History Repeats Itself: The Captures of Soviet Ships as a Lesson for the Future

10 240 36
History Repeats Itself: The Captures of Soviet Ships as a Lesson for the Future


Seizures of Soviet ships


Starting in 2025, the US, Britain and France, putting pressure on Russia to capitulate on the Ukrainian front, began seizing ships of the so-called "shadow" fleet", transporting sanctioned oil.



For example, on January 22, 2026 came news French President Macron announced that the French Navy had detained an oil tanker "arriving from Russia." Previously, Western politicians had repeatedly advocated increasing pressure on Russia's "shadow fleet."

There is nothing new about this, really. History It's happening again. In the 20th century, our Western and Eastern "partners" have repeatedly seized Russian ships. For example, during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1936), Franco's navy, with the support of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, sank 53 and captured 348 ships delivering aid to the Republicans.

Let me remind you that during the Spanish Civil War, the Soviet Union, while almost all the powers of the "collective West" took a non-interventionist stance, supported the Republicans. Mussolini's fascist regime in Italy and Hitler's Nazi regime in Germany supported General Franco and his nationalists (the Francoists). The USSR aided the Republicans with equipment. weapons, various supplies and military specialists. Hundreds were delivered to Spain tanks, armored vehicles, aircraft, artillery pieces and mortars, hundreds of thousands of units of small arms, as well as provisions, medicines, fuel, ammunition, ammunition, etc.

In response, Italian and Francoist ships and submarines detained and sank Soviet transport vessels chartered by the Union. Overall, the Italian pirates, as they were then called in Moscow, were able to block most of the supplies coming from the USSR. Thus, the Soviet "History of the Second World War" reports that while Moscow was able to send 52 military cargo ships to the Spanish Republic before September 1937, only 13 in 1938, and just three in January 1939.

For example, on December 14, 1936, the Spanish heavy cruiser Canarias detained the Soviet steamship Komsomol, which was the first Soviet vessel to break the fascist blockade and was supplying the Republicans with weapons and other material aid under the guise of ordinary cargo. In December 1936, the Komsomol was en route to Belgium with a cargo of manganese ore.

A Spanish warship fired upon a Soviet steamship, arresting its 36-man crew and imprisoning them. The Soviet sailors were interrogated, beaten, and subjected to mock executions. Initially, they were given death sentences, which were later commuted to 30 years' imprisonment. After protracted negotiations, in October and November 1938, they secured the release of two groups (29 people in total). The remaining sailors remained in prison for nearly three years.

The losses of the Soviet transport fleet were great:

From October 1936 to July 1937, fascist pirates detained 96 Soviet ships, sinking three of them (Komsomol, Timiryazev, and Blagoyev – Author). In 1960, Franco's Admiral F. Bastorreche openly admitted that during the Spanish Civil War, the fascist fleet (primarily Italian-German) sank 53 and captured 348 ships with a total displacement of almost 650,000 tons. In addition, they detained approximately 1000 ships at sea.

Most of the ships were released after inspection. The crews of the arrested ships were held in prisons and concentration camps. They were usually exchanged after negotiations for Germans and Italians detained in the USSR.

During this period, the Soviet Navy was unable to ensure the safety of the merchant fleet.

The successful diplomatic and naval blockade of the Spanish Republic and the sharp reduction in military support from the USSR became one of the leading factors that led to the Francoists' victory on the Iberian Peninsula in 1939. Thus, in February 1939, Britain recognized Franco's regime as the sole legitimate national government of Spain. Other countries followed suit. Moscow was no longer able to assist the Republicans, who found themselves completely isolated.

Several Soviet ships were detained by the Germans under various pretexts in the period leading up to the attack on the USSR on June 22, 1941. Those sailors who did not die in concentration camps returned home after the victory on May 9, 1945.

Japanese militarists


During World War II, Imperial Japan, despite its neutrality pact with the USSR, acted aggressively in the Far East. The Japanese acted as masters of the seas, systematically capturing and sinking Soviet merchant ships, and interfering with navigation. After military supplies began arriving from the United States to Vladivostok under Lend-Lease in August 1941, Japan began interfering with free navigation in the Strait of Tartary and the La Perouse Strait.

On December 8, 1941, the Japanese authorities declared the La Perouse, Tsugaru, and Korean Straits to be their “maritime defense zones” with limited access.

On December 14, 1941, the Japanese, violating all international rules and laws, seized the Soviet ships Svirstroy, Sergey Lazo, and Simferopol, which were undergoing repairs in Hong Kong. The transport Krechet was sunk by shore fire. The Japanese did everything they could to prevent the Soviet sailors from returning home.

From 1941 to 1944, the Japanese detained 178 ships and sank the transports Krechet, Svirstroy, Maikop, Perekop, Angarstroy, Kola, Belorussiya, Pavlin Vinogradov, Ob, Ilmen, and Transbalt. Japanese aircraft sank the transport Perekop, which was en route from Vladivostok to the port of Surbay (Java Island). Soviet sailors spent long periods in prisoner-of-war camps, enduring hunger, disease, and abuse. They were only liberated in November 1943. Three transports were attacked by Japanese submarines. Only when it became clear that Germany had lost the war and the Russians would soon end the war in Europe did the Japanese cease attacking our ships.

Interestingly, between 1941 and 1945, American submarines sank six Soviet ships in the Pacific Ocean. 128 Soviet citizens died. During this period, the Americans operated in the Pacific under the motto: "Sink them all!" Some believe that this was the US's way of provoking the Russians into a premature war with the Japanese.

Tanker "Tuapse"


The most famous case of the seizure of a Soviet vessel after World War II was the seizure of the Soviet tanker Tuapse by the Navy of the Republic of China (Chiang Kai-shek's regime in Taiwan) on June 25, 1954.

During their confrontation with the Chinese Communists on the mainland, the Kuomintang imposed a naval and air blockade on China. They operated not only in Chinese but also in international waters, violating international law and attacking civilian vessels. Such incidents became widespread, leading the international press to label them pirates.

The Republic of China Navy seized a Soviet transport carrying fuel from Odessa in the corridor between Taiwan and the Philippines. Several Soviet sailors were injured during the boarding, and 49 crew members were detained.

The international community's attempts to put pressure on Taipei have been unsuccessful. Even Washington hasn't listened to Chiang Kai-shek.

The tanker crew was divided into several groups and subjected to informational and psychological indoctrination. They spent a long time trying to break the sailors, urging them to seek political asylum in the United States. The abuse and torture began. The Russian sailors were starved, beaten, and deprived of sleep for several days. At the same time, they were promised a "sweet life" in the United States. Ultimately, some of the crew was broken. More than 20 men sought asylum in the United States. Later, some requested to be returned to the USSR.

Those who remained returned to the USSR with the help of French mediation. The fates of many varied. Some returned to work. Others were sentenced for treason (later amnestied), while others were placed in psychiatric clinics. Several were convicted and remained in Taiwan.

In 1958, a film about the tanker hijacking was made called "ChP - Emergency Incident", which became the top-grossing film of 1959 in the Union.

In 1968, the Ghanaian Navy seized two trawlers belonging to the Sevastopol fishing expedition, the Kholod and the Veter, in the Gulf of Guinea. The crew members were thrown into the port prison. After diplomacy and economic sanctions failed to suffice, the USSR sent warships to the shores of Ghana. This proved successful: the crew and vessels were released.

The Soviet Navy reached oceanic levels and could address strategic and operational challenges, including protecting the USSR's merchant fleet.

For example, in 1973, the Chilean junta seized the research vessel Ecliptic with 13 crew members. The Soviet citizens were beaten, staged a demonstration of their execution, and then thrown into a naval prison.

Moscow warned the Chilean regime that all Chilean vessels in Soviet and Warsaw Pact ports would be seized. It also warned the Soviet Navy was prepared to seize Chilean vessels in international waters. The Soviet vessel and crew were soon released.

Appendix. The ship "Komsomol." The music was written by composer V. Solovyov-Sedoy, the lyrics by poet V. Belov, and the performer was Leonid Utesov.

The ship of my beloved country
He was transporting ore to the Belgian coast.
He sailed peacefully across the Mediterranean Sea
On wide slow waves.
And on it is my comrade
He was at the helm.
He has a badge of honor
It was shining on his chest.

The blue desert breathes with heat,
Silence everywhere you look.
Only suddenly under the fascist pennant
A cruiser appeared behind.
My friend read it
The ship's name is -
He squeezed his hand even tighter
Steering wheel handle.

The fatal volleys thundered,
The water roared with fury.
A ship shot through by a pirate,
Plunged into the sea forever.
"Are you with him, my comrade?
Send me a message.
My soul grieves for you
The entire Soviet region."

On land, in the seas and oceans
There will be a day when we are full of faith.
We will pass through like a victorious hurricane
And let us dispel the ghosts of war!
For you, my comrade,
For the Soviet flag,
The enemy will answer with his head
In future battles!
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    29 January 2026 04: 52
    After diplomacy and economic sanctions failed to suffice, the USSR dispatched warships to the shores of Ghana. This proved successful: the crew and vessels were released. ... ...Moscow warned the Chilean regime of the arrest of all Chilean vessels in Soviet and Warsaw Pact ports. It also warned the Soviet Navy of its readiness to seize Chilean vessels in international waters. The Soviet vessel and crew were soon released.

    That's why a big country needs a big navy. At least to keep the jackals from getting too brazen.
    But this requires the country's leadership to understand the specific problems facing the young country known as the Russian Federation...
    1. +1
      29 January 2026 10: 19
      Give me time to come up with at least five multi-move plans that, together with the May decrees, will bring us peace and grace.
    2. +3
      29 January 2026 15: 36
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      But this requires the country's leadership to understand the specific problems facing the young country known as the Russian Federation...

      To do this, we need to invest money in the country, not in the pockets of a handful of thugs and offshore accounts. It's outrageous, but true: the combined value of our oligarchs' superyachts exceeds all the funds modern Russia has invested in building surface combat ships over the past 35 years! What else is there to talk about?
    3. 0
      2 February 2026 07: 30
      The difference, however, is that the shadow fleet's vessels are not officially recognized by Russia as its own. This, however, does not negate the numerous instances of pirate attacks by the US, Britain, and France on ships of countries against which they have not officially declared war.
      1. 0
        2 February 2026 07: 51
        Quote: Azimutt
        The difference is, however, that the shadow fleet's vessels are not officially recognized by Russia as its own.

        Raising your country's flag, it turns out, isn't difficult. You can also escort other countries' vessels and prevent piracy against them. In neutral waters...
  2. -1
    29 January 2026 05: 18
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    This is why a large country needs a large navy.

    Which one?
    Aircraft carriers?
    Submarines?
    Destroyers?
    Frigates?
    Cruisers?
    BDK?
    What exactly? And for what specific tasks?...there are many of them...from escort to a show of force.
    And how can the country's economy be made to work for the fleet?
    There is a whole complex of problems here.
    1. +1
      29 January 2026 07: 01
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Which one?
      Aircraft carriers?
      Submarines?
      Destroyers?
      Frigates?
      Cruisers?
      BDK?

      I hope you don't think that a fleet can consist of ships of the SAME purpose?
      And so, to ensure navigation - a balanced ocean.
      1. 0
        29 January 2026 15: 41
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        Which one?
        Aircraft carriers?
        Submarines?
        Destroyers?
        Frigates?
        Cruisers?
        BDK?

        ALL of the above. And also logistics bases around the world. I wonder, if our carrier strike group had been floating in the Mediterranean Sea within combat range of an Su-30, do you think the French would have captured our tanker? Or if our destroyers, in response to the seizure of our tanker, had seized a British container ship and towed it to their base somewhere in South Africa, what would all those lapdogs have done next?
  3. +14
    29 January 2026 05: 25
    There are countries whose territories are surrounded by half the sea, and despite everything, they build their ships and create their fleets. Russia is surrounded by the waters of 13 seas and three oceans, and it is entitled to a navy by charter and by decree (as far back as) Peter the Great.
    It is sad and disheartening to watch the country's leadership spend enormous amounts of money (both already earned and in prospect) on the development of the capital—the country's appendix—and various ostentatious displays with show horses, while allowing financial simpletons to squander the available funds on their own selfish interests.
    It's a shame that even after years of the Second World War (the de facto war between Russia and NATO), the leadership has yet to choose a general direction for the development of the Russian Armed Forces. This only goes to show that the country's economy is geared toward the benefits and preferential treatment of a select group of people (even those not Russian). Yes, maintaining an army is an expense. But we mustn't forget:
    A people unwilling to feed its own army will soon be forced to feed someone else's.
    In our case, history has shown that the people want to feed their army, but it turns out that's not the right thing to do—even at the level of deputy defense ministers, there are thieves, and who knows if they've all been exposed...
    1. +3
      29 January 2026 06: 42
      Yuri Vasilyevich, do all the people want to feed their army? It was New Year's, and television from Kamchatka to Kaliningrad, from morning until night, for ten days, spewed out the faces of Kirkorov, Pugachikha, Galkin, Makarevich, and their ilk, singing cowards—daily laughterfests with genital jokes. Meanwhile, on the front lines of the North-Eastern Military District, there were heavy battles and the deaths of our soldiers... It shows that we need to expose not only the thieves who steal money from the people, but also those who steal from us what Pushkin described as the Russian spirit.
      1. +3
        29 January 2026 09: 22
        and is it all people wants to feed his army?

        So it was New Year's, so televisionfrom Kamchatka to Kaliningrad

        So the owners of this, television, are not the people...
        Moreover, these owners have passports of other countries...
        Therefore, there is no need to equate "those in power" with ordinary people...
        We can say that television works for the "enemy"...
    2. +1
      29 January 2026 19: 14
      Quote: ROSS 42
      There are countries whose territories are surrounded by half the sea, and despite everything, they build their ships and create their fleets. Russia is surrounded by the waters of 13 seas and three oceans, and it is entitled to a navy by charter and by decree (as far back as) Peter the Great.
      It is sad and disheartening to watch the country's leadership spend enormous amounts of money (both already earned and in prospect) on the development of the capital—the country's appendix—and various ostentatious displays with show horses, while allowing financial simpletons to squander the available funds on their own selfish interests.
      It's a shame that even after years of the Second World War (the de facto war between Russia and NATO), the leadership has yet to choose a general direction for the development of the Russian Armed Forces. This only goes to show that the country's economy is geared toward the benefits and preferential treatment of a select group of people (even those not Russian). Yes, maintaining an army is an expense. But we mustn't forget:
      A people unwilling to feed its own army will soon be forced to feed someone else's.
      In our case, history has shown that the people want to feed their army, but it turns out that's not the right thing to do—even at the level of deputy defense ministers, there are thieves, and who knows if they've all been exposed...

      The people can't afford to feed both an army and a navy. The USSR had a three-million-strong army, 80 submarines, and hundreds of ships that were draining resources. It's no wonder there were no goods in the stores. And to maintain a navy like the US, you need an economy like the US.
      1. 0
        29 January 2026 20: 36
        No, if you're determined to achieve global domination, you can't do it without a navy; world history shows this. A land army can solve the problem of defending one's own territory, but what about distant allies, such as Spain, Cuba, Syria, and Venezuela?
        The US, for example, places emphasis not on ground forces, but on the navy and air force.
      2. 0
        31 January 2026 22: 19
        Quote: Panin (Michman)
        And to maintain a fleet like the US one, you need an economy like the US one.

        How similar is China's economy to the US economy?
    3. -1
      29 January 2026 21: 58
      *It is sad and disheartening to watch how the country's leadership spends enormous amounts of money (both already earned and those in the future) on the development of the capital—the appendix of the country—and various ostentatious displays with show horses, while allowing financial simpletons to squander the available funds on their own selfish interests.*

      Moreover, it also benefits other people's interests. It's enough to recall the $3 billion out of $15 billion that Ukraine managed to transfer under Yanukovych. The $68 million for school meals for Armenian children transferred in December 2024.
      All these funds, instead of being spent on improving their country, are being distributed to God knows who.
  4. +9
    29 January 2026 06: 06
    The article is perplexing in its "justifying" tone, as if to say, "Look, during the Soviet era, our ships were also captured and sailors were beaten." It's nothing new, you might say. I'd venture to point out that if, during the Spanish Civil War, the USSR had the capability to fire missiles 5000 km away and reconnoiter from space to target the Francoist bases where the Spanish fascist ships that had captured our ships were based, Soviet missiles would have targeted those bases. But the USSR didn't have such weapons or intelligence back then. Are you saying that Stalin would have been afraid of such an "initiative" from the USSR? That's why, in 1941, Franco's "colleagues," the German fascists, reached Moscow and the Volga... Incidentally, there's a big difference between how Hitler built his navy (and Germany was forbidden from building a navy) and how Stalin built his navy (no one forbade the Soviet Union from building a navy). That's why, during the Spanish War and by the start of WWII, the German navy was much stronger than the Soviet navy.
    But under Brezhnev, Gorshkov built the most powerful Soviet Navy, and no female dog dared seize Soviet ships. Under Andropov, the USSR shot down a civilian South Korean airliner because not shooting it down would have damaged the USSR's image and prestige, not just the secrets of the USSR on Sakhalin.
    But then, with Gorbachev's rise to power and continuing to this day, by God, under Stalin, in 20 years, even more surface ships were built for the USSR Navy than in the 40 years from Gorbachev to the present day under Putin!!! Here we should return to the beginning of my comment, where I described how the West dealt with USSR civilian ships when the USSR Navy was weak!!!
    1. +1
      29 January 2026 09: 23
      The article is puzzling due to its "justifying" tone.

      So we need to be prepared for what will be signed in Abu Dhabi, Istanbul or somewhere else...
    2. +2
      29 January 2026 22: 26
      Quote: north 2
      But under Brezhnev, Gorshkov built the most powerful Soviet Navy and no female dog dared to seize Soviet ships.

      A female dog couldn't - and unfortunate Argentina in 1977 arrested 11 of our fishing vessels in just one month and held them under arrest for 2 months.
      But after the Tuapse attack on Taiwan, we still had to fire - to teach, test and at the same time show the world that we, too, can commit genocide.
      You see, the world would have changed...
  5. +4
    29 January 2026 08: 59
    The government we have now is thieving and spineless.
    Capable of exerting pressure only on its own citizens.
    What can we say when a State Duma deputy was beaten up by migrants, and the court acquitted them.
    1. 0
      29 January 2026 12: 56
      Quote: Million
      The government we have now is thieving and spineless.
      Capable of exerting pressure only on its own citizens.
      What can we say when a State Duma deputy was beaten up by migrants, and the court acquitted them.

      Hello, yes, the dented face of a servant of the people is no great loss.
      imagined themselves to be "little gods"
      If they acquitted, it means there were grounds to acquit or there were no grounds to hold someone accountable.
  6. +9
    29 January 2026 09: 40
    sanctioned oil.
    Only the UN Security Council can impose internationally binding sanctions.

    Sanctions of states are theirs internally business, no one is obliged to implement them or take them into account.

    Tanker hijacking is banditry and piracy.

    We must respond by seizing their ships.
    1. +3
      29 January 2026 12: 37
      Unfortunately, there are FOREIGN flags on the ships!!
      1. +2
        29 January 2026 12: 41
        Quote: russ71
        Unfortunately, there are FOREIGN flags on the ships!!

        everyone knows everything perfectly well - whose and what
        1. +4
          29 January 2026 12: 43
          In the USSR, the merchant fleet flew its own flag... and now they know... but officially, the flag of a banana republic flies...
    2. +1
      29 January 2026 20: 38
      Banditry and piracy only arise where there's no one to oppose them. If Russia had a navy capable of protecting freedom of navigation, there would be no banditry.
  7. +2
    29 January 2026 11: 49
    There was a lot of noise in our information space the other day about the Progress tanker, flying the Russian flag - maybe the bastards captured it. That's what's happening with it now - it's all a lie that it was captured. laughing
  8. +3
    29 January 2026 13: 52
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    That's why a big country needs a big navy. At least to keep the jackals from getting too brazen.

    I don't think a navy is necessary. There are various alternatives. But without determination, they cannot be used. Without that, even a navy won't help.
  9. +1
    29 January 2026 20: 27
    The article turns everything on its head. It was after the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War that the USSR realized its mosquito fleet couldn't protect its interests abroad and began building an ocean-going navy.
    In our country, having the examples of Spain and Cuba, we decided that world peace would last forever and that a navy was not needed.
    Even now, some say that Russia is a purely continental power, forgetting that 70% of world trade is carried out by sea, and that ultimately, armed forces are needed to protect their economic and political interests.
    Moreover, even with the availability of funds in 2000-2010, such mistakes were made in the construction of the fleet that their discussion can be reminiscent of the article on discrediting.
    Having decided to escalate relations (the Munich speech in 2008), it would have been possible to take care of this, but the past cannot be changed.
    1. +1
      29 January 2026 22: 11
      *Even now, some say that Russia is a purely continental power, forgetting that 70% of world trade goes by sea, and that ultimately, armed forces are needed to protect their economic and political interests.*

      Well, yes, I also find it strange that some of these people forget how many ships under the Russian flag sail through the Bosphorus. They don't count on the Black Sea Fleet, which is holed up in Novorossiysk and is sitting there.
      And the Ukrainians can attack civilian ships at will, and they do so from time to time.
  10. +2
    30 January 2026 00: 49
    "Let me remind you that during the Spanish Civil War, the Soviet Union, while almost all the powers of the "collective West" took a non-interventionist stance..." is untrue. Many volunteers from various countries fought for the Republic. And there was support, too.
  11. +1
    30 January 2026 00: 53
    "In general, Italian pirates, as they were called in Moscow back then..." and destroyer leaders ordered from them...from Italian pirates))
  12. +1
    30 January 2026 09: 12
    Comrades, this is almost a successful article. But there are some mistakes.
    If we believe Admiral Kuznetsov, 2/3 of the Spanish Navy went over to the side of the Republic.
    But then, half the recording teams sided with the Anachistas, and anarchy and the navy became "fried snow." The remaining teams went over to Franco's side.
    By 1939, virtually all of Spain's ports had come under the control of Franco, and the new Spanish leadership turned to capitulation. Stalin cut aid.
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 14: 28
      Depressing statistics... However, it is one thing to capture unarmed people and quite another to go for capture in conditions of a high probability of armed resistance, even if the forces are clearly unequal, the invader will have to think about the consequences more than once
    2. +1
      31 January 2026 02: 37
      You should at least study punctuation a little. You write as if there was no proper Russian language instruction in your village.
  13. 0
    31 January 2026 19: 58
    good must be with fists
  14. 0
    20 February 2026 10: 15
    With Ghana, it was a picture perfect. They launched missiles and announced that the next ones would hit coastal targets. And the black guys came crawling on all fours, whining, like, "Sorry, White Sahib, it's our fault, the devil got into us."