Lancet - "Pride of the Fatherland"

9 666 20
Lancet - "Pride of the Fatherland"
Lancets of various modifications and other UAVs at the parade on May 9, 2025. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense.


The ZALA Lancet unmanned reconnaissance and strike system, manufactured in Izhevsk, was awarded the "Pride of the Fatherland" title following the federal stage of the all-Russian "100 Best Products of Russia" program. This was announced by the Zala press service.



The award ceremony took place on December 11 in Moscow, where Anton Shalaev, head of Rosstandart, and Grigory Elkin, president of the Academy of Quality Problems, presented the award.

Since 2021, the Russian army has been using loitering munitions/attack unmanned aerial vehicles of the Lancet series in military operations. This technology has long demonstrated its potential and combat capabilities. Based on operational experience, the Lancets can be considered one of the most useful new systems to enter service in recent years. Several key factors contributed to these positive results and successes.

Large family


The Izhevsk-based ZALA Aero, a Kalashnikov Concern company, is developing and producing the Lancet series of ATGMs/UAVs. The company created the first prototypes of this series at the end of the last decade. The first public demonstration of two loitering munition modifications with different characteristics and capabilities took place at the Army-2019 forum.

Soon, the Lancet-1 and Lancet-3 UAVs underwent testing and confirmed their expected performance. A decision was made to launch serial production and purchase them. drones for deployment in army units. According to available data, the first batches of new BBs entered service in 2020-21.


One of the first versions of the Lancet BB. Photo by ZALA Aero

Combat use of Lancets began in the spring of 2021. At that time, the UAVs were used to detect and destroy terrorist targets in Syria. In real combat conditions, the UAVs confirmed their capabilities and performance, proving themselves to be an effective weapon.

Lancets are being used extensively during the Special Operation to Demilitarize Ukraine. The first known instances of their use occurred in the summer of 2022. Subsequently, the number of loitering munition strikes steadily increased. The first peak occurred in the summer of 2023, when the enemy attempted a counteroffensive. In the spring and summer of 2024, the use of Lancets again reached record levels.

In mid-November 2025, ZALA Aero reported that over 4 strikes using Lancet missiles had already been carried out in the Special Operation zone. Interestingly, almost all of these incidents have become publicly known. For example, the well-known Lost Armor database, as of December 16, contains 4060 records of Lancet-series BB use. Furthermore, some very interesting statistics are being compiled and updated.

Thus, by now the Lancet family of UAVs have become truly widespread and widespread. weapons, and have also found widespread use in the Special Operations zone. Drones and their operators are demonstrating good results and confirming the need for such equipment in the military.


Lancet version 52. Photo by Rostec.

Unmanned vehicles


Several UAVs were developed as part of the Lancet project. They share a similar design and share a number of systems, but differ in size, weight, and flight and combat characteristics. The developer is constantly refining existing products and improving their performance, while also developing new ones.

All Lancets are built using the same design. They feature an elongated fuselage with two X-shaped wings. The airframe is disassemblable for easy transportation. The nose cone houses the optronic system, while the fuselage houses the control electronics, warhead, battery, and electric motor with a pusher propeller.

The smallest and lightest in the series is the Lancet-1, or Izdeliye 51. It has a takeoff weight of 5 kg and carries a 1 kg warhead. There are also the Lancet-52 and Lancet-53 UAVs, known as the Lancet-3. With a takeoff weight of 12 kg, they deliver a 3-5 kg ​​payload to their target.

All Lancet missiles have similar speed characteristics—their cruising speeds do not exceed 105-110 km/h. However, their range and endurance differ. For example, the Izdeliye 51 remains airborne for up to half an hour and flies 40 km. The latest modifications of the BB 53 can fly for up to an hour and hit targets at ranges of at least 70-80 km.


A Lancet UAV approaches its target. Photo: Telegram / Military Informant

Initially, the Lancets were only remotely controlled. Later, autonomous target acquisition and guidance capabilities were added. The introduction of artificial intelligence capabilities was mentioned in this context. These measures dramatically increased the probability of successfully detecting and engaging a target, even in the face of active enemy countermeasures and loss of communications.

Factors of success


The Lancet family of UAVs/UAVs has proven its potential during operational use and combat deployment, earning it the title of one of the most useful innovations in recent times. It's easy to see that these results are based on several key factors. The developer and the Army, the operator, were able to achieve an optimal balance between these factors, resulting in the well-known positive results.

First and foremost, a successful aerial platform is essential. Designers at ZALA Aero have developed an optimal design and architecture for a loitering munition. The Lancet airframe offers excellent flight and maneuverability. The appropriate choice of engine and battery ensures the required range and endurance.


Hit the target. Photo: Telegram / WarZ_info

An obvious but important solution is to use an electric propulsion system. It is simple to manufacture and operate, and offers excellent flight performance. Furthermore, a single battery provides power for the motor for flight and all onboard electronics.

Onboard electronics solutions are of great interest. Initially, the Lancets only had a digital electronics system and radio remote control. The equipment was subsequently upgraded to include new features. Autonomy was a primary focus, and this led to remarkable results.

According to available information, a whole range of warheads has been developed for the Lancet missile. These differ in weight and purpose. However, new ones with improved performance and other features are possible.

A key feature of the Lancet project as a whole is the scalability of its solutions. The proposed UAV architecture can be implemented in various sizes and with the required takeoff weight. Some components are selected based on the parameters of the future UAV, while others are common to the entire line.


Image from a Lancet thermal imaging camera. Photo: Telegram / Archangel Spetsnaz

The availability of several Lancet variants with different characteristics allows for increased flexibility of use. This is one of the reasons why these AFVs/UAVs have found their place in our army's weapons system. They are actively used on the front lines and complement other weapons. In essence, Lancets take on missions where other systems are unfeasible or inconvenient.

It's worth noting that technical issues weren't the only ones that positively impacted the Lancet's prospects. For example, in 2015, ZALA Aero became part of the Kalashnikov Concern. The resources of this large organization significantly facilitated the development of future drones, the launch of production, and so on.

Past and Future


Thus, over the course of several years, the Lancet series of attack drones have become a vital component of the Russian military's weapons system. They are produced in large numbers, are actively used on all frontlines, and help accomplish combat missions by engaging a variety of targets.

Several major versions of the Lancet have entered production and operational use. ZALA Aero is expected to continue developing this family of projects. The company may soon unveil new drones and promising technologies for their improvement.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    17 December 2025 05: 55
    4000 hits in 3 years. That's about 4 hits a day. It's good they caught it in time.
  2. +1
    17 December 2025 06: 02
    Well done! Congratulations! And it all apparently began in the pioneer aircraft modeling circles.
  3. +1
    17 December 2025 06: 45
    And if they also reduced the cost during mass production... then that would be great. hi
    1. 0
      24 December 2025 17: 18
      Quote: jonht
      And if there is also the cost

      Unfortunately no.
      Several million per item depending on the type sad

      Because of this, many are now campaigning for "Scalpel" instead of "Lancet", since the former, although slightly worse in characteristics, is much cheaper.
  4. -5
    17 December 2025 07: 04
    The lancets were justified when, at the initial stage of the SVO, we tried to spare the lives of our "brothers".
    Starting in late 2022, lancets will be used like hammering nails with a microscope. The electronic and video components of lancets should be used more effectively. Their software and hardware should be refined and used for reconnaissance, artillery fire adjustment, and targeting large-scale attack drones. Alternatively, a hybrid of the Geranium and a lancet could be developed for precision strikes against those same transformers.
    In my opinion, reusing lancets to target simplified, mindless geraniums and ATGMs is more efficient. And targeting is better from the side than looking through the camera of an attack drone.
    A lot needs to be done to solve this problem, but the key will be the creation of a directional link similar to Starlink. If a strike drone only receives a signal from the upper-rear quadrant, jamming it with electronic warfare will be nearly impossible. The same applies to repeaters or repeater chains—directed signal reception and transmission in a 10-15 degree beam eliminates interception.
    1. +2
      17 December 2025 11: 39
      Quote: also a doctor
      The electronic and video components of the lancets must be used more effectively. Their software and hardware must be refined and used for reconnaissance, artillery fire adjustment, and targeting of large-scale attack drones.

      Why turn a good attack UAV into a poor reconnaissance aircraft? Especially with such a long range and flight time?
      The "Izdeliye 51" missile remains airborne for up to half an hour and has a range of 40 km. The latest modifications of the "53" missile can fly for up to an hour and hit targets at ranges of at least 70-80 km.

      What's wrong with the standard reconnaissance UAVs? Those are the ones that detect targets for the Lancets and monitor their engagement.
      Quote: also a doctor
      In my opinion, the repeated use of lancets to target simplified, brainless geraniums and ATGMs is more profitable.

      How are you planning to target the Geranium? By deploying an OEK from the Lancet? wink
      Or trying to guide a blind striker from a flying reconnaissance UAV using a two-dimensional "side-top view" image on the screen?
      As for the ATGM... the Lancet is essentially the same long-range ATGM. Only it's propeller-driven.
      1. 0
        17 December 2025 13: 26
        There are similar systems like Heron that operate on this principle. Israel uses them, and Azerbaijan uses them.
      2. 0
        20 December 2025 12: 40
        What's wrong with standard UAVs? Well, the first thing is that I know nothing about them. The answer to the rest of the questions is simple, but it's not free. If you want to save money, figure it out yourself.
    2. +2
      18 December 2025 13: 37
      Quote: also a doctor
      From the end of 2022, the use of lancets - hammering nails with a microscope.


      That's nonsense, considering the cost of "nails" can sometimes be a hundred times greater than the cost of a "microscope." Trading an enemy tank or infantry fighting vehicle for a couple of "lancets" is a pretty good deal.
  5. wku
    -3
    17 December 2025 10: 05
    This expensive and ineffective design can be considered completely obsolete today, but at the initial stage of its use it was a good means of destruction.
    1. 0
      17 December 2025 13: 25
      That's so bold. Half the world does these and it's all a miss.
  6. +1
    17 December 2025 13: 24
    There are also larger X-UAVs in Israel with internal combustion engines, perhaps just a couple of cylinders.
  7. 0
    17 December 2025 17: 08
    In my opinion, the Granit anti-ship missiles had a more sophisticated AI, even though they were first used in 83, and their development began half a century ago. I'm only talking about their "intelligence" and the conditions of use. Not about size, weight, or cost.
  8. 0
    17 December 2025 17: 46
    "Lancets" can be referred to not only as "Product No.", but also as "ZNo."! At least, at one point, they were called this by the internet community and military correspondents! Understanding the "Lancet" terminology isn't easy, but there have been attempts online! For example, there was an article online where the author explained it this way: "Product 52" is "Lancet-1" and "Lancet-3," because it has two X-shaped wings! "Product 51" is "Lancet-3M," because it has one (!) X-shaped wing and an X-shaped tail! "Product 54" (Z54) is a UAV with four propellers on an X-shaped wing and fiber-optic guidance for up to 10 km, launched from a TPK! The "Izdeliye-53" (Z53) is a tailless UAV launched from a transport launch vehicle (TLV), with the ability to combine TLVs into "packages." The "Scalpel" UAV (2X configuration) was developed based on the "Lancet" and was claimed to be significantly cheaper! The "Scalpel" was promised to be quickly put into production, but that never happened! A report recently surfaced that the DPR was beginning full-scale production of the "Scalpel," but there have been no reports of its use in the SVO yet.
  9. 0
    18 December 2025 11: 22
    Question amateur.
    Everyone who talks about Lancets mentions the battery. Why?
    The product is disposable, after all. And a regular disposable battery of comparable weight has a greater capacity than a rechargeable battery.
    And the price is lower.
    Is the mention of a battery a typo? A misconception?
    1. 0
      22 December 2025 11: 01
      Quote: garri-lin
      Question amateur.
      Everyone who talks about Lancets mentions the battery. Why?
      The product is disposable, after all. And a regular disposable battery of comparable weight has a greater capacity than a rechargeable battery.
      And the price is lower.
      Is the mention of a battery a typo? A misconception?


      Good question

      Here's what Perplexity "thinks" about it.

      Why do drones use rechargeable batteries instead of regular disposable ones?

      UAVs almost always use **batteries** because they require a lot of power with minimal weight and the ability to recharge.[1][2]

      ### Energy and mass

      - Modern lithium batteries (LiPo, Li-ion) provide very high specific energy: many watt-hours per kilogram with relatively low weight. [1][3]
      - Regular disposable batteries (alkaline, saline) with the same weight provide less energy and are worse at delivering high currents, so the drone either does not fly for long or becomes too heavy. [2][8]

      ### Output current and motor power

      - Drone electric motors consume very large currents during takeoff, maneuvers, and flight into the wind; lithium batteries are capable of consistently delivering tens and even hundreds of amperes without significant voltage drop. [1][3]
      - Most disposable batteries are designed for low currents (remote controls, flashlights), when trying to remove a large current from them, the voltage drops sharply, they heat up and quickly run down, which makes them unsuitable for traction power supply of UAVs. [2][10]

      ### Reuse and exploitation

      - The battery can be charged hundreds of times, which is critical for training, commercial flights, and military UAVs: after landing, it is simply put on charge, rather than thrown away.[2][6]
      - Disposable batteries would have to be changed constantly, which would dramatically increase operating costs, complicate logistics and create a lot of waste.[2][9]

      ### Design and integration

      - LiPo packs can be easily made into the required shape and size to optimally fit into the fuselage or arms of a quadcopter, maintaining balance at the center of mass.[1][4]
      - Standard cylindrical disposable elements (AA, AAA, etc.) are less compact in terms of volume and provide less convenient geometry and weight distribution for the aircraft. [4][8]

      If necessary, we can separately analyze the pros and cons of LiPo versus Li-ion specifically for UAVs.

      Quotes:
      [1] What types of batteries are best for drones? https://shura-master.ru/blog/bespilotnye-aviaczionnye-sistemy/vidy-akkumulyatorov-dlya-dronov/
      [2] Batteries for UAVs: Types, characteristics and selection https://fpvwingrc.ru/akkumulyatory-dlya-bpla-vidy-harakteristiki-i-vybor/
      [3] Battery needs for patrol drones and... https://www.large-battery.com/ru/blog/battery-needs-drone-patrols-ground-robots-power-inspection/
      [4] Li-ion vs. LiPo Batteries for Drones: Which Lasts Longer? https://www.large-battery.com/ru/blog/li-ion-vs-lipo-long-lasting-battery-drones/
      [5] Li-Ion or Li-Po? Choosing a Battery Type for Geodetic... https://robotrends.ru/pub/2038/li-ion-ili-li-po-vybor-tipa-akkumulyatora-dlya-geodezicheskih-bespilotnikov
      [6] Important tips for choosing the perfect drone battery https://www.large-battery.com/ru/blog/choosing-the-right-drone-batteries/
      [7] Features of charging batteries for UAVs - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcWW8AKPUpU
      [8] Types of Drone Batteries: Understanding the Role of Lithium Batteries in Drones http://ru.heltec-energy.com/news/types-of-drone-batteries-understanding-the-role-of-lithium-batteries-in-drones/
      [9] Find out how long drone batteries last https://rccopter.ru/blogs/knowledge/akkumulyator-dlya-drona-Uznajte-kak-dolgo-rabotayut-sovety-ekspluatacii
      [10] What are the effects of using 1.2V batteries in a system on... https://www.reddit.com/r/batteries/comments/phlkrc/what_are_the_effects_of_using_12v_batteries_on_a/
  10. -1
    18 December 2025 22: 59
    Judging by the news from the theater of operations, Shaheds are doing most of the work there. Their range and flight time are several times greater.
    1. 0
      19 December 2025 20: 15
      You're confusing warm with soft. Lancet and Geranium have different uses.
  11. 0
    22 December 2025 11: 11
    It's time to learn how to build a UAV with a detachable warhead on a controlled glider based on the UMPK principle and an automatically returning carrier...too many video cameras with batteries are going to waste.
    1. 0
      22 February 2026 08: 24
      It's all been thought up. Baba Yaga, based on agrodrones. The Ukrainian Armed Forces used them as repeaters in the pre-StarLink era. But for some reason, the enemy has them in large numbers, not ours.