Demonic Charge, or How Radiation Learned to Kill

11 035 65
Demonic Charge, or How Radiation Learned to Kill
A reconstruction of the "tickling of the dragon's tail" that took the life of Louis Slotin


First victims


Strictly speaking, the very first victim of radiation was Nobel Prize winner in physics and chemistry Marie Skłodowska-Curie, a native of the Russian Empire. Her husband, Pierre Curie, also suffered. Due to the low concentrations of uranium in the ore they primarily worked with, they did not immediately die, but their hands were covered in ulcers for the rest of their lives. Pierre was killed by a horse-drawn carriage in 1906, while Marie lived much longer – until 1934, when she died from the effects of radiation sickness. To be precise, the diagnosis was "aplastic anemia." For the rest of her life, she was forced to wear black gloves, concealing the effects of her scientific experiments with tons of radioactive ore.



The woman was buried in a lead coffin, and her personal belongings were contaminated with radium-226, which has a half-life of over 1,500 years. The artifacts are stored in special lead boxes at the National Library of France. Access to Marie Curie's notebooks is open to the public, but due to their danger, library visitors are required to wear protective suits and provide written confirmation that they understand all health risks.


Marie Skłodowska-Curie wore a radium pendant on her chest.

History Science is full of personal tragedies. In 1907, Henri Moissan, known worldwide as the first to obtain pure fluorine, passed away. Many chemists before him had attempted to harness this halogen, at least 19 of whom had paid with their lives or suffered severe health problems. The French chemist was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1906 not only for his undoubted achievements, but also because of his serious illness—the committee in Stockholm feared Moissan would simply not survive. Incidentally, this was the reason why Dmitri Mendeleev's Nobel Prize was postponed. The Russian chemist was nominated for the 1907 prize, but he died on February 2 of that year. Moissan died 18 days later.


Henri Moissan

Along the same lines is the story of two American physicists, Harry Daghlian and Louis Slotin. Both worked at Los Alamos on the Manhattan Project and both died from the "demon core." This is the scientific folklore name for the core of the third nuclear bomb the Americans were supposed to drop on Japan. But the Japanese surrendered in time, and the charge remained in the laboratory. However, to put it bluntly, it still managed to reap a small bloody harvest. To put it simply, the "demon core" was an 89-mm sphere composed of two plutonium hemispheres. The plutonium wasn't pure, but alloyed with gallium. A very expensive piece—the sphere weighed 6,2 kg and would cost over two and a half million dollars today. Exactly the same sphere was used in the "Fat Man" bomb, which the Americans dropped on Nagasaki. The first weapon to detonate over Hiroshima, as is well known, was made of uranium.

Let's fast forward to August 21, 1945, to one of the Manhattan Project laboratories, known as the "Omega Site." On that day, 24-year-old Harry Daghlian was playing with blocks. More precisely, he was building a kind of neutron reflector for a hollow plutonium sphere out of bricks. The bricks were 4,4-kilogram blocks of tungsten carbide. Why was he doing this? The researcher was attempting to build a tamper-like device, the neutron stopper found in a nuclear bomb. A tamper diverts neutrons back into the nucleus, thereby accelerating the chain reaction. Finding the balance between moderating and triggering the reaction was the goal of his research.


Harry Daghlian


This is the design Harry Daghlian was working with on the fateful evening of August 21, 1945.


The nature of the injuries to Daghlian's right hand, which he used to remove a tungsten brick from a plutonium sphere. The photo was taken 16 days before the physicist's death.


In theory, Daghlian could have caused a nuclear disaster in the laboratory. If he had "successfully" surrounded the plutonium sphere with tungsten carbide blocks, the core could have gone supercritical, triggering a chain reaction. The laboratory's neutron detector was supposed to warn of this. And it didn't fail—it tripped at the right moment, which startled the young physicist. He began disassembling the reflector brick by brick, and one of them fell on the plutonium sphere. It even sounds unpleasant—a 4,4-kilogram piece of tungsten falling on a nuclear bomb component. A chain reaction immediately began, the core erupted with a blue light (the "Cherenkov-Vavilov effect") and engulfed Daghlian in heat. The unfortunate man couldn't quickly remove the brick from the blazing core. Before extinguishing the reaction, he had to partially disassemble the massive reflector. Daghlian faced 25 days of terrible torture.

I think I'm finished


Despite tightened safety regulations, the "demon core" claimed another life. In May 1946, physicist Louis Slotin received a fatal dose of radiation in a similar manner at the same Omega facility in Los Alamos. Remarkably, both Slotin and Daghlian had roots in the Russian Empire. Daghlian's father was from Armenia, and the Slotin family emigrated to Canada to escape the Jewish pogroms of the late 19th century. Louis Slotin received a master's degree in geology from the University of Manitoba and later studied at King's College London. He worked in nuclear chemistry at the University of Chicago, from where he was recruited to the Manhattan Project.

On May 21, 1946, Zlotin and a group of fellow scientists were testing beryllium hemispheres, which were intended to perform the same function as in Daghlian's experiment. That is, they were supposed to reflect neutrons flying away from the "demonic core."


Louis Slotin (left) near the world's first nuclear bomb.

From a 21st-century perspective, the level of security at Los Alamos is astounding. Highly dangerous experiments with nuclear bomb cores were conducted barehanded and without basic safety equipment. The researchers themselves were well aware of this—they called such experiments "tickling the dragon's tail." Zlotin was performing extremely risky manipulations. What did he do? The physicist almost completely closed the two beryllium hemispheres over the "demon charge." This meant that almost all the neutrons from the assembly were reflected, and only a small fraction escaped through the gap left by Zlotin. Guess how he kept the hemispheres from collapsing?






A reconstruction of the tragedy: a household screwdriver holds two beryllium spheres of different sizes together. Zlotin had probably performed this dozens of times, but on May 21, 1946, everything went wrong. That summer, the "demonic core" was melted down to be on the safe side.

An ordinary screwdriver, which, as usual, slipped. And then, according to the rules of the game: a blue "Cherenkov glow," heat, and panicked attempts to stop the chain reaction. This was successful, but Zlotin received a radiation dose equivalent to 21 sieverts. It was as if he were 1,5 kilometers from the epicenter of a nuclear explosion. As he was carried out of the lab, he said, "I think I'm finished."


A detailed diagram of the researchers' quarters at the time of the tragedy at the Omega facility in Los Alamos. This later allowed doctors to more accurately determine the dose-response relationship for the human body. Besides Slotin, only one of those present in the laboratory died from radiation sickness, but many years later


Louis Slotin decided to leave the Manhattan Project for ethical reasons after the strikes on Japan. On the fateful day, he was demonstrating to his replacement the rules for handling nuclear components. weapons

The book "Nuclear War: A Scenario" describes his situation:

Zlotin began vomiting while still in the ambulance. His left arm, closest to the radiation source at the time of the incident, went numb. A swelling developed in his groin. He suffered from severe diarrhea and persistent vomiting. His condition worsened at the Los Alamos hospital. Exhausted, he watched helplessly as his arms filled with fluid, swelling like balloons. Painful blisters formed under his skin and soon burst.

Doctors tried in vain to save Louis Slotin, using Vaseline dressings, debridement of necrotic tissue, and ice baths for his extremities. Despite massive blood transfusions, radiation sickness progressed: the critical exposure destroyed the body at the cellular level. Hypoxia soon developed, the skin turned bluish, and bleeding ulcers covered his entire body. Doctors considered amputating his arms, from which the skin was peeling off in layers, but the patient's condition was hopeless. The complete destruction of bone marrow stem cells had deprived the body of its ability to regenerate and defend itself. In the final hours, necrosis spread to all organs. Due to the destruction of blood vessels and the intestinal mucosa, autolysis began: the body's own bacteria and toxins attacked the defenseless body. Sepsis, gangrene, liver failure, and vascular collapse led to systemic multiple organ failure. Louis Slotin died on the ninth day after the incident.
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 13+
    15 January 2026 05: 30
    Thanks to the author! Informative article.
    1. 12+
      15 January 2026 07: 22
      This should be read by those who want to start a thermonuclear war immediately. However, due to their age, they don't care what happens after them.
      1. 15+
        15 January 2026 07: 42
        Age doesn't seem to have anything to do with it. Looking at the comments on our website... It's a question for people's minds. As for the essence of the article... Such disregard for safety was driven by necessity, haste, and, ultimately, an obsession with science. Something similar happened with us. Kurchatov, for example, didn't die an old man at all.
        1. +2
          15 January 2026 07: 46
          Quote from: dmi.pris1
          Well, age doesn't really have anything to do with it. Looking at the comments on our site...

          Whatever your opinion, all the polls and a cursory glance at the VO show that the older generation (60+) is the most bloodthirsty. "To glass," "to raze the whole world to dust," "to nuke"—these are their standard desires...
          1. +6
            15 January 2026 08: 51
            I'm +60. And I'm not at all bloodthirsty. I've only seen people die, not even in war. And I don't want war.
            1. -2
              15 January 2026 12: 15
              Quote from: dmi.pris1
              I'm +60. And I'm not at all bloodthirsty. I've only seen people die, not even in war. And I don't want war.

              This does not apply to anyone with a VO "star" good
              1. 0
                15 January 2026 14: 24
                Quote: Civil
                Quote from: dmi.pris1
                I'm +60. And I'm not at all bloodthirsty. I've only seen people die, not even in war. And I don't want war.

                This does not apply to anyone with a VO "star" good

                For example, I don't have a "star"! So what?
            2. +3
              15 January 2026 14: 23
              Quote from: dmi.pris1
              I'm +60. And I'm not at all bloodthirsty. I've only seen people die, not even in war. And I don't want war.

              I'm well over 60, but I don't want a nuclear war either! Or any war at all! I want my sons and grandchildren to live in a peaceful society!
              1. -13
                15 January 2026 14: 35
                So say the polls: your generation over 60 is the most bloodthirsty and proponents of violence. You grew up in a society where physical force was the primary solution to even everyday problems.
                1. +1
                  15 January 2026 14: 37
                  Quote: Civil
                  This is what the opinion polls say.

                  Please publish the results of this social survey!
                  And if you don’t have this result, then you are mistaken here, people!
                  1. -6
                    15 January 2026 14: 42
                    Quote: your vsr 66-67
                    Quote: Civil
                    This is what the opinion polls say.

                    Please publish the results of this social survey!
                    And if you don’t have this result, then you are mistaken here, people!

                    Don't push me to write an article, do your own research and think about the results yourself.
                    1. +5
                      15 January 2026 15: 12
                      Quote: Civil
                      Don't push me to write an article,

                      What kind of article could this be? Opinion polls are published in the open press! Surely you've read about this poll somewhere?!
                      The general drain is protected... laughing
                2. 0
                  22 January 2026 00: 32
                  "That's what the polls say- yours Generations over 60+ are the most bloodthirsty and supporters of violence."
                  "Yours"- Are you talking about Israeli generations?
                  Then you are probably right, genocide of other peoples is a common thing for the Israeli sandblowers.
          2. +2
            15 January 2026 14: 12
            Quote: Civil
            A quick glance at the VO shows that the older generation (60+) is the most bloodthirsty. "To glass," "to raze the whole world to dust," "to nuke"—these are their standard desires...

            Who told you that? Well, I'm 60+ and I haven't noticed any such obsessions or cravings in myself, and I still don't. And having served in the army for almost 32 years, I'm not really in favor of war.
            1. -1
              15 January 2026 14: 35
              Quote: Fitter65
              This does not apply to anyone with a VO "star"
          3. 0
            15 January 2026 17: 24
            So Katz is suggesting we surrender? Turning the entire world into glass—that's the logical outcome of humanity's existence. Humanity has no prospects, not even like Sharik's.
        2. 0
          15 January 2026 08: 44
          Well, age has nothing to do with it. Looking at the comments on our site... A question for people's minds
          - Well, how could it not be related? Of course it is related. Age-related dementia is quite widespread.
        3. 14+
          15 January 2026 08: 57
          It's more likely that psychology was at work in this case (I'm referring to the experiments with the demonic core). Not everyone can maintain maximum self-control for long. Super-dangerous actions, repeated over and over, become routine. Attention and caution are dulled. Mistakes are made out of the blue. A sapper makes a single mistake. Deaths at Fort Plague. The deaths of several chemists and biologists, and the Chernobyl accident. In many cases, it's not ignorance, but rather habitual self-confidence that leads to catastrophic consequences.
          1. 11+
            15 January 2026 09: 01
            True. It's the routine and the lack of clarity that are to blame. A simple example: which electrician will make more safety mistakes? Naturally, the experienced one.
            1. +6
              15 January 2026 13: 39
              Sometimes an employee starts acting up out of the blue. Expect trouble. This psychological state needs to be broken. For example, in such cases, I've sent them out for coffee or a smoke, especially if they don't smoke. If they're a woman, pinch them and give them a good smack in the face. This really helps change their state.
              1. +2
                15 January 2026 14: 24
                Quote: balabol
                Sometimes an employee starts acting up for no apparent reason.
                And it happens out of the blue, and you know you need to connect the circuit in parallel, but you stupidly install it in series, all three of us looking at each other, and why isn't it working... laughing laughing Literally in mid-December, something like this happened to us. Well, we were working on a low-voltage system. We spent one day installing it, and the next we were setting it up, but the stone flower wouldn't come out. laughing This way and that, it doesn't work wassat laughing At lunch we are sitting and heating up food in the microwave one after another, and again we sigh that we need a second microwave and not just one... and then it dawns on us that we should have done it in parallel!!!!! laughing laughing so this happens too... drinks
                1. +2
                  15 January 2026 15: 12
                  And it happens out of the blue

                  About electricians. Something funny happened to me recently.
                  I don't let electricians near my house.
                  Well, once in another life I was an electrician myself and I understand the level of those who can be called upon to work. laughing
                  So, I assembled the panel in the bathhouse. The entrance area is fully equipped with a power supply, a RKN, and an automatic transfer switch. I checked it and was happy. I connected the consumers. I took one last look before closing the cabinet. I feel SOMETHING IS WRONG.
                  I check again, everything is installed correctly. I check the consumers, everything works. But something is gnawing at me. I went for a coffee. I checked again.
                  Holy shit. All the consumers are connected BYPASSING the entrance area. laughing
                  1. 0
                    15 January 2026 17: 19
                    Quote: bk316
                    All consumers are connected BYPASSING the entrance group.

                    laughing good good good drinks
                    1. +1
                      15 January 2026 18: 57
                      laughing good good drinks

                      I was sober, by the way. laughing drinks
            2. 0
              15 January 2026 14: 16
              Quote from: dmi.pris1
              True. It's the routine and the lack of clarity that are to blame. A simple example: which electrician will make more safety mistakes? Naturally, the experienced one.

              And according to statistics, drivers with more experience are more likely to get into accidents on the road. I disagree about electricians. I've been working as an electrician for 10 years now since retiring. And I'm still afraid of electricity. laughing laughing laughing
              1. +3
                15 January 2026 17: 22
                Happening.
                High-voltage transformer substation, the old foreman, handing over his shift to another, says: "Careful, this bus is live." And slaps it with his hand. That's it. Finita la comédie.
              2. +1
                20 January 2026 12: 41
                I don't know how a driver with a lot of experience can get into more accidents than a newbie? Unless they're just a teachable individual.
                1. 0
                  20 January 2026 12: 43
                  Quote: Jager
                  I don’t know how a driver with a lot of experience can get into accidents more often than a newbie?

                  And this is what statistics confirm.
                  1. +1
                    20 January 2026 12: 46
                    Really? Where's that? It's not for nothing that even insurance companies base their calculations on age as well as experience. Almost EVERY new driver gets into an accident within one or two years of driving experience.
                    1. 0
                      20 January 2026 12: 54
                      Quote: Jager
                      Almost EVERY new driver gets into an accident within 1-2 years of experience.

                      I wouldn't say every single one. One out of a certain number, and even that's not a given. Statistics from the traffic police periodically included the number of accidents and their severity, as well as the drivers' experience. And drivers with one or two years of experience were always fewer.
            3. 0
              20 January 2026 12: 40
              An experienced electrician, if they're smart, doesn't make mistakes. An experienced and thoughtful electrician knows full well that safety regulations are written in blood.
              1. 0
                20 January 2026 12: 47
                Quote: Jager
                An experienced electrician, if they're smart, doesn't make mistakes. An experienced and thoughtful electrician knows full well that safety regulations are written in blood.

                But in fact, it's not the same person who does it, and not in the same organization. If we collect statistics, we again find that young specialists are less likely to make catastrophic mistakes than more experienced ones.
                1. 0
                  20 January 2026 12: 53
                  I was taught by a veteran power engineer, a seasoned professional. And after being exposed to voltage once (and suffering a severe arrhythmia for an hour afterward, fortunately my heart was healthy), I solidified this knowledge through my own experience for the rest of my life.
                  1. 0
                    20 January 2026 12: 57
                    Quote: Jager
                    I consolidated this knowledge through my own experience until the end of my days.

                    Some people learn from their own experience, some from someone else's, and some don't learn anything at all... Again, experience comes with age.
          2. 0
            15 January 2026 21: 43
            Quote: balabol
            In some cases, it is not ignorance, but, on the contrary, habitual self-confidence that leads to catastrophic consequences.

            Of course!!! To use a screwdriver to poke around in a nuclear bomb!!!!!
            Dreamily feel - "But if he hadn't been able to remove the cube, Los Alamos wouldn't exist... At all... And the US would have been more restrained and tactful..."
            1. +1
              15 January 2026 21: 56
              Well, not to pick at it, just to create a gap between the parts. Firstly, it's very convenient; a screwdriver is always at hand, and secondly, everyone does it all the time and nothing happens. It's just that this time something went wrong.
              This is roughly how losers explain their mistakes.
          3. AMG
            +2
            15 January 2026 23: 08
            This is just one of many examples of how technological and other progress is paid for with human lives. Take the development of aviation, space exploration, geographical discoveries, and so on. Pioneers go where there are no instructions or rules, knowingly risking their lives. It's only after them that rules written in blood appear. Unfortunately, that's the end of it all.
      2. +2
        15 January 2026 07: 59
        Quote: Civil
        This should be read by those who want to start a thermonuclear war immediately. However, due to their age, they don't care what happens after them.

        I don't know who you're talking about when you say "due to age," but I know there's no age when it's like, "After me, even the flood!" It's not age, it's a mental disorder—or, more simply, schizophrenia!
      3. +3
        15 January 2026 09: 22
        It’s true that due to their age they don’t care what happens after them.

        It's not about age, it's about worldview...
        We see around us people about whom the saying goes: "You can beat a stake on your head with it..." These people are all around, if you look closely...
  2. +3
    15 January 2026 05: 48
    How radiation learned to kill

    Mmm... she's always been good at that. It's more like humanity learned to take radiation seriously. Not everyone, of course; there are individuals who scour landfills for the treasured object, which, when dug up, gives them a dose and a ticket to the afterlife.
  3. Des
    +7
    15 January 2026 06: 07
    Article +.
    The presentation and information are calm and interesting to read, even though it is about death.
    Our scientists (USSR, before the Chernobyl disaster) were also exposed to radiation through carelessness and accident.
  4. +4
    15 January 2026 06: 29
    – Dear scientists, such experiments should only be carried out with the permission of the relevant authorities!
    Blow up our planet to hell someday.
    1. +6
      15 January 2026 07: 43
      The idea is sound, but the relevant authorities are often several years late in learning about the dangers. Pioneers always take risks, paving the way for those who follow them into the unknown. It is these pioneers we should remember and thank for their progress. "We sing a song to the madness of the brave."
    2. 0
      15 January 2026 10: 16
      Quote: The same Lech
      – Dear scientists, such experiments should only be carried out with the permission of the relevant authorities!
      Blow up our planet to hell someday.

      So the authorities approved all of this. I don't think there wasn't a body in America monitoring safety regulations. And there was probably a plan for the experiment.
      But force majeure circumstances are still possible. Like, for example, the Northern Fleet submarine reactor refueling.
      1. +2
        15 January 2026 21: 26
        American radiation hazard posters at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
        https://budan.livejournal.com/504174.html
        1. Keep your hands clean - Do not harm your family!
        2. Forgotten dosimeters do not measure radiation!
        3.Wear protective clothing if you enter a contaminated area.
    3. 0
      15 January 2026 10: 56
      Yeah, it's a shame it didn't go off back then! Twice. You'd think they'd be more mindful of the threat of nuclear war now. Instead, they've reduced it to the level of "no big deal, we'll survive."
  5. 0
    15 January 2026 07: 47
    Quote: Cube123
    "We sing a song to the madness of the brave."

    And what if these madmen release some kind of infectious disease or poison into the world? what
    Well, let's say there's a bacterium that no antibiotic can affect... it's scary to see such crazy people. request
    1. +3
      15 January 2026 07: 59
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      And what if these madmen release some kind of infectious disease or poison into the world?

      So, COVID and Chernobyl have shown the consequences of ill-conceived experiments. But if everything is banned, progress will stop. And no one can say in advance where the line should be. One of the reasons computer modeling is increasingly valued is that you can press reset without real consequences. But not everything can be modeled. And modeling doesn't provide the opportunity to make a truly revolutionary discovery.
    2. +1
      15 January 2026 10: 17
      Quote: The same Lech
      Quote: Cube123
      "We sing a song to the madness of the brave."

      And what if these madmen release some kind of infectious disease or poison into the world? what
      Well, let's say there's a bacterium that no antibiotic can affect... it's scary to see such crazy people. request

      Already. Plague epidemic in Sverdlovsk, 79.
      And Covid didn't come from Barakhta Bay.
  6. +8
    15 January 2026 08: 57
    YouTube has many very interesting films made in the US about nuclear testing, incidents, and accidents involving nuclear materials, nuclear weapons, nuclear power plants, and so on. There's even a film about the "demon core" incidents described. You can watch all of these by searching for "How Nuclear Weapons Were Tested" on YouTube—there are 44 films in the series. All the films are in Russian. Check them out—they're very interesting. A very informative film: "Trinity and What Happened Next"—I recommend it to anyone interested in nuclear weapons.
    1. 0
      15 January 2026 21: 39
      There's also a feature film (a black comedy) in which a hawkish general provoked a nuclear war with the USSR, and the Soviet Union completed the "Dead Hand" project. The finale features documentary footage of atomic explosions.
      Stanley Kubrick, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, 1963
  7. +1
    15 January 2026 08: 58
    How many more of these "Pandora's Boxes" does humanity have ahead of it? It's entirely possible that, once again, the "smart guys" could destroy the world with their curiosity.
  8. +5
    15 January 2026 09: 20
    Louis Slotin after the attacks on Japan decided to leave from the Manhattan Project for ethical reasons. On the fateful day, he was demonstrating to his replacement the rules for handling nuclear weapons components.

    hmm, you can't escape fate...
    article +
  9. +4
    15 January 2026 10: 36
    He began disassembling the reflector brick by brick, and one of them fell on a plutonium sphere. It even sounds unpleasant – a 4,4-kilogram piece of tungsten falling on a nuclear bomb component. A chain reaction immediately started.

    This is called a criticality accident—an accidental, uncontrolled nuclear fission chain reaction in an unprotected environment. There have been about 60 such accidents throughout the history of nuclear power, killing more than 20 people.
    For example, a criticality accident occurred on April 21, 1957, at the Mayak Production Association in Ozersk due to the uncontrolled accumulation of highly enriched uranium in a sealed tank on a uranium metal production waste processing line. One fatality and five cases of severe radiation sickness occurred.
    In theory, Daghlian could have caused a nuclear disaster in the laboratory.

    It couldn't. A nuclear explosion can't cause a criticality accident.
    1. +2
      15 January 2026 11: 37
      Yeah, only the melting of the sphere could have caused a wild infection of the entire area as a result.
  10. +2
    15 January 2026 11: 36
    All safety regulations are written in blood, alas... Similar incidents occurred in the 40s-60s in the USA, the USSR, and Great Britain.
  11. -3
    15 January 2026 11: 44
    "Imbecility and Courage" has been the long-standing American motto. By now, Americans have effectively lost the ability to separate uranium and plutonium isotopes. Unsurprisingly, a young American comes to work in this field, begins studying safety procedures, which include examples of mistakes and accidents, and begins to realize that he'd be better off working on the stock exchange.
  12. +3
    15 January 2026 13: 52
    Due to the small concentrations of uranium in the ore with which they primarily worked, there was no immediate fatality, but the couple's hands were covered in ulcers for the rest of their days.


    This ore, after the uranium was extracted from it, was more radioactive than uranium itself. This is what piqued the interest of these researchers. They managed to extract two new chemical elements from it: polonium (in honor of Poland) and radium. These elements were far more dangerous than uranium, and they were the ones that caused the couple's radiation sickness. However, all heavy metals are also toxic; radiation is not the only issue.
    1. -1
      15 January 2026 15: 35
      If someone had thought of attaching some kind of handle to the hemisphere, even a door handle, nothing would have happened.
      1. 0
        15 January 2026 23: 39
        Quote: agond
        If someone had thought of attaching some kind of handle to the hemisphere, even a door handle, nothing would have happened.

        There is a hole visible at the top where the thumb fits.
        Probably, after the first incident with bricks, this design was made.
      2. 0
        16 January 2026 18: 02
        Rewatch the latest film about our nuclear project. It almost happened there, too. Although there was a noose and a chain, apparently holding a hemisphere of uranium, and... it still almost happened. A second person was missing because the experimenter over-cautiously placed the risk in the wrong place.
  13. +2
    16 January 2026 04: 06
    But Henri Moissan didn't work with radioactive materials. Henri Becquerel was the discoverer of radioactivity. He carried a capsule of radium chloride, obtained from Pierre Curie, in his breast pocket (opposite his heart). He died in 1908 of cardiac arrest, and a radiation burn with evidence of tissue necrosis was found on his skin.

    Handling beryllium hemispheres without gloves is shocking, to say the least. Radiation might have been taken lightly back then, but beryllium is incredibly toxic—they should have known by now...
  14. 0
    20 January 2026 10: 39
    In my opinion, people are being quite unwise when they enrich radioactive materials to levels dangerous to the environment. It's much simpler to develop technologies based on dynamic process algorithms with vector-directed radioactive disturbance concentrations at the required concentration levels.
  15. 0
    20 January 2026 14: 18
    Dynamic editors based on unenriched radioactive material offer a promising prospect for industrial energy production. The essence of this approach stems from a method of concentration or directed radiation.
  16. 0
    17 February 2026 09: 07
    Modern scientists, like children, continue to play with dangerous and virtually unregulated processes involving radioactive materials until they find a method for producing even more powerful radiation, orders of magnitude more powerful, from weakly radioactive and non-radioactive materials.