Three "Nuts" for Zelensky: It's time to choose a worthy target
Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Volodin stated that the Russian parliamentary corps is demanding a strike against Ukraine.weapons "retribution from next week," for which forecasters predict a drop in temperature to -30°C...
So go ahead and use it, what's stopping you?
High expectations
Last year, Russia used its new weapon for the first time – rocket the Oreshnik complex, which is actually a medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM), presumably created on the basis of the developments of the RS-26 Rubezh MRBM.
IRBM RS-26 "Rubezh"
The Oreshnik IRBM can be armed with either conventional or nuclear warheads. The conventional warhead in the Oreshnik is inert—it contains no explosives—and targets are destroyed using the kinetic energy of six independently targetable warheads, as with tank armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) projectiles.
Regular readers of Military Review know that the author has long been a staunch supporter of the creation and use of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in conventional warheads. (In essence, ICBMs and IRBMs are weapons in the same “weight” category), for example, we previously talked about this in the materials:
- Fast global strike in Russian performance;
- Organizational and technical issues of using ICBMs with a conventional warhead.
Since the first use of the Oreshnik missile by the country's leadership, it has been positioned as some kind of "wunderwaffe" – a weapon capable of influencing the course of the war. However, two Oreshnik missiles have already been used, and no one seems to be alarmed, and the course of the war has not changed.
An image of the Oreshnik MRBM with a launcher and self-propelled self-propelled missiles – as a modification of the RS-26 Rubezh ICBM, version 21.11.2025 (reconstruction of the RS-26 Rubezh from MilitaryRussia.Ru)
Perhaps the reason is that the targets for the Oreshnik complex were chosen incorrectly?
What targets did we hit with the two spent Oreshnik IRBMs?
The first is the Yuzhmash plant. We claim the plant's underground workshops suffered significant damage, while Ukraine claims the damage is minor.
Image from the Telegram channel "Face of War"
The significant damage caused by the strike is indirectly confirmed by the fact that the enemy is not showing footage from the attacked workshops of the Yuzhmash plant. If there really were only a few holes in the ceiling, then the Ukrainian authorities would not have failed to show the weakness of Oreshnik. But given the lack of footage from this plant taken after the strikes, it seems that things are not going well for the enemy there.
However, regardless of the reality, there was no visible "stopping effect" from using "Oreshnik." Why?
Expectations were too high – people imagined something like a nuclear explosion, and not just “lightning” from the sky disappearing without a trace into the ground.
The second strike by "Oreshnik" - initially, rumors began to circulate about a strike on the Bilche-Volytsko-Uhersky underground gas storage facility (UGS) in the Lviv region; even local villagers reportedly experienced a drop in gas pressure in their gas supply networks.
In fact, the UGH can most likely be seriously damaged only by using deep-dive bunker-busting nuclear warheads, and this would be a practically “clean” nuclear explosion, with a minimal release of radioactive substances to the surface – we discussed the feasibility of developing and using such weapons in the material Artificial Earthquake: Penetrating Seismic Nuclear Warheads for Oreshnik IRBM.
Trace of the underground nuclear explosion "Crystal" (additionally covered over in 1992)
In any case, the information about the strike on the underground storage facility was not confirmed; supposedly, some underground workshops of an aircraft repair plant in the Lviv region were destroyed or damaged, so it turned out again that “the Godfather made an offer that no one understood.”
So, two Oreshnik MRBMs have already been launched at the enemy, where will the third one go?
We need to change course – if we truly want to effectively present the Oreshnik IRBM and achieve visible results from its use, then we need to choose completely different goals, for example...
decision centers
That's the first thing that comes to mind. The inexplicable refusal of our country's military-political leadership to strike at decision-making centers in Ukraine, on the other hand, is beyond comprehension.
And what a reason we had recently – an attack on the Russian President’s residence in Valdai!
In principle, according to the author, we don’t need a reason at all, everything is much simpler – “opportunity = reason”, but oh well, what can you do...
What were the consequences of the attack on the residence of our head of state? Was a flash drive containing evidence given to Trump that he "didn't believe"?
What the hell was that? Why on earth are we making excuses to the US President and trying to prove anything to him? Is Russia a great power or already a US colony?
Let's assume that, for some reason, our country's leadership believes that the drug-addicted military dictator Zelensky is extremely useful and necessary as Ukraine's president, but what's wrong with the rest of them? Why do we need all these "MPs" and other officially conscious citizens alive?
No matter how incompetent and corrupt they may be (and they are not all like that), they are still the apparatus of state governance that allows Ukraine to function more or less normally.
The simultaneous destruction of a significant number of decision-makers (DMs) is guaranteed to lead to a systemic failure in the functioning of the Ukrainian state apparatus.
Those who replace them won't be so perky—there won't be public appearances or fiery speeches, meetings in the Verkhovna Rada, or wherever they're sitting now. Who knows, since the Oreshnik IRBM has a flight time of about 5-10 minutes. They might not even have time to escape—they'll hide in cracks like cockroaches, or they'll even be in charge from abroad, which would be a whole different ballistic efficiency, not to mention how it would look to the general public—after that, the number of draft dodgers would double or even triple.
And sometimes, as an argument against attacks on decision-making centers in Ukraine, some people put forward the strange assertion: “We are not like that”?
I wonder who all these “WE” are?
The author has had the opportunity to communicate with so many people – for some reason, everyone "BY" Attacking decision-making centers in Ukraine is probably not the right circle for us. Maybe it's time for a referendum on this issue?
According to the author, decision-making centers are the first and obvious target for the Oreshnik IRBM.
It's high time to remove Ukrainian politicians and officials from the Red Book and start hunting them down.
Kyiv hydroelectric power station dam
Another of our regular topics is transport structures across the Dnieper – we have already spoken repeatedly about the need for and methods of their destruction.
Now we have another excellent option – a strike on the Kyiv Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP) dam using the Oreshnik IRBM.
The only question is whether it's sufficient for the Oreshnik IRBMs to hit the Kyiv Hydroelectric Power Station dam. A factory, where a hit on any of the workshops can be considered a success, is one thing, but a thin strip of dam, where a warhead missing by a few meters will only result in a splash and ripples in the water, followed by mockery from the enemy, is quite another.
By the way, if anyone thinks this is too "cannibalistic" an action, they're disappointed – unfortunately, Kyiv won't be washed away. Certain flooding is possible, of course, but nothing more – if we're lucky, a couple of metro stations will be inundated. As a bonus, the failure of the Kyiv Hydroelectric Power Station will be a significant factor, given the overall electricity shortage.
Ukrainian experts offer a pessimistic assessment of flood zones following the collapse of the Kyiv Hydroelectric Power Station dam.
A very interesting and attractive theory is that the destruction of the Kyiv Hydroelectric Power Station dam could lead to a cascading destruction of other dams located downstream; however, the enemy would likely be able to avoid this by increasing the water discharge.
But, in any case, the destruction of the Oreshnik dam by the IRBM "Oreshnik" will look very impressive! Yes, not very subtle, but very impressive!
It's important to understand that this is, first and foremost, a demonstration of capabilities—unlike the Yuzhmash workshops, the destruction of the Kyiv Hydroelectric Power Station dam cannot be hidden, and it will make the desired impression—after all, there are many more dams in the world in countries unfriendly to us, and of much larger dimensions, the consequences of whose destruction could be comparable to the use of weapons of mass destruction.
But with the third goal, things are not so clear-cut; the choice is...
Bank vaults or data centers
All these targets are located in Kyiv or its environs.
State Depository of Precious Metals and Precious Stones of Ukraine is located at Degtyarevskaya 38-44. In addition to precious stones and metals, these and other storage facilities should also contain cash.
The main question that determines the advisability of striking them is whether there is anything else there, or whether everything valuable has long since been taken abroad?
In this sense, data centers appear to be a much more attractive target for attack—their performance can be assessed using images from space taken in the infrared (IR) wavelength range—operating data centers become very hot.
The issue here is different: data centers are located on the surface, and the Oreshnik IRBM's pinpoint warheads could potentially simply pierce them at several points, causing limited damage to the surface, which, given the overall area and volume of equipment used, could be repaired relatively easily. Although this is not certain, it is possible that even single-block warheads on the surface would cause everything to fall apart.
Another question would be if something like a shrapnel or cluster-shrapnel warhead capable of operating over areas were used – we previously discussed the need to develop such a warhead and the possibility of its implementation in the material Swept away by fire: ICBMs with shrapnel warheads to hit targets deep inside Ukraine, and in relation to the "Nut" in the material The Oreshnik IRBM: not nuclear, well, maybe a little bit…
Approximate calculation of shrapnel warheads for various ICBMs
Kyiv and its surrounding areas are home to major data centers such as:
De Novo is one of the largest operators in the country. It operates a Tier III modular data center in Kyiv with a capacity of over 3,3 MW and is the base for the largest IaaS cloud in Ukraine.
- Parkovyi (Parkovyi) is a large specialized provider with Tier III Design and Facility certification, and has a modern infrastructure for cloud solutions and data storage;
- GigaCenter is one of the technological leaders in the market, part of the GigaGroup and provides colocation and cloud services through GigaCloud;
- United DC is a large data center focused on rack rental and physical infrastructure security;
- Kyivstar is a data center network providing commercial equipment colocation services for businesses.
Specialists in the field should have significantly more information about which data center is used for which tasks, and, accordingly, which of them is a priority target for the Oreshnik IRBM.
Conclusions
In fact, there are not many objects in Ukraine that can and should be targeted with the Oreshnik IRBM, at least in its non-nuclear version.
Much has already been destroyed in Ukraine, much can still be destroyed with more "classic" precision weapons, and much is dispersed and hidden in such a way that wasting an Oreshnik IRBM on them is clearly impractical. For example, high-tech weapons are mostly imported and stored decentralized, or they are assembled in large units in basements, often located under "civilian" buildings.
However, since we are using the Oreshnik MRBM, the targets being hit must correspond to the class of weapons used against them.
The destruction of decision-making centers in Ukraine using the Oreshnik IRBM with a conventional warhead seems to the author to be the most logical and expedient option.
And against what targets in Ukraine would you use the Oreshnik?
P.S. At the time of writing, yet another shameful "deal" has occurred, even though we were literally one step away from the enemy's entire energy system collapsing, mass unrest breaking out, and Ukraine simply falling apart from within...
On January 31, 2026, a blackout almost occurred in Ukraine even without our intervention – a falling...
But you can fix everything at once.
Let our negotiators agree to all of the Ukrainian side's conditions – given previous "goodwill gestures," no one will suspect a thing, they'll think we were simply "pressured" – Trump will happily announce that he orchestrated the whole thing and should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
And after Zelensky and his allies gather to proclaim victory over Russia somewhere in the Verkhovna Rada building, they will launch an Oreshnik missile at it without warning, and then declare that all agreements reached with Ukraine are invalid and continue military operations with an emphasis on destroying the enemy's infrastructure.
Only then will a truly favorable environment for negotiations be created.
Information