"Let the Syrians themselves understand"

70
“If Syria falls, then the next players on this board can be Jordan and Lebanon,” said Arabist Vladimir Isaev, a VIEW newspaper. So he appreciated the possibility of transition of the conflict in Syria to neighboring states. The likelihood of escalation of the intra Syrian conflict into a regional one increased after an Israeli air strike on Damascus.

Tehran denied on Monday the version that the Syrian object, which was subjected to Israeli shelling, allegedly contained Iranian weapons.

Recall on the night of Friday the Israeli air attack was subjected to Damascus. According to Israeli sources, the blows were inflicted to prevent the delivery of Iranian missiles to Hezbollah’s hands in neighboring Lebanon. According to some reports, the number of victims of the raids was 300 people.

As noted by The New York Times, an unexpected attack by Israel created a precedent for outside military actions capable of finishing off the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. Air strikes have fueled debate in Washington about US tactics in Syria. However, Obama aides say the president is wary of repeating the Libyan scenario. One of the reasons is the fear of the might of Syria’s air defense, the other is the presence of many jihadists in the ranks of the rebels.

Moscow, in turn, expressed concern about the preparation of world public opinion for the possibility of intervention in Syria. The representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Alexander Lukashevich, said that it was noteworthy that “the UN experts have evidence of the possible use of weapons, in particular, gas sarin, by the opposition, and not by government forces. ” Earlier, UN experts acknowledged that the recent chemical attack was most likely carried out by the rebels themselves, and not by government troops.

Meanwhile, experts say, Assad was in a difficult situation. Any counterstrike in Israel would entail such a major confrontation that it does not need at the moment. Nevertheless, Damascus has already promised to supply the Palestinian troops in Lebanon with more modern weapons and set targets that will be attacked in Israel in the event of new attacks. Moreover, the troops were ordered to respond with fire to any attack by Israel immediately, without waiting for additional orders.

Tel Aviv, in turn, also prepared for a Syrian attack, closing the airspace over the north of the country for civilian flights aviation and announcing the transfer of two Iron Dome missile defense batteries there.

"Let the Syrians themselves understand"Vladimir Isaev, chief researcher at the Center for Arab Studies at the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, told the newspaper VIEW about the likelihood of new strikes from outside Syria.

VIEW: Vladimir Alexandrovich, Israel intervened in the Syrian conflict, inflicting a series of rocket attacks on Damascus. In response, Damascus threatened to supply the Palestinians with more modern weapons and deployed its missiles toward Israel. How serious are these threats?

Vladimir Isaev: If we discard the verbal husk that accompanies these events, then, to be honest, Syria in its current state cannot withstand Israel - this is a rather pointless business. If in more favorable times for Syria she could not do anything with the occupation of part of her territory, now all the more so.

Threats to supply Palestinians with modern weapons remain threats. Syria itself is in dire need of a weapon, given that within two years there has been a full-scale civil war, weapons and so there is spent lightning speed. No wonder the Syrians are now turning to us, so that we increase our supply, which we do not do, although we continue to supply it with arms within the framework of previously concluded contracts.

So the threats are largely frivolous. Although, God forbid, the war will officially begin between Damascus and Tel Aviv. Then, in many respects, the sympathies of a number of Arab countries will naturally spread to the side of Syria, because Israel will be viewed as a threat to the entire Arab world.

VIEW: And how Iran is now able to threaten Israel?

V.I .: Iran has long been threatening the Jewish state. The same Hezbollah in Lebanon sees Israelis first of all as its adversary and mainly relies on supplies from Iran. Land supplies can only be carried out through Syria ... But in reality, at the moment, Iran cannot really threaten - at least, until it acquires nuclear weapons.

VIEW: According to Israeli sources, Syria transferred modern Iranian Hezbollah missiles to Lebanon. Is there a possibility that Damascus could transfer chemical weapons to this movement? For example, if a defeat in a civil war becomes inevitable?

V.I .: If we proceed from modern realities, the transfer of chemical weapons immediately puts in a rogue state any side that will deal with this, and it will be subjected to sanctions, including the military. And I think that the UN will not object if a very serious blow is dealt to such a country in order to deprive it of those very stocks of chemical weapons that it will try to transfer to someone. It is not known whose hands this may fall into is too serious a thing.

VIEW: Washington has so far refrained from direct assessments of air strikes. But in the end, what do you think will express his approval?

V.I .: The United States did not participate in any last-day Israel operations against Syria. Another thing is that they approved a strike on the caravan that, according to Israel, was transporting Iranian missiles to Lebanon. This they approved, because relations between Iran and the United States are not the warmest.

VIEW: If the war is already beyond Syria, then in what direction will the conflict spread?

V.I .: If Syria falls, then the next players on this board can be Jordan and Lebanon. First of all, Lebanon, which is not very stable anyway.

VIEW: After reports of a chemical attack in Syria, did the likelihood of intervention increase? If not from NATO, then, for example, from the monarchies of the Persian Gulf?

V.I .: No one has yet sent its troops into the territory of Syria, except for the armed opposition, which uses mercenaries from various countries, including Chechnya. What, Chechnya declared war on Syria, or what? This is not happening. There is an internationalization of the conflict, there are more and more people involved. Not long ago, the Syrian leadership handed over the 12 passport filed to the Belgian embassy to Belgium who died in Syria. What, Belgium declared war on Syria? Nothing like this.

VIEW: At the weekend, the Pentagon for the first time did not rule out the supply of weapons to the rebels. Moscow reiterated its readiness to act as a mediator in the negotiations between the belligerents. What are the chances for a peaceful dialogue today?

V.I .: Russia provides its platform so that the Syrian opposition can meet with representatives of the Assad regime and reach some favorable agreements in order to mitigate the severity of the conflict. It would be nice if these negotiations ended favorably. But there is little hope for that.

The only hope is that those who supply those whom they call the opposition with arms will slightly dazzle those whom they supply these weapons to. No wonder the United States has already stated - and in the UN it was confirmed - that the alleged "use of poison chemicals by the Syrian regime during some events was the work of the opposition.

Americans themselves say that they should not interfere, if only for the simple reason that it is not clear whose weapons fall into their hands. Those supplies that go, then pop up in some Mali or Algeria, where the same opposition are committing various terrorist acts. From this point of view, certain countries that have an interest in Syrian affairs would need to get together and finally determine who can be considered a normal loyal opposition, and leave, perhaps, Syria alone. Let the Syrians themselves figure it out on this long-suffering land.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    8 May 2013 15: 32
    If the Syrians were really given the opportunity to figure it out for themselves, then in a couple of weeks there would be no trash and "opposition" there would be no trace of it.
    1. Reasonable, 2,3
      0
      9 May 2013 03: 43
      NU boorish. They (our intelligentsia, already our own, even rotten, at least a little?). We have a holiday, even for a day, in Moscow, shut up. Or shut it myself.
    2. Reasonable, 2,3
      0
      9 May 2013 03: 45
      This we will understand. And this is not rhetoric.
      1. Sergh
        +1
        9 May 2013 04: 31
        HELLO guys!
        I dug a little here
        I beg your pardon, a laptop from a distant place.
        I can’t say a lot (someone else’s laptop, I’m confused <), I’ll say a thing. We are in SYRIA near the battalion, maybe back and forth
        1. Sergh
          +1
          9 May 2013 04: 49
          THERE IS KIDDES OF KILLING IN ACCOUNT OF THESE Muslims-KAZLOV; we kill. KLAVA ALIEN. There is no time to understand. I can’t upload a video, an ambush
          All with the holiday of May 9, veran, life and happiness,
          Yet.
          1. annenkov242
            +1
            9 May 2013 06: 47
            G about with about, save and save them and help them! Not for the sake of glory, but to protect the homeland ....!
  2. +6
    8 May 2013 15: 40
    Syrians should not be left unpunished by Israeli attacks and should not be afraid of a war with Israel. In the event of an Israeli attack on Syria, the same fighters that are fighting against the Syrians will turn their weapons against Israel, because it is a greater irritant for the Arab world. And even if NATO wants to intervene, we must openly declare that in the event of NATO aggression against Syria, we will immediately be forced to use chemical weapons. I think such an argument will cool hotheads.
    1. Guun
      +5
      8 May 2013 17: 23
      Actually, the militants will first finish off Assad, but then they will have to deal with Hezbollah and its Shiite groups. Israel will have time to establish a dull defense on the border, that is, to survive the fire of a neighbor. Syria is exhausted by the war and is unlikely to strike at Israel, they did not even bring down their bombers - which would mean an IDF invasion of Syria - that is, defeat. If you choose the least of two evils, then in time you can win.
      1. +15
        8 May 2013 18: 27
        Quote: Guun
        Actually, the militants will finish Assad first

        But these are pipes! Of course, if assistance is provided ONLY to the militants, then it is possible. BUT, after all, Russia does not sit idly by. I know how many shouts have now appeared on the topic - "And why is Russia silent ?!" etc. etc. BUT guys, who told you that Russia is not doing anything? Or do you think that help must be for show? What the hell did you think Kerry flew for, as scalded to Russia and almost with hugs to Putin? And even about the coalition during the Second World War I remembered ... A tear broke through. Yes, in order to try to convince Russia not to take the full range of possible measures. Now in the Syrian epic the time has come for a vividly theatrical performance - the Big Brothers (Russia and the USA) will, smiling at each other, each help his ward. The wards, in turn, will run into each other, knowing that there is a rear behind them and everyone will be watching who has the stronger nerves.
        But the fact that Russia has not abandoned its ally is a fact. And confirmation of this -
        Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while in Shanghai, received a sharp reprimand from Russian President Vladimir Putin warning that Russia would not tolerate further Israeli attacks on Damascus and would react.

        Putin did not say how, but he announced that he had ordered accelerated deliveries of advanced Russian weapons to Syria.

        Israeli military sources Debkafile revealed that the Russian leader was referring to the C-300 system and the Iskander (SS-9 Stone according to NATO classification) capable of carrying the 720K26 nuclear warheads, which are sufficiently accurate to hit a target within a meter radius at a distance of 5 kilometers .

        In his phone call to Netanyahu, the Russian leader advised the Prime Minister to be confident in this and to bear this in mind.


        http://warfiles.ru/show-30167-wnd-ahmadinedzhad-byl-arestovan-po-prikazu-hamenei


        .html

        And the article is clearly pro-Israeli-American and the author is trying hard to convince us that it is pointless to rock the boat against the Zionist-striped alliance. And here - the same - FUCK TO YOU!
        1. -8
          8 May 2013 20: 20
          Dear fellow countryman, I am always pleased to read your balanced logical posts, but in this case, it seems to me, all your speculations are rumors, like some of your previous speculations, dear Esaul .. Ah, I really want you to be right ..
    2. 0
      8 May 2013 19: 55
      Quote: elmir15
      Syrians should not be left unpunished by Israeli attacks and should not be afraid of a war with Israel.


      In principle, true. It is necessary to be afraid that Israel will simply bomb the whole of Syria as it is and that the terrorists will win ...
      1. +5
        8 May 2013 22: 20
        Quote: Geisenberg
        In principle, true. It is necessary to be afraid that Israel will simply bomb the whole of Syria as it is and that the terrorists will win ...

        Just inaction unties the hands for more evil, for good must have a sword ..
        Even the Amer hawks sensed the taste of blood, and rubbed their hands about how they would tear apart another once prosperous country .. But these people are afraid of only one decisive rebuff, as was the case in Vietnam ..
        1. WW3
          WW3
          +3
          9 May 2013 01: 35
          Quote: DEfindER
          Just inaction unties your hands for more evil

          Obviously, this will not stop, there will be more bombing strikes. This check is not so much Syrian air defense (the mossad probably knows the current state of affairs) as the response of the world community to this aggression. Naturally there will be a continuation, there are no angry statements from the powers that be.
    3. +5
      8 May 2013 23: 32
      Quote: elmir15
      Syrians should not be left unpunished by Israeli attacks and should not be afraid of a war with Israel. In the event of an Israeli attack on Syria, the same fighters that are fighting against the Syrians will turn their weapons against Israel, because it is a greater irritant for the Arab world. And even if NATO wants to intervene, we must openly declare that in the event of NATO aggression against Syria, we will immediately be forced to use chemical weapons. I think such an argument will cool hotheads.

      Judging by the number of minuses, I see how many supporters of the Israeli policy of aggression against Syria are here. I don't understand what's not clear? - in the event of NATO aggression and if no one supports Syria, the last argument should be applied - Syria needs to warn potential aggressors in advance that chemical weapons will be used. And I am sure that NATO and Israelis will not dare to undertake a ground operation, they are used to fighting remotely, without losses, but here it turns out "not according to the rules" there will be big casualties. Here it turns out who has iron nerves, NATO and Israelis will be fed up that the Syrians will not dare to use chemical weapons, and the Syrians need to make it more convincing that they will fulfill their warning
  3. +5
    8 May 2013 15: 41
    The president is wary of repeating the Libyan scenario. One of the reasons is fears about the power of Syria’s air defense,

    And today I read this
    "Establishing a classic no-fly zone is a long and costly business. But the Syrian Air Force can be landed by sending several cruisers and destroyers from Norfolk to the eastern Mediterranean and firing 250 Tomahawk cruise missiles, the end of Syrian aviation will come in less than an hour," Harmer quoted Foreign Policy.
    According to him, the goal of the strike will be runways, radars, fuel tanks and aircraft themselves.
    "And without the invasion of American aircraft into the Syrian airspace, we will actually create a no-fly zone - not by coercion, but by the destruction of the Syrian air force," the expert noted.
    The cost of one Tomahawk is estimated at $ 1,4 million, respectively, only missiles will cost $ 350 million, Harmer calculated.
    "This is not counting the cost of operating ships and the actions of thousands of military personnel ... Not so bad when compared to US spending on other military operations. Note that the Pentagon spends $ 2012 billion a month in Afghanistan in 10," the analyst said.
    According to him, Syria has less than 100 combat aircraft, most of which are at least 30 years old.


    Well, what the Americans are capable of destroying, we know that, if they could manage the situation in an hour, I would bow to them first



    1. 0
      9 May 2013 06: 19
      And the ships are afraid of getting a rocket in the Bochin?
  4. Seed
    -34
    8 May 2013 15: 54
    In my opinion, the situation needs to be addressed. The Syrian people are dying in a war that still knows how long it lasts, so you need a Yugoslav scenario. It is necessary that Russia, the USA and NATO countries gather a normal contingent and work from the air through the Asad military commissar. The same Israelis lightly broke through the air defense a couple of days ago. Ah, dreams.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +15
      8 May 2013 16: 07
      In, uncle, bent. Then let’s demolish Mother Motherland in Stalingrad, fill the grave of the Unknown Soldier with rubbish, apologize to Germany for the Victory, take off our trousers and bend our bare ass to Europe ... But do we just bomb Assad with NATO?
      1. +11
        8 May 2013 16: 18
        Sasha, we have a new Troll named "Semyonich." Judging by his posts from the gay swamp!
      2. Seed
        -17
        8 May 2013 16: 18
        Apologizing to Germany is not necessary. De jure, she was the first to start a war. Yes, and rubbish on the eternal flame do not need to pour. By the way, the city of Volgograd is called, not Stalingrad.

        Are you a Stalinist?
        1. +7
          8 May 2013 16: 31
          Quote: Semenich
          Are you a Stalinist?

          Yes. Beginning.
          Quote: Semenich
          Apologizing to Germany is not necessary. De jure, she was the first to start a war.

          And de facto? THE USSR?
          Are you a resunoid?
          1. Seed
            -18
            8 May 2013 16: 56
            Stalinists are narrow-minded people, don't be them. De facto comrade. The great Stalin pulled troops to the border, riveted the "attacking" doctrine of warfare, occupied Poland and attacked Finland. Ah, and the pact.
            1. +5
              8 May 2013 17: 08
              Quote: Semenich
              Stalinists are foolish people, do not be them.

              Glad to upset, I will.
              Otherwise, my diagnosis is accurate - resunoid, write his words directly. Do not be like you then live in Belarus?
              1. Seed
                -14
                8 May 2013 17: 10
                Who is the Reason? By the way, Belarus through O is written. And in general - Belarus. What do you like about sralin? I'm just wondering what drives you.
                1. IgWest
                  +4
                  8 May 2013 17: 36
                  When the opponent has nothing to answer, most often they look for grammatical errors.
                  By the way, in the Russian language as applied to “Belarus” and “Belarus”
                2. vovxu
                  +3
                  8 May 2013 21: 06
                  Why didn’t Stalin please you? Liberast, my friend’s campaign.
            2. IgWest
              0
              8 May 2013 17: 19
              Your phrase in the form - as from the quotation book of Mao or Mein Kampf "-" My struggle ", or the newspaper" Pravda "of the 30s:" Trotskyists are narrow-minded people ... "etc. You are apparently an adult, it's time to think with your head.
            3. uzbek
              +1
              8 May 2013 18: 40
              Did Comrade Stalin personally annoy you? Or maybe your grandmother has one? repressed?
            4. +3
              8 May 2013 19: 50
              Quote: Semenich
              Stalinists are narrow-minded people, don't be them. De facto comrade. The great Stalin pulled troops to the border, riveted the "attacking" doctrine of warfare, occupied Poland and attacked Finland. Ah, and the pact.

              The Stalinists proved in 1945 that they are the best people on the planet.
            5. +3
              8 May 2013 20: 38
              "... Stalinists are narrow-minded people ..." Of course, they are narrow-minded, they are closer than you think, They are here, they are nearby, they are on this forum. For example, I am. I ask for more details about the "attacking" doctrine of Stalin. By the way. When on September 1, the Germans crossed the border of independent Poland, the Red Army did not budge. Only on September 17, when the brave and proud government of Poland and the Supreme Command, cheerfully and amicably crossed the border with Romania, the Red Army moved towards Brest, Lvov and Chernivtsi. Such a state as Poland, de facto ceased to exist. "... Oh, and the pact ..." - and What?
            6. +3
              8 May 2013 22: 49
              Quote: Semenich
              occupied Poland and attacked Finland

              If you still do not know and have not read anything on this topic, then I enlighten you, during the civil war, Russia lost part of its territory in Belarus (Poland occupied) and near Finland. With Poland, it turned out to be returned peacefully, and with the Finns, unfortunately, only by military means, although Stalin offered them in return for this territory, several times larger lands on the Karelian Peninsula, but the Finns refused under the influence of Germany.
        2. IgWest
          +4
          8 May 2013 16: 39
          Who is de facto? Is the USSR really? Mother Motherland began to build in Stalingrad, finished in Volgograd. And the battle was not Volgograd and not even Tsaritsyn - Stalingrad! In your opinion, we are all Stalinists.
          1. Seed
            -12
            8 May 2013 16: 57
            Of course not. Stalinists are those who worship the beast and the tyrant, unnoticing all the troubles that he did.
            1. +9
              8 May 2013 18: 41
              Quote: Semenich
              Of course not. Stalinists are those who worship the beast and the tyrant, unnoticing all the troubles that he did.

              - the raspberry berry climbed into the teddy bear laughing I love those! Today I registered, I think, got into a raspberry, I’ll set the path true, liberal laughing
              My dear man, what did Stalin do to you? Got into my soul? So go, if you did it, then you’ve improved your soul laughing for before the aforementioned operation things were kept in the soul much more sickening and toxic. And why lie? You write that you live in Moscow, the Belarusian flag ... I see you still poop and poop in your soul, and only then wash it laughing Well, nothing, I can assure you that it will be unpleasant for you, then you will like it. Remember, when liberals accustomed you to tolerance for blue, it was also unpleasant for you, your ass was ill, and now nothing, you can see from the peppy voice that you’ve probably gotten into it laughing
              Well, here we have a present for your point, you will like it - such a large screw on the left thread
              1. +3
                8 May 2013 18: 59
                Quote: Semenich
                In my opinion, the situation needs to be addressed. The Syrian people are dying in a war that still knows how long it lasts, so you need a Yugoslav scenario. Need Russia

                As one of the members of the forum once said somewhere - "your words need to be Poured in granite!", To which the other replied - "In, how! Granite turns out to be pouring!" lol So think, Semenych, what to do with your words ... I think it’s more correct to screw them together with the bolt about which AKSAKAL writes and where AKSAKAL points. The very place.
            2. uzbek
              +3
              8 May 2013 18: 41
              Quote: Semenich
              Of course not. Stalinists are those who worship the beast and the tyrant, unnoticing all the troubles that he did.

              What did he do? Just without demagoguery answer the question?
            3. +3
              8 May 2013 19: 52
              Quote: Semenich
              Of course not. Stalinists are those who worship the beast and the tyrant, unnoticing all the troubles that he did.

              Are you talking about the Pentagon?
    3. -1
      8 May 2013 17: 42
      You, sir, are not ours ........
    4. +1
      8 May 2013 19: 59
      Quote: Semenich
      In my opinion, the situation needs to be addressed. The Syrian people are dying in a war that still knows how long it lasts, so you need a Yugoslav scenario.


      It is necessary to call a spade a spade. American mercenaries with the support of the Israeli Air Force destroy Syria. The Syrian people will stop dying exactly on the day when dollars cease to flow from the US to the terrorists. And the point. Further, the Syrian government will figure it out without help.
    5. RUSSIA 2013
      +1
      8 May 2013 20: 52
      Quote: Semenich
      In my opinion, the situation needs to be addressed. The Syrian people are dying in a war that still knows how long it lasts, so you need a Yugoslav scenario. It is necessary that Russia, the USA and NATO countries gather a normal contingent and work from the air through the Asad military commissar. The same Israelis lightly broke through the air defense a couple of days ago. Ah, dreams.

      You are not a fool, Russia needs to urgently help Assad, in military equipment, for example, urgently put in an air defense system, c300, Iran to send volunteers well, I think 30-40 thousand, the Security Council in the person of Russia and China should make clear the position of our countries on Syria’s account .
  5. +11
    8 May 2013 16: 02
    Secretary of State Carrie met with Putin and Lavrov. The official result is an international conference on Syria in late May. My opinion is that the results will be zero, if at all. It seems that Russia simply paid attention, pretended to consult with it and help to resolve the conflict. All this after the strike of the Israeli Air Force and, with such a hunch, on the eve of new events that are already outlined by this whole gang.
    1. wax
      0
      8 May 2013 23: 04
      This meeting was not a passing one. A year after the Geneva agreement, Americans are forced to return to it. The reason was Putin’s decisive stance. The press conference should not be read, but watch, everything is visible there. And in chemistry, the amers agreed to work with ours, which is a clear step forward.
  6. optimist
    -3
    8 May 2013 16: 25
    It is sad, but nothing in Russia depends on ANYTHING ... The masons of Assad, as well as Milosevic, Hussein, Mubarak and Gaddafi will crush \\\\ We must pay tribute to these freaks: they achieve their concrete and consistent. The whole question is only in time and price ...
    1. +4
      8 May 2013 16: 56
      Russia plays a dominant role. This is the revival of Russia from the Gorbachev-Yeltsin plebeianism. It was not Medvedev who went to the states to solve the Syrian issue, but Carrie granted Putin. They piss into Syria because they are afraid of Soviet / Russian weapons, they are afraid of Russia's response.
      1. +1
        9 May 2013 00: 50
        How I want it to be so and become! But, taking into account the experience of other countries, my forecast is pessimistic. Although the fact that Syria has been holding on for quite some time inspires certain hopes. I sincerely wish them Victory!
    2. +3
      8 May 2013 23: 32
      I have a question for the respected public and gentlemen of the moderators - since when has the word "Jew" become a curse and why this word is constantly crossed out. damn, I just wrote "Jew" and not "Jew"
    3. annenkov242
      0
      9 May 2013 07: 20
      Quote: optimist
      It is sad, but nothing in Russia depends on ANYTHING ... The masons of Assad, as well as Milosevic, Hussein, Mubarak and Gaddafi will crush \\\\ We must pay tribute to these freaks: they achieve their concrete and consistent. The whole question is only in time and price ...

      Pessimism came from an optimist. what
      There is a Russian Spirit and Freemasons only have a bolt, Victory is always in truth, and therefore can not be overcome by it. And whom you called, they themselves wanted this, do not be a prostitute, in this difficult historical time!
  7. +2
    8 May 2013 16: 28
    Quote: Vadivak
    ... Well, that the Americans are capable of destroying, we know that, if they could manage the situation in an hour, I would bow to them first

    +1

    They would show the whole world at least one such positive example!
  8. Genady1976
    +9
    8 May 2013 16: 56
    Israel resembles fascist Germany
    1. RUSSIA 2013
      +3
      8 May 2013 20: 55
      Quote: Genady1976
      Israel resembles fascist Germany

      yes, I’m arguing, Israel has recently been pursuing a policy of seizing and occupying a number of lands, but all this thanks to the support of the United States, that is, the DEVIL empire.
  9. Artmark
    +1
    8 May 2013 17: 19
    I think the Syrians need all kinds of support hi
    1. RUSSIA 2013
      +4
      8 May 2013 21: 01
      urgently. air defense systems S-300.


      “I want to talk about a very interesting conversation that took place yesterday between our Prime Minister in China [Netanyahu] and Vladimir Putin. I personally did not eavesdrop on this conversation, but the Russian side was interested in its leak. The conversation was very difficult. As far as I know, in this conversation it was said that Russia will not allow either the United States, Israel or other states, meaning Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, to overthrow President Assad and that Israel cut it well on her nose. And that in response to this kind of operation [an Israeli strike on Syria], the delivery of the latest Russian military equipment, which includes S-300 and Iskander missiles, will begin in the coming hours, ”said an Israeli expert.



      Since the Syrian calculations have already been trained in Russia to service the S-300 installations, the installations will be deployed in combat formations as soon as possible, since the air bridge between Russia and Syria works around the clock and Russian observers are helping the Syrians. Plus, plus Putin, before that I wrote FRIENDS, so if the truth is, WE DO NOT BUILD SYRIA.
  10. +2
    8 May 2013 17: 21
    Spanish Civil War = Syrian Civil War. Prolongation follows.
    1. RUSSIA 2013
      0
      9 May 2013 08: 20
      Quote: FC Skiff
      Spanish Civil War = Syrian Civil War. Prolongation follows.

      Yes, of course, it does not bring the war to good. But if we now bring Syria together, all these dogs will be in our kovkaz.
  11. MAG
    0
    8 May 2013 17: 25
    With all my desire for Assad to last longer for 3 months, this is the maximum! In this war, now no one has the advantage of power equal Jews balance swing towards the opposition and they swing they do not stop half way. The militants are slowly destroying the air defense that is and it was one of their main tasks, and then everything is just air defense violated air strikes where the militants need help (Libya)! More than half of his chemical weapons are no longer destroyed by both Jews and specialists from Turkey, the United States and Arabs. Assad will be destroyed not sadly, and the remnants of his army, which is what the Jews need — why should the organized Syrian army make it easier for Jews to fight a bunch of terrorists and the question of occupying the Golan Heights will disappear
  12. IgWest
    0
    8 May 2013 17: 31
    By the way, Belarus through O is written. And in general - Belarus. [/ Quote]
    When there is nothing to cover, the search for grammatical errors begins. For information, in the Russian language, both “Belarus” and “Belarus” are correct
  13. EDA2000
    +1
    8 May 2013 17: 37
    Syria and Syrians are now long out of this situation.
    1. Seed
      -6
      8 May 2013 17: 43
      That is why I propose a quick and painless solution.
  14. Belogor
    0
    8 May 2013 17: 45
    Quote: orff
    Not Medvedev went to the states to solve the Syrian issue


    There is a problem here. The Prime Minister is not involved in foreign policy, he does not have such authority, this is the presidential prerogative
    1. 0
      8 May 2013 22: 11
      Medvedev with the same success can go to barbecue. Medvedev’s goal is different, but he simply doesn’t have an agreement on Syria, the talker.
  15. 0
    8 May 2013 18: 04
    So they will figure it out, do not worry gentlemen Democrats !!!! The mustache will be in order. Hapnut you scum of grief over the Syrian people!
  16. Regis
    0
    8 May 2013 18: 07
    Unfortunately, the Jews won't let the Syrians "figure it out for themselves"
  17. 0
    8 May 2013 18: 18
    He remembered the old joke, he really was about amers, well, I'll remake a bit:
    After the celebration of May 9, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces asks: “Who threw the boot on the console yesterday?
  18. Irtysh
    0
    8 May 2013 18: 44
    Quote: Semenich
    Of course not. Stalinists are those who worship the beast and the tyrant, unnoticing all the troubles that he did.

    Is it better for Obama, the Nobel laureate, to worship?
  19. +3
    8 May 2013 18: 44
    Quote: Semenich
    I offer a quick and painless solution

    To bomb innocent people is what you write about? Yes, after that you are CATTLE! It’s a pity it’s not interesting to name.
    1. annenkov242
      0
      9 May 2013 07: 38
      Quote: Olegovi4
      Quote: Semenich
      I offer a quick and painless solution

      To bomb innocent people is what you write about? Yes, after that you are CATTLE! It’s a pity it’s not interesting to name.

      Slow down, do not offend the LIVESTOCK, imagine a cow, and you equate this "offended descendant" with her. This is not the case. He's just - "gay in life", or just a ritualistic stench.
  20. +3
    8 May 2013 18: 45
    slain the ass from the ass, forgot Jewish muzzles? now see what they’re doing ... the people of Israel should protest against such actions, since the government has gone crazy. Otherwise, let’s not wait for help in 3 meat grinders.
  21. +3
    8 May 2013 18: 50
    Cunning Jews do not act cunningly if the Assad is overthrown ... radical Islamists come, establish a caliphate ... scrape through the guts in Syria in Israel and wither ..... without hesitation recently a chem. guns were used by the militants, they will still find them and their hand will not flinch again ... only by then the enemy can change ..... how many Jews in the east of the United States have already gathered up potential friends ... and how can they sleep? not scary?
  22. +2
    8 May 2013 20: 45
    In Syria, there is not only a civil war, in Syria, the intervention of all bandits against all disagreeing. A kind of "wild geese" from all over the world flock at the call of the Saudi-Qatari financiers at the behest of the US intelligence services and their Western satellites. If the question was about a showdown among the Syrians, then the authorities of B. Assad would simply not allow confrontation.
  23. gremlin1977
    -4
    8 May 2013 22: 08
    But Nitsche is so komenty, only all this is crap. Syri Nehru help with all sorts of complexes. They want to get-pay. You want help-pay. Have already won this friendship for free, you already have bare asses. But bargaining with yusovtsy for Syria is possible and necessary Suddenly, what a sweetie will break off in the form of compensation.
    1. +1
      9 May 2013 03: 16
      But bargaining with yusovtsy for Syria is possible and necessary, all of a sudden, what a sweetie will break off in the form of compensation.
      Mastakok however you collect candy when the question is about the life and fate of a whole nation. Not at all friends with your head?
  24. 0
    8 May 2013 22: 39
    "Let the Syrians themselves understand"

    And where were you so smart ("very smart") yesterday, the day before yesterday? Syria is winning not only the states, but much more. Syria, in terms of the state, turned out to be more wealthy than the Russian government (made a reservation, I apologize for Medvedev). And Medvedev's government should not put a two, but a crossbar.
  25. gremlin1977
    0
    8 May 2013 22: 55
    And apparently not smarter than you, because also on the Internet and not on barricades. Or add what you want.
  26. Saraev
    0
    8 May 2013 23: 10
    The peasants are dying every day, but not how they will not calm down.
    1. +1
      8 May 2013 23: 26
      what the fuck peasants? these are thugs. let them die in batches!
  27. wax
    0
    8 May 2013 23: 15
    Where are the Zionists today? Somehow boring without their aplomb.
  28. 0
    8 May 2013 23: 54
    GDP gave Bashar a couple of weeks to take as many territories as possible, then there will be tiresome (for everyone) negotiations. And where are our friends today (who are not "goyim")? It would be interesting to hear from them
    1. The comment was deleted.
  29. WW3
    WW3
    +2
    9 May 2013 01: 44
    "Let the Syrians themselves understand"

    Class name. Scum from all over the world, generously supplied with weapons from Western democracies, are fighting for the "opposition", what kind of "Syrians" are there?
  30. Andrey44
    +1
    9 May 2013 02: 25
    It seems that the Syrians, i.e. Our Syrians, having changed their tactics, began to defeat the bandit formations - that is, to beat the "freedom-loving forces." And then the Israelis suddenly remembered the supply of missiles from Iraq to Hezbollah. We understand this, we also understand why they hit from abroad (like from the territory of Lebanon), but what? does the Syrian army have such quality air defense? Why, according to the agreement on cooperation and mutual assistance, our Federation cannot supply the legitimate government of the Syrian Arab Republic with appropriate weapons, or is it technically difficult?
  31. Andrey44
    0
    9 May 2013 02: 25
    It seems that the Syrians, i.e. Our Syrians, having changed their tactics, began to defeat the bandit formations - that is, to beat the "freedom-loving forces." And then the Israelis suddenly remembered the supply of missiles from Iraq to Hezbollah. We understand this, we also understand why they hit from abroad (like from the territory of Lebanon), but what? does the Syrian army have such quality air defense? Why, according to the agreement on cooperation and mutual assistance, our Federation cannot supply the legitimate government of the Syrian Arab Republic with appropriate weapons, or is it technically difficult?
  32. +1
    9 May 2013 03: 05
    It would not be bad if the Syrians would knock down at least one Israeli fighter, then they would immediately quiet down like the Turks. What do ours supply them with, that they don’t even have Damascus covered? If true, the words of GDP on accelerating the supply of S-300 and Iskander, then this is of course a big plus.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"