India and China led the military to their initial positions in the disputed region in the Himalayas

25
India and China led the military to their initial positions in the disputed region in the HimalayasIndia and China have withdrawn their military units to their original positions in a disputed area in the Himalayas.

"Intensive diplomatic consultations held by Deputy Foreign Minister Ranjan Mathai, in coordination with the military leadership and Ambassador Jai Sankar in Beijing, allowed a meeting (with the Chinese side) during which the situation was resolved," a government source told IANS Indian.

April 15 Chinese troops crossed the border with India and set up camp in the Himalayas. The Indian-Chinese border in the Himalayas remains a subject of controversy for Delhi and Beijing.

Several meetings of the military on the line of control ended in vain, the Indian side began to transfer additional forces to the disputed region.

Reports on the resolution of the incident appeared on the eve of the visit of Foreign Minister of India Salman Khurshid to China 9 in May.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    6 May 2013 11: 06
    here's the brix! among themselves for the joy of am, it remains only to fight
    1. +3
      6 May 2013 11: 20
      Quote: ....
      India and China take their military units back to their original positions


      Probably for a run
      1. 0
        6 May 2013 13: 08
        The Chinese show their teeth. And our official position is "friendship forever".
        It is time to recognize that the Chinese threat really exists for us.
        1. +4
          6 May 2013 13: 21
          Oh well, don't blow the flame, huh? For those who rule the United States, it’s profitable if we all think that the Chinese are just waiting for us to grab a piece of land from us, and even more profitable if we start fighting with them. The Chinese president (or whoever they have) immediately flew to us after taking office, the Chinese are not stupid, they are well aware that they are the United States’s goal, as they currently pose a great threat, so they won’t swear India, not with us, and I am sure this news is the same duck as the one in which Old Man refuses our military base, this is just a matter of fact. Well, you yourself think the Hindus would sit back if the Chinese crossed their border? So, do not panic, we need to hold on to China only until we are together, no one will attack us.
          1. +2
            6 May 2013 15: 16
            I agree that China is not profitable to fight with us, but to vent Russia with China is the dream of the United States and its minions. A bad world is better than a good war.
        2. +2
          6 May 2013 17: 10
          The worse the relationship of the Chinese with the Indians (as with the Vietnamese, Japanese, Taiwanese, Koreans, and of course the Americans), the calmer we are.
      2. +1
        6 May 2013 20: 00
        Vadivak ++++++ For a sense of humor
    2. +1
      7 May 2013 08: 23
      Quote: Ragnarek
      here's the brix! among themselves for the joy of am, it remains only to fight
      Or maybe because they do not fight, because the BRICS
  2. +10
    6 May 2013 11: 08
    You need to be friends. It is somehow creepy from the presentation of the mess of two countries with a total population of more than 3 billion people.
    1. 0
      6 May 2013 13: 17
      The Chinese are our friendship to the bulb! They need new territories! Is it really not clear?
      One incident on the Indian-Chinese border and immediately manifests all the stupidity of our leaders with statements about "the impossibility of a large-scale war in the modern world."
      1. 0
        6 May 2013 14: 54
        Well then, Japan does not need territory? Where are the screams of the Japanese threat?
        For those who did not study well at school, in the territory of small Japan there live a number of people almost equal to the population of the Russian Federation
        The territory of China .. You rave!
        Everyone needs the territories, but the question is at what cost!
  3. +5
    6 May 2013 11: 08
    April 15 Chinese troops crossed the border with India and set up camp in the Himalayas. The Indian-Chinese border in the Himalayas remains a subject of controversy for Delhi and Beijing.

    I don't know ... does China have at least one neighbor with whom they would not have "subjects" to dispute, and it seems to me that China will more and more "cross" borders, the more it feels the power, the more it will "become impudent" ". It is not in vain that the United States is switching its attention to this particular region. Oh, not in vain.
    1. UFO
      +1
      6 May 2013 11: 24
      "China will not survive within its present borders, it is vitally necessary for it to expand its territory ..." I do not remember who said, but there is nothing to add here. request And the fact that they were "taken away" - well, before a good jump .... hi
      1. Krasnoyarsk
        0
        6 May 2013 12: 15
        By the necessary territories is meant our Far East.
        1. UFO
          0
          6 May 2013 12: 39
          It is not at all possible! (To the Urals) wink
          1. +1
            6 May 2013 12: 41
            To Kiev right away. fool
      2. 0
        6 May 2013 12: 40
        China has many undeveloped territories, read the articles.
        And about the controversial, yes, we need resources mainly energy.
  4. Without a dream
    0
    6 May 2013 11: 18
    What is interesting is how India reacted to a certain contingent of troops crossing China’s border.
    Quote: Scoun
    Several meetings of the military on the line of control ended in vain, the Indian side began to transfer additional forces to the disputed region.

    They have a direct military conflict on the border, China enters troops into the country, and India not only does not prevent the invasion, it also tries to agree, and only then begins to transfer its troops to the territory already occupied by China! That is, India, the disputed region, de facto lost. On what conditions, curiously, did they agree to withdraw their troops back?
    1. 0
      6 May 2013 11: 27
      Quote: Withoutdream
      That is, India, the disputed region, de facto lost.

      As a matter of fact, this is the most scary thing ... because the situation with the Japan-China Islands is similar, that is, it turns out that China simply violates the borders and neighbors are afraid to get into a fight for their land, for their pride, for the honor of the country.
      and the Chinese are feeling more confident and impudent.
      Only the United States can really sniff China and Russia will fight back, although it will not be easy for Russia after Serdyukov's "reforms". (do not take into account nuclear weapons)
    2. 0
      6 May 2013 12: 18
      Quote: Withoutdream
      and India not only does not prevent the invasion, but also tries to agree

      And it was necessary to immediately hit the entire arsenal of nuclear weapons and Beijing? I really hope that in this long confrontation between India and China, Russia will act as the peacemaker who will lead them to agreement, but I do not understand this matter thoroughly.
  5. dc120mm
    0
    6 May 2013 11: 22
    Nadeyus will not re-see a large-scale warrior, atom piz - c.
  6. Vtel
    0
    6 May 2013 11: 24
    India and China have withdrawn their military units to their original positions in a disputed area in the Himalayas.

    "Let me go to the Himalayas ..." - Masha Rasputin. Maybe the truth is to let go, let it put things in order there.
  7. Scythian 35
    0
    6 May 2013 11: 26
    Chinas generally apupil !!! What kind of territorial claims can China have against India if they de jure do not have a common border. There is a border between India and Tebet that annexed China. The international community did not recognize the annexation of Tibet, the truth and independence of Tibet, except for India and Nepal (seem), no one recognized.
  8. +1
    6 May 2013 11: 29
    Surely it could not do without the intervention of third forces. For some, the escalation of forces in this region is beneficial. To divert the attention of the world community from their other dark deeds. Better a bad world than a good war. After all, both countries are nuclear. Hopefully enough reason.
  9. +1
    6 May 2013 11: 35
    I don't know ... does China have at least one neighbor with whom they would not have "subjects" to dispute, and it seems to me that China will more and more "cross" borders, the more it feels the power, the more it will "become impudent" ". It is not in vain that the United States is switching its attention to this particular region. Oh, not in vain. [/ Quote]

    Maybe there are no complaints against Pakistan? It can be assumed that China + Pakistan versus India. Three countries with nuclear weapons. We most likely will not help India (unless by arms), but Japan and Vietnam can help. So much for the 4th world.
  10. pinecone
    0
    6 May 2013 11: 38
    "They took the military away", "military units". everything.
  11. 0
    6 May 2013 11: 58
    They did not indicate in which region they were in conflict, because the Himalayas are large, but in any case in Tibet. Once again, problems will be with entering Tibet.
    1. 0
      6 May 2013 12: 31
      Quote: OLGRIN
      Once again, problems will be with entering Tibet.
      Yes, how to say .. what
      For example, I never had problems with entering Tibet. I have absolutely nothing to do there laughing
    2. 0
      6 May 2013 15: 49
      Quote: OLGRIN
      They didn’t indicate in which region they are in conflict, because the Himalayas are large,

      Yes, where usually - Jammu and Kashmir smile
      there troubles since 1984, during this time about 2000 people died
      (Pakistan / India / China), primarily due to frostbite and avalanches, rather than from weapons.

  12. 0
    6 May 2013 14: 52
    We are also in conflict with Japan (or rather, it is with us). Conflicts over the territory are practically difficult to resolve, because the principle is in effect: no one wanted to give in.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"