Military Review

In Turkey, presented a new infantry fighting vehicle Tulpar

68
Turkish company Otokar has introduced a new 30-ton Tulpar infantry fighting vehicle. Turkish industry has demonstrated another achievement, in addition to promising tank Altay also created the new Tulpar infantry fighting vehicle, which is yet another breakthrough in the armored industry. The word "Tulpar" in translation means a winged horse.


In Turkey, presented a new infantry fighting vehicle Tulpar


The BMP platform is a modular design and can later become the basis for various special tools. According to the concept, the BMP "Tulpar" is similar to the Swedish infantry fighting vehicle CV-90.

Arms BMP is a combat module «Mizrak 30» with remote control. Armed with a 30 mm caliber cannon and a 7,62 mm caliber twin machine gun.

To increase the level of security of the machine, in addition to the main armor, mounted modules of composite armor of various manufacturers and active protection complexes (KAZ) can be used.

The new BMP will be demonstrated in Istanbul on May 7-10 at the IDEF 2013 exhibition.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 4 May 2013 07: 26 New
    +6
    Thanks to the author for the information, but here at the end of the message it was better to write - "To be continued", since by and large it is slightly informative, there is no specificity on the main performance characteristics of this BMP. But the main thing is Turkey’s clear desire to independently produce weapons for its army, which indicates its increased industrial power and ambitions ...
    1. xetai9977
      xetai9977 4 May 2013 10: 29 New
      +9
      In addition to this machine there will be more new items, for example, the new "Cobra". Photos have already been published.
      1. bask
        bask 4 May 2013 11: 05 New
        +8
        In Turkey, presented a new infantry fighting vehicle Tulpar

        What can I say, well done. Do not pi ... (((verbiage)) do not steal, but do their job. Rearm their army with modern weapons. Without high-profile statements and cheap PR.
        Without inventing anything themselves, they receive a production license ((((as a faithful ally of the United States))) and do-produce. But they don’t, clone, like the Chinese, but make their own design changes. Adapting it for wars in this theater of operations ((take into account the experience of their longtime ally, Israel))))
        Tank ,, Altai ,, --- Yu.Koysky K-2, Black Panther ,, self-propelled gun Turkish 155-mm self-propelled gun T-155 Firtina - South Korean self-propelled gun ,, Thunder ,,
        BTR ,, Pars ,, Amerovsky - GPV "" Colonel'4 / 4'6 / 6

        / 8/8/10/10,, capital
        en ,, colonel ,, general ,,
        GPV Colonel 8/8 armored personnel carrier

        Turkish Pars ,,, find 10 differences.? ,,
        1. ayyildiz
          4 May 2013 11: 45 New
          +7
          49% FNSS is owned by BAE sistems!
        2. Kars
          Kars 4 May 2013 11: 54 New
          +4
          Quote: bask
          Tank ,, Altai ,, --- Yu.Koyskiy K-2

          Black Panther should not be offended, the Turk will definitely be worse.
          A BMP is similar to most NATO ones, for example, Italians. Or Austrian lancers.
          1. bask
            bask 4 May 2013 14: 29 New
            +1
            Quote: Kars
            A BMP is similar to most NATO ones, for example, Italians. Or Austrian lancers.

            Turks could instead SV-90 ((BAE Systems)) use GSh from .CAU ,, Thunder ,,
            K-21 BMP.Yu. Korea.
            1. Akim
              Akim 4 May 2013 15: 33 New
              +4
              Quote: bask
              bask

              Agree here the chassis is important. and then you can put anything. Like the Poles to the new Chariot crawler platform.
              1. bask
                bask 4 May 2013 19: 38 New
                +4
                Quote: Akim
                Agree here the chassis is important.

                I agree, the main chassis, with good carrying capacity. And modularity in the design of the main gearbox.
                I would give another example, the Swedish SEP, with the unification of wheeled and tracked chassis. FMV and Hägglunds, the developers of Swedish armored vehicles. SEP is the next generation multi-functional, modular platform. Modules included in the SEP: BTR base, command and reconnaissance point, medical station, radar, electronic warfare, mortar, mine clearance, repair and evacuation, platform for anti-tank and anti-aircraft systems. Ballistic protection, from caliber bullets up to 14,5 mm and 155 mm shell fragments. The main emphasis is placed on protection against IEDs and min. Additional hinged reservation and remote sensing can be installed. Weight -14 tons, payload-6 tons.
      2. ayyildiz
        4 May 2013 11: 53 New
        +5
        URAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  2. Sirs
    Sirs 4 May 2013 08: 06 New
    +3
    When will we break the stereotypical deadlock and create a new BMP ???
    1. Akim
      Akim 4 May 2013 09: 38 New
      +4
      Quote: Sirs
      and create a new BMP

      I wish to create as soon as possible, because our generals will not move until Russia has this.
    2. vostok1982
      vostok1982 4 May 2013 10: 20 New
      +2
      Create - "Kurgan".
    3. Retriever
      Retriever 4 May 2013 10: 22 New
      -2
      And what do you mean by new. What performance characteristics should she have?
      BMP-3m in my opinion out of competition.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 4 May 2013 10: 30 New
        +3
        In it, the way out of the landing does not meet the realities of today.
        1. bask
          bask 4 May 2013 11: 18 New
          +1
          Quote: Spade
          her way out of the landing absolutely does not meet the realities of today.

          What is true is true. Only aft exit, MTO in the nose. BMP BWP-200 Poland, based on the MT-SM USSR crawler chassis. Created in 1999.
          We have a crawler chassis MT-SM, standing on pedestals ... 25 tons, carrying capacity 12 tons, ready BMP.

        2. Retriever
          Retriever 4 May 2013 11: 49 New
          0
          And what answers? Answer already deployed.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 4 May 2013 12: 20 New
            +2
            Aft exit with hydraulic ramp and emergency door
            1. Retriever
              Retriever 4 May 2013 17: 07 New
              -3
              Quote: Spade
              Aft exit with hydraulic ramp and emergency door

              A ladder does not help? Do you need a ramp? Maybe then you need to replace the chairs with massage? then the fighters will always be in good shape.
              By the way, very often our fighters ride on armor, they need inflatable slides how to make airplanes.
              1. bask
                bask 4 May 2013 19: 56 New
                +5
                Quote: Retriever
                Maybe then you need to replace the chairs with massage

                Armchairs need mine action.
                And not the armor, at 21 they don’t sit, they go- SNIPERS however ((Syria example)) For this, we need armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, with mine protection.
                Mine armchair KamAZ ,, Typhoon ,,
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 4 May 2013 20: 11 New
                  +3
                  Massage also does not hurt.
              2. Lopatov
                Lopatov 4 May 2013 20: 10 New
                +3
                Short flight of stairs on the BMP? This is something new
                Massage chairs would be nice. If you rode on armor, you would know how, after two hours of driving, the spine is poured into underpants, and the legs do not hold
          2. bask
            bask 4 May 2013 12: 55 New
            +6
            Developed in the USSR, GSH.MT-MS.Moglo could serve to create an armored personnel carrier and a family of machines based on them.
            Like the bourgeois in Germany. The German company FFG demonstrated its new 5 G-2012 machine. Created by a German company as a private initiative. !!! Previously, the FFG carried out only major repairs and modernization of armored vehicles. BTR G-5, created using individual units and assemblies Leopard 1 and 2. BTR G-5 is characterized by increased mine protection, similar to those used in machines of class MRAP. The G5 armored personnel carrier has a modular design, which makes it possible to create a family of vehicles on its basis. That allows in the field to change the purpose of the machine. Due to the modularity in the design, the price of the armored personnel carrier and its operation is reduced. The weight of the basic armored personnel carrier is 25 tons, the carrying capacity is 6,5 tons ((our MT-SM has 12 tons !!))) the landing compartment has a volume of 14,5 m3, cargo. BTR 2 + 10 landing .. MTO in the nose, to the right of the driver, diesel power of 560 hp Behind the driver is a place arrow. Chassis; twelve road wheels ((six on each side))). Rollers and some other elements of the car are borrowed from Leopard 1. The speed along the highway is 72 km / h, the power reserve is 600 km. Here such an upgrade is the consciousness of modern armored vehicles at outdated units !!!
            What is stopping Russia from doing this on the finished MT-SM GSH ???



            1. Retriever
              Retriever 4 May 2013 16: 58 New
              +1
              And why this coffin with glasses to the troops. Drive comfortably to the venue of the counter-terrorist operation.
              Pluses are very large lounge.
              The cons are large, it is easy to hit from ATGMs, the Driver can also be shot from a heavy machine gun, it is problematic to jump from the armor. It does not swim, the weapons are poor.
              Personally, my verdict can be used to disperse demonstrations. If you strengthen the armor (so that the PRURs hold) and put a rapid-firing gun with large elevation angles, it can be used in urban battles.
              1. Lopatov
                Lopatov 4 May 2013 20: 13 New
                +4
                This is an armored personnel carrier. He has just one task - to bring. And inside.

                The task of protection against RPGs and anti-tank systems is easily solved by a complex of active protection. Which the Germans have.
    4. Zlyden.Zlo
      Zlyden.Zlo 4 May 2013 19: 14 New
      +1
      and what do you think it should be?
  3. dmi32167
    dmi32167 4 May 2013 08: 24 New
    +1
    Quote: Sirs
    When will we break the stereotypical deadlock and create a new BMP ???

    so who does not give you? own laziness?
  4. tomket
    tomket 4 May 2013 08: 27 New
    +1
    Matilda outwardly reminded.
    1. shark
      shark 4 May 2013 09: 13 New
      +1
      By the way, yes! I was trying to remember what it reminds me of
  5. Professor
    Professor 4 May 2013 08: 34 New
    +3
    ... which is another breakthrough in the armored industry

    Let's google it and find out who ripped off the next typewriter.

    PS
    To increase the level of security of the machine, in addition to the main armor, mounted modules of composite armor of various manufacturers and active protection complexes (KAZ) can be used.

    Maybe only someone will give them KAZ. Russia?
    1. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 4 May 2013 08: 45 New
      +4
      The concept of the BMP "Tulpar" is similar to the Swedish infantry fighting vehicle CV-90.
      Here's a tip in the article.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Canep
      Canep 4 May 2013 08: 55 New
      +4
      Good to you Professor. It looks like the dad of this horse (tulpar is a mythical winged horse) M2 Bradley
      1. Professor
        Professor 4 May 2013 09: 11 New
        +4
        Quote: Canep
        Good to you Professor. It looks like the dad of this horse (tulpar is a mythical winged horse) M2 Bradley

        Happy you.
        Running is similar.

        video




        1. ayyildiz
          4 May 2013 11: 59 New
          +4
          As in the OTKAR it was declared that a lot of groundwork was used from ALTAI!
        2. itr
          itr 4 May 2013 21: 46 New
          +1
          But in my purest view, the deuce is only glamorous, only the rink alone is added respectively heavier and that’s not
    6. Akim
      Akim 4 May 2013 09: 46 New
      +4
      Quote: Professor
      Let's google it and find out who ripped off the next typewriter.

      The breakthrough is not that they themselves will establish a full-fledged serial production. Altay is also not their full-fledged development, but not their import - this is already good for the Turkish defense industry. And in general, artillery, armored vehicles. 5th generation helicopters and fighter (so far in the drawings)
      1. Professor
        Professor 4 May 2013 09: 53 New
        +6
        The screwdriver assembly in Turkey is well established, but with their original designs they haven’t yet. what is the 5th generation airplane? So far they are not even able to upgrade their aircraft and tank on their own. However, ambitions are observed and in the end it can give results.
        1. Akim
          Akim 4 May 2013 09: 59 New
          +2
          Quote: Professor
          However, ambitions are observed and in the end it can give results.

          And I talked about ambition. Not all of them patched with the help of the Israelites. You’ve created your shock UAV.
          1. Professor
            Professor 4 May 2013 10: 04 New
            +2
            Quote: Akim
            You’ve created your shock UAV.

            Own? wink

            Quote: Spade
            Germans. Or the Czechs.

            They only have light armored vehicles, and the Turkish papelats weighs like a tank.
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 4 May 2013 10: 15 New
              +2
              But does the weight of the car really matter for KAZ?
              The Czechs created for the tank and on its base, for light vehicles.
              Well, the German AWiSS - here it is on the Korean tank
              1. Professor
                Professor 4 May 2013 10: 49 New
                +1
                Quote: Spade
                But does the weight of the car really matter for KAZ?

                It has. German KAZ

                Rafael will release KAZ for cars
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 4 May 2013 11: 00 New
                  +2
                  This is ADS. The Germans also have AWiSS
                  1. Professor
                    Professor 4 May 2013 11: 13 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Spade
                    This is ADS. The Germans also have AWiSS

                    Yes, very much like IMI's Iron Fist




                    1. Lopatov
                      Lopatov 4 May 2013 12: 21 New
                      +1
                      Or maybe the other way around?
                      1. Professor
                        Professor 4 May 2013 12: 45 New
                        +1
                        You can’t look at the dates. IMI showed its system in 2006, and the Germans tested theirs a year later.

                        In June, at the Eurosatory 2006 in Paris, the Israeli company Israel Military Industries (IMI) demonstrated the Iron Fist Active Defense System.

                        The Iron Fist system is the result of twenty years of work in this area. It has already passed intensive tests - in particular, last year 150 survivability tests were carried out - protection against RPGs, cumulative shells and other weapons was tested.
                      2. Lopatov
                        Lopatov 4 May 2013 14: 59 New
                        +3
                        Yours first tested their system in 2006. And the Germans presented a ready-made system a year later. The Germans are smart, but I do not think that they created the device from scratch in 1 year.
                      3. Professor
                        Professor 4 May 2013 15: 05 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Spade
                        Yours first tested their system in 2006. And the Germans presented a ready-made system a year later. The Germans are smart, but I do not think that they created the device from scratch in 1 year.

                        Once again especially for you. In 2006, the IMI demonstrated a system that passed 150 tests. I omit the author’s words about "The Iron Fist system is the result of twenty years of work in this area."

                        The Germans only tested theirs in 2007. hi
                      4. Lopatov
                        Lopatov 4 May 2013 15: 20 New
                        +2
                        In fact, everywhere it is written about the first test in 2006, which are 150 tests.
                        Well, about the German-
                        In a recent testn conducted July 21, 2007 AWiSS operation was, demonstrated to high level German military and MOD representatives and international delegations, Diehl BGT Defense’s AWiSS active protection system successfully defeated a rapidly approaching MILAN anti-tank missile

                        The first tests were conducted with the participation of potential customers? Hard to believe. All tests and refinements for half a year? Even less
                      5. Professor
                        Professor 4 May 2013 15: 33 New
                        0
                        In fact, everywhere it is written about the first test in 2006, which are 150 tests.

                        IMI Demonstrates Iron Fist Active Protection Features
                      6. Lopatov
                        Lopatov 4 May 2013 15: 36 New
                        +3
                        In any case, the work was carried out at least in parallel and there can be no talk of any borrowing.
                      7. Professor
                        Professor 4 May 2013 15: 40 New
                        -1
                        Quote: Spade
                        In any case, the work was carried out at least in parallel and there can be no talk of any borrowing.

                        So be it. hi
  • Akim
    Akim 4 May 2013 10: 26 New
    +4
    Quote: Professor
    Own?

    For Pakistan.
    For yourself the SOM cruise missile (air-to-surface) - 200 km
  • ayyildiz
    4 May 2013 13: 50 New
    +7
    Turkish aerospace industry agency Aerospace Industries delivered three upgraded F-8 fighter planes to Pakistan on February 16, the Hürriyet Daily News reported.

    According to the report, the aircraft originally owned by the Pakistani Air Force were modernized in Turkey and delivered to Pakistan. The deputy commander of the Pakistan Air Force, General Asim Suleiman, said that Pakistan’s air defense was greatly enhanced by the modernization of these aircraft. The Ambassador of Pakistan to Turkey Muhammad Shawkat Harun noted that this project is a sign of friendship and unity of the governments of Turkey and Pakistan.

    Aerospace Industries was selected as a contractor at a tender held by the Pakistani Air Force, after which it signed a contract with the Pakistan Ministry of Defense in June 2009. As part of the modernization program, Aerospace Industries engineers and mechanics updated the avionics and structurally upgraded a total of the 41 F-16 fighter belonging to the Pakistan Air Force.

    According to the Hürriyet Daily News, it is expected that a program called Peace Drive II, which launched in October 2010 of the year, will be completed by September 2014 of the year. The necessary components, materials and technical data are provided by Aerospace Industries under another contract signed between the United States Government and the Pakistan Air Force.

    Recall that Aerospace Industries, which was created in 1984 for the production of F-16 aircraft for the Turkish air force, is one of the largest aerospace companies in the world involved in the production and modernization of F-16.
  • Beck
    Beck 4 May 2013 15: 02 New
    +9
    I would like to add one. Tulpar does not translate as a winged horse. In the Turkic epics, such a horse was not portrayed as Pegasus, with wings. The exact translation is a flying horse that can jump over entire fortresses in a jump.

    Of course it’s not essential, but I think cognitively.
  • Lopatov
    Lopatov 4 May 2013 09: 59 New
    +1
    Quote: Professor
    Maybe only someone will give them KAZ. Russia?

    Germans. Or the Czechs.
  • self-propelled
    self-propelled 4 May 2013 10: 24 New
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    Maybe only someone will give them KAZ. Russia?

    Ukraine. Garni lads all sell
  • barbiturate
    barbiturate 4 May 2013 08: 44 New
    +1
    Quote: Professor
    Let's google it and find out who ripped off the next typewriter.

    Exactly after all) Cheto looks like a German Puma like)
  • romb
    romb 4 May 2013 09: 09 New
    +5
    Turks are beginning to surprise. And what a native name!
    The machine will be quite heavy, from 35 to 45 tons.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • shark
    shark 4 May 2013 09: 18 New
    +6
    In appearance, pulls on a heavy BMP. I’m watching this technique becomes popular. And yet, don’t you think that there are too many messages from Turkey of this kind? Neighbors are arming themselves. They are no longer satisfied with the American and German second-hand. If you link this with the ever-increasing monologues of the Turks about the great Ottoman Empire, An alarming picture is obtained.
    1. xetai9977
      xetai9977 4 May 2013 10: 39 New
      +8
      No need to make an elephant out of a fly. Dreamers of the Ottoman Empire are treated the same as dreamers of the Roman Empire. Speaking of technology, every self-respecting state should provide for itself as much as possible. Yes, and industry is developing, technology is being mastered ,workplaces...
  • Andrew 121
    Andrew 121 4 May 2013 09: 26 New
    +2
    Damn, when I look at new foreign equipment, I always think ... I’d like to shoot at least RPG-7 at it and see what happens
    1. Sleptsoff
      Sleptsoff 4 May 2013 09: 47 New
      +3
      If they shot me from an RPG, I would rather be in the toolpit than in our aluminum coffin called BMP-4.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 4 May 2013 09: 57 New
        +2
        BMP-4? I have not heard of this.
        1. OTAKE
          OTAKE 4 May 2013 10: 37 New
          +4
          Quote: Spade
          BMP-4? I have not heard of this.

          He probably said about BMD, infastopots
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 4 May 2013 10: 48 New
            +2
            Psychic is cool.
      2. Retriever
        Retriever 4 May 2013 10: 18 New
        +2
        You can rivet a lot of these aluminum coffins. And from RPG-7 the tanks are normally blown up, the main thing is to take fresh ammunition. But the tank will cost many times more. Yes, and BMP-3m It can work out for air targets, and cover it from behind a hillock with artillery. And if the tank went to its direct fire, if the enemy has birds, you can bury.
        In general, if I had no choice, I was sitting in that which is equipped with dynamic and active protection. And the thickness of the cardboard does not matter.
        1. OTAKE
          OTAKE 4 May 2013 10: 36 New
          +2
          Quote: Retriever
          You can rivet a lot of these aluminum coffins. And from RPG-7 the tanks are normally blown up, the main thing is to take fresh ammunition. But the tank will cost many times more. Yes, and BMP-3m It can work out for air targets, and cover it from behind a hillock with artillery. And if the tank went to its direct fire, if the enemy has birds, you can bury.
          In general, if I had no choice, I was sitting in that which is equipped with dynamic and active protection. And the thickness of the cardboard does not matter.

          :)) Yesterday I knocked a couple of Abrams from a slingshot, into this .. like him .. well, who’s behind the tower, the engine, everyone talks about him, if we are talking about RPGs, they will definitely say about Abrams, the engine behind the tower and what to knock him out , this is a trifling matter, it’s kind of like you can break it with a shovel, in general, bullshit all these your tanks, only RPG-7 only hardcore
          1. Retriever
            Retriever 4 May 2013 11: 31 New
            +2
            Why didn’t you please the abrams? A normal car burns no worse than the rest. Here is the fire control system in it is good. Actually, the main idea was that the tank is an BMP, modern ATGMs make their way with a bang. So why pay more. But if you have not 1 tank but 3 BMPs, the Pturov might not be enough, and even after the first shot they might not let you shoot again.
        2. Sleptsoff
          Sleptsoff 6 May 2013 11: 35 New
          -1
          Are people riveted too? The point is not to save the equipment, but to save the crew, therefore the bourgeois make well-protected equipment because they care about their people, even to the detriment of some opportunities.
      3. Nick
        Nick 4 May 2013 20: 09 New
        0
        Quote: Sleptsoff
        If they shot me from an RPG, I would rather be in the toolpit than in our aluminum coffin called BMP-4

        And why not in the tank behind the stone wall?
        But seriously, you can not compare horseradish with the nose. Our aluminum BMDs are designed for airborne landing on parachute systems, floating. Their armor is designed to protect the landing from fragments and small arms. Their advantage is maneuverability, air transportability, buoyancy.
        The question is, what would you prefer to cross the water barrier on a floating aluminum BMD or on a 30-ton steel box that has an ax buoyancy?
  • mogus
    mogus 4 May 2013 10: 32 New
    +2
    Quote: Sleptsoff
    If they shot me from an RPG, I would rather be in the toolpit than in our aluminum coffin called BMP-4.


    That's agreed. You will be instead of a mannequin in tests in the tulpar.
    1. Sleptsoff
      Sleptsoff 6 May 2013 11: 27 New
      0
      And you're in bmd-4. Noticed.
  • Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 4 May 2013 10: 40 New
    -1
    As if with the new technology, the Turks had no illusions.
    Will have to reassure.
    1. xetai9977
      xetai9977 4 May 2013 11: 21 New
      +4
      dear why such aggressive notes?
      1. Retriever
        Retriever 4 May 2013 11: 33 New
        +1
        He is not about you, but about rulers.
      2. Dmitry 2246
        Dmitry 2246 4 May 2013 13: 16 New
        +2
        Why would a country from a mighty alliance have a huge army?
        Georgians didn’t resist.
  • ayyildiz
    4 May 2013 11: 50 New
    +5
    Cobra-2 !!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1. bask
      bask 4 May 2013 20: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: ayyildiz
      Cobra 2

      Another Turkish licensed copy (((with local characteristics))) Nimr 2 with a wheel formula of 4 / 4. Nimr 2 is a further development of the basic version of Nimr. On Nimr 2, STSNAG 3 circular ballistic protection, basic mine protection against IEDs of 6 kg per tonne. Diesel power 350 hp, carrying capacity increased to 2,5 tons.
      Multipurpose Nimr 2 armored vehicle


      Nimr 1
      1. ayyildiz
        4 May 2013 21: 02 New
        +6
        Quote: bask
        Another Turkish licensed copy (


        And where are they similar!
  • 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 4 May 2013 11: 56 New
    +1
    He smiled at the sight of GPV and Pars. It is interesting where they will ride with such clearance.
  • Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 4 May 2013 11: 57 New
    +1
    Very decent BMP. By the way, I would like our ours to create BMPs on the basis of the Namer armored personnel carrier by deploying the uninhabited Samon-30 turret, but alas, it does not fit into the concept of using our SV. request It's a pity.
  • ayyildiz
    4 May 2013 12: 15 New
    +4
    It looks like this inside!
  • honest jew
    honest jew 4 May 2013 13: 08 New
    +1
    smacks of plagiarism
  • astra
    astra 4 May 2013 15: 09 New
    +9
    It seems to me that our armored vehicles need to be manufactured as armored as possible to the airborne forces, of course, does not apply, since there are restrictions on dimensions and weight. With mine protection, DZ is desirable. crate. That is, to protect the soldier as much as possible. Fortunately, the achievements were already BTR-T, and BMP with DZ and armored personnel carriers with a crate.
  • astra
    astra 4 May 2013 15: 16 New
    +2
    In general, we need a separate tank for urban combat with dumps for production between the rubble, reinforced protection against RPGs because they will shoot at point blank range, the presence of a lath, dz thermal imager, a complex for identifying and suppressing optical devices and other useful devices
    1. Chicot 1
      Chicot 1 4 May 2013 19: 09 New
      +4
      Forget about any kind of separate "city", "mountain" and "sand-salt" tanks once and for all! These are all (to put it mildly) projective inventions that do not have any real and applied value under them.
  • Thomas A. Anderson
    Thomas A. Anderson 4 May 2013 15: 30 New
    +3
    Not bad, but there is no scientific breakthrough here, the usual BMP with modern systems
    1. astra
      astra 4 May 2013 15: 42 New
      +5
      This is so an example sketch. A tank in the future will be the Ministry of Defense ordered a tank for urban combat, here is the link: http: //armyprom.ru/news/razrabotki/693-minoborony-zakazalo-tank-dlya-goro
      dskogo-boya.html
  • tupolev-95
    tupolev-95 4 May 2013 16: 30 New
    +4
    The usual Western-style BMP is heavy, but it won’t save her from the RPG, the 30mm gun is already yesterday. Judging by everything, all the achievements are that the Turks made it themselves.
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay 4 May 2013 16: 46 New
      +3
      Quote: Tupolev-95
      The usual Western-style BMP is heavy, but it won’t save her from the RPG, the 30mm gun is already yesterday. Judging by everything, all the achievements are that the Turks made it themselves.

      Apparently, they were striving for this, given the creation of both a tank and a drone !!
      The main thing is that they have begun to produce their own and will not depend on * partners *, after which it will be possible to speak already of an independent foreign policy !!
      Already have a strong military industry, excellent engineers!
      The fact that the codes of Israeli drones were decoded, however, at the cost of his life, he says that well done !!
      1. tupolev-95
        tupolev-95 4 May 2013 17: 45 New
        +1
        You covered the political side of the news — I’m more interested in the technical one. After reading the new BMP in the title of the article, I was hoping that some new product would be implemented in this machine — for example, a new cannon with a caliber of 40 mm or more or some other innovation, but my expectations weren’t In addition, the article does not have detailed performance characteristics of the machine, but judging by the appearance, nothing unusual is expected.
        1. Yarbay
          Yarbay 4 May 2013 20: 40 New
          +3
          Quote: Tupolev-95
          You covered the political side of the news — I’m more interested in the technical one. After reading the new BMP in the title of the article, I was hoping that some new product would be implemented in this machine — for example, a new cannon with a caliber of 40 mm or more or some other innovation, but my expectations weren’t In addition, the article does not have detailed performance characteristics of the machine, but judging by the appearance, nothing unusual is expected.

          I understand you and agree with you somewhere!
          I just don’t think that Turkey at this stage of its development expects to create something revolutionary in military technology!
          As for the performance characteristics, I think we will find out after the exhibition, that is, they will definitely say at the exhibition !!
    2. Retriever
      Retriever 4 May 2013 17: 15 New
      0
      They hang on any pair of Pturovs, so they are part of the standard armament, but they did not put a large-caliber gun for artillery support fire yesterday.
  • pinecone
    pinecone 4 May 2013 16: 45 New
    +3
    It is noteworthy that OTOKAR developed this machine on its own initiative.
    They plan to offer it to the Turkish army as a means of supporting the Altai main battle tank, as well as to potential foreign buyers. According to a company representative, it is suitable for transportation by air on the new Airbus A400 turboprop.
    See video http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xzjwve_tulpar-gorucuye-cykty_news
  • gggif
    gggif 5 May 2013 03: 58 New
    0
    Quote: astra
    This is so an example sketch. A tank in the future will be the Ministry of Defense ordered a tank for urban combat, here is the link: http: //armyprom.ru/news/razrabotki/693-minoborony-zakazalo-tank-dlya-goro

    dskogo-boya.html

    Good initiative