Submarine missile carriers are the backbone of France's strategic nuclear forces.

12 117 43
Submarine missile carriers are the backbone of France's strategic nuclear forces.


One of the most effective components of the French nuclear dyad are nuclear submarines armed with ballistic missiles. rockets. Therefore, the French leadership has always strived to maintain their combat readiness at the level of modern requirements for naval underwater nuclear systems. weapons.



The French government announced its intention to create a nuclear-powered nuclear force in 1955. To reduce the timeframe, the launch vehicle and its missile armament were developed simultaneously. Work proceeded in parallel. In 1962, a commission was established to coordinate the efforts of seven bureaus developing the system's components: the submarine nuclear reactor (SNRP), the ship-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), the hull steel for the submarines, and the general shipboard and specialized systems of the future SSBN.

The primary challenge was the nuclear backing for the nuclear weapons and submarine launch vehicle programs. Lacking facilities to produce their own enriched U-235, French physicists began developing a nuclear reactor operating on low-enriched fuel. At the same time, work was underway to create a French nuclear bomb. In 1959, France succeeded in purchasing 440 kg of highly enriched U-235 from the United States, and just a year later, in 1960, it detonated a nuclear device of its own design in the Sahara Desert.

By the time construction of the nuclear-powered submarine—a nuclear weapons carrier—began, a uranium enrichment plant was built in Pierrelatte. This solved the problem of supplying the submarines under construction with nuclear fuel. The keel of the first French SSBN of the Redoutable class was laid in Cherbourg in March 1964.

Unlike the American SSBNs, the Redoutable-class submarines were designed without a prototype. They were the first French SSNs and later became the prototype for the Ruby-class multipurpose SSNs.


Redoutable

All Redoutable-class SSBNs were built at the Direction des Constructions Navales (DCN) shipyard in Cherbourg.

The submarine is interesting because, unlike the American SSBN Lafayette, it had seven compartments instead of six. For safety, the nuclear power plant was housed in a separate compartment.

The boats were built using a mixed architectural and structural design: a 2-hull set over the bow and sixth compartments, and a 1,5-hull set over the rest.

The main power plant was a GEC Alsthom PWR K15 pressurized water reactor with forced circulation coolant and a thermal output of 150 MW. The reactor was designed and manufactured in France without the participation of any foreign companies.

A distinctive feature of the Redoutable was the absence of a "reduction gear"—the main turbo-gear unit (GTZ). The boat had an electric propulsion system, with the electric propulsion motor (EPM) powered by independent steam-turbine generators.

This design eliminated low-frequency noise from the gas turbine engine and ensured quiet operation over a wide speed range. This design was subsequently implemented on all French submarines. It has now gained worldwide recognition in submarine construction.

Backup power was provided by four 850 kW diesel generators and a battery. The diesel-electric power plant could give the submarine a cruising range of up to five thousand nautical miles.

The bow contained two retractable thrusters (RT), which provided the ship with maneuverability at low speeds and when mooring.

At various stages, the Redoutable-class SSBNs were armed with M1, M2, M20, and M4 SLBMs. The final boat in the series, the Inflexible (S 615), was armed with M45 missiles.

Information: The M1 Mersol SLBM is a two-stage, solid-fuel missile weighing 18 tons with a single-warhead MR-41 warhead with a yield of 0,5 megatons and an inertial guidance system. The launch weight is 18 tons, and the firing range is 2600 km. The CEP is approximately 2300–3200 m. Since 1969, it has been installed on the first two SSBNs, the Redoutable and the Terible.

S. Ketonov wrote about the missile weapons of the French missile carriers in an article France modernizes submarine-launched nuclear missileLet me remind you of some points from stories missile weapons of French SSBNs.

In 1974, the M2 SLBM entered service, featuring a lightweight second stage (steel replaced with fiberglass), improved propellant, new avionics, and a TN-60 warhead. Its range was up to 3200 km. The CEP was reduced to 2000 m. However, only one ship, the Foudroyant (S 610) Thunderer, was armed with the M2, which entered service in June 1974.

In 1976 on fleet The M20 was delivered with the TN-61 warhead, which differed from the TN-60 in its reduced weight and improved resistance to nuclear blast damage. Its CEP was reduced to 900 m, and the warhead yield was increased to 1,0 Mt. The SLBM's storage and launch system was similar to the American Mk 21, but the silo was larger in diameter. The missile was fired by compressed air stored in cylinders in the submarine's hold.

The missiles could be launched from depths of 15-20 meters, as well as from the surface. This allowed for combat duty at base. By 1981, five SSBNs had been re-armed with M20 missiles.

In 1985, the M4 SLBM entered service. It was a three-stage, solid-fuel missile weighing 36,2 tons. Its first stage was made of steel, while the second and third stages were made of Kevlar. The missile carried a MIRV-type reentry vehicle with six TN-70 independently targetable warheads (MIRVs) with a yield of 150 kilotons each.

The M4 cost the French 37 billion francs. It became the first French second-generation SLBM capable of engaging multiple targets simultaneously. Its launch range increased to 4000 miles, and its kill zone was approximately 20,000 square kilometers. At the same time, the warhead's CEP (6 x 150 kt) was reduced to 400-450 meters by installing a three-axis gyrostabilized platform. (The warhead's deployment zone was 80 x 240 km.) The missile carried an air defense system and was capable of penetrating enemy missile defense systems.

The M4 storage and launch system replicated the Mk 35 system for the Trident 2 SLBM. The missile locking mounts inside the launch tube were replaced with several obturator rings. The top of the tube was sealed with a special domed membrane made of asbestos-reinforced phenolic resin. The missile was launched using a vapor-gas mixture from a PAD. The launch depth increased to 25 meters (compared to 20 meters for the M20). The ability to fire from the surface was retained. Launch preparation time was 20 minutes, and the interval between launches was 15-20 seconds (according to other sources, 60 seconds).

The M4 SLBM had two modifications: the M4/TN-70 and M4/TN-71. The M4/TN-70 had a range of 4000 km, while the M4/TN-71 had a range of over 5000 km. The increased range was due to new fuel and a reduced warhead weight. The last SSBN, the Inflexible (S 615), carried the M4/TN-70. As new SLBMs were produced, the boats were upgraded to M4/TN-71 missiles. This procedure cost the French Navy an additional 14,5 billion francs.

French SSBNs underwent repairs every two to three years, with their nuclear reactor cores refueled and modernized every five years. Two submarines (Tonnan and Foudroyant) were modernized at the Cherbourg shipyard, and the other two (Indomfable and Terible) in Brest. The work lasted approximately 30 months, and labor costs were only 20% less than for a new submarine.

Further improvements to the missile armament of French SSBNs led to the development in October 1996 of the three-stage M45-class SLBM (weight – 35 tons; length – 11,05 m; diameter – 1,93 m; range – 6000 km; CEP approximately 350 m). Warheads: 1-6 TN-75 warheads of 100 kt each, with a warhead deployment zone of 150 x 350 km. High target engagement accuracy was ensured by an INS with computer-controlled payload.

The M45's first stage was made of steel, the second of fiberglass (using a winding method), and the third of US-produced Kevlar-49. The warhead contained lightweight, high-speed, stealthy, independently targetable warheads with enhanced resistance to nuclear blast damage. The SSBN Inflexible (the last submarine in the series) was refitted to carry M45 missiles.

In 2004, the French Ministry of Defense announced plans to replace the M45 with the M51 missile by 2010. However, the last M45 missile was only retired in 2016. Following the modernization, all Triomphant-class SSBNs use the M51 missile.

The tactical weapons of the Redoutable-class SSBNs included SM-39 Exocet anti-ship missiles and ECAN F17 mod 2 remote-controlled torpedoes or ECAN L5 mod 3 homing torpedoes. American and British SSBNs did not carry anti-ship missiles at that time.

Another feature was the ability to fire torpedo tubes while the ship was maneuvering at high speeds. The submarine could safely discard defective weapons. Two of the four torpedo tubes were equipped with a pneumatic piston with a telescopic rod, which pushed the defective torpedo overboard. This system was installed on all subsequent French submarines.

The Redoutable-class SSBNs had an interesting approach to operating them. Each hull was assigned two operational crews ("blue" and "red") and one technical crew ("green"). The operational crew consisted of 15 officers, 102 non-commissioned officers, and 18 (!) sailors. All were professional contract soldiers, ensuring a high level of maintenance and operation of the equipment.

This allowed the SSBN Redoutable to serve for 7000 days, 3500 of which were spent at sea on combat patrol, including 3458 days submerged, completing 58 combat missions with an average duration of 59 days each. ("Nevsky Bastion." A. Karpenko).

Triomphan-class SSBNs are a new step towards improving the nuclear forces


The new generation of French SSBNs and the replacement for the first six French Redoutable-class strategic missile submarines are the Triomphant-class missile submarines – a series of four French nuclear-powered strategic submarines built between 1989 and 2009.


Photo of a boat on the slipway

They were built under the Strategic Nuclear Forces Development Program for 1987-2010. Six missile carriers were planned. Design of the new SSBN began in 1982. The new project continued the targeted development of the ship's entire systems. Seven teams of scientists, designers, and engineers worked to develop the most effective technical solutions. The ship and its systems were designed for the new M5 SLBM, which had been developed in parallel with the carrier since 1980.

The collapse of the USSR and the subsequent easing of international tensions, as well as delays in missile development, forced adjustments to the submarine series' construction. The order was limited to four submarines. Due to the unavailability of the new missile, the first Triumphan-class SSBNs had to be equipped with the M45 SLBM, essentially a major upgrade of the M4 missile.

It was equipped with a TN-75 warhead with six independently targetable warheads (MIRVs) with a yield of 100 kt each and a firing range of up to 5300 km.

Taking the Trident II SLBM as a reference, French designers based the new M5 on the same weight and dimensions, which influenced the dimensions of the new missile's launch vehicle. This explains the slight difference in the design and hull dimensions between the Triomphant-class SSBN and the American Ohio-class SSBN. (For example, the Triomphant's hull diameter is only 31 mm smaller than that of the Ohio.)


Triumphant

Some tactical and technical characteristics:
- Main dimensions: length – 138 m; width – 12,5 m; draft – 10,6 m
- Displacement: surface -- 12,640 tons; underwater -- 14,335 tons
- Speed: surface – 12 knots; underwater – 25 knots
- Diving depth: working – 380 (250-350) m; maximum – 487,5 m
- Propulsion plant: nuclear power plant - K15 water-cooled reciprocating turbine with a thermal capacity of 150 MW; propulsion motor with a capacity of 41,500 hp, auxiliary diesel engines with a capacity of 1225 hp; one propeller shaft, fixed-pitch propeller in a jet nozzle
- Armament:
missile: 16 silos for M51 type SLBMs; 8 Exocet SM39 cruise missiles launched from torpedo tubes
torpedo: 4 bow 533 mm TA (ammunition - 10 torpedoes L5 mod. 3 and F17)
- Autonomy: 90 days.

The designers based the combat qualities of the new SSBN on the military's requirement to ensure its low visibility, maximum quietness, and stealth.

Understanding that the main source of noise on submarines is the power and propulsion systems, their improvement was given priority attention.

By the time the Triomphant was laid down, the shipbuilders had a K-15 nuclear VVR, which had proven itself on the previous generation of missile carriers. The same nuclear reactor was installed on the Charles de Gaulle missile carrier.

The K-15 VVR featured natural circulation of the primary coolant, eliminating the need for a primary circuit centrifugal pump. This significantly reduced the noise level of the steam generator and increased its operational reliability. The steam generators were housed in the reactor core and formed a single unit with the reactor vessel. This made the reactor more compact.

The modular steam turbine unit (STU) had two independent turbogenerators (ATGs) with their own condensers. The generators were mounted on a single shock-absorbing platform. This reduced noise and vibration from the units. Noise and vibration-isolating plates made of rubber or polymers were used to isolate residual noise.

A low-speed, low-noise fixed-pitch propeller is housed in a guide nozzle that shields propeller noise.

To reduce hydrodynamic noise, the hull contours were computer-modeled to maintain the laminar flow around the hull and protruding parts of the ship. The contours of the missile bank and the enclosures for the retractable devices were modified. The forward hydroplanes were raised to the upper edge of the oval control surface. The bow is now elliptical rather than stem-shaped.

In a number of systems, rolling bearings were replaced with plain bearings. This resulted in a noise reduction of half that of the Redoutable-class SSBNs.

The use of a new grade of 100 HLES steel with a yield strength of up to 1000 MPa allowed the Triumphan's operational diving depth to be increased to 380 m, which also improved stealth and increased the submarine's maximum quiet speed to 20 knots.

As a result, the implementation of measures to reduce the acoustic signature of the Triomphant SSBN made it possible to build a submarine that is quieter than the American Ohio-class, previously considered the quietest SSN in the world.


SSBN "Triumfan"

Triomphan-class SSBNs have a single-hull design with a streamlined hull and missile berth (superstructure). The submarine's missile compartment, rather than the control center, was used as the submarine's center of gravity. The distance between the missile silos, located in two missile sections, was increased. Between the sections, stations housing the missile control system instruments and auxiliary mechanisms were placed. This design was used only on Triomphan-class SSBNs.

Design features


Structurally, the submarine is divided into four compartments, with spherical bulkheads within each compartment. This is unique in modern shipbuilding.

The submarine's pressure hull is cylindrical (with a main diameter of 12,5 meters), with elliptical truncated cones at the ends. The ends are topped with torispherical bulkheads of relatively small diameter.

The forward compartment houses the anti-ship missile and torpedo armament, the central post with combat posts and radio-television equipment, as well as the crew quarters and cabins.

The second compartment contains the SLBM silos. They are arranged in two sections, with the missile control system's combat stations and auxiliary mechanisms located between them.

The third compartment contains the reactor and the steam generating unit (SPU).

The fourth compartment contains a steam turbine unit (STU), two ATGs and a hydroelectric motor on a shaft line with a drive to a water jet propulsion unit.

The central gastrointestinal tract is located in the permeable extremities (bow and stern).

The bow of the hull contains a thruster.

Four 553 mm TA are welded into the bow bulkhead symmetrically to the longitudinal axis and at an angle to the centerline of the ship.

The main spherical antenna of the sonar system (DUUX-80) is located in the extended nose section, well removed from the pressure hull. Isolating screens are also installed here to create favorable operating conditions for the sonar system. The nose antenna fairing is made of fiberglass-reinforced plastic.

The stern end ends with a cruciform tail with depth and direction rudders, and a Pump-Jet type water jet propulsion unit.

The horizontal stabilizers are equipped with chucks at the ends. The vertical rudder blade is insulated. The British used the same design on their future Dreadnought-class SSBN.

The second, no less significant task that the SSBN creators had to solve was to achieve an advantage in the detection range of enemy anti-submarine forces by the submarine's hydroacoustic means before they detected the missile carrier.

The Triomphant became the first French submarine to be equipped with a fully-fledged sonar system (SAS), which significantly increased the crew's situational awareness and the submarine's combat capabilities.


The missile carriers are equipped with the DMUX-80 sonar system, which includes:

- active-passive GAS DUUV 23 (nose spherical antenna);
- DUUX-5 GAS with six on-board antennas;
- LF passive (noise direction-finding) GAS DSUV-62 with a flexible extended towed antenna 100 m long and 10 cm in diameter;
- GAS DMUX-33 -- reconnaissance station and detection of hydroacoustic signals (working GAS of surface ships/submarines and homing heads of anti-submarine torpedoes).

The last missile carrier was equipped with a UMS-300 sonar system from the Thales company.

The boat's own noise level was recorded by the noise monitoring system of the boat (QSUA-A), consisting of approximately 40 hydrophone sensors and accelerometers.

The press has noted that the new sonar system can detect the Virginia-class stealth submarine at a range of up to 50 km, whereas the typical detection range for such submarines is no more than 10 km. However, this claim is questionable due to the submerged collision between the SSBN Triomphant and the British SSBN Vanguard, which occurred in the Atlantic on the night of February 4, 2009.

During the collision, the Vanguard sustained damage to the hull near the starboard missile compartment, with noticeable dents and scratches appearing on the hull. The submarine surfaced at the observation point and was towed to its base in Scotland. The Triumphan damaged the lower segment of its sonar dome under the bow. However, it managed to submerge and reach the Brest naval base under its own power.

The Triumphan-class missile carriers have a single ship-wide information system that combines all data on the ship's condition, its systems and weapons, as well as the external situation.

The submarine is equipped with a SYCOBS (Systeme de Combat pour Barracuda et SSBN) combat information and control system. It provides combat data to the automatic combat control system (ACCS), the core of which is the SET (System d'Exploitation Tactique) tactical system. Here, the data is processed and displayed in the most informative form on situational awareness displays, as well as transmitted to the ship's commander in the form of visual and audible signals, voice messages, and recommendations.

The wheelhouse contains an antenna post with a TV camera and an IR station, a navigation (NVTs detection) radar DRUA-33 and a set of tools EW ARUR-13 (as part of the DR-4000U and DR-3000U stations from Thales).

The submarine is equipped with a comprehensive communications system, including a satellite system (Syracuse II), and has several types of antennas (buoy, loop, whip, and loop). It also has periscopes: a SFIM L commander's periscope and an MRA-2 anti-aircraft periscope.

All French SSBNs are based at Ile Longue, near Brest, in a permanent base built specifically for them. All routine maintenance and repairs are also carried out here. Also located near the piers are a missile storage facility, assembly workshops, and workshops for preparing them for combat use.

The command of the strategic ocean forces of the fleet is constantly working to equip SSBNs with the latest weapons.

Thus, on October 28, 2025, the Naval News publication informed its readers:

The French submarine-launched ballistic missile M51.3 has entered service.

In other words, it has been accepted into service. It was also reported that the M51.3 has a range of 6000 miles and a speed of Mach 25. It is capable of carrying 6-10 TNO-2 warheads with a yield of 100 kilotons each. It also boasts enhanced accuracy and the ability to penetrate enemy missile defense systems.

The high combat performance of French SSBNs has earned the highest praise from military experts. Many of the technical solutions used in their construction have been adopted by shipbuilders from the world's leading naval powers.

What is planned to replace the Triumfans?


The SNLE 3G (Sous-Marin Nuclear Power Plant) project, a third-generation SSBN, is being developed to replace the Triomphant-class SSBNs. The program is being implemented under the direction of the French Ministry of the Armed Forces' Directorate General of Armaments (DGA), with the participation of Naval Group (design and construction) and Technic Atome (nuclear reactor development and supply). It was reported that the submarine will be equipped with a new K22 nuclear reactor with a thermal capacity of 220 MW.

This is a highly labor-intensive project. French experts estimate that the design phase consumed approximately 15 million man-hours, and the construction of each submarine will require at least 20 million man-hours. Over the next 30 years, the program will consume up to 100 million hours of work, including the design and construction of infrastructure facilities and the ships themselves.

As of 2021, observers estimated the cost of the SNLE 3G program at approximately €40 billion. However, the French Ministry of the Armed Forces stated that it was too early to provide a precise estimate at that time. The supply chain alone will involve approximately 200 companies and 3000 people. The main contractor is Naval Group, which is collaborating with Technic Atome.


Key Features of SNLE 3G
- Main dimensions: length – 150 m; width – 13 m; draft – 11 m
- Displacement: surface – (n/d); underwater – 15,000 t
- Speed: surface – 12 knots; underwater – 25 knots
- Diving depth: working – 400 (380) m; maximum – about 480 m
- Power plant: nuclear power plant – PWR type K 22 with a thermal capacity of 220 MW; propulsion motor, auxiliary power plant, one propeller shaft, water jet propulsion unit
- Armament:
missile: 16 silos for M51.3/M51.4 SLBMs (6-10 TNO-2 warheads each with a yield of 100 kt); 8 Exocet SM39/Naval-Scalp cruise missiles launched from torpedo tubes;
torpedo: 4 bow 533-mm TA (ammunition - 10 F21 torpedoes)
In the future, it may be equipped with future cruise and anti-ship missiles (FCASW).
- Crew: about 100 people
- Autonomy: up to 100 days.

Other features include improved acoustic and magnetic shielding to reduce signature, enhanced enemy detection capabilities through high-tech sensors, improved hydrodynamics and maneuverability.

It is also planned to use an X-shaped stern empennage and a water jet propulsion system, as on the Suffren-class submarines.

On March 20, 2024, the first steel cutting ceremony for the lead submarine's pressure hull took place at the Naval Group shipyard in Cherbourg.

Assembly of sections of the first third-generation SSBN was planned to begin in late 2026 – early 2027, and launching to take place in the early 2030s.

The lead SSBN is scheduled to enter service no earlier than 2035. Subsequent submarines are to be delivered at five-year intervals. The final, fourth submarine, is scheduled to be commissioned in 2050.

A total of four submarines are planned for construction—the same number as the Triomphan class. The replacement of the existing SSBNs is scheduled to begin between 2035 and the 2050s. Meanwhile, the remaining Triomphans will undergo modernization, incorporating selected technologies developed for the SNLE 3G. This will allow new technical solutions and weapons to be tested in naval conditions, not just on the test rigs and ranges of the manufacturers.

The new submarine's specifications have not been officially disclosed. However, Naval News claims that its design will be similar to the Triomphant-class SSNs, but the SNLE-3G will be larger: its hull length will be approximately 150 meters, almost 10 meters longer than the current strategic submarines, and its submerged displacement will exceed 15 tons. The crew will number 110. Each submarine will be capable of carrying 16 SLBMs. The submarines will be equipped with four torpedo tubes with a total of 18 anti-ship missiles and torpedo tubes.

Achieving maximum stealth for missile carriers and ensuring their advantage in detection range remain the primary objectives, as the main condition for victory in a duel with enemy anti-submarine forces.

The new sonar system for the SNLE 3G is being developed by Thales Group under a 42-month contract awarded by the military in 2012. The sonar system incorporates a powerful digital-based signal processor and new algorithms for processing data received from the next-generation onboard and forward-facing sonars, as well as from the towed linear array (ALRO) antenna, which uses optical technology.


Some features of the new HAC for SNLE 3G


It is known that the bow of the submarine is completely dedicated to the hydroacoustic dome, which implies the use of a very large conformal hydroacoustic array in the bow of the SSBN.

The aft section is designed to accommodate a center section for the towed system, which has been under development since 2016. Between the upper rudders of the X-shaped tail, there is a small vertical fin used for deploying and retrieving the flexible, extended towed ALRO sonar antenna. Its parameters will remain the same: length – 100 m, diameter – 10 cm.

The ALICIA system, designed for comprehensive analysis, localization, identification, classification, and notification of detected targets, will be mounted along the ship's sides. It optimizes operator workload and assists in decision-making. Artificial intelligence systems are expected to be used to process the large volume of information.

The possibility of the future sonar system to detect and classify low-frequency hydroacoustic signals ULF (Ultra-Low Frequency) with a frequency of 0,3–3,0 kHz is also noted.

The new sonar system is expected to be deployed gradually. The first units and versions of the systems will be installed on second-generation SSBNs (SNLE 2G) starting in 2025. They will be installed on third-generation submarines (SNLE 3G) during their construction, having already undergone testing and refinement on operational submarines. Thus, by 2035, the plan is to have a sonar system free of any "teething problems."

To reduce its visibility, the SSBN hull will be completely lined with anechoic tiles, which are designed to absorb the locating pulses of active sonars, as well as dampen the lower sounds emitted by the submarine itself.

It is expected that with the implementation of all the innovations, the noise level of the French third-generation SSBNs will be lower than the noise level of the ocean.

It is impossible to achieve the stated combat characteristics without implementing the latest advances in electronics, control systems, and artificial intelligence systems.

According to Naval Group, the ship's integrated control system includes approximately 100,000 high-tech electronic devices, as well as hundreds of cables and circuits using fiber optic technology. The ship's integrated control system is expected to be AI-based.

The SSBN basing, logistics, and combat support systems are well-established and do not require significant changes. Like their predecessors, the third-generation missile submarines will be based on the Ile Long Peninsula.

They will conduct combat patrols primarily in the North Atlantic to minimize the risk of detection. These patrols will last two to three months.

The SSBN deployment system involves their rotation: one boat on combat patrol, the second at sea practicing combat training tasks or in a state of short-term readiness for deployment, and the other two undergoing technical maintenance.


The new submarines are expected to form the core of the Fifth Republic's strategic nuclear deterrent forces and remain in service until 2080-2090. Given the current Élysée Palace administration's course of confrontation with the Russian Federation, these SSBNs could pose a real threat to the national interests and security of our country and the Union State of Belarus and Russia in the future. This will require additional efforts to mitigate the threats posed by French missile-carrying submarines and the implementation of an effective system to counter threats emanating from the ocean depths.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    31 January 2026 07: 01
    Thanks for the good review, this is a rarity these days, unfortunately.. Well, the fact is that
    Submarine missile carriers are the backbone of France's strategic nuclear forces.
    Well, this applies to all countries - to us, and to those damned imperialists too. Even India has missile submarines, except Pakistan and North Korea, which haven't acquired them yet, although... who knows, who knows...
    1. +17
      31 January 2026 07: 51
      Quote: Aleksey7777777
      So this applies to all countries - to us and to the damned imperialists too
      There are many of them it's easier to hide from the enemy's watchful eye Under the ocean floor, and if you're lucky with geography, even under the ice, unlike aircraft carriers or stationary mines. I agree with your assessment – ​​the article gets a thumbs up!
    2. +6
      31 January 2026 10: 46
      This North Korean centipede is located in a hangar in Sinpo and is easy to spot.

      It is armed with ten missiles, each approximately fifteen to sixteen meters long.

      One lucky drone strike and cows, piglets...

  2. +7
    31 January 2026 07: 42
    "The launch range has increased to 4000 miles" - probably km, we are talking about the M4 missile.
  3. +10
    31 January 2026 09: 49
    France is the only EU state entity that possesses all modern technologies, and the threat is that when creating a European army, French nuclear projects in space, at sea, and in the air will be multiplied by the industrial and scientific potential of the entire EU.
    1. +4
      1 February 2026 01: 29
      In creating a European army, French nuclear projects in space, at sea and in the air will be multiplied by the industrial and scientific potential of the entire EU

      And such plans already exist. The French support them.
  4. +4
    31 January 2026 10: 26
    Hey, this was made in my country. Fuck France!
    French expression: "You don't dine with the devil, even if you have a long spoon."
    Leon Trotsky: "In the fight against fascism, we were prepared to enter into practical, militant agreements with the devil, with his grandmother..."

    The translation from French to Russian performed by Google Translate is probably not optimal.
    1. +4
      31 January 2026 10: 35
      Trotsky a parlé ici des sociaux-démocrates, mais quant à Staline…
      In any case, at that time everyone was dealing with the devil, be it Chamberlain or Dalladier.
  5. +7
    31 January 2026 12: 06
    There is an error in the caption under the illustration: this is not the SSBN Triomphant,
    this is "Redoutable"
    1. +7
      31 January 2026 13: 25
      You're right. But apparently the other photo didn't stick. They stuck "Redoutable." So they used what they had. I'm having trouble attaching images to text on my computer. For this reason, I've already earned the nickname "zalepushnika." It's a real shame. But that's the price I pay for wanting to share information about the strength of foreign navies. Sorry.
      1. +5
        31 January 2026 13: 58
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        ...the other photo didn't stick.
        1. +5
          31 January 2026 17: 56
          Hi Sanya! Glad to see you! Great article! There are two publications on military issues – the Western Military District and our Military District – these are the leading military publications in the Russian-language media, and indeed in the global media. Of course, there are others, but they specialize more in military history – "TiV," "AiK," and the supplement to the magazine "Tekhnika Molodezhi" (Technology for the Youth), "Oruzhie" (Weapons). So, what I'm getting at is that, after 45 years in the Western Military District and 15 years in our Military District, this is the best French publication on SSBNs, the most detailed. I love articles like this; there's practically no fluff, everything is to the point.
          1. +5
            31 January 2026 21: 39
            Quote from sergeyketonov
            I love articles like this, there is practically no fluff, everything is to the point.

            Sergey, hello! Thank you for your feedback. It's truly appreciated. Submitting articles for review is a nightmare for me because of the problems with attaching images. Thanks to the editors (Anatoly and Vadim Smirnov) for taking pity on me and messing around with the photos I find online. They attach fine on my computer, but they don't on the VO website. I guess I'll have to give up on writing articles.
            Your articles have always been a model of professionalism for me, a role model. And on China's nuclear weapons, a reference book. good
            Thank you that authors like you still remain on VO. drinks
            1. +5
              31 January 2026 21: 50
              Sanya, I was expecting this article of yours, as well as others on the SSBN topic. Who better to write them than you – the commander of the BDRM, the best Soviet missile submarine? No one can write better than you. And regarding the pictures – yes, I have exactly the same problem. Don't even think about stopping writing! I'm looking forward to your next articles.
            2. +3
              1 February 2026 09: 17
              Good morning, dear Alexander!
              Thank you for the article, I read it with great pleasure.
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Submitting articles for review is a real nightmare for me because of the problems with attaching illustrations.

              I looked at the photo you attached and... maybe I understand what happened (or maybe not). The thing is, the site doesn't support all types of graphic files, so it's best to upload them in JPEG format. If the photo is from the internet in some other format, I open it in an editor (I use paint.net) and resave it as a JPEG, or I can simply copy the screenshot to a blank page in Paint and save it as a JPEG.
              There have never been any problems, and I don’t seem to create any for the editors - at least they haven’t told me anything like that.
              And the article is wonderful, a big plus from me! hi drinks
              1. +1
                1 February 2026 12: 35
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                There were never any problems

                Andrey, good morning! Thanks for the advice. I'll definitely give it a try. Your articles are a model of style and elegant presentation! It's no wonder you won the "Best Author of the Year" competition. Thank you for such a high assessment of my work. As the saying goes, even a cat appreciates a kind word.
                Sincerely, Alexander. drinks
      2. +7
        31 January 2026 16: 23
        Despite this minor inaccuracy, the article is quite useful. Unfortunately, articles of this caliber are becoming scarce on VO. Instead of quality articles, a race has been launched to generate "trash" content daily.
  6. +5
    31 January 2026 15: 10
    I want to mock, but I don't know what. France, previously if not an ally then at least a partner, has clearly become an adversary and is deliberately developing its armed forces to confront us.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      31 January 2026 20: 04
      Previously, both Switzerland and Finland were neutral countries, not sites for the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons.
  7. +7
    31 January 2026 16: 20
    High-quality article, more like this on VO. Kudos and thanks to the author. Yes
  8. +5
    31 January 2026 16: 46
    Yes, a formidable opponent, judging by the description.
    Just keep in mind that this is all based on open sources, meaning it's largely advertising.
    How it works in practice is a complex question.
    Nuclear submarines are arguably the most complex engineering structures of our time. I assure you, so-called space technology will be simpler. They certainly have their own challenges, nonetheless. I remember listening to a guide at VDNKh (Exhibition of Achievements of the National Economy) excitedly explaining how complex a hatch rack-and-pinion ring is. And I thought that even the latest diesel engine has at least a dozen of these rings. On every door... And as for the VSK rack-and-pinion, with its two-meter diameter and the enormous pressures it can withstand, that's simply not worth mentioning.
    And there are no such complex systems without flaws, shortcomings, operational difficulties, etc.
    But that's OSINT work. Specialized forums, wives, mistresses... Indirect data analysis. I hope we do that.
    What I liked: No rush for superspeed. 25 knots is actually quite decent. And this isn't a hunter, it's a strategist. That is, quietly crawl to the watch point, lie down on the bench, and don't buzz... Wait for the command.
    Well, and a little practice. Manually. After university, I worked at a ship repair yard in Vladivostok. I don't remember the name of the project, but it was similar to the "Albatross" (MPK). It has propellers in the nozzles. The specifics are different, though. They use forced-air injection. For speed. So these ships were practically constantly grazing at our yard. The area inside the ring was rotting away at a rapid rate. We were constantly toiling away at replacing the hull.
    Of course, measures have probably been taken against the French, otherwise it would be such a headache...
    God willing, our "friends" from France would have plenty of complexities and nuances. And our people would know what to do with them and how. If necessary.
    Well, yes. It's worth mentioning the engineering school. The French have an ancient one.
    I remember someone named DAM once saying something to the effect (I can't vouch for the accuracy of the quote due to the length of time it's been around for years) that if we paid some money, they would develop something like that for us...
    I was practically peeing myself with rage. This guy was banging on about something he didn't understand at all. Engineering schools in complex technical fields can't be disrupted. They're easy to kill, impossible to restore (it would be a different school); they're built over decades, from person to person. Experience like that is nuanced. You can't even write it down.
    Well, let's hope that we have passed that period of our history irrevocably.
    Thanks for the review. Well done.
    1. +3
      31 January 2026 17: 39
      The Albatross is Project 1124. You're probably confused about the air injection; it didn't have an air cavity, like the Dugong Project 21820, for example, and the propellers weren't in the nozzles.
      You may be confusing it with cavitation, but if there was such a serious problem, then it was a design error.
    2. +2
      31 January 2026 21: 20
      I remember someone named DAM once saying something to the effect (I can't vouch for the accuracy of the quote due to the length of time it's been around for years) that if we paid some money, they would develop something like that for us...
      I was practically peeing myself with rage. This guy was banging on about something he didn't understand at all. Engineering schools in complex technical fields can't be disrupted. They're easy to kill, impossible to restore (it would be a different school); they're built over decades, from person to person. Experience like that is nuanced. You can't even write it down.

      Some people use their heads, some use their hands, and for others it's enough to just talk...
  9. +3
    31 January 2026 17: 44
    Quote: gromila78
    You're probably confusing something.

    No, I'm not mistaken. The ship looks very similar to the Albatross, with its distinctive superstructure. Not exactly the same, of course. The only difference is that the propellers are in the nozzles with air injection. I've crawled around there many times myself. You won't forget that.
    1. +3
      31 January 2026 17: 57
      You've intrigued me. I'll ask a friend when I have time. It's just that the air injection system for the nozzles is quite complex and unnecessary. Air injection under the bottom is used to reduce friction, but propellers don't require that.
      Maybe they were water cannons?
  10. +3
    31 January 2026 18: 11
    Quote: gromila78
    You've intrigued me. I'll ask a friend when I have time. It's just that the air injection system for the nozzles is quite complex and unnecessary. Air injection under the bottom is used to reduce friction, but propellers don't require that.
    Maybe they were water cannons?

    If I'm not mistaken, it's been so long, but I heard claims of 37 knots with supercharged engines. That was in the 80s. And they were already old news back then.
    1. +3
      31 January 2026 18: 50
      So I dug around and found out that this is a Project 204 MPC, it says there are screws in the pipes with supercharging.
  11. +5
    31 January 2026 18: 38
    The author gets a thumbs up for the article; it's interesting! Regarding the ratio of underwater displacement to surface displacement, the Triumph is about 1,13 (the Ohio is 1,12, the Astute is 1,2, and the Vanguard is 1,05), while ours are significantly higher (the Borei is 1,63, the Dolphin is 1,53, and the Akula (water carrier) is 2,07). This means they can navigate more northern latitudes more easily than the sworn submarines. It's easier to break ice, etc. I may be wrong.
    1. +3
      31 January 2026 20: 11
      Do they need to break the ice?
      Can our sub-fleet track and escort all submarines of all potential partners???
      They don't really need northern launching positions... Although the country is much easier to fire on from the north, and the distances are shorter...
    2. +3
      31 January 2026 22: 12
      Quote: Alex013
      By the ratio of underwater displacement to surface displacement.

      The Triumfan has a buoyancy reserve of only 14%. Our submarines, as a rule, have at least 25%. But our nuclear power plant (OK-650V = 190 MW, approximately the same for both the VM and the KTP). The French have the K-15 (150 MW) and only the K-22 at 190 MW. Therefore, they sacrifice survivability. Our submarine maintains survivability (stays afloat) with one compartment filled. This is built into the design. Foreign submarines rely on invulnerability. We have a VSK, they do not. These are different ideologies and design schools. The story of the Komsomolets crew is an example of the use of a VSK in a critical situation (no comment).
      1. +2
        1 February 2026 11: 57
        Is there a comparison of submarine accident statistics by country? I'm curious. I also read about propellant gas generators for emergency surfacing (and the British describe them as propellant batteries).
        1. +3
          1 February 2026 12: 25
          Quote: Alex013
          Is there a comparison of submarine accident statistics by country?

          There are statistics on disasters (losses), and they're not in our favor. As for incident statistics, they're generally classified. True, the British did publish reports on "nuclear" incidents until 20020, but these included not only incidents involving submarines and ballistic missile submarines, but also leaks of radioactive water, depressurization of nuclear power plants, and problems with the storage and transportation of nuclear warheads. Some of these reports were handled by the Defense Ministry, some by the Ministry of Energy. So, unfortunately, I can't paint a precise picture of the nuclear and radiation safety of the enemy's submarine forces.
    3. +3
      31 January 2026 22: 26
      Quote: Alex013
      The author gets a thumbs up for the article; it's interesting! Regarding the ratio of underwater displacement to surface displacement, the Triumph is about 1,13 (the Ohio is 1,12, the Astute is 1,2, and the Vanguard is 1,05), while ours are significantly higher (the Borei is 1,63, the Dolphin is 1,53, and the Akula (water carrier) is 2,07). This means they can navigate more northern latitudes more easily than the sworn submarines. It's easier to break ice, etc. I may be wrong.


      Exactly, they are completely wrong.
      They simply don't need to break the ice. Patrol zones in the Bay of Biscayne, the Mediterranean Sea, and the so-called Norwegian Sea provide a 100% ice-free guarantee.

      But patrolling in the ice promises a multitude of problems. In the event of a strike, you'll have to surface and fire back.
      We need to surface quickly.
      You need to surface safely for the boat's hull.
      You need to surface unnoticed by the boat and its task.
      And all this works very well in the Hopkins Triangle system (cheap, high-quality, fast) with all its conclusions, take a look if you're interested.
      This is the same triangle where only two points work, and the remaining point becomes a factor in the destruction of the triangle.
      Surfacing on command in the ice is impossible. You have to find a hole. This might have been possible with Project 941. But with modern submarines, with ice more than 1,5 meters thick, it's simply impossible. Even if you squeeze the ice out, there's a huge chance the hatches won't lift because of the 1,5-meter-thick ice, which won't fall off in chunks like in the pictures. It might not fall or slide off.
      That is why our modern SSBNs do not stray too far from the ice hole or the ice edge when patrolling.

      And enemy nuclear submarines do not need to surface under the ice to attack our SSBNs.
      So the idea of ​​patrolling under the ice was initially a failure, stupid and harmful.
      Invented by pseudo-traitor designers out of desperation in the hope of avoiding a real combat clash.
      1. +2
        1 February 2026 11: 47
        Thanks for the reply. "That is, it's easier for them to navigate in more northern latitudes than the sworn submarines. It's easier to break ice, etc. Maybe I'm not entirely right." - I wrote that about ours.
      2. osp
        +2
        2 February 2026 01: 45
        The combat patrol zone of French SSBNs is the Mediterranean Sea and the Bay of Biscay. There has never been ice there.
        The British patrol zone is the North Sea, and sometimes the Norwegian Sea toward Spitsbergen or Iceland.
        There's no ice there either. They don't go further east.
        British SSBNs have never deployed to the Mediterranean, while multipurpose submarines have always been there.
        Conclusion: the design of European SSBNs is simplified in terms of the hull for service in the open ocean.
        Mainly close to their territory.
      3. +2
        2 February 2026 15: 38
        Quote: SovAr238A
        Surfacing on command in the ice is impossible. We need to find an opening.
        - with modern boats, with ice thickness of more than 1,5 meters, it is simply impossible.
        - Our modern SSBNs do not stray far from the ice hole or the ice edge when patrolling.
        - the idea of ​​patrolling under the ice was initially a failure, stupid and sabotage.
        Invented by pseudo-traitor designers out of desperation in the hope of avoiding a real combat clash.
        Colleague, even though your post wasn't addressed to me, as the author of the material, I can't ignore your sentiments. Therefore, allow me to respond to the point:
        1. Upon receiving the order to launch the SLBM (usually as soon as possible), the commander fires a salvo of two torpedoes, creating (breaking) an opening in the ice, into which the SSBN surfaced to conduct the combat mission. However, the navigator always keeps track of the last opening or thin ice, which the submarine is guaranteed to "lift" without risk. This process is always ongoing, but with the submarine's switch to "continuous" communication mode, the captain himself guides the ship to the point of possible surfacing. Before firing, the navigator urgently confirms his position. Then everything proceeds according to the sequence diagram. (Recently, the SBU and launch control are also being carried out from the Central Control Center via the R-30 console.)
        2. The idea of ​​patrolling under the ice is a powerful one! It cuts off the enemy's mobile submarines (base aviation and submarines). And the Yankee attack submarines will have to force our anti-submarine defense lines with fixed anti-submarine warfare systems and controlled mine-defense missiles to reach the anti-submarine warfare sites of our nuclear-powered missile submarines.
        3. Sergey Nikitich Kovalev — General Designer of the Soviet SSBNs. He participated in the design and construction of a series of Project 955 Borei nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines in the last years of his life. He was twice awarded the title of Hero of Socialist Labor (1963, 1974), a laureate of the Lenin Prize (1965), the USSR State Prize (1978) and the State Prize of the Russian Federation (2007). Since 2004, the Chief Designer of the Project 955 Borei SSBN has been Vladimir Anatolyevich Zdornov. He was also appointed General Designer of the 4th and 5th generation SSBNs. He is a Doctor of Engineering, Professor, and Full Member of the International Academy of Informatization. He is the author of over 100 scientific papers.
        On January 19, 2007, Zdornov was appointed General Director of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Central Design Bureau of Marine Engineering ‘Rubin’”.

        As we can see, both Generals are respected, accomplished individuals. So, your assessments are erroneous and inaccurate.
      4. +2
        2 February 2026 22: 17
        SovAr238A (Al)
        And enemy nuclear submarines do not need to surface under the ice to attack our SSBNs.

        Do you understand what you're writing about (referring to the "strike on the SN RPK")? The SN RPK surfaced in ice (in a polynya), in ice, i.e., with ice floes, ice hummocks, and underwater keels, the ice makes noise. But the enemy's craft still hears the target and tracks it via the MK-48 cable. But at the final section of the MK-48, you need to turn on your own acoustics to detect the target. I've heard about the upper and lower depth limits for the torpedo, and there's also an "ice/no ice" indicator, meaning the running depth is even lower. And then there's the time crunch. These are difficulties for anyone, but not for SovAr238A.
        (Al), who will just go and strike! Oh yeah, in the Arctic Ocean there are plenty of places where if you go in, everyone else is redundant, there's not enough space...
  12. +5
    31 January 2026 22: 40
    Boa constrictor! Excellent article.
    Thank you from the bottom of my heart!
    Modern Western ultra-low-frequency detection systems, especially with the modernization of SOSUS and the deployment of permanent emitters, using the latest components and software, are a brutal blow to our submarine fleet. We simply have no escape from this system in the next 20-30 years.
    Total control on their part.
    You wrote about a SYCOBS-type combat information and control system, version 3.0 here, but nothing about "Alicia." That's revolutionary, though. A sort of underwater equivalent of the Aegis. Some say it's simply some kind of transcendental beast.
    The comparison with the Gayka's dimensions was a bit misleading. It's still almost 40 meters longer.

    Otherwise, it's a great article.
    I'm very happy to see your growth as an author. Towards more technically accurate and correct descriptive writing, without the emotional element.
    Alexander! Thank!
    1. -1
      9 February 2026 21: 51
      Is this an authoritative comment? Should I give up or just be alarmist? In short, facts and figures are important. And since they're classified by the Russian Federation, you'll be talking bullshit. Watch Rybar and other shows. LGBT+ will feel better.
  13. +3
    1 February 2026 11: 44
    The author's informational overview is understandable even for a non-technical reader. Excellent article, easy to read.
  14. +3
    1 February 2026 12: 53
    Quote: Cympak
    Instead of quality articles, a race has been launched to generate "trash" content daily.

    Unfortunately, you're right! Writing a quality article is difficult, and the topic needs to mature for everything to fall into place and be timely. And "notes from our boy" for the needs of the day don't usually require much time to rework news agency articles. Yes
    And the editors have been having a clear problem with authors and materials lately. Therefore, I urge all forum members to support our site and our VO with articles and materials to the best of their ability. Then everyone will find it more interesting to visit VO, we'll get more information, broaden our horizons, and "grow beyond ourselves." laughing
  15. -1
    9 February 2026 21: 37
    The author has covered the topic well. And to be fair, France knows how to make good weapons. If I were French, that would be a source of pride. It makes sense to highlight the SSBN's strengths. If the author emphasizes the submarine's strengths and highlights them, that would be great. And then the most difficult part: where did the French screw up? Where is the flaw? In general terms, of course. Analysis is difficult and usually expensive. You can simply read about the technical parameters on the French Navy's website and on its contractors' websites. There are no conclusions to be drawn in the current situation. There is no question or conclusion.
  16. -1
    9 February 2026 21: 45
    And yes, the article would have been at least five times longer. That's a fact.