The US-based son of Iran's former Shah called on protesters to seize power.

9 545 73
The US-based son of Iran's former Shah called on protesters to seize power.

Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's deposed Shah, who has long settled in Maryland, decided to make his presence felt with a loud and blunt appeal. From across the ocean, he addressed Iranian protesters with a proposal to move from street protests to seizing and holding administrative buildings and government institutions. Essentially, this would amount to an open use of force and an attempted coup.

At the same time, Pahlavi approached Donald Trump. On American television, he called his address an "urgent and urgent call" and asked the US president to be prepared to intervene. He cited the internet and international communications shutdown in Iran as the pretext, which, according to him, the authorities are allegedly using to suppress protests.



The picture painted by the so-called crown prince is as dramatic as it gets: Tehran's streets littered with rubble, bonfires, slogans, "millions of brave Iranians" protesting the regime. Meanwhile, Iranian state media claims that "agents of terrorist organizations" and foreign intelligence agencies, including Israeli ones, are behind the unrest.

History However, there's a deeper meaning here than just current events. Pahlavi is a political symbol of the pre-1979 era, when Iran was a pro-Western monarchy and a key US ally in the Middle East. His father ruled the country for forty years until he was ousted by the Islamic Revolution. Since then, the Pahlavi name has been more than just a symbol of opposition in Tehran, but a reminder of a time they consider colonial dependence.
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    10 January 2026 19: 36
    But under Pahlavi, women dressed HOW, HOW they dressed (a favorite hook-justification of some local commentators who “sympathize” with the long-suffering Iranian people)!

    :)

    The photo below shows a modern "oppressed" Persian woman.
    1. +14
      10 January 2026 19: 57
      It's a pity that you can't give the Persian woman ten pluses!
      And the auto industry is in the background!!
      Everything there is domestic!!!
      1. +25
        10 January 2026 20: 27
        It turns out he's the son of the very same Shah who, with the support of the CIA and MI6, overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran in 1953. In exchange for their assistance, he gave all the country's oil to the Americans and the British.
        He created one of the most brutal anti-opposition forces, capable of arresting and torturing anyone. A complete copy of the Gestapo.
        In 1963, he gunned down 15 protesting civilians in the streets, with the full approval of the United States and London.
        And when the mad old man was finally overthrown in 1979, the revolutionaries did not execute him and his family, but rather humanely suggested that they leave the country.
        And this son of such a monster, who survived only thanks to humanity, stutters something about a “cruel regime”?
        1. +2
          10 January 2026 20: 35
          Quote: Shurik70
          This is the son of that very Shah.

          Actually, I meant the image of a girl against the backdrop of a highway and cars.
          1. 0
            11 January 2026 12: 54
            Quote: Michael
            Quote: Shurik70
            This is the son of that very Shah.

            Actually, I meant the image of a girl against the backdrop of a highway and cars.

            These days, some "sons" look hotter than the girls... feel
        2. +10
          10 January 2026 20: 47
          Well, the 15 executed number is way too much. It's like Solzhenitsyn's 3 million+ Gulag prisoners (I can't bring myself to capitalize it).
          1. 0
            10 January 2026 23: 18
            Solzhenitsyn is a liar, but the question still remains open. The population of the Russian Empire in 1900 was 160 million, on the territory of today's Russia - 90 million, Russia 125 years later - 145 million, for comparison: the USA in 1900 was 110 million, now 340, China 250 million, now 1,4 billion, in almost all countries of the world the population increased by 3-6 times, and only in Russia by 1,5 times
            1. -1
              11 January 2026 00: 38
              Quote: Pavel Dryabin
              Solzhenitsyn is a liar, but the question still remains open. The population of the Russian Empire in 1900 was 160 million, on the territory of today's Russia - 90 million, Russia 125 years later - 145 million, for comparison: the USA in 1900 was 110 million, now 340, China 250 million, now 1,4 billion, in almost all countries of the world the population increased by 3-6 times, and only in Russia by 1,5 times


              The question is certainly interesting and requires careful and comprehensive study. While the Russian Empire was certainly significantly larger than both the Soviet Union and Russia, the population growth rate, compared to the United States, China, and other countries, is bizarre and completely inexplicable. If we consider the population growth rate after the Revolution and the USSR, one conclusion emerges: the Revolution and subsequent events were anti-popular.
              1. +4
                11 January 2026 03: 04
                Quote from Eugene Zaboy
                The revolution and subsequent events were anti-people.

                After the revolution, the USSR's population grew, despite the Great Patriotic War. But after the counterrevolution of the 90s, it began to die at a record pace. So which events are considered anti-popular?
                1. +3
                  11 January 2026 06: 58
                  Quote: VasAndr
                  After the revolution, the USSR's population grew, despite the Great Patriotic War. But after the counterrevolution of the 90s, it began to die at a record pace. So which events are considered anti-popular?
                  I'll throw in my two cents worth, construction-wise.
                  The peak of housing construction in the USSR occurred in the late 80s. As of 2014, we're at a third of that level. The apparent overall growth today is driven by cottages.

                  And yes.
                  Apartments were given out after all.
                  Specially for those who didn't live in that time and are hoping to argue.
                  We bought cooperative housing with a down payment of 2,000-3,000 rubles, plus what's now called a "mortgage" for 20 years, but WITHOUT interest. The apartment I grew up in is the same age as me. My parents paid a share while I was serving in the army. The rent, including utilities, for a three-room apartment was around 16 rubles.
                  State housing (the state being the owner, and the people being responsible tenants) was provided FREE. Yes, there were monstrous waiting lists, but there were always options—relocation, young professionals, etc. It was also passed on to registered children by inheritance without any problem. Rent, including utilities, was 7-8 rubles per month for a three-room apartment.
                  Let someone show me something like this today.
                2. +2
                  11 January 2026 09: 45
                  Quote: VasAndr
                  Quote from Eugene Zaboy
                  The revolution and subsequent events were anti-people.

                  After the revolution, the USSR's population grew, despite the Great Patriotic War. But after the counterrevolution of the 90s, it began to die at a record pace. So which events are considered anti-popular?

                  It is explained quite simply:
                  If after the revolution there was a social idea of ​​equality, then there will be population growth, because there is hope for a bright future for their descendants.
                  But an anti-people coup d'état, like the one we had in 1991, led by Yeltsin, is completely the opposite. There's no confidence in the future, plus a number of negative behaviors among the Russian population, especially brazenly carried out by those from Central Asia and the Caucasus.
                  The question is, where will the population growth come from if there is injustice in all spheres, plus government lies???
                3. 0
                  11 January 2026 12: 45
                  Quote: VasAndr
                  After the revolution, the USSR's population grew, despite the Great Patriotic War. But after the counterrevolution of the 90s, it began to die at a record pace. So which events are considered anti-popular?


                  Please note, I didn't write this:

                  Quote from Eugene Zaboy
                  Quote: Pavel Dryabin
                  Solzhenitsyn is a liar, but the question still remains open. The population of the Russian Empire in 1900 was 160 million, on the territory of today's Russia - 90 million, Russia 125 years later - 145 million, for comparison: the USA in 1900 was 110 million, now 340, China 250 million, now 1,4 billion, in almost all countries of the world the population increased by 3-6 times, and only in Russia by 1,5 times
              2. 0
                11 January 2026 16: 27
                The United States has grown largely due to migration, especially in recent times.
            2. +1
              11 January 2026 12: 26
              The US is a country of mass immigration. It's more complicated here. Only from Central Asia and the Caucasus. It's interesting, I have Armenian friends, good guys, hard workers, and after seven years of moving, they have four children, citizenship, and benefits. And another thing. A colleague moved from Kazakhstan, an ethnic Russian, and he's been trying to get citizenship for three years now. How come?
          2. +3
            11 January 2026 05: 43
            As in the case of the 3 million+ Gulag prisoners, according to Solzhenitsyn (I can't bring myself to capitalize it)
            Solzhenitsyn is clearly understating the numbers! Stalin personally shot several million people in the Kremlin cellars and sent a billion to the Gulag. wink wink
          3. +1
            11 January 2026 09: 38
            Quote: Alex013
            Well, the 15 executed number is way too much. It's like Solzhenitsyn's 3 million+ Gulag prisoners (I can't bring myself to capitalize it).

            And they did the right thing!
            I've repeatedly pointed out that this would-be writer himself was a coward during WWII. Hence his anger at the Soviet system.
            1. 0
              11 January 2026 14: 32
              Quote: Joker62
              Quote: Alex013
              Well, the 15 executed number is way too much. It's like Solzhenitsyn's 3 million+ Gulag prisoners (I can't bring myself to capitalize it).

              And they did the right thing!
              I've repeatedly pointed out that this would-be writer himself was a coward during WWII. Hence his anger at the Soviet system.

              And I will add another unsightly fact about his arrest:
              Captain Solzhenitsyn was arrested shortly before victory. And considering that absolutely everyone knew military censors were reading letters sent, one is convinced Solzhenitsyn provoked his own arrest. The reason was simple: cowardice. Solzhenitsyn spent the entire war far from the front lines, commanding sound reconnaissance. And then the order came to transfer him to the front line. But this didn't suit him at all; it was better to end up in a camp but stay alive.

              I think normal and moral people will understand me correctly, why I don’t respect this scoundrel...
          4. -1
            11 January 2026 12: 56
            Quote: Alex013
            Well, the 15 executed number is way too much. It's like Solzhenitsyn's 3 million+ Gulag prisoners (I can't bring myself to capitalize it).

            What is your evidence?
        3. +6
          10 January 2026 21: 21
          - this is the son of that very Shah...
          The son went further and called on the people to go over to the side of Israel.
          1. +6
            10 January 2026 22: 11
            Iranian hackers have exposed the identities of 600 individuals allegedly linked to the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, the Tasnim news agency reported.

            According to the hackers, the agents were organizing mass unrest in the Islamic Republic. They would then execute such Jews and their participants by hanging...
          2. +1
            10 January 2026 22: 22
            So maybe he secretly converted to Judaism?
            1. +1
              11 January 2026 05: 45
              Quote: Metallurg_2
              So maybe he secretly converted to Judaism?

              Secretly visiting Gogi's son?
        4. +4
          10 January 2026 21: 52
          Shurik70 (Alexander)
          It looks like the Americans have decided to stir up another coup, since Elon Musk has already launched a campaign on Twitter to support a color revolution in Iran.
          The world is in for another shock.
          They are knocking out our allies and our bases all over the world.
          We are entering a big chess game with big stakes.
          1. +2
            11 January 2026 00: 01
            A SHOCK IS COMING - Senator Graham declared: // US aid to the Iranian people is already on the way//... HELP WILL MOST LIKELY BE IN THE FORM OF BOMBING...
            1. -1
              11 January 2026 09: 52
              If the US and Israel bomb Iran (and it won't work without it), what's stopping us from bombing Israel, on the grounds that they bombed our bases in Syria?
              Plus, gratitude to Iran for helping us with the "Shahids" during the crisis.
              1. 0
                11 January 2026 10: 02
                Quote: Arkady007
                If the US and Israel bomb Iran (and it won't work without it), what's stopping us from bombing Israel, on the grounds that they bombed our bases in Syria?
                Plus, gratitude to Iran for helping us with the "Shahids" during the crisis.

                I agree. Especially since Israel's air defense and aviation are lousy and there won't be any retaliation.
        5. +1
          10 January 2026 23: 41
          And when the mad old man was finally overthrown in 1979, the revolutionaries did not execute him and his family, but rather humanely suggested that they leave the country.
          And this son of such a monster, who survived only thanks to humanity, stutters something about a “cruel regime”?
          As we can see, the execution of the royal family's relatives is the lesser evil. Because little children have a way of growing up into big bastards.
        6. The comment was deleted.
        7. +1
          11 January 2026 10: 38
          Shurik70
          (Alexander)
          Is it really that hard to find a volunteer in the world willing to use an ice pick on the new Shah, lest a global catastrophe be unleashed? I think many in the southeast have a stake in this.
      2. +2
        10 January 2026 20: 35
        Well, completely domestic. Based on Peugeot - Samanda
        1. +6
          10 January 2026 20: 44
          Quote: Alex013
          Well, completely domestic. Based on Peugeot - Samanda

          Let me laugh about the Moskvich. The Peugeot isn't the worst option.
          1. +3
            10 January 2026 20: 44
            Yes, 405 was a normal option.
            1. +3
              10 January 2026 20: 46
              Quote: Alex013
              Yes, 405 was a normal option.

              They even exported it to Russia.
      3. +2
        11 January 2026 05: 51
        My sister was in Iran not long ago (last year), she had dyed her hair black, they perceived her as one of their own, they were surprised that she was from Belarus.
        1. +1
          11 January 2026 06: 27
          Quote: Darkdimon
          My sister was in Iran not long ago (last year), she had dyed her hair black, they perceived her as one of their own, they were surprised that she was from Belarus.

          Because she is Indo-European.
    2. +8
      10 January 2026 20: 02
      Well, they do have a music channel, Persian Music, like our Muz-TV, where they sing calmly in bathing suits and it's not bad, the Ayatollah might even like watching it))
    3. +3
      11 January 2026 04: 21
      In recent years, it should be noted, the mass conversion of Christianity has gained momentum in Iran. And this is not a fiction. Do some research. And now, apparently, the world's puppeteers have decided to turn Iran into another Wahhabi desert, like Libya, Syria, and, soon, Russia, Europe, Kazakhstan, and so on.
  2. KAV
    +8
    10 January 2026 19: 37
    Here comes the first actor on stage. Apparently, the directors gave him a kick in the pants.
    1. +4
      10 January 2026 22: 24
      Quote: KAV
      Here comes the first actor on stage.

      Actors and suicides were buried without a funeral service and behind a fence.
      And now they perform weddings for homosexuals—is it necessary to dig up the graves behind the fence and bless them?
  3. +9
    10 January 2026 19: 39
    In Pen-do-stan, these talking heads for any country are already prepared and waiting for their turn
    1. +1
      11 January 2026 07: 01
      Quote: Dmitry Smirnov_2
      In Pen-do-stan, these talking heads for any country are already prepared and waiting for their turn

      They won't be able to stage a coup in Iran. I don't think so. The authorities there are already beaten, too.
  4. +5
    10 January 2026 19: 43
    The next step will be a mass pager campaign. The bombing of the Persians was a failure, so other technologies will be used next. It's all classic.
  5. +4
    10 January 2026 19: 47
    Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's deposed Shah, who has long settled in Maryland, decided to make his presence felt with a loud and blunt appeal. From across the ocean, he addressed Iranian protesters with a proposal to move from street protests to seizing and holding administrative buildings and government institutions. Essentially, this would amount to an open use of force and an attempted coup.

    For whom to seize? For yourself, my beloved? lol
    If this is what it takes, then as the ancients said, "come and take it!" fellow
    1. +4
      10 January 2026 20: 02
      He's afraid to come: he might be killed. But if he leads from a safe distance, then yes.
  6. +6
    10 January 2026 19: 47
    Loving your homeland from afar is very convenient and easy; you don't have to worry about bleeding, and if everything goes well, the throne is within reach. He'll tell everyone in detail how well people will live under his supposed reign, but he won't say whether it will be "later." He's a citizen of another country, and his interests are, first and foremost, the interests of that country.
    1. +3
      10 January 2026 19: 49
      Quote: Jura
      Loving your homeland from afar is very convenient and easy, your head doesn’t hurt from the flowing blood
      The main thing is that you are not responsible for anything
      1. +2
        10 January 2026 20: 03
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        Quote: Jura
        Loving your homeland from afar is very convenient and easy, your head doesn’t hurt from the flowing blood
        The main thing is that you are not responsible for anything

        That is precisely why Nicholas II was neither released nor accepted.
    2. +1
      10 January 2026 20: 05
      No one will give him power. Power needs to be fought for, not moaned from across the ocean. All he tried to do was remind people of his existence.
      1. +2
        10 January 2026 20: 25
        Quote: ssergey1978
        No one will give him power.
        I think so too, but there is always this "but".
    3. +5
      10 January 2026 20: 22
      Quote: Jura
      My head doesn't hurt from the blood flowing through it.

      I remember Joseph Vissarionovich clearly showed Lev Davidovich that the head can hurt.
      1. 0
        10 January 2026 20: 27
        Quote: Naked Man
        I remember Joseph Vissarionovich clearly showed Lev Davidovich that the head can hurt.
        Well, this is Joseph Vissarionovich, whose furrowed brows made the whole world tremble.)))
  7. +1
    10 January 2026 19: 56
    Quote: Denis_999
    But under Pahlavi, women dressed HOW, HOW they dressed (a favorite hook-justification of some local commentators who “sympathize” with the long-suffering Iranian people)!

    :)

    The photo below shows a modern "oppressed" Persian woman.

    And how they undressed... good
  8. +1
    10 January 2026 20: 02
    Question: Why didn't Iran respond to those who attacked and bombed it? So why be surprised that someone is trying to seize power?
  9. +6
    10 January 2026 20: 03
    Your dad, son, was dumped by the CIA. Apparently, they also took advantage of the situation in Iran. You'll gain a lot of money with your calls...
    1. +4
      10 January 2026 20: 34
      So the CIA is probably sitting right next to him.
      1. 0
        11 January 2026 09: 21
        Most likely.) But they're very skilled at some things, so he probably believes the evil Russian communists are to blame for everything. The communists may be gone, but the Russians are still evil! And they're to blame for everything!! But if he manages to stir up the country (he's probably got a huge ego, and considers himself far from a small part of a hybrid attack, but oh-so-great...), then the blessed Shah's power will return to Iran, in his timely persona...
  10. +7
    10 January 2026 20: 12
    By the way, the USSR and the British put Pahlavi on the throne in 41...
  11. +5
    10 January 2026 20: 13
    And who are the Pahlavis themselves in Iran? They were originally from Azerbaijan, and only by force of circumstance and during a time of turmoil did they rise to power.
  12. +5
    10 January 2026 20: 18
    There's a family with karma there. A sister and brother committed suicide. In 2001 and 2011.
  13. +6
    10 January 2026 20: 25
    All the rotten stuff in the States sits and stinks.
    1. +6
      10 January 2026 20: 31
      Quote: Irek
      All the rotten stuff in the States sits and stinks.

      No. The main one is still in England...request
      1. 0
        10 January 2026 20: 38
        I agree 100%. "The Great Game". It's still going on.
  14. +1
    10 January 2026 21: 21
    So, what's a son of Iran's deposed Shah, Reza Pahlavi, to do? The main thing is that it's safe...
  15. +1
    10 January 2026 21: 21
    At the same time, Pahlavi approached Donald Trump. On American television, he called his appeal an "urgent and urgent call" and asked the US president to be prepared to intervene.
    Doesn't your son know that the Americans overthrew his dad?
  16. 0
    10 January 2026 22: 23
    Shahzade is ready to assume power. It's time to end the Middle Ages.
    1. -1
      10 January 2026 23: 32
      Quote: Stock Shooter
      Shahzade is ready to take power.

      But I'm not ready to take a bullet. am
  17. +4
    10 January 2026 22: 42
    Traitors must always be eliminated. These parasites will always attack their own country from behind.
  18. 0
    10 January 2026 23: 08
    Who's holding it?

    Come to the country, lead protests, win on the streets, go to the elections, become the Head of State.
    If there is an idea and a willingness to follow it, many will follow such a person.
    And if "I'm with you with all the money I can spare, but I don't have much money"...
    1. 0
      11 January 2026 00: 07
      It's not safe yet. Ayatollah Khomeini, for example, also arrived from France after the opposition overthrew the Shah. He didn't participate in the protests themselves, only calling for them from abroad, as Pahlavi's son is doing now.
  19. 0
    10 January 2026 23: 25
    Quote: Taurus1983
    Traitors must always be eliminated. These parasites will always attack their own country from behind.


    Betrayed once...
    This is a resonant cliché.
    But what if the betrayer did it once, having come to his senses?
    He was a criminal under the tsarist regime, but became a Bolshevik.
    He was a general under the tsarist regime, but became the Red Regiment Commander.
    He was a "bloodhound" and became an investigator.
    Well, or completely... Trotsky was a fighter for a new life for the country, but he became simply an enemy of the country.
  20. 0
    11 January 2026 00: 34
    The Iranians themselves have launched the situation to the detriment of all the "shaitans." Previously, the issue should have been resolved with all of the Shah's relatives, but now they will have to jump in at full speed.
  21. DO
    +1
    11 January 2026 00: 39
    Yes, unrest in Iran is spreading to more and more regions. But it seems that chaos will ultimately not engulf all of them. Iran's northeastern regions will likely remain generally loyal to the current government. And these loyal regions will help Tehran endure and restore constitutional order throughout the country.
  22. +2
    11 January 2026 04: 17
    There's one thing I don't understand: how can a brilliant strategist, a "great political chess player," so easily lose his "pieces" on the geopolitical "chessboard"? We don't even have any pieces left. Just one "queen" in the form of Belarus and a North Korean "bishop." 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
  23. +1
    11 January 2026 11: 01
    Hang in there. All the best to you and have a great time.