Russia has demanded that the United States withdraw its lawsuit over the Tsar's debt.

30 025 116
Russia has demanded that the United States withdraw its lawsuit over the Tsar's debt.

American investment fund Noble Capital has decided to pull out of the "trash can" stories"Tsarist bonds of the 1916 model and present a bill to Russia on 225 billion.

A lawsuit has been filed in US federal court against the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Finance, the Bank of Russia, and the National Welfare Fund, demanding that they "fulfill their obligations" on securities placed through National City Bank of New York.



Moscow's response was extremely straightforward. According to Sergei Sokolov, a partner at Marks & Sokolov, who represents the defendants, this debt was annulled by the Soviet government back in 1918. Neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation ever recognized liability for the imperial bonds under international law. The papers have long since been consigned to their proper place—the archives.

Russia demanded that the plaintiff withdraw the lawsuit by January 30. Otherwise, a motion to dismiss the case will be filed under the US Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. This is the very legal barrier that blocks private claims against a sovereign state.

Noble Capital claims to own $25 million in bonds with a 5,5% coupon, which, after interest, amounts to $225,8 billion. They propose to repay the debt using Russian assets frozen due to sanctions, calling it "debt offset" rather than confiscation.

This is an attempt to make political expropriation look like an old debt dispute. Washington freezes assets—a private foundation brings century-old papers to court—and then proposes "legally" writing off the property to cover non-existent liabilities.
116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 23
    16 January 2026 17: 47
    You can't build a business with Yankee.
    1. +8
      16 January 2026 17: 50
      The donkey's ears are not the return of the "royal" debt. negative
      1. + 12
        16 January 2026 17: 58
        The donkey's ears are not the return of the "royal" debt.
        The classics had "Dead donkey's ears"© smile
        Don't do this to a live donkey. It won't be pleasant for him!
      2. +3
        16 January 2026 20: 43
        It seemed to me that Gorbachev had already settled the issue with the tsarist debts, that we don’t owe them anything and don’t present any payment for the destruction during the intervention.
        1. -2
          17 January 2026 11: 47
          Quote from alexoff
          It seemed to me that Gorbachev had already settled the issue with the tsarist debts, that we don’t owe them anything and don’t present any payment for the destruction during the intervention.

          According to Sergei Sokolov, a partner at Marks & Sokolov, who represents the defendants, this debt was cancelled by the Soviet government back in 1918. Neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation ever recognized liability for the imperial bonds under international law. The papers have long since been consigned to their proper place—the archives.

          And as is well known, the Russian side, according to the constitution, is the legal successor of the USSR... I think further comment is unnecessary...
      3. +1
        16 January 2026 22: 46
        Quote: marchcat
        The donkey's ears are not the return of the "royal" debt. negative

        Why do this to the donkey? I feel sorry for the donkey.
        I suggest - from herring!
    2. +3
      16 January 2026 17: 50
      AK-1945 hi You can do business, but you can't trust it.
      1. + 15
        16 January 2026 17: 53
        Business without trust is impossible, even among criminal organizations. It would be a complete scam.
        1. +5
          16 January 2026 18: 03
          AK-1945, What kind of TRUST is there in business? This is nonsense. A different system works in business.
      2. + 17
        16 January 2026 18: 01
        Russian money doesn't let anyone sleep peacefully.
        How everyone wants to snatch at least a little bit.
        1. + 22
          16 January 2026 18: 05
          Blacksmith55 hi Well, not only Russian ones, they mercilessly ripped apart Gaddafi's assets, now they're going to rip apart Maduro's piggy banks, and they also dealt with Iranian deposits in a "gentlemanly" manner.
    3. + 18
      16 January 2026 17: 51
      Quote: AK-1945
      You can't build a business with Yankee.


      Yes, you can. Just knock out their teeth first so they can't bite.
      1. +3
        16 January 2026 17: 54
        You went into business with a toothless, blue-fingered jerk?
        1. +5
          16 January 2026 17: 56
          Quote: AK-1945
          You went into business with a toothless, blue-fingered jerk?


          The main thing is not the appearance, but the safety of the project.
          1. +6
            16 January 2026 18: 01
            You should tell Denmark and Canada about the security of projects with your "ally".
            1. +8
              16 January 2026 18: 04
              Quote: AK-1945
              You should tell Denmark and Canada about the security of projects with your "ally".


              Do not distort.
              I haven't heard of Denmark and Canada knocking out the US's teeth.
              On the contrary, they lied down under the US and pretended that rape was inevitable.
      2. +2
        16 January 2026 18: 16
        First, you need to knock out their teeth

        and cut off the greedy hands
        1. +9
          16 January 2026 19: 44
          Quote: alex_spb
          and cut off the greedy hands

          What kind of kindergarten are these comments? Empty air-shaking for the sake of upvotes—cut off hands, knock out teeth, impale... Do you have that option? Then try it, instead of calling someone else.
          1. 0
            18 January 2026 15: 25
            shaking the air

            Well, one can dream, right?
          2. +1
            18 January 2026 17: 33
            These are some kind of kindergarten, not comments.

            These are often patriot bots. They post their stupidity on the topic of self-righteousness, thereby creating an atmosphere of anger in the community.
            That's where the word "donkey" comes from.
      3. 0
        17 January 2026 15: 39
        Quote from kromer
        Quote: AK-1945
        You can't build a business with Yankee.


        Yes, you can. Just knock out their teeth first so they can't bite.

        A scene from a humorous story, a certificate, and a camel. They say you've stopped playing chess with Mr. Tsypa. But would you play with a man who constantly cheats and fights? Of course not. So he didn't either.
    4. + 22
      16 January 2026 17: 58
      American investment fund Noble Capital has decided to retrieve 1916 Tsarist bonds from the "trash can of history."

      These "accounts" could amount to trillions, taking into account interest.
      Evil tongues say that when selling Alaska, the Americans either underpaid or cheated them out of a considerable amount.
      Evil tongues say that the Americans paid for the weapons and ammunition supplies in gold, but only partially fulfilled them, and forgave the rest due to the collapse of the Empire.
      Evil tongues say that during the occupation of the Arkhangelsk and Murmansk provinces and the Far East, the mattress makers, in addition to murdering the indigenous population, became notorious for hauling away anything and everything they could.
      And so on and so forth and so on...
      1. + 13
        16 January 2026 18: 18
        Let all claims be addressed to Nicholas II, who abdicated the throne and all obligations...
        And, if anything, you can sue for intervention during the Civil War, when various American expeditionaries landed in the north...
        1. +4
          16 January 2026 20: 45
          and money for Nicholas II in the Federal Reserve Fund
          For 100 years, the US has made no payments under the agreement; the Federal Reserve's estimated debt for the use of Russian gold amounts to hundreds of billions of dollars, says A. G. Mosyakin, author of a study on Russian gold in the US Federal Reserve.
          Mosyakin, A.G. Up the Steps -- to the Abyss. Part I // The Fate of Gold in the Russian Empire in Historical Context. 1880-1922. - Historical Investigation. - Moscow: KMK, 2017. - P. 53-55
        2. +7
          16 January 2026 20: 53
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Let all claims be addressed to Nicholas II, who abdicated the throne and all obligations...

          Off topic of the article.
          By the way, I don't understand why they reburied him in the Peter and Paul Cathedral. Was he really a tsar? From the moment he abdicated, he was simply Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov. For example, I know someone by that name. Will his relatives be able to bury him next to Peter and Catherine?
          Louis XVI died an emperor, and so did Charles I. And who's this guy? He traded God's gift for scrambled eggs...
    5. +2
      17 January 2026 04: 25
      And haven't the Russians yet presented the Pentagon with a bill for the plunder of Russian territories in 1918-20 during their occupation by the Americans (the northern provinces and the Far East)?
  2. +3
    16 January 2026 17: 49
    A war is brewing between law firms to determine who knows American law better. wink
    1. + 14
      16 January 2026 20: 12
      Quote: Murmur 55
      A war is brewing between law firms to determine who knows American law better.

      What if this is an offer to exchange confessions?
      In 1916, did the Russian Empire take out a loan?
      Let the United States recognize the Russian Federation as the Russian Empire within the borders of 1913, with all property and territorial rights and powers. wink
      Oops... but that's Finland, Poland, Moldova and Transnistria, Georgia, and (dare I say it) Armenia, and the Kars and Erzurum regions in today's Turkey, and Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan (back then, such a nationality didn't even exist), and the Baltics. And these territories of the Republic of Ingushetia aren't just ours; they OWE US, by definition, several trillion modern dollars (or euros). We'll leave Alaska for later; that's an even older matter than the 50 million that has grown to 225 billion; the statute of limitations there now runs into the trillions.
      Do you think he will admit it?
      After all, this is not giving away what is ours (as we did), but recognizing what is OURS at the expense of completely different (but Russian!) territories.
      I would seriously consider this kind of exchange.
      For this, you can also reduce the bill for Alaska a little.
      Otherwise, our most conscientious Moscow Arbitration Court will calculate the amount at 11 trillion. And we'll knock half (a trillion) off their bill.
      This is a good deal, I swear by Karl No. 3's mom. good bully
      And then we'll write off the debts for Alaska for recognizing Norway, Sweden, and Denmark as ours. And with Spitsbergen, of course. Because freedom of our navigation is paramount. Yes
      stop Let's put the question about the Black Sea Straits aside for now.
  3. + 17
    16 January 2026 17: 49
    And file a claim for damages for the intervention during the Civil War and compensation for the killings of Russians during that time?
    1. 0
      16 January 2026 18: 07
      Quote: Grencer81
      And file a claim for damages for the intervention during the Civil War and compensation for the killings of Russians during that time?

      This is weak.
    2. -3
      16 January 2026 18: 15
      Quote: Grencer81
      And file a claim for damages for the intervention during the Civil War and compensation for the killings of Russians during that time?

      Quote: ettore
      Quote: Grencer81
      And file a claim for damages for the intervention during the Civil War and compensation for the killings of Russians during that time?

      This is weak.

      Not weak, but pointless.
      The US will pay off their court winnings from our frozen funds.
      Let's say we filed a lawsuit and even won—what next? How do we collect it from the US?
      1. +2
        16 January 2026 19: 46
        When I started suing a private security company a year ago, they also told me that it was useless.
        And before the New Year I received a certain amount of money from him.
        1. -3
          16 January 2026 20: 27
          Quote: Grencer81
          When I started suing a private security company a year ago, they also told me that it was useless.
          And before the New Year I received a certain amount of money from him.

          A private security company can kill a couple of people. tens Millions of people in half an hour? Or at least drive an aircraft carrier to the courthouse? A private security company might have a budget of a trillion dollars, and by 2027, it'll be 1.5 trillion?
          You didn't even compare a vegetable to a finger.
        2. +1
          16 January 2026 21: 47
          Quote: Grencer81
          When I started suing a private security company a year ago, they also told me that it was useless.
          And before the New Year I received a certain amount of money from him.

          Pardon me, but the court situations in these two cases are quite different. Your case was heard in Russia, and according to Russian law, the mattress case would involve an international court, and its decisions, as we know, are not binding on all countries. Moreover, in a mattress litigation, forcing them to pay any amount is a real gamble. The only way to achieve this is by seizing (nationalizing) their assets worth that amount, if any exist on our territory.
    3. 0
      17 January 2026 06: 58
      Quote: Grencer81
      And file a claim for damages for the intervention during the Civil War and compensation for the killings of Russians during that time?
      Why go so far? First, we need to file a claim for the stolen tanker and the associated moral damages.
  4. +8
    16 January 2026 17: 53
    What a clever idea! When it comes to their own gain, and even if the prospect of fleecing someone looms on the distant horizon, the Yankees turn on all their imagination and their natural imperial arrogance. The late Zadornov was wrong; the Americans are far from stupid and, as a rule, make fools of everyone around them.
  5. +3
    16 January 2026 17: 53
    They propose to pay the debt using Russian assets frozen due to sanctions.
    Here Zelya and his European partners became tense...
  6. + 10
    16 January 2026 17: 55
    This game can be played by two people, and the amount of the claim against the United States could exceed $225 billion if you dig through old laundry. good
    1. +9
      16 January 2026 18: 08
      Not long ago, I read that before WWI, Nikolai sent about 50 tons of gold to the US to create an international payment system. The system was never created, and the gold, with Nikolai's consent, was funneled into the Federal Reserve System, which was then being created, at interest.
      1. +1
        16 January 2026 19: 21
        Quote: faiver
        Not long ago I read that before WW1 Nikolai sent about 50 tons of gold to the USA to create an international payment system,

        Very interesting! Can you tell me where you read it?
  7. +9
    16 January 2026 17: 56
    Russia demanded that the plaintiff withdraw the lawsuit by January 30. Otherwise, a motion to dismiss the case under the US Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act will be filed.

    I'd send the petition via ballistic missile. The Yankees, frankly, have been getting on my nerves lately. Time for a couple of kicks. In the jaw and groin. From the heart.
  8. +5
    16 January 2026 17: 57
    Well, our money, even though it's frozen, won't give us any peace... The eye sees, but the tooth doesn't feel...
  9. +4
    16 January 2026 17: 59
    We'll bring back the Alaska question.
  10. -1
    16 January 2026 18: 00
    I wonder if American law doesn't have a statute of limitations. In Russia, it's three years and then goodbye.
  11. +4
    16 January 2026 18: 04
    Russia demanded from the US

    It seems to me that this is the first time I have seen such a phrase with my own eyes. laughing
    1. +2
      16 January 2026 18: 08
      Nice... I would like to read such news every day.
  12. +2
    16 January 2026 18: 06
    As an option...
    It all depends on whether Mandaean Donny has gone on the warpath or whether this is someone else's initiative?
  13. +1
    16 January 2026 18: 15
    Moscow's response was extremely straightforward. According to Sergei Sokolov, a partner at Marks & Sokolov, who represents the defendants, this debt was annulled by the Soviet government back in 1918. Neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation ever recognized liability for the imperial bonds under international law. The papers have long since been consigned to their proper place—the archives.
    Well, let's see how the US will listen to the Russian Federation.
  14. +4
    16 January 2026 18: 17
    Neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation ever recognized liability for imperial bonds under international law.

    The author is mistaken. In fact, there is a precedent for such an admission.
    In November 1996, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed in Paris between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the French Republic regarding the final settlement of mutual claims between Russia and France that arose before May 9, 1945. It provided that Russia would pay France $400 million over four years, $280 million of which would be used to pay off Tsarist bonds, and $120 million would go toward compensating French owners of Russian real estate who lost it during nationalization.

    Thanks to Yeltsin, claims for compensation for tsarist debts are now being filed on the basis of this precedent, primarily against private individuals.
    1. +1
      16 January 2026 18: 47
      Thanks to Yeltsin, claims for compensation for tsarist debts are now being filed on the basis of this precedent.
      - By 2006, everything had already been discussed and the matter was closed. Why on earth would a shady company decide to hype things up and make a killing is another matter entirely.
      1. -2
        16 January 2026 19: 06
        Who discussed what with whom and what topic was closed?
        We're talking about the tsar's debts to private investors. No one has closed this "topic"; it's still hanging.
        1. +4
          16 January 2026 19: 09
          Study the topic first, and then get indignant and ask questions.
          To avoid unnecessary paperwork, in 2006 Russia paid off its debts to the Paris Club (the US is a member of which), and this was recognized at the international level.
          1. -2
            16 January 2026 21: 52
            Study the topic first, and then get indignant and ask questions.
            The Paris Club deals with the debts of some states to others, and in this case we are talking about debts to private individuals.
            Noble Capital RSD is attempting to collect payments on the Tsarist loan bonds on behalf of the bondholders.
  15. -4
    16 January 2026 18: 20
    So, they're restoring the monarchy here, they've pulled St. Nicholas's uniform out of the dust. Soon, instead of the national anthem, they'll be singing "God Save the Tsar" on TV... The Yankees are wrong about that: a debt must be repaid.
  16. +4
    16 January 2026 18: 31
    In a word, the States were and remain a bunch of crooks.
  17. +1
    16 January 2026 18: 37
    The statute of limitations. It's unlikely to be 110 years. Besides, the succession didn't pass from the Russian Empire to the USSR. They're dragging all sorts of skeletons out of the closet—clearly, they want to offset what was stolen from us. I don't think there's a chance. And you still have to pay the fee.
    1. 0
      16 January 2026 18: 45
      Quote: Glagol1
      Moreover, the succession of rights did not pass from the Republic of Ingushetia to the USSR.

      And our leaders didn’t admit to anything?
      That drunkard Yeltsin admitted all sorts of nonsense, like the one the Poles were screaming about (well, the Poles-kings fell later on while flying to the Sabbath in honor of that invention).
      1. +1
        17 January 2026 14: 46
        Russia is the legal successor to the USSR. That's true. But then the chain breaks. Because before the USSR, there was the RSFSR, which was not the legal successor to the Russian Empire. This creates a legal quandary. They're proving a chain of RI-RSFSR-USSR-RF, but there isn't one. The USSR incurred its debts, but they were all repaid long ago; I think the last one was paid in 2008. There were two more treaties with England and France in 1986 and 1996, where old claims were offset, but they don't set a precedent—they were wise enough not to recognize the debts, but rather to offset claims of different types.
        The French holders of the tsarist debt disagreed with the 1996 agreement and sued the Russian Federation, but lost every case. And precisely because of the chain's break. But times have changed, the laws have been trampled, so we'll see what the striped ones try to come up with. But, as I wrote above, their chances are slim—again, there's the chain...
  18. +2
    16 January 2026 18: 39
    Moscow's response was extremely direct.
    Sent?
  19. +2
    16 January 2026 18: 39
    It's time to understand that foreign partners are not St. Petersburg dacha owners. If you don't solve the problem right away and try to hang them on a hook, they'll hang you on the hook.
    In relation to royal debts: you forgive your partners and don't bill them - they will bill you.
  20. +8
    16 January 2026 18: 43
    If your money is not with you, then you are a loser.
    Here is a good example.
  21. +2
    16 January 2026 19: 04
    I read the comments and as always there was 0 on the topic and 0 useful information (just to make noise).
    1. In 2006, Russia closed (at the international level) all issues regarding the debts of the USSR and the tsarist era and does not owe anything to anyone (except for modern obligations and so on).
    2. Why on earth did a shady real estate company from Texas, founded in 2002, end up with these "securities" in such quantity?
    3. I would like to dig under this company and find out who it currently belongs to and who it works with.
    From time to time, even in Europe, jokers with candy wrappers appear, demanding that "assets, palaces, ships, and lands" be returned to their asses.
    I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the company simply got lucky (they were taken over for debts or found in Grandpa's suitcase) with the securities. Unless someone simply scammed them and passed them off as overdue bills, disguised as securities, and now they're trying to snatch a sliver of their cash.
    But overall, it's all suspicious.
    1. -1
      16 January 2026 22: 23
      1. In 2006, Russia closed (at the international level) all issues regarding the debts of the USSR and the tsarist era.

      Not "all issues," but only those related to debts to states—that's the Paris Club. There are also issues related to debts to private banks—that's the London Club. These issues, too, seem to have been resolved. The remaining issues are debts to individuals, such as bondholders, which remain unresolved. Formally, the USSR and Russia didn't recognize the tsarist debts, but in fact, Russia made payments on them and had settlement agreements. Now, private individuals, organized into funds, are trying to secure payments following the precedent set by the Paris and London Clubs. Here's what you need to know to understand the situation.
  22. 0
    16 January 2026 19: 07
    While we're chewing snot, everyone will be wiping their feet on us.
  23. +2
    16 January 2026 19: 14
    So it's a mutual matter.
    One can recall the three railway trains with gold that they tried to save from the Zionist Bolsheviks.
    Some of the gold is still in Japan, some in the USA.

    And also present a bill for helping the Bolsheviks with weapons!
    Soviet textbooks carefully concealed the fact that the United States aided the October Revolution.
    It's time to restore justice!
    1. 0
      17 January 2026 08: 01
      Well, let's bring to light the documents according to which the USA supplied weapons to the Bolsheviks.
  24. -2
    16 January 2026 19: 15
    Wow! The "Spirit of Anchorage" is getting stronger! No big deal, the most important thing is faith in your "partner"! Well, you've got to be lucky enough to beat a shell game player sometime! They're not suckers, after all! Are they?
  25. 0
    16 January 2026 19: 15
    Moscow's response was brutally straightforward. According to Sergei Sokolov, a partner at Marks & Sokolov, who represents the defendants, this debt was annulled by the Soviet government back in 1918. Neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation ever recognized liability for imperial bonds under international law. The papers were long ago consigned to their proper place – the archives. ... Russia demanded that the plaintiff withdraw the lawsuit by January 30. Otherwise, a motion to dismiss the case will be filed under the US Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. This is the very legal "barrier" that blocks the path to private claims against a sovereign state.
    And the lawyers don't want to point out that the US has long used the concept of "limited sovereignty"? And have there been precedents?? And how should one defend oneself? And haven't they acknowledged the jurisdiction of the US court as a response?

    Or: first we'll take the money for the trial, and then we'll claim that it's unexpected...

    Just recently there was a story where a case (the one with the "London bar-cafeteria") worth tens of billions was lost, and "not a single lawyer suffered."

    am
  26. -1
    16 January 2026 19: 23
    Bruce Marks, the firm's founder and managing director, has earned a reputation as an international expert in litigation matters involving Western parties and parties from the former Soviet Union. He has represented clients in such cases since 1998 and is known in the United States and abroad as an experienced attorney skilled in the art of legal strategy.

    Bruce has successfully represented Western, Russian, and Ukrainian clients in commercial disputes and litigation involving claims based on professional liability, creditor liability, securities fraud, maritime law, and RICO litigation—some of which have involved billions of dollars in claims. Bruce also advises clients on corporate law matters, where the laws of multiple jurisdictions must be applied.

    Bruce's extensive experience in litigation under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, a key statute allowing parties in foreign disputes to obtain evidence in the United States through U.S. federal courts, is noteworthy. He also participated in groundbreaking litigation involving the recognition of Russian Chapter 15 bankruptcy cases, in which discovery led to the discovery of significant assets, which were subsequently transferred to the court in two cases. Throughout his career, Bruce has successfully represented both plaintiffs and defendants.

    Bruce is a former Republican senator in the Pennsylvania General Assembly. Bruce also served as an adviser (1985-1989) to the late Republican U.S. Senator Arlen Specter and represented Donald J. Trump's 2016 campaign. He graduated with honors from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1984 and received a Master of Laws (LLM) from the University of Cambridge in England the same year. Bruce also holds two bachelor's degrees from the University of Pennsylvania: one in economics (Wharton School of Business) and one in Russian, both with honors.

    Bruce also studied at the Pushkin Institute of the Russian Language in Moscow in 1980. He is licensed to represent clients in courts throughout the United States, including Pennsylvania, Alabama, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, and West Virginia, as well as before the U.S. Supreme Court. Bruce is an avid squash player, having competed in matches in over 20 countries.

    https://marks-sokolov.com/ru/%D0%B1%D1%80%D1%8E%D1%81-%D1%81-%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D1%81/
    Is it possible to hire someone else, not from Pennsylvania, but from Harvard?
    I'm not against squash - it's just a big deal...
    crying
  27. ANB
    +1
    16 January 2026 19: 49
    . owns $25 million in bonds with a 5,5% coupon

    Aren't the percentages too high?
    Over 100 years, that's 137.5 million. And then there's the principal debt. Even if you factor in annual capitalization, it's not that much. Maybe 200 million at the very least. Where did the 226 billion come from?
    1. +2
      16 January 2026 20: 38
      Maybe inflation has been indexed...
      1. ANB
        +1
        16 January 2026 22: 35
        Maybe inflation has been indexed...

        Inflation is the lender's problem.
        The coupon is 5.5 percent, the conditions are fixed.
        1. 0
          16 January 2026 22: 58
          Please! Have you never haggled at the market? These freemasons have presented a huge bill and are going to haggle. It's a deal, that is, and you'll have to pay, even if not the full amount.
    2. 0
      16 January 2026 20: 49
      Quote: ANB
      Where do 226 billion come from?

      inflation..?
    3. 0
      17 January 2026 15: 05
      Over 100 years, 5.4 billion, to be precise (though I rounded up a bit). Plus, inflation.
      1. ANB
        0
        17 January 2026 15: 50
        . Over 100 years 5.4 billion

        Can you provide a calculation, where did you get this figure?
  28. +3
    16 January 2026 20: 56
    And what does today's Russia have to do with this?
    Imperial Russia took it.
    There is a "legitimate heir to the throne" George.
    True, he is 1/4 rodent, the other 3/4 is unfinished German, and has a complex surname: Bagration-Romanov-Hohenzollern.
    Let them shake debts out of "King Goga".
  29. +1
    16 January 2026 21: 00
    Original. This is how our frozen assets haunt us, how they dig up archives from the trash just to hand them over.
  30. -1
    16 January 2026 21: 07
    Quote from solar
    Neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation ever recognized liability for imperial bonds under international law.

    The author is mistaken. In fact, there is a precedent for such an admission.
    In November 1996, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed in Paris between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the French Republic regarding the final settlement of mutual claims between Russia and France that arose before May 9, 1945. It provided that Russia would pay France $400 million over four years, $280 million of which would be used to pay off Tsarist bonds, and $120 million would go toward compensating French owners of Russian real estate who lost it during nationalization.

    Thanks to Yeltsin, claims for compensation for tsarist debts are now being filed on the basis of this precedent, primarily against private individuals.

    It probably will be so - based on this precedent.
    And the rest is like "donkey's ears", "Alisochka", it's just our meek lyrics.
    The Americans will shake out the imperial debt, because they have the Power.
    And we only have a movie quote about the truth.

    So, in this simple way, based on the Yeltsin-era precedent, the Americans will take that very money, those 300, from under the noses of the British, who didn't have time to devise such a brazen and, alas, effective method of robbery.
    1. +3
      17 January 2026 00: 52
      Quote: Uma Palata
      In this simple way, based on the precedent of the Yeltsin era, the Americans will take that very money

      American case law is based on the decisions of American courts. What do Yeltsin and the French have to do with this?
  31. +1
    16 January 2026 21: 17
    The Supreme Leadership Party should task its bureaucrats with finding the tsarist debts in the US and Europe. I read somewhere that their debts are very, very large.
  32. +1
    16 January 2026 22: 48
    Noble Capital says it holds $25 million in bonds with a 5,5% coupon, which translates to $225,8 billion in interest.

    By the way, what's going on about selling Alaska?
  33. +2
    16 January 2026 22: 59
    And they don’t want to repay Poddubny’s debt?
  34. 0
    16 January 2026 22: 59
    At the dawn of Soviet power, the USSR gave an exhaustive response to such claims, but after the restoration of capitalism, old debts will have to be paid.
    1. 0
      17 January 2026 09: 30
      The discount on gas, oil, lumber, chemicals, metals and other goods will be used to pay off the debt - in 200 years, perhaps, it will be paid off if the interest rates are reasonable.
  35. +1
    16 January 2026 23: 16
    In short, these bastards will win the case and then start seizing all our property that they get their hands on. Fucking thieves.
  36. +2
    17 January 2026 00: 42
    Draw them royal papers and give them a full suitcase.
  37. +1
    17 January 2026 02: 58
    Quote: your1970
    Quote: Grencer81
    When I started suing a private security company a year ago, they also told me that it was useless.
    And before the New Year I received a certain amount of money from him.

    A private security company can kill a couple of people. tens Millions of people in half an hour? Or at least drive an aircraft carrier to the courthouse? A private security company might have a budget of a trillion dollars, and by 2027, it'll be 1.5 trillion?
    You didn't even compare a vegetable to a finger.

    The question is not that, but that I was also told that it was useless...
    But... As Comrade Beria said: "An attempt is not torture, comrades!"
  38. +1
    17 January 2026 04: 51
    She didn't demand, she asked...politely.
  39. -4
    17 January 2026 06: 52
    These are the mines the Tsar laid under Russia!
    1. -1
      18 January 2026 16: 48
      Or maybe Lenin and company?
      1. -3
        18 January 2026 17: 26
        It can't. It wasn't Lenin, but the Tsar who took on the world's debts, so Russia still can't pay them off.
        1. -3
          19 January 2026 14: 44
          All of the Russian Empire's major state obligations were settled and closed by Russia through agreements in the 1990s and 2000s. Well, it's easier to say that Lenin simply robbed and destroyed my country.
          1. -2
            19 January 2026 17: 16
            You're the one explaining to the Americans that "all government obligations are settled and closed." And, excuse me, which country of yours did Lenin rob and destroy?
            1. -1
              23 January 2026 16: 44
              Russia, of course. He dismembered it into the aggressive nation-states that we now have in our midst.
              1. -2
                23 January 2026 22: 44
                Really? And in our universe, Lenin created a mighty superpower, and it was dismembered by decommunizers, 70 years after Lenin's death. laughing
                1. -1
                  28 January 2026 06: 37
                  You have some kind of alternative reality of your own😁
                  1. -1
                    28 January 2026 07: 11
                    My reality is consistent with the generally accepted one. But yours is unique. Could you list the countries around us that Lenin founded?
  40. 0
    17 January 2026 08: 47
    Quote: ROSS 42
    abdicated the throne and all obligations...

    Nicholas II abdicated only the throne. He didn't cancel any of Russia's "obligations." The Tsar's debts were "cancelled" by Soviet Russia (Lenin, by the way). But at the same time, Russia lost the rights to the Tsar's gold in Japan (Kolchak had kept it for safekeeping).
  41. 0
    17 January 2026 08: 49
    Quote from Matsur
    Draw them royal papers

    The Russian Empire took out debt in gold.
  42. +2
    17 January 2026 09: 38
    Well, then about Alaska, also an unresolved issue from the tsarist times, if you're going to play, then play... And put some rackets there.
  43. 0
    17 January 2026 11: 37
    Why not deal with Alaska? It's not necessary? The US is trying to squeeze us wherever it can, but we can't say that the US, along with the EU, is to blame for the Kyiv coup!
  44. +1
    17 January 2026 11: 47
    I don't understand on what grounds? Maybe I should sue the US; I still haven't received the money for Alaska!!!
  45. -1
    17 January 2026 12: 09
    The Alaskan lease ended last year, I think...now they're living there on credit.
  46. 0
    17 January 2026 12: 12
    Neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation ever recognized liability for the imperial bonds under international law. The papers were long ago consigned to their proper place—the archives.

    *well..so get your ass off the chair..put up the stirrup..go up a couple of steps..get out that folder..blow the dust off it..and throw it in the mattress holders' noses..slackers!
  47. -2
    17 January 2026 12: 46
    First, Japan must return Kolchak's gold stored in their banks—more than 90 tons of gold, plus the interest accrued for its use! Then America must pay for the Russian fleet that helped liberate America from capture, as well as compensation for the looting and intervention during the Revolution!
  48. 0
    17 January 2026 18: 30
    These American demands are extremely ridiculous and completely unfounded. I really want to believe that we have enough sense not to fall for all this nonsense and not pay them anything!!!
  49. 0
    17 January 2026 21: 56
    There are many things missing in Russia, especially historians and lawyers in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
    There was a precedent between the USSR and the US for a similar attack. Back then, Soviet Foreign Ministry officials quickly brushed it aside, citing a counterclaim for the US invasion and damages inflicted on the USSR during the civil war. Documents, apparently with calculations, were already prepared back then... cerca torva
  50. 0
    18 January 2026 01: 00
    Let them demand from the bun-crunchers
  51. 0
    18 January 2026 06: 12
    You scared the penguins - withdraw the claim yourself, otherwise we will demand that it be annulled through the court... A serious threat, however.
  52. 0
    18 January 2026 10: 16
    We accept and satisfy the request of 1815 of the ruler of the island of Kauai in the Hawaiian archipelago to accept the island under the protectorate of Russia.
  53. 0
    18 January 2026 15: 55
    The response of Sergei Sokolov, representing the interests of the defendants (RF), is extremely weak and pathetic.
    He says: "Leave me alone, you evil hooligans!!!"
    The USSR, in the same situation, responded: OK, but first you will pay us our bills for the damage YOU caused to our state during the civil war and intervention!
    It's a pity that the Russian Federation is not the USSR and now the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not have people with education and willpower.
  54. 0
    18 January 2026 16: 46
    But it's strange that we didn't acknowledge this debt from the start. Why?
  55. 0
    18 January 2026 17: 38
    Of course, there's no legal basis for this claim. But what will the Russian authorities do when a US court, based not on legal rights at all, but on the newly emerging concept of "the law of the strong," awards Russia these $225 billion, and the very next day the US government begins seizing and selling diplomatic property and other Russian assets in the US and other countries, simultaneously transferring the same amount held in Euroclear to itself, and seizing and selling seized tankers on a now "legal" basis? Then what will the Russian government do against this "court of the strong"? Sure, they'll release Peskov or Zakharova, and they'll mumble something (remember how they muttered about property confiscation after losing the Yukos case). Nowadays, the world accepts only the strong. But this, alas, is not about the Russian Federation ("The strong do what they will, the weak suffer what they must suffer." Has anything changed in the society of anthropomorphic predators since the time of Thucydides?)
  56. 0
    19 January 2026 15: 21
    According to our Constitution, national law prevails. Bonds usually have a statute of limitations. Payment is due after a certain date. The statute of limitations is three years. Both penalties and coupons are not proportionate to the debt. And the USSR didn't assume all of the debts of the Russian Empire. Let them go to kindergarten.
  57. 0
    19 January 2026 15: 26
    Let's see what the Central Bank of the Russian Federation will do with Euroclear in the Moscow AS on March 4, 2026. laughing