How Viking ships travel

6 804 37
How Viking ships travel
This is how Viking ships emerged from the fog...


Snake raced son Trygggvi,
Well done, on the waves
Fall aggravated evil
Gold poobzhatu.
Olav climbed on the Bison,
Noble wolf water.
Sea beast soap
Powerful horn on the road.

Funeral verse for Saint Olaf. Translated by S. V. Petrov




Monuments stories. Let's start with the fact that we're all very lucky that the Vikings had a habit of burying their nobles in ships. They didn't burn them, which would have been logical, but buried them. This operation required considerable labor, as the ship had to be hauled ashore and then piled with earth. They scuttled some of the ships in Roskilde, and they, too, have survived, albeit without grave goods. Some ships are better preserved than others, but taken together, we now know what Viking ships looked like in detail. However, even today, some of them have real adventures. And it's these that we'll tell you about today, but first, let's remember what kind of ships the land of the Norsemen gave us.


The Viking Ship Museum in Bygdøy, a branch of the University of Oslo's Museum of Cultural History

Of course, all of them are now kept in museums, and there are quite a few of them, and all the ships they contain are interesting in their own way, but the most interesting, by far, is the "Oseberg ship." It is the best-preserved Viking ship in the world, and it plays a key role in our understanding of the so-called Viking Age.


This is how they were found in the ground. Photo from the excavation of the "Gokstadt ship."

In all respects, this is a typical longship, which was found in 1904 near Tønsberg in the Vestfold region of Norway. Here are some of its characteristics: length - 21,6 meters; width - 5,1 meters; mast height - could range from 6 to 10 meters; with a sail area of ​​90 m2 The ship could reach speeds of up to 10 knots; 15 pairs of oarlocks indicate that it was propelled by 30 rowers. The Osebergskipet (as the vessel is called in Swedish) was exhibited at the Viking Ship Museum at the University of Oslo. Incidentally, this museum is truly unique. It houses the world's most important and comprehensive collection of artifacts from that era, numbering over 50,000 items, ranging from the Oseberg ship to the Langeid sword and the small pearls from Kaupang, testifying to that distant era.


The Oseberg Ship attracted an inordinate number of tourists. Their footsteps created vibrations that gradually eroded the ship's fragile wood. Their breathing was no help either. And... the time had come to move it to a new building, where conditions would be incomparably better than before. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo

As for the ship's design and origin, it has been determined that it was built in southwestern Norway in 820 and is made of oak, while the oars and mast are pine. The ship's value lies in the fact that it is made of almost 90% original wood from that time, with only 10% being modern-day wood.

The ship sailed for 14 years, but was then hauled ashore and used for the burial of… two women, which occurred in 834. Who these women were, or why they were so honored, we don't know. But all the gifts they received suggest that one or both of them played an important social role, perhaps political or religious, or perhaps both. Incidentally, genetic analysis of their remains has now revealed that they were not Norwegian, but rather hailed from somewhere in Iran!


The figurehead of the "Oseberg Ship." Until recently, it had not been on display due to its fragile condition. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo

The ship is richly decorated with carvings that wind along the bow, ending in the curved body of a serpent with a head. Such ornate ships were intended for especially important members of the aristocracy. The side planking was secured with iron nails. The planking below the waterline is only 2-3 cm thick, while the two upper rows are slightly thicker. The deck is made of short planks that are simply laid on the crossbeams. This planking could be removed at any time and so much cargo could be piled into the hold that it would rise above the deck level!


Carved dragon heads from the film "And Trees Grow on Stones" (1985). Still from the film


"Dragon's Head." Found aboard the Oseberg Ship. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo

The Gokstad Ship, a 9th-century Viking ship, was discovered in 1880, before the Oseberg Ship, inside a burial mound on the shore of Sandefjord (Vestfold), Norway. The vessel is approximately 23 meters long and 5,1 meters wide. The oars are 5,5 meters long. This ship is completely unadorned and has no carved ends, but it is nonetheless very beautiful, with a steeply rising hull line at both ends, creating a graceful silhouette. It is also built of oak. The Gokstad Ship served as the prototype for the longships built in 1984 for the filming of the historical adventure movie "And Trees Grow on Stones." Incidentally, after filming concluded in 1985, they were erected as a monument on the embankment of the Big Dipper in Vyborg.


A fine ship, and more than one at that, was built here for the filming of the historical movie "And on the Rocks Trees Grow." A still from the film.

The ship is one ton heavier than the Oseberg Ship, but has half as many frames. After the excavations were completed in 1929, the Gokstad vessel, divided into two parts, was transported to the bank of a river approximately a kilometer from the excavation site, flowing into the Oslofjord. From there, it was transported on a fishing boat to Oslo, to the Bygdøy Peninsula, and placed in a building that is part of the Museum of Cultural History at the University of Oslo. Interestingly, the ship's builders were frugal and even used planks with knots: the knots were removed and cork was used instead!


The mast mounting steps on board the "Gokstad Ship." Note also that the oar holes in the sides are covered with special wooden caps, even carved with runes! Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo


A steering oar aboard the Gokstad Ship. Oslo University Museum of Cultural History

The man buried aboard the ship was at least over 50 and stood about 185 cm tall. He also suffered from arthritis and likely simply couldn't walk. Who was he? Most likely a chieftain or local king in Vestfold, who enjoyed the support of other local chieftains. Archaeologists found no valuables in the burial—they were likely stolen by grave robbers long ago—but they nonetheless yielded a number of interesting items, including game boards, dishes, tents, three smaller boats, twelve horses, eight dogs, and two peacocks. Weapon and the jewels were taken away back in the late 900s.

Later, other ships were found, and even many more, but these turned out to be the most interesting.


A steel frame is being constructed around the ship. The biggest challenge was ensuring nothing could fall! Oslo University Museum of Cultural History


A ship in transit. Oslo University Museum of Cultural History.


The journey has ended… The Museum of Cultural History of the University of Oslo

Moreover, the decision was made to replace the old Viking Ship Museum building with a new, more spacious and comfortable one, and to house the most impressive ships there. This was no easy feat, despite the short distance to the new building—only about 100 meters. Nevertheless, it was a complex engineering undertaking. Due to the fragility of the ships, they had to be handled with extreme care, especially the heavier and less durable Gokstad ship. For example, the Oseberg was encased in a steel frame weighing over 50 tons for over two years, allowing it to remain in place during the entire construction of the new museum building. The ship was moved to its new location in September 2025, moving the frame and ship very slowly along a rail mounted to the ceiling, at a speed of just 30 cm every 5,5 minutes. Meaning, the journey to its new location took a full 10 hours.


Oseberg Museum in a new building! Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo


The future interior of the museum. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo


This is how the gold will be displayed. Oslo University Museum of Cultural History

Then, on December 29th, the "Gokstad Ship" was moved, also taking ten hours to transport, covering a distance of 94 meters! And now the "Gokstad Ship" has also taken its place in the new building housing such valuable artifacts! And there's plenty to see there, not just the ships themselves, but also finds from the Viking culture...


"Gullsporen" is a unique Viking Age spur from Norway and the only such find in Scandinavia. The spur is covered in intricate filigree work, and the work is remarkably detailed. It was likely crafted by a Scandinavian jeweler in the late 900th century. The spur was found in 1872 at Red Farm, but no burial was discovered nearby. However, a second spur like it has never been found. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo


This beautiful basalt stone axe was discovered in the late 1700s at Fiskumvannet in Øvre Eiker. A fisherman there used it as a sinker on his net. The axe was sent to the university museum in 1853, and since then it has been recognized as the most beautiful artifact from the Middle Neolithic period, meaning it was made approximately 4500 years ago. It's hard to believe the axe was lost by accident—it was clearly purposefully thrown into the water, where the farmer found it. Moreover, the axe is remarkably well preserved. The axe is 18,6 cm long. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo


Around 3000 Viking Age swords, both plain and ornate, have been found in Norway. Many bear the inlaid inscriptions ULFBERHT or INGELRII, indicating that the blades themselves were forged in what is now southern Germany, and that the inscriptions are a kind of trademark. From left to right: a sword from Steinsvik, Nordland; a sword from Risvold in Telemark, 800–850; a sword from Hedmark, 900; a sword from Momrak in Telemark, 950–1000; a sword from a source in Hedmark County, 800. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo


Another Viking Age sword. Museum of the City of Nantes, France.


Sleds from the ship "Oseberg." When this ship was excavated in 1904, a broken sled was found. The sled parts were preserved with alum, but this method of preservation proved destructive to the wood, making the sleds very brittle. Furthermore, the parts that were once held together were exposed to the elements, so the sleds are now held together primarily by an outer layer of varnish and glue. The wood is about to turn to dust, and a way to save it is urgently needed. However, funds have already been allocated for their study and preservation. Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo


A replica of the Viking in 1893 at the Chicago International Exhibition

The Gokstad ship has been reconstructed several times. The first replica was built back in 1892. On this vessel, named "Viking," 13 Norwegian sailors under the command of Captain Magnus Anderson sailed across the Atlantic Ocean in 40 days from Bergen to Chicago, where the 1893 World's Fair was held. After the voyage, it was discovered that the vessel could be easily handled by one man in normal weather and even heavy seas. Its maximum measured speed was 11 knots, which was quite respectable even for more modern ships. The elastic connection between the frames and the planking, which prevented the hull from flexing in rough seas, turned out to be an advantage rather than a drawback. Moreover, the crew pulled the vessel ashore with relative ease. However, an attempt to row the vessel ended in failure, apparently because the crew had not been trained in this technique.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    18 December 2025 04: 07
    used for the burial of... two women; genetic analysis of their remains has now shown that they were not Norwegians, but came from somewhere in Iran!

    Persian princesses? And Stenka Razin threw them overboard into the oncoming waves... He didn't follow the tradition of burying them in the boat...
    This beautiful basalt stone axe was discovered in the late 1700s at Fiskumvannet in Øvre Eiker. ...it is considered the most beautiful artifact of the Middle Neolithic period, meaning it was made approximately 4500 years ago. It's hard to believe the axe was lost by accident—it was clearly thrown into the water with a specific purpose.

    I even know the text of the prayer that was read after being thrown into the water:
    "You scaly-handed son of a lousy female dog, you will dive into the water until you find him, otherwise, I swear by Odin I will make a new axe from your shoulder blade!"
    1. +9
      18 December 2025 05: 20
      Good morning everyone, thank you Vyacheslav Olegovich for the interesting work!
      As for the question about women, well, “without them, we can’t do anything.”
      The emancipation of the fairer sex in pagan Scandinavia was so profound that Christian Europe and the Muslim East were left "crying in their corners." However, even with the Christianization of the Vikings, their descendants did not abandon the civil and legal customs of "equality." Incidentally, the renaissance of female influence in Western Europe is also directly linked to the descendants of the "wild" Norsemen.
      Regarding the axe, a lot could have happened over four and a half millennia…
      Now, back to my own stuff. I really liked the photo showing the use of a tree's root system to secure the mast. In our country, this technology of using kokor (tree roots) survived until the middle of the last century.
      Hay boat with a set of spruce kokors. KVN Museum, Perm Krai.
      1. +6
        18 December 2025 05: 37
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        Hay boat with a set of spruce kokors. KVN Museum, Perm Krai.

        Great! Thank you, dear Vladislav!
      2. +4
        18 December 2025 06: 22
        Odysseus built a house around a tree-bed, and the Vikings built ships around the tree.
      3. +1
        18 December 2025 06: 28
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        The emancipation of the weaker sex in pagan Scandinavia was so high that Christian Europe and the Muslim East are “crying in the corner.”

        Is throwing an axe at your wife to chop off her braid a local form of female emancipation? Well, you'd have to have nerves of steel for that...
        1. +5
          18 December 2025 12: 18
          Is throwing an axe at a wife to cut off her hair a local form of female emancipation?

          Is the film a documentary?
      4. +1
        18 December 2025 08: 21
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        The emancipation of the fairer sex in pagan Scandinavia was so profound that Christian Europe and the Muslim East were left "crying in their corners." However, even with the Christianization of the Vikings, their descendants did not abandon the civil and legal customs of "equality." Incidentally, the renaissance of female influence in Western Europe is also directly linked to the descendants of the "wild" Norsemen.


        The quotation marks around the word "wild" could have been removed. Well, simply wild... that's why the Scandinavians retained remnants of matriarchy, which was widespread in the Neolithic.
        However, the Slavs' morals were not initially too patriarchal.
        1. +2
          18 December 2025 16: 26
          However, the Slavs' morals were not initially too patriarchal.

          Yeah, Princess Olga burned some of the matchmakers, buried others alive, and then took the groom's land with her shield.
      5. +4
        18 December 2025 09: 08
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        A photograph showing the use of a tree's root system to secure a mast

        I also noticed... after all, the question of how to secure a mast on a long, flexible, and rather "thin-walled" vessel is not a trivial task. Thanks to the author, one of the best "technical" photographs.

        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        The emancipation of the weaker sex in pagan Scandinavia was so high that Christian Europe and the Muslim East are "crying in the corner"

        Which doesn't stop southerners from lusting after Norwegian and Swedish women as "long-legged, natural blondes" (of which there are certainly many, but far from all)... in practice, few succeed, "I can't speak for all of Odessa," but in France, my husband has never seen a Scandinavian woman, but I did meet one Moroccan waiter in a Stockholm restaurant (I used to go there, as well as Copenhagen, often 15-20 years ago), who was very subdued in his "masculine" worldview :)
    2. +5
      18 December 2025 05: 38
      [quote=Puncher][quote]They used a hole punch to bury two women. Genetic analysis of their remains has now shown that they were not Norwegians, but came from somewhere in Iran![/quote]
      Evgeny, you're great! I had a good laugh this morning, so it's going to be a great day!
      1. 0
        18 December 2025 06: 32
        Quote: kalibr
        then the day will be successful!

        I'd like to. But seriously, why were there two Persian women buried together? And where is the owner of these beauties (they probably wouldn't have dragged ugly ones from Persia), and why wasn't he included in the funeral kit? Or is this a variation on the tale of the golden cockerel, only here the "Shamakhan queens" were eliminated so as not to sow discord among brothers eager for foreign charms?
        1. +2
          18 December 2025 06: 59
          Quote: Puncher
          Quote: kalibr
          then the day will be successful!

          I'd like to. But seriously, why are there two Persians?

          And there is only one axe what ?
        2. +2
          18 December 2025 07: 17
          Quote: Puncher
          So why were there two Persian women buried together? And where is the owner of these beauties (they probably wouldn't have dragged ugly ones from Persia), why wasn't he included in the funeral kit? Or is this a variation on the tale of the golden cockerel, only here the "Shamakhan queens" were eliminated so as not to sow discord among brothers eager for foreign charms?

          And nobody knows this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
        3. +3
          18 December 2025 10: 32
          I'd like to. But seriously, why were there two Persian women buried together? And where is the owner of these beauties (they probably wouldn't have dragged ugly ones out of Persia), why wasn't he included in the funeral kit?


          The older woman was 80 years old, the younger 50
          They may or may not have been Persian. A possible connection to Iran through DNA testing has been traced only to the younger one, with the caveat that contamination from samples found 100 years earlier is possible.
          They weren't exactly beauties either, at least not the eldest. She suffered a back injury in her youth and walked hunched over her entire life. A wooden figurine found in the burial mound depicts a woman with a beard! The remains suggest that the eldest may indeed have had elevated levels of male hormones. Literally a hag from the sagas.
          The remains of a tapestry in the burial mound depict a cart with two women, surrounded by women and men. The men hold spears, the women carry sheaves of wheat. Another clue—the cart itself—was also found; it is damaged, but some of the carvings are fairly well preserved. The cart was decorated with cats, symbols of Freya, the goddess of fertility, life, and death.
          A runic inscription on a bucket from the burial mound reads, "I belong to Sigrid." Another inscription on one of the wooden tablets reads, "Man knows little."
          So, the burial mound most likely contained the remains of a priestess of Freya of exceptionally high status.

          https://osebergvikingarv.no/eng/2025/02/03/who-were-the-oseberg-women/
          1. +3
            18 December 2025 11: 56
            Quote: Engineer
            The runic inscription on the bucket from the burial mound reads: "I belong to Sigrid"
            Translating Scandinavian runes with high accuracy, as they represented sounds rather than specific letters as in modern languages, is simply impossible. They were a highly inflected Old Norse language, where verb forms varied depending on the dialect and tribal affiliation of the writer (or speaker). Even if it is possible to decipher a runic inscription, and runes have long been known to everyone, the meaning of what is written is not always clear, as Norse runes have not been deciphered in our modern understanding.

            Thus, from the inscription, which allegedly read -I belong to Sigrid, we can also draw another conclusion - Sigrid belongs to me. Or - Sigrid and I belong to each otherOr come up with your own translation...
            Quote: Engineer
            Possible DNA link to Iran traced
            The ethnic composition of the Scandinavian peoples, especially modern Swedes, includes not only Neolithic and Mesolithic ancestors, but also Bronze Age nomadic ancestors from the Central Asian region. Where they came from is a major question, and this applies to both the male Y chromosome and the mitochondrial chromosome. Incidentally, this also applies to the Slavs...

            Modern Iranians have been seriously corrupted by the nomadic Turks for several centuries, but if you dig deeper into them, they are actually quite good – you could even recruit them all into the NSDAP (joke)... wink wink
            1. 0
              18 December 2025 12: 20
              If there is an inscription on an object, then what kind?
              Sigrid belongs to me. Or - Sigrid and I belong to each other.

              ?
            2. 0
              18 December 2025 13: 21
              Quote: Luminman
              Modern Iranians have been seriously corrupted by the nomadic Turks for several centuries, but if you dig deeper into them, they are actually quite good – you could even recruit them all into the NSDAP (joke)...


              Turks? It was probably the Arabs who corrupted them. After all, the Persians are truly "true Aryans" (in the scientific sense), while the Arabs are Semites, that is, "anti-Aryans." As for the Turks, some even believe they are more of a linguistic community than an ethnic one.
              1. +2
                18 December 2025 17: 20
                Quote: Illanatol
                Rather, they should have been spoiled by the Arabs.
                Yes, the Arabs didn’t have time to hurry there, but the Turks lingered for a long time...
    3. +1
      18 December 2025 17: 32
      used for the burial of... two women; genetic analysis of their remains has now shown that they were not Norwegians, but came from somewhere in Iran!
      Of course, from Iran! Otherwise, we'd have to recognize them as Russians/Slavs (R1A1), and then embark on a slippery slope that leads to thinking the Varangians were Western Slavs, not Vikings...)))
  2. +1
    18 December 2025 08: 37
    By the way, genetic analysis of their remains has already shown that they were not Norwegians, but came from somewhere in Iran!

    Well, that's not entirely true... The haplogroup is only known to the younger one, U7, which is found among our Caucasian peoples, such as the Ossetians. Perhaps she was a slave and was buried as a servant in the afterlife.
    1. +2
      18 December 2025 08: 54
      Well, if we believe Sturlusson, then Odin himself was supposedly an Ossetian, or more precisely an Alan... And he came to Scandinavia from precisely those parts.
      1. -1
        18 December 2025 12: 32
        I once read about excavations near Ashgabat (Asgabat - Asgard). Their results shed light on many obscure aspects of Scandinavian mythology. In particular, they discovered the "Idavoll field," which turned out to be a field for a ritual ball game symbolizing the movement of the sun across the sky. They also uncovered the remains of a palace that largely matched the description of Valhalla... If this hypothesis is correct, then the future Scandinavian peoples suffered a powerful blow from invaders or a natural disaster that made their way from Central Asia to the Scandinavian Peninsula.
  3. 0
    18 December 2025 10: 01
    However, the attempt to row ended in failure, apparently because the ship's crew was not trained in this.

    I wonder if the author has even tried sailing a six-oared yawl (aka a Ya-6). It requires minimal training to avoid hitting your comrades in the kidneys.
  4. +6
    18 December 2025 10: 46
    How Viking ships travel

    Previously, they successfully traveled in space, now they travel no less successfully in time.

    Thanks to the author!
  5. +2
    18 December 2025 12: 02
    By the way, genetic analysis of their remains has already shown that they were not Norwegians, but came from somewhere in Iran!

    Haplogroup U7 was found only in the younger woman. This analysis has now been rejected three times, so the initial hypothesis of an "Iranian origin" has been relegated to the category of "unlikely." However, it has been definitively established that the older woman died of cancer and suffered from hyperandrogenism—an excess of male hormones.
  6. +1
    18 December 2025 12: 17
    However, the attempt to row ended in failure, apparently because the ship's crew was not trained in this.

    From childhood we were taught: ON oars, but UNDER sails.
  7. +1
    18 December 2025 13: 15
    The elastic connection between the frames and the planking, which allowed the ship's hull to flex in rough seas, turned out to be an advantage rather than a drawback. Moreover, the crew pulled it ashore with relative ease. However, an attempt to row the vessel failed, apparently because the crew hadn't been trained in this area.


    The hull's curvature is hardly an advantage in rough seas. The frames are there to add rigidity to the hull, preventing the sides from deforming under the impact of the waves. It's a different matter if the vessel needs to be dragged through rapids. Perhaps this type was a "river-sea" vessel.
    Only drowned men walk under oars laughing Rowers move ON oars.
    1. +3
      18 December 2025 17: 27
      Quote: Illanatol
      The hull bending can hardly be considered an advantage in rough seas.
      Body bending - normal reaction to external forcesAnd if the structural members of the frames and stringers weren't subject to slight bending, the hull would eventually collapse. It's like a skyscraper, which is also subject to external forces and bends. Otherwise, it would collapse on its side or collapse like a house of cards...
      1. 0
        18 December 2025 21: 25
        Quote: Luminman
        It's like a skyscraper, which is also subject to external forces and which also bends. Otherwise, it would collapse on its side or collapse like a house of cards...

        No. It wouldn't have collapsed. wassat
        1. +2
          19 December 2025 06: 03
          Quote: Saxahorse
          No. It wouldn't have collapsed.
          The structural elements are subjected to enormous loads, the bending of which partially compensates for the forces of these loads...
          1. +1
            19 December 2025 08: 49
            Quote: Luminman
            the bending of which partially compensates for the forces of these loads...

            And it reduces the lifespan of the structure. Cyclic loads are the main cause of structural failure. Generally, this is a matter of weight; flexible structures are significantly lighter.

            When applied to a ship, the issue of ensuring watertightness is added. This cannot be achieved for a flexible structure without the use of rubber.
            1. -1
              21 December 2025 19: 50
              Quote: Saxahorse
              And it reduces the lifespan of this structure. Cyclic loads are the main cause of structural failure.
              Well, yes. What's interesting is the historians' opinion on the question of what ensured the elasticity of the connection. Supposedly
              On the ship from Gokstad, it looked like this: the frames were tied to the planks of the sheathing with willow rods
              Question: How long will a willow rod remain intact even in a slight wave?
      2. 0
        19 December 2025 13: 42
        Quote: Luminman
        Hull flexion is a normal response to external forces. If the structural members of the frames and stringers weren't subject to slight flexing, the hull would eventually collapse.


        That's right – lightweight. And to keep it light, a framework in the form of frames is needed. Otherwise, excessive deformation could cause damage not only to the hull, but even to the crew.
        These vessels resisted "external forces" thanks to their light weight and size. They glided over the waves, seemingly avoiding their impacts, rather than being directly hit.
        Modern ships, made of metal, also don't flex much under wave impact. And yes, sometimes too strong a wave impact on the side of a ship can lead to disaster.

        It was stated that the hulls of these vessels were made of oak. Oak wood is not very elastic, but it is very strong. Although oak is not very common in Scandinavia, river boats were often built from more flexible woods.
        1. +1
          19 December 2025 14: 12
          Quote: Illanatol
          And in order for it to remain light, a frame in the form of frames is needed.
          When I talk about the hull, I naturally mean its structural members—the frames and stringers. You just misunderstood me...
          1. 0
            20 December 2025 06: 51
            A power rig will work if the attachment to the hull is sufficiently rigid. Flexible attachments (ropes, pieces of leather, etc.) were used for river vessels.
            Of course, Scandinavian vessels could have different designs. Some were suitable for long-distance sea voyages, others for coastal navigation and river navigation. The latter were smaller, had a less developed keel and shallow draft, and if necessary (due to the threat of a storm), they could simply be dragged ashore. This wasn't just true for Scandinavians.
  8. +2
    18 December 2025 14: 34
    I was especially amazed by the axe. Just look at how much work went into creating such beauty! And I don't think it's surprising that it's so well preserved. The stone was lying in one place. No one had ever hit it with a sledgehammer. It will look the same in a million years, unless damaged.
  9. -1
    21 December 2025 19: 39
    Again about these "40 days"!!! negative
    The first replica was made back in 1892. On this ship, named "Viking", 13 Norwegian sailors under the command of Captain Magnus Anderson sailed across the Atlantic Ocean from Bergen to Chicago in 40 days, where the World's Fair was held in 1893.
    I think I've already covered this topic, but apparently that time April 7 2025 20: 37 The food passed the horse.
    I repeat.
    1)
    On April 30, the Viking set sail from Bergen, accompanied by a large flotilla of vessels of all types, carrying the mayor, members of the city council, and many other dignitaries. Friends, wives, and lovers, as well as relatives of the crew, waved handkerchiefs and sent greetings in speeches and songs to the departing Vikings.

    2)
    The Viking arrived in Chicago and dropped anchor at the World's Fair amid much fanfare on Wednesday, July 12, 1893.
    It seems to me that the time interval between April 30 and July 12 is not 40 days, but rather quite a bit more. 31 days of May and 30 days of June are already 61 days.
    But how long did it take the Viking to cross the Atlantic?
    Land was sighted on May 27, almost four weeks after leaving Norway. It was Newfoundland. It took two weeks to sail along the American coast, with southern gales and torrential rains. Viking was first greeted with a ceremonial welcome in Newport, and on June 17, she reached New York City and was met at City Island by an American customs cutter, the monitor Mianton, and a large fleet of yachts, tugs, and excursion steamers. The American monitor greeted her with cannon fire, as did forts and the warship San Francisco. Numerous passing steamers hooted. It was a joyful and beautiful sight, one that those who witnessed it will not soon forget. The small Norwegian vessel, with its glittering golden dragon, was towed into New York Harbor at the head of this impressive maritime procession.
    In addition, the following must be taken into account. Since the Viking had already shown itself to be able to be brought into the wind during the testing period, a forestaysail was installed on the Viking's forestay. With this additional anti-historical With a sail that eliminated the above-mentioned drawback, Magnus Anderson and his crew set out on their voyage to Chicago in 1893.