S-200 air defense missile system in satellite images

8 278 49
S-200 air defense missile system in satellite images

In the late 1960s, in the troops Defense The USSR developed a set of facility complexes that addressed a wide range of tasks. Two rings of stationary multi-channel S-25 air defense missile systems were deployed around Moscow. The most common in anti-aircraft missile The troops were equipped with medium-range systems of the S-75 family, supplemented by the S-125, capable of combating air attack weapons operating at low altitudes, and long-range S-200 positions were deployed in the most important areas.

All Soviet first-generation air defense missile systems, except for the S-25, had a certain degree of mobility, and although, as a rule, they were constantly on combat duty at fixed, well-equipped engineering positions, if necessary, the S-75, S-125, and S-200, albeit with certain difficulties, could still be relocated.



In order to increase the combat stability of the S-200 long-range anti-aircraft missile systems, it was deemed appropriate to combine them under a single command with the S-75 medium-range and S-125 low-altitude air defense systems, forming mixed-composition anti-aircraft missile brigades that included a command post with 2-3 S-200 firing channels and several S-75 and S-125 anti-aircraft missile divisions. This organizational scheme with a relatively small number of S-200 launchers in a brigade made it possible to deploy long-range anti-aircraft missile systems in a larger number of areas of the country.

An important advantage of the "two hundred" was the use of missile homing. Even without fully realizing its range capabilities, the S-200 SAM system complemented the S-75 and S-125 systems with radio command guidance, significantly complicating the enemy's electronic warfare and high-altitude reconnaissance. The S-200's advantages over the aforementioned systems were especially evident when countering aircraft that set up active interference, which were almost an ideal target for homing missiles.

During the Cold War, the presence of S-200 air defense missile systems in border areas forced Aviation NATO countries were extremely cautious about the integrity of Soviet airspace. In most cases, the deployment of an American P-3 Orion patrol aircraft or an RC-135 Rivet Joint long-range electronic reconnaissance aircraft to escort the Russian air force was sufficient to prompt their crews to quickly evacuate their aircraft beyond the range of long-range Soviet systems upon receiving a signal of detection. The deployment of the S-200 air defense system, which became the long arm of the Soviet air defense system, largely countered the adoption of the AGM-69A SRAM air-to-surface guided missile with a range of 160 km in the United States. This missile was designed specifically to counter medium- and short-range air defense systems, as well as to strike other predetermined targets and installations. The S-200 missile carriers could include B-52G and B-52H bombers, each carrying 20 missiles (eight in drum-type launchers and 12 on underwing pylons), FB-111s, equipped with six missiles, and later B-1Bs, which carried up to 32 missiles. When deployed forward of the defended facility, the S-200 SAM system could destroy aircraft carrying SRAM missiles before they were launched, thereby increasing the survivability of the Soviet air defense system as a whole. The relatively few S-200s could also effectively counter high-speed, high-altitude SR-71 reconnaissance aircraft and long-range radar picket aircraft, as well as electronic reconnaissance aircraft and active jammers operating at greater distances, which were beyond the reach of the S-75.

In the late 1970s, the Soviet Air Defense Forces began receiving mobile multi-channel S-300PT systems with towed launchers. In the early 1980s, they began receiving self-propelled S-300PS systems, and after the collapse of the USSR, they began receiving the improved S-300PM. However, thanks to their long-range capabilities, the S-200 remained relevant for a long time, and their firing range was surpassed only relatively recently, with the introduction of the 40N6E missile into the S-400 air defense system.

At the same time, all S-200 family SAM systems suffered from a number of significant shortcomings. Primarily, this was due to the use of missiles fueled by toxic fuel and nitrogen oxide-based oxidizers. Uncontrolled contact between the propellant components inevitably led to explosions and fires. Furthermore, personnel were forced to wear insulating gas masks and protective suits when fueling, defuelling, and servicing the SAMs. Although all S-200 SAM system variants were considered mobile, relocating individual components and the system as a whole was a very labor-intensive and time-consuming process, effectively rendering the S-200 system "semi-permanent." Standards called for deployment from a march to be 24 hours. However, this was only possible in favorable weather conditions and required the heroic efforts of personnel.

The S-200 SAM launch site, built to all requirements, is a truly impressive, substantial structure, occupying a considerable area. It is unmistakable and easily visible in aerial and satellite images.

The launch site is a group of launch pads for launchers (usually six launchers) and loading vehicles with a launch preparation cabin, a diesel power plant and access roads that provide for the delivery of missiles and loading of the “guns”.


To house the radio-technical battery's equipment, permanent concrete bunkers with earthen fill were constructed, protecting the equipment and personnel (except antennas) from fragments from aircraft missiles and small- and medium-caliber bombs. Separate protected rooms, equipped with sealed doors, life support systems, and air purification systems, housed the radio-technical battery's duty shift room, a recreation room, a classroom, a shelter, a toilet, a vestibule, and a shower for disinfecting personnel.

Unlike the S-75 and S-125 surface-to-air missile systems, which were widely deployed abroad and actively used in regional conflicts, the S-200 SAM system was not exported until the first half of the 1980s. The S-200 remained classified for a long time, even among the closest allies in the Warsaw Pact, demonstrating its special role in the air defense system and the importance attached to it by the highest Soviet military leadership.

Despite their unprecedentedly long range and altitude, all variants of the S-200 air defense system were extremely expensive to manufacture, expensive to operate, and difficult to maintain. For this reason, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the "independent" republics inherited far fewer S-200 systems than other types of air defense systems, and the former Soviet republics used the legacy of the USSR's air defense systems in different ways.

Compared to other Soviet target air defense systems, the Soviet Union, and later Russia, delivered very few S-200VEs to foreign customers. However, despite their small numbers, the S-200s significantly enhanced the air defense capabilities of the countries that adopted them. With rare exceptions, the service life of S-200VE export air defense systems in Warsaw Pact countries after the collapse of the Eastern Bloc was short-lived. With international tensions easing and the risk of a major war in Europe minimizing, many countries decommissioned or mothballed these very expensive and complex long-range systems.

Satellite images of S-200 air defense missile systems in Russia


Compared to other first-generation SAM systems, the S-75 and S-125, the long-range S-200 was manufactured in significantly smaller numbers. In the mid-1980s, approximately 60 S-200 target channels were deployed and stored in the Soviet Union. As new air defense systems arrived, the early, heavily worn-out S-200A Angara systems, deployed in secondary areas and deep in the country, were decommissioned. Mixed-composition anti-aircraft missile brigades and regiments, which had S-75, S-125, and S-200 battalions, began actively upgrading to the multi-channel S-300P SAM system with solid-fuel SAMs stored in transportable launchers and requiring no maintenance during their warranty period, beginning in the second half of the 1980s.

But until the mid-1990s, the reductions weren't widespread or sweeping. The modernized S-200VM air defense missile systems, the "long arm" of the country's air defense forces, were indispensable in many ways. The modernized Vega, capable of engaging enemy airborne early warning, reconnaissance, and jamming aircraft at a range of nearly 300 km, remained in demand for a very long time. Technical literature states that the longest-range modification of the S-200 family was the S-200D Dubna air defense missile system. However, after reviewing publicly available materials and speaking with personnel who served on various S-200 modifications, I was unable to find confirmation that the S-200D actually served in combat duty. It's possible that the Dubna was built as a single unit, tested, and underwent trial operation at the Saryshagan test site in Kazakhstan.

Despite military budget cuts and a reduced military threat, the Russian Defense Ministry leadership in the 1990s did not completely abandon the highly problematic and expensive-to-operate S-200 missiles, which carried bulky 8-ton missiles fueled by toxic fuel and a corrosive oxidizer. This was because the S-300PT/PS/PM air defense missile systems could not compete with the S-200VM in terms of firing range, and the S-300 missiles were simply insufficient to cover even some of the potentially dangerous areas and protect all strategically important facilities.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200 air defense missile system position near Severodvinsk

The last S-200VMs, deployed in the Arkhangelsk, Murmansk, and Kaliningrad regions, were removed from combat duty in the late 1990s and subsequently transferred to "storage." It's no secret that in the late 1990s and early 2000s, sophisticated equipment containing electronic components containing precious metals was "stored" at our military bases. Over the course of several years, most of the mothballed S-200s were mercilessly looted and effectively converted into scrap metal. The official decommissioning of the S-200 air defense system during the "Serdyukov era" effectively marked the formal signing of a "death warrant" for the anti-aircraft systems, which were impossible to return to service.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200 air defense missile system position in the Kaliningrad region

Subsequently, S-300P and S-400 air defense systems were deployed in some of the well-equipped engineering positions of the S-200 air defense missile systems.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense system in Azerbaijan


Azerbaijan is one of the countries that emerged from the ruins of the USSR and received the S-200VM long-range air defense system. After the division of Soviet military assets, Baku received four S-200VM target systems. In the early 21st century, Azerbaijani S-200VMs underwent a "minor modernization" and refurbishment. It was reported that the country's stockpile of B-880 (5V28) anti-aircraft missiles was replenished by purchases from Ukraine.


Transport and handling vehicles with 5V28 SAMs at a military parade in Baku in 2010

At two positions near the village of Aran in the Yevlakh region, missiles on launchers could be observed until 2014, and launchers, loading vehicles, and illumination and guidance radars remained until 2018.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense missile system position near the town of Aran. The image was taken in January 2012.

The launchers located on the Caspian coast east of Baku had anti-aircraft missiles until August 2018.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense missile system position east of Baku. The image was taken in July 2018.

The S-200VM air defense missile systems were finally decommissioned after the Azerbaijani Air Defense Command deemed that local crews had fully mastered the S-300PMU-2 Favorit air defense missile systems purchased from Russia. Under a contract worth a total of $300 million, deliveries of two S-300PMU-2 battalion systems, each with eight towed launchers and 200 48N6E2 surface-to-air missiles, were completed in 2012.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense missile system in Belarus


In August 1992, the 2nd Separate Air Defense Army and the Air Defense Directorate of the Ground Forces of the Belarusian Military District were merged to form the Air Defense Forces of the Republic of Belarus. Soon after, the Belarusian authorities deemed much of the military power inherited from the USSR excessive, and in the 1990s and 2000s, they actively sold off their Soviet military legacy at dumping prices. At the same time, the Belarusians held on to the long-range S-200VM missiles as long as possible. With a range of up to 240 km against targets flying at medium and high altitudes, they could control most of Belarus and strike targets over Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania.

Two divisions, deployed 7 km north of the city of Lida, remained on combat duty until 2007. Launchers with B-880 missiles remained at the position near Polotsk until 2015.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense missile system position near Polotsk. The image was taken in April 2015.

Currently, S-300PS air defense missile systems, donated by Russia, are deployed at the former S-200VM positions near Polotsk. Before being shipped to Belarus, the S-300PS hardware and 5V55RM SAMs underwent refurbishment and service life extension.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense system in Kazakhstan


Kazakhstan played a special role in ensuring the Soviet Union's defense capability. The republic was home to the main cosmodrome, as well as nuclear and missile testing grounds. During the Cold War, Soviet airspace was protected from the south by a belt of anti-aircraft missile sites stretching across western and central Turkmenistan, central Uzbekistan, and the southern and eastern regions of Kazakhstan.

Until recently, the S-200VM air defense missile system was the longest-range weapon in Kazakhstan's air defense system, and the S-200 anti-aircraft missiles were regularly displayed at military parades.


S-200VM positions were maintained in the vicinity of the city of Karaganda, on the coast of the Caspian Sea, south of the city of Aktau and north of Almaty – a total of four target channels.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense missile system position near Karaganda. The image was taken in July 2019.

An anti-aircraft missile battalion, deployed 18 km west of Karaganda, remained on combat alert until the end of 2019. The complex's infrastructure remained in place until mid-2021. In 2023, an S-300PS battalion was deployed 400 meters north of the former S-200VM SAM site.

Until mid-2020, two S-200VM air defense systems provided northern coverage to Almaty. In 2023, the S-200VMs were replaced by S-300PS air defense systems.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense system position 12 km north of Almaty. The image was taken in June 2019.

Satellite images from April 2020 show an S-200VM air defense system positioned 10 km southeast of Aktau. Of the six 5P72V launchers, only two carried anti-aircraft missiles. This system was decommissioned in 2023.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense system position 10 km southeast of Aktau. The image was taken in April 2020.

It can be concluded that the S-200VM air defense system's service in Kazakhstan ended in 2023. In the final years before its decommissioning, Kazakhstan's S-200s were deployed in reduced numbers, and not all launchers were equipped with missiles.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense system in Turkmenistan


Until 1979, the Turkmen route was considered one of the most likely routes for American strategic bombers to penetrate the central regions of the USSR from Iran. However, after the Islamic Revolution, the situation changed significantly, and by 1991, the air defense systems deployed in Turkmenistan were mostly older.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense system position 10 km southwest of Turkmenbashi. The image was taken in September 2023.

In the 21st century, the number of S-200VM target systems capable of carrying out combat missions in Turkmenistan did not exceed ten units, and of this number, four S-200VM target systems were deployed at positions in the vicinity of the cities of Turkmenbashi and Mary.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense missile system position 20 km southeast of Mary. The image was taken in September 2023.

However, the operational SAM systems only have single anti-aircraft missiles on their launchers, and at best, this is only a third of the combat load. This is most likely due to the fact that Turkmenistan has very few operational B-880 missiles, manufactured in the 1980s.


Despite this, the S-200VM air defense system remains officially in service in Turkmenistan, and the B-880 anti-aircraft missiles look very impressive at parades.

Satellite images of Ukrainian S-200 air defense systems


After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine inherited more than ten S-200 air defense systems, some of which were stored. Between the 1990s and 2000s, the Ukrainian authorities actively sold off military assets. However, due to the specific nature and design features of this type of air defense system, exporting it was significantly hampered, and not every country could afford to maintain S-200 systems.

Lack of funding meant that by the late 1990s, only a few Ukrainian S-200s remained operational, and the level of training of their crews left much to be desired. Unlike Russia, Ukraine did not produce medium- and long-range air defense systems domestically, and there was no funding to purchase new systems abroad. In this situation, Ukroboronservis attempted to modernize the S-200VM air defense system in 2008. However, the project did not progress beyond routine repairs, which would have slightly extended its service life.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense missile system position 2 km southeast of Aleshki. The image was taken in August 2010.

As of 2011, operational "two-hundred" positions were located near the city of Oleshky in the Kherson region and 20 km north of Lviv.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VM air defense missile system position 20 km north of Lviv. The image was taken in April 2009.

In 2014, Ukrainian "200s" began to be decommissioned. The last battalion of the 540th Lviv Anti-Aircraft Missile Regiment transferred its equipment into storage in 2016.

By February 2022, some serviceable anti-aircraft missiles and target illumination radars remained in storage, and Ukrainian specialists managed to resuscitate at least one system. It is also possible that Ukraine received components from Polish and Bulgarian S-200VE air defense systems. It is known that the Ukrainian Armed Forces attempted to fire B-880 missiles at ground targets and, according to unconfirmed reports, fired them at Russian aircraft.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense system in Syria


The S-200 anti-aircraft missile system lost its secrecy in 1983, after the Soviet military-political leadership decided to deploy four divisions with Soviet crews to Syria. Soon after, the Warsaw Pact countries and North Korea gained access to the export version, the S-200VE.

In total, by 1988, Syria received eight S-200VE air defense systems (channels), four technical positions and 144 V-880E missiles.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense system position 9 km south of Homs. The image was taken in March 2017.

These systems were deployed to positions near the cities of Damascus and Homs, as well as in Latakia province. As of 2010, there were eight divisions in Syria, organized into two regiments.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense system position 25 km south of Damascus. The image was taken in December 2017.

Syrian S-200VEs have been repeatedly used to repel air strikes by Israel, the United States, Great Britain, and France. While possessing record-breaking range and altitude against aerial targets, the exported Vega is unable to engage targets flying at altitudes below 300 meters, making it virtually useless against modern cruise missiles flying at low altitudes. Furthermore, this system has a relatively low probability of hitting actively maneuvering tactical and carrier-based aircraft, as confirmed by combat statistics. Nevertheless, on February 10, 2018, a B-880E anti-aircraft missile struck an Israeli F-16I Sufa fighter jet. The aircraft crashed in the north of the Jewish state. The pilots ejected, but one was seriously injured. On September 17, 2018, a Syrian S-200VE air defense system fired at a Russian Il-20M, resulting in the aircraft being shot down and all 15 people on board killed.

According to information published in foreign media, some of the systems were disabled during Israeli and American airstrikes on Syria.


Photos of a destroyed target illumination radar from the S-200VE air defense system deployed in Al-Romandan, 10 km east of Damascus, have been published online. Judging by the nature of the damage, the radar was hit directly by an anti-radar missile, after which it caught fire. However, by mid-2024, the system in Al-Romandan was returned to service. A spare radar was taken from storage.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense system position in Er-Romandan, 10 km east of Damascus. The image was taken in June 2024.

The presence of missiles on the launchers will be an indication that this air defense system is operational in June 2024.

As of the first half of 2022, the S-200VE air defense system, which had an atypical configuration, was located on a hill 40 km southeast of the Khmeimim airbase in Latakia province.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense system position in Latakia province, 40 km southeast of the Khmeimim airbase. The image was taken in April 2022.

Following President Bashar al-Assad's flight from the country and the capture of Damascus by armed opposition forces, Syria's centralized air defense system ceased to exist. It's difficult to say what condition Syria's S-200VE air defense systems are in now, but given all the circumstances, it's highly unlikely they are operational.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense system in Libya


As part of Soviet-Libyan military-technical cooperation, by the end of 1985, in addition to over fifty S-75 and S-125 air defense missile systems, eight S-200VE firing positions were deployed in Libya. These systems were equipped with 120 V-880E missiles and four technical positions for their loading and servicing.

Although the Libyan air defense force formally represented a significant force, it was unable to offer much resistance to the American airstrikes carried out in April 1986 as part of Operation El Dorado Canyon. In the 1990s, Libya's defense potential, finding itself internationally isolated, rapidly deteriorated, and the air defense system gradually fell into disrepair. Although most of the site-based SAM systems remained operational, their technical condition left much to be desired, and the crews' professional training and motivation were low.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense missile system position 50 km southwest of Misrata. The image was taken in February 2004.

According to satellite images, by the beginning of the 21st century, six S-200VE systems remained operational in Libya.


Google Earth satellite image of an S-200VE air defense system on the southern outskirts of Tripoli. The image was taken in May 2010.

A satellite image of an S-200VE position in the southern suburbs of Tripoli, dated May 2010, shows that not all launchers were armed with anti-aircraft missiles.


Google Earth satellite image of the same S-200VE air defense system position on the southern outskirts of Tripoli. The image was taken in March 2025.

After a NATO coalition intervened in the civil war in 2011, Libya's air defense system was subjected to a series of airstrikes.


Google Earth satellite image: destroyed components and radars from an S-200VE air defense system at a position in the southern suburbs of Tripoli. The image was taken in March 2025.

The most vulnerable components of the "two hundred" are not even the anti-aircraft missiles and launchers, but the attached radar systems designed for the timely detection of air targets and the provision of target designation, the illumination and guidance radars, the control cabins and the diesel generators that provide an autonomous power supply.


Google Earth satellite image: target illumination radars and other components of the S-200VE air defense system, 50 km southwest of Misrata. The image was taken in August 2009.

It was these that were primarily targeted by NATO aircraft and cruise missiles, and the anti-aircraft missiles and launchers were mostly destroyed during military operations after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi's regime.


Google Earth satellite image: the same S-200VE air defense system position, 50 km southwest of Misrata. The image was taken in July 2013.

Currently, there is not a single operational or repairable S-200VE air defense system in Libya.

Satellite images of S-200 air defense systems in Warsaw Pact countries


In 1984-1985, deliveries of the "200" missiles to Warsaw Pact countries took place. Bulgaria was the first to receive two S-200VE (canalized) air defense systems, 26 V-880E missiles, and one technical position in 1984. Divisions equipped with these systems were assigned to the 1st Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade, stationed 10 km north of Kostinbrod.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense missile system positions 10 km north of Kostinbrod. The image was taken in October 2024.

Surprisingly, unlike Germany, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, Bulgaria has not decommissioned its S-200VE air defense systems, and they remain in service. In September 2022, media representatives were allowed to access the launch site of the anti-aircraft battalion, where they were shown the anti-aircraft missiles on their launchers and the crews at work. However, satellite images taken in October 2024 do not show any anti-aircraft missiles on their launchers, meaning that the Bulgarian S-200s are not on combat duty.

In the GDR, two S-200VE air defense systems were operated by the 43rd "Erich Weinert" Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade, headquartered in Sanitz, and two S-200VE systems by the 41st "Hermann Dunker" Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade, headquartered in Ladeburg, from 1985. After German reunification, the S-200VEs were transferred to the Bundeswehr and assigned to the 51st and 52nd Anti-Aircraft Missile Squadrons. However, by December 1993, the latter squadron was disbanded, and most of the equipment was scrapped. One target illumination radar was delivered to the United States, where it was deployed at the Nellis Range in Nevada and used to practice electronic warfare techniques during US Air Force exercises.


Google Earth satellite image: launchers with missiles from the S-200VE and S-75M3 air defense systems in the Military-historical Museum - Berlin-Gatow Airfield. Photo taken in September 2023.

Currently, one launcher with V-880E SAMs remains from the German "two-hundreds" at the Military History Museum - Berlin-Gatow airfield.

In the 1990s, S-200VE systems were also decommissioned in Hungary and the Czech Republic. However, these systems remained in service in Poland.

Launch sites for two S-200VE SAM battalions of the 78th Anti-Aircraft Missile Regiment were deployed on the Baltic Sea coast, 8 km from the town of Mrzeżyno. Despite the complex and costly maintenance of the missiles and the need to maintain the firing positions, the S-200VE SAMs were highly valued by the Polish military for their ability to strike targets hundreds of kilometers from the launchers.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense missile system positions 8 km from the town of Mrzezyno. The image was taken in October 2025.

In the late 1990s, the Warsaw University of Defense Technology and the Wojskowe Zakłady Uzbrojenia (WZU) company were tasked with modernizing the equipment and armament of one S-200VE system, along with a major overhaul. After the program was completed, the system received the designation S-200C "Wega." The second SAM system and the most worn-out SAMs were used as spare parts. The modernized version was officially accepted into service in 2002. During the overhaul and upgrade, some of the electronics were upgraded to modern components, and the control system was digitized. According to unconfirmed reports, communication between the main components of the SAM system after the upgrade is now carried out via radio, eliminating the need for the K9M cockpit and cables.

In 2018, Polish sources reported that the Air Force command had initiated another program to repair and upgrade the S-200C air defense system. It was claimed that the only remaining system in service would receive a modernized target illumination radar, refurbished 5P72VE launchers, and "a number of other elements"According to reference data, the 36th Anti-Aircraft Missile Division still maintains a battalion of S-200S missiles. However, some experts doubt its combat readiness. S-200S air defense missile systems remain stationed on the Baltic Sea coast near Mrzezyn. However, no activity has been observed there for a long time, and the missiles are not being refueled or mounted on their mounts.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense system in North Korea


After relations with China ceased to be openly hostile in the second half of the 1980s, the Soviet Union resumed supplies of modern weapons To North Korea. In 1987, two S-200VE long-range air defense systems (SAMs) and 72 V-880E SAMs were delivered to the DPRK, servicing them from a single technical position. Along with the S-200VEs, 5N84AE and 19Zh6 radars, as well as the Kabina-66M radar system, were also delivered.

Although the S-200VE air defense system is very complex and expensive to operate, the DPRK Air Defense Command wanted to obtain systems capable of shooting down high-altitude, high-speed SR-71 Blackbird reconnaissance aircraft and RC-135V/W Rivet Joint electronic reconnaissance aircraft operating far beyond North Korean airspace.


Google Earth satellite imagery shows S-200VE air defense missile systems 25 kilometers north of Wonsan Port. The image was taken in April 2020.

One complex was deployed on the east coast, 25 kilometers north of the port of Wonsan. Another division was on combat duty at a mountain position located 20 kilometers southeast of the city of Sariwon.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense missile systems 20 km southeast of Sariwon. The image was taken in June 2022.

The North Korean S-200VE air defense missile system's effective range covered a significant portion of the Republic of Korea, including the airspace over Seoul and the large Osan Air Base. Beyond their defensive role, the S-200VE air defense missile system was one of the most striking visual symbols of North Korea's military might. The very large B-880E anti-aircraft missiles were a striking sight at military parades and always attracted attention.


Until 2015, anti-aircraft missiles could occasionally be seen on satellite images of North Korean S-200s positions mounted on single launchers. However, it appears that North Korea's S-200VE air defense systems are now inoperable. However, the North Korean S-200VE air defense systems successfully served as a "scarecrow." After yet another escalation in tensions between Pyongyang and Seoul, the North Korean military conducted a special operation, deploying target illumination radars on elevated areas near the demilitarized zone. When operating at maximum power, S-200VE radar operators were able to detect and lock on to a target at a range of over 350 km. This way, the North Koreans terrorized South Korean Air Force pilots, whose cockpit warning systems would begin blaring after being locked onto a radar beam, signaling the arrival of a surface-to-air missile.

Satellite images of the S-200 air defense system in Iran


Following the Iran-Iraq War, given the situation in the region, the Iranian leadership became concerned about strengthening the country's air defense system. To this end, in addition to modernizing the MIM-23 HAWK systems, additional HQ-2B and S-200VE air defense systems were purchased from China and Russia.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense missile system launchers positioned 50 kilometers south of Tehran. The image was taken in January 2019.

In 1992, Iran received three S-200VE Vega-E air defense missile systems (channels) and 48 export-modified V-880E surface-to-air missiles, one technical position, as well as 5N84AE meter-range radars and PRV-13 altimeters, which provided timely target acquisition and target designation. In the mid-1990s, Iran received two more systems and an additional batch of missiles.


Google Earth satellite image: 5N84AE radar near an S-200VE air defense system position 50 km south of Tehran. The image was taken in September 2020.

The contract for the supply of S-200VE was signed before the collapse of the Soviet Union, but Russia had to implement it.

Unlike most countries that operated the "200s," Iran implemented its own unique firing position design, with only two 5P72VE launchers per 5N62VE target illumination radar, rather than six, as was originally the case in the Soviet air defense system. Also, standby radars were located in close proximity to the SAM firing positions and the target illumination radar.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense system position near Hamadan Air Base. The radar in standby mode is visible at the top of the image. The image was taken in September 2024.

Apparently, this layout of firing positions is due to the limited number of missiles delivered and the high operating costs for maintenance and servicing.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense system position 3 km north of Isfahan International Airport. The image was taken in December 2021.

Until recently, Iranian S-200VE air defense systems were stationed 50 km south of Tehran, in the vicinity of the Hamadan Air Base and Isfahan International Airport, near the port of Bandar Abbas and next to the runway of the Bushehr Air Base.


Google Earth satellite image: S-200VE air defense missile system position near the port of the Bandar Abbas air base. The image was taken in April 2025.

About 20 years ago, Iranian media reported that "radical modernization" The S-200VE air defense system and the start of serial production of long-range anti-aircraft missiles. However, by "modernization," Iranian officials most likely meant refurbishment and partial conversion to solid-state components. Foreign experts indicated that Iran received outside assistance in modernizing the S-200s. Foreign sources claimed that the developer and implementer of the Iranian S-200VE upgrade program was the Belarusian company JSC Tetraedr, which has specialized in the repair and modernization of Soviet-made air defense systems since 2001.

The bulky S-200VE systems are effectively "peacetime air defense systems." They are virtually ideal for engaging targets such as RC-135 V/W electronic reconnaissance aircraft or U-2S and RQ-4 Global Hawk high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft, but are ineffective against cruise missiles. drones, tactical and carrier-based aircraft operating at low altitudes, and are extremely vulnerable due to their stationary deployment. Unfortunately, Google Earth has not yet published any images of Iranian territory taken after June 24, 2025. However, it appears that the S-200, like other Iranian air defense systems, did not play a significant role in defending against Israeli air strikes, and the stationary S-200VE positions were likely heavily damaged by guided bombs and missiles.

Продолжение следует ...
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    9 January 2026 05: 26
    hi
    Thank you, dear author, for your articles!
    good
    1. +10
      9 January 2026 05: 35
      Quote: Wildcat
      hi
      Thank you, dear author, for your articles!
      good

      Andrey, I understand it's your morning? Have a good one!
      You know, I mainly write for a very narrow circle of connoisseurs and for my own pleasure! fellow
      Next up is a review of the S-300P in neighboring and far-abroad countries.
      1. +5
        9 January 2026 05: 38
        Thank you again!
        Yes, it's morning for me: I'll finish up some small work and then go to bed - "to take my day off"... winked
      2. +3
        9 January 2026 07: 04
        Write about the S300PMU in service in Greece.
        Just a few years ago, an aging missile was launched at a training target, and it was hit by the very first missile.
        Write how Israel, in joint exercises with the Greek Air Force and Air Defense, learned to bypass the radars of this installation.
        Incidentally, it was originally planned to be installed in Cyprus, but after the Turks made a fuss, they transferred it to Greece. (Although the Turks themselves later installed it in their country with 400.)
        1. +8
          9 January 2026 07: 07
          Quote: vstom
          Write about the S300PMU in service in Greece.

          Greece does not have S-300PMU. No. This country received two S-300PMU-1 anti-aircraft missile systems in 1999, and these systems are currently stored in a non-combat-ready state on the island of Crete. The next publication will cover the S-300P in neighboring and distant countries.
          1. +2
            9 January 2026 07: 12
            These complexes are still on combat duty.
            Recently, in connection with the well-known events in Ukraine, Western "partners" pressured the Greeks to hand over these systems, but Greece refused, as it itself needs to confront Turkey. This is official data.

            https://www.newsbeast.gr/politiki/arthro/10832207/se-poia-periptosi-i-ellada-tha-steilei-systoichia-pyravlon-s-300-stin-oukrania
            1. +5
              9 January 2026 07: 13
              Quote: vstom
              These complexes are still on combat duty.

              No, they don't. No. Training deployments occur a couple of times a year, typically during joint exercises with NATO and Israeli air forces.
              Quote: vstom
              This is official data.
              https://www.newsbeast.gr/politiki/arthro/10832207/se-poia-periptosi-i-ellada-tha-steilei-systoichia-pyravlon-s-300-stin-oukrania

              I trust my eyes more than "official data".
              1. +2
                9 January 2026 07: 22
                Then why don’t they give them away or write them off?
                1. +7
                  9 January 2026 07: 24
                  Quote: vstom
                  Then why don’t they give them away or write them off?

                  Ask the Greeks this question. Perhaps for the same reason that Bulgaria still operates the dilapidated S-300PMU missile system it received from the USSR in 1989.
                  By the way, the S-400s are also not deployed in Turkey and are in storage.
                  1. +4
                    9 January 2026 07: 37
                    At the parade on October 28, 2025 in Thessaloniki, TOR-s and Kornet-s were on duty. I see them here with my own eyes every year, but the S-300s aren't on duty. I'm not sure where you got your information from, but I won't argue.
                    1. +7
                      9 January 2026 07: 44
                      Quote: vstom
                      At the parade on 28/10/25 in Thessaloniki, TORs and Kornets were on duty, I see them here with my own eyes every year, but the S300s are not on duty.

                      Do you understand the difference between the Tor air defense missile system, the Kornet antitank missile system, and the S-300PMU-1 air defense system? Apparently not. No.
                      And please explain how ATGMs and short-range military systems are "on combat alert"? Military use and combat operations are not the same thing. No.
                      Quote: vstom
                      I'm not sure about the source of your information, but I won't argue.

                      You'll have the opportunity to read a publication dedicated to the S-300P. I'm currently working on it. You can also use Google Earth to explore the S-300PMU-1 positions on Crete.
                      1. +2
                        9 January 2026 07: 50
                        The discussion was about the fact that Russian models (including the S300) are still in service in a NATO country.
                        Regarding your data on Google Earth photos, everything is certainly convincing here; these are much stronger arguments than texts from the country's Ministry of Defense.
                        With such arguments I have nothing to counter you with.
                        I would be happy to read the publication dedicated to the C300.
                      2. +6
                        9 January 2026 07: 52
                        Quote: vstom
                        The discussion was about the fact that Russian models (including the S300) are still in service in a NATO country.

                        Did anyone argue with that? Let's talk about what we understand and get to the point.
                      3. +6
                        9 January 2026 08: 01
                        "Troop operation and combat operations are not the same thing."


                        Perhaps my Russian is not at such a high level (I studied it a long time ago), but thanks for the comment, I will keep it in mind.
                      4. +7
                        9 January 2026 08: 07
                        Quote: vstom
                        Perhaps my Russian is not at such a high level (I studied it a long time ago), but thanks for the comment, I will keep it in mind.

                        I wouldn't have guessed that Russian isn't your native language. In this case, it's more a matter of not knowing some specific nuances. Good luck, it was a pleasure talking to you!
  2. +5
    9 January 2026 06: 18
    In 2018, Polish sources reported that the Polish Air Force command had initiated another repair and upgrade program for the S-200C air defense system. It was claimed that the only remaining operational system would receive an upgraded target illumination radar, refurbished 5P72VE launchers, and "a number of other components." According to reference data, the 36th Anti-Aircraft Missile Battalion still maintains an S-200S battalion. However, some experts doubt its combat readiness. S-200S air defense systems remain stationed on the Baltic coast near Mrzezyn. However, no activity has been observed there for a long time, and the missiles are not being refueled or installed on their mounts.

    The Poles officially claim (in response to a parliamentarian's inquiry) that the missiles also serve the S200, which is in service as of 2022.
    There is no news about decommissioning.
    request
    "The Toruń Military Economic Unit announced the conclusion of an agreement with the Grudziądz Armament Factory for the provision of major repairs and modifications to the S-200S Vega anti-aircraft system.
    The agreement was concluded on November 5th and is valued at PLN 51,5 million excluding VAT. The contract was awarded through negotiations with the selected bidder, as WZU SA in Grudziądz holds exclusive rights to perform the work. The service is expected to be completed in 2019-2021 and will cover all components of the kit.
    The Polish Army currently operates one squadron of the S-200C Wega system, which was modernized between 1999 and 2001. This year, another order was placed between 12. On June 24, an agreement was signed to repair the ARSKP 5K43E missile test station.

    https://zbiam.pl/wega-do-remontu/

    24,11,2022: On November 21, the Chancellery of the Sejm published a response from the Ministry of National Defense to a member of parliament's request regarding Poland's rejection of the joint European air defense system project.
    A response to a request sent to the Ministry of Defence on 17 October was given by Deputy Defence Minister Wojciech Skurkiewicz. It states that the current state of work on the development of the Polish integrated air defence system.... ...reports that the Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland have the following systems in the field of air defence: Wisła - a medium-range system (two batteries are currently being purchased, with additional batteries planned for purchase in the coming years); Narew - a short-range system (the programme involves the acquisition of two Mała Narew modules); Poprad - an autonomous anti-aircraft missile system; PILICA Plus - a very short-range anti-aircraft missile and artillery system (a framework agreement has been signed for the supply of 21 sets in the developed version, equipped with CAMM missiles); upgraded WEGA kit; NEWA-125SC op kits; KUB op kits; OSA op kits; Thunderbolt missile kits (currently in the implementation of a contract for the purchase of the following kits); ZSU - 23-4 self-propelled artillery and missile anti-aircraft kit; ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft gun."

    https://zbiam.pl/mon-odpowiada-w-sprawie-odstapienia-od-projektu-europejskiego-systemu-obrony-przeciwlotniczej/
    1. +6
      9 January 2026 06: 30
      Quote: Wildcat
      The Poles officially claim (in response to a parliamentarian's inquiry) that the missiles also serve the S200, which is in service as of 2022.
      There is no news about decommissioning.

      Andrey, I assure you I've carefully studied satellite images of the firing and technical positions of the Polish "two-hundreds." There are no signs of life anywhere. No. Besides official statements, there's no objective evidence that the S-200C Wega is still operational. I'm still inclined to believe that the main components of the system were transferred to our eastern neighbor.
  3. +5
    9 January 2026 13: 47
    Bongo
    +6
    Today
    Sergey, good afternoon! hi Based on your article, I became interested, and it turns out that the 134th Red Banner Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade was stationed in Samara (Kuibyshev).
    Based on open sources, they write that, following the capital of our homeland, the Hero City of Moscow, the next city of the USSR around which the S-200 began to be installed was the city of Kuibyshev,
    not Leningrad, not Kyiv or Kharkov, not Sverdlovsk, not Novosibirsk, but specifically Kuibyshev.

    Do you think this action took place?
    1. +6
      9 January 2026 14: 08
      Quote: bubalik
      Sergey, good afternoon!

      Hello Sergey!
      It's already evening for me!
      Quote: bubalik
      Based on your article, I became interested, and it turns out that the 134th Red Banner Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade was stationed in Samara (Kuibyshev).
      Based on open sources, they write that, following the capital of our homeland, the Hero City of Moscow, the next city of the USSR around which the S-200 began to be installed was the city of Kuibyshev,
      not Leningrad, not Kyiv or Kharkov, not Sverdlovsk, not Novosibirsk, but specifically Kuibyshev.

      Do you think this action took place?

      Yes, that could well be. Yes
      Kuybyshev was an important defense industrial center (the Progress plant alone is worth mentioning), and during Soviet times, it was defended by eight S-75 and two S-200 battalions. The "two hundred" positions were located approximately 60 kilometers to the north, near the village of Novy Buyan.
      1. +5
        9 January 2026 14: 27
        Yeah, thanks a lot.
        How many wonderful discoveries our rich country could afford.
        1. +6
          9 January 2026 14: 29
          Quote: bubalik
          How many wonderful discoveries our rich country could afford.

          It doesn't matter how much money you have, what matters is whether you have enough...
          Even now we allow ourselves a lot of things, sometimes even more than we should.
    2. +4
      9 January 2026 19: 50
      Quote: bubalik
      Based on your article, I became interested, and it turns out that the 134th Red Banner Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade was stationed in Samara (Kuibyshev).
      Based on open sources, it is written that, following the capital of our homeland, the Hero City of Moscow, the next city of the USSR around which the S-200 began to be installed was the city of Kuibyshev

      They write that in the 4th Air Defense Army (whose area of ​​responsibility also included Kuibyshev - the 28th Air Defense Division), the first cities covered by the S-200 were Sverdlovsk (positions near the city of Berezovsky) and Kirov.
      Between 1965 and 1968, S-200 anti-aircraft missile systems entered service with the anti-aircraft missile forces. By 1967, six anti-aircraft missile units were already on combat alert with the new equipment. The 57th Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade (Berezovsky) and the 101st Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade (Kirov) were among the first to master the new system.
      © ON GUARD OF THE URAL SKY
      True, the Tagil residents add that the 63rd air defense brigade did not lag behind this pair and deployed its S-200s already in 1966 - near the city of Nizhnyaya Salda (3 divisions, 18 launchers).
      It is written about the 134th Anti-Aircraft Brigade that it was one of the first two brigades in the 4th Army to receive and master the "three-hundredth" complexes.
      The S-300 anti-aircraft missile system entered service with anti-aircraft missile units in 1984. The first to master the system were soldiers from the 57th Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade and the 134th Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade.
      © ibid.

      And the absolute champion of the 4th Air Defense Army was, of course, the 57th Anti-Aircraft Brigade—the first anti-aircraft brigade in the Ural Air Defense Army, the first with the S-200, the first with the S-300. And yes, the first aircraft shot down by SAMs over Soviet territory were also its.
      1. +4
        9 January 2026 20: 34
        Alexey RA
        +2
        Today, 20
        ,,,thanks for the information. hi
  4. +4
    9 January 2026 17: 08
    Sergey, thank you very much for continuing this interesting series of articles!
  5. +4
    9 January 2026 20: 31
    As usual, an amateur question arose.
    How many missiles could be used on one target according to the standards for each system in service?
    I know about the "two hundred", I served there, more or less.
    1. +4
      9 January 2026 20: 54
      hi Three missiles were allocated to one target?
      1. +3
        10 January 2026 06: 26
        For the "two hundred," this is an unaffordable luxury! The regulations were: two targets - four missiles.
        Hello, Sergey!
        1. +3
          10 January 2026 06: 34
          Hello Anton!
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          For the "two hundred," this is an unaffordable luxury! The regulations were: two targets - four missiles.

          Agreed! But such a technical possibility existed. Besides, don't forget that the firing could have been directed at a dense group of enemy aircraft.
          1. +1
            10 January 2026 06: 59
            The shooting could have been carried out at a dense group of enemy aircraft.
            This is from a different era. But Kammhuber would have been delighted!
            1. +3
              10 January 2026 07: 19
              Quote: 3x3zsave
              This is about a different era.

              This mission was practiced before the S-200 air defense missile system was decommissioned. Moreover, some SAMs were equipped with a "special" warhead specifically for this purpose. Carrier-based and tactical aircraft could fly in close formation not only because their pilots were lonely, but also to provide collective cover from electronic warfare systems carried by one aircraft in the group.
              1. +1
                10 January 2026 07: 38
                I became curious: which models of carrier-based and tactical aircraft of a potential enemy could carry electronic warfare stations?
                Another amateur question...
                1. +3
                  10 January 2026 07: 47
                  Quote: 3x3zsave
                  I became curious: which models of carrier-based and tactical aircraft of a potential enemy could carry electronic warfare stations?

                  Grumman EA-6 Prowler carrier-based aircraft were equipped with integrated equipment, but they have now been replaced by the Boeing EA-18 Growler. In tactical aircraft, the Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor (INEWS system) has excellent integrated electronic warfare systems. The F-35 Lightning II uses the highly sophisticated AN/ASQ-239 equipment. Other aircraft can carry external pods, but this reduces the payload weight.
                  1. +2
                    10 January 2026 08: 07
                    I agree with Grumman. The others are too young for the 200.
                    1. +3
                      10 January 2026 08: 10
                      Quote: 3x3zsave
                      I agree with Grumman. The others are too young for the 200.

                      Electronic warfare pods appeared on American aircraft back in Vietnam. And the "200" was still in use in a number of countries until recently.
                  2. -1
                    12 January 2026 22: 40
                    Quote: Bongo
                    The built-in equipment was installed on Grumman EA-6 Prowler carrier-based aircraft, which have now been replaced by Boeing EA-18 Growlers.

                    Group protection equipment - container (suspended).
                    Quote: Bongo
                    In tactical aviation, the Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor has good built-in electronic warfare stations.

                    The F-22A Raptor does not have a built-in electronic warfare system.
        2. -1
          12 January 2026 22: 36
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          For a "two hundred" this is an unaffordable luxury!

          What kind of luxury?
          Three missiles are assigned:
          For targets with high maneuverability (tactical aircraft);
          ......
    2. +4
      10 January 2026 02: 25
      Hi, hello!
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      How many missiles could be used on one target according to the standards for each system in service?

      It's important to understand that all first-generation Soviet systems, except for the fixed S-25, had a single target channel. The S-200VM SAM system could theoretically fire all six SAMs on its launcher at a single target in a burst. The S-75 and S-125 SAM systems with radio command guidance, if I remember correctly, could fire up to three SAMs per target. However, typically, a target was fired at with two missiles, with firing results monitored. Additional missiles were added if necessary.
      1. +2
        10 January 2026 02: 45
        So, when Wikipedia writes about a missile's effectiveness being 0,8-0.9 with active and passive interference, it's not about accuracy?
        In the film "Behind Enemy Lines," Mashkov attacked an F18 with four missiles, and only one reached its target :)))
        1. +2
          10 January 2026 03: 29
          Quote: vstom
          So, when Wikipedia writes about a missile's effectiveness being 0,8-0.9 with active and passive interference, it's not about accuracy?

          Wikipedia is a mediocre source. Much depends on the type of air defense system, the target type, its speed, course, flight altitude, and the jamming environment. In the absence of jamming, a probability of 0,9-0,95 against a subsonic target is normal for modern air defense systems.
          Quote: vstom
          In the film "Behind Enemy Lines," Mashkov attacked an F18 with four missiles, and only one reached its target :)))

          The Kub (or "Square") air defense system demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in the Yom Kippur War. Of course, this system is now significantly outdated. But judging the effectiveness of any weapon based on films isn't helpful. In general, a great deal depends on specific conditions: the condition of the air defense system and missile hardware, the crew's training, the target type, and the terrain.
      2. +2
        10 January 2026 06: 35
        The S-200VM air defense missile system could theoretically fire all six SAMs available on the launcher at a single target in a burst.
        After which the unit commander could, with a clear conscience, shoot himself with his service pistol.
        Hello, Sergey!
        1. +4
          10 January 2026 06: 38
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          After which the unit commander could, with a clear conscience, shoot himself with his service pistol.

          Considering how long a ZRDN could survive in a major war, this is clearly unnecessary. They could have simply stayed and waited in the K9M's cockpit.
        2. +2
          10 January 2026 14: 06
          That's true. A maximum of three missiles were launched at the SR71, two at fighters, and one at targets that could be re-engaged in the event of a miss.
          1. 0
            12 January 2026 22: 42
            Quote: Victor Sergeev
            A maximum of 3 missiles were launched at SR71

            It is not registered as SR71, it is registered as MNEVR.
            Quote: Victor Sergeev
            for fighters 2,

            And it says - 3.
      3. +2
        10 January 2026 23: 22
        Quote: Bongo
        The S-75 and S-125 radio-guided air defense systems, if I remember correctly, had up to three SAMs per target. However, typically, the target was fired at with two missiles, with follow-up monitoring.

        The S-125/125M had one target channel and two SAM channels. So, yes, two missiles per target.
        And even so, the “lower” and “upper” probabilities of defeat could differ by 2-4 times.
        The efficiency of the complex when firing two missiles is 0,45...0,97 in the absence of organized radio interference and 0,25...0,93 under conditions of radio interference.
        © Performance characteristics cards for the S-125M system. Available online.
  6. +3
    10 January 2026 13: 56
    When our S-200 battalion group was disbanded in 1994, it took us over a week to fold up and load one battalion, then a second. We had almost no soldiers, only a dozen officers from two battalions, and at the time, no one really knew how to fold up the radar and load it onto a vehicle. And that's without even folded up the cables, which had sunk into the ground in the dilapidated cable ducts. They spent another month slowly unrolling them (the funniest part is that no one needed the cables, so they were stolen). That's what a mobile complex it was.
    1. +3
      10 January 2026 14: 10
      And this is without rolling up the cables that have grown into the ground in the dilapidated cable channels,
      This is what I did for a week before demobilization.
    2. +3
      10 January 2026 23: 05
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      When our S200 division group was disbanded in 1994, we spent more than a week dismantling and loading one division, then the second, although we had almost no soldiers, only a dozen officers from two divisions worked there.

      A familiar scene – the same 1994, training at a defense missile regiment near Tula. The regiment was doing the same thing – handing over S-200 hardware and preparing for the promised transition to the S-300. There were more officers than soldiers: two lieutenant colonels, a major, and a captain assigned tasks to two privates. The pace of the shutdown was determined by the availability of fuel, or rather, its constant absence.

      During this transition period, the regiment was issued the battalion's S-125M equipment for some reason. That's why we were brought there from St. Petersburg—it turned out to be the closest operational antiaircraft missile system, theoretically "ours." But due to a lack of fuel, we never deployed the equipment—there was nothing to move the trailers and semitrailers with (having been parked on the ground all winter, they refused to budge, scattering them around the site as God would have it). So, we spent our entire training camp digging a command and control center around the SAM depot, washing the battalion's equipment, rolling the transport-loading vehicles around the storage area, assembling, deploying, and rolling up the UNV—and that was it. The launchers spent the entire training camp cleaning the shipping containers (containers) for the S-200 missiles. smile
  7. +2
    10 January 2026 14: 04
    I don't know how we can keep this scrap metal in combat readiness now. Back in the early 90s, we didn't have spare parts for 15 years. We had a reserve battalion, and we were removing units for the launchers from it. On one launcher, the relay would stick, so you'd take a crowbar and hit the dent in the automation unit, and the relay would come loose, and that happened every time the launcher was prepared. When the order was given to activate the reserve battalion, they couldn't fill the launcher with oil, the aluminum gasket failed, and no one had a spare, and there was no way to replace it. These are the kinds of minor flaws that plague every launcher.
  8. -2
    12 January 2026 22: 29
    On September 17, 2018, a Syrian S-200VE air defense system fired at a Russian Il-20M,

    Where does this information come from? According to Russian data, a Syrian air defense system fired at an Israeli F-16:
    https://yandex.ru/video/preview/16516940512786497714