Military Review

India and China led the military to their initial positions in the disputed region in the Himalayas

25
India and China led the military to their initial positions in the disputed region in the HimalayasIndia and China have withdrawn their military units to their original positions in a disputed area in the Himalayas.


"Intensive diplomatic consultations held by Deputy Foreign Minister Ranjan Mathai, in coordination with the military leadership and Ambassador Jai Sankar in Beijing, allowed a meeting (with the Chinese side) during which the situation was resolved," a government source told IANS Indian.

April 15 Chinese troops crossed the border with India and set up camp in the Himalayas. The Indian-Chinese border in the Himalayas remains a subject of controversy for Delhi and Beijing.

Several meetings of the military on the line of control ended in vain, the Indian side began to transfer additional forces to the disputed region.

Reports on the resolution of the incident appeared on the eve of the visit of Foreign Minister of India Salman Khurshid to China 9 in May.
Originator:
http://www.rosbalt.ru/
25 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ragnarek
    Ragnarek 6 May 2013 11: 06 New
    +8
    here's the brix! among themselves for the joy of am, it remains only to fight
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 6 May 2013 11: 20 New
      +3
      Quote: ....
      India and China take their military units back to their original positions


      Probably for a run
      1. aviamed90
        aviamed90 6 May 2013 13: 08 New
        0
        Chinas teeth show. And our official position is “friendship forever”.
        It is time to recognize that the Chinese threat really exists for us.
        1. Joker
          Joker 6 May 2013 13: 21 New
          +4
          Oh well, don't blow the flame, huh? For those who rule the United States, it’s profitable if we all think that the Chinese are just waiting for us to grab a piece of land from us, and even more profitable if we start fighting with them. The Chinese president (or whoever they have) immediately flew to us after taking office, the Chinese are not stupid, they are well aware that they are the United States’s goal, as they currently pose a great threat, so they won’t swear India, not with us, and I am sure this news is the same duck as the one in which Old Man refuses our military base, this is just a matter of fact. Well, you yourself think the Hindus would sit back if the Chinese crossed their border? So, do not panic, we need to hold on to China only until we are together, no one will attack us.
          1. elmi
            elmi 6 May 2013 15: 16 New
            +2
            I agree that China is not profitable to fight with us, but to vent Russia with China is the dream of the United States and its minions. A bad world is better than a good war.
        2. hrych
          hrych 6 May 2013 17: 10 New
          +2
          The worse the relationship of the Chinese with the Indians (as with the Vietnamese, Japanese, Taiwanese, Koreans, and of course the Americans), the calmer we are.
      2. rumpeljschtizhen
        rumpeljschtizhen 6 May 2013 20: 00 New
        +1
        Vadivak ++++++ For a sense of humor
    2. svp67
      svp67 7 May 2013 08: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: Ragnarek
      here's the brix! among themselves for the joy of am, it remains only to fight
      Or maybe because they do not fight, because the BRICS
  2. NAV-STAR
    NAV-STAR 6 May 2013 11: 08 New
    10
    You need to be friends. It is somehow creepy from the presentation of the mess of two countries with a total population of more than 3 billion people.
    1. aviamed90
      aviamed90 6 May 2013 13: 17 New
      0
      The Chinese are our friendship to the bulb! They need new territories! Is it really not clear?
      One incident on the Indian-Chinese border immediately reveals all the stupidity of our leaders with statements about the "impossibility of a large-scale war in the modern world."
      1. Refund_SSSR
        Refund_SSSR 6 May 2013 14: 54 New
        0
        Well then, Japan does not need territory? Where are the screams of the Japanese threat?
        For those who did not study well at school, in the territory of small Japan there live a number of people almost equal to the population of the Russian Federation
        The territory of China .. You rave!
        Everyone needs the territories, but the question is at what cost!
  3. Scoun
    Scoun 6 May 2013 11: 08 New
    +5
    April 15 Chinese troops crossed the border with India and set up camp in the Himalayas. The Indian-Chinese border in the Himalayas remains a subject of controversy for Delhi and Beijing.

    I don’t know ... does China have at least one neighbor with whom they would not have “subjects” for a dispute and it seems to me that China will more and more “cross” borders, the more it feels the force, the more they will “become impudent " No wonder the United States is turning its attention to this region. Oh no wonder.
    1. UFO
      UFO 6 May 2013 11: 24 New
      +1
      “China will not survive within its current borders, it is vital for it to expand its territory ...” I don’t remember who said it, but there’s nothing to add. request And the fact that they "took" - well, so before a good jump .... hi
      1. Krasnoyarsk
        Krasnoyarsk 6 May 2013 12: 15 New
        0
        By the necessary territories is meant our Far East.
        1. UFO
          UFO 6 May 2013 12: 39 New
          0
          It is not at all possible! (To the Urals) wink
          1. Phantom Revolution
            Phantom Revolution 6 May 2013 12: 41 New
            +1
            To Kiev right away. fool
      2. Phantom Revolution
        Phantom Revolution 6 May 2013 12: 40 New
        0
        China has many undeveloped territories, read the articles.
        And about the controversial, yes, we need resources mainly energy.
  4. Withoutdream
    Withoutdream 6 May 2013 11: 18 New
    0
    What is interesting is how India reacted to a certain contingent of troops crossing China’s border.
    Quote: Scoun
    Several meetings of the military on the line of control ended in vain, the Indian side began to transfer additional forces to the disputed region.

    They have a direct military conflict on the border, China enters troops into the country, and India not only does not prevent the invasion, it also tries to agree, and only then begins to transfer its troops to the territory already occupied by China! That is, India, the disputed region, de facto lost. On what conditions, curiously, did they agree to withdraw their troops back?
    1. Scoun
      Scoun 6 May 2013 11: 27 New
      0
      Quote: Withoutdream
      That is, India, the disputed region, de facto lost.

      As a matter of fact, this is the most scary thing ... because the situation with the Japan-China Islands is similar, that is, it turns out that China simply violates the borders and neighbors are afraid to get into a fight for their land, for their pride, for the honor of the country.
      and the Chinese are feeling more confident and impudent.
      Only the USA can really tap China and repulse Russia, although it will be very difficult for Russia after Serdyukovsky "rehforms". (I do not take into account nuclear weapons)
    2. El13
      El13 6 May 2013 12: 18 New
      0
      Quote: Withoutdream
      and India not only does not prevent the invasion, but also tries to agree

      And it was necessary to immediately hit the entire arsenal of nuclear weapons and Beijing? I really hope that in this long confrontation between India and China, Russia will act as the peacemaker who will lead them to agreement, but I do not understand this matter thoroughly.
  5. dc120mm
    dc120mm 6 May 2013 11: 22 New
    0
    Nadeyus will not re-see a large-scale warrior, atom piz - c.
  6. Vtel
    Vtel 6 May 2013 11: 24 New
    0
    India and China have withdrawn their military units to their original positions in a disputed area in the Himalayas.

    “Let me go to the Himalayas ...” - Masha Rasputin. Maybe she’d really let go, let them put things in order there.
  7. Scythian 35
    Scythian 35 6 May 2013 11: 26 New
    0
    Chinas generally apupil !!! What kind of territorial claims can China have against India if they de jure do not have a common border. There is a border between India and Tebet that annexed China. The international community did not recognize the annexation of Tibet, the truth and independence of Tibet, except for India and Nepal (seem), no one recognized.
  8. Renat
    Renat 6 May 2013 11: 29 New
    +1
    Surely it could not do without the intervention of third forces. For some, the escalation of forces in this region is beneficial. To divert the attention of the world community from their other dark deeds. Better a bad world than a good war. After all, both countries are nuclear. Hopefully enough reason.
  9. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 6 May 2013 11: 35 New
    +1
    I don’t know ... does China have at least one neighbor with whom they would not have “subjects” for a dispute and it seems to me that China will increasingly “cross” borders, the more it feels the force, the more they will “become impudent” " No wonder the United States is turning its attention to this region. Oh no wonder. [/ Quote]

    Maybe there are no complaints against Pakistan? It can be assumed that China + Pakistan versus India. Three countries with nuclear weapons. We most likely will not help India (unless by arms), but Japan and Vietnam can help. So much for the 4th world.
  10. pinecone
    pinecone 6 May 2013 11: 38 New
    0
    "They took the military," "military units." to everything.
  11. OLGRIN
    OLGRIN 6 May 2013 11: 58 New
    0
    They did not indicate in which region they were in conflict, because the Himalayas are large, but in any case in Tibet. Once again, problems will be with entering Tibet.
    1. lewerlin53rus
      lewerlin53rus 6 May 2013 12: 31 New
      0
      Quote: OLGRIN
      Once again, problems will be with entering Tibet.
      Yes, how to say .. what
      For example, I never had problems with entering Tibet. I have absolutely nothing to do there laughing
    2. Foamas
      Foamas 6 May 2013 15: 49 New
      0
      Quote: OLGRIN
      They didn’t indicate in which region they are in conflict, because the Himalayas are large,

      Yes, where usually - Jammu and Kashmir smile
      there troubles since 1984, during this time about 2000 people died
      (Pakistan / India / China), primarily due to frostbite and avalanches, rather than from weapons.

  12. 123tank
    123tank 6 May 2013 14: 52 New
    0
    We are also in conflict with Japan (or rather, it is with us). Conflicts over the territory are practically difficult to resolve, because the principle is in effect: no one wanted to give in.