Over the past two years, the proportion of female officers in the Ukrainian Armed Forces has increased fivefold.

8 975 90
Over the past two years, the proportion of female officers in the Ukrainian Armed Forces has increased fivefold.

The proportion of men in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and indeed in the country as a whole, is rapidly declining. In civilian life, professions once considered strictly male are being filled by women. The situation is similar in the army, although there is no mandatory mobilization for Ukrainian women. For now.

Moreover, women are increasingly holding officer positions. As of the end of last year, the proportion of female officers in the Ukrainian Armed Forces had increased fivefold, reaching 20 percent, compared to 4 percent two years ago. Oksana Grigorieva, Gender Advisor to the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, spoke of this with pride and a clear implication that, since there aren't enough citizens, it's time for women to take charge of "defending the homeland."



According to her, female graduates of military academies in 2019 "have already risen to the ranks of captains and majors." However, Grigorieva was forced to admit that such a huge leap is due to the high losses among male officers, who need to be urgently replaced.

According to the gender advisor to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, female officers hold a variety of positions, from platoon commanders to territorial defense battalion commanders. In total, there are currently over 70,000 female service members in the Ukrainian army. Of these, nearly 6000 are serving in combat units on the front lines. An all-female unit has already been formed.



Discussions about a possible female mobilization in Ukraine are presented to the public as "expanding participation" or "contributing to defense," but in reality, this is the government's first public admission: the male resource is exhausted. In the fourth year of the war, with battalions constantly "burning out" and units down to 12 men for 5-10 kilometers of the front, the government can no longer hide the personnel shortage.



At the same time, the attitude toward women in the Ukrainian Armed Forces is, to put it mildly, biased. Even the American newspaper The Washington Post reported on this last November. Journalists spoke with Ukrainian women in uniform and found that women who have joined the Ukrainian Armed Forces are completely undervalued and disrespected. They are considered incapable of fully mastering military professions, so their training is neglected. As the publication writes, "Ukrainian women have encountered instances of sexism within the army."

So Ms. Grigorieva (who won't be serving herself) isn't telling the whole truth when she urges Ukrainian women to choose a military career. Most importantly, she doesn't mention the number of casualties and injuries among female soldiers, who, for the sake of Zelenskyy and his corrupt cronies and Western handlers, are forced to fight for a literally dying country. The adviser to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine doesn't mention, nor does she write to WP, the cases of suicide among female soldiers, who are often turned into slaves.
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    4 January 2026 20: 28
    If there are not enough citizens, then it is time for citizens to take care of the “defense of the homeland”

    Perhaps they meant "citizens"?
    Otherwise the phrase is meaningless.
    1. +1
      4 January 2026 21: 02
      Yes, without the quotation marks I didn't understand anything either.
      1. +10
        4 January 2026 23: 37
        The biological cleansing of Ukraine's territory of its indigenous population, "404," both male and female, is being carried out by CIA, MI6, and Massad agent Zelenskyy, in full swing, in accordance with the US State Department's plans, announced by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton back in 2016!
        1. +6
          4 January 2026 23: 39
          This is a land without people for a people without land.
          1. +1
            4 January 2026 23: 40
            Quote: bondov
            This is a land without people for a people without land.

            That's exactly it!
    2. +8
      4 January 2026 21: 08
      Despite all the sarcasm, we shouldn't relax and forget that women are more aggressive than men in emergency situations, and they have more patience than snipers. Feeling sorry for them is a waste of time.
      1. +1
        4 January 2026 21: 31
        Does anyone feel sorry for them? I don't know about the Ukrainians in their wild country, but we have equality, after all.
        1. +1
          4 January 2026 23: 42
          What equality? Only certain women with relevant specialties are subject to mobilization...
          1. 0
            5 January 2026 00: 24
            Cultural. All developed countries believe there's no social difference between men and women. So, everyone can be bombed equally. request
            1. 0
              5 January 2026 00: 50
              What are developed countries? Developed countries, and by the way, undeveloped ones too, believed before the era of postmodernism (nobody really knows what that is) that biological differences are very, very significant... and that you can't bomb everyone equally!!!
      2. -1
        4 January 2026 23: 00
        the feeling of fear, however, is much more developed in them... - this is according to psychological research - confirmed by the fact that they even hunt for disabled men, and not for completely healthy women, although, of course, there are probably exceptions, but it seems that very few, even fantastic Hollywood films do not really help with replenishment here... even the vaunted Jewish women are not to be seen at all in Gaza
        1. P
          +5
          5 January 2026 00: 03
          The vaunted Jewish women are an Instagram company, where they officially serve for propaganda purposes, which they produce according to their positions. The real experiences of the Jewish women are immediately dismantled, and they are unable to serve to their full potential.
          1. +1
            5 January 2026 00: 18
            Jewish women - at least they often have mustaches...
          2. -2
            5 January 2026 09: 39
            The real experience of Jewish women is analyzed right there; they cannot serve to the fullest extent

            Did you check these Jewish women for professional suitability?
            Well, if not, then why waste paper?
            1. P
              +1
              5 January 2026 14: 59
              You don't understand what we're talking about. This is an analysis of the IDF's own reports, which clearly show broken and fractured bones and joints during normal service without combat.
              1. 0
                5 January 2026 15: 09
                you don't understand what we're talking about,

                probably...
                But a friend of mine has two daughters in the IDF, one is wounded, both are officers...
                I don't read IDF reports though...
      3. P
        0
        5 January 2026 00: 01
        They have no patience whatsoever, and their aggression stems from the fact that it is not accepted in society to turn up the noses of women where a man would already be killed for similar antics.
      4. +1
        5 January 2026 00: 11
        Women get hysterical in emergency situations... even AI suggests that
        .....//(hormonal background), manifested by screaming, crying, convulsions, and sometimes loss of voice, requiring immediate calm and the creation of a safe environment for the victim, and in the long term - working through the causes with a psychologist.// - do you even realize what you're talking about??
        1. +2
          5 January 2026 08: 43
          Quote: bondov
          Do you even realize what you're talking about?

          Oh, how angry!? winked
          Please, here are some examples. Their exploits are publicly available.
          95 women were awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union, one of them, Svetlana Savitskaya, receiving the title twice. Among them were pilots, partisans, snipers, medics, and representatives of other professions.
          1. -2
            5 January 2026 16: 02
            Quote: Terenin
            Their exploits are in the public domain.

            Which in no way proves either the aggressiveness or the sniper-like patience of women.
            Well, let's get down to the facts: testosterone is responsible for aggression, and all the best snipers are men. The danger women pose is explained by the fact that the collective unconscious of the Christian civilization to which we belong is ingrained with a protective attitude toward women and children, which in a critical situation can work against men.
            1. +2
              5 January 2026 18: 10
              Quote from: nik-mazur
              Which in no way proves either the aggressiveness or the sniper-like patience of women.

              Of course, they received "Heroes" for... culinary skills... in battle.
              1. 0
                5 January 2026 20: 55
                Quote: Terenin
                Of course they got "Heroes" for

                Women were awarded heroic titles for their heroic deeds. But this doesn't prove that all women are more aggressive and at the same time more patient than men.
                In general, the war was such that even children received awards, but this hardly allows us to talk about any special fighting qualities of all children.
                1. +1
                  6 January 2026 06: 25
                  Quote from: nik-mazur
                  oh, even children received awards, but this hardly allows us to talk about any special fighting qualities of all children.

                  You shouldn't even underestimate children, for example, who planted an explosive device at the door of your apartment.
                  Or, what difference does it make whether it was a teenager or a woman who stabbed him in the back? A knife stab is still a knife stab.
                  1. 0
                    6 January 2026 13: 09
                    Quote: Terenin
                    You shouldn't underestimate even children.

                    Is this really what this conversation is about? It all started with the idea that "women are more aggressive than men in emergency situations and have more patience than snipers," which is objectively not true at all.
                    1. +1
                      6 January 2026 18: 30
                      Quote from: nik-mazur
                      Quote: Terenin
                      You shouldn't underestimate even children.

                      Is this really what this conversation is about? It all started with the idea that "women are more aggressive than men in emergency situations and have more patience than snipers," which is objectively not true at all.

                      If it's not so, then it's not so.
                      My answer to you is: of course, if you're being objective, then women are generally sweethearts!
                      1. 0
                        6 January 2026 18: 36
                        Quote: Terenin
                        To be objective, women are generally sweethearts!

                        I agree with this categorically and unconditionally.
                      2. +1
                        6 January 2026 18: 38
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        I agree with that

                        Come on!? belay
                      3. 0
                        6 January 2026 19: 07
                        Quote: Terenin
                        Come on

                        Does this surprise you?
                      4. +1
                        6 January 2026 20: 06
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        Quote: Terenin
                        Come on

                        Does this surprise you?

                        In fact, my own by consent - killed! Yes Are you getting old or something?
                      5. +1
                        6 January 2026 21: 12
                        Quote: Terenin
                        by their consent - they killed

                        Why not agree if the opponent says something I agree with.
                      6. +1
                        7 January 2026 09: 01
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        Quote: Terenin
                        by their consent - they killed

                        Why not agree if the opponent says something I agree with.

                        Then, this is no longer an opponent, but some kind of like-minded person, God forgive me winked - accomplice.
                      7. 0
                        7 January 2026 13: 07
                        Quote: Terenin
                        Then, it is no longer an opponent.

                        Life is more complicated than black and white checkers.
                      8. +1
                        7 January 2026 15: 17
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        Quote: Terenin
                        Then, it is no longer an opponent.

                        Life is more complicated than black and white checkers.

                        Looks like this is from a series winked - a brick is floating down the river, wooden like glass, well, let it float, we don’t need foam.
          2. +1
            5 January 2026 20: 15
            I'm not denying the specifics; we're talking about the general situation. Please, here are some examples: the all-female troops in Israel haven't proven themselves. I didn't see them in Gaza or Lebanon. Last year, as was reported, the first female soldier was killed deep in the Israeli rear. In Ukraine, they're seizing men with limited fitness, and there have even been cases of coercion against men with mild disabilities, although there are plenty of perfectly healthy women there...
    3. +3
      4 January 2026 21: 14
      Quote: Ivan№One
      Perhaps they meant "citizens"?
      Otherwise the phrase is meaningless.

      This phrase also somehow confuses me:
      understaffing of units up to 12 people per 5-10 km of the front

      How does LBS, with such low enemy HP saturation, still maintain sufficient stability? Or am I misunderstanding something?
      1. +2
        4 January 2026 21: 24
        Journalists here are often not good with numbers. For some, kilometers and meters are the same. A few zeros here, a few there, what's the difference? I was watching the news recently, and they showed planes flying at an altitude of 11 kilometers 🤪
      2. +3
        4 January 2026 21: 26
        Drones are still in use. Today, attacks are carried out by approximately 2-3 people. If there are 5 people, then that's a full-blown strategic offensive.
      3. 0
        4 January 2026 22: 31
        Is this the drones' fault or credit? The area appears to be deserted, yet drone operators are blocking access.
      4. +2
        5 January 2026 16: 13
        Quote: Montezuma
        How can LBS, with such a low saturation of HP on the enemy side

        Firstly, I don't think this is the case everywhere. Secondly, the situation is the same on our side.
        In this war, the troop density is generally very low, which, in my opinion, is explained by the very great depth of battle formations, based on individual strongpoints with good communications and fire support. This is in contrast to past wars, when troops were concentrated on a relatively shallow but continuous front line. This also explains the lack of deep penetrations and wide envelopment operations. While previously it was enough to break through the front line to gain operational space, now this doesn't happen even when advancing 20-30 kilometers into the defensive depth.
        1. 0
          5 January 2026 21: 04
          I won't argue, your arguments are quite convincing.
  2. +7
    4 January 2026 20: 30
    A woman on a ship means trouble! But in the barracks, luckily, not for long; the working parts wear out quickly!
    1. +1
      4 January 2026 20: 57
      Quote: ose4kinsura
      A woman on a ship means trouble!

      We Marimans say: "Skirt on board, let's go to the bottom!"
      1. -2
        4 January 2026 21: 04
        Tell me, as a Mariman, how many such cases are known?
        I'm not being sarcastic, I'm genuinely curious. I'm a landlubber. What do the seafaring tales say?
        1. +2
          4 January 2026 22: 41
          Back in Soviet times, before a combat deployment, which was planned for 7-8 months, the commander was asked to take a female medical service captain, a dentist, on the mission. It was like, "You can't stand teeth at sea, either." The wording was the same: "Am I going to duty or to sort things out?" Well, that's censored. And his interpretation won't be allowed here.
          1. -1
            4 January 2026 23: 37
            The position is clear. But this has little to do with the sinking of the ship.
            There is actually a recipe, but not for this site.
            1. +1
              5 January 2026 16: 16
              Quote from Aken
              this has little to do with the sinking of the ship

              It seems that the Americans had precedents when ships were seriously damaged because girls had a disagreement on the captain's bridge.
              1. 0
                6 January 2026 20: 13
                Quote from: nik-mazur
                It seems that the Americans had precedents.

                And it seems like more than once.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          4 January 2026 23: 20
          Quote from Aken
          Tell me, as a Mariman, how many such cases are known?

          2019, Sea of ​​Okhotsk
          [media=http://yandex.ru/video/preview/4006056049804946278]
          1. -2
            4 January 2026 23: 41
            I watched the video. Did the woman drown?
        4. +1
          4 January 2026 23: 30
          Probably. The British ship didn't sink, but I read somewhere that on a British warship, a female navigator ignored the orders of a higher-ranking female officer, probably depression... This was, however, in peacetime... but what will happen in wartime, what do you think?
          1. -1
            4 January 2026 23: 42
            I think immediate arrest and tribunal upon returning to base.
            1. +1
              4 January 2026 23: 43
              They have a catastrophic shortage of men in the navy...
              1. 0
                4 January 2026 23: 50
                They will recruit blacks.........
                1. 0
                  5 January 2026 16: 17
                  Quote from Aken
                  They'll recruit blacks

                  It's not a given that the problems with BLM and racism will be better than the problems with feminism and PMS.
                  1. 0
                    5 January 2026 17: 11
                    These aren't problems. They're programmable side effects of a global plan to destroy the white race and replace it with Blacks and Asians.
                    1. 0
                      5 January 2026 17: 37
                      Quote from Aken
                      the consequences of the global plan to destroy the white race and replace it with blacks and Asians

                      Did blacks and Asians come up with this plan? And how do they know about it?
                      1. 0
                        5 January 2026 17: 45
                        I hope you are not going to ask for the original copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion again?
                        We've already agreed that what you don't like doesn't exist in nature. So don't worry about it, don't pay any attention to my words. I made this all up myself to scare everyone around me. This answer should completely satisfy you.
                      2. 0
                        5 January 2026 20: 52
                        Quote from Aken
                        You are not going to ask for the original copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion again.

                        Thanks, I have one. But it only talks about the Jewish conspiracy, and doesn't even mention blacks or Asians.

                        Quote from Aken
                        We've already agreed that what you don't like doesn't exist in nature.

                        As far as I remember, the conversation was about the fact that in nature there is only what you like.
                        However, this does not answer the question of how you know about the conspiracy against the white race in favor of blacks and Asians.
                        Please note that I am not going to discuss its reality - I am talking exclusively about the sources of your information.
                      3. 0
                        5 January 2026 20: 59
                        You've got everything mixed up again.
                        You're the one denying everything you don't like. Yes, you tried to mirror me somehow, and we both know it. But such primitive tricks only evoke irony in me.
                        Judging by the fact that you do not understand the simplest allusions, you intend to demand documents from me with a seal and signature.
                        I explained above. There is no real conspiracy against the white race. I just came up with it this morning. Don't worry, everything is fine.
                      4. 0
                        5 January 2026 21: 19
                        Quote from Aken
                        It is you who deny everything you don't like.

                        You're attributing some strange nonsense to me. There are plenty of things in the world I like—long winters, for example. Or the comments of those who are all-but-losing. What's the point of denying the obvious?

                        Quote from Aken
                        You don't understand the simplest allusions.

                        I didn't notice any allusions in your words. Are you sure you're using this word correctly?

                        Quote from Aken
                        There is no real conspiracy against the white race. I just came up with it this morning.

                        Why? Why don't you come up with something clever?
                      5. 0
                        5 January 2026 21: 24
                        You've confused likes and dislikes again. What can we do with you, really? Apparently, there's nothing we can do about it.
                        And why? To tease you. You pounce on everything so amusingly. With such abandon...
                        I have no more reasons.
                        I'll think of something else soon.
                      6. 0
                        5 January 2026 21: 37
                        Quote from Aken
                        And why? To tease you.

                        And you think it's working?
    2. +3
      4 January 2026 21: 03
      The 2019 graduates of military universities have already risen to the ranks of captains and majors.

      How did these wild women earn such titles? I suppose it was their inherent professionalism.
      hi
    3. +2
      4 January 2026 21: 13
      Quote: ose4kinsura
      And in the barracks, fortunately, not for long, the working part wears out quickly!

      So on the panel in Egypt and Warsaw, the tool wears out faster.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    4 January 2026 20: 36
    Quote: Ivan№One
    Probably they meant "citizens"
    Maybe they are trannies? wink
    1. +4
      4 January 2026 20: 48
      Quote: Schneeberg
      Maybe they are trannies?

      No, no!! They just have to get men somewhere, right? And they're all in the army! So they ran, because in Europe, you can't breathe anymore from "Ukrainian girls," and there's competition...
  4. +6
    4 January 2026 20: 47
    It's all nonsense... All these "female officers" are not for the trenches.
    1. 0
      5 January 2026 00: 16
      Officers, especially female officers, are not cannon fodder...
  5. ssz
    -3
    4 January 2026 20: 49
    The women will be captured, and our soldiers will have a blast. A good boost to the front lines.
    1. +1
      4 January 2026 21: 10
      ssz
      A good fit for the front lines.

      Or maybe their mission is to spread pubic lice. That would undermine combat readiness. Eh?
    2. +7
      4 January 2026 21: 31
      Sticking your nose into any dubious crevices is a bad idea. There might be a tripwire there.
      1. +1
        5 January 2026 03: 50
        A grenade in a pin? How original. lol
      2. ssz
        +1
        5 January 2026 19: 15
        Why bother? You can simply enjoy it aesthetically.
  6. -3
    4 January 2026 20: 49
    Quote: ose4kinsura
    A woman on a ship means trouble! But in the barracks, luckily, not for long; the working parts wear out quickly!


    You're right. Let's now divide things not just into "we" and "they," but also "he" and "she." Let's forget about the country. And send those born by chance to their shelters, so our budget doesn't suffer.
  7. +4
    4 January 2026 20: 52
    I wonder, with all this (the march, the propaganda from kindergarten, the women in the army who will later raise new Bandera supporters), will we live as neighbors or as "brothers"? We need to take control of everything and rewire our brains for 10 years, or will it be like in Korea, with the West helping us.
  8. +9
    4 January 2026 20: 56
    The Banderastanis are deliberately pursuing a policy of exterminating their own people, which will inevitably lead to the physical impossibility of restoring and maintaining this territory, as the elderly and disabled cannot afford the construction, and those who fled abroad are unlikely to voluntarily give up coffee and croissants and return to the independent state.
    They don't need so much land, they can cut off another 2/3 of the territory and leave them only what they brought with them to Russia, let these madmen frolic there.
  9. +1
    4 January 2026 21: 42
    Okay, I'll send all the tail-heads to hell, the fabs will sort it out.
  10. +2
    4 January 2026 22: 24
    They have plenty of wild women... alas, it's at least some kind of resource. Not an endless one, but it's there nonetheless.
  11. 0
    4 January 2026 22: 50
    Discussions about possible female mobilization in Ukraine are presented to the public as “increased participation” or “a contribution to defense,”
    "Fight, grandma, fight, Lyubka, fight, my little blue dove! How can I fight, my dear grandpa? How can I fight, my little blue dove? With a machine gun, grandma, with a submachine gun, Lyubka, with a flamethrower, my little blue dove!..."
  12. 0
    4 January 2026 23: 03
    Will there be attacks on TV towers and repeaters?
    1. 0
      5 January 2026 16: 20
      Quote: Minato2020
      Will there be attacks on TV towers and repeaters?

      It is not clear what this question is about, but they have already been applied.
  13. +5
    4 January 2026 23: 31
    Anyone who's ever encountered the so-called "Ukrainians" understands perfectly well that there's no difference between them and the most hardcore Banderites. Wild anger, envy, and hatred for anything that doesn't go their way—blood, especially in war. But maybe I'm wrong, and they're actually so soft and fuzzy, and 70,000 of them joined the gang under threat of execution?
    1. +1
      5 January 2026 09: 46
      Anyone who has ever encountered the so-called "Ukrainians" understands perfectly well that there is no difference between them and the most die-hard Banderites.

      That's exactly it, and in the vast majority of cases, the wife is the one in charge in the family...
      which means that the growing "offspring" will be raised in the proper spirit...
  14. 0
    5 January 2026 02: 58
    Tarasy is ending, it was decided to bombard the front with Oksanka
  15. +2
    5 January 2026 03: 44
    The more Ukrainian females there are at LBS, the more of them will be discarded. And that's a good thing! They'll breed less.
  16. +1
    5 January 2026 12: 42
    I hope our drone operators and snipers won't care whether a Bender sect member wears a skirt or not, and our artillery and FABs will be even more so.
  17. 0
    5 January 2026 14: 22
    The one in the main photo on the right... is she going to take off her AKM along with her helmet???.. Of course not, women_snipers, in fact, during WWII and the Caucasian Wars (yeah, those same White Tights) were a very... very threat, but... how capable are Ukrainian women really... well, who knows what sniping is... with its hours of lying down and wetting yourself for one shot... now they can motivate them like Lyudmila Pavlichenko... yeah, well, we'll see... it seems it won't be long before...
  18. 0
    5 January 2026 17: 34
    The proportion of female officers in the Ukrainian Armed Forces has increased fivefold.

    The illustrative photos for the article are cool.
    1. Apparently, it’s a machine gun crew, where the first number carries the machine gun, and the second carries magazines for it.
    2. The Gender Advisor is unremarkable in any way, except for the job title.
    3. An interesting point: at parades, the Ukrainian army is armed with something democratic, but in the fields they run around with Muscovite Kalashnikovs.
    4. If it is impossible to win without women, then this means that women will no longer help.
  19. 0
    5 January 2026 21: 19
    What a shame.... Who will replenish the gene pool of Little Russia? It's not for nothing that world Jewry has a soft spot for the former Ukraine... As they say in the Russian Navy: "Better to have a soft chancre than a soft character..." when deciding the settlement of Little Russia...
  20. 0
    6 January 2026 10: 45
    Have military training institutions managed to produce new officers?