"Romanov" - we can when we need to

28 771 188
"Romanov" - we can when we need to


The first in decades


Domestic automakers are very reluctant to engage in independent production, and when they do, they often lose. A look at AvtoVAZ's product lineup is enough to understand the technological impasse the company is in. Over the past four years, they've only managed to produce one new model, the Lada Iskra. True, the car is based on the Renault Logan platform, but that's of little consequence—the factory workers had to manufacture and assemble everything from scratch. More or less stable sales were only achieved towards the end of last year.



In terms of technical level, the car doesn't stand out in any way, except that nothing comparable is produced in Europe, the US, Japan, or Korea anymore. The gap with global brands is becoming critical. This is especially evident against the backdrop of the expansion of Chinese companies, ready to flood the Russian market with their consumer goods. Cars from China have many shortcomings, but they have one significant advantage: they are much cheaper than any Russian car. Two, even three times cheaper. If not for draconian customs duties and the greed of sellers, China would have long ago crushed the entire Russian auto industry. Meanwhile, the Lada Vesta costs as much as a well-equipped Chinese business sedan with a couple hundred horsepower engine.

There's reason for hope in the passenger car industry, and it's not tied to the Tolyatti plant. The Atom project is raising awareness. A perfectly acceptable electric car by global standards has entered pre-production production just before the end of 2025. Incidentally, the assembly is being organized at the Moscow-based Moskvich plant, another controversial auto project in modern Russia.

The Atom was developed by Kama JSC with the goal of saturating the market with compact city electric vehicles. Taxi companies are particularly hopeful. The car's localization rate reaches 70%, but it raises a number of questions. First, who will buy a baby electric car for almost four million rubles? Even with government subsidies, the price will be almost three million. A highly questionable price tag for a four-seat hatchback with virtually no trunk. Second, will buyers appreciate the extravagant design with hinged rear doors that don't open if the front ones are slammed?

The very concept of a pure electric car (not a hybrid) raises many questions about its use in Russia's outlying areas. Where can a resident of Omsk or Chelyabinsk find a free charging station, given that there are no more than 20-30 in each city? We wish the creators of the "Atom" project the best of luck, but in any case, the fate of the domestic car will be decided by the market.


And here we have another purely sovereign project from the Romanov company. Like Atom, created by a subsidiary of KamAZ, Romanov JSC is part of the Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern. And the trucks bear the renowned name BAZ (Bryansk Automobile Plant). stories Everything was going well with the vehicle's production development. In 2022, Scania and MAN slammed the door, abandoning a perfectly respectable assembly plant in Shushary (Leningrad Oblast). On December 26, 2025, serial production of the new BAZ civilian truck line began there. The significance of this event is difficult to overstate – this is the first completely new truck production facility in Russia in several decades. They say this is the first time in 50 years that something like this has happened.

Heavy and expensive


Why was a heavy, all-terrain BAZ truck even needed? Don't KamAZ and Ural trucks meet the demand? They don't. The market needed a robust truck with all-wheel drive and fully independent suspension. Roughly speaking, the newly developed BAZ trucks from Shushary are positioned one step below the Minsk-based MZKT trucks and above the heaviest KamAZ trucks. Last October, the truck's developers released an engaging video showing a fully loaded BAZ S31A31 tractor using a rigid hitch towing a train consisting of a similar long-wheelbase truck (loaded to its full weight) and a tractor-trailer. An excavator is mounted on the trailer, and the driver of the second BAZ truck makes matters worse by applying the brakes. The total load on the truck significantly exceeds 100 tons. The hitch moves confidently, demonstrating the high power reserves and efficient cooling system of the Yaroslavl diesel engine. It was a spectacular advertisement, to say the least.










The developers claim there are 50 variants of the BAZ truck.

By the way, why "Romanov"? We're not talking about members of the Russian imperial family, but about the engineer and inventor Ippolit Romanov. Readers probably don't know much about him, but he is considered the inventor of the first Russian electric car. In 1899, Ippolit Vladimirovich unveiled his 750-kilogram "cuckoo," capable of traveling 60 km at speeds of up to 40 km/h on lead batteries. It was a decent little car, but in Russia, it was definitely ahead of its time. It's not entirely clear what electric transport has to do with BAZ (unless Romanov also worked in St. Petersburg), but the company name turned out well. The only problem is that the truck names turned out very Russian—BAZ S31A31, S35A10, S31A00, and so on. Was it difficult to give these powerful vehicles catchy names? Perhaps they could hold a competition among Russians to find the best name.








A little about the technology of the production vehicles. All wheels have independent suspension, with both interwheel and center axle locks. Not many companies in the world make such equipment—the only ones I can remember are the Czech Tatra and the American Oshkosh. The latter were never officially supplied to Russia, and the former, if they ever appear again, will be very expensive and without a warranty.

Incidentally, Romanov JSC built its trucks precisely to counter Tatra. The vehicle was developed for about five years, meaning it was launched even before the special operation began. The primary customers are seen as oil producers, construction workers, and other industrialists forced to work in extremely harsh conditions. The development and launch of a vehicle of this profile aligns perfectly with the development of the Northern Sea Route. This is currently the country's main development route, and enormous resources are being invested in it. However, finding vehicles with the appropriate level of off-road capability and durability is a challenge.

Technically, the BAZ is assembled from the following components: the YaMZ-653 engine and 9-speed transmission from Yaroslavl, the transfer case from Naberezhnye Chelny (ZMT KOM), 12-ton axles of our own design, tires with a centralized inflation system, all electronics from Moscow's Itelma, and a frame-and-panel cabin. The cabin deserves special consideration. Since BAZs will be produced in small batches (plans for 2026 are around 600 vehicles), setting up a stamped production line made no sense. Funding has already exceeded 10 billion rubles, and the project will require approximately 7 billion more by 2027. The frame cabin is constructed on a steel frame, covered with fiberglass on the outside, ABS plastic on the inside, and insulation and sound deadening in between.






Dump truck bodies are manufactured by Becema in Krasnogorsk, Moscow Region.

The technology has already been tested in the Far North and has proven itself to be highly reliable, withstanding temperatures down to -40°C. Credit to the project's creators—they didn't take the easy way out (as many in Russia do) and install a pre-fabricated cabin made in China.

The harsh operating conditions of BAZ trucks require a robust frame. The assembly is manufactured in Belarus and then transported to Shushary. The truck's curb weight is 18 tons, and it can also carry 18 tons. This is far from ideal – most modern trucks carry more in their backs than they weigh. But for the BAZ, this is normal. A significant curb weight is required to maintain a high level of safety, and this is something to be reckoned with. The truck was designed not for highways, but for dirt roads, winter roads, and spring mud. Soon, permafrost will begin to melt throughout the northern part of the country, and this is where Romanov's BAZ trucks will come in very handy. There are reports that the new model has attracted interest in the UAE, which also has some very harsh conditions, not roads at all.

Now for the sad news. The base model costs 16 million rubles. The closest comparable model in the Naberezhnye Chelny lineup, the KamAZ 43118, is two to three times cheaper. Time will tell whether the market will accept such an expensive vehicle. Truck sales in Russia are currently at a severe low, with no signs of a quick recovery. But there is reason for optimism: the first truck of the new class has entered production, meaning all is not yet lost, as some believe.
188 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    10 January 2026 03: 37
    Bon voyage. We know how to make trucks, and buying them abroad is pointless. We need to secure orders; only through mass production can we fine-tune everything and expand the product line.
    1. +18
      10 January 2026 05: 40
      Yes, we seem to be able to... But, apparently, the deciding factor here is price. I recently drove intercity and noticed that almost all the trucks are Chinese-made; bonnet trucks have almost disappeared, and Volvos with Scanias are very rare. The situation in the city is similar: bulk cargo is hauled by Chinese trucks, while KamAZ trucks are mainly used by road workers and state-owned enterprises...
      1. +5
        11 January 2026 00: 41
        It's strange, because I often see KamAZs and Gazelles too. But I haven't seen a Ural in a while.
        In the case of the BAZ and its price, it's all about mass production. As we know, the larger the production, the smaller the unit size.
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 11: 00
          Gazelles occupy a slightly different niche: light-duty carriers. This niche, yes, is full of Gazelles and old Japanese, Chinese, and Korean trucks.
          1. 0
            15 January 2026 16: 38
            It also happens so often that I can't immediately tell if it's a Kamaz or a GAZ. You can't tell them apart from foreign cars by their appearance until I notice the badge. I can't even tell the difference between the latest models, and they've all started to look alike.
        2. +1
          14 January 2026 22: 48
          Quote: John Smith_777
          But I haven't seen Ural for a long time.

          If you live in the city, you shouldn't even see a Ural truck. They're off-road vehicles, after all, and all sorts of emergency vehicles use them. And now it looks like the Ural has joined the army.
    2. -1
      10 January 2026 07: 39
      Quote: Sergey Khoroshov
      Bon voyage. We know how to make trucks, and buying them abroad is pointless. We need to secure orders; only through mass production can we fine-tune everything and expand the product line.

      And if BAZ achieves success, their management could be transferred to Tolyatti to manage Lada.
      1. +16
        10 January 2026 07: 52
        Quote from ARIONkrsk
        And if BAZ achieves success, their management could be transferred to Tolyatti to manage Lada.
        Yes, but why? laughing
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +10
      10 January 2026 08: 39
      Well, we know how to make trucks
      - a very controversial point, almost all of our trucks come from the USSR, moreover, they come from the 60s and 70s, and commercial success was not initially included in their design...
  2. -5
    10 January 2026 03: 44
    Chinese business at the price of Vesta... well, well...
  3. +23
    10 January 2026 04: 05
    Why should AvtoVAZ do anything? Manturov will suck money out of the government, and in the end, that money just goes to waste. It's pretty clear where it ends up. They're supposedly throwing so much money at AvtoVAZ, but the end result is worse cars and skimping on everything. In reality, expenses are lower, but the price is higher. Where's Zin's money? It's mostly in his pocket. Well, just like everywhere else, utility prices keep going up, supposedly for modernization, while the systems keep rusting and deteriorating. Where's the money, Zin? It's the same everywhere.
    1. +5
      10 January 2026 06: 44
      I think until people like Manturov and the entire top management of AvtoVAZ are tried with the death penalty, which is when the moratorium is lifted, nothing will change.
      1. +8
        10 January 2026 07: 41
        Quote from: FoBoss_VM
        I think until people like Manturov and the entire top management of AvtoVAZ are tried with the death penalty, which is when the moratorium is lifted, nothing will change.

        Who can condemn him? His country's top official, on the contrary, promoted him to first deputy prime minister.
    2. +20
      10 January 2026 07: 13
      Why should AvtoVAZ do anything?
      To be fair, what does AvtoVAZ have to do with this if the country lacks entire industries necessary for automotive production? If they did, and AvtoVAZ was churning out Chinese components, the question would be appropriate. But with leaders like our government and a captain like our president, who appointed this entire team and agreed to their course, absolving himself of any responsibility, this is entirely natural.
      1. +7
        10 January 2026 12: 42
        AvtoVAZ, for example. And to be honest, the entire internet is laughing and TV is making fun of one of AvtoVAZ's executives who was giving an interview. They asked if it was possible to install a plug in the rear trunk lock. And he replied, "Why bother? People buy cars." There was another point, and the answer was also, "Why bother? People buy them." It's like that with AvtoVAZ: when the cars don't even make it off the lot, they just stop dead in their tracks.
    3. PN
      +7
      10 January 2026 09: 23
      For AvtoVAZ to start producing modern cars, all it needs is a couple of little things:
      1) a modern machine park, which does not exist in Russia
      2) modern electronics, which are also practically nonexistent in Russia. (There is ITELMA, but that alone is not enough.)
      1. +11
        10 January 2026 09: 42
        This is not enough, we also need the KGB of the USSR, which we don’t have in Russia either...
      2. -1
        10 January 2026 09: 50
        There is a machine park, but the situation with electronics has always been poor.
        1. Alf
          +6
          10 January 2026 22: 47
          Quote: Igor
          Machine tools are available

          Absolutely right—there is. And I still work on it. The CNC machine is a 1B340, the electronics are an NC-33. The whole setup was built in 1982...
          1. 0
            11 January 2026 08: 12
            This means that your company has not been involved in upgrading its machinery at all.
            Apparently, what we have is enough.
            1. Alf
              +2
              11 January 2026 19: 01
              Quote: Igor
              Apparently, what we have is enough.

              You're right. We're short on change—money—for upgrades. And we're short on domestically produced machine tools.
              1. -1
                11 January 2026 19: 03
                If you don't have enough money, then having machines doesn't matter.
                From 2005 to 2015, our neighbors worked almost three shifts - they modernized the CNC.
                1. +2
                  12 January 2026 21: 57
                  What are you talking about? What kind of machine tools do we have? Where in our country do they make stepper motors? I once visited a modern company working for the navy, manufacturing river electric trams for Moscow. They made their own laser cutting machines, but from Chinese components. The brains were also imported, but they wrote their own programs. And yet, a "Made in Russia" label doesn't necessarily mean the components are Russian.
                  1. +1
                    12 January 2026 22: 08
                    I was talking about the machine park...
                    What are you talking about?
                    Do you need stepper ED?
                    No problem at all. How much are you willing to buy per year?
                    Can you handle 50 thousand?
                    1. +1
                      12 January 2026 22: 11
                      What I'm saying is, what kind of machines are made in our country using domestic components? If we have CNC machines, they're made with imported bearings, motors, and controllers. If they're Western-made, spare parts are now hard to come by—they're exorbitantly expensive through Georgia or Kazakhstan. If they're Chinese, the quality can't compare to European ones.
                      1. +1
                        12 January 2026 22: 15
                        What specifically is bothering you?
                        Don't like that people are engaged in the production of machine tools?
                        Or don't you like normal components?
                        As for local specifics, the Ryazan textile and packaging plant has never stopped...
      3. +6
        10 January 2026 10: 04
        For AvtoVAZ to start producing modern cars, all it needs is a couple of little things:
        1) a modern machine park, which does not exist in Russia
        2) modern electronics, which are also practically nonexistent in Russia. (There is ITELMA, but that alone is not enough.)

        It would be good if they at least made the bodies galvanized...
        1. +1
          10 January 2026 14: 02
          Almost all major automakers weld bodies from galvanized steel, and AvtoVAZ is no exception. Galvanizing finished bodies is a relic of the 20th century.
      4. +3
        10 January 2026 10: 42
        Quote: PN
        a modern machine park, which is not available in Russia

        Where did Renault's machine tools go? All the factories still have modern equipment. If they don't have it, they have it in China. Now, a lot of machine tools are coming from China to replace Western ones.
        1. PN
          +3
          10 January 2026 10: 48
          AvtoVAZ doesn't manufacture all its components itself. They assemble body panels, components, and assemblies. Many components come from related manufacturers. AvtoVAZ is essentially an assembly plant. And all suppliers must have a good machine tool inventory. If someone's quality or precision is poor, the customer's complaint is directed at the automaker as a whole, regardless of whether the failed part was manufactured elsewhere.
        2. +1
          11 January 2026 14: 35
          Quote: Panin (Michman)
          Where did Renault's machine park go?

          Renault only promised to establish production in Russia. In reality, instead of modernizing component production at Russian plants, it quietly and gradually replaced them with foreign ones. Consequently, only the assembly line was equipped with "Renault machinery." (Well, and a few other things, like stamping.)
      5. 0
        13 January 2026 22: 41
        At least those that exist were assembled with high quality...
  4. +3
    10 January 2026 04: 45
    I was expecting to see this article from our author with the last name - Romanov))
    But yeah, the platform is interesting, and I especially liked the axle modularity. You can mount any axle anywhere without any modifications. The price is high, but this is essentially specialized equipment, suitable for government projects. The main thing is that the quality matches the price. We're waiting for feedback from users.
    1. +7
      10 January 2026 05: 42
      Quote: NOMADE
      We are waiting for feedback from operators.

      There won't be any reviews! Because there's no need for a machine like that on a construction site! For that price, you could buy at least three KamAZ trucks! And if they get stuck, sending a tractor would be more economical. The only interested operator is the Armed Forces! That's basically what BAZ has been living on its entire existence. I was especially surprised that the frame is made in Belarus!
      1. -20
        10 January 2026 06: 14
        I'm correcting you.
        Currently, the country's name "Belarus" is considered obsolete. "...the name "Belarus" is fully consistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus and UN documents, including the publication "Terminology Bulletin No. 347 / Rev. 1: Names of Countries", which establishes the official names of the Belarusian state: the full form is the Republic of Belarus, the abbreviated form is Belarus. In addition, paragraph 1 of the Law of the Republic of Belarus No. 1085 of September 19, 1991 establishes: the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic shall henceforth be called the "Republic of Belarus", and in abbreviated and compound names - "Belarus". It is established that these names are transliterated into other languages ​​\u200b\u200bin accordance with the Belarusian pronunciation. According to the principle of transliteration, the name "Belarus" is used in English, German, Italian, French, Japanese, Korean and other languages.
        1. +6
          10 January 2026 06: 23
          What are you saying? I didn't even know that! Just kidding. My wife is Belarusian. The editor just kept underlining it in red until I wrote it exactly as I wrote it! So, the complaints are in the wrong place!
          1. -12
            10 January 2026 06: 27
            I'm not complaining. I was just correcting you. And rewriting what others haven't written very clearly... Well, in this case, I don't see anything critical. Many people still write "Holland," even though officially it's the Netherlands. Oh well. I'll repeat myself. I was just correcting you. Have a nice day!
            1. +12
              10 January 2026 06: 35
              Let me tell you, I lived most of my life when this was Belarus! Maybe you remember the song? No complaints, have a nice day!
              1. -9
                10 January 2026 06: 37
                Of course I remember. VIA "Pesnyary"! But that was a different country, which included socialist Belarus. I still live in that country (republic) since Soviet times. Now everything is different. Thanks for the wishes!
                1. -6
                  10 January 2026 08: 03
                  Ha-ha-ha! Cons!
                  Downvoters! Did you even read the comment or just see who posted it and downvote it? So I'll go through your usernames and give you some downvotes. So what?
                  We've come to this. I don't even like VIA "Pesnyary" with their song "Belarus" anymore! These downvotes made my day! How can I not recall the words of satirist Mikhail Zadornov - so stupid!!!
                  Website editors! Please reconsider your "plus" and "minus" policy. This only fuels, to put it mildly, "irritable" people to make certain comments. But there could be actions!
                  1. Alf
                    +7
                    10 January 2026 22: 52
                    Quote: Pasha Novik
                    We've come to this. I don't even like VIA Pesnyary's song "Belarus" anymore!

                    Don't change the subject. It's just that many people are used to calling Belarus "Byelorussia."
                    1. -3
                      11 January 2026 21: 22
                      Don't change the subject. It's just that many people are used to calling Belarus "Byelorussia."

                      So what?
                      Do not replace your usual wet diaper yourself.
                      1. Alf
                        +2
                        11 January 2026 23: 04
                        Quote: Pasha Novik
                        Don't change the subject. It's just that many people are used to calling Belarus "Byelorussia."

                        So what?
                        Do not replace your usual wet diaper yourself.

                        Then don't dare call Russia Russia, its formal name is "Russian Federation".
                        Call Germany Deutschland. And England United Kingdom.
                  2. +8
                    11 January 2026 02: 51
                    When you start calling Germany Deutschland or Alemannia, when you start calling Rome Roma, when you even start calling Istanbul Istanbul, then your complaints about "Belarus" will be justified. But for now, that's it.
                    1. -3
                      11 January 2026 21: 20
                      When you start calling Germany Deutschland or Alemannia, when you start calling Rome Roma, when you even start calling Istanbul Istanbul, then your complaints about "Belarus" will be justified. But for now, that's it.

                      So what?
                      1. +3
                        12 January 2026 04: 44
                        I'm waiting. For now, saying "Belarus" in Russian is correct.
        2. -11
          10 January 2026 07: 14
          Well, that's a minus. What's the point of a minus? Huh? You're the downvoter. What's wrong with the comment? Or is it the internet hate again? There's no such country as "Belarus." There is a country called the Republic of Belarus. And it's an internationally recognized name. What's your downvote, downvoter? Or don't you like the Republic of Belarus? Come out. Show your face! Don't just hide behind the downvotes!
          1. +12
            10 January 2026 07: 38
            Calm down, citizen.
            We've been taught Belarus since childhood. Period.
            And as the saying goes, you can't teach an old dog new dances!
            After all, the independence of a state with its capital in Minsk will not be affected by what a couple of staplers are called! laughing
            1. -17
              10 January 2026 07: 41
              A. The Empire just won't let go. And I thought I was corresponding with a homosapien. Alas. With that, allow me to take my leave. Go on living in your "wet" imperial dreams. That's how easily some personalities are brought to the surface. A few manipulations—and voila!
              1. +11
                10 January 2026 07: 43
                What empire, citizen? What are you talking about?
                Perhaps the Baltic blinders prevent you from seeing the world as it is? laughing
                1. -9
                  10 January 2026 08: 18
                  My God! What are the Balts doing here? What kind of comment is that? More imperial stereotypes, yours personally? I already told you that, unlike you, many of my Russian friends get along well with us and vacation here. Why are you so offended? Is life hard? Is your neighbor's iPhone more expensive? Is your wife prettier?
                  Nothing stops me from living. I live freely in the free, beautiful country of Belarus!
                  Any complaints regarding the country's name should be addressed through diplomatic channels (if you have any). Your comment on the country's name is useless! Incompetent! Relax and enjoy your visit to Belarus. We'll be happy to welcome you!
                  1. +7
                    10 January 2026 08: 20
                    Citizen, why are you talking about the empire?
                    Are you suffering from an inferiority complex? Or are you afraid that your father will demand Vilnius back?
                    laughing
                    1. -7
                      10 January 2026 08: 27
                      Panadol (this is your nickname, so to speak).
                      Aren't you tired of it yourself? Read the original source (my first comment about the country's name). There's not a word of moralizing or anything like that. It's just your imagination that's presenting other people's comments to you this way. I wasn't trying to offend anyone. I simply pointed out the country's name according to generally accepted international conventions.
                      1. +10
                        10 January 2026 08: 33
                        Citizen, I merely explained the position of a portion of the local public. That's all.
                        And you're all into imperialism. iPhones, to boot! What's the point?
                        Let me repeat: you can't teach an old dog new dances! Understood, I hope.
                        And yes, Pluto, for me, is still a planet of the solar system! laughing
                      2. -7
                        10 January 2026 08: 38
                        Have you asked this "part" for their opinion? It might be different from yours. And, mind you, Russia and Belarus have very close ties. So you and your "friends" have no influence on the relationship between the two countries, or, even more trivially, the names of these countries. Please understand—write whatever you want! Personally, I couldn't care less about you or your opinion! You're not changing anything and you're not influencing the relationship between our two countries. Bye-bye! I've wasted so much time already.
                      3. +10
                        10 January 2026 09: 50
                        Citizen, your stubbornness makes me think.
                        Calm down. Drink some water. Take a breath. Count to ten. Then answer. And remember: we're not at a meeting of the UN or any other useless organization in the modern world. No one is disputing what's been written in official documents over the past twenty years (!) laughing
                      4. -6
                        10 January 2026 09: 52
                        No one disputes what has been written in official documents over the last twenty years (!)

                        Well, finally we understand!
                      5. +2
                        11 January 2026 03: 00
                        The ties are close, but our countries are independent of each other. It's in your best interests for no one to try to teach you. But you, too, are required not to try to teach others. That's what independence is.
                        In fact, such little things can have a big impact. For example, Ukraine uses both "na" and "v." Ukrainians are always annoyed when we say "na," and we're annoyed when they try to teach us Russian.
                      6. -1
                        11 January 2026 21: 19
                        Ukrainians are always annoyed when we say "na", and we are annoyed when they try to teach us Russian.

                        So what?
                      7. +2
                        12 January 2026 04: 42
                        No need to irritate each other.
                      8. +1
                        12 January 2026 17: 15
                        And the fact is that Ukrainians also started with this, teaching us the Russian language.
                  2. +3
                    11 January 2026 06: 59
                    My God! Why are the Balts here?
                    They say Estonians call Russia Krivechia, supposedly because the Krivichi were neighbors. And you know what? We couldn't care less! And you have some kind of complexes. laughing
                    1. -4
                      11 January 2026 21: 17
                      They say Estonians call Russia Krivechia, supposedly because the Krivichi were neighbors. And you know what? We couldn't care less!

                      So what?
                      1. +1
                        11 January 2026 22: 00
                        And the situation is completely similar, but for some reason we don't care. And if you're experiencing a similar backache, then you should consult a specialist. Did I explain it clearly enough? Or will you write it again? So what? laughing
              2. +3
                10 January 2026 10: 58
                Quote: Pasha Novik
                A. The Empire just won't let go. And I thought I was corresponding with a homosapien. Alas. With that, allow me to take my leave. Go on living in your "wet" imperial dreams. That's how easily some personalities are brought to the surface. A few manipulations—and voila!

                I think I understand why the unification of Russia and Belarus never happened. They've been talking about it for 30 years, and nothing has happened. It's better to live on bad loans, of course. It's business, nothing personal.
                1. -6
                  10 January 2026 11: 07
                  Judge not, and you will not be judged!
                  Pasha's opinion alone doesn't represent the opinion of all of Belarus. We are grateful for all the help you've given us. But we've also helped you with a lot of things. Let me repeat for you personally (you didn't read the entire thread): "I simply left a comment about what the country is called according to international law." Is that clear? I didn't call for anything, and I don't call for anything. You're doing it, and you're accusing me of accusing me. Such is the tautology.
                  1. +3
                    10 January 2026 11: 21
                    Quote: Pasha Novik
                    Judge not, and you will not be judged!
                    Pasha's opinion alone doesn't represent the opinion of all of Belarus. We are grateful for all the help you've given us. But we've also helped you with a lot of things. Let me repeat for you personally (you didn't read the entire thread): "I simply left a comment about what the country is called according to international law." Is that clear? I didn't call for anything, and I don't call for anything. You're doing it, and you're accusing me of accusing me. Such is the tautology.

                    Who are "you"? One person wrote to you. You've labeled the entire site as imperialists.
                    There are plenty of people here who will foam at the mouth to prove that the right person, ours, should write "in Ukraine" and not "in Ukraine"
                    1. -9
                      10 January 2026 11: 27
                      Apparently, foam, yes, in your area.
                      Walk into a black bar and shout "Niggas!" You'll find both understanding and laughter. It's the same with the name of the country.
                      You don't understand what I'm writing about here. Keep your wet rants to yourself. I didn't post anything extremist here. But you're infuriated by the position of a citizen of the Republic of Belarus. And not in a childish way!
                      I'll say it again: "I simply left a comment about what a country is called according to international law." Period. Don't stir up hostility here. Your comment means nothing. It changes nothing. It doesn't change anything. It's a waste of time. Zero (in your slang).
                      1. +4
                        10 January 2026 11: 31
                        Quote: Pasha Novik
                        Apparently, foam, yes, in your area.
                        Walk into a black bar and shout "Niggas!" You'll find both understanding and laughter. It's the same with the name of the country.
                        You don't understand what I'm writing about here. Keep your wet rants to yourself. I didn't post anything extremist here. But you're infuriated by the position of a citizen of the Republic of Belarus. And not in a childish way!
                        I'll say it again: "I simply left a comment about what a country is called according to international law." Period. Don't stir up hostility here. Your comment means nothing. It changes nothing. It doesn't change anything. It's a waste of time. Zero (in your slang).

                        And then Ostap suffered ....
                      2. -8
                        10 January 2026 11: 34
                        Did you just "pull" a tired line from a movie? Oh, oh. Well done, you! At least you know cinema (and literature)!
                        That's the semantic meaning it has here (the phrase). Just for the sake of it!
                        And unlike you, I don't just downvote. And I don't downvote you either. But I can run through your thread. No problem. No arguments, no problem.
                    2. -8
                      10 January 2026 11: 31
                      With your comment, are you trying to prove to me that the Republic of Belarus is "Belarus"? Look to international law. It has everything. I don't need anything from you. You don't have the expertise to make "diagnoses" at this level. You're just a citizen. Like all of us.
              3. +8
                10 January 2026 18: 01
                Well, I live in what's now the Republic of Belarus, but I was born in the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic. I usually write "Belarus"; after all, that's the country's official name. But I also have no problem with those who call it "Byelorussia" by the old fashioned way. People are used to it, and it doesn't offend me in the least. I'm guilty of similar things myself: Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Holland, and many others. So, please be lenient. Yes, you don't have my fault. You are fellow countrymen, after all.
                1. -8
                  10 January 2026 18: 36
                  Greetings, fellow countryman! I too come from the BSSR.
                  Oh, my! I've already left a comment several times saying, "I simply left a comment about what the country is called according to international law." And then everyone else just went on and on. What does this have to do with me? How long are you going to pick on me? I didn't say anything like that. I simply said what the country is called. Well, for example, let's call "Ivanov" "Ifans." Good morning, Ifan! Will that do?
                  1. +7
                    10 January 2026 19: 19
                    There's a joke in Belarus: "If you get lost in the Belarusian forest, shout 'Belorussia.' And then someone will definitely find you and correct you—'Belarus.'" Many see some hidden pitfalls in the name "Belarus," almost like Russian "pretensions." I studied and served in Russia during Soviet times. And I can say it's simply a habit from Soviet times. And not just Russians. For example, in Latvia, Belarus is still called "Baltkrievija." And in Lithuania: "Baltarusija." Balt means "white" in Latvian. I even saw this name for our country at an official football match. And finally, we're on a Russian court, so everything is forgivable. Everyone here is our own.
                    1. -6
                      10 January 2026 19: 22
                      I completely agree! I simply pointed out the name of our country! What's my sin? I'm being accused of not even pointing it out or responding. Well, read all the comments. Really! Come to your senses already! I'm not saying this to you personally.
                      1. 0
                        19 January 2026 15: 04
                        Your fault lies in the inappropriate, in a friendly environment, harping on about the same thing over and over again.
                        Strong people are generous.
                        You are being petty.
                    2. -2
                      10 January 2026 19: 33
                      Is this an example about Latvia, or did you live there? I'm just curious. My father was a navigator on a coastal merchant vessel. He was constantly traveling abroad. He left Riga in 1991, after the well-known events. I visited him several times. The Čiekurkalns area. 1st line (there were also 2nd line and transverse lines).
                      1. -3
                        10 January 2026 20: 31
                        And what is the meaning of the minus to my answer, huh, "minusator"?
                      2. +1
                        10 January 2026 20: 45
                        Don't worry about it, there are "sectarians" here, you've probably heard of "teachers" on the roads, and there are some here too...
                      3. -1
                        11 January 2026 21: 31
                        Don't worry about it, there are "sectarians" here, you've probably heard of "teachers" on the roads, and there are some here too...

                        So what? What does this give in the end?
                      4. +3
                        10 January 2026 22: 28
                        I served there, in Liepaja, back in the Soviet era. I still remember Latvia with warmth. I even considered Riga one of the most beautiful cities in the USSR. Unfortunately, a lot was destroyed there, including the Latvian Shipping Company.
                      5. +1
                        11 January 2026 21: 29
                        I respect the people who served in those times.
                        He himself served in the Airborne Forces (self-propelled artillery).
                        Yes. There was such a topic. My father also talked about this about the shipping company.
                        I was just passing through Liepaja. But I liked the city! As did other cities in Latvia.
                        I still have a half-sister living in Jelgava. It's a shame we don't keep in touch.
                  2. +1
                    19 January 2026 15: 01
                    Well, I read and I am surprised.
                    Well, I, 1952. I spoke about Belarus and I still speak about it.
                    What's offensive? The old name isn't a swear word.
                    And so he persisted and persisted... Let go of the topic...
                    If we follow your logic, then what should I call Tallinn now, so that God forbid the natives don’t get offended.
                    Tallinn? You can't even pronounce it in Russian.
                    It seems to me that you are overwhelmed by jingoistic patriotism.
                    We don't correct anyone in Belarus.
                    Not offensive and good.
                    Why are all exes so sensitive?
                    I think it's because you haven't yet gotten over your younger brother mentality. You demand I pronounce every letter.
                    Relax, you're over-cautious, it's obvious.
                    Nobody offended Belarusians.
                    The wave was created out of nowhere.
              4. +6
                11 January 2026 15: 14
                Quote: Pasha Novik
                A. The Empire just won't let go.

                Imperial pretensions are demanding that citizens of another country refer to their country by the laws of that country, which apply only within its territory. And then getting offended if they twist their fingers at their temples and continue to call that country by their usual name.
                The people of Deutschland don't seem to have any complexes about Allemannia and Germania. And neither do the Japanese, Chinese, Dutch, and others.
                1. -4
                  11 January 2026 21: 13
                  Imperial pretensions are demanding that citizens of another country refer to their country by the laws of that country, which apply only within its territory. And then getting offended if they twist their fingers at their temples and continue to call that country by their usual name.
                  The people of Deutschland don't seem to have any complexes about Allemannia and Germania. And neither do the Japanese, Chinese, Dutch, and others.

                  So what?
                  1. +3
                    11 January 2026 21: 34
                    Quote: Pasha Novik
                    So what?

                    It's okay. Transliterate your country's name into other languages ​​to make it sound Belarusian as much as you like—that's your right. Just don't correct others.
                    Quote: Pasha Novik
                    I'm correcting you.
                    Currently, the name of the country "Belarus" is considered obsolete "...the name "Belarus" is fully consistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus and UN documents, including the publication "Terminology Bulletin No. 347 / Rev. 1: Names of Countries", which establishes the official names of the Belarusian state: the full form is the Republic of Belarus, the abbreviated form is Belarus.

                    We will decide for ourselves which name is correct.
                    And some people have already taught us that according to Ukrainian laws, Russians should say “in Ukraine.” laughing
                2. 0
                  19 January 2026 15: 07
                  I wrote it accurately. But I'm afraid he won't understand. He replies to all such questions: "So what?"
                  Those citizens care about the process, not the meaning.
              5. 0
                16 January 2026 11: 57
                This is called nationalism, cultivated to such a level that one can pick on people for mispronunciation, but lacks the courage to further advance one's "valuable" worldview by joining a nationalist battalion fighting for the whole. A latent Nazi, in short.
        3. +11
          10 January 2026 07: 18
          Why do you spell "Maskva" with an "a"? What laws does this follow? Yours? And according to ours, we spell "Belarus." Any questions?
          1. -10
            10 January 2026 07: 25
            Am I writing? You've got something mixed up! Perhaps that's how some Belarusians write. But there is a Belarusian language. There, yes, it's called "Maskva." In English, it's called "Moskau." But when communicating in the language of my opponent, I try to adhere to their language as much as possible.
            Did I understand you correctly that you're writing "Belarus" in retaliation for the spelling of "Moscow"? Well, based on your comment.
            Actually, the comment was about the country's international name. Well, no one writes "Rossisiya"! And you blame it all on "bazaar"!
            1. +10
              10 January 2026 07: 34
              The international name for China is "China," and the Chinese themselves call their country something else entirely. There's no need to force anyone here to dictate what we call our country. No one in Russia would even think of forcing, for example, the Anglo-Saxons to call our country by its full name, the Russian Federation, instead of their Russia. Only proud natives on the outskirts are trying to foist their new names on everyone.
              1. -9
                10 January 2026 07: 38
                Quiet, quiet. Why are you so sensitive about everything? I was simply responding to a comment. That's all. Don't get so worked up. No one is insulting anyone, and no one is dictating anything to anyone.
                1. +9
                  10 January 2026 07: 47
                  I'm already fed up with having to lecture smart guys on what and how to call us every time...
                  1. -8
                    10 January 2026 07: 56
                    Who are we talking about? Are you speaking for all of Russia now, in your own name?
                    I have many Russian friends who respect the country where I live. They enjoy visiting us, vacationing, and socializing. And they don't have the same attitude toward my country as you do. And, to your surprise (or anger), they also call my country Belarus!
                    Your opinion has no impact or significance. Belarus will remain as it is! Regardless of your comment! Period! And treaties between Russia and Belarus are signed by the Republic as Belarus.
                    It would be better to write your angry comments to the UN while it (the organization) still exists.
                  2. -9
                    10 January 2026 08: 46
                    By the way, the downsides aren't mine. I'm for dialogue, not this "electronic hostility" system.
                    1. +9
                      10 January 2026 10: 05
                      Pasha, why are you so upset over nothing? What's got you so worked up? That someone, out of habit, called your country the way he's called it for years? Did that somehow humiliate you or your country? Why did you start this squabble this morning?
                      I hope the moderators will hush up this squabble.
                      1. -8
                        10 January 2026 10: 26
                        Am I overreacting? Don't get me wrong! I didn't comment on my comment about the country's name. Some guy just decided to impress everyone with his arrogance and started flaunting his arrogance, claiming I live in Russia and can do and write (speak, etc.) however I want. Read this guy.
                        And yes. Tone it down. I'm not raising it. I'll repeat it again for those who can't see or read – I don't care how you spell my country! I simply left a comment about its legal name! For those who don't understand, like you, I'm writing this! What else do you need to understand?
                      2. -6
                        10 January 2026 10: 29
                        I hope the moderators will hush up this squabble.

                        I hope so too! Best regards. Have a nice day!
                    2. +4
                      11 January 2026 09: 19
                      Pasha, you're not for dialogue, you're a provocateur. Why are you teaching people Russian on a Russian website, even though you don't consider yourself Russian? In Russian, it's Belarus, in Belarusian, it's Belarus. Go to German websites and prove you're Belarus, not Weißrussland.
                      1. -2
                        11 January 2026 21: 15
                        In Russian, it's Belarus, in Belarusian, it's Belarus. Go to German websites and prove you're Belarus, not Weißrussland.

                        So what?
                      2. +3
                        11 January 2026 21: 38
                        Quote: Pasha Novik
                        So what?

                        Well, you went on all the German forums and posted there that "Weißrussland" is an outdated name, didn't you? Or do you have such a personal dislike for the word "Belarus" that you've spammed half the thread, correcting citizens of another country. laughing

                        For three days I chased you—yes!—to tell you how indifferent I am to you! You have hurt me so much that I will still take revenge on you. I will prove to you that I am indifferent to you.
                      3. -5
                        11 January 2026 21: 47
                        Are you really that bad? What "all German forums"? So you've already checked in on all the Israeli and American forums!
                        Go ahead, name the countries however you want! I couldn't care less! You're a zero in international politics and have no say in anything. Stop hyping this up! Aren't you tired of it?
                      4. 0
                        13 January 2026 21: 03
                        Since you don't care, you've already written 100500 comments full of malice))))
          2. -10
            10 January 2026 07: 34
            And yes. Let's go back to the original source.
            My response to the comment was simply for informational purposes: according to international law, the name of the former "Belorussia" is the Republic of Belarus. What claims do you have against international law?
            Feel free to write whatever you want on this site. It's not my problem anymore, it's the admins'. I've given a to-the-point answer.
        4. +11
          10 January 2026 09: 45
          Quote: Pasha Novik
          Currently, the name of the country "Belarus" is considered obsolete "...the name "Belarus" is fully consistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus and UN documents, including the publication "Terminology Bulletin No. 347 / Rev. 1: Names of Countries", which establishes the official names of the Belarusian state: the full form is the Republic of Belarus, the abbreviated form is Belarus

          You have subtly mixed up different things - the self-designation of a sovereign state and its designation in other languages
          Yes, in Belarus itself the country is called the Republic of Belarus, and this is confirmed by the country's Constitution.
          But we, as it were, live in a different country, what does the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus have to do with us?
          To make this clearer, I will give you a few examples:
          Georgia (in Russian) - Sakartvelo (საქართველო, self-designation, Georgian language)
          Armenia (in Russian) - Hayastan (Հայաստան, self-name, Armenian language)
          Germany (in Russian) - Deutschland (self-designation, German language)
          Do we use these names in Russian?
          Of course not, we have historically established, established names - Georgia, Armenia, Germany, etc.
          Why did this rule suddenly stop working with Belarus?
          1. -12
            10 January 2026 09: 47
            And it's not a "self-designation." It's the accepted name of the country internationally!
            Vyacheslav! Write as you wish! I'm not insisting or forcing anyone to do anything. But thanks for the overview of country names! Interesting.
            1. +2
              11 January 2026 15: 16
              Quote: Pasha Novik
              And it's not a "self-designation." It's the accepted name of the country internationally!

              Adopted by whom? By Belarusian law? Well, let the citizens of Belarus call their country by the name their laws allow. What do Belarusian laws have to do with us?
              Or are you one of those imperialists who believe that the whole world should follow their laws?
              1. -4
                11 January 2026 21: 11
                Well, let the citizens of Belarus call their country as it is accepted by their laws.

                So what?
        5. +2
          11 January 2026 09: 04
          The Germans call their country Deutschland, the Finns Suomi, the Chinese Zhongguo—and so do all the other countries. And no one cares what they're called in Russia. And we don't particularly care what other countries call us either. In Germany, for example, we're Russland, in China, Éluósī. But the Belarusians, they're going to have to get involved and tell everyone what they've named themselves this time in their constitution. Change your names ten times a day, and what difference does it make to us? Do you have some kind of inferiority complex? Or do you feel inferior about it?
          1. -6
            11 January 2026 21: 17
            But the Belarusians, if they're going to survive, need to get involved and tell everyone what they've called themselves this time in their constitution.

            So what?
            1. +2
              13 January 2026 08: 16
              So what?

              When you lack arguments, you constantly respond with one question: "So what?" - as a result, this is an avoidance of dialogue, or, as noted above, the action of a provocateur.
              Judging by the generally benevolent comments towards Belarus, you personally are clearly not focused on uniting the two fraternal peoples, constantly contrasting them, deliberately adding provocative words to your comments (imperial ambitions, independence, in our country), clearly playing on the confrontation under the guise of a "good lamb" who is being offended (the classic position of the victim), the younger brother came running to his mother to complain about the older one.
              In general, you don't behave like a man, but like...
            2. +1
              13 January 2026 21: 07
              And then, you're either a paid troll provocateur, or... the second option, which we won't say, but everyone will understand)))) The conclusions are obvious)))
        6. +3
          11 January 2026 12: 37
          Quote: Pasha Novik
          The Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic shall henceforth be called the “Republic of Belarus,” and in its abbreviated and compound names, “Belarus.”

          What are you so happy about, and why are you promoting this? This is one of the steps toward distancing ourselves from our shared history. These are the steps that lead to the same results as in Ukraine. It's good that Belarus is in no hurry to follow this path.
          1. -5
            11 January 2026 21: 14
            These are the steps that get you closer to the result.

            So what?
        7. +4
          11 January 2026 21: 42
          Belarus is Russian for "Belarus." It's similar to Ukraine.
          1. -5
            11 January 2026 21: 48
            Belarus is Russian for "Belarus." It's similar to Ukraine.

            So what?
      2. PN
        +3
        10 January 2026 09: 29
        It depends on what kind of construction we are talking about.
        This machine isn't for the city. It's akin to a quarry truck, and it would definitely find use on a construction site. But not in the city, but in the countryside. It would find use among geologists, in oil and gas field development, road construction, and new plant construction—in general, where the carrying capacity of a KamAZ or Ural truck isn't sufficient.
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 03: 50
          Quote: PN
          It depends on what kind of construction we are talking about.
          This machine isn't for the city. It's akin to a quarry truck, and it would definitely find use on a construction site. But not in the city, but in the countryside. It would find use among geologists, in oil and gas field development, road construction, and new plant construction—in general, where the carrying capacity of a KamAZ or Ural truck isn't sufficient.

          I won't argue! Especially since I've already received a second warning for my comment!
      3. -1
        13 January 2026 22: 43
        This is specialized equipment for special conditions, where KamAZ trucks don't meet the requirements.
    2. -1
      10 January 2026 09: 55
      So, can a rear non-steering axle be installed instead of a front steering axle?
      1. +4
        10 January 2026 14: 25
        Yes, they're all modular and swivel. It's just that the rear axle's swivel mechanism is muted. Incidentally, at BASE they said they could optionally make the rear axle swivel, too.
        1. +1
          10 January 2026 15: 27
          Then the price of 2 thousand dollars is understandable.
    3. -1
      10 January 2026 10: 49
      Quote: NOMADE
      The price is high, but this is essentially specialized equipment and will be suitable for government projects.

      The state has a lot of money.
  5. +2
    10 January 2026 05: 26
    The market needed a robust truck with all-wheel drive and fully independent suspension.


    There aren't many companies in the world that make similar equipment – ​​only the Czech Tatra and the American Oshkosh are known to exist.

    The journalist confused a BAZ-135 with independent suspension with this truck with rigid axles. I only remember a Tatra with a backbone frame. Take a closer look at the frame photo in the stats section. Incidentally, in 2023, there was an article by this author with the same error.
    1. +1
      10 January 2026 05: 57
      Quote: Konnick
      I only remember a Tatra with a backbone frame.

      For some reason, I remember it as a tubular frame. Actually, you could say it was a tractor version. And in our area, we still have a Tatra dump truck! I can't say for sure about the model, but it's impossible to be mistaken, especially the axles.
    2. +2
      10 January 2026 14: 01
      The journalist confused the BAZ-135 with independent suspension with this truck with rigid axles. I only remember the Tatra with a backbone frame.

      No one promised a backbone frame, but independent suspension, not rigid axles, can be easily found on the manufacturer's website.
      1. +1
        10 January 2026 14: 27
        Quote: Maxim Davydov
        can be easily found on the manufacturer's website.

        You can check out the link. The photo shows a frame without brackets for independent suspension. For independent suspension on such a vehicle, only a trunk-type backbone frame like the Tatra's can be used; otherwise, the width would have to be the same as the ZIL-135's. It has a torsion bar with two parallel levers. The Tatra has swinging halfshafts in a housing on a longitudinal torsion bar.
  6. +7
    10 January 2026 06: 09
    The very concept of a pure electric car (not a hybrid) raises many questions about its use in Russia's outlying areas. Where can someone from Omsk or Chelyabinsk find a free charging station?
    In America, pure electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids are mostly purchased by people living in private homes, those who can install a charging station in their home, guarantee parking nearby, and charge inexpensively overnight. Those who live in apartments only face the inconvenience of charging at commercial stations, and it doesn't offer much savings compared to gasoline, because the charging station owners have jacked up the prices. So, having had their fill of the "convenience" of charging, these people are ditching their electric vehicles and returning to gasoline.
  7. 0
    10 January 2026 06: 41
    It's certainly nice to read something like this when the car isn't from a Chinese kit or was made here. With mass production, the price tag should be lower; the main thing is to ensure demand.
  8. +2
    10 January 2026 07: 05
    Regarding electric cars in Russia, they're primarily used for summer and mid-season driving, due to the freezing winter temperatures. The battery doesn't like the cold. It's suitable for those who primarily drive in the summer, such as retirees going to their dachas. Charging is another issue. Besides charging stations, it's crucial to design an electric car that allows for easy battery removal and bringing it home for charging. In reality, electric cars are two to three times cheaper than gasoline cars. So, for certain categories of people, electric cars are suitable.
    The BAZ is three times more expensive than the KAMAZ, even though their performance characteristics are comparable. This suggests that the BAZ is overpriced for various reasons. hi
    1. +3
      10 January 2026 07: 43
      Quote: V.
      Here's about electric cars in Russia

      The reason they're making it (and advertising it here) is because it's not going anywhere. Firstly, it's easier to write off money for a project that's already doomed, and secondly, the Western automobile lobby... well, it's like with airplanes. It's depressing...
    2. +8
      10 January 2026 08: 24
      Quote: V.
      In addition to charging stations, create an electric vehicle design that allows for easy battery removal so you can bring it home to charge.

      You probably can't imagine the weight of an electric car's battery. I don't think you'll enjoy lugging a 300-500 kg, awkwardly handled battery into your apartment at least a couple of times a week. lol
    3. +3
      10 January 2026 11: 44
      Quote: V.
      with a convenient battery removal for taking it home for charging.

      Electric vehicle battery weight varies greatly, but typically ranges from 300 to 600 kg, sometimes reaching thousands of kilograms. This depends on the capacity (kWh) and the chemistry used (for example, ternary lithium-ion is lighter than lithium iron phosphate). For example, a Tesla Model S weighs around 540 kg, while a Nissan Leaf weighs approximately 300-360 kg.
    4. Alf
      -1
      10 January 2026 22: 59
      Quote: V.
      In reality, an electric car costs two to three times less than a gasoline car.

      Judging by Atom?
      1. 0
        11 January 2026 06: 41
        This is if the price is calculated using a proper formula, including cost price and a proper margin, rather than by jacking up the price according to a method called "we'll lower the price a little while they keep charging." This applies to any product now.
    5. -1
      11 January 2026 07: 04
      Regarding electric cars in Russia, they're strictly summer and mid-season vehicles due to the freezing winter temperatures. The battery doesn't like the cold.
      I should probably ask the couriers; their electric bikes are practically flying through the snowdrifts. I was walking on Friday morning and they were pushing their shahids by hand, the wheels wouldn't lock. winked
      1. 0
        14 January 2026 10: 30
        н
        You should ask the couriers, their electric bicycles fly right through the snowdrifts.

        So, there's a battery there - they remove it and charge it.
        but you can't remove it from the car...
        Remember the "water-oil heaters" in the USSR Ministry of Defense vehicle fleets?
        all according to the "Instructions for the Motor and Tractor Service".
  9. +2
    10 January 2026 07: 42
    Catching up with the Western auto industry in one leap is unrealistic. It would be outrageously expensive and, of course, bad. The Chinese, by the way, with their incomparably better management, genuine (non-kickback) state support, and their unabashed stealing from the West everything they needed (consider the Chinese, whom the state protected, and our GAZ, which our state mercilessly trampled to please the Westerners), took several steps before reaching their current level. And here...
    And here at the Likhachev Plant Museum, we have an engine unlike any other in the world. It's the result of over 30 years of work by brilliant developers. And we still have engineers left. Despite everything engineers have been treated to over the past thirty years. So, we could develop something completely from scratch. A car, for sure, and it will be completely different from Western models, but it will be good. Remember the last model they made for the Moskvich?
    Ah, I'm daydreaming again...
  10. +8
    10 January 2026 08: 21
    You can talk for a long time about the advantages, innovations, lack of analogy, and... kill it all with an absurd price!!!
    1. Alf
      +3
      10 January 2026 23: 03
      Quote: Rooivalk
      kill all this at an absurd price!!!

      It's not so much the plant's fault here as the state's. A single interest rate can do a lot... But the rate in China. For strategically important industries, the rate is 0,5%...
  11. +4
    10 January 2026 08: 29
    In fact.
    I don't believe this will be widely adopted. Why would we, a country with colossal hydrocarbon reserves, need electric trains?
    As for the domestic auto industry, no one in power has ever set a goal of saturating the country with cars. The government doesn't need that. What's needed is a system for feeding the right people at the expense of the budget. Hence the howling about the low birth rate. About the too-low retirement age. And so on, and so on, and so on...
  12. -1
    10 January 2026 08: 36
    Well, well. The price tag is outrageous. It probably drinks fuel like crazy because of its power. I'll never see them again in my life.
    And if I ever see it, it’s a sure sign that I’m doing something wrong, and I need to get out of this area immediately.
  13. 0
    10 January 2026 08: 57
    We must give credit to the project's creators – they didn't take the path of least resistance (as many in Russia do) and didn't install a ready-made cabin made in China.
    The cabin looks cramped.
    1. -1
      10 January 2026 13: 13
      acetophenonThe cabin looks cramped.

      They have several cabin options, apparently five, including a two-berth option. These vehicles are designed for heavy-duty use; the niche isn't widespread, but it's necessary. Maybe not for the armed forces, as they could also be used as a crane platform, etc. We have many projects: the Alaska tunnel, the second line of the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM), high-speed rail to Kazan, Yekaterinburg, and new cities in Siberia... 😀 The platform with the finished equipment is still idle and needs to be maintained.
      1. 0
        10 January 2026 20: 02
        Yes... Manilov projects...
  14. Owl
    +1
    10 January 2026 09: 13
    I wish BAZ good luck. Prices only come down with mass production, but with consumers currently strapped for cash and the market overrun with cheap, mass-produced Chinese cars, expecting increased demand for a fairly expensive car from a private seller is pointless.
  15. -1
    10 January 2026 09: 32
    It's been a long time since I've seen such blatant display as in the first photo.
    They dumped the empty frame, engine, suspension parts...
    1. +2
      11 January 2026 21: 45
      Is that even true? knife Show-off? Now that's show-off:


      Everything about this scene is remarkable. The worker tightening the nut with a wrench a couple of sizes too big. The cameraman, for some reason giving a close-up of this action. And the editor who released this report. laughing
      1. 0
        11 January 2026 21: 50
        Birds of a feather...no better and no worse
      2. 0
        14 January 2026 10: 26
        And the cameraman, for some reason giving a close-up of this action. And the editor who released this report.

        So, "parrots on a branch" don't care: to drag something round or to roll something square...
  16. 0
    10 January 2026 09: 37
    Why does everything focus on price? If there are no alternatives and the equipment is desperately needed, especially if it's not for mass production, then effort and money must be invested in it. I'm very pleased that we were able to achieve this. We have the technology, we have the engineers, we have the factories.
    1. 0
      10 January 2026 09: 46
      Because everything in the world has its price.
    2. +5
      10 January 2026 10: 41
      Quote: Vadim S
      Why do we always focus on price?

      Because transporting cargo on a cart worth 50 million and on a used cart worth 4 million are two very different profit margins. (Prices are based on the ceiling)

      Quote: Vadim S
      If there are no analogues and the equipment is really needed, especially if it is not for mass consumption, then effort and money must be invested in it.

      Yes, but if in the end no one can really buy it, then it will either be forced (what kind of economics are we talking about here, when even used ones are expensive), or a failure.
      Price is important.
      1. +1
        14 January 2026 10: 22
        Because transporting a load on a cart worth 50 million and on a used cart worth 4 million are two big differences profitability.

        This is a dirty word: if you start asking questions about economic efficiency here, it will be a total disaster.
        1. +2
          14 January 2026 10: 47
          Quote: Dedok
          it's a swear word

          I confess, he is quite the swearer. wassat
    3. +1
      14 January 2026 10: 24
      Why do we always focus on price?If there are no analogues and the equipment is needed,

      So THIS price will be included in the costs of the product being created, and then the consumer will pay for it... and with a profitability of not even 3%...
      It is the price that is destroying us - we do not strive to produce, but rather strive to earn...
  17. +1
    10 January 2026 09: 58
    Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I see a KamAZ truck priced at 9 million with a 12-ton payload capacity, with the old cab and axles. And in the article, a new 18-ton truck starts at 16 million. It's not cheap, but I don't see anything like "the closest in performance from the Naberezhnye Chelny line, the KamAZ 43118, is two to three times cheaper." It would be great to see a more accurate price-quality comparison.
    1. +4
      10 January 2026 14: 54
      Flatbed truck KAMAZ 43118-6012-48(A5), load capacity 11,8 t, found for 9,239,548.00 RUB.
      So it definitely won't be two or three times cheaper.
    2. 0
      10 January 2026 20: 04
      I wonder how much a Tatra 815 costs now...
  18. +1
    10 January 2026 10: 22
    Domestic automakers are very reluctant to engage in sovereign production, and if they do, they often lose.

    Well, the economy must also predispose to this.
  19. +7
    10 January 2026 10: 31
    The Atom was developed by Kama JSC... ...but there are a number of questions. The first is who will buy this little electric vehicle? for almost four million rubles?

    There's a similar car in China that's breaking sales records: the Geely Geome Xingyuan. It's significantly more equipped and more interesting than the Atom. It has a modern battery, which isn't produced in Russia. Its price in China starts at 715,000 rubles, and around 900,000 for the top-of-the-line trim. In Belarus, a similar car sells for 1,300,000 Russian rubles.
    For comparison.
  20. +3
    10 January 2026 10: 38
    Prototypes always could.
    Thousands of chic.
    But on a massive scale...
  21. -2
    10 January 2026 10: 52
    We'll see how the machine performs in operation, but in any case, having your own is always good, and any equipment has its teething problems.
  22. +3
    10 January 2026 11: 46
    Quote: Pasha Novik
    My God! What are the Balts doing here? What kind of comment is that? More imperial stereotypes, yours personally? I already told you that, unlike you, many of my Russian friends get along well with us and vacation here. Why are you so offended? Is life hard? Is your neighbor's iPhone more expensive? Is your wife prettier?
    Nothing stops me from living. I live freely in the free, beautiful country of Belarus!
    Any complaints regarding the country's name should be addressed through diplomatic channels (if you have any). Your comment on the country's name is useless! Incompetent! Relax and enjoy your visit to Belarus. We'll be happy to welcome you!

    How boring you are when you are stung in your petty, local pride!
    One can argue endlessly about freedom and independence, but it's boring. It's far funnier and more revealing to compare the independent president of Madurai to a valley than to mutilate the Russian language in favor of the local name of Kyzylorda.
  23. +1
    10 January 2026 13: 13
    I look at our auto industry and am surprised.
    Well, let's not talk about sad things about our cars.
    But let's move up a deck to the next cargo category - light trucks/minibuses.
    The Gazelle, its clones, and descendants rule the roads here. Among imported vehicles, I often see Ivecos and Hyundais—I think they came from South Korea. I'd estimate that 15% or so are imported, and I haven't heard any cries in the press about protectionism, draconian tariffs, and so on. So, we can? Maybe we should just scrap our entire domestic passenger car industry and start over? There's nowhere further to fall now. (And don't count anyone who's already involved in the auto industry!)
    1. +3
      10 January 2026 14: 17
      In my opinion, the issue isn't the auto industry, but the economic model. And our valiant government doesn't want to fight it, because those in power are the very product of this economic model, and what's the most important thing about it? The most important thing isn't producing, but making money...
    2. +2
      10 January 2026 15: 50
      Even in the USSR, this niche wasn't fully filled. RAF, Eraz, many imports from the GDR, etc.
      1. +4
        10 January 2026 16: 46
        a lot of imports from the GDR
        - You're probably confusing them with the Polish mikrats Zhuki and Nisy...
        1. +1
          10 January 2026 20: 02
          There were some from the GDR, IFA W50, Robur LO 2002, Multicar M25.
          1. +1
            10 January 2026 20: 27
            Well, only the Multikar fits into the RAF and ErAZ category, while the IFA and Robur aren't light trucks, but the Czech Avia A21 vans do...
            1. Alf
              0
              10 January 2026 23: 12
              Quote: faiver
              Well, only Multikar falls into the RAF and ErAZ category.

              And these Zuki...
      2. Alf
        +1
        10 January 2026 23: 08
        Quote: Alex013
        And even in the USSR, this niche wasn't completely filled. RAF, ERAZ

        This is like the whole USSR.
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 12: 31
          That's what I wrote about. They existed, but the niche was filled by cars from Poland, East Germany, and the Czech Republic...
          1. Alf
            +1
            11 January 2026 19: 00
            Quote: Alex013
            I wrote about this.

            I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
    3. Alf
      +1
      10 January 2026 23: 07
      Quote: Not the fighter
      However, those who are already connected to the automotive industry should not be taken!

      Who will allow you to do this? In this industry, there will be no outsiders by definition.
  24. +5
    10 January 2026 15: 15
    "Romanov" - we can when we need to

    What a pretentious title for this article. But if we face the truth and summarize what's written in the article, it turns out that, unfortunately, we can't. Even when we really need to.
  25. +4
    10 January 2026 15: 44
    The YaMZ 653 is a copy of the Renault dCi11, which appeared back in 1996. The Chinese company Dongfeng also produces licensed Renault dCi11 units, using a full production cycle.
    1. +2
      10 January 2026 21: 16
      The Ural is also produced with this engine. It's strange that its output is 410 hp, while the BAZ is said to be lower.
  26. 0
    10 January 2026 17: 02
    Serial production has just begun.
    It's not a fact that this base will "take off".

    AvtoVAZ, KamAZ, UAZ, and GAZ have already tried, repeatedly, to produce cars using domestic components. The results are disappointing. The production culture at factories far outside the Moscow Ring Road is simply catastrophic. Suppliers send products of substandard quality.

    It is cheaper and better to order from China.

    But I wish Almaz-Antey only success.
  27. +3
    10 January 2026 18: 33
    According to people who deal with trucks, you can assemble one from three KAMAZ trucks produced in different years, but you'll never assemble one from three Chinese trucks. Such are the realities of our time. And they hired Chinese trucks out of desperation. KAMAZ doesn't have the required line of trucks. So, people are waiting for this truck. And time will tell how it performs.
  28. +4
    10 January 2026 19: 04
    If we speak conditionally, then the newly-made BAZs from Shusharov - There is a problem with the declension of the name of this district on the outskirts of St. Petersburg.
    Not from Shushary, but from Shushar.
    Declension of the name of the settlement "Shushary" by case:
    Nominative case (Who? What?) - "Shushary".
    The genitive case (of Whom? What?) is "Shushar".
    Dative case (To whom? To what?) — "Shusharam".
    Accusative case (Who? What?) - "Shushary".
    Instrumental case (By whom? By what?) - "Shushary".
    Prepositional case (About whom? About what?) - "Shushary".

    The name "Shushary" comes from the Finnish word "Suosaari", which means "island among the swamps".
    According to one theory, though not supported by any credible evidence, the name of the rat Shushara from Alexei Tolstoy's fairy tale "Buratino" is connected to the village of Shushary. In the 1920s, after returning from exile, Tolstoy settled in Detskoye (then former Tsarskoye) Selo, from where he traveled to Leningrad on literary and public business. At the railroad crossing near Shushary station, Tolstoy often had to stop and wait for the barrier to be raised. It was here, at the barrier, that Alexei Tolstoy came up with the name of the vicious rat guarding the treasured door in Papa Carlo's closet.
  29. +3
    10 January 2026 19: 27
    I came to the word "trawling" and realized it was a specialist writing this. Another armchair analyst trawling :-(
  30. +1
    10 January 2026 21: 15
    The BAZ's competitor is the Tatra. It's also a specialized vehicle for special-purpose add-ons. As a mass-produced truck, the Tatra couldn't compete with the European 7. As a specialized vehicle for harsh conditions, it's more than successful.
    And yes, our Naftogaz was quite willing to buy Tatras. This market is a market for bases. Plus, maybe something military would be worthwhile.
  31. -3
    11 January 2026 12: 49
    The author has vasophobia of the brain.
    The mass-production auto plant has survived the sanctions and continues to produce products, having completely restructured its production and established a new supply chain in two years.
  32. RMT
    +1
    12 January 2026 16: 04
    "Lada Iskra...More or less stable sales were only established towards the end of last year."
    Less than three thousand sold in four months.
    At the end of November, AvtoVAZ CEO Maxim Sokolov announced plans to assemble approximately 3 Lada Iskras at the Avtozavod Saint Petersburg plant. This is approximately a quarter less than originally planned. The company's CEO attributed the decline in production to weakening demand in the auto market.
  33. +1
    14 January 2026 10: 14
    The car is in basic configuration amounts to 16 million rubles.

    Shacman SX3258DT385 all-wheel drive quarry dump truck (F3000 cabin) 6x6
    from RUB 7,950,000./pcs.
    and what will consumers buy?
  34. +1
    14 January 2026 13: 03
    The market needed a robust truck with all-wheel drive and fully independent suspension.
    Which market requires an 18-ton truck with INDEPENDENT suspension on all drive axles?
    Why independent? To complicate the design and reduce the time between repairs?
  35. +1
    14 January 2026 14: 07
    The article is downright optimistic. AvtoVAZ's sales have "gotten back on track," the author wishes the Atom success, and the new BAZ has been put on the assembly line. But what's the reality? The reality is that businesses and people in Russia, given their incomes, can't afford a Lada, an Atom, or a BAZ. Prices are sky-high. Quality is rock-bottom. At least in the Lada. Who needs that ugly, trunk-less Atom for 4 million rubles? And in a taxi, no less? Only a mental patient would buy one in a taxi. And a BAZ for 16 million rubles. It costs as much as a passenger jet. I'm exaggerating, of course. But in dollars, that's 200000. A very significant sum.