "honest and noble word" immediately left for the Don and soon began a civil war,
    They couldn’t go there right away, because at that moment Kornilov was still sitting in Bykhov prison, from where he was released only November 19 and from that moment on he began to slowly make his way to the Don
    And the beginning of the formation of the Volunteer Army by Kornilov was already at the end of January 1918. Word of this reached Moscow and Petrograd only in January 18, and then the most active ones went to the Don.
    The author is overly carried away by fantasies and simplifications, somewhat reminiscent of the approach of Yegor Yakovlev's lectures, although the latter at least occasionally refers to documents
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. -3
        8 February 2026 18: 56
        Have you decided to cement your reputation as a "tram boor"?
      2. -1
        8 February 2026 18: 59
        One can feel sorry not for Yakovlev, but for the listeners of his video lectures, who perceive what he says as the Revelation of John the Theologian
        1. -3
          8 February 2026 19: 50
          Quote: Marrr
          One can feel sorry not for Yakovlev, but for the listeners of his video lectures,

          I feel sorry for all those who are unable or have not learned to think.
          1. -2
            9 February 2026 07: 30
            Have pity on yourself, and then on others.
    2. -1
      8 February 2026 21: 20
      Quote: Marrr
      end of January 1918. Word of this reached Moscow and Petrograd only in January 18, and then the most active ones went to the Don

      No, already on November 2-3, the cadets and officers decided to go to the DonCossacks and officers, Kaledin and others, fought against the Bolsheviks.
  28. -2
    8 February 2026 18: 01
    "How rotten must the regime of the last emperor have been for the children of this rich man to become revolutionaries."
    Comrade Ryzhov is a philanderer. This rich man and his children were driven by hatred of the Christian authorities and Russians in particular. As for wealth, they simply weren't satisfied; they wanted to seize it all (remember the Seven Bankers and who represented them).
    1. 0
      8 February 2026 18: 58
      And did this ascetic, selfless Zemlyachka acquire a lot of wealth in prisons and exile, and even later in the USSR?
      1. -4
        8 February 2026 19: 17
        There are crazy people who don't want good, they are obsessed with hatred and bloodlust, but I think that even in WWII she never ran out of caviar on the table...
      2. -2
        8 February 2026 19: 53
        Quote: vet
        And did this ascetic, selfless Zemlyachka acquire a lot of wealth in prisons and exile, and even later in the USSR?

        It would have been better for the whole world if she had been shot immediately, as she later did. Such monsters should not exist.
      3. +1
        8 February 2026 21: 25
        Quote: vet
        And she acquired a lot of good in prisons and exile, and later in the USSR, this ascetic, unmercenary woman Countrywoman?

        Psychopath Zalkind received unlimited power over the life and death of Russian people - for such people this is more than gold
  29. +7
    8 February 2026 19: 29
    Frankly, colleagues, I don't understand the critics' complaints about the author. Yes, it's biased. Yes, it's partial. But that's the author's right. Write a rebuttal, as Sergey Linnik (Bongo) sometimes does. Save the "Chukchi reader" excuses for kindergarten.
    To the author. Valery, in the discussion of this article, you're shifting the blame for the severity of the Crimean repressions onto Béla Kun. When and if an article about the "Red Hungarian" appears, who will be to blame for the executions? Uncle Vasya from Zhmerynka?
    1. +4
      8 February 2026 19: 54
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      Valery, in the discussion of the material, you shift the blame for the severity of the Crimean repressions onto the shoulders of Bela Kun.

      You can't wash a black dog white. And neither can a female.
    2. 0
      8 February 2026 20: 03
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      When and if an article about the "Red Hungarian" appears, who will be responsible for the shootings? Uncle Vasya from Zhmerynka?

      No, why Uncle Vasya?...
      "Themselves to blame!"
      1. +3
        8 February 2026 20: 15
        I think a civil war ends when astonished descendants examine the remains from a burial.
        For our generation, the Civil War will end with the death of our generation.
    3. +3
      8 February 2026 20: 48
      You place the blame for the severity of the Crimean repressions on the shoulders of Bela Kun.
      ,,, why him and not Mantsev?
      The first troika was formed in Simferopol. It was called the "Emergency Troika of the Special Department of the Southern Front."
      Until December it was headed by V. N. Mancev, and then by E. G. Evdokimov.
      This troika served as the main punitive body in Crimea in November and December 1920. Until early December 1920, it operated in Simferopol, and from December 1920, in Sevastopol. Members of this troika organized the remaining troikas of the Special Departments and coordinated their activities. A total of eight "Chekist troikas" were created in Crimea.
      1. +1
        8 February 2026 21: 47
        Why him and not Mantsev?
        Damn, I'm a complete loser in this thread, that's why I'm singing so sweetly. Just like everyone else, by the way.
        1. +2
          8 February 2026 21: 51
          With the level of intensity that discussions about the article about that time have been going on lately, they might even remove Valery's stories. belay like an essay by Vasily Ostrovsky. what

          "That's who to discuss."
          1. +1
            8 February 2026 22: 53
            Quote: bubalik
            With the level of heat that has been raging around the article about that time recently, Valery's stories might even be dismissed as Vasily Ostrovsky's essay.

            Compared to these battles, my essay, as you called that creation, and the comments to it are simply harmless reading. wassat

            But unfortunately, people don't often bother to read archival documents...
            It's easier to label your opponent and think that you're cool. request
            1. 0
              9 February 2026 13: 25
              Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
              Compared to these battles, my essay, as you called that creation, and the comments to it are simply harmless reading.

              no, yours were stronger, although the article itself is documentary and impartial.
    4. +3
      9 February 2026 11: 27
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      Uncle Vasya from Zhmerinka?

      Oh, these Uncle Vasyas from Zhmerynka... They get into everything and make a mess.
    5. +3
      9 February 2026 12: 39
      Frankly, colleagues, I don't understand the critics' complaints about the author. Yes, it's biased. Yes, it's partial. But that's the author's right.
      The author's right is to write all sorts of nonsense, and the reader's right is to point out this nonsense to the author (and other readers) and correct it.
      This is how balance in nature is achieved. Yes
      1. -2
        9 February 2026 17: 41
        Three people are spouting nonsense here right now: the foolish monarchist Olgovich (well, they've gotten used to him and no one takes him seriously), Siluet, and you. Loud intolerance, annoying and intrusive, the same old comments under every article, an inability to change your mind based on facts. Your comments under the article about Frunze's death were monstrous in their stupidity, and even those with a medical education, reading them, have an overwhelming desire to wrap your hands in plaster so you'll finally stop embarrassing yourself by typing. Why do you even bother reading articles here if you believe not the facts, but the false anti-Soviet tales of Shmelev, Solzhenitsyn, and that same Melgunov who was collecting gossip about Crimea in Berlin? If you're convinced that Zemlyachka machine-gunned crowds of people, and that Frunze was stabbed to death in front of eight specialists, then believe it. Believe in aliens and psychics, too. Just don't write any more nonsense here, all three of you.
        1. +3
          9 February 2026 20: 05
          Your comments under the article about Frunze's death were monstrous in their stupidity, and people with a medical education, when reading them, had an unbearable desire to wrap up
          My dear, to objectively evaluate what I have written, you lack the most important thing - intelligence and common sense.
          You believe not in facts, but in the false anti-Soviet tales of Shmelev, Solzhenitsyn, and the same Melgunov.
          You're sick and hallucinating. I never said in a single post that I believed them—you must have imagined it.
          If you are sure that Zemlyachka shot crowds of people with a machine gun
          You are hallucinating - I have never written anything like this and I am not sure about it.
          Step on the throat of your wild imagination and don't attribute to me nonsense of your own composition
          and Frunze was stabbed to death in front of 8 specialists
          You are delusional - I never said anything like that.
          I just wrote that you DON'T KNOW ANYTHING about how the operation went, you weren't present at it, and you didn't even haven't seen a single medical document, which details Frunze's medical history. Therefore, you can't credibly assert that he DEFINITELY died because it happened, and not because someone staged it.

          But the truth of this statement will never dawn on you, because you are incapable of thinking objectively and immediately accept as truth what is written on the Internet, provided that it fits into your documents.
          So, I wish you good health. hi

          .
          1. -4
            10 February 2026 09: 23
            You completely lack self-criticism and are incapable of objectively examining what you write in your comments, and how annoying you are, for example, with your persistent importunity, repeating nonsense three or four times, as with the absolute axiom about a thorough inventory of documents after Zemlyaka's death. They literally explain everything to you, and you pay no attention.
            1. 0
              10 February 2026 14: 51
              how you irritate, for example, with your annoying persistence, when you write nonsense 3-4 times,
              My dear, it is you who are not able to objectively evaluate what I write, because... You lack the ability to take what I write literally.

              You constantly attribute to me nonsense of your own making and constantly make claims against me for some statements that I never made.
              You either have obvious problems with your ability to think rationally, or you are a banal demagogue.

              And if in the future you decide to criticize the content of my posts, please first quote what I wrote directly, and then present your comments and at least somehow justify them.
              And don't hurl unfounded accusations in my face with your generous hand, as you've constantly done before, for example, accusing me of supposedly believing not facts but the false anti-Soviet tales of Shmelev, Solzhenitsyn, and even Melgunov. Even though I not only didn't claim such a thing in my comments, I didn't even mention the names of those people.
              The opponent's unfounded accusations are pure water demagogy, which is what you are currently doing
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. 0
                  10 February 2026 16: 21
                  Dear Sir, I will repeat once again for the future: either leave my posts unattended, or give me an assessment. to what I wrote, and not what arose in your wild imagination after reading my texts.

                  And try to take what I write literally - I don't hide anything between the lines, so when you read, try to concentrate as much as possible and check the correctness of your understanding of the thoughts I have expressed by rereading the text again. Yes
            2. +2
              10 February 2026 17: 09
              Quote: vet
              You have a complete lack of self-criticism.

              Look who's Talking...
    6. +2
      9 February 2026 13: 20
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      But this is the author's right

      The author is certainly entitled to his own point of view, but not to a lie.
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      rebuttal

      the comments are full of them
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      When and if an article about the "Red Hungarian" will appear

      and it won't appear, just like with Trotsky - inconvenient figures for the author, so it won't get to Uncle Vasya.
      1. -5
        9 February 2026 17: 47
        Olgovich, don't confuse paragraphs copied from the pathetic Wikipedia with refutations. By the way, how are things with the monarchy in Moldova? Still not there? That's not right. Come on, deal with the problems of your own country. You are a stranger to us, the citizens of modern Russia. Our country has changed irreversibly since the Soviet era. You and we are completely different. Your intrusive nonsense only provokes ridicule and irritation in Russia. Stop suffering from phantom pains – deal with the problems of your own state.
        1. +1
          10 February 2026 11: 56
          Quote: vet
          Olgovich, don't confuse paragraphs copied from the pathetic Wikipedia with refutations.

          Don't confuse "truths" copied from Agitprop with real facts.
          Quote: vet
          By the way, how are things in Moldova?

          Totally out of place - look at the TOPIC of the article - where is... Moldova?
          Quote: vet
          Come on, deal with your country's problems.

          Did someone give you the right to give directions and advice?

          For the Russophobic Bolsheviks, Russian Odessa and Novorossiya are Ukraine, of course, but these marginalized losers have disappeared, only the cries of phantoms remain.
          Quote: vet
          Your annoying nonsense only causes ridicule and irritation in Russia. Stop suffering from phantom pain.

          and you reproached others for... rudeness. Alas for you...
  30. +1
    8 February 2026 21: 45
    Well, here we are...at the most interesting part )) We are eagerly awaiting the continuation...)
  31. +4
    8 February 2026 22: 38
    At the end of 1918, the article's heroine was assigned to the active army. Initially, she served as a commissar for one of the brigades, and then became head of the political departments of the 8th and 13th Armies on the Southern Front.
  32. +3
    8 February 2026 23: 06
    One could discuss Zemlyachka's passion and her qualities as a revolutionary at length. But no woman in her right mind would order anyone's execution. That's all you need to know about her and her comrades. They were simply mentally ill.
    1. -2
      9 February 2026 11: 40
      She never gave it to me. It's a fake. She didn't even have that right.
      She was sent to Crimea to organize the work of the Crimean Regional Party Committee. She was assigned for three months, but stayed for just over two.
      1. +1
        10 February 2026 12: 02
        from the article: The first word I heard from her lips, it was "shoot"This is what it was about. An old father was hiding his deserter son, and both had just been brought to court.
        Quote: reframing
        It's fake.
  33. +1
    9 February 2026 00: 50
    Some Stalin-supporting commentators on the VO are cursing Zemlyachka, somehow ignoring the fact that Stalin held her in high esteem. So, he wasn't always right?
  34. -4
    9 February 2026 06: 08
    The article justifies the global Jewish conspiracy against Russia.
  35. +1
    9 February 2026 06: 40
    "How corrupt did the regime of the last emperor have to be for the children of this rich man to become revolutionaries?" They had wealth, but no power. But their desire was, in Ivan the Terrible's words, "to pick over people," to satisfy their lust for power. Modern Western oligarchs—the Rothschilds and Rockefellers—also needed more than just wealth; they needed absolute power over people, control over their bodies, minds, even thoughts. The same desires, apparently, were shared by the "ardent revolutionaries."
  36. +1
    9 February 2026 07: 06
    The principle of the Old World Order was "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," i.e., an equal compensation from the avenger to the offender. The principle of the New World Order is terror. According to Lenin, "to suppress their resistance (the clergy) with such cruelty that they will not forget it for several decades..." Here we are now, more than 100 years later, remembering all this. Terror, translated from French, means "horror, fear." The Bolsheviks and their associates, the anarchists and Left Socialist Revolutionaries, succeeded in instilling this fear in the majority of the Russian population—and this is the reason for their victory. The Red Terror set the tone and constantly raised the bar. The White Terror lagged behind the Red Terror in terms of intimidation, always playing catch-up.
  37. 0
    9 February 2026 11: 37
    There's not a single piece of evidence that Zemlyachka committed any massacres in Crimea! Except for one book by a Tatar Nazi who personally disliked Rozalia for, again, personal reasons.
    Historians and biographers have described the entire TWO months of her assignment to Simferopol almost down to the hour!
    It's all nonsense.
    By the way, there is not a single barge with white dreadnoughts, allegedly drowned by the communist Zemlyachka.
    Just no. Not found!
    1. +2
      9 February 2026 11: 45
      Quote: reframing
      By the way, there is not a single barge with white dreadnoughts, allegedly drowned by the communist Zemlyachka.
      Just no. Not found!

      Does this mean that there will be no extrajudicial executions or repressions against the remaining White Guards?
    2. 0
      9 February 2026 16: 59
      Even without this person, the Jews committed genocide against the Russian ethnic group.
  38. +1
    9 February 2026 13: 15
    A professional terrorist and that says it all.
    1. -3
      9 February 2026 17: 50
      Did you read it with the "I look at the book and see a fig" attitude? This woman wasn't exactly involved in terrorism. She had a different revolutionary specialty.
  39. 0
    9 February 2026 14: 26
    The question inevitably arises: how rotten did the regime of the last emperor have to be for the children of this rich man to become revolutionaries?

    It's a good thing the author, Valery Ryzhov, didn't pursue this theme further, otherwise the article wouldn't have been about Rosalia, but about tsarism and its rottenness, which suddenly led to another round of unrest in Russia...
    Yes, liberals don't like sovereigns and Tsarist Russia, oh, they don't like them.... Although, all of us living in Russia are Russians, and we live here from the Ruriks and the Russian Tsars...
    And in this regard, there's just one question: was it only one Jewish woman, Rosalia, who joined the revolution, or were there other Jews in the revolution? If there were, then what does Tsarism have to do with it!? After all, the ISIS that once existed in the east was joined not only by poor, downtrodden, malnourished Muslims determined to cash in on someone else's scraps, but also by many other scum who certainly couldn't be considered malnourished...
  40. -2
    9 February 2026 14: 51
    The question inevitably arises: how rotten did the regime of the last emperor have to be for the children of this rich man to become revolutionaries?

    It's a good thing the author, Valery Ryzhov, didn't pursue this theme further, otherwise the article wouldn't have been about Rosalia, but about tsarism and its rottenness, which suddenly caused another turmoil in Russia... Yes, liberals don't like sovereigns and tsarist Russia, oh, they don't like them... Although, all of us living in Russia are Russians, and we've lived here since the Ruriks and the Russian tsars, and for us, Russia is our home, our Fatherland...
    And in this regard, there's just one question: was it only one Jewish woman, Rosalia, who went into the revolution, or were there other Jews in the revolution? If there were, then what does tsarism have to do with it?
    There's no need to trace the origins of this or that Jew's conversion to revolution to the supposed oppression and lice of Russia and its Tsarist regime. That wasn't the problem. Otherwise, it turns out that the rottenness of Tsarist Russia was only noticed by Jews like Ulyanov, Trotsky, Sverdlov, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sokolnikov, and so on. But for Russians, Kalmyks, Tatars, Mordvins, Yakuts, Karelians, and so on, this rottenness somehow didn't exist at all. And they all lived in Russia, worked for the good of Russia, fought for Russia, developed new lands, toiled for the good of Russia, and they didn't need any revolution.
    And that's how it is, the Jews need a revolution, but the rest of the people don't need it at all... But, what happened is what happened.
  41. -5
    9 February 2026 16: 58
    The "chosen people" should not have been kept outside the Pale of Settlement, but deported and banned from living on the territory of the Republic of Ingushetia.
  42. +2
    9 February 2026 18: 26
    The contradictory natures of the revolution are so heavily laden with lies that it is difficult to understand.
  43. -1
    9 February 2026 19: 44
    "Professional revolutionary" is a diagnosis. That is, a destroyer, an annihilator. Someone who smashes, breaks. And kills.
    The essence of this psychotype is revealed in the apt Russian expression: "breaking is not building."
  44. 0
    10 February 2026 10: 54
    I'm tired of hammering out the same old stuff, so I typed and saved this text in my memory. Here's what I deeply believe one should keep in mind when assessing past events:
    The cause of the collapse of the Russian Empire, accompanied by innumerable human and material losses, lies in the monstrous stratification and disintegration of Russian society.
    Society was divided into numerous distinct groups, and their centuries-old antagonism reached incredible levels. In fact, members of even the most distant groups didn't consider each other human.
    This is where that same, mind-boggling cruelty came from. A peasant impaling an officer on a bayonet felt no more emotional distress than swatting a mosquito on his neck.
    The most important thing is that the division wasn't just the age-old rich/poor divide. The wealthy elite was also divided.
    In general, the following main groups were observed in society:
    The royal family;
    The highest court aristocracy;
    The outlying feudal nobility, Muslim and Lutheran.
    Landowning gentry;
    The service nobility, in turn divided into military, naval and bureaucratic;
    The merchant class, separately trading and industrial, and again separately Orthodox and Old Believer;
    Bourgeoisie, trade and craft;
    The peasantry, not only Orthodox and Old Believers, but also divided according to property status (this division was especially harsh);
    The Cossacks are also divided into several directions at once;
    The workers, at least these were more or less united.
    Jews formed a separate group, along with baptized Jews. Present in almost all of the above-mentioned groups, they found themselves in the position of outcasts everywhere.
    Poles, Muslims...
    The list goes on and on.
    The most striking example of the antagonism between the royal family and the service aristocracy can be found in Ignatiev's "Fifty Years in Service," and between the official and military nobility in Yanchevetsky's "1900."
  45. +1
    10 February 2026 11: 02
    Quote: The Truth
    And that's how it is, the Jews need a revolution, but the rest of the people don't need it at all... But, what happened is what happened.

    Hmm! And let's remember that a significant portion of the Russian Army's General Staff was evacuated to Yekaterinburg. The city was simply overflowing with General Staff officers, who possessed excellent (any modern special forces unit would be envious) training, not just in operational matters. A couple of staff officers and a lieutenant colonel could have knocked back a hundred grams and freed the "Tsar Father" in no time. For some reason, they didn't want to...
  46. +1
    10 February 2026 11: 06
    In 1920, the article's heroine married for the second time. This marriage lasted only a few months, but she bore this husband's surname for the rest of her life. So According to the documents, she is not Zemlyachka, but Rozaliya Samoylova.
    The article is unique in that the author's mistakes can be corrected ad infinitum.
    In 1940, Zemlyachka held the position of Deputy Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and is listed in resolutions as "R. Zemlyachka".
    To be convinced of this, it is enough to find the Resolution on tariffs for communication services for airmail transportation, September 12, 1940, or on amending Article 2 of the Regulation on the Committee for Arts Affairs under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, October 15, 1940.
    Under the same name, she appears in the Report of the Central Control and Management Department of the USSR State Planning Committee, Deputy Chairman of the Soviet Control Commission under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR R.S. Zemlyachka on the results of the audit of farm records during the livestock census on January 1, 1938 March 22, 1938
    Well, for non-believing fans of the author, I recommend studying this document:
    1. VLR
      0
      11 February 2026 10: 38
      There really was a gradual transformation of her surname. She was Samoylova, but everyone stubbornly called her Zemlyachka, and for quite a while she signed herself Samoylova-Zemlyachka. Then she "gave in" and became simply Zemlyachka.
  47. -2
    10 February 2026 11: 35
    Quote: Grossvater
    A couple of staff officers and a lieutenant colonel could have knocked back a hundred grams and freed the "Tsar Father" in no time. For some reason, they didn't want to...

    Even in Soviet times, this (the lack of attempts to free the former emperor) was written about with some surprise: Nicholas II had no supporters in Russia. It's simply astonishing how quickly he managed to drain the centuries-old authority of the monarchy into the cesspool.
    1. -1
      14 February 2026 10: 24
      Well, Gorbachev too...
  48. -2
    14 February 2026 10: 23
    A Russophobe with childhood trauma, whose lifelong goal was the extermination of Russians. Whenever she could, she machine-gunned prisoners and signed execution lists, then ruined their lives and led them to execution with her excessive demands.
    .
    Nowadays, there are many of the same "compatriots" among the controllers.
    1. 0
      20 February 2026 09: 00
      excessive demands.

      The demands are not excessive, but normal and appropriate to the situation. Without such demands, the war would have been lost.
      Nowadays, there are many of the same "compatriots" among the controllers.

      Such honest and principled selfless people? Don't make people laugh!
      1. -3
        20 February 2026 09: 36
        Do you believe Zemlyachka's selflessness? She took it in other ways: power, security, access to a closed distribution center...

        I don't believe that a Jewish woman who, because of her childhood trauma, executed hundreds of thousands of captured Russian men in Crimea, had any sane feelings toward the Russian population and Russian leaders later on. She got her kicks from torturing people and ruining lives.
        There are still plenty of them like that, but they still take money.

        As for Zemlyachka's selflessness, her job was as a watchdog, trained not to take anything from strangers. If she had, she would have been shot.
        1. -1
          20 February 2026 09: 43
          Can you read? Zemlyachka was the executive secretary of the Regional Committee of the RSDLP and came to Crimea to organize party work without the authority to carry out arrests and executions. The repressions were carried out by the Revolutionary Committee, the Special Departments of the Southern Front, and the Cheka. Everything is clearly written in the articles. Zemlyachka was slandered by her enemies—Soviet corrupt officials and bribe-takers, émigré slanderers who were nowhere near Crimea and who wrote specifically to denigrate the Soviet Union, and the Tatar nationalist Sultan-Galiev, who dreamed of a "Crimea without Russians."
          1. -3
            20 February 2026 09: 52
            Slandered, so be it. It doesn't change the essence of the matter. You may consider her harshness justified by the situation, but I see it differently. The revolution ousted the Russian ruling class and replaced it with a non-Russian elite. The entire population of the country was enslaved. The slaves didn't want to work, and cruel overseers were needed. As a descendant of repressed peasants, I cannot understand or forgive those who wielded the whip.
            Moreover, all the sacrifices and suffering proved in vain. The bourgeoisie's nationality simply changed...
            1. 0
              20 February 2026 10: 03
              In vain? What about the eradication of illiteracy and the dramatic expansion of higher education institutions, with priority admission to the children of workers and peasants? What about the relocation of millions of workers from dreadful barracks to apartments, albeit communal, but with their own separate rooms and "amenities"? What about the reduction of the workday to eight hours? Annual and maternity leave, sick leave, disability pensions, which were unheard of in tsarist times? What about the dramatic increase in the number of hospitals, first-aid posts, doctors, and nursing staff? Vaccinations and the eradication of a number of deadly diseases and epidemics?
              Regarding Russian villages. Do you like what's happening there now? This hopeless poverty, this despair, these overgrown fields, these empty and crumbling collective farm "cowsheds," these skeletons of poultry farms? Dairy products without milk, sausages made from soy and bone meal that used to be used for cattle feed, Egyptian potatoes, Turkish tomatoes and cucumbers, Israeli beets, and so on?
              1. -2
                20 February 2026 10: 08
                Are you sure that under the Tsar and capitalism, these same successes wouldn't have been achieved without sacrifices and executions? And that if the Russian elite had survived, the villages would have also died out?
                He who has power is responsible for the consequences.
                1. 0
                  20 February 2026 10: 12
                  Under the "Father Tsar," capitalists couldn't even establish industrial production of sausage, ice cream, condensed milk, kefir, and so on. Mikoyan organized everything from scratch in the 30s. Before that, it was a cottage industry run by small private producers with unpredictable results (each with their own recipe and no sanitary control; Tchaikovsky contracted cholera in an expensive restaurant) and at exorbitant prices.
                2. +1
                  20 February 2026 10: 21
                  He who has power is responsible for the consequences.

                  Exactly. Who's responsible for the sharp decline in industrial production (when even nails are imported from China), the decline of agriculture, and the demographic catastrophe in post-Soviet Russia? Certainly not Lenin and Stalin. The current leaders have brought the country to ruin. When sanctions were imposed, it turned out that the country couldn't produce white A4 paper or receipt tape! They couldn't produce ink for juice and dairy cartons! They started bottling milk and kefir in plastic bottles! They started producing Zhiguli cars using 90s technology! The democrats and liberals were running the show.
  49. 0
    22 February 2026 08: 26
    Quote: VlR
    If she or her reincarnation had found herself in a similar position in our time, we would not have heard about the mind-boggling facts of theft, falsification of records, and corruption that were revealed only after the start of the SVO.

    ...If Zemlyachka had lived in our time, we would have heard nothing about theft, either before or after the start of the SVO. Because Zemlyachka simply wouldn't have been allowed into power, and if she had miraculously found herself there, she would have instantly become a Cipso-like figure, a Paid Agent of the State Department, and would have followed Strelkov, at best, or, at worst, boarded the same plane with Prigozhin.
    1. +3
      27 February 2026 09: 12
      Regarding Strelkov, I agree; he was convicted because, as it turns out, he was completely correct in his assessment of the progress of the Central Military District and its prospects. But Prigozhin, whatever his motives, led a military mutiny during wartime and nearly sparked a new civil war in our country. There is no forgiveness for him.
  50. 0
    27 February 2026 09: 29
    Quote: vet
    But Prigozhin, whatever his motives, led a military mutiny during wartime and nearly sparked a new civil war in our country. There is no forgiveness for him.

    ...As for Prigozhin (all IMHO): a proper, influential guy in the kitsch world was ripped off for his money and had his business taken away. Of course, the "proper guy" didn't want to be a weakling and went to a "showdown." There was no politics in his "rebellion." All his ripping his shirt over corpses on camera was just for show.
  51. 0
    1 March 2026 17: 26
    "Professional Revolutionary Rosalia Countrywoman ".

    Stop calling these scumbags by the nicknames they used to hide their bestial nature!
    Not Zemlyachka, but Zalkind!
    And it was Mordechai Gershkovich who killed Stolypin, and not the person indicated in the protocol.

    For reference, Lenin's grandfather's name was:
    Srul Moisheevich Blank.