Military Review

Moscow turns to the East

70
The activities of the United States and Europe in the Middle East can not but disappoint


What good did the Arab Spring bring to the Middle East? Nothing. The region is slowly degrading. In Tunisia, public discontent is gaining momentum, civil war continues in Libya, rallies and street battles with new authorities are constantly going on in Egypt, Syria has become a proving ground for city battles between the state and mercenary terrorist groups, three million Syrians have left their homes, one million - the country. Behind all these cataclysms are specific customer owners and their puppet performers.

The meaning of the processes that are taking place today in the Middle East as a whole and in Syria in particular should be viewed in the context of the developing confrontation between the two geopolitical systems - the West and the East.

Master class games on the contradictions

In contrast to the East, the West has a clear philosophical basis for action, which is based on the classics of the Western geopolitical school. One of its representatives, Nicholas Spykmen, says: "He who controls Eurasia controls the destinies of the whole world." But for this you need to control all the oil, all strategic communications and key regions. The task of establishing full control over oil and gas fields and transport communications in the Greater Middle East and Central Asia has become a fundamental priority in the strategy of the United States and the North Atlantic Alliance.

Moscow turns to the East

But the main goals are China and Russia. Ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained in detail the “strategic turn” of Washington towards the Asia-Pacific region, which “logically represents part of our global efforts to secure and strengthen US leadership.” Americans will resist the attempts of any country or coalition to dominate Eurasian territory. Therefore, Russia with its Eurasian project and China are the main targets of the aggressive aspirations of the United States.

Playing on the contradictions of the Asian and Pacific countries and creating them artificially, Washington for a long time ensures its presence in this region. Over the past decades, in the Asia-Pacific region, the United States has been able to acquire new partners in India, Vietnam, Singapore, and Indonesia. Skillfully scaring these countries with the growing power of China and the nuclear threat posed by North Korea, the Americans are increasing their military-technical presence in these states.

With respect to Beijing, America uses the Anaconda Loop plan, which is as follows: surround the PRC with unfriendly neighbors, take control of all sea and land communication nodes, oust from Africa and the Greater Middle East, leave without energy reserves and strangle with economic sanctions. And at the end to launch Islamic extremists into the Uygur Autonomous Region and Tibet for the sake of "democratization", and in fact - the separation of these areas from Beijing.

To do this, urgently needed Islamic revolutions in the Arab Maghreb and Mashek.

General Wesley Clark writes in his book that as early as October 2001, the United States had a plan for five years to settle scores with seven countries, namely Iran, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Syria, Sudan and North Korea. It should be noted that at that time Afghanistan was bombed and decided to start a war against Iraq.

In 2006, retired lieutenant colonel Ralph Peters, who was on the staff of the office of the deputy chief of intelligence and was responsible for developing ways of waging future wars, called the borders of the New Middle East bloody, unfair, and in need of redistribution. And Hillary Clinton recently hinted that 27 new states should be formed in this region.

Back in 2009, the Pentagon’s official documents preserved scenarios for further invasions by the Americans. But modern information technology has made its own adjustments. There was a change in tactics of foreign policy. Under George W. Bush (adviser to Kissinger), the United States, like Ancient Rome, seized the country, leaving its legions in it to pacify and intimidate the aborigines. Today, this scheme does not work. Under the peacemaker Obama (advisor to Brzezinski), Roman tactics gave way to Lawrence of Arabia tactics, the principle of which says: “Make the Arabs kill the Arabs for the interests of Britain.” And now the Arab world with the filing of the Anglo-American forces engaged in self-destruction.

Russia is determined

Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar are at the forefront of fomenting religious and ethnic hatred. Calls to end the Syrian regime or destroy all the Christian churches in the region are from Riyadh. Turkey, having formed the Syrian opposition and supporting terrorist activities on the territory of Syria, is essentially engaged in state banditry under the auspices of Washington. After the seizure of a settlement, Turkish mercenaries dismantle and remove machine tools from factories and plants, raw materials and finished products. Orders are being fulfilled for the robbery of museums and the removal of antiquities from Syria. This can have dire consequences for Turkey. A shocking statement was made by the resigning head of the Turkish Military Academy, Admiral Turker Ertürk: "Syria is inundated with terrorists of all stripes, and Al Qaeda, which has already committed several major terrorist attacks in this country, supports the US government."

The terrorist attacks in Damascus with the use of suicide bombers show that the West and its Arab allies decided to repeat the “Salvadoran scenario” in Syria, making a bet on replacing the opposition with terrorist groups. The operation to destabilize El Salvador with the help of suicide bombers was led by John Negroponte, who later became the US ambassador to Iraq, and the future US representative in Syria, Robert Ford. The observer of the British newspaper The Daily Telegraf, Peter Oborn, said that lately Washington and London have stepped up hidden cooperation with al-Qaeda in a joint struggle against the Syrian authorities. Obviously, Americans are trying to turn Al-Qaida into the official government structure in Syria.

Salafis play a dominant role in terrorist activities in Syrian territory. Their method of struggle brings fear and horror to the entire local population - Christians, Shiites, Alawites, and Sunnis. The country is shocked by the atrocities of terrorists who destroy and desecrate Christian churches and mosques. Today, Syria has become the focus of criminal and terrorist international - people from Afghanistan, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, Central Asia, the North Caucasus and even the United States. In each detachment, the Syrians make up only two or three percent, the leaders of the terrorist groups are foreigners. Their task is to destroy the borders from Morocco to the Uygur autonomy of China for the free movement of terrorist groups. This wave must pass through Syria to Iran, then to the Caucasus and the Volga region (one branch) and through conquered Afghanistan to Pakistan and Central Asia. The ultimate goal is China.

The decision of Moscow and Beijing to vote against the resolution of the UN Security Council on Syria is justified and reasonable. The position of Russian President Vladimir Putin is the result of our country's disappointment in the policies of the United States and Europe. Moscow turns east. The SCO, BRICS, the Eurasian Union, APEC - the main geopolitical vector of Russia. It is here that a new model of the world is being formed - moral and spiritual, and therefore promising and safe.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 2 May 2013 05: 56 New
    18
    The position of Russian President Vladimir Putin is the result of our country's disappointment in US and European politics. Moscow is turning east.
    You can’t deny the GDP in political pragmatism. And don’t tell, but in this world our country has many obligations, and the main one is to save it, at the moment when it seems that everything is already lost ...
    1. Nicholas C.
      Nicholas C. 2 May 2013 06: 11 New
      16
      Quote: svp67
      in this world, our country has many obligations, and the main one is to save him

      How much pathos. In Syria, etc. Russia, first of all, defends itself. Because, as soon as the enemy wins on distant approaches, he will come to Russia. Do not even hesitate.
      1. svp67
        svp67 2 May 2013 06: 55 New
        15
        Quote: Nikolay S.
        How much pathos. In Syria, etc. Russia, first of all, defends itself. Because, as soon as the enemy wins on distant approaches, he will come to Russia. Do not even hesitate.
        Do you think that protecting itself in Syria, Russia does not save the world?
        1. Nicholas C.
          Nicholas C. 2 May 2013 07: 02 New
          +9
          Quote: svp67
          Do you think that protecting itself in Syria, Russia does not save the world?

          First, Russia. These are the priorities for me.
          1. svp67
            svp67 2 May 2013 07: 08 New
            +8
            Quote: Nikolay S.
            First, Russia. These are the priorities for me.
            And let everything burn with fire - no, this is not in Russian. And because of this, our "indifference", they rely on us and trust us ...
            1. Phantom Revolution
              Phantom Revolution 2 May 2013 09: 05 New
              +9
              Quote: svp67
              And let everything burn with fire - no, this is not in Russian. And because of this, our "indifference", they rely on us and trust us ...

              Nobody hopes for us, especially in the eastern countries, they have such a mentality. “We are strong and can handle it ourselves,” the weak are immediately “eaten up” there. Because in the video reports the moment flows, for watered. Thanks, but we can handle it ourselves. Why go there where they do not ask?
            2. vlad767
              vlad767 2 May 2013 15: 01 New
              -2
              Who believes in us? In the west, many people have been brainwashed for a long time, and in other countries they also don’t really rely on us ... Well, perhaps in post-Soviet countries, and even not in all. Sad, but true. Therefore, you first need to think about your country. Well, about friendly countries. And climb somewhere without an invitation, like the Americans, it’s better not to, it will be more expensive for yourself.
        2. nickname 1 and 2
          nickname 1 and 2 2 May 2013 11: 02 New
          +7
          Quote: svp67
          , Russia does not save the world?


          The world cannot be saved. The world is struck by a disease called - we do not have AUTHORITIES! No - TRUTH! At the same time - chaos in the INFO. Total DESA! Skillful nonsense in all channels and directions!
          The people said so = You can’t throw a scarf on someone else’s mouth! And now he opened the mouth of everyone and lies, lies and lies and figure this lie out!
          If every villain hiding behind a nickname, a scoundrel and a villain can write all kinds of nonsense, if not intentional


          Was at the WORLD - SCIENCE! It happened in science and Pseudoscience.
          And this is a disaster! NO this is not so bad!

          And when in the whole WORLD there is a complete nonsense = this is TROUBLE!
          If not a disaster!
        3. Russian
          Russian 2 May 2013 11: 07 New
          +1
          Moscow is already so "turned" to the East that it will soon become an eastern city itself! Everything must be done wisely, but in the East they really only understand power, therefore, it is necessary to cooperate and cooperate, I do not argue, but the interests of our people should be above all!
      2. donchepano
        donchepano 2 May 2013 08: 32 New
        +6
        Quote: Nikolay S.
        In Syria, etc. Russia, first of all, defends itself. Because, as soon as the enemy wins on distant approaches, he will come to Russia. Do not even hesitate.


        Disturbing, stirring up the already fragile balance in the Middle East to set off peoples among themselves is one of the goals of the "world government" to reduce the world's population. And of course, Russia stands across the throat of the Anglo-Saxons
      3. Che
        Che 3 May 2013 08: 31 New
        0
        Even ordinary people, we understand this, how to bring it more intelligibly to an understanding of power structures. And then one gets the impression of the corruption and betrayal of Russia of our bureaucracy.
  2. Sibiryak
    Sibiryak 2 May 2013 06: 25 New
    +4
    The meaning of the processes that are taking place today in the Middle East as a whole and in Syria in particular should be viewed in the context of the developing confrontation between the two geopolitical systems - the West and the East.

    The meaning is simple in another context, to get our hands on the next batch of minerals, so that on their basis they warm green paper, and the confrontation between West and East has absolutely nothing to do with it!
    1. andrejwz
      andrejwz 2 May 2013 08: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: Sibiryak
      The meaning is simple in another context, to get our hands on the next batch of minerals, so that on their basis they warm green paper, and the confrontation between West and East has absolutely nothing to do with it!

      I would add to what you said that the confrontation is a consequence of the East’s disagreement with which methods are permissible and which are “unacceptable” when the West rakes up world resources.
  3. RUSmen
    RUSmen 2 May 2013 06: 31 New
    14
    The fate of Russia is to always save itself and the whole world from all kinds of freaks, it is about Russia that all kinds of world-wide barbarians stumble and fall: the Mongol-Tatars, the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878, Napoleon 1812, Hitler 1941-45, etc. n. Right now, the amers and their policies, and China also kicks = in general, we will again rake and no one will say thank you.
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 2 May 2013 15: 36 New
      +2
      Quote: RUSmen
      no one will say thank you.
      + The battle is not for glory, for the sake of life on earth.
  4. vjatsergey
    vjatsergey 2 May 2013 06: 46 New
    11
    Yes, no one doubts that after the Syria the Caucasus will break out.
    1. djon3volta
      djon3volta 2 May 2013 08: 02 New
      +3
      Quote: vjatsergey
      Yes, no one doubts that after the Syria the Caucasus will break out.

      Putin said in a behind-the-scenes conversation that he would not surrender Assad, even if the battle reached the streets of Moscow
      http://mixednews.ru/archives/35735
      1. baltika-18
        baltika-18 2 May 2013 10: 37 New
        +4
        Quote: djon3volta
        Putin said in a behind-the-scenes conversation that he would not surrender Assad, even if the battle reached the streets of Moscow

        If the battle reaches the streets of Moscow there will be no one and no one to hand over.
        1. Nicholas C.
          Nicholas C. 2 May 2013 13: 17 New
          +3
          Quote: baltika-18
          If the battle reaches the streets of Moscow there will be no one and no one to hand over.

          Well, do not treat the words so literally great and almighty. He loves a beautiful word. I remember that he even promised, and far from behind the scenes, to hang one by the eggs. However, the subject still runs fast, eats ties, and even did not cut off his eggs just in case. Although, how to know.

          I mean, we value people not for words, but for deeds.
          1. Thunderbolt
            Thunderbolt 2 May 2013 15: 42 New
            0
            The president’s phrase has several meanings: not only the confrontation of the armies, but also the aggravation of terrorist attacks in the Caucasus and Russian cities. Remember the North-Ost. Bloody battle, from which they did not expect a blow.
        2. Che
          Che 3 May 2013 08: 37 New
          0
          If the battle reaches the streets of Moscow, it will not seem enough. The elite will rush to the west, to its real estate, and again the people will perform miracles of heroism. Something like this. Let the elite plow now on Russia, otherwise we do not need it.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  5. Belogor
    Belogor 2 May 2013 07: 24 New
    +6
    It has always been puzzling to ask why some countries constantly “stir up water” all over the world, at the same time receive their political dividends, while other countries only defend themselves and suffer damage. Indeed, in the world only force is taken into account, words remain an empty concussion.
    Maybe someone, it’s also time to apply the tactics of periodically attacking .. eggs especially restless.
    1. Rider
      Rider 2 May 2013 12: 26 New
      +1
      Quote: Belogor
      Always puzzled and questions


      and you remember military science

      A FORWARD ALWAYS HAS AN ADVANTAGE OVER DEFENDERS.

      if only because the aggressor has the ability to concentrate forces in the main areas.
      the defender is forced to smear troops across the border.

      or a simple example from life, the BAPPY and SHAPPY TYPE will always achieve more than an ordinary hard worker.
      (look who we have "business sharks")
      1. elmi
        elmi 2 May 2013 12: 40 New
        +3
        Quote: Rider
        and you remember military science

        A FORWARD ALWAYS HAS AN ADVANTAGE OVER DEFENDERS.

        As they say - the best defense is an attack
    2. elmi
      elmi 2 May 2013 12: 32 New
      +5
      I am also outraged by how Western countries, in particular the United States, have spread their "tentacles" around the world and can put any region of the world in the rank of national interests, carry revolutions, wars, destabilization and chaos. And if before the USSR was a counterweight, now they have no enemy, their hands are untied, and here they are planting their interests. In a chess game, it’s hard to think about an attack when your enemy figure is distracting in your rear. It is time for us to resort to similar measures - the Indians in America want independence - we need to help their dream, and much more. To send more figures to the rear of the opponents, so that they feel all the “charms” that they plant in other countries
      1. smsk
        smsk 2 May 2013 15: 22 New
        +2
        This will not work in their rear, everything has long been under a cap. It’s nowhere easier to train a group of people objectionable to them, they forget about any democracy. And the rest of the population is mostly stupid vegetables, which are very easy to manipulate.
  6. omsbon
    omsbon 2 May 2013 08: 02 New
    +3
    Is Moscow turning east? Does it right!
    Pragmatism and pragmatism again. First of all, their national interests.
  7. taseka
    taseka 2 May 2013 08: 08 New
    +3
    "The Salafis play a dominant role in terrorist activities on Syrian territory" -- primitivism of the soul and brain is most easily amenable to religious fanaticism - where killing a person is no longer considered a sin!
    1. Che
      Che 3 May 2013 08: 41 New
      0
      It seems that Muslims respect their prophets, but their covenants are violated everywhere. Did the people degrade?
  8. Atlon
    Atlon 2 May 2013 08: 11 New
    +7
    U-turn has been noticeable for half a year already. By the way, here is the news, which for some reason is still unnoticed. Russia and Japan are going to sign a peace treaty! If this happens, it will be a breakthrough! If anyone does not remember, we are in a state of war with Japan, even with the Great Patriotic War. And the signing of the contract, the Japanese linked with the transfer of the islands to them. I don’t know what exactly happened, but a peace treaty will be signed without islands. And this is actually the recognition by the Japanese of the results of the Second World War.
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 2 May 2013 12: 12 New
      +2
      Quote: Atlon
      Russia and Japan are going to sign a peace treaty! If this happens, it will be a breakthrough!

      You know, Pavel, honestly, all these gestures of Japan in our direction are alarming (apparently due to the lack of information on this issue). After all, Japan can say the right hand of the United States in this region, and suddenly such a sharp turn. The Japanese forgave the states of Hiroshima and Nagosaki, kiss, and exchange pleasantries with their murderers, there was information that in Japan, youth believed that almost the USSR dropped bombs on these cities. And here it is, to sign an agreement, without transferring the islands. There are not enough links in this chain of events.
      1. Kaa
        Kaa 2 May 2013 12: 28 New
        +2
        Quote: Sirocco
        There are not enough links in this chain of events.

        "The other day, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe visited the Kremlin and met with our President Vladimir Putin. At the meeting, it was decided to resume negotiations on a peace treaty between the countries. Both sides are serious. And that's why.
        Without resolving the issue of the Northern Territories, as the Japanese call them, a peace treaty cannot be signed. This is clear to everyone. It is clear that both sides will have to make concessions, but both sides may also benefit.
        In connection with the reduction in the use of atomic energy by the Japanese after the Fukushima tragedy, they can become our main energy partners. They need our gas for thermal power plants. We must remember the increase in shale gas production in the United States and attempts to export it to Europe. In these conditions, the Japanese can become our main partners. Gazprom has been looking east for a long time. This is a profitable partnership for both of us. This means that there can be no talk of any concessions on the issue of the northern territories of Japan. Simple and beneficial to both parties economic calculation.But what we can really ask for is modern technology. All the time, as far as I remember, they are trying to remove our economy from the oil needle. Japan can help modernize our production in many industries.Why did Russia and Japan suddenly decide now to forget all their grievances and sit down again at the negotiating table? Perhaps, the main thing that pushes both countries today - China. This is not even annual, but every minute strengthening of Chinese positions, both in the region and in the world. Friendship against someone often helps to tear down, it would seem, insurmountable obstacles. The time has come for such a friendship. The Japanese can help us develop Eastern Siberia for our benefit. Otherwise, very soon it will begin to be developed in China for its own.http://shkid.su/type/news/1391.html
        1. Che
          Che 3 May 2013 08: 45 New
          0
          Shale gas is a myth. A disaster for any country that decided to do it. Harm at times more.
      2. zvereok
        zvereok 2 May 2013 14: 31 New
        0
        And the Japanese bought a couple of Russian banks in the Far East. Something muddied.
        1. Atlon
          Atlon 2 May 2013 15: 20 New
          0
          Quote: zvereok
          And the Japanese bought a couple of Russian banks in the Far East. Something muddied.

          You won’t muddle anything ... Our banks are subordinate to the central bank, and it is NOT legal for Russian banks to go under the jurisdiction of another country. Shareholding - please! But it will still be Russian banks (or "daughters") operating under Russian laws.
          1. Thunderbolt
            Thunderbolt 2 May 2013 15: 58 New
            0
            We don’t have a counter-player in the Far East if we want a strategic partnership with China. We have to give in to it in some ways in joint development projects of the Far East or in trade (long-term gas prices, for example). And the Japanese islands also want a lot of gas another. A field for maneuver appears. (And do not give the Kuril Islands soldier )))
            1. The comment was deleted.
  9. djon3volta
    djon3volta 2 May 2013 08: 14 New
    0
    The task of establishing full control over oil and gas fields, transport communications

    under Yeltsin, who controlled the Russian deposits and pipes? Many probably forgot or do not know how much Khodorkovsky controlled. I would recall, but I won’t.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 08: 22 New
      +5
      Quote: djon3volta
      under Yeltsin, who controlled the Russian deposits and pipes?

      All the same people, only Khodorkovsky is missing.
      1. djon3volta
        djon3volta 2 May 2013 08: 28 New
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        All the same people, only Khodorkovsky is missing.

        I am glad that President Putin. Putin said in Russian that “do business, but don’t get into politics. And about Chubais, he hinted on April 25 - they say he’s also climbing .. Navalny is also getting into politics ..
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 08: 34 New
          +6
          Quote: djon3volta
          I am glad that President Putin. Putin in Russian said - do business, but do not meddle in politics

          Is it you now about Prokhorov wink
          Quote: djon3volta
          ..Navalny also climbs into politics ..

          You pay attention, Navalny except you on the site at all, no one remembers. No one gives a damn about him, but he gives you no peace.
          1. djon3volta
            djon3volta 2 May 2013 08: 41 New
            +7
            What was little mentioned in the retelling of the Western media, which usually depicted the actions of the Putin government as a return to the methods of the Soviet era, was that it actually provoked Putin's decisive actions.

            Khodorkovsky was arrested just four weeks before the important elections to the Russian Duma (lower house of parliament), in which Khodorkovsky managed to buy a majority vote using his enormous wealth. Control of the Duma was Khodorkovsky’s first step in his plans to run for president next year. A victory in the Duma would allow him to change the electoral law in his favor, as well as change the controversial law "The Law on the Subsoil" prepared in the Duma. This law would not allow Yukos and other private companies to control raw materials underground, or to create private pipelines independent of Russian state ones.

            Khodorkovsky broke the promise made to Putin by the oligarchs that they would be allowed to preserve their wealth (actually stolen from the state in rigged auctions under Yeltsin) if they remained outside Russian politics and returned part of the stolen money to the country. As the most influential oligarch of the time, Khodorkovsky served as the engine of what was becoming increasingly supported by Washington. conspiracy against Putin.

            Khodorkovsky was arrested immediately after the little-mentioned meeting in the press a little earlier that year on July 14, 2003 between Khodorkovsky and Vice President Cheney.
            1. djon3volta
              djon3volta 2 May 2013 08: 43 New
              +7
              After meeting with Cheney, Khodorkovsky began negotiations with ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco, a former Kondi Rice company, to acquire a large stake in Yukos, according to some reports, from 25 to 40%. This was intended to ensure Khodorkovsky’s de facto immunity from the possible influence of the Putin government, by tying Yukos to the US oil giants, and therefore to Washington. It would also give Washington, through the US oil giants, the actual veto over future Russian oil and gas pipelines and oil deals. A few days before his arrest in October 2003, on charges of tax evasion, Khodorkovsky hosted George Bush Sr., now the Moscow representative of the influential and mysterious Washington Carlyle Group in Moscow. They discussed the final details of the purchase of Yukos shares by US oil companies.

              Also, shortly before that, Yukos announced his intention to buy a rival Sibneft from Boris Berezovsky, another oligarch of the Yeltsin era. YukosSibneft, with its 19,5 billion barrels of oil and gas, would then become the owner of the world's second largest oil and gas reserves, after ExxonMobil. YukosSibneft would be the fourth largest oil producer in the world, pumping 2,3 million barrels of oil per day. Buying up YukosSibneft shares on the part of Exxon or Chevron would be literally an energy coup. Cheney knew that, Bush knew that, Khodorkovsky knew that.

              But most importantly, Vladimir Putin knew this and resolutely prevented this.
              1. djon3volta
                djon3volta 2 May 2013 10: 49 New
                12
                well that's it, the defenders of Yeltsin, Khodorkovsky and opponents of Putin woke up laughing

                I’ll write specifically - GLORY TO PUTIN GLORY OF RUSSIA !!!

                I’ll remind you once again - you put me at least a billion cons, Putin will still remain president tongue tongue tongue Putin’s policy course will not change from your minuses laughing
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 10: 55 New
                  +2
                  Quote: djon3volta
                  I’ll write specifically - GLORY TO PUTIN GLORY OF RUSSIA !!!

                  Joni, judging by what I wrote ....
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  You pay attention, Navalny except you on the site at all, no one remembers. No one gives a damn about him, but he gives you no peace.

                  and the minus that came from you, I hit the point laughing
                  You beat your posts on the authority of Putin, more than Navalny.
                2. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 10: 59 New
                  +5
                  Quote: djon3volta
                  well that's it, the defenders of Yeltsin, Khodorkovsky and opponents of Putin woke up

                  By the way, show the nicknames of those who are here on the site defending Yeltsin and Khodorkovsky, be so kind.
                  1. djon3volta
                    djon3volta 2 May 2013 11: 10 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    who here on the site protects Yeltsin and Khodorkovsky

                    Well, judging by the minuses to the post on Hodor, someone does not like that Khodorkovsky is sitting. Or they don’t like what Putin planted him in? Look at the main one, how much onlan, you don’t have to openly defend Yeltsin or Khodorkovsky, you can quietly crap by clicking the minuses, they say bad comment, wrong laughing
                    I said and will say - if the ratings of the comments are not important, why then press these + and -? if you remove this function, everyone will immediately become the same in front of each other, and then it will not work to manipulate and impose public opinion.
                    1. Alexander Romanov
                      Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 11: 16 New
                      +1
                      Quote: djon3volta
                      I said and will say - if the ratings of comments are not important, then why do they press them + and -?

                      You ask this for yourself, judging by the minuses that you give out to the left and right - you asked the question to yourself.
                      Quote: djon3volta

                      Well, judging by the minuses to the post on Hodor, someone does not like that Khodorkovsky is sitting

                      The one who set them for you, as if they won’t speak for Yeltsin and Khodor, look deeper why they were put to you.
                      Quote: djon3volta
                      if you remove this function, everyone will immediately become the same in front of each other

                      You think that I will write everything like you, I don’t think it will happen.

                      By the way, change your nickname to a more patriotic one.
                    2. baltika-18
                      baltika-18 2 May 2013 13: 32 New
                      +1
                      Quote: djon3volta
                      Well, judging by the minuses to the post about Hodor, someone does not like that Khodorkovsky is sitting.

                      Zhenya most likely they do not like this.
                3. Akhtuba73
                  Akhtuba73 2 May 2013 12: 01 New
                  0
                  slightly loud and deliberate, but CORRECTLY !!!!!! maybe it should be
  10. patriot2
    patriot2 2 May 2013 08: 15 New
    +6
    Lenid Ivashov well revealed the topic of the aggression of imperialism against Russia and China. It’s just that Russia needs not only to “become disillusioned with the US and Europe’s policies”, but to carry out concrete work on adequate impact in the regions where the terrorists have broken out, as well as closer cooperation with neighbors: China, Iran, India, and former countries of Eastern Europe. There is work ... no end. There are no recipes (ready-made), here you need to be creative in solving political problems, and not just competently conduct activities within the UN. Something the states are solving their tasks, relying on force more effectively. Where is the asymmetric answer about which we were sung from high stands? It's time to apply!
  11. fellow misha
    fellow misha 2 May 2013 08: 48 New
    +8
    Since Columbus, nothing has changed in the behavior of the West outside its borders: I give you glass and you give me gold, if you ask for too many glasses I will subject your lands to civilization-democratization.
    In China, for example, as a warning to posterity, on the doors of some catering buildings in the port area of ​​Shanghai there are still signs: "Entrance to dogs and Chinese is prohibited."
  12. cumastra1
    cumastra1 2 May 2013 08: 55 New
    +2
    it would be a huge political victory of two countries - Russia and Japan. All the same, they cannot get the islands back; they understand this very well. Only to win back, and this has already passed, and development is yes, there you can earn so much money that the islands are not worth it. So everything is right - pragmatism.
    1. avt
      avt 2 May 2013 10: 41 New
      +2
      Quote: cumastra1
      it would be a huge political victory of two countries - Russia and Japan.
      Do not forget that Japan is in fact an occupied country.
  13. individual
    individual 2 May 2013 09: 46 New
    +2
    Russia is at a crossroads, like that epic hero. You’ll go to the left ..., to the right ..., for some reason it’s not directly proposed. The eagles of the country's coat of arms look around at Europe and Asia, the head definitely goes to the west, the legs tend to go east, and the body is in thought.
  14. shurup
    shurup 2 May 2013 09: 58 New
    +5
    Moscow is not a monster to turn its teeth somewhere, substituting an undisguised ass, in this case the West.
    In Moscow, teeth should be directed in all directions of the horizon, and the “rear” in Moscow itself should be.
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 2 May 2013 16: 09 New
      0
      Quote: shurup
      Moscow is not a monster to turn its teeth somewhere, substituting an open ass
      And this will not happen. Look for a deep meaning in our state coat of arms wink (where did your flag go? request )
      1. shurup
        shurup 2 May 2013 23: 02 New
        0
        Missing in the vault. Shurup is the fifth island near the disputed four. The Japanese are not even aware of this.
        It belongs to me personally.
  15. UFO
    UFO 2 May 2013 10: 26 New
    -1
    It is not funny, but in some ways the interests of Russia and the States coincide. Not everyone sees this, and those who notice try to keep quiet. wink
  16. APASUS
    APASUS 2 May 2013 10: 27 New
    +3
    After capturing a settlement, Turkish mercenaries dismantle and export machine tools from plants and factories, raw materials and finished products. Orders are being executed to rob museums and to remove antiquities from Syria. This could have dire consequences for Turkey.

    Turkey itself can be drawn into inter-Syrian clashes against its will. Inside Turkey there are plenty of its radicals ...... and do not get into a mess?
    Too thin line !!
  17. Opera
    Opera 2 May 2013 10: 47 New
    +1
    Quote: UFO
    It is not funny, but in some ways the interests of Russia and the States coincide. Not everyone sees this, and those who notice try to keep quiet.

    Can you tell?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. djon3volta
      djon3volta 2 May 2013 10: 56 New
      +4
      he hesitated to agree that the United States was bombing and brazenly invading foreign countries, and brazenly creeping into the internal political affairs of other states. the United States creeping into our country with its own rules and policies? creeping. as if no one knows.
      Russia does not bombard foreign countries for the sake of hydrocarbons, we have enough of ours, we don’t need someone else!
  18. GOLUBENKO
    GOLUBENKO 2 May 2013 11: 32 New
    +2
    Moscow is turning east. SCO, BRICS, Eurasian Union, APEC are the main geopolitical vector of Russia.

    Article plus.
    To survive, Russia and China need to hold hand in hand. Together, perhaps we can interfere with the forces of the Evil Empire — the United States, the EU and Arab litter.
  19. Opera
    Opera 2 May 2013 11: 53 New
    +1
    The main thing is calm and steady - without getting involved in any “races”!
    In the eyes of the head of an eagle looking to the west more and more cunning squint, and in looking to the east more and more interest ...
  20. Zomanus
    Zomanus 2 May 2013 12: 37 New
    0
    Moscow now plays the role of a world arbiter, without getting into any graters. This allows us not to be subjected to the aggressive intervention of Muslim women in the Caucasus and gay men in the West. It would be nice to have an armed fist, not clearly connected with Russia, but supporting common interests with it. China unfortunately not that ...
  21. tttttt
    tttttt 2 May 2013 12: 44 New
    +1
    Emperor Nicholas II, being on the ship, asked, referring to the sailors built in front of him:
    - What do you think is a double-headed eagle?
    - Urod! Your High Honor! - Without hesitation the servant blurted out from the second row.


    According to my dear GRU officer GSh Devyatov Andrei Petrovich - the characters need to be changed. And one cannot disagree with this. Well, how can a country live with such an ugly symbol with two heads? So the authorities in Russia are looking, like this one, in different directions. Symbols cannot be treated irresponsibly, because symbols as well form an egregorial filling. In our case, the Russian spirit. Excuse me Russians.

    In Ukraine, a symbolic sabotage has been completely committed - to our common symbol of victory - the falcon, J2 chopped off his head, got him hooked upside down like a gutted chicken at a poultry farm and called the "trident". Now it is part of the coat of arms of Ukraine. How can a country live with such a trampled symbol? That's right - nothing. Like a gutted chicken in a supermarket.
  22. dc120mm
    dc120mm 2 May 2013 13: 08 New
    +1
    Quote: Zomanus
    But the main goals are China and Russia.

    100% like that. Amerikosi do everything to sink Russia and China, and for their dirty deeds use the poor countries.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 13: 36 New
      +1
      Quote: dc120mm

      100% like that. Amerikosi do everything to sink Russia and China, and for their dirty deeds use the poor countries.

      Russia is an independent country, China is also an independent country, and most importantly, China and Russia go together in the international arena, balancing the United States. Both in Russia and in China they understand what the USA is doing, therefore it will not work.
      But Georgia has already taken a sip from cooperation with the United States and is still taking a sip if the vector does not change. So pity yourself and your country. Russia will be able to protect itself, but Georgia will not.
      1. dc120mm
        dc120mm 2 May 2013 14: 23 New
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        But Georgia has already taken a sip from cooperation with the United States and is still taking a sip if the vector does not change.

        After the Soviet Union, we remember bad things from Russia (our authorities are also substitutions in children). Ludi no longer understands who is better.

        Personally, I am for Russia but ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 15: 20 New
          +3
          Quote: dc120mm
          Personally, I am for Russia but ...

          Therefore, you minus me and slapped me, well, well. come on without hypocrisy okay
          1. dc120mm
            dc120mm 2 May 2013 15: 43 New
            0
            Because I'm putting a minus Am I a hypocrite? :)

            I set the minus because I did not agree with your degeneration.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 16: 28 New
              +1
              Quote: dc120mm

              I set the minus because I did not agree with your degeneration.

              What is this?
              1. dc120mm
                dc120mm 2 May 2013 16: 43 New
                -2
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                But Georgia has already taken a sip from cooperation with the United States and is still taking a sip if the vector does not change.

                In etom. This is of course a fact, but why did our authorities ask for US assistance? because we needed to be wired from Russia, the authorities and many people thought that the Americans would protect us, but the second half (I, too) of the people knew that they would throw us.
                1. Aleks28
                  Aleks28 2 May 2013 17: 02 New
                  +2
                  Quote: dc120mm
                  This is of course a fact, but why did our authorities ask for US assistance? because we needed to be wired from Russia

                  I wonder at what point did you need protection from Russia? Yes, and what did Russia threaten you with? Your leadership just stupidly ran to lick the striped ass. Georgia betrayed Russia (not the first time). Georgia tried to help NATO to tighten the mattresses around its neck Russia, but as always, nothing came of it, and you were simply thrown out as a used material (and in deed).
                2. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 2 May 2013 17: 26 New
                  +1
                  Quote: dc120mm
                  This is of course a fact, but why did our authorities ask for US assistance? because we needed to be wired from Russia

                  They asked, but help did not come, Bush gave it in the form of humanitarian aid after the end of the war. Well, and what kind of help did the so-called allies provide, except for the words ???? No.
                  1. dc120mm
                    dc120mm 2 May 2013 19: 05 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    They asked, but help did not come, Bush gave it in the form of humanitarian aid after the end of the war. Well, and what kind of help did the so-called allies provide, except for the words ???? No.

                    UTB and I said.
                3. Che
                  Che 3 May 2013 08: 58 New
                  0
                  Tovarisch, forgot, I see the St. George Treatise. Read, refresh your memory. Then you will understand with whom to be Georgia. Licking the opera amers big mind is not necessary.
      2. tttttt
        tttttt 2 May 2013 17: 03 New
        +1
        Russia is an independent country, China is also an independent country, and most importantly, China and Russia go together in the international arena, balancing the United States. Both in Russia and in China they understand what the USA is doing, therefore it will not work.

        As a science such as intelligence teaches, there are three types of information: by announcement, by default, and by initiation. Your quote quoted above reflects supposedly public opinion, that is, is information on the announcement. Actually, world governance schemes are much more complicated. Under the simplified generally accepted schemes, such as America, the world gendarme, and the world hegemon, clearly do not fit. And what is America? Just a colony of the British Empire. What I’m leading to is not so simple, and we are dealing with a very powerful enemy - the global parasitic system that owns all types of weapons (from worldview and information to banal military weapons) and permeates all areas of activity of almost all states. So to talk about the independence of a country means greatly exaggerating. Just a great game going on. While this is a game of parasites and their distribution. But the time has come for humanity to change the rules of the game, and victory has already come.
  23. Bigriver
    Bigriver 2 May 2013 13: 09 New
    +3
    Quote: svp67
    ... And let everything burn with fire - no, this is not in Russian. And because of this, our "indifference", they rely on us and trust us ...

    I agree! +
    In this case, pragmatism and self-interest means to uphold other principles of the world order than those imposed by the "hegemon".
  24. ed1968
    ed1968 2 May 2013 13: 33 New
    0
    who digs a grave for others sooner or later into it and falls repeat
  25. rudolff
    rudolff 2 May 2013 14: 41 New
    +4
    I understand that they will start tearing me to pieces now, but still ... You did not think that what was happening in the north of Africa and the Middle East was a consequence of not the actions of the Americans, but precisely that under Obama they largely abandoned the role of world policeman focusing on domestic issues, and in foreign policy in the Pacific. Agree, to arrange a revolution in the same Egypt, which was already a transferred vassal of America, would be stupid. Yes, and with Libya, the amers had no particular problems. Another thing is that, against the background of the lack of expressed interests of the "big brother", other states have become more active, claiming the role of regional leaders or even trying to lay out geopolitical solitaire. What is not surprising, however, a holy place does not happen. Somewhat surprising behavior of France. Sarkozy clearly wanted to become a global player in the Mediterranean. It is not at all surprising, but annoying many already, the policy of the Saudis and Qatar. It will be worse than any Americans. Without interfering anywhere directly, nevertheless they rock the entire Middle East. Why what, and they have enough money for it! And about Syria, it begins to seem to me that the Americans are grateful to Russia and China for their veto in the Security Council. A good reason not to interfere in the conflict, which, apparently, they really do not want! Here Britain is already trying to steer. German policy is very impressive. They sent all the forest and are engaged exclusively in the economy and problems of the European Union.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 2 May 2013 15: 07 New
      -6
      Many have American bloody boys in their eyes and a Zionist conspiracy. Against this background, they simply cannot and do not want to see other trends.
      1. tttttt
        tttttt 2 May 2013 17: 12 New
        +1
        And in your opinion there is no such problem as Zionism at all? Or have they already been frightened with the label "anti-Semite", so scary to say it in vain aloud?
    2. tttttt
      tttttt 2 May 2013 17: 09 New
      0
      I put a plus, of all the comments, in my opinion, the closest understanding to what is happening.
    3. APASUS
      APASUS 2 May 2013 20: 50 New
      +2
      Quote: rudolff
      It is not at all surprising, but annoying many already, the policy of the Saudis and Qatar. It will be worse than any Americans. Without interfering anywhere directly, nevertheless they rock the entire Middle East. Why what, and they have enough money for it!

      A bit naive.
      Do Saudi Arabia and Qatar conduct their independent policies in the region despite the United States?
      All this independence resembles ...........

      The United States turns a blind eye to the fact that cannibalistic regimes rule in these countries, and for this these countries are doing "dirty work" to overthrow the regimes that Americans do not need.
      And countries such as France and England are simply afraid to remain the devil of their piece of oil reserves. They are now sharing resources, and they are practically pissed off on democracy.
      Indeed, in the conquered countries with democracy, it has become even worse than under previous regimes !!
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. KuzmichDP
    KuzmichDP 2 May 2013 17: 42 New
    +1
    am Remain under all this to summarize, guys, the forces of chaos are gradually taking their due, the circle closes, where everything came from, everything will return there to start again .... Philosophers will understand.
  28. Letterksi
    Letterksi 2 May 2013 19: 20 New
    +1
    Ivashov says a lot about the case, well, he always ends up with the feeling of having pink glasses on him: "It is here that a new model of the world is formed - moral and spiritual, which means it is promising and safe." In the east, however, as in South America, there is no morality or spirituality. When every resident of Russia, including the very top, finally realizes that no east, west, BRICS, SCO, APEC Eurasian Union, CU and other unions will ever save Russia, when there is an understanding that saving a drowning man’s handiwork is the best friends of Russia are the army and navy, then, perhaps, we will begin to be saved for real, and not just on paper. Ivashova was very frightened by the president, to the extent that the retired general went over to his side and very much believed in the Eurasian Union, despite the strange deaths of his associates in the officer club. Probably intimidated by the disbandment of his entire Academy? All these listed organizations will only deal with their problems at the expense of Russia and each other.
  29. Ilya Mikhalych
    Ilya Mikhalych 2 May 2013 19: 35 New
    +1
    The fact that the West wants to control everything and all this is clear. I don’t understand one thing, does the West think that if the terrorists win in the Middle East, they (the terrorists) will continue to listen to them and obey them (the West). Yes, terrorists will send the West in 3 Russian letters in their Arabic version
    1. nickname 1 and 2
      nickname 1 and 2 3 May 2013 14: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Ilya Mikhalych
      I don’t understand one


      Self-confidence with a powerful weapon!
      = And we will erase them, then!

      so they thought about Vietnam!
  30. nickname 1 and 2
    nickname 1 and 2 3 May 2013 13: 50 New
    0
    Quote: LetterKsi
    retired general went over to his side


    And on whose side, in your opinion, should a citizen, if not on the side, have a legally elected president?

    To express YOUR point of view does not mean to be on the other side.
    Khodorkovsky is a prime example. Given the opportunity to grab? I grabbed it. It doesn’t mean that - let’s go, now I’ll command you!

    Everyone according to the law must live!

    And you, sweetly expound. Breathtakingly! Where is the school from?

    Practice the cup, you are our peacemaker!