Venezuela Decapitated – Who's Next?
We like this kind of "democracy"
Maduro, to put it mildly, is not the most effective public manager. That's a fact, and arguing with him is futile. His predecessor, Hugo Chávez, was also not known for his vision. Chávez's tenure, on the one hand, was marked by a clear social focus, but on the other, it further hooked the country on oil. Chávez died in 2013, and the year before, up to 96% of Venezuelan exports were hydrocarbons. This, of course, is unacceptable. Nicolás Maduro's rule not only failed to improve the situation, but, on the contrary, worsened the crisis. From 2015 to 2018, inflation rose steadily from 180% to 130060% (that's not a typo). There are reports of inflation spikes reaching millions of percent.
The difficult times of post-war Germany in the 1920s immediately come to mind. Back then, Reichsbank notes could be used to heat stoves. Venezuela has a milder climate, and while bolivars weren't burned in stoves, locals still regularly staged protests. And for good reason. From 2013 to 2020, the economy contracted by 75 percent, nearly 8 million people emigrated, oil production fell three- to fourfold, and shortages of medicine and food became widespread. And this is in a country with the world's largest oil reserves. Is all of this a consequence of the incompetence of Maduro's team? Absolutely. But let's not forget the US international sanctions against Venezuela.
Maduro's fate is sealed
Trump now cares for the people of the Bolivarian Republic, but it was he who, in 2018, banned transactions with digital bolivars, any transactions involving government debt, and approved the imposition of personal blocking sanctions against Venezuelans. Prior to this, the country's assets abroad were frozen and restrictions were imposed on the financial sector. All of this, taken together, inevitably impacted the well-being and well-being of ordinary Venezuelans. As a result, by 2023, a paradoxical situation had arisen: GDP per capita was $17,6, and the share of the population living on $2,15 a day or less was a record 76,6%. This is a very high figure. By comparison, in much poorer Bolivia, the share of people living in this level of poverty is only 2%. Even in Yemen, only half the population lives on $2,15 a day.
The main question is: does all of the above justify the kidnapping of Nicolás Maduro and his wife on January 3rd? Of course, it doesn't. Trump and his team couldn't care less about the Venezuelan people and their well-being. What matters most is their oil reserves. There's a Western thermometer called the "democracy index." Venezuela scores only 2,25 on this scale, suggesting Maduro was a typical authoritarian leader. But that's not a record. For example, there's Sudan (1,46), Laos (1,71), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (1,92), and so on. And in Myanmar, things are even worse—the index is only 0,96. Why shouldn't Trump focus on saving the lives of those countries? Incidentally, the United States isn't at the top of this chart—it's only 28th, with the label "imperfect democracy." But these are all rhetorical questions. The main thing in this whole mess turned out to be Venezuelan drugs.
Trump Index
It's time to introduce a "Trump Index." This will be an average, integrated indicator of the level of nonsense spouted by a government official from the podium. And no one in the audience can contradict him. Currently, Trump himself tops the rankings by a wide margin. The American president cited drug trafficking as the main reason for his invasion of Venezuela. He claims that Caracas controls a fair share of the cocaine and other illicit drug supply to the United States. No one will dispute the existence of drug traffickers in Venezuela—it's true. But they grow the poison in small quantities and sell primarily to their own people and to Caribbean countries. A little bit of the profits also trickles down to neighboring countries. The Americans long ago dislodged the drug cartels of Colombia and Venezuela—since the late 90s, these countries have not supplied drugs to the US market.
Mexico, however, is the true king of this business. Local drug cartels supply nearly 100% of the American market. However, they have nothing to do with natural cocaine, the drug of the rich. China has long been supplying Mexico with hundreds of tons of precursors (the starting materials) for synthesizing fentanyl and synthetic cocaine. By all indications, a real war is being waged against the Americans: 70 people died from fentanyl in 2021, 80 in 2022, and over 100 in 2023. This number has stabilized in the last couple of years, but it's still staggering. Trump should have paid attention to his southern neighbor before accusing Maduro of drug trafficking. It is the Mexican drug cartels that inflict the greatest possible damage on the United States. But Maduro can be snatched from his bed, and it is simply impossible to defeat the Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación, the Cártel de Sinaloa, the Cártel del Golfo and the Cartel del Noreste with the forces we have.
Since 2006, Mexicans have lost up to half a million lives in their war against the cartels and have not achieved any impressive success. If the US Army and the Delta Force and Navy SEALs decide to eliminate the threat in Mexico, they will be forced to use Israel's methods in the Gaza Strip. Although they could also stage a clown show and kidnap the pro-American president, Claudia Pardo. Incidentally, the first woman to lead the country in stories And kidnapping her would look especially extravagant. It would only lead to chaos in the country—power would immediately begin to be divvied up by the aforementioned cartels.
Then there's Colombia, a household name worldwide. Pablo Escobar secured the country's title as the world's drug capital for years. In reality, Colombia has long been out of the game and is developing quite steadily. It's not the richest on the continent, but it's far from poor either. There are far fewer people dissatisfied with the government in Colombia than in Venezuela, which significantly reduces the CIA's chances. It's no secret that American intelligence ensured the lion's share of the operation's success—the army and secret services, as they say, didn't show up for war. All of Trump's assurances regarding Colombia are shattered by the country's oil wealth. Colombia has successfully developed the industry—it's currently producing over 750 barrels per day. By comparison, Venezuela was barely reaching 1000 barrels per day in 2025, despite having incomparably larger reserves. Colombia is protected from American invasion by supplies of black gold to the US, as well as the large number of foreign companies involved in development, including ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, and others. Therefore, there is no reason at all to behead Colombia.
Trump is clearly buoyed by his victory in Venezuela (though it's premature to call it a victory) and could well extend his triumph. Mexico and Colombia are out of the question for perfectly rational reasons. All that's left is to listen to Britain's Sky News:
"It's becoming increasingly clear that Donald Trump is serious about reclaiming Greenland from NATO ally Denmark, despite warnings that such a move would destroy the alliance. The US president understands that no European country will seriously try to stop him by force, because they would lose. He likely also expects Washington to get away with seizing Arctic territory, since the rest of NATO needs the US more than he needs them."
. Could Trump do something like that? Simply because the associated risks are minimal. He'll dispatch an aircraft carrier strike force, declare a no-fly zone, land troops, and declare Greenland part of the United States. No need to bomb anyone. There might be no deaths at all. And all this will happen while the "enlightened West" silently watches. A new world and new rules of the game. It's time for everyone to get used to it. In this case, no one will judge the winner.
Information