The reason for the Venezuelan army's lack of response to the US invasion has been revealed.

81 329 232
The reason for the Venezuelan army's lack of response to the US invasion has been revealed.

The Venezuelan army has everything it needs to defend its territory, but it failed to respond to the American invasion. Lieutenant Colonel Edgar Alejandro Lugo Pereira, a member of the active army reserve, explained the reason for this.

The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but chose not to, fearing a more serious invasion. This explains the lack of any resistance on the night of the attack. Having everything in their power to defeat the Americans, the Venezuelans chose to simply watch as the US army dominated Caracas.



According to the lieutenant colonel, he said in a conversation with RIA NewsCaracas chose to negotiate rather than fight. And the Venezuelan government decided not to respond to the invasion.

Of course, we have the weapons to defend ourselves against an attack of this magnitude; we could do so. But Venezuela has always maintained dialogue. If, from a military standpoint, we had attacked any American targets, we would now be subject to a military attack... Venezuela would now be under direct military attack, and the consequences of such a military operation would be catastrophic.


As previously reported, 32 Cubans, including Maduro's security detail, were killed in combat during the American invasion. Apparently, they were the only ones resisting. The Venezuelans chose to negotiate, despite the fact that their legitimate president had been kidnapped.
232 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +83
    6 January 2026 08: 10
    ❝ The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so, fearing a more serious invasion ❞ —

    "Iron" argument...
    1. +51
      6 January 2026 08: 11
      Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov hi I agree, this BRAVE TAILOR won the OTMAZ of the year nomination.
      1. +25
        6 January 2026 08: 25
        The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so for fear of a more serious invasion.
        Sasha hiThere's also Cowardice and Greed) And so - yes, to wave after the fight drinks
        1. +22
          6 January 2026 08: 27
          Sedov hi Well, it's true, it's always better to start at home. Unfortunately, that's the number one slogan everywhere these days. And the elite welcomes a donkey laden with gold with a bang!!!
          1. +27
            6 January 2026 08: 43
            Hi Sedov, well, it's true, it's always better to start at home. Unfortunately, that slogan is everywhere these days. And the elite welcomes a donkey laden with gold with a bang!!!
            Sasha, well, it's all getting interesting here. We're all relying on politics: they offer us everything, we consider it, accept it, hope for a legal solution, and then they force us to do everything. And the US just gave up on its loaded donkey and said, "Fuck you all, with your policies, international law, codes, and organizations." They simply kidnapped the President, paraded him around like a monkey in a cage and shackles, and appropriated someone else's oil, calling it "their own."
            Even our Foreign Ministry, after all this, cynically told Marika Rubio to go to hell, saying, "Seryoga, Happy New Year! Let's celebrate." And we stood there, puffed out, pouting, believing fervently in the rule of law and diplomacy. And, apparently, we'll continue to do so. But it seems the time for diplomacy is over. drinks
            1. +11
              6 January 2026 08: 45
              Sedov, well, we also seem to be investing in all sorts of projects abroad, but there is no visible benefit either in our neighboring countries or, even more so, in the distant ones.
              1. +11
                6 January 2026 08: 48
                Sedov, well, we also seem to be investing in all sorts of projects abroad, but there is no visible benefit either in our neighboring countries or, even more so, in the distant ones.
                Absolutely nothing. Nothing but losses. In Africa, the Middle East, the Caucasus, and the neighboring countries... Losses everywhere. Hoping that this will end someday. But as it is, we've already lost ground everywhere. You can't help but believe we'll be stuck in Ukraine for another ten years. hi
                1. +1
                  7 January 2026 16: 07
                  Who believes a weakling who also claims that the St. Petersburg back alleys taught him to strike first, and the result is only red lines and concerns.
              2. +18
                6 January 2026 09: 32
                Venezuela's failure to repay its debt and investments to Russia is highly probable. Russia has many more such successes: the Trump corridor in the Transcaucasus, the destruction of the Nord Streams, bases in Syria, the distancing of Central Asia and the Caucasus from Russia, Russian assets/savings in Europe.
                The construction of a nuclear power plant in Turkey, which is already beginning to threaten Russia, the cheap sale of Russian oil company assets abroad, etc., etc. - that's the outcome...
                1. +1
                  6 January 2026 11: 40
                  "Life is bad without a sucker,,,;; They sensed a sucker, and will milk them until they get an answer, [which is unlikely], or they don't give it all away and they fall apart... [which is more likely]...
                2. +2
                  6 January 2026 14: 12
                  You've forgotten about the Nord Stream pipeline, which Putin and his team championed like maniacs, and the country invested in "National Treasure—Gazprom" through god knows how. National Treasure, however, continues to buy foreign football players, and over the past 10 years has spent no less than 370 million euros (not rubles) on this. Otherwise, "everything's fine, everything's awesome..."
                  1. -19
                    6 January 2026 16: 42
                    Quote: ergh081
                    You forgot about the Nord Stream pipeline, which Putin and his team were pushing like maniacs, and the country invested in "National Treasure - Gazprom" for who knows how.

                    If there had been no invasion of Ukraine, all projects would have worked.
                    1. -5
                      6 January 2026 21: 29
                      Quote: Panin (Michman)
                      If there had been no invasion of Ukraine, all projects would have worked.

                      Until 2023, all oil, gas, and mining companies purchased frequency converters exclusively from Schneider and Siemens, even though similar products from China were available at three to four times the price.
                      1. -1
                        8 January 2026 12: 42
                        Quote: gsev
                        Although similar products from China were supplied at 3 or 4 times cheaper

                        Was it any worse than Siemens? Would you put Siemens or Huangkhe in your car?
                      2. 0
                        9 January 2026 00: 07
                        Quote: Panin (Michman)
                        What will you put in your car: Siemens or Huanghe?

                        I've been using Chinese VFDs since 2010. They've almost never failed. As I understand it, failures of Chinese VFDs occur due to thermal imbalances, incorrect acceleration and deceleration settings, failure to account for load inertia, improper cable selection, and failure to use chokes when the VFD-motor cable is long. Very often, in real-world production environments, expensive VFDs are installed where the management making purchasing decisions is completely occupied by idiots who don't understand the equipment they're supposed to evaluate. This problem is not limited to large Russian companies, but also Chinese ones. For example, I chose Xinje equipment on the advice of a Chinese PLC programmer from a concern in Tai'an, Shandong Province. Their concern mines coal, makes transformers and explosion-proof mine automation systems, and develops and manufactures a line of VFDs for mines and the textile industry in China. But the company's management ignores the opinions of its engineers and doesn't even trust them to program the PLC themselves. Moreover, the concern uses PLCs from Taian, not the ones recommended by its specialists. Incidentally, in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, Mitsubishi and Delta Electronics products are considered superior in quality to Siemens and Schneider. The belief that German electronics are of high quality stems from the Germans' reverent regard for the interests of the Russian technical specialists they work with. If a German specialist understands that you will be entering parameters into their frequency converter and can influence the decision on the frequency converter model, they will promise you long-term cooperation, which will continue under the same conditions after you leave the company. Moreover, Siemens' discounts are given not to the company owner, but to the technical specialist, and if the specialist leaves for a competitor, the discounts will also go with the dismissed specialist.
                    2. +1
                      6 January 2026 22: 33
                      Quote: Panin (Michman)
                      If there had been no invasion of Ukraine, all projects would have worked.

                      But then NATO bases would be in Ukraine and Ukraine itself WOULD BE in NATO.
                      1. -1
                        8 January 2026 12: 34
                        Quote: bondov
                        Quote: Panin (Michman)
                        If there had been no invasion of Ukraine, all projects would have worked.

                        But then NATO bases would be in Ukraine and Ukraine itself WOULD BE in NATO.

                        And she will be in NATO. Quietly. And then nothing will be possible to do, because foreign troops will be stationed there.
                        As I recall, we entered Afghanistan because otherwise "the Americans would be there."
                    3. +2
                      7 January 2026 09: 02
                      If there had been no invasion of Ukraine, all projects would have worked.
                      /////////
                      Exactly. Something about this article was also in style, but let's come to an agreement. He acted like a man once. And three days later, negotiations resumed... A month later, he withdrew troops from territories paid for in blood. Now they're openly proclaiming that our soldiers' heroism isn't for the liberation of Russians in the occupied territories, or for the overthrow of the neo-Nazi regime (otherwise, what kind of "denazification" would it be?), but... to improve our negotiating position. Oh, really! This is so that Dmitry, Ushakov (and perhaps Abramovich) can more comfortably "negotiate."
                    4. 0
                      7 January 2026 19: 21
                      "If there had been no invasion of Ukraine, all the projects would have worked." You are an outright enemy – there are no other words.
                      1. -1
                        8 January 2026 12: 35
                        Quote: ergh081
                        There would have been no invasion of Ukraine, and all the projects would have worked. You are an outright enemy - there are no other words.

                        An enemy is someone who wishes trouble on his country and drags it into all sorts of adventures.
                3. +2
                  6 January 2026 20: 39
                  All games should simply be played briefly, and not dragged out over 4+ years. Whether it worked or not, we rolled back, regrouped, and worked on our mistakes.
                  Well, if you show a certain amount of stubbornness, then in the end you get geopolitical loopholes.
                  1. +1
                    6 January 2026 21: 00
                    So, what can be done in short? The more complex the issue, the longer it takes. In short, it's mostly about show-offs and robbery/theft. It's impossible to create something like that.
                    1. -3
                      6 January 2026 21: 38
                      Quote: Xenaro
                      So what can be done in short?

                      What tools can Russia use to work with Africa and Asia? Ultimately, Asia and Africa are interested in transforming their societies into more promising models. Under Khrushchev, the USSR could boast achievements in space and aviation, the elimination of mass famine, and a rapidly developing society without repression. Today's Russia, however, is characterized by its intelligentsia fleeing poverty to the West and East, wildly exorbitant expenditures on sports, the sale of oil and gas at dumping prices, and minimal loans for hostile states at 1-3% per annum and 30-100% per annum for its own citizens. What's the point of trading with Turkey when Putin and Gref can foist Tinkoff or Sberbank credit cards on their military personnel at 70% per annum? Wouldn't it be simpler to simply ban banks with foreign capital or foreign owners from working with the Russian population and freeze half of the risky cooperation with dubious foreign countries like Syria, Turkey, Armenia, and Azerbaijan?
                      1. 0
                        6 January 2026 22: 37
                        I have a lot of questions, but I only know what not to do, and what to do requires being incredibly smart. I know it's not the intelligentsia who are running; to be called that, you need to have at least a semblance of honor in addition to average intelligence. They always run when they're lured. There's no poverty in Russia (despite the slightest ability to work), but many people's throats have grown, that's true, and where they're called, you can shove even more down that throat.
                        I don't know how Russia should work with Africa. I'm all for keeping them in line and giving them small handouts, but there's a lot of competition there. And we won't become a Western society, just a semblance of a third-tier institution, if they allow it. So for now, well, whatever works out, that's fine.
                      2. +1
                        7 January 2026 16: 14
                        It's only on screen that they tell us there are no beggars. But beyond Moscow, things are no longer so. Even in St. Petersburg, people live very modestly. What can we say about the provinces? The "gentleman" is clearly out of touch with reality.
                    2. Ray
                      +1
                      7 January 2026 06: 55
                      A lot can be done in the short term, if your army is combat-ready and ready. And the very first thing you can do at the very outset is to slaughter with daggers the entire military and political leadership of the enemy country, which, by blowing up the Northern Streams, essentially declared war on itself. Deprive the army of command and control and, ultimately, take Kyiv. Without any gestures of goodwill.
                      1. 0
                        8 January 2026 12: 39
                        Quote from Ray
                        take Kyiv, finally

                        Absurd.
                        They took Mariupol for two months and turned everything into ruins.
                        They took Bakhmut for 2 years. Avdeevka 3
                        All captured villages were turned into ruins.
                  2. bar
                    0
                    7 January 2026 13: 03
                    Quote: Billi Bons1972
                    All games just need to be played short-term, and not stretched out over 4+ years.

                    For the short term, martial law and general mobilization are necessary. Are you personally prepared for this?
              3. +6
                6 January 2026 09: 55
                It seems like they are waiting for us (or rather our oligarchs) to build something and then confiscate it.
              4. +2
                6 January 2026 13: 25
                Quote: Murmur 55
                Sedov, well, we also seem to be investing in all sorts of projects abroad, but there is no visible benefit either in our neighboring countries or, even more so, in the distant ones.

                What's more, all our investments in Venezuela will now go to the Yankees. And quite a bit has been poured into it.
              5. 0
                6 January 2026 17: 27
                Quote: Murmur 55
                Sedov, well, we also seem to be investing in all sorts of projects abroad, but there is no visible benefit either in our neighboring countries or, even more so, in the distant ones.

                Why did the gringos try to get Firtash out of Austria for 10 years, but they couldn't?
                Because, along with VVP, he seized a titanium mine from the gringos in India. Just because we don't know something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Yes
            2. +15
              6 January 2026 10: 18
              ...a firm believer in the rule of law and diplomacy.


              International Lawyers can confidently change their specialty and begin retraining in divorce proceedings.

              If we take V. Pastukhov's Conceptual Constitution and apply it to "international law" (after making some minor adjustments), we get a very realistic and objective picture of the world order.

              "SECTION I. CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF WORLD ORDER.
              Article 1.
              The strong can do anything.
              All power in the WORLD belongs to the strong, the power of the strong cannot be limited by anything but strength.

              Article 2.
              The law is for the weak.
              The weak are obliged to obey the laws that are written by the strong. The strong are not required to obey the laws they write for the weak.

              Article 3.
              Strong is not equal to weak. The strong is always to blame for the weak. For the strong, the presumption of innocence applies.

              Article 4.
              The strong have rights, the weak have duties.
              The strong can break the law. The weak can also break the law, but only in individual cases and if it does not harm the strong.

              Article 5.
              The strong can not abuse their rights in relation to the stronger than themselves. If a strong abused the right to a stronger one than himself, he is considered weak and the law applies to him.

              Article 6.
              No strong person can be held accountable for the crime that he committed, unless he violated the right of a stronger one than himself.

              Article 7.
              The weak can be held accountable for the crimes they have committed, for crimes that the strong have committed, and even for crimes that no one has committed at all.

              Article 8.
              The weak is not entitled to protection from the strong. The weak is strong towards the weaker than he is. Trying to protect the weak from the strong is a crime.

              Article 9.
              The property belongs to the strong.
              The strong hold the property with the permission of the strongest.
              The weak are obliged to surrender their property to the strong at their first demand. The right of the strong to the property of the weak is protected by FORCE....
              https://www.democracy.ru/article.php?id=3373
              1. +3
                6 January 2026 11: 09
                Krylov's fable "The Elephant and the Pug" was written a long time ago and replaces your work.
                1. +4
                  6 January 2026 14: 51
                  "The Wolf and the Lamb" would be more appropriate.[media=https://]
                  1. 0
                    6 January 2026 15: 03
                    Well, that's too much, it's from an old army joke)
              2. -1
                6 January 2026 14: 09
                Quote: AA17
                a realistic and objective picture of the world order.

                Let the wisest negotiator read this...
                Although... You don't have to show it... He certainly knows how to read, but what conclusions he'll draw is a big mystery...
            3. 0
              6 January 2026 16: 44
              And we stood in an offended pose, puffing out our cheeks, sacredly believing in the rule of law
              Only idiots believe in the rule of international law these days. And so: "Vae victis" -
              The victors always dictate the terms, and the vanquished must be prepared for any tragic turn of events. Since 1991, we have been vanquished, never rising from our knees.
              1. +1
                6 January 2026 16: 51
                Since 1991 we have been defeated, never rising from our knees.
                Andrey, this has been going on for centuries. We always fight, we win. We're offered everything, we're deceived. And then we fight again, and everything returns to normal. History is cyclical, but what's happening now is simply the Middle Ages.
                1. +1
                  6 January 2026 17: 15
                  Apparently, in the rest of the world, History, with the light hand of Hegel and the heavy hand of Marx, develops cyclically, in a spiral. But here in Russia, as you absolutely rightly noted, History develops in a circle. We, like the heroes of Solzhenitsyn's novel "The First Circle," exist simultaneously in two worlds—the material world of "Sharashka," and the world of our philosophical ideas and literary images, tormented by the search for answers to two eternal Russian questions: "Who is to blame?" and "What is to be done?"—and we have no way out of this vicious circle.
                  1. WIS
                    0
                    6 January 2026 21: 27
                    Since 1991 we have been defeated, never rising from our knees...
                    _____________ we We WE
                    Мы We keep fighting and winning. They offer us everything, they deceive us. And then we fight again, and everything returns to normal.
                    Quote: golen

                    __________we We WE
                    Мы Like the heroes of Solzhenitsyn's novel "The First Circle," we exist simultaneously in two worlds - the material one, in "Sharashka," and in the world of our philosophical ideas and literary images. I am tormented by the search for answers to two eternal Russian questions: "Who is to blame?" and "What is to be done?" and we have no way out of this vicious circle.


                    Anyone who believes that in the Western Hemisphere, or even in Latin America, peaceful resolution of contentious issues concerning the cohabitation of the majority of the population prevails, let them be the first to throw a...
                    Below is one example reflecting the structural composition of the social and discriminatory position of classes, estates, etc., depending on this trinket and regalia..., which is acceptable to "both hemispheres".
                    It is worth being able to think about who WE are and who they!!! (no questions asked)
                    "Who is guilty?" and "What to do?"
                    To each his own!
                    1. 0
                      7 January 2026 07: 27
                      I'm not particularly interested in what's going on in the Western Hemisphere. It's not the best comparison to us. And when you attribute other people's quotes to me, that's bad form. I didn't write this: "We keep fighting and winning. They offer us everything, they deceive us. And then we fight again, and everything returns to normal. Quote: golen."
          2. +8
            6 January 2026 09: 21
            Was there a donkey? Was there gold? Has anyone ever gotten anything from Trump or Americans in general? Isn't their strategy purely thug-like – your wallet or your life?! And those who can't stand up for themselves agree to anything, lest their accounts be frozen or even killed.
            1. +4
              6 January 2026 10: 27
              Was there a donkey? Was there gold?
              There was definitely a donkey. Perhaps not with gold, or not only with gold, but also with some guarantees for the decision-makers.
              1. +2
                6 January 2026 12: 42
                Well, Trump said he gave her a year and a half. At best, otherwise she'll be worse than Maduro. There he is, a donkey with gold, like, be thankful he didn't kill her. wassat
            2. 0
              6 January 2026 21: 32
              Quote from alexoff
              Was there a donkey? Was there gold?

              Rather, they promised "manna from heaven."
              Quote from alexoff
              They have a purely gopnik strategy - your wallet or your life?!

              Using the example of Iran (leadership and scientists) and Hezbollah (cell phones), they showed what they will do if the "local donkeys" don't take the carrot.
            3. 0
              7 January 2026 23: 11
              Was there a donkey? Was there gold?
              Perhaps there was no actual cash donkey. The Americans simply promised the Venezuelan army to leave it as is. For the Venezuelan army, which has never fought anywhere, this is a very tempting offer. Sitting on their butts and receiving government money for it is a very tempting offer. It's a stable income for life and a decent pension; it's even better than a disposable donkey with money.
        2. +4
          6 January 2026 13: 22
          Yes, and they love both cowardice and silver.
          Maduro himself...
          He spread "Mannlicherism" around himself, as the classic wrote.
          There is such a concept: degrees of combat readiness.
          It seems that not only in the army, but also in the presidential security itself, no combat readiness was introduced.
          What prevented the air defense forces from setting up several ambushes in the likely flight paths of American helicopters, from taking up positions to provide combat protection for the residence of the head of state, etc., etc.?
          In this case alone, with a hundred fighters protecting them, the special forces arriving in a pair of Chinooks would not have had any success...
          Are there idiots in the Bolivarian Republic? There are probably some, but not all. Treason, in one form or another, did occur. Yes, sir. Yes
          And the revolutionary Maduro himself.
          They put him, like a block of wood, into a helicopter and take him away.....
          He didn't even bite anyone, let alone enter the battle at the head of the forces with an AK in his hands and an F-1 on his belt (for the last decisive moment).
          Clearly not Fidel or Che Guevara...
          Well, let's see, maybe the Chavistas will be able to get out of this situation with dignity without him.
          In fact, it would be better for us if China bought oil from us, and not from other places. wink
          1. 0
            6 January 2026 21: 37
            Quote: Alekseev
            Clearly not Fidel or Che Guevara...

            And especially not Salvador Allende!
            In a word, it is a talking bird, not distinguished by much...
          2. 0
            7 January 2026 06: 53
            The Chinese, like everyone else in the world, put themselves first. They buy at low prices.
        3. 0
          6 January 2026 20: 08
          Disgusting scoundrels who betrayed their president.
      2. +30
        6 January 2026 08: 35
        OTMAZ of the year
        as they say, we would have given it to them if they had caught up with us.
        But in fact, why do we need such an army at all!?
        1. +7
          6 January 2026 08: 38
          Popandos hi Well, that's according to our logic, but in South America they have mono wink and like that.
        2. +16
          6 January 2026 09: 24
          Why do Latin American countries even have armies? They could never fight back against the US, and they rarely fought each other. They only staged coups and carried out terror against communists.
      3. 0
        6 January 2026 10: 12
        In Poland, the cowardly rule of businessmen led to the sale of everything and the enslavement of workers; even today, on Epiphany, they work in small chain stores called "Żabka," although by law this should be done under a franchise.
      4. +3
        6 January 2026 13: 32
        [quoteCaracas chose to negotiate rather than fight. And the decision not to respond to the invasion was made by the Venezuelan government.][/quote]
        It looks like the generals simply betrayed their president, selling out to the Americans. And the military themselves eliminated Maduro's Cuban security detail. The Yankees simply calmly flew in on helicopters and picked him up while he was still warm. A familiar story for the "banana republic."
      5. +1
        6 January 2026 18: 56
        And in the "Best Weapon of Victory" category - "Donkey with Gold"
        Quote: Murmur 55
        in the OTMAZ of the Year nomination
    2. +11
      6 January 2026 08: 14
      Yes, we'll never understand their logic. Their mentality is completely different. That's why they've tolerated the Monroe Doctrine for centuries.
      1. +20
        6 January 2026 08: 23
        Pavel Sveshnikov hi I don't remember the exact words, but the gist of it was the same: the army lost, so why resist and suffer? The Germans will destroy everything around them, and how will we cope without cafes and bakeries, without work, and in ruins? A different mentality. Moreover, they had no shame in surrendering to the Germans.
        1. +26
          6 January 2026 08: 32
          Quote: Pavel_Sveshnikov
          Yes, we will never understand their logic. Their mentality is completely different.

          The logic is this: Robbers come to the home of an armed man and rape his wife and daughter in front of him. They take the daughter with them, just in case. The man, holding a gun in his hand, reasons logically. winked That if he uses his weapon now, the robbers' friends will rape him too. Oh, no way!
          Summary: Oh, how smart I am! No problem, my women will tolerate it. And a medal for myself for preventing the "consequences of a catastrophe." fellow
    3. +3
      6 January 2026 08: 28
      But if Zelensky did the same, would that be good or bad???????
      1. +8
        6 January 2026 08: 31
        But let's get to the point - it wasn't the army that gave up everything, nor the government that did it on the sly from the president - They all screwed it up together
        1. +2
          6 January 2026 08: 37
          I feel so sorry for the Cubans - I just can't believe that 35 trained special forces (that's just the number of dead, maybe some survived back then) couldn't kill a single Sesheast at a guarded facility - that's a lie - I think that when Madura ordered everyone to back down, he ordered them to do the same - that's why the Cubans didn't fight, and a year later the Sesheast had already captured the palace and were simply shot, unarmed... ...you idiots...
          1. +8
            6 January 2026 09: 27
            I would assume the Cubans could have been poisoned or tranquilized in advance, their posts and locations surrendered, and the missiles landed there immediately. The Americans even bombed the bunker beforehand so no one could hide there.
          2. +1
            6 January 2026 18: 43
            No one there fought like knights. The Cubans were most likely gathered under pretexts in specific locations where ambushes had been prepared. Quite possibly by the Venezuelans themselves.
    4. +8
      6 January 2026 08: 33
      Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      Today, 08: 10
      "Iron" argument.

      hi The most compelling argument they forgot to add was that there was direct betrayal by the president's inner circle and a deal between the highest elites and the Americans.
      This must be taken into account in our country, understanding how far the interests of the elites are from the people.
      This is the kind of foreign policy twist that EBN said.
      1. +3
        6 January 2026 08: 41
        Classic lol

        But the Tsar didn't know that his boyars were deceiving him. negative
        that there was direct betrayal by the president's inner circle and a deal between the highest elites and the Americans.

        Enough already - Maduro told the Seshestas a little earlier - Kemskaya volost? - yes, take it... or rather, he already told them yes, take all the oil - did that happen? Did that happen and you're here claiming that he's supposedly not involved??? negative
    5. +3
      6 January 2026 09: 02
      There were no other words to justify the coup. The show continues. The Venezuelan government announced the evacuation of government institutions from Caracas.
    6. 0
      6 January 2026 09: 58
      It's completely clear - let's go wassat
    7. +2
      6 January 2026 10: 18
      Theoretically hard, practically soft... well, then why, why is this organization (the Venezuelan Armed Forces) needed, disband yourself and continue to have "pleasure".
    8. +1
      6 January 2026 20: 18
      And if a “more serious invasion” had happened right away, then what?..
    9. 0
      7 January 2026 08: 59
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      ❝ The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so, fearing a more serious invasion ❞ —

      "Iron" argument...

      Especially for Russia, which distributes weapons to such "warriors"... (well, well) it pops up, then in Ukraine, against our guys.
    10. 0
      10 January 2026 23: 53
      And here in the SVO we always have the same stupid "argument": We haven't even started yet...
      (in the 4th year of the war).
  2. +22
    6 January 2026 08: 14
    They essentially admitted that they betrayed their president. It's not the army that negotiates, but diplomats. The army fights.
    1. +9
      6 January 2026 08: 20
      Quote: Eugen 62
      It's not the army that negotiates, but diplomats. The army fights.

      Traitors betray. That's their role. They can do anything... just once.
    2. +3
      6 January 2026 12: 46
      It's just an attempt to save face... "Well, of course, our super-powerful army could have destroyed the Americans, we just didn't want to do it."
    3. -1
      6 January 2026 18: 27
      Quote: Eugen 62
      They essentially admitted that they betrayed their president. It's not the army that negotiates, but diplomats. The army fights.

      So this statement is an attempt to blame everything on the government.
      The Venezuelan government decided not to respond to the invasion.

      It is possible that this is an attempt to shift responsibility and at the same time discredit the intransigent deputy president.
    4. +2
      6 January 2026 18: 45
      They told the whole world in no uncertain terms that they had betrayed their people and their democratically elected president.
  3. +14
    6 January 2026 08: 17
    The army surrendered its state without a fight? So all is lost, and Maduro is forced to commit suicide. To avoid causing further embarrassment to the world.
    Commander-in-Chief, ugh.
    1. +4
      6 January 2026 08: 57
      Quote from Serafim
      The army surrendered its state without a fight? So all is lost, and Maduro is forced to commit suicide.


      It's not a given that it's all over. Maduro's trial has already been postponed until 2027. Why are they dragging it out? Is it to tighten up the evidence? Are they not sure the verdict will be favorable to Trump? The latter is quite likely. Trump has plenty of enemies both in the US and in the West at large. And there are many who would like to see Trump's face in a puddle of shame if Maduro is acquitted and released.
      Moreover, some understand that Venezuela is just a warm-up. If Trump succeeds, who will be next? Denmark with its (for now) Greenland, or Canada? And they certainly don't want that. So only the future will tell how the chips fall. Maduro is already denying the charges. Perhaps he did receive some assurances. But not from Trump, but from those who want to impeach Trump for such brazen lawlessness.
    2. +3
      6 January 2026 09: 51
      Quote from Serafim
      Maduro is obliged to commit suicide.
      Who's going to give it to him? The whole prison cell is probably covered in cameras (video). As soon as they see him, like, ripping a sheet into ropes, they'll put a stop to it. And a hunger strike won't work—if necessary, they'll force-feed him.
      1. +2
        6 January 2026 10: 15
        Quote: Nagan
        Who's going to give it to him? The whole prison cell is probably covered in cameras (video). As soon as they see him, like, ripping a sheet into ropes, they'll put a stop to it. And a hunger strike won't work—if necessary, they'll force-feed him.

        When the right moment comes, they will help and blame Trump for it - He killed me.
        1. 0
          6 January 2026 10: 19
          So Maduro is not Epstein; he wouldn't publish photos of former presidents and British princes "in compromising positions" with minors, even if he really wanted to.
          1. +1
            6 January 2026 10: 21
            Quote: Nagan
            So Maduro is not Epstein; he wouldn't publish photos of former presidents and British princes "in compromising positions" with minors, even if he really wanted to.

            He could simply be a sacrificial victim against Trump. There are plenty of anti-Trump supporters everywhere.
  4. +22
    6 January 2026 08: 18
    "This is just a disgrace" (c).
    Their president was stolen, and they are still talking... request
  5. +24
    6 January 2026 08: 19
    The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so for fear of a more serious invasion.
    If that's true, Venezuela is finished. And those dumb idiots will learn all about why the Iranian military was forced into desperate, but completely belated, resistance. And they'll also understand exactly what the Syrians are thinking. And they'll also learn that the size of the bribe they received from the US doesn't matter—there's no safe place for them anywhere anyway. Our planet is too small to harbor traitors like these.
    And the funny thing is, they're not the first, or even the hundredth. And yet they still think they're the smartest and most cunning! The universe, and human stupidity and meanness, are truly infinite and inexhaustible. And there are doubts about the universe...
    1. +6
      6 January 2026 11: 08
      Remember the classic? - Rome does not pay traitors. (Roma traditoribus non praemia).
      The US will certainly use them, but they will be endlessly despised and as soon as the need for them disappears, they will be thrown into the trash.
      1. 0
        6 January 2026 12: 19
        Keep it simple. They'll be killed. Where are we going to put them anyway? They'll definitely get to them in their homeland, especially since American rule always leads in one direction: impoverishment, tyranny, and universal hatred. And where will they go? Who would welcome a traitor and outright rebel, one who's also gotten rich off of treason, back in their own land?
        It's like pouring poison into wine. It was wine, but now it's a poisonous drink. They, by their very existence, spread the idea among the subjects of any country: you can betray your power, your country, and still prosper. And they themselves, their children, and their households behave in a very peculiar way. Like masters of everything that exists and everything that doesn't. Why do all sorts of thoughts spread among your subjects...
        There's no place for them on earth. They'll even be buried secretly...
    2. 0
      6 January 2026 20: 28
      Oh yeah?... where are those who turned in Milosevic?.. huh?
  6. +16
    6 January 2026 08: 20
    The Venezuelan government declared victory:
    Of course, we have the weapons to defend ourselves against an attack of this magnitude; we could do so. But Venezuela has always maintained dialogue. If, from a military standpoint, we had attacked any American targets, we would now be subject to a military attack... Venezuela would now be under direct military attack, and the consequences of such a military operation would be catastrophic.
    What pathetic babble... You're about to declare victory! Or is this how modern wars are fought?
  7. +14
    6 January 2026 08: 21
    Well, yeah! Let's not give in to provocations!! wink
  8. +16
    6 January 2026 08: 21
    It seems to me that it wasn't just the army that disengaged itself. No one wanted to fall out of the food chain. The Cubans, however, are a different matter. I suspect the Cuban BC was replaced by "necessary" people, which is why there were so many losses among the security guards.
    1. +5
      6 January 2026 11: 55
      Quote: NICK111
      The Cubans are a different story. I suspect the Cuban BC was replaced with "right" people, which is why there were so many losses among the security guards.

      Happy New Year! hi It could be much more trivial - their barracks were hit with missiles and yet - it was night... and a couple of security guards won't do much against special forces... I personally know a man who guarded the president of one of the African countries - the guys are fighters in security, but for the most part - they are on the level of a regular airborne soldier, and Delta is still Alpha level, and I think they have the appropriate equipment...
  9. +19
    6 January 2026 08: 21
    So that's what the Venezuelan army is for - to keep quiet, otherwise they might beat you up.
    1. 0
      7 January 2026 05: 00
      Or maybe the master was just such a man that all the servants turned away from him?
  10. +35
    6 January 2026 08: 24
    Just like the Czechs after the Munich Agreement, having a combat-ready army, preferred to watch from the sidelines as their country was being divided up.

    It is against this backdrop that many are desperately trying to find some kind of justification for what is happening, coming to the simplest conclusion - it was all a deal.

    After all, if Russia and Ukraine have been fighting each other for four years over the ruins of Donbas, then everyone else should too. And if our intelligence agencies aren't kidnapping other people's presidents, blowing up generals, or planting TNT in cell phones, then there's simply no order to do so.
    If only there were an order to win, then we would win immediately, but without an order we cannot.


    Or is the reality far more banal, and the cause lies elsewhere, related to planning, management, and the skills of both command and rank-and-file personnel? The question is rhetorical.
    It's much easier to believe that "stupid Americans" have always simply bought everyone than to believe that our level of planning, intelligence, and coordination is still far behind and that something needs to be done about it long ago.
    1. +2
      6 January 2026 08: 32
      Quote: Comrade Beria
      If only there were an order to win, then we would win immediately, but without an order we cannot.

      Yep! That's how they retreated from Kyiv, even though Kadyrov asked, "Give the order, Vladimir Vladimirovich."
      1. +17
        6 January 2026 09: 31
        although Kadyrov asked, "Give the order, Vladimir Vladimirovich"

        There are serious doubts that Kadyrov's men could have done anything on their own.
        1. +5
          6 January 2026 10: 17
          Well, maybe they could: the Khokhloma are not a brotherly people to the Chechens.
          1. +2
            6 January 2026 10: 45
            Well, maybe they could.

            They still have a lot of work to do to become truly elite units. This isn't even my personal guess.
            The Khokhloma people are not a brotherly people to the Chechens.

            It depends on how you look at it, and which particular khokhly [people] are there, and which particular Chechens. The khokhly [people] also made their mark in the Chechen campaigns. Whoever's going to do us dirty, those are the khokhly [people], our brothers.
      2. +2
        6 January 2026 12: 41
        Quote: Egoza
        Yep! That's how they retreated from Kyiv, even though Kadyrov asked, "Give the order, Vladimir Vladimirovich."

        If we could, we would have taken it! Well, first we got a beating when we tried to take Kyiv, and only then did we try to negotiate.
    2. -1
      6 January 2026 12: 04
      Forgive these pseudo-historical parallels. You know nothing about it. Czechoslovakia was a multinational state with a population of 15 million, Czechs making up less than half of it. There were only 3 million Germans. Only an idiot would have decided to fight Germany, with a population of 80 million, surrounded on three sides, with a 3 million-strong "fifth column," and no hope of outside help. A ruined country, hundreds of thousands dead, and the same result. When conditions permitted, we fought, even on your side... Small nations and states must play different cards than great powers, so keep that arrogant lecture to yourself.
      1. 0
        8 January 2026 01: 03
        And for what reasons did Czech engineers create the Hetzer self-propelled anti-tank gun, which inflicted significant losses on Soviet troops, on their own initiative?
  11. +24
    6 January 2026 08: 27
    If a country, choosing between war and shame, chooses shame, it receives both war and shame ...
  12. +13
    6 January 2026 08: 28
    The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so for fear of a more serious invasion.
    I laughed long and merrily! wink
  13. +2
    6 January 2026 08: 31
    I heard something similar somewhere, but I can't remember when...
    1. +2
      6 January 2026 10: 19
      Quote: O. Bender
      I heard something similar somewhere, but I can't remember when...

      And here on VO it's often like: Do you want a war with NATO?, Are you ready to fight with NATO?, No need to escalate, etc.
  14. +6
    6 January 2026 08: 35
    There's a coalition of northern countries in NATO - Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Iceland (I'm not sure), and Norway. They'll fight tooth and nail for Greenland. Norway recently replaced Denmark as the NATO presidency. They've been feeling a bit sad lately. Just blah, blah, blah.
  15. +7
    6 January 2026 08: 38
    A good army, they screwed up even before the fighting. The Semyonovs, who were Bolivars, are not in sight.
  16. +10
    6 January 2026 08: 39
    It's a trend, though. We also have plenty of people willing to negotiate.
  17. +12
    6 January 2026 08: 40
    The Venezuelan army are traitors and cowardly jackals. am
    They simply handed over their leader to the Americans for money and are ready to give up all their mineral resources and more. negative
  18. +12
    6 January 2026 08: 40
    There sit these pompous generals in their distinctively smelly brown pants, and they still dare open their mouths and spout their own versions! You've been completely screwed, as always, and then they tore down Chavez's mausoleum! I don't feel sorry for such a bunch of people!
  19. +4
    6 January 2026 08: 44
    The Venezuelan army immediately donned diapers instead of bulletproof vests during the invasion.
  20. +8
    6 January 2026 08: 45
    Again, softness, as if nothing worse could happen. Does this remind anyone of anything?
  21. +6
    6 January 2026 08: 53
    To put it into everyday language: there is an army, but it doesn’t have any balls.
  22. +6
    6 January 2026 08: 56
    Seven of them held me, otherwise I would have beaten them up, but I really love bucks, you corrupt creatures.
  23. +6
    6 January 2026 08: 59
    So, what does it mean that Maduro has given up his own? Of course, we don't know the attitude of Venezuelans themselves as a people toward Maduro. All sorts of things are said and written. But all those who agree with him should understand that tomorrow they will be gone. If they aren't given life sentences in the States, they will be removed from power, and then they will die God knows what. It's unlikely that ordinary people will be better off under the American heel. Venezuelans simply won't get a second chance to get their riches. They will be given a couple of percent of the profits for poverty and then they will say, "That's enough."
  24. +4
    6 January 2026 09: 01
    Quote: Sedov
    We'll be stuck for another ten years

    Judging by Kupyansk, yes! Unfortunately.
  25. -2
    6 January 2026 09: 04
    Another confirmation of the classical wisdom that
    A donkey loaded with a sack of gold will take any fortress.
  26. +16
    6 January 2026 09: 10
    Quote from Serafim
    The army surrendered its state without a fight? So all is lost, and Maduro is forced to commit suicide. To avoid causing further embarrassment to the world.
    Commander-in-Chief, ugh.

    Salvador Allende comes to mind. He died with a gun in his hand. And it doesn't matter whether he was a good President – ​​he was a Man and a Warrior!!! That's how he will be remembered! And how will Maduro be remembered?
  27. +14
    6 January 2026 09: 15
    The rotten, so-called elite. Our elite surrendered the country in 1917, when victory was just a step away. The Soviet elite, led by Marked One, surrendered the USSR. And it will be a long time before information emerges about how exactly Gorby and his Raika were recruited. And it's unlikely to be only them. Saddam, and not only him, now Maduro... Our guarantor has much to ponder. For four years, they've been drawing red lines and doing nothing... And here's an example! Trump and the entire West disregard so-called international law—they do what suits them, and our guarantor doesn't even respond to terrorist attacks. The Tajiks shot people in Crocus—and we already have millions of them, and we still have visa-free travel with them! Banderites are killing our citizens, even generals, and the government is appealing to the West for common sense... Ukraine is striking Russian strategic targets, even the guarantor's residence, and there's been no significant response, only the drawing of red lines with sympathetic ink... It's high time the guarantor thought about whether something like Maduro could happen to him... After all, our elite has capital and real estate in the West, and relatives live and study there...
    1. +1
      6 January 2026 14: 33
      Or maybe they weren't recruiting, Gorby and Raika, huh? Maybe everything was completely rotten, that's why it fell apart, and no one cared.
    2. +2
      6 January 2026 15: 04
      Quote: Tikhonov_Alexander
      It's time for the guarantor to think about whether something similar could happen to him.

      They reached an agreement in Anchorage. Everyone saw him calmly fly to his friend in Alaska. One confirmed security guarantees to the Nazis in Kyiv, the other confirmed his desire to continue selling weapons. Everything else is just a dumb media cover.
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. -2
    6 January 2026 09: 26
    Voilà comment ils essaient d'expliquer leur traîtrise et leur lâcheté. C'est tout simplement une honte!
  30. -2
    6 January 2026 09: 32
    Somehow our political victories have become fewer.
  31. +5
    6 January 2026 09: 33
    You'll come up with anything to save face. Generally, working on your mistakes begins with admitting them.
  32. +1
    6 January 2026 09: 41
    If his own army didn't stand up for their president, then that's because everyone there "loved" him so much. Let them judge him; we certainly shouldn't be shedding tears over this Maduro. I suspect Trump is right about something and has done the unfortunate people of Venezuela a great favor.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. +4
    6 January 2026 09: 47
    Corrupt cowards, shame!
  35. AMG
    +2
    6 January 2026 09: 52
    And who is this Pereira, and who authorized him to say such things or is this his personal opinion?
  36. +8
    6 January 2026 09: 54
    That's right)) We'll quickly find these presidents in the pampas, whether it's Pedro or Gomez or something, but we didn't join the army to fight the Yankees every now and then. We went to fight))) The uniform is just nice and the glasses are cool, and they pay you, you don't have to work, and there are no idiots to fight))) Ugh, I didn't think that 99% of the army's recruits are losers, so why the hell did you join the army then?
  37. +15
    6 January 2026 09: 54
    In 1993, Somali militias under General Aideed were unafraid to fight the Americans, despite the potential negative consequences. As a result, the brave Yankees fled in their tracks and have stayed away from Somalia ever since.
  38. +9
    6 January 2026 09: 55

    The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so for fear of a more serious invasion.
    What's the point of having such an army then? Just to watch from the sidelines?
    1. +3
      6 January 2026 10: 13
      What's the point of having such an army then? Just to watch from the sidelines?
  39. +2
    6 January 2026 09: 56
    Maduro danced his heart out. For his soldiers, life turned out to be the sweetest of all.
  40. +12
    6 January 2026 09: 57
    That's a lot. We're living off your money, but we're afraid to fight for you and the country. I remember back in the early days of the Second World War, some people were jumping off their contracts.
  41. +11
    6 January 2026 10: 01
    The Cubans have proven their unbending will.
    1. GMV
      -3
      6 January 2026 22: 36
      What did they prove? The security objective was captured, Delta suffered no losses, and they themselves were all eliminated. The samurai rip open their bellies, and here, too, that opportunity to prove something was missed.
  42. +8
    6 January 2026 10: 02
    Something similar happened in Russia when Benya the Drunkard came to power... The army simply remained silent, betraying its people (I think so, as I served during that time). Or rather, they chickened out, fearing serious clashes... Incidentally, the army behaved similarly during Prigozhin's rebellion...
    1. +1
      6 January 2026 11: 09
      You didn't serve! Otherwise, you wouldn't be writing here about the army being cowardly. I served, unlike you, a "hero"! Prigozhin is a traitor to the motherland, as the President rightly stated – this mutiny is treason! The army shouldn't "react"; the army should follow the orders of the Supreme Commander, which is exactly what was demonstrated. And only thanks to Vladimir Putin was this entire Wagner group not destroyed by the army; it was simply disbanded without unnecessary bloodshed.
      1. +6
        6 January 2026 18: 57
        Prigozhin was right about Shoigu and what he and his pocket generals did to the Ministry of Defense. You've probably forgotten how many of his protégés have already been jailed and how many cases of corruption and theft have been opened.
  43. -1
    6 January 2026 10: 05
    Quote: navigator777
    If his own army didn't stand up for their president, then that's because everyone there "loved" him so much. Let them judge him; we certainly shouldn't be shedding tears over this Maduro. I suspect Trump is right about something and has done the unfortunate people of Venezuela a great favor.

    What are you talking about? Madura had a 100% rating.
  44. +1
    6 January 2026 10: 07
    That's why it's 2x4 years or one six-year term, no more!!! And the age limit is 65 = pension!
  45. +3
    6 January 2026 10: 13
    In general, we would have given it to them if they had caught up with us.
    Sufferers...
  46. +6
    6 January 2026 10: 17
    A lieutenant colonel from the active reserve said in an interview with a correspondent... "I'm not a coward, but I'm afraid." It would have been better for this Latino to remain silent, although if the majority of lieutenant colonels there are like that, then let them reap the shame, and the words "Venezuelan army," "Venezuelan military" evoke disgust and disrespectful laughter in people.
  47. 0
    6 January 2026 10: 24
    Cooks, builders, cleaners, you are taking over the world, because this world, under the rule of the rich and educated, is moving towards turning into a cesspool!
  48. +1
    6 January 2026 10: 33
    The words from the famous hit "Why did you back down, you sucker..." took on new colors...
  49. +3
    6 January 2026 10: 43
    Venezuela is all...
    This is the only thing you need to know about liberalism.
    1. -3
      6 January 2026 11: 13
      Venezuela isn't "everything!" You won't get oil on your terms. To do that, they'd have to completely occupy the country, establish physical control over all its infrastructure, which is impossible! Venezuela is much larger than Vietnam, with jungles, mountains, and open borders with neighbors like Colombia and Brazil!
    2. GMV
      0
      6 January 2026 22: 44
      Russia should also add that the agreements regarding Ukraine are also over... what's the point of negotiating with a bandit knowing he's planning to devour you? And how are such agreements any different from the actions of the Venezuelan military, who didn't want to escalate the situation, so to speak, but "wanted to reach an agreement." So, did it work?
  50. +13
    6 January 2026 10: 45
    A familiar picture: the people feed a gang of scoundrels who are supposed to protect them, but who have no intention of doing so, only of receiving a salary.
    1. 0
      6 January 2026 19: 01
      I read somewhere that it's a bit different. Each general has his own infrastructure facility "under his roof," from which he feeds himself and the troops assigned to him. So, in essence, like in medieval Rus', there's a prince appointed by the boyars, and then there are the boyars with their own personal estates and their own retinue.
      1. +1
        7 January 2026 00: 18
        But it's now known for certain that this is mostly fiction. Otherwise, the generals who controlled the oil would have defended themselves to the last. After all, the transfer of the oil industry to the Americans would deprive them of their livelihood and relative independence.
  51. +21
    6 January 2026 10: 46
    I sincerely feel sorry for the Cubans. I wish we could defend Cuba, they could be next... sad
    1. GMV
      0
      6 January 2026 22: 51
      It's unlikely that what happened in Venezuela won't have consequences for the moles in the military headquarters of Cuba, North Korea, Russia, etc. Unless they, the ones listed, have plans for everyone to simply die laughing.
  52. -1
    6 January 2026 11: 04
    The key word is "apparently," in all the comments from so-called "political scientists"! )) Guesswork and speculation. There was some betrayal, of course. But specifics will come later, not now! So far, nothing has changed, except that Maduro "moved" to the United States. The statements of the red-haired, orange-faced guy are worthless; he's crazy! What the Venezuelan government intends to do or not do will become clear in a month or two. So far, it has been clearly stated that there will be no changes in the country's policy under any circumstances. We'll see what happens next. Overall, this barbaric action has made us even more enemies throughout the Western Hemisphere, and nothing more! ) ki. Now the question is: what can Russia even discuss or negotiate with the United States about after all this?! Nothing!
  53. +4
    6 January 2026 11: 11
    The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so for fear of a more serious invasion.

    And indeed, the glorious great-grandchildren of Simon Bolivar figured, why should we make a fuss over a president? Big deal! We have as many Maduros as there are Pedros in Brazil. One more, one less...
  54. +4
    6 January 2026 11: 12
    The Venezuelan army could have repelled the US attack, but did not do so for fear of a more serious invasion.

    recourse request
    I don't think there's been such an "explanation" in history before.
    1. GMV
      -3
      6 January 2026 22: 54
      They only went a little further than the Red Army in mid-June 1941, fearing provocations
    2. 0
      7 January 2026 12: 37
      Something similar happened when the Kursk was torpedoed by an American submarine...
  55. +5
    6 January 2026 11: 22
    We are afraid to take our ships away from the Finns, let alone the Venezuelans.
  56. +4
    6 January 2026 11: 26
    A shameful excuse. Apparently, Maduro himself didn't trust his own people, since he was guarded by Cubans.
    1. GMV
      -1
      6 January 2026 22: 56
      But even this didn't help him much.
  57. +5
    6 January 2026 11: 50
    Why the hell would one maintain such an army and command structure?
  58. +6
    6 January 2026 12: 14
    Even the shadow of Fidel, who defeated South Africa at Cuito Canaval, the United States at the Bay of Pigs... an exceptional leader. If he were in power in Venezuela, everything would be different. But this country of mestizos is worthless. When Spain left, Mexico lost half its territory in two days... The remaining brothels survive by the grace of God.
  59. +5
    6 January 2026 12: 20
    So many words... But to put it bluntly, they've simply screwed up. The Venezuelan army is an army of cowards. Their uniforms are probably brown, so they can't be seen.
  60. +3
    6 January 2026 12: 25
    Quote: aviapit123
    Venezuela is all...
    This is the only thing you need to know about liberalism.

    Two months ago, some "experts" were writing here that the US would get bogged down in this war. But look how simple it all turned out. So civilized. The Venezuelans don't even care about their country—the US boss will come and sort it out. Patriotism is unknown to them.
  61. +3
    6 January 2026 12: 28
    Quote: tralflot1832
    There's a coalition of northern countries in NATO - Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Iceland (I'm not sure), and Norway. They'll fight tooth and nail for Greenland. Norway recently replaced Denmark as the NATO presidency. They've been feeling a bit sad lately. Just blah, blah, blah.

    Will they put up a fight? =))) Another "expert." They'll put up a fight on the podium of some UN. Blah blah blah and that's it.
  62. 0
    6 January 2026 12: 51
    If their children had started being killed, would they have sat idle too? It's all nonsense. They simply chickened out. That's what they call it. There are plenty of examples in history: Denmark against Germany in 1940. They waved a white flag for three hours. No amount of weapons will suffice if the army doesn't want to defend its country. A couple hundred paratroopers entered there in 10-20 helicopters, without heavy weapons. Nothing noticeable, they could have evacuated the presidential couple and shot down the helicopters. They screwed up. Well, now when we mention Venezuela, we'll also remember Syria and Iran. And the striped ones, puffing out their cheeks, are already planning their next victim. I think they might rush to Cuba. But it won't be without losses there – the people are different.
  63. +2
    6 January 2026 12: 53
    Quote: navigator777
    If his own army didn't stand up for its president, then that means everyone there "loved" him so much.

    The army took an oath! No oath in the world includes a clause about loving the President! But there is an oath to defend to the last drop of blood... They were even afraid to defend themselves. I wonder, as the years go by, will "soldier of the Venezuelan army" (intentionally capitalized!) become a byword for cowards and traitors?
  64. +2
    6 January 2026 12: 53
    It's China's fault here, they've been doing business with Venezuela for a long time. They could have sent 50 of their own and air defense forces that would shoot, but they chose to sit on the fence.
    1. GMV
      -2
      6 January 2026 23: 05
      I believe China, and we for that matter, would be more interested in watching America disgrace itself yet again, rather than confirm the US's claims that we're weaving a net under their belt. Well, it has disgraced itself, trampling on its own "rules, democracy, freedoms, and talk of human rights." It disgraced itself, and along with it, the entire Western world, which suddenly began to vacillate in its assessments of the events. The precedent is here to stay, and no one will forget it! These military men were likely given a clear order not to succumb to provocations. We've been through this before...
  65. 0
    6 January 2026 12: 53
    Quote from Matsur
    The uniform is probably brown.

    from below - yes!
  66. +2
    6 January 2026 12: 57
    Quote: ettore
    When the right moment comes, they will help and blame it on Trump - He killed me.


    For Trump, the right moment is already in the past. "Killed during an arrest attempt" and the bribes are smooth. Remember bin Laden. The trial will be open and Maduro will be judged by a jury... not the most favorable outcome; better yet, like with Hussein. It smells like an epic setup...
  67. +2
    6 January 2026 13: 14
    Hmm... that's not a good idea. Why would they sell weapons if all they're good at is talking? Give them dialogue. They sold out their president, probably for a pretty penny, and now they're making rotten excuses about dialogue. Glory to the brave Bolivarians! They're real heroes.
  68. +1
    6 January 2026 13: 41
    A donkey loaded with gold opens the gates of any fortress. This is an old saying that applies especially to countries with poor populations and high levels of corruption. Venezuela is precisely such a case.
  69. +2
    6 January 2026 14: 03
    Quote: Z-7478
    You didn't serve! Otherwise, you wouldn't be writing here about the army being cowardly. I served, unlike you, a "hero"! Prigozhin is a traitor to the motherland, as the President rightly stated – this mutiny is treason! The army shouldn't "react"; the army should follow the orders of the Supreme Commander, which is exactly what was demonstrated. And only thanks to Vladimir Putin was this entire Wagner group not destroyed by the army; it was simply disbanded without unnecessary bloodshed.

    "Serviceman", weren't you the one who called the officers' meeting to support Benya the Drunkard??))
  70. +3
    6 January 2026 14: 08
    Of course, we have the weapons to defend ourselves from an attack of this scale, we could do it.

    "We would cut the enemy down to size, but the skin is precious..."©
    Well, we can also remember about “shame and war”©.
  71. +3
    6 January 2026 14: 40
    It's the funniest thing I've ever seen. We might as well disband the Armed Forces altogether. What's the point of them?
    And here we are chasing the GDP, some of us are creating such amazing things.
  72. +2
    6 January 2026 14: 48
    It seems the peoples have ended, only bodies remain.
  73. +4
    6 January 2026 14: 52
    Yeah.... "we have everything"??? You have nothing. No honor, no conscience, no military duty, no loyalty to the Oath, and no desire to defend your homeland and your people. Cowards and traitors. You should be hanged in the central square of Karakos; you don't deserve a bullet.
  74. -2
    6 January 2026 15: 08
    Well, there's some logic to it. The air defenses are weak and can't fully protect the skies. The only option left is to resort to "guerrilla" tactics. Conceal the air defenses as much as possible and avoid being noticed during the first Tomahawk strike. Because that would expose the air defenses, and an operation to destroy them would begin.
    A typical American and Israeli tactic demonstrated in Iran. Afterwards, the enemy flies freely in the sky and bombs with cast iron.
    It was in order to avoid this and try to cause damage to the planes that they remained silent.
    But they didn't think about helicopters.
  75. +6
    6 January 2026 15: 23
    The Venezuelan army didn't see any invasion, the dollars blinded them.
  76. +1
    6 January 2026 16: 01
    They openly sold out their president. And most likely at Maduro's request.
  77. DO
    +2
    6 January 2026 16: 01
    Lieutenant Colonel Edgar Alejandro Lugo Pereira of the Army's Active Reserve:
    "Of course, we have the weapons to defend ourselves against an attack of this scale; we could do so. But Venezuela has always maintained dialogue. If, from a military standpoint, we had attacked any American facilities, we would now be subject to a military attack..."
    Venezuela would now be under direct military attack, and the consequences of this military operation would be catastrophic."

    Well, here is an open admission to the world of betrayal of the Motherland by some officers of the Venezuelan army, from the lips of its lieutenant colonel.
  78. +5
    6 January 2026 16: 06
    They know, but they're keeping quiet. After all, making a fool of yourself is a real challenge. ))) This also explains why Russia didn't step in to support "Chávez's children." Why would Russia need the dead weight of Venezuela? No matter how you rearrange the beds, the staff is the same.
  79. +2
    6 January 2026 16: 22
    Quote: Alekseev
    What prevented the air defense forces from setting up several ambushes in the likely flight paths of American helicopters, from taking up positions to provide combat protection for the residence of the head of state, etc., etc.?

    An attack on the president was one of the most likely scenarios for US action, especially after everything that happened in Iran and Lebanon. What "serious invasion" with 5 US Marines? The commander-in-chief should be among his troops. Caracas isn't the best place, but if he were there, he'd need to concentrate at least 30-40 of his best troops in the city and its environs, cover them at least as well as Hamas, and arm them far better than Hamas. Venezuela has incomparably more money, people, and time for this.
  80. 0
    6 January 2026 16: 30
    It's only begining!
  81. 0
    6 January 2026 16: 31
    Come fanno simili vili ad occuparsi della difesa di uno stato sovrano? Una vergogna per l'uniforme che portano..
  82. +3
    6 January 2026 16: 57
    They shit their pants and took the money. It's no different in Banana Land.
  83. +6
    6 January 2026 17: 22
    Now you can explain your cowardice and venality with anything. It won't change the essence of what happened: the Venezuelan army lost its nerve and sold out to the Americans for dollars. They simply lay down and spread their buttocks, forgive the metaphor. As the current prime minister
    1. 0
      6 January 2026 17: 58
      And I didn't forget about Vaseline (it's not LGBT propaganda)...😂😂😂
  84. +2
    6 January 2026 17: 57
    There is one reason - venality, including that of the top military leadership.
  85. +3
    6 January 2026 18: 44
    The amusing army of clowns prefers to negotiate, dance and bang the drum!
  86. +1
    6 January 2026 18: 47
    They chose both shame and war. Not a single pity for these senseless hours of suffering.
  87. +1
    6 January 2026 18: 50
    Yes, all because the Venezuelan Army is a circus.
    As is the Syrian army.

    Very low salaries force military personnel to earn money on the side. By robbery.
    In Venezuela, as in any other Latin American country, this is the norm.
    During the day they lazily pretend to work, in the evening they frantically pray to the Virgin Mary, and at night they even more frantically cut each other for food.

    That night, the Venezuelan army was busy with more important matters than repelling the attack.
    1. +1
      7 January 2026 02: 10
      Even a fool would understand that the army itself captured him and stupidly handed him over to the Americans, and this circus with helicopters was just for show, to cover their own way. No one would fly to certain death – they're not fools.

      The funniest thing is that Venezuelans won't be worse off without Maduro; they'll probably even get better. America is the king of this region, and China and Russia have already merged because they understand this. The Venezuelan government understands this, too. The oligarchs also understand that they can make money with America and that they'll get some. And the people will also get a few crumbs; things clearly won't get any worse. For many in Latin America, America is a dream. They think like those who wear a forelock.
  88. +1
    6 January 2026 20: 04
    I don't believe it, it's a lie, the army fled like rats.
  89. 0
    6 January 2026 20: 41
    Quote: Piramidon
    Quote: Murmur 55
    Sedov, well, we also seem to be investing in all sorts of projects abroad, but there is no visible benefit either in our neighboring countries or, even more so, in the distant ones.

    What's more, all our investments in Venezuela will now go to the Yankees. And quite a bit has been poured into it.

    Your investments, then you didn’t understand something when you invested.
  90. 0
    6 January 2026 20: 51
    Quote: Alekseev
    Yes, and they love both cowardice and silver.
    Maduro himself...
    He spread "Mannlicherism" around himself, as the classic wrote.
    There is such a concept: degrees of combat readiness.
    It seems that not only in the army, but also in the presidential security itself, no combat readiness was introduced.
    What prevented the air defense forces from setting up several ambushes in the likely flight paths of American helicopters, from taking up positions to provide combat protection for the residence of the head of state, etc., etc.?
    In this case alone, with a hundred fighters protecting them, the special forces arriving in a pair of Chinooks would not have had any success...
    Are there idiots in the Bolivarian Republic? There are probably some, but not all. Treason, in one form or another, did occur. Yes, sir. Yes
    And the revolutionary Maduro himself.
    They put him, like a block of wood, into a helicopter and take him away.....
    He didn't even bite anyone, let alone enter the battle at the head of the forces with an AK in his hands and an F-1 on his belt (for the last decisive moment).
    Clearly not Fidel or Che Guevara...
    Well, let's see, maybe the Chavistas will be able to get out of this situation with dignity without him.
    In fact, it would be better for us if China bought oil from us, and not from other places. wink

    Tell me, what do the military lose with the president's departure? They're part of the golden billion; given the country's wealth, they have a high standard of living (in the broadest sense)?
  91. 0
    6 January 2026 20: 52
    Quote from alexoff
    Why do Latin American countries even have armies? They could never fight back against the US, and they rarely fought each other. They only staged coups and carried out terror against communists.

    To protect the president from the people and a little from the neighbors.
  92. 0
    6 January 2026 20: 57
    Quote: ZovSailor
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Today, 08: 10
    "Iron" argument.

    hi The most compelling argument they forgot to add was that there was direct betrayal by the president's inner circle and a deal between the highest elites and the Americans.
    This must be taken into account in our country, understanding how far the interests of the elites are from the people.
    This is the kind of foreign policy twist that EBN said.

    You wrote it correctly, but...you have to take into account how, by what means.
  93. -1
    6 January 2026 21: 09
    Quote: Mikhail3
    Keep it simple. They'll be killed. Where are we going to put them anyway? They'll definitely get to them in their homeland, especially since American rule always leads in one direction: impoverishment, tyranny, and universal hatred. And where will they go?

    And are you sure you're talking about that country that there was no impoverishment or tyranny in Venezuela?
  94. 0
    6 January 2026 21: 11
    Quote: Viktor fm
    We are afraid to take our ships away from the Finns, let alone the Venezuelans.

    It is popular here to discuss distant things that are not visible to the naked eye.
  95. 0
    6 January 2026 21: 15
    Absolute disgrace (this is a short post).
  96. 0
    6 January 2026 21: 16
    Quote: Andrey Andreev_2
    Something similar happened in Russia when Benya the Drunkard came to power... The army simply remained silent, betraying its people (I think so, as I served during that time). Or rather, they chickened out, fearing serious clashes... Incidentally, the army behaved similarly during Prigozhin's rebellion...

    Tell me, wasn't the army shooting at the Supreme Council? Were the future's confidants sitting in the tanks?
    Under Prigozhen, it's different. The military isn't stupid, they're people too, and they understand that they didn't create the structure and that the squabbles were within the ruling group. What's the point of getting involved in the squabbles? Some of them will be declared scapegoats no matter what, and did they need that?
  97. 0
    6 January 2026 21: 20
    Quote: Tikhonov_Alexander
    The rotten, so-called elite. Our elite surrendered the country in 1917, when victory was just a step away. The Soviet elite, led by Marked One, surrendered the USSR. And it will be a long time before information emerges about how exactly Gorby and his Raika were recruited. And it's unlikely to be only them. Saddam, and not only him, now Maduro... Our guarantor has much to ponder. For four years, they've been drawing red lines and doing nothing... And here's an example! Trump and the entire West disregard so-called international law—they do what suits them, and our guarantor doesn't even respond to terrorist attacks. The Tajiks shot people in Crocus—and we already have millions of them, and we still have visa-free travel with them! Banderites are killing our citizens, even generals, and the government is appealing to the West for common sense... Ukraine is striking Russian strategic targets, even the guarantor's residence, and there's been no significant response, only the drawing of red lines with sympathetic ink... It's high time the guarantor thought about whether something like Maduro could happen to him... After all, our elite has capital and real estate in the West, and relatives live and study there...

    Great writing, but there's a caveat: if I could do something instead of drawing it, I would. As it is, I only suppress those who are undesirable within the country; there's nothing else in sight so far.
    1. GMV
      -1
      6 January 2026 23: 15
      This is all ridiculous, gentlemen! What can we tell about governing a country to a man who has been doing this for a quarter of a century and is pulling the country out of the hole it was dragged into by the young reformers? The fact that he overestimated his troops isn't just his fault... and who is without sin?
  98. +1
    6 January 2026 21: 30
    Quote: Z-7478
    You didn't serve! Otherwise, you wouldn't be writing here about the army being cowardly. I served, unlike you, a "hero"! Prigozhin is a traitor to the motherland, as the President rightly stated – this mutiny is treason! The army shouldn't "react"; the army should follow the orders of the Supreme Commander, which is exactly what was demonstrated. And only thanks to Vladimir Putin was this entire Wagner group not destroyed by the army; it was simply disbanded without unnecessary bloodshed.

    Tell me, shouldn't the president who created illegal armed groups in the Russian Federation, violating several serious articles of the constitution, be held accountable? What's the point of having an army at all if it paid pennies, while Prigozhin's pays several times that, and all from the same state budget? Do you think the military is idiots?
  99. 0
    6 January 2026 21: 36
    Quote: RussianPatriot
    Yes, all because the Venezuelan Army is a circus.
    As is the Syrian army.

    Very low salaries force military personnel to earn money on the side. By robbery.
    In Venezuela, as in any other Latin American country, this is the norm.
    During the day they lazily pretend to work, in the evening they frantically pray to the Virgin Mary, and at night they even more frantically cut each other for food.

    That night, the Venezuelan army was busy with more important matters than repelling the attack.

    Yes, in principle this was known, but many here have no idea about ethnography and mentality and write from their own positions, it’s funny to read.
  100. 0
    6 January 2026 22: 38
    In a word, p...sies.