The Death of the Titan

119 998 62
The Death of the Titan

On June 18, 2023, the Titan submersible, persistently but completely incorrectly referred to in the media as a "bathyscaphe" (journalists, learn your stuff!), perished in the Northwest Atlantic at a depth of approximately 3800 meters. The five people on board perished along with it.

Numerous media reports and videos have appeared about this event, but most are untrustworthy, and their authors are unfamiliar with the subject. Therefore, we will turn to a reliable source.



On August 4, 2025, the United States Coast Guard (USCG) released the results of its investigation into the circumstances and causes of the incident: “Report of the Marine Board of Investigation Into the Implosion of the Submersible TITAN (CG1788361) in the North Atlantic Ocean Near the Wreck Site of the RMS TITANIC Resulting in the Loss of Five Lives on June 18, 2023.”

In this article I will try to briefly outline the contents of this document, I think that it will be of interest not only to specialists, but also to fans of marine technology and its stories.

OceanGate Inc., a privately held American company based in Everett, Washington, was founded in 2009 with the initial goal of creating a small fleet five-seater commercial underwater vehicles that would be rented to organizations or individuals for scientific research or tourism.

The company acquired its first manned submersible, the Antipodes (with a diving depth of 305 meters), in 2010. Between 2010 and 2013, the vehicle conducted approximately 130 dives, with each underwater tourist paying between $7500 and $40000. In 2018, OceanGate put the Antipodes up for sale.

In 2012, Boeing and OceanGate signed an agreement to conduct a preliminary feasibility study for the CYCLOPS submersible concept, featuring a robust hull made of carbon fiber composite and titanium. On October 21 of the following year, Boeing presented a report on the results of the work performed in accordance with the customer's requirements (operating depth of up to 8600 m, robust hull made of composite materials).

With an operational diving depth of 8600 meters and a safety factor of 1,5, the wall thickness of the cylindrical pressure hull, made of carbon fiber composite, was required to be at least 81,3 mm. The report specifically noted that one of the most critical components of the design is the adhesive bond between the composite hull and the titanium segments.

Surface preparation was critical, and little was known about the bond strength of titanium and carbon fiber. While shear strength may be less critical due to compressive loads at the bond line, compressive loads at depth will be higher than those typically observed in adhesive bonds. The report emphasizes the need for further research to understand how this type of bond behaves under these conditions and how applied loads affect the adhesive bond.


Conceptual image of the deep-sea vehicle "Cyclops" (Boeing)

In 2015, Cyclops 1 (with a diving depth of 500 meters), developed by OceanGate in collaboration with Washington State University and Boeing, entered service. Both Antipodes and Cyclops 1 had a pressure steel hull. They were followed by Cyclops 2, later renamed Titan.


Antipodes


Cyclops 1

Let's start with the technical description of Titan. It was developed by OceanGate in collaboration with NASA, Washington State University, and Boeing and became operational in 2018. The cost of designing, building, and testing the vehicle was approximately $5 million.

Initially, the submersible's robust hull was planned to be constructed entirely of carbon fiber. In 2015-2016, a series of tests were conducted on 1:3 scale models. These tests revealed the unreliability of the carbon fiber spherical ends, so the decision was made to manufacture them from titanium.


Damage to the carbon fiber spherical end of the Titan model (marked in red). Depth: 2943 m


One of the models destroyed during testing

During model tests, the maximum safe diving depth achieved was 4200 m, which is 4400 m less than planned.

The carbon fiber pressure hull was manufactured by Spencer Composites from March to October 2017. Its length was 2540 mm, its outside diameter was 1676 mm, its operating pressure was 464 kg/cm², its safety factor was 2,25, and its weight was 2722 kg.

The construction process utilized alternating impregnated carbon fibers and unidirectional epoxy fabrics in the axial direction, as well as wet circular winding of carbon fiber and epoxy resin. Grafil 37-800 carbon fibers, Epon Resin 682 epoxy resin, and Lindride LS-81K hardener were used. The structure consisted of a total of 480 layers, with a hull wall thickness of 127 mm. The hull was formed on a stainless steel mandrel. To protect against seawater, the hull was coated externally with a 5 mm layer of polyurethane, and a fiberglass insert was installed internally, preventing moisture condensation but preventing visibility of the composite portion of the pressure hull.

In the optimized design presented in Boeing's feasibility study, the carbon fiber body thickness was 7 inches. However, OceanGate reduced this thickness to 5 inches for the final Titan design, with the key difference being the exclusion of 45-degree plies from the final carbon fiber layup. Boeing's preliminary report indicated that deformation tolerance tables did not support layup patterns without 45-degree plies. Despite this, the final Titan design used only circumferential and axial plies of carbon fiber, but none of the project participants interviewed by MBI could explain why the 45-degree plies were excluded.




Winding carbon fiber onto a mandrel


Removing the mandrel

In 2021, due to the appearance of fatigue cracks in the composite part of the pressure hull, it was replaced.
Following replacement of the composite portion of the pressure hull, it was tested at the Deep Ocean Test Facility in Bethesda, Maryland, in March 2021. The maximum depth reached during testing was 4200 m.


Titan during testing

The titanium hull components (Grade 3 titanium, with a tensile strength of approximately 480 MPa) were manufactured by Titanium Fabrication Corp. The bow and stern titanium hemispheres were 1524 mm in diameter and 83 mm thick. The ends of the composite pressure hull were bonded to titanium rings, to which the hemispheres were bolted. The 1680 kg bow hemisphere, which could be folded to the right for crew embarkation and equipment loading, had an opening for a 318 mm diameter window.


Nasal hemisphere


A titanium ring with epoxy adhesive is installed on a composite part of a robust housing

HYSOL® EA 9394, a two-component epoxy adhesive also known as LOCTITE® EA 9394 AERO, was used for bonding. This adhesive was applied to the carbon fiber hull ends and to the C-shaped grooves in the fore and aft titanium rings. The C-shaped profile measured approximately 35 mm deep and 127 mm wide, tapering slightly at a depth of 122 mm into the recess.


C-shaped groove in a titanium ring


Folding nose hemisphere

Four so-called “penetrators” were attached to the aft hemisphere, serving for the hermetically sealed entry of electrical cables, hydraulic pipelines, and high-pressure air.


One of the "penetrators"


Inspection of the acrylic window mounting location in the forward hemisphere

The acrylic glass porthole (also known as plexiglass or organic glass) was 380 mm in diameter and 180 mm thick and was manufactured by Hydrospace Group Inc. at a cost of $33,450. The porthole was intended to comply with ASME (The American Society of Mechanical Engineers) PVHO-1 (Safety Standard for Pressure Vessels for Human Occupancy) standards. However, at the request of OceanGate management, its shape was modified: the inner surface was made flat instead of spherical "to improve visibility." Since the non-standard glass shape requires extensive testing (up to 10 years) for certification, OceanGate waived this requirement. Therefore, the manufacturer guaranteed its durability only for depths of up to 650 m.

In 2020, Heinz Fritz GmbH manufactured a new glass pane of similar design to replace the one damaged in the fall. Its design pressure limit corresponded to a depth of 4200 meters.


Porthole glass according to ASME PVHO-1 standard (bottom) and actual (top)


Titan's porthole glass


Porthole assembly


"Risk zones" of the pressure hull

Attached to the Titan's robust body was a chassis. It was designed to both mount the apparatus on a horizontal surface and to carry cameras, lighting equipment, scanning systems, and other components that could be jettisoned to reduce weight in an emergency.

Attached to the aft section of the pressure hull was a permeable, conical compartment approximately 1,5 m long, which housed two batteries, a high-pressure air tank, various equipment, including a telemetry system, and buoyancy blocks made of synthetic foam.


Aft compartment (fairing removed)

The ballast system was designed for trimming, diving, and surfacing the vehicle. It consisted of a combination ballast tank and jettisonable weights. An elastic "bag," open at the bottom, was installed in the upper part of the hull, serving as the ballast tank. Together with the high-pressure air system (HPA), it ensured the desired underwater state of positive, neutral, or negative buoyancy. The purge and ventilation valves of the ballast "bag" were controlled by a computer, ensuring the desired level of buoyancy. A supply of HPA, under a pressure of approximately 700 kg/cm², was stored in a 40-liter cylinder.


Sandbag"


Placement of the high-pressure cylinder (indicated by the yellow arrow)


Ballast bag control panel

Before boarding the Titan, all passengers and their equipment were weighed. Based on the combined weight of the crew and the spacecraft, lead weights were added to the landing gear to achieve optimal buoyancy before the dive. Additionally, trim weights were provided in the form of steel pipe sections weighing a total of 180 kg. These could be individually jettisoned using electric drives or an emergency hydraulic drive with a hand pump. In an emergency, the landing gear, along with all attached weights, could be jettisoned to quickly lighten the Titan.


Trimming weights


Control panel for hydraulics for dumping cargo and chassis

For emergency ascent, additional weights were attached to the Titan via a rapidly dissolving anode. The anode dissolved within 24 hours, and the weights were jettisoned.

To maintain the required atmospheric oxygen composition, there was one main and four reserve oxygen tanks (pressure 176 kg/cm²), housed inside the pressure hull and providing up to 96 hours of life support for five crew members. Oxygen supply was manually regulated using a flow meter at a rate of 0,5 liters per minute per person. Electronic oxygen sensors installed inside the apparatus were used to monitor the oxygen content.

CO² levels were continuously monitored by the Titan's control system, and a backup emergency monitoring system was provided in case of control system failure. A scrubber filled with Sofnolime® absorbent was used to remove CO². Air was pumped through it by an electric fan. Emergency CO² removal was accomplished using lithium hydroxide (LiOH) blankets.

A propulsion system consisting of four (two vertical and two horizontal) Innerspace 1002HL Hexscreen Electric Thrusters with 12 hp electric drives served for vertical and horizontal movement. The apparatus' horizontal speed reached three knots.


One of the propulsion units (thruster)

The propulsion motors were powered by two external Ictineu Li-Po® 150V lithium-polymer batteries, rated for full submersibility. One battery powered the vertical motors, and the other the horizontal motors, providing 27 hours of operation.


Ictineu Li-Po® Battery

An internal 24V battery pack powered auxiliary systems. It consisted of four sealed 6V lead-acid batteries.

The electronic equipment consisted of:
- INS/USBL (inertial navigation system/ultrasonic positioning system) from Advanced Navigation
- Teledyne BlueView 2D sonar (90-degree field of view, target detection range up to 300 m)
- Teledyne Doppler Velocity Log
- 2G Robotics Dynamic Underwater Laser Scanner (ULS-500 PRO)
- Outboard photo and video cameras, internal video camera
- Real Time Hull Health Monitoring (RTM) — a system for continuous monitoring of the hull's condition
- Management and control computers
- Four underwater LED lights (40,000 lumens)
There was no underwater voice communication system; communication with the surface could only be maintained via short messages. The maximum text message size was 64 bytes, which typically equates to 64 characters or approximately 10-13 words.

During underwater operations, OceanGate used acoustic telemetry modems from various manufacturers for communications and vessel tracking systems. An ultra-short baseline (USBL) transceiver installed on the submersible support vessel used acoustic signals to determine the range and bearing to tracking targets. The USBL transceiver measured the elapsed time since the transponder received the signal and then converted this time into distance. Using multiple converters, the support vessel's transceiver could calculate the angle to any installed transponder.

One modem was to be installed on the Titan, and a second modem was planned to be placed on the seabed near the Titanic wreck as an acoustic beacon for future dives.

The RTM system was developed and patented by OceanGate executive R.S. Rush and was intended to provide the submersible's pilot with real-time hull monitoring. It consisted of a set of acoustic sensors and strain gauges placed throughout the hull. Signals from the sensors were amplified and converted into digital data. This stream of digitized acoustic emission and hull deformation data was sent to the Titan's main computer for further processing and analysis. Hull condition information was displayed in real time as color-coded bar graphs (green, yellow, and red) for each sensor, indicating whether the readings were within acceptable limits.

The thresholds were set by Rush himself. Green meant the dive could continue normally, yellow meant the dive could be continued with caution, and red meant the dive should be aborted immediately and the diver returned to the surface.

A serious flaw in the system was the fact that the fiberglass insert of the pressure hull blocked access to the sensors. This meant that at the time of the fatal dive, only five of the eight acoustic sensors were operational.






Location of sensors for the Real Time Hull Health Monitoring system




Acoustic sensor and strain gauge of the Real Time Hull Health Monitoring system




Titan's exterior


Inside the Titan


Titan control panel


Titan's control and management system computer


The Titan's control and management computer is bolted directly to the carbon fiber reinforced plastic housing, which reduces its strength.




Information about Titan

Titan was owned by CYCLOPS II LLC (Seattle, Washington, USA), chartered by OceanGate Inc. (Everett, Washington, USA), and operated by OceanGate Expeditions (Providence, Bahamas).

It was discovered that the apparatus had been built and operated "without being registered, certified, inspected or classified by any national or international flag administration or recognised organisation."

According to U.S. Coast Guard policy, certified submersibles—small passenger vessels—are limited to a maximum diving depth of 150 feet (45,7 m), as this is considered the maximum depth to which scuba divers can dive for rescue operations. However, U.S. Coast Guard policy does not set any maximum operating depth limits for special-purpose submersibles.

After numerous interactions with various US Coast Guard units, Rush realized that OceanGate's submersibles did not meet the Coast Guard's strict small passenger vessel certification requirements, prompting OceanGate to reclassify its passengers as "mission specialists," ostensibly performing scientific tasks to conceal its illegal passenger operations. However, Rush never took any steps to certify the Titan. OceanGate's approach to regulatory compliance represented a blatant disregard for oversight by classification societies, state, and federal agencies.

As OceanGate prepared for its maiden expedition to the Titanic site in 2018, the Director of Marine Operations was tasked with inspecting the Cyclops II submersible, later renamed Titan. On January 18, 2018, he submitted a report highlighting critical safety issues. The Director of Operations made clear that the transfer of the submersible from the engineering team to the operations team was the appropriate time to address the safety concerns. In his report, he listed 26 components requiring corrective action or further attention, expressing concern that until these issues were addressed, the submersible should not be used in any upcoming trials. The Director of Marine Operations believed it was important to document these findings and ensure that OceanGate management took them seriously before the submersible was placed into operational service with personnel on board.

Management's response was immediate. On January 23, 2018, OceanGate fired its Director of Marine Operations. The dismissal letter stated: "During a meeting on the afternoon of January 19th, it became clear to [OceanGate CEO/Secretary of the Board of Directors, R.S. Rush] that you and he had reached an impasse regarding the status of Cyclops II and that your dismissal was the only option. Given your qualifications, we are confident that you will soon find another position."


Richard Stockton Rush III (1962–2023) was the CEO of OceanGate and one of its founders. Photo taken in 2015.

In January 2018, Titan's assembly was completed, and its test dives soon began, first in waters off Washington State and then in the Bahamas. These were conducted both unmanned and with a crew. On December 12, 2018, Titan, with R.S. Rush aboard, reached a depth of 3939 meters.
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    28 December 2025 05: 38
    The sharks of capitalism, in pursuit of profit, violate all human, economic, political, and engineering laws.
    One can understand space tourists, but sitting with a barrel at a depth of 4 km is a pleasure for masochists.
    1. +6
      28 December 2025 08: 22
      But sitting with a barrel at a depth of 4 km is a pleasure for masochists.

      Ballard, Sagalevich, Cameron are masochists??? laughing Rather, questions for the manufacturer of the device, no? hi
      1. +5
        28 December 2025 08: 43
        These respected people sat in the barrel and did their job, and those who died in Titan climbed into it for the sensations!
        1. +3
          28 December 2025 08: 50
          and did their job

          I would call them romantics, because their choice of profession plays a certain role here, right? Ballard even had a dream - to find the Titanic.
          The Titans climbed into her for sensations
          I disagree. Rather, it's a desire to see the legendary ship with my own eyes.
      2. +1
        30 December 2025 09: 16
        Ballard, Sagalevich, and Cameron—masochists??? laughing. More questions for the manufacturer of the device, no? hi
        To get involved with where Boeing put its hand, it’s not enough to be a masochist, you also have to be 100% suicidal.
        So I seriously doubt the sanity of those mentioned above. They're either completely nuts, or clueless and ignorant idiots. Trusting your life to a company with the unspoken motto "Other people's lives are nothing—profit is everything!" is, to put it mildly, a very shady experience.
        1. 0
          30 December 2025 12: 12
          Quote: Saturn VII
          To get involved with where Boeing put its hand, it’s not enough to be a masochist, you also have to be 100% suicidal.

          It was even worse there - Boeing itself considered the OceanGate-modified pressure hull design to be unsafe. laughing
          In the optimized design presented in Boeing's feasibility study, the carbon fiber body thickness was 7 inches. However, OceanGate reduced this thickness to 5 inches for the final Titan design, with the key difference being the elimination of 45-degree layers from the final carbon fiber layup. Boeing's preliminary report indicated that the allowable deformation tables did not support layup patterns without 45-degree plies..
    2. +2
      28 December 2025 19: 00
      Quote: andrewkor
      The sharks of capitalism, in pursuit of profit, violate all human, economic, political, and engineering laws.
      These are not sharks, these are stupid people Capitalism. Forget about calculations, ignore the experts' opinions, and dive 4 kilometers deep...
      By the way, I still don't understand why they were so upset with steel, why they decided to mess around with composites? I don't think they were supposed to fly.
      1. +2
        28 December 2025 23: 19
        By the way, I still don’t understand why they didn’t like steel, why did they decide to mess around with composites?

        And who's going to anneal and grind their steel spheres, and most importantly, at what cost? Titan is a homemade garage joint with a projected profit margin of thousands of percent. The target audience was wealthy clients who hadn't even gotten their feet wet in the industry.

        It seems they didn't need to fly.

        So flying is actually a piece of cake laughing Leonov - look, he flew into outer space wearing just a spacesuit ;)
        1. +1
          29 December 2025 23: 55
          Yes, in general, only 5 million $$ for the development and production of the first model is very alarming... Unrealistic for America and for such a device.
      2. +2
        29 December 2025 19: 45
        Composites are lighter, meaning both the device itself and its transportation costs are lower. Greed was the undoing of the sucker.
        1. 0
          30 December 2025 09: 33
          Transportation has nothing to do with it. They'd have to transport ballast along with the apparatus anyway to achieve neutral buoyancy. And the weight of the apparatus plus ballast depends on its volume, nothing else. You don't think the ballast was sand from the nearest beach, do you?
  2. +5
    28 December 2025 06: 04
    Looking at the body in section, it is immediately noticeable that an egg shape is more appropriate than a cylinder shape.
    1. +8
      28 December 2025 06: 21
      Quote: mark1
      Looking at the body in section, it is immediately noticeable that an egg shape is more appropriate than a cylinder shape.

      Only a ball can reach such a depth
      1. +4
        28 December 2025 06: 28
        Quote: Konnick
        Only a ball can reach such a depth

        A ball is the most correct, but considering that for some reason they needed an oblong shape, I thought of an egg.
        1. +3
          28 December 2025 08: 15
          The ball is the most correct, n

          Well, our *Worlds* are also far from spherical in shape. bully , nevertheless, they also worked successfully on *Bismarck*! 4875 meters.
          1. +6
            28 December 2025 08: 28
            Quote: ArchiPhil
            The ball is the most correct, n

            Well, our *Worlds* are also far from spherical in shape. bully , nevertheless, they also worked successfully on *Bismarck*! 4875 meters.

            From wiki
            Spherical The apparatus nacelle, with a diameter of 2,1 m, is made of martensitic, high-alloy steel with 18% nickel. The alloy has a yield strength of 150 kg/mm² (titanium has a yield strength of about 79 kg/mm²). Manufacturer: the Finnish company Lokomo, part of the Rauma-Repola concern.
            1. +5
              28 December 2025 08: 30
              Spherical gondola

              Yes, I got carried away! recourse
            2. 0
              29 December 2025 23: 57
              And the thickness? Please indicate!
      2. +9
        28 December 2025 09: 09
        Quote: Konnick
        Only a ball can reach such a depth

        It's better not to go to such a depth.

        Everything can be seen with the help of cameras, the thrill is not worth it.
        1. +2
          28 December 2025 09: 33
          It's better not to go to such a depth.
          Jean Picard and Don Walsh would disagree with you, Andrey! laughing
          1. +6
            28 December 2025 12: 20
            these are the problems of Picard and Walsh laughing
          2. 0
            29 December 2025 23: 59
            But back then there were no cameras like the modern ones.
      3. + 14
        28 December 2025 09: 54
        I was at the Krylov Center in St. Petersburg for work. They have underwater vehicle testing chambers there. The hydraulic units produce ~800 and ~1400 atm, respectively, down to 14 km. I saw a crushed steel model of a bathyscaphe there, an elongated shape.
        In general, the center conducts interesting research on ship models in experimental tanks, examining how a hull shape can improve a ship's or vessel's performance. There's also a landscape wind tunnel—a rig that can be used for aerodynamic studies of landscapes, high-rise buildings, infrastructure (the infamous Crimean Bridge was tested here), and, of course, ships.
        https://sudostroenie.info/novosti/26260.html
        1. +2
          29 December 2025 10: 28
          Quote: Pike
          I was at the Krylov Center in St. Petersburg for work. They have underwater vehicle testing chambers there. The hydraulic units produce ~800 and ~1400 atm, respectively, down to 14 km. I saw a crushed steel model of a bathyscaphe there, an elongated shape.
          In general, the center conducts interesting research on ship models in experimental tanks, examining how a hull shape can improve a ship's or vessel's performance. There's also a landscape wind tunnel—a rig that can be used for aerodynamic studies of landscapes, high-rise buildings, infrastructure (the infamous Crimean Bridge was tested here), and, of course, ships.
          https://sudostroenie.info/novosti/26260.html

          Isn't this crushed model by any chance the bathyscaphe Poisk-6, which tried to use not a sphere, but a cylinder with hemispheres... maybe after this crushing they stopped working on Poisk-6?
          1. +1
            30 December 2025 06: 45
            Quote: Konnick
            The crushed model wasn't accidentally the bathyscaphe Poisk-6.

            I don't know. It was about 10 years ago. The object was 2-3 meters long and probably ~800-900 mm in diameter, I can't say for sure...
      4. +3
        29 December 2025 01: 40
        The ball doesn't roll well when made of composite material. Looseness will develop.
    2. +8
      28 December 2025 06: 45
      It's more appropriate not to get clever with plastic, but to make a steel case. There's no need to skimp on weight, and steel is stronger in all conditions and, in any case, more technologically advanced.
      1. +2
        28 December 2025 07: 00
        Perhaps yes, but here the problem is not in the material but in the form.
      2. +3
        28 December 2025 07: 34
        Quote: novel xnumx
        It's more appropriate not to get clever with plastic, but to make a steel case. There's no need to skimp on weight, and steel is stronger in all conditions and, in any case, more technologically advanced.

        The apparatus would be heavier than water. Remember the record-breaking bathyscaphes and the gasoline-powered float on the steel sphere? But here they decided to do without a float.
        1. +2
          28 December 2025 09: 50
          No. Look at the internal volume.
          1. +1
            28 December 2025 10: 32
            Quote: novel xnumx
            No. Look at the internal volume.

            A small ballast tank with a bag, similar to a heating system expansion tank
            1. +2
              28 December 2025 10: 34
              Internal volume! Where do people sit! How many cubic meters? That's how many tons.
    3. +2
      28 December 2025 07: 45
      Quote: mark1
      Looking at the body in section, it is immediately noticeable that an egg shape is more appropriate than a cylinder shape.

      I would also like to draw attention to the absence of ship's frame and stringer structure.
      1. +2
        29 December 2025 01: 43
        Stringers and frames are for hulls made of 8-20 mm "foil." For thicker "vessels," there's enough stability.
  3. +4
    28 December 2025 06: 36
    Some people think they're immortal, but it turns out they're mortal, and how. It's just a shame that others die because of it.
    1. +4
      28 December 2025 06: 46
      It's the same on the roads. What can you do...
      1. +3
        28 December 2025 07: 42
        Quote: novel xnumx
        It's the same on the roads. What can you do...

        Many times more people, both rich and poor, die on the roads.
        1. +1
          29 December 2025 07: 21
          Quote: Puncher
          Quote: novel xnumx
          It's the same on the roads. What can you do...

          Many times more people, both rich and poor, die on the roads.

          Recently, Modern developer Yavarfare died. He crashed his car into a guardrail and burned to death. So, danger can lurk anywhere.
          1. +2
            29 December 2025 09: 53
            It's not a danger, but a lack of brains in the presence of intelligence. I have a V8 and 262 horsepower under the hood with rear-wheel drive, and I've almost never used them to their full potential, because that requires not only the right conditions but also skill and extensive training. And then I bought a sports car, stepped on the gas, and decided it was king of the road. I'm sure it was simply blinded by the sun when exiting a tunnel, lost its bearings for a second, and crashed into either a concrete block or a rock.
            1. 0
              30 December 2025 00: 04
              Into a concrete wall supporting a slope. A glancing blow, at very low speed. But it caught fire. It didn't maneuver, it looks like you're right, it was blinding.
  4. + 10
    28 December 2025 07: 43
    Am I right in thinking there will be a sequel? Or should Kesha, the parrot, protest, "We're in the most interesting place!!!"
  5. +4
    28 December 2025 11: 14
    Management's response was immediate. On January 23, 2018, OceanGate fired its Director of Marine Operations.
    Telling the truth is always dangerous... request Well, some comrades and gentlemen are afraid of it more than the consequences of lies and deception.
    1. +4
      29 December 2025 01: 58
      In this situation, Director of Marine Operations David Lockridge lost nothing. He resigned from the toxic (as it turned out) OceanGate and kept his reputation.
      1. +1
        29 December 2025 09: 54
        Otherwise, he would have ended up the one at fault for releasing an uncertified trough...
  6. +9
    28 December 2025 15: 00
    An absolutely typical situation.
    I encounter this all the time at work, when common sense is ignored.

    The saddest and funniest thing is that the directors later (when it didn't work out) tell us: "You didn't convince us well enough that we couldn't do that..."
    1. 0
      29 December 2025 07: 23
      Quote: VicktorVR
      An absolutely typical situation.
      I encounter this all the time at work, when common sense is ignored.

      The saddest and funniest thing is that the directors later (when it didn't work out) tell us: "You didn't convince us well enough that we couldn't do that..."

      Well, the court accepts these arguments. The buyer of Dolina's apartment didn't sufficiently assess the risks of buying her apartment. "He didn't call his relatives."
  7. +3
    29 December 2025 02: 26
    Attached to the aft section of the pressure hull was a permeable compartment... which housed two batteries,... and buoyancy blocks made of synthetic foam.
    Could you elaborate on this "wild" system? At a depth of 4 km, the pressure is over 400 atmospheres—air is compressed 400 times. If the "synthetic foam buoyancy blocks" are actually polystyrene foam, then it would be crushed by that pressure!
    An elastic "bag" with an open bottom was installed in the upper part of the hull, serving as a ballast tank. Together with the high-pressure air system (HPA), it ensured the desired underwater state of positive, neutral, or negative buoyancy.
    But this is "balancing on a wire"! As the vessel descends, it loses buoyancy due to the compression of the air bladder [and the foam blocks!]. Some computer system with valves, tanks, and batteries (all overboard!) feeds the bladder new portions of increasingly compressed air, maintaining its volume. A failure of any element of this system—and the deep-sea vehicle dives to a safe depth! The "swim bladder" compresses even more, and the dive accelerates even more...
    1. +4
      29 December 2025 09: 56
      Initially, the project was fine, but then the client started tailoring it to his liking. The result is somewhat predictable.
    2. +3
      29 December 2025 16: 40
      Most likely, we're not talking about foam plastic at all. There is a material called glass microspheres. Essentially, it's a waste product of some kind. It's a tiny glass sphere, hollow inside. But it can withstand enormous pressures with virtually no deformation. Then, this powdered glass sphere is filled with some kind of composite. It's not foam plastic, of course, as it's much heavier, but lighter than water. The Trieste bathyscaphe used gasoline as a buoyancy element, while the Cameron bathyscaphe used the same plastic with microspheres. And it withstood the depths of the Mariana Trench perfectly. This material has been used in the construction of underwater vehicles for decades.
      1. 0
        30 December 2025 05: 04
        Thanks for the tip. However, the author says "synthetic foam," but it should have said "syntactic":
        Syntactic foam is a composite material consisting of hollow spherical fillers (glass microspheres) uniformly distributed in a polymer binder.
        However, for depths of around 4 km, advanced syntactic foam is needed. (And the kind that can withstand (with a safety margin) 11 km has the density of gasoline.)
        I tried to find a price, but I only found one for the Chinese version, rated for depths up to 1000 meters: 22000 rubles for a 4,7 kg block (providing ~2 kg of buoyancy). I'd roughly estimate that "5 km foam" would cost $500 per kilogram of buoyancy. Which isn't cheap.
  8. +1
    29 December 2025 08: 50
    Quote: ArchiPhil
    Rather, questions for the manufacturer of the device, no?


    Rather, to the company responsible for operating the device.
  9. +6
    29 December 2025 16: 28
    Hmmm... I'm impressed. Especially the photo with the caption, "The Titan's control and management computer is bolted directly to the carbon fiber reinforced plastic casing, which reduces its strength."
    Anyone who decided to screw a screw into a sturdy casing made using the winding method is, at best, a complete idiot, if not a complete failure. Such a person should be fired immediately, with the cost of the entire device deducted from their salary.
    Yes, it was possible to screw it in, but only into a specially glued overlay in this place, even one made of wood, so that the fiber of the durable case would not be damaged under any circumstances.
    The idea of ​​the device is not bad, but it is not without problems.
    Personally, I wouldn't dare use a case using this technology. Just from experience. Take a piece of fiberglass or any metal. And try to bend it. Up to a certain point, the plastic will hold up even better than the metal. And then it will snap. Suddenly. Metal, however, will simply bend under the same force.
    Another example. There are too many cases of children falling out of windows. The reason is that the plastic hinges holding the net in place break. I've tried it myself. You press down, and it holds firmly, but then suddenly, suddenly, it snaps... Especially if the plastic hinge has been exposed to the sun and cold. I've written repeatedly where I could about banning plastic hinges by law, but that's a different topic, although the problems are similar.
    The winding of the body also raises questions. It's not entirely clear from the photo, but it looks like it's simply layer upon layer, like a spool of thread. The problem is that the longitudinal connections are rather weak. At worst, the winding should be at a severe angle, at least 30 degrees. This will, of course, make this part of the body significantly more expensive, and it will have to be made longer, with the ends trimmed.
    But I repeat, if I were designing this device, I would have tried to make the body metal until the very end. And if the weight distribution didn't work out, then I would have built a metal frame inside the wound body. Or even just a simple tube bundle assembled into a tube and then wrapped with a winding.
    And the bag-shaped ascent system... Cameron's apparatus was much more sophisticated. And it used glass microspheres that could withstand even greater pressure.
    However, there are many things about Titan that raise questions.
    Well, I won't give advice to business sharks. Is money more important? Well, good luck...
    1. 0
      30 December 2025 01: 30
      Take a piece of fiberglass or any metal and try to bend it.

      The Titan didn't have composite plates that worked in bending. Its composite cylinder worked in compression under a distributed load. The diagrams are different ;) On the other hand, composite cylinders (which, for example, are popular with firefighters) can easily withstand 400 atmospheres of compressed air (they are pressurized to 1,000 during testing) and last for 10 years. But the cylinder there works in tension.
      1. 0
        30 December 2025 13: 47
        Yes, of course. However, it's useful to understand the behavior of this type of plastic as an example. Furthermore, there are no bending stresses until failure begins. Microcracks and other joys of life... And once failure has already begun, it all gets worse.
        As for cylinders, these types of composite fibers perform exceptionally well in tension. Not so in compression, and in shear, absolutely nothing... A cylinder is a particularly successful application of these plastics, and even then, only with oblique winding. Otherwise, the result is something like a collection of very strong washers loosely bonded to one another. An inevitable microcrack will develop over time, and 400 atmospheres will cause the material to rupture.
    2. 0
      30 December 2025 03: 20
      Especially the photo with the caption "The computer... is screwed directly to the carbon fiber reinforced plastic case, which reduces its strength."
      I wouldn't believe everything you wrote. Because in the text:
      a fiberglass insert was installed inside, which prevented condensation moisture, but excluded the possibility of observing the condition of the composite part of the pressure hull
      , which implies some kind of fiberglass glass, with a gap from the durable body.
      1. 0
        30 December 2025 14: 06
        "Some kind of fiberglass cup, with a gap." Possibly. It's not clear from the diagrams, but some photos, and logic, suggest the presence of a layer of thermal insulation and interior lining. If so, then the nature of this particular photo is unclear. Perhaps the photographer's doubts have been dispelled, but that's a matter of conjecture for us.
        But it's important to understand that any inhomogeneity in the hull, when using this technology, is a powerful stress concentrator, significantly reducing the overall strength. On metal submarines, very strong reinforcements are installed at the points where they penetrate the pressure hull. This is impossible with a hull of this type.
        In short, this point is unclear to us. Perhaps I'm wrong here with the suggestion to kick them out...
  10. +1
    29 December 2025 23: 48
    The only question is: why? Why make such devices out of composites? To lighten them? They're not airplanes. What's wrong with steel or titanium? Without further ado, steel allowed us to reach the bottom of the Mariana Trench (almost 11 km) in 1960. The only thought is: this plague of our time – "effective management," when, for the sake of economy, people are willing to build things out of practically nothing and foist them off on the uninitiated. At this rate, they'll soon reach space with their composites... Although, of course, resins of all kinds are contraindicated at high temperatures...
    1. +1
      30 December 2025 03: 10
      steel made it possible to reach the bottom of the Mariana Trench in 1960
      The Trieste bathysphere did not float on its own, but was attached to a float with gasoline (bathysphere + float + engines = bathyscaphe).
  11. 0
    30 December 2025 03: 21
    The Titan's control and management computer is bolted directly to the carbon fiber reinforced plastic housing, which reduces its strength.

    Now that's a remarkable collective farm! The creators of this vessel apparently had no idea what they were dealing with.
  12. +1
    30 December 2025 08: 54
    Numerous media reports and videos have appeared about this event, but most are untrustworthy, and their authors are unfamiliar with the subject. Therefore, we will turn to a reliable source.
    This is by no means a reliable source; quite the opposite is true. Knowing Boeing's pathological peculiarity, bribing the air crash investigation commission always yields favorable results. Where anyone is to blame—pilots, technicians, passengers (and, fortunately, already dead ones at that)—except Boeing itself and its management. There is no more greedy and deceitful company in the world than Boeing. Boeing's unspoken motto is, "Other people's lives are nothing—profit is everything!"
  13. 0
    31 December 2025 06: 16
    Quote: Jager
    Initially, the project was fine, but then the client started tailoring it to his liking. The result is somewhat predictable.

    As it is: a camel is a horse modified according to the customer’s comments.
  14. +1
    31 December 2025 06: 24
    I'll probably die a fool, but I don't understand why carbon fiber was used. Reinforced materials are very poor at handling compression. Reinforcement, and carbon fiber is a classic reinforcement, should handle tension.
    Moreover, unlike steel, a composite structure is incapable of plastic deformation, therefore, in the chain: stability, elastic deformation, plastic deformation, destruction, one stage is skipped in carbon fiber, and the ability of a thick layer of epoxy to elastic deformation is highly questionable.
    This is very strange to me.