None of the thousands of MANPADS operators in the Venezuelan military attempted to shoot down US helicopters.

76 880 296
None of the thousands of MANPADS operators in the Venezuelan military attempted to shoot down US helicopters.

Prior to today's US military operation, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and senior military leaders of the Republic's Armed Forces repeatedly stated that they were ready to fight the aggressor and had everything necessary to do so.

Considering that the American military is most actively involved in conducting such operations Aviation, the Venezuelan military-political leadership demonstratively declared that the Bolivarian army has sufficient forces Defense to repel air attacks. There were even some semblance of exercises with a demonstration of anti-aircraftmissile complexes of various types.



Specifically, back in late October of last year, Maduro announced that the Venezuelan army possessed more than 5,000 9K338 Igla-S man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS). According to the Venezuelan president, thousands of trained MANPADS operators could take up favorable air defense positions throughout the country.

Maduro on the locations of MANPADS operators:

On the last mountain, in the last village and city in Venezuelan territory you can't even imagine, from north to south, from east to west. The homeland must be impregnable.

But judging by media reports, during today's American operation, all those thousands of MANPADS operators have literally vanished. There's not a single statement, even indirectly or for propaganda purposes, about any attempts to shoot down American aircraft, let alone helicopters, which become extremely easy targets for MANPADS during airborne landings.

Shooting down aerial targets with this system is, as they say, easy and completely safe. The Igla-S MANPADS utilizes the "fire and forget" principle, and its design ensures operator stealth and battlefield survivability.

Videos are already circulating online showing American CH-53 Sea Stallion and CH-47 Chinook heavy transport helicopters, designed, among other things, for airborne assaults, flying unhindered over Caracas under attack. None of the "thousands of operators" even attempt to shoot them down.

The Venezuelan army also operates S-125-2M Pechora-2M air defense systems. Last October, an open deployment of these air defense systems to the coast was conducted again. It was believed that these Russian systems, in a modernized export version, would provide defense for the Venezuelan army's air defense forces against an American landing.

The Venezuelan army also has even more modern Russian air defense systems: the S-300VM and Buk-M2, Su-30 fighter jets, and the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and gun system. None of this arsenal has ever been used to counter the Americans.

If we believe US President Donald Trump—and there is no basis for doubt—the leader of the Bolivarian Republic, Maduro, along with his wife, has already been captured by US special forces and transported to the United States. He faces trial there.

US sources note that the operation to capture Maduro was carried out by Delta Force special forces, along with the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment. The operation lasted 3 hours and 34 minutes.

The question arises: why didn't the Venezuelan army even attempt to put up any resistance to the American invasion? After all, they seemed to have prepared meticulously, even mobilizing, preparing for a guerrilla war just in case.

There are obviously several answers to this question. As Trump stated, the US Special Forces operation was meticulously prepared. Most likely, not only the military but also the intelligence agencies were involved in this preparation. Not everyone in Venezuela is happy with the Maduro regime, including the military. Bribery, threats, blackmail, promises of career advancement and other benefits, and simply security with the rise of US-loyal politicians to power—all of this was likely employed by the CIA and other US intelligence agencies to prevent armed resistance.

The opposition, which has many supporters in the country, certainly had a hand in this. It's no wonder Maduro won the last election by a margin barely within the margin of error; administrative resources were likely at play.

Sky News, citing sources in the Venezuelan opposition, reports that Maduro's capture may have been part of a "coordinated exit" agreed upon with Maduro himself, guaranteeing his life in exchange for testimony, including against Cubans and other Venezuelan allies. This may be indirectly confirmed by the fact that in his official statement, Trump referred to Maduro as "President" (with a capital "P"), rather than as a "bandit," as he had previously.

In general, the situation in Venezuela is somewhat reminiscent of the jihadist takeover of the Syrian Arab Republic in December 2024. Back then, the government's Syrian Arab Army offered virtually no resistance, simply throwing troops wherever they could. weapon and military equipment, of which there was plenty. The majority of SAA troops were not loyal to the Assad regime and had no intention of fighting for it. It seems the situation in Venezuela is almost identical.

In fact, the Venezuelan armed forces can hardly be called a professional or highly motivated army. It's one thing for senior Defense Ministry officers to make bravura statements and rattle their weapons, but quite another to engage in real combat with a clearly more powerful adversary. As the saying goes, "nobody wanted to die" for Maduro and his cronies, the Venezuelan military surely decided.

The American military also handled the situation very well psychologically. Before the landing operation, they carried out missile and bomb strikes, primarily on key military installations. This undoubtedly demoralized the Venezuelan army. It was a kind of hint of what would happen if there was resistance.

Experts unanimously note that the US military success was achieved not by technological superiority, but by the total paralysis of the Venezuelan defense system, which indicates a deep internal decay of the elite.

Moreover, the operation was short-lived, and there's no talk of full-scale US aggression. Trump has achieved the main goal—the removal of Maduro—and has no intention of physically conquering Venezuela, though he has no intention of formally depriving it of sovereignty. This is hardly a war of independence.

Moreover, Venezuelans, including the military, have no desire for their country to become another Vietnam or Afghanistan, much less Iraq, Syria, or Libya, embroiled in a war with the mighty United States. A change of government, however, oddly enough, promises certain benefits. Yes, the US will regain control of its vast hydrocarbon reserves. But this also means that Venezuela will be relieved of the long-standing, massive sanctions that have resulted in the misery and hopelessness of the future for the country's population, with the exception of a small number of local elites. And even with some of these elites, the US could have reached an agreement earlier.
296 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 28
    3 January 2026 17: 03
    In reality, we've seen a repeat of last year's events in Syria. Essentially, we have a dictator with 100% electoral support. The election results were rigged, just like Assad's. Nominally, he has a large army of over 100,000 men with tons of weapons. But that's all on paper. In reality, when the regime found itself in crisis, there was no one left to defend it. Assad's soldiers simply fled. Under Maduro, no one even seems to be trying to protect the president—a legally elected, legitimate, and seemingly popular one.
    1. + 26
      3 January 2026 17: 10
      It seems that the warriors, defenders of a sovereign independent state, were just waiting to declare war on the United States and immediately surrender, but Maduro did not allow it.
      1. + 17
        3 January 2026 17: 35
        There was simply no real support, either among civilians or military personnel. No one wanted to die for Manduro.
        1. + 11
          3 January 2026 18: 00
          Quote from: dmi.pris1
          There was simply no real support. No one wanted to die for Manduro.

          Have there been any examples in the 20th century of Latino troops heroically resisting "overseas" enemies superior in numbers and/or technology? I'm trying to remember, but I can't recall! Either I'm sclerotic, or... it just didn't happen! Just like with the Arabs!
          1. + 58
            3 January 2026 18: 32
            There's a unique country. Have you heard of the Bay of Pigs? But that's an incredible case: its military specialists waged war against capitalists all over the world.
            1. -13
              3 January 2026 18: 52
              Quote from alexoff
              There's a unique country. Have you heard of the Bay of Pigs?

              Imagine if I knew in advance what my "opponents" would "trump"! But Cuba is "different"! We could talk about this, but better another time!
              1. +3
                4 January 2026 10: 57
                How are Cubans fundamentally different from other people in Latin America?
                1. -5
                  4 January 2026 12: 43
                  Are you seriously asking this question? belay Hmmm...! Well...as question, so answer! Cubans are distinguished by the fact that they are "Cubans," while other "residents of Latin America" ​​have different national definitions! I won't answer this stupid question any more in this comment! Turn on your "brain" and think for yourself!
                  1. +3
                    4 January 2026 16: 04
                    Maybe we should remember Che's nationality? Certainly not Cuban, and he continued to act even after Fidel decided enough was enough.
          2. -8
            3 January 2026 18: 37
            This isn't sclerosis, colleague, it's the truth of life. What about Latinos? Ukrainians What about the rest of the public, they have to die for... there's really a difference of opinion on what to die for. For the president—no suggestion, but for the motherland? Forget it. Motherland or death—it's not about them.
          3. + 15
            3 January 2026 18: 40
            We had the same thing when Gorbachev was overthrown, you don't have to go far, the army also remained silent wink
            1. +7
              3 January 2026 21: 14
              Gorbachev and the rest of the Yeltsinites bought off the top brass of the army, placing their accomplices in the right places and ordering the rest around. There are countless such examples around the world, and now Russia is no exception. And yes, Judas wasn't overthrown; he left by agreement with the British.
          4. +6
            3 January 2026 21: 10
            In Grenada, I think it was in 1983, and then mainly Cubans working there on the construction of the airfield.
            1. -1
              3 January 2026 23: 12
              Quote: AKuzenka
              In Grenada, I think it was in 1983,

              Exactly, the Cubans! They were the ones providing the main resistance! But Cuba and the Cubans deserve a special discussion!
              1. +2
                3 January 2026 23: 19
                Yes, the remaining Latinos have long been firmly under American control, bought off at the root, for five rubles a pop. Just like the vast majority of the world's armies.
          5. +8
            4 January 2026 00: 56
            Salvador Allende.
            He died heroically.
        2. +1
          4 January 2026 06: 52
          What good did he do for the people while sitting on a huge barrel of oil? How did every citizen personally experience it? Maybe he dropped taxes to zero, covering the difference for every citizen with oil revenues? Or handed out housing grants like those clever sheikhs? Or lowered the retirement age, funding the well-being of the elderly from the oil industry. So why the hell should the people of Venezuela defend him? Of course he was betrayed. But he was the one who started it, and he treated everyone differently. He had the potential, but he didn't realize it. And this happened to all the fallen dictators who lived in their palaces, shitting in golden toilets with golden loaves of bread on their tables, amid poverty and the decay of social welfare.
          1. +3
            4 January 2026 08: 31
            Quote: Last centurion
            What good did he do for the people while sitting on a huge barrel of oil?

            In case you forgot, Venezuela's problems began after the introduction of sanctions, back under Chavez.
          2. -1
            4 January 2026 10: 45
            Your comment is also suitable for Russia.
          3. 0
            4 January 2026 14: 32
            Be careful here, otherwise you'll come to an agreement and remember another country rich in natural resources and, by the way, one that has taken a course on increasing the tax burden on ordinary citizens.
          4. 0
            4 January 2026 22: 30
            Quote: Last centurion
            What good has he done for the people while sitting on a huge barrel of oil? How has every citizen personally experienced it? Perhaps he's reduced taxes to zero, covering the difference for each citizen with oil revenues?

            Don’t you think that the issue, to put it mildly, is much broader than the case of N. Maduro? wink
          5. 0
            8 January 2026 21: 42
            I dare to recall the Libyan Jamahiriya. But what harm did Gaddafi do to the people, sitting on a huge barrel of oil? Personally, every citizen personally experienced the annual subsidy of $1000 per family member, the absence of rent, $64000 for newlyweds to buy an apartment. Every newborn received a $5000 allowance. Interest-free loans, healthcare, and education were free. A liter of gasoline was 14 cents. This is a small fraction of the social support provided to the people; listing it all would take too long. So Muammar handed out both housing and money... And how did it help him? He was slandered and torn to pieces in the spirit of the Middle Ages. It seems that on our planet, the principle "whoever helps people is wasting their time" applies. Others don't work... Although if you carefully lick Uncle Sam's asshole and offer yours in a timely manner, then everything will be tip-top... But this is not certain, as Europe has shown.
        3. +4
          4 January 2026 11: 39
          Moreover, the Minister of Defense sold out the President for $50 million and promises of immunity. This answers all the questions about why the army didn't even lift a beak at such perfect targets as low-flying helicopters... and then they handed the President over to someone else. Billionaire generals are the bane of any country and the beginning of its abject failures... and ours too.
      2. + 52
        3 January 2026 18: 03
        Well, if we recall Prigozhin's March for Justice... Who rushed to defend the Kremlin? Only Yevkurov went to reason with them. Everyone fled Moscow like rats, all the charters and business jets were sold out instantly, and the Wagnerites were greeted with flowers. There's a colossal demand in society for justice, a strong and honest leader, and not all this. So it's unclear what would have happened if something had happened.
        1. -20
          3 January 2026 18: 18
          Quote from: FoBoss_VM
          People greeted the Wagners with flowers. There is a colossal demand in society for justice and a strong and honest leader.

          What are you talking about? strong and honest Are you attaching it to the criminal Prigozhin?
          1. + 29
            3 January 2026 20: 57
            Judging by the number of arrests among military personnel and officials, the question of which of them is the greater criminal is quite difficult.
            1. +6
              3 January 2026 21: 16
              For me, there's nothing complicated about this issue. They're all of the same stripe. Just from different gangs.
              1. 0
                4 January 2026 08: 32
                Quote: AKuzenka
                They're all the same color. Just from different gangs.

                Only Prigozhin actually fought.
          2. +4
            3 January 2026 22: 03
            Quote: Carmela
            Quote from: FoBoss_VM
            People greeted the Wagners with flowers. There is a colossal demand in society for justice and a strong and honest leader.

            What are you talking about? strong and honest Are you attaching it to the criminal Prigozhin?

            What do you think about the Decembrists?
            About the Bolsheviks?
            Just wondering!
            1. +1
              4 January 2026 13: 17
              Quote: SovAr238A

              What do you think about the Decembrists?
              About the Bolsheviks?
              Just wondering!

              I don't think about them at all. I'm interested in earlier history—from the Australopithecus to the 18th century, and not all of that, just parts of it.
          3. 0
            4 January 2026 00: 28
            "Criminal"? Bring the court's decision to the studio or shoot yourself.
            1. +1
              4 January 2026 01: 09
              Quote: Luenkov
              "Criminal"? Bring the court's decision to the studio or shoot yourself.

              And he already served time for "Zaporozhets"... (C)
            2. +7
              4 January 2026 02: 40
              Quote: Luenkov
              The court's decision is in the studio.

              You don't know? Seriously?
              In November 1979, the Kuibyshev District People's Court of Leningrad sentenced Prigozhin to two and a half years' suspended imprisonment on charges of theft.
              In 1981, the Zhdanovsky People's District Court of Leningrad sentenced Prigozhin to 13 years in prison on new charges of theft, fraud, involving a minor in criminal activity, and robbery.
              In 1988, Prigozhin was pardoned.

              The most fair and humane Soviet court, however.
              1. -2
                4 January 2026 09: 28
                Pardoned in the USSR... and in the Russian Federation?
                1. -2
                  5 January 2026 19: 19
                  Quote: Luenkov
                  Pardoned in the USSR... and in the Russian Federation?

                  Are you serious? Should he have served time in all the former republics?
                  1. 0
                    5 January 2026 22: 44
                    Tell me, do you have any state awards? Something like Utkin's, 6 orders... Who are we to judge? Seriously, though.
        2. -18
          3 January 2026 18: 59
          The jets were sold out instantly, and people greeted the Wagners with flowers. There's a colossal demand for justice in society.
          You say you greeted them with flowers? You're probably confusing the greeting of Wehrmacht troops with flowers on the streets of Kyiv in 1941? While some were being shot at Babi Yar, others were throwing flowers at the invaders.
        3. -9
          3 January 2026 19: 06
          and people greeted the Wagners with flowers

          It's a lie! And the conclusions based on it are just as false, accordingly...
          No one greeted the Wagnerites with flowers after it became known where they were heading and why. And the Wagnerites were especially condemned when the public learned they had destroyed our own troops and several helicopters, I believe, sent to counter them...
          And I know a guy, a military guy from one of the forums, he was a prominent Wagnerite and even received some gifts from Prigozhin himself, interacted with him, etc. So, after Prigozhin's outburst, he denounced him and disowned him... Then, he simply joined the Ministry of Defense and signed a contract... Basically, even his own Wagnerites, the absolute majority, condemned Prigozhin then.
          1. -6
            3 January 2026 20: 59
            They weren't greeted with flowers, but no one rushed to defend the Kremlin either. Except perhaps the Caucasian nukers.
            1. -19
              3 January 2026 21: 11
              Are you even a seasoned nationalist? Or are you deliberately stirring up trouble? Are you sowing interethnic discord?
              1. -1
                4 January 2026 11: 01
                I'm telling you what I saw. Fortunately, Wagner was passing through my region. I didn't see anyone willing to rush into battle. They were stopped by digging up the roads. Although, yes. The nukers' charge, I didn't see it myself.
            2. -1
              3 January 2026 21: 33
              Quote: Single-n
              No one rushed to defend the Kremlin either

              There was no need. There are specially trained people to protect the state.
              1. 0
                4 January 2026 08: 36
                Quote: Carmela
                Quote: Single-n
                No one rushed to defend the Kremlin either

                There was no need. There are specially trained people to protect the state.

                But they're not there when it's needed. For example, in the Kursk region... But it was Prigozhin's march that showed that the roads to the center were open. And even then, many took notice.
              2. +1
                4 January 2026 11: 03
                That's what the Venezuelan military decided. There's the president's security detail, so let them fight.
          2. +8
            3 January 2026 21: 24
            Enough of your bickering. Prigozhin went to the Kremlin for the money he'd been scammed out of, that's all. He decided to settle the matter "like a man," in the style of the thug he was. And he was going to meet people like him. There were some "purely thug" squabbles at the highest level, which, fortunately, the Russian Foreign Minister's foreign partners didn't have time to exploit. Even though everything was hanging by a thread.
            1. -14
              3 January 2026 21: 38
              There was nothing hanging... At the very least, within a certain, calculated distance to Moscow, if the Wagnerites had reached it..., from the front, by any means necessary, they would have delivered the most powerful armies to Moscow... They would have destroyed the Wagner detachment before it even reached Moscow..., but on the battlefield, too, it would have had a negative impact, of course... In short, Wagner simply couldn't have committed anything illegal; they wouldn't have allowed it... and therefore, their Western partners, perhaps, didn't seize on such a weak pretext either.
              So, what was it? Prigozhin's vanity, which at some point overcame his reason? ))). Maybe someone "sang" something to him, directed him, and he, overcome with emotion, went for it? .. Until he realized it... I think he himself stopped... after Putin's speech?..)
              1. +8
                3 January 2026 23: 17
                At the very least, within a certain, calculated distance to Moscow, if the Wagnerites had reached it, the most powerful armies would have been delivered from the front to Moscow by any means necessary.
                Honestly, it's funny to read. Where are these "most powerful armies" of yours now, on the battlefield where the fate of the Russian Federation is being decided?
                In general, Wagner simply couldn't have done anything illegal; they wouldn't have allowed it... and therefore, Western partners, perhaps, also didn't "cling" to such a weak pretext.
                Taking up arms against the government isn't a crime? So then every criminal is an angel?!
                The British simply couldn't imagine that a "boys' showdown" would take place, and they simply didn't have the time or plan to take advantage of it.
                1. +2
                  4 January 2026 00: 33
                  When Wagner was under friendly fire in Syria, did someone become a criminal?
                2. +3
                  4 January 2026 13: 03
                  Quote: AKuzenka
                  The British simply couldn't imagine that a "boys' showdown" would take place, and they simply didn't have the time or plan to take advantage of it.

                  Prigozhin was a pawn in the hands of the British, and I don't even know what to call them; now all these bastards are called globalists. Remember why he was screaming at the top of his lungs that Gerasimov had fled? Why did all the fifth columnist media start blaring about 1) the capture of a city of a million people, 2) Putin fleeing Moscow, 3) the army defecting to the rebels, 4) prison riots, 5) and a coup d'état already taking place... They didn't have time to tell us anything else, because it was all over. And NATO exercises on the western border had just ended the day before, and 90 troops remained there on full combat readiness, and Medvedev had been saying for the past two weeks that their aircraft participating in the exercises were capable of carrying nuclear weapons... We also need to remember the US submarines on alert in the ocean. Prigozhin's collapse has disrupted our enemies' plans. But they are still waiting for the right moment to destroy our country and our state, so be vigilant.
              2. -2
                3 January 2026 23: 37
                Quote: Hand of the Eye
                What was that? - Prigogine's vanity was in full swing.

                Prigozhin is a typical psychopath, so logic and common sense don’t work there.
                1. +1
                  4 January 2026 02: 06
                  He's not a psychopath. He's an adventurer.
                  1. -1
                    4 January 2026 02: 35
                    Quote: Jose
                    He's not a psychopath. He's an adventurer.

                    The psychopath is the cause. The opportunist is the effect. Or, rather, the diagnosis and the symptom.
          3. 0
            4 January 2026 10: 47
            Utkin, Wagner, received six (!) Orders of Courage from Prigozhin? And Utkin couldn't tell who was right?
        4. -1
          3 January 2026 19: 44
          Are you talking about the bald dog who shot down his own helicopters?!? You have a good leader! But then again, who cares about a mare?
          1. +3
            3 January 2026 20: 47
            And who were their helicopters shooting at, other people's? Rostov was lucky there were a lot of Wagnerites, otherwise the whole city would have been destroyed.
        5. +6
          3 January 2026 20: 09
          Quote from: FoBoss_VM
          a colossal demand for justice, a strong and honest leader

          Fueled by hostile resources from our Russian-speaking neighbors.
          And where did this strong and honest leader come to power? In Syria, it was the bogeymen, in Libya, it was something similar, in Venezuela, it was a downright dollar-spinning prostitute, in 90s Russia, it was an alcoholic dancing for the West's amusement. But how they pushed this piece of shit, wrapped in a pretty package, on the people everywhere.
        6. -3
          3 January 2026 20: 45
          No one greeted this criminal with flowers, he was greeted by companies raised on alert on the approaches to Moscow, and then they surrounded him like a pig at the slaughterhouse, that’s why he chickened out and backed out, but it didn’t help him, a dog’s death for a traitor.
          1. +1
            4 January 2026 00: 37
            Were they looking for traitors in the Ministry of Defense? The Kursk epic and the civilian deaths have been forgotten.
        7. +4
          4 January 2026 01: 08
          Quote from: FoBoss_VM
          People greeted the Wagners with flowers. There is simply a colossal demand in society for justice, a strong and honest leader, and not all this
          - Hmm, could you elaborate on the "fair and honest" part? belay " dollar billionaire oligarch?
          Or have people forgotten?HOW are becoming oligarchs we have?
          Whose company fed more than half the army, kindergartens and schools?
          He apparently tore it from his heart - for army stew?
          Memory like a fish...
          1. +3
            4 January 2026 02: 43
            Quote: your1970
            People have forgotten - HOW do people become oligarchs here?

            How slow you are: "This leg belongs to the one who needs a leg." You have to differentiate.
          2. 0
            4 January 2026 03: 50
            Quote: your1970
            Whose company fed more than half the army, kindergartens and schools?

            You might also ask how Prigozhin's companies won Ministry of Defense tenders, often without the specialists, permits, or authorizations to carry out the work. wink
            It has been established that Nordenergo LLC has been operating the said boiler house since 01.11.2015 without a license for the operation of hazardous industrial facilities, as provided for in subparagraph 12 of paragraph 1 of Article 12 of the Federal Law of 05.05.2011 No. 99-FZ "On Licensing of Certain Types of Activities" and Article 9 of the Federal Law of 21.07.1997 No. 116-FZ "On Industrial Safety of Hazardous Industrial Facilities.
            © Lieutenant Colonel of Justice Pavel Konashenko, military prosecutor of the 73rd military prosecutor's office of the Svetlogorsk garrison.
            Data from the Rostekhnadzor Integrated Information System “Licensing” indicate that Nordenergo LLC does not have a license to operate explosive, fire-hazardous, and chemically hazardous industrial facilities of hazard classes I, II, and III.
            © Deputy Head of the North-West Department of Rostekhnadzor Alexey Kapaev
            Nordenergo LLC, meanwhile, had been providing water and heat supply in the Western and Central Military Districts since November 1, 2015, with contracts totaling 10,5 billion rubles. This LLC forwarded all inquiries to Megaline LLC, a subsidiary of Prigozhinsky's Concord Management and Consulting LLC. Concord had five such companies, with contracts totaling nearly 27 billion rubles.

            This is what a "fighter for justice" is like.
          3. +1
            4 January 2026 08: 39
            Quote: your1970
            Whose company fed more than half the army, kindergartens and schools?

            Is this illegal? Is it illegal to be an oligarch?
            1. -1
              4 January 2026 10: 13
              Quote: Panin (Michman)
              Quote: your1970
              Whose company fed more than half the army, kindergartens and schools?

              Is this illegal? Is it illegal to be an oligarch?

              Of course not - you can be an oligarch here.
              It's stupid to talk about a "fair and honest oligarch" - after everything the oligarchs have done to the country.
        8. 0
          4 January 2026 01: 51
          But none of the military sided with Prigozhin.
          1. 0
            4 January 2026 08: 41
            Quote: Jose
            But none of the military took Prigozhin's side either.

            Military people are special. They're given orders, and they follow them. Just like during the collapse of the USSR, just like during the coups. And by the time they start thinking, it's all over.
    2. -6
      3 January 2026 17: 45

      Essentially, we have a president with 100% electoral support.
      Legally elected, legitimate and seemingly popular.
      The election results were rigged.
      Nominally a large army with a lot of weapons.


      This smacks of discrimination.
    3. +8
      3 January 2026 21: 23
      The Americans confirmed ground fire and damage to one helicopter. Madura was betrayed by its own leadership. I'm sure they weren't even bribed; they were simply told, "If you sit quietly during the operation, we might not kill you and give you a little more time." So, what we saw wasn't the success of a few-hour operation, but the result of 20 years of focused work, beginning with the first threats against Chávez.
      1. +6
        3 January 2026 23: 44
        Russia also had 20 years to work in Ukraine, and why didn't they? In short, learn from the Americans how to conduct a strategic military operation.
        1. 0
          4 January 2026 01: 18
          Quote: Fan-Fan
          Russia also had 20 years to work in Ukraine, and why didn't they? In short, learn from the Americans how to conduct a strategic military operation.

          So what's the result? So they stole it and put me in a chair, so what?
          Whether they will have oil or not is still a question.
          The fact that the state there was loose is the same everywhere (as with the Arabs) - only Cuba stands apart.
          1. +1
            4 January 2026 02: 45
            Quote: your1970
            Cuba stands alone there

            There's also Chile, but it's a completely incomprehensible country - no oil, no drugs, and the geography is strange.
        2. +1
          4 January 2026 13: 08
          Quote: Fan-Fan
          Russia also had 20 years to work in Ukraine, and why didn’t they do so?

          Indeed, how did it happen that our oligarchs and their oligarchs found a common language?
      2. -1
        4 January 2026 00: 40
        Quote: severok1979
        The Americans confirmed ground fire and damage to one helicopter. Madura was betrayed by its own leadership. I'm sure they weren't even bribed; they were simply told, "If you sit quietly during the operation, we might not kill you and give you a little more time." So, what we saw wasn't the success of a few-hour operation, but the result of 20 years of focused work, beginning with the first threats against Chávez.

        After phone conversations with Veniki, Simonyan reported that she was paid by the ravine guards
    4. 0
      4 January 2026 16: 30
      Even if the government is lousy, it's impossible for anyone to not fire at the invaders. The evidence is clear: bribery of high-ranking officials and a direct ban on confrontation.
      1. 0
        4 January 2026 17: 49
        So, the soldiers are going to stand and watch without orders as strangers put their commander-in-chief into a helicopter? Maybe Prigozhin didn't think to bribe the right people back then.
        1. 0
          4 January 2026 18: 20
          That's your assertion. It's quite obvious that they sent the most loyal and combat-ready troops there. Only an order from above could stop them. I wouldn't be surprised if some kind of deal comes to light later. Well, time will tell.
    5. 0
      5 January 2026 14: 43
      Essentially, we have a dictator. with 100% support in the electionsThe election results were rigged, just like Assad's.


      Nicolás Maduro received 51.95% of the vote in the 2024 elections. His main opposition opponent received 43.18%.
      1. 0
        5 January 2026 15: 41
        Well, you see, if it were so popular that I had to draw 51%, 99 would be too obvious.
        1. 0
          5 January 2026 16: 16
          I see that Maduro did not have (as you stated) 100 percent support, and the difference is within the margin of error.

          I also see that there was no dictatorship (and, as a result, no dictator) in Venezuela. Simply because the people were allowed to vote against the current regime, and the votes were actually counted.
          1. 0
            5 January 2026 19: 39
            There wasn't a dictatorship in Venezuela? Wow, that's a 2 x 2 = 10 statement. Apparently, 20% of the population who became refugees simply went to see the cathedral spires. :) May I ask, if Venezuela had fair elections, then why did Maduro create a second parliament?
            1. 0
              6 January 2026 04: 47
              Directly linking dictatorship and emigration is truly a 2x2=10 statement.

              Was there a dictatorship in Ireland too? And in Sicily? Up to half the population left Sicily.

              Then why did Maduro create a second parliament?


              Venezuela has one parliament - the National Assembly of Venezuela.
              1. +1
                6 January 2026 04: 57
                The main wave of emigration from Ireland to the USA and Australia occurred precisely during the period
                when the island was under the de facto colonial authoritarian regime of the British Empire.
                From the end of the 18th century and almost the entire 19th century, Ireland:
                did not have its own parliament (after the Act of Union of 1801),
                was controlled directly from London,
                the Catholic majority was deprived of political rights,
                repressive laws were in force,
                uprisings were suppressed,
                The economic policy of the metropolis aggravated hunger and poverty.
                It was during this period:
                the Great Famine began,
                Ireland's population has almost halved,
                Millions of people fled, not "simply looking for a better life."
                So Ireland is not a counter-example, but the opposite,
                confirmation of the connection between authoritarian rule and mass emigration.
                Therefore, the comparison with Venezuela is more than appropriate:
                external or internal deprivation of political rights,
                lack of real representation,
                suppression of opposition,
                and as a consequence - population exodus.
                "Venezuela has one parliament"
                Formally, yes.
                In fact, no.
                In 2017, Nicolás Maduro:
                created the Constituent Assembly,
                bypassed the elected National Assembly, where the opposition won,
                transferred super powers to the new structure.
                This is called a parallel authority, not "one parliament."
                A classic technique of authoritarian regimes.
                Therefore, the question “why did Maduro create a second parliament?” is absolutely correct.
                The answer is simple: to nullify the results of the elections he lost.
                And the last:
                If the dictatorship has "nothing to do with it",
                if the parliament is "one",
                if everything is "normal" -
                Why then are people fleeing in the millions, and the regime is held together only by the security forces?
                This is the main question.
                1. 0
                  6 January 2026 05: 05
                  Oh! More neurological nonsense! This is 2x2=10, this is neurological schizophrenia.

                  But she also refuted you.

                  It was during this period:
                  the Great Famine began,


                  Oh! What is this? The name of a totalitarian regime?

                  The main reason for emigration from Venezuela, Ireland, and Sicily is to move to countries with better economic conditions. And emigration has increased exponentially during periods of economic crisis.

                  In 2017, Nicolás Maduro:
                  created the Constituent Assembly,


                  There never was such a body as a constituent assembly.

                  In 2017, the Asamblea Nacional Constituyente (National Constitutional Assembly) was created. It was dissolved three years later, in 2020. This isn't anything new; there was also the Constituent Assembly of 1999-2000.

                  And it wasn't Maduro who created it; rather, the members of the constitutional assembly were elected in the 2017 elections. The opposition, however, didn't make it into the assembly because it boycotted those elections.

                  What conclusion can we draw from this? Don't use neural networks; think for yourself, and 2 x 2 = 10 won't work.
                  1. 0
                    6 January 2026 05: 56
                    No one disputes that economic crises increase emigration.
                    The debate is about something else: why a crisis turns into a catastrophe – and here politics decides.
                    Across Ireland
                    The Great Irish Famine is not the "name of a totalitarian regime" but a historical term.
                    A fact that most historians agree on:
                    the famine was partly preventable;
                    Ireland was under colonial and militarised rule;
                    food continued to be exported from the country;
                    The population had no political leverage to change London's policies.
                    That is, the reason is not only economics, but the lack of political sovereignty.
                    About Venezuela and 2017
                    Formally, yes, in 2017 the Asamblea Nacional Constituyente was created.
                    But you carefully avoid the key point:
                    it was convened bypassing the elected National Assembly, where the opposition won;
                    received super powers and actually nullified parliament;
                    the elections were held without equal conditions, under the control of the authorities;
                    The opposition boycotted them not out of whim, but because the rules had been changed to suit the government.
                    This is a classic example of a parallel authority, not a “normal constitutional procedure.”
                    Maduro barely had the legitimate ability to convene any assemblies without going through parliament. The 1999 example doesn't work under Chávez. Under Chávez, there was a national referendum to form the assembly. Parliament wasn't forcibly removed. The Constituent Assembly had a limited mandate, not the deputy president's blanket mandate to write laws. This process was recognized as legitimate both within and outside the country. The "2 x 2 = 10" argument is, of course, ridiculous. But perhaps you really know better: you're the one justifying a regime under which a country with the world's largest oil reserves has been reduced to poverty.
                    1. 0
                      6 January 2026 07: 47
                      But perhaps you really know better: it is you who justify a regime under which a country with the world's largest oil reserves has been reduced to poverty:)


                      Anyone who writes that Venezuela has "the largest oil reserves" is admitting ignorance. They've read the popular narrative but haven't verified it themselves. I'm sure you have no idea what I'm talking about.

                      Regarding the regime: The country was driven to poverty by the pro-Western democratic regime of Carlos Andrés Pérez. This is what led first to the military rebellion, and then to impeachment. And then to Chávez, who tried his best to lead the country out of the crisis, but failed.

                      Under Chavez, there was a national referendum on the formation of the assembly.


                      Under Maduro, there were national elections that the opposition boycotted on its own whim.

                      This process was recognized as legitimate both inside and outside the country.


                      And again we see neurodelirium.

                      In fact, the 1999-2000 Constituent Assembly had even broader powers than under Maduro. Specifically, it had the authority to liquidate government bodies, dismiss officials, and manage the judicial system.

                      And it was her actions that led to the mass opposition demonstrations in 2001 and the attempted coup in 2002. That is, she was not recognized as legitimate either externally (since Chavez is a socialist) or, especially, internally.

                      But the term legitimacy is neoliberal and effectively means "the US doesn't like this."
                      1. 0
                        6 January 2026 12: 25
                        In 2014, Venezuela's per capita GDP was around $15,000. Now it's $4,000. So, yes, it's obviously the same in Russia; those who ruled in the 1990s are to blame for everything. And regarding legitimacy, if legitimacy is a neoliberal American term used merely as a tool to demonstrate the US's attitude toward a particular leader, then the question arises: why does Vladimir Putin care so much? Is Zelensky legitimate or illegitimate in Ukraine?
    6. 0
      6 January 2026 18: 32
      Eighty people died around Maduro, including 32 Cuban security guards. It's unclear what our chief military adviser, General Oleg Makarevich, was doing there; he was kicked out of the SVO for sleeping through the landing in Krynki.
  2. + 20
    3 January 2026 17: 07
    Well, there's nothing to argue with; it all looks like they just flew in, "swaddled" us, and flew away. And the army simply grabbed a bite and waved goodbye. At least, that's the impression one gets from the footage lying around.
    1. + 25
      3 January 2026 17: 20
      The whole operation took 35 minutes. 35 minutes, Karl.


      I envy you, Margarita. Mercader spent longer with Trotsky.
      1. +8
        3 January 2026 17: 23
        Comrade Beria hi If everything corresponds to what was stated, then what can I say, five points for execution.
        1. + 11
          3 January 2026 17: 54
          Quote: Murmur 55
          five points for execution.

          Trump:
          I was told by real military men that there is no other country on Earth that could perform such a maneuver.
          I watched it literally like a TV show.
          It was a stunning sight.


          35 minutes and the SVO is suspended (by the US) upon achieving the primary goal (regime change + intimidation) - the second act will follow if they are intractable in further decisions (by the US) about the fate of Venezuela.
      2. + 16
        3 January 2026 17: 32
        Quote: Comrade Beria
        I envy you, Margarita.

        Hmm... Is this the same Margarita who runs the powerful propaganda resource broadcasting to the entire world about the endless support of Russians for the ever-present Vladimir?
        1. +1
          3 January 2026 17: 44
          Yes, that one. Why not?
        2. + 15
          3 January 2026 18: 07
          Quote: Puncher
          Quote: Comrade Beria
          I envy you, Margarita.

          Hmm... Is this the same Margarita who runs the powerful propaganda resource broadcasting to the entire world about the endless support of Russians for the ever-present Vladimir?

          Anyone with eyes and a little internet access could already see this endless support for Mr. Putin. Everyone saw how the residents of Rostov stood up to the rebellious Wagner units. And everyone, holding their breath, watched as the old ladies from Putin's units tore their shirts off and engaged the Wagner fighters in hand-to-hand combat, crossing themselves before a portrait of Mr. Putin. Or maybe I just dreamed it all? It was something completely different: security forces, reporting to various ministries, stood modestly on the side of the road, shifting from foot to foot, not even thinking about pointing any of their weapons at the Wagner fighters, lest they mistake their actions for hostility, or simply waved lazily at each other. And then, after the capture of Rostov, there was essentially just a mass, popular fraternization with the Wagner fighters. That's the true price of "support" for His Majesty the Strategic Advantage, all 146% live (at the time). If anyone thinks things will be much different in Russia and the country will come out to die for Putin if he's removed from power, rewatch how Wagner entered Rostov... But yes, there's a common thread in all these stories - Hussein, Gaddafi, Assad, and now Maduro, according to official data, had popular support reaching almost 90 or 100%. P.S. source (https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2025/12/19/1164643-vtsiom-putinu-doveryayut from 12/19/25) - VTsIOM: More than 81% of Russians trust Putin... As they say, no comment.
          1. -4
            3 January 2026 18: 29
            Quote: Leshy1975
            More than 81% of Russians trust Putin... As they say, no comment.

            Putin has become smarter; he now has a detachment of combat Koreans.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            3 January 2026 19: 17
            Quote: Leshy1975
            But yes, there is a common thread in all these stories - whether it was Hussein, Gaddafi, Assad, or now Maduro, according to official data, the overwhelming support of the population reached almost 90 or 100%.

            First of all, have you tried reading the article?
            It is no wonder that Maduro won the last elections with a minimal margin, almost at the level of statistical error.

            Secondly, how much better did things become in Iraq, Libya and Syria after the "Overthrow of the Bloody Dictators"?
            Those who voted down are kindly requested to at least try to write about how wonderful life has become in Iraq, Libya, and Syria.
            1. +9
              3 January 2026 19: 31
              Quote: Dart2027
              Quote: Leshy1975
              But yes, there is a common thread in all these stories - whether it was Hussein, Gaddafi, Assad, or now Maduro, according to official data, the overwhelming support of the population reached almost 90 or 100%.

              First of all, have you tried reading the article?
              It is no wonder that Maduro won the last elections with a minimal margin, almost at the level of statistical error.

              Secondly, how much better did things become in Iraq, Libya and Syria after the "Overthrow of the Bloody Dictators"?
              Those who voted down are kindly requested to at least try to write about how wonderful life has become in Iraq, Libya, and Syria.

              1) I don't think the US cares much about life in these countries. 2) I don't think life has improved in, say, Vovchansk or Bakhmut since the frontline reduced these towns to rubble and dust. The US has shown how to achieve the desired result without turning towns into lunar landscapes. And, by the way, they've also shown how to set realistic, achievable goals for the military. 3) Russia was also in Syria, supporting Assad with direct participation in the military action. Can we ask the same question: so, did they achieve results? Has it gotten better? And the Idlib agreements, excuse me, who pushed them through and signed them with Erdogan? Don't you remember? I even wrote a lengthy comment on VO back then with the premise that the Idlib agreements were an axe over Assad's head. Admit it, did you personally ardently support the Idlib agreements? If so, there's no point in blaming the mirror, since... the rest is classic.
              1. -5
                3 January 2026 20: 50
                Quote: Leshy1975
                I don't think the US cares much about life in these countries.

                And does Venezuela care?
                Quote: Leshy1975
                The United States has just shown how to achieve the desired result without turning cities into lunar landscapes.

                Really? So they never carpet bombed? Hmm...
                Quote: Leshy1975
                I don’t think life became good in, for example, Volchansk or Bakhmut after the front ground these cities into rubble and dust.

                Can you find pictures of the restored Mariupol yourself?
                Quote: Leshy1975
                Well, did you achieve results? It got better.

                What have we achieved? Assad hasn't been in Syria for a long time, or am I missing something?
                Quote: Leshy1975
                And who pushed through the Idlib agreements, excuse me, and signed them with Erdogan?

                But was there an alternative? That's the question. Syria, too, was on its last legs.
            2. 0
              3 January 2026 19: 51
              They forgot about Afghanistan. It's so nice there now.
              1. +1
                3 January 2026 20: 51
                Quote: Roma-92
                They forgot about Afghanistan.

                There was chaos there even before the US arrived. But the countries listed above were more or less developing.
            3. +2
              3 January 2026 21: 02
              Well, well, well, no one stood up to defend them. And I suspect the local Urya patriots will also remain silent. And none of them will join the partisans or the people's militia.
              1. +1
                3 January 2026 23: 01
                Quote: Single-n
                Well, well, well, but no one stood up to defend them.

                And? I already knew that. So, is it better or not?
                1. 0
                  4 January 2026 11: 03
                  It's hard to say. Some people definitely feel better. Those who came to power.
                  1. +1
                    4 January 2026 11: 55
                    Quote: Single-n
                    It's hard to say. Some people definitely feel better. Those who came to power.

                    Exactly. Things improved for them, but not so much for the people. YES, their rulers had their faults, examples of all sorts could be found, but what happened after their overthrow...
                    1. 0
                      4 January 2026 12: 21
                      You and I often have no idea what life was like BEFORE or AFTER. And there are examples of revolutions and coups often benefiting the country. Otherwise, we'd still be living under the tsars.
                      1. 0
                        4 January 2026 13: 15
                        Quote: Single-n
                        You and I often have no idea how people lived there BEFORE and how they began to live AFTER.

                        So you're saying that in countries where everyone has been at war with everyone for decades, life has become better?
                        Quote: Single-n
                        And there are also examples of revolutions and coups often benefiting the country. Otherwise, we would still be living under the tsars.

                        The question is which was better. The communism project failed.
            4. -1
              4 January 2026 08: 49
              Quote: Dart2027
              So how much better did things get in Iraq, Libya and Syria after the "Overthrow of the Bloody Dictators"?

              But has anything changed in Afghanistan since the Soviet troops arrived? The Mujahideen arrived, then the Taliban, then the US, then the Taliban again.
              In general, in the same Poland, Romania, GDR, Yugoslavia (except for the Serbs), a lot has changed.
              1. +1
                4 January 2026 09: 00
                Quote: Panin (Michman)
                Has anything changed in Afghanistan since the Soviet troops entered?
                Maybe a conclusion? So how good has it been under the US?
                Quote: Panin (Michman)
                In general, in the same Poland, Romania, GDR, Yugoslavia (except for the Serbs), a lot has changed.

                Poland is gradually preparing to play the role of Ukraine-2 (remember the phrase about how they act like complete idiots), Romania is of no use to anyone, the GDR is part of Germany (how are things with industry after the break with Russia?), does Yugoslavia even exist?
                As I understand it, there will be no answer about the "wonderful life" in Iraq, Libya, and Syria after the "overthrow of bloody dictators"?
          3. +1
            3 January 2026 19: 57
            Could you remind me, maybe I missed something, where Prigozhin threatened Putin so that Putin's supporters would start throwing themselves under the wheels of the Wagner mercenaries?
            Well, for the sake of variety, at least one phrase where Prigozhin would say something against the Supreme, as he always called him.
            Your political manuals are completely out of place here, from this perspective, complete nonsense, I apologize, there are no analogies at all, just an attempt to force your dreams into reality.
            1. 0
              3 January 2026 20: 30
              Quote: Evgeny64
              Could you remind me, maybe I missed something, where Prigozhin threatened Putin so that Putin's supporters would start throwing themselves under the wheels of the Wagner mercenaries?
              Well, for the sake of variety, at least one phrase where Prigozhin would say something against the Supreme, as he always called him.
              Your political manuals are completely out of place here, from this perspective, complete nonsense, I apologize, there are no analogies at all, just an attempt to force your dreams into reality.

              So perhaps Prigozhin was following the Supreme Commander's orders when he withdrew his units from the front and advanced first on Rostov and then on Moscow? If Prigozhin acted, as you imply, without harming Putin and posed no threat to him, then why did they strike the Wagner Group? And what about the Wagner Group, which shot down several helicopters? So, in your opinion, there was no threat to Putin's power in that march on Moscow? Then why did Lukashenko get involved, promising to urgently redeploy a division to defend Moscow? If it was all just a nice little get-together that posed no threat to the Russian government? A military mutiny, with or without statements, is always a threat to the government. So, my dear fellow, it's you who are spouting utter nonsense, following the playbook...
              1. +3
                4 January 2026 02: 38
                Prigozhin, by his own admission at the time, had no intention of overthrowing Putin, much less physically killing him. (Although, oddly enough, I don't think so.)
                It's a fact that no one joined him technically or physically. It's also a fact that no government official publicly supported him—not a single governor, not a single mayor, not a single deputy. It's also a fact that no one (except Kadyrov's men) ran away at Kursk. It's a fact that we have very few cases of outright betrayal on the front lines of the fighting with Ukraine (special forces and refuseniks shouldn't be compared to traitors who defect to the enemy). So your insinuations about a "rotten army unwilling to defend a rotten regime" unfortunately don't apply.
                1. -2
                  4 January 2026 03: 12
                  Quote: Jose
                  Prigozhin, by his own admission at the time, had no intention of overthrowing Putin, much less physically killing him. (Although, oddly enough, I don't think so.)
                  It's a fact that no one joined him technically or physically. It's also a fact that no government official publicly supported him—not a single governor, not a single mayor, not a single deputy. It's also a fact that no one (except Kadyrov's men) ran away at Kursk. It's a fact that we have very few cases of outright betrayal on the front lines of the fighting with Ukraine (special forces and refuseniks shouldn't be compared to traitors who defect to the enemy). So your insinuations about a "rotten army unwilling to defend a rotten regime" unfortunately don't apply.

                  None of the governors or mayors really supported Putin either; they all hid, kept quiet, and waited to see how it all played out. For example, how did the Voronezh governor perform when the Wagner mercenaries were moving through Voronezh and the surrounding region, or the Rostov governor? The same thing will happen – they'll hide and bide their time. As for your other speculations, which I don't have at all and which have absolutely no bearing on my comment – ​​about the Kursk region, Kadyrov's men, the Special Operations Department, traitors, and so on – I don't even want to comment on the whole mess in your head. Sort out your own stream of consciousness without me... My opponent and I were discussing whether Prigozhin posed a threat to Putin, but you just got carried away.
                  1. +4
                    4 January 2026 03: 28
                    You are trying to avoid uncomfortable questions and facts.
                    Prigozhin would have lost, no matter what. He would have been crushed, no matter what. And thousands more Russians would have senselessly killed each other on both sides, no one knows for what reason. For the adventurous desires of their leader, who hid behind slogans of honesty and justice. But in reality, he nearly unleashed a civil war in a country with nuclear power plants and a nuclear arsenal. It would have been "cool" if, in the conditions of anarchy, this wealth had ended up in the hands of those same ISIS fighters and other deranged cadres. It would have been "cool" if Kadyrov, sensing the weakness of the central government, had proclaimed himself emperor of the entire Caucasus. It would have been "cool" if the Chinese had rushed into the Far East, the Americans – to start with, Chukotka and Kamchatka, the Japanese – the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin, the Finns – Karelia, the Norwegians – the Kola Peninsula, and so on. It would be "cool" when weapons were looted en masse from military warehouses and prisoners escaped en masse from prisons.
                    You're comparing it to Iraq, Libya, and Syria, right? So I've answered your questions about comparisons that don't work. Yes, including Kursk.
          4. +3
            4 January 2026 01: 30
            Quote: Leshy1975
            If anyone thinks things will be much different in Russia, and the country will come out to die for Putin if he's removed from power, rewatch how Wagner entered Rostov... But yes, there's a common thread in all these stories—with Hussein, with Gaddafi, with Assad, and now with Maduro, according to official data, the overwhelming public support reached almost 90 or 100%. P.S.

            Are you happy that we will have a situation like in Libya/Syria/Iraq/Venezuela - after their rulers were overthrown?
            If the US appoints us its own leader, will that immediately make you feel better?
            1. -3
              4 January 2026 02: 53
              Quote: your1970
              Quote: Leshy1975
              If anyone thinks things will be much different in Russia, and the country will come out to die for Putin if he's removed from power, rewatch how Wagner entered Rostov... But yes, there's a common thread in all these stories—with Hussein, with Gaddafi, with Assad, and now with Maduro, according to official data, the overwhelming public support reached almost 90 or 100%. P.S.

              Are you happy that we will have a situation like in Libya/Syria/Iraq/Venezuela - after their rulers were overthrown?
              If the US appoints us its own leader, will that immediately make you feel better?

              What does joy have to do with it, and will it get better or not? I remind you, as it already happened, no one came out. That's it. You're funny, Seryozha. You came up with something yourself before, and drew your own conclusions from it. Especially about the US, what a fetish you have, you can't live without it? Well, it happens, I sympathize, be patient...
              1. +1
                4 January 2026 03: 45
                The jihadists marched from Idlib to Damascus—yes, almost no one came out, and everything was decided in 12 days. The Ukrainian Armed Forces marched on the Kursk region—everyone came out and gave them a beating, albeit with North Korean help and with considerable losses. Your comparisons don't work, not at all.
          5. +2
            4 January 2026 02: 21
            Yes, things were already very different in Russia. For some reason, our army didn't rush to Moscow when the "liberator" Syrsky advanced on the Kursk region. And on other sections of the front, it didn't, isn't, and won't either. And not a single military member, technically or physically, sided with Prigozhin—not a single general, not a single officer, not a single soldier. And forget about Prigozhin; he's gone and never will be. And it's not 2023 anymore.
          6. +4
            4 January 2026 06: 08
            What does Putin's support have to do with it? For a year and a half, the Wagnerites were being promoted as true heroes, from every angle. It seemed like they were the only ones fighting Ukrainians And the Ministry of Defense is just whining. And even holding back ammunition for real heroes.
            Ordinary people had no idea why Wagner had entered Rostov. And why not take a photo with the real heroes? I'm sure when Wagner started shooting down helicopters and planes, most of them regretted what they'd done.
      3. CAM
        -4
        3 January 2026 17: 45
        Can you read? 3 hours 34 minutes
        1. +1
          3 January 2026 18: 06
          I can. And you?
          The attack itself lasted less than 30 minutes and the explosions - at least seven blasts - sent people rushing into the streets, while others took to social media to report what they'd seen and heard. Some Venezuelan civilians and members of the military were killed, said Rodríguez, the vice president, without giving a number.

          It was not known if there more actions lie ahead, though Trump said in his post that the strikes were carried out “successfully.” The Pentagon referred questions about the safety of American personnel involved in the operation to the White House.

          https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-us-explosions-caracas-ca712a67aaefc30b1831f5bf0b50665e

          I can read the same thing in French, Italian, and Spanish. In German, I only need a dictionary. smile
          1. CAM
            +3
            3 January 2026 18: 47
            It's physically impossible. The operation begins with a briefing, loading into a helicopter, landing on land, the actual warhead, loading again, and returning home. 30 minutes is probably just the warhead.
          2. 0
            3 January 2026 19: 26
            Let's speak Farsi...................................
            1. -1
              3 January 2026 19: 58
              My wife is an expert in Farsi, Urdu, and Pashto. She also specializes in a large group of Turkic languages.

              In Turkey, after visiting the local markets, I simply felt sorry for the vendors, seeing how they were mercilessly fleeced, and I really wanted to pay them extra. She's a professional haggler, after all. At the local market, Azerbaijanis will give you half price just to talk. She fleeces them worse than Ukrainian call centers. lol
              1. 0
                3 January 2026 20: 18
                But Türkiye is a NATO country.
                1. 0
                  3 January 2026 20: 23
                  Okay, I'll nominate her for an award. Bottles of quality Kizlyar cognac. Since she doesn't drink anything strong, I agree to sacrifice myself and accept the award.
                  What wouldn't you do for the woman you love? laughing
              2. 0
                3 January 2026 21: 04
                After visiting the local markets in Turkey, I felt sorry for the vendors, seeing how they were being mercilessly fleeced, and I really wanted to pay them extra. She's a professional haggler, after all.
                So, he (she) is practically a ready-made deputy finance minister for accounts receivable. Because debts to Russia are increasingly being written off...
      4. +2
        3 January 2026 20: 05
        Well, if you take into account that:
        The operation to capture Maduro was carried out by Delta Force special forces.
        This, in my memory, is the only successful operation of these "special forces," which previously only screwed up everywhere they participated. Apparently, things are really bad in Venezuela, even with the minimal number of units and subunits ready to fight.
    2. + 12
      3 January 2026 17: 23
      I think it was more complicated there...
      There really was a deal...
      Not only were they not shooting at the sides, they were walking and knew that they wouldn’t shoot!
      If we go back to our SVO, no one there has been flying like that for a long time!
      1. +1
        3 January 2026 17: 25
        Mikhail Ivanov, well, it was a "good" match, judging by the footage, it arrived without casualties, it's unlikely, although they did set up pawns, and who counts them or feels sorry for them, that's if it was a fixed match.
        1. 0
          3 January 2026 17: 30
          Well, I can't explain what happened any other way...
      2. +6
        3 January 2026 18: 17
        First they bought everyone's mattresses, and then they went to war. America isn't a country, it's a business. Accordingly, their army is like "Mask Show."
        1. +3
          3 January 2026 18: 25
          That's absolutely true! Everyone agreed on it first, and then Hollywood took over...
      3. + 12
        3 January 2026 18: 35
        The generals have given the all-clear. Venezuela obviously has no intelligence; no one will report anything today. Naryshkin didn't warn anyone; he's busy, still investigating who blew up the SP2.
        1. +2
          3 January 2026 19: 27
          They don't have it, but where did ours go?
        2. 0
          4 January 2026 14: 02
          =alexoff Naryshkin didn't warn anyone about anything; he's busy, still investigating who blew up SP2.

          What investigation? He won't find his way out of the office in Yasenevo on his own; he's an odd character.
    3. 0
      3 January 2026 17: 24
      Quote: Murmur 55
      Well, there's nothing to argue with; it all looks like they just flew in, "swaddled" us, and flew away. And the army simply grabbed a bite and waved goodbye. At least, that's the impression one gets from the footage lying around.

      Or maybe they just took away the already swaddled one.
      Well, we took some photos at the sights.
      1. +9
        3 January 2026 17: 27
        RUSICH hi Well then, Maduro is doubly stupid. They openly told him we're coming for you, and if he was caught like this, he only has himself to blame.
        1. +8
          3 January 2026 17: 30
          Quote: Murmur 55
          RUSICH hi Well then, Maduro is doubly stupid. They openly told him we're coming for you, and if he was caught like this, he only has himself to blame.

          We don't fully believe in the betrayal of his loved ones. I wouldn't be surprised if his own special forces swaddled him. The Defense Minister's house was bombed, and he's still alive. Doesn't that alarm you?
          1. +4
            3 January 2026 17: 33
            Rusich, at the start of this entire operation, Maduro held all the reins of power. If he couldn't even think through his own security and trusted anyone, then he's not a smart man, and therefore got what he deserved. Otherwise, he should have left while he had the chance.
            1. 0
              3 January 2026 17: 39
              Quote: Murmur 55
              Rusich, at the start of this entire operation, Maduro held all the reins of power. If he couldn't even think through his own security and trusted anyone, then he's not a smart man, and therefore got what he deserved. Otherwise, he should have left while he had the chance.

              I can't argue with you on this one.
          2. 0
            3 January 2026 18: 39
            A year and a half ago, Iran's belligerent president crashed, and the whole thing was quickly hushed up, while the new president flew to the UN in New York to talk about how good he was. It was as if they sacrificed their own to appease the US. But it obviously didn't work. It's not Maduro and Raisi's fault, it's their appetite for food...
      2. +5
        3 January 2026 17: 31
        A complete analogy with the defense of Iraq...
    4. +2
      3 January 2026 19: 29
      Quote: Murmur 55
      Well, there’s nothing to argue with, it all looks like they just flew in, swaddled us, and flew away.

      We in Ukraine should have done the same, but...
    5. +3
      3 January 2026 20: 12
      The army doesn't just decide whether to fight or not. There was clearly an order from above—don't touch them, and make sure no one accidentally fires.
  3. + 22
    3 January 2026 17: 11
    The people's love, almost 100 percent, is so unpredictable...
    1. +5
      3 January 2026 17: 37
      The people's love, almost 100 percent, is so unpredictable...
      So, all the more or less adequate participants of this forum wrote about this, that this is Assad 2.0, and the people can't stand him. And only the "turbo-sofa-Marshals" (as with the company in Syria, they wrote here that it will be almost a second Vietnam), 300 thousand elite soldiers of Madurai laughing I'm all for it. Type it into a search engine and look at the comments of these "analysts."
      1. + 12
        3 January 2026 18: 19
        Quote: spirit
        The people's love, almost 100 percent, is so unpredictable...
        So, all the more or less adequate participants of this forum wrote about this, that this is Assad 2.0, and the people can't stand him. And only the "turbo-sofa-Marshals" (as with the company in Syria, they wrote here that it will be almost a second Vietnam), 300 thousand elite soldiers of Madurai laughing I'm all for it. Type it into a search engine and look at the comments of these "analysts."

        Many of these "analysts" are here for work, seriously. Remember Mr. Staver's recent articles on the Kupyansk anti-crisis, his first one? I was simply stunned when I saw a similar article a day later by war correspondent Kotz. My first thought was that Staver had simply copied Kotz – it fit the narrative 100%, point by point. And then I thought, of course, no one copied anyone; they simply received a general manual and followed it. Kotz is more talented, Staver – well, it just happened. Do you think there aren't any VO commentators who follow the manual? There are quite a few, considering what they broadcast back then about the rebellious Donbas – they promised to beat up people's faces and hand them over to the SBU, because no one promised them anything and no one invited them to the Russian Federation, and this is all an internal matter for Ukraine. Then these same people ardently supported the events in Syria, then ardently supported the Idlib agreements, then... Hot guys, they are just burning with energy at work. hi
        1. +3
          3 January 2026 18: 47
          I agree. This can be tracked by the average number of comments per day since registration. Considering that many talented writers here are running (possibly, I'm not confirming) more than one or two accounts, it's clear they're simply earning their paychecks. But they usually get caught when they reach a dead end in a dialogue and lack any arguments, so they simply label and stigmatize according to the manual, because they have no right to deviate from the established line.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        4 January 2026 00: 58
        Quote: spirit
        The people's love, almost 100 percent, is so unpredictable...
        So, all the more or less adequate participants of this forum wrote about this, that this is Assad 2.0, and the people can't stand him. And only the "turbo-sofa-Marshals" (as with the company in Syria, they wrote here that it will be almost a second Vietnam), 300 thousand elite soldiers of Madurai laughing I'm all for it. Type it into a search engine and look at the comments of these "analysts."

        Yes, unfortunately, sometimes you have to look at their comments... They wrote five or six years ago about the "lamest" and weakest Ukrainian army on the Eurasian continent... About the aforementioned Syrian army, which "can fight all US proxies for decades." Iran, Venezuela, and even one of the Korean states, which would beat everyone's noses for its third-generation leader, were assessed the same way.
        People with only slogans and bravado on their minds, without critical thinking, are worse than the most fierce enemies...
        1. 0
          4 January 2026 03: 02
          I wouldn't put North Korea in the same category as the others listed. The nuclear shield plays a significant role. As for why everything went rotten under Assad and Maduro, I suggest we recall the true economic and social conditions in their countries before their fall. And the situation was quite dire.
    2. +9
      3 January 2026 17: 44
      Quote: Gvardeetz77
      People's love, almost 100 percent, is like that...

      Aha winked
  4. + 10
    3 January 2026 17: 12
    The US demonstrated the coherence and effectiveness of its actions, as did Israel, which used pagers and other measures. I hope Russia acts with the same precision and success!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      3 January 2026 22: 04
      To act effectively and efficiently, every general (across all structures), and preferably even a colonel, must be an independent figure, capable of acting in the interests of the country in the absence of valuable and operational instructions from superiors. To achieve this, the country must have strategic interests embedded in its ideology, rather than being driven by daily changing circumstances.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  5. -8
    3 January 2026 17: 12
    It's clear even to a fool that this is a deal. And only our brilliant Ministry of Foreign Affairs, headed by a fat-faced man, is timidly trying bend your fingers...
    1. +6
      3 January 2026 18: 26
      It's not entirely clear who the deal is with. But it's entirely possible that the army didn't support Maduro. It's possible they were bought. And, in fact, corruption is rampant there, and that's the point.
  6. -5
    3 January 2026 17: 12
    Well, Venezuela will follow in Syria's footsteps... we're waiting for a showdown.
    1. -1
      3 January 2026 17: 17
      Quote: Jrvin
      Well, Venezuela will follow in Syria's footsteps... we're waiting for a showdown.

      It's unlikely that she has a different fate, probably not for sure!
    2. +7
      3 January 2026 17: 29
      There won't be any showdowns. The local clans there don't care who's at the top, as long as they're left alone.
      1. +3
        3 January 2026 17: 54
        Quote: Sergey Kondratiev
        There, the local clans don't care who's at the top, as long as they're not touched.

        There, Chavez also crushed the ego/salary of the local rich, and Maduro continued to do so, so they're dreaming of when they can repeat Perez's "Washington Consensus"...
  7. + 15
    3 January 2026 17: 12
    None of the thousands of MANPADS operators in the Venezuelan military attempted to shoot down US helicopters.


    They would have knocked everyone down if they had been woken up. smile
  8. + 18
    3 January 2026 17: 13
    In fact, the Venezuelan Minister of Defense colluded with US specialists.
    In some backwater African countries, they're shooting down missiles and drones from a mattress army with slippers. And here, it's a clear betrayal, so to speak, of supporting the security of the American operation. Venezuela's air defenses hid in the bushes, receiving orders not to interfere.
  9. +6
    3 January 2026 17: 14
    I wonder who's next? The Yankees are masters of elite turnover.
    1. +2
      3 January 2026 17: 56
      Trump has already hinted at Mexico.
    2. +4
      3 January 2026 18: 10
      "I wonder who's next?"

      I think our Cuban comrades should think about it.
  10. +3
    3 January 2026 17: 16
    hmm...beat your chest and then pee yourself laughing I didn't expect such a reception from Venezuela!...now the Yankees will do what they planned.
  11. +8
    3 January 2026 17: 16
    Somehow our few "allies" (now former) raise questions
    1. +8
      3 January 2026 17: 37
      Quote: x.andvlad
      Somehow our few "allies" (now former) raise questions
      Yes indeed - here the local jingoistic patriots were calling for them to give up a bunch of modern weapons, just like Assad did in his time.
      1. +5
        3 January 2026 17: 43
        By the way, our transport workers transported some things by roundabout routes.

        https://topwar.ru/273115-na-fone-ugroz-so-storony-ssha-v-venesujelu-pribyl-rossijskij-transportnyj-samolet.html

        True, it's not clear whether it was weapons or Wagner. But apparently it didn't matter. The Americans operate comprehensively, taking into account the political landscape of the target. Those dissatisfied with the regime immediately defect to the US.
      2. +2
        3 January 2026 19: 34
        Someone has to use the weapon, otherwise what's the point of it?
  12. +4
    3 January 2026 17: 18
    "Maduro's capture could have been part of a 'coordinated exit' agreed upon with Maduro himself to guarantee his life."
    Since we were in a relationship with Maduro, there had to be someone, close to him or not, who would have taken him out, so he wouldn't fall into the hands of the Americans. Perhaps, here, we've all agreed on a threesome, so to speak: Maduro, the US, and us. Maybe it's a trade-off, we'll see what happens.
    But it certainly wasn't without betrayal and bribery.
  13. -4
    3 January 2026 17: 18
    History teaches us that there are only a few countries on the globe capable of standing up for themselves: Russia, Vietnam (with the support of the USSR), Israel (conditionally, since without the US it would have collapsed). Who else? Ukraine – no, that's different. tongue
    1. +4
      3 January 2026 18: 07
      Quote: BoyCat
      History teaches us that there are only a few countries on the globe that are capable of standing up for themselves.

      History offers yet another lesson in capitalist reality, in which no state or individual in the world can be completely protected if the interests of global TNCs/TNBs are at stake. It's been proven time and again, and the result is identical...
  14. +5
    3 January 2026 17: 20
    Money and bribery are a serious factor. And when combined with force, it's very difficult to counteract. Even if you're a 100-fold excellent ruler, there will be those who will object... that's just the way the world works.
    We tried buying some stuff there too. But damn... we're selling oil, and they're just printing bucks...
    400 billion in unaccounted cash (counterfeited at the state level) was brought into Ukraine. And that's just in the last couple of years. They simply poured in dollars.
    1. -4
      3 January 2026 19: 38
      Truly so!
      (short)
  15. + 11
    3 January 2026 17: 20
    Yes, there was a lot of Russian military equipment in Venezuela. Donbas will have something to send to Ukraine. He'll even make the Gayrapians pay for it.
    The wild 90s began in the world.
    1. -1
      3 January 2026 17: 28
      Rosneft and Lukoil oligarchs are crying... 20 yards were given to Trump.
      1. + 16
        3 January 2026 17: 51
        They, in fact, are not crying, because they know that the Russian government will compensate them for all losses threefold at the expense of the Russian population.
    2. +1
      3 January 2026 19: 36
      Well, they never ended, they just didn't really affect us that much before.
  16. +3
    3 January 2026 17: 20
    Either it was all very cleverly orchestrated, or they simply sold out their leader. Well, Che Guevara is no more (and never will be).
    1. +5
      3 January 2026 18: 14
      Well, if you look back at history, Che was also sold out. Latin Americans...
  17. +8
    3 January 2026 17: 24
    But this also means that Venezuela will be relieved of the long-standing, massive sanctions that have resulted in a miserable existence and a hopeless future for the republic's population, with the exception of a small number of local elites.

    The possible lifting of sanctions will not improve the poverty of the population there; poverty is a tradition for Latinos. Reversing the order of the terms doesn't change the sum; everything will remain the same.
  18. +7
    3 January 2026 17: 27
    The problem with all dictators is that they believe in what propaganda has created for them.
    1. -3
      3 January 2026 20: 20
      If you consider Maduro a dictator, then your Ukrainian Dictator has already deserved his deportation three times?
  19. bar
    +5
    3 January 2026 17: 29
    A donkey loaded with gold will take any fortress.

    Nothing new. Libya, Iraq, Syria, Venezuela...
  20. + 10
    3 January 2026 17: 29
    Something's wrong with our "friends" in the Third World. This is the second "friend" of ours, after Assad, to come to a bad end. But maybe Assad wasn't the first? As the saying goes, one event is an accident, two is a trend, three is a pattern.
  21. -7
    3 January 2026 17: 32
    Learn to speak American Gostomel, "friend" Vladimir.
    1. -2
      3 January 2026 17: 43
      Nothing in common. Hitting and running will be easier than capturing and holding.
      This is without even comparing the armies of the outskirts and Venezuela and the effectiveness of the support provided to them.
    2. -3
      3 January 2026 18: 10
      Quote: Dimax
      American-style Gostomel

      In Gostomel, the Americans would have shit themselves to the gills.
      There was very serious resistance from the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and despite this, our paratroopers were able not only to successfully capture the airfield but also to hold it for a long time. And if not for another "deal" in Istanbul, who knows how it would have ended.
      1. +2
        3 January 2026 20: 53
        This is well known; it would have ended in a cauldron of unprecedented proportions and shame for the entire world. Our forces barely managed to escape, abandoning half their equipment; a couple more days of delay and that would have been it, the encirclement would have been complete. We need to be realistic about the situation; we didn't have the strength or resources to hold that encirclement back then.
        1. -3
          3 January 2026 20: 56
          Quote: RipRap
          Our guys barely managed to escape from there, abandoning half of their equipment.

          Did they tell you this on the Kyiv idiot box?
          If it weren't for the Istanbul adventure, the Kiev junta would have been developing uranium mines long ago.
          1. 0
            3 January 2026 20: 58
            I don't know what they're showing in Kyiv, if you like to believe in goodwill gestures, go ahead and believe.
  22. +1
    3 January 2026 17: 39
    Now we can understand the video footage of Venezuelan security forces stopping and forcing cars and motorcycles to turn back near Maduro's residence. Apparently, Trump negotiated and negotiated, and by the end of the year, he had reached an agreement. On cue, Maduro was arrested by his own security forces and simply handed over to the Americans.
  23. +7
    3 January 2026 17: 42
    Whether they leaked it or not, you have to think about your own safety. Even a nuclear bomb might not help.
    1. 0
      3 January 2026 19: 38
      For it to help, someone must activate it.
  24. +6
    3 January 2026 17: 42
    Bribery, threats, blackmail, promises of career advancement and other benefits, and simply security

    This is how we should have communicated with the Ukrainian authorities immediately after the collapse of the USSR, and we would not have ended up with what we have now.
  25. -8
    3 January 2026 17: 47
    Quote: acetophenon
    It's clear even to a fool that this is a deal. And only our brilliant Ministry of Foreign Affairs, headed by a fat-faced man, is timidly trying bend your fingers...

    Yes, indeed, your minister of the Ukrainian Midreich has plump fingers accustomed to dollars wassat
  26. +5
    3 January 2026 17: 49
    I'm sure this "friend"'s entire army was only on paper. In reality, a mouse hanged itself in the warehouses. No matter what anyone says about sovereignty, plunging a country with the largest hydrocarbon reserves into dire poverty would require a lot of effort. Sovereignty alone won't keep you going. And it seems to me that most of them have long dreamed of ending it.
    1. -1
      3 January 2026 18: 00
      What did you expect from the bus driver?
      1. +1
        3 January 2026 19: 39
        And from the director of the collective farm?........................
        1. +1
          4 January 2026 13: 03
          And from KVNshik?.............
    2. +6
      3 January 2026 18: 28
      Quote: al3x
      Whatever anyone says about sovereignty, plunging a country with the largest hydrocarbon reserves into dire poverty would require a real effort.

      Here, everyone has their share of the natural resources...
      1. +1
        3 January 2026 19: 26
        Yes, there are certainly parallels. The subsoil is a national treasure. However, they don't specify whose national treasure it is...
  27. +4
    3 January 2026 17: 50
    It's time for some amazing stories. This Don Pedro was handed over like a glass container, with the consent of all interested parties, and perhaps even himself. Was there a sound coming from the towers? No, it was just my imagination. The show goes on, with lucrative deals and lots and lots of chocolate ahead, but not just for everyone.
  28. +5
    3 January 2026 17: 52
    Yeah, like in a banana country, guarantees were bought or given to those close to him in power and the military. I wouldn't be surprised if they dragged him out under their own white hands to hand him over to the Americans. But there were some uplifting videos about a million militiamen defending the country and Maduro.
    1. +6
      3 January 2026 17: 58
      Who needs this tick there? They gave him up and were happy. Do you think millions are grateful to him for their poverty? There must have been mass celebrations already. Maduro was simply stunned to the very end, thinking the whole country would rise to his defense.
      1. +2
        4 January 2026 13: 09
        There have probably already been massive celebrations there.
        / / / /
        The celebrations will likely continue... following the Syrian scenario. And then the Afghan one, with a dramatic finale at the airport.
    2. 0
      3 January 2026 19: 11
      Quote: Ghost1
      But there were uplifting videos about a million militiamen defending the country and Maduro.

      A million militiamen are possible. But they can only help if they manage to escape the hands of the traitorous generals and appeal to the people for support. And if the generals prove uncharacteristically restrained and don't brag about their involvement in the conspiracy, it won't be clear who the militiamen will have to fight. The Americans haven't launched a full-scale ground operation after their first attempt to disrupt the enemy has failed since Vietnam.
    3. 0
      4 January 2026 03: 11
      It seems they bribed not only the army, but also his personal guards, who allowed him to be arrested without a fight.
  29. +3
    3 January 2026 18: 04
    Now, everything that Russia has recently handed over to Karakos will be in the hands of the SRU.
    What kind of world is this, what kind of presidents are these? We shouldn't trust anyone unless we put them there. Only our might, only our strength for Russia, really, and for the rest, as a residual principle and out of loyalty.
    1. +1
      3 January 2026 19: 20
      Quote: ideo098
      Don't trust anyone unless we put them there.

      Even if we planted it. We don't like to do "technical maintenance" on anything, from cruisers and aircraft carriers without docking facilities to friendly presidents whose security we don't provide and whose domestic counterintelligence we don't conduct.
  30. -2
    3 January 2026 18: 11
    Latin generals, God forbid!
  31. +5
    3 January 2026 18: 12
    None of the thousands of MANPADS operators in the Venezuelan military attempted to shoot down US helicopters.

    What kind of idiots do you have to be to allow this to happen?
    Venezuelans, do you really think it was Maduro?
    There is some part, he, like Chavez, did not allow your country to be robbed.
    Now the Pindos companies will come, they will pump out all your oil, sell it, but you will not see any money from it.
    It wasn't for this reason that the Pindos people stole your president, so that they could feed you, now parasites.
    You will die of hunger, the Naglossaks will quickly organize this for you, they have a lot of experience in this, many centuries: China, India, the countries of Southeast Asia, today's South Africa.
    Now you will add to their list.
    And you know what?
    I don’t feel sorry for you now, just as I no longer felt sorry for the people of Syria after Assad’s overthrow.
    Anyone who overthrows or does not fight for their own elected president, who does not consider it necessary to defend their country from bourgeois predators, is simply not worthy of sympathy. request
    You yourselves, through your inaction and the venality of some, have chosen your fate, so when they begin to destroy you through hunger and lack of medical care, I will not feel sorry for you at all. request
    Woe to the vanquished!
    Even greater woe to those who betray their country and people. sad
    1. -5
      3 January 2026 19: 49
      Cool!
      How many wise sayings I see here today...)))
    2. +1
      3 January 2026 20: 11
      Everything described above, from the lack of food to the lack of medicine, is already present in today's Venezuela without any Americans.
      1. +1
        3 January 2026 20: 56
        Quote: Danil Timoshenko
        is already present in today's Venezuela without any Americans.

        Was it the Martians who organized the strangulation by trade sanctions?
        1. 0
          3 January 2026 22: 44
          Such a collapse would not have happened if the Maduro government had not decided to ignore economics as a science and try to overcome the crisis by freezing prices on all goods and state regulation of all sectors of the economy.
          1. -1
            3 January 2026 23: 04
            Quote: Danil Timoshenko
            if the Maduro government had not decided to ignore economics as a science and try to overcome the crisis by

            So were they strangled by sanctions or not?
            1. -2
              4 January 2026 00: 55
              No. Venezuela's economic collapse began long before 2019, when large-scale sanctions were imposed. Early sanctions were targeted at individuals and targeted only the elites—Venezuela's ruling elites—and arms supplies. The primary causes of the crisis are the regime's internal policies, not external pressure. Harsh sanctions since 2019 were triggered by the Venezuelan government's response to popular protests, dissatisfied with the widespread shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods, with extreme violence. Therefore, sectoral sanctions were imposed in 2019, which for the first time affected the country's oil industry.
              1. +1
                4 January 2026 07: 16
                Quote: Danil Timoshenko
                Venezuela's economic collapse began long before 2019, when the
                sanctions after the arrival of Chavez.
                Quote: Danil Timoshenko
                Harsh sanctions since 2019 were triggered by the Venezuelan government's response to popular protests.

                The tales that the US cares about someone's protests aren't even funny.
                1. -3
                  4 January 2026 10: 14
                  The sanctions during the Hugo Chavez era did not affect the Venezuelan economy.
                  They were personal in nature, targeting individual members of the ruling elite, and included an arms embargo. These measures were introduced after Venezuela's refusal to cooperate with the United States and its allies in the fight against terrorism and drug trafficking—which, strictly speaking, was a perfectly valid basis for the restrictions.
                  The sanctions did not destroy Venezuela's economy.
                  The country itself destroyed its economy by carrying out a de facto corporate takeover of the oil industry under the guise of "nationalization." The owners of the fields and infrastructure did not receive adequate compensation, which inevitably led to legal action and sanctions.
                  It is worth emphasizing the strategic stupidity of these decisions:
                  At the time of nationalization, up to 90% of Venezuelan oil exports went to the US market.
                  Taking away oil fields and storage facilities from American companies, while becoming completely dependent on the American sales market, is not anti-imperialism, but economic suicide.
                  Essentially, Chávez placed his bets on ideology over arithmetic, deciding to "live as the cards fall." The cards fell poorly—and by the time sectoral sanctions were imposed, the country was already in deep economic collapse.
                  1. +1
                    4 January 2026 11: 52
                    Quote: Danil Timoshenko
                    The sanctions during the Hugo Chavez era did not affect the Venezuelan economy.
                    There are just restrictions on the supply of spare parts for the oil industry.
                    Quote: Danil Timoshenko
                    These measures were introduced after Venezuela refused to cooperate with the United States and its allies in the fight against terrorism and drug trafficking.

                    This is especially funny considering that under the US, the amount of drugs produced in Afghanistan increased several dozen times.
                    Quote: Danil Timoshenko
                    Owners of deposits and infrastructure have not received adequate compensation

                    And did they buy these deposits at a reasonable price?
                    1. -2
                      4 January 2026 12: 23
                      So, Russia was helping the Americans smuggle Afghan drugs? Or have you forgotten about their transit point in Ulyanovsk?
                      It's a question for the Venezuelans whether they sold their oil fields at fair prices, we are simply witnessing the fact that after nationalization their oil industry and the rest of the economy collapsed.
                      1. 0
                        4 January 2026 13: 18
                        Quote: Danil Timoshenko
                        So, Russia was helping the Americans smuggle Afghan drugs?

                        Russia had no right to inspect US military cargo, so I don't know what was in it. However, there are no objections to the drugs being found.
                        Quote: Danil Timoshenko
                        It's a question for Venezuelans whether they sold their oil fields at fair prices.

                        That is, there are still questions about who bought them and whether they were bought at all.
  32. +2
    3 January 2026 18: 18
    In short, the situation is similar to Iraq, Syria, Panama... "a donkey loaded with gold will open the gates of any fortress."
  33. +7
    3 January 2026 18: 18
    There's nothing surprising about this. Some commenters described the current course of events in articles on Venezuelan politics. They also wrote that the Russian Armed Forces would unfortunately get bogged down in Ukraine, even before the start of the Second World War. They cited reliable facts. They write about things that they
    "Armchair experts" don't have a good understanding...
  34. 0
    3 January 2026 18: 21
    Yes, once again - talk, negotiations, and then bam... Will there be a continuation?
  35. +7
    3 January 2026 18: 25
    I've always believed that any ruler's personal guard is made up of loyal individuals who receive the best combat and ideological training and are armed with everything they need. They are capable of putting up fierce armed resistance for quite a long time.
    In this case, it appears there was no serious resistance. Otherwise, there would have been numerous 200s on the American side.
    It looks like a voluntary surrender.
  36. +3
    3 January 2026 18: 25
    Yes, the US will regain control of its vast hydrocarbon reserves. But this also means that Venezuela will be relieved of its long-standing, massive sanctions.
    Or maybe they won't... They got their way. And then, let the grass not grow, well, they'll give some concessions to some of their bribe-takers, and everything will go back to how it was in the 60s... And the fight against drugs... They've been fighting them since the first Opium Wars... In Afghanistan, after the US entered, opium production increased not severalfold, but tens of times... So they'll have both oil and cocaine, at a reasonable price.
  37. -4
    3 January 2026 19: 14
    The question arises: why didn't the Venezuelan army even attempt to put up any resistance to the American invasion? After all, they seemed to have prepared meticulously, even mobilizing, preparing for a guerrilla war just in case.
    The question arises: if the Venezuelan army made no attempt to offer any resistance to the American invasion, how can we explain independent media reports of gunfire and street fighting in the streets of Caracos? There are two possibilities: either there was "friendly fire" from the Americans, or there was armed resistance to the American invasion. In that case, there's no point in claiming there was no resistance at all.
    1. 0
      4 January 2026 02: 00
      Quote: rotfuks
      How then can we explain the reports in independent media about shootouts and street battles on the streets of Karakos?

      Banal robberies under the cover of noise, nothing more...
  38. 0
    3 January 2026 19: 22
    The United States showed us how the Second World War should have been conducted.
    1. -2
      3 January 2026 19: 52
      It's just that the US doesn't look at anyone or take into account any international condemnation, laws, etc. when it comes to its own actions... Ours, on the other hand, are the opposite... and that's why we have the results we have...
  39. +2
    3 January 2026 19: 32
    What could have happened to the Venezuelan army? what A couple of corrupt generals, a communications blackout, their complicity in the kidnapping of Maduro, and a MANPADS in a warehouse. Who's the easiest person to do this to? what They've cut off air defense and communications. Plus, someone from Maduro's inner circle has given up.
    Why didn't we do this? We probably could have done it in 2014. But we weren't so openly hostile to Europe and the US back then that we could simply land and finish off the entire opposition. But we could still find comrades. And in 2022, such an operation would probably have been difficult to carry out. Although I think it could have been tried. But we could also have tried not to go deep with troops. Just snatch what we deemed necessary and send in the rest. On the other hand, what was wrong with the chosen operation option? Because it didn't work. Any of these options could have either failed or led to an even worse outcome. So why even consider the "well, that could have been done" option? Whatever happened, it just happened. recourse
    1. +1
      3 January 2026 20: 58
      Venezuela has tons of oil, and the refineries are in America—it's obvious the local oligarchs sold out the mustachioed guy for cash. And the population couldn't care less, because it's a third-world country, a banana republic.
    2. +1
      4 January 2026 13: 46
      The worst thing that will "work" now is if we continue to balance between the "projects": "the goals and objectives of the SVO have not been cancelled" and "we are for peace, and everyone who is against it is our blood enemy."
      So, in the end, we will "tear" ourselves in the splits.
  40. +1
    3 January 2026 19: 40
    It looks like they simply bribed the military leadership. They're masters of that. Many of their military "victories," as before, are apparently driven by the dollar. It remains the most powerful weapon!
  41. +5
    3 January 2026 19: 44
    One gets the impression that Maduro himself has betrayed Venezuela in exchange for personal immunity.
    This wasn't a seizure, but an evacuation operation. And if the Venezuelan state and army swallow US aggression, it's 100% a deal.
    When the leader of a sovereign state is kidnapped by another state, those who are subjected to this must declare war
  42. 0
    3 January 2026 20: 21
    I hope someone is analyzing the partners' patterns, tactics, and many other recurring aspects. Each of their statements and actions provides a wealth of data for analysis and the construction of a system of possible alternative actions.
  43. +5
    3 January 2026 20: 38
    All this shows only one thing: people all over the world have ceased to be proud, even if they are poor, and to refuse to submit to the occupiers. What remains are corrupt creatures, especially at the top. The Golden Calf rules the world, not honor and conscience. And these baboons—these "defenders"—are beyond all recognition. Don't even glance at them, just spit in their direction.
  44. +2
    3 January 2026 20: 42
    Of course, Syria 2.0. It's all about the economy. Despite all its oil wealth, Venezuela is in dire straits. GDP per capita is 1/6th of Russia's. And we're not exactly rich. Yes, we live decently, but 1/6th!!! Question: How can this be? Answer: No one's been working on the Venezuelan economy. Well, now they've gotten it all. US helicopters are flying over the capital and haven't shot down a single one! I think this is the end...
  45. +3
    3 January 2026 20: 52
    Next will be Cuba, unless the Great Strategist figures out how to open a base there again.
  46. +1
    3 January 2026 20: 56
    Venezuela is too far away – there's no need to get involved in a place where America holds a ton of trump cards. We need to focus on what's right next door – the CIS. And we need to stop dancing the polka dot for the leaders of various would-be states, and instead take control of our own resources. And all this talk about little brothers and other such nonsense should be shove deep down for those who still talk about it.
  47. 0
    3 January 2026 21: 15
    Maybe we should have invaded Venezuela? If it was that easy.
  48. +1
    3 January 2026 21: 24
    I would nominate Zelensky as next-to-be-kidnapped.
    Then subsequently a movie titled "The Busification of Zelensky"
    I think people would celebrate it on the street.
    Then laugh their ass off during the movie.
    It could end up as a blockbuster, surpassing 2009's Avatar.
  49. +3
    3 January 2026 21: 26
    The Venezuelan army also has even more modern Russian air defense systems: the S-300VM, Buk-M2, Su-30 fighter jets, and the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and gun system. "And all these weapons will now appear in the Jewish-Bandera region.
  50. +5
    3 January 2026 21: 58
    Our leadership is focusing on the wrong people. Or there simply aren't any others. Or we don't have the necessary resources. I don't know which is worse.
    1. +1
      4 January 2026 13: 53
      Our leadership is focusing on the wrong people. Or there simply aren't any others. Or we don't have the necessary resources. I don't know which is worse.
      /////
      Or maybe he's not that critical. Let's say everything is fine with North Korea. But with Venezuela, they could have either recruited their "vice president" firmly, or brought in their own completely.

      Incidentally, at one point, someone of ours was tipped to be Roosevelt's vice president, but they swerved during the election and everyone got Truman—both vice president and, subsequently, president.
  51. 0
    3 January 2026 23: 02
    Now he'll give up all his allies, guts and all.
  52. +3
    3 January 2026 23: 17
    "A donkey loaded with gold will take any fortress."
    1. 0
      4 January 2026 09: 39
      Arutyunov-Razvedos (c) 😆
  53. +3
    3 January 2026 23: 44
    "...Why didn't the Venezuelan army even make any attempt to put up any resistance to the American invasion?..." Why? lol They sold out their president and their country! fool SOLD! hi negative
  54. +1
    4 January 2026 00: 46
    The Venezuelan army also has even more modern Russian air defense systems: the S-300VM, Buk-M2, Su-30 fighters, and the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and gun system.

    Now all of this will be closely examined by the victors. And it's not the Venezuelan army.
  55. -1
    4 January 2026 01: 15
    Quote: your1970
    Quote: Luenkov
    "Criminal"? Bring the court's decision to the studio or shoot yourself.

    And he already served time for "Zaporozhets"... (C)

    IN USSR
  56. +2
    4 January 2026 01: 25
    I feel sorry for the man named Maduro, and especially his wife. But I have absolutely no pity for the Venezuelan President with the same last name. And I don't pity the Venezuelan people. Everyone got what a nation that doesn't fight deserves! Cowards!!!
  57. 0
    4 January 2026 01: 26
    Quote: 30 vis
    The Venezuelan army also has even more modern Russian air defense systems: the S-300VM, Buk-M2, Su-30 fighter jets, and the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and gun system. "And all these weapons will now appear in the Jewish-Bandera region.

    100%
  58. +1
    4 January 2026 03: 04
    Now Trump will ban the purchase of Russian oil and force people to buy "their own," Venezuelan oil. And then it will be difficult to fill the budget with petrodollars.
  59. 0
    4 January 2026 06: 08
    It was all just talk, Maduro. There were no operators there in that quantity, not even a trace. Why discuss yet another piece of nonsense? No one simply defended him. "The army and people of Venezuela dumped their president." It happened with Gorbachev and the USSR, it happened in Yugoslavia with Melosevic, in Libya with Gaddafi, in Syria, Afghanistan with Najibullah, and so on down the list.
  60. log
    +2
    4 January 2026 06: 26
    Looks like the Yankees bought the military again. Venezuela. Like in Iraq, Syria. These people are really capable!
  61. -1
    4 January 2026 06: 28
    Quote: Comrade Beria
    Yes, that one. Why not?

    Yes, wait. There's some senile old man sitting there under that nickname, scribbling away left and right.
    Simonyan won't be corresponding with you. She doesn't get paid for it, and she's not particularly interested in it if it's just for nothing. Time is money for her.
  62. log
    +1
    4 January 2026 06: 34
    Or maybe Maduro agreed to resign as president for "cookies," and they framed it as an invasion?
    1. 0
      4 January 2026 09: 37
      Have you joined the Basharov Asadov club? 😆😆
  63. +4
    4 January 2026 08: 44
    None of the thousands of MANPADS operators in the Venezuelan military attempted to shoot down US helicopters.

    Here's the answer to why the USSR won WWII: I.V. Stalin prudently purged traitors before the war who might have colluded with the Nazis and Hitler, thereby preventing the USSR from being stabbed in the back during WWII.
    1. 0
      4 January 2026 09: 35
      But for some reason our Supreme Commander did it very late, and as a result we have what we have (((
      1. 0
        4 January 2026 09: 42
        But for some reason our Supreme Commander did it very late, and as a result we have what we have (((

        It's not that simple. Twenty years passed between 1917 and the Great Purge of 1937-1938.
        From 2000 to 2022, 22 years have passed. So, all times are fighting... Another thing is that before 1941 and 1938 there were 3 years, but before 2022 there were not and are not these 3 years.
  64. 0
    4 January 2026 09: 12
    What's the difference between countries with a normal government security system and these "sovereign powers"? It's not about the percentage of popular support. Nor is the presence of MANPADS the issue—that's just a small part of the overall countermeasures system.
    A multi-level security system where "Rambo" soldiers must die at every stage of movement toward the subject of protection.
    pisi: the old proverb "the case was not on the reel, heaven was sitting in the cabin." hi
  65. 0
    4 January 2026 09: 14
    It wasn't for nothing that Joseph Vissarionovich purged the Red Army's leadership in the late 30s. Oh, it wasn't for nothing.
  66. 0
    4 January 2026 09: 32
    Let's call a spade a spade. This was NOT a military operation, but a regular plkop by Venezuela's military elite. The much-hyped Delta Force, in its best traditions, didn't do anything "super-special forces-like," but simply acted as a courier delivering pre-packaged Maduro and his wife to their client in New York. They bought it. They simply bought it. Incidentally, Trump has already announced this, and he's already received a reprimand from the CIA for disclosing it. Now there are two possible outcomes: either the pro-Maduro operative appointed by the Supreme Court of Venezuela will fight for their country's sovereignty, or the US will simply become the owner of the world's largest oil reserves.
  67. 0
    4 January 2026 09: 34
    Quote: Jose
    But none of the military sided with Prigozhin.

    Maduro's side also failed to find a hero among those who swore allegiance.
  68. -1
    4 January 2026 10: 09
    Quote: Last centurion
    What good did he do for the people while sitting on a huge barrel of oil?

    What you say is counter-revolutionary, professor! laughing
  69. 0
    4 January 2026 10: 12
    Trump did report some losses on the attacking side, but called them insignificant. Most likely, only Maduro's closest security detail managed to exchange fire with the special forces, and even that was ineffective. I think the Americans knew no one would shoot at them; no one gave the order, or wasn't allowed to give it. And no one will fight on their own in the face of an enemy, like in Syria, it seems.
  70. +3
    4 January 2026 10: 27
    Lukoil's billions will go up in smoke again, like in Romania and Ukraine... But they could have worked in Russia...

    Lukoil alone deprived our country of at least 10% of GDP growth. And Nabiullina stole the country's future.
    1. +1
      4 January 2026 10: 51
      Stop it! Nabiullina was implementing the strategic line of raising America's leadership through the Federal Reserve. Yeltsin bequeathed it to her!
  71. 0
    4 January 2026 10: 39
    It was all so simple. You simply bought off Maduro's entire entourage! Key people in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry of Defense, and the intelligence services were bought off, so the helicopters flew into Caracas and departed calmly and unhindered, without losses! This would have been impossible without massive betrayal by the security forces! And Maduro, as it turns out, is typical. He's no Hugo Chávez.
  72. +1
    4 January 2026 10: 49
    Quote: Mitka
    Are you talking about the bald dog who shot down his own helicopters?!? You have a good leader! But then again, who cares about a mare?

    No. We're talking about a faithful dog who lies about taking Kupyansk and licks his owner's ass.
  73. -1
    4 January 2026 10: 49
    Well, you can't really hope for an army like that... What would our guys do there if they were there? They'd simply give their lives for nothing.
  74. -1
    4 January 2026 10: 52
    Everyone's talking about Maduro being a typical dictatorial president, who envisioned himself with 100% support and an army ready to defend himself with thousands of MANPADS. But in the end, we saw that they, the army, and not the people, didn't even try to save him. He sat on an oil barrel and did nothing for the people.
    Everyone's discussing it here. But why doesn't anyone want to point out that the US managed to simply capture it in less than four hours? There was no escalation with a ton of casualties, no shelling of positions with periodic airstrikes into the city, no strange field maneuvers by ground forces. No, they simply planned everything out in detail, bribed the right people, conducted reconnaissance, and then solved the problem in less than four hours by kidnapping the country's leadership.
    Why didn't we even try this? Have you heard anything about attempts to capture or eliminate the top leadership and president in the first 24 hours of the Second Karabakh War? Or remember the second Karabakh conflict. In the first couple of days, the Azerbaijanis quickly and methodically destroyed all communications links and air defense assets, and also secured the airspace to cut off reinforcements from the sky. And ultimately, they resolved the conflict in less than a month.

    Why couldn't we do the same? Fewer resources would have been wasted, fewer casualties, especially among civilians, and even less sanctions pressure. After all, by conducting an operation similar to the American one in Venezuela, we would have established ourselves as a serious adversary, but one that only targets the enemy's leadership and not the population. And the fact is that the conflict has been going on for five years, with people dying on both sides of the front, sanctions are being imposed, taxes are being raised to compensate for the deficit, the interception of destroyed villages is being presented as practically the capture of Kyiv, and the population in the frontline zones is suffering just as much.
    Was it really POSSIBLE to carry out our operation at the level of the American one in Venezuela?!?!?!
  75. +1
    4 January 2026 12: 01
    A donkey with gold opened the gates of Caracas. The generals and the elite are as corrupt as all that they corrupted (democratizers).
  76. The comment was deleted.
  77. +1
    4 January 2026 12: 42
    Okay, the generals have been bought.
    But the Juans with MANPADS could have just fired, and who would then know whose MANPADS it was...
  78. 0
    4 January 2026 14: 58
    Does this mean Venezuelans are smarter than Ukrainians? Who, with their senseless resistance, have plunged the country into the Stone Age? But if they had reached an agreement back in 2022, there wouldn't have been hundreds of thousands of deaths, a ruined country, unpaid debts, and millions of people leaving...
  79. 0
    4 January 2026 17: 34
    Quote: Million
    Bribery, threats, blackmail,
    This is how we should have communicated with the Ukrainian authorities immediately after the collapse of the USSR, and we would not have ended up with what we have now.

    A raven will not peck out another raven's (one alearch's) eye:
    - They themselves have the same corrupt masters, holding and registering their assets in the zone of English judicial jurisdiction.
    Can't you see from their behavior that they are fixing matches with the Turkish ones?
  80. 0
    4 January 2026 17: 54
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Quote from: dmi.pris1
    There was simply no real support. No one wanted to die for Manduro.

    Have there been any examples in the 20th century of Latino troops heroically resisting "overseas" enemies superior in numbers and/or technology? I'm trying to remember, but I can't recall! Either I'm sclerotic, or... it just didn't happen! Just like with the Arabs!


    Are the Falklands not an example of an attempt to fight?
  81. 0
    4 January 2026 17: 56
    Quote: Tail pipe
    Does this mean Venezuelans are smarter than Ukrainians? Who, with their senseless resistance, have plunged the country into the Stone Age? But if they had reached an agreement back in 2022, there wouldn't have been hundreds of thousands of deaths, a ruined country, unpaid debts, and millions of people leaving...


    If we hadn't agreed to take from the Union as much sovereignty as we couldn't carry, then...
    Further your text becomes fair
  82. 0
    4 January 2026 18: 37
    There's an online article called "How Helicopters Are NOT Shot Down Over Venezuela" that explains in simple terms how the Igla MANPADS's IR warhead locks on to a target, and how the Americans managed to create interference that makes it difficult to lock on to a target.
    It's hard to say how true it is, I'm not an expert, but judging by the fact that the Igla was exported, including to a NATO country, Slovenia, the US had no problems familiarizing itself with the IGL's performance characteristics and operating principles.
  83. 0
    4 January 2026 19: 14
    Mah, il responsabile è al Cremlino, anche i siriani avevano missili russi ma quando erano attaccati da Israele non potevano usarli perché lo zar non voleva..
  84. 0
    4 January 2026 19: 15
    The operators simply weren't given MANPADS from the warehouses, otherwise at least one would have been found that would have fired.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  85. 0
    5 January 2026 04: 54
    And in our State, in the USSR, not a single border guard, not a single policeman, not a single KGB officer detained a single American intelligence officer for even 24 hours in 1991, and not a single CIA spy was expelled from the country.
    1. 0
      7 January 2026 19: 13
      You're naive. Why expel the spies? They'll send another one. He'll still need to be tracked. It's much more interesting to send disinformation through a known spy and find out what information he's transmitting.
  86. 0
    5 January 2026 13: 45
    At this point, a true "Iron Lady" has come to power in Venezuela, not Trump and his rabble. I wrote the real thing because that nickname is mistakenly attributed to the old street dame Margaret Thatcher.
  87. +1
    5 January 2026 15: 10
    The Soviet Army carried out such operations with ease. August 21, 1968. Operation Danube. The introduction of Warsaw Pact troops into Czechoslovakia. Commanded by Army General I. G. Pavlovsky.
    At 10:15 PM on August 20, the troops received the "Vltava-666" signal to begin the operation. At 2:00 AM on August 21, advance units of the 7th Airborne Division landed at the Ruzyně airfield in Prague. They blocked the airfield's main facilities, where Soviet An-12s carrying troops and military equipment began landing. By 4:30 AM on August 21, the Central Committee building was surrounded by Soviet troops and armored vehicles, and Soviet paratroopers arrested those present. By 9:00 AM on August 21, paratroopers had blocked all roads, bridges, exits from the city, radio and television buildings, the telegraph office, the main post office, city and regional administrative buildings, the printing house, train stations, as well as military unit headquarters and military industrial enterprises. The CNA commanders were asked to remain calm and maintain order. Four hours after the landing of the first groups of paratroopers, the most important objects in Prague and Brno were under the control of Soviet troops.
    1. 0
      5 January 2026 16: 53
      "Yes, there were people in our time, not like today's tribe! You are not heroes!" M. Yu. Lermontov
    2. 0
      8 January 2026 23: 26
      I would also recall Operation Baikal 79. More precisely, the part of it codenamed "Storm-333"—the capture of Amin's palace and his assassination. Five special forces soldiers, nine paratroopers, and seven members of the Muslim battalion were killed during the assault, which lasted about 45 minutes. Of the Afghan guards, 300 were killed, and 1300 were captured. Amin knew about the assault plans, but he didn't believe it was possible.
  88. +1
    5 January 2026 16: 50
    I predict that now all these weapons: MANPADS, S-300, SU-30, the AK-103 BMP and APC production plant will be sent to country 404 am
  89. +1
    6 January 2026 20: 05
    Quote: Last centurion
    What good did he do for the people while sitting on a huge barrel of oil? How did every citizen personally experience it? Maybe he dropped taxes to zero, covering the difference for every citizen with oil revenues? Or handed out housing grants like those clever sheikhs? Or lowered the retirement age, funding the well-being of the elderly from the oil industry. So why the hell should the people of Venezuela defend him? Of course he was betrayed. But he was the one who started it, and he treated everyone differently. He had the potential, but he didn't realize it. And this happened to all the fallen dictators who lived in their palaces, shitting in golden toilets with golden loaves of bread on their tables, amid poverty and the decay of social welfare.

    For fun, compare the cost of gasoline in Venezuela and Russia.
    1. 0
      7 January 2026 19: 09
      And it's not just about gasoline. There are also other products, electricity, and other benefits.
  90. +1
    7 January 2026 19: 07
    The hypothesis doesn't work. There's a branch of mathematics called probability theory. 5000 MANPADS. Let's say it's like a 50:50 election for the president: against the president. In reality, more people in the army are for the president, but oh well, for simplicity's sake. How many MANPADS are there in Caracas? Well, let's say 1/10. Let's say half are against the president. Total: ~250. This and that, sick, scared. Well, a hundred at least. To bury Delta, a couple dozen would be enough. To launch the helicopters, they had to be 100% sure that not a single MANPADS would be used. There's no way such an operation could work. The only hypothesis is that all the MANPADS were removed from military units and taken to warehouses. And even then, the question of the MANPADS used by the president's security remains.
  91. 0
    8 January 2026 22: 38
    Quote: Danil Timoshenko
    May I ask, if there were fair elections in Venezuela, then why did Maduro create a second parliament?

    It wasn't Maduro who created a second parliament, but Guaidó, in collaboration with Trump. There should also be a second parliament somewhere nearby, with Tikhanovskaya, the President of the Republic of Belarus... There would have been a third, with Navalny, but he didn't make it to the elections...
  92. 0
    9 January 2026 00: 13
    Quote: Totor5
    Next will be Cuba, unless the Great Strategist figures out how to open a base there again.

    To reopen an overseas base, you need Fabergé made from the appropriate materials, but after the collapse of the USSR, these materials were stolen or sold. So, without these Fabergés, you have to engage in fine art—drawing lines, in the epistolary genre—expressing concern, in oratory—speaking at the UN... I don't know, maybe I've missed something else....