Will the French ground-based group of strategic nuclear forces be revived?

5 685 18
Will the French ground-based group of strategic nuclear forces be revived?

Following the UK's exit from the European Union (it officially left the EU on January 31, 2020), France remains the only EU country with a nuclear weapons.

It's worth remembering that France is one of ten nuclear powers, ranking third in the table of ranks in terms of the quantity and quality of its strategic nuclear forces (SNF). It developed its own nuclear weapons and national SNF independently of the US and UK, and without their assistance.



Initially, the French created a “classical” three-tier structure of national nuclear forces, including land-based missile PU, nuclear submarines with ballistic missiles on board and aviation nuclear weapons carriers.

Today, the Fifth Republic has only the sea and air components of the nuclear dyad. history Its ground component has disappeared. I'd like to remind forum members of this in light of the press's recent reports of a renewed interest by the French leadership in the ground component of its strategic nuclear forces.

A bit of history


The ground forces of the nuclear triad in the early seventies of the last century were made up of medium-range ballistic missiles S-2 (Sol-Sol Balistique Stratégique, SSBS).

S-2 ballistic missiles were deployed at the Apt-Saint-Christol airbase on the Plateau d'Albion in the Vaucluse region of Haute Provence in southern France. This location has become the primary base for the land-based component of France's strategic nuclear forces.


Construction of the infrastructure began in 1970. Launch sites, weapons storage facilities, an assembly shop, and other necessary facilities were erected here.


A total of 18 launch silos, approximately 24 meters deep, were constructed, grouped into two groups of nine missiles each. Only the silo head and a movable cover, 1,4 meters thick and weighing approximately 140 tons, were above ground. During routine maintenance, the cover was opened hydraulically; during combat use, it was opened by a powder pressure accumulator.

The silo housed a cylindrical rocket well, a ring-shaped launch pad suspended by a system of cables and hydraulic jacks for cushioning and leveling the rocket, and servicing platforms. An elevator and support spaces were located separately from the silo.

The silos were designed for an excess shock wave pressure of 21 kg/cm2Their construction utilized special steels and reinforced concrete grades, along with general and localized shock absorption systems. The shafts were located in solid rock at intervals of approximately 400 meters.


Each group of nine silo launchers was organized into a squadron and controlled from a separate command post, which was located deep in the rock and also equipped with shock-absorbing systems. The command posts were connected to the launchers via multiple, redundant communications systems.


The missiles were stored disassembled. Individual stages and warheads were placed in sealed containers in special underground arsenals. Before deployment, the containers with two stages were sent for assembly. The assembled missile (minus the warhead) was delivered to the silo and loaded into it. The warhead was then delivered separately and attached, after which the silo door was closed.


Technical monitoring and missile launch were carried out remotely. A two-officer shift maintained a 24-hour watch at the missile squadron's command post.

The first nine S-2 silos entered combat service in the summer of 1971, and the second group of S-2 missiles became operational in April 1972. In September 1973, the first combat training launch took place from the Biscarrosse range. A total of 13 missile training launches were conducted.

The S-2 remained in service for a relatively short time. It was replaced by the S-3 BSRD, development of which began in 1973. This was a major upgrade of the S-2 missile. As early as April 1978, the first BSRD squadron began upgrading to the more advanced S-3 missile. It was officially accepted into service in 1980. That summer, the S-2 was finally decommissioned. Since then, 18 S-3/3D BSRDs have remained on combat duty in silos on the Albion Plateau.

Information: The S-3D MRBM is a two-stage, solid-fuel, medium-range missile with a detachable warhead.

- length – 13,8 m; diameter – 1,5 m; weight – 25,75 t.
- warhead – single-block TN 61 with a capacity of 1,2 Mt with means to overcome enemy missile defense systems.
- maximum launch range: up to 3700 km.
- KVO is about 700 m.


Distance from different silos to key points of the USSR (Russia):
to Moscow - approximately 2500-3000 km;
to St. Petersburg - about 2800-3300 km;
to Kyiv - about 2000-2500 km;
to Minsk - approximately 2200-2700 km.


Thus, without reaching the Urals and Siberia, missiles on the Albion Plateau could hit important military-administrative and industrial centers of the European part of our country.

The future of the land-based component of the French strategic nuclear forces


In 1996, the S-3D missiles were decommissioned. Plans were made to replace the S-3D BSRD system with a mobile, land-based version of the M45 sea-launched ballistic missile. However, these plans never came to fruition.

The missile silos on the Plateau d'Albion were dismantled in 1998.

Following this, France abandoned the land component of the strategic nuclear triad, focusing on the air and sea components.

This, in general terms, is the history and inglorious end of the first iteration of the land component of the French strategic nuclear forces.

However, in late 2024, the press reported that France's military and political leadership was seriously considering reviving a third component of its nuclear forces in the form of ground-based ballistic missile launchers. The impetus for this was the development of a new class of Russia-made IRBMs.

According to the publication Challenges, France intends to develop a new ground-launched ballistic missile with a range of over 1000 km. This decision was made following Russia's successful deployment of the Oreshnik medium-range ballistic missile.

High-level talks are underway between the General Staff of the Armed Forces and the General Armament Directorate (DGA) on a ground-launched ballistic missile project, the range of which is likely to be significantly greater than 1000 kilometers.

- informs edition.

On October 1, 2025, in an interview with the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that he intends to publish the main provisions of France's updated nuclear doctrine as early as early 2026.

He stated that:

I am currently working on updating our doctrine and would like to continue deepening our strategic dialogue with Europeans who want it.

Given the rhetoric of the current occupant of the Élysée Palace, who aspires to a leading role in the EU and whose leaders are obsessed with achieving Russia's strategic defeat, such a development is entirely expected. As the saying goes, there's no smoke without fire. And if politicians and military personnel are mulling over the reincarnation of nuclear-armed IRBMs on the European continent, it's quite likely that somewhere in the quiet of design bureaus and research institutes, powerful computers are already being used to bring these plans to fruition.

Naturally, such statements cannot go unnoticed. They raise our concerns, calling for vigilance and the readiness of the country and its armed forces to respond decisively, including the use of nuclear weapons. After all, NATO strategists still haven't abandoned hope of changing the situation in the Middle East in favor of the so-called "coalition of the willing."

But this will not happen.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    12 January 2026 04: 07
    I am working on updating our doctrine and would like to continue deepening our strategic dialogue with Europeans who want it.

    Today they want it, tomorrow new ones come along, and they may "not want it." Macron doesn't have much time left, and it's not a given that his successor will move in the same direction. If he had begun reviving land-based strategic nuclear forces at the beginning of his term, his successor would have been forced to continue because "the money has already been paid for," but today's intentions may remain just that—intentions.
  2. +1
    12 January 2026 12: 02
    Why does France need land-based strategic nuclear forces? The territory is small and densely populated. Russia, the US, or China have deserted positional areas where silos can be well-dispersed. So SSBNs as a basis make sense.
    1. +3
      12 January 2026 18: 40
      Land-based strategic nuclear forces are no longer necessarily silos. They can also be mobile launchers.
      1. +4
        12 January 2026 19: 25
        Quote from solar
        Land-based strategic nuclear forces are no longer necessarily silos. They can also be mobile launchers.

        You're absolutely right! The French wanted to put their M45 SLBMs on wheels back in the 90s, too. But they ran out of money (and apparently technology, too). They're still short of money now (thanks to Makaron, who loves Zelensky like a neighbor), but the French have made technological progress. And since 2010, they've been working closely with the British on the issue of long-range cruise missiles/short-range ballistic missiles for the European theater of operations. The stated ranges are 4-4,5 km. So we should expect some progress on their part in this direction. Especially since the US and Russia withdrew from the INF Treaty. Now it's up to Euro-NATO...
        1. +4
          12 January 2026 19: 47
          The French, the British, and the Chinese are not limited by any treaties regarding the quantity and type of nuclear weapons; it is at their discretion.
        2. +1
          12 January 2026 21: 42
          Good article!
          I wonder if the French have their own fully-fledged early warning system, independent of the US and NATO? Or is 300 nuclear warheads too much credit?
          1. +4
            13 January 2026 00: 03
            Quote: dzvero
            Good article!
            I wonder if the French have their own fully-fledged early warning system, independent of the US and NATO? Or is 300 nuclear warheads too much credit?

            France currently lacks a national early warning system. However, in 2025, an agreement was signed with Germany to develop and build one jointly. It is to consist of two components: space-based and ground-based. The space component will consist of two geostationary satellites with infrared sensors for detecting ICBM launches. These satellites will be launched by Ariana launch vehicles and built by a German company. The ground component will consist of a radar network, including a surface-wave radar for detecting low-flying cruise missiles. The program will be funded by the European Commission for Defence. The agreement is open for signature by other countries. The early warning system is expected to become operational in the 1930s. This is from foreign media. Perhaps someone knows more. I would be grateful for any new information. Yes
            1. 0
              13 January 2026 03: 12
              I wonder: have the decision-making centers and design bureaus already shifted somewhere east of France? It seems some NATO countries are ready not only to accept the French "nuclear umbrella" but also to become its sponsors in exchange for a certain "independence and autonomy." This is no longer just a security purchase; it is a long-term investment in their own strategic weight within the Alliance.
          2. +1
            14 January 2026 12: 56
            No, only tactical.
      2. 0
        14 January 2026 12: 55
        It's not a panacea. Ground-based launchers also need positional areas and clear roads. This is NOT the case in Europe—everything there is very densely populated.
    2. 0
      12 January 2026 20: 40
      -Why does France need land-based strategic nuclear forces?
      Offer the EU its nuclear umbrella in exchange for the American one.
      1. +2
        13 January 2026 03: 33
        Yes, the issue has always been one of resources. But now it's clear that the financial factor in Europe is being addressed through new subsidies and the bilateral agreements France signed in 2025. The idea is pragmatic: if you want autonomy from Washington's policies, invest in a pan-European "nuclear baton."

        The paradox is that Trump, when he stirred up trouble in Europe, simply forced them out of their slumber. Instead of degradation, there was a surge in the development of the military-industrial complex and a revision of doctrines to accommodate a tough scenario. The result is the emergence of a wealthy European region that is becoming far more dangerous for Russia than before.
        Those who are now celebrating Donald's arrival in the White House don't fully understand the implications for NATO's military components. They fail to see that an alliance transitioning to self-sufficiency is a structure of an entirely different order.
  3. -5
    12 January 2026 12: 43
    France, a small state. France's strategy is focused on sea- and space-based nuclear missiles, as well as the deployment of nuclear missiles within the EU—in Poland, Romania, and elsewhere.
    1. +5
      12 January 2026 19: 52
      France is not small at all, with a population of 70 million and territory spread across Europe, Africa, Polynesia, Oceania, and the Americas. France's largest land border is with Brazil.
  4. -2
    12 January 2026 16: 19
    They want to change the strategic balance of power... Napoleons, Hitlers - and now their descendants, with a sinking cowardly heart, dream: here we are, now, how we will drag ourselves to Austin, just a little more and we can live in luxury... filthy thieves, bandits, pirates and murderers...
  5. +2
    12 January 2026 20: 06
    Macron would do better to think about something else.
    The number of people arrested for posting on social media that his "wife" is a man with junk has already exceeded a hundred, and thousands have already been fined 1500 euros.
    How can you even shake hands with someone like that?
  6. 0
    20 January 2026 00: 09
    Technically and technologically, they are quite capable of this.
    The question is whether they can afford it financially.
  7. 0
    28 February 2026 17: 54
    France is a small state, and the land-based deployment of strategic nuclear forces means consenting to the complete destruction of France in the event of a retaliatory strike by Russia. To increase the combat readiness of the strategic nuclear forces and slightly reduce the threat of France's destruction, priority should be given to the submarine fleet and space-based strategic nuclear forces. After the creation of the EU army and the scaling up of France's nuclear technologies to the EU's industrial potential, the land-based deployment of strategic nuclear forces on EU territory will also be possible, particularly tactical nuclear forces in states bordering Russia, the Transcaucasian republics, and especially in Kazakhstan.