Mikhail Frunze and the repressions in liberated Crimea

14 562 185
Mikhail Frunze and the repressions in liberated Crimea

In previous articles, we discussed Mikhail Frunze's origins and early life, his revolutionary activities, and his successful career as a Soviet military leader. Today, we'll continue that story.

Frunze's rejected proposal


As you may remember from the recent (Mikhail Frunze's Crimean triumphAccording to the article, Frunze's Southern Front's offensive against White Crimea began on the night of November 8, 1920, with strikes at Perekop and through the Sivash. Within 24 hours, fearing encirclement, the White units withdrew from Perekop. By November 12, they had been driven from all positions and fled to the sea. And on November 11, the Revolutionary Military Council of the Southern Front and commander M. Frunze sent Wrangel the following radiogram:



In view of the obvious futility of further resistance by your troops, which threatens only the shedding of unnecessary streams of blood, I propose that you cease resistance and surrender with all the troops of the army and fleet, military supplies, equipment, weapons and all kinds of military property. If you accept this offer The Revolutionary Military Council of the Armies of the Southern Front, based on the powers granted to it by the central Soviet government, guarantees those who surrender, including those in high command, full pardon for all offenses related to the civil struggle. All those unwilling to remain and work in socialist Russia will be granted the opportunity to leave the country unhindered. On condition that I renounce, on my word of honor, any further struggle against workers' and peasants' Russia and Soviet power. I expect a response within 24 hours. White officers, our proposal places a colossal responsibility on you. If it is rejected and the struggle continues, then all blame for the senselessly spilled Russian blood will fall on you. The Red Army will drown the remnants of the Crimean counterrevolution in torrents of your blood..


Incidentally, it is very similar to Suvorov's ultimatum to the Turks before the storming of Izmail - but in a more detailed form and with clearly stated guarantees.

If Frunze had broken his word, he would, of course, have tainted himself with perjury and ruined his reputation forever. However, he always kept the promises he made to his opponents. And there is no reason to believe that he would have suddenly abandoned his principles in November 1920. Moreover, on that same day (November 11, 1920), the order "On the Successful Advance of the Red Army in Crimea and the Treatment of Prisoners" was published, which stated:

Red Army soldiers! Our valiant units, having broken through the enemy's fortified positions, have stormed into Crimea... The Revolutionary Military Council of the Southern Front sent a radiogram to Wrangel, his officers, and soldiers offering them 24 hours to surrender—a period that guarantees the lives of those surrendering and free passage abroad for those who wish to do so... The Revolutionary Military Council of the Southern Front calls on all Red Army soldiers to spare those who surrender and those captured. A Red Army soldier is feared only by the enemy. He is a knight to the vanquished.

He also contacted Vice-Admiral Charles Dumesnil, commander of the French Mediterranean Squadron, by radio, informing him of his intention to create a "golden bridge" for Wrangel's forces. He then ordered a halt to the offensive for two or three days, which gave Wrangel the opportunity to load his troops onto ships; otherwise, they would have been simply destroyed en route to the sea.

The Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, Lenin, was not at all pleased with Frunze's "leniency" and telegraphed him:

If the enemy does not accept these conditions, then, in my opinion, they cannot be repeated any more and must be dealt with mercilessly.

However, as you can see, he did not give the order to break the promise, knowing Frunze’s character.

It's worth noting that Wrangel had already given up on resistance and was busy organizing the evacuation of his troops, which was far from ideal. General Ya. Slashchev, mentioned in the previous article, recalled:

Of course, there was no complete order during the evacuation of Sevastopol... The evacuation took place in a nightmarish atmosphere of disorder and panic.

Here is how A. Sudoplatov describes the boarding of the transport "Saratov" in his diary:

The crowd is still loading. The gangway has already been lifted. They're climbing ropes, jumping into the water, and approaching in boats. Horses are swimming in the water. Poor animals. One is already exhausted. And the banks of the pier are rocky, high. Hundreds of boats glide along the bay, and more and more are arriving. The cramped, crushed conditions on the ship are terrifying. There are as many people as flies. You can't squeeze through.

It would seem that in such a situation, Wrangel should have simply blessed Frunze for his proposal. But the "Black Baron" wanted to preserve his troops, hoping to negotiate with the Entente countries for support and continue the war. And Frunze's proposal was literally destroying his army. The rank and file already knew that their comrades who remained in Novorossiysk had not been executed or sent to hard labor; many had been accepted into the Red Army, while others, having surrendered, weapon, and went home. The officers had promised not to fight against Soviet Russia, and not all of them were as dishonest as Krasnov, who had broken his word. And so Wrangel not only failed to respond to Frunze's radiogram, but also forbade its dissemination to the troops and ordered the closure of all radio stations except one, manned by officers.

The consequences were tragic. First, Frunze and the members of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Southern Front concluded that their proposal had been rejected, and that the retreating Whites were implacable enemies, ready to die rather than surrender. And now the fanatics had a free hand. Especially since Lenin himself had issued an order on the table for "merciless reprisals" against any White Guards who refused to lay down their arms. And Frunze could do nothing: "You can't beat a whip with a club."

On the other hand, many Whites refused evacuation precisely because they counted on the generosity of the victors, which had already been demonstrated in Novorossiysk. By failing to inform them of Frunze's offer or the consequences of refusing it, Wrangel literally exposed these people to the bullets. Thus, responsibility for the large-scale repressions against the remaining White Guards falls not only on the notorious "Extraordinary Troika for Crimea"—composed of the Hungarian Béla Kun, the Jewish woman R. Zemlyachka, and the Russian nobleman Yuri (Georgy) Pyatakov—but also on Pyotr Wrangel—as Frunze stated in his radiogram.

Wrangel's "Innocent Lambs"


However, there is a third side to the problem. The fact is that the White Guards who remained in Crimea were not at all the meek, innocent "lambs" who would submit to the slaughter, as today's admirers of Kolchak and Denikin try to portray them. After Wrangel's departure, many formed large detachments (effectively gangs), which even included nurses. The commanders were White Guard officers, and large gangs were led by, for example, Staff Captain Mamuladze (his detachment was the largest, with 175 men), Captain Glazer, Colonel Motitsirov, Captain Glazar, and Lieutenants Alyoshin and Spai. The total number of such detachments reached several thousand (some researchers put the figure at 8-10). The former Whites had no shortage of weapons and ammunition, knew the "taste of blood," and killed easily and without hesitation. This is how the commandant of the Crimean Cheka (and famous polar explorer) Ivan Papanin recalled them:

Crimea in 1921 was full of gangs and anti-Soviet groups! They terrorized the population, raided cities and towns, disrupted Soviet events... We often encountered beasts, mistakenly called humans. There were cutthroats who thought nothing of killing a person, even a small child, just for the hell of it... I led raids, searched suspicious houses, traveled into the Crimean forests with Cheka detachments to catch White Bandits, and expropriated valuables from wealthy people who hadn't managed to emigrate. They shot at me, and I shot back. Sometimes I thought angrily that life was easier and simpler at the front.


Ivan Dmitrievich Papanin in a photograph from 1918

And here is how he conveys the words addressed to him by his immediate superior, Stanislav Redens (plenipotentiary representative of the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission in Crimea):

Do you pity? Who do you pity?! Remember, Papanin: a judge who is incapable of punishing ultimately becomes an accomplice to criminals. By sparing criminals, honest people are harmed. The greatest firmness is the greatest mercy. He who strokes everyone and everything on the fleece loves no one and nothing but himself; he who pleases everyone does nothing good, because good is impossible without the destruction of evil. These are not my words. That's what Chernyshevsky said.

Golden words. Law enforcement officers and judges shouldn't be humane, kind, or merciful—they should be fair. Excessive mercy toward a criminal is cruelty toward his victim. "Vengeance is mine, and I will repay." Anything else is "from the evil one": both cruelty and kindness.

Let's continue the story about the White bandits of Crimea.

Not content with simple robberies, they committed genuine sabotage and terrorist acts, such as a raid on a prison in Yalta and a factory in Kerch, the bombing of the Simferopol-Sevastopol railway line, and an attack on the village revolutionary committee in Sably (now Partizanskoye), where five local activists were executed. Thanks to the measures taken in advance, an armed takeover of Bakhchisarai was prevented. As you can imagine, these bandits' actions did not inspire sympathy for the former Whites, but instead fueled further anger among the Red Army soldiers and local residents.

Most of these former White Guard gangs were defeated only by the end of 1921. But as early as 1925, eight former White Guards seized the steamship Utrish and hijacked it to Bulgaria. An attempt to seize the steamship Ignatiy Sergeyev was also recorded, this time unsuccessful. The capabilities of the escaped Wrangelites can be judged by the former head of Wrangel's naval counterintelligence, Count Pavel Keller, who fought against our country during the Great Patriotic War as a colonel in the Romanian Army. In 1944, he was captured in Crimea and sentenced to 11 years in a labor camp. For some reason, he was then allowed to emigrate, and he died in West Germany at the age of 97.

In general, Dzerzhinsky’s telegram, which stated:

Take all measures to ensure that not a single White Guard escapes from Crimea to the mainland. It would be the greatest misfortune for the republic if they managed to infiltrate.

It was after receiving this information that the Crimean Revolutionary Committee issued a decree requiring the mandatory registration of all soldiers and officers of Wrangel's army remaining on the peninsula. At this time, extrajudicial reprisals against White Guards had already begun, carried out primarily by Makhnovists and "Red-Green" partisans. Their actions were approved by many local residents, who were extremely embittered by both the official "requisitions" and the "unofficial" looting that had occurred en masse under Wrangel. None other than Yu. P. Gaven, a member of the Crimean Revolutionary Committee, claimed that at least three thousand White Guards were killed in this way. And when a telegram arrived demanding that Crimea be "cleansed of counterrevolutionaries," mass repressions began.

On December 6, 1920, Lenin declared:

There are currently 300 bourgeois in Crimea. They are a source of future speculation, espionage, and all manner of aid to the capitalists. But we are not afraid of them. We say we will take them, distribute them, subjugate them, and digest them.

As you can see, there was no order to "kill a hundred thousand bourgeois." Now some "researchers" are talking about some undocumented "oral orders." But serious historians shouldn't rely on information from a cesspool of "one woman said" sources.

Mass repressions took place, and there was no shortage of fanatical perpetrators on the ground. Yefim Yevdokimov, head of the Southern Front's Special Department, distinguished himself with great zeal in carrying out the "purges." According to his award sheet:

During the defeat of General Wrangel's army in Crimea, he and his expedition cleared the Crimean peninsula of the white officers and counterintelligence agents who had remained there for underground activities, removing up to 30 governors, 50 generals, more than 300 colonels, the same number of counterintelligence agents, and a total of up to 12,000 white elements.

And many serious researchers are inclined to believe that this document provides general data on the repressions in Crimea.

It should also be pointed out that the statements about per capita the extermination of the remaining soldiers and officers of Wrangel's army in Crimea fall into the category historical Myth. I. Papanin, quoted above (let us recall that he was the commandant of the Crimean Cheka and was not at all embarrassed about it), reports that at that time a certain student of the Physics and Mathematics Department of Taurida University often approached him with petitions on behalf of his comrades:

A tall, dark-haired young man with clear eyes came to me to plead for several students who had been accidentally detained. He vehemently asserted that he would vouch for his friends.

What is the ending of this story?

I forgot about this "petitioner" and would never have remembered him if, three and a half decades later, a world-renowned scientist hadn't stopped me in the hallway of the Academy of Sciences. "Ivan Dmitrievich, do you remember how, at my request, students were released from prison?!" he asked, laughing.
It was Igor Vasilyevich Kurchatov.

But these are students who were arrested by chance. Now look at the photo:


Who do you think this powerful man in civilian clothes is? It's Anatoly Petrovich Aleksandrov, a machine gunner in Wrangel's army who remained in Crimea, defended Perekop, and managed to earn three St. George's Crosses. And, imagine, he wasn't executed by either Rozaliya Zemlyachka or Bela Kun. Instead, he became director of the nuclear center in Sarov, deputy director of the Kurchatov Institute, and president of the USSR Academy of Sciences. While working at the Kurchatov Institute, he simultaneously became deputy to the Minister of Medium Machine Building, Yefim Slavsky, who stormed Crimea with Budyonny's First Cavalry Army (as a platoon commander in the 1st Separate Cavalry Brigade).


I. Kurchatov and E. Slavsky

A. Alexandrov received nine Orders of Lenin, became a three-time Hero of Socialist Labor, and was awarded the State Prize, Lenin Prize, and four Stalin Prizes. So, it must be acknowledged: there were excesses in Crimea, but they tried to sort things out.

The exact number of alleged victims of the "Red Terror" in Crimea is virtually impossible to determine. After perestroika, "researchers" emerged who cite figures ranging from 50 to 120 and even up to 200. However, as already noted, serious historians believe the true figure is closer to the 12 cited in Yefim Yevdokimov's award sheet cited above. Indeed, Wrangel himself claims that even at its peak, his army numbered no more than 40:

The number of fighters at the front, in reserve and rear units, reached 40. Everything combat-ready was brought into action.

This army lost approximately 20 soldiers and officers during the retreat from Northern Taurida. Approximately 145 people were evacuated from Crimea, including 12 combat officers, 15 Cossacks, 10 cadets, and 30 officials and officers of rear units. Several thousand White Guards were in gangs operating in Crimea. And suddenly, "researchers" emerged who claimed that the Reds killed almost 200 officers alone in Crimea, without explaining where such numbers came from.

For example, V. Vozilov, director of the Shuya Museum named after Frunze (!), stated in one interview:

About 200 thousand officers believed Frunze's promise.

As the saying goes, there are no words—only unprintable expressions. Even the émigré historian V. Burtsev (the famous "provocateur hunter" who exposed Yevno Azef in 1908) wrote of 10–12 people repressed in Crimea. And the Tatar nationalist M. Sultan-Galiev, a member of the Board of the People's Commissariat for Nationalities of the RSFSR and founder of the Russian Muslim Communist Party and an implacable enemy of Rozaliya Zemlyachka, wrote in his denunciation of her to Moscow:

According to the Crimean workers themselves, the number of executed Wrangel officers in all of Crimea reaches 20 to 25 thousand.They indicate that in Simferopol alone up to 12,000 were shot. Popular rumor puts this figure for the whole of Crimea at 70 thousand..

But then his hand trembled, and, apparently ashamed of the figures he had given (or believing that no one would believe him), he took a “step back”:

I was unable to verify whether this is indeed the case.

It should be noted that Sultan-Galiev, who accused Zemlyachka of mass executions of White Guards, was not a witness to the events described (he arrived in Crimea a month after Zemlyachka left) and had neither the authority nor the ability to conduct any kind of investigation—he wrote from hearsay and, as you can see, he himself admitted that his information needed to be verified.

Zemlyachka is traditionally ranked alongside Béla Kun and Pyatakov as the main organizers of the repressions. Meanwhile, she was the executive secretary of the Crimean Regional Committee of the RCP(b) (one of her subordinates included Lenin's younger brother, Dmitry Ulyanov). And her "Regional Committee," unlike Béla Kun's Revolutionary Committee, was less concerned with repression than with economic matters, such as relocating working-class families from basements to bourgeois apartments and establishing the first sanatoriums for workers and peasants. Zemlyachka was a fervent supporter of turning Crimea into an "all-Russian health resort."

R. Zemlyachka was, of course, uncompromising, ascetic, cruel, and incredibly demanding—of herself and others. But she was declared almost the main symbol of the Red Terror, not entirely fairly: the primary responsibility for the repressions in Crimea rested with members of Béla Kun's Crimean Revolutionary Committee and the "special departments" of the 4th and 6th Armies and the Naval Department. This is also confirmed by the aforementioned M. Sultan-Galiev:

In the small territory of Crimea, there are three agencies charged with combating counterrevolution: the Special Department of the 4th Army, the Crimean Cheka, and the Special Department of the Naval Department.

Sultan-Galiev is a fierce and implacable enemy of Zemlyachka, but the Regional Committee of the RSDLP(b) does not write a word about her in this case.

V. Veresaev, who was in Crimea at the time, wrote about his conversation with Dzerzhinsky in January 1923:

Thousands of people were killed in Crimea. I asked Dzerzhinsky, why was all this done?

Please note: the writer, who was well aware of what was happening in Crimea, speaks of thousands of people executed – not tens of thousands (and certainly not hundreds of thousands).

Let's continue the quote:

He (Dzerzhinsky) replied:
"You see, a very serious mistake was made here. Crimea was the White Guards' main stronghold. And to destroy it, we sent comrades there with completely exceptional powers. But we never imagined they would use those powers like that."
I asked:
- Do you mean Pyatakov?
Dzerzhinsky answered evasively:
- No, not Pyatakov.
He did not say whom, but from his vague answers I concluded that he meant Bela Kun.


Bela Kun in 1919

Special and almost Home People who weren't even close to being in Crimea in late 1920 and early 1921 ascribed a role in organizing and carrying out the repressions against Zemlyachka. These rumors were eagerly picked up by rumor-mongering foreign anti-Soviet figures like S.P. Melgunov, who wrote and published a book in Germany called "The Red Terror in Russia 1918-1923." Melgunov not only wasn't a witness to the tragic events in Crimea, but also had no contact with anyone who was there at the time. He based his book solely on articles in émigré newspapers and the stories of tipsy White Guards, not shying away from "fake" "quotes"—for example, from a nonexistent issue of "Izvestia of the Provisional Sevastopol Revolutionary Committee" from November 28, 1920, while the last issue of this newspaper dates back to 1917.

On the other hand, these rumors were spread by those within the nomenklatura who hated Zemlyachka. The fact is that this woman was known for her relentless fight against official tyranny, sloppiness, corruption, and theft, and inspired fear in many precisely as the chair of the Soviet Control Commission under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, and then as deputy chair of the Party Control Committee under the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). And Demyan Bedny wrote:

From bureaucracy and hibernation
To protect yourself completely

Portrait of Comrade Zemlyachki
Hang on buddy on the wall!
Then wandering around the office,
Pray what you have learned so far
Countrywoman only in the portrait,
A hundred times more terrible than the original!

I'm sure you've read this poem many times without the first two lines: anti-Soviet authors carefully delete them, as they diametrically alter the meaning: the poem becomes complimentary, and Zemlyachka turns out to be menacing precisely for bureaucrats who are unwilling or unable to work.


This is the portrait that Demyan Bedny used to frighten Soviet bureaucrats, embezzlers and corrupt officials.

Sensing some kind of "sin" behind them, first secretaries of regional committees, directors of major factories, commanders of military districts, with bent legs, shaking with fear, entered Zemlyachka's office and then whispered in the kitchens, cementing the legend:

This time it worked out! But okay, I'm okay, but do you know what that beast did in Crimea?

We'll explore the life and fate of this extraordinary woman—the daughter of a Jewish merchant of the first guild, who studied medicine in Lyon but became deputy chair of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the first woman awarded the Order of the Red Banner. And in the next article, we'll continue our story about Mikhail Frunze.
185 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 January 2026 06: 15
    Yes, all the horror stories about the repressions in Crimea come from émigré sources. Some particularly gifted ones searched for mass graves, but found none.
    We need to finish talking about Frunze in Crimea, and start talking about building a new army under Frunze's leadership.
    1. -6
      27 January 2026 07: 23
      They say rightly that paper will bear anything. I've lived in Sevastopol for a long time and remember stories of indigenous elderly Sevastopol residents About the mass executions of Russian officers at Maximov's Dacha and elsewhere. They believed the Bolsheviks and did not emigrate. The fiery revolutionary Zamlyachka (though she has a completely different surname) was particularly brutal.
      1. VLR
        +11
        27 January 2026 08: 38
        All researchers who deal with "eyewitness accounts" know: in the first days, weeks, and months, their stories are very sparse; after 10 years, they become much more detailed and colorful; after 20 years, they take on an epic, folkloric quality. And stories like "my father heard it from his father, my grandfather" are "garbage," "fables," "urban legends"—folklore. They are not a source.
        1. +1
          27 January 2026 09: 31
          In my youth, I, a young communist, was sent to congratulate a party veteran on the Great October holiday. He was about ninety years old, short and sturdy. He was delighted to see me and began enthusiastically telling me how he'd chopped off the heads of Russian officers with an ordinary axe. This wasn't...
          eyewitness account
          , this is a participant's story
          1. +4
            27 January 2026 16: 20
            He was about ninety years old... a participant's story

            As a doctor, I can say that at that age, false memories are common—when a person can't distinguish their own memories from what they saw in a movie, or heard and vividly imagined. I personally saw one such old man on TV retelling the plot of an anti-Soviet song: his tank was shot down, and he was summoned to the political department, and "Why are you a pest, didn't you burn with the tank?"
            But that couldn't possibly happen. Just think about it: if an experienced combat tanker burns to death in his tank on the orders of a political officer, who will take his place in a brand-new tank just delivered from the factory? A random outsider? An inexperienced rookie?
          2. +3
            27 January 2026 19: 16
            participant in the events and eyewitness.
        2. +3
          27 January 2026 09: 35
          And the "sources" written by the victors are very "reliable".
          1. 0
            27 January 2026 19: 25
            The scent of laurel. Whose wreath. And then jump into bed.
            1. +1
              27 January 2026 19: 43
              Well, she never sleeps in the winner's bed.
      2. +5
        27 January 2026 12: 09
        Were there at least native Sevastopol residents born in the 1900s? How old are you? I only remember stories from my grandmother, born in 1917, but that's not about Crimea. Do you have to be at least 70? Is that right?
      3. 0
        28 January 2026 14: 46
        The destruction of the Russian elite, concentrated in Crimea during the three years of repression following the Bolshevik coup, was planned long before the breakthrough of the Ishun fortifications in November 1920 and did not take place overnight.
        On July 28, 1920, member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Southwestern Front Joseph Stalin reported to Trotsky: “We intend to issue and distribute an order for the total extermination of Wrangel’s command staff at the moment of the beginning of our general offensive.”
        Krasnov V.G., Daines V.O. Unknown Trotsky. Red Bonaparte: Documents. Opinions. Reflections. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS, 2000. – P.324
        On the same day, an employee of the Crimean regional party organization, A. Shapovalov, in a letter to Nikolai Krestinsky, a member of the Politburo and the Organizational Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP(b), expressed the idea of ​​a total “cleansing” of Crimea from “counter-revolutionaries” after the victory over Wrangel.
        In May and September 1920, the newspaper Pravda published appeals to soldiers in Wrangel's army, inviting them to lay down their arms and defect to the Reds. For this, they were guaranteed amnesty. GUARANTEED. Note, not by Frunze, but by the government of Soviet Russia.
        On November 15, 1920, 6th Army commander August Kork and 6th Army Revolutionary Military Council member Georgy Pyatakov sent radiogram No. 817 to Leon Trotsky, Chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic. It discussed the situation in Crimea following the completion of the evacuation of the Russian Army, the organization of the first revolutionary committees, and the capture of the remnants of Wrangel's army. It also reported that the number of voluntarily surrendering troops was increasing and that "complete disintegration" reigned among the enemy. In connection with this, the Revolutionary Military Council of the 6th Army petitioned for a pardon for "the entire command staff of the remnants of Wrangel's army (numbering twenty thousand)."
        Trotsky's order to the Revolutionary Military Council of the Southern Front, November 22, 1920:

        "It is necessary to focus all attention on the task for which the 'troika' was created. Try to mislead the enemy through agents by reporting correspondence that would indicate that the liquidation has been canceled or postponed." Russian Military Emigration of the 1920s–1940s: Documents and Materials. Vol. 1: Thus Began the Exile. 1920–1922. Book 1: Exodus. Moscow: Geya, 1998. - Page 2017
        1. -2
          28 January 2026 14: 49
          On November 16, 1920, Dzerzhinsky telegraphed Vasily Mantsev, head of the Special Department of the Southwestern and Southern Fronts: “Take all measures to ensure that not a single White Guard escapes from Crimea to the mainland. Treat them according to the instructions I gave you in Moscow. It would be the greatest misfortune for the Republic if they managed to infiltrate. No one should be allowed to leave Crimea…”[12]
          A state of emergency has been declared on the peninsula.
          On December 7, 1920, Order No. 89 of the Crimean Revolutionary Committee, signed by Béla Kun, was issued. According to it, entry into Crimea was prohibited "from the moment of publication of this decree until further notice." Exit from Crimea was also restricted. On November 25, 1920, the newspaper "Krasny Krym" (Red Crimea) published a notice that only those traveling on business trips were permitted to leave Crimea.
          All movement outside the peninsula, as well as entry into its territory, was strictly controlled. This task was entrusted to barrier detachments.
          Even before the capture of the peninsula, the Crimean Strike Group was created, with Yefim Evdokimov, deputy head of the Special Department of the Southern and Southwestern Fronts, appointed as its commander. The Crimean Strike Group reported directly to V. Mantsev, head of the Special Departments of the Cheka of the Southern and Southwestern Fronts.
          The Crimean Strike Force created special "troikas" of special departments empowered to impose death sentences. Investigative procedures were simplified as much as possible. In the vast majority of cases, people were not interrogated. Sentences were handed down in the absence of the accused, based on forms they filled out upon registration. In the "Charge of What?" column, the Cheka investigators wrote without hesitation: "Cossack," "second lieutenant," "wartime official," "staff captain," "volunteer," and so on. That was sufficient. After hearing a brief report from the head of the Special Department, the members of the "troika" signed a pre-prepared execution order and submitted it for execution. However, the Cheka officers considered even this semblance of an investigation too lengthy. Not bothering with bureaucratic red tape, the "administrators of revolutionary justice" proceeded simply. Having compiled a list of people slated for extermination, they wrote a resolution on it, deciding the fate of tens and hundreds of people with a single stroke of the pen.
          1. -2
            28 January 2026 14: 59
            At the end of 1920, V. Mancev wrote to F. Dzerzhinsky: "Now, after Crimea, I'll probably also be called 'bloody.' Well, what can I do? Such a nickname from the bourgeoisie is pleasant."
            Mikhail Vikhman, Chairman of the Simferopol, and later Crimean, Regional Cheka: "Upon the capture of Crimea, I was personally appointed by Comrade Dzerzhinsky as the first Chairman of the Crimean Extraordinary Commission, where, on the orders of the Party's military organ, the Cheka, I exterminated thousands of White Guards—the remnants of Wrangel's officer corps. I personally executed the Ukrainian Rada's Minister of War, Ragoza, and Minister Komorny, and many hundreds more enemies of Soviet power were executed by my own hand; the exact number is inscribed on my Mauser pistol and carbine."
            By Order No. 1665 of September 10, 1921, Konstantin Avksentyevsky, Deputy Commander of the Ukrainian and Crimean Troops, awarded captured horses to E. Evdokimov and Semyon Dukelsky, head of the All-Ukrainian Cheka's Anti-Banditry Department, for their "labor in eliminating Wrangel's front." Another Crimean "cleaner," Nikolai Bystrykh, was first honored with the Crimean Revolutionary Committee's gratitude "for energetic activity," and was later awarded a gold watch inscribed "to an honest soldier of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army" and a silver sabre inscribed "for bravery" by Dzerzhinsky.
            On December 7, 1920, Order No. 8, signed by E. Evdokimov, was issued for the Crimean Shock Group of the Special Departments of the Southern and Southwestern Fronts. According to this order, "for energetic work in the fight against counterrevolution," the following special department employees were awarded "revolutionary gratitude" and gold watches: Kudryashev, Chief of the Special Department of the 46th Division; Breidus; Yudin; Petrov; Kalyayev; Oleynikov; Dolgopyatov; and Chanov. Other special department employees of the 46th Division received "heartfelt gratitude" and were awarded silver watches with the inscription "for energetic work from the Special Department of the Southern Front."
            E. Evdokimov himself was awarded the Order of the Red Banner for his participation in the Crimean “cleansing”.
            "During the defeat of General Wrangel's army in Crimea, Comrade Evdokimov and his expedition cleared the Crimean Peninsula of White officers and counterintelligence agents who had remained there to fight underground, removing up to 30 governors, 50 generals, over 300 colonels, the same number of counterintelligence agents, and a total of up to 12,000 White elements, thereby preventing the emergence of White gangs in Crimea." In 1921, the Chekist was awarded the Order of the Red Banner, although without a public announcement. Awards were also received by those directly responsible for carrying out the sentences—members of firing squads.
            1. 0
              28 January 2026 15: 00
              By the way, Evdokimov was shot in 1940 as an enemy of the people.
        2. +2
          31 January 2026 17: 53
          Write your counter-version: with documents, photos, literature... and I will definitely read it and compare who is lying and where!
    2. +2
      27 January 2026 08: 41
      Dzerzhinsky) replied:
      "You see, a very serious mistake was made here. Crimea was the White Guards' main stronghold. And to destroy it, we sent comrades there with completely exceptional powers. But we never imagined they would use those powers like that."

      Really, what repressions? Well, they executed thousands of people without trial or investigation, so even the head of the Cheka was shocked, but otherwise, it's no big deal. "It's just part of life."
      1. VLR
        +15
        27 January 2026 09: 11
        And how many people were not simply executed, but tortured by Semyonov, Annenkov, Shkuro, Mamantov (Mamontov), ​​and other "White heroes"? This is civil war. Cruelty begets cruelty, and, alas, no one manages to "keep their hands clean."
        1. +5
          27 January 2026 09: 20
          Quote: VlR
          And how many people were not simply executed, but tortured by Semyonov, Annenkov, Shkuro, Mamantov (Mamontov), ​​and other "White heroes"? This is civil war. Cruelty begets cruelty, and, alas, no one manages to "keep their hands clean."

          Dear Valery, what do these bandits have to do with this? I'm not defending the "whites" at all. But we must still distinguish murderers and maniacs from ordinary people. You yourself cited the example of the machine gunner Alexandrov—what if he hadn't been saved?
          1. +3
            27 January 2026 23: 07
            Author: This is Anatoly Petrovich Aleksandrov, a machine gunner in Wrangel's army who remained in Crimea, defended Perekop and managed to earn three St. George's Crosses. And, imagine, he was forgiven—he wasn't executed in 1921 by either Rozaliya Zemlyachka or Bela Kun.

            That's right, Valery, he wasn't executed or repressed back then. Why not? You obviously weren't embarrassed to write about this. It's a shame, there's no secret here—the academician himself writes about it honestly in his biography:
            "In 1918, like many Kyiv students and realists, I, at the call of Hetman Skoropadsky, enlisted in the Russian volunteer units to defend the city from Petliurites and pogromists. On February 5, 1919, I was with a friend at a dacha in Mlynka. On the way back to Kyiv, at the Fastiv railway station, we met an officer we knew, a neighbor in a Kyiv apartment. The officer told us that Kyiv had been captured by the Bolsheviks and that people like us could no longer go there. We went with him to Crimea. In Crimea, at the age of 16, I became a cadet, then fought in Wrangel's Russian army as a machine gunner and was awarded three St. George's crosses. When Wrangel's army was evacuated from Crimea, I chose to stay. During the mass roundups of 1921 in Yalta, I was captured, but thanks to a combination of circumstances, I was able to escape from Under escort and escaped from the peninsula. He reached Kyiv, where he found work as an electrician and electrical engineer at the Kyiv Physicochemical Society under the Political Education Committee and as a secondary school teacher in the village of Bilki, Kyiv Oblast. For several years, he combined his studies at the Physics and Mathematics Department of Kyiv University, where he studied from 1924 to 1930, with teaching physics and chemistry at School No. 79 in Kyiv (c).
            link[/b]: Demina N. Academician Anatoly Alexandrov: “Science was my refuge.”
            Here's what Professor Angelina Guskova writes about Alexandrov:
            "He had a 'double biography.' He fought in the Civil War on the Whites' side. He knew that Beria's department was aware of this, and he understood that any retreat, careless remark, or failure could be used against him. Therefore, he was always 'buttoned up.' Anatoly Petrovich only 'let himself go' a little in the last years of his life, 'melted,' and became more trusting. He was loved, but in a different way than Kurchatov. They revered his authority, his sense of responsibility, and his willingness to share danger. (c)" Link: A. K. Guskova, “The country’s nuclear industry through the eyes of a doctor.”
        2. +1
          27 January 2026 11: 57
          Quote: VlR
          This is a civil war. Cruelty breeds cruelty.

          everything, there was no more breastfeeding- the troops sailed away, only unarmed people who agreed to live in the country remained.

          And they were brutally destroyed
          1. +1
            27 January 2026 18: 39
            Quote: Olgovich
            Only unarmed people who agreed to live in the country remained.
            And they were brutally destroyed
            And how many were destroyed, and how brutally is that? And did they really agree to live in this country? tongue And without further ado, are you sure everyone who was armed fled? They even say they captured a steamship in 1925... And there aren't a single "Kosorotov" left in Crimea... Reading your stories, all the "bad guys" suddenly fled the country, and now the "evil" Bolsheviks have decided to vent their anger on innocent people? They have nothing better to do, there are no problems in the country, than amuse themselves by brutally exterminating "unarmed people."
            1. -2
              28 January 2026 13: 07
              Quote: Fitter65
              And how many were destroyed, and how brutally?

              Ask the Bolsheviks - they exterminated Russians en masse from 17 to 53, but for some reason they didn't write the numbers in Pravda. Do you know why?

              Such achievements and...silence.
              Quote: Fitter65
              . Reading you, all the "bad guys" suddenly left the country, and now the "evil" Bolsheviks decided to take out their anger on innocent people.

              ALL good people are one people
              Quote: Fitter65
              They have nothing better to do, there are no problems in the country, except to have fun - to brutally destroy "unarmed people".

              Lenin set the task of destroying them at the 3rd Congress of Soviets.
              Quote: Fitter65
              Ah, you don’t even see the difference between those who agree and those who want to live in this country.

              They were citizens of the country and had the same rights.
              1. +2
                28 January 2026 13: 47
                Quote: Olgovich
                Ask the Bolsheviks - they exterminated Russians en masse from 17 to 53, but for some reason they didn't write the numbers in Pravda, don't you know why?... Such achievements and... silence.
                It's good that you wrote everything down, took everything into account, and can share these figures with us, just like that very same Solzhenitsyn.
                Quote: Olgovich
                Lenin set the task of destroying them at the 3rd Congress of Soviets.

                And for what purpose? Why and for what purpose did Lenin, and the leaders who followed him, want to exterminate an entire people? In your anti-Soviet obscurantism, you've already outdone yourself. When the Tsarist government exterminated its own people and invited various Germans to replace them, that was normal. But if the Soviet government began to fight its enemies, that's bad...
                Quote: Olgovich
                They were citizens of the country and had the same rights.

                One of the rights of a citizen is not to violate the laws of the country. That's the first thing. Moreover, even former enemies of Soviet power, by abiding by the laws of that state, became highly honored individuals...
                1. 0
                  28 January 2026 14: 37
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  It's good that you wrote everything down, took everything into account, and can share these figures with us, just like that very Solzhenitsyn.

                  So, please provide the official Soviet figures of those shot, exiled, and imprisoned -from Pravda-Who's against?

                  What, none? Were the Reds ashamed of their atrocities or something...

                  It was funny in the USSR when they were screaming at Solzhenitsyn, foaming at the mouth, but there was not a single refutation figure.
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  And for what purpose? Why and to what end did Lenin, and the leaders who followed him, want to exterminate an entire people?

                  not all, but members of class feuds, but their number was growing..
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  In your anti-Soviet obscurantism you have already outdone yourself.

                  your communism can't be overcome
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  When the tsarist government destroyed its own people and invited various Germans to take their place, this was normal.

                  belay lol 24 years before the VORs, Russia grew by 50% - by 60 million people.

                  Your people were even afraid to conduct censuses, they shot the organizers, but they should have shot themselves.
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  If the Soviet government began to fight its enemies, then that’s bad...

                  In fascist Italy in 1937-38, 2 people were executed, in the "people's USSR" - 342,000 times more.

                  Who is not your enemy? Rykov, Yagoda, Yezhov, Beria - who? lol
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  One of the rights of a citizen is not to break the laws of the country. This is the first

                  This is a duty. Which country?
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. +1
                    28 January 2026 14: 52
                    Quote: Olgovich
                    So, give the official Soviet figures of those executed, exiled, imprisoned - from Pravda - who is against it?
                    It seems that the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanovs also somehow did not spread in the newspapers about how many people they shot in their time.
                    Quote: Olgovich
                    Your people were even afraid to conduct censuses,
                    What a liar you are, Olgovich. laughing The last census in the Russian Empire was in 1897. When is the next one? The 1920 and 1926 population censuses were occupational-demographic censuses, while those of 1937, 1939, 1959, 1970, and 1979 were standard demographic censuses, and the 1989 and 2002 censuses were demographic and housing censuses. I have not omitted anything regarding the number and dates of censuses in the USSR before 1941.
                    Quote: Olgovich
                    In fascist Italy in 1937-38, 2 people were executed, in the "people's USSR" - 342,000 times more.

                    Did you get these figures from Pravda? Incidentally, you cited slightly different figures for the number of executions in Italy last time. Overall, it's a shame to waste time on your further anti-Soviet nonsense.
                    1. -1
                      28 January 2026 15: 07
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      It seems that the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanovs also somehow did not spread in the newspapers about how many people they shot in their time

                      so there was nothing to write about - it was a different matter under you - millions of people shot, imprisoned, deprived
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      What a liar you are, Olgovich.

                      All normal countries conducted a census after WWII, except the USSR - the physical education teacher and demographer were afraid, but the reports were classified.
                      1937 census - they shot - the lies of a friend about demography were exposed, 1939 was approved as a lie and still - a catastrophe.
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      Did you get these figures from Pravda newspaper? Incidentally, last time you reported slightly different figures on the number of executions in Italy.

                      bring, untruthful in our
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      In general, it’s a shame to waste time on your further anti-Soviet nonsense.

                      Soviet nonsense, nothing. can..not. lol .
                      1. +1
                        28 January 2026 15: 29
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        so there was nothing to write about - it was a different matter under you - millions of people shot, imprisoned, deprived

                        Of course, why would anyone write about how they treated the cattle in Tsarist times? Well, the only thing they mentioned in the ads was that they were selling greyhound puppies and a cook. And those who died from crop failure weren't even worth mentioning. That's why there's no documentary evidence of the real life of the people during the Russian Empire. As for the Soviet period, please go to the archives, get a document, and read it. And as always, you run to the NGO dump and start writing about the tens of millions of people who were repressed...
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        All normal countries conducted a census after WWII, except the USSR - the physical education teacher and demographer were afraid, but the reports were classified.
                        1937 census - they shot - the lies of a friend about demography were exposed, 1939 was approved as a lie and still - a catastrophe.

                        Well, this is the USSR, here they either lie or cheat, there is no other option.
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        bring, untruthful in our

                        Go and see for yourself, I've wasted most of my precious time on you, and it was completely pointless.
                      2. -1
                        29 January 2026 12: 06
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        the only one that was advertised was that they were selling greyhound puppies, and a cook girl

                        Read about WHAT the Yenukidzes, Berias, Kalinins, and others did to Russian girls - forcing, raping, destroying, establishing harems, exchanging and selling concubines, for example, in Dyakonov's book
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        And those who died from crop failure were not worth mentioning. That's why there is no documentary evidence of the real life of the people during the Russian Empire.

                        Don't confuse free Russia with the medieval USSR: in Russia, the state, writers, journalists, party members, and the public (zemstvo) closely monitored the famine, carried out attacks, monitored it, wrote reports, newspaper articles, and appeals; all signals were checked and responses were published, and measures were taken.

                        In the USSR, millions died from cannibalism in 33 years:
                        and not a single TV commentator even mentioned it in the newspaper or at the convention, not even a single condolence was expressed ANYWHERE - just as there were no fellow citizens, moreover:
                        February 1933, a friend of physical education:
                        "Millions of poor people living before from hand to mouth, steel wealthy people,.
                        belay
                        What is this anyway?
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        But regarding the Soviet period, please go to the archive, take a document and read it.

                        lol laughing no shame, nothing else: WHEN did they start letting this into the archives - in 33, 47, 53, 60, 70?!
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        You always run to the NGO trash heap and start talking about tens of millions of people who were repressed.

                        Give me an official SOVIET garbage dump with the numbers of those shot, imprisoned, dispossessed - a newspaper, a speech from a friend of physical education.
                        What?

                        You have nothing, nothing. Everything is a secret from the citizens. And who gave you the right to hide your "achievements"?
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        Well, this is the USSR, here they either lie or cheat, there is no other option.

                        Do you know other examples?
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        Go and see for yourself, go to your own comments and see.

                        You are lying without evidence - here is my statement.
                      3. -1
                        29 January 2026 12: 08
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        Read about WHAT the Yenukidzes, Berias, Kalinins, and other beasts did to Russian girls - forcing, raping, destroying, setting up harems, exchanging and selling concubines, for example, Dyakonova
                        With you, as an "expert on historical facts," everything is clear.
                      4. -1
                        29 January 2026 12: 18
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        With you as an "expert on historical facts"

                        You, Alexander, are not a stupid man. Read the evidence, the documents. Aren't you interested? Or... are your heads full of sand?

                        Have a nice day!
                      5. +2
                        29 January 2026 14: 09
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        You, Alexander, are not a stupid man. Read the evidence, the documents. Aren't you interested? Or... are your heads full of sand?

                        These are precisely the evidence, the documents, not the gossip and other anti-Soviet drivel that filled the information space in the 90s. So, thank God, as a sensible person, I can distinguish between forget-me-not and what Leonid Filatov wrote in his tale. These "evidences and documents" of yours are as valuable as V. Shalamov's story "The Last Battle of Major Pugachev," which "describes real events," or the "true writings" of Solzhenitsyn... So, excuse me, but this gossip and similar perestroika-era smut have been refuted more than once for at least 25 years, yet you still dig up this rottenness that will never turn into a historical fossil. Since the late 80s, you've been trying, foaming at the mouth, to equate Soviet power with Nazi Germany, just as they do in the West, distorting facts, slinging mud at the achievements of Soviet power, and if that doesn't work, you don't shy away from outright lies.
                      6. -1
                        29 January 2026 15: 57
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        These "certificates, documents" of yours have the same value.

                        What has value if not documents?

                        Is this a document or what:
                        February 1933, a friend of physical education:
                        «Millions of poor people who previously lived in hunger have become wealthy people.,.
                        ?
                        This is the PEAK of deaths 33 years

                        Congress of victors - not a word about millions of deaths - is this not a document?

                        Are reports from the OGPU, NKVD, and other cannibals not documentary?

                        Gas. A true document? There was nothing there but lies...

                        If you don't want to know, that's your right. But it's not clear.
                      7. +3
                        29 January 2026 15: 18
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        That is why there is no documentary evidence about the real life of the people during the Russian Empire.

                        This thesis is incorrect. A huge body of research, reports, and statistics from pre-revolutionary times exists in the archives. And these aren't just one-off reports, but those conducted by contemporary scholars and high-ranking officials. Very interesting, I recommend it. Incidentally, I haven't encountered any such studies after 1928, although they were clearly conducted. I assume they were stored in special collections.
                        For the early Soviet period, there is another source - documents from district committees and executive committees; from them, the general picture and the specifics of the district can be clearly seen.
                        There is a line of success in the Leningrad region, for example, but in the Far East in many districts it’s simply scary to read these documents...
                        When I have time, I'll definitely prepare a comprehensive, not selective, material. It will be interesting...
                        But the Far East is a very small part of the country, so it won’t be an indicator for the whole country, even though there are many common features.
                      8. 0
                        29 January 2026 16: 43
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        And in many areas of the Far East, it's scary to just read these documents...

                        What's so scary? What the White Guards did under the wing of the occupiers? The Americans and the Japanese, though the Americans got away in time... We here in the Far East don't know anything about what happened here. wassat
                      9. 0
                        29 January 2026 17: 14
                        You're laughing in vain... People in the second half of the 20s and throughout the 30s-50s didn't find it funny at all...
                        If they knew, they wouldn't be sarcastic.
                    2. +3
                      29 January 2026 15: 06
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      By the way, last time you gave slightly different figures regarding the number of executions in Italy.

                      It's not my discussion, but I somehow like Italy )))
                      So, during Mussolini’s reign until 1940, 9 people were executed for special crimes, and from 1940 to July 1943, another 17.
                      At the same time, other forms of coercion were widely used: deportation to remote areas and imprisonment.
                      Simultaneously, in the colonies: Libya, Ethiopia, the Balkans—the regime was bloody—there are no counts at all, only estimates, and they are in the tens and tens of thousands (I came across more precise figures somewhere, there were, I think, around 500 executed in Dalmatia, but I couldn't find them right away, sorry).
                      After the fall of the regime and the division of the country from 1943 to 1945, the death toll was already in the thousands, with more than 8000 Jews alone killed...
                2. 0
                  30 January 2026 18: 14
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  And for what purpose? Why and to what end did Lenin, and the leaders who followed him, want to exterminate an entire people?

                  No one aims to destroy an entire people. Why? It's enough to transform the state-forming people into the population of a territory by eliminating and replacing its elite. This is what was done in Crimea, where, for obvious reasons, a very large concentration of this elite was concentrated. Therefore, they eliminated not just the officers, but everyone. Those who couldn't leave. And this is the tragedy of Crimea. It was necessary to clear space for a new elite of sealed train cars, their relatives, and fellow tribesmen. So that in due course all the property and mineral wealth, temporarily (two generations) unclaimed ("belonging to the people"), would finally find a legal owner for eternity.
                  Which is what happened before our eyes in the most miraculous way.
                3. +1
                  30 January 2026 19: 01
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  One of the rights of a citizen is not to break the laws of the country.

                  You're confusing rights with responsibilities. Your head is filled with confusion and the clichés of the "Brief Course in the History of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks." Nothing else. Like this gem:
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  When the Tsarist government exterminated its own people and invited various Germans to take their place, that was normal. But when the Soviet government began to fight its enemies, that's bad...

                  There is elderberry in the garden, and an uncle in Kyiv.
            2. 0
              28 January 2026 13: 13
              Quote: Fitter65
              They have nothing better to do, there are no problems in the country, except to have fun - to brutally destroy "unarmed people".

              So this was necessary to maintain the Bolsheviks' power! They continued to plunder, exile, and exterminate millions of people. Collectivization alone cost at least 2 million people exiled and 4 million robbed. Reread Virgin Soil Upturned; it's a well-groomed history, and that was during peacetime. request
              1. -1
                28 January 2026 13: 27
                Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                Reread Virgin Soil Upturned; it's a well-groomed story, and it happened in peacetime.

                Why? I once wrote an essay about it for university admission.
                Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                Collectivization alone cost at least 2 million people exiled and 4 million people robbed...

                Did you also read these numbers in "Virgin Soil Upturned"?
                Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                So this was necessary to preserve the Bolsheviks’ power!

                What are you talking about? No wonder the Bolsheviks had nothing better to do to maintain their power than destroy and rob their own people... Are you by any chance confusing the Bolsheviks with Pol Pot? No?
                1. 0
                  30 January 2026 10: 59
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  At one time I wrote an essay about it for admission to a university.

                  This is serious :) But let me remind you of a character like Frol the Rvany... A Red partisan who became an enemy because he got rich through his own labor... hi
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  Did you also read these numbers in "Virgin Soil Upturned"?

                  Certainly, there are more rigorous sources—I recommend the works of Doctor of History Zemsky. If you haven't read them, you'll learn a lot.
                  https://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2005/0211/biblio01.php
                  https://www.politpros.com/journal/read/?ID=783
                  "We have studied the entire set of statistical reports of the Department of Special Settlements of the NKVD-MVD of the USSR. It follows from this that in the 1930-1940s, about 2,5 million people were in "kulak exile," of which about 2,3 million were dispossessed peasants and approximately 200 thousand were "impurities" in the form of urban declassed elements, "dubious elements" from border zones, etc. During the specified period (1930-1940), approximately 700 thousand people died there, the overwhelming majority of them in 1930-1933."
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  Are you by any chance confusing the Bolsheviks with Pol Pot? No?

                  Pol Pot was a communist, and the Bolsheviks are communists... Let me remind you that the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) was renamed the Communist Party of the Soviet Union... Well, who was the more terrible executioner of his people is a moot point... hi
          2. -1
            27 January 2026 18: 43
            Quote: Olgovich
            Only those people who agree to live in the country remain.
            Ah, you don’t even see the difference between those who agree and those who want to live in this country.
            1. +3
              28 January 2026 13: 15
              Quote: Fitter65
              between those who agree and those who want to live

              Could you enlighten me? I'd like to point out that the question isn't about migrants, but about native residents... hi
            2. +3
              28 January 2026 13: 25
              Quote: Fitter65
              You don't even see the difference between those who agree and those who want to live in this country.

              Since when has such a formulation of the question been grounds for the destruction of those who agree and desire?
              Killing everyone is quite a strategy, everyone who is against it - to the grave. Are you out of your mind?
              1. -1
                28 January 2026 13: 34
                Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                Killing everyone is quite a strategy, everyone who is against it - to the grave. Are you out of your mind?

                Well, I don't think I've had any complaints about my intelligence from those around me yet. And killing everyone and sending everyone who opposes to the grave—that's exactly the Bolshevik strategy that commentators like Sergey_Yekat are trying to convince us was in place from October 1917 to December 1991.
                1. +2
                  28 January 2026 13: 47
                  In our polemics, we very often get into such twists and turns that we ourselves end up feeling... not so good...
                  There have always been and always will be casualties in civil war; the word "war" implies this. The number runs into the thousands...
                  The number of victims in revolutions and palace (and not so palace) coups is usually much smaller, in the latter (palace) - only a few or tens, rarely hundreds...
                  The result is the subjugation of either the ruling elites, or the estates or classes... The key is subjugation. The bulk of the people do not participate in these massacres, but simply submit to the strongest, with or without resignation... and then—if the opportunity arises—they rebel. The trigger here is the inability or unwillingness of the "victors" to work with the masses and the notorious "excess of the performer"—the same peasant revolts that followed the civil war and were provoked precisely by this, not by ideological differences.
                  And then - what path will the authorities choose... often - the path of intimidation, during collectivization and repressions in the army and in 37-38 this was revealed in all its ruthlessness.
                  The result: the government held on, but created a huge layer of silent curse for itself. This manifested itself again at the beginning of the war, and even in 45, protests were recorded, including armed ones...
                  When speaking about the results (and they are undoubtedly impressive for the Soviet government), we must not forget the price paid by the people.
                  The question of "national happiness" must always be meaningful: who benefits from this happiness? What is the price of happiness? Who was sacrificed? Where did this happiness come from?
                  1. 0
                    28 January 2026 14: 11
                    Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                    And then - what path will the authorities choose... often - the path of intimidation, during collectivization and repressions in the army and in 37-38 this was revealed in all its ruthlessness.

                    The repressions of 1937-38 are interesting. They flared up so suddenly, hundreds of millions, as one historian wrote in the early 1990s, were imprisoned, tens of millions executed... But how did these repressions begin? What was the goal? At one point, it was reported that over 40,000 military personnel were repressed... And then, when they started breaking it down, the repressed included those dismissed for health reasons, for moral and professional qualities, those imprisoned for theft, negligence, and so on. And the most interesting thing is that this is also documented; anonymous denunciations, for some reason, were ignored. It was later that "Anonymous" came to power under Khrushchev. It's now common to slander Pavlik Morozov, claiming he put his dad in jail. True, his dad had already been in prison for almost a year or a year and a half, when the boy's relatives killed him, and for purely mundane reasons. But that's a different story. What did his dad do? As chairman, he issued fake certificates, drank heavily, and sold collective farm property on the sly. The court documents are publicly available... By the way, have you ever wondered why, during Khrushchev's time, many of the files of those rehabilitated were destroyed? Maybe someone didn't want the real truth to come to light... so it's not that simple.
                    1. +5
                      28 January 2026 14: 30
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      They flared up so suddenly, hundreds of millions, as one historian wrote in the early 90s, were imprisoned, tens of millions were shot...

                      Well, even the most ardent anti-Soviet supporters have already quietly rejected such figures...
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      How did these repressions begin? What was the goal?

                      This issue has been studied quite well by now, if we put aside ideological intolerance...
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      At one time it was written that more than 40,000 soldiers were repressed.

                      This also happened; with large numbers there is always the possibility of errors, sometimes intentional - then it is a manipulation, sometimes unintentional...
                      However, the figures are generally close to the real figures; even an error of 1,2,000 to 5,000 doesn't make them bogus... For the army, as you understand, the removal of the highest command level is always catastrophic... As for the highest command, down to the corps and division levels, no one has any actual objections. This is already a generally accepted fact. Lower down, variations are entirely possible, but they haven't made much of a difference...
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      For some reason, anonymous denunciations were not taken into account.

                      Incorrect. They were accepted, cases were opened against them in operational files and investigations, they were included in the general conclusions and even added to indictments. Please note, if there is the phrase "also confirmed by the testimony of other persons," these are anonymous. Moreover, sometimes they are undercover operatives.
                      Quote: Fitter65
                      By the way, have you ever wondered why, during Khrushchev's time, many of the files of those rehabilitated were destroyed? Maybe someone didn't want the real truth to come to light...so it's not that simple.

                      You're right - it's all very complicated, and Khrushchev had to be removed from the line of fire too, so there's nothing new...
                      After Yeltsin's arrival, the authorities were shaken up - oh, how... the archives were ablaze... and for other comrades too...
                      1. 0
                        28 January 2026 15: 08
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        After Yeltsin came

                        After his arrival, the bacchanalia began. Anyone and everyone became "historians." So, when the country has a museum dedicated to L.Zh.Initsyn and makes films based on Shalamov's "stories," like "The Last Battle of Major Pugachev"—which, they say, was based on real events—then what truth can we even talk about now? So many worthy people have written about the Katyn lie, as it happened, but the Polish memorial to the "victims of the NKVD" still stands on our soil. Everyone knows about the "prisoners who built the port" thanks to songs, but no one believes that the port was actually built by Komsomol members anymore. 700 prisoners (under criminal charges) built the railway. But 700 people is interesting. But the tens of thousands of prisoners who weren't there, who built the city, and the hundreds of thousands who died of hunger and cold during the construction of Komsomolsk—that's interesting, even if it's not true. It's like the Kolyma Highway, where they talk about how dozens of dead prisoners lie buried under the roadbed every kilometer... No matter how many times this road has been reconstructed, they've never dug up a single buried body. Something like that.
                      2. +3
                        28 January 2026 15: 29
                        Well, here we have a complete coincidence of positions, discussion is inappropriate.
                        On one condition: the Gulag existed, and its history doesn't paint either the country or the idea in a good light. Repressions did occur, and they (or rather, their nature and anatomy) need to be addressed, preferably honestly and carefully, rather than under an ideological banner.
                        But that is another part of the story, which has nothing to do directly with Frunze, although that is not a fact...
                      3. 0
                        28 January 2026 15: 39
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        The Gulag existed and its history does not paint either the country or the idea in a good light.

                        There was a GULAG, that's for sure, but now in our country, instead of it, we have another organization that performs practically the same functions, only under a different brand.
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        But that is another part of the story, which has nothing to do directly with Frunze, although that is not a fact...

                        Well, you can throw filth at anyone you want, but I don't think it's for nothing that the nuclear icebreaker "Stalingrad" is being built on the slipways. Our history needs to be washed clean of Khrushchev's manure. As the saying goes, better the bitter truth than a lie that drags everything deeper into its own swamp. After all, it was precisely because of this that the West began equating the USSR with Nazi Germany when one Russian blogger, who fancies himself a historian, explained that the crematorium at Buchenwald had the same ovens as the ones at the Solovetsky camp, where they (the Germans) installed them back in the mid-20s... Not bad, huh?
                      4. +3
                        28 January 2026 15: 54
                        No objections.
                        But it doesn't get any easier...
                        All the complex pages of history are twisted by the authorities as it suits their current interests...
                        Remember how the authorities, through the hands of the fascists of the "Memory" society, resolved the issue of suppressing protests and any other points of view...

                        Why is access to some archives restricted? Some collections are not released under any circumstances, especially non-classified collections and files...
                        I've had to apply for declassification of files, and almost all of them were approved. But a refusal is one thing. Looking at it from another perspective, it's not a big deal... Maybe some names were being protected—I don't know.
                        History needs to be known and studied widely, rather than reprinting gossip and unfounded assertions by Solzhenitsyn and others like him...
                      5. +1
                        30 January 2026 11: 51
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        History needs to be known and studied widely, rather than reprinting gossip and unfounded assertions by Solzhenitsyn and others like him...

                        It's hard to disagree with you... but who created the conditions for The Gulag Archipelago to become a quasi-bible? Or why did so many only learn about the actual tank ratio in June 1941 from V. Suvorov's works?
                      6. 0
                        30 January 2026 12: 05
                        The answer to the surface:
                        The new government came on a wave of anti-Sovietism, and everything was declared communist propaganda.
                        And there it's all simple: the first one up gets the slippers. Anti-Sovietism will belch out bitter tears at us more than once or twice...
                        It's very easy to just denounce, not investigate. And our government is not deviating from this course...
                        Simple schemes always win, this wasn't invented today
                      7. +2
                        30 January 2026 12: 10
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        The new government came on a wave of anti-Sovietism, and everything was declared communist propaganda.

                        Isn't that true? I'm not saying the new government is better or worse, I'm saying the CPSU Central Committee has completely lied...
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        Anti-Sovietism will vomit bitter tears at us more than once or twice.

                        We must tell the truth, as much as possible... I was once shocked by the level of truth in Churchill's book on WWII! It's impossible to even compare it with Soviet sources, although he concealed some things and distorted some things here and there...
                      8. 0
                        30 January 2026 12: 22
                        Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                        Isn't that true? I'm not saying the new government is better or worse, I'm saying the CPSU Central Committee has completely lied...

                        I wouldn't make such a categorical statement... They kept quiet about a lot, a lot, and it's not just the CPSU Central Committee... It would be inappropriate to delve into the reasons for the fall of the Soviet Union in the comments to this article... let's leave that for later.
                        Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                        At the time, I was shocked by the level of truth in Churchill's book on WWII! It's impossible to even compare it with Soviet sources, although he concealed some things and distorted others.

                        Regarding "truth"... This is a relative category; each side has its own truth...
                        After some incorrectly translated articles, I had to read the originals, which often have completely different accents; translators either deliberately shift them or use cheap versions of automatic translations, without using specialized dictionary blocks.
                        And the array of documents that is in the US Library of Congress, for example, is almost never used in our media; it is the prerogative of only serious research work.
                        Hence the poverty of arguments.
                      9. +1
                        30 January 2026 12: 31
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        They kept silent about a lot, a lot.

                        How subtly you whitewash lies... hi
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        This category is relative, each side has its own truth...

                        Who argues, but lies... it's a question of proportion... Churchill simply knew that if he told a gross lie, other authors would laugh at him... in the USSR, this was impossible...
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        I had to read the originals

                        For us techies, it's just not any other way; we read the originals straight away...
                      10. +1
                        30 January 2026 12: 35
                        Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                        How subtly you whitewash lies...

                        Yes, I need this like a hare needs a stoplight...
                        Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                        Churchill simply knew that if he told a gross lie, other authors would laugh at him.

                        Churchill is an outstanding, great politician. A politician is obliged to lie, simply by virtue of his job...
                        Everything requires verification. Compared to our political memoirs, Churchill's account of history is a revelation. But still, everything needs verification...
                      11. +2
                        30 January 2026 12: 39
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        Compared to our memories of politicians, Churchill's account of history is a revelation.

                        consensus! drinks
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        A politician is obliged to lie, simply because of the nature of his activities...

                        We've been trained to do this... A real, big politician doesn't lie... I have a difficult relationship with the VIL and IVS, but they didn't openly lie! The level of honesty in their work is amazing... Yes, they shifted the blame, kept quiet, etc.
                      12. +1
                        30 January 2026 12: 44
                        No politician, when looking back after the fact, forgets to present himself in the best light.
                        But operational reactions, like Lenin's, for example, are not aimed at shaping perceptions in the future; action is needed - hence the truthfulness of the articles, letters, and telegrams of that time.
                        The late interpretation of operational reactions by political scientists and official propaganda is aimed at softening or glossing over reality and "cleansing it of suspicions and enemy attacks."
                      13. +2
                        30 January 2026 12: 46
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        No politician, when looking back after the fact, forgets to present himself in the best light.

                        I would replace the word "politician" with "person"... hi
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        to soften or varnish reality

                        I never understood this... any lie is just a reason for:
                        attacks of enemies
                      14. 0
                        30 January 2026 12: 51
                        You're talking about warm again, I'm talking about green...
                        Lying and "softening or varnishing" are not the same thing.
                        Quote: Sergey_Yekat
                        I would replace the word "politician" with "person"...

                        And you will be mistaken... everything is much more complicated than simple schemes.
                      15. +2
                        30 January 2026 13: 31
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        Lying and "softening or varnishing" are not the same thing.

                        Are you so good at understanding the categories of lies? hi So a soft lie never ceases to be one... This is why the Central Committee of the CPSU failed - they simply stopped believing the propaganda...
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        everything is much more complicated than simple schemes.

                        It's a well-known technique: this is different, you don't understand, it's complicated... bully
                      16. +1
                        30 January 2026 11: 48
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        After his arrival, the bacchanalia began, and everyone who was not too lazy became "historians"

                        Have you already forgotten the Perestroika foremen? Quickly... was it really Yeltsin who pushed out Korotich and the rest?

                        Quote: Fitter65
                        Everyone knows about the "prisoners who built the port" thanks to the song, but no one believes anymore that the port was actually built by Komsomol members.

                        If it's not a secret, are you talking about the Transbaikal Komsomol members? bully
                      17. +1
                        29 January 2026 11: 24
                        Well, even the most ardent anti-Soviet supporters have already quietly rejected such figures...

                        Who and where refused?
                        The anti-Soviet forces destroyed the USSR, devastated Russia in the 90s (a demographic pit, like after WWII), unleashed a war on a fraternal nation, and you still strive to defend them.
                        Shame on you?
                        Compare the achievements of the USSR and Russia over 35 years. In what area did they surpass? What new things were created, what most did you make the people useful?
                      18. -1
                        29 January 2026 13: 11
                        Quote: Wened75
                        Who and where refused?

                        Myths about tens of millions of victims of the repressions have already evaporated from the public space – some LOMs of the 90s and 00s, in the heat of the moment (white) agreed on the figure of 50 million...

                        Quote: Wened75
                        Anti-Soviet forces destroyed the USSR and devastated Russia in the 90s.

                        That's true, and who's arguing? But these scoundrels rose from the very top of the party. So who are they—the best of the best party members...???
                        Quote: Wened75
                        and you still try to protect them.

                        Bullshit... (from the film The Elusive Avengers)
                        This is not for me...
                        Quote: Wened75
                        Shame on you?

                        Not at all. Read carefully, and such hasty judgments will disappear.
                        Quote: Wened75
                        Compare the achievements of the USSR and Russia over 35 years. In what areas did they surpass each other? What new things did they create, what did they do that was beneficial for the majority of the people?

                        Again, not for me. And make such comparisons; it will only improve the content. Some people think the country was living in bast shoes until 2000, and only started to live again in the last 25 years...
                        In Leningrad, according to media reports published in the early 00s, this new regime killed 300 elderly people—they sold their apartments in the 90s and never reappeared. In the city of Slantsy, there are entire cemeteries of the nameless victims of Yeltsin and his followers. The market, however...
                      19. The comment was deleted.
                      20. The comment was deleted.
                      21. The comment was deleted.
                      22. The comment was deleted.
                      23. The comment was deleted.
                2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +2
            28 January 2026 14: 32
            that's it, there was no more GV-

            The Civil War did happen—some consider its end date to be October 25, 1922, others June 19, 1923. And, most importantly, the idea of ​​civil war was still in the minds of people—both Whites and Reds. The Russian All-Military Union (ROVS) constantly sent saboteurs into the USSR. And the White Guard general A.P. Kutepov put forward the theory of "medium terror," which involved attacks on individual Soviet institutions in the capitals. And many Whites went into Hitler's service—because they hadn't yet calmed down and wanted revenge. The desire to "drive the cattle into the stall" hadn't disappeared after all these years.
        3. +7
          27 January 2026 13: 09
          Quote: VlR
          And how many people were not just shot, but tortured by Semyonov, Annenkov, Shkuro, Mamantov (Mamontov) and others

          Well, then they should have shot Mamantov, Semenov and the others. request
          Once the fighting is over, there's no need to rush anywhere. Why not take a thoughtful look at who's to blame, and who might not be...
          And then it turns out that because Commander Sorokin ordered the execution of the Central Committee members, Atarberkov stabbed the hostages to death, but the Whites are to blame for everything!
          Quote: VlR
          Sultan-Galiev is a Tatar nationalist who dreamed of a “free Tatar Crimea”, independent Tatarstan and Bashkiria.

          And how did such a "wonderful" person get appointed chairman of the board at the People's Commissariat?

          By the way, the next time you say that the Whites, had they won (which was impossible by definition), would have certainly torn Russia apart into its national quarters, don't forget about these "figures." They didn't, did they?
          Or do you think that the hypothetical Kutepov didn't have enough gunpowder to put the separatists up against the wall?
          1. +6
            27 January 2026 16: 26
            And how did such a "wonderful" person get appointed chairman of the board at the People's Commissariat?

            But they were flirting with national cadres back then. In Ukraine, the Jew (!) Kaganovich carried out large-scale Ukrainization and de-Russification. Moreover, Ukrainization was carried out in Kuban, the Rostov, Kursk, and Voronezh regions, the Far East, and northern Kazakhstan! And how about this certificate of passing the Ukrainian language exams in 1928—without it, they wouldn't hire anyone in the Kyiv region!
            Only in the mid-30s, when Stalin gained power, did they begin to fight nationalism in the republics.
            1. +3
              27 January 2026 16: 29
              Do you criticize the Soviet government?
              You, my friend, are a real baker!)))
              1. +2
                28 January 2026 09: 36
                Quote: Senior Sailor
                Do you criticize the Soviet government?
                You, my friend, are a real baker!)))

                This name always makes me smile, because it’s not entirely clear which booths exactly were being crunched and under what circumstances)
                1. +3
                  28 January 2026 09: 55
                  Quote: Trapper7
                  because it's not entirely clear

                  Sometimes, to be known as a monarchist and a proponent of the crystal bakery, it is enough to quote Lenin)) request
                  1. +3
                    28 January 2026 13: 19
                    Quote: Senior Sailor
                    to be known as a monarchist and a proponent of the crystal bakery

                    What's wrong with crispy buns? What's the sacred meaning behind eating underbaked bread made from bad grain? I understand the dire necessity in certain difficult times, but making a fetish out of it?
                    If it's a reference to a famous song, then it's simply nostalgia for a young, carefree life... request
                    1. +1
                      28 January 2026 14: 09
                      Colleague, I understand you are new to the site.
                      Usually, it's Vet and his ilk who call others (including me) "crust bakers." So in this case, I simply gave him his own epithet. request
    3. -1
      28 January 2026 19: 14
      Quote: Konnick
      All the horror stories about the repressions in Crimea come from emigrant sources.

      And all Soviet or other official sources are still classified or destroyed.
      You do not know?
  2. +8
    27 January 2026 06: 50
    Thanks to Valery for the interesting series; I learned some facts about Frunze that I didn’t know before.
  3. +10
    27 January 2026 06: 56
    I didn't know about Alexandrov, thanks. Interesting information... wink
    1. +8
      27 January 2026 12: 01
      Quote: Arzt
      I didn't know about Alexandrov, thanks. Interesting information... wink

      There were two such academicians: the chemist N.N. Semenov, an artilleryman in Kolchak's army.
      1. +5
        27 January 2026 19: 49
        The future academician Terpigorev, a laureate of the Stalin Prize and a holder of many orders, was a member of both the Denikin and Wrangel governments.
    2. 0
      27 January 2026 17: 47
      "And, imagine, he was not shot by either Rosalia Zemlyachka or Bela Kun."
      Let's just say the information is not entirely reliable:
      "In 1919–1920, A.P. Alexandrov found himself, by chance, caught up in the events of the Civil War. There was an episode in his life that remained a family secret for many years. As a cadet in Wrangel's army, he participated in combat operations and earned military awards from the White movement. During the evacuation of the remnants of the White Guard army from Crimea, A.P. Alexandrov had the opportunity to board a ship with the others sailing to Turkey, but he chose to remain in his homeland.
      As a result, he was captured, was sentenced to death and miraculously escaped."
      This is information from the website of the Russian Academy of Sciences from the official biography of the Academician:
      https://www.ras.ru/presidents/964afe38-5001-4507-8573-f4de14a07f6f.aspx?hidetoc=0
  4. 0
    27 January 2026 07: 26
    The author mentioned... golden words Stanislav Redens, the Pole who executed Russian people, was shot in 1940 as an enemy of the people and an enemy agent.
    Papanin, after his bloody Crimean adventures, was treated in a psychiatric clinic.
    1. +2
      27 January 2026 08: 46
      Papanin was a big drinker, and people suffering from alcohol addiction were treated in mental hospitals.
      1. +1
        27 January 2026 09: 18
        Quote: Andrey VOV
        Papanin was a big drinker

        He was never a drunkard.
        1. 0
          27 January 2026 09: 52
          Loving to drink and being a drunkard are two different things.
          1. +6
            27 January 2026 09: 55
            Quote: Andrey VOV
            Love to get drunk

            So was he a drinker or a heavy drinker?
            There wouldn't be enough mental hospitals to send all these amateurs there.
    2. +1
      27 January 2026 17: 22
      Papanin was treated in a psychiatric clinic.

      Vrubel, Pavel Fedotov, Van Gogh, Camille Claudel, Munch, V. Tsoi, T. Peltzer, V. Basov, S. Svetlichnaya, Jean-Claude Vandamme, Kurt Cobain, A. Jolie, Mel Gibson, Jim Carrey, Orlando Bloom were treated in psychiatric hospitals...
      So what? All after the "bloody Crimean adventures"?
      1. +5
        27 January 2026 19: 40
        Well, that's a pretty poor retort. Didn't Vrubel, Van Gogh, V. Tsoi, T. Peltzer, V. Basov, S. Svetlichnaya, and all the comrades you mentioned, serve in the Crimean Cheka at that time?
        Let's, Alexey, better read I.D. Papanin himself:
        In November 1920, I was appointed commandant of the Crimean Extraordinary Commission. I approached any task with great enthusiasm. Apparently, both my character and upbringing played a role: I never abandoned anything halfway. Order is order, discipline is discipline. I took over the responsibilities, but quickly ended up in the hospital from exhaustion." (c) link: Papanin I.D. _ "I came to the revolution from the navy. Memories of participation in the civil war of 1920."_ military memoirs_ M.: Politizdat, 1987..

        Here, in my opinion, Ivan Dmitrievich is being disingenuous when he claims he was hospitalized due to exhaustion. He modestly fails to mention that, had it not been for a "magically convenient hospital" that led to his urgent transfer from the Crimean Cheka as military commandant to the Kharkiv Central Executive Committee, he would certainly have been among the defendants in the Crimean Cheka investigation, staged from the center by Dzerzhinsky, "On the Execution of Wounded White Guards from the Feodosia Hospital and on the Errors and Abuses of the Crimean Cheka in the Registration and Filtering of All Former Servicemen of Wrangel's Army, Foreigners, and Refugees." As a result, almost the entire staff of the Feodosia Cheka department and the special department of the former 46th Division were themselves executed by the Crimean Cheka's special traveling squad "for abuses."
  5. 0
    27 January 2026 08: 08
    The commissars received their deserved punishment in 38.
    As for the "imperfectly executed evacuation" - there were not enough resources to evacuate everyone.
    1. +1
      27 January 2026 08: 18
      There were enough evacuation means, and many civilians left.
    2. +4
      27 January 2026 08: 25
      Quote: Panin (Michman)
      The commissars received their deserved punishment in 38.

      Rozaliya Samoilovna Zalkind, aka "Zemlyachka" and "Demon," survived.
      Zalkind chose her demonic nickname for herself, which is typical, meaning that Rozaliya Samoilovna is pure evil spirit, and for this reason she survived, turning out to be very tenacious.
      Some scientific researchers have defined Zalkind as a sociopath - this is when a person is constantly in an agitated state and goes on a rampage.
      In the church understanding, the mentioned disease is interpreted slightly differently.
      1. VLR
        +4
        27 January 2026 09: 09
        Zalkind chose the demonic nickname for herself,

        NO. I'll tell you later when, how, and why she got this nickname. It had nothing to do with the events in Crimea.
        1. +2
          27 January 2026 09: 28
          Quote: VlR
          I'll tell you when, how and why she got this nickname.

          Did your party comrades come up with this? I'm curious.
          In Samara, there is a street called Artsybushevskaya, in the central part of the city, named in honor of the revolutionary and fighter against the tsarist satraps, Vasily Petrovich Artsybushev, also known as "Samara Marx" or "Satan" (nicknames).
          It's curious how both revolutionaries and demons are the same.
          It's good that Vasily Petrovich didn't make it to Crimea; he was stirring up trouble in Samara.
          1. VLR
            +4
            27 January 2026 09: 57
            Did your party comrades come up with this?

            Oddly enough, it was her "party comrades" who spread defamatory rumors about this woman. The reason is simple: she spent her entire life fighting theft, embezzlement, and abuses of power at the hands of these very "comrades." And that's why she was both feared and disliked. And which of these "comrades" would say they suffered at the hands of an honest and principled woman? No, they were "white and fluffy," while Zemlyachka was a "mad witch."
            1. +4
              27 January 2026 10: 39
              Quote: VlR
              Oddly enough, it was the "party comrades" who spread defamatory rumors about this woman.

              Not certainly in that way.
              All revolutionaries were very fond of party nicknames and, as a rule, had several, and they also had favorites.
              For example, Sverdlov is a terry-haired man, Krupskaya is a lamprey (this is some kind of strange creature that lives in the water, jawless), the prominent Bolshevik Maria Moiseyevna Essen is a beast (666,?), etc., etc.
              1. VLR
                +2
                27 January 2026 13: 30
                You misunderstood me. In this case, I was writing about the reasons for this woman's denigration by her enemies, who she prevented from freely accepting bribes and stealing. And the nickname "Demon"—yes, it was given to her by her comrades in 1905, but not at all for "bloodthirstiness" or cruelty. The reason was rather unexpected. We'll talk about that later.
              2. +2
                28 January 2026 12: 01
                It was brutal, such a hotbed of evil back then... They say it's true that revolutions are started by romantics, carried out by maniacs, and enjoyed by inveterate scoundrels... Have we learned the lessons of history, because these terry demons, lampreys, and beasts are once again striving for power...
            2. +6
              27 January 2026 15: 38
              Author: Rozaliya Samoylovna Zemlyachka - party nickname "demon", the daughter of a Jewish merchant of the 1st guild, who studied to be a doctor in Lyon, but became deputy chairperson of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the first woman awarded the Order of the Red Banner...

              Author:It was her "party comrades" who gave her this nickname. The reason is simple: she spent her entire life fighting theft, embezzlement, and abuses of power by these very "comrades." And that's why she was both feared and disliked.

              No, Valery.
              Zalkind received her party nickname "Demon" before 1901, during her time as a member of the Odessa Committee of the RSDLP. What theft, embezzlement, and abuses among Odessa party members at the beginning of the century are you writing about? Please provide facts, otherwise this will be nothing more than a banal slander against the sterling image of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. Yes Tatra will never forgive you for this. am
              I'll give you an idea: young Rosalia received the nickname "Demon" from her Odessa comrades in 1901 because they used Lermontov's volume of the same name as a code book. Be that as it may, the unusual nickname wouldn't have stuck if not for her personality.
              For the sake of truth, among her revolutionaries, Zalkind-Berlin-Zemlyachka had numerous party nicknames, which changed with a series of her arrests and marriages (changing her previous surname to her husbands’ surnames):
              "Demon" - 1896-1905
              Osipov - 1905-1908
              "Valeria" - 1911-1915.
              "Aunt Anya" - 1915-1917

              It was under her party pseudonym "Aunt Anya" that she was included in all official Soviet history textbooks. White émigrés, however, simply called her the "Crimean fury" and the "Jewish witch."
              And she will receive "nationwide fame" under the name of "demon" only after the "historical investigation" of the Crimean events in the perestroika "Ogonyok".
              ,
              1. VLR
                +2
                27 January 2026 15: 42
                More on these nicknames later. And the fight against abuses—that, of course, dates back to Soviet times! When she was chair of the Soviet Control Commission under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, then deputy chair of the Party Control Committee under the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks).
    3. VLR
      +4
      27 January 2026 08: 59
      Wrangel managed to somehow get the Whites onto the ships only because Frunze ordered a halt to the offensive. Without this order, the retreating White Guards would have been surrounded by two cavalry armies—Budyonny's and Mironov's—and a massacre would have begun in the open field. And there would have been no one left to repress.
  6. +4
    27 January 2026 09: 37
    The author, while speaking of "garbage dumps," nevertheless turns his own articles into poison-soaked garbage dumps! Perhaps targeting a historically uneducated audience.
    1. S. Melgunov, in his book "The Red Terror in Russia," published in 1923 in Berlin, wrote: "I cannot take responsibility for every fact I cite. But I have always indicated the source from which it was borrowed."
    This source for him was primarily the Bolshevik and émigré press. At that time, the Soviet press was open and printed everything it could about the "enemies of the people."
    It's also worth noting that Melgunov was biased in some aspects of his writings due to the intensity of his personal experiences. Nevertheless, his examples resonate with the collection of documents entitled "Red Terror During the Civil War." Based on the materials of the Special Investigative Commission for the Investigation of Bolshevik Crimes under the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Southern Russia.
    The collection was published in Russia in 2004.
    2. Crimea.
    Documents from the Crimean Archives indicate that this territory was transformed into part of the "All-Russian cemetery."
    P.N. Wrangel evacuated 145639 people from Crimea on 126 ships, including 5,000 sick and wounded. Remaining in Crimea were 2009 officers and 52,687 soldiers of Wrangel's army as prisoners of war, and approximately 15,000 sick and wounded in hospitals. Another 200,000 people were military officials, journalists, actors, teachers, doctors, their families, and officers who did not fight and did not wish to leave the country. Essentially, they were refugees.
    Lenin actually intervened "about the excessive concessions to the conditions." Trotsky generally demanded "the wholesale extermination of all command personnel."
    These demands of Trotsky and Lenin began to be realized as Crimea was liberated, when heavy losses of the Reds and the resistance of the Whites led to the killing of hundreds of wounded officers in hospitals.
    The infamous Order No. 4 of November 17, 1920, regarding registration, generated 3000 queues in Sevastopol, 7000 in Yalta, and a total of at least 25000 across Crimea in three days. And then the raids began!
    In Sevastopol alone, 6000 people were detained, 700 of whom were released, 2000 were shot, and the rest were sent to concentration camps.
    The entire tragedy of Crimea cannot be described in a single comment. It requires a separate thread.
    I'd advise the author to read Ivan Shmelev's "Dead Sun" before bed. Perhaps the ghosts of Crimea will come to him in his dreams.
    1. VLR
      +4
      27 January 2026 10: 01
      A subjective literary work by a wronged man. You might also recommend Bunin's "Cursed Days." His favorite pastime, even before the Revolution, was to criticize and denigrate everyone, starting with Gogol and Dostoevsky.
      1. +6
        27 January 2026 10: 36
        I would like to hear your subjective opinion if your children or grandchildren were captured by militants of acres in Ukraine.
      2. +5
        27 January 2026 12: 24
        Quote: VlR
        A subjective LITERARY work of an offended person

        yeah, better to read subjective works executioners, trying to justify their crime..
        С
        Law enforcement officers and judges shouldn't be humane, kind, or merciful—they should be fair. Excessive mercy toward a criminal
        Let me remind the author of a basic truth: a person can be called a criminal by a court, and not by a "fair" agent of the Cheka driven mad by permissiveness and bloodshed - there were no courts.
        Read the photos of the profiles of the murdered with the resolution rachtreljat6


        1- Princess Nadezhda Alexandrovna Baryatinskaya, 75 years old (paralyzed , carried in their arms to the execution ditch).

        2. Baryatinskaya's daughter, Irina Vladimirovna Maltsova. 40 years old. (Pregnant, mother of 3 children)

        3- Maltsov Ivan Sergeevich, infantry general. 73 years disabled.

        4- Zaitseva Nina Zakharovna. Sister of MercyMe. 25 years old.

        5- Fotieva Evgenia Ivanovna. Sister of Mercy. 25 years.

        6- Popova Evgenia Fedorovna. Sister of Mercy. 23 years old.
        .

        Russian people turned out to be enemies of non-humans.
  7. -3
    27 January 2026 10: 02
    there was an order from Lenin himself about the “merciless reprisals” against those White Guards that refuse to lay down their armsAnd Frunze could no longer do anything: “You can’t beat a whip with a butt.”
    Having trouble understanding Russian?

    Inhuman atrocities were committed by sadistic Russophobes Zalkinds/Kuns against surrendered, unarmed people, with non-military women, old people, children

    "Researchers" have appeared who cite figures ranging from 50 thousand to 120 thousand.


    The author again doesn't read himself:
    Lenin: There are currently 300 bourgeois in Crimea.

    Dzerzhinsky:
    Take all measures to get out of Crimea did not reach the mainland not a single White Guard.

    NO ONE was released - and where, author, did these hundreds of thousands of Russian people go?

    In addition, ordinary residents of Crimea were also killed en masse.

    Bolshevik Sultan-Galiev, sent to the Reds to stop the massacre:

    The worst thing about this terror was that among those executed were many workers and individuals who had abandoned Wrangel with a sincere and firm resolve to serve the Soviet government faithfully. The local emergency organs were particularly indiscriminate in this regard.There is almost no family in which someone has not suffered from these executions: one person’s father was shot, another’s brother, a third’s son, and so on.

    But what is especially striking in these executions is that the executions were carried out not by themselves, but by entire parties, several dozen people together. The executed were stripped naked and lined up in front of the armed detachments. They point out that with such a "system" of executions, some of the convicts managed to escape to the mountains. It is clear that their appearance in a bare state almost in a crazy state in the villages produced the most negative impression on the peasants. They hid them at home, fed and sent further to the mountains ...

    Such reckless and brutal terror left an indelibly painful reaction in the minds of the Crimean population. Everyone feels some kind of strong, purely animal fear of Soviet workers, some kind of mistrust and deeply hidden anger
    ...

    The crazy sadistic perverted Russophobe Zalkind and her fellow Kunas flooded Crimea with the blood of Russian people, like the occupiers they were.

    Many executioners went mad...
    1. VLR
      +3
      27 January 2026 11: 31
      Sultan-Galiev was a Tatar nationalist who dreamed of a "free Tatar Crimea" and independent Tatarstan and Bashkortostan. He was arrested for separatism in 1940. He arrived in Crimea a month after Zemlyachka left, began collecting rumors and gossip, and wrote denunciations to Moscow. No one sent him to "stop the slaughter"—and he had no authority. He opposed the establishment of sanatoriums in Crimea, saying "people of other nationalities have no business on traditional Tatar land."
      Zemlyachka, as stated in the article, worked in the Regional Committee, which dealt primarily with economic matters. The repressions were carried out by the Revolutionary Committee, the Cheka, and special departments of the army and navy.
      1. +9
        27 January 2026 12: 09
        Quote: VlR
        Sultan-Galiev was a Tatar nationalist who dreamed of a "free Tatar Crimea" and independent Tatarstan and Bashkortostan. He was arrested for separatism in 1940. He arrived in Crimea a month after Zemlyachka left, began collecting rumors and gossip, and wrote denunciations to Moscow. No one sent him to "stop the slaughter"—and he had no authority. He opposed the establishment of sanatoriums in Crimea, saying "people of other nationalities have no business on traditional Tatar land."

        This was hushed up for a very long time, but today try to voice these theses publicly – the Tatar public will eat you up... Nationalism is a very contagious thing and practically "indestructible", the roots will never be torn out...
      2. +2
        27 January 2026 13: 20
        Quote: VlR
        Sultan-Galiev - Tatar nationalist who dreamed of a “free Tatar Crimea”, independent Tatarstan and Bashkiria

        No, Galiev - Chairman of the Central Muslim Military Collegium under the People's Commissariat for Military Affairs of the RSFSR and held high positions until 1940.
        Such were the national cadres of the Bolsheviks.
        Quote: VlR
        was arrested in 1940.

        If you accept the 1940 sentences, then please accept the "golden-mouthed" lol REDENSA shall be named according to the sentence, Polish spy and a conspirator (you have good authorities lol ) and his wife Anya (a relative of Stalin)-poisoner , and the heroes of the Southern Front, Kork and Blucher-German and Japanese spies
        Quote: VlR
        began to collect rumors and gossip

        His truthful report, according to historians, played a key role in stopping the repressions.
        1. +11
          27 January 2026 16: 21
          Quote: Olgovich
          No, Galiev was the chairman of the Central Muslim Military Collegium under the People's Commissariat for Military Affairs of the RSFSR and held high positions until 1940.
          Such were the national cadres of the Bolsheviks.

          That's true... the Bolsheviks were exceptionally indiscriminate in their selection of national personnel. Remember how, to create the theoretical basis for Ukrainization and the creation of a separate Ukrainian history, they invited the ultra-nationalist Hrushevsky, Chairman of the Ukrainian Central Rada of the UPR. In the USSR, he became a full member of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
          1. +1
            28 January 2026 13: 28
            Quote: Alexey RA
            They invited the ultra-nationalist Grushevsky

            He was far from the only one invited from abroad to destroy Russian things in Ukraine...
            1. +6
              28 January 2026 17: 31
              Quote: Olgovich
              He was far from the only one invited from abroad to destroy Russian things in Ukraine...

              It's just the most illustrative.
              It would be like the GDR appointing Goebbels responsible for writing a new history of the German nation. laughing
          2. +4
            28 January 2026 19: 21
            Quote: Alexey RA
            They invited the ultra-nationalist Hrushevsky, Chairman of the Ukrainian Central Rada of the UPR, who became a full member of the USSR Academy of Sciences in the USSR.

            Instead of sending him to fell trees... I'm not against harshness here... Nationalist ideologists, especially theorists, and those who aren't untalented, should be removed from society always and everywhere. They can't be re-educated, they can't be re-educated. The best way to keep your hands and your ideas clean is expulsion. And this infection must be purged down to its roots...
        2. +2
          29 January 2026 11: 07
          [quote=Olgovich][quote=VlR]Sultan-Galiev - Tatar nationalist who dreamed of a “free Tatar Crimea”, independent Tatarstan and Bashkiria
          No, Galiev - Chairman of the Central Muslim Military Collegium under the People's Commissariat for Military Affairs of the RSFSR and held high positions until 1940.
          [/ Quote]
          He did not hold any high positions; from 1923 onwards, he spent time in camps with short breaks.
    2. 0
      27 January 2026 12: 57
      The author is knowledgeable about the subject matter and doesn't try to gain a scientific understanding by searching for his own personal favorites in a garbage dump with sparrows. Don't try to force your own tastes on me by disguising them as complaints about not understanding Russian.
  8. +5
    27 January 2026 10: 56
    Thanks to the author for the interesting facts. We often don't put 2+2 together. There's a name and a story about a famous person - well, that's good, but we often don't have the time or desire to look a little deeper.

    The biographical facts of Papanin, Kurchatov, and Aleksandrov, "stitched" into this historical context, provide an opportunity to look at the events of that time in a new light.

    This passage confused me:
    "Golden words. Law enforcement officers and judges shouldn't be humane, kind, or merciful—they should be fair. Excessive mercy toward a criminal is cruelty toward his victim. 'Vengeance is mine—and I will repay.' The rest is 'from the evil one': both cruelty and kindness."

    And it seems to be true, but from the text of the article one gets the impression that this paragraph was pasted in there by accident.
    The atrocities of "their own" were not condemned in Soviet historiography, nor are they today; there is little effort to smooth things over. The Whites' atrocities have been repeatedly criticized, but even there there is no unity. This position is highly fraught with the urge to repeat the same atrocities as soon as the conditions are right.

    Wrangel's actions then and Zelenskyy's today are rooted in the same thing: fear of making a decision that would be personally fatal for the main figure. Wrangel understood that he personally would not be forgiven, and not even by the Bolsheviks—they, in fact, had the opportunity to save their lives. But his entourage clearly would not have allowed him to give the order to surrender; at best, they would have shot him, or even hanged him. As a combat officer, Wrangel didn't simply fear death—he feared a shameful death at the hands of his own people. Death at the hands of the enemy held no terror for him. Even today, this historical misunderstanding understands that it won't be his adversary, Russia, who will hang him, but his own people, who will hang him by the bootstraps in his own office...

    Regardless of party or ideological affiliation (or lack thereof), atrocities must be investigated and condemned not only by the judiciary but also by society. Otherwise, we will always step on the same rake. I will never cease to assert that only the fear of eternal retribution, including historical retribution, can keep people from turning into beasts. This won't stop pathological killers—there have always been psychopaths—but others—it certainly will, that's an axiom. Any government can and should limit the excesses of the perpetrator, but it doesn't always want to do so, hoping that this process works in its favor. And almost always, it objectively works against that government, in the long run.

    The weapon of repression has been around for thousands of years. And it's always the same: first comes "victory" and the atrocities committed in its name, and then comes the counterattack. People forget nothing and forgive nothing for the brutal "revolutionaries" or the "tsarist guardians."
    This is a problem, and ignoring it is unproductive.

    The article is interesting, thank you.
    1. +4
      27 January 2026 15: 49
      Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky

      This passage confused me:
      "Golden words. Law enforcement officers and judges shouldn't be humane, kind, or merciful—they should be fair. Excessive mercy toward a criminal is cruelty toward his victim. 'Vengeance is mine—and I will repay.' The rest is 'from the evil one': both cruelty and kindness."
      And it seems to be true, but from the text of the article one gets the impression that this paragraph was pasted in there by accident.

      Perhaps because the quote itself about “vengeance is mine, and I will repay” is out of place, for it speaks of man’s refusal to judge in favor of God, who promises to “repay” himself.

      Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
      The weapon of repression has been around for thousands of years. And it's always the same: first comes "victory" and the atrocities committed in its name, and then comes the counterattack. People forget nothing and forgive nothing for the brutal "revolutionaries" or the "tsarist guardians."
      This is a problem, and ignoring it is unproductive.

      Gold words.
      Thanks to the author for the article.
    2. +1
      29 January 2026 10: 49
      Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
      The weapon of repression has been around for thousands of years. And it's always the same: first comes "victory" and the atrocities committed in its name, and then comes the counterattack. People forget nothing and forgive nothing for the brutal "revolutionaries" or the "tsarist guardians."

      And each subsequent generation of revolutionaries forgets this. Or at least hopes that this won't happen to them.
      First, we honor the history of the French Revolution, where Robespierre and Saint-Just first sent Danton and Desmoulins to execution, and then executed Robespierre and Saint-Just themselves.
      Maximilien, I'm waiting for you, you will follow me!
      © Danton
      And then it begins:
      Tell Comrade Stalin that a terrible mistake has been made!
      1. +1
        29 January 2026 12: 53
        Quote: Alexey RA
        First, we honor the history of the French Revolution, where Robespierre and Saint-Just first sent Danton and Desmoulins to execution, and then executed Robespierre and Saint-Just themselves.

        And we keep silent about the fact that in terms of bloodiness this revolution is no different from a slaughterhouse.
        But ideologically this was not advantageous to our revolutionaries, so streets and other things were named after the murderers... and where there are foreign murderers, there are also our own, the same heroes...
  9. -3
    27 January 2026 11: 02
    Judging by the comments on these undoubtedly interesting articles, the civil war in the country is flaring up with renewed vigor. There are supporters of the White movement, a movement of losers and traitors who sold out their homeland to return the "rabble to the fold." And there are those who understand that Bolshevism and socialism are the only salvation for the Russian state. White supporters appeal primarily to literary works and outright lies, while their opponents rely on documents and real deeds. After 30 years of bourgeois rule, supporters of the "French loaf" still haven't understood that this is a road to nowhere, to catastrophe, to oblivion. Therefore, reconciliation with them is impossible.
    1. +4
      27 January 2026 12: 03
      Excuse me, but this is such a mess - everything is thrown together: if you are for the White movement, then it is definitely traitors, Bolsheviks and socialism all mixed up, and even as the only option for salvation, the notorious French roll, again irreconcilability towards it is unclear to whom and why...

      It's so naive and straightforward, like a telegraph pole... life and history are much more complex than the primitive diagrams that propagandists draw for the public, just posters from the time of Tsar Pea...

      After all, it's impossible to seriously think that the abolition of classes and estates would be met with the complete delight of those classes and estates. And the peasant question doesn't seem to be a happy one at all...

      And appealing to some kind of universal "justice" seems simply foolish. No one in history has ever succeeded in building happiness on a neighbor's misfortune, although such attempts are repeated again and again.

      Such primitivization of the historical process and history only harms both the Reds and the Whites.
    2. +2
      27 January 2026 15: 32
      We are not threatened by civil war.
      What the interested parties write here bears no comparison to what actually happened on the ground. But it was perceived as routine. Many times more people died from typhus than in battles and summary executions. So, "today it's you, tomorrow it's me..."
      I was lucky, as a child in the early 60s, to have two grandparents who had lived through the fires of the First World War (Imperial), the Revolution, and the Civil War. And this sadness, ingrained in them from their youth, was the main leitmotif of every story they told. And they were different people, after all, people in extraordinary circumstances, not the caricatured maniacs they appear to be from the depths of a century.
      A characteristic trait: my grandfather didn't eat fish, not at all. He'd even leave the table if others were eating. It was only after his death that I learned from my grandmother what the reason was. He (the platoon commander) had commanded the execution of the Semyonovsky men; the bodies were shoved into the river. And in the spring, he saw the hungry fish clinging to the corpses so tightly that they seemed to be waving their arms in the depths. It had a lasting effect on him. And another phrase he carried over from the Brusilov Offensive and the Eastern Front: taking Magyars prisoner is a sin.
      1. +7
        28 January 2026 11: 01
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        We are not threatened by civil war.
        What interested parties write here is incomparable.

        We already have something comparable going on, where two former fraternal nations are fighting to the death.
    3. -1
      28 January 2026 12: 24
      You've become a hostage to blind faith in communism, Bolshevism, and socialism and their ideology... but all of this is destroyed by the ordinary everyday life - this is when two neighbors live, one has a three-story house, and the other a shack on chicken legs, one sits after work doing remote work, and on Sundays provides, for example, real estate services, and the other neighbor, after 5 pm, goes to Krasnoye i Beloe with a bottle of beer, sits drinking and cursing the government, and on Sundays goes fishing, also with a bottle of beer, and you want to drive these two people into your socialist camp, as the Bolsheviks tried to do in their time
  10. +4
    27 January 2026 11: 04
    Do you pity? Who do you pity?! Remember, Papanin: a judge who is incapable of punishing ultimately becomes an accomplice to criminals. By sparing criminals, honest people are harmed. The greatest firmness is the greatest mercy. He who strokes everyone and everything on the fleece loves no one and nothing but himself; he who pleases everyone does nothing good, because good is impossible without the destruction of evil. These are not my words. That's what Chernyshevsky said.

    This phrase is attributed to Chernyshevsky. In reality, it's propaganda justifying terror. As for the "punitive judge," a true judge must not only punish but also protect the rights of the accused. And if he punishes, then it must be proportionate. It's telling that many officers who left Sevastopol (escaping the fate of being killed) later returned to the USSR and worked for the good of the Motherland.
    1. +6
      27 January 2026 13: 28
      Quote: Stas157
      But in reality, this is propaganda justifying terror. As for the "punitive judge," a real judge should not only punish, but also protect the rights of the accused. And if he punishes, then do so proportionately.

      quite right
      Quote: Stas157
      officers from Sevastopol, then returned to the USSR and worked for the good of the Motherland

      There are none, they were destroyed. Except for those who returned in the 1950s and later.

      There is a website with the fates of returning officers - take a look.
  11. +5
    27 January 2026 11: 55
    This is Anatoly Petrovich Aleksandrov, a machine gunner in Wrangel's army who remained in Crimea, defended Perekop and managed to earn three St. George's Crosses. And, imagine, he wasn't shot by either Rozaliya Zemlyachka or Bela Kun.
    His Majesty Chance - the young man was lucky
  12. +5
    27 January 2026 12: 24
    Melgunov not only wasn't a witness to the tragic events in Crimea, but he also had no contact with anyone who was there at the time. He wrote the book exclusively based on articles in émigré newspapers and the stories of tipsy White Guards, not shying away from "fake" "quotes"—for example, from a non-existent issue of the "Izvestia of the Provisional Sevastopol Revolutionary Committee" from November 28, 1920, while the last issue of this newspaper dates back to 1917.
    And the author of the publication (compilation) was apparently next to Melgunov and observed with his own eyes what sources he used to collect material for the release of his book.

    There is information that the newspaper “Izvestia of the Sevastopol Revolutionary Committee” was published under this name until November 1920, and from December it was published under the name “Mayak Kommuny”
    1. +6
      27 January 2026 12: 45
      I googled it and found information that in 18 the newspaper was called “Izvestia of the Sevastopol Council of Workers, Peasants, and Military Deputies,” and then Mayak Kommuny.
      Melgunov got it wrong
    2. +1
      28 January 2026 10: 01
      You should Google it first, and then write. Not the other way around.
      1. -1
        28 January 2026 10: 42
        That's exactly what I did: first, I googled it and found a publication stating that the newspaper "Izvestia of the Sevastopol Revolutionary Committee" had been published since 17, but in 20 it began to appear under the name "Mayak Kommuny" (Beacon of the Commune). That's what I wrote about.
        Then I decided to google deeper and found information that this newspaper changed its name in 18 and was called “Izvestia of the Sevastopol Council of Workers, Peasants, and Military Deputies.”
        That is, the name had changed twice by December 1920, but it would be even more correct to say that “Mayak Kommuny” was a completely new newspaper that began to be published after the liberation of Crimea by the Red Army.
        I believe that when Melgunov was working on his book, the issues of these newspapers, starting from 17 and ending in 20-21 (apparently in separate places), were in one file (or folder), so he mistakenly indicated the earlier title, believing that it was the same newspaper.
        Hence the error in the name of the source of information, and not false information.
        1. +2
          29 January 2026 09: 10
          You first wrote 1920, and then 1918. You clearly rushed your first message.
  13. -5
    27 January 2026 12: 52
    I was waiting for a thread about Alexandrov, the horseman of the apocalypse who brought Chernobyl.
  14. -1
    27 January 2026 13: 09
    Author, did Goebbels bite you?!
    1. -1
      28 January 2026 20: 57
      This is really spot on!
  15. -2
    27 January 2026 13: 15
    "...Commander M. Frunze addressed Wrangel with a radiogram of the following content:
    ...White officers, our proposal places a colossal responsibility on you. If it is rejected and the struggle continues, then all the blame for the senselessly shed Russian blood will fall on you. Red Army The remnants of the Crimean counterrevolution will be drowned in streams of your blood.... "
    If Frunze had broken his word, then, of course, he would have tainted himself with perjury and ruined his reputation forever.
    Of course, that's why he didn't break his word, as they say - I warned you laughing
  16. +4
    27 January 2026 20: 14
    A vile article. A shameful apology for crimes and criminals. I haven't read anything like this in a long time. The author lacks not only conscience, but also logic.
    So, without a second thought, he defends the figure of 10-12.000 executed throughout Crimea. This is based on data from the award sheet of Yevdokimov, head of the Southern Front's Special Department. He attempts to corroborate this figure with the authority of Burtsev, who was not involved in the investigation. He then writes:
    “...as already noted, serious historians believe that the true figure is closer to the 12 thousand indicated in the award sheet of Efim Evdokimov cited above.”
    The author is trying to prove the unprovable. If the award list of only one murderer mentions 12.000 people, then why does he omit the award lists of the heads of special departments of the 4th and 6th Armies and the Naval Department? How many thousands of executed people were listed on their award lists?
    Why doesn't anyone mention the Crimean Cheka, where Papanin and his ilk worked? How many thousands are on their conscience?
    But punitive functions were also performed by other “extraordinary organs of the dictatorship of the proletariat”: revolutionary tribunals, people’s courts, the police, “workers’ detachments,” “rural self-defense units,” units of the Red Army, military commandants, political officers, and the Cheka.

    And where to put and where was this taken into account:
    “At this time, extrajudicial reprisals against White Guards had already begun, carried out mainly by Makhnovists and “red-green” partisans.”
    And this is at least 3 thousand people, according to Gaven’s testimony.
  17. -3
    27 January 2026 20: 51
    It's too bad there wasn't a Zemlyachka like her back when Banderites and the Forest Brothers were spared. It's too bad they established the Order of Suvorov and didn't follow its precept—to destroy the enemy completely. Now we're lapping it up.
    1. +3
      28 January 2026 10: 00
      I completely agree. Stalin's inexplicable leniency toward the Nazis of Western Ukraine and the Baltics, as well as the Vlasovites. And Khrushchev's criminal amnesty.
  18. +4
    27 January 2026 21: 03
    Here are the lists of those executed in Crimea at this time.
    https://ria1914.info/index.php?title=Списки_расстрелянных_в_Крыму_в_1920-1921_гг.#.D0.A1.D0.BF.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BE.D0.BA_.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.81.D1.81.D1.82.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.BB.D1.8F.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8B.D1.85_10_.D0.B4.D0.B5.D0.BA.D0.B0.D0.B1.D1.80.D1.8F_1920_.D0.B3._.D0.B2_.D0.AF.D0.BB.D1.82.D0.B5
  19. +5
    27 January 2026 21: 06
    Just one day.
    List of those executed on January 28, 1921 in Yalta
    • 1. Aksenenko Methodius Andreevich, born in 1883, native of the city of Yessentuki, private Cossack, has 4 children.
    • 2. Babenko Prokofiy Ustinovich, born in 1898, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
    • 3. Baranov Daniil Ivanovich, born in 1888, native of Rostov, soldier.
    • 4. Basenko Petr Prokofievich, born in 1880, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
    • 5. Belikov Ivan Yakovlevich, born in 1892, native of Nikolaev, cornet.
    • 6. Bodunkov Ivan Aleksandrovich, born in 1883, native of Tver province, guard in Yalta.
    • 7. Borodenko Vasily Petrovich, born in 1884, native of the Tauride province, guard in Alushta.
    • 8. Boatswain Egor Grigorievich, born in 1893, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
    • 9. Brezhnev Nikolai Vasilyevich, born in 1891, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
    • 10. Burtsev Daniil Alekseevich, born in 1895, native of the Taurida province, peasant, soldier.
    • 11. Buyanov Sergei Paramonovich, born in 1878, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
    • 12. Vandin Ivan Evdokimovich, born in 1882, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
    • 13. Vivchar Ivan Benediktovich, born in 1870, native of the Kuban region, Cossack, was in the Yalta hospital after being wounded.
    • 14. Galushko Timofey Antonovich, born in 1896, native of the Voronezh province, senior non-commissioned officer.
    1. +4
      27 January 2026 21: 07
      • 15. Ganzey Ivan Lukyanovich, born in 1899, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
      • 16. Garkusha Ivan Petrovich, born in 1896, native of the Voronezh province, guard in Alushta.
      • 17. Golubov Vasily Gavrilovich, born in 1877, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
      • 18. Gorobets Andrey Ivanovich, born in 1891, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
      • 19. Goryun Petr Ivanovich, born in 1880, native of the Kuban region, police officer.
      • 20. Grabovsky Boris Semenovich, born in 1893, native of the city of Skvira, Kyiv province, second lieutenant.
      • 21. Darius Semyon Ivanovich, born in 1897, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
      • 22. Demin Gavriil Ivanovich, born in 1900, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
      • 23. Dudka Spiridon Yakovlevich, born in 1888, native of the Kuban region, Cossack, was in the Yalta hospital after being wounded.
      • 24. Uncle Ivan Nikitich, born in 1884, native of the Taurida province, soldier.
      • 25. Zarubin Pavel Stepanovich, born in 1897, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
      • 26. Zudin Ivan Ilyich, born in 1879, native of the Moscow province, soldier, from the beginning of 1920 - guard at the Vorontsov-Dashkov palace in Alupka.
      • 27. Zyuzen Petr Petrovich, born in 1884, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
      • 28. Ivankov Petr Ivanovich, born in 1888, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
      • 29. Karpov Yakov Sitrovich, born in 1879, native of the Don region, guard in Alushta.
      • 30. Kvach Avtonom Grigorievich, born in 1870, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
      • 31. Keren Ermolai Petrovich, born in 1885, native of the Don region, corporal.
      • 32. Klimov Pavel Nikolaevich, born in 1894, native of the Don region, sergeant major.
      • 33. Kozhukharev Semyon Spiridonovich, born in 1897, native of the Bessarabian province, sergeant major.
      • 34. Kolbasin Aleksey Makarovich, born in 1895, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
      1. +3
        27 January 2026 21: 07
        • 35. Korenev Iosif Aleksandrovich, born in 1896, a native of the Don region, a Cossack, was in the Red Cross sanatorium No. 10 in Livadia after being wounded.
        • 36. King Mikhail Danilovich, born in 1897, native of Poltava province, soldier.
        • 37. Korostichenko Petr Kalinovich, born in 1900, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
        • 38. Korotkiy Efim Grigorievich, born in 1879, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
        • 39. Kuznetsov Vladimir Pavlovich, born in 1893, native of Yekaterinoslav, second lieutenant, was in hospital in Yalta after being wounded.
        • 40. Kuprin Ivan Ananyevich, born in 1882, native of the Taurida province, second lieutenant.
        • 41. Kurilko Kirill Petrovich, born in 1900, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
        • 42. Kurnosov Kakey Nizyaev, born in 1894, native of the Astrakhan province, Kalmyk, soldier.
        • 43. Lazarevich Nikolai Nikolaevich, born in 1894, native of Yerevan province, nobleman, captain.
        • 44. Lebedenko Filipp Nikitich, born in 1893, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
        • 45. Linnik Ivan Minovich, born in 1894, native of the Kuban region, Cossack, his two brothers serve in the Red Army.
        • 46. Lychev Petr Vasilyevich, born in 1893, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
        • 47. Magoliy Izmail Serbovich, born in 1895, native of the Terek region, private Cossack.
        • 48. Malov Yakov Grigorievich, born in 1890, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
        • 49. Mishkov Gabriel Ivanovich, born in 1885, native of the Don region, police officer.
        • 50. Mozgovoy Ivan Andreevich, born in 1897, native of the Taurida province, ensign.
        • 51. Moskvin Alexander Petrovich, born in 1885, native of the Ryazan region, guard of the state guard, member of the trade union committee of workers of Yalta.
        • 52. Musienko Efim Vasilyevich, born in 1895, native of the Kuban region, Cossack, was in the Yalta hospital after being wounded.
        • 53. Naseka Petr Stepanovich, born in 1900, native of the Don region, soldier-telephone operator.
        1. +3
          27 January 2026 21: 08
          • 54. Nedilko Kuzma Ivanovich, born in 1885, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
          • 55. Padalka Petr Platonovich, born in 1886, native of the Kuban region, Cossack, was in the Yalta hospital after being wounded.
          • 56. Pariy Ivan Sisoevich, born in 1899, native of the Kuban region, Cossack, baker.
          • 57. Pishchudin Ivan Grigorievich, born in 1892, native of the Kuban region, staff captain.
          • 58. Vasily Ivanovich Poluyanov, born in 1891, native of the Oryol province, guard of the Yalta state guard.
          • 59. Ponomarev Joseph Yakovlevich, born in 1898, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
          • 60. Popov Vladimir Ilyich, born in 1881, native of Petrograd, teacher, soldier.
          • 61. Popov Efim Nazarovich, born in 1875, native of the Don region, non-commissioned officer.
          • 62. Posoh Vasily Ilyich, born in 1899, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
          • 63. Rasko Ivan Antonovich, born in 1900, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
          • 64. Rakhovsky Vasily Maksimovich, born in 1890, native of Ananyev, since 1915 - resident of Yalta, Emir Bukharsky Street, Borodin House, guard of the state guard.
          • 65. Roshupkin Tikhon Fedorovich, born in 1875, native of the Oryol province, resident of Yalta, Naberezhnaya St., 40, janitor, former guard.
          • 66. Rudik Fedor Stepanovich, born in 1893, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
          • 67. Rutkovsky Ivan Adamovich, born in 1887, native of the Volyn province, resident of Yalta, guard of the state guard.
          • 68. Salodsky Alexander Georgievich, born in 1898, native of the Kuban region, junior sergeant.
          • 69. Selcuk Philip Ivanovich, born in 1892, native of the Kuban region, ensign.
          • 70. Seredin Ivan Fedorovich, born in 1889, native of the Don region, non-commissioned officer.
          • 71. Skripkin Afanasy Efremovich, born in 1886, native of the Oryol province, soldier, guard of the state guard in Yalta.
          • 72. Smirnov Mikhail Dmitrievich, born in 1896, native of the Terek region, soldier.
          • 73. Smirnov Mikhail Fedorovich, born in 1884, native and resident of Yalta, Livadiyskaya Slobodka, Chaika Street, 32, janitor of the Yalta State Guard.
          • 74. Snegar Nikita Andreevich, born in 1899, native of the Yekaterinoslav province, soldier in the army of N. Makhno.
          • 75. Sobolev Trofim Erofeevich, born in 1888, native of Chernigov province, guard in Alushta.
          • 76. Solod Konon Mironovich, born in 1892, native of Yeysk, soldier.
          • 77. Stolyarov Andrey Semenovich, born in 1876, native of the Don region, sailor, cook.
          • 78. Strelkov Vasily Fedorovich, born in 1874, native of the Yaroslavl province, guard of the Yalta state guard.
          • 79. Strelnikov Fedor Klementyevich, born in 1896, native of Kobelyaki, Poltava province, second lieutenant.
          • 80. Strigunovsky Boris Ignatievich, born in 1897, native of Kyiv, musician, ensign.
          • 81. Suvorov Mikhail Vasilyevich, born in 1891, native of Kharkov province, staff captain.
          1. +3
            27 January 2026 21: 09
            • 82. Talalaev Alexander Ivanovich, born in 1871, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
            • 83. Tekuchev Alexander Zakharovich, born in 1898, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
            • 84. Filippov Alexander Semenovich, born in 1871, native of Nogaysk, lieutenant colonel.
            • 85. Chernov Nikolai Nikolaevich, born in 1892, native of the Don region, private Cossack.
            • 86. Chernyavsky Moisey Antonovich, born in 1897, native of the Kuban region, private Cossack.
            • 87. Shekun Nikolai Afanasyevich, born in 1886, native of Belgorod, soldier.
            • 88. Shupik Roman Platonovich, born in 1884, native of Kharkov province, guard in Alushta.
            • 89. Shuplyak Roman Ivanovich, born in 1883, native of the Kuban region, soldier, disabled after being wounded, without an arm (!).
            • 90. Shcherba Petr Gordeevich, born in 1883, native of the Kuban region, Cossack, hospital orderly.
            • 91. Yaskin Ivan Nikolaevich, born in 1876, native of the Don region, sailor on the ship "Rostislav".
            1. +3
              27 January 2026 21: 15
              Here is part of the list for the city of Yalta.
              List of those executed on December 22, 1920 in Yalta
              By the decision of the extraordinary troika of the Crimean strike group of the special departments of the Cheka of the Southern and Southwestern Fronts, consisting of chairman Udris and members Tolmats and Agafonov, dated December 22, 1920, 22 people were sentenced to death by shooting:

              1. Leonid Mikhailovich Alekseev, born in 1871, was a native of Tsarskoye Selo. He graduated from the Mathematics department of Petrograd University. He served as a garrison clerk in the White Army and lived in Yalta, in the village of Massandra.
              2. Alchevsky Dmitry Alekseevich, born in 1865, a native of Kharkov. In 1887, he graduated from the Physics and Mathematics Department of Kharkov University, holds a PhD in natural sciences, and before the revolution worked as a plant manager in Lisichansk. He lives in Yalta, in the village of Kokeneiz, and has two daughters.
              3. Konstantin Pavlovich Apraksin, born in 1896, was a native of the Ivanovo-Voznesensk Governorate. He graduated from the Alekseevskoye Military School as a lieutenant and served on the front lines of World War I as a battalion commander. His father was a public teacher at the Ivanovo-Voznesensk Factory and Technical School. He lived in Yalteya and intended to move to his family.
              4. Voznitskaya Isabella Ivanovna, born in 1896, a native of Kyiv, a sister of mercy at the Yalta military hospital, was a member of the Union of Sisters of Mercy of Crimea, lived in Yalta, Massandrovskaya Street, 29.
              5. Dolgonovsky Anton Aleksandrovich, born in 1885, a native of Kyiv, a wartime official, lived in the Yalta hotel "Russia".
              6. Zalieva Nina Zakharovna, born in 1895, native of Mozdok, Armenian, secondary education, lived in Yalta, worked as a nurse at a naval sanatorium.
              7. Kashinova Elizaveta Nikolaevna, born in 1875, native of Petrograd, secondary education, lived in Yalta, worked as a nurse.
              8. Kiseleva Alexandra Romanovna, born in 1898, a native of Petrograd, lived in Yalta, worked as a nurse at the Yalta naval sanatorium.
              9. Konstantinov Anatoly Aleksandrovich, born in 1879, native of Beletsky district, Saratov province, lived in Yalta, Botkinskaya street, 5, apt. 6, worked as a crime reporter for various newspapers, did not serve in the White Army.
              10. Kostamil Ivan Demyanovich, born in 1880, native of the Don region, Cossack, sergeant, lived in Yalta.
              11. Kryvoshapka Fedor Martynovich, born in 1882, native of Poltava province, clerk, lived in Yalta.
              12. Makarov Straton Dmitrievich, born in 1892, native of the village of Fedoseyevskaya, Don region, illiterate, Cossack, lived in Yalta, sick, with frostbitten feet.
              13. Manske Evgeniya Lvovna, born in 1891, a native of Odessa, lived in Yalta, worked as a nurse in a hospital.
              14. Negozhenko Maria Kuzminichna, born in 1867, a native of the Novgorod province, lived in Yalta, worked as a nurse.
              15. Radchenko Andrey Pavlovich, born in 1888, native of Stavropol province, non-commissioned officer, quartermaster, lived in Yalta.
              16. Rubtsov Dmitry Fedorovich, born in 1887, native of the village of Syrotinskaya, Don region, illiterate, ordinary Cossack.
              17. Subbotin Nikolai Pavlovich, born in 1863, native of the village of Simeiz, Yalta district, graduated from the Moscow Engineering School, civil engineer, lived in Subbotina’s house in Yalta, served in the army.
              18. Popova Evgeniya Fedorovna, born in 1897, native of Kharkov, nurse on a hospital train.
              19. Fotieva Evgenia Ivanovna, born in 1895, a native of Sevastopol, lived in Yalta, worked as a nurse at a naval sanatorium.
              1. -5
                28 January 2026 09: 57
                For the sake of balance, please provide a list of the names of those killed by the same Ataman Semenov. Or Anenkov. Or Shkuro.
                1. +4
                  28 January 2026 10: 01
                  Quote: vet
                  For the sake of balance, please provide a list of the names of those killed by the same Ataman Semenov. Or Anenkov. Or Shkuro.

                  You have already been answered about this nonsense.
                  There are crimes and there are criminals, why should a nurse who didn’t even know Semenov be held accountable for his actions?
                  You have a kind of cannibalistic view of things.
                  1. -4
                    28 January 2026 10: 03
                    So, whites can kill innocent people, but reds can't? What kind of double standards are these? Civil war is always and everywhere brutal and bloody, and the laws of conventional warfare don't apply.
                    1. +6
                      28 January 2026 10: 06
                      Quote: vet
                      So, whites can kill innocent people, but reds can't? What kind of double standards are these? Civil war is always and everywhere brutal and bloody, and the laws of conventional warfare don't apply.

                      You're mentally ill and inattentive. I never wrote anywhere that "white people can do it," so don't attribute things to me that I didn't say.
                      And if you think it's acceptable to kill women, old people, doctors, etc. in large numbers, you need to see a psychiatrist and not justify your insanity with the actions of Shkuro or Anenkov.
                      That's all I have. I don't intend to answer you any further.
                    2. +4
                      28 January 2026 12: 09
                      Quote: vet
                      Whites can kill innocent people, but reds can't?

                      The logic of posing the question is false.
                      The Reds – definitely not. And all such murders should be condemned by the Red authorities. Sometimes, that's what happened.
                      Good ideas cannot be realized through brutality.

                      The Whites also tried to fight against extrajudicial executions, understanding that this was demoralizing the army and denigrating the White idea.
                      A very large number of innocent victims from irregular white/red partisans and gangs of all colors.
                      1. +3
                        28 January 2026 13: 50
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        The logic of posing the question is false.

                        This isn't logic, but the lack of it. In other words, marketplace logic.
                        The man has never heard of the ideology and methods of turning an imperialist war into a civil war, the forms and methods of establishing the supposed dictatorship of the proletariat by people who were not authorized to do so, the class struggle aimed at replacing national military, managerial and creative elites, etc., which is what all these Trotskyists like Bela Kun, Zemlyachka and others like them were doing.
                        And what about Frunze? ...The Moor has done his job, the Moor can go. We know what to do without him. And this isn't about sanatoriums.
                    3. +2
                      28 January 2026 14: 15
                      Quote: vet
                      What are double standards?

                      Believe it or not, I often ask myself this question... reading your comments and Ryzhov's articles. request
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. +2
              28 January 2026 13: 45
              It's terrifying, the majority of them are ordinary people, the foundation of the country, and they were killed in a mad thirst for revenge and blood.

              Now they ask, "Where are the Russian people?" Well, there they are...
              1. +2
                28 January 2026 14: 08
                Quote: Olgovich
                the foundation of the country, and they were killed in a mad thirst for revenge and blood.

                This is a somewhat simplified explanation. It doesn't account for the two philosophical steamships and two sealed train cars, nor the executions of hostages from the Russian national elite in St. Petersburg and Moscow, declared a hostile and counterrevolutionary class.
                This is in fact the replacement of the national elite through its genocide.
                1. +4
                  29 January 2026 12: 38
                  Quote: Silhouette
                  The shootings of hostages from the Russian national elite in St. Petersburg and Moscow

                  and also in Kyiv, Odessa, Tashkent, etc.

                  In Kyiv, it was not Petliura's nationalists, but the Bolsheviks who destroyed the Club of Russian Nationalists, an association of scientists, writers, journalists, and clergy who advocated for a Russian Kyiv:
                  nazeta bolshevik:
                  The first to go were gentlemen from the camp of Russian nationalists. The choice was very fortunate, and here's why. The "Russian Nationalist Club," led by Shulgin and Savenko, was the most powerful support for the tsar's throne; it included landowners, homeowners, and merchants from Right-Bank Ukraine.
                  ...
                  No matter how many governments there were after the revolution, none of them touched Pikhnov's nest. Therefore, the entire mass of the Black Hundred bourgeoisie who voted for the "Russian list," including reaching 53,000, felt very calm in Kyiv.
                  ...
                  Shooting of a Russian nationalist club
  20. +1
    27 January 2026 21: 21
    For those interested, I recommend Mark Elenin's novel-chronicle "The Seven Deadly Sins," which describes the last year of Wrangel's reign and the subsequent fate of the White émigrés. The narrative is told from the White side.
  21. +1
    28 January 2026 16: 42
    "The Hungarian Bela Kun" Bela Kun is as Hungarian as George Soros or Zelensky is Ukrainian. So, no need to modestly shift the blame.
  22. -3
    28 January 2026 19: 44
    Before the start of the operation to liberate Crimea in November 1920, Wrangel had 60,000 troops in Crimea. According to Wrangel himself, 43,000 troops were evacuated from Crimea. The total difference is 17,000 men. However, it must be kept in mind that heavy fighting took place in Crimea: at Perekop, on the Lithuanian Isthmus, in front of the Ishun positions, Barbovich's cavalry corps was routed, there were battles at Chongar, and elsewhere, and the Whites suffered losses everywhere. Ten thousand prisoners were captured, but those who surrendered were mainly those who had no sins against Soviet power, various conscripts who would have been forced to abandon their families during the evacuation. There were practically no officers among them. In other words, there was no room for thousands (let alone tens of thousands) of officers. In reality, hundreds (perhaps around 1,000) were probably repressed, but not tens of thousands. These were mostly gang members, various counterintelligence agents, and all those responsible for the White terror in Crimea. Thus, I. Shmelev's son, who, I note, served in the commandant's office, was arrested and executed. And it was usually the commandant's office that carried out executions (they couldn't remove combat officers from the front for this). As is well known, neither Govorov nor Tolbukhin (future marshals) were executed, even though they served in the White armies.
    1. +2
      28 January 2026 21: 21
      Quote: Andrey A
      There were practically no officers among them.

      Don't spout nonsense. It hurts her. Better take the trouble to look at the execution lists for Crimea in the 20s and 21s.
      1. -3
        29 January 2026 09: 15
        The issue concerns the number of officers executed. Indeed, anti-Sovietists cite unrealistic and fantastical figures.
        1. +1
          29 January 2026 09: 24
          The execution lists speak for themselves. They just need to be understood, not skimmed. If a 23-year-old nurse is executed simply for being a "White Guard," then an officer or a cadet has no chance at all. The only possible exceptions are those with statistical bias. This isn't fantasy. Those you call anti-Soviet forces compiled their information based on the testimonies of relatives and eyewitnesses of the dead, not archival data.
          1. 0
            29 January 2026 20: 06
            But the article about Melgunov, "a sleepwalking agent of the Entente," is precisely how the Bolsheviks saw him. Well, the Entente was, first and foremost, England. Considering the connections of some Melgunovs with Herzen, who didn't deny his connections with England, everything seems logical. And yet, and this is important, the Nazis also accused the Bolsheviks of mass executions, but it was the Nazis themselves who executed the people on our soil, and there's no need to look for the graves of the people they executed; they're well known; it was the Entente who executed them. https://document.wikireading.ru/hLKNmHRGYb
            1. -2
              29 January 2026 20: 48
              Quote: Andrey A
              But here is an article about Melgunov, “a fallen asleep agent of the Entente” - this is exactly how the Bolsheviks saw him.

              Shove this Bolshevik propaganda article into your...well, you know where.
              And don't make anyone laugh with your utter ignorance.
      2. 0
        29 January 2026 19: 51
        All this information from the lists stems from Ukrainian propaganda, which itself stems from Mr. Melgunov's fantasies. Meanwhile, there is NO confirmation of Melgunov's fantasies: his references to Soviet newspapers are fake, there is no confirmation in Soviet archives, there are no bodies of those executed, no one was ever found near Sevastopol, Simferopol, Yalta, etc. Although it would seem that the problem of proving Bolshevik atrocities in Crimea is easily solved: dig up the graves of the executed – there you have the evidence. In a quarter-century of domination in Crimea, Ukrainian anti-communists and their overseas masters have not found a single bone. As I already wrote: there weren't enough officers in Crimea to execute so many. The Whites conscripted everyone they could into Wrangel's army, and then these gentlemen fled abroad with it. There was no one to execute in Crimea. Bandits and Wrangel's agents were executed—dozens and hundreds, at most. And that's a FACT. In the preface to his book, "The Red Terror in Russia 1918–1923," Melgunov wrote: "I cannot take responsibility for every fact I cite." His facts, however, are primarily drawn from propaganda articles in White Guard newspapers. For example: "They say that sailors now often fish up the corpses of Solovetsky monks while fishing, bound together at the wrists with wire..." Relying on Melgunov as an objective source is impossible. As evidence of "Bolshevik atrocities in Crimea," he cited the émigré newspaper "Poslednie Novosti" (Latest News) No. 198 from 1920, which in turn cited a supposedly Soviet newspaper from Sevastopol. Melgunov writes: "On November 28th, the first list of those executed appeared in the Izvestiya Vremya Sevastopolskogo Revkom (News of the Sevastopol Revolutionary Committee)—1634 people, including 278 women; on November 30th, a second list of 1202 people was published, 88 of whom were women." But in February 2013, a lecture entitled "Turning the Pages of the Past" was held at the Russian Center of the Naval Library in Sevastopol. It turned out that the newspaper "Izvestiya Sevastopolskogo Revkom" (News of the Sevastopol Revolutionary Committee) was published in December 1917, and upon the restoration of Soviet power in November 1920, the Bolsheviks began publishing a newspaper called "Mayak Kommuny" (Beacon of the Commune). Since there were difficulties with paper in Crimea at that time, no other newspapers were published in Sevastopol at that time. It turns out that this report in the émigré press about the execution, citing a now-defunct newspaper, is a common newspaper hoax. There are no lists of those executed, neither for "1634 people, including 278 women," nor for "1202 people, including 88 women," in any newspaper, although all issues of Sevastopol's Bolshevik newspapers, beginning in 1917, are now stored in the editorial archive of the newspaper "Slava Sevastopolya," which is considered the successor to these newspapers. https://arctus.livejournal.com/96966.html
        1. 0
          29 January 2026 20: 34
          Quote: Andrey A
          There are no bodies of those executed; no one has ever been found near Sevastopol, Simferopol, Yalta, etc. Although it would seem that the problem of proving Bolshevik atrocities in Crimea is easily solved: dig up the graves of the executed – there you have the evidence. In a quarter-century of rule in Crimea, Ukrainian anti-communists and their overseas masters have not found a single bone.

          One might be curious: who, when and where searched for the bodies of executed White Guards, nurses and other "counter-revolutionaries"?
          1. -2
            29 January 2026 21: 07
            https://sammler.ru/index.php?/topic/185094-%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%BC-%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%BE%D1%82-7-%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%80%D1%8F-1920-%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0-322-%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0/&ysclid=mkzrcytwun573146097
            1. +2
              2 February 2026 19: 17
              The link doesn't work. No bodies of those executed in Crimea by the Bolsheviks in 1920-21 have been found, and that's a fact. And you can write whatever you want. Just a reminder: 30 people were allegedly executed in the Levashevskaya Pustosh (in St. Petersburg) in the 120s, a figure that was subsequently reduced many times, and now, supposedly, several thousand lie there. However, during this time, not a single body, not a single bone, has been found (and it's not a fact that anyone lies there). The same goes for the Butovo firing range in Moscow. These are all just "virtual" executions. As for Crimea, Yalta, for example, is small, and finding and excavating the graves of the executed there wouldn't be difficult. But neither the Ukrainian nationalists who ruled there for a quarter of a century (in this sense, the telling "fairy tales" from Kyiv's Abramenko in 2005 are completely unsubstantiated) nor the current authorities did this. Nothing was found. After all, in many countries, a person cannot be declared dead without a body. And Melgunov's constructions are worthless! And so, let me remind you, a year after the surrender of Crimea, General Ya. A. Slashchev and a group of senior officers returned to Soviet Russia. And they weren't executed; Slashchev went on to teach marksmanship and tactical courses for the Red Army's command staff for many years.
              1. 0
                2 February 2026 20: 58
                Quote: Andrey A
                The bodies of those shot in Crimea by the Bolsheviks in 1920-21 have not been found, and this is a fact.

                And who was looking for them?...
                Under Soviet rule, no one. Because relatives could also be subject to repression for this. Those who needed it were abroad or in the Gulag. The rest of the population didn't need it.
                Slashchev was shot by a man who was exempt from any punishment for his actions.
                1. 0
                  3 February 2026 18: 57
                  Soviet power has been gone for almost 40 years now, so the burden of proof is on the party proving it. Those who argue for mass shootings in Crimea must provide evidence of excavations. Let me repeat: Ukrainian nationalists and their Western patrons ruled Crimea for a quarter of a century. If they had even a sliver of truth, our people would have dug it up long ago. The reality is, there's NOTHING. There's no evidence. Slashchev lived in Soviet Russia for almost eight years. Slashchev's killer was avenging his brother, whom he had executed, and committed the murder while insane.
  23. -2
    29 January 2026 21: 17
    On December 10, 2005, in Bagreyevka, near Yalta, a ceremony was held to lay the foundation of a chapel in the name of the Sign Icon of the Most Holy Theotokos of Kursk Root (1295), reports the Crimean Center for Humanitarian Research.
    The chapel was built on the site of the mass executions of Yalta residents between December 7, 1920, and March 25, 1921. According to some estimates, between 5,000 and 6,000 people were shot in Yalta during the Red Terror. Bagreyevka, the estate of attorney Alexei Mikhailovich Frolov-Bagreev in the suburbs of Yalta, was one of the execution sites. Around 1000 people died here. Among those executed were Princess N.A. Baryatinskaya, her daughter I.V. Maltseva (who was pregnant), her husband, Captain-Lieutenant of the Black Sea Fleet S.N. Maltsev, and his father I.S. Maltsev (the founder of Simeiz). Among those executed were many famous old generals who had not served in the White Army: Major General A.P. Bagration (a direct descendant of the hero of 1812), Lieutenant General N.P. Bobyr, Major General V.D. Orekhov, and others. In Bagreyevka, perished the archpriest of the Church of St. Alexander Nevsky (Yalta) K.M. Ageyev, the son of Pavel Undolsky (the builder and first priest of the Foros Church) - Vasily, the photographer of the sovereign emperor A.M. Ivanitsky, D.A. Alchevsky, the son of the founder of the city of Alchevsk A.Yu. Alchevsky and his wife, the famous teacher Khristina Alchevskaya.
    Among those executed were people of the most diverse nationalities and social status: nobles and peasants, military personnel and priests, students and nurses, workers and scientists, lawyers and judges.
    At present, thanks to the efforts of a Kiev resident, former prosecutor L.M. Abramenko, about 800 names of those whose remains rest in Bagreevka have been identified (see: Abramenko L.M. The Last Abode: Crimea. 1920-1921. Kyiv: MAUP Publishing House, 2005).

    More:
    https://ruskline.ru/news_rl/2005/12/14/na_meste_rasstrela_zhitelej_yalty_v_1920-1921_godah_zalozhena_chasovnya_vo_imya_ikony_znameniya_presvyatoj_bogorodicy/?ysclid=mkzqq85fb9830252974

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1840095832777519&set=pcb.1840098542777248&type=3&__tn__=HH-R&eid=ARCqS4AjsZRrh_2F6WlseEsw53KNUBDkawQoCZVCebH0irFbQavH9MJgjvmEq4BShB4tdR882u0O3rpg
    Crimea. Execution list from December 7, 1920. 322 people - White movement and Russian emigration - SAMMLER.RU
    List of those executed in Yalta in 1920. Photo: View and download images — Yandex Images
  24. +2
    30 January 2026 08: 16
    Was there a Red Terror? Yes, of course there was. But the victims of this terror are portrayed as godlike elders in homespun robes, who, in response to the actions of the Bolshakites, merely crossed themselves, and with both hands. And the victims were by no means examples of Christian humility and forgiveness. The victims themselves could have carried out terror, and did so many times... Alas, this is civil war. And if the Whites had won, they would have carried out terror against the Reds... C'est la vie, as they say. Nothing personal – à la guerre à la guerre.
  25. 0
    30 January 2026 09: 46
    Civil war is the most brutal. If we don't kill them, they kill us.
  26. 0
    30 January 2026 12: 20
    That's all beside the point! The most hopeless task is trying to evaluate past events from the perspective of today's realities, today's moral standards, and today's technological capabilities.
    Finally, realize that for 95% of Russia's population at the beginning of the 20th century, the concepts of nobleman, officer, official, and owner (of a factory, shop, or establishment) embodied absolute evil. For centuries, they flogged, starved, and forced people to work so hard that penal servitude seemed like a resort. They fucked wives and daughters, knocked out teeth, and traded people like cattle.
    Even the abolition of serfdom did not change much; most peasant households gave up to 95% of their cash income in redemption payments.
    The accumulated reserve of hatred could not help but fire!
    If we talk about responsibility, then it was precisely the noble and landowning masses that categorically hindered the attempts of the Sovereigns, starting with Catherine the Great, to remove this barrel of gunpowder from under their backsides.
    I recommend reading: Petr Andreevich Zayonchkovsky, The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia, Moscow, 1968.
    1. +1
      30 January 2026 15: 53
      "For 95% of Russia's population at the beginning of the 20th century, the concepts of nobleman, officer, official, and owner (of a factory, shop, or establishment) embodied absolute evil." In other words, there is such a concept as collective responsibility. If members of a social, national, or religious group committed evil, and this evil is recognized by society, then, in your opinion, society has the right to physically destroy this national, social, or religious group, regardless of the personal guilt of each member. Consistent with this principle, Hitler gave the order to exterminate the Jews, and Bandera blessed the OUN to exterminate Poles and Jews.
      "The accumulated reserve of hatred could not fail to explode!" The task of the authorities is to prevent this "accumulated reserve of hatred" from turning into genocide. "Never in this world does hatred cease with hatred, but with the absence of hatred it ceases. This is the eternal truth" (Dhammapada). Any evil committed in this world sooner or later returns to those who do not repent of their evil. Bearers of neo-communist ideology need to take note of this.
      1. +1
        3 February 2026 10: 39
        My young friend!
        In your accusatory frenzy, you are making several mistakes at once:
        1. You're attributing your own fantasies to your opponent. Please provide a passage from my messages where I justify what happened. I'm sorry, but if you don't see the difference between an explanation and a justification, you should consult a specialist.
        2. You view past events from the perspective of today's realities. In particular, you view the authorities of the time as established and capable of resolving moral issues. Alas, this was not the case. The old world, having collapsed under the weight of its own failure, took traditional notions of morality with it. Note that I'm not saying it was good. I'm saying it was so.
        3. Well, most importantly. For a very long time, Russian society was split into a multitude of antagonistic groups. The royal family, the upper court aristocracy, the upper aristocracy, the landed gentry and, as it happened, the nobility (itself split into army and naval officers), the bureaucracy, the large merchant class (Old Believers and a small Orthodox cadre), the small merchant class, the bourgeoisie (traders and artisans), the workers, the peasantry (itself split into several factions), Jews of all kinds, the remnants of the fringe feudal nobility...
        Sorry, but the list goes on and on.
        The whole problem was that the tradition of distance came from the very top. From the royal family. Read Ignatiev's description of Nikolai Alexandrovich's visit to Stockholm, or Yanchevetsky's description of the reception at the Russian embassy on the occasion of that very embassy's escape from a terrible death.
        In general, we read, we think, we read, we think...
        And again, please don't attribute your own fabrications to others!
    2. +1
      30 January 2026 17: 28
      Quote: Grossvater
      for 95% of the population of Russia at the beginning of the 20th century,

      would you mind disclosing the source of information?
      Quote: Grossvater
      Even the abolition of serfdom did not change much

      If it's not a secret, did you know that not all peasants in the Russian Empire were serfs?
      Quote: Grossvater
      I recommend reading: Petr Andreevich Zayonchkovsky, The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia, Moscow, 1968.

      I wonder if it talks about the second enslavement of peasants in collective farms? hi
  27. 0
    30 January 2026 17: 42
    The author of the article cites only the final part of Lenin's telegram to Frunze. The full text is as follows: "I have just learned of your offer to Wrangel to surrender. I am extremely surprised by the excessive flexibility of the terms. If the enemy accepts them, then we must ensure the capture of the fleet and not allow a single ship to escape. If the enemy does not accept these terms, then, in my opinion, they can no longer be repeated and must be dealt with mercilessly."

    History of the Civil War in the USSR, volume 5, Moscow, 1960, p. 209.

    That is, Frunze’s promise – “…will be given the opportunity to travel abroad without hindrance…” – is directly prohibited from evacuating by sea.
    Wrangel, in refusing Frunze's offer, showed wisdom. He apparently understood who he was dealing with and the value of their promises. Ultimately, he evacuated part of the army by ship.
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 19: 19
      Wrangel's men were evacuated primarily on Entente ships! Lenin wasn't crazy enough to order their capture. We're talking about the Russian ships that Wrangel, of course, "stole." And they carried only 5400 people. The Entente ships carried over 140. And these ships, stolen by Wrangel, later disappeared ingloriously in Bizerte, scrapped in 1924.
  28. +1
    30 January 2026 18: 15
    And then, after the “liberation”, Ivan Shmelev wrote the work The Sun of the Dead.
    1. -2
      30 January 2026 19: 22
      This same Shmelev later fantasized about 120 executed. Melgunov, who was collecting gossip abroad, outdid him – 150 (and why should we feel sorry for them, the White Guards!). And then some particularly gifted idiots came along and wrote about 200.
  29. +3
    30 January 2026 18: 22
    📌 The main idea of ​​the article

    The author tries to show that:

    1. Frunze offered lenient conditions for the surrender of the White troops to Wrangel's army before the assault on Crimea, offering amnesty and evacuation.


    2. Mass repressions took place in Crimea, but their scale is significantly exaggerated (50-200 thousand are often cited, but the author is inclined to believe that the number of victims was approximately 10-12 thousand).


    3. Not only the Cheka and the Soviet authorities are to blame, but also the Whites themselves, who continued the armed struggle after refusing to surrender.


    4. Some of the accusations of repression are mythological in nature and are not supported by documentary sources.




    ---

    🧱 Logical structure

    The article is structured roughly according to the following scheme:

    1. Description of Frunze's proposal to Wrangel regarding surrender with a guarantee of safety.


    2. Information about the evacuation of white troops and its chaos.


    3. Demonstration of the increased resistance of anti-Soviet groups and the actions of the Reds against them.


    4. Quotes and excerpts from diaries/telegrams, in particular from Dzerzhinsky and Lenin.


    5. Analysis of the casualty figures: criticism of exaggerated estimates of up to 200 thousand and a reference to more moderate ones – around 12 thousand.


    6. Mention of historians who, according to the author, use unreliable sources or rumors.




    ---

    📊 Main arguments and criticism

    ✅ Strengths

    1. Historical context:
    The author provides a detailed background of events on the Southern Front in 1920, including negotiations with Wrangel and the situation of the evacuation of White troops.

    2. Diversity of sources:
    Documents, diary entries, and telegrams are cited to provide a factual basis for discussion of the events.

    3. A skeptical approach to unconfirmed figures:
    The author points out the strong variability in estimates of the number of victims and seeks to rely on documented data.


    ---

    ❌ Problematic points

    1. Sources and methodology:
    The article frequently recounts the accounts of participants in the events or their recollections, which cannot always be considered independent historical sources. This is an important point in the critique of historical accuracy.

    2. Assessments of repression:
    The choice of a figure of around 10–12 is based on a single award sheet and a review of sources with higher estimates, but this does not mean it accurately reflects reality. Historians interpret such data differently, often even lower or higher than these figures.

    3. Tonality and ideological coloring:
    The article is written in a style typical of journalism with a specific position: the author defends the view that repressions did occur, but "not that widespread." This view may be driven by the political motivations of the platform and the author.

    4. Partial argumentation:
    Some statements, for example about Wrangel's moral responsibility for the consequences of refusing Frunze's offer, are more the author's interpretation than a direct historical conclusion.


    ---

    📚 Reliability assessment

    The historical events of the Civil War are always difficult to reconstruct accurately:

    Documentary sources from that era are often incomplete or contradictory.

    The number of victims of political terror in Crimea is estimated differently in historical science (historians disagree).

    The article is more analytical/journalistic rather than a rigorous scientific review.



    ---

    📌 Brief summary

    The article attempts to rethink the repressions in liberated Crimea, linking them both to military logic and to the actions of the parties to the conflict. Author:

    ✔️ Emphasizes that Frunze offered lenient terms of surrender;
    ✔️ Believes that some of the repressions were caused by a reaction to armed resistance;
    ✔️ Doubts the mass nature of the repressions cited in higher estimates;
    ❌ But it relies in part on controversial sources and opinions, making some of the conclusions a subject of debate.
    1. +2
      30 January 2026 19: 29
      Well, how unexpected: it’s simply pleasant to read such a deep and intelligent analysis of the material.
      1. 0
        10 February 2026 14: 21
        I admit, I'm not the author of this. Sorry for using someone else's work. I wanted to analyze the author's text and found these conclusions interesting, so I published it.
  30. 0
    30 January 2026 20: 12
    The ardent justification of terror is clinical. And it's not Soviet ideology, if the Brezhnev period is any guide.
    This is the same Trotskyism (Trotsky’s 1920 work “Terror and Communism”) that was condemned in the late USSR.
    In the USSR under Stalin (A Short Course in the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)), Khrushchev (the edition I cited above) and Brezhnev, there was no talk about the Red Terror in Crimea after the defeat of Wrangel.
    A quote from a 9th-grade history textbook from 1982: "The remnants of Wrangel's forces were evacuated to Turkey on Entente and Black Sea Fleet ships." Page 240. That's all.
    They were ashamed of this massacre. They simply hushed it up. Moreover, there was no justification for it.
    Being mentally healthy people, the leaders understood that this was a shameful page of history.
    So we can give Stalin a plus for fighting this very Trotskyism.
  31. +1
    2 February 2026 13: 24
    Quote: billybones
    The fiery justification of terror is a clinic.

    Oh-ho-ho-ho! In my opinion, it's clinical to confuse two different concepts: justifying an event (action) and explaining it. Any murder, especially a mass murder, cannot be justified. It's perfectly explainable, however: it's an outburst of centuries of pent-up hatred. When, for centuries, your ancestors were flogged, sold like cattle, forced to work worse than convicts, raped, and even murdered, and after the so-called "liberation," robbed through ransom payments, sooner or later, the volcano was bound to erupt. And so it did.
  32. 0
    3 February 2026 14: 10
    Quote: Sergey_Yekat
    I wonder if it talks about the second enslavement of peasants in collective farms?

    Aha! So I needed a time machine. You're linking the events of 20 to the events of the 30s. See a doctor, see a doctor immediately!