Operation Corporation - First Blood

14 738 51
Operation Corporation - First Blood
Queen Elizabeth II in 1982


An operational unit of 127 ships and vessels (43 warships, 22 auxiliary vessels) fleet and 62 requisitioned merchant ships) moved south between March 31 and May 12, 1982. How so? But I told you, three nuclear submarines were planned for the islands even before the Argentines landed there! And the requisitioned cruise liner Queen Elizabeth II, carrying the 5th Infantry Brigade, departed Southampton on May 12 (Canberra on April 7). Although it is believed that the task force reached full combat readiness on April 12, the British scraped together everything they could to retake the Falklands, but it all had to be found first, and then restored to a state of repair. At the same time, an air base was being established on Ascension Island, from which Vulcan bombers and tanker aircraft could operate.




Boeing 707 of the Argentine Air Force

Britain declared a "Total Exclusion Zone" with a 200-mile radius around the captured Falklands. The Task Force was shadowed by unarmed Argentine Air Force Boeing 707s, but outside the zone, the British aviation They weren't attacked, which led the Argentines into a fatal, costly misconception: they assumed that no military action would take place outside the zone. In fact, at that point, Britain had simply not made the decision to use force—during the voyage, as I've already written, British diplomats were trying to resolve the disputed islands through their own means, and the sailors weren't at all sure they would have to fight at all.

The first operation to be launched was Operation Parake, to liberate South Georgia. How do you translate this name? "Dust" is probably the most accurate: "Parake" is slang for the herbicide "Paraquat," used for the same purposes as our orthodox DDT. 42 commandos, recently trained for operations in Norway, were selected for the operation. Major Guy Sheridan became the landing force commander. The commandos were reinforced by M Company, 42nd Airborne Commando Detachment, commanded by Captain Chris Nunn. Thus, 132 men were to land on South Georgia. 132? No, more! The landing force also included the 19th Mountain Troop, D Squadron, SAS (Special Air Service) from Ascension Island, the 2nd SBS (Special Boat Service) Troop, and two artillery spotter groups. Distributing all this troops among the ships became a difficult task: 250 people with weapons were placed on one destroyer, two frigates, one submarine, and one patrol ship. Warships are not taxis, and there is usually little space there...


Destroyer Antrim is the flagship of the task force

The task force departed Ascension Island on April 11, commanded by Captain Brian Young, commander of the destroyer HMS Antrim, the armada's flagship. On April 14, the icebreaker Endurance joined the group, and Admiral Fieldhouse's order was dropped from an RAF Nimrod aircraft, setting the landing date for April 21. Yes, it was dropped from an aircraft, and the British maintained strict radio silence, indicating a serious approach to the operation's preparation.


SSN "Conqueror"

The submarine Conqueror was the first to approach the island, on April 18. The submarine reconnoitred the most favorable areas of the coast and Argentine positions. It must be said that the British had no information on the total number of Argentines on the island, except to assume that their numbers had not increased since the capture of the island. According to the plan, a mountain SAS detachment was to land on the Fortuna Glacier from helicopters, cross it, and attack the Argentines from a place they clearly weren't expecting. Why not? Well, from there it was eight miles to the nearest buildings, the abandoned Stormness station! In fact, the polar explorers from the Endurance warned the paratroopers that the plan was foolish, but they were ignored.


British Marines on South Georgia

On April 21, 1982, 15 commandos led by Captain Gavin Hamilton were dropped off on the Fortuna Glacier. As it turned out, the combination of freezing temperatures and 100-knot winds was a nasty experience! Especially since the glacier had crevasses that needed to be navigated. So, the brave SAS men decided to set up camp, but the wind blew away their tents. Fifteen hours later, Hamilton requested evacuation, and three helicopters were dispatched. They searched for the frostbitten soldiers for a long time in the polar night. One helicopter crashed, two others picked up the squad, but another crashed on takeoff. Fortunately, there were no casualties, but two helicopters were lost. A third helicopter managed to evacuate all the poor fellows, but they had to abandon their equipment. And while landing on the destroyer… the third helicopter also crashed. It was a fiasco!


Gemini motor inflatable boats

On April 22, four special forces troops were dropped off by helicopter in Hound Bay, where they discovered there were no Argentines. The helicopter attempt to land reinforcements failed; the Endurance approached to within 800 meters, after which the troops were sent in Gemini inflatable motorboats. After spending the night, the detachment set off on foot to the foot of the Nordenskjöld Glacier. A pair of Geminis were supposed to be airlifted there by helicopter for the crossing. However, one boat broke down during the transfer, and the second was unable to cross the bay due to a strong headwind and ice accumulation. Ultimately, they had to wait another day for evacuation, after which the frozen special forces troops were returned to their ships. Fiasco No. 2.

On the night of April 22–23, the Antrim entered Stormness Bay to land the third SAS detachment. The landing force was to be carried out in five Gemini boats, but two of them malfunctioned and were blown out to sea by a sudden storm. One was later rescued, and the second managed to restart its engine and reach shore. The remaining three landed the commandos on Grass Island, where they climbed a cliff and reported no sign of the Argentines, after which they requested evacuation. They were picked up by helicopter the next day; there were no casualties.


Submarine "Santa Fe"

Meanwhile, the Argentines, unlike their opponents, weren't observing radio silence (for some reason, these naive people believed their enemies couldn't read their codes...). From radio intercepts, the British realized that the submarine Santa Fe—an ancient diesel submarine, built in 1945—had set out for South Georgia. The boat was carrying reinforcements to the island's Argentine garrison, which, observing the British's persistent attempts to land, decided that they might succeed one day! A storm prevented the submarine from using its snorkel, and its batteries weren't in the best condition, so it was floating on the surface. The British, hearing of the submarine's arrival, dispersed the task force: the frigate Brilliant was sent to retrieve new helicopters, while Conqueror was called to South Georgia, although the submarine's retractable antenna broke, so it never received the order.


The Santa Fe's wheelhouse railing shows signs of an attack.

The Santa Fe landed reinforcements at Grytviken unopposed and, at 5 a.m. on April 25, headed back. At 8:55 a.m., the Antrim and its Westland Wessex helicopter spotted the submarine and attacked it with depth charges. The bombs punctured the ballast tank, preventing the submarine from submerging, and the commander decided to return to Grytviken. Meanwhile, a Lynx anti-submarine helicopter attacked the submarine, launching a Mk. 46 torpedo, but it was configured to hit a submerged submarine and passed under the submarine while it was on the surface. Then, Wasp helicopters armed with AS-12 ATGMs took off from the Endurance and Plymouth. The first Rocket One hit the wheelhouse railing and damaged the retractable devices, the second missed its target by 30 meters. After this, a helicopter from the Plymouth, which was located further away, returned to the ship, and a helicopter from the Endurance repeated the attacks: one missile missed, and the second penetrated the aft vertical rudder and exploded in the sea. In the third attack, one missile failed to leave the launcher, and the second hit the wheelhouse railing. Finally, a Lynx from the Brilliant arrived, firing at the submarine with a 7,62-caliber machine gun. In short, by 11 a.m., the submarine returned to Grytviken and was abandoned by its crew, thus becoming only the first submarine destroyed (if you can call it that) by helicopters.


The White Flag over South Georgia

Meanwhile, Major Sheridan decided that the Argentines were despondent over the loss of the submarine and decided to land a force of 79 men. Beforehand, the hills near Grytviken were shelled from the Plymouth and Antrim for psychological effect. In fact, the effect was sufficient to force the Argentine garrison to surrender. The only casualty of Operation Paraque was an Argentine prisoner of war, Petty Officer Felix Artuso, mistakenly shot by a British marine who thought he was about to scuttle the Santa Fe. After the garrison's surrender, at 17:15 GMT on April 25, 1982, Brian Young issued a statement:

I have the honour to inform Her Majesty that the Union Jack is flying alongside the white British flag on South Georgia. God save the Queen.

The "White Ensign" is a naval ensign with a red St. George's Cross on a white background, flown by Royal Navy ships during military operations.


The Victor air tanker is a converted bomber...

On May 1st, Operation Black Buck began as part of Operation Corporation. This time, the Royal Air Force decided to bomb Port Stanley Airport. The operation was unique: Vulcan bombers took off from Ascension Island to bomb the Falklands. The aircraft flew 3700 nautical miles and then returned, with the pilots spending 16 hours at the controls for the round trip. The operation's peculiarity was that the Vulcans had been designed for a European war (with the USSR, of course?) and could not reach the Falklands without refueling. They were refueled by tanker aircraft converted from Handley Page Victor bombers, which, of course, were also designed for the European war and also had to be refueled in the air. In total, two bombers required 11 tankers, which refueled both the bombers and each other, and the island only had one runway.


Avro Vulcan bomber

The result of this cunning operation was ambiguous. The raids were of little use: only one bomb hit the airport runway, but the crater was sealed by Argentine military construction workers by evening. True, high-speed aircraft could no longer take off from it, only Hecules transports (though the runway was still too short for fighter-bombers). But malicious tongues claimed the entire operation was conceived and executed by the Royal Air Force to highlight their role in the conflict and, therefore, prevent further cuts. Maggie Thatcher was slashing budgets like a wolf slashing sheep, and all three remaining Vulcan squadrons were scheduled to be disbanded by July 1, 1982.

All this was merely a prelude to naval battles! The Argentine command prepared to pincer the British task force that approached the islands on May 1. Three tactical groups were formed for this purpose: GT 79.1, GT 79.2, and GT 79.3. The first included the aircraft carrier 25 de Mayo, three corvettes, a destroyer, and a tanker; the second included five destroyers and a tanker; and the third included the cruiser General Belgrano, the destroyers Piedrabuena and Bouchard, and the tanker Puerto Rosales. The northern part of the pincer movement was much more powerful than the southern: it included GT 79.1 and GT 79.2, while GT 79.3 operated further south.

The third task force's mission was to destroy the British ships with Exocet missiles from the destroyers, while the General Belgrano's role was to finish off the wounded with its six-inch guns. The ships were outside the declared 200-mile zone and felt safe—after all, British aircraft hadn't shot down the Argentine military Boeing 707s tracking the task force. It must be said, the British took the threat seriously! After all, they also had Exocet missiles, and their capabilities were no secret.


Exocet anti-ship missile

These missiles are worth exploring in more detail. "Exocet" is the French word for flying fish. Missiles bearing this name were developed by the French company Aérospatiale in 1974. The development was prompted by the sinking of the Israeli destroyer Eilat by a Termit anti-ship missile. The missile's first tests took place in 1971, and in 1973, three versions were accepted into service—for launch from ships, aircraft, and submarines. The design was based on the earlier Nord anti-aircraft missile, from which the "flying fish" inherited its main advantage—a solid-fuel motor. The thing is, it allowed the missile to fly very low above the waves—the air-breathing engines typically used on cruise missiles would flood their air intakes in such a situation, while the solid-fuel Exocet experienced no difficulty flying above the very crests of the waves. True, everything comes at a price, and the "flying fish" paid for its flight above the waves with a short range: the ship-based version had a range of 42 km, the submarine version the same, and the air-launched version 70 km. By comparison, the Harpoon anti-ship missile, with its similar size, has a range of 90 km. But the Exocet can fly 1-2 meters above the sea surface, while the Harpoon can fly 4 meters... The Exocet's warhead is also unimpressive—165 kg, compared to 220 kg for the Harpoon, and half a ton for the Termit!


Captain 1st Rank Hector Bonzo

So, at 1:00 a.m. local time, the Argentine ships received an intelligence report hinting at a possible cancellation of the operation. At 5:00 a.m., it was indeed called off—Admiral Woodward began withdrawing the task force from the Argentine pincers (in fact, a British reconnaissance aircraft had spotted the pincers' northern claw). GT 79.3 was ordered to remain in a holding area—outside the 200-mile zone. On board the ship, commanded by Captain 1st Rank Héctor Bonzo, were 1093 people, including two civilian stewards.


Captain 3rd Rank Christopher Redford-Brown (left)

Meanwhile, the submarine Conqueror, commanded by Captain 3rd Rank Christopher Redford-Brown, was already patrolling the area. The submarine's primary mission was to land 12 commandos—the same SBS troops who had already landed on South Georgia. On April 28, Conqueror received orders to sail from South Georgia to the Falklands. The submarine arrived in the patrol area on April 30, and that same night, sonar operators detected the sound of the GT 79.3 propellers. The submarine's commander monitored the General Belgrano and its task force through his periscope but did not attack: he had been ordered to remain focused on nothing but the "25 May." Nevertheless, he reported the sighting of the Argentine cruiser to Strategic Command in Northwood.


Conqueror loads torpedoes

On May 1, the task force began bombing and airstrikes against Argentine positions in the Falkland Islands. Woodward assessed the danger posed by the General Belgrano and its destroyers as quite high: modern shells and missiles were far less dangerous to an armored cruiser than its 6-inch shells were to unarmored modern ships. Upon receiving a report of the GT 79.3's sighting, he ordered Radford-Brown to attack without waiting for strategic command approval—wasting time coordinating could have ended badly. But the Conqueror's commander sent a request to Northwood for an attack, and only after confirmation did he decide to sink the Belgrano.


MkVIII and Mk24 Tigerfish torpedoes

The Conqueror was armed with the new Mk24 Tigerfish guided torpedoes, but the commander decided to use the old, proven MkVIII, developed in the shaggy year of 1927. As it turned out, he was right: the use of wire-guided torpedoes during the conflict proved quite problematic. He fired a three-torpedo salvo from a range of 0,93 miles, and the MkVIIIs did not disappoint! At 16:01 local time, 365 kg of torpex penetrated 14 cm of armor: the first torpedo hit the aft engine room, cutting off the ship's propulsion and power, while the second tore off the General Belgrano's bow up to the forward turret (the third missed, hitting the destroyer Bouchard but failing to detonate). Radford-Brown later assessed the attack as follows:

Frankly, the Faslane gunnery practice was more challenging than this attack. The Royal Navy spent 13 years preparing me for exactly this kind of situation. It would have been a shame if I hadn't handled it...


The General Belgrano is sinking.

In fact, whether the cruiser had a British, American or Soviet crew, there was a chance to save the ship even in this situation (the ship's bow had been torn off for the third time during its stormy history(The first two times, however, it wasn't the Argentines who piloted it.) But Captain 1st Rank Bonzo, having left the operational range of the task force's Sea Harriers, declared the ship at 3X combat readiness—the Argentine version of our No. 2 readiness, which means all hatches and bulkhead doors are open. In a combat zone—astonishing carelessness! Escort destroyers... When the third torpedo from the Conqueror hit the Bouchard, its commander assumed he was also under attack, after which the destroyers withdrew. Strictly speaking, this behavior is not out of the ordinary: after the sinking of the Cressy, Hog, and Aboukir, rescuing drowning people in an enemy submarine's area of ​​operations is categorically not recommended.


The sinking Belgrano from another angle. The quality is poor, but two people are visible at the stern: Captain 1st Rank Héctor Bozo and Petty Officer Ramon Barrionuevo, preparing to be the last to abandon ship.

The cruiser was rapidly listing to port, and the crew began lowering life rafts, with sailors making improvised ponchos out of wool blankets—the Argentines were in dire straits with warm clothing. The order to abandon ship was given at 16:23 PM, when the list had already reached 20 degrees. The evacuation was completed at 16:40 PM, though it was carried out... in a Latin American style: some rafts held 30 people, others only three. At 16:50 PM, Captain 1st Rank Bonzo was the last to leave the ship, and ten minutes later the cruiser sank. The ship's life rafts were not discovered until May 3; 770 sailors were rescued, 323 perished.


Fernando Belaunde Thierry, President of Peru

It should be noted that on May 2, Peruvian President Belaúnde Tieri offered to mediate in negotiations between Great Britain and Argentina. It is sometimes claimed that the sinking of the General Belgrano put an end to these initiatives. This is refuted by both Galtieri's speech, in which he publicly declared that Argentina had lost 400 men but was prepared to lose another 4 or even 40 to defend the Malvinas Islands, and by Thatcher's memoirs, which claim the decision to sink the cruiser was made solely for military reasons, and that she had not yet even been informed of the Peruvian president's initiative. In short, at the time of the attack on the Belgrano, both sides were extremely belligerent and had no need for mediators for peace negotiations.


"Hello" of the Royal Air Force, the Argentine one was not found...

A separate issue is the Argentine command's errors after the ship was torpedoed. It's often written that the Argentine destroyers should have sailed with their active sonars engaged. This is theoretically true, but... In practice, the Argentine ships' machinery was poorly maintained, so they were unable to squeeze more than 18 knots out of their engines. The sonars themselves were also outdated, and GT 79.3's sole Alluet helicopter carried no hydroacoustics at all. In short, the muchachos had no chance of detecting and sinking the new submarine at 28 knots, so they sailed quietly, without their sonars engaged, relying more on stealth. GT 79.3 didn't even use an anti-submarine zigzag—there was no point: at their speed, the British would have had no problem calculating their firing patterns anyway.


Admiral Jorge Anaya

The sinking of the General Belgrano made far more sense from a psychological standpoint: the British believed that the destruction of the ship would severely undermine the enemy's morale. And they were right! Having lost the cruiser, the Argentine command ordered the fleet to return to base. Jorge Anaya believed that the British had detected his surface forces using satellite images transmitted by the Americans, and in such a situation, remaining at sea, in his view, meant sending men to certain death. The British had no American satellite images, but the Argentine naval command was unaware of this and abandoned the struggle for naval supremacy. More precisely, Argentina's main striking force in the Battle of the Malvinas now became air power. And it was precisely this air power that would prove to be quite successful!
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    30 December 2025 06: 09
    Thank you!
    I don’t remember which of the military leaders spoke out, but essentially it was: “All plans are good until they are implemented!”
    Have a good day everyone!
  2. +10
    30 December 2025 07: 29
    He fired a three-torpedo salvo from a range of 0,93 miles, and the MkVIIIs did not disappoint! At 16:01 local time, 365 kg of torpex penetrated the 14 cm armor: the first torpedo hit the aft engine room, knocking out the ship's propulsion and power, while the second tore off the General Belgrano's bow up to the forward turret (the third missed, hitting the destroyer Bouchard but failing to explode). Radford-Brown later assessed the attack as follows:
    Frankly, the Faslane gunnery practice was more challenging than this attack. The Royal Navy spent 13 years preparing me for exactly this kind of situation. It would have been a shame if I hadn't handled it...
    After long adventures with attack permits, communication problems and choosing a position for the attack, the captain was going to attack, but: "...having given the command "Torpedo tubes at your disposal!", Wreford-Brown was impatiently about to fire, having entered the "omega" seventeen degrees to the right.
    He was interrupted by his first mate, Tim McClement, who shouted from his seat:
    - Don't shoot! stop
    An awkward silence fell over the control room. Everyone held their breath, staring at the first mate. Wreford-Brown, tearing himself away from the periscope, crossed the room with a nervous step and gave the disobedient officer a reproachful look.
    - Why the hell? request , not?
    — The angle is decreasing.
    "This was my duty as attack coordinator," McClement later explained, "although Admiral Herbert later called it rather daring during the first torpedo attack since World War II." The submarine's commander didn't object. He filled the resulting pause with a scan of the horizon and an entry in his logbook: "Nothing else in sight, target M-04 Belgrano unaware of my presence. Waiting for target to come to 13° starboard course, after which torpedo launch will be made with zero gyroscopic angle." In another situation, such meticulousness, which required the submarine to remain on its attack course for five minutes longer, could have had fatal consequences, but in this case, she was in no danger.
    When the target finally came within range of the salvo, Wreford-Brown turned again to the first officer:
    - You don't mind? winked , if I request now request I'll shoot request ? - His tone was feigned politeness, but at the same time did not tolerate objections.
    — Go on. feel "Sir!" McClement blurted out.
    ...
    According to the submarine's log, the command to fire a torpedo salvo was given at 15:56:45. Three Mk.8 mod.4 torpedoes launched at three-second intervals in a fan pattern with a slight spread. In fact, Wreford-Brown commanded three times, with short pauses: "Tube six, fire!... Tube one, fire!... Tube two, fire!" and the torpedoes themselves were launched from the firing device in the first compartment due to an automatic failure. As torpedo operator William Budding recalls: "Normally, torpedo firing was carried out from the control room. Unfortunately, feel , on a £50 million submarine button wassat "It didn't work. So I got the order to fire manually."
    ...
    The submarine's commander later shared his impressions that during the attack he was haunted by the feeling as if he were performing an exercise on a training simulator at Faslane. He had to suppress the urge to ask feel steward bring a cup winked tea, as the submarine went into deep water, executing a rehearsed maneuver to evade the escort ships' counterattack, which, however, was unnecessary, since they made no attempt to pursue. He also did not return to attack them, allowing them to focus on rescuing the Belgrano's crew, and later commented: "I don't think Mrs. Thatcher thanked me." feel "It would have been better for me if I had reloaded the apparatus and torpedoed the other two ships."
    "
    https://ridero.ru/books/flot_i_folklendy_1/freeText/#freeTextContainer
    Later, of course, permission was given to fire at other ships, but the tea lover didn't encounter anything else of interest during his evasive maneuvers...
    request
    1. +6
      30 December 2025 08: 37
      Just wonderful! good Although, if the enemy was more serious than the inhabitants of the pampas, then who knows whose side will fall to the bottom
      1. +8
        30 December 2025 08: 54
        laughing
        Much more interesting is the attack on South Georgia itself.
        Everything is straight from the textbook:
        - We are SAS, so we are going on reconnaissance with landing from helicopters.
        -And there is also SBS, which means we are going on reconnaissance in boats!
        good
        Meanwhile, the Argentines simply feel They are bored, SAS and SBS are nothing other than the providence of G-m, who gets off with a few scars, "almost shame" and a bottle of whiskey: "Frozen, frostbitten, and bruised, we were assigned by the ship's medical team to the wardroom, which had been set up as a casualty reception center. The surgeon's relief matched ours when he realized that, aside from a few stitches for those who needed them, blankets, and hot drinks, his more complex skills wouldn't be required. The sailors were shocked by our appearance and what we'd been through. They gave up their bunks so we could rest peacefully through the night, but not before the ship's assistant quartermaster announced over the radio that their film from the previous night, "The Avenging Hawk," would be rerun in honor of those he affectionately called "our greenery," meaning us.
        More than 8000 miles from home, in one of the most inhospitable places on the planet, this double breach of the ship's strict routine meant a lot to us. While we watched John Terry prance with a magic sword in some fantastical nonsense on the ship's television system, John Hamilton and the senior NCOs sought out the Humphrey's crew with a bottle of whiskey to thank them for saving our lives.
        In many ways, Squad 19 was lucky. We barely survived. However, our joy at having survived the Fortuna experience soon gave way to a feeling almost of shame.

        recourse
        Apparently, the desire to shoot had not disappeared, and, having convinced everyone around that the reconnaissance was over (and the helicopters crying ending...), the special forces went on the assault: shooting at seals (why are they suspicious), at hills (the same accusations), at hills with iron - from the Milan ATGM (someone was planning to retire and now they need to shoot...).
        The Argentines were delighted to be noticed and hung out white flags, likely hoping to be fed and washed:...about 100-odd Argentine marines and sailors sat calmly on the ground in three rows in front of one of the buildings. Cedric forced them to lay down their weapons. There was no hostility on either side, and they were compliant. The Argentines seemed somewhat stunned and awkward, as if a little embarrassed at being caught where they shouldn't have been, but they also seemed relieved that it was all over. They had been attacked by armed helicopters, lost their submarine, and witnessed a demonstration of the navy's firepower, which could have descended on them at any moment.
        Despite the discipline, they were sloppy and hungry. The Argentine sailors from the submarine were particularly smelly, apparently having had no access to a shower for several weeks. Lawrence ordered us to take care of the prisoners, and we moved them to the shelter of the UAS mess hall, where we began feeding them from the large supply of prepared meals provided by the research team. Bilbo, James, and I found huge tin trays of lasagna and heated them up in the kitchen before handing them to our prisoners. Eight trays of food were all they needed, and we repeated this the next day to feed them breakfast.
        It was a strange experience. As we handed out pasta to men in navy blue uniforms and olive-green field jackets, amid steaming mugs of tea and the cozy atmosphere of shared dining, it dawned on us that just moments before, we'd been ready to kill these men. They were grateful, polite, and completely unlike the stereotypical misconception we'd had of them up until that moment: something like Manuel the waiter from the sitcom Fawlty Towers.

        http://samlib.ru/k/klimkow_o_g/seakingdown.shtml
        good
  3. +7
    30 December 2025 07: 54
    Admiral Togo has long said that a navy wins not at sea, but at the desks of technical schools.
  4. +3
    30 December 2025 11: 21
    It would all look pretty comical if it weren't for the hundreds of people who actually died....
  5. +6
    30 December 2025 11: 50
    This article is fantastic! The series continues in a very interesting way. I'm reading about the capture of St. George by British paratroopers, and the music from the Benny Hill show is playing in my head.
  6. +2
    30 December 2025 12: 09
    The Conqueror's commander is Commander Redford-Brown, aka "cap two." He's wearing a commander's stripes in the photo. British MAPS were commanded by commanders. And then there's "warships" again. Citizens, a ship is a warship!!! Everything else is a vessel.
    1. +5
      30 December 2025 16: 05
      The ranks are a tricky issue: at school, they taught that a commander is a captain of the third rank, and a captain (navy) is a captain of the second rank, but that's in the American Navy; even our military translators got confused with the British (or rather, the Indians, but they have an English rank system). Judging by the insignia, four stripes mean captain; the photo most likely shows him after the Falklands...
      1. +2
        30 December 2025 16: 31
        There are no complications. The British system of military (officer) ranks hasn't changed for over a hundred years. "Cap three" is lieutenant commander, two wide stripes with one narrow stripe between them. Cap two is commander, three wide stripes; cap one is captain, four wide stripes. The standard rank of MAPL commander, in the British navy, has been commander for many years.
        Redford-Brown, who previously served under Woodward, is referred to in his book as Commander Redford-Brown. Incidentally, he graduated from the very expensive and prestigious Rigby School, after which he joined the navy, although graduates of such schools usually go to Oxford and Cambridge.
        1. +2
          30 December 2025 18: 39
          The thing is, we have four stripes—one for a captain of the second rank, three for a third rank, and two wide stripes for a captain-lieutenant—one narrow. That's where the confusion comes from. Incidentally, in a naval phrasebook from the 1970s, a left-commander is a captain-lieutenant...
          1. +2
            30 December 2025 20: 41
            The British use the rank of lieutenant commander, not captain lieutenant. Many translations often make the mistake of rendering "lieutenant commander" as "captain lieutenant." The British didn't have such a rank. It existed in the German Navy and the USSR. Therefore, "lieutenant commander" is "captain three."
            1. +1
              30 December 2025 22: 02
              Let me repeat: in the USSR, they taught that a lieutenant commander is a captain lieutenant. Judging by the insignia, that's what it looks like. Questions arise because it's unclear how to count a midshipman: in our country, it's not an officer's rank, whereas in the Royal Navy, it's a first officer's rank. If we count him as our junior lieutenant, then our lieutenant is their junior lieutenant, our senior lieutenant is their lieutenant, and then our captain lieutenant is equivalent to their lieutenant commander. I suspect that those who compiled military English textbooks and naval phrasebooks in the USSR thought of it this way.
              1. 0
                30 December 2025 22: 52
                Let me repeat: in the USSR, they taught that a lieutenant commander is a captain lieutenant. Judging by the stripes, that's exactly what it looks like.
                It seems so.
                "Translating British naval officer ranks into Russian is complicated by the fact that during World War II, our country used different approaches to establishing their correspondence with Soviet Navy ranks than it does today. Therefore, to avoid ambiguity, it is advisable to translate them literally: captain, commander, lieutenant commander, lieutenant, and sub-lieutenant. And this is precisely how it is most often done today.
                At the very bottom of the British officer rank ladder is the midshipman (or warrant officer). Whether he should be considered an officer is a matter of debate. He is more of an officer candidate, a sort of equivalent to the Russian naval midshipman of 1906–1917.[3] Nevertheless, according to the NATO "table of ranks," the midshipman, along with the superior sub-lieutenant, belongs to the first officer rank of OF-1. Historically, warrant officers were once another category of "sub-officers." Serving as junior specialist officers on a ship, they, unlike midshipmen, were not allowed into the officers' mess, and their commissions were issued not by the monarch, but by the Admiralty. In short, "officers, but not gentlemen." After World War II, this military rank was abolished in the Red Navy, but in the modern fleet it was restored in a different capacity - as an extension of the petty officer line of ranks.
                "
                https://taskforce82.livejournal.com/18063.html
                Insignia application see: 1946-1947 and 1982
              2. +1
                30 December 2025 23: 25
                I don't know why, but the USSR simplified the officer rank system of capitalist countries. Especially since there was no direct correspondence. They had ranks that the USSR had, and vice versa. The British had a commodore (brigadier, brigadier general), which had no equivalent in the USSR.
                A midshipman isn't a warrant officer, but an officer candidate who has graduated from the academy but hasn't yet been promoted to sublieutenant. Incidentally, I believe the system, whereby the decision to promote a candidate to a rank is made by the officers of the ship on which they serve, rather than by the academy's leadership, is correct. Their equivalent of a warrant officer was a warrant officer.
                1. 0
                  30 December 2025 23: 30
                  P.S. There's a book, "The Conqueror Mystery," about this submarine's actions during the Falklands War. Radford-Brown, or Wreford-Brown—various sources also give this version—is called a commander. Woodward, in his book, also calls him a commander. Wreford-Brown served under him when he commanded the HMS Warspite. I don't think Woodward could have mistaken the rank of an officer he had known for a long time.
                  1. 0
                    30 December 2025 23: 54
                    Most likely Reford-Brown and rank - commander.
                    "Conqueror, commanded by Commander Chris Wreford-Brown, was deployed during the Falklands War, setting sail from Faslane Naval Base on the Gareloch in Scotland on 3 April 1982, one day after the Argentine invasion. Conqueror arrived in the exclusion zone around the Falkland Islands 21 days later and was ordered to scan the area for Argentine shipping, particularly the aircraft carrier Veinticinco de Mayo ("25th of May")." Wiki
      2. 0
        5 January 2026 07: 39
        Thank you for the articles. Very informative. Happy New Year to you. Good luck and patience in the comments. Best regards, BBC.
  7. +4
    30 December 2025 12: 52
    Many years ago, in the early 80s, I read about this war in the Naval Collection, a very serious magazine for senior officers. Our officers and admirals wrote without unnecessary irony, only the facts - courses, altitude, launch, withdrawal...
    People died there, more than 300 sailors.
    1. +3
      30 December 2025 13: 48
      There were articles in the Foreign Military Review, and Dotsenko managed to write an entire book. But it mostly focused on the actions of ships against aircraft and aircraft against ships.
    2. +1
      30 December 2025 16: 33
      "Morskoy Sbornik" (Sea Collection) is a popular science magazine. Serious journals were classified as "Secret."
      1. 0
        10 January 2026 19: 31
        The Marine Collection used to be the official journal of the Navy, not some kind of popular science magazine.
        1. 0
          10 January 2026 21: 21
          The point is that it was a popular science publication, intended to promote the Navy in the country. Serious magazines, aimed at active officers, warrant officers, and the like, were published with the "Secret" stamp.
          1. 0
            10 January 2026 22: 48
            There was one magazine in the Armed Forces that was published with a stamp, but that's a completely different story))
            1. -1
              11 January 2026 11: 21
              There were many such magazines, covering a wide range of topics. They were simply read by those with the appropriate clearance.
              1. 0
                11 January 2026 13: 26
                The journal's editors classify their publication as a military-theoretical journal. The Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science has included this journal among the peer-reviewed scientific publications. We do not publish any other journals, including classified ones, on naval topics. You, personally, can consider it humorous.
                1. 0
                  11 January 2026 19: 05
                  Just because you don't know doesn't mean they're not published. The Mirageswar website publishes a once-secret KGB journal; I read a similar one when I served in the Ministry of Internal Affairs. There were similar ones in the Soviet Army, too, and I believe they still exist.
                  1. 0
                    11 January 2026 19: 19
                    You think, but I served in the navy and had the appropriate clearance
                    1. 0
                      11 January 2026 20: 49
                      Just because you haven't seen something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Everyone else has it, but the Navy doesn't?
                      1. 0
                        11 January 2026 20: 55
                        Do you really think that those who served in the police know better what happened in the navy?
                      2. 0
                        11 January 2026 21: 56
                        You can serve in a variety of roles in the navy, for example, as a midshipman in a food warehouse. During my time in the police, I interacted with a huge number of people, including military personnel. Not to mention that I myself served in the Soviet Army and even read the relevant magazines.
                      3. 0
                        11 January 2026 22: 05
                        You even know that in the navy there are midshipmen, not warrant officers, you are not who you say you are)) Believe me, I know a lot about the navy, much more than you, although you also know a lot
  8. 0
    30 December 2025 13: 00
    New Year's is just around the corner, and everything's falling apart. You're useless, you've lost your zest for life, and the tangerines, you see, aren't the same, and that very salad, even if it's made with four types of meat and tongue, just makes you feel sick. And then, I'd become a chef, let them teach me! A wonderful choice, by the way, if only those islands hadn't loomed on the horizon. A peninsula on a plate with a blue border wouldn't do? It's all in my head! And the picture paints itself. The chef is in oversized red satin panties and a white apron, and I urgently need to call Snegurochka, who, in light of the latest trends, is dressed as Malvina, which means her favorite lace and knee-length ones. She didn't put on an apron; she's not going to cook anyway, she's going to teach Buratino; she should have knocked on wood three times. But the pioneer tie is just begging to be put on my chest, but that’s a whole other story, let it be a New Year’s gift!
  9. +3
    30 December 2025 13: 08
    The only fatality during Operation Paraque was an Argentine prisoner of war, Petty Officer Felix Artuso, who was mistakenly shot by a British marine who thought he was about to sink the Santa Fe.

    Well, the Naglichian could have shot the Argentinean without a mistake.
    Remembering that the British are the "authors" of concentration camps and genocide, it's quite possible that they and their soldiers could easily shoot you and then slap on an excuse so that the "democratic people" would swallow it. sad
    The provocation in Bucha was their decision, and they also oversee attacks on neutral ships in neutral waters.
    So I don’t find anything surprising in their killing of a PRISONER. request
    They're capable of doing this, they're real scum. angry
    1. -2
      30 December 2025 15: 11
      Your diagnosis: "Acute Soloviev's syndrome of the brain." Stop watching TV immediately!
      1. +2
        30 December 2025 18: 02
        Quote: Scaffold
        Your diagnosis: "Acute Soloviev's syndrome of the brain." Stop watching TV immediately!

        Read about the history of the Boer War. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.
    2. +5
      30 December 2025 16: 09
      Things were more complicated there: they were planning to drive off the Santa Fe, and put the Argentines under escort to help with this matter, but the boat was a little battered, something went wrong. Artuso started yelling in Spanish at his English colleague, who started yelling at him, and the marine, looking at all this nervousness, decided that the Argentine was sinking the boat, and well...
      1. 0
        31 December 2025 00: 53
        Quote: Georgy Tomin
        The marine, looking at all this nervousness, decided that the Argentine was sinking the boat, and so...

        What, didn't it occur to me to just hit him over the head with the butt of a rifle? That's more like a demonstration: "I have a Maxim, and you don't." So that the others won't look so proud and will obey the first time.
      2. 0
        31 December 2025 07: 11
        And there were no problems. If you were captured, don't yelp.
    3. -1
      10 January 2026 19: 32
      How do you live with this mess in your head?
  10. -5
    30 December 2025 14: 20
    Are these "warriors" seriously planning to fight us? I don't understand—are they stupid? (M. Zadornov)
    1. +3
      30 December 2025 16: 10
      I wouldn't say they were stupid, it's just that there wasn't time to properly work out an operation plan; everything was in a rush, the units hadn't had any combat coordination, and they screwed up with all the proletarian hatred...
    2. 0
      31 December 2025 07: 14
      If you think that ours are smarter, you are very much mistaken.
      Let's say you land special forces on a godforsaken island, who knows where, and where no one's ever been. Unless our guys request evacuation and drive out the Args. But they'd grab more than enough of everything else.
      1. -1
        31 December 2025 20: 26
        Quote: MCmaximus
        If you think that ours are smarter, you are very much mistaken.
        Let's say you land special forces on a godforsaken island, who knows where, and where no one's ever been. Unless our guys request evacuation and drive out the Args. But they'd grab more than enough of everything else.

        Serpentine
        1. 0
          31 December 2025 20: 45
          How do you manage to write such short comments?
    3. -1
      31 December 2025 09: 04
      Quote from: voland_1
      Are these "warriors" seriously planning to fight us? I don't understand—are they stupid? (M. Zadornov)

      The current state of the Russian Navy is much worse than the state of the Soviet Navy.
  11. +2
    30 December 2025 14: 51
    Not Redford-Brown, but Reford-Brown.
  12. 0
    31 December 2025 00: 34
    Soviet special forces look at their British colleagues with bewilderment.
  13. 0
    31 December 2025 06: 59
    Argentina, with its five (FIVE!) anti-ship missiles and four carriers, nearly overwhelmed the "mistress of the seas," which enjoyed a vast advantage at sea. But Argentina's moronic admirals outnumbered them. As a result, the "Falklands" remained "Falklands," and the junta got its ass kicked.
    1. -1
      31 December 2025 20: 55
      Somehow, this doesn't seem to be happening. The English took out the Args easily. Not without losses. But still.
      Just because we came to war, we have to fight.
      To criticize them, one must imagine a war at such a distance from the metropolis.
  14. +2
    31 December 2025 07: 10
    One thing English sailors can always be praised for is their determination. If there's an enemy, go ahead and sink them. Politics is a gimmick, negotiations are expediency...
    And here's the result! Apparently, Nelson's legacy is actually more important there than the orders of his superiors and other considerations.