Boris Annenkov, one of the most notorious White Atamans of the Civil War.

11 292 111
Boris Annenkov, one of the most notorious White Atamans of the Civil War.
Boris Annenkov sits in the center


Among the leaders of the "White" movement were individuals of varying talents and moral character. One might recall, for example, Sergei Ulagay, who astonished his comrades by refusing to rob himself, "and not allowing others to do so." Yakov Slashchev called him "the only one of the 'famous' who had not tainted himself with robbery." Or the upright and honest soldier Kappel, who suddenly revealed his talents as a great military leader during the Civil War. Or Nikolai Yudenich, who rose to fame on the Caucasian Front and was then known as a master of improvisation.



But there are also those whose role is simply impossible to dispute, as they are the embodiment of absolute evil, and their actions cannot and cannot be justified. In addition to their incredible cruelty, they also became "famous" for collaborating with the enemies of our country. Nevertheless, there are still those who passionately desire to exonerate Grigory Semenov, Andrei Shkuro, and the man featured in this article—Boris Annenkov. Pyotr Wrangel was nicknamed the "Black Baron" for his love of Circassian women. Annenkov, meanwhile, earned the nickname "Black Ataman" precisely for the numerous atrocities he and his subordinates committed.

The origin and beginning of Boris Annenkov's military service


The future bloody ataman of the civil war was born on February 9 (21), 1889, in the territory of the modern Ukrainian Cherkasy region.

His father, a retired colonel, was a nobleman, but his mother did not hold a noble title. Boris Annenkov himself claimed to be a relative (almost a grandson) of the Decembrist Ivan Annenkov—the same one who became the hero of the Soviet film "The Captivating Star of Happiness." However, this is more of a family legend; there is no documented evidence to support the ataman's relationship with this Decembrist.

Many members of the Annenkov family served in the military, so it's no surprise that 8-year-old Boris was enrolled in the Odessa Cadet Corps, then entered the Moscow Alexander Military School, where A. Kuprin was a graduate. He completed his studies in 1908, receiving the rank of cornet and an assignment to the First Siberian Cossack Regiment named after Yermak Timofeyev. It was to this regiment that the "ataman of all Cossack troops," Tsarevich Alexei, was assigned, and in 1916, Emperor Nicholas II himself became the regiment's commander. This unit was then stationed on the territory of historical Semirechye region—in the city of Jarkent, located near the Chinese border. In 1911, Annenkov became a sotnik, and that same year, the regiment was commanded by the infamous Pyotr Krasnov, the future head of the "Main Directorate of Cossack Troops" in the Ministry of Eastern Occupied Territories of the Third Reich. He wrote of Annenkov:

He was… an excellent horseman, athlete, superb marksman, gymnast, fencer, and swordsman… He would often sit under a fallen tree, holding his Fox, while the Cossacks leaped on their horses over their centurion commander. There was nothing risky he wouldn't volunteer for.

But a few years later, Centurion Annenkov was transferred to the Fourth Cossack Regiment.


Centurion Annenkov in a photograph from 1913.

Buntovshik


In early summer 1914, a mutiny broke out in the Fourth Cossack Regiment, which was stationed in a training camp. It was caused by "unclear relations" between commanders and their subordinates. Podsaul Borodikhin was particularly hated by everyone. Several of the most notorious officers were killed, including the training camp commander. The rebels chose Ensign Annenkov as their "temporary commander." He had not actually participated personally in the mutiny, but because he refused the appointment and later refused to name the ringleaders, he became one of the defendants on charges of "inaction and harboring the rebels." A total of 80 men were tried: eight were executed, and 20 were sent to hard labor. Annenkov was sentenced to 16 months in prison, but then World War I broke out, and instead of prison, he was sent to the German front, where his regiment was stationed. He arrived at the unit's location in January 1915.

B. Annenkov during World War I



Annenkov (with the dog on the right) in a photograph from World War I

From February 7 to 21, 1915, the so-called Second Battle of the Masurian Lakes (the "Winter Battle in Masuria") took place in northeastern Poland. Quartermaster General of the General Staff of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief Yu. Danilov wrote about it:

This offensive by the 8th and 10th German armies in February 1915 was undoubtedly a major success for our enemies. Our 10th Army was forced to retreat from East Prussia, this time for good.

Annenkov's regiment was encircled, senior officers perished in heavy fighting, and some accounts claim that Ensign Annenkov had to lead the remaining soldiers out of the encirclement. However, this information raises legitimate doubts, as he received no award for such a remarkable feat. Furthermore, he was never promoted—during the entire World War, he rose only to the lowly rank of Yesaul (at the time equivalent to captain in the infantry and captain in the cavalry). The regiment broke out of the encirclement, and Annenkov was among those who fought through, but there is no documentary evidence that he was in command.

Having fortunately evaded capture, Annenkov initiated the formation of Cossack units to carry out sabotage operations behind German lines. Such units during World War I are often referred to as "partisan," but it would be more accurate to call them "raiding" units.

The idea was in the air: in that same year, 1915, Esaul A. Shkura (Shkuro) approached the command with a similar proposal: "to dispatch him with a party of Cossacks to harass the enemy's rear and communications." Thus was created the "Kuban Cavalry Detachment for Special Purposes," which Shkuro himself called the "Wolf Hundred."

One often reads of the great exploits of such raiding parties, which supposedly destroyed almost entire regiments and even brigades—in short, they performed miracles, striking terror into the enemy. However, contemporaries were highly skeptical of them. Pyotr Krasnov, for example, wrote of Shkuro and his party:

Like all partisans in this war, he was not particularly distinguished.

And Wrangel claimed that in the “partisans”:

With a few exceptions, those who came were mainly the worst elements of the officer corps, who for some reason were burdened by service in their native units.

He also accused the "partisans" of spending most of their time in the rear, not conducting raids or sabotage, but drinking and robbing the local population. In short, the commanders of such units' reports to headquarters about the devastation they inflicted on the enemy are largely unsubstantiated self-promotion.

Nevertheless, on June 21, 1916, near Baranovichi, one of Semyonov's surprise attacks was successful, and his unit, having routed the enemy infantry, captured significant trophies. Annenkov himself claimed to have been awarded the French Legion of Honor for his exploits, but this information, again, is not confirmed by historical sources. Here are the Russian awards he received: the Order of St. Anne, 4th, 3rd, and 2nd class; the Order of St. Stanislaus, 2nd class with swords; and the Gold St. George Cross. weapon, soldier's St. George's Cross with a laurel branch.

B. Annenkov after the abdication of Nicholas II


After the February Revolution, Annenkov and his subordinates (around 30 in total) swore allegiance to the Provisional Government, and after the Bolsheviks came to power, they headed to Omsk, where the unit was supposed to be disbanded. However, Annenkov changed his mind about disarming his men.

Having replenished the detachment and brought its number up to 200 people, he led it to the village of Zakhlamlinskaya.

On February 17, having learned that unrest had begun in Omsk, Annenkov hurried to the city and, "under the cover of the situation," robbed St. Nicholas Cathedral, stealing one of Yermak's banners and the military banner received from the emperor in connection with the 300th anniversary of the reign of the House of Romanov.

The Chief Administrator of the Supreme Ruler and Council of Ministers of Kolchak, G.K. Gins, wrote about this in his book “Siberia, Allies and Kolchak”:

Under the Bolsheviks, he (Annenkov) stole Yermak's banner in Omsk and assembled an entire detachment. He spent the first half of 1918 in the villages near Omsk, constantly harassing the Bolsheviks and remaining elusive. He was aided by the Omsk bourgeoisie. A coup occurred, and Annenkov refused to hand over Yermak's banner. The circle demanded it, but he refused until they brought the disobedient man to heel, shaming him in the Cossack newspaper "Irtysh."

B. Annenkov at the beginning of the civil war


Annenkov gathered his forces, and while his detachment consisted of 200 Cossacks in April 1918, by June he had increased its numbers to 1,000, and by the end of the summer, to 1,500. His subordinates elected him ataman, and he later assumed the rank of troop sergeant major. After the outbreak of a mutiny by Czechoslovak legionnaires, Annenkov, with their assistance, captured Omsk on June 7, 1918. Then fighting began near Verkhneuralsk, defended by Ivan Kashirin.


Ivan Kashirin in a photograph from the mid-30s.

The city fell on July 6, Ivan Kashirin retreated to Beloretsk, where he joined up with the detachment of his brother Nikolai.


Nikolai Kashirin in a photograph from the mid-30s.

Former podsaul Nikolai Kashirin commanded the Ural partisan army until he was seriously wounded on August 2, 1918. He was then replaced by V. Blucher.

The Reds launched a counteroffensive and recaptured Verkhneuralsk. After this, Annenkov and his detachment came under the command of A. Dutov.

Even at this time, Annenkov and his subordinates were known for their pathological cruelty. In the summer of 1918, Captain Kaurov's punitive company, which terrified civilians, rode on one of the armored trains. Other Annenkovites weren't far behind Kaurov. Vasily Dovbnja, for example, testified at Annenkov's trial:

In July-August 1918, a White detachment appeared in the Lepsinsky district of the Semirechye region, arriving from Siberia and glorifying the "power of Russian arms" by beheading and flogging civilians. The lack of resistance gave the drunken, unbridled gang of officers and the Cossacks who had joined them the opportunity to flog and hack civilians with impunity, rape women and even young girls, and plunder their property. Woe to anyone who attempted to express displeasure at the looting and violence, let alone defend them. They were immediately declared a Bolshevik and, at best, flogged, or even hacked—and not just hacked, but tortured. They would chop off a leg, an arm, or slit their stomach. All the sick and wounded who were in the Lepsin hospital were brutally hacked to pieces... An old party member, sick with typhus, who had recently arrived from Perm, was brutally beaten, then his stomach was ripped open and he was thrown into the garden, where he died a day later.

According to other witnesses, 800 people were shot, hacked to pieces, or hanged in the city of Sergiopol. In the burned-out village of Troitskoye, 100 men, 13 women, and seven infants were beaten to death. In the village of Nikolskoye, 30 people were shot, five were hanged, and 300 local residents were flogged. In the village of Znamenka, almost all the inhabitants were killed, and the breasts of local women were cut off before being killed. In the village of Kolpakovka, 733 people fell victim to Annenkov, and in the settlement of Podgorny, 200. In Karabulak, all the men were killed, leaving the bodies unburied, and dogs became so accustomed to human flesh that, according to eyewitnesses, they began attacking living people.

However, one shouldn't think that the behavior of Annenkov and his men was condemned by the White command or even Kolchak. In his book "Siberia, Allies, and Kolchak," G.K. Gins, quoted above, wrote that the admiral openly stated many times:

Civil war must be merciless. I order unit commanders to shoot all captured communists. Either we shoot them, or they shoot us. Cadet V.N. Pepeliaev, head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Kolchak's government, became synonymous with terror. He bluntly declared that one must not be afraid to "stain one's hands in blood" and, if necessary, "be the executioners themselves."

Meanwhile, the forced mobilization of men by mid-July 1918 led to an uprising in 46 villages in the Shemonaikhinsky district of the Semipalatinsk region. The repressions were extremely brutal. For example, Annenkov's detachment burned down the village of Cherny Dol in September and later became infamous for its unprecedented atrocities in Slavgorod (now located in the Altai Krai). During his 1927 trial, Annenkov, under the testimony of 104 witnesses, was forced to admit to mass executions and summary executions. However, he claimed ignorance that his subordinates also "amuse themselves" by burying people alive, cutting strips of skin from their backs, gouging out eyes, and sprinkling wounds with salt. One witness reported that 1667 people were killed in Slavgorod alone. In addition, it was proven that in Cherny Dol, 10 women were raped, including 13-year-old girls; in settlement No. 42, all women and girls were subjected to violence.

And here is what the peasant Semyon Polyansky showed:

People fled from Annenkov's in carts toward the Klyuchinsky Highway... A little later, I had to travel that same route one day with the mail. Four miles before Slavgorod, I began to see corpses hacked to pieces with sabers. The road there was compressed into a narrow passage, and the corpses were crowded together in this channel. I dismounted, dragged them to the side of the road, and only then did the driver move forward.

Witness Turenbaeva stated that, upon arriving in their village, the Annenkovites began demanding that the Bolsheviks be handed over:

We replied that there weren't any. We didn't even know what kind of Bolsheviks they were. Then they shot my husband, three Cossacks, and one girl. Then two soldiers took my daughter-in-law and raped her, and after they did that, they did the same to me. After the rape, one of the women died.

Annenkov's "exploits" were highly praised by his superiors, and on October 15, he was promoted to major general. On October 23, 1918, Annenkov's unit was expanded into the "Ataman Annenkov Partisan Division" and sent to suppress an uprising in 12 villages of the Lepsinsky District (present-day Sarkand District, Zhetysu Region, Kazakhstan). In 1927, Annenkov testified at his trial:

In early 1918, when the Cossacks returned from the front, they were joined by the Kyrgyz and the old peasant villages, while all the remaining villages sided with the Reds. Tensions were building between the peasants and the Cossacks. The Cossacks wanted to convert the entire Semirechye region into a peasantry. All peasants were ordered to enlist as Cossacks; those who refused were threatened with deportation from Semirechye to Siberia. Some peasant villages joined the Cossacks, while others refused. The "Mountain Eagles" (partisan detachments in the Tarbagatai Mountains) were formed from the peasants in the mountains. When I arrived in Urzhar, I learned that the "Mountain Eagles" were commanded by my former sergeant major from the German service, Yegor Alekseyev. I began corresponding with him, asking how he had joined the Bolsheviks and who he was fighting against. He replied that he was going neither against the Bolsheviks nor against the provisional government, but against the Cossacks and the Kirghiz.

The ataman of the Semirechye Cossack army, Alexander Ionov, was also a supporter of "Cossackization", but he had "difficult" relations with Annenkov and each found plenty of reasons for reproach.


A. Ionov

Alexander's father, General Mikhail Ionov, and his brother, Vladimir, sided with the revolution. Mikhail Ionov was a recipient of nine royal orders and the Golden St. George's Sword, a participant in the conquest of Khiva and Bukhara, a former governor of the Semirechye region, and the acting ataman of the Semirechye Cossack Host. He taught at one of the Red Army infantry military schools and died in 1923 (according to other sources, in 1924).


General M. Ionov in a photograph from 1892 from I. Sytin's "Military Encyclopedia"

Vladimir Mikhailovich Ionov served in the Red Army since 1919 and was the chief artillery He served on the Transcaspian Front and participated in the liberation of Krasnovodsk from the White Guards and the British, for which he was awarded the Order of the Red Banner (the order was personally presented to him by M. Frunze). He then commanded the first cavalry mountain division, which captured Denau, Karatag, Gissar, Dushanbe, and Kulyab in 1921. The local emir fled to Afghanistan, leaving behind a harem of 300 women. Interestingly, many of them later married Red Army soldiers (recalling the film "White Sun of the Desert" and Petrukha's attempts to woo Gulchitai).

In May of that same year, 1921, Vladimir Ionov lost his left arm in a victorious battle against a large detachment of Basmachi. He was awarded a second Order of the Red Banner but was forced to leave the army. Despite his injury, he led an active life: he became a member of the Central Asian Military Scientific Society, participated in hydrographic expeditions, worked in the cotton production department of the Turkestan Military District, and, towards the end of his life, took up painting and graduated from the Tashkent Art College. His painting "The Defeat of a Basmachi Nest" could be seen in the Tashkent Garrison Officers' Club during the Soviet era. He died in 1946.

Let's return to the autumn of 1918.

On November 18, 1918, the Ufa Directory fell, dissolved by A.V. Kolchak, who staged a coup d'état and declared himself supreme ruler of Russia. Like another famous ataman, Semyonov, Annenkov initially refused to submit to the admiral, but in exchange for supplies and funding, he finally decided to recognize his authority.

On the night of December 23, 1918, an uprising against Kolchak began in Omsk, which was brutally suppressed with the participation of Annenkov's detachment. Afterward, he was sent to Semirechye, but we'll discuss that in the next article, which will recount the ataman's further bloody "exploits," his escape to China, his trial in Semipalatinsk, and the inevitable outcome of his life.
111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 15
    9 December 2025 04: 46
    Boris Annenkov was mistakenly classified as a White Guard. He wasn't one. He was the leader of a bandit gang who didn't care who they fought for or what ideals they stood for. Banditry, robbery, rape, and murder were their ideals. His execution on August 25, 1927, marked the logical end to his bandit career. He is beyond rehabilitation.
    1. + 15
      9 December 2025 05: 26
      He was not a White Guard.

      In all circumstances, he fought on the side of the Whites against the Reds.
      It's natural that the White movement, like the Red one, was diverse. But the Bolsheviks had the people on their side, and that's what determined the outcome of the confrontation.
      1. +4
        9 December 2025 05: 30
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        In all circumstances, he fought on the side of the Whites against the Reds.


        So he regularly killed the White Guards.
        1. +9
          9 December 2025 08: 47
          [B]
          So he regularly killed the White Guards.
          / B]
          And he was promoted for this. laughing
          1. +5
            9 December 2025 08: 53
            Quote: parusnik
            And he was promoted for this.


            He was given ranks in advance for his potential loyalty.
            And his ranks have also jumped wildly. From a troop sergeant major (lieutenant colonel) straight to major general.
            In general, Annenkov's phrase is noteworthy: "Every partisan has the right to shoot anyone who did not serve in my units, without trial or investigation. Annenkov."
            1. +3
              9 December 2025 08: 59
              He was given ranks in advance for his potential loyalty.
              And in response he killed the White Guards laughing
              1. +4
                9 December 2025 09: 03
                Quote: parusnik
                He was given ranks in advance for his potential loyalty.
                And in response he killed the White Guards laughing


                Tell me, if Denikin had given Batko Makhno the rank of major general, would anything have changed?
                1. +5
                  9 December 2025 09: 11
                  If Denikin had given Father Makhno the rank of major general

                  Without ifs. The White Guards offered the captured Kochubey an officer's rank and a unit to command. He refused. They hanged him. While they were hanging him, Kochubey called the White Guards the most obscene names. Tell me when Annenkov killed White Guards and under what circumstances. Specifically. Maybe he destroyed some White Guard unit.
                  1. 0
                    9 December 2025 09: 15
                    Quote: parusnik
                    Maybe he defeated some White Guard unit.


                    Well, he didn't destroy any units. But he robbed and killed those who could be robbed or those who got in his way.
                    1. +3
                      9 December 2025 09: 18
                      Please provide specific examples.
                      So he regularly killed the White Guards.
                      If you don't know when and where, don't engage in demagoguery.
                      those who could be robbed or those who interfered with him - he robbed and killed.
                      Were there White Guards among them?
                      1. 0
                        9 December 2025 09: 22
                        Quote: parusnik
                        If you don't know when and where, don't engage in demagoguery.


                        Well, let's assume that I'm a demagogue.
                        Somewhere there are memoirs of the White Guard captain Solovyov, which he left behind after emigrating to China, but I can't find them now. All that remains are the recollections of what I read.
                      2. -2
                        9 December 2025 09: 45
                        Somewhere there are memoirs of the White Guard captain Solovyov

                        You, Prince, don't remember Captain Solovyov's name, but I remember Annenkov killing White Guards. Let's return to your statements.
                        So he regularly killed the White Guards.
                        и
                        those who could be robbed or those who interfered with him - he robbed and killed.

                        Note that in this sentence you no longer have the White Guards. Hence the conclusion that you don't have the information, but if you read Captain Solovyov's memoirs, you should at least remember who Captain Solovyov served under and where, if you have any memories from what you read.
                      3. +1
                        9 December 2025 09: 47
                        Quote: parusnik
                        At least you should remember who Captain Solovyov served under and where, if you have any memories from what you read


                        At Ataman Dutov's.
                      4. -1
                        9 December 2025 09: 54
                        At Ataman Dutov's
                        Dutov operated in the Orenburg region, while Annenkov operated in Semirechye. A. I. Dutov's Orenburg Army fought the Red Army with varying success, but in September 1919 it was defeated near Aktyubinsk. The ataman and the remnants of his army retreated to Semirechye, where they joined Ataman B. V. Annenkov's Semirechye Army. Due to the lack of provisions, the march across the steppe became known as the "Hunger March." Upon arrival in Semirechye, A. Dutov was appointed Governor-General of the Semirechye Region by Ataman Annenkov. Command of the Orenburg Army passed to General A. S. Bakich. Under pressure from the Red Army in May 1920, Dutov, along with his ataman detachment and civilian refugees, crossed the border and fled to China, where Ataman Annenkov's Semirechensk army soon retreated. Returning to your phrase
                        So he regularly killed the White Guards too.
                        So, Annenkov orchestrated the massacre of Dutov's Cossacks? Or only those who wanted to join the Reds?
                      5. +2
                        9 December 2025 10: 11
                        Quote: parusnik
                        So, Annenkov orchestrated the massacre of Dutov's Cossacks? Or only those who wanted to join the Reds?

                        Quote: parusnik
                        where the Semirechensk army of Ataman Annenkov soon retreated

                        The thing is that at the time of all these events, Annenkov didn't have any army - everyone started to run away and rebel, and it wasn't even because of the Reds' offensive, it was just that this whole Annenkov rabble had completely gone wild.
                        Annenkov is an absolutely crazy person.
                      6. 0
                        9 December 2025 10: 18
                        Annenkov is an absolutely crazy person.
                        .

                        What a simple explanation. Kolchak was sane when, in one of his orders to suppress peasant uprisings, he called for using Japanese methods, distributing "enhanced food coupons" to the rebels. laughing
                      7. +1
                        9 December 2025 10: 23
                        Quote: parusnik
                        distribute "enhanced food coupons" to the rebels

                        Whatever you want, whatever the times, such are the explanations.
                        "Send him to Dukhonin's headquarters"
                        This is who should have been sent away at the time, Boris Vladimirovich.
                      8. +1
                        9 December 2025 10: 28
                        Whatever you want, whatever the times, such are the explanations.

                        Prince, time is to blame. Time forced Kolchak to sign such orders and collaborate with the interventionists. Time is to blame for the erection of monuments to I. Ilyin, deputy director of the Nazi Russian Institute.
                      9. +4
                        9 December 2025 10: 38
                        Quote: parusnik
                        time is to blame

                        Yes, it is time, some kind of shift occurs in people’s heads, and this is of a mass nature, and whose head it is - red or white, does not matter.
                        I explained this in a simple way.
                      10. -2
                        9 December 2025 10: 40
                        Some kind of shift is happening in people's minds, and it's on a massive scale.

                        Are you talking about yourself? I'm not so sane. laughing
                      11. +6
                        9 December 2025 10: 19
                        Quote: parusnik
                        Or exclusively those who wanted to join the Reds?

                        By the way, Annenkov promised not to interfere with those Cossacks who wanted to remain in Russia at their own risk and peril, and even promised food supplies near the city of Karagach. When this entire group of 3800 people arrived there, machine guns were waiting for them, they were all killed, and buried near Lake Alakol.
                      12. +1
                        9 December 2025 10: 22
                        A nice man in every way, but this is the KNS, an exception, among the white knights. laughing
                      13. -1
                        9 December 2025 10: 26
                        Quote: parusnik
                        in the ranks of the white knights

                        The Red Knights didn't lag behind, I'm tired of the Whites, it's become a pain in the neck, the author needs to switch to the Red Knights, they're no less exciting.
                      14. +3
                        9 December 2025 10: 30
                        I'm sick and tired of hearing about white people.

                        What's so sudden? laughing
                      15. +2
                        9 December 2025 15: 13
                        It's worth remembering what happened to them later...in Karagach
                    2. +4
                      9 December 2025 09: 52
                      Quote from kromer
                      Well, I didn't destroy any units.

                      Well, why not? He also smashed small White Guard units - he routed a detachment of Dutov Cossack families (evacuated to China), there were many women in the detachment (from among the Cossack families), all of them were brutally killed - officers who accompanied the detachment, the women were raped, then also brutally killed, they seized the regimental cash register of the Orenburg regiment.
                      Events at the Selke Pass.
                      1. +2
                        9 December 2025 10: 36
                        defeated a detachment of Dutov Cossack families
                        Family members of the Cossacks, women, old people, children, apparently, were notorious White Guards, and ideological ones at that. laughing
                      2. +5
                        9 December 2025 10: 40
                        Quote: parusnik
                        Family members of the Cossacks, women, old people, children, apparently, were notorious White Guards, and ideological ones at that.

                        They were members of White Guard families and were accompanied by White Guard officers.
                      3. 0
                        9 December 2025 10: 42
                        They were members of White Guard families.

                        Everyone without exception? Were all the refugees exclusively ideological?
                      4. +6
                        9 December 2025 10: 43
                        Quote: parusnik
                        Were all the refugees exclusively ideological?

                        Should they be members of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)?
                      5. -2
                        9 December 2025 10: 47
                        Okay, but why did Annenkov give such an order to destroy the Cossack families? For what purpose?
                        Should they be members of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)?
                        At that time, there was no All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), and believe it or not, not even the USSR. Yeah, but if they were members of the RCP(B) or the RKSM, wouldn't he have given such an order?
      2. -7
        9 December 2025 06: 50
        Based on your logic, do you believe that eastern Ukrainians and western Ukrainians are not one people?
        How interesting!😊
        1. +6
          9 December 2025 07: 26
          What do Ukrainians have to do with this?
          But if we consider Kharkiv residents to be eastern Ukrainians and Lviv residents to be western Ukrainians, then yes, they are practically different peoples. They even speak practically different languages ​​(surzhyk and the Galician dialect), and have different traditions. Galicians considered Bandura a hero, while in Kharkiv, "Banderovets" was, until recently, a swear word.
          1. +1
            9 December 2025 07: 33
            This is pure nonsense! There are no different peoples in a civil war! The people are always one! At the Kolchak monument in Irkutsk, there are sculptures of two warriors. One Red and one White. Facing each other. They were based on two real brothers. One fought for the Whites, the other for the Reds. Are you saying they are from different peoples?
    2. VLR
      +7
      9 December 2025 06: 44
      Annenkov was a bandit, but he was also a White general. Kolchak, after all, knew perfectly well what Annenkov, Semyonov, Kalmykov, and the others were up to. And Denikin knew about the "heroic acts" of Shkuro and Mamontov. And then the more reasonable White émigrés wrote abroad:
      “The Whites, with their tyranny, terror and requisitions, have created an enemy for themselves.”

      And:
      "It was sometimes difficult to determine where politics ended and ordinary, if not extraordinary, criminality began. The term 'White Bandits' truly suited this milieu."
      1. 0
        9 December 2025 06: 48
        Quote: VlR
        Annenkov was a bandit, but also a White general.


        That's right. He was a bandit first and foremost, and a White general only second.
        1. +2
          9 December 2025 07: 22
          If the gangs of Annenkov and Semenov were subordinate to Kolchak, and the bandit squads of Shkuro and Mamontov were subordinate to Denikin, who were Kolchak and Denikin?
          1. +1
            9 December 2025 07: 25
            Quote: vet
            If Annenkov and Semenov's gangs were subordinate to Kolchak


            Was Semenov subordinate to Kolchak? In theory, perhaps, but in practice, Semenov always proved otherwise.
        2. +3
          9 December 2025 10: 38
          Annenkov was an ordinary white bandit, without first or second place.
          1. +2
            10 December 2025 06: 27
            They committed terrible atrocities; my great-grandfather fought against them. I vaguely remember his stories due to my age, but I'll never forget his lacerations and the missing fingers. The site of Annenkov's trial remains standing to this day; it's surprising they didn't demolish it, a beautiful spot in the very center of the city. There was a monument to Annenkov's victims, but I never saw it, perhaps it was removed. I can't say for sure; it's a different country now, after all.
      2. -1
        9 December 2025 07: 48
        The Red Bandit also fit into that environment!
        Do you think Lenin didn't know what the Reds were doing?
        Lenin to Rakovsky:
        "Decree the complete disarmament of the population, shoot on the spot mercilessly for every concealed rifle."
        And they shot mercilessly, on the spot!
        1. -9
          9 December 2025 13: 31
          Quote from Songwolf
          Do you think Lenin didn't know what the Reds were doing?

          knew and sanctioned
          In August 1918, the Bolsheviks organized an invasion of Ingush detachments on the villages of Aki-Yurtovskaya (Vorontsovo-Dashkovskaya), Sunzhenskaya, Tarskaya, and Tarskie khutors: the Cossacks from these villages were deported to the last man (up to 10,000). Unarmed, they moved north, dying and freezing along the way, subjected to constant attacks by the highlanders. Property worth 120 million gold rubles was confiscated from the Cossacks. In just a few days in 1918, about 12,000 Cossacks were exterminated—mostly women, children, and the elderly—and 70,000 were expelled from their homes.


          (October 26, 1920) Stalin reported to Lenin: "Several Cossack villages have been punished approximately..." From another telegram from Stalin (October 30): "Five villages have been evicted by military force. The recent Cossack uprising provided a suitable pretext and facilitated the eviction; the land has been placed at the disposal of the Chechens..."

          Red Division Commander F.K. Mironov:
          The Communists, with their atrocities, provoked a mass uprising in the Don region and are now driving the Russian people to correct their evil mistake. The blood now being shed on the Southern Front is needless and unnecessary, and it is being shed amid the savage, satanic laughter of new vandals, who have resurrected the Middle Ages and the Inquisition with their villainy. For example, in the village of Kachalinskaya in the 2nd Don District, Communists, while torturing a 22-year-old Cossack who had defected from the Cadet side, placed him barefoot on a hot frying pan and beat his bare feet with sticks. In the village of Bokovskaya, among the 62 innocent Cossacks executed, one was executed for refusing to give matches to Commissar Gorokhov. In the village of Morozovskaya, the Revolutionary Committee slaughtered 67 people. These villains brought people to a barn and there, drunk, practiced the art of sabre and dagger attacks on them. All the slaughtered bodies were found under the barn floor. In the Sevastyanov farmstead in the Chernyshevskaya stanitsa, the chairman of the farm council was shot for sharing a surname with a cadet officer. And when the outraged population demanded to know why, the murderers replied, "There was a mistake." In the Setrakovskoye farmstead in the Migulinskaya stanitsa, 400 unarmed people were killed during a rally under an order issued by the expeditionary force to exterminate Cossacks. Under the order of the Red Terror, tens of thousands of unarmed people were executed in the Don region. The number of illegal requisitions and confiscations must be counted in the hundreds of thousands. The population groaned under the violence and abuse. There isn't a single hamlet or village that doesn't count its victims of the Red Terror in the tens and hundreds. The Don is speechless with horror.

          etc.

          The atrocities are countless.

          Annenkov is a bandit, but he's a child compared to the state terror of the Krasnykhs.
    3. +1
      9 December 2025 07: 28
      Annenkov is more likely to be considered one of the "batki" (little fathers) who proliferated during the Civil War, appearing in the form of greens, red-greens, white-greens, and other gray-brown-crimson varieties. They regularly fought for the Reds and Whites, and were mostly bandit groups. The fact that Annenkov wore epaulettes in no way makes him a White Guard. While Denikin, Kolchak, and Wrangel fought for the idea of ​​a United and Indivisible Russia, these figures couldn't care less. And their end was sealed.
      1. VLR
        +4
        9 December 2025 08: 13
        "Batkas" who multiplied in the Civil War in the form of greens, red-greens, white-greens, and other gray-brown-crimson varieties. They regularly fought for the Reds and the Whites,

        Annenkov, Semyonov, and Shkuro didn't fight for the Reds. Only for the Whites. And they certainly didn't forget themselves; they lived for their own pleasure, hoping to escape with their loot. Indeed, they did, but ultimately they had to answer to the people of their country.
        1. -10
          9 December 2025 09: 30
          Quote: VlR
          Annenkov, Semyonov, and Shkuro didn't fight for the Reds. They fought only for the Whites.

          The bandit Rusorez Grigoriev, the bandit Yaponchik and others fought for the Reds.

          The wild atrocities of the 1st Cavalry were described by the Reds themselves.

          This is the Civil War from two sides. State Terrorism is a policy specifically of the Reds—it didn't exist before 1953. Before the VOR, it shouldn't have been carried out by the Reds; everything was decided in the Criminal Code.

          Ivan Kagirin retreated to Beloretsk, where he joined up with his brother Nikolai's detachment


          These famous army commanders turned out to be,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Japanese spies And they were exterminated in 37 by the very government they brought in, along with their families. They deserved it—they fought on the wrong side...
          1. +4
            9 December 2025 09: 48
            Quote: Olgovich
            The bandit Rusorez Grigoriev, the bandit Yaponchik and others fought for the Reds.

            Well, yes, that’s why Makhno killed him when Grigoriev wanted to go over to Denikin’s side.
            1. VLR
              +2
              9 December 2025 10: 00
              F Yaponchik was shot by the head of the Voznesensky combat area N. Ursulov.
            2. 0
              9 December 2025 14: 42
              This has not been proven... There was such a version, but it was not confirmed by documents.
            3. 0
              9 December 2025 14: 44
              This version has not received any documentary confirmation!
          2. +1
            9 December 2025 10: 03
            If those to whom your innocence belongs had won, then the so-called "red" terror would have turned out to be just a child's play in a sandbox.
            All this hatred of the whites towards the people who supported the reds in the activities of people like Annenkov, Shkura, Semenov and others.
            1. +5
              9 December 2025 10: 14
              Yes, the civil war was brutal on both sides. However, the people had the opportunity to compare the Whites and the Reds. And they chose the Reds.
            2. -10
              9 December 2025 11: 23
              Quote: Grencer81
              If those to whom your innocence belongs had won, then the so-called "red" terror would have turned out to be just a child's play in a sandbox.

              without any x's: under the Whites, before the VOR, there was no trace of any terror in Russia; under the Reds, it began in 1917 and continued to crush the people until 1953.
              1. 0
                9 December 2025 14: 54
                Actually, there weren't any Whites before the October Revolution. But there was terror, especially in 1905-07.
                1. -3
                  9 December 2025 19: 36
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  Actually, before the October Revolution there were no Whites themselves.

                  Whatever it was, they definitely were, led, served, and worked in Russia.

                  Your parasites, the never-working loafers, didn't exist in Russia; they drank beer and drank in Switzerland and London.
                  1. +1
                    9 December 2025 19: 42
                    57% of the generals and colonels of the General Staff of the former Tsarist army went to serve their people in the Red Army. And the vast majority of them served honorably, while the officers of the White movement turned into a gang of robbers, murderers, rapists, and marauders, whose command, for the sake of gaining power, sold out the country wholesale and retail to its enemies, and first and foremost to the bitterest enemy of the British Empire.
                    1. -4
                      9 December 2025 20: 25
                      Quote: Grencer81
                      57% of the generals and colonels of the General Staff of the former Tsarist army went to serve their people in the ranks of the Red Army.

                      belay lol fool Having served time in prison under fire, yes, and your Lelins were never a people - they lived half their lives in the West.

                      57;%- :lol fool :
                      Quote: Grencer81
                      So, gentlemen, the officers from the White movement have turned into a gang of robbers, murderers, rapists, and marauders.

                      There was no need to turn red - they were already a gang of robbers, murderers, rapists and marauders, whose command, for the sake of their power, sold out the country wholesale and retail to the German occupiers.

                      Animals:
                      The Chairman of the Don Bureau S. Syrtsov himself, speaking about the “reprisal against the Cossacks”, their “liquidation”, noted: “The villages were depopulated." In some, up to 80% of the inhabitants were killed. In the Don region alone, between 800 and a million people perished - about 35% of the population.. Another testimony is from the Moscow communist M. Nesterov, who was sent to the Don: "The party bureau was headed by a man... who acted on some instructions from the center and understood it as the complete destruction of the Cossacks... Illiterate old men and women who could barely drag their feet were shot, as were the sergeants, not to mention the officers. 60-80 people were shot per day... A certain Goldin was at the head of the food department, his view of the Cossacks was this: all the Cossacks must be slaughtered! And the Don region must be populated with alien elements..." Another Moscow agitator, K. Krasnushkin: "The commissars of the villages and farmsteads robbed the population, got drunk... Completely innocent people were shot - old men, old women, children... 30-40 people were shot at once in front of the entire village, with mockery, they were stripped naked. Over the women, who covered their nakedness with their hands, they mocked me and forbade me to do this.

                      and so it is throughout the country.

                      Remember, the GENOCIDE of the Russian people was committed by your Zagarans.
                      1. +1
                        10 December 2025 04: 15
                        And they built a country in which you only learned to shit on it.
                      2. -3
                        10 December 2025 09: 55
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        And they built a country in which you only learned to shit on it.

                        They built a wreck on the bones of their citizens - now there are few Russian people - and you look for them there, where you destroyed them.

                        Russia is the best country, but Russophobes have seized power...
                      3. +2
                        10 December 2025 15: 23
                        This "wreck" taught you, went into space, made nuclear weapons.
                        And the Russian Empire wasn't built on bones?
                        And after the Civil War, was there any other option to boost industry and bring it to the global level?
                      4. -3
                        10 December 2025 19: 20
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        This "wreck" taught you

                        The wreck fell apart, they're learning all over the world, weapons were invented before it, like, FAU
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        And the Russian Empire wasn't built on bones?

                        It was a useless country and there were fewer bones. And where is the building? lol
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        And after the Civil War, was there any other option to boost industry and bring it to the global level?

                        If you can't do it, don't torment me. We'll build much better without you.
                      5. +1
                        10 December 2025 19: 58
                        What was built in the USSR still feeds you...
                      6. -3
                        11 December 2025 08: 57
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        What was built in the USSR feeds you still...
                        What was built could not even FEED itself - it bought bread, meat, butter, etc. lol
                      7. +2
                        11 December 2025 10: 20
                        Can I read the whole list? But you were fed and raised. And you still are.
                      8. 0
                        11 December 2025 14: 17
                        In the RSFSR, during the famine of 1990, per capita butter consumption was approximately 7,5 kg per year. In 2024, per capita butter consumption in the Russian Federation was approximately 2,5 kg per year.
                2. 0
                  10 December 2025 10: 44
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  Actually, there weren't any Whites before the October Revolution. But there was terror, especially in 1905-07.

                  On the side of the revolutionaries there was, of course, and what a one... on the side of the government there was an order of magnitude less...
                  1. +1
                    10 December 2025 15: 26
                    Yeah, on the side of the revolutionaries there were militants with revolvers, on the side of the government there were the army, police, Cossacks... And they didn't hesitate to use artillery either.
                    1. 0
                      10 December 2025 16: 11
                      I'm talking about "before" the revolution.. "Beginning in October 1905, 3611 government officials were killed and wounded in the Russian Empire. By the end of 1907, their number had increased to almost 4500 people. Together with 2180 killed and 2530 wounded private individuals, the total number of victims in 1905-1907, according to A. Geifman, is more than 9000 people. According to official statistics, from January 1908 to mid-May 1910, 19,957 terrorist acts and expropriations were committed, in which 732 government officials and 3051 private individuals were killed, while 1022 government officials and 2829 private individuals were wounded." What you consider to be the above is just a small change? And comparable to the couple of hundred who died during the suppression of the riots? And at least half of them were instigators? Or do you have larger figures of those killed by the authorities?
                      1. +1
                        10 December 2025 19: 56
                        Has anyone counted the number of people killed by government punitive squads? The government's lawlessness has sparked a backlash from the masses... And did you think the people would tolerate your lawlessness?
                      2. 0
                        10 December 2025 22: 10
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        Has anyone counted the number of people killed by government punitive detachments?

                        Are there any numbers? Or should I take your word for it?
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        The government's lawlessness has given rise to a backlash from the masses...

                        Whose outrage is it when thousands of officials are killed and blown up? Meanwhile, thousands of civilians die... and besides, people died in almost all cases when revolutionaries organized riots—without them, for some reason, riots and deaths almost never happened... What would you call such actions today?
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        Did you think that people would tolerate your lawlessness?

                        Calm down, it's not mine, I was born much later and in a different country. I just think you need to approach everything with a balanced mind and evaluate it from all angles. If you're interested in the truth, right? More than one... And what are your personal experiences with pre-revolutionary events? Were you alive then? If not, then why are you so nervous, sir? I simply cited figures from scientists who didn't publish in the USSR. hi
                      3. +1
                        11 December 2025 10: 18
                        The figures from British scientists? It wasn't the revolutionaries who were to blame for the riots and uprisings, but rather those who drove the people to it—the local authorities and the central government.
                        And there is no need to be sarcastic about the people killed by government punitive forces; they existed and there were many of them.
                      4. 0
                        11 December 2025 11: 29
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        Figures from British scientists?

                        I don't like Geifman - although she has nothing to do with the English, let it be Budnitsky - a purely Soviet and Russian historian... there are others... and according to you, there was no revolutionary terror?
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        And there is no need to be sarcastic about the people killed by government punitive forces; they existed and there were many of them.

                        Is asking you to provide links with a quantity of links a joke? If you're talking about thousands, that seems like a perfectly normal request in a conversation.
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        It is not the revolutionaries who are to blame for the riots and uprisings that occurred, but rather those who brought people to this point, the local authorities and the government at the center.

                        Of course, the gas explosion was caused by the gas in the room, right? But it explodes because of a match, not the gas... And that match was the revolutionaries with their cells and agitators... Moreover, their actions further worsened the situation after the suppression of the rebellion, i.e., they also played a significant role as a "catalyst" of the revolution... And when ministers, governors, and other officials are killed by the hundreds and thousands, at the same time no fewer people die... innocent people, by the way, of nothing... And in terrorist attacks and expropriations - which are serious crimes in themselves... Does this mean, in your opinion, it's absolutely normal?
                  2. +1
                    11 December 2025 14: 19
                    Before Stolypin, there were no death penalties in Russia, with the exception of regicides. Under Stolypin, peasant villages began to be shelled with artillery, and death sentences were handed down to "field troikas."
                    1. 0
                      11 December 2025 14: 36
                      Quote: Azimutt
                      Under Stolypin, peasant villages began to be shot at with artillery, and death sentences were passed on peasants by "field troikas."

                      I would ask you to give examples, as I have never read about anything like this.
            3. 0
              9 December 2025 14: 53
              This is pure speculation! The Whites simply couldn't win in this reality. Because there was no unity around a common idea, no leaders who could embody this idea and lead the masses. And all talk of the will of the people as such is simply misleading.
        2. -1
          10 December 2025 08: 04
          Valery, you still manipulate your articles in favor of the "Reds," as I understand it. You told about Ionov's entire subsequent life, until his death, but you didn't about Kashirin. hi
    4. +2
      9 December 2025 12: 06
      True. Just a bandit with no motive.
  2. +5
    9 December 2025 04: 53
    Thank you, Valery!

    More pages of the atrocities of the Civil War.
    1. +5
      9 December 2025 07: 17
      Quote from Korsar4
      More pages of the atrocities of the Civil War.

      Alexander's father, General Mikhail Ionov, and his brother Vladimir went over to the side of the revolution.

      Not only are there atrocities, but also
      ..... brother against brother, son against father, father against son! And that's how it was! My father, a participant in the Civil War, spoke of this more than once in his stories.
      It's terrible, this Civil War!
      Thank you very much to the author! I look forward to the continuation.
      1. +2
        9 December 2025 07: 50
        According to Artem Veseloy, “Russia, washed in blood.”
        And when blood is spilled, there's no telling who's right or wrong. The genie's out of the bottle.
        1. -9
          9 December 2025 10: 41
          Quote from Korsar4
          And when blood is spilled, there's no telling who's right or wrong. The genie's out of the bottle.

          and who released it?
          There's a national council, WHY can't all issues be resolved by vote? Everyone agrees, right? Fight with your heads and kullaks, why take it to the fields?
          In the end, everyone lost.

          Would a normal person in a tired, three-year-old country say this?
          To all accusations of civil war we speak: Yes, we have openly proclaimed what no government could proclaim... Yes, we have started and are waging a war against exploiters.
          lenin
          ?
          He and his company spent the entire war drinking beer in Switzerland, but he wasn't done fighting.
          1. 0
            9 December 2025 11: 55
            The genie is out of the bottle
            and who released it?

            Definitely Kornilov and the counterrevolutionary generals who joined him. It was they, having fled to the Don, who started the civil war there, and this fact is undeniable.
            1. -5
              9 December 2025 12: 10
              Quote: vet
              Definitely Kornilov and the counterrevolutionary generals who joined him. It was they who, having fled to the Don, started the civil war there, and this fact is undeniable.

              The nonsense is undeniable: the Don and other Little Russias did not recognize the thieves on the same day, October 26 .

              Remember the confession of your Ulyanov, January 1918:
              To all accusations of civil war we say: yes, we openly proclaimed what no government could proclaim... Yes, we started and are waging a war against exploiters
              1. 0
                9 December 2025 13: 05
                One of the Bolsheviks' first decrees was the abolition of the death penalty. The Red Terror was a response to the assassination attempt on Lenin. Until then, the Bolsheviks, on the contrary, had tried to contain popular anger against the "nobles."
                1. -3
                  9 December 2025 13: 44
                  Quote: vet
                  The Red Terror was a response to the assassination attempt on Lenin.

                  yeah

                  On December 5 (28), 1917, sailors from the destroyers Fidonisi and Gadzhibey executed all 32 of their officers on Malakhov Kurgan. By the evening of that day, the massacre of officers had spread throughout Sevastopol. The bodies were thrown into the sea in Yuzhnaya Bay. Eyewitnesses testified that a total of 128 officers were killed in Sevastopol during these events.

                  January 1918, Feodosia. Repressions began in the city, taking on a large scale and lasting three days. In front of their relatives, who witnessed the executions, all captured members of the officers' squad (46 people) were drowned in the sea. Over eight hundred "counterrevolutionaries" and "bourgeois" were arrested, and their degree of guilt was determined by a judicial commission of local and Sevastopol revolutionaries.[29]

                  The prisoners were placed in the hold of a transport ship, and the commission met on board. The bodies were dumped into the Black Sea. The exact number of those killed during the first three days (January 15-17, old style) is unknown, according to the commission's decision, but it was at least 47.

                  In early January 1918, the destroyer Fidonisi arrived at the Feodosia roadstead with a detachment of revolutionary sailors on board under the command of the anarchist A. V. Mokrousov. A landing party was deployed. The sailors killed all the officers they found (the number of victims was estimated at between several dozen and sixty-three people).

                  etc.
            2. +1
              9 December 2025 14: 48
              We bashfully like not to mention the intervention, because it didn't happen. laughing It’s somehow awkward to mention Western partners who are almost not our partners now. laughing
            3. +1
              9 December 2025 23: 22
              Definitely Kornilov and the counterrevolutionary generals who joined him. It was they who, having fled to the Don, started the civil war there, and this fact is undeniable.

              If we run through the calendar chronology, your "indisputable fact" is quite easy to dispute. The civil war on the Don began not with Kornilov, but with the assassination of Colonel V.M. Chernetsov, the most popular colonel in the Don, by the head of the Don Revolutionary Committee, Podtelkov, after which the Don revolted. This moment, explaining the defection of G. Melekhov, who sided with Ataman Golubov, to the White Cossacks, appears in Sholokhov's "Quiet Flows the Don":
              "On the way, Podtelkov mocked the wounded Chernetsov; Chernetsov remained silent. When Podtelkov struck him with a whip, Chernetsov pulled a small Browning from the inside pocket of his sheepskin coat and fired point-blank at Podtelkov. There was no cartridge in the pistol barrel—Chernetsov had forgotten about this, not having handed him a cartridge from the clip. Podtelkov drew his saber, slashed him across the face, and five minutes later the Revolutionary Committee members rode on, leaving Chernetsov's hacked corpse in the steppe. The commander of the Red Don regiments, the elected Red Don troop elder N. M. Golubov, upon learning of Chernetsov's death, burst into tears and pounced on Podtelkov with curses: "You bastard, you've ruined everything, what have you done, you bastard—now it's going to begin..." (c)
              -M. Sholokhov "Quiet Flows the Don"-

              Fact:The first written mention of the beginning of the Civil War was left January 31, 1918 In the church register of the Panteleimon Church in the Ivankov farmstead in the Kamenskaya village, Chernetsov was buried by priest Alexander Smirnov and psalm-reader Vasily Baizdrenkov. The "Cause of Death" column reads: "Killed during the Civil War."
              A.I. Denikin wrote in his "Essays on the Russian Time of Troubles":
              With Chernetsov's death, it was as if the soul had departed from the entire Don Cossack community. Disunity and instability set in. Everything was falling apart completely. The Don government again entered into negotiations with Podtelkov. Military Ataman Kaledin made his final appeal to the Don Cossacks to send volunteer Cossacks to serve as partisans. General Kornilov made the final decision to march with his supporters on Yekaterinodar. Thus began the civil war. (c)

              link: Denikin A. I. Essays on the Russian Time of Troubles. - M.: Iris-press, 2006. - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7.
              1. VLR
                0
                10 December 2025 07: 53
                Kornilov and his supporters announced the formation of the Volunteer Army as early as December 24, 1917. Why do you think they created it? From the moment Kornilov, Denikin, and others arrived on the Don and began forming counterrevolutionary combat units, civil war became inevitable. And the fundamental decision to start the civil war had already been made even earlier. The trigger for the outbreak of hostilities could have been anything—a little earlier, a little later—but Kornilov and company would have started the civil war.
                1. +1
                  10 December 2025 09: 34
                  Greetings, dear Valery!
                  In truth, the "Appeal to the Russian Army and Cossacks" of December 24, 1917, to gather around Kornilov on the Don was signed not by Kornilov himself, but by Ensign S.N. De Bode. While it undoubtedly enjoyed enormous authority in military and patriotic circles, it effectively placed Kornilov himself in an ambiguous position. His march on Yekaterinodar, according to Denikin, was a necessary measure – with the death of Kaledin and his self-defense partisan detachment, led by V. Chernetsov, Kornilov's volunteers were deprived of the protection of the Bolshoi Don Circle and their status as internees on the Don. After Chernetsov's murder, the Podtelkovo Don Revolutionary Committee decided to arrest Kornilov's officers and their families. Before this, the Don region had been more or less calm—yes, there were local skirmishes between Kaledin's troops under Chernetsov and the revolutionary forces of N. Golubov, but the Cossacks, for the most part, were neutral, dispersed to their kurens, or, as Sholokhov aptly put it, "they fought enough on Germanskaya to the point of belching." So, whatever one might say, the trigger for the Civil War was the assassination of V. Chernetsov, the popularly elected representative of the Bolshoi Circle of the Don, by Podtelkov, the chairman of the Don Revolutionary Committee.
                  It has been more than a hundred years since the Civil War ended, but in the Don region, military commemorations and memorial services for all the victims of the fratricidal Civil War are still held annually on January 23.
                  1. +1
                    10 December 2025 09: 38
                    In the Don region, military commemorations and memorial services for all victims of the fratricidal Civil War are still held annually on January 23.
                2. +1
                  11 December 2025 03: 10
                  From the moment Kornilov, Denikin and others arrived on the Don, and the formation of counter-revolutionary combat units began, civil war became inevitable.

                  Counterrevolutionary combat units? Well, Valery, that depends on how you look at it. Kaledin's partisan detachments, led by Chernetsov, were at that time entirely legitimate law enforcement agencies, approved by the highest executive authority of the Don—the Great Military Circle of the Don. And they were commanded not by a simple Don officer, but by an elected member of the Great Military Circle (a rank similar to modern regional deputies). And the troublemakers were precisely the self-proclaimed Don Revolutionary Committee, supported by Cossacks—front-line soldiers of the troop sergeant major N.M. Golubov—a hero of WWI, a man of exceptional personal bravery, but ultimately confused by his vacillations between Bolshevism, Cossack traditions, and the Old Believers. He disagreed with either the Whites or the Reds. Both considered him a traitor, and so he was sentenced to death by both. It can be assumed that both the Reds and Whites wanted him dead because they saw Golubov as a very serious ideological opponent, possibly a religious one as well, pursuing his own Cossack path and unwilling to serve either side. At the same time, he attempted to exploit both the Whites and the Reds to achieve his main goal in life—to be legally elected Don Ataman, and to implement his plans not only for land reform but also, apparently, for the reorganization of religious life in the Don. His fate as a Don Ataman largely coincides with that of Ataman Kondraty Bulavin. Unlike the Don supporters of a United and Indivisible Russia—Kaledin, Chernetsov, and Polgin—he strove for autonomy for the Don. From October 1917 to May 1918 (a period of significant weakness), the communists advocated autonomy for the Cossack regions. But by the autumn of 1918, a policy revision had begun. As soon as the situation at the front improved for the Bolsheviks, they easily abandoned their own guarantees. On September 30, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee decided to liquidate the Don Republic. No longer needed by the Don Revolutionary Committee, Golubov was killed in the village of Zaplavskaya, where he was shot in the back of the head with a revolver by student Pukhlyakov during a rally.
                  1. 0
                    11 December 2025 22: 39
                    They weren't prepared? Then why do you think Kaledin's Kornilovites were actively arming themselves?

                    No, my dear sir, it was quite the opposite. The BV Don Circle agreed to provide asylum to volunteers arriving to Kornilov only under conditions similar to internment—they were to retain only their award and personal weapons; everything else was confiscated. Even the initial successes of Kaledin's "ambulance" under Chernetsov can be explained quite simply: he was given 11 machine guns and 8 cannons confiscated from armed units arriving to Kornilov's side from Don arsenals. After Chernetsov's murder and Kaledin's suicide, much of this property returned to the BVK Don campaign ataman, Popov. After Popov withdrew his loyal units to the steppes and the Don Revolutionary Committee's decision to arrest the arriving volunteers, Kornilov was forced to withdraw his men from the Don to the Caucasian Cossacks. The main goal of the campaign was to join Kornilov's volunteers with the detachments of the Kuban military ataman Filippov, who, as it turned out after the campaign had begun, had already abandoned Yekaterinodar. The Kornilovites were also joined by some of the Don Chernetsov "partisan" detachments, from whom the volunteers received their first 630 rifles, four cannons, and eight machine guns. link: A.R. Trushnovich "Memories of a Kornilovite (1914-1934)"
                    For Kornilov's army, which was actively arming itself under Kaledin, you'll agree - it's not exactly a lot. What do you think?
                    1. +1
                      13 December 2025 08: 41
                      "Richard," I'm sorry, your name isn't listed (or is it your real name?), do you remember the famous quote about a gun hung on the wall always going to go off? If an army is gathering, weak today, strong tomorrow, what else is it supposed to do if not fight? On the other hand, were the Red forces at that time on the Don or Kuban stronger than the Whites? Probably weaker, since Kornilov was recruiting professional soldiers, and moreover, combat officers. Thirdly, what central authority would tolerate the existence of an "illegal armed formation" on the outskirts? Sooner or later, they'll be asked to surrender their weapons and go home. If they don't agree, they'll be dispersed and destroyed. In short, if Kornilov and Denikin had stayed quietly at home (as did the vast majority of other officers), no civil war would have broken out. At most, minor, amateur rebellions on the outskirts would have been easily suppressed. And there would have been no reason to declare the Red Terror. There would have been victims, as in any revolution, including innocent ones, but their number would have been immeasurably fewer.
                      1. +1
                        13 December 2025 11: 03
                        Good afternoon, dear Alexey!
                        Sorry, your name is not specified.

                        I'm 65 years old. I'm a retired military man. My name is Dmitry. I don't mind if you call me by my first name. I always appreciate your objective and unbiased comments. Unfortunately, that's rare on VO these days—most commenters are overwhelmed by emotion.
                        Now, to the point, I fully support your comment. I disagree only with the exaggeration of the role of Kornilov's volunteers in unleashing the Civil War. Without Lavr Kornilov, Sophia de Bode, or their volunteers, it would have started, sooner or later. The Cossack regions would have rebelled anyway—the Don, the Terek, and the Kuban. The reason? You described it yourself above:
                        What kind of central government would tolerate the existence of "armed autonomies" on the outskirts? Sooner or later, they'll be asked to surrender their weapons and go home. If they refuse, they'll be dispersed and destroyed. (c)

                        Here, Lenin's government acted very imprudently. On June 1, the Council of People's Commissars adopted a decree that enshrined broad autonomy for the Cossack regions (archive photo 1). From October 1917 to May 1918 (a period of significant weakness), the communists advocated autonomy for the Cossack regions. In this way, the Bolsheviks attempted to prevent the consolidation of the White movement and the Cossacks by strengthening their separatist aspirations. It was no secret that the Cossacks strove for independence, something the White movement's leaders absolutely could not allow. By the fall of 1918, a policy review had already begun: on September 30, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee decided to liquidate the Don Republic and other Cossack autonomous regions. As soon as the situation at the front improved, a slight renunciation of their own guarantees occurred. The trigger for the outbreak of the Civil War was pulled.
                        Damn, how we love to blame all our mistakes on others. So Valery, who claims to be a historian, writes that the Don Cossacks took pity on Kornilov and sheltered him, but he went and unleashed the Civil War. Doesn't his analogy with Yeltsin's sovereignty, which was not to be beckon at night, and the two subsequent Chechen wars, ring any bells? It's a shame history lessons are only learned after bloodshed.
                        Something like that, Alexey.
                        Best regards
                        Dmitry.
          2. +1
            9 December 2025 13: 32
            [i
            ]and who released it?[/i]

            The February bourgeois revolution, Order No. 1 of the Provisional Government, etc.
        2. 0
          9 December 2025 14: 45
          And when blood is spilled, it is impossible to find the right and the guilty.

          And before that, was there no bloodshed in the Russian Empire? Absolutely not. Peasant women, in the evenings, by the light of a torch, read Pushkin's fairy tales, Tolstoy's The Living Corpse and other works, especially, they were thrilled by the poets and writers of the "Silver Age", played A. Vivaldi on the "babalaikas". The Seasons, in the cities, the KNS, were better, balls, beauties, cadets, champagne flowed like a river, workers died from overeating French bread. And then such a nasty thing, the Decembrists, woke up Herzen, and he, such a bastard, launched a revolutionary agitation and off it went, and it was so sweet. But if someone's blood was spilled, the peasants or workers were to blame. And after October 1917, you can hardly find the guilty ones, these bastards of workers and peasants, coveted what was acquired honestly, land, factories and factories, and also the Soviet government wanted equality, you see, to walk in the Summer Garden with the nobles. laughing laughing
      2. -4
        9 December 2025 11: 00
        Quote: your vsr 66-67
        Brother against brother, son against father, father against son! And that's how it was! My father, a participant in the Civil War, spoke about this more than once in his stories.
        It's terrible, this Civil War!

        It's like that.
        But how old are you if your father participated in
        GW?

        My grandfathers and great-grandfathers fought in the Russian Air Force, the Russian Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Region, WWI, the Northern Fleet, and the Great Patriotic War, but thank God, not in the Civil War.
        1. +8
          9 December 2025 11: 03
          Quote: Olgovich
          But how old are you if your father was there when you were breastfeeding?

          And for what purpose are you interested? laughing
          Just kidding... I was expecting such a question from someone.
          Will it be enough for you that my eldest son is 56 and my youngest grandson is 26? laughing
          1. -1
            9 December 2025 11: 12
            Quote: your vsr 66-67
            Will it be enough for you that my eldest son is 56 and my youngest grandson is 26?

            so it's about 80 years.

            Bravo and delighted hi
            1. +4
              9 December 2025 11: 13
              Quote: Olgovich
              so it's about 80 years.

              Nearly! hi
              Father was born in 1900.
  3. +1
    9 December 2025 08: 00
    The author of the article mentioned the flattering characterization of Annenkov given to him by the former regiment commander Krasnov (he was Krasnov's favorite), but being already in exile, and knowing all the bloody adventures of his former favorite, a short comment from the general followed... Annenkov has gone mad.
    As for Annenkov's family tree, he was from a hereditary military line, his mother had no connection to the nobility - she was a peasant, he also had no connection to the Decembrists, this was his imagination. And, in general,rumored - His gypsy gave birth to him.
    Boris Vladimirovich, of course, was not a white ataman.
    1. +4
      9 December 2025 11: 53
      His mother had no connection to the nobility - she was a peasant, and he had no connection to the Decembrists either.

      The article states all of this.
      1. -2
        9 December 2025 14: 46
        Quote: vet
        The article states all of this.

        It is not stated that the mother was from a peasant family, perhaps she was a merchant or a gypsy, these also had no connection to the nobility.
        There was no need to mention the Decembrist in the article at all.
  4. 0
    9 December 2025 08: 14
    Pyotr Wrangel was nicknamed the "Black Baron" for his love of Circassian women of that color. Annenkov, meanwhile, earned the nickname "Black Ataman" precisely for the numerous atrocities he and his subordinates committed.
    Ungern was also called the "Black Baron," although it's never really clear why. Pelevin offers this version:
    “Tell me,” I said, glancing sideways at him, “why do they call you the Black Baron?”
    "Ah," Jungern smiled. "It's probably because when I was fighting in Mongolia, the living Buddha Bogd Gegen Tutukhtu granted me the right to a black palanquin."
    1. VLR
      +2
      9 December 2025 08: 16
      Ungern was often called a mad baron, albeit behind his back.
    2. +2
      9 December 2025 11: 53
      Pelevin offers this version

      Well, Pelevin is quite the "historian"
  5. +4
    9 December 2025 09: 33
    Dog - a dog's death.
    1. +1
      9 December 2025 10: 04
      Please do not insult dogs and other animals, they do not deserve to be equated with this abomination.
    2. +1
      9 December 2025 15: 14
      Exactly. To a mad dog.
  6. +5
    9 December 2025 09: 39
    Annenkov was a rare bastard. A sadist.
    I will only note that I was one of the first, perhaps even the first, who realized that units with mountain training were needed, at a level higher than the ability to handle pack animals.
    Mannerheim probably realized this several years earlier, but it seems he did nothing practical.
  7. +5
    9 December 2025 12: 05
    Annenov is the archetypal "scumbag" of the Civil War era, just like Semenov. What kind of rehabilitation is this? :)
  8. +3
    9 December 2025 15: 11
    The second part of the story will be more severe, because - "the providence of one's own"...