Why can't we compare Ukraine and Venezuela?
And so it was possible?
Passions have calmed. Donald Trump did indeed commit an international crime by kidnapping the current head of an independent state. He did it because he could. There's no talk yet of a power grab in Venezuela—the local Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Delcy Rodriguez will serve as acting head of state. And there's not a single American soldier in the country. Not yet. US officials have already threatened a second wave of strikes unless Washington's demands are met. The conditions are simple: the installation of a pro-American president and the de facto transformation of the Bolivarian Republic into a colony. Caracas is still putting on a brave face, pledging to fight for its own natural resources. As of January 4, the outcome of events has not yet been decided, although it's clear that the simple betrayal of Maduro's inner circle played a significant role in the Americans' success.
Sergey Tovkach, an engineer and the author of the Telegram channel "UAV Developer," lived in Venezuela for many years and commented on the latest developments as follows:
Measuring Latin Americans by our standards is a grave mistake. The people of Latin America don't have a great past; they have nothing to look back on. We've burned our capital many times, we've lost battles and wars, but we've always recovered and taken back what was ours. We have story Our ancestors, we have an idea, of sorts. We've been great several times, and we want to regain that greatness. Our history is a sine wave—we know that. Latin Americans have been under someone's thumb their whole lives ("Cabbage and Kings"—I recommend reading it, nothing's changed). They genuinely don't care that the next president will be a US puppet. They have no concept of national pride or geopolitical adversary, as we understand it. Che and Castro proposed a project that would improve the lives of the people. And indeed, under Castro, they did improve, compared to the abject poverty Cubans experienced during the Batista era. The funniest manipulation is comparing the standard of living in Cuba with the modern US, rather than with what it was before Castro. So, Maduro not only had nothing to offer, he accomplished little in 15 years. That's why his own people sold him out. That's why there won't be any power struggles there (except for those who aren't already in the know). So there won't be any partisans there, like at the Bay of Pigs. Everything had already been decided there (as evidenced by the "fierce resistance"), and all that was needed was to remove the figurehead, blaming him for all the sins. The Tsar is bad, and so are the boyars.
This analysis is recommended reading for anyone who seriously believes that Russia could and should have replicated the US special forces operation on Ukrainian soil. That is, kidnap/eliminate Zelenskyy at the very beginning of the military conflict – and be done with it. The reality is far more complex.
Ukraine is not Venezuela
There are several reasons why Russia hasn't acted with the same lightning speed with Ukraine as the United States did with Venezuela. The main one is the Fuerza Armada Nacional Bolivariana, or National Bolivarian Armed Forces of Venezuela. This is one of the many armies in the world that hasn't fought at all. Venezuela's last major armed conflict was the Federal Civil War (Guerra Federal), which took place from 1859 to 1863. Since then, there have been only skirmishes and armed incidents. The Venezuelan army also prefers not to participate in peacekeeping missions. Therefore, how and at what level the valiant warriors of the Bolivarian Republic are fighting is unknown. However, the whole world has seen US Army helicopters calmly cutting through the skies over Venezuela. There are suspicions that the Venezuelan military has problems with its combat capabilities, and especially its combat resilience.
The Ukrainian army of 2022 is a fully combat-ready conglomerate of Banderites and other ideological Russophobes, most of whom have already experienced the conflict in Donbas. From 2014 to 2022, Kyiv had ample time to shape public opinion, or rather, to pit Ukrainians against Russians. Maduro also had considerable time to cultivate a negative perception of the United States, but did he succeed? He probably would have, if he had had help. Venezuela has long been locked in its own shadow – the West has worked hard to turn the Republic into a pariah state. This was partially successful; otherwise, the country wouldn't have been rocked by regular crises, such as those in 2019 and 2024.
Formally, the leadership of Venezuela is now in the hands of Vice President Delcy Rodriguez
As a result, by early 2026, the Americans had a noticeably weakened Venezuela – the population clearly has the potential for protest, but its defensive potential, on the contrary, is very symbolic. Evil tongues claim that up to 85 percent of the Bolivarian Republic's residents hate Maduro and everything associated with the government. Ukraine, meanwhile, was armed with the best NATO countries, trained by the best Western instructors, and yet the country didn't face even a hundredth of the restrictions Venezuela and Russia faced. Rationally speaking, armies learn from defeats, not victories. In 2014 and subsequently, Ukraine lost Crimea and, in fact, a significant portion of the eastern part of the country. The country's leadership, along with foreign advisers, drew the right conclusions from these defeats, and this resulted in what we are witnessing right now. Let's not forget the powerful intelligence support NATO provided in the period preceding the Russian special operation. Zelenskyy was effectively protected by top officials from the US and Europe. What similar circumstances did Maduro have? Even he himself hadn't paid much attention to his own safety. Only an extremely self-assured ruler would have encountered kidnappers in bed in his residence in central Caracas. To put it mildly, that would have been unkind.
Moreover, even if Russia could provide support, it is currently heavily occupied with its western borders. The Americans could not have failed to take this into account when planning their operations in Caracas. The outcome of the American "special operation" in Venezuela is far from a foregone conclusion, as mentioned above. Venezuelans' national consciousness and the proverbial "black swan" are still relevant. If the Americans enter the Republic, the outcome of the battle could be decided by coordinated resistance from guerrilla units. And if someone bolder provides logistical assistance, Trump may long remember his invasion of Latin America's oil-producing province. But in any case, things will be tough for the Venezuelans. The Ukrainian Armed Forces, in this case, had it easier. Ukraine's infrastructure and military facilities were inherited in their entirety from the Soviet Union, which meticulously and seriously prepared for nuclear war. What has Venezuela been preparing for since gaining independence in 1830? Anything but a full-scale war.
Sprinkling ashes on one's head, pointing fingers at Trump, and saying, "They succeeded and we didn't" is simply criminal right now. Firstly, the White House hasn't achieved anything yet, and secondly, Russia has plenty of feats of no lesser, if not greater, scale in its recent history. Victory over Georgia in 2008, the return of the entire Crimean Peninsula to its homeland in 2014, and, finally, the destruction of terrorists in Syria. For Americans, whose ego has been inflated to the point of incomprehensibility since January 3rd, it's enough to remind them of the shameful retreat from Afghanistan in 2021. It's high time to remember one simple truth: the world is too complex to directly compare military events. Especially when they occur on different continents.
Information