UAV companies will appear in tank battalions

6 959 20
UAV companies will appear in tank battalions


Recent experience has clearly demonstrated the full potential of aerial reconnaissance using unmanned aerial vehicles. Data from UAVs accelerates fire guidance and target engagement and has a positive impact on overall combat performance. Moreover, for more effective use drones Some organizational solutions are needed. For example, UAV units are being created as part of larger formations.



Drones for tanks


On January 22, Izvestia revealed new details about the introduction and use of UAVs in the Russian army. From unnamed sources in the Ministry of Defense, the newspaper learned of the formation of new units that will assist combat operations. tank parts. However, this information has not yet been officially confirmed.

As Izvestia writes, unmanned aerial vehicle companies have begun to be created in the tank battalions of the ground forces. aviation systems. They will be tasked with solving tasks typical of such equipment: conducting reconnaissance for tank crews, as well as providing target designation and fire adjustment.

Unfortunately, so far, only the formation of the new units has been revealed. Details of this process remain confidential. Specifically, it is unknown how exactly the new companies will be organized, what their equipment will be, how many such units the army requires, etc. It is expected that such information will begin to emerge in the future, once the UAV companies are formed and the initial desired results are achieved.

However, Izvestia, as always, cites the opinions of experts. They generally evaluate the organizational innovation positively and point to its positive consequences.

It's worth noting that in recent years, our Ministry of Defense has been paying increased attention to the development of unmanned aircraft. UAVs of various classes and types are being procured centrally. They are being deployed to the troops and are being actively used, including as part of the current Special Operation.


Furthermore, last year, a new branch of the armed forces was formed—the Unmanned Systems Troops. They are responsible for the development and operation of UAVs and other remotely controlled or autonomous systems of all types. It's likely that new changes to the structure of the tank forces are being implemented with the participation of this branch of the armed forces.

Intelligence issues


From a tank crew's perspective, monitoring the surroundings, finding targets, and aiming weapons is not the most difficult task. Tankers are initially equipped with standard optics for their combat vehicle. These include a set of observation devices on the hatches, as well as gunner's and commander's sights. Provision is made for the use of daytime vision devices, night vision devices, or thermal imagers.

Modern optics provide a good field of view, but they can only search for and engage targets within line of sight. Detecting objects at greater range or behind obstacles, as well as firing from indirect positions, requires additional reconnaissance and target acquisition equipment.

In recent years, small UAVs have been primarily used in this role. Aerial reconnaissance has obvious advantages over ground surveillance. A drone can survey areas several times larger and be no less effective at finding enemy targets and determining their coordinates. Target data is then transmitted to tank crews.

Problems and solutions


However, UAV reconnaissance is not without its drawbacks. For example, organizational difficulties can arise. It is not always possible to establish and maintain a direct line of communication between the drone operator and tank crews or other fire control personnel.

For example, it's not uncommon for tank crews to be assisted by infantry UAV operators. In this case, data from the unmanned system is first transmitted to a higher-ranking infantry commander, who then contacts the tank unit commander, and only then is the information sent directly to the tank crews.


This combat organization allows for the execution of fire missions and has proven itself to be effective. However, it lacks speed and responsiveness. In some situations, this can negatively impact fire effectiveness.

An obvious solution to this problem is to reduce the data transmission loops. To achieve this, the UAV crew must be present directly within the tank unit or formation. This makes it possible to transmit target designations or corrections directly to the tank firing.

Similar organizational principles are already being used in the military and are demonstrating their advantages. However, now they will be taken to a new level. UAVs will become standard equipment in tank battalions, and special companies are being created to operate them.

Obvious advantages


The proposed and already implemented change to the organizational structure of tank units will have several important consequences. Some of these are directly related to combat operations, while others are related to support.

According to available data, one of the objectives of the newly formed unmanned systems forces is to centralize unit supply. This means that UAV companies from tank forces will receive identical equipment, operate according to common principles, etc. All these measures will help prevent potential problems associated with a lack of uniformity.

The collection of combat data and subsequent systematization of experience will also be simplified. The implementation of new knowledge and recommendations will be organized in a similar manner. This will allow all drone companies to master new solutions in minimal time.


It hasn't yet been announced which specific unmanned systems the new units will receive. However, the Russian army has a wide range of options in this area. Tank troops could receive a variety of quadcopters capable of operating over a range of several kilometers, staying in one place for long periods, and providing data with sufficient accuracy. Aircraft-type UAVs, such as the Orlan or Supercam, could also be used. Such technology could increase reconnaissance range without sacrificing other capabilities.

In recent years, domestic industry has been actively developing loitering munitions. The new tank companies will likely not receive such equipment. They will be tasked with supporting missions, and for this, their own strike assets are not required. Also, for obvious reasons, the tank forces will not receive heavy reconnaissance and strike UAVs.

Clearly, the creation of new units and the introduction of unmanned vehicles will not require any other significant changes. In particular, tanks will not need to be refitted or equipped with new communications equipment. All data will be transmitted via existing channels. Furthermore, the use of current communications systems will allow for the full implementation of the assigned tasks.

Observation and defeat


Thus, the Russian army is taking measures aimed at further enhancing the combat effectiveness of its tank forces. Plans call for improving their target reconnaissance, target designation, and fire adjustment systems. This will utilize existing equipment and generally known operating principles.

The desired results are expected to be achieved through the formation of new units and without any other significant innovations. This approach will, to a certain extent, simplify and accelerate the transformation, and the effectiveness of tank fire in various situations will increase in the very near future.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    26 January 2026 04: 11
    According to Izvestia, unmanned aerial vehicle companies have begun to form within ground forces' tank battalions. They will be tasked with performing tasks typical of such systems: conducting reconnaissance for tank crews, as well as providing target designation and fire adjustment.

    Another hack that will only create new organizational structures. How do you transmit target designation to the gunner or commander of a T-72 tank from a UAV operator? Only verbally, like, "Don't go there, go here, or you'll get snow on your head..." A unified target designation system should provide for the transmission of digital information directly to the operator. If such a system exists, why split it into separate units?
    1. +1
      26 January 2026 05: 08
      How to transfer - yes..., we read carefully: "It is obvious that the creation of new units and the introduction of unmanned vehicles will not require other significant changes. In particular, Tanks won't need to be refitted or equipped with new communications equipment. All data will be transmitted via existing channels.. At the same time, the use of up-to-date communication systems will allow us to fully address the challenges at hand."
      The last person I know who tried to do anything about BT was Fighting Cat Murz from the KPTsN. There are no more Cats.
      You can also watch the legendary video with the Alyosha tank (and the tankers' comments), there will be no questions at all.
      1. +1
        26 January 2026 06: 08
        Quote: Wildcat
        tanks will not have to be refitted and equipped with new communication equipment

        That's exactly what I'm talking about: voice commands only. It's certainly better than nothing, but modern technology also allows for broadcasting with target markers.
    2. +3
      26 January 2026 06: 31
      Regarding the transmission of information within a unified system and how the battlefield should appear to a commander, strategy games or wargames are an example. This is precisely the kind of information representation we should strive for: a terrain map, friendly forces, enemy forces, and a gray zone. When a UAV conducts reconnaissance, information should be transmitted with minimal delay. Ideally, orders should also be issued as in games, where a unit is identified and directed where to move or fire. This may surprise some, but all sorts of command and staff exercises, command and staff training exercises, strategic command and staff exercises, and the like are also games, just on maps.
      1. 0
        26 January 2026 08: 10
        An example would be strategy games or wargames.

        So how.lov has it all...
        we are talking about us...
        For us, the main thing is Bureaucracy, and that's okay in civilian life, but it plays a major role in the military too.
    3. +1
      31 January 2026 22: 37
      A unified target designation system should provide for the transfer of digital information directly to the executor. If such a system exists, why break it down into structural divisions?
      Because there are certain engineering practices that advocate eliminating single points of failure and breaking a monolith into smaller pieces to prevent the domino effect. I won't go into detail about the "bulkhead" pattern (borrowed from shipbuilders); please look it up yourself. There's a lot of interesting stuff there.
      But modern and future military conflict will be decentralized with a high degree of fragmentation and duplication.
  2. -1
    26 January 2026 04: 16
    Unfortunately, only the formation of the new units has been revealed so far. The details of this process remain confidential.

    Fortunately, they are closed...there should be no details for our enemy in principle.
    And so, long before the SVO, there were proposals in the Military District to make drones standard equipment on tanks as reconnaissance and observation devices.
    1. +1
      26 January 2026 04: 44
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Make drones standard equipment on tanks as reconnaissance and observation devices.

      And add drones to intercept enemy drones...
      1. 0
        26 January 2026 06: 11
        "Add interceptor drones."
        That's right!
        By the way, the TB and MSB should also have UAV units and regular anti-drone air defense units.
        In combination with the APS and other protection, this will reduce the effectiveness of the "Madyarov birds" and other "nadia" Banderdogs to values ​​close to zero.
      2. 0
        26 January 2026 21: 45
        Active defense against drones on a tank would be much more effective with a remote or autonomous module equipped with an automatic canister (shotgun). After all, someone would need to control the drone, and they'd also need to detect and intercept the enemy drone, especially if several drones are involved. This is a virtually impossible task for a tank crew. A canister only requires radar. The enemy recently published an article on their website about developing such a defense.
  3. -1
    26 January 2026 09: 15
    It's been less than four years... The main problem is that this is all being done under duress. Well, now the higher-ups have given orders—the generals are forced to obey and try to use the hated drones, all sorts of other things, and the like. As long as the generals can't see beyond their tarpaulin boots, earflaps, AK-47s, and area-effect artillery fire, there's no point.
    1. 0
      26 January 2026 23: 52
      I think the generals' hatred of drones and unmanned systems stems from the fact that they've wiped out their entire lives and all that now-useless military knowledge they've accumulated over the last 50 years. It's all gone to waste, so to speak, and they have neither the strength nor the desire to retrain for a new form of combat... that's why they need a refresher; the old ones are baked, so to speak.
  4. Owl
    0
    26 January 2026 09: 45
    It's necessary to create a closed, jam-proof communication channel between the tank crew and the UAV operator (UAV unit commander), including the ability to transmit images. Knowing the basics of indirect fire, the gunner will be able to engage the target more quickly by seeing the firing results. Transmitting data when using electronic warfare, both friendly and enemy, is a complex task.
    1. 0
      26 January 2026 10: 01
      So, people who cared did just that, and these problems were voiced publicly. But they did it in defiance of the system, for which some paid the price, as Murza recalls. And after the law on discrediting the army was introduced, all the problems disappeared.
    2. 0
      31 January 2026 22: 41
      Transmitting data during electronic warfare operations, whether by one's own or by the enemy, is a complex task.
      What exactly is the difficulty?
  5. 0
    26 January 2026 11: 28
    As I understand it, the downvotes are coming from those who think there are no problems in the army. And the criminal case against the communications chief because of the Azarty was a misunderstanding. The original idea was to create a unified communications network, including for armored vehicles.
  6. -1
    26 January 2026 13: 23
    In my humble opinion, at least half of the staff should be made up of drone fighters, for cover, reconnaissance, and regimental level.
  7. 0
    13 February 2026 10: 59
    Why only observation and engagement? Does the Russian Armed Forces lack imagination? What is the purpose of a tank? Its primary function? Why is the tank's use in the Air Defense Forces limited to its primary purpose? This is the core question that they are trying to solve experimentally. Apparently, there are some good developments.
  8. 0
    10 March 2026 17: 07
    For the gifted, the Russian Armed Forces have special teams to process all the experience on the LBS. You can throw it all out there, but there are a lot of smart people in the army. And because only the Russian army has all the information, you can drool and fart as much as you like, everything that needs to be done will be done. And little will be known about it.
  9. 0
    April 4 2026 14: 26
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    Fortunately, they are closed...there should be no details for our enemy in principle.

    lol You, by God, seem to have fallen from the moon. Or is that just how TV works? Our "enemies" know our "secrets" 146% better than the rest of us. First-hand. On demand. For a modest reward. And sometimes – just for the promise of one. All the government's secrets are from the scam. Not from its "partners."