Kuprin, Slashchev, the Smenovekhovtsy and the Cossacks, or Four Reasons to Return to the Homeland

6 700 83
Kuprin, Slashchev, the Smenovekhovtsy and the Cossacks, or Four Reasons to Return to the Homeland
To a foreign land


About the Cossacks, the native ashes and the graves of our fathers


The Civil War generated a flood of refugees from the collapsed Russian Empire—the first wave of emigration. The peak of the exodus of our compatriots occurred in November 1920, when approximately 150 people left Crimea along with the army of Lieutenant General Baron P.N. Wrangel. People had left earlier, and not only through Crimea. It's enough to recall the Russian city of Harbin with the grave of Lieutenant General V.O. Kappel.



Between 1917 and 1920, between 1 million and 1,5 million people left the former empire.

The motives that compelled so many people to leave their homeland varied, as did those for some to return; however, for the Cossacks, they were generally similar. Their psychology hadn't changed much since the Middle Ages, when, to recall Cicero's famous dictum, blood was shed for altars and hearths.


Cossacks on the island of Lemnos, 1921

For the Cossacks, zipuns also played an important role, as discussed in the article. What we take from the Bolsheviks is ours! Or, What the Cossacks Fought for in the Civil War.

This way of life, somewhat reminiscent of the lifestyle of a Byzantine acritus, and somewhat reminiscent of a Horde raider, was reflected in the work of the remarkable poet of the first wave of emigration, N. N. Turoverov:

Grow up, become strong, villages,
Ringing with an ancient song;
Lead the Cossack, young lady
For new horse campaigns,
For new raids in the desert,
In the remote Asian distance...

Without their native altars and hearths, far from the graves of their ancestors, the Cossacks' purpose in life was lost. Therefore, of the approximately 100 Cossacks who left their homeland between 1918 and 1922, according to historian L. P. Reshetnikov, only 10-12% returned home. In fact, not so few.


N. N. Turoverov

Those who remained recreated traditional forms of communal living in foreign lands, wherever fate took them. And fate took them not only to Bulgaria and Yugoslavia, France and Czechoslovakia, but also to Brazil, Peru, and Paraguay, not to mention China, where the Cossacks found it easy to maintain their traditional way of life due to similar natural and climatic conditions and the relative weakness of local government in the 1920s.

Interestingly, the Cossacks went to Paraguay in response to the call of the White Guard Major General I. T. Belyaev—an astonishing man whose military talent helped the country defeat Bolivia in the Chaco War. Many years ago, I dedicated an article to Ivan Timofeevich. Russians in battles for Paraguay.

Moreover, the Cossacks not only reproduced their familiar way of life, but also popularized it abroad: the world-famous Don Choir of A.S. Zharov.


A. S. Zharov and the Cossacks of his choir

And yet, even though they had settled down well in a foreign land, they retained a longing for the villages, as reflected in the piercing lines of Turover:

O bitterness of the Zadonsk wormwood,
A pinch of Cossack land!
Or is my heart broken?
No – the heart beats and beats.
Fatherland, am I not your voice?
Did you hear it in the Parisian night?

It was this melancholy that motivated some of the Cossacks to prepare for the return journey. But, as we know, it wasn't only the Cossacks who returned to their homeland. City dwellers, primarily intellectuals, including military personnel, also returned. It's no coincidence that I said "city dwellers."

Unlike villages or stanitsas, where the ancient way of life was long preserved, city life was more secularized. Consequently, city dwellers found it easier to integrate into the cosmopolitan realities of émigré life. But they, too, returned.

The reasons were complex: difficulties in everyday life, material security, and socially, emigration pushed a significant portion of our compatriots down a peg. Some were forced into this downward spiral, like the father of the once-famous Metropolitan Anthony of Sourozh, born to a family of diplomats in Lausanne and who spent his childhood in comfort and prosperity.

After the revolution, the family emigrated to France, and there, according to Bishop Anthony:

My father lived apart from us, adopting a peculiar position: when we emigrated, he decided that his class, his social group, bore a heavy responsibility for everything that had happened in Russia, and that he had no right to enjoy the advantages his upbringing, education, and class had given him. And so he didn't seek any work where he could use his knowledge of Eastern languages ​​(the Metropolitan's father had once served as a diplomat in Persia – I.Kh.), his university education, or Western languages, and became a laborer. He lived alone, in utter squalor, praying, keeping silent, reading ascetic literature, and truly living completely alone, mercilessly alone, I must say. He had a tiny room at the top of a tall building, and on the door was a note: "Don't bother knocking: I'm home, but I won't open the door."

An important aspect of the daily life and psychology of some of the first-wave emigrants. People in intellectual professions tend to reflect on the events in the country—the fate of Father Bishop Anthony is a vivid and, perhaps, extreme example.

Another group of emigrants interpreted the events that had taken place in Russia and the prospects for the new government in a positive light: the Smenovekhov movement had formed abroad, advocating for the reconciliation of the Whites with the Bolsheviks and for a return to the homeland.

His ideological inspiration was the philosopher N. I. Ustrialov, a man with a tragic fate and a fascinating thinker. Ultimately, he, like some of the Smena Vekhovites, returned to the USSR and were repressed. Ustrialov was executed.

Among the military, Smena Vekhov's views were shared by the former commander of the elite 1st Army Corps of the Volunteer Army—in which the equally elite "colored" divisions, which remained combat-ready until the last day of the White Struggle, fought—Lieutenant General E. I. Dostovalov, who returned to the USSR and was also executed in 1938.

It should be noted that in the early 1920s, the military émigré community was not monolithic. While some of it, primarily members of the Russian All-Military Union (ROVS), held uncompromising positions against the Reds, others were inclined to abandon anti-Bolshevik activity. Among the latter were former senior White Guard officials, which created a rift within the military émigré community.


Lieutenant General A.K. Kelchevsky

The two lieutenant generals in question were the former commander of the Don Army, A. I. Sidorin, his chief of staff, A. K. Kelchevsky, and the commander of the 3rd Army Corps of the Armed Forces of South Russia, S. K. Dobrorolsky. They did not return to their homeland, but they did not share anti-Bolshevik views.

He always wanted to die in Russia


Not all returnees had such tragic fates as those of the Smenovekhovtsy who set foot on their native land. For A. I. Kuprin, for example, it was the opposite. Alexander Ivanovich, who lived in Gatchina, emigrated first to Finland and then to France after the defeat of General of the Infantry N. N. Yudenich's army.

In 1937, already ill, he returned to the USSR. Why? I believe no one has answered this question better than Lieutenant General A. I. Denikin's biographer, D. V. Lekhovich—incidentally, his book about Anton Ivanovich, I believe, is the best of all those devoted to this extraordinary man. What does Denikin have to do with it? The two writers were friends.

I did not make a reservation about Denikin the writer, for he left behind not only the multi-volume “Essays on the Russian Time of Troubles,” but also talentedly written works of art, to which I will dedicate a separate article.


The old and ill A. I. Kuprin with his wife in the USSR

Here I will cite Lekhovich’s reasoning about the reasons for Kuprin’s departure:

He always wanted to die in Russia. He compared this desire to the instinct of a wild animal that retreats to its den to die. But by the time of his departure, physical illness and cerebral sclerosis had sapped Alexander Ivanovich Kuprin's strength and sanity, and his financial situation was dire. Meanwhile, the Soviet embassy in Paris promised him and his wife a quiet and secure life in a writers' retreat near Moscow.

In the late spring of 1937, he came to see the Denikins. The general's wife vividly remembered how A.I. Kuprin, without saying a word, walked into Anton Ivanovich's room, sat down on a chair near the desk, stared at the general for a long moment, and suddenly burst into tears, the way only small children cry. The door to the room closed, and Ksenia Vasilyevna heard only Kuprin's voice, and then her husband's. After a while, Anton Ivanovich politely escorted his visitor to the stairs and, to his wife's astonished question, "What's wrong?" he answered curtly, "He's getting ready to return to Russia."

Kuprin, who had a military education, was, at heart, a civilian. But true military men, perhaps of all the representatives of the émigré community, felt the exile most acutely. Again, civilians could return to their former jobs.

A jacket instead of a uniform


Some officers also held civilian professions—a prime example being Wrangel, who had earned a degree in mining engineering. But such individuals were few in number. And the majority of officers were not always able to return to uniform, as, for example, was the case with Lieutenant General I. G. Barbović, who served in the Yugoslav Army's War Ministry.


Major General of Wrangel's army and lieutenant of Franco's army N. V. Shinkarenko

And if they were fortunate enough to do so, it was rarely at their previous rank. For example, Major General N. N. Shinkarenko, who fought in Franco's army against the Republicans and received the rank of lieutenant—albeit along with Spanish citizenship and a pension.

The same rank was held in the French Foreign Legion by the Kuban colonel F. F. Eliseev, the author of the most interesting memoirs “With the Kornilov Cavalry,” “In the Foreign Legion and in Japanese Captivity.”

In relation to officers, one must also take into account the psychological factor: from time immemorial, the right to wear personal weapons – a sign of a free person in a traditional society, which formed a sense of elitism among the military.

The uniform played a significant role, distinguishing an officer from a civilian, which also determined the psychology of a military man, his stereotype of behavior, and ideas about honor, part of which were, for example, duels.

An entire culture associated with weapons developed: their ownership, carrying, presentation, and use. All of this included a certain ritual inherent to the military establishment. It's no surprise that officers were recognized by their demeanor and bearing, even in what was then called civilian dress.

And exchanging his uniform for a rumpled, cheap taxi driver's jacket somewhere in Paris or a miner's uniform in Lorraine, tearing an officer away from his familiar world, was a painful blow to his pride. In such circumstances, some saw a return to military service as a solution, even in the Red Army, especially given their faith in a Soviet Thermidor and a new Bonaparte.


Our compatriots are the first wave of emigrants

In this case, it is worth noting that in the public consciousness of the first wave of emigration, somewhere up until the mid-1920s, the Russian Revolution was measured by the template of the Great French Revolution, believing that the first, in the logic of events, repeated the second.

Dreaming of a Russian Thermidor


Were there grounds for such hopes? With some reservations, yes. I'll examine this using the example of the legendary Lieutenant General Ya. A. Slashchev.

There's a common misconception that he was the inspiration for General Khludov from "The Flight." This isn't true:

A careful study of the general's biography, writes historian A. S. Kruchinin, one of the country's leading specialists on the Civil War, forces us to conclude that Bulgakov's hero, insane, gloomy, and shrouded in an atmosphere of delirium and "dreams," is not only not identical to the personality of Yakov Alexandrovich, but is in many ways his opposite—and, conversely, as if these enthusiastic lines were written about Slashchev:

You whose wide overcoat
Reminded sails
Whose spurs rang merrily
And the voices,
And whose eyes are like diamonds
A mark was cut out on the heart,
Charming dandies
Years gone by!
Three hundred won - three!
Only the dead did not get up from the ground.
You were children and heroes
You all could.
Which is also touching youth
How is your mad army?
You are the golden-haired fortune
Led like a mother.
You won and loved
Love and the saber's edge,
And fun crossed
Into oblivion!


It is wrong to see in General Khludov, brilliantly played by V. V. Dvorzhetsky, a prototype of Ya. A. Slashchev

The reasons for Slashchev's return in 1921 remain the subject of debate to this day. A. S. Kruchinin explains the general's motivation as follows:

And while General Kutepov (who headed not only the ROVS, but also a combat organization within it, which was engaged in subversive activities in the USSR – I.Kh.) was preparing his fighters and General Wrangel was collecting funds for the fight, officer circles were gathering within the USSR, “threads” were being drawn abroad, General Slashchev was discussing something with the young “Red Committees,” and his old comrade Colonel V.V. Zherve was visiting him, gathering and, perhaps, uniting Finnish officers... But what could they all count on?

Slashchev had plenty to talk about with the guests gathered in his apartment and plenty to teach them. But, as is well known, he longed to join the ranks and saw himself as part of the Red Army command staff.

The latter, in terms of his origins, experience of service with the Reds and Whites, as well as in the national formations generated by the Time of Troubles, presented a very mixed picture:

In general, the 1920s, writes historian E. N. Durnev, were a very ambiguous time, to which black-and-white assessments are inapplicable. Thus, during the Civil War, the Red Army often recruited people who—as many today believe—could never have been recruited. For example, former Staff Captain N. Ya. Aversky, head of the regiment's chemical service, served in the Hetman's secret services. Milles, a teacher at the Kamenev School, was a former military official who served under Denikin in OSVAG and counterintelligence. Vladislav Goncharov, citing Minakov, mentioned Colonel Dilaktorsky, a former White Army colonel who served in 1923 at Red Army headquarters and who was Miller's head of counterintelligence in 1919. Staff Captain M. M. Dyakovsky, who had served in the Red Army as an instructor since 1920, had previously served as an adjutant at Shkuro's headquarters. Colonel Glinsky, who had served as head of the administration of the Kamenev Kyiv Unified School since 1922, had already been an activist in the Ukrainian nationalist movement during his service in the old army, and later as a confidant of Hetman Skoropadsky. In the spring of 1918, he commanded the Officers' Regiment, which became P. P. Skoropadsky's military support during the coup d'état; he then served as a senior sergeant major for the Hetman's Chief of Staff (he was promoted to general ensign on October 29, 1918). Similarly, in 1920, an officer clearly unwilling to serve in the Red Army, Lieutenant Colonel S. I. Dobrovolsky, was enlisted. From February 1918, he served in the Ukrainian army: as head of the Kyiv district's transport operations and commandant of the Kyiv railway junction. From January 1919, he held leadership positions in the UPR Army's military communications department. In May, he was captured by the Poles, escaping captivity in the fall and returning to Kyiv. He joined the Armed Forces of South Russia, with which he retreated to Odessa and was captured by the Red Army in February 1920. He was sent to Kharkiv, but escaped en route and reached Polish-occupied Kyiv, where he re-enlisted in the UPR Army, only to be captured again by the Red Army a few days later. He served in the Red Army from late 20, but was dismissed as an unreliable element in 1921.

Colorful biographies. It's important to understand that, unlike many military specialists from the General Staff—for example, the Chief of Staff of the Red Army, former Major General P. P. Lebedev, celebrated his 50th birthday in 1922, a respectable age at the time—captured White Guard officers were young and often assigned to combat positions in the armies of yesterday's enemy. This was especially true for technical specialists, primarily artillerymen.

In total, in 1921, according to the eminent historian A. G. Kavtaradze, 12 thousand former White officers served in the Red Army.

And this is against the backdrop of the explosive situation in the country in the first years after the Civil War:

In a devastated and not entirely calm Russia, writes historian S. T. Minakov, whose untapped rebellious energy continued to focus on the "World Revolution," it was not only what was thought of the "revolutionary military leaders" within Russia that mattered. Equally important was how they were perceived and ranked outside Russia and the Red Army, in the Russian diaspora.

And in it reigned, as the aforementioned researcher notes:

Expectations and hopes for an internal, “national-Bonapartist” rebirth of Soviet Russia and the decisive role of the Soviet military elite in this matter.

As an example, I will cite lines from the diary of a prominent figure in the ROVS, Major General A. A. von Lampe, for April 1920:

I'm very interested in the essence of the Red Army. It was created as a socialist delusion, but the fight against us, the introduction of real officers, the gradual return to pre-revolutionary order—that's also a chapter in the book I dream of.

According to A.S. Kruchinin, Slashchev set out, figuratively speaking, to write the book von Lampe had dreamed of. The result is well known. After all, something resembling the Soviet Thermidor could only have been achieved in command positions in the ranks.


Ya. A. Slashchev with the staff of the Crimean Corps and his true combat friend N. N. Nechvolodova, 1920.

But the Bolshevik leadership kept Slashchev away from the troops. Other repatriates who had previously held command positions under Denikin and Wrangel, including Lieutenant Generals Yu. K. Gravitsky, E. I. Dostovalov, and A. S. Sekretev, were also denied combat positions.

The Kremlin had a similar attitude towards its charismatic commanders, because the ideas themselves – whether red or white – were personified in their bearers.

That's why the 1st Cavalry was disbanded after the Civil War, separating S. M. Budyonny from the troops, though nominally promoted—"Red Murat" became a member of the Revolutionary Military Council. The same happened to M. N. Tukhachevsky—he was removed from his post as army commander and appointed head of the Military Academy. Incidentally, Mikhail Nikolayevich had no academic education.

But these were charismatic military leaders who aroused fear in the Soviet government. The less charismatic White Guard officers captured during the Civil War survived in the Red Army until the second half of the 1930s, and some even outlived them. Perhaps the most colorful biography here belongs to Major General of Kolchak's army and Lieutenant General of the Soviet army, A. Ya. Kruse. A wonderful scholarly article by historian A. V. Ganin, "Kolchak's General with the Order of Lenin," is about him.

Historian V.S. Milbach writes the following on this matter:

Former Whites served in the 1930s. During a tour of Siberia and the Far East, Mekhlis discovered a significant number of Kolchak supporters and former Whites in the troops and sought their dismissal from the People's Commissariat of Defense. Despite the difficult situation, when every Far Eastern commander counted, K. Ye. Voroshilov supported the idea of ​​another purge, telegraphing to the Far East: "The proposal to remove all Kolchak supporters from the ranks of the Red Army has been accepted by the Main Military Council."

The position of Mekhlis and Voroshilov is a separate issue. For us, something else is more important: in the early 1920s, after the war with Poland ended, the Red Army's technical weakness went hand in hand with the unresolved military threat from its neighbors.


Red Army soldiers of the 1920s were often commanded by former White Guards, especially in artillery units

Let me remind you that the Bolsheviks did not recognize Romania's annexation of Bessarabia and waged war in Central Asia against the Basmachi. Furthermore, not only Wrangel's troops but also the White Guard units that had retreated to China remained combat-ready. It was only in 1921 that the Antonov Rebellion was suppressed, and Lieutenant General Baron R. F. Ungern von Sternberg was captured and executed.

That is, we are faced with a duality of the situation in which the Bolshevik leadership finds itself: yesterday's White officers are not seen as reliable, and qualified personnel are needed for combat positions.

Paradoxically, writes S. T. Minakov, although Red Army soldiers sang that "from the taiga to the British seas, the Red Army is the strongest of all," in the 20s, the Red Army as a force capable of ensuring the country's defense practically did not exist. This circumstance presented the military elite and political leadership with the problem of a painful search for the formula of a "real army."

The formula for a "real army" was eventually found in the USSR, albeit at an inordinately high price: the deaths of outstanding military figures such as Ya. A. Slashchev—I don't think that, had he been commissioned and maintained his loyalty to the Soviet regime, he would have become obsolete by 1941—Division Commander A. A. Svechin, the repressions against Colonel G. S. Isserson, and others.

Yes, I cited A.S. Kruchinin's assessment of Slashchev's return above. But this is merely a historian's assumption, albeit a weighty one. However, if Yakov Alexandrovich had realized in the 1930s that the anti-Bolshevik Thermidor would not materialize, he could have immersed himself in his native military environment and faithfully served the USSR. However, story does not tolerate the subjunctive mood.

And finally, a few words about the "formula for a real army." It's unthinkable without Svechin's "Strategy." This year marks the anniversary of its publication. Next time, we'll talk about both the book and its author.

References
White Cossack Emigration. Interview with L.P. Reshetnikov
Bocharova Z. S. Russian refugees: problems of resettlement, return to their homeland, and legal regulation (1920s-1930s)
Ganin, A.V. Kolchak's General with the Order of Lenin: Reconstruction of the Biography of A.Ya. Kruse // Civil War in the East of Russia: A Look Through the Documentary Heritage: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific-Practical Conference (October 20–21, 2021, Omsk, Russia). Omsk: Omsk State Technical University. pp. 50–57
Durnev E.N. To paraphrase Kavtaradze: White officers in the service of the Soviet Republic
Kavtaradze A.G. Military specialists in the service of the Republic of Soviets, 1917-1920. / Rep. ed. V.I. Petrov; Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of History of the USSR. – M.: Nauka, 1988
Kruchinin A.S. The White Movement: Historical Portraits. – Moscow: Astrel, AST, 2006
Lekhovich D.V. Whites against the Reds. – M.: Voskresenye, 1992
V.S. Milbach, “Political Repressions of the Command Staff. 1937-1938. Special Red Banner Far Eastern Army.” Puchenkov, A.S., “That Same Slashchev…” [Review of the book: Ganin, A.V., “White General and Red Military Specialist Yakov Slashchev-Krymsky.” Moscow, 2021] // The Newest History of Russia. 2023. Vol. 13, No. 1. Pp. 219–231
Simonova T. Returnees. Repatriation to Soviet Russia before 1925 // Rodina. 2009. No. 4. Pp. 26–29
R.G. Tikidzhyan, Historical Fates of Cossack Re-Emigrants in Soviet Russia, 1920–1930 (Based on Materials from the Don and Kuban Regions)
Turoverov N.N. Russian poetry
Khodakov I.M. Russians in battles for Paraguay
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    10 January 2026 04: 06
    Good article. Kuprin lived for quite a long time in the Ryazan province (Kursha, south of Tuma). There he wrote a number of works, such as "The Small Fry," etc.
  2. +14
    10 January 2026 04: 52
    There's nothing worse or more merciless than civil war! And its consequences will linger for decades after it's over! This is precisely the tragedy of the "White" officers, and they knew it. Therefore, I believe that those who returned to the RSFSR (remember, the USSR was created in December 1922) were true patriots! They couldn't have been unaware of what awaited them! Incidentally, this is unlike other "officers" who joined the Wehrmacht in the 1940s.
    1. +1
      10 January 2026 09: 53
      The fact that Whites ended up in the Russian Security Corps on the side of the Wehrmacht is partly the Soviets' fault. Yugoslavia at the time was home to many Russian officer families with their own way of life, there were Cossack villages, and everything was more or less fine. Incited by both Soviet and British agents, Yugoslavia's attitude toward Russians began to change. Yugoslav communists began repressing Russian émigré families, terrorizing and killing them. The Ustaše offered to help the émigrés resist this. And then things went back to normal. But things could have been different. The shortsightedness of the Soviet government played a cruel joke on the Russian émigrés. And no one has abolished the Linz tragedy. We simply shamefully keep silent about it. But even so, far fewer former White Guards joined the Russian Security Corps than Soviet citizens joined Vlasov's army. Everything is relative!
      1. +2
        10 January 2026 11: 16
        A traitor is a traitor, period. Collaboration with local nationalists began almost immediately, and the Whites themselves played the leading role. If we lost at home, we'll win here. There were no communists in power in Yugoslavia at the time; the Communist Party was banned in 1920, repressed in 1921, and crushed. There were plenty of other groups there besides the Vlasovites. And again, some all-powerful Moscow! The USSR couldn't exert much influence on the local communists before the war, and afterward, even in tiny Albania.
        1. +5
          10 January 2026 13: 37
          I don't even have to respond to this nonsense! You'd better read up on why Hitler stopped his advance in Greece and moved his troops to Yugoslavia. Damn it! Enough of these educated people!
          1. +1
            11 January 2026 05: 43
            Where did he stop his advance? Operations began simultaneously on April 6, Thessaloniki was captured on April 9, then through Macedonia (partly in Yugoslavia, partly in Greece) they outflanked the Anglo-Greek positions, and Kozani was captured on April 14, 1941. The British hand in the Yugoslav coup d'état is clearly visible, with protests, as expected. Yugoslavia's entry into the Axis immediately placed the British troops in Greece in a dangerous position, which, after the appearance of German troops in Bulgaria in January 1941, was already in limbo, and otherwise would have given them time to evacuate. And the Germans, knowing about the coup, did nothing. By the way, I understand you're going to continue writing nothing but nonsense and drivel.
            1. 0
              11 January 2026 08: 35
              Hitler carried out his decision to attack Yugoslavia at 6:00 a.m. on March 27, when the Soviet-Yugoslav treaty was signed in the Kremlin.[19] The news of Germany's attack on Yugoslavia stunned Stalin and Molotov: their illusions about Hitler as a difficult, albeit partner, were completely dispelled. Goebbels sensed the mood in the Kremlin quite accurately:

              Now the Russians are beginning to feel fear. This is good news…"[20].

              Stalin's cynical reaction to German aggression against Yugoslavia is striking. Upon learning of it, he ordered the cancellation of the banquet that was to be held to celebrate the conclusion of the treaty, calling it "an inappropriate undertaking."[21] The terrified Stalinist leadership, striving to appease Hitler by any means possible, did not even dare to condemn the Reich's blatant aggression against a state that was almost allied with the USSR. Even more cynical was the policy of the Soviet government after the defeat of Yugoslavia. On May 8, 1941, Deputy People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs A. Ya. Vyshinsky, having received "friendly" advice from Berlin, declared to M. Gavrilovich that the Soviet government saw no legal basis for the further activities of the Yugoslav mission in the USSR.[22]

              Vyshinsky demanded that its activities in Moscow as a diplomatic mission be terminated, but its staff refused and left the USSR. Goebbels, once again, poured out his admiration in his diary:

              Yesterday there was an article in Pravda. They have nothing against Germany. Moscow, the article says, wants peace, etc. This means Stalin has sensed that things are getting tough and is waving the olive branch of peace. The Russian card is no longer winning![23]

              A comparison inevitably arises with Emperor Nicholas II's policy of defending Serbia in the summer of 1914. As an Orthodox monarch, protector and patron of the Slavs, the Tsar could not abandon his fraternal people, who were facing imminent enslavement and destruction. The self-sacrificing aid provided by Emperor Nicholas II to Serbia proved far more effective than Stalin's "pragmatism." In July 1914, it was clear to Nicholas II that the Austro-German bloc had decided to fight, no matter the cost. Had the Tsar retreated in the summer of 1914, as Stalin did with Yugoslavia in 1941, had he turned a blind eye to the Austro-Hungarian conquest of Serbia, he would not only have gained nothing but, on the contrary, would have found himself in a grave situation.

              Russia's moral authority would have been irreparably damaged, and its influence in the Balkans would have been lost forever. Germany would have started the war anyway, but without the need to fight on two fronts. Russia could have found itself alone, isolated, and without allies facing the European coalition, as it did in June 1941, when Stalin found himself completely alone in the face of unprecedented military danger.
    2. +6
      10 January 2026 14: 40
      "There is nothing worse and more merciless than civil war!" Traveler 63, I would add, "than civil war and revolution." How many people, how many intelligent, educated, talented people we have lost... These aren't gas and oil fields, billions of dollars... These are people. And what kind of people... People are our greatest treasure. Of course, you can't rewrite history...
      And a huge thank you to the author of the article. A wonderful topic and a magnificent article.
  3. -16
    10 January 2026 05: 03
    Between 1917 and 1920, between 1 million and 1,5 million people left the former empire.
    More than 100 years have passed, and the enemies of the Bolshevik communists and their supporters are still experiencing the same thing as after the October Revolution - some of them are experiencing mass emigration, others are experiencing war.
  4. +5
    10 January 2026 05: 23
    Thank you! An eternal theme.

    The Eiffel Tower is just a stone's throw away!
    Serve and climb.
    But each of us is like that
    He has matured, he sees, I say, and today,

    What is boring and ugly
    It seems to us like your Paris.
    "My Russia, Russia,
    Why are you burning so brightly?
  5. +12
    10 January 2026 05: 25
    Valery, thank you for the article, I sincerely look forward to its continuation!
    Seriously, I consider it a civic achievement to write about the White movement on VO. We all come from our childhoods, where everything was simple and understandable. Only with age do you begin to understand the tragedy of the civil war.
    "Wedding in Malinovka," "The Run," "A Stranger Among Strangers, a Stranger Among His Own," and "The Elusive Avengers" all left a burning question: why do people speaking the same language stand on opposite sides of the barricades? One old man in the film "Wedding in Malinovka," fiddling with his Budenovka rifle and silently asking who "in the city are the Whites or the Reds," is a marker of how the people perceived the events of those years.
    Well, something like that...
    1. -14
      10 January 2026 05: 35
      Your question is strange. Why did the enemies of the Soviet people first wage war against the Soviet people, and then, after seizing the republics of the USSR, begin to wage war against each other? Because it's part of their mentality to destroy, annihilate, kill, wage war, and hate both the Soviet people and each other with a passion.
      1. +9
        10 January 2026 07: 06
        Quote: tatra
        Why did the enemies of the Soviet people first unleash wars against the Soviet people, and only after they had captured the republics of the USSR?

        Are you talking about the leadership of the Communist Party again (Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, Yeltsin, etc.)?
        1. +4
          11 January 2026 15: 33
          Quote: Dart2027
          Are you talking about the leadership of the Communist Party again (Gorbachev, Shevardnadze, Yeltsin, etc.)?

          They will tell you that they were not communists. laughing
          Just to answer the question - But where were the real communists in those fateful years? - There will be no answer. Because, with few exceptions, members of the CPSU either directly destroyed the USSR or remained silent. And silence was perceived as consent.
          "With few exceptions"—that's primarily Nina Andreeva. For her expressed position, she was harassed by the entire CPSU, from the General Secretary to "decisions of labor collective meetings." Ardent champions of pluralism and critics of Stalinism and the personality cult quickly staged a cosplay of 1937, with "nationwide condemnation" and accusations of Trotskyism.
          1. 0
            11 January 2026 16: 06
            Quote: Alexey RA
            But there will be no answer to the question: where were the real communists during those fateful years?

            Of course, because this is a great mystery.
    2. +7
      10 January 2026 06: 04
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      Valery, thank you for the article.

      Valery is resting, Igor is writing! Thanks to him.
      You could have written about the Reds, for variety.
      1. -11
        10 January 2026 06: 16
        Yes, you, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, have been writing and speaking about the Reds for all 40 years, with the "freedom of speech" given to you by Gorbachev, including the fact that you have thrown out of the history of the Civil War the White Terror, the occupation of Russia by the interventionists and their atrocities against the Russian people, their large-scale robbery of Russia, and inflated the Red Terror to enormous proportions, including the fact that in your country the Bolsheviks "destroyed" all the Cossacks.
    3. +8
      10 January 2026 06: 27
      This suggests that the common people had a simple ideology: either white or red, as long as there was bread on the table and there was no war.
      1. +6
        10 January 2026 08: 07
        Quote: Glock-17
        The common people had a simple ideology: white or red, as long as there was bread on the table and there was no war
        This is the most primordial ideology! But when bread appears on the table, and even with butter, and there has been no war for a long time, that's when ordinary people begin to think about ideology—who is governing us, and is it right?
        1. +7
          10 January 2026 08: 34
          True. According to Maslow's theory, a person without pathologies will not stop at basic needs and will strive for self-actualization. Over time, they may also have questions for the government. There are several options for dampening such a person's ardor: either force them into debt so they can work tirelessly, or keep them in abject poverty.
    4. +9
      10 January 2026 06: 41
      Thank you for your kind words. Yes, you're right – we come from our childhood, and the theme of the Civil War, as N. Bokhanov once told me, is forever relevant.
      1. +4
        10 January 2026 10: 07
        I agree with you! I remember back in school, in one of my essays, I wrote that we were Soviet people, already communists, even in our mother's womb. My father read it and chuckled, but said nothing. And only many years later, when I was being dragged across the table in debates and arguments for my historical ignorance, did I begin to seriously study the history of my country myself, without the crutches of Soviet ideology. It all turned out like that monk who went mad when he got his hands on the original source of Holy Scripture.
        1. +2
          10 January 2026 11: 48
          Quote from Songwolf
          It all turned out like with that monk who went crazy when the original source of the Holy Scripture fell into his hands.

          The monk should have listened to his spiritual mentors and read the works of the Holy Fathers, but he immediately took up the primary sources, and that’s how it all ended in demonism.
          --- Never go to extremes! You need to live carefully, choose a middle path, and avoid extremes.
          Fr. Seraphim (Rose)
      2. +3
        11 January 2026 14: 41
        Keep writing, Igor, the articles are good. hi
        1. +3
          12 January 2026 17: 40
          Thank you for your kind words. I'll try my best.
    5. +2
      10 January 2026 09: 44
      Why do some of my relatives now consider the fascists Bandera and Shukhevych heroes and serve in the Waffen-AFU, while others serve in the Russian army and for them, those who serve in the Waffen-AFU are enemies?
      1. -8
        10 January 2026 13: 51
        Because of the evil mentality of the enemies of the USSR who seized the republics of the USSR, their ideology, propaganda, and history are all against our country and people. Therefore, their "heroes" and "great men" in the history of our country are those who were against Soviet power—for some, it's Bandera, for others, the White Guards and White Cossacks.
    6. +4
      10 January 2026 14: 52
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      «Wedding in Malinovka, The Run, One of Our Own, A Stranger Among Our Own, The Elusive Avengers"Everyone was left with a burning question: why... people speaking the same language stand on different sides of the barricades

      hi There were no such questions back then - for us, whites were the embodiment of evil, cruelty, treachery, and stupidity.

      Thanks to Pikul:
      :
      Russia will forget that he existed an excellent miner and talented naval commander, that he was a polar explorer and hydrographer-
      .

      This was the beginning...
  6. +4
    10 January 2026 05: 27
    Civil wars have occurred in many countries. And in most countries, efforts have been made to extinguish the embers of past conflicts. But not in our country. After all, even the memory of such wars does not serve the unity of the people. There is also a desire to reexamine the civil war. If this is true, then our future is bleak.
    1. +4
      10 January 2026 05: 46
      A reexamination of the Civil War is necessary, if only for the sake of national reconciliation. After all, the ideology of communism has fallen, and the question arises as to why so many Russians died and who benefited most from it. If we don't learn from the past, history could repeat itself.
      1. -13
        10 January 2026 06: 00
        What kind of reconciliation can there be with pathological liars? Same with you.
        the ideology of communism has fallen
        Because you, like all enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, are afraid to honestly admit that it was you who seized the USSR. And you don't care about the tens of millions of victims of your anti-Soviet period. Your "philanthropy" is activated only for the sake of profit, to justify what you did.
        1. +10
          10 January 2026 06: 08
          I was 15 years old when the USSR collapsed. And you didn't go to the barricades to fight for the gains of October. What happened, happened.
          1. -14
            10 January 2026 06: 11
            Ha, the classic cowardly response of all enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people is "I have nothing to do with it" to everything they did during the Soviet period, and during their vicious and totally deceitful anti-Soviet era, starting with their Perestroika. And they'll do something themselves first, and then cowardly shift the blame and responsibility onto others.
            1. +12
              10 January 2026 06: 15
              You're hinting that I should have joined the "elusive avengers" squad. laughing
            2. 0
              10 January 2026 23: 15
              Quote: tatra
              And first they do something themselves, and then cowardly shift the blame and responsibility onto others.
              Are they the communists who destroyed the USSR? Yes. Admit your guilt in the country's demise! You were the ones who unanimously supported Gorbachev.
        2. +11
          10 January 2026 11: 43
          You are enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people.

          Please confirm that you and not a robot submitted the answers.
          We're sorry, but the responses from your device appear to be automated.
      2. +4
        10 January 2026 09: 46
        Try to convince Olgovich that his idols are essentially state criminals and try to reconcile him to this idea. Can you? I don't think so...
        1. +9
          10 January 2026 12: 57
          My minus, Vladislav.
          You shouldn't blindly repeat the labels previously placed on a person by narrow-minded people.
          It's easy to blame a "Moldovan bread baker" while counting oneself among the Russians in Russia. It's harder to understand that the collapse of the USSR left 25 million ethnic Russians abroad against their will, making the Russian people the largest divided people in the world. The root causes of this "Parade of Sovereignties" are well known. The Soviet state, at Lenin's suggestion, was created as a broad federation, with the right of republics to leave the Union, something which, incidentally, I.V. Stalin opposed. Stalin's point of view had prevailed—the new power could have followed a different path of territorial organization, and perhaps, in that case, the state would have had a different fate. So why does Olgovich, who experienced firsthand all the "joys" of the collapse of his united country, idolize Lenin? By the way, Vladislav, Olgovich's posts don't contain the slightest disrespect for Russia, which, in my opinion, is his true idol... I wouldn't want to be mistaken.
          1. -5
            10 January 2026 13: 41
            For God's sake! I don't give a damn about these downvotes... And "patriots" like Olgovich are worse than any European fascists...
            And he was not the only one who experienced the joys of the collapse of a united country.
            I have relatives there in Ukraine who are now in the Waffen-AFU.
            And other relatives who lived near Luhansk, two families, went missing on the territory of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in 2015.
            Disrespect for Russia? It's just oozing out of him!!!
            For him, his idols are those who robbed, raped, maimed, and killed residents of Russia of all nationalities, starting with Russians.
            1. +6
              10 January 2026 15: 50
              I don't care about these downsides.

              These??? I only gave you one and explained why. The rest of the downvotes are not for me. It's not my policy to indiscriminately downvote those I'm debating with.
              Sincerely. hi
              1. -2
                10 January 2026 17: 40
                At least some downvotes. Look, fascist Olgovich is ready to break his own computer, let alone give downvotes.😂
          2. -10
            10 January 2026 13: 45
            You, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people on the territory of the USSR, are completely devoid of conscience. And you ALWAYS cowardly shift the blame for your crimes—both during the Soviet era and during your vicious and totally deceitful anti-Soviet period—on to others, including what you yourselves acknowledged as your crimes: your seizure of the USSR, and your division of the USSR into your anti-Soviet, Russophobic states, contrary to the will of the majority of voters in the referendum on preserving the USSR. Therefore, you cowardly shift the blame for this onto others, including those who were able to do so many decades before you seized the USSR.
            1. +12
              10 January 2026 14: 01
              You, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people

              Is the record stuck?
              1. +8
                10 January 2026 15: 30
                Is the record stuck?

                Worse, …..
                hi
          3. +3
            10 January 2026 15: 14
            Quote: Richard
            which, by the way, I.V. Stalin opposed.

            Greetings, Dmitry.

            He resisted so much that he created the largest number of allied sovereign states.

            Thanks to Khrushchev, he destroyed the KFSSR, otherwise we would have had two Kaliningrads.

            Nobody asked for the MSSR to be created, but they ordered it

            .
          4. +5
            10 January 2026 15: 28
            My minus, Vladislav.

            Hi Dima, at first I thought it was directed at me.
            No thank you though.
            On a personal note, I'll write one thing. Unlike many, I don't pretend to be either God or commissar—I only know one thing: our Fatherland cannot withstand a second civil war.
            The true motives behind people's choice of sides in the fires of that past were, by and large, rarely ideological. Sometimes it was a matter of chance or an irony of fate.
            Ultimately, the Bolsheviks won, and honor goes to those who had the will and courage to return to serve the Motherland.
            And so, Kotovsky and Budyonny are closer and dearer to me than Wrangel and Slashchev, but to understand the motives and aspirations of both, at least to know the history of my country.
            One should love and hate not for their pretty eyes, but for their actions.
            Well, somewhere like that...
            My respects to the honest company.
            1. +5
              10 January 2026 16: 20
              Good day to you too, Vlad!
        2. 0
          10 January 2026 12: 57
          Quote: Grencer81
          his idols are basically state criminals

          The court calls people criminals - remember?

          And exactly USSR court called as such - almost all of YOUR Politburo, Council of People's Commissars, Orgburo, 75% of the Central Committee, the founders of the Red Army, etc.

          What did the Prosecutor General of the USSR call them, the knights of Lenin's VOR-CHILDREN? And remember:scum, stinking scum, manure, stinking pile of garbage, filthy dogs, damned vermin etc.
          Have you learned?
          1. +3
            10 January 2026 13: 35
            And there was already a trial... A trial by history, which tossed your White Guard bandits into the dustbin of history. Although some of them had a glimmer of insight, and some even returned to the USSR.
            Kolchak was shot like a dog by order of the Revolutionary Tribunal, the rest died abroad like mongrel dogs...
            1. +5
              10 January 2026 14: 06
              Quote: Grencer81
              And the trial has already taken place...

              So, what was I talking about?
              The USSR court was there and threw your bandit children of Lenin (Bukharin, Zinoviev, etc.) into the garbage heaps of the country and history, they were shot like mongrel dogs by the verdict of the revolutionary tribunal, the rest died behind the barbed wire of their own camps, like mongrel dogs
              1. -8
                10 January 2026 14: 17
                "And who are the judges?" You, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, cowardly whining in chorus that you have "nothing to do" with what you did during the Soviet period, and in your anti-Soviet one, because you YOURSELF admit that everything you have done is your crimes against the country and the people, betraying your "leaders," throwing them on the Soviet communists, the Chekists, and their supporters, always and in everything sowing malice and hatred, lies and slander, despite the "freedom of speech" given to you by Gorbachev.
                In the 10 years that I have been on VO, not a single real supporter of the State you created has appeared here; all you do is rage AGAINST other States and their peoples.
              2. -3
                10 January 2026 14: 35
                And I mean that you hate Russia to the point of gnashing your teeth, to the point of darkness in your eyes...
                1. 0
                  10 January 2026 15: 28
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  And I'm about

                  No, you're talking about something else, but this
                  The USSR court was there and threw your bandit children of Lenin (Bukharin, Zinoviev, etc.) into the garbage heaps of the country and history, they were shot like mongrel dogs by the verdict of the revolutionary tribunal, the rest died behind the barbed wire of their own camps, like mongrel dogs
                  causes
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  to the point of gnashing teeth, to the point of darkness in the eyes...
                  lol

                  And tell me, "lover" of Russia - WHO gave you the right Cut off Lugansk from Russia, Yuzovka, Mariupol, and other Novorossiya cities and turn them into Ukraine, huh? WHY didn't this become Russia under YOU?
                  1. +2
                    10 January 2026 17: 39
                    Well, it clearly wasn't you... The right of peoples to self-determination...
                    1. -1
                      10 January 2026 18: 48
                      Quote: Grencer81
                      The right of peoples to self-determination...

                      fool Russian people I have long ago made my decision, He founded, named, built, and populated the cities of Novorossiya. and her herself.

                      WHO gave you, Russophobes, the right to tear them away from the Russian people and turn them into a Ukraine and Ukrainians that never existed there, huh?
                      1. +1
                        10 January 2026 19: 23
                        But no one discovered them; they decided to break away on their own. The ZUNR and UPR weren't organized by the Bolsheviks, and they were recognized by the Provisional Government.
                      2. -2
                        10 January 2026 19: 44
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        And no one opened them, they decided to break away themselves.

                        Where Novorossiya decided to break away, huh? fool Teach DKR Kornilov - Executed Republic) and OR as part of the RSFSR
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        The UPR was not organized by the Bolsheviks and was recognized by the Provisional Government.

                        belay lol There was no UPR and ZUNR under the Provisional Rights and it did not recognize them.

                        Again you don't know anything...

                        But class instinct... good lol ..
                      3. +1
                        11 January 2026 04: 01
                        The Ukrainian delegation negotiated with the Provisional Government regarding recognition of Ukrainian autonomy within the Russian Republic. The Provisional Government was almost in agreement, but then the October Socialist Revolution occurred.
                      4. -1
                        11 January 2026 14: 08
                        learn again: there was no unr and zunr under the Temporary Rights and it did not recognize them.
                      5. +1
                        11 January 2026 16: 58
                        And who then negotiated the recognition of Ukraine's autonomy with the Provisional Government? Aliens?
                      6. 0
                        12 January 2026 11: 21
                        thereafter
                        Grancer81
                        (Vladislav Yazhikov)
                        -1

                        10 January 2026 17: 40
                        D. Vaughan,fascist Olgovich
                        - I won't communicate with you until I make a public apology.

                        yuck ...
                      7. 0
                        12 January 2026 14: 12
                        A public apology to someone who justifies the executioners of the White movement? You're a boor, sir.
            2. +6
              10 January 2026 14: 30
              Quote: Grencer81
              Kolchak was shot like a dog by order of the Revolutionary Tribunal.

              Not certainly in that way.
              And there was no trial, no sentence, no revolutionary tribunal, they really shot him like a dog.
              And there was a telegram from Lenin to his Irkutsk comrades... to shoot them, allegedly because of a White Guard conspiracy in Irkutsk, and in fulfillment of Lenin's demand, the Irkutsk Military Revolutionary Committee decided to shoot Kolchak and Pepeliaev, without trial or sentence, in accordance with Ilyich's execution telegram.
              1. -2
                10 January 2026 14: 31
                It doesn't matter, the main thing is that he answered for his crimes...
                1. +7
                  10 January 2026 14: 43
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  It doesn't matter, the main thing is that he answered for his crimes...

                  When it's purple, it's fraught with bad consequences, that is, lynchings, anarchy and lawlessness begin.
                  And Alexander Vasilyevich had to answer for his crimes in court.
                  The great proletarian writer Gorky, as he claimed, In Russia, they really love to beat people up, no matter who...who is more cruel, the Whites or the Reds? Probably equally so, both Russians..
                  M. Gorky's article "Russian Cruelty"
                  1. 0
                    10 January 2026 14: 48
                    There were crimes, there was a sentence, there was an execution... And attempts at his rehabilitation, which each time failed miserably.
                    Moreover, the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation found no grounds for his rehabilitation.
            3. -1
              10 January 2026 18: 56
              Quote: Grencer81
              by verdict revolutionary tribunal

              There was no "revolutionary tribunal" - you don't even know that, but the abuse flows endlessly:
              shot like a dog
              are dead
              mongrel dogs

              eww...
              1. +2
                10 January 2026 19: 26
                What was he supposed to do with him? He got what he deserved. As you trade with Russia, so you must repay. He sold it wholesale and retail, and got a bullet in the bridge of his nose.
                He hated Russian men, hanged them, shot them, killed them in every possible way, and got what he deserved.
                1. 0
                  10 January 2026 19: 36
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  What was to be done with him?

                  What should we do with you, "expert?" request
                  1. +1
                    10 January 2026 19: 41
                    And what about you, who hates Russia?
      3. 0
        11 January 2026 07: 22
        Still can't calm down? Keep in mind, nothing will ever be the same again. And a better one hasn't been invented yet.
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 08: 11
          History is cyclical and punishes those who believe that this time everything will be different.
  7. +6
    10 January 2026 06: 39
    My great-grandfather's brother, Alexander Vladimirovich Kostromitinov, a full Knight Commander of the Civil Guard and a participant in the White movement, fled from Crimea to Greece, then to France. There, all trace of him disappeared. In the 80s and 90s, I saw a report about his service in the Foreign Legion, but I didn't know back then that he was related to me. I haven't been able to find that material since, so I have doubts; perhaps my memory is failing me. If anyone has any information about him, please let me know in a private message.
  8. +3
    10 January 2026 08: 16
    There were only a few like Slashchev among White leaders. Denikin and Wrangel envied Slashchev's career. Of course—in three years, he went from lieutenant to general in the White Army.
    As for Khludov from the film "Flight," virtually all the characters are composites of real-life heroes Bulgakov himself knew or heard about from stories. That's why some people "recognize" Slashchev in Khludov, while others "recognize" Slashchev in General Chernota. Just like Lyuska. In the film, she seems to be Chernota's lover, but in real life, she's actually Nechvolodina, Slashchev's second, camp wife. Ultimately, these are generalized, composite characters meant to show what the Civil War does to people. But Dvorzhetsky's Khludov, like Ulyanova's Chernota, is magnificent in this film.
    By the way, I read somewhere that after Slashchev's murder, Nechvolodina lived almost until Khrushchev came to power, and Slashchev's killer, the Jew Kolenberg, lived until Gorbachev came to power... and besides, Nechvolodina wrote some other book about Lenin.
    This series of articles about the White Army generals is desperately needed. If only to show that the Russian army always had Slashchevs who understood the incompetence of the top generals, who, in turn, hated the Slashchevs, and that the Slashchevs understand who is really to blame for all the chaos...
    1. 0
      10 January 2026 13: 24
      Quote: north 2
      Of course - in three years from lieutenant to general of the White Army


      On December 6, 1909, he was promoted to lieutenant.
      On April 4, 1913, he was promoted to staff captain.
      On September 8, 1916, he was promoted to captain,
      October 10, 1916 – from captain to colonel.
      By 1917 he was assistant commander of the Finnish Regiment.
      On July 14, 1917, he was appointed commander of the Moscow Guards Regiment, a position he held until December 1 of the same year.
      On September 6, 1918, he became the commander of the Kuban Plastun Brigade as part of the 2nd division of the Volunteer Army,
      November 15, 1918 - commander of the 1st separate Kuban Plastun brigade
      On May 14, 1919, he was promoted to major general for distinguished service in battle.
  9. -2
    10 January 2026 12: 44
    The motives that forced so many people to leave their homeland were varied.

    The motive was, naturally, one-save your life

    The madmen in power declared a war of extermination against them; they did not think about peace in society, no, only about the destruction of alien people.

    , Ulyanov after VOR:
    to all the reproaches and accusations against us of terror, dictatorship, civil war - we say: yes, We openly proclaimed what no government could proclaim. The first government in the world that can talk openly about civil war is there is a government of the workers, peasants and soldiers' massesYes, we have started and are waging a war against exploiters.The more directly we say this, the sooner this war will end.


    and enemies are shown:
    an opportunity arose to suppress the exploiters, to suppress the resistance of this insignificant group, strong with yesterday's money bags, yesterday's store of knowledge. They, their knowledge— professors, teachers, engineers — are turned into a tool for exploitation of workers
    Sick person...

    We have entered simply: without fear of causing criticism from the "educated"

    people, or rather, uneducated supporters of the bourgeoisie, trading in the remnants of their knowledge, we said: we have armed workers and peasants

    simple man - simple solutions lol

    and this is how he resolved production issues with workers
    And I told them: you are the power, do whatever you want to do, take whatever you needWe will support you, but take care of production, make sure that production is useful
    lol EBN 1918, the workers themselves determined whether their production was useful or not lol fool

    all means of power to finally destroy their class enemy, the bourgeoisie, wipe off the face of the Russian land not only officials, but also landowners

    and what should be used in building the state?
    experience and... instinct of the masses

    So people fled from these experimenters, and those who remained were subjected to experiments.

    She sent them not only to Bulgaria and Yugoslavia, to France and Czechoslovakia, but also to Brazil, Peru and Paraguay,

    and they lived much better materially and freely, working in the sweat of their brow for themselves, without hunger, cannibalism and party orders0, unlike the remaining Cossacks, who experienced in full

    In the Red Army

    These are small things, there were even former whites in... commanders of the Gulag camps And they asked the decrepit communists with pre-Rev experience at the logging site: "Well, are you happy with your Bolshevik power now?!" How this infuriated the communists! They were later destroyed, just like the communists.

    Slashcheva's role is vile—all who came with him are destroyed, as are most of those who return (or to the camps—the typical fate of Nina Aleksandrovna Afanasova, a fantastic female surgeon).
  10. +4
    10 January 2026 13: 14
    Love for the Motherland has nothing to do with "love for the Bolsheviks"
    1. +3
      10 January 2026 15: 09
      Quote: Panin (Michman)
      Love for the Motherland has nothing to do with "love for the Bolsheviks"

      And if you think about it, those who oppose your thesis love not the Motherland specifically, but the USSR as the Motherland... What's even sadder is that they are against the Motherland that existed before and after the USSR, and are exclusively for the "dead" Motherland, the USSR... That is, they don't have the concept of a Motherland in the classical sense of the word; they don't need any kind of one - only a communist one, and only one that no longer exists... Should they be considered patriots of Russia? I don't think so... They are exclusively patriots of something that no longer exists, so it's somehow even sad for them... A bit like the white exiles they hate so much, and those who died, when Russia supposedly exists, but the Motherland does not.
  11. -3
    10 January 2026 14: 11
    How much unction is poured into this article about the émigrés! How unfortunate and magnanimous they are. The author, in 1921, declared an amnesty for all participants in the White Movement, and those who wanted to returned. Moreover, they were not subjected to any reprisals. Those who did not return adopted an anti-Soviet stance, participated in terrorist attacks, brought mischief to their homeland in every way, and ultimately went into the service of Hitler. The USSR was built, fought, and created, while these gentlemen, who had brought the country to ruin and were selling it on every street corner, continued to hate the "cattle" who had escaped their oppression. They understood nothing and learned nothing. Their ideas and their descendants, who returned to power in 1991, prove their degenerate nature better than any words, by their actions.




    2
  12. +1
    10 January 2026 14: 44
    The same rank was held in the French Foreign Legion by the Kuban colonel F. F. Eliseev, the author of the most interesting memoirs “With the Kornilov Cavalry,” “In the Foreign Legion and in Japanese Captivity.”


    Perhaps the author meant not F.F., but F.I. (Fyodor Ivanovich) Eliseev? Indeed, a man with a very interesting fate.
  13. +2
    10 January 2026 15: 26
    Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
    In most countries, they tried to extinguish the embers of past contradictions

    How can they be remedied? Some want to parasitize on others. This is an inherent conflict of interest.
    1. +3
      10 January 2026 19: 06
      Quote: LuZappa
      Some want to parasitize on other

      and these others don't want to? wink
  14. 0
    10 January 2026 19: 10
    Quote: Olgovich
    and these others don't want to?

    I think everyone agrees. Capitalism is a society built on the exploitation of man by man. Socialism is the opposite.
    But to suddenly say: "Thank you all, everyone is free to go." It doesn't work like that.