Patrol and reconnaissance aircraft of the U.S. Navy and Customs and Border Protection

54 458 49
Patrol and reconnaissance aircraft of the U.S. Navy and Customs and Border Protection

The US Navy has the largest fleet of carrier-based combat aircraft in the world. However, compared to the US Air Force, the Navy's tactical and strategic reconnaissance capabilities are aviation are far from what is desired, and American admirals are forced in this regard to rely more on other technical means and to establish an active exchange of operational information with other branches of the military and intelligence agencies.

In addition to the US Navy, the Coast Guard and Customs Service also operate aircraft designed for reconnaissance and surveillance, which are primarily used to interdict illegal immigration and the smuggling of narcotics into the country.



Northrop Grumman E-2C/D Hawkeye/Advanced Hawkeye carrier-based early warning and control aircraft


Northrop Grumman E-2C/D Hawkeye/Advanced Hawkeye airborne early warning (AEW) aircraft are a vital component in supporting the combat operations of US naval aviation. As of 2024, the US Navy operated 83 AEW aircraft, with an additional 25 E-2D variants on order. Approximately two dozen E-2C aircraft are in storage, but these aircraft, having reached the end of their service life and equipped with obsolete equipment, are unlikely to return to service. However, they can serve as a source of spare parts and unique components.


A Google Earth satellite image of Northrop Grumman E-2C Hawkeye aircraft stored at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. This image was taken in February 2024.

Meanwhile, carrier-based AWACS aircraft built in the 1980s, which have been modernized and overhauled, are still in service. Approximately 20 years ago, older Hawkeyes began to be equipped with the AN/APS-145 radar, and instead of the previous four-bladed propellers, aircraft built in the 1980s and 1990s received new eight-bladed NP2000 carbon fiber propellers reinforced with steel inserts. The engine control system was also modernized, equipped with digital controllers and sensors. This significantly reduced the response time to thrust changes and improved fuel efficiency. The modernized aircraft have improved takeoff and landing performance, increased range, and increased endurance. Many E-2C aircraft with significant remaining service life were brought up to the level of the Hawkeye 2000.

The most advanced American carrier-based AWACS aircraft to date is the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye. This aircraft, which first flew in 2007, incorporates cutting-edge technologies to improve crew conditions. In addition to new communications, navigation, display, and data processing equipment, the most notable innovation is the installation of the AN/APY-9 AESA radar, which is capable of detecting high-altitude aerial targets at a range of over 600 km and, thanks to its high energy potential, effectively monitors the flights of aircraft using low-radar technology.

This variant has a maximum takeoff weight of 26,082 kg. The empty weight is 18,234 kg. The length is 17,57 m, and the wingspan is 24,56 m. Two Allison/Rolls-Royce T56-A-427A turboprop engines, each producing 5100 hp, provide a maximum speed of 650 km/h. Cruising speed is 474 km/h. The flying radar picket can conduct patrols for six hours. The ferry range is 2,700 km. The crew consists of two pilots and three radar operators.

In addition to the surveillance radar, E-2C/D aircraft are equipped with electronic reconnaissance equipment capable of receiving high-frequency signals, classifying them, and determining their coordinates. In the past, carrier-based Hawkeyes were used in reconnaissance missions using only passive receiving equipment, without activating the radar.


Google Earth satellite image of Northrop Grumman E-2C/D Hawkeye/Advanced Hawkeye aircraft and Bell Boeing CMV-22B Osprey tiltrotor aircraft at Chambers Field, Norfolk. The image was taken in November 2025.

Radar picket aircraft are permanently deployed by ten airborne early warning squadrons. Five of these are based at Norfolk Air Force Base Chambers Field in Virginia, and four are based at Point Mugu Air Force Base in California.


Google Earth satellite image of Northrop Grumman E-2C/D Hawkeye/Advanced Hawkeye aircraft at Point Mugu Air Force Base. Image taken in March 2021.

E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft of VAW-125, a permanent member of Air Wing 5, are assigned to the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) and operate from Iwakuni Air Base, Japan, as their shore airfield.


Google Earth satellite image of a Northrop Grumman E-2D Advanced Hawkeye and a Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet at Iwakuni Air Base.

After returning from a mission, the carrier-based air wing's aircraft are relocated to coastal airfields that have the necessary infrastructure for routine maintenance of aircraft.


A Google Earth satellite image shows aircraft on the upper deck of the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) moored at Pearl Harbor Naval Air Station, Hawaii. This image was taken in February 2024.

Four upgraded E-2C aircraft are also present at the Air Force Combat Applications Center at Fallon Air Force Base in Nevada, also known as "Top Gun." These Hawkeyes are used to monitor simulated air battles and practice combat interactions with carrier-based AWACS aircraft.


Google Earth satellite image of a Northrop Grumman E-2C Hawkeye and a Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet at Fallon Air Force Base. The image was taken in November 2025.

Several other Hawkeyes are operated by the 20th Test and Analysis Squadron at Patuxent River Air Force Base, Maryland, and the 30th Test and Analysis Squadron at Point Mugu Air Force Base, California.


A Google Earth satellite image shows a Northrop Grumman E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft mounted on a ground test catapult at Lakehurst Air Force Base. This image was taken in May 2019.

Two aircraft belonging to these squadrons have also been spotted at Lakehurst Air Force Base in New Jersey, where several different types of catapults used for takeoff training and a ground laboratory complex for testing and debugging various onboard electronic systems are built. In 2019, a modified E-2D Advanced Hawkeye was launched from an electromagnetic catapult here.

Lockheed P-3 LRT Orion and Lockheed P-3 AEW Orion patrol and reconnaissance aircraft operated by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Customs and Border Protection is the largest law enforcement agency within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Among other responsibilities, this federal agency is tasked with interdicting drug trafficking. weapons and other illegally imported goods, as well as preventing illegal migration.

In the 1980s, the flow of illegal drugs into the United States increased dramatically. In addition to traditional delivery methods, smugglers began to make extensive use of light aircraft crossing the border at low altitude. Ground-based radars, which were primarily used for air traffic control, were clearly insufficient for effectively detecting low-altitude targets, and the American ground-based radar network in the southern United States had been significantly reduced in the early 1970s. In this case, AWACS aircraft could have monitored the airspace from Mexico and the Gulf of Mexico, where the main drug flow originated. However, the constant use of heavy AWACS aircraft for this purpose was too expensive, and the command used the relatively economical E-2 Hawkeye. fleet allocated extremely reluctantly.

As new Hawkeye variants were introduced into carrier-based air wings, older E-2Bs and E-2Cs were reassigned to shore-based reserve squadrons. These aircraft were used by the Coast Guard and Customs Service. However, the aircraft's age and inadequate electronic equipment took their toll. In several cases, crews were forced to abort patrols due to avionics failure or problems with worn-out engines.

The Hawkeye, designed for carrier deployment, had insufficient endurance when deployed from a shore airfield. The situation was exacerbated by the fact that older AWACS aircraft typically lacked in-flight refueling equipment, and the Border Customs Service did not have its own tanker aircraft.

To reduce operating costs, the Navy transferred several heavily battered E-2Cs to the Border Patrol in the late 1980s. These aircraft were crewed by retired U.S. Navy pilots and operators, and maintenance was performed by former Navy technicians. However, after a Hawkeye assigned to the Border Patrol Service crashed on August 24, 1990, due to a technical malfunction during a patrol flight, killing its crew, all carrier-based AWACS aircraft were returned to the Navy.

To close the gap that had opened in American airspace on the Gulf of Mexico side, there was an urgent need to create an inexpensive patrol and reconnaissance aircraft capable of hovering in the air for 8-10 hours.

In the mid-1980s, the US Navy began replacing its obsolete, but still robust, Lockheed P-3A/B Orion patrol aircraft with improved P-3Cs, which featured sophisticated avionics and weapons systems by the standards of the time. To detect aerial targets, four P-3As, designated P-3CS after conversion, were equipped with used Hughes AN/APG-63 pulse-Doppler radars, removed from F-15A/B fighters that had been upgraded with the more advanced AN/APG-70 radars.

Thus, the P-3CS radar picket aircraft was purely a budget ersatz variant, assembled from whatever was at hand. Naturally, the capabilities of the converted Orions could not compare with the radars and data-sharing systems of fully-fledged AWACS aircraft. Consequently, the Coast Guard and Border Patrol, despite the aircraft's lower cost, were not entirely satisfied with them. However, the US federal agencies responsible for border protection and coastal water control did not abandon the use of patrol aircraft with relatively low-performance radars. As the converted P-3As with AN/APG-63 radars were decommissioned, their place was taken by P-3 LRT (Long Range Tracker) aircraft, converted from refurbished P-3Bs stored at Davis-Monthan, Arizona.


Google Earth satellite image of Lockheed P-3 Orion aircraft at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base.

Based on operational experience with the P-3C, these aircraft, in addition to the AN/APG-63V radar with a detection range of up to 150 km, received side-looking optronic systems capable of detecting boats or light aircraft at ranges of several dozen kilometers. Furthermore, Orions operated by the Customs and Border Protection retained their submarine detection equipment, as drug traffickers have begun using small submarines to infiltrate the United States.

This patrol modification, based on the P-3B, was designated the P-3 LRT and remains in service today. The P-3 LRT has an eight-person crew (pilot, co-pilot, flight engineer, radar and optronic systems operators). Operational support at the forward airfield is provided by a three-person ground crew. Based on recent satellite imagery, three P-3 LRT aircraft remain in service.


Google Earth satellite image of Lockheed P-3 LRT Orion aircraft at Cecil Field. The image was taken in October 2025.

Customs and Border Protection's Aviation and Marine Division patrol aircraft are based at airfields in Corpus Christi, Texas; Cecil Field; Point Mugu, California; and Jacksonville, Florida. The distinctive CBP insignia of these aircraft is a zigzag blue stripe painted forward on the fuselage.

Overall, the P-3 LRT patrol aircraft satisfied US border officials, but the AN/APG-63V radar did not provide 360-degree coverage of the airspace. This problem was partially solved by carefully planning the flight path, with the aircraft making figure-eight and donut-shaped turns along the most likely routes of intruders. However, the detection range of the fighter-based radar, although quite compact and relatively low-powered, left much to be desired. But then Lockheed came to the aid of federal agents fighting the smuggling of mind-expanding substances, developing the P-3 AEW airborne early warning and control aircraft on its own initiative.

The first aircraft built had the same radar as the E-2C—the AN/APS-125, with an antenna in a rotating dish-shaped radome. This radar could detect a smuggler's Cessna against the sea at a range of over 250 km. Initially, the P-3 AEW was offered for export as a cheaper alternative to the E-3A Sentry. However, no foreign buyers were found, and the sole customer was the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The onboard equipment included communications equipment capable of operating not only on Coast Guard and Border Patrol frequencies but also capable of direct targeting of interceptors. Later-production aircraft received new AN/APS-139 and AN/APS-145 radars, better suited for detecting low-speed air and surface targets. The first P-3 AEWs were painted a striking red and white. The last such aircraft was decommissioned approximately in 2018.


Google Earth satellite imagery shows a Lockheed P-3 Orion patrol aircraft, an early-production P-3 AEW aircraft, Lockheed C-130H Hercules military transport aircraft, and Hawker Hunter fighter jets at Point Mugu Air Force Base.

To extend their service life, Orion-based AWACS aircraft are overhauled and modernized under the Mid-Life Upgrade program. P-3 AEW aircraft undergo a complete airframe inspection and replacement of components affected by fatigue wear and corrosion. This extends the aircraft's service life by another 20-25 years. New navigation and instrumentation, as well as communications and display systems similar to those used on the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye, are installed. In the future, the P-3 AEW may be equipped with the latest AN/APY-9 radars, surpassing the capabilities of the carrier-based E-2D. The four-engine P-3 AEW is a much larger aircraft, capable of significantly longer patrol missions. The Orion has a larger interior, allowing for the installation of additional reconnaissance and search equipment.


Google Earth satellite image of a Lockheed P-3 LRT Orion and a Lockheed P-3 AEW Orion at Cecil Field. The image was taken in January 2021.

Ten years ago, 14 P-3 LRT and P-3 AEW aircraft served in border aviation units. Currently, their number has been reduced to nine. To replenish the P-3 AEW and P-3 LRT fleet, P-3B/C aircraft from the Davis-Monthan "boneyard" in Arizona, where more than 180 are stored, could be used.

General Atomics MQ-9B Reaper UAVs operated by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection


The U.S. Department of Homeland Security became interested in the medium-class UAV in 2003 and received its first MQ-9B in the fall of 2005. As of 2012, Customs and Border Protection operated nine MQ-9Bs. Two were based at Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota, four at Fort Huachuca in Arizona, and one at Naval Air Station Corpus Christi, Texas.


Google Earth satellite image of Lockheed P-3 LRT Orion and Lockheed P-3 AEW Orion aircraft and a General Atomics MQ-9B SeaGuardian UAV at Corpus Christi Air Force Base. The image was taken in January 2017.

Currently, unarmed troops are used to protect the sea and land borders. Drones The MQ-9B SeaGuardian has an endurance of over 18 hours. Drone The MQ-9B SeaGuardian UAV can patrol for eight hours at a range of 2200 km from its airfield. The MQ-9B SeaGuardian UAV is equipped with Raytheon MTS-B optronic infrared sensors and a Leonardo Seaspray 7500E V2 AESA synthetic aperture radar, which can detect surface targets, including ships, submarine periscopes, and personnel.

The basic patrol and anti-submarine aircraft Lockheed P-3C Orion and special reconnaissance modifications created on its basis


For a long time, the primary American shore-based patrol and anti-submarine aircraft was the turboprop Lockheed P-3C Orion. This aircraft is an evolutionary development of the previous modification, the P-3B, which replaced the P-3A in operational squadrons, which traces its lineage back to the Lockheed L-188 Electra airliner, which first took to the air in 1957. In addition to fighting submarines, the modified P-3C could carry out mine laying, over-the-horizon target designation and warning for surface ships, conduct reconnaissance, and strike land and sea targets with guided missiles. rockets.

The P-3C aircraft has a maximum takeoff weight of 61,235 kg. Length is 35,61 m. Wingspan is 30,38 m. Four Allison T56-A-14 turboprop engines, each producing 4910 hp, enable it to reach a speed of 760 km/h at an altitude of 4500 m. Cruising speed at an altitude of 7600 m is 607 km/h. Patrol speed at an altitude of 460 m is 382 km/h. Ferry range is 8950 km. Flight endurance is up to 17 hours. A combat load of up to 9100 kg can be accommodated on external components and in internal compartments. There is space on board for 11 people.

The aircraft remained in serial production until 1990. Lockheed built 650 units of all variants. Another 107 Orions were built under license by Japan's Kawasaki. Currently, virtually all P-3Cs in US naval aviation have been replaced by the new-generation Boeing P-8A Poseidon.


Google Earth satellite image of Lockheed P-3C Orion and Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft at Jacksonville Air Force Base.

According to reference data, three P-3C and one NP-3D aircraft are part of the 30th Test and Evaluation Squadron, stationed at Point Mugu Air Force Base in California.


Google Earth satellite image of Lockheed P-3C Orion aircraft, along with IAI Kfir and Hawker Hunter fighters at Point Mugu Air Base.

The 1st Research Squadron also operates two NP-3D aircraft at Patuxent River Air Force Base, Maryland.


Google Earth satellite image of a Lockheed NP-3D Orion and a Lockheed P-3 AEW Orion at Patuxent River Air Force Base.

NP-3D aircraft are equipped with a Billboard side-looking radar and optronic sensors. In the past, these aircraft monitored missile tests. During the American presence in Afghanistan, two NP-3Ds conducted detailed radar mapping of the country's territory.

In 2025, the 1st Marine Reconnaissance Squadron, based at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington, operated several Lockheed EP-3E Aries II electronic intelligence aircraft. One such aircraft also operated with the 20th Test and Development Squadron at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland.


Google Earth satellite image of a Lockheed EP-3E Aries II, Lockheed P-3C Orion, Boeing P-8A Poseidon, and Boeing EA-18G Growler aircraft at Whidbey Island Air Force Base. The image was taken in August 2020.

The EP-3E aircraft were developed in the 1990s by converting basic P-3C patrol aircraft, which had logged little flight time. The naval aviation received a total of 12 of these aircraft. The customer received the last aircraft of this type in 1997.


Google Earth satellite image of a Lockheed EP-3E Aries II aircraft at Patuxent River Air Force Base. The image was taken in June 2022.

The electronic reconnaissance aircraft, based on the P-3C, differs externally from the standard Orion in its large longitudinal antenna located in the upper rear fuselage and a radome antenna behind the tail, installed in place of the magnetic anomaly sensor. Of the P-3C's search equipment, the reconnaissance aircraft retains only the AN/APS-115 radar, but adds electronic reconnaissance systems and electromagnetic and infrared jamming stations. The EP-3E is similar in basic specifications to the base aircraft, but the crew and electronic reconnaissance operators on board can exceed 20.

The Navy's EP-3E aircraft were used very intensively, and their presence was noted in various regions of the planet. Until recently, they were active in the Middle East, regularly scanning assets. Defense Russia, Cuba, China and North Korea intercepted radio communications and monitored the naval exercises.

An incident involving an EP-3E on April 1, 2001, caused a stir. On that day, a crew at a Chinese radar station located in the southeastern part of Hainan Island detected an aerial target flying at an altitude of 6700 meters and a speed of approximately 370 km/h along the edge of China's territorial waters. Two J-8D interceptors scrambled from Lingshui Air Base, located on the island's east coast, toward the unidentified target. After closing in on the target, the Chinese pilots identified it as an American EP-3E ARIES II electronic reconnaissance aircraft.

Having detected the interceptors nearby, the Americans descended to 2400 m and reduced their speed to a minimum. Since the stall speed of the J-8D jet is much higher than that of a turboprop, the EP-3E commander intended this to force the Chinese to climb and abandon the pursuit. However, the plan failed: during the third flyby of the intruder, during a close maneuver, one of the interceptors collided with an American reconnaissance aircraft and crashed into the South China Sea. His pilot was missing in action and later presumed dead.

The EP-3E aircraft sustained no fatal damage in the collision and was able to continue its flight. It was forced to land on Hainan Island under threat of gunfire. The American crew failed to completely destroy the classified materials on board. The Chinese military obtained cryptographic and intelligence equipment, encryption keys, call signs, radio frequency lists, and information regarding the operation of radar stations in China, Vietnam, North Korea, and Russia.

A US State Department official was forced to apologize for the incident and pay monetary compensation to the widow of the deceased pilot. Following this, the Chinese government abandoned the trial of the American military personnel, and the 24-member crew was released. The electronic reconnaissance aircraft was disassembled and returned to the US on July 3, 2001, aboard a Russian An-124 heavy transport aircraft. The EP-3E, gutted by Chinese specialists, was then decommissioned.

According to available information, all EP-3Es in service as of early 2025 are to be decommissioned and transferred to the Davis-Monthan storage facility.


Google Earth satellite image of Lockheed EP-3E Aries II aircraft at Davis-Monthan Aircraft Storage Facility.

Following the decommissioning of the Lockheed EP-3E Aries II, the duties of conducting electronic reconnaissance have been assigned to the crews of Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft and Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton UAVs.
.

Boeing P-8A Poseidon basic anti-submarine and reconnaissance aircraft


The turboprop Orion was an excellent aircraft for its time, and these aircraft are still actively used by twelve nations. However, by the beginning of the 21st century, American admirals realized that naval aviation needed a new, modern aircraft that, in addition to improving anti-submarine capabilities, would also serve as an effective patrol and reconnaissance platform, carry a variety of weapons, and interact with long-range UAVs.

The competition to replace the Lockheed P-3C Orion was announced in 2000. Boeing won the bid in 2004, offering an aircraft based on the Boeing 737-800 airliner and designated the P-8A Poseidon after its introduction into service. The initial contract was for 108 aircraft, but the US Navy subsequently ordered additional aircraft, and as of October 2025, 136 were in service, with three more expected. Including foreign purchases, 185 aircraft had been built as of May 2025. Poseidons are produced at Boeing's facility in Renton, Washington. Major subcontractors include Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Spirit AeroSystems, GE Aviation Systems, Marshall Aerospace and Defense Group, CFM International, BAE Systems, and Marotta.


Google Earth satellite image of the Boeing plant in Renton. Taken in July 2024.

For military use, a number of modifications were made to the basic design. To compensate for the loads associated with more frequent low-altitude flights than the base aircraft, the P-8A was equipped with a more robust wing from the Boeing 737-900. Because the Poseidon's onboard equipment consumes significantly more power than a civilian aircraft, each CFM International CFM56 engine on the P-8 is equipped with a 180 kW electric generator, replacing the 90 kW generator. This necessitated a redesign of the nacelles and their wing mounts. The P-8A uses canted wingtips, similar to those on the Boeing 767-400ER, instead of the composite wingtips found on the civilian Boeing 737NG.

The aircraft is equipped with mechanical anti-icing systems. Changes have been made to the flight control and warning system software, allowing for a greater bank angle, a more responsive autothrottle, and the elimination of audible warnings during low-altitude flights. The airframe's strength has been increased, and a bomb bay for torpedoes and other cargo has been added.

With a length of 39,47 m and a wingspan of 37,64 m, the P-8A has a maximum takeoff weight of 85,820 kg. Two CFM56-7B27A turbofan engines have a maximum takeoff thrust of 121 kN each. Maximum flight speed is 907 km/h. Cruising speed is 815 km/h. Combat radius is 2,225 km. Ferry range is 8,300 km. Service ceiling is 12,500 m.

A payload of up to 9,000 kg is accommodated on six external hardpoints and in an internal compartment. Mark 54 anti-submarine torpedoes, equipped with a glide module, can be used from an altitude of over 9,000 m. The armament suite also includes AGM-84 Harpoon, AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER, AGM-88G AARGM-ER, AGM-158C LRASM guided missiles, Sting Ray torpedoes, naval mines, and depth charges. Unlike the turboprop Orion, the turbofan Poseidon is not equipped with a magnetic anomaly sensor, but carries much more sophisticated search and reconnaissance equipment, which is operated by seven operators. The flight crew consists of two people. Seven operators operate the onboard equipment.

The first production P-8A was delivered to the US Navy on March 4, 2012, and after being flown to Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida, it was assigned to Training Squadron 30. Currently, six operational, one training, and one reserve squadron equipped with Poseidons are based in Jacksonville as part of the 11th Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing on the US East (Atlantic) Coast.


Google Earth satellite image of Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft at Jacksonville Air Force Base. The image was taken in January 2021.

Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, has several P-8As with Test and Evaluation Squadrons 1 and 20.


Google Earth satellite image of Boeing P-8A Poseidon, Lockheed C-130H Hercules, and Northrop Grumman E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft at Patuxent River Air Force Base. The image was taken in July 2022.

Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington, is home to six active and one reserve squadron of the 10th Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing on the Pacific Coast.


Google Earth satellite image of Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft at Whidbey Island Air Force Base. The image was taken in April 2025.

Poseidon aircraft have not only good anti-submarine capabilities, but also high reconnaissance capabilities, which are constantly being improved through the introduction of new equipment.


Google Earth satellite image of Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft at RAF Lossiemouth, UK. The image was taken in April 2025.

Currently, P-8A aircraft are actively used for reconnaissance purposes and have largely replaced the older RC-135V/W Rivet Joint and RC-135U Combat Sent.


Google Earth satellite image of Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft at Kadena Air Base. The image was taken in May 2019.

On a rotational basis, Poseidon squadrons are deployed to the UK, the Japanese island of Okinawa, Hawaii and the Middle East.

Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton UAV


Almost simultaneously with the order for the next-generation patrol and reconnaissance aircraft, the US Navy announced a competition for a long-range unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that could replace the aging Orion aircraft for routine patrol missions. The winning bid was a UAV based on the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk. Compared to the original high-altitude reconnaissance drone, the naval version features a reinforced airframe and wing, an anti-icing system, and lightning protection. This allows the aircraft to fly below cloud cover for better visibility of ships and other objects on the sea surface. Onboard equipment enables the UAV to track and classify ships, determine their speed, and determine their coordinates.

The MQ-4C Triton is being considered as a complement to the Boeing P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft and is designed to provide intelligence and reconnaissance missions over vast ocean and coastal regions with real-time data transmission, continuous maritime surveillance, and search and rescue operations.

The primary means of detecting maritime targets during high-altitude flights is the X-band active electronically scanned synthetic aperture radar (AESA) with 360-degree coverage. The radar can capture high-definition radar images and then use its onboard computing system to automatically recognize and classify targets without operator intervention.

Unlike the Global Hawk, the Triton, thanks to its more robust design and lightning protection, is capable of rapid descent and low-altitude flight. In this case, the primary reconnaissance instrument is the Raytheon MTS-B multispectral optronic system, combined with a laser rangefinder/target designator. The MQ-4C UAV is also equipped with modular receiver equipment, similar in capabilities to that used on the Lockheed EP-3E Aries II electronic reconnaissance aircraft. This allows it to passively detect, classify, and geolocate weak radar signals and transmit the information to other users.

The MQ-4C can also act as a network relay and data center. It can receive and transmit messages from across the theater of operations, from aircraft, ships, and ground stations located beyond line-of-sight, and combine this information to create a common "picture" of the battlespace. This significantly improves interoperability and situational awareness, and provides an alternative to satellite communications systems.

The MQ-4C Triton UAV has a gross takeoff weight of 14 kg. It is 14,5 m long and has a wingspan of 39,9 m. Its Rolls-Royce AE 3007 turbofan engine, producing up to 39,66 kN of thrust, provides a maximum speed of 575 km/h (630 mph). Its range is up to 15 km (200 mi). Its endurance is 30 hours. Its service ceiling is 17 m (000 ft).

The MQ-4C Triton made its maiden flight on May 22, 2013, taking off from Palmdale Airfield in California. Assembly of prototype and production aircraft took place at Northrop Grumman's Palmdale facility.


Google Earth satellite image of a Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton UAV at Palmdale Airfield. The image was taken in April 2023.

The main distinguishing feature of the MQ-4C Triton from the very similar RQ-4 Global Hawk is its fuselage and planes, which are painted a single white color.


Google Earth satellite image of a Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton UAV and a Lockheed C-130H Hercules military transport at Point Mugu Air Force Base. The image was taken in August 2018.

As of mid-2025, the US Navy's maritime reconnaissance aircraft had received 30 of the 68 Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton heavy-lift unmanned aerial vehicles on order.


Google Earth satellite image of a Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton UAV and a Lockheed Martin F-35C Lightning II fighter jet at Patuxent River Air Force Base.

The MQ-4C Triton UAVs are deployed to the 11th Unmanned Patrol Squadron at Whidbey Island, Washington, the 19th Unmanned Patrol Squadron, and the 20th Test and Development Squadron at Patuxent River, Maryland. Other air bases in service include Point Mugu, California; Kadena, Hawaii; Sigonella, Italy; and Andersen, Guam.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    15 December 2025 04: 59
    US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) aircraft should ideally have the highest priority for equipment, no worse than US Navy aircraft, but instead, they are being staffed on a residual basis. Meanwhile, CBP crews and operators should be far better trained, as they serve daily in combat missions monitoring both air and surface traffic. And given the huge number of surface vessels and aircraft in the air, which must identify potential smugglers and direct interceptors, their level of competence is clearly higher than that of US Navy combat pilots. If I were them, I would have all AWACS and ASW aircraft operators undergo CBP training so they could gain real-world experience.
    1. +8
      15 December 2025 05: 20
      Quote: Puncher
      The US Customs and Border Protection aircraft should ideally have the highest priority in equipment, no worse than the US Navy aircraft, but instead it is equipped on a residual basis.

      The budgets of the Navy and Customs and Border Protection can be compared. Furthermore, other means of detecting the vessels and aircraft used by drug smugglers are beyond the scope of this publication: patrol boats, the AN/TPS-71 ZGLRS in Corpus Christi, Texas, near Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and in Puerto Rico, as well as more than a dozen LASS and JLENS airborne optronic and radar surveillance systems.
      Quote: Puncher
      And given the huge number of surface vessels and aircraft in the air, among which they must identify potential smugglers and direct interceptors, their level of competence is clearly higher than that of US Navy combat pilots. If I were them, I'd run all AWACS and ASW aircraft operators through Customs and Border Protection so they can gain real-world experience.

      This is a very specific experience. Providing air defense for a carrier strike group and coordinating air support in a theater of operations differs from the operations of P-3 AEW aircraft in much the same way that conducting combined arms combat and the operations of the Russian Guard in a cleared town differs. Rather, the P-3 AEW is viewed as a reserve for ensuring the timely detection of military threats. Furthermore, this would require the deployment of carrier-based AWACS aircraft for the Customs and Border Protection Service, something the US Navy command avoids at all costs, given its negative past experiences.
      1. 0
        15 December 2025 05: 42
        Quote: Bongo
        You can compare the budgets of the navy and the customs and border service.

        That's understandable, of course. But combating drug trafficking is part of national security. And according to reports from the US Drug Enforcement Administration, the bulk of the drug is shipped via the Pacific Ocean. That is, via surface vessels, aircraft, and submarines.
        Quote: Bongo
        It's a very specific experience.

        Essentially, this is a counterattack against multiple stealthy targets. Where else can one gain experience in detecting them and coordinating with interception systems? This is especially true given that the enemy is cunning and constantly develops new, sophisticated penetration methods using cutting-edge technologies, as they have the means to do so.
        Quote: Bongo
        Moreover, this will require the deployment of carrier-based AWACS aircraft in the interests of the Customs and Border Protection Service, which the US Navy command, given its past negative experience, is avoiding at all costs.

        Absolutely. But it's possible to equip the customs and border service with compatible systems (and in fact, that's what's happening). That means, instead of hiring the same operators with their equipment, they could temporarily second them to gain experience.
        The fact is that setting up a target environment is quite expensive and complex, so it's important to create one that closely resembles real-life situations. It's no wonder they hire commercial companies staffed by retired Air Force personnel to train them, as they aren't constrained by regulations and instructions and are willing to act outside the box. And here, you have a virtually entire army (in terms of numbers) attacking your coastline daily from the air, by sea, and underwater.
        1. +9
          15 December 2025 05: 53
          Quote: Puncher
          Essentially, it is a reflection of the invasion of multiple low-visibility targets.

          Let's compare the radar cross-section of the Shahed and the Cessna 172 Skyhawk, as well as their speed characteristics with the Kh-31 anti-ship missile. Regarding "numerosity," that depends on how you look at it. Several smugglers' aircraft may be detected over the Gulf of Mexico in a day, but that's not quite the same as a "star" strike on a carrier strike group.
          Quote: Puncher
          That is, it is possible not to attract the same operators with their equipment, but to temporarily assign them to gain experience.

          Have you ever tried to organize, let alone collaborate, training specialists from different law enforcement agencies at a single educational institution? Believe me, a host of unique problems immediately arise. Bureaucracy and the ambitions of superiors are the same everywhere. More often than not, it's easier to operate autonomously within your own agency.
          Quote: Puncher
          It's no wonder they attract commercial companies employing retired Air Force personnel to train them, as they are not limited by regulations and instructions and are willing to act outside the box.

          First of all, it’s a question of cost; everything else is secondary and comes as a nice bonus.
          1. 0
            15 December 2025 06: 23
            Quote: Bongo
            Let's compare the radar cross-section of the Shahed and the Cessna 172 Skyhawk, as well as their speed characteristics with the Kh-31 anti-ship missile.

            That's all true, but there's a BUT. How often can the Navy conduct exercises involving the interception of multiple stealth aircraft? Not even Coyotes, but classic Chukars? Once or twice a year, and for a limited number of people? But here, much more often, and without paying for it.
            Quote: Bongo
            training specialists from different security agencies in one educational institution?

            I confess. No.
            Quote: Bongo
            Bureaucracy and the ambitions of the bosses are the same everywhere.

            It's impossible to argue with that. My assumption is based on logic and expediency. They have the capacity and even the need, but of course, it all comes down to departments filled with people who want to serve peacefully until retirement. As a result, they use the National Guard for police duties, which is a clear sign of a broken system.
            1. +5
              15 December 2025 09: 19
              Quote: Puncher
              How often can the Navy conduct exercises involving the interception of multiple stealth aircraft?

              Large-scale exercises are held several times a year, but the practice of such tasks for individual crews, fighter pairs and squadrons during aircraft carrier cruises is carried out constantly.
              Quote: Puncher
              But here it happens much more often and you don’t have to pay for it.

              You're mistaken. Deploying AWACS crews along with ground personnel is not cheap. Furthermore, it will inevitably weaken the operational squadrons and waste aircraft resources on non-target missions. Furthermore, as I mentioned above, the Cessna is not a typical target, making it an extremely easy target for the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye's radar.
              Quote: Puncher
              My assumption is dictated by logic and expediency. They have the opportunity and even the need.

              The current situation, where the customs and border service aviation has its own AWACS aircraft, is dictated by expediency.
              Quote: Puncher
              As a result, they are using the National Guard to perform police tasks, which is a clear sign of a broken system.

              I disagree with you. The American National Guard, subordinate to governors, is tasked with combating unrest, among other duties. The fact that Trump, by executive order (since overturned by a court decision), deployed them onto the streets only suggests that his cognitive abilities are not as good as required for such a position.
          2. +2
            15 December 2025 11: 16
            Have you ever tried to organize not even interaction, but, say, the training of specialists from different security agencies in one educational institution?

            From 2005 to 2011, I worked closely in this area, but in related job categories.
            For operational customs they trained operatives, for the Ministry of Emergency Situations - investigators, for the Investigative Committee - investigators and forensic experts, etc. Basically, advanced training and professional retraining
            The experience was mutual. The only problem was finding the right person to provide exclusive material to the specialists. They had already proven their skills, but here they had to find a way to make do.
            Border guards, investigators, judges and prosecutors were invited to customs.
            Complex, but very interesting groups.
            1. +2
              15 December 2025 14: 47
              Vladislav, hello!
              Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
              From 2005 to 2011, I worked closely in this area, but in related job categories.

              Knowing you and your qualifications, we have no doubt you have had positive experience. But you trained people who were purposefully motivated to learn, uninfluenced by their superiors.
              1. +3
                15 December 2025 21: 44
                Olya, good night!
                In the system, professional development is the preserve of losers. Those who weren't too shy about being pulled away from their duties were sent on such assignments.
                Only four regional headquarters took a balanced approach to staffing: the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Jewish Autonomous Region, Orenburg, Kirov, and Kaliningrad.
                Moscow once sent me such a miracle that by the third week of training, everyone had formed the firm opinion that this body was being hidden from trial or lynching.
                1. +3
                  16 December 2025 00: 56
                  Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
                  In the system, advanced training is the domain of losers.

                  A few years ago, Serezha was undergoing retraining at an educational institution, and a group from another department, led by their supervisor, was sent there. There were problems with them.
                  1. +2
                    16 December 2025 07: 44
                    Olya, good afternoon!
                    Advanced training should be built on three pillars.
                    1. People need to be given a break from the routine of service.
                    2. Organize an exchange of experience.
                    3. Involve specialists in the classes who can provide something interesting and useful for the job.
                    For example, bring the head of the regional internal security unit to the traffic police.
                    The classes themselves should be educational.
                    For example, test psychologists with a polygraph, etc.
                    Over seven years at the faculty, I mentored three and a half thousand employees. Many came back two or three times. We knew that only the entrance and exit tests and the excursions to Ganina Yama and Verkhnyaya Pyshma would be the same; everything else would be new.
  2. -1
    15 December 2025 08: 08
    Quote: Sergey Linnik
    Among other tasks, this federal agency is tasked with preventing smuggling
    To strengthen security on their borders and prevent smuggling, simple operational work by the FBI and Border Patrol, consisting of talking to local people living in border areas and encouraging them to report where it should go Illegal border crossings, the appearance of strangers, and suspicious behavior by certain individuals. Fortunately, everyone has phones these days, and the experience of protecting state borders from the Soviet era has not yet been forgotten. The use of AWACS and aircraft carriers is simply an extreme waste of money. It's unclear where American taxpayers are looking. P.S. I just want to throw in a classic - they're so stupid! ©
    1. +2
      15 December 2025 09: 30
      Quote: Luminman
      To strengthen border security and prevent smuggling, simple operational work by the FBI and Border Patrol is sufficient, consisting of talking to local residents living in border areas and encouraging them to report illegal cross-border movements, the appearance of unfamiliar individuals, and suspicious behavior of individuals.

      Perhaps you rely on the experience of the KGB of the USSR in border regions, but you have little understanding of drug cartels and are unfamiliar with American realities.
      Quote: Luminman
      The use of AWACS and aircraft carriers is some kind of extravagance

      Sorry, maybe I forgot what I wrote, but where in the publication does it say that aircraft carriers are being used to combat drug trafficking in the US?
      Quote: Luminman
      I don't understand where American taxpayers are looking? P.S. I really want to throw in the classic line - they're so stupid!

      It's very sad when someone, without adequate information, based on subjective opinions, considers someone "stupid." Americans are real jerks, but considering them fools is a grave mistake. The technical means used by US Customs and Border Protection to detect smugglers' boats and aircraft (including the P-3 LRT and P-3 AEW) are entirely adequate and cost-effective.
      1. -2
        15 December 2025 12: 14
        Quote: Bongo
        Perhaps you are relying on the experience of the KGB of the USSR in border areas
        This KGB experiment was the best, with a complete guarantee of border protection! Or almost complete...
        Quote: Bongo
        Where in the publication does it say that aircraft carriers are being used to combat drug trafficking in the US?
        A photo of an aircraft carrier was posted, and the caption underneath it reads, and I quote: "Aircraft on the upper deck of an aircraft carrier." USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70)Moreover, the article is entitled - Patrol and reconnaissance aircraft of the U.S. Navy and Customs and Border Protection
        1. +1
          15 December 2025 12: 33
          Quote: Luminman
          This KGB experiment was the best, with a complete guarantee of border protection! Well, almost complete.

          Blocking a land border is much easier. There's a vast ocean there, and boats scurry across it, because the population has plenty of them. And the population also has plenty of aircraft and licensed pilots. Nothing like that existed in the USSR.
          1. -2
            15 December 2025 12: 39
            Quote: Puncher
            ...boats are scurrying...
            ...the population has a lot of aircraft...
            That's all true! But various antisocial individuals sooner or later emerge from their boats onto the shore, and aircraft land on more or less level ground. This is precisely where the KGB's methods would come in handy...
        2. +1
          15 December 2025 14: 26
          Quote: Luminman
          A photo of an aircraft carrier was posted, and the caption below it reads, "Aircraft on the upper deck of the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70)." The article is titled, "Patrol and reconnaissance aircraft of the Navy and U.S. Customs and Border Protection."

          And there is Yes But it would be nice if you not only looked at the pictures and what is written under them, but also read the entire text.
        3. +2
          15 December 2025 14: 42
          Quote: Luminman
          A photo of an aircraft carrier was posted, and the caption below it reads, "Aircraft on the upper deck of the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70)." The article is titled, "Patrol and reconnaissance aircraft of the Navy and U.S. Customs and Border Protection."

          The publication also mentions Poseidon aircraft and Triton drones. By your logic, should they also be used to fight drugs? There's no point in taking a single image out of context and drawing conclusions based on it that don't correspond to reality.
        4. +2
          15 December 2025 20: 40
          In fact, the KGB's experience with border protection primarily involved protecting the border "at the exit." They tightly sealed the border and adjacent territories for at least 100 km. All vehicles entering the "zone" were thoroughly checked and inspected.
      2. 0
        15 December 2025 12: 42
        Quote: Bongo
        You have a poor understanding of drug cartels and don't know American realities.
        I don't know what drug cartels are, I'm mostly into alcohol, but I'm well aware of American realities—I crossed the US-Canada border just for fun, and no one paid me any attention, even though there was some clown in uniform standing there. I'm not a US citizen and don't have visa-free entry, but if I wanted, I could have smuggled anything from drugs to OVD. Well, for example: Ten years ago, I had to cross the administrative border of the Stavropol Territory with Kabardino-Balkaria, and there at the checkpoint the bus was stopped and a cop got on board. He didn’t check documents, though, but he looked at all the passengers with a menacing glance.

        And if there were at least such light control on the American border, then half of the drug trafficking problems in the USA would be solved, without the use of a large fleet of airplanes and drones...
        1. +2
          16 December 2025 01: 08
          Quote: Luminman
          I crossed the US-Canadian border just for fun and no one paid any attention to me

          Have you tried crossing the US-Mexican border or entering from the Caribbean without a visa?
          Quote: Luminman
          With the exception of large metropolitan areas, the United States consists of small towns, homogeneously populated by a wide variety of people - one town may be inhabited exclusively by Puritans, another by Baptists, a third by Quakers, and so on. This means complete (but unobtrusive) control over all newcomers who, one way or another, end up in that town.

          Only the conditions in Florida and in the desert areas bordering Mexico are radically different from what you describe.
    2. 0
      15 December 2025 09: 32
      Quote: Luminman
      which consists of talking to the local population living in border areas and encouraging them to report illegal movements across borders.

      You clearly don't understand the scale of things. Look at the length of the US West Coast; even from San Diego to San Francisco, there are so many populated areas that no amount of resources would be enough to control the entire coastline. Intelligence work is certainly necessary, but what you're proposing is overkill.
      Quote: Luminman
      The use of AWACS and aircraft carriers is some kind of extravagance

      Aircraft carriers are not used for this purpose.
      1. -1
        15 December 2025 12: 28
        Quote: Puncher
        Look at the length of the US West Coast...
        ...Intelligence work is certainly necessary, but what you're proposing is too much.
        The issue is not the length of the American border, but their mentality, which makes it simply impossible to organize total control over the coast with the help of the local population. A very interesting exampleIn Nazi Germany, the SD had complete control over its entire population, making it impossible for either anti-Nazi literature or spies to penetrate the Reich. And all of this is thanks to the German mentality, which is unacceptable to the vast majority of American citizens. That's why they used aircraft with the most incredible electronic gadgets.
        1. +2
          15 December 2025 12: 30
          Quote: Luminman
          In Nazi Germany, the SD had complete control over its entire population

          Well, through terrorism, there's no other way. How are you going to arrange something like that in the US? Everyone there has guns.
        2. -1
          16 December 2025 01: 10
          Quote: Luminman
          A very interesting example: in Nazi Germany, the SD had complete control over its entire population, making it simply impossible for any anti-Nazi literature or spies to penetrate the Reich.

          This is only possible in a mono-ethnic totalitarian state.
    3. +2
      15 December 2025 09: 52
      It would be enough to carry out simple operational work by the FBI and the Border Patrol, which would consist of talking to local residents living in border areas and encouraging them to report illegal movements across borders.
      - hm, hm, there are entire districts there that neither the feds nor the state police control, something like that physically couldn't have happened in the long-gone USSR, and in the US during the USSR, too...
      1. 0
        15 December 2025 12: 57
        Quote: faiver
        There are entire areas that neither the feds nor the state police control.
        Name at least one such area?

        P.S. With the exception of large metropolitan areas, the United States is made up of small towns, homogeneously populated by a wide variety of people—one town may be exclusively Puritan, another Baptist, a third Quaker, and so on. This means complete (but unobtrusive) surveillance of all newcomers who somehow find themselves there. I've been there, and I've often caught the locals staring at me, even though I have gray eyes and light brown hair and am indistinguishable from them in appearance.
  3. +6
    15 December 2025 08: 10
    The author gets credit for interesting material. good
    Almost two hundred "Poseidons" alone is quite impressive....
  4. 0
    15 December 2025 08: 14
    Quote: faiver
    Almost two hundred "Poseidons" alone is quite impressive....
    In the USSR, a grandmother sitting on a bench, living in a border area, noticing everything, would have been enough... wink
    1. +7
      15 December 2025 09: 32
      Quote: Luminman
      In the USSR, a grandmother sitting on a bench, living in a border area, noticing everything, would have been enough...

      Using grandmas on a bench to detect submarines, track enemy fleets, and conduct electronic reconnaissance is certainly very creative! good
      1. +5
        15 December 2025 09: 53
        Using grandmas on a bench to detect submarines, track enemy fleets, and conduct electronic reconnaissance is certainly very creative!

        hi
        Creative... especially if you need to track an airplane that will fly at low altitude "somewhere there" and drop its cargo "over there."
        To use grandma like this, you need to raise her 5-6 km on the bench to increase her range and give her maneuverability...
        In general, it still turns out to be an AWACS...
        good
        But you can’t shoot down civilian planes, you can only land them.
        laughing
        Educational video on the topic, with Tom Cruise
        1. +7
          15 December 2025 09: 57
          Andrei, hello!
          Quote: Wildcat
          But you can’t shoot down civilian planes, you can only land them.

          Sometimes they even shot them down when they refused to comply. They even fired at the boats from helicopters. The Customs Service uses 12,7mm M82 rifles specifically for this purpose. If they get hit, you'll get into trouble... belay
          Quote: Wildcat
          To use grandma like this, you need to raise her 5-6 km on the bench to increase her range and give her maneuverability...
          In general, it still turns out to be an AWACS...

          lol good
          1. +2
            15 December 2025 10: 01
            hi
            IMHO, I don't remember anything like this happening with airplanes...
            With boats, yes, even before, if they didn't stop, they could shoot, but not sink... now they sink...
            request
            1. +3
              15 December 2025 10: 05
              Quote: Wildcat
              IMHO, I don't remember anything like this happening with airplanes...

              In the 1990s, this happened, but it wasn't particularly publicized. However, pilots transporting drugs are aware of this and don't get into trouble. Initially, older F-15As were assigned for interception, but later Hornets and Super Hornets began to be used. These naval fighters often operate alongside P-3 LRTs and P-3 AEWs, and if you study satellite imagery, they can be seen at the same airfields.
              1. +2
                15 December 2025 10: 12
                request
                There were mentions that "on the spot" through the "Virginia Army" and other "off-spear/tip-of-the-spear types" they tried to solve problems with the help of explosives, "they don't have planes there" and other stories, up to "local" A10s with machine guns.
                But there were always two problems: the ban on shooting down civilian aircraft (the Chicago Convention, IMHO) and the presence of American citizens on board. It would have been easy to lose your positions and be grounded for a long time... so they made do with forced landings and turns, IMHO.
                But old Tom Clancy in "Clear and Present Danger" tried to paint an ideal image of the struggle, including by destroying planes... in reality, it is a criminal offense in the States.
                request
                1. +4
                  15 December 2025 10: 17
                  Quote: Wildcat
                  But old Tom Clancy in "Clear and Present Danger" tried to paint an ideal image of combat, including by destroying planes...

                  I read it with pleasure! good By the way, this book was recommended for students of American military academies.
                  Quote: Wildcat
                  But there have always been two problems: the ban on shooting down civilian aircraft (the Chicago Convention, IMHO) and the presence of American citizens on board the planes.

                  Nevertheless, there have been cases where planes were actually shot down. And this is entirely justified; otherwise, the pilots would refuse to obey. On the other hand, a Cessna can also be brought down by the wake of a fighter jet flying nearby at high speed.
        2. +2
          15 December 2025 10: 02
          I didn't understand the video - I got a dark blue image on my screen bully
          1. +3
            15 December 2025 10: 04
            Hmm, then, on any working internet video service, there's Made in America (2017 film). Basically, the film is "based on real events," with plane flights involving ///// /Roskomnadzor/
            shown in detail...
            1. +3
              15 December 2025 10: 08
              Got it, thank you.............. hi
          2. +3
            15 December 2025 10: 12
            Quote: faiver
            I didn't understand the video - I got a dark blue image on my screen

            Everything works for me... fellow
            1. +5
              15 December 2025 10: 15
              ...after viewing, all that's left is to prepare an article on the topic of "how to use SIGINT/EW to detect and evade radars in jungle and ocean conditions."
              laughing
            2. +4
              15 December 2025 10: 16
              Apparently my internet is frozen laughingIt's minus 47 outside...
              1. +5
                15 December 2025 10: 18
                Quote: faiver
                Apparently my internet froze laughing, it's -47 outside...

                It's only -27 here, but the humidity is high and there's a breeze. sad
                1. +3
                  15 December 2025 11: 06
                  Thank you Sergey, as always “+”!!!
                  The number of machines capable of monitoring the air and surface is impressive.
                  It's a shame we can't boast about that. However, we've started using UAVs in our work and there are results, but only when combined with operational work.
        3. +1
          15 December 2025 12: 25
          Quote: Wildcat
          It will fly at a low altitude "somewhere there" and drop its cargo "way over there."

          They need a law prohibiting flying and sailing without a transponder on under threat of confiscation of the vehicle.
      2. -2
        15 December 2025 13: 05
        Quote: Bongo
        Using grandmas on a bench to detect submarines, track enemy fleets, and conduct electronic reconnaissance is certainly very creative!
        The grandmothers on the bench are not there to detect submarines and conduct electronic reconnaissance, but to detect strangers who will inevitably end up on the ground, and it doesn't matter how they get there—by sea or by air...
        1. +1
          15 December 2025 14: 23
          Quote: Luminman
          The grandmothers on the bench are not there to detect submarines and conduct radio reconnaissance.

          And before that it was said:
          Quote: Luminman
          Almost two hundred "Poseidons" alone is quite impressive....
          In the USSR, a grandmother sitting on a bench, living in a border area, noticing everything, would have been enough...

          That is, you have equated the grandmother and the R-8A patrol and reconnaissance aircraft.
  5. +3
    15 December 2025 10: 02
    hi
    As always, an interesting article!
  6. 0
    19 December 2025 22: 34
    military construction, including the accumulation of forces and resources for reconnaissance and planning...