Tu-95 bombers flew near Alaska

7 May 2013 69

Russian strategic missile-carrying bombers Tu-95 flew within the US defense zone near Alaska and the Aleutian Islands, The Washington Free Beacon reports on Monday.

According to the publication, the US air defense systems detected two bomber near the Aleutian Islands 28 and 29 April.

Representative of the US Northern Command, Bill Lewis, confirmed that American fighters were raised to intercept the aircraft, but he refused to give details.

According to him, the two F-22 identified Russian bombers on the night of April 28 when they left the agreed flight area near Alaska. Lewis stressed that Russian aircraft did not enter US airspace.

As noted by The Washington Free Beacon, air defense forces in Alaska are used by the US military to monitor both civilian and military aircraft, and the launch of the F-22 fighters is an indication that the appearance of bombers created a potential threat to the US territory.

Recall that in March, the American media tied the allegedly conducted exercises of the Russian nuclear forces with the frequent flights of Tu-95 strategic bombers. In particular, February 16 reported that fighters were raised from the US Air Force base to intercept two Russian strategic bombers Tu-95, which allegedly flew around the American island of Guam in the Pacific Ocean.

The US military reported that they had discovered two turboprop strategic bomber on radars, according to NATO, that bear the nickname "Bear." The F-15 fighter jets flew out to their potential interception from the US Air Force Andersen base.

It was reported that "contact between American and Russian aircraft was at a professional level," without incidents, and that Russian bombers remained in international airspace all the time.

The US military explained that the long-range flight of two Russian bombers, which involves refueling in the air, they spotted from radar and satellites as soon as the Tu-95 took off from an airfield in the north-eastern part of Russia.

For his part, the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense for the Air Force said that no scheduled flights of bombers in the Pacific have been conducted recently.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Canep

+7

7 May 2013 06: 05

For his part, the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense for the Air Force said that no scheduled flights of bombers in the Pacific have been conducted recently.

Why hide it, or in the Moscow Region they themselves do not know where Russian aviation is flying.
According to him, two F-22s were identified by Russian bombers

Another interesting phenomenon, the Americans use the latest 5th generation invisible fighter as an interceptor. This is so that the intruder does not see who shot him down.
1. Romn
  
  +5
  
  7 May 2013 06: 34
  
  But still it’s really nice to listen to messages of this kind, and the Americans started to fuss!)
  1. bask
    
    +5
    
    7 May 2013 06: 40
    
    Quote: Romn
    Tu-95 bombers flew near Alaska
    
    Great news. First in the morning.
    Amers need a little bit, check the nerves, and open their air defense systems in our Alaska.
    1. Russian
      
      +2
      
      7 May 2013 09: 15
      
      I’m wondering why our bombers almost always fly unaccompanied. They would have a couple more Su-35 and it would be great!
      1. Wedmak
        
        +2
        
        7 May 2013 09: 51
        
        Too long range to follow.
      2. Tjumenec72
        
        +1
        
        7 May 2013 09: 53
        
        And to these same Sushki there’s another tanker ...
        And what for, they tell them, in real conditions, the bears will work out (if the ship’s Aigis haven’t clicked them before) without entering the zone of interception by rattles.
      3. Ram chandra
        
        +1
        
        7 May 2013 10: 00
        
        And the meaning is accompanied? In the event of war, they don’t really need to come back. Just drop bombs / rockets and that’s it. And spending fuels / resources of fighters that can really PROTECT their territory, their people is stupid.
  2. Vasya Ivanov
    
    +13
    
    7 May 2013 08: 55
    
    Every day I want to listen to how our planes plow the sky near America, Japan, Europe and our submarines float there. For me, it’s like a song, the hysteria of NATO countries and not NATO when our troops conduct exercises with allies.
  3. Scoun
    
    +3
    
    7 May 2013 09: 45
    
    Quote: Romn
    But still it’s really nice to listen to messages of this kind
    
    and I honestly was a little upset (((
    they spotted with radar and satellites, as soon as the Tu-95 took off from the airfield in the north-eastern part of Russia.
    1. Wedmak
      
      +2
      
      7 May 2013 09: 52
      
      and I honestly was a little upset (((
      
      They lie like a gray gelding. Maybe they took off and spotted, but then 100% lost them. The radar will not reach there, the satellite also does not hang in place.
  4. ttttt
    
    0
    
    7 May 2013 10: 23
    
    Quote: Romn
    But still it’s really nice to listen to messages of this kind, and the Americans started to fuss!)
    
    Yeah. The theme of Alaska should be heard all the time, everyone should remember that this is Russian land, and it is time to give it away. With fagot differently impossible, they understand only the fist. Just as Russia constantly makes territorial claims, so Russia must constantly remind and fight by all means: force, legal, political. Always the best means of defense was and is an attack. Not in the literal sense, but in all aspects. And justified territorial claims have always been and are a sign of superpower.
    1. Black Colonel
      
      +2
      
      7 May 2013 11: 26
      
      Alaska in Russia is a utopia.
  5. elmi
    
    +4
    
    7 May 2013 14: 24
    
    Tu-95 bombers flew near Alaska
    
    The former territories visited and reminded the Amers that Alaska would sooner or later return to Russia.
2. vadimus
  
  +5
  
  7 May 2013 07: 11
  
  Give me a little straw Alyasochka ....
3. night1313
  
  0
  
  7 May 2013 09: 39
  
  F-22 it is clear, amusement pride, I had to be so scared.
  1. King
    
    +5
    
    7 May 2013 10: 24
    
    It’s good that the raptor’s wing didn’t fall off from the hum of our bear, otherwise it would be a scandal)))
    1. Black Colonel
      
      0
      
      7 May 2013 11: 28
      
      Well, if the Khryaptor was sent to intercept, then the Bear was walking on a shaver. Otherwise, the pilot in Khryaptor would have gone to certain death - he suffocated from a lack of oxygen.
4. Army1
  
  0
  
  7 May 2013 14: 27
  
  The US military explained that the long-range flight of two Russian bombers, which involves refueling in the air, they spotted from radar and satellites as soon as the Tu-95 took off from an airfield in the north-eastern part of Russia.
  American show-offs, they already knew everything as soon as the carcass took off, and burned that they were watching our territory.
sasha.28blaga

+1

7 May 2013 06: 14

Did ours identify them?
1. evgenii67
  
  +4
  
  7 May 2013 09: 05
  
  Hello everyone!
  Quote: sasha.28blaga
  Did ours identify them?
  
  Here is the real question ++++++, apparently only from the press identified (and from the Western press). Well, the "carcass" flew by, we will shout urya ??? circled near the Aleutian Islands, but "Russian aircraft did not enter US airspace"We survived, we rejoice and are surprised in fact that our planes fly. The question is how many NATO planes hang out daily near Russian borders ?!
  1. night1313
    
    0
    
    7 May 2013 09: 41
    
    It is interesting how in the F-22 with acoustic comfort, they say when the bears fly their acoustics on submarines they hear.
  2. Tjumenec72
    
    +1
    
    7 May 2013 10: 04
    
    Of course, you should not beat yourself in the chest, but I see no reason to give up. We remind ourselves that it’s good ...
    Russian aircraft did not enter US airspace
    and you would like to come in ... the stink would rise from that continent.
2. Tjumenec72
  
  0
  
  7 May 2013 10: 00
  
  Did ours identify them?
  
  They fly at point blank range for escort ...
borisjdin1957

+3

7 May 2013 06: 18

from the Don.
Good news. Enough for the Americans to drink and burgers to eat. Let them pull up a little bit! And you may not come close to the air border to strike. Glory to the Air Force !!!! Good morning everyone!
1. Tjumenec72
  
  +1
  
  7 May 2013 10: 07
  
  Sorry for the offtop)
  about the burgers - in Tyumen, the makdak is built on the foundation of the former PUBLIC TOILET in the city garden))) and nothing - they are eating)))
avant-garde

+5

7 May 2013 06: 19

Amerikosov developed a phobia of fear of Russia, I do not know how anyone and I am pleased))))
avant-garde

+3

7 May 2013 06: 21

Have you noticed the level of air defense? The highest see even the invisible))))
1. Samurai
  
  -12
  
  7 May 2013 08: 53
  
  Well, where is the American air defense up to Russian or USSR! They have unidentified planes on the Red Square do not land
  1. Phantom Revolution
    
    +8
    
    7 May 2013 09: 23
    
    Quote: Samuray
    Well, where is the American air defense up to Russian or USSR! They have unidentified planes on the Red Square do not land
    
    And don’t say, not like in the USA on 11 of September.)
    1. Samurai
      
      -6
      
      7 May 2013 09: 45
      
      Following your tower logic, the twins rammed unidentified aircraft and flew over the border
      1. Curculum
        
        +7
        
        7 May 2013 10: 05
        
        Quote: Samuray
        Following your tower logic, the twins rammed unidentified aircraft and flew over the border
        
        This is the whole joke: both the planes (not one) were identified, and the border did not cross, and were constantly monitored, and the echelon was "under control", and so on, and so on, and you go - they blasted, and did not peacefully sit on the streets of New York.
        
        Samurai
        
        0
        
        7 May 2013 10: 28
        
        The fact of the matter is that the story is terribly dark, because someone gave them a corridor to Washington
        
        Curculum
        
        +1
        
        7 May 2013 11: 10
        
        Quote: Samuray
        The fact of the matter is that the story is terribly dark, because someone gave them a corridor to Washington
        
        he himself answered
        Quote: Samuray
        Well this is already the excuses of those gentlemen who lost the planeы
        
        (highlighted - added by me)
        
        Samurai
        
        -4
        
        7 May 2013 12: 47
        
        Let's just say there are two different cases. First, the Americans themselves gave the corridors to the terrorists. In the second case, the councils, due to the mess and gouging, lost the plane and thereby allowed it to land in the square.
        
        Grishka100watt
        
        +3
        
        7 May 2013 13: 39
        
        Let's just say there are two different cases. First, the Americans themselves gave the corridors to the terrorists. In the second case, the councils, due to the mess and gouging, lost the plane and thereby allowed it to land in the square.
        
        There was no gouging, the plane was discovered, and fighters passed over it twice. But there was an oral order not to bring down civilian planes. And this flight was organized by special services (possibly the KGB) in order to remove the USSR Minister of Defense.
        
        So do not la la
        
        Curculum
        
        +1
        
        7 May 2013 15: 30
        
        Quote: Samuray
        Let's just say there are two different cases
        
        Below has already been answered regarding the "second case".
        Quote: Samuray
        Americans themselves gave terrorists a corridor
        
        those. Does this, namely, the destruction of residents of their state within its borders in order to obtain preferences for expansion in another state, no longer belong to a mess in state power? Oh well. Now the reasons for writing some of your "postulates" about buckets, etc. become clear.
  2. Ezhaak
    
    +1
    
    7 May 2013 09: 30
    
    Quote: Samuray
    They have unidentified planes on the Red Square do not land
    
    Everything is rightly noticed. One little thing is missing. They DO NOT have a "red square"... Only in Russia does such an area exist! Because only in Russian does the word "red" have the concept of color or beauty.
  3. Tjumenec72
    
    +4
    
    7 May 2013 10: 09
    
    minus you - he was therefore identified and allowed to land.
    It would have been related to the military - it would have died out on the approaches ...
  4. Hudo
    
    +1
    
    7 May 2013 10: 10
    
    Quote: Samuray
    Well, where is the American air defense up to Russian or USSR! They have unidentified planes on the Red Square do not land
    
    They have them right into the world trade centers with a summer crashing into the joy of the hamburger-eating clerks who have settled there. Yes, and the size and number of gamers will be much more.
    1. DmitriRazumov
      
      +4
      
      7 May 2013 11: 04
      
      I would like to recall the political and psychological situation in the country and the Armed Forces before Rust's flight in those "blessed" Gorbachev times. Immediately after coming to power, the MSG was dragged into the Soviet media, as if on a command from Washington, the topic of the downed Korean Boeing, Kotor. In 1983 he entered our airspace in the Far East over strategic objects, did not respond to requests from the ground and tried to hide from interceptors. The pilots of the MiGs, sent to intercept, clearly followed the instructions and orders and shot down the intruder, which would have been done by any air defense of any other NATO country and absolutely legally if, for example, a TU-154 circled over their military bases and did the same as boeing. But, instead of an apology from the violating state, the USSR received a portion of dirty accusations of allegedly unlawful murder of passengers, for which. the Washington provocateurs clearly had to answer. The intruder stayed in the airspace of the USSR for a long time, while the pilots did not respond to the dispatchers' requests, and the Boeing course was somehow strangely passing over the strategic objects of the Ministry of Defense. Our media broke loose, accused the bloodthirsty military of a crime, the pilots were even dragged to the broadcast of the central TV, where the tearful announcer asked them questions about how they felt in the role of killers. After this rabid company, conflicting directives began to flow into the troops. clearly did not comply with the orders for the combat use of air defense forces and means. Pilots and unit commanders. made scapegoats, did not know how to behave. If you shoot down, they will be punished, or even condemned, if you do not shoot down, they will also be punished .. In this "favorable" situation Rust flew. He was spotted immediately, but no one took the responsibility to give the order to destroy the small-sized low-flying target, everyone waited tensely until reports of landing on the descent in front of the Intercession Cathedral were received. The military were again made scapegoats. The Minister of Defense, Marshal Sokolov, and many commanders of formations and units, in the area of responsibility of which were removed. there was an intruder.
  5. aviamed90
    
    +2
    
    7 May 2013 10: 53
    
    Samurai
    
    But skyscrapers heroically ram.
waisson

+3

7 May 2013 06: 33

with fun nastronemy perceive these news I’m very glad that not only can we nerve-rack but we can make us nervous
Nitarius

0

7 May 2013 06: 46

Quote: Canep

Why hide it, or in the Moscow Region they themselves do not know where Russian aviation is flying.
According to him, two F-22s were identified by Russian bombers

Another interesting phenomenon, the Americans use the latest 5th generation invisible fighter as an interceptor. This is so that the intruder does not see who shot him down.

Everybody knows everything! And that side and the other!
As it turns out, the relationship is changing - when the Minister of Defense is changed.
NDA - doesn’t build up! Recovery will take more time!
The comment was deleted.
vilenich

0

7 May 2013 07: 15

The positive news is unambiguous, but still it’s interesting: did our planes fly there or have glitches already begun in the airplanes?
Tan4ik

+2

7 May 2013 07: 26

Americans got along) That's what they need.
1. dimon-media
  
  +2
  
  7 May 2013 07: 38
  
  The point is not iron in them. Each such bird carries so much vigorous charge that enough staff to wipe off the face of the earth.
dimon-media

-1

7 May 2013 07: 28

It is necessary to "pull" more often them (pindos). The Alaska topic is not closed. Well, you don't have to fly past our southern Kuriles - Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan and Habomai. it is also desirable to appear there more often. It is desirable to even establish another base for strategic long-range aviation there. The entire Far East region will be covered. All of East Asia with Japan and northwest America (Alaska), and without refueling in the air.
ed65b

+3

7 May 2013 08: 03

Yesterday the spears were broken about the f-22. And in order to justify the money spent on the program and in response to skeptics with cruising over-zoning speed, turning on all stealth modes hung with clusters of Pterodactyls rockets, sorry raptors, slender shoals flew to intercept the bears, so to speak, We eat food, work out bread, protect the country from evil Russian barbarians. And here’s how we build Lightings, but then we will intercept everything.
VohaAhov

+2

7 May 2013 08: 09

On our strategic aviation planes, it is possible to suspend flights with a launch range of up to 3000 km. And the new X-101 and X-102 missiles will fly at a range of up to 5000 km. So it’s not necessary for our planes to fly so close to Alaska. To reduce the state of Alaska, launches can be made over Yakutsk.
JonnyT

+8

7 May 2013 08: 14

Feeling the Amerian system.
Vtel

+4

7 May 2013 08: 36

Well hto said, shaw Bears do not fly. There is a bear wedge seen over Alaska.
nikolas 83

+1

7 May 2013 08: 42

Russia is once again building up its military potential, the amers are already afraid. The good news is that you need to scare them more often. Let them know that their supremacy in the world is not infinite.
vitas

+2

7 May 2013 08: 44

The US military explained that the long-range flight of two Russian bombers, which involves refueling in the air, they spotted from radar and satellites as soon as the Tu-95 took off from an airfield in the north-eastern part of Russia.

Chasing.
afire

0

7 May 2013 09: 01

which one turns out ...
look - they have the ability to control the location of each of our strategists, guide them, see where they are flying and from where. It is unpleasant as something, is it possible to do something? pilots answer
lobik

+6

7 May 2013 09: 16

Quote: Samuray
Well, where is the American air defense up to Russian or USSR! They have unidentified planes on the Red Square do not land

Our anti-aircraft missile Rust led, but no one wants to understand that there was no order to shoot him down after the scandal with the Korean side. And in America, light-engine aircraft from Mexico also flew with drugs, or you wanted him to fly from Moscow, and it was Washington to White housework.
1. Tan4ik
  
  0
  
  7 May 2013 09: 25
  
  Yes, let them fly up to the white house, everyone will run in horror
2. Samurai
  
  -7
  
  7 May 2013 09: 55
  
  Well, this is the excuse of those comrades who lost Rust's plane
Ezhaak

0

7 May 2013 09: 25

The official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense for the Air Force said that no scheduled flights of bombers in the Pacific recently
Everything is clear from the article and everything is clear. One question in all! Who is lying, USA or Russia?
1. night1313
  
  +1
  
  7 May 2013 09: 49
  
  Nobody is lying, it was unscheduled! And then the Onyzh Bears are strategists like, what they up to the official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on the Air Force
  1. Ezhaak
    
    0
    
    7 May 2013 10: 48
    
    Well, if unscheduled, it’s a completely different matter.
    1. aviamed90
      
      +1
      
      7 May 2013 10: 57
      
      Such flights, as a rule, are carried out according to the directive of the Air Force Civil Code or the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. They cannot be called planned.
King

0

7 May 2013 09: 44

It was necessary to drop a couple of bombs with humanitarian aid in Alaska
1. Samurai
  
  -3
  
  7 May 2013 09: 48
  
  Better buckets that are used in carcases instead of toilets
  1. Curculum
    
    0
    
    7 May 2013 10: 08
    
    Quote: Samuray
    Better buckets that are used in carcases instead of toilets
    
    And often do you endure?
    1. Hudo
      
      0
      
      7 May 2013 10: 14
      
      Quote: Kurkul
      Quote: Samuray
      Better buckets that are used in carcases instead of toilets
      
      And often do you endure?
      
      It lives on that. He takes out and wipes for his owners a small share - a basket of moldy hot dogs and a barrel of sour kaka-kala.
    2. Samurai
      
      -1
      
      7 May 2013 10: 29
      
      Yes, somehow it did not have to. But if this interests you so much, then ask the pilots, they will tell you in detail how to carry and take out
      1. Curculum
        
        0
        
        7 May 2013 10: 42
        
        Quote: Samuray
        Yes, somehow it did not have to.
        
        It is clear, that means you are not present near such planes. Tady, maybe you have something to do with the supply of such items to the Air Force? In this case, at least educate those who do not know about the labeling and the number of products supplied ... although the latter is superfluous, refers to classified information, your company must have a "nondisclosure" agreement.
        Quote: Samuray
        But if it interests you so much
        
        Interested in saying
        Quote: Samuray
        Better buckets that are used in carcases instead of toilets
        .
        Quote: Samuray
        ask the pilots, they will tell you in detail how to carry and take out
        
        Did you ask yourself?
        
        Samurai
        
        +1
        
        7 May 2013 12: 52
        
        And what is it so the buckets outraged you! Well, designers did not foresee a closet; well, you have to fly with buckets. What can you do when crew comfort is sacrificed? But the pilots are not coddled, hardened in difficulties not like pampered Americans who prefer to fly in comfort
        
        Curculum
        
        0
        
        7 May 2013 15: 58
        
        Quote: Samuray
        And what is it so the buckets outraged you!
        
        Do you think I am outraged by the presence of buckets? You are mistaken, I am "tolerant" to these products.
        Quote: Samuray
        Well, designers did not foresee a closet; well, you have to fly with buckets.
        
        Are you concerned about the comfort of combat pilots or do you know the design conditions (TTZ) of this type of aircraft?
        But if you really appreciate comfort on combat liners, then do a good deed: order-pay compact bio-toilets and send them on airplanes. You look, your rack name from the chassis will be called ...
        And if you thickly troll with the delights (latent) of Amer’s weapons and try to throw the demerzo with fanfare - Duc, this should not be done here, but on Amer or Japanese sites - there it will be positively perceived. So - banzai!
        
        Samurai
        
        +1
        
        7 May 2013 12: 55
        
        By the way, I advise you to read http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/panzir56/post111216735/. Sailors are also comfortable
        
        Curculum
        
        0
        
        7 May 2013 16: 05
        
        Quote: Samuray
        By the way, I advise you to read http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/panzir56/post111216735/
        
        and you try to get to the source of this stuffing - figs will work. A similar one could be written by someone who does not distinguish a scupper from a frame, for him another thing is more important - presence on Bolotnaya Square. So - feed yourself on such slops, I - on the side of the like.
2. dimon-media
  
  0
  
  7 May 2013 13: 15
  
  Yeah, and then how will we take Alaska? So that all then, like New Year trees, would glow from the background?
The comment was deleted.
avant-garde

0

7 May 2013 10: 00

Even if ours flew, it was a planned combat duty in peacetime, well, what if they raised their f 22, if it were a sortie, they would go without cover.
runway

-2

7 May 2013 10: 01

Deer in Alaska are still in shock - how can Russians fly this technique
1. King
  
  +2
  
  7 May 2013 10: 21
  
  Such a normal technique. still serve the same. not for nothing that the Yankees are still afraid of her
2. Black Colonel
  
  +2
  
  7 May 2013 11: 40
  
  All vipers in Afghanistan are also still cherishing from the B-52 from Vietnamese dumps.
avant-garde

0

7 May 2013 10: 11

Right now, go to America, you are boiling in the headlines of articles on the front pages they write "Russia wanted to bomb our state of Alabama"))))
1. dimon-media
  
  0
  
  7 May 2013 13: 19
  
  Passed similar in 08.08.08. When our troops entered Georgia (Georgia), by the way, they have the state of the same name in this republic, so the residents searched the streets for Russian tanks when they heard the news that the Russians were in Georgia.))) I understand that the Pindos are stupid, but still I think this is a fun story :)
Mhpv

0

7 May 2013 11: 05

just three such handsome men and equally beautiful others defiled in the direction of Red Square.
Black Colonel

0

7 May 2013 11: 38

But interestingly, Khryaptorov Bears spotted or air defense radars?
avant-garde

+1

7 May 2013 13: 12

Quote: Samuray
Let's just say there are two different cases. First, the Americans themselves gave the corridors to the terrorists. In the second case, the councils, due to the mess and gouging, lost the plane and thereby allowed it to land in the square.

No one lost him, I talked with people and are still in the service, our interceptors led him from the moment he entered our airspace, there was simply NO ORDER to shoot him down.
Misantrop

0

7 May 2013 14: 40

Good article, that's just the name is strange. Especially considering modern slang. As if they were denied basing in Alaska, well, or the navigator missed by accident
Yura

+1

7 May 2013 16: 35

Very good news. Keep it up the Russian Air Force!
SEM

0

7 May 2013 22: 38

Quote: р_у_с_с_к_и_й
I’m wondering why our bombers almost always fly unaccompanied. They would have a couple more Su-35 and it would be great!

Not just a couple, but a link of 3-4 fighters is quite appropriate in this case)))