A toothless law is a path to the abyss

22 744 212
A toothless law is a path to the abyss

How often do we hope we've hit rock bottom and won't fall again? But almost immediately, a knock comes from below: "Hello, here we are with two rubles."

Unlike the "rightists," who are essentially no different from the Nazis, I don't support the slogan "Russia is only for Russians." After all, when our country was the Russian Empire, and then the Soviet Union, the country's power was built, among other things, on the idea that our strength lies in unity. Yes, the Russian Empire had the term "inorodets," and there were social and other barriers, but even then, people of other, non-Slavic nationalities could achieve career heights and recognition in science and art.



The Soviet Union, having declared the equality of all peoples, didn't simply issue a declaration; it actively promoted the development of healthy forces within each nation. Suffice it to say that many nations, for the first time in their history, acquired their own written language, elected their representatives to government positions, and many gained the opportunity to realize their potential in science, technology, art, medicine, and so on.

At that time, friendship between peoples was not an empty phrase. Tens and hundreds of thousands of people who died for our Motherland are silent witnesses to that time. Representatives of various peoples of the USSR nominated for the title of Hero of the Soviet Union are also a vivid testimony of that time.

But time is merciless. After the betrayal perpetrated by Yeltsin, Shushkevich, and Kravchuk, the West, inspired by its success, set itself the task of dismantling Russia as well, dismantling it into nationalist quarters, where everyone would slaughter everyone else simply because they were different, of a different faith, of a different nationality. People of my generation well remember the end of the "holy" 90s and the early 2000s, when the North Caucasus was ablaze. And yet, back then, the bet was placed precisely on ruthless nationalism and anti-communism. Inspired by the West, nationalists were eager to crush Russia with their nationalist fervor. That time, it didn't work.

But the West never gives up. If they could find Yeltsin, then they can find others willing to continue his legacy for a box of cookies and a barrel of jam. A prime example is Ukraine, where the descendants of the surviving Banderites seized power. Who did they immediately turn their hatred on? That's right! On the Russians. Not the Hungarians, not the Crimean Tatars, but specifically the Russians. The authorities of Moldova, Georgia, the Baltics, and the Central Asian countries behave in exactly the same way. The Russians have always been and will always be to blame!

Has all this taught our authorities a lesson? No! Let's recall how Vladimir Abdualievich Vasiliev, the leader of the United Russia faction in the State Duma, stated the following, among other things, in his final year-end interview with Rossiya 2 about the work of the State Duma in general and the activities of United Russia in particular:

The issue of migration. A difficult one. It arose as a simple solution to a complex situation. The threat of terrorism. The threat of instability in the Central Asian states. Our allied duty, our fraternal relations, opened the door to migrants, so they could somehow channel this volatile youth environment to us.

Wonderful! Simply wonderful! Everyone knows what we got in the end. News That migrants killed a Russian there, raped a Russian woman there, beat someone there, robbed someone there, there... there... there... There's probably not a single article of the criminal code that migrants haven't violated in their efforts to destroy the Russian people. And all because the toothless government allows it. Those at the top have forgotten that the East understands only strength. Kindness, for them, is a sign of weakness.

Take Qatar or the UAE, for example. The migrant population there reaches 90 percent. And they're all Muslim. Do they allow themselves to do what they easily do in Russia? The devil knows! Can you imagine what would happen if a visiting Uzbek or Tajik raped a local woman? That's exactly it.

Here's an example: a UAE court has ruled in a murder case, an exceptional emergency and a severe blow to the image of a country that had established itself as a nation of reform and progress. Six Uzbek citizens have been sentenced to death for their participation in the massacre. A Dubai court has handed down a verdict in the case of a clash that occurred in April 2025. In addition to the six death sentences, another participant in the incident received a life sentence. According to local media, the verdict was announced on January 22 in an open court hearing. How do you like that, good citizens?

But in Russia, you can do whatever you want. We ourselves declared an open-door policy: come here, whoever wants, do whatever you want. If worst comes to worst, you can always leave, and nothing will happen to you. There are no extraditions from the Don.

What prompted me to write this article? Two outrageous incidents, one of which occurred recently in Elektrostal, where a Tajik stabbed a Russian man to death, and the other in St. Petersburg, where migrant security guards at the City Mall shopping center killed a teenager. They killed him without reason, simply because one of them thought he'd stolen something. They strangled him in front of indifferent passersby and customers. Watching the video, you can see how casually and simply three bandits murder a man before their eyes. Such a thing could only be seen during the fascist years. But it turns out it's happening in our time, too.

Why is this happening? The answer is simple: the government must be strict and strong. Any sign of leniency will be seen as weakness, as permission to do whatever the heart desires. Given a suspended sentence for robbery? So, it's safe to continue robbing. Six months for the murder of a Russian? So, it's time to arm ourselves and start killing.

You'll say I'm exaggerating? Fine. So what about the case of State Duma deputy Mikhail Matveyev, who was attacked by migrants with the intent to kill him? The investigation determined precisely that: attempted murder. But Judge Tatyana Kerosirova acquitted the migrants who smashed the State Duma deputy's head.

As a result of the verdict, the aggressive migrants were exonerated of criminal liability and released from prison. What conclusions do you think the migrants drew? The "dura lex – sed lex" principle doesn't work in Russia. And until it does, regardless of nationality, true lawlessness will continue.

And, as a small bonus, I suggest you read the material about how things stand with law enforcement in Belarus. Law in Belarus We could learn from Batka. Maybe we'll see a workforce of indigenous people emerge, and the streets will be calmer.
212 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +45
    28 January 2026 03: 08
    At that time, friendship between peoples was not an empty phrase.
    Despite all this, the Central Asians lived and worked in THEIR OWN republics of the USSR.

    We ourselves declared an open door policy: come here, whoever wants, do whatever you want.
    We - who is this? What kind of WE?!
    1. +46
      28 January 2026 03: 31
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      We - who is this? What kind of WE?!

      When it comes to managing money, it's me; when it comes to managing responsibility, it's us...
      1. +19
        28 January 2026 03: 59
        Quote: Puncher
        When it comes to managing money, it's me; when it comes to managing responsibility, it's us...

        This most likely doesn't apply to the author of the article, but how much longer can you shoulder the blame for someone else's guilt, or even criminal intent?
        1. +22
          28 January 2026 04: 09
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Quote: Puncher
          When it comes to managing money, it's me; when it comes to managing responsibility, it's us...

          This most likely doesn't apply to the author of the article, but how much longer can you shoulder the blame for someone else's guilt, or even criminal intent?

          Of course. This is a technique used by those in power.
          1. +5
            28 January 2026 19: 52
            The author of the article cannot seem to move away from the Marxist-Leninist dogma of "PROLETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM" at the expense of the Russian people, even though the USSR and the socialist system have long since vanished. Capitalism reigns, but the consumerism of the former Soviet republics toward Russia and the Russian people remains. Specifically,

            The development of SOVIET Russia, the world's first socialist state, was twofold - controversial - in nature.
            On the one hand, the Russian people, who believed in the communist idea of ​​the Bolshevik-Leninists, and, being the bearer of the sovereign mentality, on all fronts of social construction really created socialism within the framework of the whole country as their entire multinational Motherland. In fact, as the historically most numerous state-forming and sovereign people of the Russian Empire, he had no other choice but to do so. But at the same time, on the other side, in the former tsarist national outskirts, where feudal relations still prevailed and there was no national proletariat, power from the Bolshevik-Leninists and under their control received the petty national bourgeoisie and former local feudal lords. The national industry was already being built by the hands of the Russian and Russian-speaking peoples. Wherein everything that was really created national during the years of Soviet power in the once backward tsarist national outskirts - the national republics - is only the local national party and Soviet bureaucracy, as well as the national creative intelligentsia serving it (social scientists, writers, artists, etc.). This national party and Soviet intelligentsia objectively retained the national bourgeois-feudal mentality not only in relation to their own working people, but also in relation to the Russians who came to “hunch on them” up to the time of the so-called Gorbachev “new thinking”.

            Thus, national problems in the Soviet Union were not only
            from the very beginning of Soviet power, but also in relation to the Russian people
            National-bourgeois class character. The bourgeois coup d'état in the USSR in 1991, on the whole, merely brought to the surface the national-bourgeois deformations that had already been present during the construction of socialism in Russia, dating back to the Grand October Socialist Revolution of 1917 and the formation of the USSR in 1922, which the Soviet leadership tried to keep under wraps.

            The question arises: representatives of what nationality were they originally and in
            the period of "perestroika" led this process of liberal (bourgeois) departure
            from the model of classical socialism and why? Are there many "at the top" among
            Were the next liberal "reformers" of Russian history in the last century ethnic Russians? In whose national interests were the economic reforms carried out?
            "Reforms" in the USSR, based on CIA manuals and IMF recommendations, resulted in Russians in a state of apartheid in the former Soviet republics?
            In whose national hands did the country's wealth end up as a result?
            Gaidar-Chubais "privatization" in the Russian Federation and which nationality was predominant in the Russian oligarchy?
            1. +5
              29 January 2026 10: 51
              This state no longer exists and, unfortunately, it never will... but we have what we have - we are now a capitalist country, and not even a first-tier one at that...
            2. +1
              3 February 2026 19: 41
              The oligarchy and the authorities are Jews. This is no secret. The same nationality carried out the bourgeois coup d'état. All the national union republics were and are being used by them to further the interests of the clan oligarchy.
              You need to write specifically your full name, nationality, position, and a detailed biography, where you came from, and whose protégé you are.
      2. +31
        28 January 2026 04: 12
        So that they could do this explosive youth environment somehow channel it to us.
        He says outright that they are bringing in terrorists and troublemakers...
      3. +15
        28 January 2026 15: 07
        Vladimir Abdualievich Vasiliev, aka Alik Abdualievich Asanbaev, the leader of the United Russia faction in the State Duma, said, "Our allied duty and fraternal relations have opened the door to migrants. So that they can somehow channel this volatile youth environment to us."
        So, thanks to his efforts, among other things, they “channeled” and continue to “channel” into Russia, without thinking about control "Explosive" youth from the independent states of Central Asia, including ISIS supporters, Wahhabis, the Crocus City killers, and a host of criminals with families, have dramatically increased the rate of serious crime in Russia. So, perhaps instead of "sewering" migrants, he should admit his mistakes and change jobs?
    2. +9
      28 January 2026 08: 13
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      We - who is this? What kind of WE?!

      That's right, serfs don't have nationality.
      1. +19
        28 January 2026 08: 57
        Judge Tatyana Kerosirova acquitted the migrants who smashed the head of a State Duma deputy.
        And who are the judges? (C)
        Guests are rude because they are allow! Such judges, such law enforcement agencies, such legislators... Ask yourself - why are they doing this?
        A donkey loaded with gold will take any fortress! (A. Macedonian)
        1. +11
          28 January 2026 08: 58
          Quote: Good evil
          A donkey loaded with gold will take any fortress! (A. Macedonian)

          Philip of Macedonia, Alexander's pope, said)
          1. +3
            28 January 2026 09: 00
            So, dad was not a stupid man either! hi
    3. +6
      28 January 2026 10: 39
      We - who is this? What kind of WE?!


      +.
      Dear Vladimir.
      You asked interesting questions.

      Most Russian citizens should ask themselves these questions before the next elections, which will take place on Single Voting Day, September 18–20, 2026, and also reflect on M. Twain's words about elections.
      1. WIS
        +1
        31 January 2026 22: 52
        We - who is this? What kind of WE?!

        Quote: AA17
        Most Russian citizens should ask themselves these questions before the next elections, which will be held on the Single Voting Day, September 18-20, 2026.

        Russian citizens are now being deprived of the right to freely choose and receive information at their own discretion.
        The authorities have long ago determined and are deciding how far the democrat has grown and what to push away from him.
        What kind of rights and choice are we even talking about here?
    4. +5
      28 January 2026 14: 08
      Dear Vladimir! I took the liberty of writing "WE," because who, if not us, elects the government? Even those who don't vote also elect the government, since the government takes their uncast votes for itself. So, we are all responsible for what happens. You may agree, or you may not. I simply expressed my opinion.
      1. +9
        28 January 2026 16: 34
        Quote: roosei
        So we are all responsible for what happens.

        Well, certainly not those of us who have been voting for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation since 97. Not because we are devout communists, but because the others are clearly and guaranteed to be worse for Russia.
      2. +2
        29 January 2026 17: 45
        Quote: roosei
        Even those who do not go to the polls also choose the government, since the government takes their uncast votes for itself.

        Listen, aren't you tired of this campaign to legitimize a show called "elections" by ensuring voter turnout?
        Have you seen the ballot lately? Where's the "against all" box, or are you suggesting voting for any other proxy party that will ultimately drain your vote or divert it to the ruling party, like what happened with the presidential candidates? laughing
        In the US, for example, did the "beacons of democracy" even allow anyone other than two parties to participate in the elections?
        Just listen to the gray hairs of a writer respected throughout the world:
        "If elections were to be anything to go by, we would not be allowed to participate in them." Mark Twain.
      3. +1
        31 January 2026 22: 24
        I took the liberty of writing WE, because who, if not we, choose the government?
        Do you need Power, or do you need Order? That's the first thing we need to decide. And secondly, that guy in St. Petersburg was still firing a gas pistol before force was used against him.
        And the most important thing - People are treated exactly as they personally allow themselves to be treated. Chechnya and Dagestan also have a significant number of migrants from Central Asia working on construction sites. Have you ever heard or seen news about any incidents involving migrants in those areas? Is there a migrant problem there? Is there any discontent among the local population towards the newcomers? Do you have any defense?
  2. +36
    28 January 2026 03: 40
    Well, the issue here (concerning accountability for actions) lies with law enforcement and the judiciary. If the Ministry of Internal Affairs is incapable of preventing migrant crimes, then perhaps its internal problems should be addressed? Why are there so many big stars and stripes in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, yet there's no one left to work? What about the judiciary? Some argue that if all the judges were arrested and their offices searched, the budget would be in surplus. The decisions made by judges are often astonishing, as exemplified by (oh, God, I didn't mean to mention it...) Dolina. She's certainly an impudent woman and doesn't evoke positive emotions, but like any Russian citizen, she has the right to go to court with any heresy scrawled on the sly by a drunken law student. But why does a judge uphold such claims without bearing any responsibility? Why have people been seething for years, cursing Dolina, when they should be cursing the one who ruled in her favor? Maybe that's why judges justify migrant crimes?
    1. +26
      28 January 2026 06: 54
      Maybe that's why judges justify migrants' crimes?
      Maybe because judges are not subject to jurisdiction, that's why they do whatever they want, "for a small share," although it is very considerable.
      1. -5
        28 January 2026 07: 42
        Quote: Alexey 1970
        Maybe because judges are not subject to jurisdiction

        Well, not exactly beyond the pale. They also make headlines...
        Quote: Alexey 1970
        That's why they do whatever they want, "for a small share," although it is very considerable.

        Migrant cases are very high-profile and widely reported online. It's easy to get into trouble. If... If they don't cover it up at a high level. So, given the choice between taking money from local shopkeepers trying to extort their own money and risking their job because some deputy will try to make a big deal out of it and tell the applicant to go to hell, they'll likely choose the latter, because they won't end up poor.
      2. +19
        28 January 2026 09: 56
        I remember someone working in the police wrote here on VO that when a crime involves migrants, their relatives immediately contact the "diaspora," and this "diaspora" immediately uses various levers of influence to influence the investigation and exonerate the accused. "Diaspora" groups are the main evil.
        1. +8
          28 January 2026 19: 03
          Monster_Fat (What's the Difference), but by your logic, a corrupt police officer, a corrupt prosecutor, and a corrupt judge aren't the most important evils? Uh-huh...
          1. +2
            29 January 2026 11: 05
            Quote: Tests
            Monster_Fat (What's the Difference), but by your logic, a corrupt police officer, a corrupt prosecutor, and a corrupt judge aren't the most important evils? Uh-huh...

            and would they exist without diasporas?
            1. 0
              29 January 2026 12: 35
              Second-level advisor (Nikolai), sir, there are districts, cities, towns, and villages where there are no diasporas. Outsiders don't walk or drive there. But there are corrupt police officers, corrupt prosecutors, corrupt judges, even corrupt forest rangers, corrupt heads of municipal enterprises, and corrupt heads of administrations.
              1. +2
                29 January 2026 13: 25
                Quote: Tests
                But there are corrupt police officers, corrupt prosecutors, corrupt judges, even corrupt foresters, corrupt heads of municipal enterprises and corrupt heads of administrations.

                What you're talking about is called corruption, and it doesn't depend on the diaspora... I'm not defending it... I'm just trying to look at the root cause...
            2. +3
              29 January 2026 14: 42
              and would they exist without diasporas?

              It's one thing when they have an organized system on their side, with connections, finances, legal cover, and media coverage, but quite another when they find themselves face-to-face with investigative bodies and the justice system. That's what "diasporas" are. Got it?
              1. 0
                29 January 2026 15: 12
                Quote: Monster_Fat
                It's one thing when they have an organized system on their side, with connections, finances, legal cover, and media coverage, but quite another when they find themselves face-to-face with investigative bodies and the justice system. That's what "diasporas" are. Got it?

                so the first evil is corruption, not the diaspora...
                1. 0
                  29 January 2026 17: 21
                  Well, you're unlucky with your people, where do corrupt people come from... Corrupt people... Unlucky...
                  1. 0
                    29 January 2026 23: 06
                    Monster_Fat (What's the Difference), sir, we're lucky with the people, but with admirals and generals, it's a different story. They say Oleg Aleksandrovich Tregubov was a fine cadet and a brilliant submarine officer, serving the USSR and the Russian Federation with honor. But Vice-Admiral Oleg Aleksandrovich Tregubov, commander of the White Sea Naval Base, is a criminal; the housing issue has ruined more than just Muscovites. And Vice-Admiral Oleg Aleksandrovich Tregubov, a deputy of the Arkhangelsk Regional Council and former commander of the White Sea Naval Base, is a criminal. His connections have already weakened since he retired. It was much easier for military counterintelligence officers to push military investigators to open a criminal case against him and bring the case to a verdict; fuel is always at a premium. As for Azerbaijanis, as commander of the White Sea Naval Base, Comrade Tregubov's primary contacts were with Hero of Russia David Guseynovich Pashayev, the director of SEVMASH. Not at all with the diaspora.
                    1. 0
                      30 January 2026 09: 33
                      That's what I'm talking about - we're unlucky with the people - where are the corrupt ones just crawling out from? Or are all these corrupt, corrupt officials, and other "unworthy" people being parachuted into the Russian Federation by the US and the EU and placed right into leadership and management positions? winked
    2. 0
      31 January 2026 22: 29
      If the Ministry of Internal Affairs is incapable of preventing migrant crimes, then perhaps its internal problems should be addressed? Why are there so many big stars and stripes in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, yet no one is working?
      There's a physical shortage of frontline staff. There's no one to really do the work "on the ground." Ask your friends for a tour of the site. Little has been done for the people there. They still remember with nostalgia the quarantine era, when most of the restless citizens sat at home, doing who knows what.
  3. +2
    28 January 2026 04: 37
    Our government fears Russian nationalism! And continues Lenin's policy of Russian chauvinism!
    1. +3
      28 January 2026 08: 00
      Vladimir Ilyich told you about this himself? There's no need to put such nonsense on public display!
    2. +3
      28 January 2026 14: 10
      What nonsense is this? My dear fellow, have you ever read any of Lenin's works? Or are you, like in that phrase, "I haven't read it, but I condemn it?"
      1. +1
        28 January 2026 15: 40
        Do you want me to quote Lenin's speeches and essays? Communists can be surprisingly blind when it comes to their beloved messiah.
  4. +19
    28 January 2026 04: 49
    There's a concept called statistics, which Mark Twain wrote about so caustically. So, for the sake of statistics, foreigners can be granted citizenship. To improve demographics. For officials, it doesn't matter who accepts citizenship. After all, nationality hasn't been included in passports for a long time. Americans don't have nationality, yet we so desire to be like them. All of this is very dangerous for our country.
  5. +8
    28 January 2026 05: 30
    Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
    So, for the sake of statistics, they can grant citizenship to foreigners. To correct demographics.
    And also to get voters' votes
    1. 0
      28 January 2026 09: 24
      Quote: Schneeberg
      And also to get voters' votes

      Made laugh laughing
  6. +13
    28 January 2026 05: 37
    The idea that Russia is for Russians is, of course, incorrect, erroneous, and unacceptable. But the paragraph in the country's Constitution that the Russian nation is a state-forming nation, and that Russians have sacrificed their physical and intellectual strength for a thousand years to create this Russian state around the Russian nation, to shelter other tribes and peoples within it—this should have been written into the country's Constitution. They didn't, and now here we are, bearing the fruits...
    1. +15
      28 January 2026 05: 48
      [quote]The thesis that Russia is for Russians[quote] does not at all mean that only Russians should live in Russia. But that all newcomers, visitors, should not forget where they are.
      1. +8
        28 January 2026 07: 20
        Quote: Uncle Sam_2
        that Russia is for Russians


        I remember going down the escalator in the metro about 15 years ago, and three people coming up the stairs were chanting, "Russia for Russians. Moscow for Muscovites." I was genuinely surprised by the latter. Where in Moscow can you find Muscovites for even one district? And in 25 years, I've only met one native Muscovite (my mom and dad were also born in Moscow). And he was a Tatar.
        1. +3
          28 January 2026 10: 09
          Quote from kromer
          Where in Moscow can I find Muscovites for at least one district?
          So, soon it will be possible to say where to find Russians in Russia... In Soviet times, passports listed nationality, but you could choose it, and many people wanted to be Russian. That's the problem: being Russian is losing its prestige now. The question is, why? Perhaps, to live in Russia, everyone must first become Russian, and only then anything else, as in the case of a small homeland or a "minor" nationality.
        2. +3
          28 January 2026 19: 09
          Quote from kromer
          And in 25 years, I've only met one native Muscovite (my mom and dad were also born in Moscow). And he was a Tatar.

          Yes, a native Muscovite. I think I read something in Gilyarovsky about them being street cleaners, lots of them. And a lot of responsibility.
    2. +3
      28 January 2026 06: 08
      Quote: north 2
      But here is a paragraph in the Main Law of the country that the Russian nation is a state forming a nation and that the Russians have been laying on the altar for a thousand years

      Okay, we've contributed. So what next? What? practical will this make a difference?
      How to prove So, are you Russian? But if your grandfather is Tatar, or your grandmother is Polish, or your father is Uzbek, or great-great-great-great... Ethiopian, are you automatically not Russian?
      But if it’s based on “convictions, ideas,” then it’s not automatically provable!
      And there will be a problem with by-laws.
      1. +9
        28 January 2026 06: 19
        Quote: your1970
        How to prove that you are Russian?

        Go out into a wheat field in leather pants, a white shirt, with bleached hair and sing "I'm Russiiii ...
      2. +3
        28 January 2026 07: 27
        Quote: your1970
        Okay, we've contributed. So what next? What? practical will this make a difference?
        How to prove So, are you Russian? But if your grandfather is Tatar, or your grandmother is Polish, or your father is Uzbek, or great-great-great-great... Ethiopian, are you automatically not Russian?
        But if it’s based on “convictions, ideas,” then it’s not automatically provable!
        And there will be a problem with by-laws.


        There's a photo floating around the internet somewhere, but I can't find it now. It's a Soviet passport with a black man in it, and his nationality is Russian. I'm sure many of you have seen this photo.
        1. +3
          28 January 2026 08: 00
          Soviet passport with a black man in the photo and nationality: Russian.

          Yes, many of these dark-skinned comrades already speak pure Russian and swear no worse than the native population.
          1. +9
            28 January 2026 08: 05
            Quote: Dimy4
            Yes, many of these dark-skinned comrades already speak pure Russian and swear no worse than the native population.


            Yes. For example, the Sakhalin Koreans, whose grandparents were brought to Sakhalin by the Japanese as slaves. They don't speak Korean, they speak pure Russian with lots of swearing. Close your eyes and you'd never guess they were Korean.
        2. +2
          28 January 2026 11: 32
          Quote from kromer
          Quote: your1970
          Okay, we've contributed. So what next? What? practical will this make a difference?
          How to prove So, are you Russian? But if your grandfather is Tatar, or your grandmother is Polish, or your father is Uzbek, or great-great-great-great... Ethiopian, are you automatically not Russian?
          But if it’s based on “convictions, ideas,” then it’s not automatically provable!
          And there will be a problem with by-laws.


          There's a photo floating around the internet somewhere, but I can't find it now. It's a Soviet passport with a black man in it, and his nationality is Russian. I'm sure many of you have seen this photo.

          In the Saratov and Samara regions, among Kazakhs in the 1950s and 60s, Russian names were in fashion, so for example, Sergei Vasilyevich Bisengaliev is commonplace.
        3. +6
          28 January 2026 13: 40
          Quote from kromer
          Soviet passport with a black man in the photo and nationality: Russian.
          Instead of the black man, there's another interesting photo of a Soviet passport, this one featuring a very specific and well-known figure. I think that's a plus. Stalin also called himself Russian. Essentially, Russian is the most developed, informative, and multifaceted language. But English, with its animalistic "atavisms" of unintelligible sounds and the most obtuse grammar, has become not only international but a downright fetish. This is something you need to master. The fight for Russia and Russians must begin with popularizing the Russian language, the Russian speech. There's also a photo of another Soviet passport. This is something that should have been fought; it's good that "Siberian" or "Uralic" languages ​​didn't appear, nor did newly minted nationalities like "Ukrainian" or "Siberian" or "Uralets."
      3. +12
        28 January 2026 08: 01
        Quote: your1970
        . Ethiopian - you are automatically not Russian?
        Well, let's remember Pushkin, or Baklazhan from Zhmurki. We don't need to rewrite the Constitution, but rather ensure the implementation of existing laws.
        1. +4
          28 January 2026 15: 43
          Pushkin is 7/8 Russian, so why do you think he's Ethiopian? Are you a Nazi-Russophobe?
          1. -2
            28 January 2026 17: 40
            Pushkin has 7/8 Russian blood

            Blood is a fluid that performs a biological function in the body. Nationality is a set of cultural and everyday characteristics of a large group of people. Blood doesn't have nationality (nor does saliva, urine, gastric juice, etc.). All these attempts to assign some kind of biological basis to nationality are touching. Mythical haplogroups, for example. And, by the way, this is not such a harmless misconception. Nationality is a group of people by spirit, not by blood. You would be closer to approximately 300,000,000 Chinese by blood than to your own wife, because your wife has a different blood type.
            1. 0
              28 January 2026 20: 07
              Nonsense, ravings, a Soros-like manual for ex-Komsomol members. To understand this, just put 10 Chinese and 10 English people next to each other – and lo and behold, even someone as dumb as you won't be mistaken about who's who. And suddenly it turns out that a nation has its own physical dimensions. I'm saying communists = leftists = Sorosites. Everything is identical for you; you're all definitely of the same nationality.
              1. +4
                28 January 2026 23: 14
                Should I immediately be rude and label people? But that's always the first sign of a weak position.
                It's enough to put 10 Chinese and 10 English people next to each other

                If I showed you a photo of my class, you wouldn't be able to identify even half the ethnic composition. Can you tell a Pole from a German, from a Russian? Can you tell a Greek from an Azerbaijani? Come on! So many unidentified bodies have been found on city streets, but I've never heard of a single case of a cunning medical examiner determining a person's ethnicity.
                And suddenly it turns out that the nation has quite physical dimensions

                Well, yes. There were some examinations under the Austrian corporal. They measured noses and skulls.
                even a not very smart person like you

                Yes. The internet is like that! It's spawned so many heroes. Back then, you could only be rude to someone's face, so there weren't as many heroes.
              2. +1
                29 January 2026 10: 03
                And suddenly it turns out that the nation has quite physical dimensions
                Somewhere around here the Fuhrer is walking with his instruments for measuring skulls, breathing gently on your back
          2. +3
            28 January 2026 18: 35
            Kolya Roma(nova) has 1/200 Russian blood, but he was considered a Russian tsar.
      4. +1
        28 January 2026 08: 10
        How to prove that you are Russian?

        There you have it. It's precisely with statements like these that the current liberal revelry begins... From here begins the logical chain that leads us to destruction.
        1. -1
          28 January 2026 11: 39
          Quote: paul3390
          How to prove that you are Russian?

          There you have it. It's precisely with statements like these that the current liberal revelry begins... From here begins the logical chain that leads us to destruction.

          From what statements?
          If the Constitution will write separately about the Russian nation, then ALL laws are checked for compliance with the Constitution and allotment some nation will receive priority, which means - automatically - the need to prove it.
          And if the formula is declarative, then why is it being introduced, given that it would violate Article 16 of the Constitution on equality?
          1. +5
            28 January 2026 11: 47
            And here are yours. Let's try?

            Is there a 100% test for Russianness? No. That means no one can prove they're Russian. So, does that mean Russians don't exist? Consequently, Russia can't belong to a non-existent people; it belongs to all of humanity, and anyone can move here. Right? Should I continue?
            1. -2
              28 January 2026 12: 07
              Quote: paul3390
              And here are yours. Let's try?

              Is there a 100% test for Russianness? No. That means no one can prove they're Russian. So, does that mean Russians don't exist? Consequently, Russia can't belong to a non-existent people; it belongs to all of humanity, and anyone can move here. Right? Should I continue?

              Then ALL CLAIMS to citizens demanding that the following be added to the Constitution:
              Quote: north 2
              paragraph in the main law of the country, that the Russian nation is a state-forming nation and that the Russians for a thousand years have laid their physical and mental strength on the altar of history in order to create this Russian state around the Russian nation and to shelter other tribes and peoples in their state.


              Quote: paul3390
              Is there a 100% test for Russianness? No.
              - I know. When Kurds resettled here in the 1970s speak, you can't tell even if you close your eyes. Local Kazakhs, who lived in Russia for the entire 20th century, are sometimes more noticeable to the ear than Kurds.
              But the Kurds of the 1980s - from the village of Gavrilovka in the Osh region - are runners - they are more noticeable in speech, although they also learned the language in a Soviet school.
              Language immersion... That's how I learned Uzbek during my military service in the Soviet Army - there were 60 Uzbeks, 4 Kazakhs, and 3 Russians in the artillery reconnaissance battery.
              After a week you already understand, after two you speak...
              1. +1
                28 January 2026 12: 24
                ALL CLAIMS to citizens demanding to be included in the Constitution

                And they, unlike you, do not claim that Russians do not exist...
                1. +1
                  28 January 2026 12: 30
                  Quote: paul3390
                  ALL CLAIMS to citizens demanding to be included in the Constitution

                  And they, unlike you, do not claim that Russians do not exist...

                  Okay, let's write in the Constitution - "Russians are a nation that forms the state" and then what?
                  If this recording gives anything to Russians, then they need to prove their Russianness - which is what you were just outraged about. If it doesn't, then what is it there for?

                  And yes, I didn't say that "Russians don't exist." fool , the conversation was about legal side of this issue and the benefits for Russians of such a recording.
            2. -2
              28 January 2026 12: 19
              It belongs to the citizens who have a passport))) even if it is from Uzbekistan
              1. +2
                28 January 2026 12: 25
                As the old folk wisdom goes, they hit you not by your passport, but by your face...
                1. -2
                  28 January 2026 12: 27
                  Hit a tazhik and you'll get a prison sentence, that's why they don't hit you in the face anymore
            3. -2
              28 January 2026 21: 09
              Quote: paul3390
              Is there a 100% test for Russianness? No. So, no one can prove they're Russian. So, does that mean Russians don't exist?

              Philosopher! drinks There is no test for Jewishness. But there is a religion—Judaism—songs, fairy tales, music, legends, writing, customs, writers, musicians, and scientists who have glorified this people. All of this applies to the Russian people, too, only instead of Judaism, there is Orthodoxy. hi
          2. 0
            28 January 2026 15: 45
            You're just another liberal-minded individual. Almost ALL countries in the world easily define who is what. And only Russia can't figure out who is Russian. I'll tell you a secret – there is such a nationality. Can you identify a Finn? Or a German? So what's your problem with defining Russian? Lenin and Soros have ingrained themselves so deeply in your brain that you can't get out.
            1. 0
              28 January 2026 20: 00
              Quote from: newtc7
              And only the Russian Federation cannot understand who a Russian is)) I’ll tell you a secret - such a nationality exists.

              Is Stalin Russian?
              Is Vlasov Russian?
              Is Lenin Russian?
              Is Gorbachev Russian?
              Is Siyatvinda Russian?
              What is the nationality of Sergey Sergeevich Sergey and Serik Berikkalievich - my friends?
              Are the Germans expelled from Poland and Kaliningrad in 1945 Germans? What about the Germans in the GDR? And if a German's grandmother is Turkish, is he German?
              And Vasily Petrovich Ivanov - if he lives in Yakutia - what is his nationality?
              Let's not talk about Americans - 1/3 of them don't know English. lol lol
              Ah, Finns... - it's true that the Swedes frolicked there for 3 centuries - like our Tatars - but that's okay - you can immediately recognize a Finn!!
              1. +1
                28 January 2026 20: 05
                That's exactly what I'm talking about. A clear example of how logic is deliberately distorted to destroy an entire nation. You're a Russophobe-Nazi. But I'm Russian, my father is Russian, my mother is Russian, my children are Russian, and most of the people I know are Russian. Gorbachev, by the way, was also Russian, and Stalin was Georgian. Now that's news! ))) You're probably never hearing that Stalin was Georgian. Lenin wasn't Russian; he had German-Jewish roots, and I think he was Chuvash on his mother's side, but I don't care who he was. Being a bureaucrat in your head without actually being one is a disaster.
                1. +1
                  28 January 2026 20: 37
                  Quote from: newtc7
                  so - I am Russian, my father is Russian, my mother is Russian,

                  And your great-great-grandfather? And who is your family tree in the 18th century?
                  Are you sure about them - considering that you most likely don't know them?

                  Quote from: newtc7
                  Most of the people I know are Russian.
                  but at the same time, somewhere around 1/8 of the Russian population has relatives in Ukraine...

                  And yes, you didn't answer the question.
                  Quote: your1970
                  And Vasily Petrovich Ivanov - if he lives in Yakutia - what is his nationality?

                  Were you embarrassed???
    3. +5
      28 January 2026 08: 17
      Quote: north 2
      This should have been written into the country's Constitution.

      There is a lot you can write on the fence, and behind it there is firewood.
    4. +4
      28 January 2026 09: 47
      Article 68 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: “The state language of the Russian Federation throughout its territory is the Russian language as the language of the state-forming people, part of the multinational union of equal peoples of the Russian Federation.”

      These are amendments from 2020, but the situation has not improved at all.
      And let's be honest - what will this affect?
      Will migrants consider us demigods like white people in some African countries?
      As for me, this is all writing for the sake of writing.
    5. +1
      29 January 2026 09: 36
      Shelter - is this about the 25-year Caucasian War?
  7. +13
    28 January 2026 06: 21
    Let us recall how the leader of the United Russia faction in the State Duma Vladimir Abdualievich Vasiliev


    What was the name of this respected anti-migrant activist? Before changing his name, he was Alik Abdualievich Asanbayev, of Kazakh descent.
    1. +11
      28 January 2026 06: 32
      And I changed my name for the sake of climbing the career ladder.
      1. +5
        28 January 2026 06: 34
        Quote: Maxim from Irkutsk
        And I changed my name for the sake of climbing the career ladder.


        Otherwise, with his Kazakh name, he would hardly have had such a career.
        1. +3
          28 January 2026 09: 36
          Is Vasiliev his mother's last name?
          1. +4
            28 January 2026 09: 47
            Quote: VTOL helicopter
            Is Vasiliev his mother's last name?


            Yes.
  8. +10
    28 January 2026 06: 29
    He lifted our portrait from her knees (well, it’s obvious) and placed her in the coffin!
    This is my opinion.
  9. +17
    28 January 2026 06: 47
    A satirist once said, "If you call a black person a black person, you're a racist. If you call a Jew a Jew, you're an anti-Semite. If you call yourself Russian, you're a Nazi. If you insult a Russian, you're a human rights activist." But today, after reading left-liberal (or simply diaspora-friendly) bloggers, it becomes even more frightening: it turns out that if you kill a Russian, you're a fighter against Nazism.
  10. +16
    28 January 2026 06: 48
    How do you like this, good citizens?
    How about this? They apparently refuse to issue insurance policies to families of migrant workers—not citizens, mind you, but migrants! It seems they'll swallow this, too, and even apologize. am
  11. +19
    28 January 2026 06: 59
    By the way, for some reason, in Soviet times, Russians were respected, and no one was offended if a Yakut was called Russian. For example, I come from the area where the Chuvash, Mari, Kazan, and Udmurts live. And everyone was Russian. I traveled around the country, and everywhere I went, the Buryats, Adyghe, and Sami were Russian. And the Soviet Union was for Russians. Now they've turned it upside down and invented "Russians." They've already banned people from saying "Russia is for Russians." But migrants aren't afraid. They say Moscow isn't a Russian city, and all of Russia is for them.
    1. +38
      28 January 2026 07: 14
      In Shchyolkovo, near Moscow, a court handed down an extremely lenient sentence in the high-profile murder case of a disabled man. The illegal immigrant convicted of causing his death received only a one-year suspended sentence and was released from court. His accomplice escaped punishment entirely.
      So, an illegal immigrant killed a disabled father of two. In broad daylight, on camera. Then he and his accomplice hid the body, tried to escape, and demanded a translator in court. The court's verdict was a one-year suspended sentence for the killer and nothing for his accomplice. That's even tougher than the British justice system.
      1. +20
        28 January 2026 07: 35
        Quote: Crowe
        This is even tougher than British justice.
        There's nothing better than Russian justice! Well, maybe somewhere else in the pampas. wink
        1. +15
          28 January 2026 08: 06
          The court's verdict: a year's probation for the murderer, and nothing at all for the accomplice.

          If the man had remained alive, he would have been imprisoned for 10 years, they would have found a reason for it.
        2. -5
          28 January 2026 12: 17
          Quote: Schneeberg
          Quote: Crowe
          This is even tougher than British justice.
          There's nothing better than Russian justice! Well, maybe somewhere else in the pampas. wink

          Tell this to Berezovsky about England - the judge's son worked for Abramovich, received 0.5 million pounds sterling, but the judge refused to recuse herself lol lol lol "There is no effect on me! "(C)
          1. +5
            29 January 2026 14: 07
            Andrew Popplewell is the adopted son of Judge Elizabeth Gloster, who, as Queen's Counsel, represented Roman Abramovich in his lawsuit against Boris Berezovsky. A LAWYER, not a judge... why are you spreading misinformation, Sergey?
            1. -5
              29 January 2026 14: 59
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              Why are you spreading disinformation, Sergey?

              - you SAMI write
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              adopted son of Judge Elizabeth Gloster,

              Judge Gloucester was considering the case - in which her son worked for one of the sides!!
              Not so???
              What is the misinformation???? That this STRAIGHT bribe to the judge - through her son?
              Even for England, this was too much, and she was asked to recuse herself, but she refused, declaring that "her son doesn't influence her decisions." Under current English law, a judge cannot be forced to withdraw from a case—only to recuse herself.
              The strangest thing is that Abramovich won the case. lol lol lol lol

              And 3 downvoters were offended - for the English court or the judge, or Abramovich or Berezovsky, or for England - that I suspected "noble knights and gentlemen" of taking bribes...
              1. +5
                29 January 2026 15: 03
                Quote: your1970
                What's the misinformation???? That this is a DIRECT bribe to the judge - through her son???

                The point is that a judge and a lawyer are different people... You specifically said "a judge"... although you already clarified that...
                Quote: your1970
                And under current legislation in England, a judge cannot be forced to withdraw from a case - only to recuse himself.

                Well, that's how it is with us too...
                Quote: your1970
                that I suspected "noble knights and gentlemen" of being bribe-takers...

                Perhaps for untruth... although I didn't downvote, I don't have the habit...
                1. -3
                  29 January 2026 15: 29
                  Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                  the fact that a judge and a lawyer are different people.

                  It's mind-blowing belay belay
                  Quote: your1970
                  son(!!!) belay judges lol worked for Abramovich, belay received 0.5 million pounds sterling, but judge belay refused to recuse herself

                  According to your logic, Baturina was a cool builder of 1/4 of Moscow’s construction projects not at all because of her husband Luzhkov - they
                  Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                  different people...
                  Yes??????????????

                  Even in England, there was a huge scandal (with their failure to resolve the issue) - and you're like, "What's the big deal? Well, mom and son are in the same boat..."
                  1. +3
                    29 January 2026 15: 44
                    Quote: your1970
                    Even in England there was a huge scandal (with their failure to resolve the issue) - and you're like, "What's the big deal? Well, mom and son are in the same boat..."

                    It's simpler... I'm not saying that this is right or good, but that the judge and the lawyer were different people...
                    Quote: your1970
                    According to your logic, Baturina was a cool builder of 1/4 of Moscow’s construction projects not at all because of her husband Luzhkov - they

                    Of course, because of him... but she is not him... I'm talking about this inaccuracy in your message... hi
                    1. -2
                      29 January 2026 15: 54
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      Of course, because of him... but she is not him... I'm talking about this inaccuracy in your message

                      If the judge belay worked for Abramovich belay for 0.5 million pounds - that would be downright rude even for the British.
                      1. +2
                        29 January 2026 15: 59
                        Quote: your1970
                        If a judge worked for Abramovich for 0.5 million pounds, it would be completely rude, even for the British.
                        It seemed to me that this is how it was for you initially, if I was mistaken, I apologize. hi
                      2. -2
                        29 January 2026 16: 11
                        Quote: 2 level advisor
                        Quote: your1970
                        If a judge worked for Abramovich for 0.5 million pounds, it would be completely rude, even for the British.
                        It seemed to me that this is how it was for you initially, if I was mistaken, I apologize. hi

                        No problem. Accepted.
                        What's interesting is that who read us and said that the 3 minuses went to zero? lol lol
                      3. +2
                        30 January 2026 11: 22
                        Quote: 2 level advisor
                        Quote: your1970
                        If a judge worked for Abramovich for 0.5 million pounds, it would be completely rude, even for the British.
                        It seemed to me that this is how it was for you initially, if I was mistaken, I apologize. hi

                        The most interesting statistics on minuses are accumulating - people are angrily sticking minuses for statement of fact It is a well-known historical fact that the judge's son worked for Abramovich.
                        It would be extremely interesting to see the motivations of those who are unhappy with my post. Are they upset by the suggestion that judges in England take bribes, or that I'm "supposedly on Berezovsky's side," or that I didn't kick our guys, or are they offended on behalf of the lawyers?
                        What didn't they like about my post - 8 downvoters?
                        Do you understand why you got upvotes here and I got downvotes? I don't...
                      4. +2
                        30 January 2026 11: 50
                        Quote: your1970
                        Do you understand why you got upvotes here and I got downvotes? I don't...

                        no... maybe your ill-wishers have appeared on the site?
                      5. +2
                        30 January 2026 12: 12
                        Quote: 2 level advisor
                        Quote: your1970
                        Do you understand why you got upvotes here and I got downvotes? I don't...

                        no... maybe your ill-wishers have appeared on the site?

                        Of course—I'm a "vicious critic of the USSR!!" (c). It's just that my usual opponents aren't visible in the thread—that's why it's strange.
                        As soon as they reach the rank of lieutenant, I'll start writing, "Hurray for the USSR, everything's bad now!"
      2. +5
        28 January 2026 09: 38
        Hasn't this case been reviewed?
        1. +5
          28 January 2026 12: 21
          Quote: VTOL helicopter
          Hasn't this case been reviewed?

          We rewatched it and got 8 years.
  12. +22
    28 January 2026 07: 06
    The article describes how the issue of migrant crime is being addressed in the UAE.
    Why go so far? We can learn from Belarus if we lack the intelligence ourselves. But it's not really a question of intelligence here. In Belarus, for example, the diaspora-national organized crime groups aren't the "authorities," unlike us. Of course, I "understand" that this is all the "machinations of the Englishwoman" who's been "causing trouble for hundreds of years," but still...
    1. +5
      28 January 2026 15: 49
      What the hell are Englishwomen for? I know it's sarcasm, but still. Putin orchestrated all of this, his policies from start to finish. He bears full responsibility, as he's been ruling the country for 30 years now, and this is what we've come to.
  13. +10
    28 January 2026 07: 31
    Our richest segment of the population is judges. And why does no one understand why they are so rich? laughing the judicial business is the most profitable
    1. +12
      28 January 2026 07: 44
      We have the richest interlayer population is the judge.

      this is a caste, or one of the castes - bureaucrats...
  14. +7
    28 January 2026 07: 34
    Quote: Konnick
    And why does no one guess why they are so rich?
    Because they are judged according to justice and the law, which is above all! wink
    1. +10
      28 January 2026 07: 47
      Because they are judged fairly and according to the law

      About 30 years ago I had to fight in court, and when everything became completely hopeless, my lawyer told the judge - so will the trial be according to the law or according to the rules?
      1. -3
        28 January 2026 12: 23
        Quote: Dedok
        About 30 years ago I had to fight in court, and when everything became completely hopeless, my lawyer told the judge - so will the trial be according to the law or according to the rules?

        Well, at that moment - 1990s, 30 years old ago, judges were killed, and the article was good for the zone.
        1. +3
          28 January 2026 13: 57
          Well, at that time - in the 1990s, 30 years ago - judges were killed, and the article was good for the zone.

          30 years have passed and what has changed?
          "Dolina case" - was it a "court decision"?
          or still - according to concepts?
          1. -8
            28 January 2026 14: 56
            Quote: Dedok
            "Dolina case" - was it a "court decision"?

            The Dolina case was a court decision in within the framework of the country's established judicial practice - To stop "black realtors" from taking elderly people's homes into the forest, in disputed cases they should be returned to the owner within 10 years.
            This case law was widely discussed in the media 10-15 years ago. Everything settled down, but after the start of the Internal Security Service and the increased activity of fraudsters, a wave of activity ensued.
            And now I think there will be a resurgence of "black realtors" (perhaps more humane ones) who will lure people into buying homes and quickly resell them. After that, the seller (the elderly, etc.) is out of business, even if they were forced to.
            Not everything is so simple in the real estate market
            1. +5
              28 January 2026 15: 49
              The Dolina case was a court decision within the framework of the country's established judicial practice

              Do you want to argue about what came first: the chicken or the egg?
              The "Dolina case" has sparked a wave of fraud not only in the real estate market...
              1. 0
                28 January 2026 20: 05
                Quote: Dedok
                Do you want to argue about what came first: the chicken or the egg?

                Since I work in the field of this problem, I know what I am writing about.
                The problem is much more serious than it seems.
                1. 0
                  29 January 2026 14: 18
                  Quote: your1970
                  Since I work in the field of this problem, I know what I am writing about.
                  The problem is much more serious than it seems.

                  There is a sales contract and if it is empty space, it is really a problem...
                  1. 0
                    29 January 2026 15: 16
                    Quote: 2 level advisor
                    Quote: your1970
                    Since I work in the field of this problem, I know what I am writing about.
                    The problem is much more serious than it seems.

                    There is a sales contract and if it is empty space, it is really a problem...

                    The problem is not in him - the problem is that by 2030 the registration of transactions will take 1 day (like notarial ones now) and will be signed with an electronic digital signature.
                    That is, they will drug you, beat you, deceive you, or scam you - after which you will sign a sales contract with a front man (or a similar seller), after which the next day they will resell it to the real buyer.
                    And that's it - he is a bona fide purchaser and you go with the second link into the steppe beyond the third mound...
                    And if, for example, they simultaneously transfer to you (1 seller), say, 1/10 of the cost of the house, then the 2nd will say, “He sold it like this and I bought it, but they offered me 5 and I resold it tomorrow.”
                    And that’s it, the second is pure before the law, and the third is as pure as a sinless baby.
                    This was when, in the 2000s, elderly people were being killed/evacuated en masse by "black realtors" - so the judicial practice then shifted towards returning the housing to the seller, in order to protect them at least a little.
                    In the Moscow region there was a shack that 90 old people from Moscow bought one after another over the course of a year - naturally, no one was there - everyone was taken out into the forest by a gang (the program "Man and the Law" was about this case about 15 years ago).
                    1. 0
                      29 January 2026 15: 21
                      Quote: your1970
                      This was when, in the 2000s, elderly people were being killed/evacuated en masse by "black realtors" - so the judicial practice then shifted towards returning the housing to the seller, in order to protect them at least a little.

                      So you're suggesting we ruin the concept of a DCT because of the incompetence or naivety of some? You remember what all the fuss was about, right? Because of completely dishonest pensioners... So why should this category be privileged? Or the incompetent? Pensioners aren't what they were in the 90s anymore...
                      1. 0
                        29 January 2026 15: 50
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        Pensioners are not the same as in the 90s...

                        Buga-gaga..
                        In our rather poor town, two pyramid schemes were shut down last year—one for 90 million, another for 50 million, and phone scammers who scammed a sizable sum. The same ones from the 90s...

                        Let me repeat: they'll beat you with a stun gun for just half an hour, and you'll sign the sales contract and attach the digital signature to the MFC, and they'll transfer you 1 million for an apartment in the center. lol Krasnodar, they'll resell it and that's it...
                        And for insurance against such a risk (as is currently being offered) - the insurers will want a mountain of money - hundreds of thousands won’t be enough.
                        In general, all options are bad.
                      2. 0
                        29 January 2026 15: 58
                        Quote: your1970
                        Let me repeat: they'll beat you with a stun gun for half an hour, and then you'll sign the sales contract and attach the digital signature to the MFC, they'll transfer you 1 million for an apartment in the center of Krasnodar, resell it, and that's it...

                        I agree with you, but this will work with anyone - even non-retirees....so why do they get such preferences?
                      3. 0
                        29 January 2026 16: 09
                        Quote: 2 level advisor
                        Quote: your1970
                        Let me repeat: they'll beat you with a stun gun for half an hour, and then you'll sign the sales contract and attach the digital signature to the MFC, they'll transfer you 1 million for an apartment in the center of Krasnodar, resell it, and that's it...

                        I agree with you, but this will work with anyone - even non-retirees....so why do they get such preferences?

                        That's all there is to it - they rolled it back.
                        That is why I am talking about high risks that have arisen again in connection with this.
                        The issue here is not about pensioners.
                        For example, I don’t see a way out of this situation...
                        Rosreestr promised one day – it will deliver, as included in the roadmap as part of the overall policy of accelerating government services.
  15. +14
    28 January 2026 07: 42
    Kyrgyzstan recently expressed outrage over why family members of migrant workers were no longer receiving compulsory medical insurance policies...they've spoiled them.
    And so, those in power save a lot on migrants. All the elite cottage communities are serviced by migrants. Our low wages are a consequence of the free access of migrants.
    1. -8
      28 January 2026 12: 24
      Quote: Konnick
      And so, those in power save a lot on migrants. All the elite cottage communities are serviced by migrants. Our low wages are a consequence of the free access of migrants.

      High utility salaries will be automatically reflected in citizens' bills.
      1. +5
        28 January 2026 15: 52
        This character, Svoy1970, is a shining example of a Soros victim. All the rhetoric is a carbon copy. Yeah, we don't care about these receipts, that's one thing – but our children's lives and health will be fine. And two – remove the corruption component, and it will suddenly turn out that the bills on the receipts will become smaller, not larger. But you keep broadcasting the nonsense that the Sorosites have hammered into your heads. And listen to Sobchak more; you're saying the same thing over and over again.
        1. 0
          28 January 2026 20: 28
          Quote from: newtc7
          We don't give a damn about these receipts, that's one thing – at least our children's lives and health will be fine. And two – remove the corruption component, and the bills on the receipts will suddenly become smaller, not larger.

          The management company - one of the best in the city - is looking for a janitor + plumber for one standard 7-story building with 3 entrances - for a salary of 90,000.
          4 months already...
          There are no volunteers...
          1. +1
            29 January 2026 14: 27
            Quote: your1970
            The management company - one of the best in the city - is looking for a janitor + plumber for one standard 7-story building with 3 entrances - for a salary of 90,000.

            Sergey, honestly, I don't believe it. We have no problems with a plumber who charges 45, but in your small town, he charges 90? That's strange... very strange... in Moscow, a plumber who charges 100-120 is usually an ordinary person...
            1. -1
              29 January 2026 15: 20
              Quote: 2 level advisor
              Quote: your1970
              The management company - one of the best in the city - is looking for a janitor + plumber for one standard 7-story building with 3 entrances - for a salary of 90,000.

              Sergey, honestly, I don't believe it. We have no problems with a plumber who charges 45, but in your small town, he charges 90? That's strange... very strange... in Moscow, a plumber who charges 100-120 is usually an ordinary person...

              My son has 90 in his house in Saratov (janitor + plumber) in 1 person). Maybe because in addition to 1-2-5 calls a day, there is also need for revenge.
              Maybe I didn't write it quite clearly. feel
              1. +1
                29 January 2026 15: 45
                Quote: your1970
                My son's house in Saratov costs 90 rubles (a janitor and a plumber combined). Maybe because, in addition to the 1-2-5 calls a day, they also have to sweep.
                Maybe I didn't write it quite clearly.

                Well, if you count it as two positions... although it's still not bad by our standards...
                1. 0
                  29 January 2026 15: 59
                  Quote: 2 level advisor
                  Quote: your1970
                  My son's house in Saratov costs 90 rubles (a janitor and a plumber combined). Maybe because, in addition to the 1-2-5 calls a day, they also have to sweep.
                  Maybe I didn't write it quite clearly.

                  Well, if you count it as two positions... although it's still not bad by our standards...

                  The manager is a meticulous man – he owns seven buildings in the city. His wife is an accountant, and he has a minimal staff of cleaners, janitors, and plumbers. Everything is clean, everything is washed, everything works, and the rent for such buildings is among the lowest.
                  Well, he doesn’t go hungry - if he gets 50 thousand from each management company, then 7 * 50 = 350,000 belay
  16. +8
    28 January 2026 08: 35
    Why does this happen? The answer is simple: the government must be strict and strong.

    That's exactly what it is. In relation to its citizens, except perhaps in the republics of the North Caucasus.
  17. +8
    28 January 2026 08: 53
    How do those in power differentiate us from migrants? They see us as the same kind of rabble, fit only to ensure the well-being and satisfaction of all the needs of the elite and, to some extent, their servants. Now, even elections are just for show, after the "against all" clause was abolished, feedback disappeared. That's when the so-called elite no longer needed us as a people and turned us into an electorate. And even a migrant can tick a box.
    1. +6
      28 January 2026 09: 22
      How are we different? for those in power from migrants? The same cattle in their understanding, suitable only for ensuring the full well-being and satisfaction of all the needs of the top and, to some extent, its servants.

      That's the problem:
      we are a state-forming nation,
      we are like a thorn in the side...
      Or like a suitcase without a handle - our rights are spelled out in the Constitution, but no one is in a hurry to fulfill them...
      And migrants have no rights under the Constitution until they are citizens...
    2. +10
      28 January 2026 09: 34
      The ideal worker from a business perspective: skilled, low-paid, and submissive. Eliminate the first point and you've got a migrant. Incidentally, they've started importing Indians and Bangladeshis, while Tajiks are demanding higher wages.
      Again, safety. I was working on a construction site, and we had a fatal accident: a worker fell from the scaffolding. He was a migrant. They quietly packed him into a crate and sent him home.
      What I'm getting at is that a native will demand that his wages be paid on time, he might file complaints, not only to the court but also to the police and the prosecutor's office, and if anything happens to him, there will be unnecessary problems. It's easier to just hire a migrant.
  18. +7
    28 January 2026 09: 24
    Why is this happening? The answer is simple: the government must be strict and strong. Any sign of leniency will be seen as weakness, as permission to do whatever the heart desires. Given a suspended sentence for robbery? So, it's safe to continue robbing. Six months for the murder of a Russian? So, it's time to arm ourselves and start killing.
    I'm sure the authorities are deliberately creating this situation to counteract the locals. There's no other explanation for it. The counterbalance: migrants can be released amid widespread local discontent, to lower wages, to serve as strikebreakers, and for many other reasons. Otherwise, how can the authorities' loss of self-preservation be explained? They're also making money from them, that's no secret. But those who take them forget that they're not dealing with downtrodden migrants, but rather prepared militants just waiting for the signal to act. This is the "sixth column" they themselves have nurtured. Understanding will come too late, although the alarm has been ringing for a long time. And this isn't panic, it's an understanding of the situation. And the first to be hit will be the very authorities who dug this hole themselves.
  19. +11
    28 January 2026 09: 29
    I have written this many times and I can repeat it.
    Take it as an axiom that we live in a world of lies.
    There are TWO states in this country. A state of the rich and the poor, a state of swindlers and suckers. Decide for yourself who lives in which state.
    The elite doesn't care about us, and they won't bother us until they're personally offended.
  20. -6
    28 January 2026 09: 45
    Excuse the pun, but maybe Judge Kerosinova's problem of not getting laid hasn't been solved that easily?
  21. -6
    28 January 2026 10: 26
    "A toothless law is a path to the abyss." Striking, striking, and immediately captivating. Dear author! Which law, passed by distinguished deputies and signed by the President of the Russian Federation, is toothless, in your opinion?
    "Two outrageous incidents, one of which occurred recently in Elektrostal, where a Tajik stabbed a Russian man to death, and the other in St. Petersburg, where migrant security guards at the City Mall shopping center killed a teenager." What's so toothless? Did the Tajik receive a suspended sentence? Have the migrant security guards already been fined 500 rubles? Yes, a Russian citizen smashed Deputy Matveyev's head in. Incidentally, the initial criminal case was opened for hooliganism. The author has no desire to cast aspersions on whoever initiated this case or the prosecutors who accepted the "hooliganism" classification? The judge acquitted him, but how did the honorable prosecutor's office appeal it? And what about the victim himself? Did the author read the criminal case? The investigators' handling of the case was unclear, and evidence of attempted murder was not collected? Or was there evidence, but the judge violated the law, and the verdict was unlawful? There are a lot of emotions, but I haven't read any facts about the toothlessness of the law...
    1. +4
      28 January 2026 14: 21
      In the title, the word "LAW" refers to the concept of law as such, everything that exists. This includes the Constitution, the Criminal Code, the Civil Code, and so on. Secondly, you can find a wealth of information on the Matveyev case, even without being familiar with the case itself. This case was widely covered in the media, so Google is your friend.
      1. -3
        28 January 2026 15: 34
        Thank you for the clarification! A life sentence for premeditated murder—is that, by your logic, a weak law? And which articles of the Russian Constitution are considered weak, by your logic? Where is the weak point in the Merchant Shipping Code? Please explain... If you, dear author, are dissatisfied with the law enforcement practices of specific judges in cases involving foreign nationals, have you tried mobilizing the public through public organizations, bombarding them with letters: deputies from municipal to the State Duma and the Federation Council, the Prosecutor's Office from the district to the General Prosecutor's Office, or involving Mr. Bastrykin's agency?
        Before your particularly valuable advice, sir, I found information on the great and terrible Russian Wikipedia that Matveyev's head was broken by a Russian citizen. Who's lying?
  22. -2
    28 January 2026 10: 34
    In the US, immigration officers kill people on the streets for no apparent reason. They recently killed a man who tried to help a protester they deliberately ignored. Thousands of people die every year from police bullets, even those with no criminal connections. The incarceration rate is the highest in the world, so, as you might guess, some inmates are guilty of poverty and an inability to adapt to a system of exploitation and hatred. Such results would be a source of pride for any resourceful dictator, yet the US is called a democracy, and it has so much of that democracy that it exports it.
  23. +2
    28 January 2026 10: 39
    Excellent article! However, I'll correct the author slightly: the victim in St. Petersburg wasn't a teenager, but a 24-year-old man. But that's a minor detail. What's infuriating is that until something out of the ordinary happens and affects the public, the "management" won't do anything. Only after this incident did they start combing through the retail chain and find a TON of violations. And they only checked two "brands" of stores.
    1. +1
      28 January 2026 14: 22
      Thanks for the correction. The thing is, the original information was specifically about a teenager. So, when writing the article, I automatically wrote "teenager."
  24. +2
    28 January 2026 11: 27
    It is profitable for someone to keep the people in fear, to keep them defenseless, it is easy to control them and it is also easy to cheat them, where else will you find such obedient people
  25. +3
    28 January 2026 11: 53
    Author! Don't spout nonsense about the friendship of nations in the USSR. As soon as the state weakened, we immediately got Dushanbe, the Fergana Valley, Sumgait, Baku, Karabakh...
    1. -3
      28 January 2026 14: 25
      Churchill! I knew this friendship firsthand. To this day, I have friends—a Greek, a Tajik, an Azerbaijani, Belarusians, Ukrainians, and many others. And they are all against the Nazism that today's right-wingers are spreading. And they aren't just friends in words; they've helped me and many others in deeds many times. So, don't talk nonsense. And also, look at the lists of Heroes of the Soviet Union. They don't only have Russian names there.
      1. 0
        28 January 2026 15: 59
        Passing off personal friendship as friendship between nations is a typical example of the Komsomol's insane leftists. Zatullin (who, incidentally, is paid) also proclaims that these are our compatriots, even though 36 years have passed since these people were citizens of completely different countries, with a different mentality and raised on Russophobia. Personal relationships are personal because they are not fully supported by any political, economic, ethnic, or other factors.
        In the end, we can simply say that if the author is generalizing based on his personal history, he's just stupid, nothing more. He's too lazy to even argue, as if you were reading someone from 2004 saying, "Right-wingers are bad, Greeks are friends." Ugh. By 2026, it's high time he smartened up a bit.
        1. -1
          29 January 2026 09: 51
          The logic is simply brilliant! If there is personal friendship, it is not a friendship between people of different nationalities. It reminds me of the logic of Yeltsinites, liberals, and other right-wingers: "This is different!"
          1. +1
            29 January 2026 14: 48
            Quote: roosei
            The logic is simply brilliant! If there is personal friendship, it is not a friendship between people of different nationalities. It reminds me of the logic of Yeltsinites, liberals, and other right-wingers: "This is different!"

            I have a couple of friends from the USA, the EU - in your opinion - does that mean they are all our friends there?
            1. -1
              29 January 2026 18: 24
              Of course not, but that doesn’t mean that they are all our enemies, which is what agitprop is currently tirelessly busy with!
            2. -1
              29 January 2026 19: 48
              Do you see the logic in your own sentence? First, there are a couple of people, they're your friends. And then suddenly, a generalization. All friends... It's somehow strange. If one is good, then they're all good? What kind of logic is that?
  26. -3
    28 January 2026 12: 43
    Quote: Maxim from Irkutsk
    Our government fears Russian nationalism! And continues Lenin's policy of Russian chauvinism!

    Lenin, if anyone hasn’t read his works, was quite the Russophobe!
    1. -1
      28 January 2026 14: 26
      Give me an example. At least one. Anyone can talk like that.
      1. -3
        28 January 2026 16: 03
        "Ivashek" must be fooled.
        We won't seize power without fooling "Ivashki"
        "And I don't care about Russia ..."
        "... So that they would not dare to think about any resistance for several decades."

        I.A. Bunin about Ulyanov-Lenin:

        "...A degenerate, a moral idiot from birth.
        He ravaged the world's greatest country and killed several million people ...
        And yet the world has already gone so mad that in broad daylight it argues whether it is a benefactor of mankind or not?”...
        1. +1
          28 January 2026 17: 28
          Bunin on Lenin... A wonderful example of quoting Vladimir Ilyich. Congratulations!
        2. 0
          28 January 2026 17: 39
          I read the pseudo-quotes and realized: you can't argue with someone who's read Solzhenitsyn and his ilk. There's a complete lack of logic and critical analysis.
    2. +3
      28 January 2026 14: 33
      Here are some quotes for you: 1. "With such people the Russian people will win complete liberation from all exploitation." V.I. Lenin, Ivan Vasilyevich Babushkin. 1910. Collected Works. Vol. 20. Page 82 2. "Is the feeling of national pride alien to us, Great Russian class-conscious proletarians? Of course not! We love our language and our homeland, we are working most of all to raise its working masses (i.e. 9/10 of its population) to the conscious life of democrats and socialists." On the National Pride of Great Russians. 1914. Collected Works. Vol. 26, pp. 107-108 3. A new type has appeared in the Russian village – the class-conscious young peasant... he explained to his village comrades the significance of political demands, he called on them to fight against the large landowning nobles, against the priests and officials." V.I. Lenin. Report on the 1905 Revolution. 1917. Collected Works. Vol. 30. pp. 313, 315-316 4. The Russian people, workers and peasants do not want and will not oppress any people; - do not want and will not forcibly keep any non-Russian within the borders of Russia
      (non-Great Russian) people. Freedom for all peoples, a fraternal union of workers and peasants of all nationalities! Lenin, V.I. Instructions to the deputies elected by factories and regiments to the Council of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies. May 1917. Collected Works. Vol. 32. Page 40

      And this is only a small part. Oh, you illiterate little man.
      1. -5
        28 January 2026 16: 04
        Leninets in 2026, this isn't even a deviation, it's already a hopeless case)
        You lose, we win.
        1. +1
          28 January 2026 17: 39
          Fascism often wins, I know that. So, bragging about the victory of your NSDAP idols is bad form.
      2. 0
        28 January 2026 18: 57
        Dear author! "...And we are not necessarily in favor of small nations; we are certainly, all other things being equal, for centralization and against the bourgeois ideal of federal relations." - this quote is from "On the National Pride of the Great Russians."
        "The struggle for any national development, for "national culture" in general - certainly not. The economic development of capitalist society shows us throughout the world examples of underdeveloped national movements, examples of the formation of large nations from a number of small ones or to the detriment of some small ones, examples of the assimilation of nations. The principle of bourgeois nationalism is the development of nationality in general, hence the exclusivity of bourgeois nationalism, hence the hopeless national squabble. The proletariat, however, not only does not undertake to defend the national development of each nation, but, on the contrary, warns the masses against such illusions, defends the most complete freedom of capitalist exchange, welcomes any assimilation of nations with the exception of violent or based on privileges...." "...We will speak separately about the right of nations to self-determination, i.e., to secede and form an independent national state. But, as long as and insofar as different nations constitute a single state, Marxists will in no case preach either the federal principle or decentralization." - quotes from "Critical Notes on the National Question".
        Dear author! How can the principle of a federal structure of the state, as expressed in Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov's works before October 1917, be reconciled with Article 65 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation? Or do you consider the constitutional principle of a federal structure of the Russian Federation to be a toothless law?
        1. 0
          29 January 2026 10: 08
          A long and drawn-out debate is possible here. And it's unclear whether it will be useful. But I'd like to point out the following: being familiar with the facts that HAVE HAPPENED, it's easy for us to talk about what should have been done and what shouldn't have been. But alternative history isn't a science. Try to put yourself in the shoes of those who had to make the decisions. I recommend you read V. T. Loginov's book "With This You Conquer." It very well addresses many of the questions you've raised here.
          1. 0
            29 January 2026 12: 30
            Thank you for the advice! I haven't read V.T. Loginov's book. I don't know who he is, what he writes about, or how he writes, so, as always, thank you again for the new knowledge. However, you somehow gracefully evaded my questions: "Or is the constitutional principle of the federal structure of the Russian Federation, in your opinion, the toothlessness of the law?" and this: "If you, dear author, don't like the law enforcement practices of specific judges in cases involving foreign nationals, haven't you tried bombarding deputies from municipal to the State Duma and the Federation Council with letters through public organizations, from the Prosecutor's Office from the district to the General Prosecutor's Office, or involving Mr. Bastrykin's agency?"
            You, as I understand it, hold leftist views. Vladimir Vladimirovich, the proletarian poet, wrote in a poem dedicated to Comrade Ulyanov:
            "One! -
            Who needs it ?!
            Unit voice
            thinner squeak.
            Who will hear her? -
            Is the wife!
            And then
            if not in the market,
            but close. "
            I advise you to organize at least a dozen letters to the organizations I've mentioned. This certainly won't boost the esteemed "V.O."'s rating, and there won't be any comments under the article, but it will likely have some concrete results... Yes, unfortunately, you haven't answered: a Russian citizen smashed a State Duma deputy's head in, or Wikipedia is lying...
            1. 0
              29 January 2026 19: 52
              Thanks for the comment. Regarding the letters, I'm writing. I'm trying to be a citizen, not just a scribbler. Regarding: "The constitutional principle of the federal structure of the Russian Federation—is this, in your opinion, a toothless law?" It's hard to say. But it seems to me that the issue isn't the principles as such, but how these principles are observed. Can you imagine a governor in the Omsk or Vladimir regions bringing his son to a pretrial detention center so he can beat up a defendant and then have his son showered with awards? I can't either. But some can. How can this be resolved? It's a federation, but everyone is equal.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. -6
    28 January 2026 14: 53
    Quote: roosei
    Oh, you illiterate little man.

    Is rudeness a national trait of communists?
    1. 0
      28 January 2026 17: 41
      Where's the rudeness in that? The man was shown his complete ignorance. He should have run to the library and started reading. But no! A true Yeltsinite right-winger starts by launching into accusations that are completely unsubstantiated, but which nevertheless instill a sense of confidence and alliance with the anti-communist right-wingers. Incidentally, the right-wingers are the Nazis' most reliable reserve.
  29. -2
    28 January 2026 14: 58
    Quote: roosei
    Give me an example. At least one. Anyone can talk like that.

    Here, in brief: In the discussions preceding the Congress of Soviets that decided to form the USSR, Lenin grew increasingly intolerant of the opinions of his comrades—Dzerzhinsky, Stalin, Ordzhonikidze—who, as he believed, were attempting to revive "Great Russian chauvinism" by limiting the independence of the republics. "'Freedom to secede from the Union'... will prove to be an empty piece of paper, incapable of protecting Russia's non-Russians from the invasion of that truly Russian man, the Great Russian chauvinist... who is the typical Russian bureaucrat," he wrote on that day, December 30, 1922, when the Congress adopted the Declaration on the Formation of the USSR. Consequently, Lenin continued in his letter the following day, in order for the independence of the republics to be a fact, and not an empty formality, “Internationalism on the part of the oppressor or so-called ‘great nation’… must consist… in such inequality that would compensate on the part of the oppressor nation, the great nation, for the inequality that actually arises in life.”
    1. -1
      28 January 2026 16: 09
      Quote: sirGarry
      Quote: roosei
      Give me an example. At least one. Anyone can talk like that.

      Here, in brief: In the discussions preceding the Congress of Soviets that decided to form the USSR, Lenin grew increasingly intolerant of the opinions of his comrades—Dzerzhinsky, Stalin, Ordzhonikidze—who, as he believed, were attempting to revive "Great Russian chauvinism" by limiting the independence of the republics. "'Freedom to secede from the Union'... will prove to be an empty piece of paper, incapable of protecting Russia's non-Russians from the invasion of that truly Russian man, the Great Russian chauvinist... who is the typical Russian bureaucrat," he wrote on that day, December 30, 1922, when the Congress adopted the Declaration on the Formation of the USSR. Consequently, Lenin continued in his letter the following day, in order for the independence of the republics to be a fact, and not an empty formality, “Internationalism on the part of the oppressor or so-called ‘great nation’… must consist… in such inequality that would compensate on the part of the oppressor nation, the great nation, for the inequality that actually arises in life.”

      And where is the Russophobia in this? The talk was about the equality of the peoples of the USSR,
  30. +1
    28 January 2026 15: 04
    Take Qatar or the UAE, for example. The migrant population there reaches 90 percent. And they are all Muslim. Do they allow themselves to do what they easily do in Russia?

    Because they'll chop off your head there, legally, and they'll chop it off right away. And there's no option at all for the diaspora to stand up for you or for someone else to get hurt.
    Actually, it's an old problem, but it needs to be addressed for everyone, not just migrants. These guys are driving Mercedes-Benzes around Moscow and everything's fine. Dolina cheated someone out of their apartment, and only a media scandal allowed the issue to be resolved. There are about 300 such cases across Russia.
  31. -3
    28 January 2026 15: 37
    "Unlike the right-wingers who are no different from the Nazis"... Biryukov, just go and play. Equating the right with the Nazis is such a favorite tactic of crazy left-wing liberals of all stripes, from modern European to ancient communist - that nothing remains of this tactic except a wry grin.
    Under the "rightists" in power, such lawlessness would not have happened, believe me) it was the former Komsomol members who caused it with their stinking and long-rotten friendship with the people.
    As Matviyenko once said, "In any fair election in Russia, the nationalists will win," and that was her only honest public statement. If you equate the right with Nazis, you're no better than Merz or Sobchak.
    1. -1
      28 January 2026 17: 17
      The right is mostly about money, about making the bread crunch, about lackeys and cadets, they already lost the state in 1917 because of their "humanism" and as a result the Bolsheviks had to clean it up.
      1. -2
        28 January 2026 20: 10
        Yes, yes, they cleaned it up so badly that they wasted their country in 70 years. Cleaners! Rus' existed outside of leftist ideas for 1000 years and everything was fine, but 70 years was enough for the leftists to ruin everything and leave the people without the will to live. Because all your ideas are completely false.
        1. 0
          28 January 2026 21: 21
          You have some kind of complexes. Learn from the English—where did their empire, mistress of the seas, go? Tell them they lost it? However, they also have a caste society, which our bun-crunchers like so much. There are nationalists who organize rallies against migrants to let off steam, but the fact remains that fewer and fewer English people live there, and do you know why? Because the caste society there is devouring itself. The vaunted freedom of the right is freedom for a handful of rich sadists and slavery for everyone else, whose destiny is extinction in a generation or two.
          1. -3
            29 January 2026 02: 16
            You are confusing warm with soft, as always - adherents of the class-caste theory simply cannot help but be mistaken because this teaching is false at its core.
            A person is defined not by their social class, but by the choices they make in life. Leftists, however, are accustomed to measuring everything by class, forgetting that consciousness is shaped by much more than just social standing. You were simply deceived a hundred years ago, and you're still living under that same lie. And if you weren't aware, England has had a completely leftist government for a very long time.
            1. +2
              29 January 2026 05: 33
              Note that you are using the terminology used in the West: leftists-rightists. In the domestic tradition, all these currents have never been generalized, and especially not the Laborites and the Communists, who have as much in common as hares and kangaroos.
            2. +1
              29 January 2026 05: 42
              Leftists are accustomed to measuring everything by class, forgetting that consciousness is not formed solely by position in society.

              reminiscent of the famous research of British scientists
    2. -1
      28 January 2026 17: 28
      That's right. The right is a reserve force for Nazis. I'd give you their quotes, but they consist entirely of justifications of Nazism.
      1. +1
        28 January 2026 21: 42
        Nazism as an ideology is aimed
        to establish and maintain the superiority of any nation through the exclusively physical destruction or enslavement of other nations... the so-called modern right, as a rule, does not consider Nazi methods possible, although they are not averse to profiting from the suffering of others
    3. -2
      28 January 2026 17: 43
      "Biryukov, go for a walk!" - My God, what wonderful politeness this man has! The Rightists came to power in 1933 in Germany, and in 2014 in Ukraine. Is this the kind of order you dream of? So what's going on then? Suitcase - train station - Kyiv region
      1. -1
        28 January 2026 20: 15
        Let Channel One discuss the level of analysis. Even commenting on this... well, let's say it's a three-step descent. But okay, I'll tell you, you'll be surprised, but for a thousand years (more, actually), Russia lived within the right-wing paradigm, and only in the 20th century did it become stricken with this insane disease, brought by a certain Navalny of the 20th century on a train.
        And send yourself to the train station, this is our country. And it will be very surprising for you, but you will see in your old age that the right will still come to power. Because I'll tell you a secret: right-wing ideas (healthy ones, not Nazism) are generally normal for a person; it simply means not being mentally ill, and the overwhelming majority of people in our country are like that. Of course, it's mixed with all sorts of propaganda from the friendly-patriotic cauldron that's been stuffed into them for 100 years, but the subcortex is still right-wing. Just remember the saying, "A shirt closer to the body" and you'll understand how a normal brain works.
        When schools are built in other countries, the influence of which is absent is not normal.
        It is not normal to bring in migrants from other cultures and not prosecute them for crimes.
        When they draw red lines and then do nothing, it is not normal.
        When they foist off pre-nationalism and pilaf festivals for joint embezzlement with diaspora organized crime groups, this is not normal.
        And the rights are exactly the norm.
        1. -1
          29 January 2026 06: 00
          Russia lived in a right-wing paradigm, and only in the 20th century did it become ill with this insane disease.

          There was no need to shoot at peaceful demonstrations by the close associates of the terribly tart Santa Claus II
          1. 0
            29 January 2026 18: 55
            Haha. A powerful argument, especially when compared to the number of people executed and exiled to the USSR. It looks particularly clear.
            Again, the hatred for the Tsar, who was shot by the Red bastards! Along with his children! for not wanting Russian casualties – powerful. This characterizes you best of all; after this, it's immediately clear what kind of person is on the other side of the screen.
            1. 0
              30 January 2026 06: 04
              It's called cognitive dissonance when a person who supposedly doesn't want victims but somehow still shoots his own subjects remains white and fluffy in the minds of bun-crunchers, as if there were more victims in the USSR - only those who lived then, not armchair experts, can compare these two periods.
        2. -1
          29 January 2026 09: 55
          The logic of the possessed Fuhrer is in almost every line. Right-wingers = Nazism, sooner or later. And if we're talking about "right-wing" Rus' for a thousand years, then it's time for you to win a Nobel Prize, because not a single philosopher has ever spoken of such a Rus'. And you've managed to discover it. Coupled with blatant rudeness, in the form of name-calling and expressions of racial superiority, the diagnosis is one: fascism in its ultra-liberal form. Congratulations.
          1. +1
            29 January 2026 12: 01
            Fascism by definition rejects liberalism, and you have it in an ultra-liberal form... Something new...
            1. 0
              29 January 2026 12: 14
              Dear Evgeny! Do you think philosophy, ideology, and political doctrine are just a set of dogmas, or do they tend to react to changes in society? Fascism hasn't changed in essence; its essence is anti-humanity. But it can mimic various forms. Liberalism in the West has led to the rise of radical Islam, which is little different from fascism: the same forms of suppression of dissent, animal hatred of people of other faiths and nationalities, murder as a means of imposing power, and so on. At the same time, liberals dehumanize their own society by promoting homosexuality and other "delights." And reasonable boundaries have long been erased, which is why I'm writing about the ultra-liberal form.
              1. +1
                29 January 2026 13: 07
                Fascism and liberalism are mutually exclusive concepts. Personally, I prefer to stick to the classics, without the various layers. How inhumane is classical fascism? Only someone who lived in Mussolini's Italy can answer that. But his legacy lives on, and, albeit incompletely, it has formed the foundation of modern Chinese society... As for the entire article... The whole problem lies in legislation and the legal framework. It must be uniform and satisfy the majority of those living in the country. Unrest occurs due to imperfect laws and their implementation. In any case, the national factor must be taken into account by legislation and take into account the national interests of the predominant nationality living in the country. Laws must protect the culture and way of life of the Russian-speaking population in a reasonable manner. And allow only contact with the best manifestations of other cultures. When a sheep is slaughtered in the courtyard of a multi-story building, for example, that is completely unacceptable... (When I lived in Dushanbe, even then they slaughtered it in the backyards.) Basically, the legislative and executive branches. All questions should be directed to them...
          2. -1
            29 January 2026 19: 05
            You can't even grasp the concepts, you can't even comprehend what is meant by the word "right" and what is meant by "left." Whether a philosopher said it or not, this is a perfectly obvious fact. Logically, if the left came to power in 1917, who was there before? Well, it wasn't the left. But you can see this, if you want, in politics, economics, and everywhere: before 1917, under any flag, princes, tsars, or emperors, Russia maintained a moderate Russian nationalism with Orthodoxy as the dominant ideology—no worldwide revolution at the expense of Russians, no internationalism, no siphoning off of resources anywhere but the country's Russian heartland. Therefore, Rus' has been right-wing throughout its history, and surprisingly, there was no talk of fascism. So, it turns out you can be a nationalist for 1000 years and not become a fascist.
            You just have a set of propaganda stamps in your head, “expressions of racial superiority”, “fascism”, you are not an intellectually developed person, you are just a communist bio-robot who has been eating propaganda all his life and now speaks with it, but is not capable of analysis.
            The funniest thing is that your article—well, okay, YOU, if you prefer—is completely right-wing, except for the innuendo about the state apparatus, which is more out of habit than sincerity. So it turns out: a person like you shouts that he's a leftist with all his heart (perhaps genuinely happy about the executed tsars, the repressed Cossacks, and the escaped nobility), but in reality, he actually has healthy values ​​(those called right-wing, but if you abstract from that terminology, they turn out to be simply reasonable).
            And that's the whole comical thing about the situation: no matter how much you force yourself to be an internationalist and Komsomol member, everyone always remains a little bit nationalist because it's all about starting at home, and that's all there is to it - it's a natural thing.
            1. +2
              29 January 2026 19: 39
              How they await you in the State Duma, in the United Russia faction. And the Führer is delighted to read your opuses.
  32. 0
    28 January 2026 17: 32
    A state is only worth anything if it can defend itself. This was said by V.I. Lenin. They simply replaced revolution with the State. Let's add the ability to defend one's citizens.
  33. -2
    28 January 2026 19: 57
    Another article is just empty talk and the same comments that those in power and lobbying for the import simply couldn't care less, no matter how much they've been shouting about it here on Vologda. You/we won't do anything to them. The author would have been better off writing about the judge who acquitted him for attacking a deputy. And then they'll soon be cutting off our internet service for the "fight against terrorists." Where were those "Gelendvagen racers" in front of Crocus, though, or is it the local police officer's fault again, overlooking something, like what happened with Dubrovka?
    1. 0
      29 January 2026 09: 56
      Dear Sir, the cards are in your hands for writing the articles, the topics of which you have outlined
  34. 0
    28 January 2026 20: 12
    I didn't like the publication. It was too aggressive.
    A possible goal is more comments. It's good for VO. Just look at how many well-known commentators, many of whom are also authors of interesting materials, are squabbling among themselves! And most of the emotions are already aimed at other than the authors.

    Personal opinion... The fact that many peoples, nationalities, and simply ordinary people received written language, status, and regional distinctions in the USSR is connected not only to the struggle of our socialism against their capitalism, but also to the fact that knowledge, skills, abilities, the movement of goods, the redeployment of troops, and the emergence of new ideas accelerated.
    Do we have peoples with their own written language and regional rights?
    Haven't the number of overseas free territories speaking English, French, and German increased? Should England and France be praised for this?
    No.
    Should we praise the Russian Empire or the Soviet Union? No.
    And quite provocative... Where would any of the commenters like to be in their imagination? You can't choose your income or location, only the year and approximate location.
    1. +1
      29 January 2026 10: 00
      Dear commentator, Russia's expansion into other territories was different from that of Western countries. The West initially viewed the territories it captured as colonies. Russia, however, made the captured territories OWN. In other words, it was not a metropolis. Of course, there were taxes and so on, but all the peoples who became part of the Russian Empire were considered subjects, not slaves. This is a very significant difference. This is even confirmed by the fact that after the Civil War, the peoples of the outlying regions wanted to be part of Russia, while the Western colonies, after gaining independence, did not wish to remain part of their former metropolises.
  35. -1
    28 January 2026 21: 42
    Lots of water, little meaning.
    The author obviously does not provide details of these three cases.
    And here's the rule: if someone is pressing on emotions and not on facts... then something is fishy.

    And we'll have to accept it: according to a recent article I read, based on Rosstat, a record number of migrants were brought into Russia in 2025: 6 million, including new arrivals—either 40 or 70 Indians...

    So, alas. Nothing can be done. Soon, on May 9th, Russian folk songs will be sung before the elected deputies by dark-skinned, squinting, accented people in sarafans... (just as songs of northern peoples are already being sung by artists with Russian faces in their national costumes, as they wrote.)
    1. -1
      29 January 2026 10: 00
      Lots of water, little meaning.
      The author obviously does not provide details of these three cases.
      I probably should have requested the opened cases and published them here in full.
      1. 0
        29 January 2026 13: 25
        No, at least a little more detail about the essence.
    2. +1
      29 January 2026 18: 48
      I have doubts that someone will sing Russian songs.
  36. +5
    28 January 2026 21: 50
    It's just that in recent years, our government has been methodically crushing any civic initiative. I'm not a supporter of the white ribbon protesters or Navalny, but after Bolotnaya Square, it became mainstream—anyone who disagrees is an enemy, and only those who support non-traditional values ​​can criticize the government. The result is apathy among people, because you can still be prosecuted for interfering, and if the diaspora gets involved, it's all over.

    By the way, I noticed that there are many concerned people on the site, as evidenced by the number of comments under articles discussing their country's problems. After all, there are practically no other opportunities to express one's opinion. The main TV and media outlets only talk about the drug-addicted Zelensky and the crazy Trump.

    Yes, and the migration problem has one solution, apparently one that's now being implemented. Immediately issue Russian passports to everyone, then the negative statistics on migrants will disappear, and no one keeps track of the statistics on newly minted citizens.
  37. +1
    29 January 2026 01: 34
    In the UAE, Uzbek migrant workers were sentenced to life imprisonment for leaving the construction site where they lived and starting a drunken (!) fight among themselves.

    The Uzbek Ministry of Foreign Affairs humbly requested that its compatriots not be sentenced to death.
    The sheikhs came to the rescue and gave him a life sentence.

    Please note that no other country in the world holds roach festivals (like in Vologda) or Tajik cuisine festivals.

    And in Moscow, by order of Borukh Eltsyn, in the 90s a branch of the UN IOM was opened, the work of which continues to this day!

    Recently, Edim Rossii (We Eat Russia) voted to lift restrictions on money transfers from migrant workers to Turkestan.

    78% of rapes in Moscow are committed by people from Central Asia. M. Trubnikov, Deputy Head of the Moscow Criminal Investigation Department, RIA Novosti, 2016.
    More plov festivals!
  38. +2
    29 January 2026 11: 33
    I saw what happened to locals (not even migrants) who raped a girl in Saudi Arabia. All four were simply forced to their knees and beheaded one by one. They weren't blindfolded, so the first one was lucky, you could say. The whole execution, you could say, is about the criminal watching what will happen to him in a minute... It's cruel, but with such radical measures they cleanse their society... and instill real respect for the law.
  39. -1
    29 January 2026 12: 04
    Judging by the stated topic and the "material part" in the comments, we don't have much left...:))
    Meanwhile, all the usual troubles stem from the fact that, after apparently fair elections, Zyuganov abandoned the power entrusted to him by the people. Whether through cowardice, self-interest, or, perhaps, a lack of conviction... Political literacy, despite all the party titles, is approaching zero! Just like the commentators :))
    Even in a dispute with an "individual citizen," it's not allowed to immediately fight, but rather, they say, "throw a warning shot in the air" first. And here—entire societies! Politics is the domain of indirect, indirect influence, "on processes and trends:))." Therefore, to save "Russianness," we must not save "Russians," but Russian culture—both from destruction by foreign-culture new compatriots:)) (not by fighting, but by the superiority of genuine (!) education and behavior), and from the capitalist greed of spectacles. These, by lowering the cultural level through all kinds of broadcasting, have already caused greater harm.
    "Nation" and "nationality" don't describe a person's national or tribal origins for identification. On the contrary, they are the outer contours of their subordination—the state capitalism of each country is finally closing its economic borders for complete control, starting with the old "bandit-smugglers" (children... :)), and now down to every banknote and gram of raw materials. Nation means a complete accounting of each member of the population as a taxpayer and potentially liable for military service. This is precisely why the bourgeois government "hands out passports" (!)—it has no interest in WHO lives within the borders of THIS country—it's only interested in financial reporting and profits. Why was such a government placed on its neck? Only because of its own political illiteracy. Who's to blame? The Russians :))) What to do now? To begin with, they need to understand that they were dragged from the football field to play beach volleyball on barbed wire. That is, instead of actually solving such problems, arguments are being imposed on the level of, among other things, religious wars. How could this end?
    Furthermore, we must remember (this is still possible) that, strictly speaking, only the Russian peasant is a "Russian", a "Great Russian". For "the proletarian has no homeland" (c). Have you forgotten this too?! The proletarian, the worker, is completely subordinated to production, it is his mother and father; and what did you think - evacuation to the Urals in 24 hours is the discipline of WHAT? For the proletarian, the only homeland is the SOCIALIST homeland, where he returns to the peasants, carefully (!) preserved from excessive industrialization, who restore to him the ability to love HIS land. Because only the farmer is granted this side of the joy of labor. The preservation of the numerical share of the peasantry, which is necessary for the survival of the entire people, including the self-employed, in cultural terms, is a prerequisite. And have you ever wondered why the "Satalinists" built Empire-style village halls? :)... So, how's it going there? Has everyone migrated from abandoned, "unpromising" villages to the cities? Incidentally, that's the only place where the "accountable children" desired by the government can be born. :)
    1. 0
      29 January 2026 12: 18
      Because only the farmer is granted this side of the joy of labor
      So, if I teach people English, I am incapable of experiencing joy in my work?
      1. 0
        29 January 2026 22: 24
        Any work brings joy, as an organism-self-realization! :) Even something as indirect (only endorphins) as sports :)) Here we're specifically talking about the concept of the Motherland as one's sacred land, which, in its responsible ownership, extends no further than from hunter-gatherers to farmers. And industrial workers will smoke and cover everything with soot! They have other work, and they're desperate for it :). It was in this mutual assistance of preserving nature by some and harnessing its powers by others that the bond between city and village was envisioned.
        Regarding the joy of successfully completing a mental task (which is actually off topic), how can one deny it? But this divergent circle of interference from the applications of the mind, starting from the very (!) smart, in-house electricians and plumbers, is so vast... But education is also important; there was a bus driver who became president, but he didn't think of what he should have.
  40. +2
    29 January 2026 18: 47
    Putin kissed the Koran. It's just a fact. Well, I understand it wasn't for the best, but it did happen.
  41. +1
    29 January 2026 19: 17
    The Soviet Union, having declared the equality of all peoples, did not simply issue a declaration, but in every way contributed to the development of healthy forces in every nation.

    He didn't develop anything; they remained as savages as they were. Everything there developed thanks to people sent from Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.
    1. +3
      29 January 2026 19: 45
      Let me repeat: look at the lists of Heroes of the Soviet Union, look at the number of people killed by nationality in the Great Patriotic War, and even those who died during the Civil War. Yes, Central Asia has now become a center of Islamic radical obscurantism. But during the Soviet era, it was far from that. And note, I am not condoning Islamic Russophobia or opposing uncontrolled migration.
      1. +1
        29 January 2026 19: 53
        I'm talking about the level of education, culture, and development, about society's involvement in the development of the state. Because the USSR was an empire in reverse, handing out money and helping everyone, they somehow managed to live. And then these incompetent people started taking revenge because a Russian worked as an engineer in a factory, while they were wielding shovels, thinking that once all the non-Uzbek, Tajik, and Kyrgyz people left, they would all live like they belonged to Allah.
        These devils got away with everything, now they're coming to us in their bosoms and are already starting to show their jackal grins: I built the road, made shawarma, repaired the yards, drove taxis, I'm the boss here, kiss the boot of the bistro, you Russian bastard!
        1. +1
          29 January 2026 19: 56
          You know, Lenin thought about this too. And Stalin, too. It just so happens that it's very difficult to pull people out of a tribal society. It would take at least 200 years. And the USSR only lasted a little over 70 years.
          1. 0
            29 January 2026 20: 05
            Especially when they don't want to reach the next level of development. We need to get this straight: we're not on the same page with these peoples. How much longer can we mess around with them? We're completely diametrically opposed, not just in skin and hair color, but mentally, with different moral and ethical norms, values, customs, and views on the future. For these reasons, there can't be any friendship between peoples, and therefore, no alliance is possible. As long as we're just food for them, they'll just go along with us; as soon as things get tough, they'll turn on us and stab us in the back.
            1. +2
              30 January 2026 10: 50
              It's easier for our guarantor to give them money and kiss the Koran than to work
  42. 0
    30 January 2026 12: 47
    One question for the author: should the government be strict with all citizens/non-citizens/nationalities of the Russian Federation or selectively?
    1. 0
      3 February 2026 19: 45
      It's time to establish regulations in government bodies regarding the number and nationality of Russian citizens allowed to hold positions. Find non-Japanese citizens in Japanese government bodies.
  43. +1
    30 January 2026 22: 01
    Can you imagine what would happen if a visiting Uzbek or Tajik raped a local woman in the UAE?
    I personally can't imagine it. If this happens, I think all the Uzbeks there will be put on bottles.
    In our country, Asians rob, rape, and kill.
  44. 0
    31 January 2026 10: 36
    Glory to the toothless and rotten United Russia!
  45. 0
    6 February 2026 14: 14
    So, could you at least cite court decisions? Preferably in similar cases, but these involving citizens? Or is this just another hoax to fuel the migrant issue?