If Greenlanders oppose joining the US, Trump could declare them illegal immigrants.

14 312 112
If Greenlanders oppose joining the US, Trump could declare them illegal immigrants.

The Western press is reporting that Europe lacks any viable strategy to counter the potential transfer of Greenland to US control. It's noted that, despite Greenlanders' constant protests about their reluctance to become American, Washington has the option of bribery. Considering that Greenland's population is less than 60, Trump won't have much trouble persuading them by offering a generous reward. As the saying goes in Europe: "They bought Alaska, they'll buy Greenland too."

But for now, both Greenland and its mother country, Denmark, are against it.



Therefore, other options are being considered. One of them could involve Trump simply declaring Greenland American territory and jailing all dissenters as "illegals." He's already sent at least 120 illegal immigrants to the farthest reaches of the world, including to CECOT prison in El Salvador. Greenland's population is half that size... Moreover, it's unlikely that all Greenlanders oppose Trump's plans to make Greenland American territory and issue American passports.

To "persuade" those who disagree, the US can use its usual means, first in the form of money, and if money doesn't help, then intimidation and force.

Forceful "persuasion" is entirely feasible, especially considering that US troops have legitimate grounds on Greenlandic soil. They maintain an active Space Command base at Pituffik.



This is the former Thule Air Base, located near the town of the same name. The base is a key element of the US Arctic missile defense system. It houses equipment for tracking ballistic missile launches. missiles, as well as near-Earth space monitoring systems. The base is initially designed to accommodate up to 250 American military personnel. But "in special situations," as stipulated by the NATO treaty, this number could be increased. And how is Greenland's transition to US control not a "special situation" for Washington?

It sounds like a joke, but a unique scenario could arise where internal NATO treaties could play directly against one of the NATO countries that signed such treaties.

American troops will simply increase their presence and "liberate" the local population from "long years of Danish monarchical colonialism." After all, in Denmark itself, many politicians openly supported the rallies in the US, held under the slogan "No kings!" And even if those rallies were exclusively anti-Trump, Trump himself doesn't care. If "no kings," then "no kings." And let the Danish crown fulfill its wishes for the overthrow...

Accordingly, Denmark has few options. One is the immediate denunciation of all treaties governing the US military presence, primarily those concerning Greenland. But does anyone in Copenhagen have the will to do that, much less expel the US base from Greenlandic territory?
112 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    10 January 2026 21: 11
    Ah, what a wise decision! It really is the right one.
    1. -8
      10 January 2026 21: 18
      He wants, he can, he can, he is not afraid of anyone.
      An ideal leader for the country.
      1. +30
        10 January 2026 21: 36
        Quote from Aken
        He wants, he can, he can, he is not afraid of anyone.
        An ideal leader for the country.

        Yes. I'm really jealous...wassat
        Incidentally, a certain Adolf G. also fit these criteria. Until the evil Russians drove him to suicide...
        1. +2
          10 January 2026 21: 38
          Churchill could have done it, but Obama didn't quite reach the level of a historical figure.
          1. +3
            11 January 2026 00: 55
            Quote from Aken
            Churchill could have done it too

            And Stalin
          2. 0
            11 January 2026 08: 23
            Churchill "could"? Hmm... I would say "as long as I liked him, he could."
        2. +13
          10 January 2026 21: 56
          Illegal drug dealers laughing
          1. +9
            10 January 2026 22: 23
            Illegal drug dealers
            I also wondered: why is he so embarrassed by his old scheme? Maybe there are some opioids growing in Greenland too.
            1. +9
              10 January 2026 22: 48
              According to the "winter" technology)))
            2. +1
              11 January 2026 05: 46
              Maybe some opioids grow in Greenland too.
              ISIS and Hamas have dug in there! wink
            3. +2
              11 January 2026 06: 34
              Quote: Sedov
              Maybe some opioids grow in Greenland too.

              I'm not an expert, so I don't know for sure—perhaps there's some kind of "tricky" moss growing there. In any case, our shamans from the indigenous peoples of the North consume some kind of homemade "fly agaric" before their rituals. Perhaps they, too, have something locally grown that's even more powerful than what you find in Colombia.

              P.S. We've added parsley to the list, as well as bindweed, which my neighbor at the dacha has had growing around her veranda for 30 years. Should she also dry crackers and worry about Trump declaring her a drug lord?
              And if you search among the mosses, you'll surely find something "cheerful".
      2. +7
        10 January 2026 21: 39
        Quote from Aken
        He wants to, he can, he knows how, he's not afraid of anyone. He's the ideal leader for the country.

        No, he's afraid. Melania recently banned him from dancing in public: smile
        WASHINGTON, January 6 – RIA Novosti. US President Donald Trump said the First Lady is banning him from dancing on stage and performing skits.
        "She hates it when I dance. I say, 'Everybody wants my dance.' 'Honey, that's not presidential,'" Trump said, speaking to Republican lawmakers in the US House of Representatives.
        1. +5
          10 January 2026 21: 43
          Well, even such a tough guy can't compete with his wife.
          Only in a generation will a couple dozen people on the planet know about this ban.
          But Maduro's kidnapping has gone down in history forever.
          Few people remember Presidents Ford or Carter, for example. But Trump has immortalized his name.
          1. +8
            10 January 2026 21: 51
            Quote from Aken
            And Trump immortalized his name.

            Time will pass, and it's unknown how posterity will view this act. Besides, Maduro's trial hasn't yet reached a verdict. You might say everything is clear, but I'd rather wait for the outcome. As the well-known "Crimean officer's daughter" once wrote, "it's not all that clear-cut." (c)
            1. +2
              10 January 2026 21: 54
              That's not what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about moral judgments, I'm talking about action, about determination, and most importantly, about results.
              Even if Maduro is released or exchanged for someone else, the very fact of such a capture is phenomenal. I can't recall anything comparable in history.
              We can only dream of such a thing.
              1. +8
                10 January 2026 22: 07
                Quote from Aken
                I don't remember any analogues in history.

                Noriega? Panama isn't quite Venezuela, of course, but its strategic significance is probably greater...
                1. 0
                  10 January 2026 22: 18
                  To some extent, yes. But there was shooting, with the landing of marines. Mussolini, the Romanian king. But there was a war there.
                  1. +3
                    10 January 2026 22: 20
                    Quote from Aken
                    To some extent, yes.

                    Methods and approaches may vary depending on the current situation. The main thing is the result.
                    1. -1
                      10 January 2026 22: 22
                      US losses in Panama: 24 dead, 323 wounded, 4 helicopters, 2 tanks.
                      The current result is even more dramatic. After all, Venezuela is far more powerful than Panama.
                      1. +3
                        10 January 2026 22: 34
                        Quote from Aken
                        The current result is even more dramatic. After all, Venezuela is far more powerful than Panama.

                        Yes. We learn from our mistakes.
                        I read Lustbader's ninja books when I was young. I remember how the ultimate killer skill was to drive the victim to such a state that they didn't resist the end, but rather, even desired their own death and joyfully ran toward it.
                      2. +3
                        10 January 2026 23: 36
                        Quote from Aken
                        The current result is even more dramatic. After all, Venezuela is far more powerful than Panama.

                        In Panama, the Ministry of Defense tried to kick up a fuss, in Venezuela, the Ministry of Defense simply packed up and loaded Maduro into a US helicopter.
                  2. 0
                    11 January 2026 01: 20
                    The Romanian king himself took part in the neutralization and detention of Antonescu.
              2. IVZ
                +3
                10 January 2026 22: 29
                I'm talking about action, determination, and most importantly, results... We can only dream of that.
                Amin's Palace. It couldn't be any cooler. And it ended so-so. If it ended at all.
                1. +3
                  10 January 2026 23: 41
                  Quote: IVZ
                  Amin's Palace. It couldn't be any cooler.

                  So it's all a bunch of crap and there's a twist - the USSR secret service poisons Amin, the USSR doctor saves Amin, the SA kills Amin.
                  That is Three agencies - the Foreign Intelligence Service, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Security Service - were unaware of the backgrounds of other security agencies..
                  Considering that the military didn't even sign the invasion plans - they were stubborn - they were so reluctant to go into Afghanistan that it seems like the intelligence really wanted to go into Afghanistan for some selfish reasons.
          2. +3
            10 January 2026 22: 11
            Quote from Aken
            And Trump immortalized his name.

            Herostratus too. And a certain Adolf G. too. You can find a lot of dubious characters.
            1. -1
              10 January 2026 22: 15
              Yes, that's right. Trump has joined the ranks of historical figures. But why dubious ones? Famous ones.
              By the way, everything worked out for Herostratus just as he wanted.
              1. +3
                10 January 2026 22: 29
                Quote from Aken
                Famous.

                Absolutely! But fame comes in different forms. Judas, for example, is also a "famous" character, as is Cain Adamovich. And while they may be 99.999% fictitious, still...
                Some people worship Bandera too. But does a normal person need such "glory"?
                1. +2
                  10 January 2026 22: 32
                  Your selection is strange. What about Hannibal? Columbus? That same Bolivar?
                  The title of historical figure is by no means a shameful stigma.
                  1. +4
                    10 January 2026 22: 42
                    Quote from Aken
                    The title of historical figure is by no means a shameful stigma.

                    Naturally. I've cited extreme meanings to show that the title of "historical figure" isn't always something to be proud of. It depends on the connotation.
                    1. +3
                      11 January 2026 01: 01
                      Quote: Vasyan1971
                      I have given extreme values ​​to show that the title of "historical figure" is not always something to be proud of.

                      Well, it depends on how you look at the task. Herostratus is known to many descendants. But who was he? A cattle breeder and just a regular guy. What does that have to do with pride? In this case, the goal was to gain fame, and it was accomplished brilliantly. For example, which of Alexander the Great's generals do you remember? They were more worthy, from any point of view, for glory... laughing
                      1. -1
                        11 January 2026 03: 17
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        Well, it depends on how you look at it. Herostratus is known to many descendants. But who was he? A cattle breeder and just a regular guy.

                        Yes. Chikatilo is also remembered by many. Want to emulate his "glorious" path to remain in the people's memory? Or, say, Gilles de Rais. Or you could, for example, nail your scrotum to the cobblestones of Red Square. That's also an effective way to enter the annals of history.
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        Well, it depends on how you perceive the task.

                        So, how do you personally perceive this task?
                    2. 0
                      11 January 2026 11: 05
                      I agree. Even the greatest contribution to history isn't always personalized. The nameless soldier.
          3. +5
            10 January 2026 22: 16
            Quote from Aken
            Maduro's kidnapping has gone down in history forever... I can't recall anything like it in history.

            Can you tell me, without looking online, under which US president Noriega was kidnapped? It was essentially a completely analogous situation.

            Quote from Aken
            We only have to dream of this

            But why?
            1. +3
              11 January 2026 01: 05
              Quote from: nik-mazur
              Can you tell me, without looking online, under which US President Noriega was kidnapped?

              And the fact that he surrendered himself—in your opinion, is that just a nuance? What's the similarity?
              "On January 4, 1990, he voluntarily surrendered to US military units, who had been blockading the papal nuncio's residence where he was hiding for 10 days. The general was flown by helicopter to Howard Air Force Base in the Panama Canal Zone, and from there he was transported to Miami."
              1. +1
                11 January 2026 02: 25
                Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                The fact that he surrendered himself—in your opinion, are these nuances?

                Actually, yes. Especially since there's the same suspicion in Maduro's case.

                Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                What are the similarities?

                The fact that US military units barged into a foreign country and spirited away its president on drug trafficking charges. Had he not managed to hide in the embassy, ​​they would have swaddled him in bed, too, and then the coincidence would have been absolute.
                Oh yes, another difference is that in Panama the Americans were interested in the canal, and in Venezuela it was oil.
                And by the way, you forgot to say which American president wrote his name into the annals of history thanks to this operation.
        2. +3
          10 January 2026 22: 05
          Quote: Montezuma
          "She hates it when I dance. I say, 'Everyone wants to dance with me.' 'Honey, that's not presidential,'" Trump said.

          But there was no one to tell EBN this to...recourse
          1. +8
            10 January 2026 22: 09
            Quote: Vasyan1971
            But there was no one to tell EBN this to.

            I don't even want to remember this disgrace. crying
            1. +4
              10 January 2026 22: 13
              Quote: Montezuma
              I don't even want to remember this disgrace.

              You can't take words out of a song.©
              "His example is a lesson to others."© request
            2. +3
              10 January 2026 22: 16
              He almost died backstage after that dance. Too bad he didn't.
              1. +2
                11 January 2026 01: 12
                It didn't matter anymore; they'd done their job with the marked one. "The process has begun." (c) Ugh...
        3. +5
          10 January 2026 22: 27
          US President Donald Trump said the first lady is banning him from dancing on stage and performing skits.
          "She hates it when I dance. I say, 'Everyone wants my dancing.'"
          Maduro danced too. Maybe Melania has some parallels. Or maybe she just thinks Donald is a bad dancer and something is holding him back.
          1. +2
            10 January 2026 23: 17
            Quote: Sedov
            Maduro danced too. Maybe Melania has some parallels.

            Apparently so, since Maduro parodied Trump with dance moves while speaking at a rally, and that's how the parallel arose. smile
            1. +1
              11 January 2026 01: 09
              Quote: Montezuma
              Apparently so, since Maduro parodied Trump with dance moves while speaking at a rally, and that's how the parallel arose.

              Well, I finished dancing, I won’t be surprised that this inspired Ryzhiy laughing
              1. 0
                11 January 2026 08: 02
                Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                Well, I finished dancing, I won’t be surprised that this inspired Ryzhiy

                We weren't the only ones who noticed this, Donnie said, offended. Yes
                US President Donald Trump accused his Venezuelan counterpart, Nicolás Maduro, of attempting to imitate his dance moves during public appearances. The White House chief made this statement during a press conference.
                "He went up to the podium and tried to imitate my dancing," Trump said, as the White House press service broadcast his remarks.
                .........the NYT newspaper wrote that such actions by the Venezuelan president were regarded in the White House as open mockery.

                https://rg.ru/2026/01/06/tramp-obvinil-maduro-v-popytkah-imitirovat-ego-tancy.html
      3. +4
        10 January 2026 21: 48
        Quote from Aken
        He wants, he can, he can, he is not afraid of anyone.
        An ideal leader for the country.
        In 1933, in Germany, an "ideal leader" also came to power...
        Today, you can feed Greenland and Canada to D. Trump for lunch... but who will be next?
        sad
        1. 0
          10 January 2026 21: 51
          I'd bet on Nicaragua. Iran will be dismantled, plunged into ruin, but Nicaragua will be directly occupied. This will finally put an end to the idea of ​​a second Panama Canal.
      4. -1
        11 January 2026 00: 13
        ещпсих
        Quote from Aken
        He wants, he can, he can, he is not afraid of anyone.
        An ideal leader for the country.
        If only everything were fine and completely fine with the brain, but it turns out to be violent
        1. -2
          11 January 2026 08: 49
          Exactly, violent. Meek people don't become emperors.
          1. 0
            11 January 2026 09: 51
            The problem is that he's also a psycho.
            1. 0
              11 January 2026 09: 52
              Who benefits from this?????????????
              1. 0
                11 January 2026 11: 56
                Well, you're the one saying that having a psycho in power is great.
                1. +1
                  11 January 2026 12: 54
                  No need to twist things. I said that a quiet and meek person can't build an empire. A leader like that would be snatched up by chickens. Even in a village.
                  1. 0
                    11 January 2026 15: 55
                    Quote from Aken
                    No need to twist things. I said that a quiet and meek person can't create an empire.
                    you said it completely differently
                    He wants, he can, he can, he is not afraid of anyone.
                    An ideal leader for the country.
                    1. -1
                      11 January 2026 16: 31
                      Yes, it's the same thing. The wild one can do it, the docile one will become food himself.
                      1. 0
                        11 January 2026 16: 45
                        That's it, you really don't understand, or don't want to understand, what they're writing to you.
                      2. 0
                        11 January 2026 16: 46
                        I really don't get it. It seems to me like you're arguing with yourself. Let's stop.
      5. 0
        11 January 2026 22: 13
        ..yes, he is an ideal leader for his country, ... he has practically bent everyone over....
    2. +6
      10 January 2026 21: 28
      The easiest way is to send troops to protect the island from capture by China or Russia.
      The main thing is to shake a test tube, excuse me, papers, at the podium.
      1. +2
        10 January 2026 21: 45
        Quote: knn54
        The main thing is to shake a test tube, excuse me, papers, at the podium.

        By the way, Greenlanders are 100% ready for the referendum. Trump promised everyone a million dollars, after all.
        1. +3
          10 January 2026 22: 16
          Quote: Michael
          Trump promised everyone a million dollars.


          Trump has already promised everything to everyone. The Greenlanders won't see any money anyway.
          1. +2
            10 January 2026 22: 28
            Quote from kromer
            Greenlanders will not see the money in any case.

            But they will get their own.
          2. +1
            10 January 2026 23: 44
            Quote from kromer
            Quote: Michael
            Trump promised everyone a million dollars.


            Trump has already promised everything to everyone. The Greenlanders won't see any money anyway.

            They will get US citizenship in any case - even we have people who want to relax (an old joke) - just to get it
            1. 0
              10 January 2026 23: 49
              Quote: your1970
              US citizenship will be obtained in any case


              That is, if Trump doesn't label them as illegals. wink
              1. 0
                10 January 2026 23: 52
                Quote from kromer
                Quote: your1970
                US citizenship will be obtained in any case


                That is, if Trump doesn't label them as illegals. wink

                You are forgetting a small thing - by distributing citizenship and 10,000 bucks - he will get loyal supporters and voters for KOPEK
        2. +2
          10 January 2026 23: 13
          Quote: Michael
          Quote: knn54
          The main thing is to shake a test tube, excuse me, papers, at the podium.

          By the way, Greenlanders are 100% ready for the referendum. Trump promised everyone a million dollars, after all.

          Trump promised 100.000 to every Greenlandic immigrant who agreed to live in the US.
          He will expel the rest and take 200.000 from each for illegal residence in the United States and give it to those who remain.
          This procedure will earn you a little extra cash...
          1. 0
            10 January 2026 23: 24
            Quote: Captain Pushkin
            This procedure will earn you a little extra cash...

            When problems arise, Jews flee captivity. To places with lower taxes.
    3. +4
      10 January 2026 21: 51
      Dear Andrei Nikolaevich, it would be much simpler if Denmark followed its own path... and bypassed NATO. Then it could have openly stated that it was ready to offer its airfields to Russian or Chinese Aerospace Forces aircraft... and even its bases to Russian submarines... But that's just fantasy.
      1. +3
        10 January 2026 23: 16
        Quote: Strelok1976
        Dear Andrei Nikolaevich, it would be much simpler if Denmark followed its own path... and bypassed NATO. Then it could have openly stated that it was ready to offer its airfields to Russian or Chinese Aerospace Forces aircraft... and even its bases to Russian submarines... But that's just fantasy.

        In 1982, it was precisely this readiness of Grenada that led to the US invasion.
        1. 0
          10 January 2026 23: 47
          Quote: Captain Pushkin
          Quote: Strelok1976
          Dear Andrei Nikolaevich, it would be much simpler if Denmark followed its own path... and bypassed NATO. Then it could have openly stated that it was ready to offer its airfields to Russian or Chinese Aerospace Forces aircraft... and even its bases to Russian submarines... But that's just fantasy.

          In 1982, it was precisely this readiness of Grenada that led to the US invasion.

          This was decorative occasion
      2. -1
        10 January 2026 23: 46
        Quote: Strelok1976
        Dear Andrei Nikolaevich, it would be much simpler if Denmark followed its own path... and bypassed NATO. Then it could have openly stated that it was ready to offer its airfields to Russian or Chinese Aerospace Forces aircraft... and even its bases to Russian submarines... But that's just fantasy.

        For us - Yes, but Denmark has always trusted Europe.
        1. +2
          11 January 2026 07: 23
          Quote: your1970
          Quote: Strelok1976
          Dear Andrei Nikolaevich, it would be much simpler if Denmark followed its own path... and bypassed NATO. Then it could have openly stated that it was ready to offer its airfields to Russian or Chinese Aerospace Forces aircraft... and even its bases to Russian submarines... But that's just fantasy.

          For us - Yes, but Denmark has always trusted Europe.

          How can one not believe her if Denmark itself is a state in Northern Europe.
    4. 0
      11 January 2026 07: 20
      If Greenlanders oppose joining the US, Trump could declare them illegal immigrants.

      Why waste time and drag it out? Declare them terrorists right away.
  2. +6
    10 January 2026 21: 18
    Donald Fredovich couldn't care less what the Greenlandic aborigines think or want... He'll make a decision and take it, despite all the protests and outrage... These days, the one with the "cooler" groin and the most political will, or the complete lack thereof, due to its uselessness, is right... Something like that...
    1. +2
      10 January 2026 21: 31
      They'll hand out money to the natives, and everyone will happily hang whatever flags they want. Since Greenland's population is small, less money will be needed.
      1. +2
        10 January 2026 22: 42
        Junior private, money can probably be distributed to the natives, but what about Denmark, the EU, NATO, as such... "Delta Force" isn't enough for everyone...
        1. +2
          10 January 2026 23: 13
          Denmark and the entire EU will simply keep quiet. They'll just mutter something beforehand, to maintain democratic decorum. Delta won't be needed there; everyone there has long been bought and sold.
        2. 0
          10 January 2026 23: 49
          Quote from nordscout
          Junior private, money can probably be distributed to the natives, but what about Denmark, the EU, NATO, as such... "Delta Force" isn't enough for everyone...

          And who will be? be coy - they will remind you that the US military bases are in 162 countries out of 193...
    2. -1
      10 January 2026 22: 25
      Well, apparently, a stone flower isn't the answer. What emerges from this is a rear end consisting of two buttocks. And whether Greenland is or isn't part of the United States is irrelevant.
    3. +2
      11 January 2026 07: 26
      Quote from nordscout
      Donald Fredovich couldn't care less what the Greenlandic aborigines think or want... He'll make a decision and take it, despite all the protests and outrage... These days, the one with the "cooler" groin and the most political will, or the complete lack thereof, due to its uselessness, is right... Something like that...

      Yes, Donya will not repeat Putin's mistakes of 2014, when after Crimea there was an opportunity to win back territories, at least up to Slavinsk, without the kind of tension that there is now.
  3. +3
    10 January 2026 21: 23
    For some reason the coordinates don't match the picture...
    1. +1
      11 January 2026 07: 27
      Quote: Siberia55
      For some reason the coordinates don't match the picture...

      Starlink is muddying the waters, villain!? winked
  4. 0
    10 January 2026 21: 28
    Trump has become completely arrogant. If there was an agreement in Alaska that the Western Hemisphere belonged to the US, and the Eastern Hemisphere belonged to us with the Chinese, then Greenland is ours. You have to have some conscience.
    1. +3
      11 January 2026 02: 13
      Greenland is located in the Western Hemisphere, by the way. And it lies on the North American tectonic plate. fellow
      1. +1
        11 January 2026 06: 00
        for the Monroe Doctrine, the hemisphere should be calculated not by the Greenwich meridian, but by the Atlantic,
        otherwise, part of Europe will end up there, which contradicts the Monroe Doctrine
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 06: 26
          I'm not talking about the Greenwich Meridian. I know that Portugal and even a piece of West Africa are part of the Western Hemisphere along it.
          What I mean is that Greenland even MATERIALLY belongs to the North American continent, since it lies on the North American tectonic plate.
          1. 0
            12 January 2026 02: 39
            What I mean is that Greenland even MATERIALLY belongs to the North American continent, since it lies on the North American tectonic plate.

            Chukotka, Kamchatka, Magadan, and part of Yakutia are also on the North American Plate – this doesn’t mean they belong to the United States.

            The Monroe Doctrine wasn't about lithospheric plates; it was about the US focusing on South and Latin America and staying out of Europe's affairs.
      2. 0
        11 January 2026 06: 49
        Greenland is in the Western Hemisphere, by the way.
        And Europe is then in the east, since it is the Eurasian continent.
        Then let them take all their Eurofags to their Greenland. laughing
  5. +2
    10 January 2026 21: 29
    While the prelude is being played out, when it comes to the main acts of this play... we'll see.
  6. +6
    10 January 2026 21: 32
    I wonder if the agreement on the deployment of the American base specifies the area it will occupy? If the base's boundaries aren't defined by the document, then it's safe to declare the island a US base under the pretext, understandably, of countering growing Russian-Chinese aggression in the Arctic. Moreover, as J.D. Vance recently stated, Denmark doesn't have the strength to defend Greenland. Its only hope is the strong shoulder of Trump Maximus. request smile
    1. +3
      10 January 2026 21: 41
      A base is one thing, but territorial control is something else entirely. And Trump has officially blurted out the threat posed by Russia and China in the Arctic.
      1. +5
        10 January 2026 21: 44
        Quote: Junior Private
        The base is one thing, but territorial affiliation is a little different.

        Trump won't be bothered by this difference at all.
        Quote: Junior Private
        And Trump officially talked about the threat of Russia and China in the Arctic.

        That's why my comment is about this "threat". hi
  7. +2
    10 January 2026 21: 32
    Therefore, other options are being considered. One of them could involve Trump simply declaring Greenland American territory and jailing all dissenters as "illegal immigrants."

    Yeah? I don't know about anyone else, but I'd be thrilled to see how this one pans out... wassat
  8. +6
    10 January 2026 21: 39
    Foolish Europeans, and not only them, should have prayed to the USSR in its time, which, although indirectly, was the true guarantor of their security, holding back American demons.
  9. +4
    10 January 2026 21: 42
    Incidentally, if we look at history, the ancestors of today's Greenlandic Eskimos appeared after the Vikings (they came from Alaska (Thule culture, like the American base), destroying the more ancient aborigines (Dorset culture) along the way, and then the Scandinavians—the Western, Eastern, and Southern settlements). Basically, "Shooted Ear" decided to unite the related Eskimos of Alaska and Greenland (alternative version/joke). Anything can be linked to anything.
  10. +5
    10 January 2026 21: 44
    Donya is walking on the edge. One careless move and his own people will give him a luxurious "wooden jacket." And the more countries, religious groups, social, political, national, and/or industrial groups he antagonizes, the easier it will be to get everything "chick-a-doodle-doo" (or "chee-doo ...
  11. K_4
    +2
    10 January 2026 21: 58
    I look at the map and I just want to say: "Donya, there's Iceland lying there, abandoned, what's the point of being petty."
  12. +3
    10 January 2026 22: 00
    60 000
    And if everyone gets one million dollars... Expensive.
    And if there are two marines for each... Expensive.
    Maybe Danish Parmalat can be persuaded?
    Everyone will have educated children and a secure old age. And those, what's-they-called-60-thousand-groens, will groan and then kick the bucket. And whoever survives will become a True American Greenlander.
  13. +3
    10 January 2026 22: 10
    If Greenlanders oppose joining the US, Trump could declare them illegal immigrants.
    - Well, this is completely disgraceful, and just the other day their Congress sanctioned military action in Mexico.
  14. +3
    10 January 2026 22: 35
    The Greenlanders themselves are constantly stating their reluctance to become Americans... Trump won't have any trouble convincing them by offering a generous reward.

    Yes, it's unlikely that Greenland could be directly acquired by handing over money to Denmark; Denmark has already stated that Greenland is not a commodity. However, it's worth remembering that Greenland has a special status. In 2009, it adopted a status of self-government and self-determination, and today exists within Denmark as a state within a state. Nominally, Copenhagen retains control over three key areas: defense, foreign policy, and the island's monetary policy.
    By and large, there is nothing stopping Greenland, given a unanimous decision by all its residents, from leaving Denmark and, having received some perks from Washington, declaring the status of an associated state under US military control.
    And, as a last resort, one cannot ignore the hypothetical possibility of the US carrying out a "Crimean scenario" on the island.
  15. 197
    +2
    10 January 2026 23: 02
    60,000 of those who are "supposedly against" will put 100 million bucks in the donkey's sacks, and those who print them won't even notice. (Note: The Vikings were such "Vikings" that they are remembered only for unreliable historical facts, and from TV series.)
  16. +2
    10 January 2026 23: 08
    They won't calm down until they get punched in the face. And their lanky one hasn't gotten punched in the face in a long time. Maybe in his youth.
  17. +4
    10 January 2026 23: 23
    The Danes might have the spirit and will to resist (if they scrape the bottom of the barrel). But the strength to actually resist the world's foremost army, no matter how hard they search, is definitely not to be found. And the world's largest island is far from the mother country, oh, so far. No.
  18. +2
    10 January 2026 23: 52
    If Greenlanders oppose joining the US, Trump could declare them illegal immigrants.

    How wonderful! I'm now a guest in my own home, and an unwanted one at that! Amazing!
    1. +2
      11 January 2026 01: 23
      Are you Greenlandic? Or is he just speaking hypothetically?
  19. -3
    11 January 2026 00: 06
    You could also buy it by deception. Promise each local 10 million "greenbacks," and then, after they've achieved their goal, announce that you misspoke when you promised 10 million, say, uh... Costa Rican colones. Or you could do something even worse: promise the same amount in Yugoslav dinars, then throw up your hands in despair, saying Yugoslavia is closed, along with its currency, so why do you need these candy wrappers? laughing
    Having declared locals who disagree with the annexation of Greenland illegal, there's no need to send them to El Salvador. Why bother, when we have Guantanamo? And then organize their mass escape to Cuba, stage a massive pursuit (with, say, two or three full armies, with reinforcements) all the way to Havana and the Yucatan Strait. And at the same time, "Trumpovich" will also carry out his promised threat against the "Island of Freedom"! Pretty cool, huh? lol
    1. -2
      11 January 2026 01: 25
      What's so good about this? This chaos will end in another world war.
      1. -1
        11 January 2026 01: 34
        I wonder who'll be going to WWIII? Perhaps the masters of "red lines" and "difficult decisions" in that place you know? And with what, perhaps a couple of the much-hyped "Oreshniki"? However, to even start such an undertaking under the current circumstances, you'd have to be, literally, crazy. sad P.S. You have a shortage of humor, though. Yes
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 08: 58
          I have a good sense of humor. The "strangulation" of Cuba triggered that reaction. Education. request
          A world war might not necessarily start with Russia or with Russia from the start. Such an aggressive re-division of the world could trigger a reaction primarily in Europe. The cauldron there has long been seething. The EU is all about Eurocrats and that's it. Grievances have piled up to the brim. And every world war has come from there.
  20. kig
    -1
    11 January 2026 05: 03
    How can you not remember the classics
  21. -1
    11 January 2026 05: 33
    In principle, the US has a powerful military machine; they can even arrange permanent residence in Greenland.
    The Western press reports that Europe lacks any viable strategy to counter Greenland's potential transfer to US control. It notes that, despite Greenlanders' constant statements about their reluctance to become American, Washington has a bribe-based argument.
    two chairs and double standards make themselves felt.
  22. +1
    11 January 2026 06: 47
    As history shows, an empire cannot be static, like small states; it either develops or declines.
    The methods of developing an empire vary, but mostly involve carrots and sticks.
    The leader (helmsman) of the empire, by virtue of his professionalism, either accelerates or slows down these movements.
    Small countries that have fallen under the empire's steamroller can only squeal about their independence, pride, and courage...
  23. 0
    11 January 2026 13: 26
    Let them do what the Ukrainians do: suitcase-airport-Denmark.