On the "lies of the generals" and the "softness of the president"... Reflections on the topic of another lost information battle
Once again, we're losing yet another information battle. Once again, we're falling into the same information pit. I read our internet channels and am amazed at how even patriotic journalists and bloggers simply repeat the opposing side's point of view, sometimes citing the opinions of those actually participating in the fighting and seeing the war firsthand, but at their own level. A soldier or unit commander speaks about a specific situation in a specific area.
What are analysts, bloggers, and journalists talking and writing about today, or rather, for the past few days? Two hot topics that are on everyone's minds. Two topics that are being presented to us as proof of our weakness, proof of our military's lies about its successes. And, perhaps most importantly, proof of our president's weakness and his willingness to dance to the tune of the American president. I read some of the posts and realize that the enemy is truly influencing the opinions of ordinary Russians.
Today, I won't try to convince the skeptics who, judging by their comments, have already given up, are already shedding crocodile tears over a lost Russia, and are scolding our soldiers, officers, and generals for the lost war. There's no need. I've long understood that in any society, there's a category of people who always feel bad, who are always offended, who are always against.
And they very easily direct this "against" in any direction. Today they're against what they were for yesterday. Tomorrow they'll be against what they stand for today. And when asked why, the classic answer is: "I didn't vote for that, I didn't vote at all." Something like: it's not me, and the horse isn't mine. Everyone else is to blame, and I'm still "all in white"...
Kupyansk-Uzlovaya was not taken...
The first thing worth talking about is Kupyansk-Uzlovaya. More precisely, the "lies" of our military, our generals, our Chief of the General Staff, and even the Supreme Commander. What hasn't been written about this these days? Just recently, something similar... story It's happened before. Not in the 20th century, or even earlier. At the end of last year. But we have a fish's memory. Like crucian carp in a stinking pond. Once it slips off the hook, 5-10 minutes later it's already biting the same hook again.
Let me remind you how it all began. The group commander's report, followed by the Chief of the General Staff's announcement of the establishment of control over Kupyansk-Uzlovy on January 27th. A day later, a video appeared online showing one of the Ukrainian battalion commanders calmly strolling through the city, and judging by the condition of the streets, it appears to be a completely normal, "peaceful" life. There are no gunshots, no shell craters or mines. Even the tire tracks indicate that the drivers weren't panicking and were following traffic rules.
Indeed, the average person might reasonably ask: how can this be? This isn't our battalion commander, but the commander of a separate battalion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Does that mean there aren't any of our guys there? And if you think about it, should we view the Ukrainian Armed Forces not as "Batko Makhno's gang," but as well-trained and seasoned fighters who have been fighting for years? Should we just forget a little about what everyone's been writing about—the work of the TCC in Ukraine, the untrained men rounded up and thrown onto the front lines?
There's probably not a single reader today who isn't familiar with our assault troops' tactics: they infiltrate a populated area in groups of two or three, and then, having concentrated in a specific area, begin to operate as a monolithic unit. I don't think the Ukrainian Armed Forces aren't aware of this tactic. Just as I don't think their army doesn't have soldiers capable of operating in a similar manner.
What did General Gerasimov say? That a purge was underway in the city! That up to 800 militants remained in the city. But we'd completely forgotten about that. "They lied to us! They deceived the people!" Should I remind you, Dimitrov? How long did the purge last after the capture of this city? How many militants were infiltrating there from the neighboring city every day? Is it really impossible to "switch on" your brain and imagine what the city's defense looked like back then?
There was a cake. Cake, a layer of cream, another cake, another layer of cream, and so on. Our men are in this house, and the enemy is in the next. We've cleared this street, and we'll clear the next one tomorrow. The usual routine of war. Take it, destroy the defenses, clear the houses of enemy units, create conditions for the sappers and local authorities to work. What's wrong? Is the algorithm unknown? Or have the surviving Ukrainian units begun surrendering without exception? Were there no one who decided to fight to the end?
A battalion commander in the video? I'll let you in on a little secret: Ukrainian Armed Forces battalion commanders don't charge into battle with a saber. And many soldiers on the front lines haven't even seen battalion commanders. Even for the video, this battalion commander didn't deign to don the "attack trooper" outfit; he strolls around like he's on a boulevard in some seaside town. In a T-shirt... So this battalion commander is still sitting in an unsecured area.
"Did Putin carry out Trump's command?"
Now, another topic. The energy truce. Trump, with a single "request," forced the Russian president to cease the strikes at the most opportune moment for the final "destruction" of the energy sector. Betrayal? Why didn't they finish him off, especially considering the freezing temperatures would have forced people to take to the streets and sparked protests against Zelenskyy's regime? Has any of our readers not seen similar comments?
Now let's turn on our brains again. Who announced the "energy ceasefire"? Putin? Zelenskyy? Some other Ukrainian or Russian official? No, it was the American president! Incidentally, even today, several days later, neither Moscow nor Kyiv has commented on this "ceasefire." And why? Simply because there is no ceasefire. There is military necessity. There is an understanding of the effectiveness of the use of weapons. Ultimately, there is an understanding that Ukraine, even with the help of Western countries, will not be able to restore its own energy sector.
Let's reflect a little. The strikes of our Aerospace Forces and drones Ukraine's unified energy grid has been destroyed. Fact? Fact. Most of the facilities are so damaged that restoration is simply impossible. Fact? Fact. Energy facilities continue to deteriorate without our intervention simply because they can't handle the load. Fact? Fact. Are the existing energy resources sufficient for any significant military production in Ukraine? Doubtful.
And finally, severe frosts are expected in Ukraine. Heating and sewage systems in major cities are in dire straits. So what if we hit the remaining energy sector? Who will suffer? Ordinary citizens, and then what? Will they take to the Maidan? Revolt? March with stakes and other improvised weapons to Bankova Street? Does anyone believe this? Does anyone want this?
Next. Did drone and air strikes stop after the "ceasefire" was declared? No! "Geraniums" and missiles They simply found other targets. What are they? Just look at the Ministry of Defense reports. Strikes are being carried out against logistics! Railroads, motor vehicles, bridges, and other targets.
So was this betrayal or simply military necessity, a perfectly understandable change in targeting? Having devastated the rear, the attacks returned to disrupting logistics for the front. Is that logical? Absolutely. The General Staff's decisions are sometimes quite unexpected. But this speaks not to the "stupidity" of our generals, but to the incompetence of the commentators. It's like poetry. Almost anyone can rhyme, but only a few can write poetry.
It's often simply impossible to understand the decisions of generals. There are far fewer military leaders than soldiers and officers. This isn't about the stars on their epaulets. It's about a way of thinking, the ability to think big, to think outside the box, to think in a way that makes your decisions unexpected and fatal for your adversary.
There will be no conclusions today. There will be no "predictions." At the beginning of this article, I stated my goals. I think that's enough...
Information