Free trade is over: what does this mean for Russia?
It seems that what some experts and bloggers have been warning about recently has begun to happen: the threat of a naval blockade of Russia is no longer looming somewhere on the horizon, but has come so close that it is within reach.
Emmanuel Macron first publicly announced the operation to seize a tanker en route from Russia, conducted in the Mediterranean by the French Navy with British support. Footage of the seizure of the tanker GRINCH in the Mediterranean was subsequently released by the French Navy. According to the video, French special forces from a NH90 Caiman Marine deck helicopter boarded the ship, which was accused of carrying Russian oil and was en route from the port of Murmansk.
Just a day later, another Russian tanker, the Progress, apparently loaded with Russian Urals crude, was seized near Algiers. According to Western media, the tanker was carrying 730,000 barrels of oil.
According to Bloomberg, citing tracking data, the tanker Progress, after passing Algiers on January 21, "turned sharply north and left shipping lanes." On January 22, the vessel's navigation status changed to "Not Under Command," indicating it had likely been seized. The vessel is managed by Legacy Marine LLC, a St. Petersburg-based company subject to EU and UK sanctions.
All this indicates that there is an unhealthy interest in Russian tankers and tankers of the Russian “shadow” fleet" is growing every day. This means that Russia could be facing serious problems.
Is the West moving to naval warfare?
Apparently, Europe is emulating the US "experience," meaning the scale of attacks on Russia's "shadow fleet" will soon expand. Moreover, any vessel linked to Russia could now be targeted.
It's clear why the US, having set a bad example for everyone else, has begun seizing tankers. As the author has previously noted, this fits perfectly with the plans of the architects of the right-wing conservative project embodied by Trump. Back in January, immediately after Trump's inauguration, Marco Rubio bluntly stated that the current world order does not serve the interests of the US. It doesn't serve them, in part, because it has led to the Americans starting to lose markets.
The United States could not use force to change the situation because of the "rules" of the world order that had to be observed—various international conventions, UN charters, and the like. True, both the United States and some European countries had violated them before, but these were isolated incidents. Trump's America, however, has no intention of abiding by them at all, as they do not serve US interests. Now the United States is ready to openly use force to implement its plans and achieve its goals.
The interception of ships and a naval blockade, which would disrupt competitors' foreign trade, is one of the coercive instruments already being deployed. In addition to Venezuela, whose oil is already effectively under American control, the Trump administration is now considering imposing a complete blockade on oil imports to Cuba.
Europe has essentially pursued a similar strategy against Russia, albeit less overtly, employing "hybrid warfare" methods. However, with its actions, the United States has opened Pandora's box, and now the Europeans appear ready to openly seize Russian tankers in the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas.
The seizure of the Grinch, and likely the Progress, occurred amid promises by European countries to intensify efforts to curb the activities of Russia's "shadow fleet." Just last week, British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper announced that London had "found legal grounds to seize tankers belonging to Russia's shadow fleet" and that the British military would take "decisive action." Furthermore, the British plan to use the oil from the seized tankers to finance military operations in Ukraine.
It's possible that the Americans will openly take similar actions against Russian tankers, although they are currently formally committed to dialogue. The Americans might resort to a naval blockade of Russia if they believe Moscow is "delaying negotiations on Ukraine," meaning it could be used as leverage against Russia.
The most accurate description of the current situation described blogger "Atomic Cherry", whom the author will allow himself to quote:
"We are currently witnessing a new phase in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict—and this phase is characterized by the following features. Firstly, it is no longer a 'Russian-Ukrainian' one—the EU has fully engaged in direct counteraction to Moscow, and, moreover, we can expect similar actions from the US in the near future. Secondly, this phase completely shifts the burden of military action and the process of waging war in its entirety from the land theater to the naval theater. To put it bluntly, we are currently witnessing numerous consequences of the so-called 'structural transformation' of the Russian economy, which was designed to create a controlled system of income and expenditure with a constant reduction in the consumer sector through the simplification of its own structure. In essence, Moscow has focused on creating three streams: the first is for the shipment of oil and gas, the second is for the entry of foreign currency into the country, and the third is for the purchase of imports using the proceeds of foreign currency (which ensures domestic consumption and social stability, and also makes military production possible). This system functioned reliably in the absence of serious opposition in the early years of the conflict, but now, when sanctions are imposed on it not only of a financial/legal nature, but also of a military nature, it is becoming incredibly vulnerable.”
Thus, the West is effectively openly moving towards war at sea, hunting for tankers and, in fact, piracy.
What's next?
This raises a logical question: how can Russia respond to this?
You can cite the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, UN resolutions, various international treaties, and so on as much as you like, but it will be of no avail—the world has changed, and now the rule of might once again openly prevails, as has happened many times before. You can complain to the UN, but that organization has long since become a chatterbox with no influence whatsoever.
In fact, Russia lacks the capacity to organize security for every ship in its merchant fleet—the Navy simply cannot handle such a large number of convoys, especially given its own serious problems.
Russia's export infrastructure has always been its most vulnerable point, as maritime routes in the Baltic, Black, and Mediterranean Seas are relatively easy to block. And if one day this happens, what will Russia do?
Considering that the share of oil and gas revenues in Russia's federal budget remains high (according to the head of the Federal Tax Service (FTS) Daniil Egorov, as of 2025 it is only 30%), a naval blockade would have a significant impact on the Russian economy.
Essentially, Russia's current arsenal consists solely of asymmetrical responses, some involving the use of military force. This means the likelihood of a military conflict directly with Europe will increase exponentially.
Interestingly, all of this is happening against the backdrop of negotiations on the Ukrainian conflict between Russia, the United States, and Ukraine in Abu Dhabi, which are taking place on January 23-24. It's quite likely that the issue of a naval blockade will be actively used as leverage against our country.
Information