The Navy will have mobile units of combat swimmers.

9 219 32
The Navy will have mobile units of combat swimmers.
Combat swimmers of the anti-PDSS detachment from the Pacific fleet, 2017 city


The Russian Navy currently has over a dozen special forces units dedicated to countering underwater sabotage. Their number will increase in the near future. Plans are underway to form new units of this type that will carry out their specific missions away from naval bases.



New plans


On January 16, Izvestia reported on new plans to strengthen the fleet's defense system. It received this information from unnamed sources familiar with the situation. For obvious reasons, the Ministry of Defense declined to comment on such plans. news, confirming or refuting them.

New units to combat underwater sabotage forces and assets (PDSS) are reportedly being added to the Northern Fleet. Unlike existing units, these will be mobile units. The number and locations of the new units have not been disclosed.

In terms of their primary functions, the new units will be no different from those currently deployed in the navy. They will be tasked with protecting waters, ports, ships, and vessels from potential underwater attacks. At the same time, these units are not planned to be assigned to specific ports and bases. They will operate in designated areas, including moving alongside ships.

According to Izvestia, the new units will primarily be deployed in remote areas of the Arctic. It's possible to guess which regions and bases are being discussed, but no exact list is provided.


Soldiers with special underwater pistols SPP-1

So far, only one fleet has been reported to be creating new units. These measures are intended to improve the protection of its bases and ships. Whether this idea will be further expanded is unknown. It's entirely possible that the Northern Fleet's valuable experience will be adapted for use by other naval task forces in the foreseeable future. If this happens, the fleet as a whole will benefit.

Anti-sabotage forces


According to available data, the Russian Navy has 13 special forces units dedicated to countering PDSS. All major Navy formations have their own units of this type. They all perform the same tasks, are armed with similar equipment, and employ common tactics and methods.

Counter-PDSS units are assigned to the main naval bases and fleet bases. Therefore, the number of detachments varies among each fleet. For example, the Black Sea Fleet has only two units, while the Northern Fleet has six. Under the existing organizational structure, each unit is responsible for its own water area, port facilities, and the ships located near them.

The units are staffed with personnel who meet health requirements. During the training phase, future unit members receive physical, diving, and airborne training. They master various equipment and weapon, are trained to work with radio-technical systems, explosive devices, etc. Despite its complexity, this training course takes into account the specifics of future service and the tasks to be solved.

According to available data, anti-PDSS units are armed with several types of small arms for various purposes. For use on water or land, they use AK-74 or AK-12 assault rifles, special "Val" assault rifles, and others. Underwater, combat swimmers use similar weapons, such as APS assault rifles or SPP-1 pistols.

Hand grenades or special DP-64 grenade launchers are used for preventative or counter-insurgency purposes against enemy saboteurs. In both cases, the aim of grenade launching is to injure or disable the enemy with a shock wave.


Servicemen from the Baltic Fleet's anti-PDSS detachment on patrol

The units have the necessary transport. On land, they use the army's standard vehicles. On water, the soldiers use motorboats or specialized cutters. In appropriate situations, they operate from the shore or from the ship they are defending.

Combat swimmers also have a wide range of specialized equipment for monitoring underwater conditions and searching for potentially dangerous objects. For obvious reasons, the full list of such equipment, its functions, and capabilities cannot be disclosed.

In recent years, the units have received new assets across various categories. For example, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have entered service. These facilitate surveillance of waters, the search for suspicious objects, and the delivery of weapons to them. Furthermore, the delivery and development of unmanned boats has begun. They perform virtually the same tasks as UAVs, but with their own unique characteristics.

Personnel from the anti-PDSS units, using available equipment, conduct surface patrols, search for suspicious objects underwater, carry out preventative grenade launches, etc. They also conduct dives to identify and neutralize threats, including enemy saboteurs.

Areas of responsibility


Under the current system, detachments are primarily tasked with protecting their base and the ships and vessels located there. However, combat swimmers may be present on ships during patrols and responsible for defense and security during stays. This organization of service has been in place for several decades and generally meets the assigned tasks.

According to recent news, anti-PDSS units at bases and deployment points will be supplemented by mobile units of similar purpose. They will initially be deployed in the Northern Fleet, and then similar innovations can't be ruled out in other formations.


Baltic Fleet soldiers during ground training.

The tasks and specifics of the future service of such units are already known. They will conduct a standard set of activities, but not at their base, but away from it. They will be responsible for organizing the security of new bases, including temporary ones, escorting ships on patrol, etc.

Essentially, the plan only calls for changes to the organizational structure and an increase in the number of detachments, while their functions will remain fundamentally unchanged. At the same time, the Navy's capabilities to counter sabotage should significantly increase.

The formation of new units will significantly increase the overall strength of counter-PDSS forces. This will make it possible to secure more facilities and/or strengthen the protection of existing bases and points. In any case, the updated quantitative indicators should lead to qualitative growth.

The new units will be mobile—they are being created from the ground up to operate remotely from their permanent bases. This role will likely require them to receive their own specific equipment, weapons, and resources. This adaptation of the units to their intended missions should improve their operational effectiveness in any conditions, even the most challenging.

On the eve of deployment


Unfortunately, all the details of the Ministry of Defense's new plans have not yet been disclosed. Only the creation of new units has been revealed, along with their basic features and functions. Nevertheless, initial assessments and predictions can already be made.

Overall, the creation of additional mobile units to combat PDSS should be considered an important and useful step. Such units can be expected to improve the Northern Fleet's capabilities and facilitate the military development of the Arctic. Similar units may then be established in other fleets.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    20 January 2026 04: 02
    Strengthening the armed forces and defense capability in general is always good news.
    1. +6
      20 January 2026 04: 16
      Only the creation of new units is known
      1. 0
        20 January 2026 05: 25
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        Only the creation of new units is known

        Read V. Savin's book "The Sea Wolf" (and its sequel). Although it's fantasy, there's still a lot to be learned that's interesting and relevant to our times.
        1. +3
          20 January 2026 06: 57
          What the... where are the underwater BECs for the same functions?
        2. 0
          20 January 2026 07: 54
          After they changed the Russian naval flag and removed the shoulder straps, I stopped reading altogether. Only traitors do that!
          In Mikhailovsky's books they didn't do that!
    2. +2
      20 January 2026 13: 24
      The PDSS has existed since time immemorial. We need to improve the existing units, not create new ones.
      1. -1
        20 January 2026 20: 39
        Those already have their own admirals, but in the new ones... you can put the right ones (i.e. new ones).. And in general, the 21st century is famous for drones (how much quadcopters have changed the battlefield on land and BEKs on the surface (for now).. And with us, everything is like Prince Borghese.. Maybe it’s worth (even if not instead of, but in addition to swimmers) developing drones?? No.. We need to wait for our 404, but this time underwater..
  2. +1
    20 January 2026 05: 11
    There are more than a dozen special forces units dedicated to combating underwater sabotage forces and assets. Their number will increase in the near future. Plans are underway to form new units of this type that will carry out their specific missions away from naval bases.

    Hmm...if the tasks are carried out on enemy territory, then that's very good news.
    It's always better to be one step ahead of your enemy.
    1. +7
      20 January 2026 06: 43
      Reconnaissance divers carry out missions in enemy territory, while the anti-PDSS unit has other tasks.
    2. +1
      20 January 2026 13: 25
      PDSS is for fighting enemy saboteurs, but sabotage by the enemy is something else entirely.
  3. +2
    20 January 2026 05: 34
    We are reviving what once existed in the Soviet army.
    1. +2
      20 January 2026 13: 31
      Quote: Good
      in the Soviet Army

      In the navy, sailors don't particularly like to think of themselves as an army
      even if it's the Marines.
  4. 0
    20 January 2026 09: 02
    crappy optimizers, such units existed in the USSR, but were cut back.

    Also, I have a question: I didn't see an octopus in the scuba gear in the photo of the swimmers. Is it really not there? And I thought they used closed-circuit scuba gear, but these seem to be regular ones.
    1. +1
      20 January 2026 13: 27
      The photo is most likely purely illustrative and will not show us anything new.
    2. +1
      20 January 2026 18: 17
      There were such units in the USSR, but they were reduced.
      The USSR had combat swimmer units, but they were never reduced. They remain active to this day. As evidence, I provide links to articles about combat swimmer units.

      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%86%D1%8B

      https://m.ok.ru/group/52398035632318/topic/156173609493438?ysclid=mkmoy2cpen956189710

      https://army.ric.mil.ru/Stati/item/209636/

      https://russian.rt.com/russia/article/627877-boevye-plovcy-morskoi-specnaz?ysclid=mkmo2vho359234391
      1. 0
        21 January 2026 09: 14
        Quote: qwertyui_1
        The USSR had combat swimmer units, but no one reduced them.

        Well, at least most of those stationed in Crimea were left without work. I just happened to meet the son of one of the officers, so I know.
        I know that the diving service in the Far East has been cut.
        There was also a group of swimmers in Novorossiysk - now there are only technical divers.
        It's the same story in Murmansk. I don't know about the Baltic Fleet, but I suspect the staff there has shrunk, too.
        1. 0
          6 March 2026 12: 42
          Search for the phrase "naval reconnaissance point." It's never been very well developed in the north. February 16th was Navy Reconnaissance Day. There was a congratulatory message at the Military District on this occasion. Three veterans showed up there. All of them were from the Pacific Fleet. Their unit is on Russky Island, a popular vacation spot, but it's a place where outsiders are best kept away. If they see you, they'll be very surprised.
    3. +2
      20 January 2026 19: 19
      I didn't see the octopus in the swimmers' photo.
      An octopus is a backup breathing apparatus for a partner in case they run out of air. So, it's for amateurs. We're dealing with professionals here; an octopus isn't for them.
      Closed-circuit scuba diving equipment is used, but it seems to be the usual one.
      Closed-circuit scuba gear (rebreathers) is primarily used by saboteurs to avoid revealing their identity in enemy waters. This article discusses scuba divers engaged in counterterrorism operations in their own waters, where there is no need to hide. Furthermore, standard scuba gear is easier to operate and much cheaper.
      1. -1
        21 January 2026 09: 08
        Quote: qwertyui_1
        regular scuba gear is simpler

        The problem is visibility and autonomy. If they swam at depths of 10-15 meters, that would be one thing,
        and at greater depths, conventional scuba diving equipment quickly uses up its air supply
        Moreover, the military cannot afford to swim leisurely and save on breathing.
        Quote: qwertyui_1
        Octopus is a backup breathing apparatus.

        Anything can happen underwater - an octopus can save more than one life or help complete a task
        And it weighs and takes up minimal space.
        1. +1
          21 January 2026 12: 30
          If they swam at depths of 10-15m, that would be one thing.
          - This is exactly the depth at which combat swimmers swim; they have nothing deeper to do.
          The military cannot afford to swim leisurely and save on breathing.
          High air consumption is for beginners. Professionals, even with intense movement, have minimal air consumption, which is achieved through practice.
          Octopus can save more than one life
          An octopus is a breathing apparatus used by a buddy in recreational diving. Professional divers don't have such a concept.
          1. -1
            22 January 2026 10: 22
            Quote: qwertyui_1
            they have nothing deeper to do

            1. Even with a dive computer, experienced divers manage to misjudge the depth by 10-15 m.
            2. Why shouldn't this be done? Protecting ships at anchor isn't just about 15 meters. For example, if a bottom mine is planted under an Orlan-class ship and it needs to be removed, what depth is that?
            The Orlan has a draft of only 11 meters, maybe more.
            3. Landing from a submarine to the shore is easily 30+
            Quote: qwertyui_1
            High air consumption is for beginners.

            Yeah, you'll also tell me that military pilots only fly in good weather.
            Problems vary. If something needs to be solved urgently, as was the case in the Thames Estuary during the Soviet era, there's unlikely to be any savings. I'm sorry, but I don't believe you can talk about intensive traffic with minimal consumption. But some things can be solved with technology—for example, tugboats. Small arms have eliminated active hand-to-hand combat underwater.

            Quote: qwertyui_1
            Professionals don't have such a concept.

            What do the "professionals" have? Don't they have any backup options at all?
  5. 0
    20 January 2026 12: 53
    In recent years, the units have received new assets of various types. For example, unmanned aerial vehicles have entered service.

    We need automation of a number of security functions, and on a massive scale - hydroacoustic surveillance, radars, maybe some small unmanned floating vehicles, and much more.
    It's impossible to cover the situation with just people, even trained ones. It takes a lot of engineering work, not soldiers.
  6. -1
    20 January 2026 16: 59
    The generals, or rather, in this case, the admirals, are again preparing for the past war.
    Judging by the latest attempt to strike our diesel-electric submarine inside our naval base with an underwater drone, things are going badly with the PDSS.
    A new PDSS boat is needed, capable of countering aerial, surface, and underwater drones. The Navy's existing Project 21980 Grachonok boat is unsuitable for this purpose.
  7. 0
    20 January 2026 17: 54
    According to available data, anti-PDSS units are armed with several types of small arms for various purposes. For use on water or land, they use AK-74 or AK-12 assault rifles, special "Val" assault rifles, and others. Underwater, combat swimmers use corresponding systems, such as APS assault rifles or SPP-1 pistols.
    Where did they put the ADS?
    which :
    "........The ADS dual-medium automatic grenade launcher system enables the fulfillment of combat missions:

    on land - similar to the AKS-74 (AK-74M) assault rifle with a 40-mm 6G15 underbarrel grenade launcher;
    underwater - similar to the APS machine gun;

    and has advantages:
    _ on land - compared to the AKS-74 (AK-74M) assault rifle with the 6G15 underbarrel grenade launcher in terms of accuracy and precision of fire due to better balance and stability of the weapon;
    _ underwater - compared to the APS in terms of accuracy and precision of fire, bullet stability and firing range at immersion depths from 5 to 20 m;
    _ small dimensions and a bullpup design with the cartridge case reflected forward;
    _ the ability to shoot from the right and left shoulder;
    _ use of one type of magazine for shooting on land and in water.

    Equipping the Russian Navy's special forces units with the ADS assault rifle-grenade launcher system allows them to replace the AKS-74 assault rifle, 6G15 underbarrel grenade launcher, and APS assault rifle with a single system, as well as expand the tactical capabilities of the rifle on land in various weather conditions, time of day, and lighting, and increase its combat effectiveness in water.
    https://www.air-gun.ru/social/readtopic/ads
    1. 0
      21 January 2026 00: 03
      It's the weapon of choice for the PDSS forces and combat swimmers. Although, as far as I know, they train and operate on the ground with regular Kalashnikovs. The ADS weapon is a one-off, low-volume production. And the barrel's lifespan isn't very long due to the long bullet. hi
      1. 0
        21 January 2026 01: 31
        Quote: jonht
        And the barrel's service life is not very high due to the long bullet.
        The long bullet is used only underwater (rarely in air) and does not go through the rifling, but in other cases the standard cartridge is used, which means the barrel wear is comparable to the AK-74.
        Where am I mistaken?
        1. 0
          21 January 2026 01: 47
          Both use a standard case and the bullet diameter is roughly the same, although the special cartridge may have a slightly smaller diameter. The barrel is also more stressed in water.
  8. 0
    27 January 2026 08: 54
    This applies both to the Marine divisions and to the overall development of the Navy. Incompetence is everywhere, a complete degradation.
  9. 0
    18 February 2026 16: 43
    It would be a good idea to expand on the special equipment used by these units...
  10. 0
    24 March 2026 21: 15
    Dum spiro spero. Always were, always are, always will be.
    1. +1
      25 March 2026 03: 35
      As long as I breathe, I hope it was like that for us.
  11. 0
    25 March 2026 03: 35
    In 2000, I served in the 1st Naval Detachment in Khabarovsk. We had ancient IDA-71s and standard scuba gear with wetsuits. We had AK-74s, APS, PPS, DP-64s, and MRGs. The training was decent, but the equipment was outdated. I don't think anything has changed there, unless they're just buying something for themselves. The first thing we need to implement is underwater and surface drones that can conduct reconnaissance, patrol the waters, and engage targets. An underwater assault rifle fires at a range of 15-30 meters, depending on depth, so a diver with an assault rifle would be practically useless if a backdoor is detected. Unfortunately, with our ancient, thieving commanders, we can't expect any progress. They'll give us one toy, take a photo report, and that's it.