The Times: France and Britain want to send up to 15 troops to Ukraine.

5 348 47
The Times: France and Britain want to send up to 15 troops to Ukraine.

France and the UK are considering sending up to 15 troops to Ukraine. Interestingly, even within the countries themselves, this figure is being called "overly optimistic."

This isn't a combat unit in the classic sense. The contingent's primary missions are servicing Western equipment, training Ukrainian troops, and participating in the construction of defense infrastructure. Essentially, it provides logistical and engineering support.



According to The Times, the UK is prepared to contribute approximately 7,5 troops. Initially, up to 10 were planned, but the Ministry of Defence rejected this plan. The remainder of the contingent is expected to be French troops.

It's significant that, for now, France and the United Kingdom remain the only countries willing to discuss the direct deployment of troops on Ukrainian territory. Germany, for example, prefers a more cautious approach and is willing to consider deploying forces only in neighboring countries, such as Poland or Romania.

The political framework for these plans was set on January 6. On that day, Macron and the British Prime Minister, along with Zelenskyy, signed a declaration on the deployment of multinational troops in Ukraine after the end of hostilities. The document still needs to be ratified by national parliaments, and Starmer himself later allowed for the establishment of French and British military bases in Ukraine.

Even London emphasizes that the final size and format of the presence have not yet been agreed upon and will directly depend on the terms of the ceasefire. Behind the grandiose rhetoric about security guarantees, the reality is becoming increasingly clear: resources are scarce, and those willing to fight for a foreign country are even fewer.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    8 January 2026 13: 44
    Yes, troops will be sent... Odesa is leaving the jurisdiction of "Ukraine" and becoming a Free Porto. To ensure the functioning of the "joint Odesa-French administration," a French expeditionary force is deployed to Odesa...
    The British enter Kyiv under a concluded mutual aid treaty...
    Poles enter Lviv just like that...
    As options...
    1. +1
      8 January 2026 13: 53
      Andrey Khramov
      The British enter Kyiv under a concluded mutual aid treaty...

      Germans and Poles want to register there.
      And the British like the Black Sea coast.
      1. +1
        8 January 2026 14: 00
        The British love not only the Black Sea coast, but also the entire Krasnodar region and the Rostov region to boot. They have plans there like Hitler's, and our task is to make these plans just as "successful."
        1. +1
          8 January 2026 14: 07
          Dear Fyodor Sokolov (Rostov Donych)!

          Yes, they don't hide their plans... We, however, seem to be a little lost in ours...
          1. +2
            8 January 2026 14: 12
            Quote: Andrey Khramov
            Yes, they don't hide their plans... We, however, seem to be a little lost in ours...
            We don't have plans, we have goals, and for now, this is SVO, and those goals will be achieved. And these three have been getting together for six months now and singing the same tune. They have a meeting once a week, where they sniff the powder and agree on where and how to inject something. They're chatterboxes, in a word.
            1. +1
              8 January 2026 14: 19
              Dear topol717 (Eugene)!
              The SVO began with an "analysis" about a "brotherly people" - with bread and salt at the border.
              But the 4th year is still being greeted with bullets, shells, and drones.
              So the people are Nazis...
              Yes, they're still singing... But they might well finish singing...
        2. +3
          8 January 2026 14: 36
          Quote: Fedor Sokolov
          The British love not only the Black Sea coast, but also the entire Krasnodar region and the Rostov region to boot. They have plans there like Hitler's, and our task is to make these plans just as "successful."


          Where does this information come from regarding the Krasnodar Krai and Rostov Oblast?
      2. +1
        8 January 2026 14: 02
        frruc (Vasily)!

        Maybe "these" ones... But, alas, we are powerless to stop them - if they still dare to do such a thing...
        1. +2
          8 January 2026 14: 13
          Quote: Andrey Khramov
          Maybe "these" ones... But, alas, we are powerless to stop them - if they still dare to do such a thing...
          Their troops will be a legitimate target. And Iskanders and Geraniums will fly at them; they know this and that's why they're waiting.
        2. +2
          8 January 2026 14: 29
          Andrey Khramov
          But, alas, we are powerless to stop them - if they still dare to do such a thing...

          Of course, we can't stop them. But they're obligated to warn them once, not to prattle on like parrots every day. Then, we need to take specific actions to ensure our words match our actions.
        3. -1
          8 January 2026 14: 33
          Quote: Andrey Khramov
          frruc (Vasily)!

          Maybe "these" ones... But, alas, we are powerless to stop them - if they still dare to do such a thing...

          We have the strength, but those giving the order lack the spirit.
          1. +2
            8 January 2026 14: 47
            ARIONkrsk
            We have the strength, but those giving the order lack the spirit.

            The authorities are being cautious. Simply waving a club isn't an option either. We'll see, the main thing is to avoid unnecessary and thoughtless moves.
      3. +2
        8 January 2026 14: 14
        They'll come in, receive death blows, and gradually get drawn into the war.
        1. -1
          8 January 2026 14: 35
          Myths
          And gradually they will get involved in the war.

          Why are you writing in the future tense? They're already at war, which they don't deny. But they haven't gotten punched in the face (yet).
    2. +4
      8 January 2026 13: 55
      Quote: Andrey Khramov
      To ensure the functioning of the "joint Odessa-French administration," a French expeditionary force is being sent to Odessa...
      The British enter Kyiv under a concluded mutual assistance treaty...
      Poles enter Lviv just like that...

      I've heard about this somewhere before...
      True, the Germans had entered Kyiv by then, and Bandera hadn't even been heard of yet, but the hetman was already in place. And the British had been in Sevastopol and Odessa much earlier.

      In any case, it will end the same.
      I wonder why they think that right now, and with them, so beautiful, everything should be different?
      1. -1
        8 January 2026 14: 01
        Dear Zoldat_A (Igor, son of Alexey, a Russian soldier)!

        Sevastopol and Crimea are automatically out of the question. Mykolaiv doesn't have the same level of port infrastructure... The Odessa Freeport is outside Ukraine's jurisdiction – it's leaving Russia "for good."
        Quite an elegant combination... ...
        Times are changing - there were Germans - now there will be Englishmen...
        This is just a forecast...
        And how will it end...??...
        In the conditions of the SVO, and not war, nothing catastrophic will end for them...
        There are no fools sitting there either...
        1. 0
          8 January 2026 14: 24
          Quote: Andrey Khramov
          In the conditions of the SVO, not war
          Key clarification.
          The whole country thinks we're at war. My son even says they're at war there...
          And only the Smart Heads of the Big Bosses know that we are not at war at all, but at a military conflict.

          When this cognitive dissonance and confusion with definitions disappears, then, I hope, we will resolve the issue with Porto Franco-Odessa and much more.
          1. 0
            8 January 2026 14: 28
            Dear Zoldat_A (Igor, son of Alexey, a Russian soldier)!

            God bless your son...

            Yes, you are absolutly right.
            But there are nagging doubts that this dissonance in the “heads of the bosses” will end...
            1. +4
              8 January 2026 14: 35
              Quote: Andrey Khramov
              I have doubts that this dissonance in the "heads of the bosses" will end...

              They're gnawing... They've chewed out all the insides...

              Sometimes, in moments of deep "darkness," I want to give up everything, sell the company and go away, like the Lykovs, somewhere where Makar didn't drive his calves, because there are windbreaks, wolves and bears... But my father didn't teach me to show my back to the enemy, and I raised my son that way.
              All that remains is our usual "maybe"... Maybe, even with bosses like these, we'll get through it...
              1. +1
                8 January 2026 14: 45
                Dear Zoldat_A (Igor, son of Alexey, a Russian soldier)!

                Yes, I agree with you...
    3. +2
      8 January 2026 13: 56
      They've been sending them for 4 years, but they only soil their pants and don't send them anywhere.
      1. 0
        8 January 2026 14: 05
        Dear Kull90 (Alexander)!

        Don't underestimate the enemy—they've got a firm grip on Russia. This is their last chance to try to "break us apart." The Americans can do whatever they want—it doesn't enhance their authority.
        4th year, alas, is not a preparation for the storming of Berlin for us either...
        1. +1
          8 January 2026 14: 09
          Overestimating the enemy is undermining self-confidence, the road to defeat
          Take, for example, American films and games: Russians are pelted with hats everywhere, and no one worries about being underestimated.
          and only here everyone writes: don't underestimate
          1. -1
            8 January 2026 14: 13
            Dear Kull90 (Alexander)!

            Why should I watch an American movie? I watched our film with director Shoigu, where he was throwing tank-shaped biathlon hats "up to the brim..."
            And "Timur and his team" in the rear of the tank biathlons stole billions...
            Underestimating the enemy and overestimating your "commanders" is the path to defeat...
            1. +2
              8 January 2026 14: 20
              Well, if the Americans can throw hats at us, then why can't we?
              And how can tank biathlons be used to throw hats at the Americans?
              Timur and his team were caught and are on trial
              overestimating the enemy and underestimating one's own is the path to defeat
              Americans and Europeans say we can't do anything (they underestimate us) and feel great.
    4. +1
      8 January 2026 14: 18
      Yes, troops will be sent...
      [i] [/ i]
      I made a simple calculation:
      1. They want to send 15,000 soldiers.
      2. The area of ​​one grave is 2 sq. m.
      3. 15,000 x 2 = 30,000 sq. m... That's only 3 hectares. Well, about 6 football fields.
      4. Is it really true that in Ukraine or somewhere in Europe there is no free land in cemeteries?!
      I'm sure it will be found!
      1. -2
        8 January 2026 14: 21
        Dear olezenka1 (Oleg)!

        For now, alas, our boys are also dying. May they rest in peace and we bow to the ground for their courage...
        So the calculations must be done in "different directions"...
        1. +1
          8 January 2026 14: 26
          We may suffer losses, but it's not a given that we need to calculate the losses as you suggest, sir. Judging by their, NATO's, expectations, they won't be entering the front-line trenches, meaning our fire on them will be remote—missiles, Geraniums, and maybe something else. So, if I were you, I'd be wary of talking about calculations in both directions.
          1. -2
            8 January 2026 14: 30
            Dear olezenka1 (Oleg)!

            And where did I say anything about "trenches with them"?..
            I mentioned, for example, the option of Odessa being a free port... You might object - why can't THAT happen?
            1. +1
              8 January 2026 14: 40
              I won't object to the Odessa free port for now. )))). Maybe because I don't believe the area around Odessa, Odessa and Mykolaiv, will become something that's not ours, not Russian, and/or neutral. That's why I objected. And you're not falling for their propaganda. Or is this your propaganda? (I'm going to have dinner—it's perfect time for that in Siberia now.)
              1. -1
                8 January 2026 14: 43
                Dear olezenka1 (Oleg)!

                What kind of propaganda is that??
                Just an assessment of the enemy's possible actions...
                Odessa is not Nikolaev-and-Kherson...
  2. 0
    8 January 2026 13: 44
    ...of course, why should the Europeans fight? Barrier detachments are there to keep the guys from running away... just right.
  3. +1
    8 January 2026 13: 49
    France and Britain are discussing sending troops to Ukraine.

    Let them discuss it; various surprises, mostly negative ones, will await them there.
    1. -1
      8 January 2026 13: 59
      Quote: frruc
      France and Britain are discussing sending troops to Ukraine.

      Let them discuss, there will be various surprises waiting for them there., mainly negative.
      We never tire of warning them, but they don't believe us...
      Shsh...
      There are enough rakes for all of them in Ukraine. The main thing is to make sure their foreheads ache for as long as possible this time. If their foreheads remain...
  4. HAM
    +6
    8 January 2026 13: 52
    But they might send them. Considering our lack of reaction to the lawlessness of the West, and the US in particular, it's nothing surprising. They've come to believe in their own infallibility and our weakness, even though we're giving them reasons... We should remain silent, not make excuses for every incident and not bring UAV routers to embassies... it's absurd and ugly.
    First, they'll send quartermasters and sappers, and then combat units... everything repeats itself...
    1. +2
      8 January 2026 13: 57
      They can send it for the 4th year, they look at the lack of reactions, but for some reason they don’t send it
      1. -2
        8 January 2026 14: 13
        Well, four years ago they spent a long time justifying the helmets and radios they supplied, and now they're seizing civilian ships under Russian flags...
        1. +1
          8 January 2026 14: 16
          Something's wrong with your memory: On March 1, 2018, the US Department of Defense announced that the Donald Trump administration had decided to supply Ukraine with 37 Javelin anti-tank guided missile systems (ATGMs) and 210 missiles for them for a total of $47 million, and in 2022, deliveries only began to increase without any justification.
          1. -1
            8 January 2026 16: 14
            Quote: Kull90
            Something's wrong with your memory: On March 1, 2018, the US Department of Defense announced that the Donald Trump administration had decided to supply Ukraine with 37 Javelin anti-tank guided missile systems (ATGMs) and 210 missiles for them for a total of $47 million, and in 2022, deliveries only began to increase without any justification.

            It depends on how they set it up. Free is one thing, but if they sold it, so what? Trading is still possible.
            1. 0
              8 January 2026 17: 27
              Where do the Ukrainians get the money? The supplies were free as part of the support program.
          2. -1
            8 January 2026 16: 52
            Well, yes, I remember well the articles in foreign media where foreign authors anxiously speculated about Russia's reaction to the supply of body armor and the like to Ukrainians. They even made excuses, claiming they weren't lethal.
  5. 0
    8 January 2026 14: 04
    WITHOUT American missile and air cover, this trio will NOT send anyone or anything. For now...
  6. -2
    8 January 2026 14: 12
    Judging by our lack of reaction to everything that's happening, they might even dare send us, beyond just chatter. Another option is to free up ground troops from the rear units to send them to the front lines.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. -2
    8 January 2026 14: 40
    As soon as the war ends, we will start a war.
  9. +2
    8 January 2026 16: 48
    "Macron and the British Prime Minister, along with Zelenskyy, signed a declaration on the deployment of multinational troops in Ukraine [b]after the end of hostilities." The key point of this phrase is "after the end of hostilities." So, no end—no deployment...
  10. 0
    8 January 2026 20: 34
    It is significant that for now, France and Great Britain remain the only countries willing to discuss the direct deployment of troops on Ukrainian territory.

    Don't forget the plastic bags. Putin is tired of saying that priority targets will be. And if after the SVO, then it will be NATO troops in the 404th zone. This is one of the reasons why the SVO began.
    "Here are the billies!" (c) laughing
  11. 0
    10 January 2026 12: 17
    Quote: Andrey Khramov
    Yes, troops will be sent... Odesa is leaving the jurisdiction of "Ukraine" and becoming a Free Porto. To ensure the functioning of the "joint Odesa-French administration," a French expeditionary force is deployed to Odesa...
    The British enter Kyiv under a concluded mutual aid treaty...
    Poles enter Lviv just like that...
    As options...


    I suspect that's exactly what will happen. And the decision to launch the SVO was absolutely correct. And if, as military science dictates, there had been an order to take control of the source of the danger—Kyiv—then we wouldn't have had such a... outcome. And how many casualties could have been avoided. But what we have is what we have.