Dugin: Russia has one way to regain its authority on the international stage

41 148 213
Dugin: Russia has one way to regain its authority on the international stage

Alexander Dugin, a philosopher and public figure, claimed that Russia must allegedly do "something terrible" to regain its authority, and that in the reality of "Trump's world," only harshness, pressure, and fear matter. The logic he explains is simple: either you strike first, or you're written off.

The statement sounded harsh and alarming—and that's precisely why it immediately spread across the media. The philosopher effectively described modern international politics as a world where, in his words, agreements and compromises are not what decide things, but rather demonstrations of strength and a willingness to go all the way.



Before this, Dugin asked himself:

Why doesn't Russia act with its adversaries the same way the US does in Venezuela?

In his opinion, many Russians are asking themselves this question, and there's no simple answer. Dugin acknowledges that such restraint doesn't fit well with the usual logic of the power world, but essentially reflects the reality that the United States can afford, if not everything, then a great deal—not only technically, but also politically.

According to the philosopher, Russia has great potential, but the path to achieving the goals of the SVO, as he believes, must be paved with more difficulty, taking into account moral, legal, and other limitations.
213 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +34
    9 January 2026 11: 51
    I completely support Dugin’s thoughts on this issue.
    Trump was raised in a culture of permissiveness and US superiority over everyone and everything. He understands only force.
    1. -14
      9 January 2026 11: 56
      Even if we respond harshly, nothing will change; it will only get worse. We need to use cunning here...
      1. -15
        9 January 2026 12: 00
        I remembered a song from a childhood movie: "Real pirates always go around."
        1. +19
          9 January 2026 12: 08
          Moves digging curves
          Underground smart mole
          Normal heroes
          Always go around
          1. +11
            9 January 2026 12: 12
            Bypass go, of course,
            Not very easy.
            Not very nice
            And very far away! hi
            1. +12
              9 January 2026 12: 13
              Yes, and at the end the question: "Why the hell did you drag me around?"
          2. +3
            10 January 2026 17: 34
            What's interesting is that they carry it feet first.
        2. +1
          9 January 2026 12: 11
          I remembered a song from a childhood movie: "Real pirates always take the long way around." (c)

          Fools, lining up heroes,
          Rush forward
          Normal heroes
          Always the other way around!
          1. +6
            9 January 2026 12: 15
            Yes, and at the end:
            And we are off the curve
            We won't turn back,
            And it will be necessary again
            Let's go the crooked way!
        3. +4
          9 January 2026 15: 05
          The phrase was: "Normal HEROES always take the detour!" Song from the film "Aibolit 66".
        4. +1
          10 January 2026 21: 10
          I remembered a song from a childhood movie: "Real pirates always go around."
          Actually, the correct answer is: “Normal heroes always take a detour,” from the film “Aibolit 66,” 1966.
      2. +6
        9 January 2026 12: 09
        Quote: marchcat
        Here you have to use cunning...

        This is for the Ukrainians winked They will tell how Kolobok was also the most cunning... until he met the fox.
        1. +3
          9 January 2026 12: 11
          Not even cunning - the other animals were just stupid.
          Gene, hello! hi
          1. +1
            9 January 2026 12: 12
            Quote: novel xnumx
            Not even cunning - the other animals were just stupid.
            Gene, hello! hi

            Roma hi Hello!
            Did you clear the snow away from the garage? I gave up, it was no use, it was just snowing right back in. laughing
            1. +5
              9 January 2026 12: 13
              I didn't even go, screw it, the car, I don't really need it
              1. +4
                9 January 2026 12: 26
                Quote: novel xnumx
                I didn't even go, screw it, the car, I don't really need it

                Ah, you still think, after such a big celebration!? belay Good for you! good
                1. +3
                  9 January 2026 12: 27
                  Yes, already, and work is just around the corner
                  1. +3
                    9 January 2026 12: 28
                    Quote: novel xnumx
                    Yes, already, and work is just around the corner

                    That's right! Yes
      3. -3
        9 January 2026 15: 20
        And if we wipe ourselves off, it will only get better! wassat
        But we somehow don’t know how to be cunning...
      4. 0
        13 January 2026 09: 43
        Quote: marchcat
        Here you have to use cunning...

        Take it by cunning? Where can you find that cunning? No matter where you look, you can always hear "they tricked us!"
    2. +26
      9 January 2026 11: 58
      I disagree with you. North Korea, compared to us, and the US to say nothing of it, is a small country. But no one messes with them. It's more expensive to mess with someone who's got steel.
      1. +7
        9 January 2026 12: 01
        The statement sounded harsh and alarming—and that's precisely why it immediately spread across the media. The philosopher effectively described modern international politics as a world where, in his words, agreements and compromises are not what decide things, but rather demonstrations of strength and a willingness to go all the way.

        And again I remembered the joke winked
        "Only on the third day philosopher Keen Eye noticed that there was no fourth wall in the cell.
        1. +3
          9 January 2026 12: 11
          The question is different: who pays philosophers and for what?
          1. +3
            9 January 2026 12: 24
            Quote: novel xnumx
            The question is different: who pays philosophers and for what?

            If a philosopher is for hire, then employers will be found.
      2. +1
        10 January 2026 20: 17
        There's no need to compare Korea to us. We are dust on the paths of history, and they are a stone on the road.
    3. +22
      9 January 2026 12: 30
      Do we have the reserves to withstand long-term conflicts? (like, say, 5-10 years under a complete embargo)
      So, the Bolsheviks, over the course of about 20 years (the civil war ended around 1922), carried out industrialization and, for better or worse, brought the agrarian country to the point where it was relatively ready for war.
      For a longer period of time, the "Democrats" were deceived and played at friendship-magic.
      1. +1
        9 January 2026 12: 45
        To be fair, it wasn't a complete embargo. The specialists and equipment were foreign. And the government was different.
      2. +6
        9 January 2026 14: 48
        Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
        The Bolsheviks carried out industrialization in about 20 years (the civil war ended around 1922).

        At the same time, we should not forget how many factories were created during industrialization with American assistance, at considerable expense, of course.
        1. +12
          9 January 2026 14: 51
          Quote: Montezuma
          At the same time, we should not forget how many factories were created with American assistance during industrialization.

          Yes, that's it
          Quote: Montezuma
          for a lot of money, of course.


          If it weren't for them, the Japanese/Germans/someone else would have sold it.

          Well, it's clear that it's not processors, but some small factories that could have been bought in the 21st century instead of investing in Western securities...
          1. +5
            9 January 2026 15: 04
            Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
            Yes, that's it

            Quote: Montezuma
            for a lot of money, of course.

            The West was just experiencing the so-called "Great Depression" in the economy, which significantly encouraged capitalists to seek profitable cooperation with the communist state – "just business, nothing personal." (c)
            1. +1
              10 January 2026 17: 20
              And right next door, we have a highly developed China, with our hammer and sickle on the banner of its ruling party, which the Americans have taken up arms against. Yes, they don't trust our bourgeoisie, but they could build many factories with our raw materials.
              1. -2
                10 January 2026 23: 18
                Quote: Personal opinion
                Yes, they don’t trust our bourgeoisie, but with our raw materials they could set up many factories.

                What primitivism...China is a deeply capitalist country. The only trace of communism they have is the red flag.
          2. +4
            10 January 2026 00: 56
            "Well, it's clear that it's not processors, but some small factories, and in the 21st century they could have bought them instead of investing in Western securities..." You're basically right, but we need a government policy to create these "little factories," a well-thought-out policy to develop technologies that will create opportunities for technological breakthroughs, and these new factories should be state-owned, focused not on money, but on development... I remember the phrase: "We build the factory, and it builds us," but the elites are torpedoing such opportunities... they are the offshore kings...
        2. -1
          9 January 2026 18: 53
          Quote: Montezuma
          It is worth remembering how many factories were created with American assistance during industrialization.

          It is also worth considering how many factories were destroyed during the establishment of Bolshevik power.
          1. 0
            12 January 2026 23: 49
            The Bolsheviks destroyed factories?! belay Why? That's why they lie now, that's clear.
            1. 0
              13 January 2026 01: 34
              Quote: Photon
              The Bolsheviks destroyed factories

              Not a reader? Or don't understand? I wrote: "during the establishment of Bolshevik power." Well, if you're really interested, about 70% of industry was lost during the Civil War. And about 40-50% of agricultural production. Or do you think the Bolsheviks didn't defend their power during the Civil War? And I didn't say a word about who destroyed what.
              And another 15 million were lost in deaths. Plus or minus a few million who emigrated. And several million who died of starvation in the early twenties.
      3. -2
        9 January 2026 15: 22
        Ah, the Bolsheviks managed to get from Brest to Berlin during the Central Military District, although they did make a detour to the Volga...
        1. +1
          9 January 2026 18: 05
          Could you tell me what the losses were? Could you tell me how people lived in the country back then? Would you like the same?
          1. +5
            9 January 2026 19: 01
            Quote: Sergey Kondratiev
            Do you also want

            Plowing twelve hours at a machine for bread rationing, with no days off or vacations? Of course not. They want to sit on the couch, drink beer with one hand, and angrily whine online with the other, while Stalin's SMERSH bombs NATO hordes with nuclear weapons somewhere far, far away in the West.
            1. 0
              9 January 2026 19: 17
              Quote from: nik-mazur
              SMERSH, under Stalin's command, bombs NATO hordes with nuclear bombs somewhere far, far away in the West.

              Five points! They go on the attack every day! And we keep trying to talk them out of it. laughing
          2. -1
            10 January 2026 11: 52
            Read truthful books about how people lived and survived in other countries during this time. You'll be amazed!
            1. 0
              10 January 2026 14: 31
              What's surprising? That they worked 12-hour shifts for food stamps? That people were starving? That the food was only the bare necessities and nothing extra? That people didn't sit in cafes? That there were problems with electricity and water? That Balenciaga clothes weren't sold? That there was a huge death rate from malnutrition and exhaustion? No trips abroad, no trips to the sea, no vacations in the rear. You either go to the front or work in the rear at factories connected with the military industry.
          3. -1
            10 January 2026 20: 19
            Is there a result?? The rest is not important.
            1. 0
              10 January 2026 21: 00
              What doesn't matter? Do you want to serve under these conditions or not?
          4. -2
            13 January 2026 00: 35
            What were the losses? If we compare the losses per unit of time, then they were certainly 20 times greater. And if we compare the losses per unit of area, then the losses now are about 50 times greater than during the Great Patriotic War.
            "Could you tell me what life was like for people back then? Would you like the same?" Do you know those people? Life was hard. And even worse than hard. People gave their lives. But I never heard a word of complaint from my relatives.
            After the war, the Soviet Union was the first to abolish rationing. Sixteen years after the war, Gagarin's flight took place. The Soviet Union confronted the West in Korea and during the Cuban Missile Crisis, achieving military parity with the West. Life expectancy doubled.
            There's no comparison with today's "achievements." Now we've even lost our republics. Russians and Ukrainians are killing each other.
            1. +1
              13 January 2026 01: 43
              Quote: Photon
              compare losses per unit area

              This is, of course, a congenial indicator - as irresistible as it is idiotic.

              Quote: Photon
              But I didn’t hear a word of complaint from my relatives.

              But the descendants are left to pine on the internet. Even though the standard of living today is such that our ancestors couldn't even dream of it.

              Quote: Photon
              Now we have lost even our republics.

              Are you a communist? Because they were the ones who screwed up the republics. And not just now, but thirty-five years ago. And now, just the opposite is true – we're slowly regaining what we lost.
      4. +7
        9 January 2026 19: 05
        And so they created a generation of people who were able to defeat Hitlerism and defeat the world's first land army. Not men, but hardened people.
      5. +3
        10 January 2026 08: 03
        Here are the Bolsheviks for about 20 years
        The Great Depression hit the US (and not only) - people there were ready to sell their own mother for a small amount of money.
        Now they have learned to export their depressions.
    4. +5
      9 January 2026 17: 46
      I completely agree! It's just like in real life. Once upon a time, during my conscription, we had a morale booster who, using his strength and length of service, bullied not only the younger guys but also his own. At one point, a scrawny weakling got into trouble. Who knew the kid had so much spirit? He punched him in the jaw and then hit him over the head with a stool. He almost hit him, but one of the guys put his hand out and the stool slid off. That eagle was afraid to come within a mile of him. He touched everyone, but gave this guy a wide berth. This is where I agree with Duginov. Sometimes you have to do something to shut everyone up and make them give you a wide berth.
      1. 0
        12 January 2026 17: 22
        Absolutely right!
        This is a yard/army principle, or even a camp law. These American gangsters live by the same principles!
        You need to scare them, to put yourself out there - it's better to be considered a psycho and inadequate, and to be feared (and therefore respected), than to be treated like a snot-nosed person and to spit on the lines you've drawn.
        I've been suggesting for several years now: draw a line and issue an ultimatum. You've backed us into a corner, and now we have nothing to lose. If you violate this, the first warning will be a nuclear-armed Hazelnut flying over your Nevada test site, and there won't be a second warning!
        1. 0
          12 January 2026 17: 33
          We can be compared to a strong, resilient, yet predictable boxer. Predictability negates all strength. Our enemies don't fear us because they know our every move with certainty. Where and when we can strike, and where not...
    5. +11
      9 January 2026 18: 06
      I completely agree. London needs to be nuked. England is not needed.
      1. -7
        9 January 2026 19: 22
        Quote: Sergey Kondratiev
        I completely agree. London needs to be nuked. England is not needed.

        Are you ready for your entire family to die for this?
        1. -1
          9 January 2026 20: 20
          At one point, a skinny weakling got it. Who knew the kid had so much spirit? He punched him in the jaw and then hit him over the head with a stool. He almost hit him, but one of the kids put his hand out and the stool slid off. That eagle was afraid to come within a mile of him. He touched everyone else, but gave this one a wide berth.
          Here's the answer. He hit him, knowing he'd kill him and go to jail, but he kept hitting him. But he was still a man. He didn't have a hazelnut-sized weapon, and he didn't even have a knife. He grabbed a can and hit the jerk. And he won in the end. And the jerk got away with it.
          1. -2
            9 January 2026 20: 53
            It's not a fair comparison! In that case, the person was only responsible for themselves. But here, in the event of a retaliatory nuclear strike, there would be cities with populations of over a million. That doesn't look very good.
        2. 0
          9 January 2026 23: 01
          I am ready for this so that all my relatives live and do not die because of the war with the West.
        3. +2
          10 January 2026 17: 35
          Well, she's not in London. What about where you are?
        4. -1
          13 January 2026 00: 50
          Who told you about all the relatives? Let's compare... ~200 warheads in Europe. (The US, even according to its military doctrine, is on the sidelines.) Against 3500-4000 of ours. Plus an advantage in missile defense and air defense. Plus the difference in population density is not in Europe's favor. So, Russia will very much regret a war with Europe. Europe will not regret it. There will be no one to regret it.
        5. 0
          19 January 2026 06: 15
          And the fact that people are dying yesterday and now—does that make you feel any better? Does it make you feel better that your relatives aren't there? It's only temporary, unfortunately...
    6. 0
      9 January 2026 18: 27
      Kidnap him from his Florida residence and bring him to Cuba for a "talk."
      1. 0
        10 January 2026 17: 36
        His own people would rather set him up, blame all the sins on him and call him a dictator.
    7. 0
      9 January 2026 20: 57
      Now even the PR man for homespun clothes and bast shoes has become a geostrategist.
    8. 0
      10 January 2026 19: 44
      Why doesn't Russia act with its adversaries the same way the US does in Venezuela?

      Everything can be explained by the cowardice of the Kremlin leadership and its cronies from the Ozero cooperative. There are simply no other options in sight.
    9. +2
      11 January 2026 09: 29
      Yes, in all wars, victory was achieved not only through battles on the battlefield, but also by eliminating the enemy's leadership, the military-political leadership. The US and Israel do just that, bribing, destroying, and enticing the enemy's leadership. But for some reason, we're embarrassed to do so... Perhaps if the leadership and upper echelon of power in State 404 had been eliminated at the very beginning of the war in Ukraine, the war would have ended long ago, State 404 would have capitulated, and the Russian flag would already be flying over the Motherland in Kyiv!
      So, we have to guess and wait for the next victories and advances of our hard-working guys on the battlefield...
      1. +1
        11 January 2026 09: 58
        Pravdodely (ppp)
        That's why we also need to start bombing Israel, just as it did in Syria and Iran with the support of the United States.
        The advantage is removing Zelensky as a US stooge. The transition of power in Ukraine will drag on for a long time, with chaos in governance and disintegration. The Bolsheviks took advantage of this moment in October 1917. There's no need to invent anything here; it's all happened before in our history.
      2. 0
        13 January 2026 01: 01
        No. Ukraine shouldn't have been touched. NATO should have been touched. An ultimatum should have been issued. Not too harsh. But a serious strike should have been launched, against several military installations, if the order wasn't complied with. I don't see any other options. I'm afraid that's not for the current leadership.
      3. 0
        13 January 2026 01: 27
        Quote: The Truth
        But for some reason we are embarrassed to do this...

        Not our methods, you understand. laughing hi
  2. 0
    9 January 2026 11: 52
    The logic he explains is simple: either you strike first or you get written off.
    Everyone understands... But not everything gets done. Apparently, the people at the top have the best view...
    1. +15
      9 January 2026 12: 02
      Quote: aszzz888
      The logic he explains is simple: either you strike first or you get written off.
      Everyone understands... But not everything gets done. Apparently, the people at the top have the best view...

      While our government, which is more aware of its moral and legal limitations, is killing more of our soldiers than it could.
    2. +9
      9 January 2026 12: 04
      Quote: aszzz888
      The logic he explains is simple: either you strike first or you get written off.
      Everyone understands... But not everything gets done. Apparently, the people at the top have the best view...

      So the top one winked He explained to us: “50 years ago, a Leningrad street taught me one rule: if a fight is inevitable, you have to hit first,” Putin emphasized.
      1. +8
        9 January 2026 12: 08
        It seems that Leningradskaya Street "taught" him something else... At least, reality says so - "to begin without starting."
        1. +1
          9 January 2026 12: 10
          Quote: Vladimir M
          It seems that Leningradskaya Street "taught" him something else... At least, reality says so - "to begin without starting."

          It may have been said correctly, but I didn't understand anything. request
          1. +8
            9 January 2026 12: 16
            The quote goes, "We haven't even started yet." However, we did... Four years ago...
            1. +6
              9 January 2026 12: 19
              Quote: novel xnumx
              The quote goes, "We haven't even started yet." However, we did... Four years ago...

              Of course we won't remember this statement! winked "We've been fooled, we've been fooled again...!"
              1. 0
                9 January 2026 12: 21
                No, of course not, unless I'm drunk... laughing
                1. +1
                  9 January 2026 12: 23
                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  No, of course not, unless I'm drunk... laughing

                  Roma, I've had enough drinking, I've got no strength left. No.
                  1. 0
                    9 January 2026 12: 26
                    So, we don’t remember...
              2. +2
                9 January 2026 12: 28
                It is difficult “not to be deceived” if we ourselves are happy to be “deceived”.
                If everyone is constantly deceiving one person, then the first complaint is directed at that one person.
          2. +4
            9 January 2026 15: 19
            but I didn't understand anything

            What's there to understand? It's all very clear if you take a philosophical approach. We are a country that can show off a lot and actually do very little.
            It looks like the influence of Western postmodern philosophy... with continuous simulacra.
            The army of early 2022 turned out to be cardboard or a toy, just like the FSB and the police.
            At the beginning of the Second World War, she pretended to attack, but then abruptly retreated, declaring mobilization and starting to build a new army, which now fights much better.
            Well, in the political department, everything is the same, but the construction of a new and adequate one has not yet begun... We need to get rid of the idea of ​​showing pictures, replacing it with the idea of ​​real actions and their evaluation according to the criterion of effectiveness.
            Well, Nabibulina is fighting inflation, but it’s no use, so it’s time for her to retire. The assessment of her work is obvious, but there are no conclusions.
      2. -1
        9 January 2026 12: 14
        How do you know a fight is inevitable? Well, once someone hits you, it's inevitable... lol
        1. +2
          9 January 2026 12: 17
          Quote: novel xnumx
          How do you know a fight is inevitable? Well, once someone hits you, it's inevitable... lol

          And my two cents on fighting philosophy. winked
          Since they had nothing to blame each other for, they fought in silence. angry
          1. +3
            9 January 2026 12: 19
            No, there are better ways to start. lol
            1. +4
              9 January 2026 12: 28
              Quote: novel xnumx
              No, there are better ways to start. lol

              This sounds like a casus belli. am
      3. +4
        9 January 2026 12: 19
        Quote: Terenin
        50 years ago, the Leningrad street taught

        But judging by his actions, the democracy dealers later convinced him that international relations is not a street, but a blooming garden, and everyone who manages to get there from the “jungle” does not need street skills. They just forgot to tell him that “blacks and dogs” are not allowed to enter there. (Especially trusted “blacks” can work there as sewer cleaners and shoe shiners if they are willing to endure that the “white” gentlemen will ask them to get out of the way with kicks, and the “white” judge will hang some of them a little for prevention)
        1. +1
          9 January 2026 12: 22
          Quote: Chief Officer Lom
          The merchants of democracy later convinced him that international relations were not a street, but a blooming garden, and anyone who could get there from the "jungle" did not need street skills.

          It needs to be clarified whether these democracy merchants are theirs or home-grown?
      4. -3
        9 January 2026 15: 24
        But there were probably some clarifications there. Like, how do you know a fight is inevitable? What if your opponent only has enough of your pocket money? Or maybe you should give him your watch? And that's it, the fight has already happened, and the best fight is the one you didn't fight. wassat
      5. 0
        13 January 2026 01: 28
        Quote: Terenin
        “50 years ago, Leningradskaya Street taught me “There is one rule: if a fight is inevitable, you must strike first,” Putin emphasized.

        But it’s not clear whether she taught me.
    3. +5
      9 January 2026 12: 07
      They said so often that those at the top can see better, that we've reached the point where even at the top no one wants/can't/is allowed to look anywhere
      1. +5
        9 January 2026 12: 37
        It has often been said that one can see better from above.

        Of course, it's more visible. But there's one caveat. From there, you can't see the abyss, only the endless horizon. :)
        1. +4
          9 January 2026 13: 07
          Quote: fsvlad
          From there you can't see the abyss, only the endless horizon :)

          I subscribe....
    4. -1
      9 January 2026 21: 28
      Yes, there are 150 million people behind you. And you're supposedly responsible for them. But you're also responsible, like in Ivan Vasilyevich, who the son of a bitch gave you the right
  3. +10
    9 January 2026 11: 54
    and other restrictions
    Until our officials worry about their capital and their relatives abroad, these will be the key restrictions...
    1. +1
      9 January 2026 12: 05
      uralex
      As long as our officials don't worry about their capital

      If you want to be respected in the world, you must first respect yourself. When the people and the government treat each other with respect, then the whole world will turn to us. And you're talking about "bureaucrats."
      1. +10
        9 January 2026 12: 13
        so that we are respected in the world
        Until our officials and their relatives living abroad respect their country, neither their own people nor other countries will respect them either! How many relatives of the American elite live in Russia? And how many relatives of the Russian elite live in the EU and the US?
        1. 0
          9 January 2026 12: 15
          uralex
          Until our officials and their relatives who live abroad respect their country, neither their own people nor other countries will respect them either!

          That's right, you are 100% right here.
  4. +5
    9 January 2026 11: 58
    And so it's all clear! What's there to ask? They don't act like Trump, because there's Russian coalition of the willing make peace, make friends with staff members. Or gay Europeans. Or with stolen goods
    1. +1
      13 January 2026 01: 31
      Quote: Reptiloid
      coalition of the barking

      So it will be more correct. laughing hi
      1. +1
        13 January 2026 01: 35
        Now these have become a little quieter, but sometimes they can’t be erased and start to boast, like children with foreign passports or something else.
  5. HAM
    -4
    9 January 2026 11: 59
    They say that Vladimir Vladimirovich listens to Dugin's advice...
    I hope he hears it this time.
    1. -1
      9 January 2026 12: 06
      He may listen, but he carries out the will of other people.
    2. +4
      9 January 2026 12: 09
      Quote: HAM
      They say that Vladimir Vladimirovich

      And are these people who speak up actually responsible for anything? I doubt it...
  6. +1
    9 January 2026 11: 59
    The answer to his statement is well known. There's no way to respond except with a nuclear strike. The multi-move planner and his cronies have driven him to the brink. Trump does whatever he wants, and the guarantor has squandered all 26 years of opportunity to respond. Therefore, there's nothing to respond with.
  7. +1
    9 January 2026 12: 00
    Logical conclusions when there is nothing to lose.
  8. +6
    9 January 2026 12: 01
    I agree with the philosopher. Today, we also need to take into account that we are limited by a virtual lack of allies. Those loyal or neutral are being methodically suppressed, and quite effectively.
  9. +10
    9 January 2026 12: 01
    ...however, the path to achieving the goals of the SVO, as he believes, must be paved in a more difficult way, taking into account moral, legal and other restrictions.

    What does "morality" have to do with it? We have to look at the houses and money that belong to our officials in the West, their children, and the wives of those with foreign citizenship.
    Brzezinski explained everything in a popular way long ago
    1. +3
      9 January 2026 12: 20
      It's the Duck Test))) Obvious things, but they're always somehow overlooked and even condoned, like patriotism isn't a travel ban, and all this liberalism immediately awakens in our mega-patriots))) Well, they don't want to live near Voronezh in retirement)
  10. +1
    9 January 2026 12: 06
    So we'll keep looking back - what will the perverted gayrope and the gang of Americans say?
  11. +1
    9 January 2026 12: 12
    Yes... Russia has lost its authority in the world. How can we get it back?... These people won't be able to...
  12. +1
    9 January 2026 12: 12
    Maybe try to raise your life level?
    Playing with the alternative option somehow doesn’t make sense when people want to come here only when they are forced to (persecution there).
    So, both here and there it is capitalism, only there it is richer.
    1. +3
      9 January 2026 12: 42
      Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
      Playing with the alternative option somehow doesn’t make sense when people want to come here only when they are forced to (persecution there).

      Were there times in Russia when things were different? always We only went there when there was nothing to eat at home or they could kill us
      1. -2
        9 January 2026 14: 49
        Quote: your1970
        Were there times in Russia when things were different? People only came to us when there was nothing to eat at home or they were about to be killed.

        It doesn't matter whether there were any.
        There must come such times.
        Otherwise, what's the point?
        The same (essentially) ideology as the USA (it's sweeter to eat).
        But it really does taste sweeter there.
        The system cannot be changed because of the constitution.
        Conclusion: we need to fix the economy.
        1. -1
          9 January 2026 16: 18
          Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
          It doesn't matter whether there were any.
          There must come such times.

          If they didn’t go/don’t go socialism and capitalism - What do you suggest to get them to come to us now?
          People don't go to China, the world's number one economy.
          People don't go to Cuba to socialism.
          1. 0
            10 January 2026 09: 40
            Quote: your1970
            People don't go to China, the world's number one economy.

            To obtain Chinese citizenship, you have to be either VERY rich or a truly useful scientist. They don't need it; there are already plenty of people.
            Otherwise I would go.
            1. 0
              10 January 2026 12: 35
              Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
              Quote: your1970
              People don't go to China, the world's number one economy.

              To obtain Chinese citizenship, you have to be either VERY rich or a truly useful scientist. They don't need it; there are already plenty of people.
              Otherwise I would go.

              The conversation was about RICH countries - and not about penniless people like us for China.
              So there is a whole bunch of people coming to us from Tajikistan.
              Quote: your1970
              Were there times in Russia when things were different? People only came to us when there was nothing to eat at home or they were about to be killed.
        2. 0
          13 January 2026 01: 35
          Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
          The system cannot be changed because of the constitution.

          The Constitution is not religious commandments.
          1. 0
            13 January 2026 12: 49
            Quote: guest
            The Constitution is not religious commandments.

            But there is a prison term for calling for such things, so it’s not allowed.
            1. 0
              13 January 2026 18: 07
              Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
              so it's impossible.

              Everything is possible, if someone has the desire.
              1. 0
                14 January 2026 10: 57
                Quote: guest
                Everything is possible, if someone has the desire.

                To call or approve is a term.
                But if someone succeeded and replaced him, who would put him in jail?
                It always has been.
                1. -1
                  14 January 2026 13: 20
                  Quote: Hitriy Zhuk
                  But if someone succeeded and replaced him, who would put him in jail?

                  I actually meant someone who has the appropriate authority.
                  1. 0
                    14 January 2026 15: 03
                    Quote: guest
                    I actually meant someone who has the appropriate authority.

                    And for this someone it’s fine as is.
  13. +3
    9 January 2026 12: 14
    So what exactly is this? Where are the clear guidelines and proposals? Again, everything is vague and evasive. We can discuss these topics endlessly, but as the Arabs say: No matter how many times you repeat halva, the halva in your mouth won't get any sweeter.
  14. -1
    9 January 2026 12: 14
    I just read on Mail.ru that Trump said that Russian military security ships did not contact the Americans when the tanker was seized and left.
    1. +4
      9 January 2026 16: 19
      Quote: Alexander Rasmukhambetov
      I just read on Mail.ru that Trump said that Russian military security ships did not contact the Americans when the tanker was seized and left.

      Grab a fork from the buffet and take care of your silly talk. The Russian security ships haven't left their bases.
    2. +1
      11 January 2026 11: 36
      Put on your glasses and read, it wasn't me who said that.
  15. +5
    9 January 2026 12: 17
    Killing, sowing fear and terror... Well, what exactly can you expect from a man who declared a billion people "possessed by Satan" and called for a new crusade against these "forces of evil"? What can you expect from a man who declared the caste-based church-feudal system of government to be the only correct and only applicable one for the country?... He's not a philosopher. Calling for a crusade against those "possessed by evil"... He himself, surely, isn't "possessed"?
    1. +2
      10 January 2026 10: 10
      He just said the other day that the only true path for Russia is the army and the monastery. laughing
  16. -1
    9 January 2026 12: 19
    There is no need to do anything terrible, we need to get ahead of the enemy in escalation, create a new group and begin an offensive in a new direction, which he will no longer be able to parry.
    And if we act the way we do, we could fight for 20 years.
  17. +9
    9 January 2026 12: 20
    Alexander Dugin, a philosopher and public figure, said that Russia is supposedly about to do "something terrible."

    It would be better if the "philosopher" told how he dodged military service in the USSR, when military service was universal?
    But if you serve for two years, it’s better to “dodge”, and if the whole globe is destroyed, it’s turned to dust.
  18. +3
    9 January 2026 12: 23
    and willingness to go all the way

    Whose end?
    You don't need much intelligence to philosophize about vodka. Or courage.
    But go and fight yourself, your children and grandchildren went to the front...

    Everyone, literally everyone, teaches us how to live, knows “how it should be.”
    And the country is permanently in trouble.
    Although many of the teachers are very close to power or even in it.

    Russia is supposedly about to do "something terrible"


    Totally awful.
    Pan-Filosov wants (not him, but others) to go and commit a massacre? Is he calling for terrorist attacks? Genocide? Another shootout somewhere?
    Isn't Mr. Philosopher aware that a bunch of idiots will understand this as a call to action?
    With such philosophers, we don't even need Viy... wassat
    1. 0
      9 January 2026 22: 42
      Curb your ardor a bit. His daughter died for Russia. Although, actually, it seems they wanted to kill Dugin himself.
      1. +1
        10 January 2026 09: 04
        Quote: Sergej1972
        His daughter died for Russia.

        Holy shit, apparently they accidentally killed his daughter instead of him, and now she's like Matrosov, and he supposedly gets the credit? No. It doesn't work like that, and it's not "for Russia."

        This also didn’t make him any smarter or more philosophical.
        Why all this?

        But the fact that "an incomprehensible person calls for something strange" (and what this might lead to) somehow doesn't matter.
  19. -5
    9 January 2026 12: 24
    The statement sounded harsh and alarming—and that's precisely why it immediately spread across the media. The philosopher effectively described modern international politics as a world where, in his words, agreements and compromises are not what decide things, but rather demonstrations of strength and a willingness to go all the way.

    Gee, but a long time ago, not so long ago, many ordinary, intelligent people wrote and said the same thing—few paid attention. And then Dugin himself, the authority figure, figured it out, and said it! And all the sheeple-heads started groaning and sighing, and spreading it across the media.
    This is what happens in systems where the authority and media presence of a person (and not truth, logic, sound thinking, argumentation, etc.) is the main thing that they are listened to and heard, and if someone says smart and correct things, but he is not someone who is intoxicated, then the sheeple, accustomed only to judge and consume by the sign (authority), then, without turning on their own brain, until the authorities pour something into them, do not listen to them, do not draw their own obvious conclusions, etc.))))
  20. 0
    9 January 2026 12: 25
    Putin, like Lavrov, has long since lost face in international politics. This is irreversible.
  21. +2
    9 January 2026 12: 26
    Russia has only one way to regain its authority on the international stage: a quick and unconditional victory in the war, but this is impossible.
  22. -1
    9 January 2026 12: 27
    Why doesn't Russia act with its adversaries the same way the US does in Venezuela?


    1. Okay, so we somehow miraculously captured Zelensky, losing our most valuable specialists in the process (miracles don't happen). What are we going to do with him? Put him on trial? So he can sit here (we have a moratorium, after all), and we can feed him with our own money? As far as I'm concerned, people like Zelensky should be killed in a particularly perverse way; that means there's always time.

    2. Okay, we've seen enough of the red-haired Don Perdolon, and we've also grabbed ourselves some "resources" in the form of neighboring states (former socialists), where there's NOTHING (no industries, everything's been destroyed, in favor of the European market), where pro-Russian propaganda hasn't been conducted for 30-40 years, where—besides Ukraine—we'll have to invest HUGE amounts of money. WHAT are we going to do with it? We'll be turning it over in our hands, wondering, like, what the hell did I buy?

    3. Don't expect Putin to launch a "cleansing" strike with the Oreshnik missile or an ICBM – your nerves will be healthier, and there will be less bile coursing through your veins. Almost anything, Putin, "Oreshnik," Putin, "Oreshnik," if he doesn't strike, doesn't respond – that's it, the end of the world, traitor, Judas!!! He most likely has HIS OWN plans, at odds with our understanding. Well, pay attention to YOURSELF. That's why half the world still has Che Guevara on their T-shirts, because he was ALONE, a lone hero! Now, with the encroaching chaos, SUCH opportunities are opening up, you just have to grab them!!!
    1. 0
      13 January 2026 01: 44
      Quote: Denis_999
      where - besides Ukraine - we will have to invest VERY LARGE amounts of money.

      At least it's better than investing in our open enemies, who will simply steal the money. 300 billion have already been stolen from us.
  23. +3
    9 January 2026 12: 29
    The whole world is in ruins... but why?
    To do something "terrible"... so is there any gradation of significance to that "terrible"?
  24. 0
    9 January 2026 12: 31
    But in general, I don’t really like Dugin... He seems to say some good things, but in many ways, in my opinion, he’s mistaken, pointing to false guidelines, etc.
  25. -2
    9 January 2026 12: 31
    With such bureaucrats, Russia has no chance of regaining its authority.
  26. +4
    9 January 2026 12: 37
    Repeat the atrocities of fascists and terrorists in order to gain the respect of fascists and terrorists?!
    Well, firstly, it's pointless. Secondly, those countries that still believe in international law—India, China, the countries of the Global South—will turn their backs on us.
    And thirdly, this is not our method. Russia has never sowed evil. And it will not do so.
    1. +4
      9 January 2026 13: 52
      Why are British and French missiles allowed to fly over Russia and destroy Russian citizens and our infrastructure? That's precisely why Russia has every moral right to destroy at least the factories that produce these missiles!!!
    2. +3
      9 January 2026 19: 20
      Absolutely right: "Don't sow pearls for swine!"
  27. -1
    9 January 2026 12: 39
    Alexander Dugin, a philosopher and public figure, said that Russia must allegedly do "something terrible" to regain its authority.
    Of course!
    But for Dugin, this is terrible - more terrible than anything: Russia could switch to the path of socialism - and then the US would be sad, because people there would start thinking.
  28. 0
    9 January 2026 12: 40
    Dugin seems smart, but he's missing one detail. We probably don't care what the US or EU think, but we do care how our actions are viewed by countries in our neighboring countries and the so-called Global South. If we start acting like the West, how will we be any better in the eyes of the Global South? If we trample on basic notions of justice, just as the West does, we'll end up with the same old story, only from a different angle.
  29. 0
    9 January 2026 12: 49
    I don't like this weather vane... hi
  30. +3
    9 January 2026 13: 22
    Indeed, the no answer : Why does the pseudo-philosopher, provocateur, and fascist preacher Dugin so systematically promote himself on VO and other resources?
    (maybe Mindar knows the answer?)
    1. +2
      10 January 2026 08: 09
      Maybe Mindar knows the answer?
      It looks like you can get permanently banned from VO for answering.
  31. +2
    9 January 2026 13: 49
    There is one garbage dump on the planet that stinks to the whole world and the Earth, together with the peoples inhabiting it, would say a huge 'thank you' if it were removed from the map... It's Britain!
    1. 0
      10 January 2026 08: 10
      "City" in Britain, to be more precise.
  32. +1
    9 January 2026 13: 52
    He was absolutely right when he said that only the strong will always be right until humanity unites to conquer the solar system! We just need to be clear about what will happen and actually do it, instead of spewing nonsense and confusing Russian citizens!
  33. +1
    9 January 2026 13: 56
    Je rejoins partiellement cette analyse: nos faiblesses peuvent servir de catalyseur à des décisions hostiles prices par des acteurs adverses.
  34. -5
    9 January 2026 13: 56
    It's all about the same thing. A terrible answer, this and that. And everyone's silent – ​​what exactly? What kind of monstrous answer is this? And we all know the answer. The answer is simple – THERE'S NO answer. Simply nothing. Well, except nuclear weapons. We've been holding out for four years in the Donetsk area... And you're talking about a monstrous answer...
  35. +1
    9 January 2026 14: 01
    philosopher and public figure

    Pictured with Belgian pro-German collaborator, SS Brigadeführer, commander of the 28th SS Volunteer Division "Wallonia", one of the founders and leader of the Rexist Party of Belgium, Léon Degrelle

    https://pikabu.ru/story/ne_fashist_dugin_fashist_ilin_natsist_leon_degrel_i_mimikriya_11349560
  36. 0
    9 January 2026 14: 18
    Absolutely right, Alexander Gelyevich, this is an important issue for modern Russia!
    The measure of what is permitted and the measure of what is possible!
    This question is both collective and personal to our ruler! It's connected to the people's mentality, their spirituality, and their morality!
    But I'll note: there are journalistic essays by wartime correspondents, in particular Mikhail Sholokhov. It's called "The Science of Hatred."
    You will understand the essence of this essay for yourself after reading it....
    1. +1
      9 January 2026 14: 21
      I also recommend essays by other war correspondents: Simonov, Tvardovsky, Kataev, Vasily Grosman and others.
  37. -1
    9 January 2026 14: 18
    Dugin's idea isn't straightforward, but it's certainly valid. I'd just like to adjust it. Nothing horrific or cruel needs to be done; it's enough to blow up another Kuzka's mother on Novaya Zemlya or conduct a full-scale ocean test of a nuclear torpedo that would create a 100-meter tsunami.
    1. +4
      9 January 2026 14: 35
      I think that Russians always have enough common sense not to be more terrible than other peoples.
      But this does not mean that we should not use military cunning, think about victory over the enemy, use the power of our weapons, the strength of our army!
      This was the case during the times of Princess Olga and the Drevlyans, Evpatiy Kolovrat and the Mongols, and so on down the list... Why should we, the descendants of these people, limit ourselves to the morality of philosophy?
      1. +2
        9 January 2026 14: 37
        This is also a T R A D I C I O N!
        Only military ones!
      2. +2
        9 January 2026 15: 07
        Russians are terrifyingly easygoing. And when it comes to heated debates, they don't harbor hatred or blinding phobias; they fight with cold reason, without clichés, defeating the conceptually limited "democratizers and enlighteners" of their upbringing. And the enemies of Russians are always pumped up: vatniks, savages, serfs... Such is the contradiction... Someone once said that Russia is alive as long as at least one Russian lives. Of course, Putin, the deputies, the officials... are not Russians.
  38. +2
    9 January 2026 15: 01
    With all due respect to Dugin, it's the "big battalions" who decide! A metaphor. The government should work first and foremost for its own state and citizens, not for the cosmopolitan oligarchs at the gas pipelines. But the generalized "Putin" values ​​his stomach (luxury, comfort...) above his conscience... A servant of the oligarchs, Russia's enemies worship him! Shame on St. Petersburg for its citizen. They missed the Bad Guy.
  39. +1
    9 January 2026 15: 04
    I'm amazed at what agreements we've reached and with whom. Our entire liberal Yeltsin elite, with relatives and property all over Europe, is insane. We're launching strikes supposedly in retaliation for the divine residence, not for the dead civilians from Kherson. We're freeing the entire Azov elite because of the godfather. And the likes of Popov, Prigozhin, Surovkin, and others are simply considered negative.
  40. -1
    9 January 2026 15: 12
    claimed that Russia was supposedly about to do "something terrible"
    Chatterbox.
  41. 0
    9 January 2026 15: 34
    Russia is supposedly about to do "something terrible"
    For example, turning Venezuela into a kind of Ukraine for the Americans. I can just picture the BECs in the Caribbean, driving the large and beautiful American fleet somewhere toward the shores of Canada.
  42. +1
    9 January 2026 15: 40
    Russia is supposedly about to do "something terrible"

    For example, detonate a 100-megaton Tsar Bomba in central London. Then the Anglo-Saxon rats would retreat to their burrows for decades.
  43. 0
    9 January 2026 16: 49
    The thoughts are correct, but the Kremlin won’t go along with it.
  44. +1
    9 January 2026 16: 50
    I agree with Dugin 100%. I suggest England as the first option. Enough already, "shit on the Englishwoman."
  45. +1
    9 January 2026 16: 53
    Russia is supposedly about to do "something terrible"
    Indeed, Dugin has a point. Why not seize Greenland if Europe has all but accepted the loss? We'll give the Americans a run for their money at the same time, and hee hee, we'll gain an important piece of territory for unintentional control, and we'll also get caught up in a media scandal of unprecedented proportions. We'll practically become celebrities.
  46. +2
    9 January 2026 17: 13
    Quote: garik77
    It would be enough to blow up another Kuzkina mother on Novaya Zemlya or conduct full-scale tests of a nuclear torpedo in the ocean, which would create a 100-meter tsunami.

    What's wrong with Novaya Zemlya? And the ocean creatures aren't to blame either; we should feel sorry for them. We need to hit the target, and be more precise...
  47. +3
    9 January 2026 17: 33
    This is not the first time that words and actions have diverged.
    Everyone probably remembers the phrase: "If a fight is inevitable, strike first."
    Does anyone know when, over the last 10-20, or even 30 years, we didn't respond to challenges, but rather set the agenda ourselves?
    In my opinion, this is some kind of systemic error. Perhaps the Kremlin does have some kind of think tank, but its work is completely invisible and inaccessible.
    Public analysts have been predicting a situation where Ukraine would become an enemy, even a war, since the early 2000s. These same public analysts warned against soft responses to Western pressure and provocations. The West prepared every step, often for years. For example, the refusal of Russian gas or electricity was long compensated for technically and economically; therefore, it never came as a shock or even caused economic damage to our sworn "friends." Nevertheless, time and again, greed has decided everything. For some reason, we are building a nuclear power plant for Erdogan, even though Turkey is our historical adversary, and its ambitions for the Turkic world are much more conceptually fulfilling than the Russian world. It is a NATO member, by the way, but that didn't stop them from supplying S-400s.
    There are many examples of the style—for money for! This has practically become the motto of our foreign policy.
    We can simultaneously condemn China for supplying drones and components that aren't available to our brothers in the same quantities as we are, but we supply weapons to India, China's main geopolitical adversary. Clearly, China is an even more problematic customer than India, but we don't supply Pakistan.
    Migration policy is a similar story. Despite the complete failure of similar uncontrolled migrant imports in Europe, even now, when the issue has already divided society (along with Islamization), high-ranking officials are making statements about the impossibility of eliminating migrants. The problem is certainly complex, involving corruption and lobbying by megacorporations, but public analysts anticipated and discussed the problem long before the systemic crisis.
    So, what's the Kremlin's analysis of the situation? Central Asia is also on the horizon, where our diplomacy is following the same disastrous path as in Ukraine.
    It's worth noting, but everyone already remembers how harshly the highest authorities react to any attempt to apply the law to their citizens, while the indispensable experts themselves are genuinely perplexed—and why us? Throughout Central Asia, the green light has been given to the Sorov Foundations, history is being rewritten, and the image of the enemy is being swooningly crafted.
    The scenario is the same as in Ukraine.
    Is the hopak on a rake really a national trait of non-brothers?
    1. +1
      10 January 2026 17: 42
      Because the Jew Dmitriev is going to Miami to talk to the Jew Kushner about the fate of the Jew Zelensky and the money of the Jewish oligarchs from Russia?
    2. -1
      10 January 2026 23: 42
      Quote: avdkrd
      In my opinion, this is some kind of systemic error. Perhaps the Kremlin does have some kind of think tank, but its work is completely invisible and inaccessible.

      Grandfathers are old, grandfathers think long and hard and get tired quickly. You have to understand.
  48. 0
    9 January 2026 18: 50
    Why doesn't Russia act with its adversaries the same way the US does in Venezuela?

    Because Russia isn't America. We have a different situation, different opportunities, different adversaries, and different goals. It seems so simple.
    1. +1
      9 January 2026 19: 38
      It should be noted that no one in Russia or the United States has studied civilization. It's likely that there's no material on the American mentality at all. Only fragments of understanding the American character—as human nature—are found in classic American literature.
      For example, Americans are taught from childhood to use it to the maximum at the first opportunity that appears, in all spheres of life.
      Including at the state level!
      1. +1
        9 January 2026 19: 41
        We are experiencing a mental confrontation with the United States, among other things.
        The US has the maximum possible measure, while Russia has the reasonably acceptable measure.
  49. +2
    9 January 2026 19: 20
    Dugin is right, in our time the one who has more rights is right.
    We have enough grounds to knock off all the administrative heads on the outskirts with one blow to the knees, and this will not be a terrible, but a quick solution to get rid of the scoundrels at once.
  50. -1
    9 January 2026 20: 48
    Karaganov has long been suggesting going all-in. Unfortunately, that's the only way to cool them down. For example, in 2013, if 200-300 people had been shot on the Maidan, there wouldn't have been millions of victims now. So, if the tactical nuclear weapons hit a couple of Pshek cities now, the entire world would immediately cool down, and that would save the lives of tens of millions. Their border states still need to be gradually phased out of the game.
    1. 0
      9 January 2026 22: 51
      Yes, there's some truth to it, but according to the cartoon Mowgli, the jackals will eventually reach Shere Khan, that is, Trump, and the answer depends on his sick mind. Alas, it's not Russian psychiatrists who are examining his head.
  51. 0
    9 January 2026 22: 11
    I sat there and read almost this entire thread, and we all understand that Russia is our entire population. And when making decisions, taking well-trodden paths, sometimes one person makes those decisions. Now a question for the experts? Why doesn't Trump care? Why does he do whatever his ass pleases? Answer in a minute.
    1. 0
      10 January 2026 23: 44
      Quote: Hariton Laptev
      And now a question for the experts??? Why doesn't Trump care??? Why does he do whatever his ass pleases???

      Because he is self-sufficient and does not suffer from complexes, and he has a powerful team and country behind him.
  52. 0
    9 January 2026 22: 13
    It's all nonsense. The exercise of will here is a consequence of political convictions, in which bookish knowledge is only a minor element of life experience. Wait until chance brings Sergeant Major Ivanov to the ruins of "international law."
  53. 0
    10 January 2026 00: 15
    The logic he explains is simple: either you strike first or you get written off.

    We remember one elder who also said that, “if a fight is unavoidable, then you have to strike first”...
    And then what, he struck first, then ran away like a coward, with his tail between his legs...
  54. -1
    10 January 2026 03: 30
    Dugin: "The logic he explains is simple: either you strike first,
    or you are written off."
    ALIENS may strike first, and we may only self-destruct,,,,,
  55. +1
    10 January 2026 03: 45
    This means that a special forces operation must be carried out to capture Trump, and then he must be tried in Novgorod.
    1. -1
      10 January 2026 04: 03
      Seriously speaking, Russia is effectively alone against a coalition of the most powerful states. We're teetering on the brink of survival, thanks to the greed of capitalists and their ability to circumvent their own sanctions. Plus, our capitalists in power are desperate to befriend the West. So Dugin's dreams will remain empty words. In reality, if anyone else joins in the fight against the US, that would be a very good thing. For now, everyone is willing to put up with everything. But alone, we could overextend ourselves.
  56. 0
    10 January 2026 08: 29
    A lot of people here have gotten into "rhyming"... but Dugin is actually quite right! We need to stop "expressing concern and protest" – we just need to punch them in the face!!!
  57. 0
    10 January 2026 11: 34
    Biography and facts
    Vagit Alekperov is Russia's leading oil magnate and the main shareholder of Lukoil, Russia's largest private oil company.

    Alekperov was born in Baku to an oil worker. "I grew up in the oil fields... In our yard, there was no other entertainment in the 50s except throwing a rope and riding on the [oil] pump," the billionaire said in an interview. He attended evening classes at the M. Azizbekov Azerbaijan Institute of Oil and Chemistry and worked at the Kaspmorneft production association. Five years after graduating, he rose to the rank of deputy head of the oil field and in 1979 left for work in Western Siberia.

    Alekperov could be said to have begun building his business back in 1987, when he was appointed CEO of Kogalymneftegaz. From 1990 to 1992, he held the posts of Deputy and First Deputy Minister of the Oil and Gas Industry of the USSR. In 1992 and 1993, under his leadership, three oil production companies—Langepasneftegaz, Urayneftegaz, and Kogalymneftegaz—were merged into the LangepasUrayKogalymneft oil concern, which later became Lukoil.

    Only the letter "K" remains in the name "Lukoil" of the company Alekperov led. Nevertheless, after privatization in 1993, he became its largest shareholder and permanent president. In 2002, Alekperov directly and indirectly owned 10,4% of Lukoil's shares. Since then, his stake has almost tripled, to 28,3%.

    Career: In the late 1980s, he served as the General Director of PO Kogalymneftegaz; in 1990–1991, he was Deputy Minister of the Oil and Gas Industry of the USSR. In 1992–1993, he founded the oil concern LangepasUrayKogalymneft, which later became LUKOIL. Since then, he has served as the oil company's president. During the privatization process, he became its largest shareholder.

    Capital of NK Lukoil (28,3%, as of September 30, 2021).

    In December 2023, Alekperov flew with President Putin to meet with the leaders of the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

    Sanctions Alekperov resigned as president of Lukoil in April 2022, days after the UK imposed sanctions against him.

    Figure: Alekperov received more than $2 billion in dividends from Lukoil in 2024.

    Detali Alekperov owned the Dutch shipyard Heesen Yachts, where his 70-meter yacht Galactica Super Nova was built in 2016. In May 2022, he transferred all his shares to an independent Dutch foundation.

    Inheritance: In 2013, he bequeathed his entire Lukoil stake to his son, Yusuf, with the stipulation that he would not have the right to sell or divide it. The stake, according to Alekperov, would not exceed 30% of the shares. "We're probably not yet so developed that we could donate all our income [to charity]. But my heirs will be limited in the income from my shares. <…> Moreover, they will only be able to own the stake after seven years. Although, God willing, I'll live a long time," Alekperov told Vedomosti in 2018.

    Hobbies: Collecting antique coins. His primary focus is Russian gold and platinum coins, but he also has a large collection of antiques. The International Numismatic Club Museum, founded by Alekperov, houses approximately 5000 coins.

    Friends, read this text and tell me about a harsh response to the West. If you don't know, this is the richest man in Russia—our country's elite. Well, England and Holland will be reduced to dust. Ha, twice. The text, by the way, is from Russian Forbes.
  58. -1
    10 January 2026 11: 48
    I urge all commentators to consider the possibilities: what would happen if two "Trumps" collided - the American and the Russian.
    Option 1 - no one will want to give in;
    Option 2 - someone will not be able to withstand it and will give in: Trump (2A) or Putin (2B);
    Option 3 - they will come to an agreement, making concessions, but will not allow a World War.
    Perhaps you could suggest some other options for discussion.
  59. +2
    10 January 2026 12: 19
    The SVO itself is more than a harsh move. They ripped open the Banderites' bellies and liberated a ton of land. Now they have no time for self-indulgence—just to stay alive. Russia has authority in the world—just look at how Putin is greeted in various countries during his visits. But anyone who's overdue is met by the captain of the arriving flight and the ambassador. Those are the ones with zero authority.
  60. 0
    10 January 2026 12: 29
    Because the mansions, the cash, and the offspring of the newly minted nobility and boyars are all in the West. That's why these nobility and boyars are screaming that they need to reeeeeease take harsh action, since the West considers them "Faberge."
  61. -1
    10 January 2026 12: 31
    Quote: Glagol1
    The SVO itself is more than a harsh move. They ripped open the Banderites' bellies and liberated a ton of land. Now they have no time for self-indulgence—just to stay alive. Russia has authority in the world—just look at how Putin is greeted in various countries during his visits. But anyone who's overdue is met by the captain of the arriving flight and the ambassador. Those are the ones with zero authority.

    Yeah, they meet... They speak to the guarantor through thin lips, except for Batka.
  62. The comment was deleted.
  63. +1
    10 January 2026 14: 45
    Well, it's all clear - Dugin (by analogy with the phrase from the film "At Home Among Strangers...": "Well, it's all clear - the League of Nations...").
  64. log
    0
    10 January 2026 15: 38
    Russia's problem is that Putin is a lawyer by training, while Trump is a businessman (read: gangster!). That's why they have such different "methods of operation."
  65. +3
    10 January 2026 17: 00
    Russia has one way to regain its authority on the international stage.


    Don't let idiots like Dugin speak out.
  66. 0
    10 January 2026 17: 52
    Dugin is an idiot (alternatively gifted). This is how you can act with unlimited resources. Grimy African Americans from North America do this out of inertia. They have the habit, but they lack the resources.
  67. +2
    10 January 2026 20: 08
    Was Dugin the entot in charge of anything, responsible for people, accountable for his words and actions? Empty and resonant as a drum...
  68. 0
    10 January 2026 20: 10
    Yes, I'm a better philosopher than any Dugin, but they don't pay me any money (just kidding)
  69. 0
    10 January 2026 20: 41
    I read the comments and had a good laugh. But seriously, either all vessels transporting our oil are officially included in the navy's auxiliary fleet, or the concern continues. They wouldn't dare attack a naval vessel from a country with nuclear weapons. The same goes for China...
  70. 0
    10 January 2026 21: 45
    It's time to stop thinking and go to the polls.
    I don’t know about other commentators, but in my personal opinion, Dugin voices his opinion more than most of the legislators in both the Duma and the Council.
  71. +2
    10 January 2026 21: 54
    Does anyone take this "philosopher" seriously? All he does is make grandiose statements and elaborate logic.
  72. 0
    10 January 2026 22: 18
    From the author:
    The logic he explains is simple: either you strike first or you get written off.

    Ah, these mediocre philosophers with their superficial views and lack of understanding of the essence of the matter. Trump is far from stupid, and certainly not a thug or a gangster. His actions are only seemingly emotional and abrupt. It's a facade, a well-choreographed performance. If you observe him closely, his actions are well thought out, planned, and executed to perfection. Plus, he takes what's lying around. Judge for yourself, only a lazy person could have failed to stage the kidnapping of Maduro. Yemelya and Basurman, like highwaymen, were peddling oil without even bothering to provide the slightest bit of security in the region.
    By comparison, the "stripes" are still pumping oil through the Kurdish SDF in Syria. And they have no plans to leave completely. Why bother? They'd lose such a huge zone of influence.
    Okay, Basurman can afford universal restraint and indifference. But what was Yemelya expecting?
    P.S.: as a wise classic once wrote: "You are a fool, a simpleton..."

    And one more thing. Considering the fact that the US outnumbers Yemelya in numbers and resources, launching sharp attacks on the US opposition is only possible if you understand you're playing Russian roulette or going all-in. Yemelya would be better off calculating all his actions two or three steps ahead, neutralizing his opponent's superiority. But he doesn't count the easy paths and never learns from them. Ukraine, Syria, and Venezuela are examples of this.
    1. 0
      10 January 2026 22: 26
      Please excuse the spelling, I was in a hurry.
    2. +1
      10 January 2026 23: 51
      Quote from cytadell
      Trump is far from stupid, and certainly not a thug or a gangster. His actions are only seemingly emotional and abrupt. It's a facade, a well-choreographed performance.

      That's right: his behavior is a carefully calibrated "choreography." Only he's not the one orchestrating and planning it all; most likely, he has a huge team of advisers behind him.
      1. +1
        10 January 2026 23: 55
        I disagree with you. I think this man possesses intuition and imagination, and everything else comes second. Ambitious, successful people are, above all, intuitive and resourceful. He got burned in his first term by his straightforwardness, drew conclusions, and paved the way. Well done.
        1. +4
          11 January 2026 00: 05
          Quote from cytadell
          I disagree with you. I think this person has intuition and imagination, and everything else comes second. Ambitious, successful people are, above all, intuitive and resourceful.

          You're greatly overestimating him. He's certainly an extraordinary man and has colossal experience (in business). And he stands out in stark contrast to all previous presidents, like the sleepy old man Biden, the socialist populist Obama, or the dimwitted Bush. But there have been US presidents far more serious and competent than Trump, though that was in the past. Compared to them, he's simply an upstart with rustic manners.
          Personally, I think that the American elites allowed him to be elected to office to fulfill a specific mission, the implementation of which we are now witnessing: a radical restructuring of the states by forcefully breaking the entire ineffective system that has obviously led the country to a dead end.
          They are most likely currently building an "American Empire" by incorporating all of North America (Greenland and Canada) into the United States and clearing out the entire Western Hemisphere, turning all of Latin America into their vassals and colonies. The end result will be a macroregional empire the size of half the world.
          1. +2
            11 January 2026 00: 40
            It's unfair to compare politicians from different eras; they would even have different ways of thinking. And extraordinary thinking has nothing to do with a person's manners or background. Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov is an example. What matters is how a person thinks, what categories they use, what principles and values ​​they have. And other qualities, too. They're a rare breed. Trump has that talent, though he's certainly a joker. But I think his previous presidential term benefited him. He's become more cunning.
            Regarding America's plans and future prospects, I completely agree with you.
            Today I read Strelkov's comments on Telegram in recent days. They're very spot on and resonate with our thoughts.
          2. +2
            11 January 2026 01: 05
            The elites allowed him to be elected to office to fulfill a specific mission, the implementation of which we are now witnessing: a radical restructuring of the states, by forcefully breaking the entire ineffective system, which, obviously, had led the country to a dead end.

            In the US, nothing has changed for decades. By their own admission, they've created a stable legal system and that's it. They've become accustomed to a stable and sustainable life. The price for this, predictably, is stagnation. Of course, technologically, they were much better off, and their technological leadership remains, which keeps them afloat, counterbalancing the first factor. Trump realized it was time to intensify the momentum and embrace the times. The US elites understand this too.
            Russia served as a catalyst.
  73. The comment was deleted.
  74. 0
    11 January 2026 00: 56
    Kidnap Trump and threaten Vance :)
  75. kig
    0
    11 January 2026 05: 14
    It turns out that this obscurantist has so many supporters.
  76. 0
    11 January 2026 09: 56
    Congratulations to Alexander Gelyevich on joining the party. Yes, the world has entered the era of "Realpolitik," where the use of any ideology as the basis for government policy is being abandoned. Such policies are based primarily on practical considerations, not ideological or moral ones. But each specific case must still be considered individually. What's applicable in one place may not be applicable in another.
  77. 0
    11 January 2026 11: 29
    Many Russians ask themselves this question, and there's no answer. Not many, but most Russians! I agree with Dugin! By wasting time, we're losing ground, and that's dangerous.
  78. 0
    11 January 2026 11: 31
    He's largely right: the shifting of red lines has led to a sharp decline in Russia's standing among its allies. If Trump talks a lot but acts regardless of public opinion, then Russia, compared to the United States, looks like a jellyfish with red stripes. As harsh as it may sound, it's true. And don't think I'm happy about this in any way—quite the contrary.
  79. 0
    11 January 2026 12: 13
    Dugin is an idiot. Authority is when all issues are resolved through negotiations and everyone is happy. What Dugin described is pressure through military means. And this is a costly and difficult-to-control process. The US's history with Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere confirms this. A sea of ​​money down the drain. Apparently, Dugin beats his wife if he preaches such narratives.
  80. 0
    13 January 2026 09: 16
    Dugin: Russia has one way to regain its authority on the international stage

    With the current Russian elite, and the system of reproduction of these elites, it is impossible for Russia to regain its authority. The fact is that the current Russian elite does not consider Russia a part of their own; for them, Russia is a place to make a fortune.