White Guard General Nikolai Yudenich

10 295 156
White Guard General Nikolai Yudenich
Yudenich in a portrait by M. Mizernyuk. 1916.


В previous article We discussed Nikolai Yudenich's origins, the beginning of his military career, his participation in the Russo-Japanese War, and his successes on the Caucasian Front during World War I. Today, we'll continue this story and discuss Yudenich's activities after his retirement and before the October Revolution, his escape to Finland, the Northwestern Army's march on Petrograd, and his life in exile.



So, after Yudenich's refusal to send the already disorganized troops of the Caucasian Front into an offensive that was doomed to failure, he was removed from the post of commander-in-chief and returned to Petrograd.

Yudenich after his resignation


The Provisional Government was leading Russia to ruin, and by the summer of 1917, this was clear to everyone. Lavr Kornilov was claiming the role of "savior of the Fatherland." From August 12th to 15th (25th to 28th), a State Conference was held in Moscow, at which this general apparently decided to become a Russian Bonaparte. Here's how M. Sholokhov describes his appearance in his novel "And Quiet Flows the Don":

The officers, linking arms, formed a protective chain, but were scattered. Dozens of hands reached out to Kornilov. A plump, disheveled woman trotted alongside him, trying to press her lips to the sleeve of his light green uniform. At the exit, amid a deafening roar of welcoming shouts, Kornilov was lifted into arms and carried.

And this is the testimony of L. Trotsky:

Morozova, the millionaire merchant, fell to her knees. The officers carried Kornilov out to the people.

A member of the Cadet Party, F. F. Rodichev, addressed the general with the following words:

Save Russia, and a grateful people will crown you.


Kornilov's arrival at the Meeting

General Yudenich, the military commander, supported Kornilov's plans to restore order in the country. Kornilov, incidentally, was confident that he was acting in strict accordance with the government's plans, which had itself requested that he send a detachment of reliable troops to Petrograd. Therefore, upon receiving Kerensky's telegram on the morning of August 27 demanding that he immediately relinquish his position as Supreme Commander to Lukomsky and report to Petrograd, he concluded that Lukomsky was "under pressure from some destructive forces" and replied:

In view of the grave situation of the country and the army, I decided not to relinquish the post of Supreme Commander-in-Chief and to first clarify the situation.

Upon receiving this telegram, Kerensky imagined that the army units he had summoned were marching to overthrow the government. He declared Kornilov a rebel and, finally losing his nerve, turned for help to the Bolsheviks, who had already been effectively driven underground. Ultimately, Kornilov's troops were stopped without a shot being fired—by Bolshevik agitators and the railway workers' union, the powerful "Vikzhel," about which Z. Gippius wrote on November 9, 1917:

We have become fence-sitters,
Don't crawl away!
Already dismantled with black hands
Vikzhel routes.

It's worth noting that the "black hands of Vikzhel" in this case is not a metaphor: the hands of the railway workers were indeed black—dirty with coal dust and grease. Here's how General P.N. Krasnov recalled the actions of Vikzhel activists:

By some order, unknown to anyone, a steam locomotive would be attached to some echelon, and it would be hauled two or three times: forty, sixty miles, and then it would end up somewhere off to the side, at a remote siding, without fodder for the horses and without food for the men. The people, seeing all this chaos going on around them, began arresting officers and superiors.

And this is Krasnov’s testimony about the work of Bolshevik agitators:

Almost everywhere we saw the same scene. Dragoons sat or stood on the tracks or in the carriages, and among them, a nimble figure in a soldier's greatcoat. We heard abrupt phrases:

"Comrades, what's wrong with you? Kerensky rescued you from under the officer's baton, gave you freedom, and now you want to bend over backwards again, only to have him poke you in the teeth. Is that it?" Or:

"Comrades, Kerensky is for freedom and the people's happiness, and General Kornilov is for discipline and the death penalty. Are you really with Kornilov?"

However, unlike Denikin, the retired Yudenich suffered no harm and was not arrested. After the Bolsheviks came to power, he lived in Petrograd in the building of the Russian Insurance Company, where a sergeant major he had known since the Pamir Expedition served as janitor. He left Russia in January 1918 (according to other sources, in November 1917): using false documents, he and his wife and adjutant moved to Helsinki, Finland, where he hoped to find help from an old acquaintance from the General Staff Academy, Carl Mannerheim.

He negotiated with representatives of England and Sweden, recognized Kolchak as Supreme Ruler, and in April 1919, the admiral transferred funds to him to finance another White Guard army, which was located in Estonia and the Russian Pskov Governorate and was called the Northwestern Army. It was commanded by General Alexander Rodzianko, who had already attempted to advance on Petrograd in the spring and summer of that year, but was now forced to cede his post to Yudenich, who had more authority in the troops. This army numbered 20,000 men, and Yudenich had at his disposal over a hundred artillery pieces, two armored trains, eight armored cars, and six tanks (who, however, were unable to take part in the fighting – they got stuck in the mud of the autumn roads).


Generals N. Yudenich and A. Rodzianko with officers of the Northwestern White Army, 1919.

Ironically, Yudenich's allies were supposed to be the Estonians, whose independence he refused to recognize. Yudenich even managed to issue his own money; here's a credit note from the field treasury of the Northwestern Front bearing the general's signature:


The offensive on Petrograd



Defense of Petrograd, map

In 1919, the situation in Russia seemed to favor the Whites. Denikin launched his offensive, and by the end of the summer, his troops had captured Kharkov, Yekaterinoslav (Dnepropetrovsk), and Tsaritsyn. In September, Sumy, Oboyan, Stary Oskol, and Kursk fell. And on September 28, Yudenich's Northwestern Army launched an offensive on Petrograd. By October 20, Yamburg, Luga, Tsarskoye Selo, and Pavlovsk had been captured. The Whites failed to cut the Nikolayevskaya railway, which supplied Petrograd, but the city remained only 20 kilometers away. Trotsky recalled:

In Petrograd, I found the most abject confusion. Everything was in disarray. The troops were retreating, crumbling into pieces. Zinoviev was the center of this confusion. Sverdlov told me, "Zinoviev is panic."
When things were going badly, Zinoviev would usually lie down on the sofa, not in a metaphorical but in a real sense, and sigh... Apathy, hopelessness, and doom had also taken hold of the lower ranks of the administrative apparatus.

Mass repressions were unleashed in the “liberated” territories, and Demyan Bedny later wrote with full justification:

General Yudenich is brave
He was also a bloody executioner,
He broke through to Leningrad,
To organize a parade there:
He didn't skimp on the effects,
Decorate all the brochures,
On the shoulders of the lanterns
Hang the rebels.


It should be noted, however, that Yudenich had no need to order executions: most often, extrajudicial executions were carried out at the initiative of his subordinates (who had considerably tarnished this general's name) and even without his knowledge. Particularly memorable was the former tsarist captain Stanislav Bulak-Balakhovich, who began as a Red Army commander but, upon learning that a decision had been made to arrest him for unjustified cruelty and embezzlement of entrusted property, fled to the Whites, receiving colonel's epaulettes from them. In Yudenich's army, this sadist took up his favorite pastime; Prince Lvov, a correspondent for the newspaper "Russkie Vedomosti," wrote in 1920:

We were driving through a region occupied a year earlier by the notorious Bulak-Balakhovich. Popular memory of him is not good. Robberies and, most importantly, the gallows, must have forever ruined Balakhovich's reputation among the peasant world. Forty to fifty miles from Pskov, peasants speak with stern disapproval of his executions in Pskov squares and his inhuman penchant for hangings.


S. Bulak-Balakhovich (far left) and the commander of the Estonian army, Johan Laidoner, Pskov, May 31, 1919.

Among other things, the White Guards also made their mark by burning down the colored smalt factory founded by Lomonosov.
It's hard to believe, but in memory of Yudenich's march on Petrograd, the first "monument to the White Guard movement" in Russia was erected on the Pulkovo Heights in 1991. And already in 2008, a monument to the "soldiers of the Northwestern Army" appeared in the village of Opolye (Kingisepp District, Leningrad Region).

Let's return to the turbulent year of 1919. To repel Yudenich's advance toward Petrograd, new combat units of the Red Army were quickly redeployed, including some units of the 2nd Division from Frunze's army, which had fought against Kolchak.


Soldiers of the 2nd Rifle Division near Petrograd, 1919.

But G. Kotovsky’s cavalry brigade was late – the White Guards had already been driven back from the city.

On October 21, 1920, the Northwestern Army's advance was halted. The following day, the Red Army itself went on the offensive, and in early November, threatened with encirclement, Yudenich's forces began to retreat. In mid-November, Yudenich wrote to Johan Laidoner, commander of the Estonian Army:

The Reds are persistently attacking with overwhelming force, and in places are pushing back units of the army entrusted to me, particularly from the direction of Gdov. The troops are exhausted by the constant fighting. In the extremely cramped space between the front and the Estonian border—in the immediate rear of the troops—all the supply trains, reserves, prisoners, and refugees have accumulated, which is severely restricting troop maneuvering. The slightest setback could create panic in the rear and lead to disaster and the destruction of the entire army. It is necessary to transfer all rear units to the left bank of the Narva River no later than tomorrow. I foresee the possibility, even the inevitability, of a further army retreat, which could lead to conflict if the Estonian border is crossed. To avoid the inevitable destruction of the army, I ask you not to refuse to immediately accept the army entrusted to me under your command and assign it a sector of the front shared with the troops entrusted to you. I ask you to report my request to the Estonian government to accept the Northwestern Army under Estonian protection.

The Estonians treated the retreating White Guards with no ceremony. Journalist Heinrich Grossen wrote about this:

Despite the winter cold, the unfortunate Russians were literally stripped naked, and everything was mercilessly taken. Gold crosses were ripped from their chests, purses were taken, rings were taken from their fingers. Before the eyes of the Russian troops, the Estonians stripped the soldiers, shivering from the cold, of their new British uniforms, giving them rags in exchange, but not always. Warm American underwear was not spared either, and tattered greatcoats were thrown over the naked bodies of the unfortunate vanquished.


Narva. Interned soldiers of Yudenich's army. February 1920.

Lieutenant General A. Rodzianko, who commanded the Northern Corps, which later became the Northwestern Army, from June 19 to October 2, 1919, blamed Yudenich for the defeat:

Enormous responsibility for the army's destruction rests with General Yudenich himself, a weak-willed and stubborn man who was completely alien to the aspirations and desires of those fighting for a just cause. This decrepit old man had no right to assume such a responsible role; those Russian public figures who promoted this mummy to such a responsible position are grave criminals against the fallen fighters.


1912, Olympic Games in Stockholm, member of the Russian Empire team A.P. Rodzianko.

Incidentally, A. Kuprin, who served as a lieutenant in the Northwestern Army at the time (he was the editor of the newspaper “Prinevsky Krai”), recalled that during the offensive on Petrograd:

Generals Rodzianko and Palen, both tall giants, in light-colored officer's overcoats, with weapons, which seemed like a toy in their hands, went on the attack ahead of the chains.


Lieutenant A. Kuprin in a photograph from 1914.

Alexei Tolstoy was also very critical of Yudenich, calling him “a stupid, stubborn, ferocious man and an armchair general” in his novel “The Emigrants.”

On January 22, 1922, Yudenich officially announced the dissolution of his army and handed over the remainder of its treasury—227,000 pounds sterling—to the "liquidation commission." The former allies of Yudenich's army were housed in what amounted to concentration camps, with deaths from cold and disease (primarily typhus) at a high rate. As a result, more than 7,000 White Guards fled from the "hospitable" Estonians back to Soviet Russia.

Yudenich, of course, settled in quite comfortably—in the expensive Commerce Hotel in Reval—but on the night of January 29, 1920, he was arrested by the aforementioned Bulak-Balakhovich. At the request of the French and British military missions, the general was released, and Balakhovich fled to Poland, where J. Pilsudski told B. Savinkov:

Balakhovich may be a bandit, but since there is no choice, it is probably better to deal with Balakhovich than with gold-shouldered generals.

Eventually, this sadist rose to the rank of Polish general.

Yudenich in exile


On February 24, 1920, the former general was evacuated from Estonia in a carriage belonging to the British military mission. He traveled via Riga, Stockholm, and Copenhagen to London, but soon moved to Nice. He avoided political involvement, but instead became the head of the Society of Zealots of Russian stories In Nice, he lectured on military operations in the Caucasus. In 1933, at the age of 71, he died of tuberculosis. Demyan Bedny responded to his death with these verses:

Got it in the lower back,
And Yudenich goes abroad
Without looking back, he also stole it,
Where he was ill for thirteen years
And the other day he died in Nice –
In a venereal hospital.

However, now Yudenich's name, as the holder of three degrees of the Order of St. George, is engraved on a marble plaque in the St. George Hall of the Moscow Kremlin.

Alexandra Yudenich outlived her husband by 29 years. In 1956, she was elected honorary chairperson of the meeting dedicated to the 40th anniversary of the capture of the Erzurum fortress. In 1962, she published her memoirs about her husband in the magazine “Chasovoy”.
156 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    14 December 2025 04: 47
    The number of this army reached 20 thousand people,

    The maximum was 18500 people, but the fighting spirit was very high.
    Yudenich's allies were supposed to be the Estonians, whose independence he refused to recognize

    He recognized Estonia as an independent state. This was a condition of the British, who otherwise would not have given him either weapons or money. True, the Estonians did appropriate some of the weapons. But the Ingrian Regiment, 6000 strong, fought as part of the Northwestern Army. It was they who decided the fate of Petrograd. They simply grew tired of fighting and went home.
    And putting all the blame on the commander is always our thing!
    Yes, the future fate of the army is not enviable.
    1. +9
      14 December 2025 05: 17
      Yudenich, like Judas, sold out his people: he went to war against them with money from Western "sponsors".
      1. 0
        14 December 2025 07: 43
        Both the Reds and the Whites fought not for the people, but for power, and both of them wasted millions of lives in this struggle. I don’t see much of a difference...
        1. +9
          14 December 2025 09: 06
          Quote: faiver
          Both the Reds and the Whites fought not for the people, but for power, and both of them wasted millions of lives in this struggle. I don’t see much of a difference...

          The difference is clearly visible: WWI and WWII, free education and healthcare, maternity (Leninist) leave, nuclear weapons, space, the second economy, etc., etc.
          1. -11
            14 December 2025 09: 17
            You forgot to mention the almost free work for the only employer in the country - the "state of workers and peasants", in which neither the workers nor the peasants decided anything....
            1. +8
              14 December 2025 09: 22
              Quote: faiver
              You forgot to mention the almost free work for the only employer in the country - the "state of workers and peasants", in which neither the workers nor the peasants decided anything....

              No wonder everyone is so rich these days. laughing
              And everyone decides everything. 146% decide. wink
              Especially workers and peasants. Yes
              1. -1
                14 December 2025 09: 24
                And now it's the same thing, only it's not the CPSU that's at the helm, but United Russia, a change of party card...
                1. 12+
                  14 December 2025 09: 28
                  Quote: faiver
                  And now it's the same thing, only it's not the CPSU that's at the helm, but United Russia, a change of party card...

                  But now you can't complain to the trade union or the party committee, and you can't find any way to control your bosses—they'll fire you right away. The heads of all public institutions are awarding themselves and their peers astronomical bonuses at the expense of their rank-and-file employees.
                  1. -6
                    14 December 2025 09: 34
                    Heads of all budgetary institutions
                    - writing slander against thousands of people on the internet knowing that you won't face any consequences for it - that's probably communist? bully
                    1. +7
                      14 December 2025 09: 52
                      Quote: faiver
                      Heads of all budgetary institutions
                      - writing slander against thousands of people on the internet knowing that you won't face any consequences for it - that's probably communist? bully

                      I'm not a communist. You missed the mark.
                      I've worked in public sector organizations. That's the system there. And you can't go against it. I fully admit that director positions in public sector institutions are for sale, but I haven't held a candle to it.
                      I did not write slander against anyone.
                      Just look at what happened to the leadership of the Ministry of Defense: Timur and his team and other teams.
                      The USSR had its own system: connections, special feeding stations, special rations, etc.
                      1. -4
                        14 December 2025 09: 59
                        I have had this happen too, and since you didn’t hold a candle to it, then this is simply your speculation, and it was slander that you wrote, the topic is closed..... hi
                      2. -10
                        14 December 2025 10: 34
                        You also slandered that the Reds fought for the people.
                    2. +6
                      14 December 2025 19: 29
                      Quote: faiver
                      - writing slander against thousands of people on the internet knowing that you won't face any consequences for it - that's probably communist?

                      A Krasnodar official sought a court order to ban discussion of her salary.
                      https://yamal-media.ru/news/krasnodarskaja-chinovnitsa-zahotela-zapretit-cherez-sud-obsuzhdat-svoju-zarplatu
                      Probably ashamed of his small salary. wink
                      1. -4
                        14 December 2025 19: 43
                        A little educational program: the heads of budgetary institutions are not, for the most part, civil servants
            2. -3
              14 December 2025 13: 54
              You are an interesting person... Apparently a descendant of the one in the photograph, staring (ready to shoot) and pointing a finger at the photographer... In the picture with the Estonians and the punitive forces of Bulak-Balakhovich
              1. -4
                14 December 2025 15: 19
                Apparently, people like you were the ones who labeled their neighbors and co-workers as enemies of the people and wrote denunciations about them to the NKVD... hi
                1. +3
                  14 December 2025 15: 38
                  By the way, my ancestors were among the so-called repressed. Moreover, they bore no grudge against the Soviet regime. And I received an excellent education in the 70s and 80s. And with you, there's some confusion about informers? Not one of those? Huh?
                  1. -3
                    14 December 2025 15: 46
                    age-related confusion like Tatra's?
                    1. 0
                      14 December 2025 16: 00
                      DO NOT slander. The enemies of the USSR, given the "freedom of speech" granted to them by Gorbachev, developed a mental inclination toward slander.
                      1. 0
                        14 December 2025 16: 02
                        I apologize, madam, I admit that I, the idiot, asked for it. hi bully
    2. -3
      14 December 2025 18: 14
      Quote: ee2100
      The Estonians appropriated some of the weapons. But the Ingermanland Regiment, 6000 strong, fought as part of the Northwestern Army. It was they who decided the fate of Petrograd.

      Back in 1918, the Bolsheviks recognized the independence of Estonia, Lithuania and Lithuania.

      Estonians hated Russians more than the Bolsheviks- During the fighting they seized ammunition, food and clothing for the Russian army.

      And the main reason for the defeat was that Latvia did NOT allow the Western Russian Volunteer Army to pass through Riga to the front to Yudenich, otherwise St. Petersburg would have been free.

      The Reds were saved by Estonian and Latvian Nazis.
  2. +4
    14 December 2025 05: 23
    The article is very interesting and informative, thanks to the author! But again, there's a "but"—Yudenich was indeed a Knight of the Order of St. George, three degrees, but not all (as stated in the article), as the Order of St. George had four degrees! And Yudenich didn't even have the first degree!
    1. VLR
      +6
      14 December 2025 05: 53
      Yes, in the first article I wrote that Yudenich was the last recipient of the second degree of this order. The word "all" is, of course, unnecessary; it slipped through somehow. Thank you for pointing it out; we'll remove it.
      1. +4
        14 December 2025 05: 57
        Thanks for the reply! Although some people think the comment is too short.
      2. +5
        14 December 2025 08: 16
        And anyway, thanks for the article. Soviet schools don't say anything good about Yudenich, especially about his actions on the battlefields of World War I and his army in Turkey. It's clear he was a controversial figure. Personally, I'm against all this White Guardism, but you need to know your own history.
      3. +3
        14 December 2025 08: 58
        Quote: VlR
        Yes, in the first article I wrote that Yudenich was the last recipient of the second degree of this order. The word "all" is, of course, unnecessary; it slipped through somehow. Thank you for pointing it out; we'll remove it.

        Good morning Valery!
        I'm ahead of Ivan: before the revolution, the orders of the Russian Empire were distinguished by classes, not degrees.
        Thank you for the article!
  3. -5
    14 December 2025 06: 15
    There is silence about sadism among the Reds, who also robbed and hanged to their heart's content.
    Although... They're now considered "patriots." Even though they once viewed Russia as a resource base for the spread of "world revolution."
    1. +8
      14 December 2025 06: 45
      Quote from invisible_man
      There is silence about sadism among the Reds, who also robbed and hanged to their heart's content.
      The author pointed out why there is silence.
      The former tsarist captain Stanislav Bulak-Balakhovich was especially remembered by everyone, who started out as a red commander, but, having learned that a decision had been made to arrest him for unjustified cruelty and embezzlement of entrusted property, he fled to the Whites, receiving from them the shoulder straps of a colonel.
      Everything is in order.
      1. -5
        14 December 2025 08: 21
        Well, it's a classic "fired retroactively." I'd like to hear not only about those who "started," but also about those who continued and rose to high ranks.
        1. +3
          14 December 2025 08: 33
          Quote from invisible_man
          I would like to hear not only about those who "started", but also about those who continued.
          Since they started and continued like that, they weren’t awarded Gruppenführer titles for their pretty eyes... What more could you want?!
          1. -1
            14 December 2025 09: 23
            I'm talking about a career in the Red Army. You're completely wrong to pretend you don't understand.
            1. +7
              14 December 2025 11: 40
              Quote from invisible_man
              I'm talking about a career in the Red Army. You're completely wrong to pretend you don't understand.

              Did Shkuro, Krasnov, and their ilk actually serve in the Red Army? As far as I remember, many of the White Guard generals were released on condition that they signed a written undertaking not to fight, and so on...
              1. -3
                15 December 2025 09: 42
                Quote: Fitter65
                Did Shkuro, Krasnov and others like them really serve in the Red Army?

                Of course, who carried it out? genocide Terek, Don and other Cossacks with the destruction of Russian villages, mass murder of children and women?

                Hundreds of thousands of victims. Read about the Decossackization; these atrocities against the people are no secret today.
                1. 0
                  15 December 2025 09: 57
                  Prince Dologorukov under Peter the Great - the Don had never seen such genocide, it was completely depopulated and was already being settled by new Cossacks - essentially anew.
                  1. -1
                    15 December 2025 11: 18
                    Quote: vet
                    Prince Dologorukov under Peter the Great - the Don had never seen such genocide, it was completely depopulated and was already being settled by new Cossacks - essentially anew.

                    a million and thousands - we don't see the difference, nor the difference of several centuries and by a government that is not of the people's will?

                    And yes, when will you finally show the country where in the year 37*38 682 thousand citizens were shot, - 300 thousand more than in fascist Italy?
                    1. 0
                      15 December 2025 12: 08
                      Quote: Olgovich
                      And yes, when will you finally show the country where in the year 37*38 682 thousand citizens were shot - 300 thousand more than in fascist Italy?

                      682,000 tsk-tsk... And in what years were the remaining millions executed?
                      1. -2
                        2 January 2026 16: 12
                        Quote: Fitter65
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        And yes, when will you finally show the country where in the year 37*38 682 thousand citizens were shot - 300 thousand more than in fascist Italy?

                        682,000 tsk-tsk... And in what years were the remaining millions executed?

                        The remaining millions were sitting in the Gulag. Well, really, the USSR had half a million extra people.
                      2. 0
                        2 January 2026 18: 55
                        Quote: Panin (Michman)
                        The remaining millions were sitting in the Gulag. Well, really, the USSR had half a million extra people.

                        And how many millions were in the GULAG?
                    2. VLR
                      +2
                      15 December 2025 12: 29
                      Dolgorukov's report to Peter I:
                      “3000 people sat in Esaulov, and they were taken by assault and all outweighed, only from the mentioned 50 people they were released after infancy. In Donetsk, 2000 people were seated, they were also taken by storm and many were beaten, and the rest were all outweighed. 200 people were taken from near Voronezh, and in Voronezh all those mentioned were outweighed. In Cherkassky, about 200 people were hanged near the Donskoy circle and against the village huts. Also many parties from different towns and many of those parties are cut. ”

                      Dolgorukov doesn’t even count the destroyed Cossack towns and villages:
                      “According to Khopr, above from Pristannaya along Buzuluk - everything. On Donets, from above on Lugansk - all. By Medveditsa - by the Ust-Medveditskaya stanitsa, which is on the Don. According to Buzuluk - that's it. According to Aidar - that's it. According to Derkula - everything. In Kalitva and in other rivers beyond the river - everything. According to Ilovle, according to Ilovlinskaya, that’s all. ”
                      1. -1
                        15 December 2025 13: 47
                        Quote: VlR
                        Dolgorukov's report to Peter I:
                        “There were 3000 people in Yesaulov



                        From a telegram from Vrachev, a member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Caucasian Labor Army, to Stalin and Ordzhonikidze dated November 1, 1920: "The eviction of the villages is proceeding successfully... Today I had a meeting with Chechens, representatives of the villages. The Chechens are in excellent spirits, they are endlessly happy...

                        Are you happy too?

                        Red Division Commander F.K. Mironov: The Communists, with their atrocities, provoked a mass uprising in the Don region and are now driving the Russian people to correct their evil mistake. The blood now being shed on the Southern Front is needless and unnecessary, and it is being shed amid the wild, satanic laughter of new vandals, who have resurrected the Middle Ages and the Inquisition with their villainy. For example: in the village of Kachalinskaya in the 2nd Don District, the Communists, while torturing a 22-year-old Cossack who had defected from the Cadet side, placed him barefoot on a hot frying pan and beat his bare feet with sticks. In the village of Bokovskaya, among the 62 innocent Cossacks executed, one was executed for refusing to give matches to Commissar Gorokhov. In the village of Morozovskaya, the Revolutionary Committee slaughtered 67 people. These villains brought people to a barn and there, drunk, practiced the art of sabre and dagger attacks on them. All the slaughtered bodies were found under the barn floor. In the Sevastyanov farmstead in the Chernyshevskaya stanitsa, the chairman of the farm council was shot for sharing a surname with a cadet officer. And when the outraged population demanded to know why, the murderers replied, "There was a mistake." In the Setrakovskoye farmstead in the Migulinskaya stanitsa, 400 unarmed people were killed during a rally under an order issued by the expeditionary force to exterminate Cossacks. Under the order of the Red Terror, tens of thousands of unarmed people were executed in the Don region. The number of illegal requisitions and confiscations must be counted in the hundreds of thousands. The population groaned under the violence and abuse. There isn't a single hamlet or village that doesn't count its victims of the Red Terror in the tens and hundreds. The Don is speechless with horror.
                        .

                        Boguslavsky, who headed the Revolutionary Committee in the village of Morozovskaya, went drunk to the prison, took a list of those arrested, called out the 64 imprisoned Cossacks one by one, and executed them all one by one. Subsequently, Boguslavsky and other members of the Revolutionary Committee carried out similar mass executions, summoning Cossacks to the Revolutionary Committee and to their homes. The outrage over these extrajudicial executions was so great that when the 9th Army headquarters moved into the village, the army's political department ordered the arrest of the entire Morozovskaya Revolutionary Committee and an investigation. A horrific scene of brutal reprisals against the residents of the village and surrounding farmsteads was uncovered. In Boguslavsky's yard alone, 50 buried bodies of executed and slaughtered Cossacks and their families were discovered. Another 150 bodies were found in various locations outside the village. An investigation revealed that most of the dead were innocent and all were subject to release.

                        In February 1919, the Ural Regional Revolutionary Committee issued an instruction according to which it was necessary to “outlaw the Cossacks, and they are subject to extermination”
                2. -1
                  18 December 2025 12: 28
                  The Cossacks wanted their own state, and they would have been the first to hang monarchists like you, Olgovich, on their way to this goal.
                  But I would like to get a comment on this wonderful: "Stanislav Bulak-Balakhovich, who started out as a Red commander, but upon learning that a decision had been made to arrest him for unjustified cruelty and embezzlement of entrusted property, fled to the Whites, receiving from them the shoulder straps of a colonel."
                  So, it turns out that the White Camp is a refuge for sadists and scoundrels who were expelled by the Reds?
                  1. -1
                    18 December 2025 12: 42
                    Quote: Aleks
                    The Cossacks wanted their own state, and they would have been the first to hang monarchists like you, Olgovich, on their way to this goal.

                    we got our state from red All the nationalists, whoever wanted and how much they wanted at Russia's expense, look out the window

                    Quote: Aleks
                    It turns out that the white camp is a refuge for sadists and scoundrels,

                    Red camp: and was like that all his life, 1939 NKVD, cadet:
                    From the first day, Comrade Tomin called us all into his office and said that our course knowledge had fallen behind practice [and] here you will have to change it and use physical force on those being interrogated [,] unless there is a confession [,] and then he took us into the next room and showed [,] how to interrogate [,] and with one kick to the arrested person’s stomach, he knocked him to the ground, and his assistant Neiman stomped on the lying one’s chest and stomach, after which the arrested person jumped out the window and killed himself. As a result of this interrogation, the second arrested person, a doctor, jumped out the window [,], broke his leg, and was sent to the hospital only after he signed the unread protocol [of the interrogation]. Otherwise, he lay on the floor in the room.

                    Assistant Neiman specifically went around the rooms of the cadet investigators and taught them how to interrogate, showing us new forms of beating he had invented, as a result of which several people died in the prison hospital. On Tomin's orders, 87 people were placed in a single cell in the turpod under the department building, which could barely accommodate 30 people, and water was forbidden. A couple of hours later, 8 people suffocated to death, and the ninth teacher went berserk—he lost his mind. Tomin, Petrov, and Neiman, along with a cadet (the physical education teacher—the strongest one in our school [of cadets], I forgot his last name), took him to the cellar and shot him without trial. The prison doctor was forced to draw up a false report, with the help of Prison Warden Abramov, claiming that the teacher had also suffocated. Among those who suffocated was a Komsomol secretary, 18-19 years old, from the Monastyrsky district, and all of them died two days after they were arrested.

                    For this incident, thoroughly interrogate the prison doctor and the young nurse who was pregnant at the time, and the physical education cadet and the police officers on duty at the prison guard station, and you will find out that the teacher was mad, not dead, and was taken from his cell alive to be killed, and Borisov and Tomin argued not to do this, but he did not listen and shot them.

                    When Tomin checked the interrogation protocols we had recorded, he returned the recruited persons for revision, pointing out to us that the recruitment should be recorded according to the bigwigs (engineers, doctors, teachers, district workers, even regional ones), as long as the arrested person named their last names, and we, the cadets, according to his standard, recorded them ourselves and assigned them to the counter-revolutionary organization to which Tomin could assign them.

                    PETROV, NE[Y]MAN, ABRAMOVICH, and TOMIN stoned an arrested NKVD officer in a cellar, forced him to sign a confession, and then killed him. They took the dead man's overcoat for themselves, and ABRAMOV[ICH] wore it. Petrov, the commandant, himself told about this, and you can find the coat on him. They also used young and beautiful women, one 17 years old.a summer girl[,] the daughter of a planner or laboratory assistant at the Monastyrsky District sugar factory[,] and another, the wife of the division's political department chief, and then they were shot[,] and Petrov inserted a wooden pin into the genitals of the murdered women
                    1. -2
                      19 December 2025 02: 07
                      Quote: Olgovich
                      From the first day, Mr. Tomin called us all into his office and

                      Composed for a long time?
                      1. 0
                        19 December 2025 09: 09
                        Quote: VasAndr
                        Composed for a long time?

                        belay fool
                        Read Historical Materialism
                    2. 0
                      25 December 2025 12: 07
                      It was clear that the Reds were handing out power; they were surviving. Those they were able to bring back later, they did. As for the military and capitalists, along with the church, overthrew their tsar before that, with the Germans at the door, and then the provisional government screwed up—that's the starting point for the Achtung crisis, of course.
                      1. 0
                        25 December 2025 12: 28
                        Quote: Aleks
                        It was clear that the Reds were handing out power; they survived. Those they were able to bring back later, they did.

                        look out the window - all is lost, because the Turks were
                        Quote: Aleks
                        And the fact that the military and capitalists, together with the church, overthrew their tsar, with the Germans at the door, and then the provisional government shit itself, this is not accepted as the starting condition of Achtung in your head, of course.

                        Stalin thought differently - he overthrew the people under the leadership of the Bolsheviks - read the short course
                        Quote: Aleks
                        the starting condition of Achtung in your head is not accepted,

                        No, of course not - they weren't elected to decide issues, they lost the election and it's not their damn business to rule the country - especially since these idiots have never worked for anyone before.
                    3. 0
                      25 December 2025 12: 10
                      The story about the Reds' criminals is a bit short – there were far more of them. Just like the Whites! Because at times like these, all the rot comes out, whether on shoulder straps or collar tabs, it doesn't matter. Still, the example is telling – the Reds drank the shit, and the Whites picked it up. This is already a systemic approach to personnel management.
                      1. 0
                        25 December 2025 12: 30
                        Quote: Aleks
                        The story about the Red Army criminals is a bit short—there were far more of them. Just like the White Army! Because at times like these, all the rot comes out, whether on shoulder straps or collar tabs, it doesn't matter.

                        it 1939 year, and there are a lot of such witnesses - this abomination ruled from 1917 to 53
      2. +4
        14 December 2025 09: 15
        And,
        Tsarist captain Stanislav Bulak-Balakhovich, who began as a red commander.

        The key phrase is "Tsar's captain."
  4. +8
    14 December 2025 06: 17
    In memory of Yudenich's march on Petrograd, the first "monument to the White Guard movement" in Russia was erected on the Pulkovo Heights in 1991. And already in 2008, a monument to the "soldiers of the Northwestern Army" appeared in the village of Opolye (Kingisepp District, Leningrad Region).

    The cursed legacy of the shameful 90s, when they suddenly decided to erase everything Soviet. And only now have our rulers suddenly realized that it's impossible to win by proclaiming themselves the heirs of the losers. They've changed their rhetoric, but judging by the Yeltsin Centers that operate and the monuments to Solzhenitsyn and Kolchak that stand, they remain, at heart, admirers of the White Guard.
  5. +4
    14 December 2025 06: 19
    Yudenich had no need to give orders for executions: most often, extrajudicial executions were carried out on the initiative of his subordinates (who have considerably tarnished the name of this general)... the former tsarist captain Stanislav Bulak-Balakhovich, who started out as a Red commander, but upon learning that a decision had been made to arrest him for unjustified cruelty and embezzlement of entrusted property, fled to the Whites, receiving from them the epaulettes of a colonel

    It's telling that Yudenich didn't even try to rid his army of such Balakhnovichi. Apparently, he operated on the principle of "no scum, only talent."
  6. -1
    14 December 2025 06: 25
    Someone seems to be very concerned about the fate of the White Guard "heroes" who demonstrated their talents in the Civil War and lost the Russo-Japanese War and WWI...
    White Guard, White Flock,
    White army, white bone.
    The wet slabs become overgrown with grass.
    Russian letters - French churchyard.
    I touch history with my palm,
    I'm going through the civil war.
    Oh, how they wanted to go to the capital
    To ride in one day on a white horse.
    There was no glory - there was no Motherland,
    The heart is gone, but the memory lives on.
    Your Excellencies, Their Honors
    Together on Sainte-Geneviève-des-Bois.

    How she's already had enough of this "raspberry"...
    Looking for pearls in manure is truly a thankless task... They are not worth remembering just because their hands are elbow-deep in the blood of Russian people...
    1. -2
      14 December 2025 07: 06
      Quote: ROSS 42
      Someone seems to be very concerned about the fate of the White Guard "heroes" who demonstrated their talents in the Civil War and lost the Russo-Japanese War and WWI...

      Let's remember how the communists ended up. And everyone killed Russians back then.
      1. +7
        14 December 2025 07: 11
        Quote: Dart2027
        And then everyone killed Russians.

        They killed only because the thieves didn't care how many people would be left behind as a result of the property redistribution... During the years of Yeltsin's rule, Russia lost several million citizens (killed, missing, dying of hunger and drugs)...
        And stop whistling about the communists – call everything by its proper name: the highest political leadership and the leadership of the security agencies...
        1. 0
          14 December 2025 07: 26
          Quote: ROSS 42
          During the years of EBN's rule, Russia lost

          I'm not talking about Yeltsin, but about the Civil War.
          Quote: ROSS 42
          And stop whistling about the communists – call everything by its proper name: the highest political leadership and the leadership of the security agencies...

          Were they Martians? How does that change the outcome?
          1. +2
            14 December 2025 07: 38
            How could it not be about EBN? There was just as much shooting in cities back then as there was during the civil war. And it was essentially an undeclared civil war.
            1. +2
              14 December 2025 07: 51
              Quote: Gardamir
              How could it not be about EBN? There was no less shooting in cities back then than in the civil war.

              And what time did Yudenich live at that time?
              1. -1
                14 December 2025 07: 56
                I twist and twist, I want to confuse.
                1. +5
                  14 December 2025 08: 37
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  I want to confuse

                  I don’t know who’s confusing you, but I wrote that
                  Quote: Dart2027
                  And then everyone killed Russians.
                  Specifically about breastfeeding. Both sides had plenty of everything.
                  1. -2
                    14 December 2025 10: 23
                    Yes, but before that, for some reason, they asked how the communists ended up.
                    1. +2
                      14 December 2025 12: 19
                      Quote: Gardamir
                      For some reason they asked how the communists ended up.

                      Because before that, they talked about who failed what.
      2. -3
        14 December 2025 07: 35
        Communist Putin is the president of Russia.
        1. VLR
          14+
          14 December 2025 07: 43
          Putin is as much a "communist" as Yeltsin, who handed over power to him. It was under Putin that Sozhenitsyn began to be studied in schools, and Putin even asked the hack's widow to remove passages praising Vlasov and his followers from Russian publications of "GULAG"—because "the time had not yet come." He personally unveiled a monument to Solzhenitsyn. He even paid tribute to Denikin's reburied ashes with flowers. And the monument to Kolchak in Irkutsk could only have been erected with Putin's consent.
          1. +3
            14 December 2025 07: 54
            I completely agree. Just don't blame everything on the communists. How can a communist working as a carpenter destroy a country?
            1. -4
              14 December 2025 13: 26
              Quote: Gardamir
              Just don't blame the communists for everything. How can a communist working as a carpenter destroy a country?

              Many, but few, came out to rallies demanding the preservation of the country - in the Baltics, Moldova, etc. - and these are the Interfronts, not the Communists

              Why didn't communist carpenters come out all over the country?
              1. 0
                14 December 2025 18: 38
                Now, no one's coming out either. The same old story of servility toward migrants, a path to the country's destruction, is repeated. But these aren't communists, so they're doing the right thing.
                1. -2
                  14 December 2025 20: 06
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  Now, no one comes out either.

                  me and my friends They came out then, demanding that the country be preserved, that the law be observed.

                  But how many of us were there? You went, no one cared.
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  The same old story of servility toward migrants, a path to the destruction of the country, but these aren't communists, so they're doing the right thing.

                  Again you don’t come out, just like back in 87-91 - don’t like it - go ahead!

                  Although I don’t see any worship, it is necessary to add it to the law.
          2. +1
            14 December 2025 08: 42
            Quote: VlR
            It was under Putin that Sozhenitsyn began to be studied in schools.

            You are slightly mistaken.
            It was during the Soviet era that the decision was made to include Solzhenitsyn's books in the school curriculum.
            In 1989, a literary methodology journal recommended including some of Solzhenitsyn's books for study, and in 1991, "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" was included in the school curriculum.
            Then the process began to accelerate.
            As for the former communists, whatever the party was, that's what the communists are.
            Famous Ukrainian characters - a woman with a scythe, a bloody pastor and other rabble - were all communists.
            I wonder, in what year of military school did Vyrus Syrsky join the CPSU?
            1. VLR
              10+
              14 December 2025 09: 31
              "The Gulag Archipelago" was included in the school curriculum in 2010. Solzhenitsyn's widow, N. Svetlova, stated on September 10 at the presentation of the first school edition of "The Gulag Archipelago":
              “The material about the heroes of Russia, the Vlasovites, has been removed from the book. It takes several decades for the people of Russia to understand that they were real patriots of their country.”
              1. +3
                14 December 2025 09: 49
                Quote: VlR
                Solzhenitsyn's widow, N. Svetlova, stated on September 10 at the presentation of the first school edition of "The Gulag Archipelago":
                “The material about the heroes of Russia, the Vlasovites, has been removed from the book. It takes several decades for the people of Russia to understand that they were real patriots of their country.”

                To be fair, this is the opinion of one woman, not necessarily a smart one... and in my opinion, you shouldn't draw global conclusions based on her opinion.
                1. VLR
                  +8
                  14 December 2025 10: 05
                  I have no doubt she's not smart. But she's not promoting her own opinion (or just her own), but the viewpoint of a significant number of people, many of whom are now classified as "foreign agents," but who, until recently, were favored by the Russian authorities, receiving money for anti-Soviet films, plays, and television programs, and accepting titles and state awards as a matter of course. Some of them are still "in the saddle," for example, K. Ernst, who only slightly adjusted his position and has now temporarily put the brakes on the release of openly anti-Soviet and anti-Russian projects. Or Medinsky, the initiator of the Mannerheim memorial plaque and a great admirer of all the White Guards. Incidentally, he recently amazed me when he started telling the Kultura channel about how Lermontov stood at a duel with a cap filled with cherries and calmly ate them—something clicked in his head, and he retold the plot of Pushkin's "The Snowstorm." Pushkin took it from a story about a duel by one of Count Zubov's descendants.
              2. +2
                14 December 2025 11: 15
                Quote: VlR
                The Gulag Archipelago was included in the school curriculum in 2010.

                The decision to include Solzhenitsyn's books in the school curriculum was made by the highest Soviet leadership, and not recommended by some methodological journal; these were merely announced.
                The Soviet government, the communists, carried Stalin out of the Mausoleum and trampled his name, but the current government is bringing Stalin back.
                And who are the counter-revolutionaries and the White Guards here?
                1. 0
                  19 December 2025 02: 22
                  Quote: bober1982
                  the current government is bringing back Stalin

                  Why do you think so? Explain? I don't see any signs of it.
          3. -5
            14 December 2025 12: 10
            Quote: VlR
            I personally unveiled a monument to Solzhenitsyn and the reburied remains of Denikin.

            I sincerely don't understand WHY we have to remain silent about something that makes our hair stand on end? These are our compatriots, our neighbors.

            1936
            ...Zhenka flew into the classroom, jumped onto the teacher's chair at full speed, raised his hand and began:

            — They cut down the oak tree near Lukomorye,

            The golden chain was taken to Torgsin,

            The cat was twisted into cutlets,

            The mermaid was drowned in the sea,

            And the goblin was exiled to Solovki...

            A man in an NKVD uniform sat in the teachers' lounge. A cap with a light blue top and a crimson band lay on the desk in front of him. He was writing something, ignoring me. Finally, he raised his head and asked, "Last name?" I answered. "Year of birth? Place of birth, social background? Criminal record? Who are your parents? Have they been convicted?" and he wrote down the answers on a piece of paper. Then the soldier asked:

            "So, what do you know about this case?" The soldier looked up and stared at me unblinkingly.

            “What is this about?” I asked.

            "I'm asking the questions here!" he barked.

            - I don’t know what you’re asking about.

            — I ask: who wrote anti-Soviet slogans in the toilet?

            — I don’t know who wrote it.

            — Who went to the toilet?

            - Well, I'm waiting.

            "Indeed, several people went out, some to the restroom, some to the hallway to smoke, but I don't know who went where. I don't smoke myself. There was no need to go to the restroom."

            — Have you read poetry?

            - No, I wasn't in the toilet.

            I told the truth, I personally didn’t read them.

            "Here, read it," he said, handing us a piece of paper with the parody Zhenya had read to us. The thought flashed through my mind that Mishka hadn't betrayed Zhenya.

            - Well, how?

            - Stupidity, hack work.

            — What if it’s deeper?

            - And deeper - use this paper in the toilet and flush it with water.

            - You are not so simple, class president, don’t lead me away from the essence of the matter. This is a vile slander against Soviet reality, against our socialist system. What have we come to under Soviet rule? They cut down a historic oak tree. The golden chain—a national treasure—was sold at Torgsin. They used the money to buy vodka, herring, or whatever else they needed for personal use, and then came the full-blown counterrevolution. There's famine in the country, nothing to eat, people are eating cats. Who brought this on? The Bolsheviks.!

            The investigator got into a frenzy and made one assumption more incredible than the next.

            "And you say: stupidity. It's not stupidity, but an anti-Soviet act, an enemy sortie. So you approve of this proclamation?"


            Vladimir Timinsky and seven other students were imprisoned for a year, then sent to the Gulag for seven years. Their lives were ruined.

            Was this even possible under Denikin and Yudenich?
            1. VLR
              +5
              14 December 2025 12: 21
              Was this even possible under Denikin and Yudenich?

              More than possible, considering how many worthless people they had under their command. And these Shkuro and Semyonov, Mamontov and Annenkov, believe me, would have thought not of the workers or peasants, but of themselves, not forgetting the landowners and bourgeoisie who had returned with them. They would have replenished their losses, and theirs, with interest, while the "cattle" would have been driven into pens, shooting and imprisoning the dissatisfied left and right.
              Regarding your beloved Solzhenitsyn, here's a story from his childhood friend, K. S. Simonyan, a professor and physician to Academician Landau. He was summoned to a state security investigator in 1952 and given Solzhenitsyn's denunciation to read:
              "I began to read and felt the hair on my head stand on end... These fifty-two pages described the history of my family, our friendship at school and later. At the same time, on each page it was proven that from childhood I was allegedly anti-Soviet, spiritually and politically corrupted my friends and especially incited him, Sanya Solzhenitsyn, to anti-Stalinist activity."

              At the end of the conversation, Simonyan asked the investigator:
              "Tell me, why did Solzhenitsyn do this just before the end of his sentence?"

              The answer was as follows:
              "He's just a lousy person."
              1. -6
                14 December 2025 12: 37
                Quote: VlR
                More than possible, considering how many crappy people they had under their command.

                Judging by the hundreds of thousands of executions, the Reds have orders of magnitude more worthless people - isn't that true?
                Quote: VlR
                They would think not about the workers or peasants, but about themselves, not forgetting the landowners and representatives of the bourgeoisie who returned with them.

                Universal, equal, direct, secret elections They decided in case of the whites' victory, and not the skin - even if you choose the communists!
                Quote: VlR
                and "cattle" - "driven into stalls", to the right-shooting to the left and imprisoning the dissatisfied

                This was from 1917 to 1953, wasn't it?
                Quote: VlR
                As for your beloved Solzhenitsyn, here is a story from his childhood friend

                I don’t like him, but he and Shalamov discovered what the authorities were shamefully silent about and what millions went through.
                1. +3
                  15 December 2025 10: 03
                  Judging by the hundreds of thousands of executions, the Reds have orders of magnitude more worthless people - isn't that true?

                  Of course not. You're an amazing person. You're told of the horrific atrocities of Shkuro, Semyonov, Annenkov, and others, and yet you try to convince everyone that the Whites were the most peace-loving "elves" who only thought about how to make Russian peasants and workers happy. Indeed, had they won, the repressions would have been such as the Bolsheviks couldn't even dream of. Plus, there's a 100% chance of defeat in World War II. Truly, monarchism and imbecility are synonymous.
                  1. -1
                    2 January 2026 16: 35
                    Quote: vet
                    They tell you about the terrible atrocities of Shkuro, Semenov, Annenkov and others, and you try to convince everyone that the Whites are the most peace-loving "elves" who only thought about how to make Russian peasants and workers happy.

                    In any warring army, there are unprincipled thugs, especially in civil war, who shoot prisoners. Because they are avenging their brothers, parents, and other acquaintances. Everyone has their own beliefs, right or wrong.
                    There would have been repressions, of course, and the commissars would have been eliminated. Ordinary Red Army soldiers, however, defected to the Whites and back when the opportunity arose.
                    The state does not negotiate with terrorists.
                    Regarding the defeat in World War II.
                    If Russia had become a democratic state, without slogans about world communism, then it would not have had contradictions with England, France and the USA.
                2. +2
                  15 December 2025 10: 04
                  As for your beloved Solzhenitsyn, here is a story from his childhood friend
                  I don't like him, but he and Shalamov discovered that

                  Shchalamov wrote the truth, but Solzhenitsyn lied, and his entire "Gulag" is a collection of camp tales, which has long been proven.
                  1. -2
                    15 December 2025 11: 09
                    Quote: vet
                    his "Gulag" is a collection of camp stories

                    Here are the authors of the archipelago, refute them:
                    Alexandrova Maria Borisovna
                    Alekseev Ivan A., a prisoner of Ustvymlag in the first half of the 1960s for “unhealthy anti-Soviet sentiments.” Ivan Alekseev received 3 years of prison regime[6]:4C. and”[6]:440.
                    Alekseev Ivan Nikolaevich
                    Anichkova Natalia Milievna (1896-1975) - philologist, prisoner of Unzhlag (Sukhobezvodnoye) in 1949-1955. II 210, 514.
                    Babich, Aleksandr Pavlovich (1899, Novorossiysk – 1950, died in prison) – lived in Leningrad, honorary polar explorer, head of the Domashny Island polar station of the Main Directorate of the Marine Transport. On January 7, 1942, he was sentenced to death under Article 58-1a of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR. On March 6, 1942, the sentence was commuted to ten years (Dzhidinsky camp) [7] I 143, 408; II 172–173, 237, 305–307, 523, 530
                    Bakst, Mikhail Abramovich (b. 1933), a student at Secondary School No. 10 in Leninsk-Kuznetsk, was sentenced on September 29, 1951 by the Kemerovo Regional Court to 10 years in a correctional labor camp (ITL) under Articles 58-10, Part 2, and 58-11. On October 2, 1954, the sentence was changed, Article 58-11 was excluded, and the term was reduced to 5 years.[8] I 147, II 254, III 415.
                    Baranov Alexander Ivanovich - prisoner of Nyroblag in 1944 II 321.
                    Baranovich Marina Kazimirovna (1901-1975) - in "The Gulag Archipelago,
                    and pr


                    Kersnsovskaya, Mukhina, Belenky and thousands of others are also lying?
                    1. VLR
                      +1
                      15 December 2025 12: 35
                      Solzhenitsyn had no access to documents, and so, like all his "informants," he pulled figures out of thin air—and these figures were so fantastic and implausible that even anti-Soviet émigrés clutched their heads, believing no one would believe such nonsense. Career intelligence officers were more pragmatic and cynical. Karel Jezdinsky of the Czechoslovak service of Radio Free Europe stated:
                      "Literary nonsense of the first order, but anti-communist in nature, and therefore valuable."

                      Moreover, after the publication of "The Gulag Archipelago," the Soviet government approached Solzhenitsyn with a proposal to work in the archives and then personally correct the figures he had provided. Quoted in the journal "Knowledge to the People":
                      "Come to Moscow. The documents are waiting for you."

                      Solzhenitsyn, of course, didn't even respond. And subsequently, he merely "raised the temperature"—because otherwise, his American masters "wouldn't feed him."
                      1. -3
                        15 December 2025 13: 35
                        Quote: VlR
                        Solzhenitsyn did not have access to documents, and therefore, like all his 'informants', he pulled numbers out of thin air.

                        why These documents are secret—they were afraid of what the authorities had done. The stories themselves about the conditions in the camps are horrific in nature.
                        The authorities themselves could have provided the figures, but beyond general cursing, not a word. And who's being dishonest?
                        Quote: VlR
                        Solzhenitsyn, of course, didn’t even answer.

                        Of course, the authorities themselves responded—with figures, geography, etc. What, no? So what's there to talk about?
    2. +3
      14 December 2025 07: 11
      How simple everything is for you! These were also Russian people, and they fought for their Russia, not the future one. And no one knew what that would be.
      Are you sure that you are on the side of good now?
      That's what civil war is for, where brother pits himself against brother, and son against father. But they're all ours. And they're all worthy of remembrance. Maybe we shouldn't be throwing out soldering irons, but we must honor the fallen soldiers.
      This is my opinion and if someone doesn’t like it, that’s their business.
      Monuments in Estonia.
      The first one to the soldiers of the North-Western Army, and the second one to an unknown sister of mercy.
      1. +6
        14 December 2025 07: 17
        Quote: ee2100
        How simple everything is for you!

        What's so difficult about that? Some toiled for the country, while others ate and drank away the tax revenue... Name an example of someone who gave their fortune to fight the "Reds"? Were we still searching for "Kolchak's gold"? Were there any such cases involving Soviet citizens during WWII? Yes, there were...
        So, no need to shed crocodile tears...These "whites" also betrayed their tsar...
        1. 0
          14 December 2025 07: 28
          Quote: ROSS 42
          We are still looking for "Kolchak's gold"...

          Why bother looking for him? Just remember who turned him in, that's all.
        2. +2
          14 December 2025 16: 25
          Quote: ROSS 42
          when one of the former gave his fortune to the fight against the "Reds"

          Do you realize you wrote bullshit?
          They laid down their lives.
        3. -1
          2 January 2026 16: 40
          Quote: ROSS 42
          while others ate and drank away the money collected in taxes...

          I assure you, there were people like that in the USSR too. Watch any war movie. The restaurants are full. The same goes for "The Meeting Place Cannot Be Changed."
    3. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    14 December 2025 08: 40
    What's surprising about the comments is that a hundred years have passed, yet people are once again divided between Reds and Whites. And they're once again fueling civil war.
    Maybe that's enough? It's time to take a slightly detached look. Isn't it clear that if something in history did or didn't happen, it couldn't have been any other way? And after-the-fact evaluations are an interesting pastime, but nothing more. "I wish I were as smart before as my Sarah was after." Aren't there enough examples? England. France... Things have settled down there for now. The USA. They have their own way, but they're on an island. Otherwise, no one knows what would have happened there.
    1. +1
      14 December 2025 08: 49
      Quote: MCmaximus
      What's surprising about the comments is that a hundred years have passed, yet people are once again divided between Reds and Whites. And they're once again fueling civil war.

      They deliberately set them against each other.
      They are trying to shake things up from the inside, so it’s not surprising.
      1. -3
        14 December 2025 09: 51
        Quote: bober1982
        They deliberately set them against each other.
        They are trying to shake things up from the inside, so it’s not surprising.

        I disagree. It's just that many people's minds are still steeped in the USSR, which no longer exists, and they're trying to defend it, as they were taught. Or they're trying to admit that they weren't taught to do everything without propaganda. The majority aren't ready for that. Think about the meaning of the words "civil war"? It's a war between insiders over how each side sincerely believes the country should go. The word "traitor" isn't appropriate here.
        1. -5
          14 December 2025 09: 56
          Don't make me laugh. You, enemies of the Soviet people, who unleashed the Civil War for YOURSELF, who seized the USSR solely for YOURSELF. You have always cared nothing for your country and people.
          1. +4
            14 December 2025 10: 10
            Quote: tatra
            Don't make me laugh. You, enemies of the Soviet people, who unleashed the Civil War for YOURSELF, who seized the USSR solely for YOURSELF. You have always cared nothing for your country and people.

            I don't feel like a millionaire who got something from the collapse of the USSR, although I was still in elementary school then - but that doesn't matter to you, Irina? laughing
            1. -6
              14 December 2025 10: 12
              Well, for all of you, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, “it’s better now than in the USSR,” that means you all gained something from your destruction of the USSR.
              1. +1
                14 December 2025 12: 31
                Quote: tatra
                Well, for all of you, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, “it’s better now than in the USSR,” that means you all gained something from your destruction of the USSR.

                Did a primary school student gain anything from the destruction of the USSR? Whose mother is a doctor and whose father is a researcher? Well, well... You seem a bit off-kilter, Irina.
                1. -3
                  14 December 2025 15: 46
                  You, enemies of the USSR, deny both what you yourselves have done and what you yourself say and write. And every single one of you has "nothing to do" with your seizure of the USSR: "I didn't seize the USSR," "I was little then." BUT you selflessly "suck" at the events of 80-100 years ago.
                  1. +5
                    14 December 2025 15: 49
                    Irina, let's be specific: 1. How did I, as an 8-year-old child, capture the USSR?
                    2. Why shouldn't I reflect on events that happened 100 years ago?
                    1. -4
                      14 December 2025 16: 05
                      This is the essence of the communists' enemies: they are all cowardly "innocent" of what they have accomplished in the nearly 40 years since they took over the USSR during Perestroika. Moreover, they are all "innocent" of each other, of their "leaders," whom they have been imposing on us since 1991, and of the results of their highly paid work, their vaunted capitalism. Therefore, their entire ideology, propaganda, foreign policy, and their online commentary are not for themselves, but against others.
                      1. +3
                        14 December 2025 16: 08
                        Quote: tatra
                        This is the essence of the communists' enemies: they are all cowardly "innocent" of what they have accomplished in the nearly 40 years since they took over the USSR during Perestroika. Moreover, they are all "innocent" of each other, of their "leaders," whom they have been imposing on us since 1991, and of the results of their highly paid work, their vaunted capitalism. Therefore, their entire ideology, propaganda, foreign policy, and their online commentary are not for themselves, but against others.

                        Irina, I have a sneaking suspicion something's wrong with you. An 8-year-old can't seize power in a country or install a president. That's for sure, no doubt about it. And if you're not talking about me, why are you replying? Don't write a reply, just a comment.
                      2. +1
                        15 December 2025 09: 55
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        An 8-year-old child can neither seize power in the country nor appoint a President.

                        You appeal to common sense, which, alas, does not exist.
                      3. +1
                        19 December 2025 02: 47
                        There's no point in arguing with Irina... smile
                        Nothing can break through this blank wall. hi
                    2. +5
                      14 December 2025 16: 07
                      Apparently, even when you were still an Octobrist, you were plotting the events in Belovezhskaya Pushcha and writing secret messages to Yeltsin, Shushkevich, and Kravchuk... lol
          2. +8
            14 December 2025 10: 41
            You, enemies of the Soviet people,

            Irina, aren't you being a bit too vocal and completely unsubstantiated in your categorization of everyone here as your mythical "enemies of the USSR"? Sure, you could cite the iconic phrase of our own Arnie Schwarzenegger, but why bother? I wouldn't respond to your malice, but please understand, I'm thoroughly fed up with your yelling. The vast majority of us on this site were simply working hard back then. We simply worked honestly, and some even served. Please understand this and calm down. You're not Nina Andreeva or Sazhi Umalatova; you're not the same caliber, you know.
            1. +4
              14 December 2025 13: 12
              Quote: ArchiPhil
              We, the overwhelming majority of the participants of this resource, were simply working at that time

              hi Moreover, they broke through the barriers to the polling stations in March 1991, to the rallies for the preservation of the country, to the elections of people's deputies - I note - with the complete indifference and apathy of the local communists
              1. 0
                19 December 2025 02: 55
                Quote: Olgovich
                to rallies for the preservation of the country

                If that's how you reacted to the country's collapse, then why are you slinging mud at the communists who reassembled the crumbling Russian Empire in the USSR, but keeping silent about the communist traitors in power in the Russian Federation, whose actions resulted in the country's territorial shrinkage, turning it from the world's second-largest economy into a raw materials appendage?
                1. 0
                  19 December 2025 09: 15
                  Quote: VasAndr
                  If you reacted this way to the collapse of the country, then why are you throwing dirt on the communists?

                  because this was my homeland, the communists cut it into pieces in 1917-1954
                  Quote: VasAndr
                  as a result of whose activities the country has greatly shrunk territorially,

                  They squeezed Russia from 1917 to 1954.
            2. +2
              14 December 2025 16: 22
              Hi and bravo to you, Sergey! You really got me going! Good health and good luck! Nikolay sent us your photos. Wonderful!
              1. +4
                14 December 2025 16: 29
                Hello and bravo to you, Sergey!

                Hello Alexander, hello!!!
                He sat him down, so he sat him down!
                No, I didn't set out to do that, believe me. Just? How much longer can we have the same thing year after year? And not just on this site, I took the time to do some light monitoring. bully After all, sometimes she does make perfectly normal and sensible comments, but? Mostly what we see and try to read. That's how it is.
                Nikolay sent us your photos. Wonderful!
                Which ones? Let's use WhatsApp, it's fine for me at the moment. It was acting up a bit a while ago, that's true. hi
          3. +2
            14 December 2025 12: 23
            Quote: tatra
            You, enemies of the Soviet people, who unleashed the Civil War for YOURSELF, who captured the USSR only for YOURSELF

            Communists?
            1. -2
              14 December 2025 15: 50
              One of the qualities of the communists' enemies is their incredible cowardice. You have cowardly shifted the blame and responsibility for what you did to the Bolshevik communists and their supporters onto them.
              And the guilt and responsibility for what you did against the same enemies of the communists as you, were placed on them.
              1. +1
                14 December 2025 15: 51
                Quote: tatra
                One of the qualities of the communists' enemies is their incredible cowardice. You have cowardly shifted the blame and responsibility for what you did to the Bolshevik communists and their supporters onto them.

                So, it wasn't the communists who were in power in the USSR?
                1. -3
                  14 December 2025 15: 58
                  Why do you, the enemies of the communists, the USSR and the Soviet people - such an anomaly of humanity, including the fact that you are the only ones in world history and now in the world, cowardly refuse responsibility for the fact that you seized power in your country?
                  1. +2
                    14 December 2025 17: 40
                    Quote: tatra
                    Why are you, enemies of the communists, the USSR and the Soviet people, such an anomaly of humanity?

                    So were they or not?
        2. 0
          14 December 2025 10: 47
          It's not about the civil war. Why did your people make the movie "The Mummy" and all that stuff?
          1. -4
            14 December 2025 11: 04
            Well, this is one of the elements of the "cold war" and the "cold civil war" that has been waged by external and internal enemies of the Soviet people for all 108 years since the October Revolution.
          2. +2
            14 December 2025 11: 27
            Quote: Gardamir
            Why did your people make the movie The Mummy and the rest?

            The film, by the way, is ugly, but whether it was made by our people is a big question.
            And even if it's shown on the Spas TV channel, there are plenty of quick and clever ones everywhere, including on the aforementioned channel.
          3. 0
            14 December 2025 12: 23
            Quote: Gardamir
            It's not about the civil war. Why did your people make the movie "The Mummy" and all that stuff?

            I don't quite understand your point... what does the 2000s mummy in Hollywood and GW have to do with it? And "yours" in relation to me, who has never been to the USA?
            1. +7
              14 December 2025 12: 43
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              I didn't quite understand your idea.

              We're talking about a provocative documentary film that aired on the Spas TV channel. The author is a smart guy. Incidentally, the channel itself should also be treated with caution; there's too much of all kinds of "nonsense."
              By the way, your question hit the nail on the head: no one knows anything about this film, no one is interested in it, except perhaps a few intellectuals. In short, the film hasn't reached the masses and never will; it's too crude a work.
          4. 0
            14 December 2025 12: 26
            Quote: Gardamir
            Why did your people make the movie The Mummy and the rest?

            And if we remember how much the communists filmed and wrote there?
            1. VLR
              +6
              14 December 2025 12: 36
              How much did the communists film and write there?

              Oddly enough, the USSR had some pretty honest films about the civil war. Remember "Chapayev," where it's like, "The Whites came, they plundered; the Reds came, they plundered, too." And Kappel's men aren't robbers and marauders, but steadfast, disciplined fighters, gracefully launching a "psychic attack." And remember the White officers in "The Adjutant of His Excellency"? Or the film "41" (about the love between a boshevichka and a White officer). Even in "The New Adventures of the Elusive," the White officers are polite, gallant, and cultured; one of them sings a good song, "Russian Field." It's strange to even think about it now, but back then, these rather sympathetic Whites didn't surprise anyone.
              1. -1
                14 December 2025 12: 55
                Quote: VlR
                Oddly enough, there were some very honest films about the civil war in the USSR.
                I recently reread "Dawns over Russia" (1958). It's about the Battle of Kulikovo and the Russian trials that preceded it. It's generally well written, but I was just annoyed by the plot inserts that showed that, although Dmitry Donskoy is against the Mongols, he's still a bad guy because he's a prince, while the protagonist, a real historical figure, was demoted from the boyars to the peasantry.
                As for the films mentioned, in 17 moments the Germans are also cultured.
                1. +1
                  14 December 2025 14: 38
                  are also cultured.
                  And smart! Unlike the caricature characters in a number of our films. bully
                  1. +1
                    14 December 2025 14: 45
                    Quote: ArchiPhil
                    from the cartoonish characters of a number of our films

                    I remember these.
              2. +2
                14 December 2025 14: 36
                movie "41"

                Valery, excuse me, I'm not being picky, but the title of the film is *Forty-First*! It doesn't really ring true in numbers, you know? And the film itself is, of course, magnificent, and the captivating Izvitskaya as Maryutka is something else! The refined Oleg Strizhenov had it easier, though; he was essentially playing himself. Incidentally, there was also a film from 26, directed by Protazanov. hi We have already met several times on the topic of this film. bully
            2. 0
              14 December 2025 15: 52
              Unlike you, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, Soviet communists did not slander those from whom they took the country. And they had a positive history of pre-revolutionary Russia.
              1. +1
                14 December 2025 17: 40
                Quote: tatra
                Unlike you, the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, Soviet communists
                And what if the communists weren't in power in the USSR?
        3. +4
          14 December 2025 16: 45
          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          I disagree, it's just that many people still have their brains in the USSR, which no longer exists, and they're trying to defend it, as they were taught... or admit that they weren't taught everything without propaganda...

          Nikolai, as a level 2 advisor, I will type out a few sentences for you.
          What makes you think so many people have their brains in the USSR? Maybe they remember all the best things that happened in the socialist country? Most likely, they remember the pride they felt in their socialist homeland. No one is insisting that Russia should create a USSR 2.0... Can't they remember how the Soviet people defeated the Nazis in 1945? Or maybe North Korea just decided to sign a cooperation agreement with Russia?
          Many people from the Russian Empire finally understood why the revolution took place in October 1917 and why power passed to the people...
          You like the current era, which (if nothing changes) will soon be forgotten. The country is dying. The population is impoverished. People have lost faith in goodwill and expect new upheavals every year. Thieves, speculators, swindlers, and junk dealers are everywhere, making it impossible for ordinary people to live a normal life. As one former policeman said: "The police used to be for the people, now they're for the bureaucrats..."
          Isn't that why there's something so strange about National Unity Day: there's a holiday, but no unity...
          New Year's is coming soon, and the channels will once again be showing "nasty" Soviet films...
          You're not interested in them, are you?
          1. 0
            14 December 2025 18: 44
            Quote: ROSS 42
            Nikolai, as a level 2 advisor, I will type out a few sentences for you.
            What makes you think so many people are so intelligent in the USSR? Maybe they remember all the best things that happened in the socialist country? Most likely, they remember the pride they felt in their socialist homeland. No one is insisting that Russia should create a USSR 2.0... Can't they remember how the Soviet people defeated the Nazis in 1945?

            I agree here, Yuri Vasilyevich, but there are some nuances... Living by the ideals of a vanished country is possible, but is it logical? What's the point? And the fact that the grass is greener when you're young, etc., can't be argued with... I think that also has a strong influence... Frankly, it's a moot point for me, whether I'd like to live in the USSR... I think the main reason I'd like to live there is confidence in the future... The reason I wouldn't want to live there is the imposition of communist ideals, and if you stand out from the crowd, whether by your opinion or actions, you'll get a slap on the wrist...
            Quote: ROSS 42
            Or perhaps North Korea just decided to enter into a cooperation agreement with Russia?

            How many people want to sign a contract with them? Why not? I'm sure they get some nice bonuses from it. If I were them, I'd definitely be in favor of a contract.
            Quote: ROSS 42
            Many people from the Russian Empire finally understood why the revolution took place in October 1917 and why power passed to the people...

            I think it's clear to everyone, but interpretations of events vary. To which people, sir? Maybe in the first years, and then with each five-year plan, increasingly toward the new nobility—the "nomenklatura"—isn't that right? Didn't the party bigwigs behave like nobles (not immediately after the Revolution, of course?)
            Quote: ROSS 42
            You like the current era, which (if nothing changes) will soon be forgotten. The country is dying. The population is impoverished. People have lost faith in goodwill and expect new upheavals every year. Thieves, speculators, swindlers, and junk dealers are everywhere, making it impossible for ordinary people to live a normal life. As one former policeman said: "The police used to be for the people, now they're for the bureaucrats..."

            I'll be brief - I don't like it. There are too few positive aspects to like it.
            Quote: ROSS 42
            New Year is coming soon and the channels will be showing "nasty" Soviet films again... You're not interested in them, are you?

            I like them and watch them regularly. I recently watched "Shurik's Adventures" with my son. But I'm not averse to foreign films either, although they're mostly rubbish.
            In general, Yuri Vasilyevich, you understood me at best only halfway. hi
            1. +4
              15 December 2025 08: 08
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              I agree here, Yuri Vasilyevich, but with some nuances... It is possible to live by the ideals of a vanished country, but is it logical? What's the point?

              If these are ideals of justice, if they prioritize productive labor, if these ideals promote family values, then not only can they be lived by them, but they must be lived by them. It's far more vile to live by the ideas of financial pyramids, promising society prosperity... And in the tried-and-true socialist system, all that was needed was to amend the electoral laws and cull the regulatory bodies in a timely manner...
              hi
    2. 0
      14 December 2025 09: 49
      But here is one of the cardinal differences between the "reds" and the "whites" - that the "reds" both in the Soviet period and in the evil and totally deceitful anti-Soviet period were FOR their State, the USSR, and the "whites" both in the Soviet period and in their anti-Soviet period were AGAINST the USSR, but FOR the State they created, their anti-Soviet power, which they imposed on us in 1991, their System, their economy, none of them.
      And they always betray each other, including the fact that they betrayed their two “leaders” Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and abandoned them to those from whom they all together took the country.
    3. +6
      14 December 2025 09: 56
      And it’s worth looking at it from a slightly detached perspective.

      The KNS, in Ukraine, also looked on with detachment and began to honor Petliura and Bandera. And now, with regard to Ukraine, the SVO is being carried out, one of the goals being denazification. "Do you want it like in Ukraine?" (c) V.V. Putin. From an unpublished article. Or is it something else?
      1. 0
        14 December 2025 09: 59
        Yes, all the enemies of the USSR who seized the republics of the USSR are the same, and their entire “history” of our country and people is ANTI-Soviet and RUSSOPHOBIC.
      2. -2
        14 December 2025 12: 29
        Quote: parusnik
        The KNS, in Ukraine, also looked at it with detachment and began to honor Petliura and Bandera.

        Knsh, how should I understand this?
        By the way, Petliura has always been disowned in Ukraine; he killed too many Jews; it would be foolish for the current Ukrainian Jewish government to honor him.
        Ah, Bandera, yes - he is one of their heroes, hence the conclusion - one of the main goals of the SVO is the denazification of the Ukrainian criminal Nazi regime.
        1. VLR
          +4
          14 December 2025 12: 46
          Monuments to Petliura have already been erected in Rivne and Vinnytsia. Perhaps there are some elsewhere, too.
          And in the 90s we simply walked on a knife edge - after all, we were already planning to open a museum of Vlasov and Vlasovites.
          1. +1
            14 December 2025 12: 49
            Quote: VlR
            Monuments to Petliura have already been erected in Rivne and Vinnytsia.

            It's strange, Vinnitsa is a Jewish city, from grateful Jews, or something?
            1. VLR
              +6
              14 December 2025 12: 52
              Well, Zelenskyy is also a "grateful Jew." Just like his former "sugar daddy" Kolomoisky. Or Mindich, who fled to Israel.
        2. +3
          14 December 2025 12: 55
          By the way, Petliura was always disowned in Ukraine

          Symona Petliura Street is a street in Kyiv, located near the Kyiv-Pas railway station. Sydir Artemyevich Kovpak called Bandera's followers Petliura's henchmen. Grandpa knew what he was talking about. And yes, Petliura's troops fought against Soviet troops in the Civil War, just as Bandera's followers fought against the Soviets during the Great Patriotic War. And yes, the flag of today's Ukraine is the flag of Petliura's Directory. I'm listening to the other arguments in defense of Petliura, from an Orthodox patriot who yesterday, when joining the Komsomol, wrote in his application, "I want to be the first in the ranks of the builders of communism."
          1. -1
            14 December 2025 12: 59
            Quote: parusnik
            I wrote in my application that I want to be the first in the ranks of the builders of communism.

            So, what should I have written in my application, saying I wanted to be among the last ranks of the builders of communism? I wanted to be on the right flank.
            1. +1
              14 December 2025 13: 01
              That's fine. I don't see any arguments in defense of S. Petliura, who is not honored in Nazi Ukraine. The right-wing Orthodox patriot is a turncoat.
      3. 0
        14 December 2025 17: 21
        Ukraine is in the present. Our events took place 100 years ago. Only conclusions can be drawn from them. And for the Whites, they are disappointing. Neither the people ultimately supported them, nor did the vaunted Tsarist professionals have any strength against the purely civilian Bolsheviks. Basically, the conclusion is simple and irrevocable: there's no point in starting a politically lost war. Maybe foreigners will help. Maybe not. The other thing is that the Whites simply had to start fighting. Otherwise, those generals wouldn't have been worth a dime. Back then.
        1. +4
          14 December 2025 21: 16
          In Ukraine it's real.

          And where did the present begin? With de-Sovietization and decommunization. The same thing is happening here, only with difficulty so far... I had a comment about this, but you didn't want to notice. We're not Ukrainians, right? It won't work here? But two monuments to the deputy director of the Nazi Russian Institute, A.I. Ilyin, are already standing. This "great Russian philosopher" fought the country to the end of his life to defeat fascism. But we are the KNS, not Ukrainians. laughing
      4. +3
        15 December 2025 10: 09
        Here it is: Ukraine is a shining example of what happens to a state that renounces its own history and embraces a fictitious one in which the heroes are sadists, scoundrels, and traitors. If the Olgovichs predominated in our country, we would have brought Russia to the same state. But, thank God, he lives in impoverished Moldova, which will soon become a disenfranchised region of impoverished Romania. Let him drink this to the bottom of this cup and see what de-Sovietization and decommunization lead to.
    4. +7
      14 December 2025 10: 44
      Maybe that's enough already?
      I completely agree. But as a Soviet oceanographer, I know nothing about the "scientist" Kolchak. But both the Reds and Whites know that he robbed and hanged. However, the current government is suggesting we forget one and pray for the other, just like with the Mannerheim plaque.
      1. -1
        14 December 2025 12: 28
        Quote: Gardamir
        But I, a Soviet oceanographer, know nothing about the “scientist” Kolchak.
        Are you serious? In the USSR, you couldn't talk about things like that.
  8. +3
    14 December 2025 09: 23
    Discussing General Yudenich without taking into account the Northwestern Army and the games of Baltic politics is talking about nothing. As if the people would swallow anything!
    At the same time, the Baltics were a pit of vipers, where the redivision of Europe, and in particular the Baltics and Finland, was taking place. It was in this pit that General Yudenich found himself. A general, but far from a politician. As it turned out, the head of all Allied missions in the Baltics, the British General Gough, was in Reval at the time. His mission was supposed to be under Yudenich, just as foreign representatives were under Denikin and Kolchak. In reality, Gough acted as the sole ruler of the entire region, with Yudenich always second in line. This can be explained by many factors. The specific nature of the front and the White Guards' complete dependence on foreigners there, as well as the personality of the commander-in-chief—neither Denikin, nor Kolchak, nor Krasnov would have tolerated even a tenth of Gough's antics.
    As an example... In particular, the Baltic Fleet. By that time, the madness and folly of the revolution had already begun to subside, and many were coming to their senses. A number of ships were preparing to defect to the Whites. Instead of trying to win over wavering sailors, Gough set out to destroy the Baltic Fleet. He began by handing over two destroyers to Estonia, which abruptly put an end to the idea of ​​defecting. Moreover, the British launched a torpedo boat attack on Kronstadt. Nothing good came of it. Kronstadt lost a cruiser, and the British lost a destroyer and a submarine. And various barges and boats on both sides. The Russian sailors became embittered, and there was no longer any talk of defecting.
    In short, the combat-ready General Yudenich was lost in all this political intrigue. The army was not cohesive, and supplies were completely lacking. Petrograd was not particularly threatened, but Stalin was sent there to lead, so subsequent Soviet sources are, for obvious reasons, not to be trusted.
    In general, this is a vast topic and requires a separate narrative. It is well explored in Valery Shambarov's book "White Guardism."
  9. +3
    14 December 2025 09: 52
    The admiral transferred money to him to finance the next White Guard army, which was located on the territory of Estonia and the Russian Pskov province and was called the Northwestern Army.

    How did the Northwestern Army begin? It began with the Northern Corps.
    The Northern Corps, which changed names frequently during its existence and was also known as the Russian Volunteer Northern Army, the Separate Pskov Russian Volunteer Corps, the Pskov Corps, and the Northern Army, was, in other words, an operational-strategic unit of White forces in northwestern Russia in 1918-1919, during the Russian Civil War. It was formed on October 10, 1918, with the assistance of the German army. As it developed, it underwent many reorganizations, structural and deployment changes, being, with the support of the Entente, transformed on June 19, 1919 into the "Northern Army", which on July 1 was renamed the Northwestern Army. While it was under the "wing" of the Germans, it received uniforms and equipment from the German army. Having already been transformed into an Army, the army received "sponsorship" assistance from the Entente countries, Great Britain and the USA. The English fleet and air force supported Yudenich's army during his liberation campaign against Petrograd. The attack of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet by English torpedo boats, the bombing of Petrograd and Kronstadt by English aviation, probably, if not for the NVO, memorial plaques to brave English pilots and sailors would have appeared in the city on the Neva and Kronstadt, like the Mannerheim plaque, which is dear memory, kept in the Museum of the First World War in Pushkin-Tsarskoye Selo, Leningrad Region.
  10. +4
    14 December 2025 09: 53
    The enemies of the USSR have proven they don't care about all the crimes of the Soviet people's external and internal enemies, but if this article were about the Red Terror, they would have rushed to feign "humanity" and "righteous anger" against the Bolsheviks. Because it's BENEFICIAL to them. They always do, speak, and write only for profit.
  11. -4
    14 December 2025 10: 02
    Where he was ill for thirteen years
    And the other day he died in Nice –
    In a venereal hospital.
    Could a normal person write something like this?

    Yesenin to the Poor:
    And yet, when I read in Pravda
    The truth about Christ the lascivious Demian -
    I felt ashamedas if I got into
    Into the vomit spewed out by a drunk


    Yudenich attacked with forces much smaller than the Reds, without a rearguard, the Estonians betrayed the Russian army, he did the maximum possible.

    A wonderful Russian general, a patriot, a smart guy.

    And the unsuccessful red commanders who fought against him were DESTROYED by their party comrades in the basements of Lubyanka - Vatsetis, etc.

    And already in 2008, in the village of Opolye (Kingisepp district of the Leningrad region), a monument to the “soldiers of the Northwestern Army” appeared.

    A reminder that there might have been no wild dictatorship of a small group of party members, no millions dying from starvation in the mid-20th century, no cults, no gulags, no hundreds of thousands of executions, no islands of cannibals, no twisting and straightening of the party line, no indigenization, no dismemberment of Russia into 16 pieces, and no even a siege of the city....
    1. +2
      15 December 2025 10: 12
      Yesenin to the Poor:

      Oh, come on, this whole bohemian thing is always a tangled web of snakes, everyone hates each other. Remember what Mayakovsky wrote about Yesenin, for example. And TsUvetaeva wrote about this, speaking on behalf of Yesenin to Mayakovsky:
      "And do you remember how, with all his swearing,
      Basishche - me
      "Did you lay it out?"
      1. -2
        15 December 2025 11: 22
        Quote: vet
        Oh, come on, all this bohemian stuff -

        Come to your senses - this is what a normal person could write about someone who has passed away:
        Where he was ill for thirteen years
        And the other day he died in Nice –
        In a venereal hospital.


        This is disgusting
    2. 0
      15 December 2025 16: 58
      Yudenich attacked with forces much smaller than the Reds, without any rear support., the Estonians betrayed the Russian army, he did the maximum possible.

      A wonderful Russian general, a patriot, a smart guy.


      It's just somehow awkward to argue with you.
      Beautiful
      Russian general.
  12. +5
    14 December 2025 16: 29
    V. Shishkov's story "Peypus Lake" describes Yudenich's army's exodus to Estonia and the horrors they endured there. "Peypus Lake" is the Estonian name for Lake Peipus.
  13. +3
    14 December 2025 21: 52
    Quote: Bearded
    Yudenich, like Judas, sold out his people: he went to war against them with money from Western "sponsors".

    He is not alone.
    1. -3
      16 December 2025 11: 13
      Quote: Pavel57
      He is not alone.

      There are countless of them - the red Tukhachevsky Egorov, Gamarnik, Uborevich Vatsetis and others, all the 1st and 2nd rank commanders of the Red Army of 1937 - spies, Nazis of the West, saboteurs and traitors to the people Yes
  14. -2
    15 December 2025 11: 33
    Yes, judging by the intensity of passions in the comments, the Civil War isn't over yet, 105 years later. Moreover, the Reds are clearly more aggressive than the Whites. It's time to end this senseless standoff. N. Yudenich was a worthy Russian general, and he fought, like Denikin, Kolchak, and others, first and foremost for Russia, not for the Communist International of Lenin and Trotsky, who were ready to burn the Russian people in the furnace of permanent world revolution.
    1. +2
      16 December 2025 16: 41
      Red supporters are clearly more aggressive than whites

      Come on: Olgovich alone is more aggressive than all the "pro-red" commentators combined. There's also Tatra, of course, but we'll leave her out of it. They should be grouped together in one thread, and banned from the others.
  15. 0
    15 December 2025 14: 19
    "However, now the name of Yudenich, as the holder of three degrees of the Order of St. George, is engraved on a marble plaque in the St. George Hall of the Moscow Kremlin."
    He was just driving around the Caucasus like a Turk during WWI. Even Erdogan probably has hiccups. He simply chose the wrong side.